WEBVTT - Meme Stock Mania, A16z Funding Adam Neumann's Startup

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Check in San Francisco and this

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. Mean

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>stock mania is back. Bed Bath and Beyond surgeons in

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>defiance of Wall Street as retail investors get a second win.

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll chat with the CEO of stock Twits about how

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>social media is impacting market moves. Plus you know who

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>else is back? Adam Newman. Yes, we work, founder who

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>lost billions for investors in one of texts most spectacular

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>flame out. He's just raised money yet again, getting the

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>biggest check ever. Written by Andres and Harowitz. Silicon Valleys

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>water cooler is all a buzz. We will take you there.

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>And big tech companies like Microsoft and Amazon have pledged

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to go green, but critics say they're also helping big

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>oil prolong the fossil fueled age. We'll tell you how.

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a look now at a three week chart

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of Bed Bath and Beyond. The stock up four d

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>despite at least three downgrades on Wall Street. Shares were

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>halted after spiking this morning. A Shore sign the meme

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>traid is alive and well, I want to bring in

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Richie Conna, now CEO of stock twits, a social platform

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for investors. So Richie, curious what kind of activity you

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>saw on stock twits ahead of this surge. Hey, Emily,

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on um. Yeah, so we saw,

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of at the end of July, beginning

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of August, we saw bed Bathroom Beyond rocket up to uh,

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of on the top leader boards in

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>terms of activity. So since August first, it's been second

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>only to a m C and activity and you know,

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>historically lastics once bed Bathobyond has not cracked the top

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten twenty um. And also since August first,

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it grow it's followers by thirty you know,

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>approaching fifty thou followers on stock twits. And I think

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting thing also has been the stocked with

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>social sentiment over the last you know, four or five months.

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Since about April has been mostly negative on bed Bath

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and Beyond, and then there was a spike in early

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>July in its sentiment, and then since August first, it

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>has moved to an extremely positive position and has maintained

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that position and you kind of see that correlated with

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:30.839
<v Speaker 1>a run up in price, you know, from the five

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars that it's been at for most of the last uh,

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, six plus months to I don't know where

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it closed that today twenty bucks. Right, So we've seen

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really interesting activity and activity that started

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in July onto bed Bath and Beyond side. So here's

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:51.119
<v Speaker 1>a question, why why are retail investors on this train? Yeah?

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, there's a couple of factors in

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>bed Bath Beyond is probably the interest one. But overall,

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>meme stocks that you know we've seen over you know,

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>has has seen less capitulation and um in the retail

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>markets then some of the other ones. So AMC has

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>maintained its position, you know, game Stop has been steady. Uh,

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and so the interest there from the retail world has

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>has maintained better than some of the other stocks, uh,

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bed Bath and Beyond. I think there's probably

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of factors at play here. There's you know,

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the short interest report that came out at the end

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of July. Uh. You know, I think the Ryan Cohen

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>news obviously today yesterday was probably a big catalyst and factor.

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, in the summer we've had generally speaking,

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, low low volumes uh and uh, and so

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I think all these pieces come together, and retail definitely

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.559
<v Speaker 1>still seeks out these you know, kind of um opportunities.

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Retail trainers and investors seek out these opportunities of dislocations,

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's short interest or or just price movements. And

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Bed Bath and Beyond has been the beneficiary as a

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>stock over the last you know, three weeks, I guess, right.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So we'll talk a little bit about the power of

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Cohen in particular. Obviously he's the chair of of

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Game Stock, which is sort of the original meme stock.

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But how much of this is driven by him and

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>how much of this is truly driven by general retail

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>investor sentiment. Um. You know, I think definitely in the

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in the retail fanning community, the Wall Street best community,

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:19.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the kind of meme stock community, Ryan

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Cohne seems to have uh, some pretty significant sway on

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the markets. You know, I don't know personally, I can't

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>speak to anything of that nature, but you know, I

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>think if you look at you know, when he takes

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>when he takes positions, the markets move, right. So the

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>move we saw today and that Beth and beyond after

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>already a massive move. Uh. You know, it can probably

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>highly be attributed to the news that he took, you know,

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the out of money call auctions. Uh. You know, I

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>think that came out last night or this morning or

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever it did. But so, you know, it's he's an

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>interesting person in this place obviously, uh, kind of first

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>with the game stop, but you know, uh, you know,

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 1>has has made a lot of moves over over the

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>last eighteen months that have definitely been followed by the

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>retail community in the investing community. So you know, I

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>think you can't ignore what he does, at least in

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>short term bursts. In general. You know, we're hearing you know,

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this talked about on Reddit, We're seeing the

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff talked about on Twitter. What would you say the

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>role is of social media in stock pork at movements

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>these days? You know, I think the rule of social

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>media and you know, kind of social platforms in general

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is uh, you know, we do disseminate, you know, information quickly,

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>We allow you know, kind of the communication and sharing

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of ideas. Uh. And and I think you know, the

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>ability for retail, especially to you know, kind of communicate,

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, in some extent they've organized in the past,

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>right like as as we remember in the uh kind

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>of the major meme stock Moment of of twenty one.

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh And I think, you know, social media has a

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>strong role to play, and you know, platforms like stock

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>twits to you know, kind of give retail a place

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to you know, learn to collaborate, to share and uh

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and and you know ideally to you know, kind of

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>do it in a way where they where they profit

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>from it and they learn in a positive way. So uh,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a powerful tool. I think, you know, it

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>can be used for good and bad and and uh

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, but there's a lot of uh, you know,

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>education and learning and you know, partnerships that kind of

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>come out of it from from a community perspective. I

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>think any regulatory concerns for stock twits h at a

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>moment like this, um not, you know, no, not not

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 1>so much. I mean, we're we're you know, we do

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we have our house rules and stuff, but those are

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>our rules and uh, um, you know, we cooperate where

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are issues you know, potentially on the board. Um,

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we do know obviously some of the bigger

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>agencies like the SEC and stuff are are paying attention.

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>But no, I mean, you know, we don't you know,

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>see any massive regulatory issues um, you know, along the

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>lines of social media. Not in not in the current

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of environment. I don't think. All right, uh rich

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of CEO of stock Twitz, thank you for joining

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>us on the latest addition to the meme craze. All right,

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>coming up. Silicon Valley's best known venture capitalist just wrote

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>its biggest check ever to controversial We Work founder Adam Newman,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>sparking an outcry about yet another tech guy failing up.

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Gloomberg. Tech venture capital pioneer and reason Harrowitz

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>has just made one of its biggest ever bets on

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the man behind we Work. Will someone call it the

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we Work disaster? The firm writing it's the largest single

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>check investment million dollars to Flow, a residential real estate

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>startup founded by Adam Newman. According to Mark entres and

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Flow is rethinking the entire value chain, from the way

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>buildings are purchased and owned, to the way residents interact

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>with their buildings, to the way value is distributed among steakholders.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Joining me now to discuss Bloomberg Businessweeks. Max Chafkin a

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of tweets today about this. Max, a lot of tweets,

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>what's Adam Newman's angle here and why is Mark Andreason

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>betting on it? Right? Well, it feels like and again

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the details here are are so sketchy, and I think

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the reason that that there's a lot

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of skepticism. It feels like Adam Newman is trying to

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>do something very similar to what he did with We Work,

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>which is to take a traditional real estate business. With

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>We Work, of course it was commercial real estate offices.

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Here we have with flow residential real estate apartments and

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of give it a text sheen, and that worked

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 1>for for uh, you know, quite a while. With We Work.

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>We saw the valuation climbed to something like fifty billion

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars um and then of course, um, as you said,

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it kind of fell apart and and what we have

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>now is a much more conventional real estate company that

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of investors lost a lot of money in.

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's sort of hard to understand why Mark and Reason,

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>why Andreas and Horrowich would be writing such a large check,

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>although you you just have to think they see this

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>as you know, another long shot. Bet you know, maybe

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a contrarian angle. It kind of seems weird

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to have, you know, backing a billionaire as a contrarian angle.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Mark Andres is more successful than I am,

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he knows something I don't. Well, mass actually

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>sound lost almost nine billion dollars on we work. Why

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think, Mark, Why does Mark Andreason think that's

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 1>not going to be his fate? I mean, is he

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the smartest VC ever or is he also being hoodwinked? Well?

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, of course, Adam Newman, you know,

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>if you if you read some of the published accounts,

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was very effective at talking rich people out of their money,

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and so so that maybe, um, part of what's going

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on here. Andres and clearly has you know, a soft

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>spot for trolling and that sort of thing, So so

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe that is playing into it. Um. You also, if

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you read between the lines of the blog post he

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>wrote that was published yesterday, it sounds like there's gonna

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of crypto or tokenized the angle here,

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>which of course Andres and Horowitz has been um very into.

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the jury is still very much

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>out on whether or not that's gonna work. Um, but

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it feels like, hey, maybe we've got we work, but

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>with apartments and a little bit of crypto mixed in

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, yeah, you be the judge of whether

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a good idea or not. Sounds like a recipe

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>for something, all right, Bloomberg's Max Chafkin, thanks for weighing,

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna get some more reaction to this now.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>The real question, of course, is in a valley where

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it is notoriously hard for some founders to raise money,

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>why is it so easy for some founders who failed

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>or messed up to raise money again. Alison Buyers, an

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>early stage founder and angel investor, tweeted, I'm obviously outraged

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>by the A sixteen Z news. If you follow me,

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>rage is likely all over your feet. I'm also not

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>surprised at all. This isn't new, it is how VC operates.

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Joining me now, Alison Buyer's founder and CEO of Scrubys

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Allen Alison, why do you feel so much rage? Yeah?

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>So uh. Whenever something big like this comes out a

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>big funding round, a lot of underrepresented founders, particularly women

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>people of color, are asked why why the outrage? Why

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 1>do you have this emotion? Uh, well, it's because only

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>two percent of VC dollars go to women, two percent

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>go to Latin X founders, point six seven percent go

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to black founders, and there are less than one hundred

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>black women total who have raised more than a million

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in DC funding. That's the outrage. It's visceral. It hits you,

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but then it also quickly becomes a muted rage because,

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>as they tweeted, it is expected. It is not a surprise.

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>We are used to it. But you you have to

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>feel that rage when you are part of that community

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:50.599
<v Speaker 1>that is just historically blocked from accessing this funding. That's it.

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>We waved out to a lot of female investors today.

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Privately they feel like you. Publicly they don't want to

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. Why do you think that is? Uh well,

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it is really difficult to talk about in any industry

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>where you are marginalized, or where you can have repercussions

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>for speaking out, it can be a scary thing to do. Right.

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>There's risks. There's risks to my business, there's risks to

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>those who associate with me when I am outspoken. But

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I also really believe that in order to have any

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of change or awakening of these reactions within other

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>populations and segments. You can do something about it. You

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>have to talk openly about it. And to me, it's

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>just a clear choice in the community that comes around

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in and opportunities like this that come from it is

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>how you catalyze public discourse and really make a change.

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So here's what Mark Andreson wrote about this. He says,

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Adam is a visionary leader who revolutionized the second largest

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 1>asset class in the world, commercial real estate. Adam and

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the story of lee work have been exhaustively chronicled, analyzed,

0:12:56.080 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and fictionalized, sometimes accurately. We understand how difficul that is

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to build something like this, and we love seeing repeat

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>founders build on past successes by growing from lessons learn.

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>What's your response to that? So my response to that is,

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 1>regardless of anything or what you believe may or may

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>not have been fictionalized, he knowingly perpetrated fraud and lost

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars. It's a fact. What is a major

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>prestigious investment house doing backing fraud a second time? There

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is no excuse for that, and there has to be

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the ability to separate what is a good business idea

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that has the potential to be a good investment from

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the person who is behind that idea and executing on it.

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And what I would say is, let's let's think about

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>where does and Reason's money come from or any investment house.

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>It comes from endowment, it comes from wealthy individuals, it

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>comes from pensions, it comes from other fiduciary backers. Is

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that where those people want their capital to be deployed?

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>And Reason is the steward of that capital? Do they

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>want three hundred and fifty million dollars in a single check,

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the largest check written to go to a person who

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>knowingly committed fraud and lost billions of investor dollars to me,

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you justify that. Taking on and

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Reason Harrowitz Allison is bold. I mean you might never

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>get a check from them. Why take that risk? Okay?

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I honestly what is signaled to the world and particularly

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to underrepresented founders. Again, only two of females have written

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>two percent of VC dollars go to women. I don't

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>think I am getting a check from them, But also

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so it signals that their check is not for me. Unfortunately,

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it signals that venture may not be for many founders,

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's just not true. Um, But you do have

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to be intentional and realistic about where you put your

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>time as a founder if you want to build a

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>successful company, and intentional about whose money it is that

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you're taking. For me. Ethics, business ethics and competency and

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>honesty are paramount along with the viability of the idea

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of my business and the difference that I want to

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>make in this industry. I do not want investors who

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in that. I do not want an investor

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>who clearly says it is okay that you overstated yourself

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and your business. We're still going to write you a check.

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>We're ignoring that to the exclusion of others who have

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>more viable business ideas and better business ethics. You allude

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to that in your jet where you say founders value

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>your time. Getting a meeting does not equal getting a check.

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Choose widest ly. You also told to Crunch you could

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>be mad about this all day long, but you have

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other female founder you know what to do.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you what do you mean by that? I

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>assume you're talking about all the extra bird and that

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>comes with being a female founder what's all this extra

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>female founder stuff. Yes, of course, I think it's that

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>sentiment again, it's that muted rage. It's the it's the

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>known element for anyone who is on the receiving end

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of this that this is how it is. And if

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to run our businesses, we have to run

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>our businesses. It is harder for us. The numbers don't lie.

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>We do not get the funding, we do not get

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the resources, we do not have the access to the networks.

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Are metrics that we are assessed by for signals of

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>growth and potential are much harder than others. And this

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>goes for women, but also a lot of other underrepresented groups. Uh,

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and you just have to keep going. I don't have time.

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't have time for this to consume my day.

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm building a successful business and I'm going to earn

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a profit for my investors. So yeah, I have my

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 1>bleek to do. I gotta go do it. Let's talk

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:09.479
<v Speaker 1>about that. Your company, SCRUBYUS helps companies, helps people with

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:15.959
<v Speaker 1>their own pitching. What's your big idea? Yeah, so, um,

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you for bringing up SCRUBYUS. Um. So, our company

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's two years old. We're started to extem from my

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>last experience where I did successfully raise ten million for

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a startup medical device company that I help launch and

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>co run, where I experienced extreme gender bias during the

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>fundraising process. So with scrubyus UH, we are product tizing

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>what you would get from working with a pitch coach

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>or having access to resources that teach you how investors think,

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>so that you can present yourself as an investible because

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>if you have been traditionally blocked from accessing those resources,

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>whether by network or whether because of funds, because those

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>are very expensive things to access for quality material, you

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know that you are not presenting in a compelling way.

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It is not intuitive to understand how investors think. UH.

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And then on the other side of that, we are building,

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>not yet launched. We have launched that founder side, a

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>data driven way to curate in a hyper curated way

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>what investors see that so that it will speak to

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>them and what they want to write checks to both

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea and the person, which is where we need

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the checks from at the early stage. Allison, thank you

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for having the current to talk to us today, UM

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and for sharing our story. Appreciate you stopping by. Thanks

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO Alison buyers a few other stories we're watching.

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Coin Bay shares fell as much as seven percent today

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>after announcing in a blog post that it will temporarily

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>pause new Ethereum and the r C twenty token deposits

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>during the merge. It is a temporary precautionary measure. Theorium

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>anticipates the merge will be completed on or around September

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and after a number of delays, Apple has set us

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>September fifth deadline for its corporate workers to be in

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the office at least three days a week. COVID surges

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>delayed the company's plans multiple times. Apple has been making

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 1>other COVID related adjustments. It's also dropped its mask mandate

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in office common areas, and according to people familiar with

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the matter, Apple is laid off many of its contract

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>based recruiters. In the last week. About a hundred contract

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>workers fired at the world's most valuable company were told

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>these cuts were made due to changes in Apple's current

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>business needs. We reported last month the company was joining

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>many other tech firms and hitting the brakes on hiring.

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to lumber Technology and Emily Changin's fan Francisco

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>President Biden has now signed the seven billion dollar healthcare,

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Climate and Tax bill into law, capping more than a

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>year of negotiations, as Democrats had into mid terms this fall.

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Known as the Inflation Reduction Act, the bill aims to

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>reduce inflation while encouraging greener industries to develop. And big

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>tech has been vocal about wanting to go green for

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>some time now, except big tech has actually been helping

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>big oil make more profits than ever. Let's hear more

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>about how Bloomberg's Mark Bergen, who covers Alphabet, joins US. Now, So, Mark,

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>is there some hypocrisy here? I sense that's certainly the

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>criticism from both from outside environmentalists and then from you know,

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>even employees at these companies. So Microsoft actually has been

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the leader and the energy market UM Paul, coming closely

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>behind mine by AWS, Amazon, UM. You know, these companies

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>will say and have said multiple times that the reasons

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're purnering with the oil and gap industry is

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to help them with the energy transition to clean, renewable

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>sources of low carbon. We know we started off this

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>report to sort of interrogate that idea. It looks like

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>so far a lot of the work has been their

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>existing oil and gas production, whether that's making that more

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>efficient in some cases, you know, the the oil and

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>gas companies say they're lowering the carbon footprint of those operations. UM.

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's there's certainly evidence that they haven't slowed

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>down oil production. And especially now when you're seeing gas

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>prices but so high this summer, there's there's political demand

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>for the oil companies to be producing more UH, and

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>the cloud companies are really there's powerful data assets that

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>let them do that more efficiently. I recently spoke with

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Carrie, and the head of Google Cloud, about Google

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Clouds deal with Saudi around COO. Take a listen to

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>what he had to say. We work with their system

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>integration division to provide our technology to customers in different

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>parts of the Middle East. We said that again and

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>again that we don't work with the oil and gas

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>division within the ram cole or with the system integreation

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of our outcome. Does what do you say? Said? They're

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>underscore what UM you're trying to explain here? I think so.

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, there's certainly employees at Google have

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>been very vocal about this, UM as of employees in

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and Microsoft and in some ways, if you're you know,

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>just a Google shareholder, you might think, well, I want

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>them to be more active in the industry. Like there's

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money in the oil and gas sector

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, whether that's their their regular sort of production

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and exploration businesses, and even some of this, you know,

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chevron and and VP and these big majors have

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>talked about a big game about investing a lot of

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 1>money in reeable energy. And so I think in some

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>ways Google is sort of and behind this sector. Whether

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>or not that's because they intentionally sort of put one

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:00.120
<v Speaker 1>arm behind their back as far as limiting their their work. Um,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but I do think that's that's attention, you know, but

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem to be slowing down Microsoft and Amazon.

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>And in their defense, they're saying that, you know, these

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>oil companies wouldn't be able to move into the renewables

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>and clean energy as quickly without us. Interesting, all right,

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll continue to watch your coverage on this, Bloomberg's Mark Brikin,

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you well. The Inflation Reduction Act, the lower drug

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>costs as well. I want to bring in Jason Kelly,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>now the CEO of the biotech firm Get Go bioworks

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to discuss. So, Jason, how is this bill being signed

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>into law impact your corner of the biotech universe. Yeah,

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>there's actually two reason bills. So there's the Chips in

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Science Act and then the Inflation Reduction Act. Both both

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of them are relevant in biotech. Um. So, on the

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Inflation Reduction Act, you saw these you know, forty tax

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>credits being expanded. You know that that's really to create

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, a growing market for carbon capture. And and

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think biology if you like look out the window

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, you will see plants out there pulling CEO

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>two out of the air and fixing it. Um you know, uh,

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and and so biology we see as one of the

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>few really scalable technologies for doing carbon capture. But I

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>think the Chips Bill actually is just as important from

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>my standpoint. Why do you think it's so important? Yeah, So,

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>so if you look at if you look in that bill,

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I think two things are critical. So one, I think

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you see the U s sort of kind of getting

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>our mojo back when it comes to like industrial policy

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>and the and the government saying hey, this sort of

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>technology is important for us to have on shore. Um

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, actually get Ginko. We just acquired a company

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on in California. Are announced that we're gonna acquire a

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>company in California called Examergen. You know, this is a

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>really build on the foundry technology we have at Ginko.

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, my view is we we want to be

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>doing that so that we're not doing a bio chips bill,

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty years from now and having to bring

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that back on shore. These types of growth of these

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>bio foundries here in the US, I think is important,

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and you see that reflected in the bill. You know,

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they it directs a National Engineering Biology R and D

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Initiative where OSTP is is supposed to direct NSF and

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>d O E and d O D to spend on this.

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And then also that has the OSTP established a National

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Genomic Sequencing strategy, So you actually see bio in the

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>bill alongside chips. So so I think it's a really

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>uh it's a good signal by the government that these

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>types of technologies are critical for the U. S. You've

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>become a sort of regular voice for US through the pandemic.

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.719
<v Speaker 1>What are the biggest post pandemic storylines in biotech right

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>now that aren't being talked about enough. Yeah, So I

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>think the big one UM is going to be certain

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 1>types of technologies that got built out in the during

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic are going to stick around for ongoing prevention.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>So we actually just announced yesterday morning, UM is up

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to sixty one million dollar contract with the Centers for

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Disease Control here in the US to do monitoring on

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.479
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing basis at airports in the US where we

0:25:56.600 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>basically collect samples from plans that come in internationally and

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>then sequence the DNA to look for new variants. And

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>this program we did as a pilot with the CDC

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>caught the first cases of b A two and b

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>A three uh in the US that we're sequenced. Well,

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>now now that CC is funding this up to have

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>it stick around, I mean to me, this type of

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>thing eventually will be kind of like a smoke detector,

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>right it we should be on the lookout for infectious disease.

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's a change. I think that happened because of COVID,

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>But we'll stick around after COVID. Are we prepared to

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>go back to school? You know? As a parent, I

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>feel like there are still conflicting messages about masks. No

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>masks testing, Like, what are the rules supposed to be? Yeah,

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>so so CC did just update some some guidance on this.

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think where we're headed towards is I think

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see the SAC starting to reflect a little

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>more how people have been operating. I think you're gonna

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>see you seeing relief in some of the things like

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the distancing rules and mask wearing making it easier where

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>if you had an exposure, you don't need to quarantine,

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to be clear, if you have COVID

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>you still need to quarantine, right, So I think there's

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>been some misinterpretation a little bit on that. You know,

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>so if you're a positive or COVID, you should quarantine,

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>but for folks that have been exposed you don't need to.

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna help a lot um in terms of having

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>classes full. I think the regular monitoring what you know,

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>which we do, and as you know, like you know

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>ten or fifteen states across the country where you're doing

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>weekly testing in a group. This actually allows for schools

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to stay open, right because you can identify, you know,

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>if there's a positive case in the class, you can

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>pick it out, send that one student home to quarantine

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but not the whole class, and then prevent big outbreaks

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>in schools, which I think if we let it just

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of rip, you will see a lot of that

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>type of disruption, you know, in various places. And so

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>so I think you'll end up seeing monitoring stay, you know,

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>masking go, distancing go. And then the big wild card

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is is there some new variant that flips that all

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>on its head and that's certainly still in the range

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of possibilities. Well, on that note, do you think there

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 1>will be a universal COVID vaccine in the future or no?

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, the virus is just gonna keep changing.

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, you know, I think you will see

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the virus keep changing. UM. You know, I think people

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>are working on this. There's ways to get at it

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.239
<v Speaker 1>in the in the scope of biotech, you know, like

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>over the next tense what of years, I think we

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>should will get dramatically better at this UM. But we

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously we've been fighting flu and we do

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>updated vaccines annually. I think you'll see things like that

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.239
<v Speaker 1>in the near term. But folks are definitely working on

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>that UM and and so you know, we you know,

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we can hope, but I'd say in the near term

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it's more likely to be just updated versions of the vaccine.

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, we can hope, indeed can go. Bioworks

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>CEO Jason Kelly always good to have you, Jason, thanks

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>for stopping by. Alright, coming up, why is Jesse Pale

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>still so bullish on bitcoin? More on that and wider

0:28:43.440 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>institutional sentiment on crypto next, Mrs Bloomberg. It's hard to

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>know what the private markets, you know. Obviously we were

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>not tracking the price UH on a minute by minute

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>basis like markets are, so it's it's really hard to know.

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>You know. We haven't been out raising capital. We've got

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a very long runway cash in the bank. We're profitable,

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>so we don't need to go do another financing anytime soon.

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll probably wait for the market to improve

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>before we do another another round. It is time now

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>for our crypto report. And that was cracking CEO Jesse

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Powell talking about what he thinks of the current crypto

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>bear market in an interview earlier on bloom Box Crypto

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Show with Kaylee Lines. Let's talk about it more with

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>our own crypto contributor, Snelli Bosti. CHANNELI give us an

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>update on the crypto markets and whether Jesse Powell is

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.719
<v Speaker 1>right by just waiting it out. Well, Jesse Powell had

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>bought in more out about eighteen thousand, and you saw

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:52.479
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin did reach twenty five thousand for a bit. This

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>month it has come down below two thousand again. So

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>where does that leave us, Emily? It doesn't leave us

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>at the price that he thought it would hit it

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>last year. Do you remember he told you and me

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin would be worth Lamborghini. But even though it

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>has not hit that price, you do see it about

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>half the price it was at this time last year,

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but double where it was two years ago. It'll be

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see the market kind of sort out the

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.719
<v Speaker 1>natural price of bitcoin as you make it through another cycle.

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to also point out a theoryum on the month,

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>because you do see again on the month, you do

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>see the price rising because of that anticipation of the merge.

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>But in more recent days that excitement has worn off

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit. You have it rolling around eighteen

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven d seven right now. It did peak above

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand this month with that anticipation, anticipation of the merge.

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I know we're going to talk a little bit more

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>about that next um alright, shall I stick with us?

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about this more and how bitcoin

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>startups are trying to secure capital as as the crypto

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>winter continues. Um our investors buying the industry back up?

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Are they staying cautious? Let's talk about that with at

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>least Kill Lean, founder managing partner of still Marks. So

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>at least are you on the bullish side like Jesse

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Powell or somewhere else on the spectrum. We're varia bullish

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>both about Bitcoin, the asset and the underlying protocol, and

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to be because entrepreneur activity has never been

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>more robust. In fact, we've seen a pickup in sort

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of the tests that people are willing to take during

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>this period when the market is more quiet, When we're

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in the bearer market and there's less consumer activity, it's

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a great time to both dig into the metrics that

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you've produced in bull market times as well as to experiment.

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're seeing now from top founders. What

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>do you make of the merge because you saw this

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>news coming out about coin based really looking to pause

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>transactions in and around the merge. Clearly there's going to

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:55.719
<v Speaker 1>be some technical difficulties around it as people try to

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>scam others. That was a warning that they sent out.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>What are you thinking will be near term issues and

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what is a long term prospect? Well coin base coin

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>bass is note that they're pausing deposits and withdrawals for

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>eight I think is something that's expected, but it points

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>out to us the tradeoffs is using a centralized exchange

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to hold to your cryptocurrency. Of course there's some opportunities

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and using a custodian, but the advantage is to people

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>using self custody that they themselves set the rules for

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>how they use their Bitcoin or their eth or other

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>forms of crypto assets. Now, looking ahead to eat two

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>point oh, I think that we know we know that

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>there's risks and that the etherean community is hoping that

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>there's great reward. But one of the things to look

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>out for is the centralizing forces of moving from proof

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of work to prove a stake. Of course, we know

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that the majority of the states, the vast majority of

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the state is belonging to these large institutions, and so

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>those folks, of course are exposed to US regulators and

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have been tested very recently with O fact coming out

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>against Tornado cassion, and the same institutions that comprise the

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>majority of state each in fact, are those that have

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>complied within days to O fact sanction of Tornado. I'm

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>so glad you brought up Tornado cash because earlier today

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Powell did say that the shutdown was unconstitutional. I'm

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>wondering how you see this debate really playing out in

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the market, the good, the bad, and what behaviors might

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>not be accepted among these companies moving forward. It's hard

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to know what regulators are going to do, but it's

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>easy to know how centralized institutions are going to respond.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>They're going to comply, and that's the value, of course

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of decentralization. So you know, the bitcoin leads with decentralization.

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>What that means is that when looking at how the

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>protocol is secured, Bitcoin finds it most important to make

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>sure that the protocol is secured in a decentralized fashion

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.479
<v Speaker 1>and that any individual user can do two things. One,

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:20.479
<v Speaker 1>they can validate the code bitcoins, um core protocol and

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 1>its payments and more. Protocol or open source users can

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 1>know the rules the software rules of these systems. But

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>number two, users can participate in validating the accuracy of

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the ledger themselves. That's something that's much easier to do

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in Bitcoin than in other protocols, and one of the

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>reasons it's important to be able to do that is

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of being demonstrated by the news of the last

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks and the implications of UM governments imposition

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of UM regulations, for instance, regulations to prevent things like

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>money laundering. We're seeing that happen now with Tornado Cash,

0:34:57.200 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know that some of the most critical services

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in the dearium space has has felt the need to

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>compline have quickly done so, making users that have received

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>even passively transactions from Tornado cash UM sort of lose

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>access to services that they depended on. Alice I recently

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>sat down with coin based CEO Emily Choi to talk

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>about their partnership with black Rock. Take a listen to

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>what she had to say. I have wanted to do

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that black Rock partnership since the day I joined coin Base,

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So for this to come together now, actually during the

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>crypto winter, is such an incredible testament to where we are,

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>where they are, where their customers are. And I think

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the most important point is it speaks to institutional customers,

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 1>very traditional institutional customers wanting to get crypto acid exposure.

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>She said, to expect more partnerships like this, but every

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>day there are more bumps in the crypto road. You know,

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>how is this all impacting? Give us a temperature of

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>investor sentiment, institutional sentiment. So the black Rock and coin

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Based partnership will launch bitcoin only a black Rock is dealing,

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is allowing its institutional investors to participate, to buy bitcoin

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 1>and to trade bitcoin via coin Based, while still using

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>black Rocks software for management and for risk analysis. This

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I think was a response. We see it as a

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.959
<v Speaker 1>clear response to the demand of the very traditional institutions

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that are served by black Rock. Now it's important to

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>note here is that providing a new on ramp in

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a familiar environment and with familiar tools is likely to

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>act as a very significant catalyst for institutional adoption. I

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>want to flip this for a moment, though, Emily and

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:46.240
<v Speaker 1>say that, well, while we're seeing traditional institutions adot bitcoin

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like black Rock, we know that some of the most

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>significant and important adoption of bitcoin and of bitcoin's payments

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>network is happening in emerging markets. And so these two

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>forms of adoption are happening simultaneously and I think add

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 1>to sort of the fundamental value of the coin that

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Jesse from Crackman spoke to earlier. Mm hmm. Alice, Colleen

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>still Mark Capital, thank you so much for sharing your

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>views with us today as well as our own. Amazon

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>is fighting back against the FTC, and a filing made

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.959
<v Speaker 1>public on Monday, Amazon claims that FTT staff have made

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>unduly burdensome demands on the e commerce giant as it

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>keeps investigating its subscription services here for more on this,

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>bloom ex Emily Berm bomb with us now and Amazon

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>also claiming that the FTC is harassing Jeff Bezos. How

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>so yeah. So. In this filing made public yesterday, Amazon

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>claims that UM the FTC has been overreaching in their

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>ongoing consumer textion investigation into Amazon subscription services. So that

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>includes Prime and it's actually expanded to include Audible, Kindle

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and some other of Amazon's UH services. So they UM

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the FTC issued what's called civil investigative demands UM, which

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>are essentially subpoenas UM to twenty former and current Amazon employees.

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>They served them at their houses and that includes Jeff

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Bezos and Andy Jazz, the two top executives at Amazon.

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>UM and they say it was unnecessary to give them

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to Jasse and Bezos. UM. These are about a lot

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of different parts of the business. These are the highest

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>level executives. UM. You know, there's nothing this is what

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Amazon says. They say, there's nothing that Jasse and Bezos

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 1>can give you that you can't get from documents and

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 1>lower level executives. Is this unusual? It's actually extremely unusual,

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 1>UM in how confrontational it is. What's typical is that

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>companies will always fight to narrow down subpoenas and civil

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>investigative demands that they get from the government. UM. But

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>what's atypical is how public this is, how aggressive they

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>are in their rhetoric, you know, calling this very unusual,

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>perplexing UM, and UM asking the FTC to par it

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>down in such a public way. Remind us why the

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:23.359
<v Speaker 1>FTC is investigating Amazon and the status of this case. So,

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the FTC has been investigating Amazon UM for several years now.

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It actually began under the Trump administration UM when they

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 1>were given the power to investigate Amazon over antitrust UM concerns. UM.

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 1>It's gotten broader since then. This particular investigation that we're

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about is a consumer protection investigation into whether Amazon

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>makes it too difficult for consumers to opt out of

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Prime or other subscription services. But this is only

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>one part of a sweeping investigation that looks at all

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:58.319
<v Speaker 1>parts of Amazon's business, including cloud, including UM streaming. So

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>when could we expect this US to draw to some

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of conclusion. The filing says that the FTC intends

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to make a decision about whether to sue Amazon over

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the subscription issue by the fall. UM. This is probably

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>going to prolong it, so it's probably going to take

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>UM more time than that, you know, a couple of months, UM.

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But what's clear from the filing is FTC staff are

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 1>under a lot of pressure by UM the commissioners, including

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>FCC chair Lena con to get something done by the

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. All right, Well, we'll continue to

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:34.399
<v Speaker 1>follow your reporting on this. Bloomberg's Emily Burnbaum for US

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. Thank you. Adding so that doesn't for this

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Technology Wednesday, we've got ARM CEO Renee

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Has joining us about the chip landscape and the latest

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>with their possible I P O and don't forget to

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>check out our podcast. Wherever you get your podcast, you

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>can find it on the Terminal, online, Apple, Spotify, our

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, and more. I'm Emily Changing in San Francisco.

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg four