WEBVTT - Tech News: A Spooky Halloween Tech News Episode

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio and how the tech

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are you? It is time for tech News for Tuesday,

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>October thirty first, twenty twenty three. Happy Halloween, everybody, or

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a spooky sawyn if you prefer. Last week I mentioned

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>we would not have a news episode today because of

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>smart talks with IBM, But the joke was on me.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Turns out there was a scheduling delay, and so now

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you get an episode from me after all. So let's

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>dive into the spooky world of tech news, and you

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>might hear me make some spooky sounds throughout the show

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that I assure you it's not that I'm hand It's

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>just that the kidney stone I'm dealing with still isn't

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>done yet. Anyway, the back half of twenty twenty three

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.199
<v Speaker 1>is hitting me hard, y'all. But never mind that you're

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>not here to hear me grouse and moan about my health.

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>You're here to hear me grouse and moan about tech.

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to it. First. Up this week, US President

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden issued an executive order that deals with the

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>big topic in tech of twenty twenty three, that of

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, and they had a particular focus on generative AI,

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>which I'll just remind you. Generative AI is one subset

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of the overall discipline of artificial intelligence. And if you're

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>not from America, or maybe you are from America but

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you've never really looked into it and you don't know

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>what an executive order is, it is one of the

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>president's powers of office. The president has the authority to

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>issue directives without having to go through Congress or any

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>other branch of the govern as long as those directives

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>relate to how the federal government works. So the US

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>president could issue an executive order to manage federal resources.

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But the president could not issue an executive order to

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>force South Dakota to change its name to Frank or whatever,

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>because that's not in the power of the federal government.

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>This executive order in particular, creates requirements, mostly among federal

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>agencies when it comes to entering into contracts with AI

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>companies and AI services. So the order restricts those contracts

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to companies that comply with regulations, and those regulations include

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:46.839
<v Speaker 1>things like testing requirements for their AI models, transparency when

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it comes to developing the tools, and various restrictions on

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>what generative AI is and is not allowed to do so.

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>For example, if the generative AI can be convinced to

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>design weapons, that's right out. You know, a federal agency

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is not allowed to enter into a contract with a

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>company that does that. So these requirements don't hit the

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>AI companies directly, right they're hitting the federal agencies. But

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>if you assume that those companies want to do business

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>with the federal government, which is a very lucrative business

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 1>to get into, it thus creates an incentive for those

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>AI companies to comply with the rules. Now, there are

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>some aspects to the executive Order that more directly target

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>AI companies. For example, should a company engage in training

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>AI systems that could potentially create a threat to national security, well,

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>those companies are going to need to send a little

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>heads up to the federal government first, which is not

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea, though I would submit that sometimes we

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>don't realize something is a threat until you know it's

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>threatened US or worse. The order also recommends, but does

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily require, that generative AI companies use a label

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>or a watermark for all AI created material, whether that's audio, video,

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>or images or whatever. The order also places the onus

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of creating more structured regulations on various other agencies within

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the US government. And speaking of regulations, a couple of

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>AI luminaries have recently spoken out against regulations. Business Insider

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>reports that Jan Lucun, one of the leading researchers in

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, has argued that the various doomsday scenarios being

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>bandied about regarding AI aren't really realistic. Rather, he says,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>spreading these stories is a tactic that's used by a

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>few large companies that are working in AI today. And

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you might say, well, why would they do that, why

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>would they say AI is a potential threat to humanity's existence. Well,

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>these same companies are actually taking a very active role

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to work with governments around the world to develop AI

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>regular not because the companies actually believe these regulations are

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.799
<v Speaker 1>going to prevent harm. Instead, they're trying to create regulations

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that will allow big established companies to be insulated against

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>smaller startups because the smaller startups are going to find

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it hard or maybe even impossible to work within the

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>framework of regulations. So, according to Lucun, this is a

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:30.239
<v Speaker 1>way to stifle competition and innovation. Sam Altman, the CEO

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of open Ai, comes to mind when you hear about

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this argument when it's put this way, because Altman has

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>taken an active role to work with governments in the

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>US and the UK and elsewhere in an effort to

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.559
<v Speaker 1>frame regulations around AI. Now. To take the other side,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Altman would argue that his goal is to set up

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>rules that make sense and that will protect people against

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>bad AI design and bad AI implementations. But critics like

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Lacun say this is really more of a self serve motivation,

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and it prompts Altman to work so closely with governments

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to suppress potential competitors and give open

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>aye an unfair market advantage. He is, not, by the way,

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the only AI bigwig to suggest that this is a thing.

