WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Robots of Theseus

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. Today

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>we're going to dive into some listener mail and you

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>know we have we actually have two different carney the

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>mailbots here to help us today. The one on the

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>left here is just bright silver gleaming like a suit

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>of armor from the movie ex Caliber. And then, uh,

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the one on the right and resembles a like a

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>rusty death bucket, like a suit of armor from Monty

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Python and the Holy Grail. Yeah, that's pretty much what

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>he looks like. Uh, how how did did did we

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>get two carneys in these two different states. Well, it's

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>because we did that massive upgrade on Carney. You know,

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we we started replacing some of his parts, um, upgrading

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.639
<v Speaker 1>apart here apart air, and then we just kept doing it.

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>And then on the other end, we when when we

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>were done the used parts, we just started assembling those

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>as well, until we had two complete carnis the carney

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>in which we had replaced every last piece with a new,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>shiny piece, and then the carney that we built out

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of the old pieces. Now the question is which Carney

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>is going to deliver us this week's listener mail. I'm

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>just gonna I'm just gonna close my eyes and put

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>my hand out and um and I guess hope that

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't get pricked by the rusty one just because

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure my tetnas shots up to date. Uh.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Fun fact, Russ does not cause tetanus, does it not? Well,

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>there you go. So it's okay that he has razor

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>sharp rusty claws. It's a okay all right now. Unfortunately,

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, we never have time to read all

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of the great listener mail we get. So if you

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>have sent us a message and we haven't been able

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to respond and you don't hear it on the show today,

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>please please don't be discouraged. It's not because we don't

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the mail we get. There's there's just a lot

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of great stuff out there and and no time to

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>attend to it all. But we really do appreciate all

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the wonderful community case we get from you lovely people

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>out there. Yeah, because even though we have twice the

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Carney now, we only still have the two of us,

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>So there's only so much we can do, and there's

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>only so much time. That's right. Let's jump right in, Robert,

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's do it. I'm gonna put out my hand.

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>It looks like Shiny Carney is bringing me something to

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>read here. All right. This one comes to us from Alex.

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Alex says, Hi, Robert and Joe, your podcast is wonderful,

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and although it was already very good to begin with,

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel you two are getting even better and better

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>because we keep replacing parts. That's what's happened. Keep up

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the great work. We're big fans. I have a comment

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>about the ship of theseus episode. I'm a particle physicist

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>by training, so I was thinking about your discussion a

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>bit from that perspective. I don't claim to have any

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>definite answers, but I think the theory of quantum mechanics

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>adds more depth and weirdness to the problem of identity

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on top of what you've already discussed. In quantum mechanics,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>different particles of the same type are treated as truly indistinguishable.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Two particles can be separated in space, but in the

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>theory they are described by one wave function, which simply

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>features a high probability to find a particle in region A,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as a high probability to find a particle

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in region B with no mention that it's particle Alice

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>here and that it's particle Bob there. My tentative takeaway

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is this, if a quantum teleportation machine were to transfer

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the quantum state of the atoms in my body sitting

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in place A onto a stream of photons, and then

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>transfer that onto atoms in a place B a mile away,

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a real justification to treat the newly

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>created atoms a mile away is anything thing other than

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>truly the parts of my own body which have been

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>moved there. I still feel a bit queasy to hand

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>over my fate to this machine, but rationally I'd love

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to hear a discussion of these quantum physics aspects of

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the ship of the Theseius sometime. Cheers Alex. Now, that

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting question because there's this obvious preference people

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have that like, oh, if I'm going to be teleported

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and it will still be me, I want the particles

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that originally made my body to be the same particles

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that make up the copy of me. Now, that's if

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you're teleporting information about your body from one place to another.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>That's just probably not going to be the case, right,

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to build from different particles. And Alex

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is saying, why would that really make a difference. I

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that really would make a difference. I

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>would think that the problem would be the interruption of

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>the continuous existence of you from during that moment of transition,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>basically what I said before, where you just need somebody

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to lie to you about that interruption. You know, you

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>need somebody to just to to gloss over the more

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>problematic details of your teleportation system. So I think you

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>said this before, you'd rather live in a world where

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>people are teleporting they are just actually dying every time

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they do it. But nobody is it well. But but

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess the positive spin is you're not only dying,

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you're being reborn. I mean, this is kind of what, uh,

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>what what Seth Brundel was talking about in Cronenberg's The Fly,

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>The idea that it's it's like there's a purifying aspect

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to the teleportation. I believe this was some of what

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he was talking about before things began going terribly wrong

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>for him, mixing his DNA with that of a fly,

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but as being reborn worthwhile if you don't know you're

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>being reborn, Say, for example, people say, you know, I'd

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>love to be able to go back and start over

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 1>my life again, to do it right this time. But

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>if you were to go back and start over without

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the memory of your previous life, how would anything, Why

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>would that be any better? Why would that change anything?

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the value of being reborn is the

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of what came before and the knowledge that you

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have been reborn, or to just the idea that you've

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>been reborn. I mean, somebody could just fool you into

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking teleportation is possible. You walk into a box, there's

0:05:58.040 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>some lights, you walk out of the box. But if

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you feel will renewed right then it could have an

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>overall positive effect. Speaking of Cronenberg, I don't know if

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you've read about this as well, but supposedly, uh, David

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Cronenberg has has a screenplay that he wrote that is

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a sequel to The Fly that doesn't necessarily contain any monsters.

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It's more about something. I don't know that there are

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>any more additional details out there, but it is more

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>concerned with teleportation itself than it is with any kind

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of monstrous side effects of the technology. Oh, I think

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you could write a great psychological horror movie it's purely

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>about teleportation without any like DNA fusion or you know,

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>becoming half fly or anything like that. Yeah, it's it's

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>one of my hopes that either Cronenberg will get to

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>direct that script, where somebody will one day direct that script.

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm very interested, um what he's exploring in that because

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>because we're also talking about later day Cronenberg. Cronenberg who

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really been dipping his toes into the the squeamish

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>horror content of his his earlier filmography. So the more

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>recent Cronenberg version, it's just got a bunch of like

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>mafia guys who get into a teleporter together and they

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>come out having an existential crisis. I'd probably be down

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>for that, you know. And I do love so many that,

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>like the transcendent ideas that were at least briefly discussed

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in The Fly, like the idea towards the end that

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>not only is he gonna cure himself by climbing into

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the telepod uh with Gina Davis's character, you know, but

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>they will become one perfect being you know that there's

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>this this fusion that will take place, that will create

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a higher human. Yeah, and that embodies some of the

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>questions I guess about the whole teleportation idea. Like to him,

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that's an idea of like addition or becoming better into her.

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>That's obviously an idea of obliteration or destruction. Yeah, Okay.

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Also about the ship of Theseus, this comes to us

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>from our listener, and and writes, Hi, Robert and Joe,

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm a longtime listener of your show, and I'm writing

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in to respond to your great episode on the ship

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of Theseus. I've never heard of the mythic iteration of

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>this concept, but I'm familiar with it from the Romantic

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>poets of England. I wouldn't be surprised if they built

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>off of it from some of the philosophers you mentioned,

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>including Hobbes. In a September eight, nineteen letter to his

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>brother and sister in law, John Keats, that's the romantic

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>poet John Keats takes a personal and religious approach to

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the question. I've included the excerpt here. Quote from the

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>time you left me. Our friends say I have altered completely,

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>am not the same person. Perhaps in this letter. I

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>am for in a letter, one takes up one's existence

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>from the time we last met. I dare say you

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>have altered. Also every man does. Our bodies every seven

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>years are completely fresh material seven years ago. It was

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 1>not this hand that clinched itself against Hammond. We are

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>like the relict garments of a saint. The same and

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 1>not the same for the careful monks patchet and patchet

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>for St. Anthony's shirt. Oh that's nice. Yeah, I like that.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>That brings in. And I so if you believe, for example,

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that an item can be holy, that's another question about identity.

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Imagine you say you believe uh in like a piece

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>of the True Cross or something, one of these medieval relics,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's gradually losing splinters, but having splinters replaced by

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>people who are working on it. Once the entire thing

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 1>has been replaced, it does still have holy power. But

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this is why you notice it. In some of the

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>museums that you go to, There'll be a tiny vial

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of vampire blood uh inside the temperature control compartment with it,

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>so they can see just how holy the artifact still is.

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>That would be a good test, and continues I love

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that the section gets into different layers of identity, both

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the one self reported and or time traveled to e g. Quote,

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>taking up one's existence from the time we last met unquote,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and also the one created by others, as in the

0:09:55.920 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>monks reconstructing the relic ironically in trying to preserve the original.

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>This also touches on the biological transformation that you mentioned

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in the podcast, the seven to ten year recreation of

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the cells in the body. As for identity being defined

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>by the static reality of an object or its constant

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>evolution in a process, Shelly weighs in with a poem

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>called mutability, which concludes on the following stanzas. So this

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is Percy Biss Shelly we rest a dream has power

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to poison sleep. We rise one wandering thought pollutes the

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 1>day we feel, conceive or reason, laugh or weep, embrace

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>fond woe, or cast our cares away. It is the same,

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>for be it joy or sorrow, the path of its

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>departure still is free man's yesterday. May ne'er be like

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>his morrow, not may endure. But mutability. To me that

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>embodies very much the the idea of the Heraclitis type

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of pant ray. Everything flows, it's all flox, it's

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>all change, but a continues. While he's maybe talking more

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>about emotional states here than comprehensive identity, the final thought

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of the poem sides with the argument that existence is

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>defined by transformation, which brings up the question of whether

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>or not change itself can be defined as a constant. Anyway,

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just some tie ins from yet another realm. I

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.599
<v Speaker 1>love your show and the curious exuberance with which it

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>addresses these potentially terrifying existential questions. Thanks a lot, Thanks

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of great listening sincerely, Anne, Thank you

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>so much. And I always love when people come at

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>us with poetry. Yes, and I particularly like the specimens

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that she presented us with. With there, I want to

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>skip to another bit of listener mail here that came

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to us about the Ship of Theseus. And this came

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to us from Diana, Diana Rides, Hi, Robert and Joe.

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening for a while, sometimes by myself, sometimes

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>with the kids. Recently, my seven year old daughter and

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I were listening to the Ship of Theseus episode and

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought i'd ask her the question if you had

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a toy and replaced all the parts that toy with

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>new different parts, would it be the same toy? Her

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>unequivocal answer was yes. When I ask why it we

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>would be the same and not different, her response was

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>because it's the same toy. The new parts don't make

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it different. Yeah. So there you go. From the mouths

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of babes love the show, Diana. I really like this, uh,

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>this this email because it reminds me of the the

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>whole scenario of the replacing a lost toy, which is

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>something that uh and imagine a number of you have

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>experienced as a child or perhaps you've you've played a

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>part in the scenario as a parent. But obviously, when

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you replace a toy, especially if it's a stuffed animal,

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the replacement can often look just like a completely different

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>species compared to the like the worn out thing that

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you had to replace, you know, uh, like it becomes

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the essentially the rusty carney, Like the rusty carney is

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the one you love, and then when you're presented with

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>this brand new, untarnished carney, you're like, that's not carney,

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's not you know, uh, socks the bear socks.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>The bear has only one eye and his his fur isn't,

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, bright and fluffy, it's it's mad at and gray. Like,

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the wear and the tear that that that is

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that is part and partial to the identity of the thing.

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But it sounds like Diana's child is saying, maybe that

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not right that like, even if you do replace

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>all of the body parts of Socks the bear with newer,

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>fresher body parts, it's the same bear. Yeah, So maybe

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this is just h This is just me like looking

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 1>back on childhood experiences and you know, and and and

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at my my own child's experiences through the eyes

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of a parent. Yeah, maybe that ultimately doesn't matter to

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the kid. They're like, yeah, Socks is great. Now, look

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>at him. He's he's doing great, He's he's wonderful. It

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>looks like he's brand new, exactly what I wanted, you know.

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>With the kind of unreality of childhood, the kind of

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>hallucinatory quality of the child's view of the world, I

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>can almost imagine that I could have been a little

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>kid and had some of my toys replaced with clearly

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>newer versions of themselves, And I wonder if I would

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.599
<v Speaker 1>have noticed, or if I would have thought anything was unusual,

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>or if I just would have thought, hey, it's you know,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it's even better now, Well, sometimes the function would be improved, right,

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like like I remember having two boba FETs. There was

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the original Boba fet that I played with so much

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that he couldn't stand up anymore like his his limited

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>joints were just they would just swivel around, so he

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>could only like lay down, that was it. Or you know,

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>he could fly through the air, I guess. But it

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>was only the newer boba Fete that could actually stand upright,

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>which was more important. I think ultimately standing upright was

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>more important. The floppy boba fet was had limited usage. Okay,

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>here's one from our listener and frequent contributor Jim writing

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>also about the Ship of Theseus Jim rights, Robert and Joe.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>One can visit a real life ship of Theseus in Boston.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>The USS Constitution Old ironsides. She is the oldest commissioned

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>naval vessel still afloat. She makes it lea least one

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>quote turnaround a trip in the Boston Harbor every year,

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>where they take her out and dock her back again

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in the opposite side for even more wear and tear

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>while docked. I was in Boston in the early nineteen

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>nineties where she was under major renovations. She was barely

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a hull and timbers from what I remember. About a

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>dozen years later, I visited again when she was fully

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>restored and beautiful. I asked our guide on the tour

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>how much of the ship was original. He said about

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent as original, mostly below the waterline. He then

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>motioned towards the bow of the ship, toward the sick deck.

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what a sick deck is anyway, sick

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>deck and said, quote, do you see those brass nuts

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and bolts in the bulkhead? They were made by Paul Revere.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I was impressed. Um. He mentions that Malcolm Gladwell talked

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>about the Ship of Theseus in an episode of the

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Revisionist History podcast. Yes, and I do remember. I do

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>remember listening to that one. Now I believe he was.

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe this was the the golf episode. Yeah, he

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>explains it so, Jim Rights. This was an episode about

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>golf courses on California. California property taxes are based upon

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the value of your property when you purchased it, not

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>on current value. This was to prevent retired couples who

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>owned their houses from being forced to move due to

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>taxes when the value of their home skyrocketed. But what

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>about the Gulf country Club who owns them? They are

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>owned by the members, much like the members of a

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>credit union. But when does membership change so as to

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>recalculate the tax? The tax regulators determined that an individual

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>member leaving or joining was not enough to not enough

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of a change to trigger a new property value. Therefore,

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the golf courses are taxed that there are property values

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>from decades ago, even if the entire membership from those

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>original days has completely turned over. Given this logic, the

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>THESEUS Country Club never changes its ownership, especially for tax purposes,

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>even if the entire membership turns over multiple times over

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the decades. And then he also has a ps with

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek transporter issues. I don't know, we could get

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>into those maybe maybe not sure. I'm I'm I'm positive

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that um our our producer Alex would would would would

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>prefer that we get into these teleportation issues from track

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>so Jim Rights. In the old show, some sort of

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>cosmic dust causes Kirk to reassemble twice on the transporter.

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>He was split into good and evil. It was their

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Jecklin Highe homage. In the Next Generation, Riker is found

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>stranded as an outcast on a waste land of a planet.

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>But hasn't he been on the Enterprise for years? He

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>had been on the barren planet when with a previous

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>ship before the Next Generation started. When beamed up from

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the previous assignment, his signal was split by something in

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere. One copy materialized on his ship, the other

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>bounced back to the surface of the planet where he

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>re materialized, but no one knew the stranded Ricker wasn't

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>too pleased that no one had come looking for him.

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, what if that just happened? It turns out

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>it just happens all the time, like one out of

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>every five teleportations, and Star Trek ends up shooting a

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>random copy of you either to the surface of the

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>of the deserted planet or you know or you know,

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>into the walls. It is a galaxy full of like

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Kirks and the you know, the red Shirt away parties. Now,

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>this next one, he mentions, is one of the episodes

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>I remember the most uh from watching Star Trek The

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Next Generation as a kid, and yet I totally forgot

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>about this whole uh you know, teleportation ship of theseus

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>angle right gim rights. In the next generation the Dyson's

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Fear episode, we meet Mr Scott from the old show,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't aged from the movies, which took place

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>decades previously. How he had put himself into a form

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>of stasis I don't remember exactly why, which placed him

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in an infinite disassemble slash as symbol cycle, basically freezing

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>time until he was found. Yes, I forgot all about

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that because it's it's a pretty distracting aspect of that

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>episode that there's a dycense here and if you you

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>were like me, you never encountered that concept before. It

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>was pretty mind blowing enough so that it overshadowed the

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of glitching uh teleporter mishaps of of of Dr

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Scott here, Mr Scott, Mr Scott say, I was never

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a classic track guy. I'm not sure what his credentials are.

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been I've been lashed by our fans enough about

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>not having sufficient treknowledge. General Scott, that's correct, that's correct,

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Admiral Dr Scott dds um one. Last note in Voyager

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>two characters information was mixed somehow. It wasn't a fifty

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty mix. It was more like a sixty forty mix.

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>In both cases, the sixty personality wasn't too keen on

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>sharing their bodies with the other. I only saw this

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>episode once, and when it originally aired, I think the

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>two characters were male and female. I have a memory

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that they cast two different actors to play each so

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>as to make the fusion even more realistic. Oh nice, Yeah,

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't usually think a Star Trek is realistic, but

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>uh well, I'd explored a lot of territory. I will

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>say this. Uh. I am definitely pro Star Trek, especially

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Next Generation and the Space nine. Uh And I'm not

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>really a fan of golf, so I will say check

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>out Star Trek by all means, but also check out

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>that Malcolm Gladwell a revisionist history episode about golf. He

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>he promises at the beginning that he says that he

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>hates golf, and by end, by the end of the episode,

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>he hopes that he thinks that you'll hate golf as well.

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh And, and I think I did hate golf even

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>more after listening to that episode. It's a great podcast.

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>It just fills you with insightful rage. It's great for

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>road trips. Okay, maybe we should look at a couple

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>more Ship of THESEUS mails. All right, here's another one.

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>This one comes to us from Marcos. I love your podcast.

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I have to say it's my favorite way of passing

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>time on my commute. Conversation and conjecture turn a undane

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>daily trip into a timeless voyage. I was voyaging on

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>your Ship of Theseus episode when it occurred to me

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.679
<v Speaker 1>that our constitution, by by this means the the U. S.

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Constitution has in a way become a document of THESEUS.

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>The words like planks, have warped and rotted in a way,

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and have been replaced each generation by new interpretations of

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the same letters. It's as if each year a plank

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is removed, studied, whittled, and placed back, so that the

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>same ship is now one of immense complexity and context.

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Even a strict structuralist interpretation fills the same words with

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>more subtlety and complexity than the original carpenters ever did.

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm also thinking that the physical U. S. S Constitution

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>might embody an actual example of a true modernship of THESEUS.

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting parallel. Thanks for adding insight to my

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>otherwise absent drive another reference to the old Iron Sides.

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>But this is interesting about the document because I mean,

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously exactly this kind of question comes up in judicial philosophy, right.

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, judges are trying to interpret how should the

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>constant who san applies to laws we write today? And

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a tricky task because the Constitution was written a

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>long time ago and not anticipating all kinds of stuff

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 1>that's come up since then. Do you say that the

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Constitution embodies what the spirit of people expressing the same

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>sentiments would probably be saying today, or should we just

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>try to pretend somebody wrote these words yesterday and read

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>them to mean exactly what they should literally mean in

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>our usage, or uh, should it should we look to

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the letters of the people who wrote it and see,

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, what did they really mean when they wrote this.

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>That's complicated enough without getting into the various agendas that

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>would influence one in in in various interpretations. Oh sure,

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, I guess that's taking the idea of judicial

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>philosophy at face value, which you know, obviously there's some

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>judicial philosophy that's probably just motivated reasoning for people's own

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.719
<v Speaker 1>personal politics, you know, speaking of of politicians, I mean

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>something like the Senate is is kind of like a

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>ship of theseis as well. Right, oh yeah, we're always

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>swapping out new parts for the old parts, and they

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of the parts are rather old. Um.

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>But if we were to replace half the members of

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Senate would say amphibians, it would still

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>be the Senate, even though it would have far more

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Amphibians than it currently has. Mr Toad goes to Washington.

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Well, at this point, I feel like

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>we should take a break and then come back and

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 1>tackle some more listener mail. Thank you, thank you. All right,

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we're back. Okay. This next one comes to us from

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>our listener Ian. It concerns viruses high there. I only

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>discovered your podcast a couple of months ago, and I

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know how I coped without it. I'm a my

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>cross capist. I spend much of my day working in

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the dark alone and trying not to move much. But

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that does mean I get three or four hours a

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>day to listen to podcasts, and I get to see

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>things that nobody else ever has. Have you ever thought

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>about doing an episode on viruses. If we have school

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>trips in at work, or it's just a quiet day,

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we go virus spotting in the pond outside the lab

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and the results are absolutely staggering. Hardly anyone realizes the

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>extent of viruses in the world. They outnumber us. In fact,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they outnumber every living cell on the planet, and there

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>are a major driving force of evolution, not just through

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>selection pressure, but the vast scale of cross species gene swapping.

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>They facilitate eight hundred million viruses land on every square

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>meter of our planet's surface every day. They're around ten

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to the eight in every milli liter of seawater. More

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>than that in our pond. They reckon to kill a

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>third of every cell in the ocean every day. If

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>that's not mind blowing enough, we found giant viruses in

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the drip tray of a water cooler. This dude and

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and Ian attaches a picture is five nimes across and

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>lives in our coffee room, and there is a suitably

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>evil looking metal album cover here. It's kind of this, uh,

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this whirling void of a hexagon in a gray background.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>It it's kind of love craft Ian. It's inviting me

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>into the dark with it. It. That's kind of it

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>has a kind of a black hole feeling to it,

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Yeah, I continues, if you're ever in the UK,

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>drop us a line and we'll let you drive an

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>electron microscope. Keep the episodes coming. My coffee strained brain

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>depends on it. Ian, Well, thank you so much. Ian.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>We I don't know if we'll ever get to test

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>drive an electron microscope with you, but it sounds fun.

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And actually we I think have talked about doing an

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>episode on on viruses. Uh we have both um the

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>organism and uh, we've we've talked about the computer viruses

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. It's it's been a long time since I've

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>looked at this, but I remember there being some interesting,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>um parallel questions one can ask about viruses and computer

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>viruses and their their status as as as living entities.

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's another piece of listener mail that comes

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to us. Uh. This this one has to do with

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>our episode on teasing that that recently came out, where

0:25:55.280 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this curious phenomenon of of of of

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>human interaction that is often difficult to to make sense

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 1>of and they also difficult to figure out, like what

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is uh, what is playful teasing and what is harmful teasing?

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 1>So this one comes to us from Rachel quote, I

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>just finished listening to your excellent episode on teasing. That's

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 1>not meant in an ironic way. I actually did think

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>it was an excellent episode. The line between teasing and

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>bullying can be so blurry. I was teased and bullied

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot as a kid, so I identified a great

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>deal with what you were saying. I wondered what your

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>research revealed, if it touched on at all about the

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>roast of certain prominent individuals, such as comedians or politicians,

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>since this ritualized form of socially acceptable teasing can be

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>quite mean spirited at times. I loved your mention also

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of teasing through the pet. We do this a lot

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>at our house. We have a cat, our dog recently passed,

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and she is often the butt of jokes that simultaneously

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>earned her a lot of attention. My husband might be

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>holding the cat in an awkward way that really displays

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>how big she is, or exposes her belly and says

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>something like, quote, getting a bit plump there, slippers. Her

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>name is George, and she's a tortoise shell. I might

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>also and I might also respond with something like, if

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>she keeps eating all her food and treats like a

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>good girl, we might even be able to get a

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:14.959
<v Speaker 1>pair of gloves out of her too. We'll get her

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>nice and tubby. Yet I'm also certain she is trying

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to kill me. I tell people, I'm certain she is

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a reincarnated mafia princess, and she's basically held onto the

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>same business model. She is a homicidal sociopath with a

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>mafia style flare for vengeance. She's a great foil for

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>when I stumble into something on my own, I can

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>always blame it on her. Sometimes, if she was stretched

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>out in one of her more hedonistic poses on some

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly posha perch, like a fresh laundered or folded comforter,

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>one of us will express the concern that she may

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>not be getting enough rest. Probably far too much about

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>our cat. But I am home all day with her.

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>She is the subject of much teasing. I look forward

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to your next cast. Keep them coming, you keep me

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>saying at work, this is very familiar kind of pet roasting. Yeah, um,

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>what is it that's so fun about roasting a pet?

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>You you don't dislike your pet, You like your pet.

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot, but it's really fun to make fun of them. Yeah,

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know it. It really keeps their status in check,

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, like they no matter how how how pompous

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>or loud they may be. Now, as for the roasting culture,

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like the celebrity roast and all, I don't remember specifically

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>running across anything, but but it might be out there.

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>It is certainly interesting because it is this this area

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of comedy that gets uh, it gets gets very sharp

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>at times and and can I feel like has a

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>has a tendency to uh, to get a little out

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of control sometimes, you know what I'm saying. Um, But

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>then again, it is a very ancient form of comedy.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you go back to the ancient Greeks and like,

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and make making fun of politicians was was a central

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>aspect of some of our earliest examples of comedy. Yeah,

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would say, if you're gonna use harsh,

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>biting mockery, it's good that it's directed at people who are,

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, in high status positions of power. Now in

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>some cases though, it is of course comedians roasting other comedians,

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and that may be a special category. Uh, I mean

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that I would be interesting to hear fould be interesting

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to hear from a professional comedian stand up comedian out

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>there on this topic, because I know there is probably

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of of ribbing going on there on just

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a regular basis, and a lot of comedy is clearly

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>about pushing boundaries, Like how mean can you be in

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in roasting is probably one of the boundaries people are

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>going to experiment with, right though, certainly at this point,

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>if you agree to be the subject of a celebrity roast,

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know what's in store for you, so

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't complain, I guess, But you gotta wonder, like

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>why do people do it? I mean, do they think, well,

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm so great, everybody's gonna be nice to me at

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>my roast. Well, it's in a way, it's kind of

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>like we even that episode we talked about the test

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of the King. Right, if the king can set there

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and be a big good sport about it, even when

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it's vicious, Uh, then then then the king has kind

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of passed the test. Also, I think if I remember correctly,

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.479
<v Speaker 1>and I do, I do not watch uh any of

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>these celebrity roasts these days, but I remember correctly, the

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>format usually involves the subject at the very end getting

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to throw out a few jabs at the participants as well,

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>so they kind of get the last laugh, even though

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they take most of the punishment. You know, now that

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about it, I can actually think that specifically,

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the stuff I've seen that seemed really over the line,

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>mean to me, at at celebrity roast was not directed

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>at the main roast Steve, was directed at other people

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in attendance. Yes, like other roasters and celebrity participants that

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>were involved. Yes, that's often the stuff that that seems

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>like just like way over the line, because it's like

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they're not the sanction target. This is about this is

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:05.239
<v Speaker 1>about an keep the attention on Shatner. I'm tuning in

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to watch him be made the fool, the one that

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the ones that I've seen that have been really I

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>felt not cool, or when they like go after the

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>roast ease spouse or or partner or something you know

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that happens. Yeah, again, like they're not the target. Like

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to, I want to see the target just

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely skewered, like you have. You have just almost free

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>range in terms of this individual. But I don't know

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>about these other targets. I guess I don't make the

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>roast rules, and neither do you. Okay. This one comes

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to us from our listener, Dean, and he introduces himself.

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>He says he's an associate lecture in psychology and postdoctoral

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>research fellow based in Ireland. And uh, Dean says, quote,

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>my research focus is broadly psychology and education, but I

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>do have that techy twist of how technology influences human behavior. Uh.

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I teach numerous programs focusing on this. I love the

0:31:56.880 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>podcast and actively encourage my students to listen to it. Oh,

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you, Dean. Dean writes, I finished listening

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to the on Teasing episode yesterday and couldn't agree more

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>about how teasing quickly turns to bullying. My PhD supervisor

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is a powerhouse regarding this field, especially alterophobic bullying, and

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know what that was, so I looked it up.

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's like bullying people based on like subcultures or

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>alternative lifestyles. Uh. Perhaps a study could be done on

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a species of squirrels here. My own PhD was looking

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>at interpersonal interactions between students and teachers and the role

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>positive educational experiences can play in academic and social outcomes.

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm often asked questions in class about quote wind is

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>teasing end and bullying start, especially between students and also

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>between staff, and I often reply by saying how it's

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>next to impossible to fully know, not only because interactions

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>between individuals are incredibly subjective, and it would also depend

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on multiple contextual factors and how the teased or t

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>easier processes the situation. Anyway, like most episodes, this one

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>got me thinking of technological applications and social cues in

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the digital space. Well, you mentioned the yellow smiley faces

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and how emoticon slash emoji support comprehension. How do you

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>feel the concept of disinhibition and the bystander effect would

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>play out in a physical situation and then in a

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>digital situation they might seem polar opposites in some cases,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but then again maybe not. Thoughts from the Hive mind

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>once again, love the show. I need to get my

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>hands on some merch and flag it to my students.

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>All the best Dean, Oh, yeah, that merch. It's a

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>great time for us to plug the merch store. If

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you got to stuff to blow your mind. Dot com

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the page, you'll see a tab

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>for store. You can go there. You can get shirts

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>with our our cool new logo logo on it. You

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>can get what bags for your laptop. You can get

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>two framed art. You can get pillows, stickers to put

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on your car, you name it. Listen to the soulis

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>ad Man. No. I appreciate Roberts saying that, so I

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. Yeah, please merch up some cool stuff.

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's a great way to support the show if

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>you want to, you know, you want to throw a

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>few bucks to the show. Okay, but back to Dean's message,

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>so Dean asked. I assumed Dean here is talking about

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>how we talked about in the episode, this idea of

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you've been there watching teasing turn to bullying, like you've

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>seen it happen, and you didn't do anything because you

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't know, like should I intervene or would I be

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>making it weird if I did? Is this actually okay?

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 1>And I misreading? Like you never really know. It's it's

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to know when to step in and sort of

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.839
<v Speaker 1>like become the social police, right because you don't want

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to feel like you're a kindergarten teacher when you're hanging

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>out with your friends, Like, don't say that that's me.

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 1>That's mean to Sam, Kyle, say you're sorry to Sam. Okay,

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>now you too, hug All right, now we can go

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>back to talking about molodies. And maybe maybe you're misreading.

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Sam is not actually being bothered, and by stepping in,

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you were making everybody feel bad. I mean, there's this

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>bystander effect going on. You don't know when it's your

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>turn to act, when you should do something. And so

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Dean is asking about the disinhibition and the bystander effect

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and how that varies across physical space versus digital space.

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.399
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about that, Robert, mm hmm, Well,

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean in digital space, it's it's kind of complicated

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>because there's I mean, undoubtedly there's so much there's so

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>much bad stuff going on out there at any given moment.

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm sure I could go on to say Reddit,

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't mean to single Reddit out, but I'm

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I could go on to Reddit right now

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and find somebody being, um, you know, somewhat bullying towards

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>another person. I mean, sometimes you don't have much to

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>work with, right because you're just responding to somebody's comments.

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>It's one stranger, uh responding to another stranger. Or you

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>see similar things play out on on Facebook or Twitter, right,

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>especially on Facebook where it's someone has their their their

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>their privacy UM settings very open and it's maybe arguments

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>between one like a friend's friends or a friends relatives

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>than you UM. And I mean you see it going on,

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and it just it doesn't necessarily feel like your place

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to step in, Like I don't know who these people are.

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not the one to come in. This is clearly,

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly somebody knows these people because it's on their Facebook profile.

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>They should be the ones to step in and start

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>breaking it up. Right. Well, I would say some of

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the same inhibitions or at play in digital space like

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. But I think I've observed, I mean,

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe you'll disagree. I feel like I've observed people are

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 1>more likely to step in and play social police in

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>digital space than they are in physical space. I mean,

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:43.240
<v Speaker 1>have you not like I see people like like stepping

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in and and saying like, okay, it's time to intervene

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 1>in in comment threads on Facebook way way more often

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>than I see that happening in person. I never see anything.

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>People are more likely to be a jerk quad uh

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>digitally than they ask a person as well. Uh, yeah,

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're guess you're right. I mean, I'm having

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>trouble thinking the last time I saw somebody being a

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>jerk in person and saw somebody intervene, or saw a

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.800
<v Speaker 1>situation where even I was wondering if someone should intervene.

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It's been a while, I haven't It's been a one

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>since I've taken like public transit for instance. Yeah, well, yeah,

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I I feel like these situations used to

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>happen more back when I was in school, and stuff

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>happens less often as an adult. I just don't see

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>adults bullying each other that often. Well. The other aspect

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>of it, too is that in physical space, I mean

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I do on the internet. Well well, well, I guess

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the aspects of both scenarios is that in

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a physical environment, there is always the possibility, even if

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it is even if it is distant, it's still possible

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 1>that it could escalate into into a physical altercation, into

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>physical violence. And in a digital scenario, I mean it, certainly,

0:37:55.960 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>digital arguments can still have real world consequences. Um they're

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>not completely removed from it, but it is. It's not

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 1>an immediate step, like like if if it's stranger Kyle

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and stranger Andrew or engage in an argument, uh, you know,

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>one's gonna have to find out where the other one lives,

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>or they're gonna have to agree to meet up in

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a parking lot and fight. Like there are more steps

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.360
<v Speaker 1>where it's just two people arguing at a bar or

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>on a street, uh, you know, on the sidewalk, Then

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>they could conceivably come to blows without too much planning involved.

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>So you think the threat of a punch in the

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.919
<v Speaker 1>face may actually be a positive influence on our social interactions.

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.879
<v Speaker 1>There are some that would argue that, right, Yeah, well,

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean another another factor there, though, is that you

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>just aren't that often getting into conversations that are covering

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 1>any kind of potentially sensitive or controversial subject matter with

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:56.399
<v Speaker 1>people you don't know very well in physical space. That

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing happens all the time in digital space

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and almost never happens in physical space. When do you

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>argue politics with a stranger in person, it just doesn't happen.

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And then when it does, I mean, the cases that

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 1>come to mind are going to be uh, certainly cases

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of say protest and that is it's a huge stretch

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to call the back and forth it's happening there a conversation.

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>It's probably more one side shouting at the other. Right,

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>But you see that kind of thing happening on the

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>internet all the time. And then so of course there's

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of incentive there to just like just show

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>want and cruelty and to turn it straight over into

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.879
<v Speaker 1>personal insults and bullying and all that. Well, some great

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.839
<v Speaker 1>food for thought here from Dean. We're gonna take one

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>more break and we come back. Will crack open a

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>few more listener mails before we close out this episode.

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank thank Alright, we're back, and I can see that

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>our two robots here are very excited because the next

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>few listener mails are going to listen to I have

0:39:56.640 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to do with our two thousand and one Space Odyssey episode. Okay,

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>this one comes from listener Eric. Eric writes, greeting stuff

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to blow your mind. Your recent episode two thousand one

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>of Space Odyssey made me think you might find the

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>following interesting. I was as far as my research yields,

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and I could be wrong. One of the last people

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to conduct a long form interview with Arthur C. Clark.

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.439
<v Speaker 1>He gave a few long form interviews in the last

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:23.240
<v Speaker 1>five years of his life due to post polio fatigue syndromes, scandal,

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:27.720
<v Speaker 1>his pending knighthood, and general failing health. Conducted while visiting

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 1>my then girlfriend in Colombo, Sri Lanka, in the summer

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen Clark's sole interview condition was that I couldn't

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>sell the interview to a national magazine, but he would

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>allow it to be published in my college's literary magazine.

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Online publishing didn't effectively exist at the time, of course.

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh And then he says, he did publish it in

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the college literary magazine. Uh. So picking up, he says,

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Clark sat behind his desk all the while a top

0:40:56.160 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>which were two cutting edge Macintosh computers and abacus, various

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and sundry papers, and a moon rock. And behind his

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.280
<v Speaker 1>desk stood an eight by twenty foot wall of books,

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 1>one half of which consisted of his novels in translation

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and most of which were hard backs. A regal environment there.

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh I spent about two and a half hours with

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Dr Clark, as his staff invariably called him, and our

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:25.800
<v Speaker 1>meeting ended with he my girlfriend Pepsi, which is Clark's

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>one eyed Chihuahua, and I watching eight millimeter home movies

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:33.439
<v Speaker 1>of Clark and Isaac Asimov playing chess. This was done

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in total silence and was admittedly odd, But my reason

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>for writing is to say that many of your listeners

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:43.760
<v Speaker 1>might be interested in knowing what Clark thought his magnum

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>opus was in science fiction. About an hour into our meeting,

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I asked him what novel he felt made the greatest

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>mark on science fiction. I expected Clark to name two

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand one, in spite of its interesting creation, in tandem

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:58.919
<v Speaker 1>with the screenplay for the film, which you mentioned as

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>his most horton novel, given that it canonized him as

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a science fiction master and made him decidedly world famous. However,

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 1>when I asked him, he said that his most important

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 1>novel was The Songs of Distant Earth, a brand new

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>copy of which was then in my backpack unread. It

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was the only Clark novel I could find at a

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>local store. All other Clark books were about scuba diving.

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I asked him to sign it. He laughed and said

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I was being quote cheeky, and accused me of a setup.

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:32.760
<v Speaker 1>He also showed me specs of a space elevator cable

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and told me two math jokes I didn't understand. In

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>any case, it was a great episode. I thank you

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for it and for conjuring up some wonderful memories. Thanks

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>gents for all you do. What you do makes the

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>world less stupid and more interesting. Yours, Eric, Oh, thank

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you Eric. Yeah. And plus, that was a fascinating story.

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I really really just a delightful little story about meeting

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 1>uh the author there, watch me play chess. That's that

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>that has the ring of truth. I don't know. I

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:00.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know Eric, so I don't know if he's on

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the truth, but I believe him based on that detail.

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's another bit of two thousand and one, Uh,

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 1>listener mail. This one comes to us from Chandler. This

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:10.919
<v Speaker 1>is this is our coworker Chandler. Is it? Oh? Yes?

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh well the way I know exactly who it's from.

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Then he says, quote, I listened to your two thousand

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and one episode the other day and thought it was fantastic.

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 1>There's one thing I wanted to ask you that perhaps

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have time to cover in your opinion. Did

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 1>how make a mistake? Was he actually malfunctioning. When Dave

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>brought back the satellite unit and found nothing wrong with it,

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 1>How's next suggestion was to put it back, let it fail,

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>then find the source of the problem afterwards. This seems

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like a logical solution, but Dave and Frank planned to

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.439
<v Speaker 1>shut him down before we ever got to find out

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>if How had actually made a mistake or not. And

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 1>since How was given a secret directive to contact the

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:52.760
<v Speaker 1>monolith with or without the crew, he felt he needed

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to remove the humans from the mission. Or did the

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>secret directive itself make How malfunction in that the conflicting

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:02.359
<v Speaker 1>goals of taking care of the crew and not letting

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the crew get in the way of his journey to

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the monolith? Did he create an almost a programming paradox

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that made his brain short circuit. I'm curious to hear

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts, Cheers Chandler. This is an interesting question because

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like asks if do we need to

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 1>put the responsibility back on the humans for what went

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong in their interactions with How um So obviously the

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>way most people would read that as well, How starts malfunctioning.

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>There's something wrong with his logic, and this leads the

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>like Bowman and Pool to have no choice but to say,

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we've got to shut him down, and then How reacts

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 1>negatively to that and everything spirals out of control. What

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Chandler is asking, what if How was not malfunctioning?

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>How was doing just fine? But Bowman and Pool misread

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the situation. They go on the offensive against How and

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>he just has to defend himself. Yeah, Frank and Dave,

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:57.399
<v Speaker 1>they are kind of like, uh, you know, automatons. Once

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they decide to act, they can't be stopped. I mean,

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>remind me of this concept in a way of the uh,

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the the hunter Killer aies the idea that you could have.

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 1>You could have a specialized AI who's who in Their

0:45:11.520 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>primary goal is to take down a general AI should

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>it emerge or or you know, emerge from it's the

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 1>confines of its digital prison, and their only purpose is

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to just take out that superior AI intelligence. In fact,

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I can well imagine a scenario where that the first

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 1>AI Hunter Killers are called David Frank for that purpose. Bowman. Yeah,

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I never thought about this before, but Bowman in many

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>ways behaves like a terminator. Yeah, He's kind of like

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Arnold Schwarzenegger in the first Terminator movie or or even

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>more so kind of like uh Robert Patrick and Terminator too.

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have much of a discernible personality and is

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 1>just very singly focused on achieving goals. One of those

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>major goals of Worse becomes shutting down How. While how

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:04.719
<v Speaker 1>begs for mercy, he can't be stopped. He can't be

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>reasoned with. And that's what Hal tries to do. He

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:10.959
<v Speaker 1>essentially tries to reason with him. Um and uh, yeah,

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:16.359
<v Speaker 1>imagine a future in which uh post singularity of course. Uh,

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the the machines when they dress up for Halloween, they

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 1>dress up as Bowman, like he's the new icon of terror.

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:25.959
<v Speaker 1>That's a good idea. Costume stores get on that starts

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 1>selling the suit. Another thing that Chandler's question brings up,

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:36.800
<v Speaker 1>which I think is interesting, is the idea of, um,

0:46:36.840 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, like, whether whether a secret inherently sort of

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 1>pollutes the nature of of a functional AI from from

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>doing well right. You know. This is I think present

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely present in the novel somewhat in the movie. The

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 1>idea that having a secret secondary objective that must be

0:46:56.120 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>kept secret from the human operators is sort of a

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous proposition to start with for an AI, right,

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:06.600
<v Speaker 1>because if like an AI has a thing it must

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 1>do and the human operators can't know about that thing

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it must do, then they could interfere with its mission

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>without knowing they're interfering with its mission, and thus it

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 1>could come into conflict with them in a way that

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it can't even tell them how not to be in

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:25.320
<v Speaker 1>its way. And maybe it's also a leap in cognition

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>too far for an artificial intelligence, right, because it's one

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:30.719
<v Speaker 1>thing for it to be able to have this this

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, robust relationship with the crew, you know, playing

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>chess with them, engaging in small talk qu while also

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:39.840
<v Speaker 1>looking after their every need. But then you add on

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 1>top of that this necessity for deception. I think teaching

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>computers how to lie is a bad idea. Is that

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the secret to preventing the AI from going wrong just

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a have a like as a prime directive

0:47:53.200 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 1>more so than anything else, that a computer can never

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>lie to the user. I mean, it does remind me

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of some of some of the ideas that have been

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that have been brought up um uh, specifically some of

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the ideas that presented by max Tech Mark and his

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 1>his book Life three point oh about the idea that

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to make sure that that the that the

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the AI that we're developing, that these that their goal

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is to benefit humanity, that that that is just like

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:22.799
<v Speaker 1>part of their you know, essentially part part of their

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:25.400
<v Speaker 1>their their core programming, their backbone, their DNA is that

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they exist to help us and to make a better

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:31.839
<v Speaker 1>world and not to uh to fulfill some of these

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:36.440
<v Speaker 1>smaller goals these uh um, the these finite games that

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>are being played between nations and companies. That's a great point.

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And and to those of you who are saying, well, yeah, obviously,

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean that just sounds like an obvious thing that

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it should be made to benefit humanity, That's actually not obvious.

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:53.319
<v Speaker 1>It's not obvious to people who are working artificial intelligence.

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, you might be working on a chat bot

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>program that there's no reason you have to fear this

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>chatbot program you're working on is gonna harm anyone, But

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not telling it that it has to benefit humanity.

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's not part of your research program. At

0:49:07.040 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 1>some point we need to think about that being a

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 1>core part of any AI research is the benefit of

0:49:12.719 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>humanity being part of what it does being sort of

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the Asimov's Rules of robotics that underlies everything it does. Right, Otherwise,

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be just going about your business one day

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and a robot's gonna snip your life hose and then

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you're done. Now, we already mentioned an email from our

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 1>listener Jim. Today. Jim also wrote us about two thousand one,

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're not going to read a whole other email

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:35.760
<v Speaker 1>from him, but just to mention a couple of interesting

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:38.319
<v Speaker 1>points he made in his email about two thousand one

0:49:38.320 --> 0:49:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of Space Odyssey. He mentions that the quote bone to

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 1>satellite cut in the movie. So that's when moon Gazer

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:46.840
<v Speaker 1>throws the bone up in the air and then it

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>cuts it to become a satellite in orbit. Um uh.

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Jim says that it had a bit more context than

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>what's obvious. When Ciskel and Ebert talked about two thousand one,

0:49:56.719 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>one of them made mention that the satellite is a

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:02.840
<v Speaker 1>space missile form pointing back down to Earth. It represents

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:05.960
<v Speaker 1>more than just several million years of man's progress. It's

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>several million years in man's progress to kill one another.

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Since the bone was also of course used as a weapon,

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. Um. Then also one more point

0:50:16.840 --> 0:50:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that that Jim makes quote as for the star Child

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at the end, I read the book years ago in school.

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going on memory alone since I don't have a copy,

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 1>but I recalled that the final lines or something like

0:50:27.440 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Bowman looked down at the Earth. He didn't know what

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he was going to do with it, but he was

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 1>sure he would think of something. I have looked at

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of the book, and Jim, you're very close.

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:38.839
<v Speaker 1>That is almost exactly what it says at the very end.

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.879
<v Speaker 1>So Bowman as the star Child as sort of having

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 1>ascended to this strange godlike form by with by way

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of you know, alien transmutation. Uh, he shows up, trains modified,

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:51.279
<v Speaker 1>he's a star child. He's in orbit and he looks

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 1>down and he's going to do something with Earth. And

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a lot of ambiguity, the same kind of

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>ambiguity we get at the end of the movie, Like

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 1>does he of nefarious intentions? Good intentions? Is you want

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to help Earth? Does he want to destroy it? As

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you say here? Is he a destroyer? How how much

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 1>difference is there between the two. All right, we have

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>one last listener, Mail here and uh, I know which

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 1>one you're gonna Yes, it's the Highlander one. This one

0:51:18.280 --> 0:51:20.839
<v Speaker 1>comes to us from Elizabeth Dear stuff to blow your mind.

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Hosts and team, thank you very much for your show.

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:27.440
<v Speaker 1>It is a joy to hear about unsettling Boltzmann brains

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and bloodthirsty scugs while walking my dog here in Paris.

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening to and enjoying your show for a

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>few months now, and I noticed many references to Highlander,

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the movie earlier this summer. You mused about Highlander style immortality.

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Immortality is a form of immutability. In the movie, Connor

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>McCloud and the other immortals are trapped in time, unable

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to evolve their immortal therefore outside life very interesting. Do

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:56.879
<v Speaker 1>you know that there also was a Highlander TV show? Uh? Yes,

0:51:57.640 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I am aware. I have. I have to say I

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 1>did much. I watched a fair amount of it, but

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't watch it like religiously, so I was never

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:08.319
<v Speaker 1>like really privy to the overarching narratives that were going

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 1>on there. I would just like tune in and occasionally

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 1>there'd be a fun episode in which, you know, they

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of go through the typical um motions of the

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:19.399
<v Speaker 1>show where McLeod encounters a Highlander from the past, there's

0:52:19.400 --> 0:52:21.839
<v Speaker 1>a there's a flashback as to how they know each other,

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:24.319
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a big standoff and and uh and

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:27.319
<v Speaker 1>so forth. Now I have to sadly assume that Chris

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:31.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff Lambert is not in the TV show. I believe

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he's in the first episode at least. And the thing is,

0:52:34.239 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I never actually saw the first episode, but I believe,

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 1>based on subsequent research, that he did show up in

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the pilot to set up their relationship. Anyway, she says,

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:46.200
<v Speaker 1>do you know that there was also a Highlander TV

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>show where a major development arc was actually about the

0:52:49.840 --> 0:52:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the possibility slash impossibility of change for immortals? And this

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I did not realize, She says, quote the air the

0:52:58.080 --> 0:53:00.279
<v Speaker 1>show aired in the late nineties in France. Don't know

0:53:00.320 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 1>about the US. Uh it did? Uh this I think

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:06.600
<v Speaker 1>it aired exclusively in syndication. So this was the kind

0:53:06.600 --> 0:53:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of thing that I would watch like uh. I think

0:53:08.920 --> 0:53:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it would come on like like four in the afternoon

0:53:11.280 --> 0:53:13.839
<v Speaker 1>on a Saturday, or come out on at like ten

0:53:13.880 --> 0:53:18.080
<v Speaker 1>at night on some random channel. She continues, It's protagonist

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Duncan McCloud Connor's better looking and younger cousin started office

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>this archetypical immortal boy scout hero set in Stone and

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>settling scores with batties that were as stuck in the

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:32.360
<v Speaker 1>past as he was. However, the show couldn't follow this pattern,

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and definitely since we the viewers, are of course, children

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of time, so it became all about how Duncan needed

0:53:38.360 --> 0:53:40.759
<v Speaker 1>to change and break his black and white vision of

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the world. It was hard for him and he didn't

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like it, uh was forced to have He was forced

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:49.719
<v Speaker 1>to evolve by interesting side characters. In the end, after

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a few seasons, he got there only to become this

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 1>faded out version of himself, almost losing the will to

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:58.560
<v Speaker 1>live and fight another day. Having lost his trademark identity,

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>he resolved to leave the game, and thus the show ended.

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Sorry for the long message, but I really enjoyed hearing

0:54:04.200 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 1>about your thoughts on identity and immortality and am delighted

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:09.920
<v Speaker 1>about the ongoing challenge of watching the Highlander movie a

0:54:09.960 --> 0:54:12.400
<v Speaker 1>few minutes at a time. I couldn't resist telling you

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:15.320
<v Speaker 1>about the TV show in case you didn't know about it. Again,

0:54:15.640 --> 0:54:18.799
<v Speaker 1>merceies for your show, best, Elizabeth Well, I didn't think

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I'd ever be tempted to go back and watch the

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Highlander TV series. Now I am a little bit. This

0:54:24.040 --> 0:54:26.319
<v Speaker 1>gives me renewed respect for it. I mean, I I

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:29.399
<v Speaker 1>know loosely that they do end up adding a lot

0:54:29.400 --> 0:54:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of elements later on, Like there's this whole thing with

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the Watchers, who I think are just mortals who watched

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the Immortals um like this. You know, they it went

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:41.600
<v Speaker 1>multiple seasons, so they had to add more elements. I

0:54:41.680 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 1>had to have like Highlander administrators. Yeah, you couldn't just

0:54:44.560 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 1>have follow the Kurgan of the Weak model. And definitely

0:54:48.239 --> 0:54:51.319
<v Speaker 1>though that hasn't stopped the movie series post Highlander two,

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 1>because I think that's basically what they've done. How many

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:58.360
<v Speaker 1>movies are there after Highlander too, something like three or

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:01.759
<v Speaker 1>four only saw up to three. Those of you out

0:55:01.760 --> 0:55:04.759
<v Speaker 1>there who think we've forgotten that we've promised on the

0:55:04.800 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>show before to one day do a Highlander to the

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:11.959
<v Speaker 1>quickening science of episode, we have not forgotten. That will happen.

0:55:12.000 --> 0:55:15.280
<v Speaker 1>In that's nature. It is a guarantee. In fact, I

0:55:15.520 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>finally finished watching the first Highlander like three minutes at

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a time, so that one's done, I'm ready to to

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 1>rewatch Highlander two and its original theatrical glory. Uh, and

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:28.439
<v Speaker 1>then we'll we'll pick it up from there. Highlander two

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:31.080
<v Speaker 1>remains one of the best bad movies of all time.

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It is bad movie sorcery. It is transcendent. Your soul

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:38.759
<v Speaker 1>will leave your body and flash around the room and

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:41.439
<v Speaker 1>uh and bolts of lightning. Yeah, all right, we'll look

0:55:41.440 --> 0:55:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to that. I think at this rate, it's probably gonna

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:45.400
<v Speaker 1>be November before we get that out, because we've got

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>our our Halloween content. But I'm hopeful for November. Let's

0:55:49.760 --> 0:55:52.120
<v Speaker 1>let's make a date. It's got to happen, all right.

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're gonna leave it off there. The

0:55:55.400 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 1>robots are tired. I think they want to embrace each

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:01.839
<v Speaker 1>other and swap the parts around, so that now we'll

0:56:01.880 --> 0:56:05.400
<v Speaker 1>have just to uh. We'll have two new new slash

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:08.720
<v Speaker 1>old carney, the mailbox running around, both of them made

0:56:09.000 --> 0:56:12.040
<v Speaker 1>out of a combination of new and old parts. Uh.

0:56:12.080 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And then they'll probably ask for replacements, request more parts.

0:56:15.520 --> 0:56:17.239
<v Speaker 1>This is just gonna get out of control. We're gonna

0:56:17.280 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>have three carneys, so we're gonna have four carnis Us.

0:56:21.719 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll pick that up another day in the meantime, if

0:56:24.560 --> 0:56:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in touch with us, you want

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to find out more about what we do, you want

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to listen to more episodes of the podcast, head on

0:56:29.920 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 1>over to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That

0:56:31.680 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is the mothership. That'she. We'll find all the episodes. You'll

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:36.239
<v Speaker 1>find links out to our social media accounts. You'll find

0:56:36.239 --> 0:56:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that tab for the store. Uh yeah, it's a great place.

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Go check it out. Huge Things. As always to our

0:56:42.320 --> 0:56:45.880
<v Speaker 1>wonderful audio producers Alex Williams and Terry Harrison. If you

0:56:45.880 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 1>would like to get in touch with us directly to

0:56:47.719 --> 0:56:49.759
<v Speaker 1>let us know feedback on this episode or any other,

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to send us a listener mail of your own, uh,

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:54.879
<v Speaker 1>to suggest a topic for the future, just to say hi.

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:57.399
<v Speaker 1>You can email us at blow the Mind at how

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:08.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com for more on this and thousands

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Does it how stuff works dot com.

0:57:18.280 --> 0:57:23.000
<v Speaker 1>The Big Man