Speaker 1: All right, thanks scotch On an hour or two Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity Show, toll free. Our number is eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine to four one, Sean, if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. You know, we spent years
Speaker 1: on this show. I mean years on this show with
Speaker 1: a great ensemble cast, and thankfully and the same with
Speaker 1: Hannity the TV show, we were able to unpeel the
Speaker 1: layers of the onion. And it took a long time
Speaker 1: and a lot of hard work and a lot of
Speaker 1: deep dives and a lot of digging and a lot
Speaker 1: of shoe leather to get to the bottom of it.
Speaker 1: Now I was able to partner with an incredible cast
Speaker 1: of fellow patriots to get to the bottom of Russia
Speaker 1: Russia Russia, get to the bottom of Ukraine, get to
Speaker 1: the bottom of the Hunter laptop Biden laptop story, get
Speaker 1: to the bottom of Faiza abuse, and it goes on
Speaker 1: from there. What is what has never happened is all
Speaker 1: of the people that were involved in all of these
Speaker 1: efforts to use the deep state to thwart Donald Trump
Speaker 1: have never been held accountable. And if it weren't for
Speaker 1: people like John Solomon and Greg Jarrett and Sarah Carter
Speaker 1: and at the time Catherine herriage, and and there were
Speaker 1: many others as well. We would not have gotten to
Speaker 1: the bottom of it. There was a very small group
Speaker 1: of us that were digging hard every single day, and
Speaker 1: everybody equally contributed to getting to the bottom. Line is
Speaker 1: you know? That is the truth? Finally, now you know,
Speaker 1: I honestly had given up any any hope that we
Speaker 1: might one day get to the bottom of this. You know,
Speaker 1: why did James comy? You know, why do we have
Speaker 1: a double standard with Themorrow Lago raid when we know
Speaker 1: that Hillary Clinton had more class by top secret information
Speaker 1: on her servers that she cleaned out with bleach bit
Speaker 1: and devices that were destroyed with hammers and simcards that
Speaker 1: were removed. How is it that Hillary Clinton's bought and
Speaker 1: paid for dirty Russian dossier was used not once but
Speaker 1: four times to spy on Carter page and backdoor spy
Speaker 1: on Donald Trump, his campaign, his transition team, and his presidency.
Speaker 1: How come James Colemy was never held responsible. Now, two
Speaker 1: of the people that really were in the forefront of
Speaker 1: our coverage, and I couldn't have done it without either
Speaker 1: one of them are John Solomon, Editor and chief investigative
Speaker 1: reporter founder justinnews dot com, Fox News legal analyst and
Speaker 1: best selling author Greg Jarrett both there with us. What
Speaker 1: jump started my desire to cover this today and we
Speaker 1: discussed it a little bit in the last hour, is
Speaker 1: this long piece put together by John Solomon and welcome
Speaker 1: back both of you. I mean, I think the number
Speaker 1: of hours that we all spent on a lot of
Speaker 1: these stories is too high to begin to even calculate.
Speaker 1: But we got to the truth and the rest of
Speaker 1: the media lied to the American people. We've been fully
Speaker 1: completely vindicated, but nobody knows that we've been medicated.
Speaker 2: John, Yeah, listen, this is a seminal moment. What I
Speaker 2: reported this morning is the potential moment for extreme accountability,
Speaker 2: real accountability. For the first time, the FBI has opened
Speaker 2: what they're calling a grand conspiracy case, meaning they're looking
Speaker 2: at everything that happened from the moment that Hillary Clinton
Speaker 2: was cleared in their email server. Even though the FBI
Speaker 2: had just gotten new intelligence that suggested there might have
Speaker 2: been a crime, the FBI decides not to look at
Speaker 2: that unilaterally clear as Hillary Clinton, and then of course
Speaker 2: the next day they flip towards investigating Donald Trump, even
Speaker 2: though they know Donald Trump's allegations on Russia collusion or
Speaker 2: invented by Hillary Clinton as part of a political dirty trick.
Speaker 2: And then it goes on all the way through the
Speaker 2: things that you just illuminated. Instead of investigating Hunter Biden,
Speaker 2: they try to impeach President Trump. Instead of treating their
Speaker 2: laptop as well, they pretend it's iression disinformation. Instead of
Speaker 2: looking at the Chinese intelligence that suggests it maybe there
Speaker 2: is an effort to interfere in the twenty twenty election,
Speaker 2: they turned a blind eye to it. And then when
Speaker 2: Joe Biden finds out he has classified documents, instead of
Speaker 2: pursuing that, they actually go and create a case against
Speaker 2: Donald Trump and pursue him in mar Lago. So the
Speaker 2: FBI is treating that entire window, of many other events
Speaker 2: that fall into it, as a continuing, ongoing conspiracy. What
Speaker 2: makes it so important. It means that that can go
Speaker 2: back and charge crimes that are necessarily outside the statute
Speaker 2: of limitations if you charge them individually. It also allows
Speaker 2: them to change the venue from Washington, d C. Where
Speaker 2: traditional criminal cases against the government are brought, to a
Speaker 2: place like Florida, where the raid and Marlago occurred, you
Speaker 2: might get a more reasonable jury and or more reasonable
Speaker 2: grand injured. So I think things are starting to line
Speaker 2: up not only for a grand conspiracy investigation, but perhaps
Speaker 2: a special prosecutor who takes it over.
Speaker 1: Let's get your take your your forty thousand foot overview
Speaker 1: on this, Greg Jared, because this has been years in
Speaker 1: the making.
Speaker 3: Yeah, great article by John as usual. I do think
Speaker 3: that a special council is inevitable and absolutely merited because
Speaker 3: Trump is the victim of a long running criminal conspiracy
Speaker 3: to destroy him. For almost a decade, he suffered this
Speaker 3: onslaught of diabolical lies, invented smears, fraud, deceit, even forgery.
Speaker 3: At one point, nearly all of it was done by
Speaker 3: dishonest and scrupulous government actors. And they abuse their power,
Speaker 3: and they weaponized the law. They manufactured phony documents, crooked investigations,
Speaker 3: they cooked up criminal charges against Trump, and often they
Speaker 3: acted in concert with a common goal, the goal to
Speaker 3: sabotage Trump's electoral chances and under law. As John points out,
Speaker 3: that constitutes a criminal conspiracy and agreement either express or
Speaker 3: implied to commit illegal acts. They planned it, and they
Speaker 3: acted together. They schemed and connived at every turn. So
Speaker 3: if appointed, and I think one will be, a special
Speaker 3: counsel should look at two major offenses. And I talked
Speaker 3: about it when I filled in for you last week
Speaker 3: on your radio show. They are conspiracy to defraud the
Speaker 3: government and deprivation of rights under color of law, that
Speaker 3: is to say, using knowingly faults or fabricated evidence to
Speaker 3: support cases against Donald Trump. I think that's where.
Speaker 2: This is headed.
Speaker 1: Okay, John, let's walk through. I mean how much. I mean,
Speaker 1: we're talking about it almost a ten year period of
Speaker 1: time here, and you mentioned in your article statute of
Speaker 1: limitations issues kick in when you talk about a grand
Speaker 1: conspiracy and this is everything from Russia collusion to Jack Smith.
Speaker 1: And you also mentioned jurisdictions such as Florida and the
Speaker 1: Jack Smith case, which would certainly be a better venue
Speaker 1: than doing anything legally. If you're a conservative or Republican
Speaker 1: or related to Donald Trump in any way in DC, explain,
Speaker 1: explain to people how the depth that we're talking about
Speaker 1: and the conspiracy involved here, and who are the people involved,
Speaker 1: and what are the statute of limitations? What impact is
Speaker 1: that going to have because some of them are running
Speaker 1: out in weeks.
Speaker 2: Yeah, like the China issue is actually was discovered in
Speaker 2: August of twenty twenty. That's when the Intel comes in
Speaker 2: saying China's trying to maybe file fake ballots to help
Speaker 2: Joe Biden beat President Trump, and Tenttoya comes into the FBI.
Speaker 2: It comes from a trusted intelligence source. And then some
Speaker 2: of the fake driver's licenses are captured in a facility
Speaker 2: in O'Hare Airport, and they like they proof it's going on,
Speaker 2: and then they turn a blind eye to it. That
Speaker 2: statue of limitations would expire in five years unless you
Speaker 2: treat the chronic pattern of ignoring evidence of wrongdoing for
Speaker 2: Democrats in manufacturing evidence to pursue Republicans, if you treat
Speaker 2: that as a conspiracy, then you can go back and
Speaker 2: say this conspiracy began the day that James Komy waved
Speaker 2: a magic wand and absolved Hillary Clinton of email abuses,
Speaker 2: even though they had brand new evidence that they hadn't
Speaker 2: pursued yet. And then it goes on to Russia collusion
Speaker 2: and a Russia collusion that goes on to Ukraine impeachment
Speaker 2: because Ukraine impeachment, it's about protecting Hunter Biden's criminal conduct
Speaker 2: and making it look like Donald Trump had done something
Speaker 2: wrong there, and then you go into acting Joe Biden's
Speaker 2: election chances by not looking at the Chinese interference. And
Speaker 2: then when Joe Biden discovers he has classified documents in
Speaker 2: his garage and in his office, which they discovered much
Speaker 2: earlier we learned, then they start a case against Donald
Speaker 2: Trump for classified documents to cover up nothing. It's the
Speaker 2: same pattern. It's the same group of people. The Justice Department,
Speaker 2: the FBI, and actors in the Clinton Biden world who
Speaker 2: run this entire gamut for ten years, are involved in
Speaker 2: so many of these efforts to deceive the American people.
Speaker 2: So once that happens, you can treat something out of
Speaker 2: the Statute of Limitations as part of a criminal conspiracy.
Speaker 2: The statute essentially goes away.
Speaker 1: Explain what the criminal conspiracy is, Greg Jarrett, Well, the.
Speaker 3: Most obvious, and they were about a dozen different schemes
Speaker 3: that would fit in to the grand conspiracy charges that
Speaker 3: John has outlined in his article. The most obvious is
Speaker 3: how Comeing and Brennan exploited the bogus dossier is a
Speaker 3: basis to launch the FBI's investigation of Trump and then
Speaker 3: obtain warrant's despy, even though they knew that the Hillary
Speaker 3: funded document was total garbage. At a White House meeting
Speaker 3: on July twenty eight, twenty sixteen, Brennan informed Barack Obama,
Speaker 3: Joe Biden, James Comy, James Clapper on how Hillary Clinton
Speaker 3: had approved this illicit scheme that was pitched to her
Speaker 3: by her acolytes in the campaign to smear and frame
Speaker 3: Trump for colluding with Russia, even though it was completely
Speaker 3: untrue and they all knew it, And of course she
Speaker 3: did it to distract.
Speaker 1: From her own and didn't bruce or warn them in
Speaker 1: August of twenty sixteen. It's political and nature, don't use it.
Speaker 3: He did, and Hillary did it to distract from her
Speaker 3: own email scandal and to like from her own Russian
Speaker 3: involvement in the uranium one deal. We now actually have
Speaker 3: Brennan's handwritten notes confirming that meeting in the Oval Office
Speaker 3: and what was said. None of the people there ever
Speaker 3: had the decency and the honesty to disclose the truth
Speaker 3: as they should have. Instead, they concealed this dirty political
Speaker 3: trick conjured up by Hillary and watched as it evolved
Speaker 3: into a dilating, damaging scandal that in Gulf Trump's first
Speaker 3: two years in office. It's really incredibly despicable. But John
Speaker 3: and I could go on for another hour describing all
Speaker 3: the other dozen schemes that have one common denominator to
Speaker 3: destroy Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: All right, clickbreak right back more with John Solomon, investigative
Speaker 1: reporter and founder and also editor in chief justinews dot com,
Speaker 1: best selling author, Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett. Then
Speaker 1: your calls on the other side eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: to four one seawan as we continue. But we continue
Speaker 1: now with justinnews dot com founder, editor in chief and
Speaker 1: investigative reporter John Solomon, Fox News Legal analysts, best selling
Speaker 1: author on this very topic that we're discussing. Greg Jarrett
Speaker 1: is with us. Explain where how this process is going
Speaker 1: to work, John Solomon, because you're the one that broke
Speaker 1: this story about the FBI launching this quietly, and so
Speaker 1: I think you have a little bit more insight into
Speaker 1: this and talk about the role of Brennan Clapper call
Speaker 1: me in particular, and what they knew and when they
Speaker 1: knew it, which is how you started your peace out.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's so important, and by the way, the process
Speaker 2: should just start with a prosecutor in the Justice Department,
Speaker 2: just reading Greig Jarrett's The Russia Hoax and Which Hunt
Speaker 2: because in there all the elements, all the overt acts
Speaker 2: of the conspiracy are laid out in such extraordinary detail.
Speaker 2: But you have this scheme to basically clear Hillary Clinton
Speaker 2: and Hunter Biden and Joe Biden are wrongdoing even though
Speaker 2: there's strong evidence that there's something wrong going on, and
Speaker 2: then framed Donald Trump and his supporters around him making
Speaker 2: it look like they did something wrong with manufactured evidence.
Speaker 2: That's the scheme. And so the FBI opened up with
Speaker 2: calledy predicated investigation about three months ago, several weeks ago,
Speaker 2: almost three months ago. And the next app is for
Speaker 2: Pam Bonni to assign the prosecutors. And there's two ways
Speaker 2: they could do it. They could assign a US attorney, or,
Speaker 2: more likely, because a lot of these allegations involve her boss,
Speaker 2: their boss being the victim in this case, Donald Trump
Speaker 2: the victim, you kick it to a special prosecutor. Now,
Speaker 2: they don't have a lot of options because they don't
Speaker 2: have a lot of confirmed US attorneys. The Senate has
Speaker 2: been slow to confirm some of the attorneys to US attorneys,
Speaker 2: so they might go to someone on the outside who
Speaker 2: is a confirmed cabinet member but could also be double
Speaker 2: as a special prosecutor. So the next step will be, yes,
Speaker 2: we're going to make this a full investigation. Justice will
Speaker 2: take over the prosecutorial partner and panel the grand jury,
Speaker 2: and most likely they will pick someone to be a
Speaker 2: special prosecutor so that the conflict of interest that oh,
Speaker 2: Pam Bondy's just trying to make good with their boss
Speaker 2: goes away of an independent prosecutor looking at it.
Speaker 1: Wow, last word, we have twenty seconds. Greg.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's absolutely the way to go. And you know
Speaker 3: it wasn't just the illicit scheme to frame Donald Trump,
Speaker 3: but you know when Biden took office and Trump out
Speaker 3: to run again, the DOJ and the FBI doubled down
Speaker 3: and they conjured up a new scheme to hit Trump
Speaker 3: with a slew of criminal indictments that were specious at best.
Speaker 1: Well, I appreciate all the work that you guys contributed
Speaker 1: to this show. To Hannady the TV show, great work, uh,
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, John Solomon, thank you both. Let us say
Speaker 1: I to Linda and Minnesota. Linda High, how are you
Speaker 1: glad you called hi?
Speaker 4: Sean thank you for having.
Speaker 1: Me, thank you for calling. I hope you I hope
Speaker 1: you had a good fourth I hope you're doing well.
Speaker 4: We did. We had a fantastic four. Thank you. Thirteen
Speaker 4: grandkids oldest nine and they were all with me, which
Speaker 4: brings me. I just on Friday, I got a glimpse
Speaker 4: of President Trump and the First Lady visiting the Texas devastation,
Speaker 4: and I just first want to say, from Minnesota, thoughts
Speaker 4: and prayers, and I wish we were closer to be
Speaker 4: able to help hands on, but Texans are a class act.
Speaker 4: What I saw in that visit were young rescue workers
Speaker 4: and military people walking up to the President saluting. They
Speaker 4: were taking their hats off as they as they shut
Speaker 4: Melania's hand. The construction workers took their hats off, just
Speaker 4: the old respect, and it was so touching. I just
Speaker 4: wanted to say, Texas, you're a class act, and our
Speaker 4: thoughts and prayers are with you.
Speaker 1: I think it's well said, you know sometimes in life,
Speaker 1: and I learned this, you know, twenty nine years ago,
Speaker 1: this past March thirtieth, when my dad passed away. I'd
Speaker 1: only been on Fox six months at the time. And
Speaker 1: when people send flowers they make a phone call. At
Speaker 1: the time, I had email. I don't anymore. You know,
Speaker 1: it just means a lot, the fact showing up, letting
Speaker 1: people know you care, doing little things in life matters.
Speaker 1: And you know that's something that Joe Biden, you know,
Speaker 1: pothole Pete never did. And I think Trump is particularly
Speaker 1: good at because I, in spite of all the bluster
Speaker 1: that people like to focus on, has got a heart
Speaker 1: of gold, is generous to a fault. That's the person
Speaker 1: I've known for thirty years, and he, you know, unfortunately
Speaker 1: he's in a position to fight all the time, so
Speaker 1: the people are not often going to see that side anyway. Linda,
Speaker 1: God bless you.
Speaker 5: Man.
Speaker 1: I'm glad you called. People like you are what makes
Speaker 1: this country great. You have a heart of gold. Michael
Speaker 1: and my free state of Florida. Michael, how are you
Speaker 1: glad you called?
Speaker 6: John? I'm doing great, Thank you. How are you doing today?
Speaker 1: I'm good. What's going on? It's great to be back
Speaker 1: to work. Do you miss me?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 6: We missed you for sure. Listen, Sean, I remember that
Speaker 6: a couple of weeks ago, there was a reporter who
Speaker 6: was interviewing Mom Donny and and the question she asked,
Speaker 6: was you know how much money? You know, put a
Speaker 6: billion dollars? Well, mon, Donny basically stages a billion dollars
Speaker 6: is way too much for any one person to make, and.
Speaker 1: Yeah, billionaires shouldn't exist, was the exact statement.
Speaker 6: Well, thank you for reminding me. I just we're thinking
Speaker 6: to myself. Got that reporter really blew it? I mean,
Speaker 6: she has such an opportunity to go into how much
Speaker 6: shouldn't somebody be able to make? You know, five hundred million,
Speaker 6: five million, five hundred thousand and fifty are we all
Speaker 6: going to make the same thing? And then is that
Speaker 6: who's going to motivate CEOs to do the big companies?
Speaker 6: You know, where's all this wealth going to go? And
Speaker 6: nobody can have their big houses anymore. I mean, so
Speaker 6: many questions it could have opened up to which he
Speaker 6: doesn't have an answer for because you don't answer her
Speaker 6: for anything. He's just kind of like, you know, just
Speaker 6: saying these popular phrases like free supermarkets, you know, the
Speaker 6: whole list. But I thought I just would bring that
Speaker 6: up that I thought she blew it.
Speaker 1: In six days, it will be the sixth month mark
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump has been president. In six days, we
Speaker 1: can talk about all the success that the president has
Speaker 1: had in six days. Look in six months, Well we'll
Speaker 1: find you know, we'll we'll, we'll, we'll mark this mile stone.
Speaker 1: Look at the border compared to six months ago. Look
Speaker 1: at the deportation efforts compared to six months ago. Uh,
Speaker 1: look at what the president has done in terms of
Speaker 1: the largest tax cut in history. Look at what he
Speaker 1: has done in terms of opening up uh, energy, independence
Speaker 1: and dominance. Now he's created a path for that to begin.
Speaker 1: And the Democratic Party is is insane.
Speaker 7: You know.
Speaker 1: I'll give you an example. Mamdanni is a good example
Speaker 1: because you know, asked about Mamdani's you know, refusal to
Speaker 1: condemn you know, the slogan globalizing the Antifada. The DNC
Speaker 1: chair Ken Martin. Uh, we're a big ten party. We
Speaker 1: have we have conservative Democrats, we have centrist Democrats, we
Speaker 1: have labor progressives like me. We have a new brand
Speaker 1: of Democrat, which is the leftist. And we win by
Speaker 1: bringing people into the coalition that's not a coalition. It's
Speaker 1: not hard to condemn, you know, being against the global antifada,
Speaker 1: and you know it's it's not hard to be anti
Speaker 1: racist or you know, be against anti Semitism. You know,
Speaker 1: there's certain fundamentals and Democrats are squirming and they don't
Speaker 1: know what to do. And if you're if you're more moderate.
Speaker 1: Right now, this party's dominated by the mom Donnis, the Aofc's,
Speaker 1: the Squad members, the Jasmine Crocketts, the Grandpa Bernie's, and
Speaker 1: the Elizabeth Warrens. And I ask people, you know, are
Speaker 1: we better off than we were six months ago? Just
Speaker 1: just stop right there. We are so dramatically better off
Speaker 1: than we were six months ago. And this guy, you know,
Speaker 1: I know that Andrew Cuomo is making a push right
Speaker 1: now to say, oh, come September. You know, if if
Speaker 1: you're not if you're not the leading other candidate against
Speaker 1: mom don we all should agree to drop out, including himself. Well,
Speaker 1: he thinks he's going to be number two, and Pole's
Speaker 1: show indicate that he is, and nice of him to
Speaker 1: do that. Hakeem Jeffries wouldn't come and he dodged on
Speaker 1: mom Donnie. You know uh. In an msdn C interview,
Speaker 1: he opted not to answer direct question about the party's
Speaker 1: nominee for New York City mayor, and he joined Al
Speaker 1: Sharpton and anyway, the self described Democratic Socialist to beat
Speaker 1: Andrew Cuomo and Jeffries, you know, previously commented on another
Speaker 1: Mum Donnie controversy, and that is he said it was unacceptable.
Speaker 1: But none of these people are willing to take it on,
Speaker 1: none of them. So I just want to see what happens.
Speaker 6: You get some very very powerful people that really are
Speaker 6: behind much of this, and it's just been so well
Speaker 6: indoctrinated into our system, it's become part of our system.
Speaker 6: You know, Democrats are really a party that don't make
Speaker 6: sense anymore, and they're really for nothing. And I don't
Speaker 6: understand why. I don't understand why people get angry, why
Speaker 6: we can't talk. I just you know, years ago. I'm
Speaker 6: going back up there in years and just the whole
Speaker 6: thing is stupid. It's just we got so many radical
Speaker 6: people here and starting seems like from kindergarten, you know,
Speaker 6: as we're indoctrinating all of our kids and paying for
Speaker 6: them to be indoctrinated, and just.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean that's another success to Trump. I mean,
Speaker 1: we're getting rid of the Department of Education, and we're
Speaker 1: going to give that money and block rent that money
Speaker 1: to local communities, not even states, because states will screw
Speaker 1: it up and give it to local authorities because they
Speaker 1: better know how to take care of it. You know
Speaker 1: this guy, mom Donnie. An article came out he sits
Speaker 1: on a council of an anti Israel group sympathetic to
Speaker 1: suicide bombers, and he came on to fire on social
Speaker 1: media this week over a resurface book excerpt which he
Speaker 1: expressed sympathy for the way suicide bombers are viewed. Quote,
Speaker 1: suicide bombing needs to be understood as a feature of
Speaker 1: modern political violence, rather than stigmatized as a mark of barbarism.
Speaker 1: He wrote in a two thousand and four book. I'm like, Okay, well,
Speaker 1: you know this is how extreme. Now the party you
Speaker 1: would think would have a moral compass and speak out
Speaker 1: against this guy, but they're not going to because they
Speaker 1: fear him like they fear the people that I mentioned. Anyway,
Speaker 1: you get the last word.
Speaker 6: Well, I just want to know how much Mondonnie makes
Speaker 6: a year. Figure out how much he thinks everybody else
Speaker 6: would take.
Speaker 1: Listen, as Rick Scott and Ronda Santis and others have said,
Speaker 1: I mean, all this is is if you live in
Speaker 1: the state of Florida where I live, If you live
Speaker 1: in Tennessee, if you live in the Carolinas, if you
Speaker 1: live in Texas, you know you're salivating at the thought
Speaker 1: of Mom Donnie winning because all it's going to do
Speaker 1: is result in an incredible opportunity, you know, for for
Speaker 1: businesses to move and for prosperity to get even greater
Speaker 1: in those states. Well, we'll see.
Speaker 4: That's right, that's right.
Speaker 6: All the normal people that can actually think and you know,
Speaker 6: reason out different topics and things that they've left.
Speaker 2: That's how I guess.
Speaker 6: Yeah, you're right, he's getting voted in. And there's just
Speaker 6: a lot of people that I don't know. I can't.
Speaker 6: I don't know that there's a good word for it,
Speaker 6: but I guess nobody listens.
Speaker 1: New York appreciate the call, my friend. Thank you. All right,
Speaker 1: quick break right back to our busy phones. Here's our
Speaker 1: toll free number. It's eight hundred and nine four one Sean.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program
Speaker 1: as we continue this Monday.
Speaker 5: The final hour roundup is next. You do not want
Speaker 5: to miss it, and stay tuned for the final hour
Speaker 5: free for all on the Sean Show.
Speaker 1: All right, let's get back for busy phones. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one. Sean, if you want to join us.
Speaker 1: We have an update from Epstein's lawyer that's coming up
Speaker 1: straight ahead as well, South Dakota Dan Next, Sean Hannity Show,
Speaker 1: What's up down the Man?
Speaker 7: Hey, Sean, how are you today?
Speaker 1: I'm good? What's going on?
Speaker 7: I really thank you for taking my call. I used
Speaker 7: to be a senior corrections officer and I've been really
Speaker 7: bothered with all of this talk about how mister Evsteen
Speaker 7: there's a chance he could have taken his life. But
Speaker 7: the things that I've heard, and I'm only going by
Speaker 7: what I've heard, I can't I don't have the facts.
Speaker 7: But I had done six different suicide watches, and each
Speaker 7: one is different, but each one is it's your primary
Speaker 7: focus when you're working, whether you're by yourself. I believe
Speaker 7: they said there was three people there and they fell asleep.
Speaker 7: That in itself is an impossibility because when you do
Speaker 7: suicide watches, you have a person that is totally under
Speaker 7: your control, and you need to document. It's anywhere from
Speaker 7: five minutes a check every five minutes to every fifteen minutes.
Speaker 7: And from my understanding, it was his second suicide watch
Speaker 7: that he was kind of there's levels, but he was
Speaker 7: getting more and more space to you know, walk out
Speaker 7: of his cell and stuff. But the story that those
Speaker 7: three people gave, it's not it's an impossibility. I uh,
Speaker 7: I'm just dying to you know, maybe you could try
Speaker 7: to find one of them in interview, because it's it's
Speaker 7: all right, it's so simple and all right there, it's
Speaker 7: it's an impossibility for what they claim that it happened,
Speaker 7: because even if the cameras went out, your number one focus,
Speaker 7: regardless of feeding the inmates or somebody sick or something
Speaker 7: like that, what the psyche, the staff psychiatrists will give you,
Speaker 7: you know, his his orders. You know you need to
Speaker 7: check them every five minutes, every ten minutes up to
Speaker 7: fifteen minutes, no longer than that. And I've worked with
Speaker 7: federal inmates and state inmates and everyone's different.
Speaker 8: And it's it's again, it's it's it's some I really
Speaker 8: wish somebody would invest in a really good private investigator,
Speaker 8: since New York has the best.
Speaker 1: Listen, there's no other way to explain it. You're right
Speaker 1: on everything that you're saying that they you know, people
Speaker 1: should be awake, that should be taken seriously. My mom
Speaker 1: was a prison guard. I know that she did that
Speaker 1: work as well. Uh, and they have very strict protocols.
Speaker 1: Is it's strange, odd, bewildering that most of the cameras
Speaker 1: conveniently weren't working, and only one camera was working, and
Speaker 1: that camera, you know, showed. I guess that nobody went
Speaker 1: back and forth and we hear about a missing minute.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, the only the only frustrating part
Speaker 1: is that's it's not Donald Trump's fault. That's not Dan
Speaker 1: Bongino or Cash Bettel or Pam Bondi's fault on those issues.
Speaker 1: And I don't know what happened. I don't. It certainly
Speaker 1: seems suspicious to me. But I don't know how you
Speaker 1: get the answer either. So how do you get to
Speaker 1: the truth there? You ask people. I don't know if
Speaker 1: I was the one that fell asleep. I don't think
Speaker 1: i'd be too quick to tell people that I fell asleep. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I appreciate the call. It's frustrating. I share your frustration