WEBVTT - Loreen Gilbert on the Markets (Radio)

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to Loreen Gilbert, CEO at Wealthwise Financial. So

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to my friends who are bears, you may want to

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>turn the radio down a little bit here we're going

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to make the case for the other direction. So, Loreen,

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we we got two main major overhangs. Obviously, one is

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the is the China COVID zero policy and the other

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 1>central banks being aggressive on race. Yesterday, we got this

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>little rumor that filtered through the markets that a committee

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>was being set up for China to to reopen by

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>next March, and the markets exploded to the upside. This

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is what's out there waiting, uh, you know, once you

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>get the kind of all clear from the FED and

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>from China. So yeah, I mean, b B be wary

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of that, Loren. Yeah, I think that the people are

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>chomping at the bit, certainly on Chinese stocks, wanting things

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>to turn around. And I guess you could say the

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>same in the US, although I think investor sentiment is

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>still quite negative and has been. That's what we've seen

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>during earning seasons so far, is that people have been

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>quite negative as they've looked it forward guidance. So I

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>think we still got a very strong FED, a very

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>aggressive bed definitely think that that's in the cards and

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to stop any time soon. But I

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>do still hold that we are going to see, as

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we have in the past, after the midterm elections and

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 1>potentially this idea of UH divided government. The markets tend

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>to like that looking forward at what's ahead, and we've

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of bits of old wisdom kind of

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>war here. I mean, on the one hand, there's that

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>saying that you point out it's time in the markets,

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>not timing the markets. So with that in mind, you

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>get along. Or there's the other saying, don't catch the

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>following knife. If we got more to fowl here, which

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is it? Yeah, Well, I think that I think you

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely have a following knife, especially in some of these

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>growth names, where on those growth names, we don't know

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly where the bottom is. Certainly we know that valuations

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>were high. Now they've come down quite a bit, but

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>we've just seen even in the last few days after

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>news of certain stocks, we've seen the continued decline. So

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that's really what I'm saying on the falling life. I

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think that you have to be aware of some of

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>these growth names and stick to what's been working, which

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is on the value side, the dividend paying stocks. Yeah,

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I think even the bulls would not say, you know,

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>back up the truck, but just that if you're looking

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>out for say six to nine months, it could be

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a little better. It's been a great year for the bears. However, Um,

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we're actually higher than where we were in June. So

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the last four to five months, even though

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bears have probably felt pretty good, Um, you know,

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen continued losses. Now. We had a great

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>October and better than we would have expected. And h Loreen,

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I just want to get your thoughts on earning season

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>thus far and the risk of an earnings recission and

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.399
<v Speaker 1>a recission more broadly, because you do make an interesting

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>point about earnings once you strip out energy, suddenly don't

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>really look that terrific, do they. They don't, And so

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that's where if we really look at it, we're looking

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>at a negative five point one per cent on the

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>SMP five when you take out the energy sector, and

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.399
<v Speaker 1>so with that we are technically in an earnings recession

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for the sectors apart from energy. With that, though, if

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we look at next year, it looks much more promising

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>as far as what analysts are expecting. And so just

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>like we see the markets are always forward looking. The

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>markets have gone down precipitously years date, but as things

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>turn around, by the time we actually realize how much

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the economy has slowed down, the market might have turned already.

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>A bear case scenario could be that productivity is falling

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty sharply and people are not sure what's actually causing this.

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you if you enter into a period where

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you have you know, prices remaining high, cost up, productivity down,

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not good for profits. No, it's not that good

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for profits. And what you also have, of course, this

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this wage growth issue too, that continues to be a problem,

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's increasing costs, most definitely for companies. So with that,

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the good news is we've seen a lot of companies

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to pass on those costs the consumer. But

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>how long then can the consumer continue to purchase goods

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and services at these higher levels. And we know you

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have a bias towards US equities at the moment, but

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I just want to get your thoughts on China as

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>well and sort of the balance of risks there. I mean,

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously it's a much more stimulatory environment in

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of monetary policy. Um, we now have a little

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of political certainty going ahead with shij and Pink

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>confirmed for that third term, but then there's those risks

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>as well, zero COVID, the property crisis, the potential for

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>sudden regulatory change. Is this a market that you trade,

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>ware Lian? We do. We are keeping much more domestically

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>versus Internet sationals. So within the US with the strong

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.679
<v Speaker 1>dollar and the and the Federal Reserve continue to raise rates.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Once that rolls over, I think we will see more

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunities as the dollar than potentially weakens against other currencies.

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>But you mentioned China specifically, but what we saw after

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that twentieth Congress is many more hardliners and more of

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>a nationalist approach versus a globalism approach. So with that,

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>we're still keeping it within the United States. And if

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.239
<v Speaker 1>you stay in the United States, Uh, probably a pretty

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>good time for stock picking. Um. What are you most

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>drawn to? Yeah, we like the value side of things

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>across capitalization, large cap, MidCap, small cap. We do also

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>especially like small cap as much as it has been

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>beaten down and hurt so far this year. And if

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we look at sectors. We like healthcare quite a bit,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>and we still like industrials as well. Uh, we do,

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>of course, have the FED meeting coming up. All the

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>decision very very soon. I just want to get a

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of when you think that pivot might come, and

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's going to come eventually that the question is all

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>about the timing. Yeah, it is the timing, and I

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think we see it in two I think it's

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>most definitely and maybe after February, so you know, maybe

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>around March. But I think given the jolt's number that

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we saw today, I think we're going to hear a

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>very strong FED tomorrow. Alright, Lorene Gilbert, we will have

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to leave it there. Thanks so much though for joining

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>us on Bloomberg Daybreak. Asia Lorene Gilbert is CEO at

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Wealthwise of Financial