WEBVTT - Global Business, Technology, Twitter & Amazon

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast on Paul Swing You.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits, each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. We're broadcasting live from with ham

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>seventh Annual Global Summit at Events Space Second in New

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>York City. This year's program features business leaders that are

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>exploring past lessons, current trends in the future outlook for

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>global business. Joinings right now are Jason Maria Rothenham, senior

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>consultant at consulting firm h LB von Dal based in

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the Netherlands, but joining us on site here at the

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Withhem Global Summit. Jason, thanks so much for joining us.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I know when your panel coming up you're gonna be

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>covering the manufacturing industry and how technologies impacting business. Give

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>us your sense as you talk to your clients around

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the world, you know kind of what are the big

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>challenges that they are facing in terms of adapting to

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>interest in technology great, Thanks Paul. I'm so happy to

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>be here in New York City. It's a beautiful day outside,

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm excited, excited to talk about technology and from Amsterdam.

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, we like to innovate, we like to change,

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and so do our clients. I keep saying this in

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>presentations all around the world that unless you're Coca Cola

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>or you're an old fashioned watchmaker, UH, technology is going

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to impact you. It's gonna change the way you do business,

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>change the way you think. And we see that. UM.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll just pick up one simple topic like logistics. Logistics

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is totally being impacted by technology, with AI, with robotics,

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with the big data. UM, it's all about how do

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I get my consumer how do I get my products

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to my own consumers as quick as possible and as

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>cheap as possible. Um. We see robotics taking over in

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>logistics centrums, tread printing. UM. What I would advise people,

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're listening and if you're a business leader, just

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>just look at you all of your processes and think

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>how can technology impact be and what kind of investments

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I need to make in there? Jason, do you feel

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>like business leaders in general are aware of how radical

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the change is and how quickly they have to adapt. No, no,

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'll be very direct with that. I think only

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of the business community understands the changes that

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>are coming into place UM and those ten percents are

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>usually the big boys that are playing the Googles of

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this world, the facebooks. But the mid level, the small

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>businesses is there is there a particular industry that's that's

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 1>particularly behind UM. What we would see is the retail

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>market is still a bit bigger problem. I've seen back

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>home where I live. I live in a small town

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>outside of Amsterdam. It's called hof Top Retail. Bricky motor

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>stores are closing down by the day, and yet you

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>still see business owners saying, oh yeah, I've got a

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of cash lying around, so let's just go and

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>open up another shop. Again. They make the same mistake

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>again and again and again. And they got to ask

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>yoursel why do they do that? Let you do that?

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Because because they have fit the past, and they're making

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the decisions based on the past, not of the future.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And they thought, oh, my well, my dad did it,

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>my my uncle did it, so I should do it too.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>They're not learning from the future. So for some of these.

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I get the big companies, the technology oriented companies,

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously they have a better familiarity with with change and evolution.

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>But when you go to see some of your smaller

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and mid size clients, how do you get them to

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>really start thinking about their business models and how they

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 1>may need to adapt. Right, So what we do with

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>at FANDAL is we try to expose our clients to

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>our logic clients, try to get them to think a

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>bit differently. UM mandate almost that you have to read

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a book a day. I'll pick up once a week

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>at least, spend some sessions in the morning, UM reading

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>How We've got a little program where we teach our

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>staff to actually learn the code to be more relatable

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to UM clients. UM getting them used to familiar with

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>UH Internet websites will be surprised, we've we've still got

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>client so don't even have a website. And that and

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that is and that is a big problem. That's a problem. Well,

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you say technology, it's a pretty broad

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>sweep of things. Artificial intelligence logistics, while they can be

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>paired together, are distinct and can be applied in different ways.

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So how do you go about determining. I mean for

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the retailers, for example, what should they be doing, because

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not just simply abandoned brick and mortar, How should

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>they be thinking in this technological era. That's an excellent question. Um.

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>What they should be looking at at is how do

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I bring in AI, bring in big data into understanding

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>who my clients are. So I'll tell you a little

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>story of a client of mind. What they do is

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they inside small little chips in the in the hangars,

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and they know how many times a piece of clothing

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is taken off a hangar, how many times to put back?

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>And then that gives you a lot of information if

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>to give some perspective, if I have a customer that

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>comes in or several customers that come in and pick

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>up the same uh piece of clothing and if put

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it back, that tells you a lot about Maybe I'm

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>pricing it wrong, maybe it's the wrong color, maybe it's

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>not but something is good about it. But I don't

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>know why my clients are not buying it. So you

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>can flow through from where it was picked up right

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to the checkout counter and see whether there's a good

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>flow through their Apart from that, you can set up

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>senses all the way around your store. You can tell

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>which part of my stars are underutilized. There's a lot

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of stuff you can do with AI. That sounds like

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it costs some money. How about somebody smaller and mid

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>sized companies do they have the capital to make these

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>investments in technology? Right? So we've got two parts of

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the market. One is a very conservative part. In speak

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for Europe, a lot of our clients are sitting on money.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>They're sitting on money, they don't want to invest, they

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's coming up ahead. I heard uh recently

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that in the US that that there is no such

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>thing as a recession. That I heard that, But in

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Europe we still very conservative over that we don't know

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>what's coming around, so we allow U sit and to

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>answer your question, Uh, that costs a lot of money. Well,

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>if you take get in small steps, baby steps, it

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't cost you a lot. Jason Maria Rathenom, thank you

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. UH, senior consultant at

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>h l V von Dala, which is based in Amsterdam,

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>but is here with us on site in New York

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>City at with him seventh Annual Global Summit. Thank you

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>so much, so interesting. I love the idea of these sensors.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love them, and I also wonder what

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 1>else you can do with all of that data, you know,

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the other issue. But at a certain point,

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>people have to be aware that we live in a

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>technological era and people are looking to use the facilities

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>they have to the best advantage possible. We are broadcasting

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>live from with him seventh Annual Global Summit in New

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>York City. A big topic of discussion is logistics and

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>how technology is transforming, UH, the way that goods move

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Joining us now Michael Kaminski, chief operating

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>officer at h M t X Industries, which is a

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>global l v T manufacturer. I had to look up

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>what l v T was, ask Michael what that is.

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>It's luxury vinyl tile because I actually googled it. But

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>luxury vinyl tile. Looking you can look at the different

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>layers here. So, Michael, from a moving things around perspective,

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>how crucial is that to what you do every day? Well,

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the essence of what I do every day. Where

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we sell over seven million dollars of product l v

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>T UH, most of its manufactured. It is manufactured in

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>China and we sell it throughout the world, although about

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty plus percent is sold in the United States. So

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>getting those goods from China into the United States and

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>then out into the distribution centers, then into the local community,

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and then ultimately to customers homes is all about logistics. So, uh,

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking a little bit about this China trade

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>thing here in tariffs and all that kind of thing,

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's been the talk of the markets really for

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the last six months or so. How has tariffs impacted

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>your business? Well, it's a significant issue. Uh. It takes

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>up a huge amount of my time and senior executive

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of the company time. The tariffs on our products ten

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>percent tariffs started on September two, eighteen. Uh, there were

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>threats to go up to that kept on happening and

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>actually in June did rise the t So that's an

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of money placed on our goods. Um it's

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>it's the topic who bears the cost of that. You

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>pass that along to your customers or do you as

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 1>a company eat it, or is a little bit of both. Well,

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a certain gentleman who thinks the Chinese are paying

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for it. Um, he's wrong. Uh. The costs are paid

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>by a variety of different people in the global supply chain.

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>First and foremost, we've negotiated prices with our factories. We

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>have eaten a percentage of the the higher costs, We've

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>passed on a percentage of those costs to our customers,

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and then our customers have passed on a percentage of

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>those costs to the consumers. So the truth and matter

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is worn by many different people and it hurts many

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>different people throughout the chain. Some people have said, well,

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>just changed the supply chain, and when you talk about

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the factories, uh and sort of replacing them, etcetera. There

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>there's an issue with that. But logistically, how challenging would

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>it be to uh completely rejigger the supply chain? I mean,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>simply put, it couldn't be done. Uh. The investment and

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the factories are manufacturing partners in Asia have invested tens

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and tens of millions of dollars into their facilities. They

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>backed over a hundred million dollars in certain instances. Uh,

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you just can't replicate that. First from a from a

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>cost point of view. Uh. In fact, one of our

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>biggest competitors over the last few years is invested almost

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars to create a manufacturing facility in the

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>United States that would be capable of producing the product

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that we make, and they've been unsuccessful. It's not a

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>simple product to make um. And second of all, who

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>would invest that kind of money unless you felt that

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you could make a good product and and go to

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>get a good return on it. So um our supply

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>chain is embedded, and it starts with our manufacturing facilities

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in China, and then across the board. Each element of

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it has to react to it. You just can't pick

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 1>up a factory, move it and and start afresh. What's

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>your primary UM I guess transportation method or route of

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>bringing the product from China to the U S. You

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>just slap on one of those big monster container ships

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and it goes to Long Beach or something like that. Yes, okay.

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So we ship approximately two thousand containers a month. Almost

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>all of that comes out of the Shanghai port starts. Actually,

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>our manufacturing partners are in jiang Jigon, China, which is

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>up the Yellow Yankcee River a few hours from Shanghai.

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>So they go from the manufacturing facility in Jang Jigan

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>on river boats down to the port of China, which

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is Shanghai, by far the largest port in the world.

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Two thousand containers a month get put on those very

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 1>very large boats that you see out there. Uh. Some

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of them go to the port of Long Beach and

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles. Some come through the Panama Canal and go

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to the port of Savannah, which is actually the third

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>largest port for these kinds of containers in the in

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the country. And then we have distribution facilities in Compton, California,

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in rinkin Georgia, which is a little bit outside of Savannah,

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and from there we then ship them throughout the United States.

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly here, I'm wondering whether there are new technologies

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that would facilitate some of the logistics around this that

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you're hesitant to invest in right now due to the uncertainties. Well,

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's very very hard in this uncertain environment

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to make long term strategic decisions. We happen to be

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>very lucky in the fact that we have a product

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that the consumer is clamoring for and so we are

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>selling even in the face of these tariffs. We're doing

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>very very well. So we're not going to stop investing

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in our businesses because of the uncertainty, but but it

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>makes it more difficult. We've invested UH. Two years ago

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we opened a new facility in outside of Savannah, invested

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>eleven million dollars in robotics and in a new facility.

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're doing that all the time, understood. Michael Commitskey,

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We appreciate you stopping

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>by here. Michael's the CEO of h mt X Industries,

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>joining us here at the with them seventh Annual Global

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Summit at second in New York City. Veraging with logistic

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>discussions and really important to get that view in terms

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of on the ground, how realistic it is to shift

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>around your entire UH supply chain exactly, not very easy.

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. We are so lucky to have with

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.559
<v Speaker 1>us Tom Angel, who is the practice leader with him's

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Financial Services Group. He has decades of experience with private

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>equity and venture capital firms in particular, which is incredibly topical.

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Just this morning, Mark Wiseman of black Rocks that that

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>almost half of Black Rocks institutional clients plan to increase

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>their allocation to private asset classes. So Tom, thank you

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>so much for being here, can you talk about that

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>shift and sort of what you're seeing among your clients

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the just massive amount of money flooding

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>into that There is a lot of capital coming into

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the market, and especially for the private equity venture capital

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>funds UM. So if you take a look at Cowper's

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Texas T Shirt Union, a lot of the pensions stated

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of sovereign funds they are looking a ways to make

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.839
<v Speaker 1>returns because they have to pay their retirees and typically

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to look at a seven eight percent return

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>depending on what they're um what the amount is that

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they need to return in order to be able to

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>make those payments. So UM, they can't make it in

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the market UM over a long period of time. But

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I think in the least twenty years, UH, the private

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>market has significantly outperformed the public market. And those studies

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are out and so they're doing much more allocations to

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>private private equity, venture capital. Real estate could be dead funds,

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of private dead funds that are out there,

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and in order to generate those returns that they need,

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>they're allocating dollars to that. Since the christ this back

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight, two thousand nine. You know,

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>so we've been going almost ten a little more years,

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and that you keep wondering, well, when is that going

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to stop? Because all that capital keeps coming in, how

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they're going to deploy it? But places like Cowper's and

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the others, they're not on a short term window. So actually,

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the larger institutions like Blackstone and Carlisle, they're

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at doing twenty year funds set a ten year

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>typical private equity funds ten ure because they have a

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>longer term horizon and so they want to generate more returns,

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>higher returns over a longer period of time. So they're

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>not worried about market dips or even even a recession

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>because at a recession point, they think they have an

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to buy in at a lower price and get

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>better value. So, Tom, one of the issues that kind

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of I think came to the market's head this year,

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>which maybe it's too much money chasing too few deals

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in the venture community and maybe even the private equity community.

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe the greatest example that would be we

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>work where in the venture private world, and you could

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>even say were lift that, you know, the valuations that

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>were getting in the private market just we're too high.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Then they get really unmasked. I guess when they came

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to the public markets. Are some are your clients worried

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>about too much money, tasting too few deals and driving

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>valuations to you know, crazy levels. Yeah, you'll talk to

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our our funds and and they're looking

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>at what they're paying in terms of maybe on the

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>private equity side, in terms of um EBA on multiples,

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>they're definitely going up, and you know they're looking at

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that and maybe being too frothy. But um if you

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>say to them, hey, what are you worried you're gonna

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>be holding the bag when the recession turns around, that

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you have all these investments and they have capital that

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they have to deploy that they've gotten in, and so

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at that downturn as a possible um value

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>by at that point. So you know, they may start

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to get hurt on some of these valuations, but they're

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>going to make up on those valuations after the recession

0:16:56.080 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>if you know one is coming. Um So, I think

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the returns have been there and they have continued to

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>be there. Uh So on the venture side, you know

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you brought up good points in terms of things that

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>have But there's only public companies where ten fifteen years

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>ago there were seven thousand. There's there's really no place

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to put put the capital now that those particular examples

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you're brought up weren't profitable, and nobody's worried about profitability.

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>They were more worried about growth on the private side.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Once they become public, everybody's looking at, well, one is

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>a profit going to turn around? I mean, if you

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>look at what happened with Amazon years ago, similar type

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>of thing, it took a while before they kind of

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>hit their stride. So the question is uber is lift

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>good public companies or good companies that are eventually turn

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it around and they were in large growth mode and

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>now they're going to try and become profitable. Uh. I

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's where the way you have to look at

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it as opposed to this is just a bad model

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's not working right now. I think it's fascinating

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that some private equity firms are moving to twenty year

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>fund models. That's new, right, I mean that does that

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>have a precedent pre crisis, No, So this is new

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>because again they have certain institutional investors that are looking

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>more long term. So if you got a ten year

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>fund and your investment period is your first three or

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>four years, UM, then after that you're kind of carrying it.

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So how much higher are some of the returns on

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>say a twenty year fund versus a ten year fund.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>They've only been um launched in the last few years,

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>so UM. We don't have statistics on that yet, but

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I would think that you have more of an opportunity

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>of when to sell as opposed to your coming to

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of the fund and now you have to

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>liquidate those positions. So um. And there were only for

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, those larger institutional types of investors, retirement plans,

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>state funds, um that don't need the money you know

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>immediately if you're high net worth individual and these are

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>investments you want to get some cash back within ten years.

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>These more worried about future payments for all the pensioneers

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>over a period of time. Let switch gears real quickly

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to hedge funds. I saw just news I think the

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>last there so that Jeffrey Vinneck, the former star hedge

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>fund manager of Fidelity madgellan and who ran a long

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>time hedge fund, actually closed shop because he couldn't raise funds.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it that hard to raise money today? It's difficult,

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>especially on the hedge fund side. The e t fs

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have really um hurt the hedge fund industry because the

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>fees are a lot less UM. So that's really brought

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>it down. I think I saw a week or so

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>or ago where UM dollars into e t f's first

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>for the first time exceeded dollars into hedge funds or

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>manage funds. So there was more capital going to those

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>uh e t f s, and and you know, you

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>need the right manager. So it's not everybody that can

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>um come in there. And you know back in the

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>old days where everybody would set up a fund and

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>invest in it, that's not happening anymore. Yeah. I guess

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>which shocked me is Jeff Vinick. I mean, you don't

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>get a bigger name. Well, there's a large a lot

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of large like Leon Cooperman became a family office. There

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>were a lord a lot of large institutional head funds

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that basically shut up, shutdown shop, gave all the money back,

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and now they have a family office instead. Right exactly. Uh,

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>let's see here we are here, we're broadcasting life from

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>with him Seventhaniel Global Summit and second in New York City.

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Tom Angel Practice Leader with him Financial Services script. Thanks

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We appreciate your comments on

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the financial service indust You have a great conference today.

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you well. Twitter reported results last night and the

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>market did not like those results. The stock is trading

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>off about nineteen percent today, stocks around thirty one a share.

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>To get the latest on what happened there and also

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>week a little preview of Amazon, we welcome our good

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>friend to Tender Warral. He's a senior Internet annalyst for

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg INTELLGM. He joined us from our San Francisco studio, Tender,

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. First, give us

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a sense of what happened at Twitter. They were on

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a run there. Looked like they

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>were turning things around. What happened, Yeah, you're right, it was.

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.959
<v Speaker 1>It was a disappointing quote on Twitter has just walked

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a few steps back in its recovery story here. I mean, first,

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>it was a quarter with a lot of bugs in

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>their mobile app promotions product. That's sort of like impacting

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the at targeting aspect and hence the revenue that's coming

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>from that product. But the bigger concern here was the

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>seasonality that they were experiencing two months in the quarter.

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh And it's interesting, but the seasonality was around events.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So basically, there are a lot of events happening, there's

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 1>content flowing around that, the air product launches happening, you know,

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the your revenues go up. But if that doesn't happen,

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly you see a lull that's happening. And this

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>this is a problem in terms of long term growth

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.719
<v Speaker 1>visibility because you know, if they're not able to maintain

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a steady scheme of advertisers, that it becomes difficult to

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>see how they can you know, continue to grow double

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>digit for years to come. So I'm struggling to understand

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>why they're having difficulties with advertisers given the fact that

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.360
<v Speaker 1>their user base continue to show pretty strong growth, which

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>actually had been a question for the company a while back. Yeah,

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question, and they are showing they continue

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to show progress on the user growth. But what happens

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is with with Twitter, you know, they're going after these

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>bigger brand advertisers. Self service a very small portion of

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the business, not like uh, Facebook or Google or even

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Snap for that matter. So you know, the salesforce has

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to drive these advertising dollars. And and sometimes because these

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>advertising dollars sort of budgets flow against a given event

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>or a series of events or a product launch, you know,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>they tend to keep on seeking new advertisers of humane

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>versus having a self service engine running like Facebook is.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And and that's why you see this lumpiness. And this

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>lumpiness is what what worries us the most. But there

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>was also a problem with some bugs that it talked

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>about what what was the issue there? So the issue

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>there was basically the ad targeting of the mobile app

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>promotions product, which is basically you know, mobile app installed

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>ads and and things like that. These are higher price ads.

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>They were facing issues with the data that was flowing

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>through to the advertisers. There was some data that was

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to go was going, some of it was

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>not going, and and because that reduced the at targeting,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that had an impact on the spending against UH that product,

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they saw they saw hit there. Now

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>the expectation is this will continue next quarter UH and

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>into next year as well. But next year they have

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 1>some uplift coming from the organic election year traffic. They

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>have Japan Olympics, uh coming as well, so they have

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>some offsets they're coming in next year. But what what

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>investers are questioning right now is the longevity here in

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of you know, this lumpiness and business or if

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>vents driven or hits driven seasonality that that that the

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>quota is shorn so tender. Probably maybe as recently as

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. There are real questions around this company.

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Could it be a long term viable player in the

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>digital advertising market place. Did it have big enough audience

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to compete with, you know, for ad dollars against the

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>facebooks and the of the world and the snapchats and

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>all the all that kind of thing. They seem to

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>be on their way to answering that question in the affirmative.

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>But did they take a big step back here? Uh?

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>They did, Paul, and I think last you're right, last

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of quoters. They have been showing progress towards that.

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the health initiative that they are spending money

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>on is actually paying off as we see you know,

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the da you growth happening. But when it comes to

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>attracting advertisers longer term and scaling the business you know,

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 1>they have to scale the small business, small and medium

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>business dependence more. They have to scale the self serve advertising,

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the dr advertising war. So those are the aspects that

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>there are still in the in the making and and

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>this quarter really puts them back in the show me

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:06.239
<v Speaker 1>mode for to answer that longcome good question. So just

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 1>shifting gears a little bit, We're expecting Amazon earnings after

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the bell. What are you looking for? Costs is going

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to be the biggest topic. Last quarter, we saw their

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>marketing costs skyrocketed as they spend money on a WST marketing,

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Prime Video, Alexa, and lex of those also one day shipping,

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>which is giving a boost to revenue, so we anticipate

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that boost too happened this quarter as well. But what

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>would it cost is the question. And we saw them

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>come ahead a little bit than expectations last quarter, but really,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's so early with this one day shipping, we

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly how many or how quickly the new

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 1>products are being added to this platform and how much

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>more it can really cost. So this is a big

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>question mark for Amazon from profitability standpoint. So from a

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>revenue growth standpoint, I think they're doing well. One day

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>shipping is helping a WS wrote will come in question

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>again as it did last quarter, but you know the

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>size of the business, thirty billion dollars plus business. It

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>has to be considered when we look at these growth

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>rates going forward. But the focus for Amazon, I think

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>this quarter in the quarters to come, really is going

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>to be cost Thank you so much for being with

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>us to tender Verall, senior Internet analyst for a Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>joining us from our San Francisco studios. Twitter shares down

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>more than nine percent on those disappointing earnings, still though

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>shares that more than nine percent year to date. Amazon

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>shares ahead of the earnings release after the bell uh

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>up just at one point four percent, so people expecting

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 1>some positive news there. We are broadcasting live from with

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>him seventh Annual Global Summit in New York City, looking

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>at a mixed market with the Dow down while the

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>other broad indusicries are higher to set up a tenthse

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of eight percent. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Panel podcast.

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to Inner Use at Apple

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. M Paul Sweeney,

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at PT Sweeney. I'm Lisa abram Woits.

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa abram Whits one before the podcast,

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio