WEBVTT - Delta Airlines More Upbeat for First Quarter Amid March Bookings 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's switch to the airline industry. We heard from Delta

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Airlines today. They gave a better than expected forecast and

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 2>that's despite saying, hey, they took a four hundred million

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 2>dollars of increased fuel charge in the month of March,

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>reflecting what's going on in the world. So let's check

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.599
<v Speaker 2>in with somebody who follows this stuff. Sid Phillip Bloomberg,

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 2>chief correspondent for Global Aviation Joint. Just here, what did

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 2>we learned from from Delta today, said Morning Polt.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 3>So, Delta Airlines is talking about how they've managed to

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 3>raise their ticket prices and that sort of helped them

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 3>offset the increase in jet fuel prices. I mean, we've

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 3>seen jet field prices so almost double more than bubble

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 3>since the war and Iran began, and that's really the

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>biggest chunk of costs for airlines. And what airlines are

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 3>talking about is saying that they've managed to pass on

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 3>those cost increases to the customers in the form of

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 3>higher ticket prices, and that's really helped them sort of

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 3>continue to weather the crisis and be able to sort

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:22.559
<v Speaker 3>of manage a ramp up bookings. I mean, Delta talked

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 3>about how in the last in the last since the

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 3>war began, they've had five of their ten biggest sale days,

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 3>and that sort of really shows that consumers are sort

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 3>of locking in their travel at the moment.

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 4>That's great if you have the pricing power like a

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Delta Airlines, but what if you are a discount carrier

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 4>that relies on low ticket prices to get your passengers,

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 4>to get consumers to sign up. I mean, it's a

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 4>different story, isn't it.

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 5>It is?

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 3>And so Delta Airlines obviously has a predominance of premium

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 3>heavy travelers, so they sort of talk about how they're

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 3>targeting businesses and corporate travel, which is sort of continue

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.559
<v Speaker 3>to see growth. They're also talking about how premium leisure

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 3>travelers are continuing to buy tickets, but at the lower

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>end of the spectrum, I mean, the Spirit Airlines and

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the others they might see their consumers that have balk

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 3>at higher ticket prices and they may put off those trips.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Although we are sort of seeing Jet Blue. We heard

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 3>from Jet Blue earlier today and they talked about how

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 3>they are also seeing people continuing to book. So it

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 3>does look like consumers are trying to sort of get

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 3>ahead of future price increases by locking in travel for

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 3>the summer and the rest of the year early.

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 2>So what's about the visibility. What are the airlines saying

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 2>about the visibility of their bookings. I mean, that's also

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 2>a metric that I know kind of gives you a

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 2>sense of how confident they are in their business.

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 3>So at the moment, the airlines say that the bookings

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 3>look visibly healthy, at the other end of the spectrum,

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they're still talking about how they're not quite

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 3>sure where jet fuel prices will settle, and that's sort

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 3>of really key in terms of bookings as well as

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the jet fuel prices. So that's sort of those two

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 3>things go hand in hand and determine how profitable the

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 3>airlines will be, because remember, if they're able to sort

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 3>of pass on higher ticket prices, but jet fuel prices

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 3>continue to grow higher than those ticket prices, that's when

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the airlines start feeling the pain because then sort of

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 3>not being able to keep up with their costs. On

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the other hand, if they can sort of dick the

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 3>higher prices and see costs come down, that'll sort of

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 3>help them boost their profitability.

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 4>So one thing that you and your colleagues point out

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 4>and your reporting is that US carriers, unlike those in Europe, don't.

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 6>Hedge fuel prices.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Once upon a time, some of them did, but most

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 4>of them don't anymore. Why the change And do you

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 4>think that because of what we're seeing in around, because

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 4>of what we're seeing with the volatility the uncertainty around

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 4>oil prices, that airlines might start to hedge those fuel

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 4>prices again.

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 3>So the airlines have typically not hedge. I mean, famously,

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 3>during COVID, a lot of airlines got stuck with hedges

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 3>that were sort of in the wrong direction when jet

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 3>field prices crashed, when demand plummeted, and so at at

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>the moment, we haven't yet heard from airlines talking about

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 3>returning to the hedging policies. But Delta does point out

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 3>that they own a refinery and that gives them somewhat

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 3>of a natural hedge, and essentially they expect that to

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 3>help them whether the increase in jet field prices.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 2>He said, what are the airlines saying about the state

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>of TSA today? A lot of We've seen a lot

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>of stories, a lot of video plasts a week or

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 2>so of really long lines at airports. Do they have

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 2>an opinion on how this might play out?

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the airlines, including the industry groups that Airlines

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 3>for America has been talking about how there needs to

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 3>be a deal that would basically allow DSA staff to

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 3>get paid and basically start reducing those lines, because essentially

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 3>the problem is that while it's not a safety or

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 3>flight issue like the previous shutdown when the FAA had

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 3>to sort of cancel flights into forty airports because of

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 3>concerns about safety, this time it is sort of affecting

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the comfort of passengers and causing those long life we've

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 3>seen in various airports acrowns the country, And essentially the

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 3>airlines have been saying that this will get worse as

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 3>we get into the peak summer travel season, and so

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 3>they're hoping for early resolution and a return to somewhat

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 3>normal as they go into the busy travel peaks.

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, speaking of the busy travel season, of the summer.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Also at this conference, a lot of industry executives were

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 4>making the point that if the strait of her moves

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 4>were not secured by Memorial Day, that would be a

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 4>key timeframe in which consumers might start to see ticket

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 4>prices really go up even more than perhaps they already have.

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Exactly that would sort of take the long That would

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 3>basically mean that higher fuel prices are here to stay

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 3>for the slightly longer term, or we're not really sure

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 3>when those fuel prices start coming down, and that's when

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 3>consumers will.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 5>Say, Hey, do I.

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 3>Really need to take three trips? Maybe I can just

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 3>do with two, or I can sort of not fly

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 3>at all the summer.

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us. More from bloomberk Intelligence coming up after this.

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>through some.

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Other company news here Today, our friends at Craft Hindes

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 2>they were going to.

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 6>Split up, right, Yeah, but now they called it off. Yeah,

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 6>they called it off.

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 2>This They have a new CEO and I think he

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 2>feels like can invest in some of these brands and

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 2>drive growth that way, which is a different strategy than

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 2>what we've seen from some other consumer products companies, because,

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 2>let's face it, they're under pressure here. I think a

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 2>lot of people like me are have traded down, our

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 2>trading down some of the store brand, the private label brands,

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>private label brands. That's putting pressure on some of those

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.119
<v Speaker 2>brands that they've spent generations trying to create these brand

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 2>values through advertising in other ways. Christina Peterson joins US

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 2>food industry reporter for Bloomberg News. Christia talk to us

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:55.679
<v Speaker 2>about what's going on at Craft Hines. What's the latest

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>news there.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, as you guys mentioned that they halted their plans

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 7>to split. Their new CEO, Steve Kaling, is trying a

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 7>new tactic by investing six hundred million dollars in their

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 7>research and development. They're marketing, lowering some of their prices,

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 7>and as part of that effort to restore growth in

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 7>the company, they are unveiling some new healthier products and

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 7>some of the brands that have really struggled but are

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 7>showing some signs of growth. So we are going to

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 7>be able to purchase a higher protein version of Kraft

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 7>mac and Cheese later this month, and then in April

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 7>they are unveiling a pre sun lower sugar hydration beverage

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 7>and a snack sized version of Lunchables. So these are

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 7>some of the brands that craft Higns has been weighed

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 7>down by. But when they are investing in some money,

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 7>they've seen a little bit of growth coming into those brands.

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 4>Okay, adding protein makes sense given the shift among consumers

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 4>towards more protein packed foods. But isn't the bigger shift

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 4>about people wanting to avoid food that is seen as

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 4>perhaps not as healthy as fresh food. I mean, we're

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 4>still talking about packaged goods, right.

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean I think that is the sort of

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 7>inherent risk here. I asked the CEO about this, and

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 7>he said he thinks people are leaving the center aisles

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 7>of the store where you buy package food because they

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 7>want better for you options, and that as a packaged

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 7>food company, what they can do is try and do

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 7>better for you through a shorter ingredient list what food

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 7>companies called clean labels, by adding more of these kind

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 7>of trendy macronutrients, leaning into protein, leaning into fiber, but

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 7>You're right, no one's going to confuse this for Kale.

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 7>So they're betting that there are times when convenience and

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 7>taste will win over consumers.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 2>That's the only thing that drives me. I don't know

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 2>what they're talking about here, but I understand.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 7>You're all Kale all the time.

0:08:54.800 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, exactly, Christina. What's the specifically for Craft Highs.

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean a lot other companies in the package goods

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 2>industries have pursued separation plans. Is there a sense within

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>the industry whether that's a good strategy not a good strategy.

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Craft finds things they can be a little bit

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>smarter about it.

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 7>I think that there was a general agreement that splitting

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 7>Craft Hinds into two separate companies at that moment in

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 7>time did not actually make a lot of sense because

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 7>both halves were seen as somewhat weak. If you had

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 7>one company that was doing really well and one half

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 7>of the company that was struggling, then you could siphon

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 7>that off and protect the stronger half. But in this instance,

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 7>I think people thought it did make sense to pump

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 7>the brakes on that and see if you could restore

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 7>growth and at least part of the company before splitting

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 7>them apart. So even if you know Oscar Meyer Meets

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 7>or Maxwell Hoouse Coffee can't be restored, maybe some of

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 7>the other parts of the business can be. And then

0:09:58.040 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 7>if they were to pursue a sale down the road,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 7>a split down the road, that would make more sense.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 7>So just trying to like bring the company back to

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 7>life before you auction it off.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, you mentioned a couple of brands there, mac and

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Cheese being something that Craft Times is willing to invest in.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 4>The Lunchible's brand is also something that they're kind of

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.719
<v Speaker 4>beefing up, and Caprice Son as well, which I think

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 4>we all remember from packing our kids lunchboxes and having

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 4>them ourselves, but also the other brands within its portfolio,

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 4>including Maxwell Hooll's Coffee and Oscar Meyer Delli Needs. Like

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 4>those are things that has a company largely given up

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 4>on it and if they're not going to refresh those.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 6>Does that mean that they are for sale? For sure?

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 7>They have said that they will invest in order to

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 7>protect their market share, but they are not as far

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 7>as we know now, thinking a lot of resources in

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 7>to get new consumers there to grow their market share.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 7>The CEO has said that he would not rule anything

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 7>out in terms of a sale or divestment, and they

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 7>are you in the portfolio kind of broadly speaking, to

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 7>see what works and what isn't working. He said they're

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 7>not actively engaged and looking for buyers for those brands,

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 7>but that they would not rule anything out.

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 2>What's the market's feedback on this new CEO or has

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 2>been there's too soon to really hear anything.

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, it's a tricky time. Shares of craft

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 7>higns have been down since the split was paused, but

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 7>it's also been a tough time for the food industry.

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 7>Just in general. Consumers are strapped. The conflict in the

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 7>Middle East has sent oil prices rising. There are concerns

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 7>that that will stress already strapped consumers out further. In general,

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 7>the large food companies have been selling less food, so

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 7>there is just concern broadly in the market. So I

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 7>think people are willing to give Steve Kaylene a shot.

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 7>And in general, you know, he is not highly of

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 7>He presided over the split of Kellogg, so I think

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 7>there was initially an expectation that he do the same

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 7>with Kraft Times. I think people are interested to see

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.839
<v Speaker 7>if his gamble works but there is some skepticism that

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 7>these are the brands that will be able to be

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 7>perceived as better for you. That seems a little.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 5>Make a little bit of a lift.

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am. He's done on Apple, Cocklay, and

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>A little m and a trade on the tape here Today,

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 2>the MasterCard will acquire the stable point infrastructure startup bv

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 2>NK for as much as one point eight billion dollars.

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Have no idea what that is, so I'm going to

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 2>go to somebody who does. Catherine Chiglinsky, US finance team

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 2>leader for Bloomberg News, joining us Lacker in our Bloomberg

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Interactive Brokers studio. Katherine, what is MasterCard buying? What is

0:12:59.000 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 2>bv nk.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, it really does a lot of the stable coin infrastructure,

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 8>So I think that's been a huge bet for them.

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 8>Right Like MasterCard and its rival Visa have long dominated

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 8>the payment infrastructure world, and this deal with bvank and MasterCard.

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 8>I think really just allows MasterCard to actually boost its

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 8>sort of digital payments operation without actually having to build

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 8>the truct some of the technology itself, which I think

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 8>is a real boon for it.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 4>There's also, you know, kind of this strategy that MasterCard

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 4>has taken over the last few weeks, few months, because

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 4>earlier this month they launched a what they call a

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 4>global partnership network with a whole bunch of digital asset

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 4>crypto related firms for more collaboration. It sounds like, you know,

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 4>they're moving in that direction, but I don't know what

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 4>it really means in terms of what changes for consumers.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, I don't think a ton will change for consumers,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 8>because I think MasterCard is still very much wedded to

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 8>the idea that like regular payments are its bread and butter.

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 8>I do think, though, that they want to be a

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 8>player in all these different markets, and especially as we

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 8>see the adoptions of digital currencies increase, you know, I

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 8>think they want to have at least the back end

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 8>so that they can handle a lot of that. So

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 8>I think those partnerships and this BV and K deal

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 8>really are helping them sort of toggle both end so

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 8>that they can get bigger with the growing market and

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 8>have that technology ready so that as it continues to

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 8>grow and they can really seize on it.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, when I first started learning about fintech, one

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 2>analyst said, just buy Visa, Mastercret. I mean, no matter

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 2>what the technology is, it's going to flow on their

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 2>platforms to some degree. How is that playing out? How

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 2>is how are our mass card en Visa and maybe

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 2>even A. Do they feel like they're participating in this

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 2>transition to financial technology and digital in many ways?

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 8>Yes, Like I do think that they have been, you know,

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 8>seeking different ways to get there, to establish footholds in

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 8>these markets. In other ways, you are still seeing deals

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 8>like you're still seeing them by BV and K. I

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 8>think there is still room for them to grow. But

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 8>in the end, yes, will they find a way to

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 8>sort of have their how have their fingers in all

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 8>these different markets? I one hundred percent belief, so just

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 8>because yeah, it really is this benefit of even if

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 8>you know most of our markets are still relying on

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 8>sort of regular payment systems, they want to be you know,

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 8>intertwined with sort of this digital asset.

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Push has MasterCard clarified what its M and A strategy is.

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean there's partnerships that it's formed with this you

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 4>know network, this global partnership network that it announced, and

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 4>then there's actual M and A. At what point do

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 4>they buy something wholesale versus just form a partnership.

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, I think there's a careful divide obviously. I

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 8>think it has a lot has to do with price

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 8>these days for these assets, especially when you think about

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 8>how hyped up sort of the digital asset space is.

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 8>So I assume, you know, like many companies are going

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 8>to be pretty careful about exactly which ones they buy

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 8>and which ones they partner with. You know, I think

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 8>some of their partnerships have also been really to expand

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 8>it widely. And I think but with like BV and K,

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 8>I think they're getting you know, specific data infrastructure that's

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 8>going to help sort of beef up their back end.

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's the stock prices performed just about in lockstep

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 2>Visa and MasterCard over the trailing five years on a

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 2>compounded annual basis, their stocks up about seven percent per year.

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 5>Both of them.

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 2>But that's laggings and people that's our thirteen percent, So

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of an issue there. Performing kind of

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 2>in lockstep with each other. Catherine, thank you so much.

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate that.

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Kathryn Chiglinsky, US Finance team leader, Bloomberg News talk to

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 2>us about MasterCard buying in a little bit more into

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 2>that fintech space here.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Coarclay, and Android

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 2>We've been following this office market really since the pandemic,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 2>as you talk about an industry that was really hit

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>hard by the pandemic and it's still recovering as we

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 2>think about getting back to the offices, and different companies

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 2>have different policies, but from a real estate invest perspective,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>what's the story these days?

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 5>What's check out?

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 2>With Jeff Langbam, Senior US RIAT analyst FRO Bloomberg Intelligence. Jeff,

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 2>I know you guys and your team did some research

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 2>on kind of the current state of the office market

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 2>in the US. What did you guys find?

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, not just the US, We actually did a survey

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 9>of cities in the US and Europe and Asia and Australia,

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 9>and the story was largely the same in all of

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 9>these major cities, which is, companies want people back in

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 9>the office and the way to get them back is

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 9>to offer high quality new space and highly amenditized space

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 9>and adjacent to transportation. And if you do that, then

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 9>the people will come. And then the other takeaway, which

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 9>is interesting I think, is that as of right now,

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 9>at least so far, employees sitting in office buildings view

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 9>AI as an expansion opportunity, less so of a and

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 9>less so a threat to office demand.

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that that seems kind of counterintuitive. Explain why that is.

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Why is it an expansion opportunity?

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, a couple of different reasons.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, the first, I guess the most obvious, as as

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 9>it relates to leasing, is all these growing and forming

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 9>AI companies need someplace to.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 5>Have their headquarters.

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 9>So there was a lot of tech leasing happening in

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 9>some of these big CDs that is directly related to

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 9>this AI wave.

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 5>So that's one thing.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 9>But as it relates to the survey itself, you know,

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 9>a lot of the a lot of the jobs that

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 9>may be deemed irrelevant from AI or maybe back office.

0:18:58.160 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 5>They don't. They don't.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 9>They're not the jobs that are sitting in the high

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 9>rise towers in New York.

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 5>And London and Hong Kong.

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 9>And maybe, you know, if companies can find incremental business opportunities,

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 9>you know, by making themselves more efficient, there's actually a

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 9>need to expand their space in those types of buildings

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 9>to take advantage of that opportunity, even if it does

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 9>mean some job redundancy elsewhere.

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Jeff, I think I know an A quality office building

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 2>when I see on simply because I work in an

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 2>A plus quality building here. Bloomberg seven thirty one les

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 2>what percentage of the inventory office inventory in the US

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 2>would you say is a quality?

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 5>It's pretty low.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 9>And what's interesting is there is such a need for

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 9>more of it that even though there are a lot

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:53.479
<v Speaker 9>of empty or mostly empty older office buildings, there is

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 9>now new building new construction starting to come out of

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 9>the ground and being earmarked for new construction coming out

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 9>of the ground. And because there's no big blocks of

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 9>available high end new space, and you know, we've got

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 9>a couple of new buildings that are getting ready to

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 9>start in New York and you know, you look back

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 9>at two years or so ago, and that would have

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 9>been crazy. Nobody would have thought that was that was possible.

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 9>But that's where we are because there's just not the

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 9>space that people want to lease.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 5>There is no availability, all right.

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 2>So let's say like eighty percent is B and C.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 2>What happens all that stuff in every city?

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 9>Well, the hope is that a lot of it turns

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 9>to residential and there is some of that, and there's

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 9>increasingly more of that, but that's going to be a

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 9>slow burn and and you know, it's going to take

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 9>time for those buildings to convert, but as they do,

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 9>that reduces inventory of office which is helpful and also

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 9>helps ease the housing affordability and lack of availability crisis

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 9>in some of these cities. So that's that's one thing

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 9>that will take, you know years. The other thing is that,

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 9>you know, knock one down and build a new office building.

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 9>You know, we're going to see some of that over

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 9>the next couple of years as well.

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 4>Wouldn't it be easier to turn those B or C

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 4>grade office buildings into A grade office buildings? I mean,

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 4>assuming you have the location, you kind of got, you know,

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 4>share out the interior and rebuild it.

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so obviously the location is is paramount, but you know,

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 9>depending on what age building you're talking about, the ability

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.479
<v Speaker 9>to retrofit to what is really required now for a

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 9>high end, high tech, environmentally friendly, you know, all of

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 9>those things. I mean, it's it's an expensive proposition and

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 9>in some cases just structurally challenging to do. And in fact,

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 9>you know, if you're if you've got a building that's

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 9>largely vacant and you can get it cheap enough, you

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 9>probably are buying it for effectively the land cost anyway,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 9>and so knocking it down, you know, really ends up

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.719
<v Speaker 9>being probably cheaper and easier in some ways than entirely

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 9>retrofitting it.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal