WEBVTT - Wind Power Boom of Today Is Just the Start

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.079
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone. Today we're going to talk about wind. Twenty

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty was a record year in this sector, with nearly

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>one hundred gigawatts of new capacity coming online globally. But

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>from the looks of it, this record year appears to

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>be only the start. In our twenty twenty new Energy outlook,

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>which we discussed in our January twenty ninth show titled

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Modeling the Energy Future, Ants Birds and Doctor Strange, being

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>if projects wind to grow on average five point seven

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>percent per year to twenty fifty, this means about hundred

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and forty seven gigawats per year, beating last year's record

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>every year and growing from six percent to power supply

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 1>today to thirty three percent to twenty fifty. And to

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>put a bit of a point on it, on March

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty ninth, the Biden administration announced a target to install

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty gigawatts offshore wind in the US by twenty thirty,

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>up from about zero today. In short, wind is growing.

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>This weekend the show, we've got two bloom Bergunna f

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>wind analysts, Isabel Edwards and Leo Wong. They're here to

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>tell us about what happened in twenty twenty to achieve

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>record installations where the growth of the sector is happening

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and who is winning is supplying all those turbines. Our

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>discussion is based on our report titled twenty twenty Global

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Turbine Market Shares being i fusers can get this report

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>on benef go in the Bloomberg terminal, BNF dot com

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in the BNF mobile app. As a reminder, BENIF does

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>not provide investment or strategy advice, and you can hear

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the full disclaimer at the end of the show. I'm

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Mark Taylor and you're listening to switch down the BENF podcast.

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>He is he Mark hay Leo, Hi, Mark, thanks for joining.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Today is a year in London. Leo, you're in Beijing.

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm in London and today we're going to talk about

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>global wind. So can you start us off by telling

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>us what's happening in wind? So there was a huge

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>growth last year in year on year and almost a

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>hundred gigawatts of new capacity was put online. Can you

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>tell us how that happened? Yep, So was a bit

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of a crazy year for the wind industry. We saw

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>two giga watts added in the onshore wind market, which

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>is increase on last year, and then six point five

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>gigawatts added in the offshore wind industry. But really, when

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>we look at where that growth happened, it's down to

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>two markets, which are the U S and China, and

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 1>both had subsidy schemes that were due to change at

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the end of So in the US, developers at the

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year thought that production tax credit would

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>begin to be phased out at the end of twenties,

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>so they were rushing to get their projects online by

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. And then in China was

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the last year we're going to see significant built for

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>projects that qualify for the onshore wind feed in tariff Leo.

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Do you do you want to say anything more about that? Yeah, sure,

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely so looking back in the past ten years, actually

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>China's tremendous growth has largely been filled by the supporter

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of government subsidies andies really the last year for the

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>onshore wind projects to qualify for the fair in Paris

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so on that regard, since everyone needs to capture the

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>lucrative subsidies, they essentially just rushed everything and that's how

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>we get to this tremendous amount of capacities built in

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty just really quick, can we do a quick parenthetical?

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain what the production tax credit is and

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 1>what a feed in tariff is for the uninitiated. The

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>production tax credit is a federal income tax credit that's

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:15.839
<v Speaker 1>awarded to project owners based on electricity sales. And so

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this year ends last year projects can qualify for of

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the production tax credit, but it is going to be

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>phased out every year until leo, do you want to

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>explain how does the feed in tarifforic in China? So

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>the fit entire scheme in China allows the developers as

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>owners to sell their power at the fixed rate. And

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>essentially the income comes with two parts. So the first

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>part is essentially paid by the local credy companies, which

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is usually equal to the local coal power prices, right.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And then then the second part, which is intially the gap,

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is paid by the central government's budget. So when you

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>add those two components together, that will be the total

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>volume for for the in tires. Okay, So they're racing

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to get guaranteed income or a tax credit or a

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>tax break on the production electricity exactly. These are just

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the different ways that projects owners can guarantee

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>revenue from electricity sales on their projects, and in many

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>markets they're getting fased out or the governments are changing

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the level of seity that they're awarding to projects, and

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>so there is a push among developers worldwide to qualify

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for the kind of highest level of government support before

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that is phased out. Cool okay and Leo, you mentioned

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>that there's like some crazy activity going on in China

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>to try to meet that deadline. Can you describe some

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of that essentially in China? Added fifty seven point eight

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>was of new win forms, And to just put that

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>into context, that's the number doubling from the twenty nineteen level,

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>which is another big year for China. And if you're

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>actually comparing that number fifteen seven point eight to the

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>global win installations, that's only two gigglewards the shine off

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the total wind capacity at it in twent nineteen globally, right,

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 1>So that just put everything into the perspective. And what

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>happened in is UH joint efforts from the supply side

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>as well as the demand side. So on the supply side,

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing manufacturers working there in the night, and then

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.119
<v Speaker 1>they were even able to reduce the amount of time

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to produce a single blade from seventy two hours all

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the way down to twenty four hours. And then you're

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing the developers sending their employees to stay in the

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>wind turbine makers factories so that they were making sure

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>their towbins get to be first. On the demand side,

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>what we're saying that those developers were also building like

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>crazy in the central part of China. Some teams were

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to transport the wind installation cranes to a wind

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>farm and it breaks down in the middle of the night,

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:01.679
<v Speaker 1>So these construction crews were driving five hundred kilometers away

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to a service center to get the spare parts and

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>then then get back to the construction site the second day.

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So that just tells us like whole heart those folks

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>on the grill on a twin to get those winter

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>been spilt. That's amazing. We'll get into this, but like

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the supply side alone is just really incredible. To build

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>double the capacity that you put in the ground last year,

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that's quite a jolt to the supply chain, right, Yeah,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's something we would never imagine. Okay, so we'll

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>get into that in a second. But there's two more

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 1>things I want to touch on on the context of

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>global wind. So one is that it seems really undeterred

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.559
<v Speaker 1>by COVID nineteen, right, so the world kind of shut down,

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>but it seems not to have affected wind at all.

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Can you describe why it looks like it hasn't affected

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>wind at all? When you look at the year end installations,

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a single region worldwide where installations didn't grow

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>compared to But when we look earlier in the year,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of national lockdowns that delayed farms

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>from being built. So there were restrictions on the movement

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of goods so the turbines to actually get to the sites,

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and then on the movement of people so like workers

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to go and build the wind farms. But that was

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>relatively short lived because construction projects were some of the

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>first to be prioritized in terms of the people that

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>could go back to work throughout the pandemic. So now

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we we really don't see that much of an impact

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>when we look at global installations. So the projects that

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>were in the pipeline got built, but did the pipeline

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>keep growing? You know, our more projects being financed as

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>well through the pandemic, So that's where we start to

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>see the impact of COVID nineteen on the wind sector.

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>We recorded a record here for offshore wind investments with

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion invested worldwide and new projects and actually mean MIA.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>We saw about about half of that was in EMA,

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>which is actually equal to the same amount that we

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>saw invested in the onshore wind sector and AMIA. But

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>when we look at global offshore wind financing, it was

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>down to you about ninety billion last year, down from

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred and twenty billion in twenty nineteen. And

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we think that's both just because it was maybe more

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>challenging to get parties together in order to agree on

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a financing agreement for a project, but also some parties

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that might have been willing to finance a win farm

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>at the start of the pandemic might have had a

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>lower appetite for the risks posed by some of these

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>projects by the end of the year. How is that

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>looking for one and beyond, so we expect one to

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>be another large year for for wind. We currently are

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>forecasting about eighty four giga watts of new wind capacity

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to come online, so not as much as last year,

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>though not as much as last year. It's gonna be

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>difficult to top twenty, but still a big year. So

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>about seventy had gig watson the onshore wind industry and

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>nine gigg wats in the afshowin industry, which is a

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of an increase an offshore based on twenty twenty.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>There's one more thing I want to touch on context

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the supply chain. President Biden in

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the US announced, you know, on what tenty ninth of March.

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe that they want to build out thirty gigawatts

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of offshore wind by in the US, up from I

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>think forty two now in the area between New Jersey

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and Long Island. That seems huge, is it, or is

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know, just a few wind farms. It's pretty big.

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So we currently estimate that about twenty three gigawatts of

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>offshore wind capacity will be added in the US by

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's a further seven giga watts. And right now

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>there is no large scale offshore wind installation in the US.

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 1>The first one to come online, we think is only

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>going to come online. So all of that thirty gigga

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>watts would have to be built within a six year period,

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 1>so about four point nine giga watts added each year

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>over six years, which is really kind of logistically challenging.

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>UM some of those new projects will need to secure permits,

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>which in the US has been challenging to date. And

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>really all of that off shore capacity has to be

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>built in the northeast UM where the waters are shallow

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to accommodate bottom fixed offshore wind turbines. If we

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>look to the other markets in the US that have

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>set offshore wind targets, they're on the west coasts and

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>have deeper waters, so those installations are more reliant on

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>floating wind technology, which hasn't benefited from the same cost

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>reductions due to large deployment of commercial offshore wind installations

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. And if I'm remembering correctly from your report,

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>there currently is not a US based offshore wind equipment supplier.

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that right, Yes, that's quite right. So we're looking

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>at the global off your wind supply chains, so instantially

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>today Europe and the China and other actually two major

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>regions where actually they're able to produce the off your

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>wind turbines as well as the the other equipmenting need

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to build a wind farm. And for you, as yes,

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a ready to go wind turbine manufacturing

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>facility yet, But that doesn't necessarily mean that the existing

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>facilities might not have a second chance to expand their facilities,

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>upgrade the producing increments and they get ready for the

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>for the future production. So we think right now the

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>industry have the confidence that the marketing will boom very soon.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And besides, the local content rules just but just to

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to sift the transportation costs will be another

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>strong driver for them to think about sitting up the

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>local facilities. When we look at who has secured orders

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>so far in the US, only about six gigawats of

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the thirty gig a wats that these government is targeting

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>has signed preferential supplier agreements, So there is a lot

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of potential for new sales um for offshore wind turbans

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>among all of the determined players. Most of the orders

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to date have gone to Semens, Comma and Geo Security

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in order as well Investors right now is the only

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>company that doesn't have a US preferential supplier agreement for

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a project the US. Okay, wow, So there's gonna be

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do there. So thirty giga watts in

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the US of offshore by six globally predicted or projected

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>by bloomguin e F and then our new Energy outlook,

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>our outlooked to predicts somewhere on the order of a

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred giga watts per year, so matching the number roughly

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>every year out a call from the report. Let's leave

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that there. The point is that wind is growing. We're

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>going to take a short break and when we come back,

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about who is supplying the wind sector,

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>who's building the turbines, who's winning, who's losing. So stay

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>with us. So this report we're talking about today is

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the global wind turbine market shares you know, who is

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>supplying the wind sector with well turbines? Can you tell

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>us a bit more just about who's playing and who

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is winning in global wind? So it depends on where

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>you look in the world. So outside of China, we're

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>we're currently looking at about five have major companies. Some

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of those are best to us, the Danish turbine maker

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>General Electric, which is an American conglomerate, and then seems Lasso,

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the leader in offshore wind. But about five

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 1>to ten years ago there were many more players in

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the kind of ex China market. But so we're really

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.839
<v Speaker 1>seeing strong market consolidation outside of China, and right now

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the top five companies account for about ninety four percent

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of all onshore wind installations outside of China. That's huge, right,

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>That's not a lot of room for others. And if

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you're looking China, then the story is totally different. Right.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So in China is actually today one of the most

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>fragmented wind marketing in the world despite the huge volume.

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>So looking back in the past, when we are looking

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>at the top three companies, their market shares pually around

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and the living tremendous space for the other players. And

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>in just in last year, we have more than twenty

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>companies supplying win turbines in China. So that's a huge market.

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Who is so many players active in it? So today

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>go to wind Envision and the Mania are the three

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>top players in the market, whereas a few others that

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>belonged to a larger state owned enterprises. So I note

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the global wind turbine supply market has been relatively hard

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to track over the years. Player, remember that correctly, how

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>did you actually go about doing this? Can you tell

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>us a bit about your process or methodology for determining

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the market shares of these players. Bloomber Getting have win

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>teams strives to track every wind farm that was brought

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>online in a given year and a database of projects

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that currently accounts about forty wind farms and who supplied

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the turbines to those projects. So what we look for

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is in this exercises projects that are in the construction phase,

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that are entering the commercial operation phase within and we

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>work in collaboration with the wind turbine manufacturers to come

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>up with the final numbers for the report. So doing

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this work, you know, this is the laborious process. We've

0:14:59.920 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>been doing this since we've been at We've been tracking

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy projects in two four. It's a it's a

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>labor of love. I guess you could say. The results

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>are really interesting and they allow us to draw insights

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>or conclusions about the market. LEO, as you were doing

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>this last year, what did you find most surprising as

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you look through the data. What we're looking back for,

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the numbers, obviously we're all stunded by

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the total amount of capacity at twenty but one more

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>fine interesting detail that already surprised all of us. It's

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>really how the market share of the top three players

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>has come down a bit so asas they pointed out, globally,

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the wind marketing has been going through some marketing consolidation

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>process and it's cause a true for China as well.

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And for the past few years the market share of

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the three leaders have been growing all the way, but

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this year their market shing has come down by thirteen

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>percentage points. And what happened behind the curtains really a

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>boom of performance from the small that will ended about

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>makers who are able to double or even triple their installations,

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you know a year because the smaller players who are

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>able to utilize their id only manufacturing capacity when the

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>other books of the leading players will full, so in

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>this way the capacity will doubling or even tripling. So

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>really it's just a rising tide raises all boats in

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>this case, right that there's more demand for projects and

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>then the orders get filled up for the big ones

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and then there's room for the small players. That's really cool.

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that the same outside of China as well? Or

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>do you see you know that top ownership amongst five players?

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you said, is there room for smaller players

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>outside China? Less and less So when we look at

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the global picture, G E. Goldwyn and best Us are

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in the lead with over twelve gig awats at it

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>last year, and then Envision at it over ten gig awats,

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we see all the smaller players to ring

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>behind those top four. So we're really starting to see

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the gap widen between the the top few players and

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>then the smaller players. And there's the instance of send Beyond,

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>which filed for insolvency in because it was not able

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to kind of compete on a turbine crising basis with

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the larger players and had a high degree of market

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:20.919
<v Speaker 1>concentration risk um. And so the larger players, particularly Siemens Comessa,

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>were able to absorb sem Beyond business units. So Siemens

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Comessa acquired Semyon's i P and its service portfolio which

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>is the high margin business, and its manufacturing facilities. So

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>now it seems we're getting into a very different type

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of consolidation, right, players that can't keep up, they get

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, solver parts on the cheap, I guess right, exactly,

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they get priced out, and then the larger players are

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>able to absorb their their businesses. Fascinating, So we've touched

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>on this a bit, you know, when we talked about

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>supplying the US offshore market, But can you tell us

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>a bit about the regional aspect of supply, so you know,

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we know the Goldwin supplies in China, g E in

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.959
<v Speaker 1>the US. Is the market mostly or entirely regional or

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is there any cross pollination or cross geography supply going on?

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>It is mostly regional. So about East twenty installations came

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>from the US, and for Goldwin, more than of them

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>came from China, and those two companies placed first and

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>second this year really by relying on growing demand in

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>their home markets. Best LS, which placed third, takes a

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>very different approach. So the U s it's largest market,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>only accounts of its twin twenty installations, and instead Best

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>US supplied wind turbines to over thirty markets worldwide, just

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>more than double the number of countries that g East

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>By turbines too, and we are starting to see some

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese players grow their business outside of China,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and in turn the Western turbine makers for their business

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>within China. So vest for just Invest US and gi Eat,

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>China was the second largest market after the US for

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>last year's Win installations. So Leo to your point earlier

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 1>about you know, the smaller players in China being able

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to gain a foothold, it's sounding like it's true. Also

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>for players outside of China, there's room for them too,

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Is that right, Yeah, exactly. So we are looking at

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the numbers in tween twenties. So gvestwesoms Commiss, those three

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>companies combined they added around to point full kick awards.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>It might know it sounds like a lot compared to

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the total number in China, but still that's doubling from

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the level in twenty ten. Again, so looking into the future,

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>which the presidentsen Pain's announcements on combinationality, the Chinese, the

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>most of players, developers, and the government agencies were also

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at additional growth in the next five years. So

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's still a bounding room for actual turbans to

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>be built. Let's continue to look to the future. There's

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a tool on BNF dot com that you guys built

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>that looks at future market shares, which to me, honestly,

0:19:58.119 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I think is one of the coolest tools we have

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>that I love that it's not just backward looking, but

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it's forward looking at who is going to own the

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>future of the market? Chairs can you tell us based

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on that? You know, who has the strongest pipeline and

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>what do you see one? You know, I think you've

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>said another eighties six gig watts for this year, but

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>who's looking to own that? So it's looking like it

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>will be a similar story to this year, and that's

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>not very surprising. So among the top five will be

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>best s Ge, Goldwyn, Envision and Semens Comessa. And right

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>now we have a project level data for about seventy

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of all of the capacity that we expect will

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>come online, so there is some room for the kind

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of top players to shuffle around. We don't expect too

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>many surprises from so in China this year actually something

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>new will happen. So that's the first year for the

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>unshaw win to go completely substidi free. And right now

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a price wall going on with so many

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>tebet makers testing again and again the bottom of the

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>topam prices. So right now more and more companies are

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>looking for potentially going to the public, meaning that they

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>need the market to share to tell a good story

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to their investors. So now the war's still going on

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and with think as possible that the ranking will still

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>reshuffle little bates at the end of one Okay, cool,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So I guess one final question. We've talked a lot

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>about China, the US, Europe today, but we haven't talked about,

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know where else growth might occur, Latin America, Africa.

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us a bit more about what the

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>prospects are in in those markets. Sure, Africa has actually

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a reagioned that I'm watching pretty closely. So last year

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw that giga wat added across the Middle East

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and Africa region, most of that being in North Africa

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and South Africa, but there were a number of countries

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>that financed some of their first wind farms. So Sambique

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is one, and there's a wind from being built in

0:21:55.560 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Ethiopia and Jibouti. So there is growing interest in and

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>wind across the continents. And South Africa is now planning

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>its next renewable energy auctions, so the government will auction

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>about four point eight gig watts of entra wind capacity

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>over the next three years. So I expect the market

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and Africa to grow. So it seems to be a

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>theme that wind is growing. Leo is he thanks for

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>joining us? So we'll be back. I think we should

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have you one you know next year to check in

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>on the market. Leo is See. Thanks for joining us.

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Mark. Great to be on the show. Thanks

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for Today's episode of Switched On was edited by Rex

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Warner with Great Stoke Media. Bloomberguin EAF is a service

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This recording

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>does not constitute, nor should it be construed, as investment advice,

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to an investment or

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>other strategy. BLOOMBERGUNA should not be considered as information sufficient

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>upon which to base an from decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>LP nor any of its affiliates makes any representation or

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>contained in this recording, and any liability as a result

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of this recording is expressly disclaimed