WEBVTT - Week 14 Injuries, QB Matchups, Waiver Talk,

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find Sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences. Listen,

0:00:37.440 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>do didnit? Yeah? Welcome your hosts five Bay from your

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>co host, by guy from Saint Practic, Prike Stanfall, your

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>co host, and five eleven from All Why ladies and gentlemen,

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>your with that? We want you inside of Studio thirty four.

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the b f S. He is Frank Stamford,

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg sauceman e y all the way in

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>just a few moments, Frankie, what's happening man Reggae? Happy

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>hump day to you, Bud. Lots to talk about getting

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of news here. Teams opening up their practices

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for the weeks, so we're getting a lot of relevant

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>injury information before we do that. Hid you sleep last night, buddy?

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>It felt so good. It's good to sleep and not

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>be hungover when you woke up. It was a fantastic feeling.

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I did wind up taking more Adeville when I got home.

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Um it was I bought Thailand all for the office yesterday.

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, not even the longest hangover I've ever

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>had in my life. I mean, they only get worse, healer,

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you get, that's the problem. I guess I haven't drank

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that well, I haven't drank that much being that old,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and we've been old for a long time. Well, yesterday

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>was older than I ever before. I hear that marriage

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>ages you Greg, maybe it did, but it was bad, man.

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I did not get right until I woke up this morning.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like, wow, this is awesome. Yeah. Likewise, man,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>it was a rough day yesterday, trying to get through it.

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But again, lots of fun on Monday night for the

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>holiday party. But now we are well rested and we

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>are good to go. Here on a hump. Take one

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>thing I was able to do last night, Frank, was late?

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>Was I I watched check out raw mat e y

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Like that wasn't some two minutes like you were legit

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>on the show on Monday night. Yeah, yeah, I kind

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of made a little bit of an appearance there, me

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and Andrade going one on one in my hometown. Uh,

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that changed during the day. So it was it was fun.

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It was fun to be in there. It's a it's

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>always cool when I get a chance to perform, and

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>especially in my hometown. So it was, it was, it was.

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>It was a good experience. That was awesome. It was

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it was fun to watch and I was like, I

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>was really into it. It was cool. So that was

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>really awesome to see. And of course be able to

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again here with a clearheaded mind is

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>also fantastic to see. Let me get into some news

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and notes. We're gonna the whole hodgepodge of stuff today.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>We have some strategy conversations. We're gonna get to some

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>strategy conversations, but we're like overall league rule type of things. Yes, yes,

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get to that. Um, we're got the news

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and notes. Like I said, we'll hit on what's going

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>on in Carolina. I want to start with my hometown team, Frankie.

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the New York Giants, where what back, what's old

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is new? Again Danny Dimes hurts the ankle, which means

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the final times in New York Giant, Eli Manning is back. Baby,

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go. Let's go Eli Manning. Yeah, just in time

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for a divisional matchup with the Philadelphia Eagles. An Eagle

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>secondary that got destroyed last week against Ryan Fitzpatrick as well,

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but over the past couple of weeks before that, they

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>were actually playing really well. It'll be interesting to see,

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, how this affects everything from a betting perspective.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure the line is going to change. The Eagles

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.239
<v Speaker 1>were already eight and a half point favorites in that game.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>I looked into the target shares from earlier on in

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>the season Greg where Eli Manning did start for the

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>first two games for the Giants, and that was without

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tate. We saw Evan Ingram in those two games,

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg with a twenty four percent target share, Benny Fowler

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>with a sixteen percent target share, Say Kwan Barkley third

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>on the team with a fourteen percent target share. Stilling

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>Shepherd only played in Week one. If I had to say,

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, how does this affect their offense? I would

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>imagine more checkdowns, more dump offs, for Sae Kwon Barkley.

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So someone tweeting earlier today we're back to fourteen receptions

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>for fifty yards for se Kwan, which if you're playing

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the PPR League, I'm sure that that is welcomed. But

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>we also got a report earlier today that Evan Ingram

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>should be good to go, and I think based on

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the targets here he had in those first two games

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>with Eli Manning, Evan Ingram will make for another really

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>good play in week fourteen. Alrighty, Evan Ingram, if he's back, well,

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we're putting your a lot of gold and should be

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>back for the Giants. We'll see how Eli Manning manages

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>to utilize these weapons. And e y you pulped for

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the Eli Manning swan song, I think pomp would probably

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>not be the right word for it. Um. For me,

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>what just comes down to for the Giants is se

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Kwan Barkley has been a massive disappointment. This is his

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>second year UM lit the league on fire last year,

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>was pretty much the consensus number one pick this year.

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Uh And I was reading a thing yesterday that David

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Johnson actually has more top ten finishes this year than

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>say Kwan Barkley. David Johnson has barely played uh and

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Sagan Barkley. Yeah, I know he was hurt there for

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit um, but he came back and was supposed

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 1>to be back up to speed and he just hasn't

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>been the running back that everyone thought he was getting.

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think Eli Manning is going to help.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So there you have it. He's definitely not going to

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>help him from a rushing perspective, that's exactly right, e y.

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And look just in terms of getting them down the

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>field to present scoring opportunities for se Kuan, probably not

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>going to help him there either. But we have seen

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>that whenever Eli is still back their quarterbacking for the

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants, Greg all he does is checkdown, checkdown,

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>check down, Same thing with Joe Flacco when he was

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>starting for the Broncos. So I think this helps the

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>target share for se Kwan Barkley, It'll help the receptions,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately does not help his rushing efficiency, does not

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>help his ability to score touch since all right, yeah,

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>probably not. We saw the Giants with Eli Manning or

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking of touchdown, Sakwe has not scored since Week eight,

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is bad. It's not good Marklyn What does

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>he goes? He? Where does he go next year? In drafts?

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I saw someone tweeting this out yesterday. Actual might have

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>been Davis Maddick shout out to Davi's Maddock Awesome podcast.

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So listen. If you're not listening to Sports Screen Podcast Network,

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you make a mistake. Obviously we're on it, clearly because

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you can hear this show. And maybe that is where

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you listen to the show. The els in the take casts,

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and I know a lot of people doing where you

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>listen to take as anything else. The Dominator, the Intern,

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Laird, Baby, Patrick Laird was on the Take cast

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>with Davis Maddick. Really good conversation between Davis, Patrick Laird,

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and Pete Overzette of Rhodo Grinders, And they've basically created

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a cult DFS following for Patrick Laird, so that's how

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>they were able to get him on the podcast. Again,

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Laird only has like eighteen Twitter followers now with the

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>three thousand, I'm sure Davis has a little bit of

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>something to do with that. But yeah, they talk about

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>how he got the nicknamed the Intern, so that was

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. They just talk about their love

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for Patrick Laird in general. Uh. They created a rodal

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Ware rotal Ware shirt out of Patrick Lair now as well.

0:07:56.280 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's fun times in the fantasy industry. That's awesome.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>It's talking for about Patrick Laird. A whole lot to

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>do today on the program Dalvin Cook Update as well

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to stick around, a whole lot more to come. It's

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>your BFFs, e Y, Frank and Greg here on Sports Grade.

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready for the nation's first and only free,

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour network dedicated to you, the betting and

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide you with a

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence unlike anything you've

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>ever seen before. Located both in the heart of New

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>York City and inside the FanDuel Sports book at the

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>meadow Lands, sports Crade is live eighteen hours a day

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>here to serve you the fanatic. This is Sports Grade.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Get all the grid. I'm just watching this this peloton

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>ad from Thanking Stating weekend. I remember watching seeing on

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>TV maybe during um to the Games. This is kind

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of weird and everything. There's a new sexist uproar about this.

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Either of you guys see this? I did not? What

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>about you? Uh? No, uh, there's an uproar. I feel

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>like every five minute of course. Yeah. So basically this

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is this woman like with doing all those selfy videos

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>like wow, alright, I'm a little nervous my first peloton class.

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>So we're doing it five days later. Oh my god,

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I love it. This is great. And the end of

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the commercial is she's watching the um is since watching

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the commercial on TV and she goes over to her

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>boyfriend or husband. I really needed this thank you, And

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it was just like, it's sexist because the man made

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like the man got her, this president of a peloton

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>like made her to do this. And I was like,

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:47.719
<v Speaker 1>people are people are really showing you, Like, all right,

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>this guy got his wife a gift, Like that's awesome story.

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>It's got him mighty here. What a world. I hope

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not considered sexist for for for bringing for bringing

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>this up and and choosing to feel the way that

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>we do it. We're not sexist. I just I would

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>say that we are very far from sexist. I like

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to think so, yeah, bike, but isn't that the way

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that everything is going nowadays? Guys like just in general

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>look like there are things that are wrong, for sure,

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like there are things that can an uproar that deserve too,

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like everybody's just trying to find something

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to be angry about or to cause an uproar about,

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>or two, I don't know, just lash out against it.

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>It just seems like people are really really reaching at

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>this point. It's that's why you know, Look, play fantasy,

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have fun. I don't think we have much controversy here

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>do we? Greg well play controversy. You can tell people,

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>say Ryan Dannel, you know, I'll tell you again to

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>start him this week? The top ten quarterbacks Matt Ryan,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that would be Frank Let's go, Let's go Titans. You

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned during the break like do I know where saying

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on Barkley's been the last since he's been back. He

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>returned in weeks seven. So from weeks seven through thirteen,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>where do you think Sae Kwon Barkley ranks at the

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>running back position in Fantasy points per game in a

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>PPR format, knowing that he had as you reveal tofore break,

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>he has not scored since week eight, is not scored

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>since week eight and E Y will give you a

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>shot to uh guess this as well, or RB fifteen

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and fantasy points for game e y, what would you say?

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go, um eight, RB eleven. It wasn't far off,

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>but doesn't feel like he's been worse. Well, that's the thing.

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>He's still in RB one since he has returned in

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>PPR League. He's catching passes, he's not scoring, he's not

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>doing Sa Kwon things, I guess is the way to

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>put it. But he's still in RB one. Well that's

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the thing, right, So we're gonna like Sklon Barkley, you're

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>underwhelmed by what he's giving her one for sure. The

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>same thing about Avin Kamara. Well, sure, another really good?

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Where's he ranking that start? The same time periods here?

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>He's hurt during that time too, remember no, but that's

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>why fantasy points per game. Okay, so you look that up.

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>But the other name that he's RB six. But the

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>other name that it really came to mind was Odell Beckham, right,

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>because like ode beck has been underwhelming. People don't want

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. We talked at Benji ode Beckham name on

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 1>him off the back of the jersey, the whole deal.

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But if you look, he's on page for you stiff

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>on paste for the eighty catches over a thousand yards,

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of touchdowns. But it's not like the Odell

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Beckham that you expect when you drafted at the end

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of the first round. So if you want to get

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>fanasy points per game in the same time, aread for Odell?

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you got? I've already I already exit Outreig

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You kidding me? Were you looking at while I was

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>doing from weeks seven through thirteen fantasy points per game?

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Odell Becka, He's gonna be far down the list here.

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>You can't like control f Odell? Yeah, but yeah, this

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>website's weird. Man, He's RB. He's wide receiver thirty seven

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy points accumulative fantasy points during that time. What's

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>not the question? Though? Well, once you sort it by

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points per game, it doesn't use the right numbers anymore.

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>It's tough. But I mean still, from weeks seven through thirteen,

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham is wide receiver thirty seven in PPR leagues accumulatively,

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>are not? I mean seven? What are we doing? Absolutely? Okay?

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Um Ode Beckham saging Barkley notwithstanding, like those are superstars?

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Who Joe is a superstar? He were trying to practice

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 1>limited fashion. I expect he will play on Sunday. But

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>before we move on some of the other news and notes,

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to make sure we hit on something that

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you're very passionate Franky. Last night, the waiver wire ran

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>for many of us, including the Pit League, where we

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>are trying to advance to the next round to play

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Y for the third time. As you can't lose someone

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>three times in a row. You'd think, we hope, we hope,

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we hope, But it atally this wasn't an issue. In

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>some leagues. You got people of consolation black consolation bracket

0:13:57.880 --> 0:13:59.599
<v Speaker 1>going out of the waiver wire and taking guys like

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>oh Man Patrick Laird from us. You have an issue, alright.

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna give you a nuanced answer here, Greg,

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>because you know what else would you expect. I think

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>if you play in a league where the consolation bracket

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>counts for absolutely nothing, then people should not be able

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to make waiver wire pickups. It just shouldn't be able to.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But if you play in a league where I don't know,

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>there's some kind of money that goes into the pot

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>for a consolation bracket or the constellation bracket, means something

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>for the next year. So I think in the flex league,

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>if you win the consolation bracket, you get to choose

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>your draft pick for the next season. And that's how

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we play in my home keeper league, where in order

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to kind of mitigate people fire sailing their whole team

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>away at the trade deadline, to offer some kind of

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>incentive for continuing to play out the rest of the

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>season because it is a keeper league, if you win

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the consolation bracket, you get to choose your draft spot

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the next season. So we are playing for something. And

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in leagues where the constellation bracket counts for or something,

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I have proposed to you Greg that okay, the normal

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>waiver run, whether you do it on Tuesday or Wednesday,

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the first waiver run in your league, the people who

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>are playing in the playoff bracket have the first go

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>at that waiver run. So if you play, if you're

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in the constellation bracket, whether you're playing for something or not,

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you cannot make a waiver wire pickup in the first run. Now,

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>when you have the second run normally, whether it's Saturday, Sunday, Friday,

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>however you want to do it, that's where everybody can

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>be involved. But I think that for the people that

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>are still playing in the playoffs that actually matter, that

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>are competing for the championship, they should get there shake

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>at the waiver wire first and foremost, without anybody in

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the constellation bracket affecting that. And that's how I feel

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>about it. Now, if your league just has a constellation

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>bracket that you're just playing out for fun and it

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any involvement, but no, you shouldn't be able

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to make any waiver wire pickups. That's dumb, like you're

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>already out of it. It doesn't mean anything. What if

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you played for money or if there's something at stake

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in your consolation bracket, you should have an opportunity to

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>make waiver wire pickups later on in the week, not

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>during the first waiver wire run. And that's how I

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>feel about that. When it comes to like obviously, when

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a thing on the line there, their line up

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>should be locked, right, there's no reason, no trades, no

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>waiver WI pickups. No you can't drop your players, and

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, funago the league. But here's my issue. Constellation bracket.

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Should it never mean something because though they are losers,

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>do not get do not get rewarded for being a loser.

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>So you have two waiver wire runs, or you want

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to have two waiver wire runs in your lead one

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for the uh the playoff bracket, for the Constellation bracket. Well, no,

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be changing things because that's how my league

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is now. We have two waiver runs throughout the week, Tuesday, Wednesday,

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and then overnight from Saturday into Sunday. Sunday is then

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>open waivers all morning. Got it? So? All right, So

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Tuesdays for the playoff teams. Yeah, Wednesday is for the

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>non playoff teams. No, the Tuesday Wednesday, the first waiver run,

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>whether you do it on Tuesday or Wednesday, is for

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>just the people that are playing in the playoff, competing

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>for the championship. Got it? So? Then the Saturday one

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is for everybody. Okay, here's my issue. What if, as

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen plenty of times before, the guy gets hurt

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in practice tomorrow. Right now, you don't necessarily get this

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>guy on Saturday daring every one someone who it doesn't

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>matter for. I don't give a crap, but your draft

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>stock next year, I'm not. You're trying to win a

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>championship this year. You're the playoffs somebody may get that

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>player that benefits from that because of the day of

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the week. That's ridiculous. Okay, but there are a lot

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of things that happen in fantasy that are not necessarily

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>fair greg that are out of our control. This is

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it you, I would say, if your Constellation bracket means something,

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are a lot of people that will

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>pick up players in their Constellation bracket just to screw

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>over other teams, and that's ridiculous. It should Your Constelation

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>bracket shouldn't mean something. These six teams lost in Keeper

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>League League, why are they? Okay, we're trying to find

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>a way to keep people active throughout the course of

0:17:59.920 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the entire seat. It's screwing you over. It has potential,

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily going to screw people. The other answer

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is just locking the waiver wire for the entire playoffs.

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Look at that a second. Why what do you think

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of this? If you're a Constellation bracket, should you continue

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>to play? Yeah? I'm kind of one with frank Is

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in like, look, if you're a GM and the Constellation

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>bracket is for nothing, that there shouldn't be a Constellation bracket,

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and those those teams should be locked from getting players.

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>I made a mistake of of picking guy up. Uh.

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought that I had made the playoffs and was confused.

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And I have been so many leagues. Uh, this is

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>not the face of an organized person. Uh. So I

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>accidentally picked a guy up. I dropped him today and

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>then they'll run another waiver thing tomorrow to see who

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>gets that player. Uh. For me, like I mean up

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>until the point where the playoffs are on the line,

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>be competitive play all the way through. At this point,

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're out of the playoffs and the Constellation bracket

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>means nothing to you, it's just to play, then you

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be picking up players where we come back to

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>one that means we win GREG and you lose. When

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we come back. We'll describe if there's new waivers at

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>all in the playoffs, because I know a couple of

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>these don't do that. We talk about that. We'll get

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the news and notes from today. It's a

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>big baseball note that is breaking. I'll tell you what

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it is next. Are you ready for the nation's first

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and only free, twenty four hour network dedicated to you

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you with a real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>unlike anything you've ever seen before. Located both in the

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>heart of New York City and inside the FanDuel sports

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Book at the meadow Lands, Sports Grade is live eighteen

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>hours a day, here to serve you the fanatic. This

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>is Sports Grade. Get all the gride. Get in the

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>game of the Draft King sports Book where listeners of

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>this show and you deposits about to five dollars works

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>create a Drafting sports Book account, make a deposit, place

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>your first bet. Draft Kings will match up any bonus

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>ab to five. This offers eligible to all users. Plus

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>new users get a risk freebet. But the two hundred

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars going to sportscrad dot com slash dk to play.

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Sportscrad dot com slash d k to play. Do you

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have a gambling problem called one d gamblers twurning on

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>an over New Jersey Only eligibility restrictions apply the website

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for detailed Sportscrad network Pluto TV, ZOOMOTV, stirs well, get

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.719
<v Speaker 1>on the grid if you want the edge all right.

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Last year, on the waivers, we talked about two waiver runs,

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a nonwaiver run if you're smart for this uh um

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for the non constantly consolation bracket, because it's stupid. Should

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>there be weavers at all in the NFC the expensive

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>leagues that professionals play, our GST league waivers are non existent.

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>After Week thirteen, your team is is what it is.

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So all these handcuffs, a backup kicker just in case,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>no streaming defenses, backup quarterback, just in case you gotta

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>do that all before the season the regular season ends.

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you like that model? Frank, I don't mind it.

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I would say I like it

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>because it does limit the player pool for you. And

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there are going to be players that emerge in weeks fourteen, fifteen,

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen, like somebody's gonna get hurt knock on wood,

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you know, no big names. But again, you know,

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we referenced a lot c J. Anderson end up winning

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>people fantasy championships last year, Greg, So they're gonna be

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>players that emerged throughout the fantasy playoffs that need to

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>be added. And you know, for the teams that still

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>have fab remaining, they should be able to access those players.

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>So I don't mind it. Is it my preferred way

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to play. Probably not, but I do play in leads

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>like that. I'm in an NFFC playoff right now where

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>my team is locked. There's no more waiver wire moves.

0:21:56.240 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>But the way that the rosters are constructed there in

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the high stakes leagues is you have deeper bench spots,

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>so you'll have eight to ten bench spots, which which

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>allows you to grab a second defense, a second kicker

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in case your kicker gets hurt, or you know, have

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>more handcuffs available to you. So you know, if you're

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>going to play like that where you just lock the

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>waivers after the regular season, you know, once you get

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to week fourteen, that's it. No waiver wire. You have

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to have deeper bench spots that allow people to carry

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>two kickers, to carry two tight ends, and you know,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>however many defenses you need, and try and play the

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>matchups that way. But personally, I do like to play

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in a fantasy playoffs scenario where you have access to

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the waive war Why where are you on this? I mean,

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>as long as everyone agrees to that, then it's fine.

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's strange, a strange thing to do. I mean,

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>if you want to lock certain teams that earn in

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs from picking up players that that's a more

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>preferred system for me. But I mean, as long as

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone understands the rules before going in, it doesn't matter

0:22:57.920 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>what the rules are, just as soon as long as

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>it's very clear. I agree. I agree. As long everyone

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>understands the rules, they know where they are, and they're

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>not a knuckle head that's in the constellation bracket picking

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>up players, you're good. So what would you prefer? Greg?

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Would you prefer of the all the scenarios that we

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>have discussed no waiver wire uh once the Fantasy playoffs start,

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>or having a waiver wire just available for people playing

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in the winners bracket, or kind of mixing and matching

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>where you have one waiver run for the winners and

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>then everybody kind of jumps in together in the second

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>wave run. It sounds like you prefer just one waiver

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 1>runs for the winners. Yeah, yep, exactly what I want. Yes,

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned breaking news. A lot of baseball football us

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to gets you. There is breaking baseball news you probably

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>don't wait to get thoughts. You probably read about this

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that Cole Hamiles signed for eight sea million dollars on

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>one of year contract with the Atlanta Raves, well, the

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.959
<v Speaker 1>n L East. He isn't done. Zach Wheeler. One million

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars plus it's a lot of money. The Philadelphia Phillies

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>over five years, good picture, probably not a difference maker picture.

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Our boy Joe Girardi has a new web in the Phillies.

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>What is Zach Wheeler number invertation is a Zach Wheeler.

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>He's number three picture right. I think if everything hits

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>for him his upside as, he could be a number

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>two picture on the staff. I think that that's true.

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Million dollars for a number two, for number three, maybe

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.719
<v Speaker 1>a number two, Yeah, okay. I think it's because he's

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>still younger and you've seen flashes of him having the upside.

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But it does seem like a lot of money for me.

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:25.719
<v Speaker 1>When I saw the numbers being thrown around for him,

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>even before he signed this contract, I thought to myself,

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I like Zach Wheeler. I was all in on Zach

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Wheler last year. Obviously that didn't come to fruition um,

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but that's a lot of money. Five years for a

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars for Zach Wheeler. That is a decent bit,

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>especially when you consider he was pitching in City Field,

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:45.479
<v Speaker 1>which was a neutral park more of a neutral park recently,

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and now he's going over to a hitter's park in Philadelphia.

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that that's gonna bode well for him.

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>In Romance Sandro, it's just under a hundred and twenty

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. Well, there goes the dream of him joining

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Houston becoming an awesome, fantasiastic, very weird men. Right, um,

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>let me get to some football news, you know, that's

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what us here for. Anyway, Marlon Mack returned to practice

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>for the Indianapolis Colts. T Y Hilt not so much.

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It was a mess last week in Indianapolis. Hopefully this week,

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>e y, Marlon Mack. If he does return, I went

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>from this broken hand and he plays, he's not nearly

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>as much of a mess. Are you confident if Mac plays,

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you put him in your line up? Yeah, if he plays.

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean like they're they're battling. I mean that that

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>whole uh, that whole division is battling for a spot.

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>They're all kind of on equal playing and have a

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>very similar record. So if Merlin Mac can go and

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>can play, he's gonna play, and he's going to carry

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball because that's what they want to do. So

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm still in the process of working on my running

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>back rankings for the week. Greg. But again, while Tampa

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Bay has shown cracks in the armor recently in the

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>run defense, they're still a very, very good run defense,

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think that the Cults are going to have

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>success throwing the ball to Jack Doyle and Zach Pascal.

0:25:58.000 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like t Y Hilton is gonna play.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>It's still early in the week. Let's see what happens.

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But for me, I don't know that Marlon Mack would

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>be the slam dunk RB two started that he has

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>been all season. I still think that they might mix

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in Niheim Hines a little bit more. I don't know

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that they give Marlon Mack that full workload. Is first

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 1>game back, and it's a tougher matchup as of now.

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I think Marlon Mack to me would be more of

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>an RB three, more of a flex play than the

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>RB two he has been most of the season because

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>he's returning from injury and it is a tough matchup. Yeah,

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I I'm good with more than Mac putting in my

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>line as if he's out there, I expect the normal

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>workload from him. I know what Jonathan Williams did. I

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>know what Jordan Wilkins did. I think if he plays,

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>he's not even is a muscle injury, right, This is

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a hand that's gonna be wrapped. They're gonna figure out

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a way that he's gona be sucessful. I don't think

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 1>he snaps are limited if he plays, but it might

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>affect his ability to catch passes, not that he catches

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>a ton of hate anyway, but opens up the likelihood

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for more of a fumble, you know, playing with a

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>brace on your hand or whatever it might be. So

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>there are a few factors to take into account. Greig,

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the question that I will have to answer on one

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of my playoff teams is do I start David Montgomery

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday Night Football or do I use Marlon Mack

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>playing on Sunday in a tougher matchup against Tampa Bay.

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>As of now, I would leave David Montgomery. What about you?

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:10.959
<v Speaker 1>I probably lean David Montgomery as well. He's looked good

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of weeks. Score the touchdown on Thanksgiving.

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I would leave David Montgomery. E y, yeah, Montgomery for me.

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>He's looked he looked really good. He's more in the

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>past game last week two had that absolutely hopefully that

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>continue play. That was design fan, which is cool. So

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery be used. Not that hard, Matt Maggie. Just

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>give get one of your best players the ball. Don't

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>let Mitchell to risky throw the ball thirty five times

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a game. It's not that hard. Speaking speaking a running

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Max coming back um, Terry On Johnson returning to practice

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for the lines, I was on I R. So he's

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>not eligible to come off I r um until week

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>sixteen when he returned to practice. I don't know that

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>they activate him off I R if they're they are

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>completely out of it. I don't, you don't. I don't

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>just have the reason for it. Terry On Johnson's out there,

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Frankie picking him up. I am not picking up carry

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>On Johnson because when he is activated, if he is

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in week sixteen, that's when he's eligible. He'll go up

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>against the Denver Broncos, who have been very tough against

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the run. Plus who's to say that he's going to

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>see a full workload in his first game back after

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not playing for eight weeks. So you have all these

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>different things that to account for the fact that he

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>still might not be Is he gonna see a full

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>workload both Scarborough has actually run pretty well for the

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions. They're already out of it. It's a tough matchup,

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>way too many things to take into account, Greg, I

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>am not adding carry On Johnson, all right, Carrie On

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Johnson not an ad for Frank? What about for Eric?

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you could have him, I mean, and

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you think you're gonna make it through, I mean, he

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>could be a starting running back. We know that carry

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>On Johnson is very talented. The fact that he's on

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the I R and that he returned to practice today

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>means that by week syste and he could be. So

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're getting healthy carry On Johnson, I mean, what

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>could it hurt. There's got to be room or your

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>roster for someone like that. The problem is he why

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if you pick him up, you're almost gonna feel like

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to play him right because his name is

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>carry On Johnson and he's really talented. Look, I love

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>carry On coming into the year, but in a tougher

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>matchup against Denver bron and the Denver Broncos in Week sixteen,

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just I don't even want to present myself with

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that predicament. Almost does that make sense? Yeah, I mean

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense. I actually I'm I I've held him

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in my r I R spot this this whole season,

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>uh in the w w E League. Um. Now, like,

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm pretty loaded there. I got Derrick Henry and

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>see Kwan Barkley at running back Sanders Hide like I

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>end up being able to pick up Madison. So I

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm loaded. But I mean for me, you can

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>never have enough running backs. No one's gonna force me

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to do anything, Frank, But I like having cary On

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Johnson there. I mean, like, there's gotta be someone on

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>your roster that you can uh get rid of. If not,

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>then then don't pick him up. But I mean there's

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta be somebody you're not going to start heat you

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to the tiber here picking up carry On Johnson. No,

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not picking up carry On Johnson. The number one.

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he's either number one. I don't

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>know I'm gonna be around in week sixteen, I hope,

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know number two. I'm playing for the

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>future boys here, I understand you playing for the future.

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I get that, but number two, I don't know his

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>workloads like in week sixteen, right, like not that. J D.

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>McKissick and both Scarbrough my man, I believe, don't worry.

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>They're Ti Johnson. They're involving the offense, and they're not

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>nearly what carry On Johnson is. But carry On Johnson

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>coming back from this injury and and getting he's twenty

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>carry or what he touches the game, no way, no way. Personally,

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think he's activated. I mean they're out

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of it, right. I think that they just rest him

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for the final games of the season and have him

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>ready to go for next year. So personally, uh, there

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are too many things playing against him in my opinion.

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, so I agree, I am not picking up

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>carry On Johnson at you. I'm I'm so sorry. Way

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Uh, w w EE League and x

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>T League you in? Are you in the playoffs? That's

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>going on? And xt League fell short? My team is

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>really good. I really liked it put up, but I

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>fell short. They are but w League, Uh, I finished

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in first to my division. I gotta buy this week

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>who who ended up dominating in the NXC league? Uh?

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>In the NX two. Uh Mike Rowlis again, um did

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>very very well. We had him on the show the

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>one time. I'm trying to see here, who else is in? Like? Look,

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I told you, like, look at this is not a

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>face of an organized person. Um. So remembering all my leagues,

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the part of the year where it's just

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's too hard for me to keep track because I'm

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>so deadly into hockey. When we come back, I'll tell

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you who else made it to the nx T League.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, cool? Well, hear all that? Right y? Who's

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>good advance football due to new sucks. I'll be exciting

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>after this. Are you ready for the nation's first and only, free,

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour network dedicated to you, the betting and

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Crade will provide you with a

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence unlike anything you've

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ever seen before. Located both in the heart of New

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>York City and inside the FanDuel Sports book at the

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>meadow Lands Sports Crede, He's live eighteen hours a day.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>You just serve you the fanatic. This is sports Crade.

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Get all the grade back with you, BFFs. I'm Greg.

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>He's Frank Eric's here too. Anyway, you're gonna break down

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the w RE league. I was, yeah, yeah, I was

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at the playoff bracket. So it was a controversial

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>finish to the league. I'm not gonna get into details,

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:51.239
<v Speaker 1>but the commissioner, um Rick Moss, got into a bit

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of a back and forth with uh one of the

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>other guys and uh, some shade was throwing happy. No, no,

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna get into that. Who was, Uh, well,

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a conspiracy theory. D a Brewer, referee

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>from n X t uh filled in. He took over

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a team that was picked um by the consensus. Everyone

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>took a took a round and and and picked a

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>player for this makeshift team, and then he took them

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>over during week one. Uh, he finished eleven and two.

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a theory. Yeah, it's I mean, it's of course

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the team that was. I mean basically, we just, oh yeah,

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that's who someone who would pick next with no care

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>or or desire or want to make the team good.

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>H We just threw the team together. He finished eleven

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and two in dominant fashions. Um, he's getting to buy.

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>We got Roderick Strong also getting a bye finished with

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>ten and three. Very good record that we got Rickick

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Moss versus uh Tomaso Chompa and in uh the storm

0:33:55.680 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>watch blood Feud, we've got um Dash, which we on

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the show last year, a very good fantasy guy, great

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>dude versus e C three. So there it is. That's

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the playoff practice. He pivoted real quickly, real quickly. We're

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna find out what we're not getting. I mean, you

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>know how he did it can get I'm sure you

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>guys have been in leagues where people that are buddies

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they end up in uh poof pretty heated argument over

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>something that doesn't mean anything. Um, I think cooler heads

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to prevailed. I think they've talked since and worked it out.

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>May have been a few drinks involved in that one,

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and uh, we're not gonna get into the details. This

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>fantastic cheers to fantasy football. I will be texting it

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>after the show, that's for sure. Um. Wow, that's crazy.

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>We've heard some had some heated conversations in regard to

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football, and um, people got really really ticked off.

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's really interesting. Um, how even like professional athletes

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>get that intense, that intense on it. Well, of course,

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean you would say that they might even be

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 1>more intense, right, because look, professional athletes, they might be

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>more competitive than the average human being. And once you

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 1>once you play that much testosterone into uh, into a league,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy football league, where obviously, look everyone's trying to win,

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone's trying to compete. Uh. You know that competitiveness comes out, man,

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes that that type of competitiveness can bring out

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the ugly side in human beings. You know, I've I've

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>nearly ended friendships over like fantasy football, and I left

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy basketball league a couple of years ago. I

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was the commissioner. I was like, look, someone else can

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>take this over. I don't want anything to do with it.

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:34.959
<v Speaker 1>It's stuff gets crazy, man, right. So I've since calmed

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit. Yeah, you're older, like, you know,

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the older wiser. I'm not gonna say that I care less,

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I come over and works. She was like,

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I like football more than you do at

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>this point. I was just like, it's just it's worked

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>for me at some point, and she just like it's

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>all super into it, like screening on Oh my god,

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this is this is our life. This is what we choose,

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>which is fun, of course. I mean it's some of

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the other big stories. So we did talk about it

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>because it wasn't like Super Fantasy relevant, but I think

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning. Right. Ron Rivera fired as the head

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>coach of the Carolina Panthers yesterday after our show. Had

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a goodbye press conference this morning, which is crazy because

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like he won the press conference. People are saying,

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard somebody win the combined press conference, but

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>he did. And a lot of teams are gonna look

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>at Ron Rivera. He's been linked to the Giants already,

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 1>even the Gettleman connection, and people seem to like Ron Rivera,

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and they opened a new ideas that he's a gambler

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the whole deal. He could be matched up with Cam

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Newton and go somewhere together, maybe I don't know where,

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe Washington, I don't don't know, but we'll see um.

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But with Ron Rivera out, Frank and Perry fuel in,

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Scott nor Scott Norville Scott Turner taking over for his

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>father Norville Turner, what changes if any comes to the

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.879
<v Speaker 1>fantasy landscape in Carolina. Yeah, so we were talking about

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>this downstairs, and I don't think that much is going

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to change for the Carolina Panthers. I mean, the identity

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of this team is very obvious at this point. It's

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 1>feed Christian McCaffrey and then guess what you feed Christian

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey even more actually looked into this while is downstairs

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Christian McCaffrey, as of now in PPR scoring

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 1>is averaging the fifth most fantasy points per game in

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>NFL history this season, and I don't think that that's

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 1>going to change even with what is the gentleman's name,

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Scott Turner. Scott Turner as the offensive coordinator now. Calling

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>plays a very weird situation too, because like your dad

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:22.479
<v Speaker 1>gets fired, but then you replace your dad didn't get fired,

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>relieved or he like stepped he stepped down because you

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 1>want to be there without Ron Vero and he wanted

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>to have his son an opportunity. All right, well, that's

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>cool then all four of that, but ultimately, um, you know,

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>he might put some new concepts into play, you know,

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe some kind of like creative things, do a little

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>bit things differently, but ultimately, you know what the pulse

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of this offense is. It's Christian McCaffrey. They're gonna feed

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the two wide receivers and someone who's getting talked up

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this week, Greg If Greg Olsen cannot go, he did

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>not practice today. He's dealing with a concussion. Ian Thomas

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>is now back in the mix. And you know he

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 1>played about forty seven percent of the snaps he was

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>running route for the Carolina Panthers this past week. I

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>believe you had four targets in that game. Yea, four targets,

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>four catches for twenty four yards. So going up against

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons, we can see him back and forth.

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>If Greg Olson can't go and you need a tight

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>end to stream, I think Ian Thomas is going to

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>be back in that mix. Greig, We'll see Ian Thomas.

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>We've been looking for tight ends all season long, and

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 1>if Greg Olson is out, sure, why not Ian Thomas?

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Ian Thomas. There's only so many tight ends you can start. Yeah.

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>We and this is someone that we've liked in the

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>past because if you talked about him as you know,

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 1>a dynasty play, he has flash at times when Greg

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Olson has not been in the lineup. How about you

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>y any interest in Ian Thomas here with the Panthers yeah.

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean they like using the tight end there in

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the passing game, Greg Olson going out, And I mean

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>like last year, I can remember Ian Thomas showing up

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>late in the season. Uh you know, I mean he's

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>not gonna to win you a week. But look, no

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 1>tight end really is. I mean, tight end is an

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>absolute mass. This might be the worst year ever for

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end, which is saying something absolutely. It was a

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>brutal year out end, unless, of course, you Mikaseki the

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 1>first twelve weeks for you, first eleven weeks, Greig, He's

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>scored in back to back games. Brutal first eleven weeks

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for you. You speaking of tight ends, I mentioned that

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Eli Manning's returning. We talked about the skill position players

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>with the Giants for a moment. Evan Ingram could be

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>back on Monday Night football. Golden Tate also expects to

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 1>be back for the New York Giants. Yesterday we talked

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot about Minnesota Vikings and Dalvin Cook and what

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we want. And I've told you Frank anywhile like I

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want Dalvin Cook to play. I do not want

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:33.839
<v Speaker 1>him to play because this is going to be a disaster. Well, Greg,

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you can always get what you want. Dalvin Cook seems

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:40.359
<v Speaker 1>very adamant that he is going to play. People keep

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>asking about him, asking him about it, and it seems

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>like he's almost getting frustrated to a point where he

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:48.879
<v Speaker 1>keeps reiterating, I am going to play this week. Look,

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to cause turmoil within the organization, especially

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>with a team like the Vikings that has played so

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>well this year. But at some point you have to

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>protect a player from themselves. And we spoke about this

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot yesterday. I think that that would be in

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the best interest of the Minnesota Vikings and Dalvin Cook

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>for the longevity of the season, for them going deep

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>into the postseason, for the longevity of his career as well.

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're talking about this is a pain tolerance thing, great,

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>where he's not gonna end up making the injury worse.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that I buy that completely, So I'm

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>reading a lot about it. I read a lot about it.

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It's just clavital it's just it's it's frain. So when

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you get hurt, I don't know that I buy that

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 1>you can't make it worse, though, So I think if

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 1>you have a shoulder injury, like if you land the

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>wrong way. Of course, you're gonna make it worse. Like

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt about so. Andrew Kramer says down cook

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>shoulder injury is a pain tolerance deal. There is not

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>any risk of injury it worse. He'll play on Sunday.

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>He just has to work on holding onto the ball

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>when he's hitting the shoulder alight, So can you. I

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>brought it up down the stairs and I'm gonna throw

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it to you. Dalvin Cook, I believe will be limited

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in some fashion. You'll not have his normal workload. Can

0:40:55.239 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you start Alexander Madison over Daln Cook this week? I

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. I mean you may believe that. I

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know if there's any truth to that or not. Uh,

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but people are owners of Dalvin Cooker are going to

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>have to make a decision. I'm an owner of Delvin

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Cook in a dynasty league where I absolutely dominated this year.

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 1>He's uh, he's been one of the big reasons. And

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the reality is is, I mean, there's no one I

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>can really put in there that's going to give me

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the upside of Dalvin Cook. He may be limited, you

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.760
<v Speaker 1>may be right, but we're not gonna know he seems

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Adam and he's going to play, and I mean, he's

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>arguably one of the best running backs in the league

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>this year. Uh, and maybe going forward he's gonna want

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to play. Um. So, so we'll see what's gonna happen.

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>The problem with this, Greg, is what happens when the

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Lions go of zip against When the Vikings go up

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>zip against the Detroit Lions and David Blow. You know,

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to downplay David Blow. He actually looked

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty good on Thanksgiving, but the Minnesota Vikings are thirteen

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.279
<v Speaker 1>point favorites in that game for a reason. Greg, So

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, they go up two scores or what it

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>might be. I mean, why are they trotting Dalvin Cook

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>out there for the rest he saw it against Seattle

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 1>they were down, they were in this case, they were

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>down in the other way, you go up and he

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:12.359
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play. I don't see how you can't not use

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook though. I mean, look, you're question. You're gonna

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>have to have some some real cojones to uh to

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>pull that one off. Greg. But I think ultimately, if

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you own both of these guys, I mean, maybe you

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>flirt with the possibility of playing ball, so can you

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>play both of them? Again? I haven't finished my my

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>rankings yet, but I think instead of Dalvin Cook being

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the top five running back that he normally is, he

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>probably will come in more as a low end RB

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>one high end RB two because I think that there's

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a chance that he is limited in some capacity and

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that will push Alexander Madison up into RB three flex

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>territory for me. So if he is better than your

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>other flex options, then the answer will be yes. They

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So I bring up the names that we've been talking

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>about off the waiver wire this week, Patrick Laird, Jack Pascal,

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Miller, Peyton Barber, most Scarbor. Like those types of guys,

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I would use Madison over both Scarborough for sure. I

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>don't like the spot for both Scarborough being thirteen point

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>dogs and a tough matchup against the Vikings, so he's

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>one that's already out. I would use Madison over Patrick Laird.

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:17.320
<v Speaker 1>UH have to wait and see what the chiefs. But

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 1>if it's just Darwin Thompson and Lasan McCoy, then I'm

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:26.800
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna use Darwin Thompson over Alexander Madison myself. But

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, once we get into those wide receivers like

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I would use Madison over Anthony Miller, and

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I would use Madison over Pascal. But it is a

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>conversation worth happening having. E Y, what about you when

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Alexander Madison, I mean, how high is

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>too high for for him? Is he an RB two

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>in this game? Even if Dalvin Cook is active? Yeah,

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I mean, how I'm I'm doing it?

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe because it's wishful thinking on my part, but I

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>think if Dalvin Cook wants to play and he's clear

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to play, he's going to have very similar kind of workload. Um.

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I think if they do get up, they may say, hey,

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>look like, you know, we gotta lead. Let's let's just

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 1>let Batison carry the ball. Uh, you know, work the

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>clock and keep you fresh going forward. That that is

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a reality, That is a thing. But I don't think

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>any of us can predict what's going to happen. Uh

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the Lions, Uh could could make this game interesting. I mean,

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. Scarborough has been decent. Uh, Galladay had

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a big week last week. So we're gonna find out.

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:29.399
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see me myself. I'm gonna start Dalvin Cook.

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think if you have them, you should start them. Um,

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a busins where you gonna start both

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of these guys in a playoff game, m hm. I

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>wish you luck because I don't think you're going to

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:41.800
<v Speaker 1>be in the playoffs very long. I don't know what

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to do. They really don't. I have Laird, I have

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Barber Great. I don't know if this helps or hurts

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>your decisions. Well, last time Dalvin Cook face the Lions

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>this season carries a hundred and forty two yards and

0:44:53.760 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. Yeah, good luck, buddy, Thank you. I don't

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of Dalvin Cook anywhere, so I don't have to make

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>this decision. If you are an Alexander Madison owners separately

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the Dalagook, you know what Cooking? You just known Madison?

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Are you more at to start him? Yeah, it's the

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>same kind of situation. Look, he's gonna be in the

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 1>flex discussion. It depends who else you have. I just

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of broke down, you know how I feel about

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Madison versus some of these other waiver wire targets that

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we've we've been talking about all week long. But I

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>think it probably makes me more apt to play him

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>if I don't own Dalvin Cook, just because whenever you

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 1>start to running backs on the same team, you're feel

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird about it, right, Yeah, because you know, look,

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 1>what are the chances that both of these guys, you know,

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>unless of course it's for Shot Penny and Chris Carson,

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>what are the chances of both of these guys having

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:41.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen plus touches in the game? Not very high. You know.

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:43.759
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because in my league, someone's gonna hit and

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>someone's gonna let you down. In my league that I

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:48.439
<v Speaker 1>have Dalmond cooking, my opponent is starting Kirk Couson's games freme,

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:53.800
<v Speaker 1>all those vikings game. Yeah, that is uh, that's just

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a gameflow galore for you. Greg. You're hoping that Dalvin

0:45:56.800 --> 0:46:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Cook scores early, maybe once or twice, then then it's

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the Alexander Madison Show from there on. A last time

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins faced them, he did for like four yards

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and three touched Fantasy football. Baby, let's go, We'll do

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it all gonnamorrow. We hope are you ready for the

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>nation's first and only, free, twenty four hour network dedicated

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to you the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>will provide you with a real time content, statistics and

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 1>gaming intelligence unlike anything you've ever seen before. Located both

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in the heart of New York City and inside the

0:46:32.520 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel Sports Book at the meadow Lands, Sports Crade is

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 1>live eighteen hours a day, here to serve you the fanatic.

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Sports Grade. Get off the grid. So what

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>did what did? Here's what you missed on the BFFs.

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with my hometown team, Frankie. That's

0:46:57.160 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the New York Giants. Where what back? What old? Is

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>new again? Danny Dimes hurts the ankle, which means the

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:11.320
<v Speaker 1>vital times in New York Giant. Eli Manning is back, baby,

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's go. Let's go Eli Manning. Yeah, just in time

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for a divisional matchup with the Philadelphia Eagles. An Eagle

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>secondary that got destroyed last week against Ryan Fitzpatrick as well,

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but over the past couple of weeks before that, they

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 1>were actually playing really well. It'll be interesting to see,

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, how this affects everything from a betting perspective.

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure the line is gonna change. The Eagles were

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 1>already eight and a half point favorites in that game.

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I looked into the target shares from earlier on in

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the season Greg where Eli Manning did start for the

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 1>first two games for the Giants, and that was without

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tate. We saw Evan Ingram in those two games,

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg with a twenty four percent target share, Benny Fowler

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 1>with a sixteen percent target share, Say Kwon Barkley third

0:47:53.239 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 1>on the team with a fourteen percent target share. Stilling

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Shepherd only played in week one. If I had to say,

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, how does this affect their all fence, I

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>would imagine more checkdowns, more dump offs for sa Kwon Barkley.

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So someone sweeting earlier today we're back to fourteen receptions

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>for fifty yards for se Kwan, which if you're playing

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the PPR League, I'm sure that that is welcomed. But

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we also got a report earlier today that Evan Ingram

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>should be good to go, and I think based on

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the target share he had in those first two games

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>with Eli Manning, Evan Ingram will make for another really

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>good play in week fourteen. Alrighty, Evan Ingram, if he's back,

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what we're putting your a lot of gold and tap

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 1>should be back for the Giants. We'll see how Eli

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Manning manages to utilize these weapons, and e y, you

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:38.360
<v Speaker 1>pulp for the Eli Manning swan song, I think palmpt

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 1>would probably not be the right word for it. Um.

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 1>For me, what just comes down to for the Giants

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is se Kwan Barkley has been a massive disappointment. This

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:52.399
<v Speaker 1>is his second year UM lit the league on fire

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 1>last year, was pretty much the consensus number one pick

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this year. Uh. And I was reading a thing yesterday

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that David Johnson actually has more top ten isshes this

0:49:00.600 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 1>year then sa Kwan Barkley. David Johnson has barely played uh.

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>And Sagan Barkley, Yeah, I know he was hurt there

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 1>for a bit, um, but he came back and was

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be back up to speed and he just

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:14.479
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been the running back that everyone thought he was getting.

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think Eli Manning is going to help.

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So there you have it. He's definitely not going to

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:21.880
<v Speaker 1>help him from a rushing perspective. That's exactly right, e y.

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:24.279
<v Speaker 1>And look just in terms of getting them down the

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>field to present scoring opportunities for se Kuan, probably not

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>going to help him there either. But we have seen

0:49:30.040 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that whenever Eli is still back their quarterbacking for the

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants Crag. All he does is checkdown, checkdown, checkdown,

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with Joe Flacco when he was starting for

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. So I think this helps the target share

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>for se Kuan Barkley. It will help the receptions, but

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 1>ultimately does not help his rushing efficiency. Does not help

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:46.879
<v Speaker 1>his ability to score touch since