WEBVTT - Bloomberg Markets Special Simulcast Day Two

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanebeck. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all furnishing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Clomber News. We want to get right

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>onto our first guest here, Michelle Schneider. She's managing director

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>of the Market Gauge Group. She's also the author of

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the best selling book Plant Your Money Tree, A Guide

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to Growing your Wealth. Uh, Michelle, Tim keeps reminding me

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're sitting on like twenty plus percent gains percentage

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>gains here in the markets here. How do you grow

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that going into next year? Do you have confidence here

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that some of the gains that we saw this year

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's going to persist in Well, what's so interesting

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>about this coming year is that we have a lot

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>more question and essence about what's going to happen versus

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>when we were going from one, we knew we were

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>having a change of administration, but we knew that the

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>federal Reserve, for example, was going to stay accommodative. And now,

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of course going into two, we know that's changing a bit.

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And so we also know that we have an infrastructure

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>program coming up and the possibility of more government spending,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's also still the unknown of haw far inflation

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>will continue. So when you put that all together, really

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it looks like what the market is playing out here

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is a scenario where as we see big tech can

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to lead, although it's come off today, but we

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>have a situation where small caps, which are the Russell

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to thousand literally have gone sideways. From February one to date,

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they have traded between If we look at our WM

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>two oh seven and two thirty four, there was one

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>brief flip above two thirty four in November. And what's

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that saying is that even though transportation is now out

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>pacing it, we're still looking at the potential of not

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>much growth in the industrial manufacturing sector, which we desperately

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>need to continue to grow g d P. Okay, So Michelle,

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>let's take this one step further and talk a little

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>bit about what our audience wants to know in terms

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of where they should allocate their portfolio in give us

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.839
<v Speaker 1>some of your picks for the year. Well, for one thing,

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it was really very bullish right now in oil, and

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I think if oil goes up, as it seems like

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it will, we also then can look at alternative energy.

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>There is definitely a correlation between electric vehicles, which have

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>been strong, but if you look at the whole old

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>energy space compared to oil, it's still relatively weak. If

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>oil goes up, then there will be more interest I

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>think in ets like tan or p BW. We also

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>are looking at Mountain Pass just in terms of rare

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>earth minerals as something that could potentially double in So

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that's one big area for us. Another is obviously at

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>some point this whole pandemic thing has to at least

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>be absorbed where normalcy comes back, and that leaves a

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunity in travel and leisure, some chain restaurants,

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and then if inflation takes whole, we're looking at consumer

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>staples which have already gone up and made a new

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>all time high, but particularly companies that have pricing power,

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>things like medical devices, some of the high tech that

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Cathy Wood looks at that have gotten beat up that

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>could also be somewhat immune to inflation. And then, uh, finally,

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're still very interested here in the whole

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>medical space, but instead of the the whole healthcare the

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>way it was with XLV, we're looking more at medical

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>supplies like an intuitive surgical or I h I, which

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>is an E t F because those two are inflation.

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And the last thing I'll say about it is precious

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>metals have been stagnant as well, and if inflation kicks in,

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>which it still can, we could be a good year

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for gold and silver. Michelle, you took the thought right

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>out of my head. I want to really point out

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to our viewers here you were one of the first

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>female traders on the New York Commodities Exchange, which makes

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>me really want to draw on your commandity's experience. You

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>already discussed oil, but talked to us about gold in particular,

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>because since it hit that two thousand level in July,

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of been hovering a really in kind of

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a trading range a little bit of sideways. What helps

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>gold break out in the face of this very, very

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>long list of worries. Well, we know that gold is

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely going to be reactive to any geopolitical concern and

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>at this point we don't really have anything strong happening,

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>but we do have the underpinnings of Russian Ukraine that

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>could always erupt. But besides that, we know it's an

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>inflationary factor, and that's where you have seen so many

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>people looking at inflation through cryptocurrency initially in the year,

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>or through food commodities or industrial medals. But gold could

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>actually erupt if inflation gets to the point where people

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>think that it is much more out of control than

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of people are saying now it has peaked.

