WEBVTT - Can you send messages without particles?

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Orgey, did you get the outline I sent you for

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this episode? I did, well, I didn't hear back from

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you about it. Oh well, I guess you should only

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>worry if you do hear bad from me. Oh, that's right,

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>I forgot. No reply also means something. Yeah, you know

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>what it means. It's all good, or it means I

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't see your email. Or maybe it means I'll just

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>reply later. It sounds like a super position of quantum possibilities.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Yes, I believe in Q mail, not email.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I hope you don't get entangled with your inbox, and

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I am A box is a pretty big quantum mess,

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, maybe one day it will collapse. Well,

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what they say. I like to wave at

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>my emails Estate fly By. I wonder if Schrodinger got email.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>He did and he didn't, right. Hi am worry On

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>my cartoonist and the co author of Frequently Asked Questions

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 1>about the Universe. Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>and a professor at U C Irvine, and I'm gonna

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>do my best not to spend most of this podcast chuckling. Yeah,

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you should be explaining things Daniel not laughing. Well, we

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>got an email from a listener this morning complaining that

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the chuckle time on the podcast has been going up.

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, am I getting too funny? Is that what

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>you're saying? Or are you laughing at your own jokes?

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. Just too much chuckling overall, more content

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>less chuckling, I see, more physics, less humor. Yeah, exactly,

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>stop these spontaneous expressions of fun. Please, boy, you can't

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>please everybody all the time. Well, we'll try to be

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>more serious about it. We'll try, but we'll probably fail.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.279
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, Welcome to our podcast, Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the Universe, a production of I Heart Radio in which

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we try to be serious about questions of the universe

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and have fun while doing it. We ask the biggest,

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>deepest questions about how everything out there works. What, in

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the end are the fundamental rules of reality? Why is

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it even possible for us to understand them? Or is it?

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Can we import the rules of the universe into our

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 1>minds so that they actually make sense to us? On

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this podcast we push against that frontier and trying to

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>make sure that you understand everything that humans do and

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>do not know about the universe. That's right, because what

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>could be more fun than exploring this humongous and complex

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and complicated and amazing universe, And what could be more

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>chuckleworthy than thinking that us humans can one day understand

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>all of it. It does seem sometimes like the universe

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is playing a big joke on us. It's like, oh,

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems to work this way. If equals m A

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is totally right. No, actually, we were lying. It's a

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>completely different set of rules. Are you saying quantum mechanics.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just a big punchline. The whole thing is a

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.119
<v Speaker 1>psi op. Man. The universe is trying to psych us out.

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what we can get these humans to believe

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff like true random nous. Well, you know we

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>are part of the universe. Does that mean we're playing

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a joke on ourselves? Mmm? I suppose so, Yes, we

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are psyopping ourselves. I mean we're the joke. You have

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to say, you're the only one who doesn't get the

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>joke that jokes on you. As long as I get

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to hear the secrets of the universe, I'm happy if

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody laughs at me at the same time. But it

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't interesting and sometimes funny universe because it is so weird.

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Especially Quantum mechanics is this weird theory about the universe.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It says that things are truly random, and that sometimes

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>there are multiple things that are true at the same time.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>It is really amazing that we can spend thousands of

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>years developing an intuition for how the universe works, and

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>then a few hundred years describing it mathematically, only to

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>discover that at its core, at a deeper level, the

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>rules of the universe are completely different, totally foreign to us,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe even alien, and yet those alien rules somehow weave

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>themselves together so that at our scale and our experience,

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they act in the way that's intuitive to us. It's

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>incredible that a difference aales the universe seems to follow

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>these totally different sets of laws, incongruent ideas about the

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>very nature of space and time and information, and yet

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>they weave themselves together at the interface. It's incredible. Yeah,

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>are you saying quantum mechanics is just a tiny little joke.

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>It's only funny in small places. It's like ten to

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the twenty six tiny jokes, which all add up to

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>one hilarious chuckle. To one average bland experience of the

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>universe exactly until the universe collapses on the weight of

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>its own puns. But quantum mechanics says the universe gets

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>really weird at the very smallest scales, which maybe you

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think affects you on an everyday basis, but it

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>actually does. You know, most of our electronics and a

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of our communications, and all of our devices, they

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>all sort of are depend on our knowledge of quantum mechanics,

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and as we try to understand the way that the

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>universe works, we tend to revert to this microscopic picture.

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>When we say we want to understand the universe, some

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of us feel like we want to tear it apart

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>into the tiniest little pieces, figure out what are the

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>rules of those little pieces, how do they interact? And

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 1>then how do you zoom back out to get the

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>picture of the universe that we're familiar with. And so

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>often in quantum mechanics, we are thinking about little particles,

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>tiny little quantum objects, and what are the rules for

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>those things? Do they fly through space the way baseball does,

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>or do they appear just in snapshots? How do they

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.239
<v Speaker 1>communicate information back and forth? And how does that change

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 1>how we can communicate up here at the big, slow

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>human scale. That's right, because if quantum mechanics does lead

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>you do some weird things that we didn't think about before,

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it might change the way that we can maybe make

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>devices or allow us to communicate between different points on Earth. Exactly.

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>If the rules of quantum mechanics really are strange, alien

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to our intuition, then maybe we can make quantum mechanics

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>do things at our scale that are very weird that

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>we once thought might be impossible. Coming to the Apple

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Store soon alien iPhones? Is that what you're saying? Excuse

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>my long chuckle there. That was pretty funny. Well, I'm sorry, man,

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>already going to get a lot of complaints. Stop laughing, Danny,

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>think that the chuckle time is just increasing. The first

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>rule of chuckle time is don't talk about chuckle time.

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It just makes more chuckle time. That's right. Although usually

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about the joke kills the joke. We've collapsed it again,

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>and so quantum mechanics may open some interesting possibilities for

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>future technologies and so. On the podcast today, we'll be

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>tackling the question can you send messages without particles? Is

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>that like sending emails without replies That happens all the time, actually,

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but this has to do more with how information propagates

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in a quantum universe. We like to think about everything

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>happening in terms of the microscopic particles, and usually that

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>picture involves local interactions, meaning like one particle pushes against

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>another particle, which pushes against another. I think about how

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>electricity flows. You can think about just flowing down the wire,

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 1>but if you zoom into the particles, it's one electron

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>jumping from spot to spot and pushing other electrons. You

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 1>can build up this idea of electory city from the

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>little microscopic particles and how they touch each other. Usually

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>there's this crucial bit where they need to be near

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>each other, where everything has to be local. Is that

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like how my wife communicates a lot to

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>me just by giving me certain looks. I think that's

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>actually telepathic, man, I think that might break the laws

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of physics. Usually they're not good messages. I get the looks.

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we should be doing marriage therapy

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast. We already have too many chuckles. Well, yeah,

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>because you know, no marriage needs more chuckles Every marriage

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>needs more chuckles. Man, humor is the best therapy the

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>tense and what they are chuckling at. You gotta take

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>your wife seriously, that's for sure. But yeah, usually communication

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>involves some sort of interaction between particles, right, Even if

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you're just giving somebody look to communicate something to them,

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you're exchanging photons, right, that's right. Our picture of how

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we communicate involves sending particles or waves through fields, which

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you can also think of as particles. But everything involves

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>somehow wiggling a field or sending a particle using that

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to communicate in form asian. Yeah, because I guess you know,

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in the universe we have a certain speed of light, right,

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a speed of information like you can't somehow, it seems,

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>move things from one place to another without going faster

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>than the speed of light. That's right. It's pretty hard

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>coded into special relativity that no information can move faster

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>than the speed of light, and even quantum mechanics, which

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>does really weird things, doesn't violate that rule, although sometimes

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it might. M And so I guess

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the question here is, can you somehow communicate, send messages,

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>interact between two places in the universe without actually exchanging

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a particle or wiggle in some kind of particle field. Exactly,

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>could you somehow send a message to your body on

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Alpha Centauri without having to shoot him an electron or

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a beam of photons or some other kind of particle

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>or wave based information. It sounds like we're asking does

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>magic exist? You know, quantum mechanics feels like magic sometimes,

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it does things that we think are impossible.

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, an electron can be here and then it

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>can be there without going in between, even if sometimes

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the spot in between is impossible for the electron to

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>be in. You can have an electron appear on one

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>side and then the other side of an infinite barrier.

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy. That seems like magic, and yet we see

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it happen in our universe. Would you describe it as

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>magic though, or is it maybe like scientific magic because

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you can maybe you know, statistically predict what's going to happen. Yeah,

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>it's only magic until we explain it. Then it's science again,

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>then it's not magical. Science has been ruining the magic

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of the universe for hundreds of years well, as usually,

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we were wondering how many people had thought about this

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>question or think it's possible to maybe send messages without

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>using particle or particle fields. So thank you very much

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to our cadre of volunteers who answer these questions without

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>any preparation to give us a sense for what people

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about and to give you a sense what

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone else out there is thinking. If you'd like to

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>participate for future episodes of the podcast, especially if you

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you've never done so before and you're a long time listener,

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>please do reach out our email addresses questions at Daniel

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge dot com. So think about it for a second.

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's possible in this universe to send

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a message without using particles? Here's what people had to say.

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I think, no, you can't. Well, oh no, no no,

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 1>because of like quantum computers and quantum entanglement. So theoretically,

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>if we have to quantum lee entangled particles, we could

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>send information and thus send a message between those two

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>particles without sending particles from one location to another. When

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about these questions, actually I'm thinking about quantum entanglement.

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>How you can send you formation from one point to

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>another faster than the speed of light. Scientists hope this

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>will be it like quantum entanglement, but I don't know

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>too many information right now, I don't think No, I

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's possible. I think maybe the closest thing

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to sending information without particles that were currently looking at

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is gravitational waves. But then how's that possible. I think

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 1>that that's just a shift in gravitons, So no, I

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. I think the only way to send

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a message without sending any particles might be through quantum entanglement,

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not even sure if that counts, since I'm

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure we can't affect the state of the entangled particles.

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 1>We can just observe them, So I'm not sure we

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>can actually pass a message through that. That depends on

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>what you mean by particles. If you mean pheromons, then yes,

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you can send a message with argues and particles because

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>photons can carry information. But if you mean any particle

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>if you include photons, then you can't because I think

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you need some entity lack of photon that carries energy

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to transfer information. Well, everything in the universe of ib

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>made of particles, so I'm not really sure how you

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>would be able to send any message without them. But

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm also thinking maybe you could send a message with

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a lack of particles. So say someone's on the moon

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and you make a really big shadow with your hand

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in a really powerful light, and that person on the

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>moon knows that when the shadow passes over them that

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>means X or Y, and I guess technically that would

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>be sending a message with a lack of particles, if

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>that makes any sense, But otherwise I don't see any

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>other way. Al Right, not a lot of optimism. Most

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>people are like, well, a few mentions of quantum entanglement. Yeah,

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we have a pretty educated and listener crowd. On physics,

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a few people said quantum entanglement, yeah, and quantum entangling

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the right direction to think about, because

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 1>that's the non local part of quantum mechanics, the fact

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that things can happen in a correlated way across space

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>even if things are causally separated. So that's definitely the

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>right direction to be thinking about, right. And somebody try

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to make a distinction between like different kinds of particles, right,

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>because there are some matter particles like the stuff we're

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>made out of, and then there are other particles, which

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know are more intangible exactly. In the end, we

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>can think about all of those as particles, or you

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>can think about all of them as fields. In theoretical

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>particle physics, this sort of this argument about whether fields

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or particles are the most basic thing in the universe.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>But fundamentally we're all talking about the same kind of stuff,

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>like can you send a message without a field at all?

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Or disturbing any field? Well, you know, some people think

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that fields don't even exist, the fields are just like

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a mathematical construct in our minds, that particles are the

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>only real thing because you don't ever see fields, right,

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>You can't interact with the field except for seeing its

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>effect on a particle. So some people don't even think

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>fields are real, that everything is just particles. But then

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>those people are just imaginary too. So there's even a

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>guy who developed a version of physics without fields and

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>even without numbers. What ironically his last name was Fields, ironic,

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I say, you're can say ironically his name was whit

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>sund no Archery. Fields is a philosopher of physics, and

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you word a book called Science Without Numbers, in which

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>he argues that fields are just a made up thing

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and you don't need them at all. Of course, he

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>thinks he's real, you know, he's a field, and he

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to be the only field in the universe,

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the field field. But yeah, this is an interesting question.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Can you communicate without particles? And so let's dig into Daniel.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with, first of all, messaging with particles. How

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>does that work? How do we usually send information? So

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>almost all the information that we transmit use either particles

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>or waves, and really those two are equivalent. You can

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>think of every particle as a wave in some quantum field,

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>or if you like, you can think of quantum fields.

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just like an infinite sum of possible particles. It's

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all really fundamentally equivalent. You know, when you send an email,

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, what are you doing. You're sending a message

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>along some wires, and those messages are wiggles in those

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>little fields. You send a beam of light at somebody

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>right your friend across the street has an open window,

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and you've turned your flashlight on and off. Then you

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>are sending beams of photons, which you can think of

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>either as ripples in the electromagnetic field of the universe

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>or little packets, little particles that are flying through space.

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Either way, you're transmitting that information through particles and fields. Right.

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Even when you talk on your cell phone out there,

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you're using light as well, right, Like your cell phone

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is transmitting light at the really high frequency that you

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>can't see, but it's it's light, right, And then the

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>cell phone antenna and towers out there are also communicating

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>with your cell phone through light exactly. And you even

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>have transformation of information there because the neural pulses go

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>through your mind and those are electrical pulses, and then

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>your mouth transforms them into sound waves, which is just

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>shaking of the air. Then the microphone in your cell

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>phone translates them back into a different kind of electrical pulses,

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>which then get emitted by your phone as electromagnetic pulses,

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>because that's just another kind of photon, one with very

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>long frequency. And in all of those steps we have

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a micro pas to call picture of what's going on.

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Atoms pushing against other atoms, or photons flying through the

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic fields that fill the whole universe. It's always local.

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It's always like one thing pushing another thing. It's like

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a Rube Goldberg machine. Right, Everything is coming into sort

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of effective contact with something else. Right, And even your

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>voice uses the electromagnetic radiation and forces, right, Like when

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the air particles are pushing against each other, they're pushing

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>against each other using the electromagnetic force, which means they're

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>also exchanging photons. Right, Yeah, that's exactly right. The reason

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that air particles don't pass through each other, they can't

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>occupy the same space, is primarily because their electrons bump

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>against each other. They resist and repel. And you're right,

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that's done either through electromagnetic fields or virtual photons, depending

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>on the picture that you prefer. But all that stuff

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>requires some sort of passage of wiggles in fields or particles. Yeah,

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>even your voice is light, pure like kind of right,

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>even when I'm talking about heavy topics or emanating topics

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>as well, or chuckling to the chuckles are made of

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>pure light as well, Daniel. And light is really one

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of our primary ways to interact in the universe. When

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>stars send us light from across the vast distances of space,

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>those are also photons. It's created a particle which is

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>shot out from the surface of that sun and then

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>flown to many megaparsecs before it hits your eyeball. That

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>information that the star exists and what it's temperature is

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and where it is comes along with the photon. Yeah,

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's not the only particle we get information from

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and from the universe, right, And we also get lots

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of other particles coming at us and telling us things

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>about the universe. Yeah. Now we have multi messenger astronomy,

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>which means that we can see things out there in

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the universe, not just using photons. So, for example, we

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>can see other particles. Protons hit the atmosphere at very

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>high speed. Some of them are generated by the Sun,

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>some of them come from outside the Solar system. These

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>things we call cosmic rays can carry a lot of

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>information about what's going on out there in the galaxy.

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>So that's only not a photon, right. A proton is

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a matter particle. It's made out of corks, which each

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>are ripples in the cork fields that fill the universe.

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>But just like a photon is a ripple in the

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.719
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic field, these corks are ripples in the cork fields

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and they carry information exactly the same way that a

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>photon does. Right. But then there are gravitational waves though, right,

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>those are a sort of real information we're getting about

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the universe, something communicating something to us. But do we

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>know if there are particles. Yeah, that's a great question.

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of confusion about gravitational waves versus gravitons.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So gravitational waves happen to anytime anything in the universe

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>with mass accelerates, like if two black holes fall into

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>each other, the acceleration as they fall in their circling

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>around each other generates gravitational waves, really big gravitational waves

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that we can detect. And this is a prediction of

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>general relativity, which is a non quantum theory. It's a

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>classical theory. It says that space and time are continuous

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and everything has a smooth path, really in conflict with

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>our quantum view of the universe, but we see it.

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>We see these things happening. We see these ripples in

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>space and time. These are gravitational waves and their classical objects.

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there are waves in a field and

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>they carry information and move at the speed of light,

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of awesome. We don't know if they're

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>made of gravitons. It might be that gravity is in

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the end a quantum field theory like the other forces,

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and you can describe in terms of tiny little packets.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>But those packets, if they exist, they're too small for

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>us to see. We're just barely able to even see

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>gravitational waves. And one gravitational wave might be made out

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>of an enormous number of tiny gravitons, so small that

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we can't resolve them, the way like a wave in

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the ocean is made of lots of droplets, but we

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>can't separate them necessarily. Wait, so then, if gravitational waves

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are not made out of particles, and we've answered the

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>question of the episode, I could send the message using

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>gravitational waves without particles. Yeah, I suppose. So you can

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>send information without particles if gravity is not a quantum theory.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>But you'd still be sending information via waves. And in

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the end, particles and waves, really, what's the difference. They're

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>just two attempts by the human mind to describe something

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.719
<v Speaker 1>about the universe, which, in the end is unfamiliar. You know.

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Physics is the effort to describe the unfamiliar in terms

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of the familiar. And the reason we have an argument

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about whether to describe these things in terms of particles

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>or fields or waves is because none of those are

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>really the right description. They're just sort of like our

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>attempt to capture them in terms of something we know,

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 1>like when you drink a really tasty glass of wine

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, hm, hmmm, it's like vanilla and notes

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of oak or whatever. Now those aren't really there in

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the wine. They're just your efforts to describe them in

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of a language. You know, it sounds like you're

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to get out of something there, But I think

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is that, you know, it's kind of

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine communicating something across a distance in this

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>universe without creating some sort of ripple that you know,

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>moves through spaces. I think that's what you're saying. And

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>gravitational waves are technically ripples through some sort of me

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>m or some sort of field in the universe. And

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>so the question then maybe is like can you actually

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>communicate without causing any ripples in the universe. Yeah, we

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>think about information is propagating through the universe. We think

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of everything is local. Something passes a note to the

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>next thing, which passes a note to the next thing.

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>You can't just have information appear somewhere far away. We

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 1>think we have this intuition that the universe seems to

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>be local, that information moves and propagates, so that to

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>send information you've got to create some sort of ripple

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>in a field. And think about really what a wave

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is like. If you think about a guitar string with

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a wave on it, why does it wave anyway? It

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>waves because one bit of the string is then wiggling

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the next bit, which is wiggling the next bit, which

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is wiggling the next bit. Information about the wave is

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>flowing down the string the same way like you're driving

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>down the freeway. Why is everybody in front of you

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>breaking because the person in front of them is breaking

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>because their information is local. They just respond to the

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>person in front of them. So the whole idea of

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a wave is sort of comes out of information being

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>local and propagating locally. Right, all right, Well, it seems

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of impossible to maybe communicate or send information across

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the universe without causing any kind of a ripple. But

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>let's see if that is actually true, and so let's

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>get into how we might be able to do that.

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>But first let's take a quick break. Alright, we're trying

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to send I guess Q mail messages without causing a

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 1>ripple in the universe. What are you trying to do here?

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Then you're trying to send messages? Will let anybody finding out?

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it could be pretty awesome to be able

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to send information without creating any ripples or sending any particles.

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just be something new that we didn't think was

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>possible before. It might open up new technologies that we

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.719
<v Speaker 1>can't even imagine today, because it would like break down

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>one of our basic intuitions about how the universe works.

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're pretty sure that we're pretty wrong about

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>some of these assumptions about the universe, things we've assumed

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>for a long long time. One of them probably has

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to go. We just don't really know which yet. Yeah,

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there are many politicians who would love to

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have the technology to send text messages without leaving a

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>trace or a ripple through anything. Wow, you went straight

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>for the cynical application, So those usually come first. We're

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how to pitch this to Facebook next, right,

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they're on it. You know. The waste time

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>chuckling about these things. But I think you were saying

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>earlier how physicists sort of look at the universe and

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>how things interact in it as being local or non local.

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>So local just kind of means that you can't affect

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>something that's really far away from you, kind of, right,

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Like the universe seems to have a sort of a

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>short range of things. If I want to communicate something

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to you, I have to do it through a series

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of intermediary particles or things like that, right, or fields

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly have your people talk to my people. That's how

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>these things get done. On the other hand, we also

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>know that quantum mechanics has some very strange, very non

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>local features to it. It seems to be able to

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do things across space time that sounds sort of impossible. Yeah,

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And so that's maybe the question we're asking here today

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is can we exploit can we use some of this

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>weird quantum mechanical magic to maybe send messages without causing

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a ripple in any of the quantum fields. And we

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>heard several of our listeners suggest maybe using quantum entanglement,

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a great idea because quantum entanglement really highlights

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the non local nature of quantum mechanics. You know, so

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>very briefly, the idea of entanglement. You have two particles

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.239
<v Speaker 1>that are somehow connected. You know something about them, like

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if one is spin up, the other one has to

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>be spinned down because of the way they were created.

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, or imagine you have two balls and you

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>know that only one of them can be read and

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the other one has to be blue. But maybe you

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know which is which. So quantum entanglement says, you

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>have these two particles, you know something about them overall

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that makes them have like opposite states or different colors

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>or something, but you don't know which is which. They

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>just have to be in the opposite states. And quantum

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>mechanics says that they can stay uncertain. That you can

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>have one particle have a possibility of being up in

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of being down, and the other particle also

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>maintained both of those possibilities. I take these two particles

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and pull them really far apart a kilometer, ten kilometers,

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a thousand kilometers or whatever. They can maintain those possibilities.

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the first particle and you say, oh,

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it's up, that means that the other particle, even though

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it's super duper far away and there's no time for

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>information to get to it, all of a sudden goes

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>from having both possibilities to having to be down because

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the first one was up, the second one has to

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be down. You know that because of how they were created.

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>The quantum entanglement definitely is a weird, non local part

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of quantum mechanics. I guess that's the confusing part about

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>this whole entanglement thing, right. It's that like if you

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you would think that if I had two balls, one

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>red and one blue, and I put them in a

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>bag and I make them up, then I take one

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>out without looking at it, and I drive it over

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to the other side of the country. Obviously, if I

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>see that it's red and the one that stayed behind

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be blue, or or if I look

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>at the one over there and it's blue and then

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this one has to be red, that's it. It It seems obvious.

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But I guess the tricky thing about quantum mechanics is

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're not balls, right, They're quantum mechanical objects. Like

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>when you separate the two balls, it's not like one

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of them is red and you just don't see it.

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's they're both both red and blue at

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the same time. In quantum mechanics, they're both actually undetermined, right,

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe hasn't decided which one is red and which

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>one is blue. This this whole beautiful series of experiments

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in Bell's experiments that asked the question, as the universe

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>actually decided in advance, is it really determined and we

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>just don't know the answer, or is it actually undetermined

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the whole time? And we'll have a whole episode about

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Bell's experiments soon. But those experiments determine that there's no

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>local hidden variables. There's no information that's traveling along with

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>those particles that somehow determines which one is red and

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>which one is blue. That you have some sort of

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>nonlocal effect. They're either they're communicating somehow, or there's some

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of like global plan that affects everything. Right, And

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess from a lay person point of view, like

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to swallow, you know, Like you I would think, like, hey,

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not that the ball is red and blue, it's

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>just you just don't know what it is. But inside

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the bag, the ball knows if it's red or blue. Right,

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that's our intuition, because that's the way that our world works. Right.

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 1>We think that there's a truth that everything is determined.

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>We just don't have all the information. But quantum mechanics

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>really does seem to operate differently, really does seem to

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>follow very different rules. That's what I was talking about earlier,

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that there are these weird, strange, almost alien ideas about

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>how the universe works which really fly in the face

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we expected to do, and maybe

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that would let us build on those properties to do

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy bonkers things we thought were impossible. You know, whenever

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we talk about entanglement on the podcast, get a few

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 1>emails from folks who ask, isn't it possible to use

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>entanglements somehow to communicate faster than light? Because it seems

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>like there's this faster than light process here you're looking

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 1>at one of the particles and deciding whether it's up

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>or down. Somehow the other one instantaneously goes from undetermined

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to determined, either up or down. So several listeners have

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>emailed me with the scheme trying to use this to

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>send information faster than light by, for example, collapse in

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>one particle and noticing on the other end that the

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>particles collapsed, using that to send information somehow. Unfortunately, that

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work because you can't tell whether your particle's wave

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>function is collapsed. You can just measure it. You can say, oh,

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>mine is red or blue. You can't tell whether the

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>other person has measured their particle or not. So, as

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>far as we know, there's no way to use this

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to send information faster than light. However, it does seem

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>like there is something nonlocal going on, so maybe we

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just need to be more clever about it, right, I

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>wonder maybe an interesting analogy to flesh out here is like,

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>instead of having balls that are painted blue and red,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're like transparent balls and they have a little

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>led lights inside of them that turn red or blue.

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And so when you put them together inside of the bag,

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>they somehow make the arrangement that one of them is

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>going to turn blue the other one turns red, and

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.239
<v Speaker 1>if the other one turns red, the other is going

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to turn blue. They make that arrangement, and then you

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>take the ball off and you separate them, and you

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>take one to the other side of the country, and

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you keep one of them. Now, I think the magic

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of happens if I look at the one I

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have here and it turns blue. Somehow the one and

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the other on the other side of the country has

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to know to turn red. But they're separated by a

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of space, and yet somehow that information is

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>communicated instantaneously. That's kind of the magic of it, right,

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it is the magic. And one thing I think to

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>point out there is that the correlation is created locally.

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Like you talked about them making some arrangement. They were

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>next to each other when they did that, right when

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they said, if I'm going to be blue, you got

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to be red. That was a local conversation. That was

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>an agreement made with your neighbor, and then you separated

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the two particles. The correlation, however, was created locally. I

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's an important hint for like how this works

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in the universe, that these correlations are always created locally.

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, what is it a clue to like,

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>how can you use this to maybe communicate faster than

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>light or without RiPP playing the universe. The basic idea

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is to use these quantum probabilities to somehow communicate. So

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>if you can like communicate via the quantum probabilities but

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>not the actual waves, and so there's this ingenious experiment

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>where you take photons and you split them in half,

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and if you look for this online is part of

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the quantum bomb detector experiment. But you don't need a bomb.

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that just makes it more confusing. So we're

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>going to simplify it a little bit. But you have

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>this beam of photons, and the first thing that happens

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>is the beam. It's a beam splitter. This is like

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a mirror that's half silvered, and it splits part of

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the beam in one way and the other part of

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the beam the other way. The important thing to think

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>about is what happens if you shoot one photon at

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>this beam, it has a fifty percent chance of going

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>one way and a fifty percent chance of going the

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>other way. So, because this is a quantum mechanical object,

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're not looking at it, it it sort of does both.

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>That has a probability to go left and a probability

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to go right. Okay, so now you have your beam

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's split into like two probabilistic halves. Now put

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>some mirrors into the beam's come back together and read

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>joined them again with a second beam splitter. So the

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>second beam splitter can now sort of undo the splitting

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of the meat. So you have a beam of light

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>which you split and then brought back together into a

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>single beam. What's not like you actually split the beam.

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just that you give the photon two possibilities to go.

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>You can go right or it can go left right

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly for an individual photon, it has possibilities to go

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>left or to go right. And then later down the

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>road you sort of bring those two possibilities together so

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that there's only that one photon. And this is like

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the double slit experiment. If you don't look to see

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>which path of photon takes, then it has a probability

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to go left and the probability to go right. And

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>those quantum waves do both right, and the quantum waves

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>can do things like interfere with each other. So now

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a crucial step. When you bring these two photons

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>back together. You make one path a tiny little bit longer,

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>like a half wave length longer, so that they will

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>interfere with each other, and just this one way. So

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the beam goes in a certain direction. So call that

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>detector a You split the beam's probabilities, you bring them back,

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and you interfere them in this special way, so they

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.239
<v Speaker 1>will go in this certain direction. Detector A, so they

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>have to interfere in just this way to hit this detector. Okay, Now,

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>if there wasn't interference, if you like blocked one of

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the beam paths, then the light would have go on

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>only one beam path. They would hit the beam splitter

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and it would either go left or right after that

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>beam splitter. If two detectors, they're like A and B.

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>A is what happens if you have both paths live

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>because they interfere in just the right way, so they

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>always go to A. But if one of them is blocked,

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>then the photon has just hit the beam splitter and

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>they can go either left or right at the end

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of the path. Okay, I think you're saying that I

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>take a photon, I give it two possible paths to

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>go on, and then I merged those paths, and so

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanically, it's doing some weird quantum me kind of

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>go things in the middle because it's sort of going

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or left and right at the same time. But then

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>at the end you set up two ways to detect

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>what happens either the two things merged together or one

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of those possibilities got blocked exactly, and if the two

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>things merged together, then it goes to detector A. If

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>one of them got blocked and only one of the

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>possibilities is live, that half the time it goes to

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>A and half the time it goes to BE. So

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the key thing is that it only goes to BE

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>when there's one path live. If both paths are possible,

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it always goes to A. So if it goes to

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>detector B, that means that only one path was possible, Okay,

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and very possible. You mean, like I put an obstruction

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in between one of the possibilities for this photon to

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>go through. Exactly. So now put some device along one

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of the paths that you can control, some gate that

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you can close to block the possibility, right, So then

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>what happens. So now the photon can't go along both

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>paths simultaneously. It has to choose. This is just like

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in the double slit experiment. When you add a detector

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to one of the slits, it collapses the wave function.

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't allow it to maintain this uncertainty. It's like

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at the balls in the bags that we were

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier. So now the photon has to either

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>go on one path or the other. It has to

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>go left or right at the first beam splitter. It

0:33:55.880 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>can't maintain both possibilities. So either it goes into the obstacle, right,

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it hits your gate and it gets squashed and you

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>don't get any beam on the other side. Right. That's

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>one possibility. Another possibility is that it doesn't that it

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>goes along the no obstacle path on the open path,

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and then when it gets to the end of the experiment,

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>it either goes left or right into Detector A or B.

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 1>The cool thing is that if it hits Detector B,

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 1>that means that only one path was alive, because the

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>only way it can get to detector B is if

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>there is no interference both paths are alive. It always

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>goes to Detector A only one path is alive, then

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>half the time it goes to either one. So that's

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:34.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool because it means that if it hits

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Detector B, it went along the path that didn't have

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the obstacle. Okay, you kind of lost me a little

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>bite a while back. So I have this set up right,

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and there's a both an obstacle and a device that

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:47.399
<v Speaker 1>I put it on on one of the paths or

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>there's only one obstacle, and I control that obstacle. Yeah,

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>you can control. It's like a gate that you can

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>close or open. You can create an obstacle or you

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>can remove it. Okay, If I'm blocking it, then the

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>photon can only go through, for example, the left path,

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and if I open it, then it goes through both

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and I should get a different signal at the end. Exactly.

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>If you open it, then you both possibilities like we

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about earlier, and the interfere in this way so

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 1>that the beam always goes to detector A. But if

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I activate my obstacle and I block one side, then

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>it can either go to A or B. Right, exactly,

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>because it has to choose the left path or the

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>right path. Now right, both possibilities are not allowed, and

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>so it Ethan needs to decide am I hitting the

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>obstacle or am I taking the other path? Just like

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in the double slit experiment, it can maintain the possibility

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of coming out of either slit as long as you

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>don't look. In this experiment, now we're looking. By adding

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>an obstacle, we're insisting that we know which path of

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:46.120
<v Speaker 1>photon went on, so it destroys this quantum mechanical possibility. Right,

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm blogging the right paths, and so now the photon

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it has to go through the left path if I

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 1>receive it at the end exactly. So half the time

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't get any photon out because it hits the obstacle.

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>The other half the time it does decide to go

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on the left path, and then it's the only beam

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that arrives at the second beam splitter, and so it

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>goes fifty left and right because there's nothing else to

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>interfere with it. Okay, So I set up this complicated experiment,

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and then what do I see? And what does that

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 1>tell us about communicating without rippling? So if the obstacle

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 1>is not there, you always see detector A. If the

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 1>obstacle is there, then twenty five percent of the time

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you see the photon in detector B. And that's kind

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of cool because what that means is you can detect

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that the obstacle is there without sending a particle to it. Right,

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the photon only goes through the open path, the one

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have the obstacle. So now I'm detecting that

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there's an obstacle along the right path by sending a

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>photon along the left path, because now there's no possibility

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 1>on the right path to do the quantum interference with

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the left half of the photon. Right. But it seems

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>like then you're just communicating by blocking things, right. It's

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of like, you know, the reason that I see

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>my head in front of me is because it's blocking

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the photons that are coming from the wall behind it.

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>So isn't that also the same thing? It sounds sort

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of like the same thing, right. It sounds like saying, well,

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what if I just send two messengers and if one

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of them gets blocked, then I know that there's a

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>block there. Right. But here we have not sent a

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>photon along the other path. We've only sent the quantum

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>mechanical possibility, right, And so it's different from the classical version.

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>The classical version where you have like actual messengers, you

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>have to send someone along both paths. Here we've sent

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the probability along both paths. We haven't actually sent a particle.

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>The photon only goes along the open path. It doesn't

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>go along this path. We know that it has to

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.439
<v Speaker 1>go along the open path. But wait, does this work

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>with only one photon or do you have to send

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of photons. Now, this works with single photons,

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>so you know which path the photon went. That one

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>photon went on the open path and not on the

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>blocked path. Then yet you know the obstacle is there,

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that the path is blocked because of where the photon

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>ended up. But you only know that by taking a

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:00.760
<v Speaker 1>statistical survey right of photons you sent through. Any photon

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that arrives and detector B tells you that the obstacle

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 1>is there. So you may need to send a few

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>photons through your experiment to figure it out. I mean,

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's sort of like random, right, Like if you

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>send one photon and it goes through A doesn't tell

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you that there's an obstacle or not. That's right. It

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't give you information. You have to keep going until

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you get one in the one that got blocked. That's true.

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's individual photons, right, It's not like a beam.

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not like the electromagnetic classical fields are interfering here.

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>These are individual photons. It doesn't work every time, It

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 1>only works of the time. But when you see a

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>photon hit B, that means it didn't follow the blocked path.

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And that path has to be blocked. It's only one

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>way for the photon to get to the second detector,

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's if the right hand path is blocked. The

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:45.399
<v Speaker 1>path it did not follow is blocked. Right, So you're

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:48.280
<v Speaker 1>saying that it communicates sort of without making a ripple,

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>but only of the time, or this email only works

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of the time, which is more often than I get

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>answers to emails sometimes anyway, But now imagine that you

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 1>are controlling the obstacle and you're far away or something,

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and I can just look at the detectors. Now you

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>can send me information by opening and closing the obstacle

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>without us exchanging any photons or any kind of particle

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or any kind of ripple in any kind of field.

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Just the quantum mechanical probability of my photons going through

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>your obstacle, or the lack of that probability is sending information.

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 1>All right. Now we're getting into the practical application of

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>sending a Q mail, and so let's get into the

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>details of that arrangement and how it might work. But

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:43.319
<v Speaker 1>first let's take another quick break. All right, we're trying

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to send an email without leaving a ripple in the universe,

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and we have this arrangement of splitting photons, and one

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>possibility of the photon goes one way and the other

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>one maybe gets blocked. So how do I translate that

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 1>into sending an email? Well, the first thing you'd want

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to do is do better than that. Doesn't seem like

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>a very good bit rate to lose your information at

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the time. So people have come up with like meta

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>versions of this. When you stack these on top of

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>each other, so that if it goes to a have

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>like another chance. But wait, how am I actually communicating

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 1>through these? Like? Am I sending you the photon and

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>then you're on the other side receiving the photons or what?

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>You only control the gate. You only control whether the

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>right hand path is blocked or not. So you want

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to send me some information, you close the gate or

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>open it. I have like a morse quode button here

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that activates or deactivates the block the obstacle. And so

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>where are you receiving this message? So I'm controlling the

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 1>laser and the detectors, and we are not in communication

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in any other way. We're separated somehow, right, And so

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you can send me information. You can close the gate

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>and we'll agree that. Like, I'm going to send ten

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of my photons through the experiment and see if I

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>get any of them on B and then I'll know

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that the gate is closed. You and I do not

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have to talk to each other or communicating any other way,

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 1>but I can tell whether or not you have closed

0:40:56.880 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the gate just by seeing if any photons arrive detector.

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>B Oh. I see you're not talking about something at

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a distance, because we kind of have to be close

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to each other if I'm going to be pressing the

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 1>button and blocking your stream of photons partially, right, that's right.

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I have to set up my experiment so that it's

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 1>possible for my photons to go through your gate if

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it's open. Okay. So then and then you're at the

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>end measuring what comes through this arrangement, and you're saying

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that if you get photons and one detector, then you

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything. But if you get it in the

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>other detector, then you know that I activated my gate. Yeah, exactly,

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you closed your gate and shut down the quantum probabilities

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for one half of the beam. In that case, I

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:40.919
<v Speaker 1>know my photon didn't take your path because it went

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>all the way through the experiment, so it didn't hit

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 1>your obstacle, so I know which path it took, so

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I know that it didn't go through your obstacle. And

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>yet I know something about your obstacle. I've learned something

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>from your obstacle without sending any particles to you or

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:55.839
<v Speaker 1>getting any back from you. But I feel like some

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>ripple has been made and you use particles to get

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>this information, right, like you know, my my obstacle, what

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:06.919
<v Speaker 1>had to come into effect and had to act and exist, right,

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and some of the time it is going to be

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 1>blocking the photon right from going through. So it feels

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>like a very loyally kind of like, hey, we got magic,

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 1>but only if you sort of look at it in

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this very narrow and then and technical way. But yes,

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>but this is this our lawyers of the universe, right

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>where like where's the loopole? The rule says we can't

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 1>do exactly this, Let's see if we can accomplish it

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>without actually doing that thing, And so yes, it's a

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 1>half step forward. You know, we are definitely sending quantum

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:37.399
<v Speaker 1>mechanical probabilities in order to communicate. I'm sending the probability

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of a photon in your way the fact that doesn't

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 1>make it through your gait and so it can't come

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 1>back to interfere with the other. Probability is definitely how

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the information is being propagated. And yet it is true

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>that we're not sending any actual particle or any actual field.

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.399
<v Speaker 1>We're only sending the probability of it. So yeah, it's

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a half step forward, but it's definitely not sending a

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>message with particles or with yields themselves interesting And so

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>what is is this an actual experiment that's been done

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and it works, or is this just a theoretical construction. No,

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>people have done this and they've actually seen these results,

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and so we have accomplished this. We have sent information

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>without communicating any particles. Are these photons are going through

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the non obstructed path and yet telling us whether or

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>not the other path is obstructed? And people have built

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 1>up on this. You can make this more robust by

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:26.920
<v Speaker 1>stacking a few of these on top of each other,

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>having like multiple geats. Do you open them all at

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 1>once or closed them all at once? So you can

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>make it more robust. And there's a group in China

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that's been using this to send information to like demonstrate

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>how to actually do this, so they can like send

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>information from one computer to another computer without any actual

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>messages passing back and forth. And they've actually done this.

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 1>They sent a picture of a flower, I think it

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 1>was from one computer to another computer. How good can

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you get with the stacking, Like you said, one photon,

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's um one set up, it's accuracy. I guess how

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>good can you get it? But it just depends on

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 1>how many times you want to stack it. So the

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 1>more versions of this experiment you have, the more opportunities

0:44:08.920 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to see that photon, and so you can

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 1>get it essentially arbitrarily good if you string together, you know,

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a hundred or a thousand of these things. So people

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>have some clever ideas for how to do that. But

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, people have done this experiment. They like communicated

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this picture from one computer to another without actually sending

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:28.240
<v Speaker 1>any particles. Now, there's a lot of controversy about this result.

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Some people feel like there's loopholes there. They don't quite

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>believe the result that it's really solid. So it's not

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:37.800
<v Speaker 1>like this is conclusively demonstrated. The simple experiment with the

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 1>single photon that's definitely been done and that agrees with

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the quantum mechanical predictions. The more sophisticated thing, where like

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 1>are sending images from computer to computer without actually sending

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>any particles. That's much more controversial, right, And I think

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it also maybe depends on what you mean philosophically by

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 1>like causing a ripple in a universe or things not interacting, right,

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 1>because things are definitely interacting here. There's just interacting in

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a quantum way, right. So you know, if I'm on

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the opposing council of this courtroom the universe, I might

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>say like, yeah, you're still you know, you're still using physics.

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 1>This is affecting then, and that is affecting this other thing,

0:45:11.520 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and so therefore you're still causing a ripple in the universe.

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And it opens up really interesting philosophical questions like is

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>information physical is it quantum mechanical. A lot of people

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>think that this whole quantum mechanical stuff is just abstract,

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that this wave function we're talking about, it's just like

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a calculation we do in our heads that helps us

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 1>predict things, but the wave function itself is not real.

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But these kind of experiments support the other argument that

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>the wave function itself is real and is out there

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and carries information on its own, because what we're doing

0:45:44.200 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 1>here is not sending information via physical objects, right, actual photons,

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 1>actual electrons, but the probability of them, right, just their

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanical waves. So you're right, we're still sending information

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>using the rules of the universe, and it's still propagating,

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but propagating in this probability space. And it's pretty bonkers

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:08.399
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that those are actually real in some philosophical sense, right,

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>although you are still collapsing things, right, I mean, if

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you're sending ten twenty photons, if you're passing these through

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred of these gates, you're essentially kind of

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>collapsing things right to measure them. It collapses the way

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>function when you put the obstacle there, right, And that's

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:24.839
<v Speaker 1>how part of the information propagates. The fact that there

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 1>is no quantum way of coming along on the right

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>side to interfere with the left side is how you

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>know the right side is blocked. But it's not a

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>physical object that's being blocked. It's just the probability. It's

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>not a classical object being blocked, is I think, is

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. Yeah, it's not an observed quantity being blocked.

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>It's just the probability, and that suggests that the probability

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 1>itself is real in some way, like has the information

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.839
<v Speaker 1>And it's this deep question about information, like is information

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 1>physical this idea we have that it has to like

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>propagate locally from real objects to other real objects. Maybe

0:46:56.560 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. Maybe information is quantum mechanical and can propagate

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 1>through this like probability space, which again means like maybe

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the way function itself is real in some way, which

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>is hard to grapple with because the wave function, you know,

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a complex number. You can have values like four

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>plus two I and we don't think of these as

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>real numbers. We don't call them real numbers because their

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:20.319
<v Speaker 1>imaginary numbers, because they're just like a calculation we do

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in our heads. But maybe they are real, right because

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we can use them to actually propagate information that doesn't

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 1>appear in physical space. All right, Well, um, well what

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 1>do you think this all means? And how soon are

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 1>we gonna maybe see this in my iPhone? Well it's

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 1>a very exciting development, and you know, it serves to

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 1>like break down some of these barriers to tell us

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that something we thought was impossible is now possible. And

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:45.279
<v Speaker 1>it might feel like a technicality to you, but it's

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a crack in that door, opens it up, and maybe

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we can get our foot in there and then push

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it open and develop technologies that we thought were impossible,

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 1>like sending messages between computers without actually connecting them in

0:47:57.320 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 1>any way. All right, well, it sounds like stay too une.

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>We might see this in the future or not or

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:05.319
<v Speaker 1>both at the same time. You hope you enjoyed that.

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us, See you next time. Thanks for listening,

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and remember that Daniel and Jorge explained. The Universe is

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcast from

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. H