WEBVTT - Jane’s Chick Radio Counters “Toxic” Rush

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>From the UK's Daily Mail. Men are more intelligent than women,

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>claims a new study. Uh it's by sieves. This website

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>prints out in the weirdest way. Uh you never know

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.799
<v Speaker 1>where the story started his research that is guaranteed to

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>delight men and infuriate the women in their lives at

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>controversial new study has claimed that men really are more

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>intelligent than women. The study, carried out by a man,

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, concluded that men's i q s are almost

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>four points higher than women's on average. British born researcher

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>John Philippe Rushton, who previously created a fewer by suggesting

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>intelligence is influenced by race, says the finding could explain

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>why so few women make it to the top in

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the workplace, or that then when they get to the top,

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>they start spying on board members and congress investigates like

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Hewlett Packer. Now you know, I was prepared to debunk

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>this until I saw Jane Fonda this morning. Jane Fonda

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>was being interviewed by reader can Be on p MSNBC

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>about the new women's talk radio network. By the way,

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we have the stations that that network will appear on.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>They've got four stations. W n A, G, w c R, Y,

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>w F E M and w p MS. They're working

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on a fifth affiliate uh w b i ITH but

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>having FCC approval on those call letters because it's too long.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>You're allowed three or four and they can't figure out

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>how to put w b i ITCH into into four

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>call letters actually three after the w uh but nevertheless.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Rita Cosby is talking about mail talk show host and

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>just asks her specifically, we've got the audio this coming up,

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>cookies working on it. Now, what do you think of

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Rush Slimball? And she just she got this hour look

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>on her face and she turned away from the camera

0:01:53.480 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and just was so paint toxic, toxic? Are you hitting?

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I just I worry about the future of my country.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I worry about my children and my grandchildren. It's from

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a woman who sat atop of tank over in North Vietta.

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>He Hanoy Jane Fonda worried about the future of the

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>country because of me. You know what the smart answer

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>would and by folks, this is not egos, but you

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>know what the smart answer would be. Here are these

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>babes try to start a talk radio network? Right, you

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>get a question about me or anybody else, I you

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>know that it's amazing the success that they've had, and

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we hope to duplicate it. Is this something like that

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to be done with it? Oh no, no, no, women

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>aren't listening to talk radio. Why women hate talk radio?

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Why women don't like combativeness? They don't like argumentation? Really, Uh,

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 1>they don't. They don't like conflict, they don't like confrontation.

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Women are more nuanced than men. They don't like black

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and white all the time. It's got more gray areas

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>out there. Uh. Really, her opinion of women was demeaning.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Women don't care about the fate of the country, uh

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>so much, and that you women don't that listen to

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're supposedly are leaving in droves. Um makes it

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>sound like conservative talk radios on its last legs, and

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be there to pick up the the pieces. Anyway,

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>until I heard her with this goofball answer, I was

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I was prepared to give some I mean, I was

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>prepared to lampoo in this study on men being smarter

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>than women. But I mean, how to explain that? All right,

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Michelle and Albany, Well, let's take a quick phone call

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>from you as we get going here today in the

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>e I b network high. Hi, rush Um, I just

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>gotta let you know that Hanley Jane does not speak

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>for me, and it's just another left wing kuk elite

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>who's out of touch of the mainstream. Isn't it amazing?

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it amazing how these women come along, these liberal women,

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and they've always done this trying to speak for all women,

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the nags. The nags tried to speak for all women.

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Now Jane Fonda speaking for all women, except when Paula

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Jones or somebody that comes along. Then they reject them

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>because they're too bourgeois to law a class to middle class.

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>That's why the Libs hate Walmart, by the way, is

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because the middle class loves it. Well, I just want

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you to know that I'm a rabid female, dittohead, stay

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>at home mom. I change diapers to the sound of

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>your lovely voice in the background. Well, because I live

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>for a lively debate and welcome the opportunity to conflict

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>with those delusional papists of this country. I'll tell you what,

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>did you hear what Jane Fonda said? I know I

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>just from what you've said. Well, let's I've got the

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>audio that you want to we've got two sunbites. You

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>want to listen to them with me, and then you

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>can offer cutting edge analysis as a woman. Because she's

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>speaking for you here on all of this, Rina Cosby says,

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you specifically think about Rush Limball? You've got

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to be kidding. They make me feel, um, worried about

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the future for my grandchildren. This is not These are

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>not voices that I want to invite into my brain.

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they're toxic to myself, to my soul

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and to other people's. So life shouldn't be like that.

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>We women want thought provoking, friendly, trustworthy, funny. They want

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to laugh informative talk radio and of them and we

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of research said they would come back

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to women's talk radio if they could hear what they

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>want to hear, and we hope to provide it for them.

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>We know what they want. We think we can get

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it to them. All right, what do you think of that?

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>She's nuts, She's completely insane. Um. I want to talk

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>about real issues, um seriously, and I the reason I

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>want to do that is to protect my children. Um.

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, this country is just not going to be

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the same if we continue to appease the terrorists appease

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>the governments that support them. Um, and I want to

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>do something about it in my little small way with

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>my four year old and my one year old. That

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds great. Let's not talk about me. Uh, seriously, seriously.

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 1>She said that we women want thought provoking. Is this

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>program fund provoking to you? It keeps my mind so sharp.

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't even tell you the fact that I rarely

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>get out to talk with adults. It's it's hard for

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>me to do so with little kids. I do it

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to keep my mind sharp. You just to be thinking

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and talking about, you know, real world issues. Okay. She

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>said that we women want friendly. This program friendly to you.

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>It's friendly to me because because you want me to live,

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you want this country to survive. That to me, that's friendly,

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all right? And trustworthy? You consider this program trustworthy? I

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>mean when you when you listen to this program, do

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you you feel you're being told the truth about things? Uh?

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>And a host is dealing with you in honesty? Absolutely?

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, Um, you look at all the issues,

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you have good researchers behind you. I'm sure that give

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you the news of the day, and you give a

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>thought provoking, realistic view of those issues. That's a great answer,

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>except for the fact that don't have researchers. Now, do

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 1>you think the program is funny? Uh? And uh you

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>laugh when all the time, very irreverent, very dry sense

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of humor. All right, So you have just disagreed with

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>everything Madam Fonda has said, and she is speaking for you.

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>She's just she's out there, she's delusional. Um. I think

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that the fact that what she did during the Vietnam

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>War completely discredits her. Besides the fact that she's a

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood elite. They're they're they're just out there, completely out

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of touch. It continues, but Michelle, thank you very much.

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that you're You're very kind. It continues to

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>amaze me. Radio is so horrible, it's so mean, it's

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>so we can't wait to get in it. Radio is

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>so mean spirited's toxic radio. We can't wait to get

0:07:55.960 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on the radio. All of these libs are convinced. And

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I wonder why that the only way to really change

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>opinion and move public opinion in this country is via

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the radio. Today, I wonder why that anybody have a guess.

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's the next Jane funded by p MSNBC. This Morning

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>with Rita caused me the question, Look, Jane, folks like

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Russia and others are widely successful. You know, they represent

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe of the American public. But and the third third

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of those listeners are women of conservative talk were surprising

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.599
<v Speaker 1>that number. I didn't know that a third of the

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>tiny amount because not you know, there's women used to

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>be a big portion of radio talk show listeners and

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>they're not anymore. I get to that in just a second.

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Fondly says, you know, they represent maybe thirty of the

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>American public. If Jane, if that's the case, you know,

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>these people are in denying there. They have no chance

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of success. They don't even understand the business they're going into,

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're not even gonna be honest with themselves about

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>why they're doing it. If we only affected of the

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>American public, we wouldn't be a problem, wouldn't be a threat.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>They wouldn't have to come up with all these efforts

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to counterist and defeats, they would have to come up

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>with their own feminist radio network. For only thirty we

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't matter. And then Cosbi says, well, a third of

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that audience is women. I didn't know. And then Fonda says, well,

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, women used to be a big portion of

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>radio talk show listeners, and they're not anymore. Now. This

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be really ironic because I am an expert

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>in this business. Maybe nothing else, but I am an

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>expert in this business and she isn't. And if you

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>want to know when the greatest percentage of women listen

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk radio, Mr Sturtley used student of this business,

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>What were the shows? What types of shows were they

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that attracted the largest numbers of women to talk radio

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in the past, in the in the past, I'll give

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>you a name. Bill Balance had a talk show in

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>l A that did nothing but have women call in

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and discuss their sex lives in great detail. It was

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it went through the roof. Uh. The other shows that

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>did well were shrinks, psychiatrists, psychologists where people could call in,

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>UH and and wine and moan about their problems. Until

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>this show came along, when women were treated with respect

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this program. Ah, your host, do not look at the

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.479
<v Speaker 1>audience as men and women. I look at you as Americans,

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and I look at you as all interested in caring

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in the future of the country in substantive ways because

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of your children and your grandchildren, your own lives as well,

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I view I have. I have the utmost respect for

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you people and your intelligence. Otherwise I wouldn't do the

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>high brows show that we do here. And never once

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>do I sit down and say, you know, I can't

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>discuss that the women in the audience won't link it,

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>or the women in the audience won't understand it. I mean,

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I talk in all I have adolescent stereotypical male humor.

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>At times, I'm a man, I'm a boy, I'm a

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>guy yippie. But this audience, you people, are treated with

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the utmost respect in terms of your intelligence and your knowledge.

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>And this program, according to the Pew Research Center, indicates

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that you are the most knowledgeable audience in all of

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>broadcast media, including television. And that does that deals in

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>news and and cultural political issues. And I would be

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a fool to look at it otherwise. Now, if Jane

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Fonda is really serious and these babes are really serious

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>about about going out and attracting more women than ever, uh,

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and if they look at history, you know what they

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>what's what's the most important? I can't say it that way.

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Let me give you a little anecdotal evidence there are

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>women in this audience who send me things all the time,

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of ideas, They send me articles in their

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>local paper, They send me things they see on the

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>inner net, and it is amazing. Men do this too.

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Men do this too. I never ever get a story

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>sent to me. Maya male it has aing to do

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>with male female relationships or babies, or at the closest

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it would get his education. But there are women who

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>send me nothing but that. Now, clearly there are differences

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>between men and women. Time magazine discovered this in the

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>last last decade, and relationships are very important things to women.

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine if they really want to go out

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and attract women who are not interested in the kind

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of things we discuss here, what are they gonna have

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>to do to do it? They're gonna have to go

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>out and talk about all the things as feminists they

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>attempted to impune and and rebuke. Relationships should not define

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a woman. Happiness in a relationship should not be the

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>sole thing. In fact, a woman who engages in that

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and has that as her primary desire in life is

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>letting down the sisterhood. You remember the early days of

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the of the feminist movement, These people don't even know

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the business that they are getting into, and they don't

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>even know the first thing about success, which is having

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>respect for the audience and trying to connect to it

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>on a daily basis. But their Libs and the reason

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that they have this attitude is they look out across

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the country and they see idiocy. You know, I have

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>said for the longest time that liberalism is nothing but

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>arrogant condescension, a bunch of elitists who think they're better

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>than everybody else, looking down on everybody else through their

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>snooty noses, and feeling very condescending to people. George Will

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>uses the term today in a Colony writes about Walmart,

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's a great column, and he's done a lot

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of research and he nails why liberals hate Walmart. And

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not unions. I mean, the unions are part of

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>the money reason they're trying to influence democrats with their contributions.

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>He said, even without the unions, liberals would hate Walmart

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>because they look at Walmart and Walmart customers with condescension,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and they look at them with condescension because these people

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that go to Walmart and work at Walmart are actually

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the people liberals think can't do anything on their own

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and need liberals to guide them through life, making proper judgments,

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>having enough money to live, and so forth. And when

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>these people actively happily engage in middle class pursuits and

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>middle class activities, the arrogant condescension of liberals prevents them

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>from embracing them, because they don't want to be known

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>as Walmart people. Liberals don't want to have to go

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to cocktail party said, yeah, I saw you a Walmart there?

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>When you last time John Kerry was in a Walmart?

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you think or Teresa or Joe Biden, when was

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the last time they were in there? They wouldn't be

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>caught dead in there, except maybe in a campaign, uh,

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to point fingers at them for not hiring good

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>union people and so forth. But they look at Walmart

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>shoppers and oh my god, I can't be associated with

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>these people. What do people think of me? They look

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>at the middle I've been trying to tell you for

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>eighteen years the way liberals look at people. They look

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>at average people as helpless, dependent. They want them that way.

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>That's how they do I have their power. And when

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>middle class people show they don't need liberals, while guess

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>who their biggest enemies become liberals. And so they're trying

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to shut out Walmart, trying to harm it as you people,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you people that go to Walmart, and you bourgeois, middle class,

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>ungrateful types are shunning these great liberals in exchange for

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>taking care of yourself. And that is a crime against liberalism.

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And so these pursuits of yours must be dealt with well.

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Jane Fonda, Rosie O'Donnell, and whoever the hell else is

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in glorious Stein up same way, a bunch of elitist

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>liberals with condescension and arrogance. I will guarantee you that

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the women who do like conservative talk radio will be demonized,

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe portrayed as brainwashed or what have you. It's it's clear,

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>as clear as day. What was one of the big

0:15:53.640 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>issues of the nineties, sexual harassment. All office vps, president's kids,

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>males and predators. They have the power, and they are

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>subjugating their female assistants and subordinates and making them provide

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sex for promotions and so forth and so on. And

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>then along comes a woman says, okay, yes, it's happening

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to me. Your name is Paula Jones, and I was

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>sexually arrested by Bill Clinton, who turned on her first.

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>The nags, the feminazis, the women who who who built

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>their whole existence in their and their uh reputations on

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the notion of protecting women against this kind of boorish

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>predatory behavior. But see Paula Jones gave him a problem

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>because she was from Arkansas. That's bad enough. Then she

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>came from a trailer park. Can't, can't, cannot possibly embrace

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Paula Why? What? What? What would Molly Yard think of

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>us from the grave? Uh? What would Bendy for dannam

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>up embracing trailer park trash and homosexual haarrassments. Plus Bill

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Clinton is our guy. He can sexually arrest anybody and

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>we won't say a word about it. It's not about

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the issue that liberals bring up. It's always about something else,

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and in this case, it's class. Paula Jones just one

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of the right class. Walmart shoppers are not of the

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>right classic bourgeois they are they are middle class. Uh dirty.

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>We just can't be seen associating with these people. We can't.

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>The only way, the only way that liberals will embrace

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the middle class is when they're on food stamps or

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>some other liberal created dependency program and voting Democrat and

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>being good obedient middle class slaves. An other than that,

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Liberals want nothing to do with it. So here comes

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Miss Fonda and her cohorts trying to set up this

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>network based on wrong assumptions, lack of understanding how the

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>business operates, and not even correct research on why talk

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>radio is successful. Besides this, these are the people that

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>say we should all get along. We have too much

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>arguing in this concrete, too much partisanship. And what are

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>they doing. They're only going after women. They don't care

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>about you men, And I know you wouldn't listen to

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it anyways, So they're smart neet regard. But still, who

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>is it as being divisive? Does this program say women,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you're not allowed. We're gonna do things of this program

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to offend you, so you don't listen because we don't

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>want you here. Does this program do that? Nope? Are

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>they going to do that? Liberals don't stand a chance

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.479
<v Speaker 1>in mass marketing, folks. I don't care what the business

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be at talk radio. Even having trouble in Hollywood, now,

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>they don't stand a chance. Look at every business that

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they demonize, a successful American business. They don't stand a

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>chance because they can't mass market. They can't make themselves

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>appeal to a cross section of Americans, like Christians or

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>any other group that you want to say exists in

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the mass. They can't because they have resentment for so

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>many of them. They have resentment for Christians, resentment for

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Walmart shoppers, resentment for the middle class, resent and an

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>arrogance and condescension towards all kinds of people. It's impossible,

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>It is structurally institutionally impossible for them to mass market,

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>including political ideas. Why do you think they don't tell

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>us what they really believe because they know they don't

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>dare because what they really believe is cutting and critical

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and condescending towards the people they're trying to to to

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>to a trick into into voting for them. Mariel in Tampa, Florida.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you called. Welcome to the E I B Network.

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Hello Rush, last time I talked to you was thirteen

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago and I'm plaid for right now twenty four

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So while so you were you were eleven, Yes when

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 1>you first talked, what don't we talk about when you

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>were eleven years old. I think Rich was on MTV

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and they just disrespected him. And I was enraged about

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it because I love you at eleven years old. God,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>God love you, Mary l you. Uh you didn't grow

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>out of it. That's that's tremendous. Well, welcome back. I

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>just I was just so upset about Jane Fonda's comments,

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and I was absolutely amazed that she wants to start

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a radio network. It has zero ideas most popular talk

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>show on radio. That just flores me as a businesswoman,

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that she wouldn't even have a clue. Uh. Well, there's

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the arrogance and condescension that I that I'm talking about.

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>The last thing they would do is model themselves after me.

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>There are two sides to all of this too, by

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the ways, the programming side, which is what you hear.

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>There's the business side. And that's what all these liberals

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>are missing. I I the fact that it's a business

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>and they don't have a business planner, business model. They

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>just think they're going to go on the air and

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>attract all these people. It's it's no different democrats. Democrats

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>honestly believe that half the country or more hates George

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Bush and can't wait to get to the polls and

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and express the same hatred for Bush that they have. Uh,

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it there, Really is it a better word or

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>phrase to describe these people than arrogant condescension the people

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>who are succeeding all around them, Uh, like Bush. Take

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>anybody who's succeeding where liberals are failing. And what's the

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>liberal attitude? Liberal attitude is m we should study this.

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not that liberal attitude is they're cheating, or they're

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>they're poisoning people's minds, or they're they're there brainwashing people

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>or or and they're projecting that's what they think they

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have to do to win. Uh, it's it's fascinating to

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>watch this there and and you know, watch if the

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Rasmussen poll gets widely reported, if the number is I mean,

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the early stages of a crack up will be visible

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>very very very soon, because you know, this is a

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>news template that they're unable to control. Meriel, thanks again

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>for the call. Julie and Boise Idaho. Welcome to the

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>E I B Network. TI, Hi Rush, how are you good?

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you good? Um I just called us listening to

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the comments by Jane Fond and it was quite why.

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I have their problem all figured out. Their

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is she started off with, I feel, and

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us don't always act on what we feel.

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the conservative population acts on what is right,

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>not on what they feel. And that's kind of where

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the whole Hollywood liberal uh wine comes out. If they

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>do what feels them, not what's right. Very astutive. You

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Liberals are governed by their feelings, what they think others

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to think of them. Um, and their feelings

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>is how they make themselves feel good. They say things

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to make themselves feel good. Uh. We think about things,

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's what helps us come to what are hopefully

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>correct conclusions. Well, and I have to tell you, as

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I tell everybody, because they're just amazed that I actually

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>listened to Russia Limbaugh. A woman that listens to Russia Limbaugh.

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>But as I'm driving along listening to you, I am

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>just laughing my head off about half the time. I mean,

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>someone driving by must think I'm crazy, but I find

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you quite entertaining. Thank you, thank you. Well. These people

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that are amazed that you listen to this program, have

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>they ever listened to this program? No, no, no, no, no,

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>they haven't. And when I asked them, they just kind

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of shake their head. Um, you know, and it's usually

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of women. And I'll say, what, you know

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>what you want to tell them this? You know you're

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>questioning my intelligence. But I actually listened to it. You

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>never have, and you think you know it's what it's

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>all about. I'd turn it. I'd turned this whole intelligence

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>thing right back on him. I do turn it on him.

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I say, so, what don't you like about his show? Well,

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I haven't listened to it. Well, then,

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>how how in the world can you judge it? So

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.479
<v Speaker 1>I do I and I enjoy every minute of it. Well,

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate. I appreciate that. I think, Look, Julie, thanks

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>uh so much of the call. Appreciate it. Les do

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>we have? You know what? I don't have enough time

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to take a call because there the calls we have

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>on the uh uh board here all have nothing to

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>do with Fonda and the women's talk radio, which is good.

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>We have we have exhausted this. We've put this one

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to bed. Um the women's talking that we have. What

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>else can I say about it? This is the thing

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>We thoroughly discuss things on this program, and I've told

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you why and who they are, and there's nothing else

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to say. We have put the Women's Talk Network to bed,

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right by the way. Mr Snardley had a great

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>idea just a moment ago during the commercial break. Uh,

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but not that I said they've added a new station.

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:41.959
<v Speaker 1>That they've got five stations and out of their lineup.

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>In addition to w n A, G, w c R, Y,

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>w F E M and w p MS. Uh sturdily

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>says they've added w d y K