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So those two areas are eighteen hundred has been this

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of transitional type of number to look at. We're

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting right around eighteen hundreds. So if we can get

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>back up through eighteen forty, it's very possible that a

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that have ignored it could come in

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>and really start buying. Well that's the hedge though, But

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the hedge if, of course, the FED doesn't do anything.

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>If the Fed actually does start to raise rates, normalize policy,

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and do so aggressively. Does that take some of the

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>bloom off of the rose of gold Well? Yes, but

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's going to happen. First of all,

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they have to finish the taper, so we're looking at

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>about March, right, And then in terms of aggressive action

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>by the Fed, they have a big price to pay

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if they get too aggressive. They really still think that

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole inflation narrative is transitory. Maybe we're looking at

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>max a year out. So I don't think that they're

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>going to do anything too aggressive until they wake up

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>one day and realize that things have gotten out of control.

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And then of course they're going to put the kabash

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on any economic growth that we've had, which is still

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>also limping along. We really haven't had major growth, alright, Michelle,

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>A great stuff, Michelle Schneider. They're managing director of the

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>market Gage Group, helping us kick off the our simulcast here.

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a special Bloomberg Markets coverage simulcast across our

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg TV, radio and YouTube platforms. Remain Bossi here alongside

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanovic and Krety Gupta taking a look right now

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in the commodity space, watching settlement right now of nim

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Ex scrude futures. We are going to settle higher year

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for a fifth strade day, a pretty phenomenal run here,

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>about eleven h higher here over that five day stretcher

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>official settlement right now at SI SO five. That's the

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>start of the new session for those folks watching this

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.239
<v Speaker 1>on your screen. Natural gas futures over in Europe down

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for a fifth strade day, down about three tents of

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a percent. That's the smallest decline over that five day stretch.

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Your gold futures pulling back slightly, basically called it unchanged.

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And you guys remember when used to talk about lumber

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>all the time. I remember you had that phenomenal run

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>up in lumber. Future is back in where it doubled,

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and then we started off this year. The first four

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>months you had a doubling of that doubling, and then

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>of course it's kind of cratered. But look at this

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>back above eleven hundred bucks upper a thousand uh board

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>feet here, up four percent here on the day, now

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>up for a fourth straight day, creaty well off the high.

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>As of course, we were up around seventeen earlier this year.

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think back, you know, a year and a

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>half or so ago, we were something like three hundred

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>bucks UH per board feet remain. It's interesting that you

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>bring in lumber because that's exactly where I want to

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>go with our next conversation. Timberland our cultural land. There

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>is no shortage of land. It is in demand upon

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>not intended and thanks to that commodities and inflation really

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>driving it. I want to bring in our next US

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Jason Walter, National Land Realty CEO and founder. Jason, thank

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.239
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Let's really talk about

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that lumber picture. Timberland in particular is really important when

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes to just the commodity rises that you've seen,

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>not only this year. What does that look like, Well,

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we just see we see it continue to go up.

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>The stuff in prices is finally caught up for the

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>lumber prices to an extent, and we see that continuing

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>especially for the first half of how much of when

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the distortions that we saw earlier this year,

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly that variants that we saw in stompage prices UH

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and in the futures market here, how much of that

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>was specifically driven by the housing market, and how much

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of that was driven maybe just by speculators, Well, a

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of it was driven just by control and supply.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of the a lot of the

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>sawmills and timber companies controlled the supply of starting four

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>or five years ago, and so that that's really what

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>drove it up. The housing market just put fuel on fired.

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>But things are starting to settle out a little bit

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>more than even out across the markets. Okay, when you

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>say things are starting to settle out and even out

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>across the markets, what's the time frame that you're giving.

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>The timeline line that you're giving here for perhaps a

0:08:52.960 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>cycle top, we're looking at it topping out in second quarter. Um.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, part of the issue you have is just

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>supply across the board. I mean, it's it's getting harder

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and harder to find land. Um, and so it's that

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that's going to become an issue. The latter part of Jason,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>how does this viewed, say abroad, for someone who's looking

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>at making perhaps a hedge against inflation, is land somewhere

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>where they could possibly look to that to do that

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in the long term, Yeah, I mean, it's historically outperformed

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>everything even even twice as much as gold. So I mean,

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a better place to put your money in

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>inflationary period, especially in the commodity driven timberland, agg land,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>recreational land. So we've we've just seen incredible numbers. I

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>do think in two you know, I get asked every day,

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>when is this market going to slow down? I don't

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>think demand will slow down, but supply is going to

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>become a real issue. Um, it's already becoming an issue.

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>There's just there's only so much land to sell, and

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's becoming the prices they're just getting outrageous, and

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>there's so much competition there. I mean, we've talked to

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wealth managers who talk about this idea

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of looking at real estate, whether it's as a hedge,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>but more importantly just as an alternative form of earning

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of interest in capital? Here? How do

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>you make the assessments? So, and I'm looking at it

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>more from the perspective of just kind of the rank

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and file investors, maybe those who aren't experienced in real estate.

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what are they looking at? What do they

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>use to sort of make an assessment of not just

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>what's available, but what could potentially be profitable. Well, a

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of our clients are driven by use.

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean there that's what we call recreational and they're

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they're looking to build a house on one day, but

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they're hunting on it, they're fishing on it, they're using

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>it for recreational lotions probably of our clientele. UM as

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>far as the pure timber and egg investors, Uh, there's

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of middle ground there. You're either a

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated investor or or you're not. UM. There's there's not

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of It's not like the stock market where

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>you can just kind of puddle in it. It's a

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>big part of the narrative that emerged over the last

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>let's say, twenty twenty two months as we've been in

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic has been the idea of families searching for

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>more land, more space so they can do stuff outside

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>rather than be together inside. Do you see this as

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a permanent shift or or something that when we do

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>finally get to the other side of this pandemic, we'll

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>see prices kind of go down a little bit and

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>demand go down a little bit. I do think, I

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>mean it's settled out in the beginning, you know, April May,

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and you had people kind of going to one extreme.

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>They want to move from a neighborhood to earning a

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred acres of alien, you know, sixty miles out of town.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen that kind of uh settle out into

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Instead of moving from a neighborhood in an urban area

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to sixty miles out, they might buy ten or fifteen

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>acres um and we've seen a lot of that. So

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's anything else. You have extremes in the

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>early stages and then things settled down. But I do

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.359
<v Speaker 1>believe you'll see people have just gotten used to isolation

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and and some people really enjoyed it.

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Jason Walter, National Land Realty CEO and founder, We're gonna

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>have to leave it there. Thanks so much for joining us.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate you taking the time. This is Special Markets

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>coverage simulcast on Bloomberg TV Radio and on YouTube. I'm

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanevik along with Creedy Gupta and Romaine Bostick. The

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>other big headline out there right now is Apple apparently

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 1>paying out bonuses of a hundred eighty thousand dollars to

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>retain engineering talent. The man who broke that story, Mark German,

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>joining us right now. Mark. This isn't just a hundred

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>eighty thousand dollars in cash, is it? No? Not in cash.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>These are in r s U so restricted stock units.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So the way it works is they'll give these grants

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>out in January, so about a month from now, and

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>they will vest every year annually for four years. So

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that eight divided by four. There's some people reporting under

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand, some people in the sixties, eighties, and nineties.

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.719
<v Speaker 1>It's really a long range between that, about fifte eighty.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And these are going out to individual contributors, so people

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>without direct reports. In many cases, these are individual engineers

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>working on products like Apple's upcoming mixed reality headset, working

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>on silicon engineering the chips that now power the Mac,

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone, iPad and all of Apple's devices. A small

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>stepset is also going to software engineering. Uh, individual contributors

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>as well as people in the operations department. Uh. You know,

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 1>these bonuses are out of cycle. These are are random

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and unusual. In many cases, people receive them and we're

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>taking a back surprise. These are not part of the

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>normal compensation packages. This is not something that I believe

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple has done before. And this is really an effort

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to retain key talent. Apple is, you know, losing talent

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. There are people more than the usual number

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of people leaving. People don't want to eventually return to

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the office. There's other companies like Meta, Google who are

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be more lax about their office return you know,

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>policies in the middle of next year. Uh. Meta is

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 1>paying out base salaries that in many cases are much

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 1>higher than the base salaries that Apple and others are

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.479
<v Speaker 1>paying out, and they have been aggressively recruiting Apple engineers

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>given their shift to hardware in the so called metaverse.

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So this is an effort to sort of stop that

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and retain the key people that push out these products

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and are really court developing the Apple devices on an

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>annual basis. Yeah, Mark, you've reported on defections from Apple

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>self driving car team in recent months as well as

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>this most recent news. Of course, I'm wondering if this

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be enough to get people to stay at

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the company, because you did say that there are higher salaries,

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>higher base salaries that companies like Meta for example. Yeah,

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So the hope for for Apple at least the management

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>giving out these RSU stock bonuses that that that this

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>will offset some of the recruiting being done at least

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>for a period of time from Meta and other companies.

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a hundred thousand, two hundred eighty thousand, fifty

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand is even a lot of money, and in many

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>cases that could help, you know, match or or offset

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the higher base salaries that Meta is offering. And if

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at Apple stock, obviously they're nearing that three

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar threshold. These RSU bonuses are only going to

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>become more valuable as Apple's stock continues to rise. Obviously,

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the price targets we're seeing is that there

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>will be a rise in Apple stock price. These hundred k,

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred eight k, fifty k, you know, r s U

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>s could you know eventually at some point be worth

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>double than they are today. Mark talked to us about

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the other ways that Apple can actually pay its employees.

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about time off, We're talking about perhaps working

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>from home, will more flex schedule. Where does that kind

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of fit into all this in a market that is

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>very hot when it comes to finding a job right now,

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and a market where a lot of other big tech names.

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking Amazon are dealing with unionization for example. Yeah,

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for decades. You know, the perks that Apple has offered

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>employees in many cases, uh, you know, are not as

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>substantial as you might see from Meta, from Meta or Google.

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs liked to to frequently say, obviously ten plus

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>years ago that you have to buy your own lunch

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>at Apple, right, whereas Google and Meta are companies that

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, provide free lunch. I know that's a simple thing,

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know that's important to you know, a lot

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of the engineering talent um. But in terms of the

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>normal parks that you're going to expect from a company

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>for on K, vacation, health benefits, obviously, these RSU bonuses

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>are you know, higher in many cases that these other

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>companies are. So Apple in terms of employee benefits is

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is extremely a generous even down to their retail employees.

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>If you recall during the height of the COVID nineteen pandemic,

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>when all of the Apple retail sorts globally were shut

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for several months, those employees were still being paid and

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they were able to work from home as customer service

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>agents and for online sales. So they have been fairly

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>good to their employees. But employees are also, you know,

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, not happy with the company, not

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>happy with some leadership or the management. They have been

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>feeling underpaid on base salaries compared to META when they're

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of their coworkers get offered these gigantic pay packages.

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>You're also seeing uh employee concerned about return to office

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>plans and having to work in the office us if

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you're a hardware engineer during this variant, right, they're expecting

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>hardware engineers to be back in the office either four

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>days per week or full time with the headline sometime

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>mid next year, they're saying it today, not yet to

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>be determined, but they're aiming for bidden next year. You're

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>seeing all employees needed to be in the office at

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>least three days per week, whereas you see other companies

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be going fully remote for many

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of those roles. So what we're seeing is a sea

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>change or Apple may need to up some of its

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>benefits in addition to this money to retain their top engineers.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>A great scoop today really give us some insight and

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>to the talent war out there in California and beyond.

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess across the tech sector here, Mark German as

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>always all over it. We'll catch up with him soon,

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure. Of course he talks about those R s

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>U s and what it can mean if the stock

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>goes up. It's down today. We're still on that. Of course,

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>we'll watch for that three chillion dollar market cap. And

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>as he pointed out to him and creaty uh, you're

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>basically every analyst in the street thinks this stock is

0:17:50.880 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>going higher next year. This is Bloomberg Markets especial Sill

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Markets coverage, our global simulcast today, joined right now by

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stenovic and pretty goodime Romaine Bostick here counting you

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>down to the close, just about eleven and a half

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>minutes left to go out here in the trading day,

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred flat on the day. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index,

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>which of course yesterday closed at a record high, down

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit today by about seven tents of her percent.

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Airlines rebounding pretty nicely from yesterday's so off of about

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one point seven percent. Retail stocks also higher, and keep

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>an eye on the Arc Innovation et F Cathy Woods,

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>a flagship fund here down about one percent here on

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the day down for a second straight day. But you

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>go back to the beginning of the year, guys, this

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>outperformed the market. I mean it was up something like

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent, outperforming the SMP by like twenty percentage points.

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>As of right now, it's heading into the end of

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>the year trailing the SMP five hundred by something like

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty percentage points. If you can believe that, it's remarkable

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and it raises the question, you know, and Cathy Wood

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>will defend this over and over again her five year

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>time horizon. She was out just a couple of weeks

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>ago talking about how well the fund is gonna do

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>two and she got some heat for it, but was

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>and a nonomally for the fund. I think that you

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have people. I think it's a fair question to ask.

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a high beta tech play. At the

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, right this isn't something that is

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>really going to be specific to alone. It's something that

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you're going to start to see more funds drop into,

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not just here in the States, but around the world

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>as people really see that defensive bid, whether that's now

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>or where that's in five years in the face of

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>decelerating growth and in fairness to Kathy would I mean,

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 1>she has made it clear that you know, she is

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess, for lack of a better we're kind of

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a moonshot type of person, that this is more than

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>just about short term gains here, that she's making bets

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>on some big structural changes in our society and more

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>importantly in technology. All right, let's talk about the broader

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>market here and bring in uh a friend of the

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>show here, Katie Nixon, chief investment officer over at Northern

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Trust Wealth Management, joining the program now as we count

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you down to the close here on this Tuesday afternoon,

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>just about ten minutes ago. And Katie, you know, we're

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>pretty much wrapping up the year here. Whatever gains we

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we lock in over the last few days here a

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of immaterial to I guess the narrative that we've

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>seen leading up to this. I think what everyone really

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>us to know is how confident, how optimistic are you

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>heading into we remain? Thank you for having me on today,

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and I would say we're pretty constructive going into two.

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can't deny the strength of fundamentals right now, um,

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in corporate America in particular, and even in the economy

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that we're having fits and starts related to this omicron

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>variant of course, um, but we expect, as we've said before,

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that this will create maybe demand delayed, but not destroyed.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>So we actually expect above trend growth in two Um.

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>What about inflation and potentially you know you mentioned omicron

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>being fits and starts, does it does it turn into

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>something that's beyond fits and starts that causes more supply

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>chain scenarils is perhaps people once again shift spending. Look,

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this story play out before, shifts spending from

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>from services to goods. We really have seen this story

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>play out before. It's been a year of deja vu

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>after deja wo um, And I guess the interesting thing

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>right now is the way that we have really modified

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and and and and figured out ways to live with

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with covid um. The recent CDC guideline change I think

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting and so far as it will probably

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>mitigate some of the supply chain constraints that we worried

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>about as we saw ami crom sort of ramp up

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>as the as the dominant variant in the US, So

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we do think we'll see the supply constraint issues prolong,

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>but not for as long as we had feared when

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this when this latest version of the virus came and

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>came into interview. So, yes, supply constraints will continue, but

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we still think that we'll get past them sort of

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in mid Hey, let's talk about where we are in

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the market psycho in particular, we just came out of

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>with this massive rebound really kind of thriving in value

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and then a switch into a lot of those defensive

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>growth plays, those yielding sectors in the back half of

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>going into do we get closer to that scary R word,

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>which is recession really kind of perhaps eclipsing these kind

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 1>of ten years, seven year long recessions that we've had

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and going back to perhaps the historical norm of recession. Ever,

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you say five years, So we don't have a recession

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in our in our five year forecast. Actually, um, we

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>think our point of view is that the FED is

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be uh, very much on hold. Maybe we'll

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>get one, maybe two rate hikes off next year, but

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the cycle will be really short in terms of FED policy,

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're constructive on growth going forward. Now, what I

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>would say is this whole growth value debate is it's

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>so interesting because It's been a year of both and UM,

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think investors who have tried to pivot between

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>growth and value have probably gotten burned because the cycles

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>have been really short and at the end of the day,

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you've been fined being being in each. But what I

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>would say is now is a great time for investors

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>to think about quality. And you mentioned quality dividends, and

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the intersection between those two is really going

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to be interesting for investors going forward. You get the

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>defensive nature of Equality stocks, they have a sustainable profit margins,

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the ability to pass on price increases amid these supply

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>chain constraints that we talked about, and then you've got

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that dividend that burden the hand to provide some current income. Katie.

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we are focused right now on the countdown

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to the close of US markets, but I do want

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to get your thoughts on some of the markets outside

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the US, particularly in the developed world, particularly in Europe,

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and whether you see anything attractive over there heading into

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>next year. So remain. We actually are favorable to Europe

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of reasons. First of all, we think

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>UM monetary policy is going to continue to be very accommulative,

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and we have some fiscal policy adding to the to

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the mix um in two as well. Then you also

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>have this interesting dynamic in the European equity markets where

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>the markets themselves, the benchmarks are pretty highly levered to

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>value into cyclical stock. So if you're a believer in

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>the baroque global growth momentum, and we certainly are, you

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>really want to be in those areas that are going

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of that. And I would just add also, um,

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>we have some fiscal stimulus finally now in Japan as well,

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 1>so we expect to see some economic growth there that

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>can can be pulled through to some corporate profitability. So

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>we're favorable and developed x US markets UM in general.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Katy, let's say that somebody's watching the simulcaster

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to us on Bloomberg Radio right now, and they've

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>been hesitant to put money in the market, waiting for

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>some sort of pullback. Look, I know professionals always advised

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>against timing the market, but is it fair to say,

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion that you think there will be some

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of pullback or opportunity to get in when it's

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>not hitting a record high. You know what I would

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>say if there's always the up. The opportunity for a

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>pullback of five or tem percent correction are normal normal

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>features of a right the tem percent five percent pullback

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.239
<v Speaker 1>behind the two percent pullback. So yeah, we haven't had

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of volatility, so I think your point is

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a good one. We we anticipate that will have volatility

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>next year because we're in a year of transition, right.

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>We've had a sort of one way bets for a

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of years now, strong fiscal, strong monetary, tons of liquidity.

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Those things are going to slowly be be put in reverse,

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>so you can anticipate that will have some volatility. I

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>just think market timing is so difficult because when you

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you have those strong, strong pullbacks, those tend to be

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>very difficult time for times for the individual investor to

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>put money to the market. So our advice always is

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>set your strategic plan, align your your assets with your goals,

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>and then get invested as soon as you can. And

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this year has been a real cautionary tale

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>against people who have tried to time the market. Katie,

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned that you are in the camp of

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.719
<v Speaker 1>global growth momentum. Let's really broaden this out and talk

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>about the international playbook here, especially when it comes to

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>tackling not only COVID nineteen. You have China with their

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>zero tests, zero COVID policy, the United States dealing with

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 1>vaccinations and boosters and testing as well. But then you

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 1>also have different rate paths when he comes to emerging

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>market central banking, for say the FED or the BOE.

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>How does this all come together? Well, I'm glad you

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 1>raised the emerging markets, and I think the big question

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>mark and the big source of uncertainty there is China

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and the implications of not just the zero COVID policy

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>on Chinese economic growth, but also on supply chains, the

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 1>regulatory crackdowns that they've had on some of the high

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>growth sectors, and then clearly the the trying to tap

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 1>down the speculation on the property markets. Those are really

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>strong headwinds to economic growth. Now we have started to

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>see Chinese authorities, the PBOC start to provide some stimulus,

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>um it's been slower than we anticipated actually, so we

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we think that in two were gonna have to see

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>much more, much stronger policy action from China as a

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>way to sort of reignite interest in emerging market equities.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But until that happens. I think emerging markets remains sort

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of the big area of uncertainty from an investor's perspective

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. Katie Nixon over at a Northern trustt Thanks

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Sarah to Bloomberg Global News