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Andrew ng, who founded Google Brain and who teaches at

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Stanford University and in fact taught Sam Altman, has also

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>argued that the push for regulations, particularly the push from

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>large AI companies, suggests more of a move to squash

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>competition and innovation than to actually create a safe environment.

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Now Ing told Financial Worldview that he believes regulations are important.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>He's not saying don't have regulations at all, but he

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is saying that bad regulations are worse than no regulations

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at all. So it goes bad regulations at the bottom,

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>no regulations, and then good regulations. If things are left

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to the companies that are going to be regulated, then

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and we should expect nothing less than rules that are

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>going to benefit them to the detriment of everyone else,

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>whether that's a competitor or a consumer, which kind of

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to me. And in the war between artists

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and AI, a US district judge named William Oric has

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>dismissed most of a lawsuit that three artists brought against

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the company's mid Journey, Deviant Art, and Stability AI. In fact,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>out of those three, only the part of the lawsuit

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>directly involving Stability AI is still alive in the court system.

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>The judge ruled that the accusations as laid out in

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit were quote defective in numerous respects end quote

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>regarding mid Journey and Deviant Art, and so those elements

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>are now essentially dead in the water until they perhaps

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>get reasserted in a updated filing. So at the center

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of this whole legal mess is a concern among artists

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that generative AI companies are making broad and unrestricted use

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of artist works without the artist's permission or compensation, and

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that as a result, these generative AI models are able

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to lift elements of artists' styles and essentially the AI

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>can compete against the very artists whose work the model

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>was used to train on in the first place. As

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for why Stability AI is still in the mix here,

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it mostly has to do with how mid Journey and

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>dev and Art have used Stability AI's generative tool called

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Stable Diffusion, and the judge says, well, the artists weren't

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>able to really show that those companies were using this

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>knowingly in an effort to harm artists, or were doing

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that where they were disregarding the

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>harm being done to artists, and that really just falls

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to Stability AI, which created the tool in the first place.

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>The artists accusations showed that, at least according to a

0:08:56.120 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>search tool meant to match artists against work that generative

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>AI models have supposedly used during training, the Stability AI

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>tool had made unauthorized use of art to train up

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Stable Diffusion. So out of the three artists, only one

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of them is still part of this lawsuit. The other

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>two dropped out because they did not actually obtain a

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>copyright for their works, so there was no legal protection

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to be violated in the first place. But one of

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the three did. She's still in the mix. So she said,

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>my name has popped up in the search engine, showing

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that this model used my work to train itself. Now

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that in itself is not definitive proof, right, just because

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>she shows up on the search engine. But the judge

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>rule that it was sufficient to allow the case to

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>continue through to the discovery phase. Now I should add

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>this is not the only case brought against Stability AI

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and how it trains stable diffusion. Getty Images sued the

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>company both in the UK and in the United States,

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>arguing that Stability AI used stock images from Getty's enormous

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>database to train its model, and that the company quote

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>removed or altered end quote Getty's copyright management information in

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the process. Just yesterday, Stability's AI legal team asked a

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>London judge to throw out the UK case. I've not

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>heard how that has panned out. But also these cases

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have been going on for a while. While this is

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>an update, you know, they date back to early twenty

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and even late twenty twenty two, so it's

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>not like this just popped out of nowhere. This is

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing battle in legal systems around the world. Justice

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 1>moves ever swiftly. Okay, we've got more stories to cover,

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>and they don't even have to do with artificial intelligence.

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to take a quick break and when

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>we come back, I'll talk about some more tech news.

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>We're back, and now I'm done talking about AI at

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>least for the moment, which means it's time to talk

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>about X. You know, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Only one story though, so let's just get through it.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And the big news this week is that X is

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>going to offer restricted stock units or RSUs to its employees. Now,

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind X is a private company. At the moment,

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>there is no publicly traded stock market that it's on,

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>so you can't look to see what stocks are trading

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>at right now. It's privately held. So in order to

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to issue restricted stock units to employees, first

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the company has to determine how much it's actually worth.

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And this gets a little more loosey goosey than you

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>would find with a publicly traded company. Like with a

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded company, you take the number of shares that

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>exist in that company, and you multiply that by the

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>price per share, and you get a rough estimation of

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the valuation of that company. So X had to go

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 1>through a different process, but in internal documents it had

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>listed its valuation at around nineteen billion dollars. Now keep

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in mind, when Elon Musk agreed to purchase Twitter, he

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>did so at a share price that would be set

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>at fifty four dollars twenty cents per share, which meant

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that at the time of purchase, Twitter would be worth

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>forty four billion dollars. So he spent forty four billion,

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and now the platform has a current valuation of nineteen

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. That's a fifty six percent drop in valuation

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>over the course of a year. Now keep in mind

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that's just one assessment. Other assessments are actually different. For example,

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Fidelity figure that the drop is closer to sixty five

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of value YELSA. Now I admit when I first

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>read about this, I didn't see that there was a

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>bright side, but tech Crunch's Amanda Silberling points out that

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes a lower valuation isn't necessarily a bad thing for

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the company or its employees, because the employees stand to

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>gain those stocks or stock options, and it could mean

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that they could get a lot more of them as

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>part of their compensation package. This can also become a

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>very powerful tool to recruit new talent into the company,

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and as long as the company does better and starts

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 1>to improve in value, employees will see a huge gain

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>as a result of having those stocks, assuming that they

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>execute their stock options. Obviously, X still needs to regain

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of lost ground, right A fifty six percent

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>drop invaluation is not a great thing to communicate out

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to the world. Doing that is going to create much

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>greater gains for the employees who exercise their stock options. However,

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>so it could be a really good thing. And you know,

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>never say never. I'm not going to say that X's

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is just death to be doomed. It just has to

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>prove it can reverse the trend it's been on over

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the last year. Now. Personally, I think that would be

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot easier if Elon Musk took a big

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>old step back from the driver's seat. I mean, sure,

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>he put in a different CEO, so technically he's not

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of the company anymore. But the general impression

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I get in the tech world is that it's really

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>still Elon Musk calling the shots over there. And maybe

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that's unrealistic. Maybe that's not the case, but it certainly

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>seems to be that, at least from the outside, and

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's been doing the company any favors.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Another long ongoing story around the world is how various

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>countries are beginning to treat apps and tech that is

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>created out of countries like China. So in a recent example,

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the government of Canada decided yesterday to issue a ban

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on the messaging app we Chat on all government issued

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>mobile devices. The Canadian government also included a Russian app

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in that ban as well, or really a Russian suite,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the Kasperski antivirus program specifically. Now, this is out of

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a concern that the governments of China and Russia could

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially either directly or indirectly use those kinds of apps

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to spy on Canadian government officials and Canadian systems. The

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>government did say that there was no evidence that any

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>such thing had happened so far, so this would really

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>be more of a proactive move, as the CIO for

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Canada has identified those two apps as having unacceptable risks

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>associated with them. Chinese representatives condemned the move. They said

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that it was really done more as a political gesture

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>without any real justifiable foundation, and Kasperski responded with surprise

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and disappointment, saying that the lack of evidence indicates that

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the ban is a response to a geopolitical perceived threat

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>rather than a real one, and claims no one from

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Canada's government ever reached out to Kasperski to work things

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>out before issuing the ban. Now, I will say that

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:13.479
<v Speaker 1>at least with Kasperski, it has a somewhat shady reputation

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>in the cybersecurity community, not that their tools don't work,

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>but that there is this fear of a potential connection

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>between Kasperski and various Russian intelligence agencies. Kasperski has been

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>rather compliant with Russian government on several things that have

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>led to people saying it may not be a good

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>idea to use Kaspersky products in things like government settings

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>because of the potential that someone could use that for

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>surveillance purposes. Canada is not the only country to have

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>concerns about this product. The US issued a similar ban

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Back in twenty seventeen. Germany's Federal Office for Information Security

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>issued a strong recommendation to its staff not to use

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Kasperski antivirus products out of concern, you know, regarding the

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>company's potential connections to the Russian government. So this is

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>not an unprecedented event. Now, for those of you who

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>like those stories where the little guy stands up to

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the fat cat, I got one for you now. In

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>this case, the little guy is a software firm in

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the UK called Threads Software Limited, and the fat cat

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is Meta, formerly known as Facebook. And yes, this all

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the name Threads, which Meta has

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>used for its microblogging service, you know, the Twitter slash

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>x killer platform that saw rapid adoption and then not

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:42.959
<v Speaker 1>long after that rapid disengagement or what I call oh

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I forgot I even installed that itis. The software company

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>sent a letter to Meta and said that it will

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>go to the courts and ask for an injunction against

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Meta if the company doesn't stop using the name Threads. Now.

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, Threads Software Limited or actually a precursor

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to that company called JPY Limited, applied for and received

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a trademark for the brand name Threads more than a

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>decade ago, and that was well before Meta announced any

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>intention of creating a microblogging competitor to Twitter. Now that

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>being said, this is not the first threads product from Meta.

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Back in twenty nineteen, Meta, which at that time was

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>still called Facebook, introduced a feature in Instagram and it

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>was called Threads. I'm not sure if the thread Software

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Limited company actually pushed back against Meta when that happened.

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 1>That's important because holding a trademark requires a company to

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>defend that trademark. If Meta can show that that Threads

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Software Limited did not attempt to defend its trademark when

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Meta first introduced the Threads product in Instagram in twenty nineteen,

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>then that could really weaken the case against Meta. I

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Maybe they did pushback. I couldn't find information

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>on that when I was reading up on the story.

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>If I'd done some more digging, I probably could have,

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>but I was running out of time. Also, there are

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other products out there that have the

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>name thread or threads, and they have not really seen

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pushback from this company. From what I

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>can tell, which is another potential strike against them. Now,

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 1>all that being said, Meta supposedly did reach out to

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>thread Software Limited in an attempt to purchase the domain

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>threads dot app, but the company gave Meta the cold

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>shoulder for every single request. It does, however, indicate that

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Meta was aware that was going to use a brand

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>name that was already in use. So it is a

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>complicated thing. And who knows which way the courts will go.

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of courts might already be I

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>hate to use the word biased, maybe predisposed to laying

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>judgments against Meta because Meta has not done itself any

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>favors of the last decade. It has operated in a

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>way that has almost dared governments and courts to take

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>action against it, which could potentially spell over in decisions.

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>We're all human beings, even judges and lawyers, So who knows.

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's what's going on in that world. In India,

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple has sent an urgent alert to several politicians in

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the Indian Parliament. The alert warned the recipients that their

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>respective iPhones were potentially targeted by a state sponsored attack,

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>like an attack with a high level of sophistication and

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>a high requirement for you know, resources, So something that

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>would typically only happen from a hacker group that had

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the backing of some sort of government somewhere in the world. Now, notably,

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>all the people who have come forward so far saying

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that they received this alert belong to the opposition party

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in India's parliament. Now, Apple has not identified which state

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>may be behind these attacks, and in fact, Apple has

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>also said it's possible the alerts could be a false alarm.

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>They have not issued that many alerts around the world,

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and they said, you know, this could be something where

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>we are being extra defensive, but there's no actual threat. There.

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>At least a few of the people who receive the

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>message suspect that India's conservative government is actually behind the operation,

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that this is an effort to maintain and extend control

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of the nation in general and to suppress opposition politicians.

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I've talked a lot about how India's government takes a

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>really aggressive stance with tech companies when it comes to

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>things like allowing people to use various platforms to criticize

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the government. So the implication that opposition leaders could be

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the target of the actual Indian government fits that narrative,

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't necessarily mean it's true. It could be,

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.479
<v Speaker 1>but without evidence, you can't really draw a conclusion. Various

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>representatives of the majority have argued that those who are

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>contacted are overreacting, that they're jumping to conclusions that cannot

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>be supported by evidence, and they're just reaching for reasons

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to be outraged at the government. So they're essentially saying

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>we're being unfairly targeted by these criticisms. I'm sure more

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>well unfold, but it'll be interesting to see how Apple

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>navigates this because obviously it's a pretty thorny political situation,

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>so we'll have to wait and see. Okay, I've got

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>some more tech news items to cover before we conclude

0:22:53.440 --> 0:23:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but first let's take another quick break. Are

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you ready for some football and by that I mean

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>American football? And also were you ready for it last Sunday?

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you were, did you find yourself frustrated when

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>using YouTube in order to watch football? All right, let

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>me back up a bit. So YouTube secured a contract

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>to carry the NFL Sunday ticket product that originally was

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>with DirectTV. Now it's an add on to the YouTube

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>TV service NFL Sunday Ticket gives subscribers the ability to

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>tune into the various NFL games, the American football games

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of the National Football League that are playing on any

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>given Sunday during football season, regardless of where you happen

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to live. It is a very expensive add on. It

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>starts at three hundred and forty nine dollars per year,

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>and remember football season doesn't go all year long. This

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is also on top of the YouTube TV subscription, which

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>is more than seventy dollars per month, so that starts

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>to add up real quick. You sports fans have to

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>pay a whole bunch of moulah to watch your stuff.

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I shouldn't complain about all the different

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>streaming services I subscribe to at this point, because yikes. Anyway,

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>for the first seven weeks of this current season, YouTube's

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>version of the NFL Sunday Tickets seem to be working

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>just fine. But this past Sunday users encountered issues with

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>lag and buffering times, and for some of the games,

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>those issues lasted well into the second half of the game. Understandably,

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of customers are upset. I mean, if you're

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>paying a premium price for a service, you expect premium

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>quality in that service. And yeah, we all understand that

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>technical errors can happen, and that systems can and do breakdown.

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>That's just a fact of life. But when you're charging

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>three three hundred and fifty dollars a season just to

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to let people see games on their television

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>or computer screen, not even go to a game, but

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>just see it at home, there is a certain expectation

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>that the service is gonna work as advertised. YouTube posted

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a message indicating that the company was aware of the

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>problem and was working on it, but as I was

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>writing this episode, it didn't have any further details about

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>what actually caused the problem that might be public by

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the time you hear this, but I hadn't seen it

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>when I was actually putting the episode together. The game

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>company Ubisoft is ending online service for ten of the

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>company's titles. That includes Assassin's Creed two, Assassin's Creed Brotherhood,

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and Assassin's Creed Revelations, all three of which were very

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>popular titles. This means that the online features for those

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and the seven other games that they announced are just

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to work anymore. Those services will no longer

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>be active, and that includes stuff like online multiplayer obviously,

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>as well as Ubisoft Connect rewards. Those are kind of

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like achievements on Xbox or trophies on PlayStation. Steam also

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>has achievements like this. Fortunately, this is not a case

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>where the online component means the games become totally unplayable.

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>As far as I can tell, gamers should still be

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>able to run these games on the hardware that can

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>run them because these are older games and still be

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>able to play the single player experience. They just won't

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to access those online features. But this is

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the big reasons I personally do not like

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>game companies tying their single player games to some sort

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of online service. Usually it's an online service that's meant

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to verify that the gamer is using a legitimate copy

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the game and not a pirated copy. And that's

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>because if a company decommissions the online component, then the

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>game can become unplayable, even if you still have equipment

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that could technically run the game. So I hate when

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>game companies tie their titles to some online service that

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really add to the game itself. It only exists

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>to verify the copy of the game, because if that

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>service goes offline and they don't offer some sort of patch,

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>then the game you purchased is just it's just dead code. Anyway,

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of sad to see that that support go away.

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It does make sense, like there is a limited amount

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of resources that a company has to put towards supporting games,

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't really make sense to just continually support

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>online components in perpetuity to a diminishing audience, right, That

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make good business sense, So I get it from

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that perspective. You might remember that a few weeks back,

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I talked about how NASA had retrieved a capsule from

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the Osiris REX mission. That's the mission that visited an

0:27:55.160 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 1>asteroid called Binu, and the spacecraft up collecting soil and

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>rock samples from Benu and then swung by Earth jettison

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this capsule, and the capsule landed here on Earth and

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 1>NASA retrieved it. That's good news, but there's also some

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>bad news. The bad news is, so far the scientists

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't been able to open the capsule. They have collected

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>more than seventy grams worth of dust and rocks from

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the outside of the container. But because that dust and

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>those rocks were on the outside of the container. That

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>means that they've had contact with and thus contamination from

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>our dirty, dirty Earth dirt. So you can't really make

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>specific scientific conclusions about stuff from outer space if it's

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>already been contaminated here on Earth. You don't know what

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>elements were just present in the space stuff versus what

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>was transferred through that contact. So the real treasure is

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>inside the case where those samples have not been contaminated

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>by Earth. So the goal is to preserve that status

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and retrieve the samples, then run tests, and that way

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you can at least be pretty sure that the conclusions

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you draw are are firm, that they're well grounded, because

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you were to say, find organic material

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>inside the dust or rocks, then you could say, well,

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>we took all the controls necessary to prevent contamination from Earth.

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>We found this stuff here that's really interesting and it

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>raises a lot more questions. You can't really do that

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're not able to maintain that integrity. Unfortunately, two

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of the fasteners on this capsule, they're more than thirty

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>fasteners in total, but two of them are firmly shut

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and cannot be removed with the tools that NASA had

0:29:55.840 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>previously approved for the retrieval operation, So that means that

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we have to wait while researchers work on the problem

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and figure out an alternative to accessing the material inside

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the capsule, one that will maintain that integrity. It doesn't

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>mean that they won't come up with it. In fact,

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they will come up with it, but it

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>will delay things a little bit because they have to

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.959
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they're still keeping things as secure as

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they possibly can. So we do still expect to get

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>into that capsule and to eventually be able to check

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>out those space rocks. It's just going to take a

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit longer to come up with a way to

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>do it that keeps them preserved properly. Now that's it

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for the stories, but I do have one press release

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and one article to recommend for y'all for further reading today.

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So on the press release side, the US Securities Exchange

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Commission stated that it has filed fraud charges against the

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>company Solar Winds, as well as the company's chief information

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>security officer. Now you might remember that Solar Winds is

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the company that was behind the Orion software that thousands

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of large companies and government agencies use and that hackers

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>were able to compromise the Orian software and through updates

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that were pushed out by Solar Winds itself, they were

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>subsequently able to infect target computer systems, thousands of them.

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>It was one of the largest known cybersecurity breaches of

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>all time, and it raised awareness of a type of

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>malware strategy called a supply chain attack. Anyway, the fraud

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>charges are complicated, and I'm sure it'll necessitate like a

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>full episode on the topic to give a full update,

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>but for the time being, I recommend y'all read up

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>on that press release. You can find it at SEC

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>dot gov and look for the press release about Solar Winds.

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>As for an article recommendation, Lindsey Clark of The Register

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>has a piece titled tech still cling to sexist stereotypes

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>forgetting female pioneers who coded their path Now, I cannot

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>say that this story surprises me, which makes me sad.

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could say it surprised me and still

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>made me sad, but I wasn't surprised, and that was

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>really sad. It's a reminder that the tech industry in general,

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and really the whole tech bro culture in particular, is

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>often an unwelcome or downright hostile environment for women and

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>really for anyone who doesn't identify as male, and it

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>reminds us that we wouldn't be where we are today

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in the tech world without contributions of people who do

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>not identify as male, of women, and of non binary

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>people who have made incredible contributions to tech. Some of

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the greatest innovators in tech who built the foundations of

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>computer science were women, Grace Hopper and even further back,

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a Lovelace, for goodness sakes, people who were true visionaries

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to technology. And yet we still have

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this environment that denigrates women and dismisses their contributions and achievements.

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>It's unfortunate and sadly, again not surprising, but I do

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>recommend reading that article again. That's in the Register. It's

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.239
<v Speaker 1>called tech Bros still cling to sexist stereotypes. You can

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>check that out. That's it for today. I wish you

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>all a happy Halloween. I hope you are you encounter

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>endless treats and very few tricks, and I hope you're

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>also all doing well. And I'll talk to you again

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Y tech stuff is an iHeart radio production.

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.