WEBVTT - Interview With Saadia Madsbjerg: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, we have an extra special guest,

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Sadia Modsburg, director of Innovation and managing partner at the

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Rockefeller Foundation, a small, four billion dollar outfit dedicating itself

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to the betterment of mankind. How's that for a broad subject? Anyway,

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>If you're at all interested in philanthropy or how foundations operate,

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and what it's like to have to think about giving

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>away hundreds of millions of dollars a year, I expect

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you will find this conversation to be quite fascinating. The

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Rockefeller Foundation takes a decidedly off center approach. As the

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>expression goes, they are not looking to give a man

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of fish as much as they are looking to find

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the economic choke point that is leading to whatever distress

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 1>any given region is suffering and find ways to fix

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that on a permanent basis. Two so called teach the

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>person to fish. Uh. They've spent a lot of time

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:22.199
<v Speaker 1>thinking about things like resilience and how cities and regions

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>can develop resiliency. Two ongoing threats, be they economic, terrorist,

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>or even just threats um caused by the weather like

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Super so Sandy or Katrina all told, I found this

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to be quite a fascinating conversation, and if you are

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 1>at all interested in all things philanthropy, I think you'll

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>similarly find it interesting. With no further ado, here is

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Saudia Madsburg. This is Masters in Business

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>with very Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio Mice. Special guest today

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is Sadia Mottsburg. She is the managing director at the

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Rockefeller Foundation, which has about four billion dollars in assets.

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>She joined the foundation in and leads the foundation work

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>on innovation. Previously, she was senior vice president for strategic

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Planning at the New York City Economic Development Corp. She

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>spent six years at Mackenzie and four years at Cisco.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>Has a Masters in Science in Applied Economics from Copenhagen

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Business School, as well as an undergraduate degree in international business.

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Saudia Madsburg, Welcome to Bloomberg. Thank you, briam delighted to

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>be here. Uh and it's a pleasure to have you.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's spend a little bit of time on your

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>background before we delve into the details of what the

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>foundation does. How do you go from being a consultant

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>at mackenzie and working on telecom technology at Cisco, to

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>too of working in a foundation. How does that trend

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>position take place? So if you had asked me, you know,

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty odd years ago, whether I think I would be

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting in the position I'm in now, the answer would

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>probably be no, because it hasn't been an intentional career

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>choice that I made from the very beginning. UM, I've

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>always followed my intuition and my feeling in terms of

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>what I need to be doing and where I need

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to be doing that. So that is what took me

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>from consulting to the world of tech, to public um

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>sector in terms of New York City and now here

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>at philanthropy. But as I do reflect back at all

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of this, I do think that the experiences I've gathered

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>along the way put me in a better position to

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>be doing the job I'm doing today. So so obviously

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>with an entity like McKenzie, which is known as a

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>consultant to all different manners of organizations and businesses, UM,

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>there's clearly and overlap. But technology telecom, how does that

0:03:55.800 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>translate into heading up the innovation project Rockefeller? So technology,

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say I mean always but a lot recently

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>as well, is playing a critical role in terms of

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>how society is developing, how the basic fundamentals of you know,

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the job market are being shaped, what has happened, where

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>growth is coming from, how we interact with each other,

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.479
<v Speaker 1>how we work with each other. Uh, the work that

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I did at Cisco was very much about that. It

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>was about understanding what is the fundamental role that technology

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>plays in our lives at work and outside of work,

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and how can we use technology to address some of

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental challenges and opportunities. Because it's not all about

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>challenges as we go along, So let's talk about some

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of those challenges and some of those opportunities. I want

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to reference something you had blocked about for the Foundation,

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the Innovative Finance Revolution. What is that and what does

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the Foundation do with that? So before I get to

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>describing the revolution, maybe I can dis where have the

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>challenge that that revolution attempts to address. So twenty fifteen

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I think was a landmark year and in many different ways,

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>but there are two particular things that we saw happened

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 1>that year. One was that the world came together to

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>um agree on what we call the Sustainable Development goals,

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>which are seventeen very lofty goals about how we want

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the world, what we want the world to look like.

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, we also had the Paris Climate

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Agreement that you know, most countries around the world came

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>together and agreed on and has been ratified by you know,

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.799
<v Speaker 1>a significant number of them. I think there's one large

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>country that hasn't gotten around to signing offer right, and

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we can we can get to what that actually means

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in practical attempts. But both of those agreements kind of

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>brought to the forefront the big question of how are

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>we going to pay for all of this? How are

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>we going to pay for these sustainable development goals? And

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just about developing countries, it's about us, Europe,

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the entire world. And how are we going

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>to pay for are all the climate related efforts that

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we want to do, And that is where innovative finance

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>comes in. And just to put a few numbers on

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the table as well, it's estimated that for the sustainable

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>development goals, they're going to cost around fifty to seventy

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>trillion over the next decade. Trillion trillion with a capital

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>T that's a lot of zeros, and there are also

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>some you know, and and these are high level estimates,

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>so when you dig down, I'm sure you can refine

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it along the way, but they're also estimate stent that

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a massive funding gap in terms of how we're

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get there, and that takes into account the

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>money philanthropy has, the money the private sector has. So

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about and there's just another number for

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to put it in context, a gap of roughly two

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>point five trillion per year in developing countries alone. So

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't even include where we are sitting right now.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So we have to think innovatively. We have to think

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>about alternative solutions, and we at the Rockefeller Foundation think

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that innovative finance is a big part of the answer.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So how does that manifest itself? What does innovative finance

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>do to help funds projects like smart power for rural development.

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So innovative finance represents a pretty expansive set of financing

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms that, in one way another are designed to either

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>attract more money to development goals and and different programs

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and initiatives, or to take the money that's already in

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>place and the new money that's coming in and make

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>sure that it's more effectively deployed. Because I talked about

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the massive funding gap. That gap is there and we

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>need to focus on it. At the same time, we

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>also need to make sure that the way money is

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>delivered is done in a more predictable way, in a

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>more sustainable way, because if people you know, are working

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in this space, you have to know what's going to

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>happen next year in terms of whether you're going to

0:07:57.800 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>have the money or not. So you're really referring to

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of philanthropic efficiency, making sure that the money that is

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>allocated is used appropriately and effectively for whatever the I

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>will say, not just philanthropic funding, also what comes from

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the private sector, also what comes from the public sector.

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>So pretty pretty broad and and you know, just to

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>put context to what kind of financing mechanisms we're talking about,

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's everything from insurance links, securities, to pay for performance

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>debt structures to even micro texas. I'm Barry Ridholts. You're

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Sadia Modsburg. She is the director of

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Innovation at the Rockefeller Foundation, and and let's talk a

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the foundation's mission. I'm gonna quote right

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>off of the website to improve the well being of

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>humanity around the world. That's a little broad. What what

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>does it really mean in actuality, improve in the well

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>being of humanity? It is indeed quite broad, and every

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>time I say it, I almost kind of need to stop,

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>take a breath, let it sink in, and then, you know,

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about what that actually means. So, the Rockefellow Foundation

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>has been around for roughly a hundred and four years.

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>The year I joined, we were celebrating our centennials, So

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we had been around for a hundred

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>years and were reflected back on what we had achieved

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in those hundred years and what it had meant. We

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have always stayed true to the mission, which is to

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>promote the well being of humanity. But what that means

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.599
<v Speaker 1>at any given point in time, of course, has shifted

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>over the years, and it's shifted based on what we

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>think the big challenges of our times have been and

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>where we think that philanthropy has an important role to

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>play in terms of stepping in, trying out new solutions,

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>proving how they work, and then letting others step in

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and drive those forward. I would say, though, the three

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>things that have remain the same over the hundred and

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>four years. One is our focus on innovation, so really

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>driving towards new thinking and new solutions. The second is

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>more you know and and it's something if you read

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the letters written by John D. Rockefell in

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the early days that it comes out is this idea

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of scientific philanthropy, meaning what what's about trying to really

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>understand what the core underlying drivers behind the challenge are.

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So instead of just throwing money at something and so

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>here's money, you know, let's go alleviate the pain and

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>suffering here, it's about really understanding what the fundamental issue is.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>So when they say when you say scientific philanthropy, you

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>mean sort of a scientific methodology using an evidence based approach. Yes,

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, these dollars are actually having resonance and

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>having an effect, these not so much less focus on

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>what's working. Both that, but also to use the data

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and to use the research to understand what the problem

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>really is, where the problem really comes from. So when

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to figure out what the answer to that

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 1>problem is, you're actually addressing the root causes of it.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>As opposed to just you know what comes to this effect.

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like it's somewhat process oriented. Don't just

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>identify a problem, find that fulk rum point that's the

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>key to the problem. Right. That sounds quite fascinating. I

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>assume you're a five percent foundation, meaning each year you

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>give away five of of the four billion or so

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>UM and your your portfolio offsets those that that donation.

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>How do you prioritize where to focus your efforts again,

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>improving humanity, improving the well being humanity a giant charge

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>trying mission. How do you drill down and say, we

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>want to focus on these areas and within these areas,

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the specific um issue we want to attack. So,

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned, we try to you know, really understand

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>what we think the big challenges of our times aren't

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>based in at set our strategy at any given point

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in time. That's the responsibility that the senior leadership team carries,

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>as the responsibilities that our trustees carry as well. If

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we look at where we are at this point in

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>time and where we have focused, we have two overarching

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>goals as we call them. One is around resilience building,

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the other one is advancing inclusive economies and within that therefore,

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>what we call issue areas um that we focus on.

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>There's advanced health, revalue ecosystems, transform cities, and secure livelihoods. Now, now,

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>having just said what these issue areas still brought issues,

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.599
<v Speaker 1>So that brings us back to how do you operationalize

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it on a day to day basis? How do you

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>actually try to understand what's happening in those spaces. We

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>have a strategic insights team that continuously monitors what's happening

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in those spaces and shapes different suggestions for areas where

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we could engage, and then we take those are years

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and have a conversation around you know, how pressing is

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the problem. And I'll be honest, in most cases when

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, nobody can come and argue the

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>problem isn't pressing. They're they're terrible things happening around the world,

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, in our backyard and across the ocean as well.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's about that, But then it's also about what

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>we like to call looking at dynamism and potential for innovation.

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>So with dynamism, what I mean is is there something

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>happening at this point in time that makes it the

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>right time for us as a foundation to go in

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and engage. Is it on the policy side, is their

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>developments in the private sector that what we should be

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>looking at and focused on. Is it something in civic society,

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>some thing that gives an indication there's a momentum that

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we can build on and accelerate. And then of course

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>there's the impact at scale. We're here, I mean, philanthropy

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is here to serve poor and vulnerable people around the world.

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>That is our role, that is what we're focused on.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So at the end of it, it comes down to

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>our ability to have impact. So we're gonna talk more

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>about resilience in a few minutes. Let's talk a little

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>bit about um, the day to day and the prioritization.

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you look for low hanging fruit as the expression

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>uh suggest, where where there's an immediate impact or are

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>there occasional moonshots that hey, we don't know if this

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be successful, but if it works, the

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>impact is tremendous. So it's a both, it's it's that's

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what I was going to say. It's a fine balance,

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's both. And again, when our mission is so broad,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>our areas are so broad, if we're really doing our

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>job well, we can't be going to the obvious solutions

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and funding the obvious things. But sometimes you need to

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>do that too. Um. I mean, we think of our

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>money as America's risk capital, where we can deploy it

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in ways where the private sector wouldn't be will too,

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>because they maybe don't want to take on the risk.

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>The public sector again may not be able to because

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>either they don't have the resources available or they don't

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to take that risk. So we have

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a big responsibility in terms of what we do with

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that really precious privileged capital in terms of driving towards

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>new solutions. I mean, and you talk about moonshots that

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you can look at it in many different ways. We

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about in a bit of finance earlier and one

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of the portfolios that that I oversee the Foundation is

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>called zero Gap, and it is focused on the financing

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms and closing the funding gap within that. Right now,

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we're funding something called outbreaking epidemic insurance. Now, ten years ago,

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>if you weren't to anybody in the insurance industry and said,

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, public health, you know there's a massive lack

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of funding. They are all these public health emergencies that

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>come up time and time again, we don't have a

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>good system in place to fund out how about insurance.

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Many of them would probably you know, have roll their

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>eyes and say, yes, that's great. We run this business,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, based on these things, and you know, good

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>luck fiddling with that. Over in the philanthropic sector. I'm

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Barry Ridholts. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>My special guest today is Sadia Madsburg. She is the

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>managing director of the Rockefeller Foundation, focusing on the Foundation's

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>work on innovation. So let's talk a little bit about

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>resilience as a public policy here in here in New

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>York City and the surrounding region. Uh, the Superstorm Sandy

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>was a giant mess that caused all sorts of problems

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in some ways outside of Katrina. It was the most

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>expensive um storm, certainly on the East Coast. What can

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we as a city and a region do to become

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>more resilient. So I was working for New York City

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>at the time super Storm Sandy hit, and you're right,

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>it was a massive disaster. It was a mess. It

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>costs the local economies of the states that were hit

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>by it a lot. The small and medium sized businesses

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>were shut down for a while. The public infrastructure broke down,

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>whether you're talking about subways or telecommunications infrastructure, um, electrical electrical.

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I live in the suburbs. We had no electricity for

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve days. If you would have asked me beforehand, yeah, hey,

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>what are the odds that a storm is going to

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>knock out electricity for two weeks? I would say, this

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is America. That shouldn't happen. Yeah, exactly. I mean I

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>was living downtown Manhattan and you know I had to

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>relocate to Midtown. That was the extent of you know,

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the suffering I I went through. But but no, it

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>was a big shock to the system. And that really

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>does bring forward this whole concept of resilience and what

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>should we do, not just at a city level and

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a state level, but for countries and regions as well.

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>At the Rockefeller Foundation, we talked about resil alliance as

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the capacity of individuals, communities, societies to withstand shocks when

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they happen and then bounce back from them faster as well.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's not about trying to stop the disasters from

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>happening and saying how do you put in place the systems,

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the solutions, the policies that will allow you to bounce

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>back faster? Now have we done that? Because I know

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in the world of finance, we are notorious for experiencing

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>something terrible and then forgetting about it as soon as possible.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Have we forgotten about Superstorm Sandy or Katrina? Or have

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we taken steps to become more resilient as a as

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a geography. So I think in in the public realm um,

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>there's this very broad understanding that you cannot just forget

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and pretend that it didn't happen. It's happening time and

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>time again in different parts of this country and different

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world. So there is a very strong

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>momentum and focus on saying, you know, let's let's get

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>to this oceans. Part of it is also breaking away

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>from the silos that we operate in. Don't think about

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>you know this is this has to do about education,

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>This has to do with infrastructure, this has to do

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>with you know something else. You have to sometimes cut

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>across the silos and say what are the right solutions

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you put in place? And I mean, I'd like to

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>give an example again from our innovative finance portfolio of

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>something we're funding currently which people would not normally associate

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with resilience effort, and it has to do with natural infrastructure.

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So by natural infrastructure, I mean oyster reefs, I mean

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 1>coral reefs and you know marsh lands and coastal wetlands.

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>They protect a natural barrier when it comes to storms.

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, they have done it time and time again.

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Their science out there that shows that, you know, a

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>healthy coral leaf can absorb around of the energy of

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a wave that is massive. So you don't even have

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to go think, you know, let's build a massive sea

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>wall or any you know, thing equivalent to that. How

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>do you put in place mechanisms that can allow you

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to protect the natural environment we have today that is

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>protecting us. So so what we're funding and we're working

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>currently with the Nature Conservancy and they're partnering with Swiss

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>re on it is to say, um, there's the meso

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>American reef. It's the second largest reef in the world.

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It protects a lot of the local economy. When it

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to the Mexican Mexican tourism system, can you gather

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the hotel association and the local businesses that benefit from

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>having a healthy reef get them to pay into a

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>fund that invests in the maintenance of the reef but

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>also bios catastrophe insurance on it, so when something terrible happens,

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>one insurance pays out immediately, so you have the money

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in hand, build right away because you have to. And

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't understand you know, the complexity of it, but

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is picking it up at the

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>right time, reattaching it so it can continue to go.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, you can't come back in a month,

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>two month, three months into it because then you're vulnerable

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>to the you know, there are some little things I

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>was I think a lot of people were shocked about

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>with Sandy, and we haven't even gotten to Katrina shocked

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to learn that emergency generators are located in the basements

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of buildings, which assumes there's no flooding right stop and

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this was done twenty thirty years ago. People

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>weren't really conceptualizing a wave coming over Manhattan, going down

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>into the subway, going down into the basements of buildings,

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and basically rendering those emergency generators um unusable. But what

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about with reef building and oyster bed promotion.

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>These are giant macro projects that are far beyond anyone business,

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 1>probably anyone UM city or or municipality. It has to

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>be part of a broader effort. I'm Barry Ridhults. You're

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters and Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Sadia Madsburg. She is the Director of

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Innovation at the Rockefeller Foundation, whose mission is to improve

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the well being of humanity around the world. So let's

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>get into the nitty gritty of that. Uh, I'm ballparked.

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>The foundations about four billion dollars? Is that slightly more

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>than that? Slightly more than that? Um? How does the

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Foundation manage its money? Do they use in house managers?

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>They use out outside managers? They use both. So we

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>have our investment office that is led by our Chief

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Investment Officer, Donna Dean. She's a brilliant, very very smart

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>woman who's been taking care of the money for us

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>so that the rest of us on the program side

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>have money to spend on unfulfilling our mission. Uh. It

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>is managed externally. We have our team internally that sets

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, goals and along with the with our board

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and and us on which direction we want to be

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>going in, and then they look for the right opportunities externally.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>So you target five percent a year to give out.

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>That's everybody that's a tax exempt foundation uses uses that money.

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>How our priorities set? Is it long term thinking and

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it's mapped out over years, or do you have the

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>ability we reference the bowler earlier, do you have the

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>ability to pivot when an emergency such as that pops up.

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>So we try to do boats because we have to

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>be invested in areas for the long term. You can't

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>come up with solutions, you know, in the short term

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know, we saw for it, let's go

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 1>on the next, onto the next one. So we have

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>some of it dedicated towards our longer term initiatives and programs.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>One example of that is what we call yield wise.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>It's focused on reducing post harfice lass in agricultural food

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>chain in Africa. It's something we yield loss yield wise.

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so it's focused on reducing post harvest loss.

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So from the time a small hold of farmer harvests

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it till the time it gets to a market where

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you can still sell it. There's a big loss that

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>happens in there, meaning just natural attrition rot or what

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 1>what is it that it's a combination of that. So um.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>One of the crops that we're looking at is called cassava.

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.479
<v Speaker 1>It's something that you have to get to the market

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>quickly and process very quick to melon and it's um

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a decent size and so I you know, for me,

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it's more about how do you want link it to

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>the local markets in a more efficient way quickly And

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes technology plays a role, or processing close to where

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you're harvesting plays a role. Uh. Sometimes it's about having

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 1>in place agreements when it comes to bulk purchase with

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>big you know, food chains, where you know there's somebody

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>there to take it off your hands and know what

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. Um. So it's a number of

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>different things that come into play in terms of how

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you can work towards reducing food loss. So when I

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>when I'm I'm listening to the maintaining the yield and

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the loss, that sounds like you're trying to

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>attack two things. One is poverty in the Third World

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>by by allowing farmers to generate a better economic return.

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>But that also applies towards food scarcity and starvation. If

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a better yield, then you have less loss.

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>That just means is that much more food around, right?

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean it has to do with food security definitely.

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>UM And actually, I mean what I didn't mention was

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the efforts that we're doing here in the US UM

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>within that initiative aren't focused on reducing harvest loss, but

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it's about consumer waste. There's a lot of food that

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you know comes into grocery stores, comes into your fridge,

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>my fridge that never gets consumed that we end up

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>throwing out. So again, more to say, we look at

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>what the challenges were and then figure out what we

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think the appropriate response would be. So let's let's talk

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>about that, because I know I'm the person who takes

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the garbage out in the house and my wife is

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>always wait a second and going through the fridge and

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>tossing out whatever is turns or the tomatoes. So what

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>can you do in the United States to reduce And

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the if memory serves it's massive. It's like fift

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>of the farmed food is wasted. Is that is that

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a fair number? So I don't know the exact percentage,

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but it is a really, really significant amount. Yes, uh

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>so we're in the process of deciding where to go

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>with it. Part of it has to do with creating

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 1>alternative markets. Right, what is waste to you may not

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>be waste to somebody else. Um. I don't know how

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>things were when you were growing up in your house

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and what kind of food culture there was around it.

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 1>But in the old days, you used to take a

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of the things that you would consider close to

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>expiration and you would make stock out of it, right,

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And you would make stock and cook it right, and

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you could put it in the freezer. It tastes delicious.

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You can use it, you know, for time and time again.

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>But and then you can, you know, do other things.

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>You can donate it to local organizations that try to

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>bring food to people that don't currently have food. So

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>part of it is behavioral. Part of it has to

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 1>do with the market dynamics, and I think you have

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to work on both hand. And I recall reading not

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>too long ago about the market for quote unquote ugly fruit, yes,

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>which I find fascinating that, Hey, this tomato was ugly,

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this apple isn't pretty, but it's perfectly edible. And there

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 1>are people who are more than happy to buy it

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>at a substantial discount. And that's an economic solution to one.

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean not just that very if you go to

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>any of the farmers markets around here. I live close

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to Union Square and I go so I go there often.

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 1>And the food isn't set up to look beautiful and

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>well shaped and the same proportions and the same sizes

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and all that. That is just nature. That's you know,

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the charm of the farmers market. This

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>isn't factory farmed. Every tomato is perfectly read, perfectly round.

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Everything looks like it was recently grown without a lot

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of chemicals that I think always thought that was half

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the appeal. So we're talking about some of the things

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>that money can do. What are some of the things

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that money can't do, or at least can't do by itself. Meaning,

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>how do you decide we can only go so far

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with this project? And there needs to be a lot

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>more education and a lot more persuasion of people before

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they recognize and funds a project. If that makes any sense.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It does, um, I think the most stark example of

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>what money can't fix or philanthropy can't fix today is

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the Syrian crisis. Um If you look at it, it's

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a crisis that started, as you know, small protests escalated

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>into a full blown um civil war. Now you're a conflict,

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and now you're at a point where you know there

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a cease fire. But I've read one of

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the headlines in New York Times saying, you know, the

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>parties were quarreling about how to move forward. In the

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>span of those five years, you have a quarter of

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a million people that have died. You have eleven million

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>people that have been displaced from their homes, some of

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>them within Syria, but a significant amount of them left

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Syria as well, state went to neighboring countries. Jordan's I

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>was Jordan recently. And then it's amazing what capacity that

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>country has had to take in refugees time and time again,

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and the treat them with decency and dignity. But Lebanon

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>as an example, Jordan as an example. There even your

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>refugee is going to Iraq. I mean, who would have thought,

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know, somebody would want to go to Iraq

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>as a refugee to get away from what's bad. And

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>then I got you know, Turkey, and then I started

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>getting closer to my old home, which is Europe, and

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it's been front and center of the policy debate in Europe,

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in the US, in Australia, and you know, all other

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>parts well impacted. Brexit might have an impact on the

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>election here. I I think people underestimate how significant the

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>issue in Syria was as a global um affectation. It's

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>really driven all sorts of issues around the world. So

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>if I take that as an example, there's no amount

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of money that I could have given us a grant

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that would have fixed the core of that problem. Now

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>there are things that we can do, we should be doing,

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and we are trying to do around How do you

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>then take the people that are, if affected by the conflict,

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>refugees and try to create more inclusive societies that they

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>can be a part of to actually, you know, allow

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>them to come back into what could be a normal

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>life away from what what they left behind. That's quite

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that's quite astonishing. So when you pick a specific issue

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to focus on, obviously one one question is can we

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have an impact? And if the issue is perhaps not,

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we there's not enough money in the world to resolve

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this that that becomes a diplomacy and governmental challenge. But

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>when you find something that you believe your approach and

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.959
<v Speaker 1>your um cash can actually impact, how do you go

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>about measuring that impact? How can you determine how effective

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a given program is, both both when you're evaluating against

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>other programs you're running or deciding, hey, we're really seeing

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>residents here, let's put a greater refer into this or not.

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you manage just like an actual portfolio. So we

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>do have a very strong focus on what we call monitoring,

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>which is doing it as the program is implemented, and

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>then evaluation, which is the actual outcomes of the program

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>once it has been implemented. One because we want to

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the impact we want to have on

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the life of pinvulnerable people is actually achieved, but to

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>also so we can figure out whether the starting point

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that we had for when we started the program was

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the right one or whether we need to pivot along

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the way. We have been speaking with Sadia Modsburg of

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the Rockefeller Foundation. If you want more information on the foundation,

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you could go to their website just google Rockefeller Foundation,

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>or go to Rockfeller is it Rockfellow Foundation dot org?

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? Um. If you enjoy this conversation, be

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>sure and stick around for the podcast extras, where we

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>keep the tape rolling and talk about all things philanthropic.

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Check out my daily column on Bloomberg View dot com

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>or follow me on Twitter at rit Halts. I'm Barry

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>rit Halts, Human listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the podcast. I don't know why I do that.

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I do that every time, Sadia, thank you much so

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>much for doing this. I find the topic of how

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>great pools of wealth is subsequently used in endowments and

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>foundations for whatever the founding principle um goal was, Even

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>when it's something as broad as making humanity, improving the

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>well being of humanity, something like that, it's fascinating because

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you usually don't get to see the nuts and bolts

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of how that's done. And what I find really interesting

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about the Rockefell Foundation, I think people's general sense of

0:33:56.240 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>foundations are they're throwing money at problems, and and everything

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you've described is much more to get Biblical teach a

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>person of fish rather than give them a fish. It's

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>identifying where the problem is and looking for a solution

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>where there's some subsequent ongoing economic incentive to keep the

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 1>solution going. And that's that's really quite fascinating to me. Um,

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I imagine your day to day work must be really interesting.

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>It really is that it keeps me on my tiptoes.

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So when I was at the point of deciding whether

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>or not to join you know what I would broadly

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>characterize as the social sector of the development sector, I

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>actually went around and talked to a lot of people

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, I don't want to just jump the

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>fans because I think it's going to be better on

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Let me get a realistic feel for

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. And it was an interesting time where, you know,

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people said, no, no, no, if you

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>really want to make a difference, you know, find one

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of the smaller startups and go work there. Don't go

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>in philanthropy. There's said in their ways and what have

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 1>they done. And what I've come to realize and and

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.240
<v Speaker 1>really respect about the place that I work in, about

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the field of philanthropy at large, is, you know, it's

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>not about hacking. You know, global poverty, you can't do that.

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>The problems that there's no silver bullets, there is none

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>of that and you know this idea, you can do

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>an app and you know everything will be fine. No,

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to have respect for the complexity of the

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>problem and then you have to just go at it.

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And my days are fascinating. I mean, you can start

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 1>with talking about infrastructure finance, and then you know, talk

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>about a humanitarian crisis and rhythm refugee crisis, and from

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>there will go on to natural disasters in Africa and

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>how to think about the solutions there. So there's never

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a dull moment I can imagine. Um, I was going

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to ask you. We didn't get to to this question earlier.

0:35:59.840 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I and I don't know if this is the focus

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>of the Rockefeller Foundation, but what can a foundation do

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>about global or domestic inequality? Is that an issue that

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>comes up. So one of our two goals is about

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>advancing inclusive economy. So we we talk about it and

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 1>think of it as inclusion that everybody gets to participate

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.399
<v Speaker 1>in the economic bounty of a given so not just economically,

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but socially as well, because you can't distinguish one from

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the other. If you're a member of society, you want

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>people to be integrated on the social side, cultural side.

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, economic side, give them the same opportunities and

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>treat them as equals. And I think philanthropy has a

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>role to play. One of the programs and you mentioned

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>it earlier that we're funding is Smart Powerful Rural Development.

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>It is an effort focused on trying out testing new

0:36:55.840 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>sustainable business models that drive like trification and economic development

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>of rural villages in India. That's about how do you

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>take somebody who's currently completely excluded from what's happening and

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>try to bring them into the economy, but do it

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>in a way where it's actually sustainable. Really that that's

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 1>quite ah, that's quite interesting. A buddy of mine is

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>working on this project that it's called Helical something I'm

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>drawing a blank on it. They essentially take what is

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a a rail car or you know, the standard shipping

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>containers and they converted so you could basically air drop

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it anywhere. The doors open it up, solar panels come

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>out to the top. You you purify water, you have

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a satellite uplink for communication. You are able to grow

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:52.760
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of food stock for for um, cattle and

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>sheep and everything. And it's the idea is you can

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>instantly in the response of let's say a Katrina or

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 1>some other emergency. You could instantly instant civilization with this

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>one thing. It's really quite that is fascinating. You know.

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 1>It's recently um in Denmark and I was visiting my dad,

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>who spends part of his time in Denmark now a

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of it in Pakistan, and he was telling me

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>how he has a solar panel installed back home in

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the village in Pakistan because there's so much load shedding

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:28.319
<v Speaker 1>that happens. And I thought, wait, it's like you just

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>had it installed yourself, and he said, yes, it's about

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>It was like, it was like, do you have a

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>battery for it? And he looked at me as if

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I was an idiot, and of course I have a

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna do with it? You know? How

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>do you get power at night? It's amazing how this

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:48.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of decentralization. Remember when you look at let's say

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>telecommunications and a lot of parts of the world. You know,

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a big deal for the United States to wire

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>phones to everybody, and a lot of parts of the

0:38:56.440 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>world just skipped over that went right to cellular I

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised to see something very very similar happening

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>with electrical distribution. They're gonna skip over that centralized authority

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, it's especially today panels are so efficient, So,

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they still have a way to go, but

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they're a tenth of what they were. I think that

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that you need on gred and offward situations to go

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>hand in hand. But but but I think they have

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>a big role to play. I mean, you mentioned decentralization.

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Another interesting thing that we're funding right now is and

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it's very different from electrification, where it goes back to

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the topic of inclusion is the use of blockchain technology

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to create economic identities for displaced people. Now, that sounds

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>so in other words, Syrian refugees, everybody gets a unique identifier,

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and that blockchain is a way that you can validate

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 1>who they are. So not just that, and it's more

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 1>about what it can do for the development organized less

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:57.920
<v Speaker 1>about what it can do for the development organizations, and

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.479
<v Speaker 1>more about the individual. Today, if you're displaced from home,

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, you may have left under god awful circumstances,

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you may have some form of identification or not. You

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>end up in a camp, you get a number and

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that's quote unquote your identity. But and then you know,

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>when you go from one place to another, you may

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>keep it, you may not, you may get a new one.

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>There's probably no record, collective record of what you've done

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>along the way. So what blockchain can allow you to do?

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And we're still testing it, so so let's see what

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the results are. It can allow you to record along

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the way the different interactions. You have to say, you're

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>living in Jordan's not in a camp. You know the

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:42.240
<v Speaker 1>refugees there live outside the camps. You get a cash

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:46.280
<v Speaker 1>transfer from U n h c R regularly, right, Um,

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>You have a cousin that lives in Europe who sends

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:54.839
<v Speaker 1>you money, remittances regular on a regular basis. You have

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>some small job that you've taken somewhere, you know, maybe

0:40:57.640 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>part time, maybe something. You have money that comes from.

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if you had one place where all those interactions

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>could be recorded. So at some point in time you

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>want to start your own business and you go to

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the bank and say I would like to take out

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a loan, They wouldn't look at you and say, well,

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, you are just a person who has no

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>record of showing what your credit worthiness is or isn't

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you actually have the ability yourself as an individual to

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>choose how much you want to share with the institutional

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and then figure out alternative ways of getting integrated into

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the new home that you found. That that's fascinating, that

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 1>that may be the best single usage of blockchain i've

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>heard to date. That that's really quite interesting. So I know,

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I only have you here for another fifteen twenty minutes,

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 1>and I have a bunch of questions I want to Uh,

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanna go over. Let me just go to one

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that I know I missed earlier. You mentioned about working

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>with the private sector. How do you integrate what you

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>do with both state and federal governments, local and federal governments, um,

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 1>other philanthropy as well as the private sector. How does

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that look when a project is moving forward? Right? So,

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned earlier, one of the core principles that

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we've always had is about building relationships and partnerships because

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 1>we realized that we never alone can come up with

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the with the answer and then drive it forward. Now,

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:28.439
<v Speaker 1>that can take many different shapes and forms. Sometimes it

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is the public sector, either the federal level or state

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:37.280
<v Speaker 1>or national um sorry, state or local that we partner

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>with and then bring in the private sector, and sometimes

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it may just be with the private sector. I mean,

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you one example of a place where we

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>we've collaborated quite well across the board, and it goes

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 1>back to the to the finance work as well. UM

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it's called New York City Housing Acquisition Fund, and this

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>was around ten ten years ago, more than ten years now,

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 1>where we came to get there with a number of

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 1>different philanthropies, the City of New York, and a number

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of big banks to create this fund that was targeting, um,

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 1>creating more affordable housing units here in the city. You

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>know what the real estate market here looks like. You

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 1>know how tough it can be to get loans to

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to do affordable housing. So what we did was, so

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 1>there's Battery Park City along with a number of different foundations,

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we created a guarantee fund. At the back of that,

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we attracted around two hundred million from big banks. So

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you have the likes of JP Morgan City, Morgan Stanley,

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:41.479
<v Speaker 1>many of them or most of them that put money

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 1>into it. Now, we couldn't have done that alone. The

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:47.400
<v Speaker 1>banks wouldn't have ventured into it because they saw it

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially as a risky proposition and the city couldn't have

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 1>done it alone. And so what did that end up funding?

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So they have to date deployed over three hundred million

0:43:57.040 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 1>UM and invested in either the preservation or the creation

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 1>of more than ten ten house affordable housing units here

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in the city. And that's in down in Battery Park alone.

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's all over the city. And they continue

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the work. The fund still exists. That that's quite that's

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 1>quite fascinating. You know, I wanted to ask you a

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>question personally. So you're you're born in Copenhagen or born

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in Denmark? Is that right? And so you you grew

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>up there? You do a semester abroad UM at Boston

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 1>College and at George Washington for undergraduate and graduate. How

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>challenging was the decision to say, um, I'm gonna come

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:43.240
<v Speaker 1>work in America. By all the annual UM surveys, Denmark

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is considered one of the happiest countries in the world.

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:49.359
<v Speaker 1>How do you decide to I mean, do you just

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>not like bicycles? What makes you? Every I've been to Dencark.

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I've been to Copenhagen twice and the one thing everybody

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 1>tells you is look both ways. Pretty cross the street

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:00.839
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get rund of a bike by schools. And

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it's so true. It's I've never seen anything. Forget Portland,

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Seattle of San Francisco, that is a bicycle city. It

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>sure is. And you know it's a dangerous endeavor to

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:16.399
<v Speaker 1>drive in the city. You're here where it's dangerous to bike,

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and everyone's exactly there as a as a as a

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:22.920
<v Speaker 1>car driver. It's like you're surrounded by bikes. It's amazing.

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 1>So I I mean you mentioned, you know, my being

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:31.319
<v Speaker 1>born in Denmark. I was. Both my parents were from Pakistan.

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>They had moved there back in the sixties, and as

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a result of a lot of different family decisions, I

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 1>ended up moving and living in Pakistan for a long

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:42.800
<v Speaker 1>time as well. So yes, I did my basic elementary

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>schooling in Pakistan. I lived there for nine years, then

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:49.839
<v Speaker 1>moved back to Denmark. Um was that culture shock going

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>back and forth like that. So I mean, if you

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:56.719
<v Speaker 1>take kind of you know, a spectrum, you could put

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Pakistan at one end and you'd put Denmark at the

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>exact Visit it right, Boisan is loud, it's colorful, it's messy,

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it's completely it's completely unorganized, and then Denmark, on the

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 1>other hand, is calm. It's you know, very black and

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 1>white and gray, and it's it has a you know,

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>very different field to it. I grew up in both worlds.

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in both worlds when I was living

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in Denmark. I grew up in both worlds when I

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 1>was living in Pakistan and visiting Denmark. Um. So for me,

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't see the culture shock. I can start a

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>thought in my head in Danish and finish it in

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Urdu and then say it in English. That is just

0:46:38.960 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 1>how you know what my life was like. In terms

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 1>of moving to the U S. I'd say yes, I

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>lived in Boston for half a year, and then I

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>lived in d C for a year while I was studying,

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 1>and then when I was at McKenzie, I did um,

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I moved over to your New Jersey office. Lived in

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>New York, but did that for a year. And the US,

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the U S. East Coast has always had a special

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>place in my heart. So my husband and I we

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 1>moved here eight years ago because we were getting restless

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in Denmark. I was getting restless in Denmark and New

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 1>York has always felt like home right. A lot of energy,

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dynamism, a lot of things going on here,

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of messiness, lots of noise. Yes, so it's

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of of all the world. Exactly, very interesting.

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's jump to some of my favorite questions. I

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:30.439
<v Speaker 1>asked these of all my guests. Um, we talked about

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 1>what you did before you started working? Who were some

0:47:34.480 --> 0:47:37.560
<v Speaker 1>started working at a Rockefell, or who are some of

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>your early mentors. So I think it's only now that

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I've come to think of them as my mentors. If

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>you'd ask me this question twenty years ago, I wouldn't have.

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of the women in my family. I

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 1>grew up in a very patriarchal society, whether that was

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, in our house in Denmark, or whether it

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>was in Pakistan, and in Pakistan I assume as patriarch

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 1>called Denmark also, No, well, a lot of that culture

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>from Pakistan moved over with my family to Denmark. So

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>so no, not wrought a Daniel society. It's the opposite.

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at it, I've I've drawn inspiration

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:17.440
<v Speaker 1>from many that you know found their own way forward,

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 1>whether that was my aunt who raised her own kids

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the way she wanted to after her husband passed away,

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:27.040
<v Speaker 1>or my mother who was, you know, a very successful doctor,

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:30.400
<v Speaker 1>or some of my cousins who broke away from tradition

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and did what they wanted to do, um, which was

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 1>against expectations. On the other side, I would also say,

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in the more traditional sense, some of the directors that

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I worked with when I started at McKenzie um ages

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Ago one in particular. I remember it was one of

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:49.120
<v Speaker 1>my first projects. I was the junior associate on the team.

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:51.879
<v Speaker 1>We went in seated there with the CEO and so on,

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and the CEO asked a question and the director turned

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>around and pointed to me, and he said, well, she

0:48:57.239 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 1>did the work, why don't we just ask her? And

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>it was just I mean, it showed me that it's

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>about your ideas and what you have to offer and

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 1>not rank um that matters in the world. And he

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.719
<v Speaker 1>showed that by example, and he gave me the confidence. Now,

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>if the answer to this question hadn't been good, I'm

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sure he wouldn't have given me the same opportunity again UM,

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>But that did set the tone for how I've approached

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things in my career since. Care to

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 1>share the name Michael, help you, Michael, help you, help you?

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So local Danish person. Yes, And so let's talk a

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what people influenced your approach to philanthropy,

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:45.319
<v Speaker 1>who has affected how you look at the world of

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 1>affecting change for the betterment of mankind. So this may

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 1>sound a little bit cliche, but this was ages ago.

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I was still in the private sector. I was getting

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 1>on a plane to go to some clients somewhere and

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I had a magazine UM that had an interview with

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton. And I know it's not the popular thing

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to say these days and talk about the Clinton Foundation,

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:10.759
<v Speaker 1>but I talked about some of the work where it

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>laid out some of the work that they were doing

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 1>in Africa around medicine for HIV n A. So talked

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 1>about how they had brought together different players from the

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>private sector to you know, reset the price off those

0:50:23.760 --> 0:50:25.879
<v Speaker 1>medicines in that part of the world, and how they've

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>done it through something called advanced market commitments. And to me,

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 1>that was completely fascinating that, you know, and I hadn't

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 1>thought of philanthropy in those terms. I thought about it

0:50:34.600 --> 0:50:36.759
<v Speaker 1>in the more traditional You just give money and then

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you wait for something good to happen Um the other person,

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is more around our zero gap And in

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit of finance work I met he used to

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 1>be the former Treasurer of the World Bank. His name

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is Kenneth lay Um, and he was the one who

0:50:52.239 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>designed the very first green bond. Now when we talk

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:57.440
<v Speaker 1>about green bonds and all the good and bad things

0:50:57.520 --> 0:50:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that have come with it, you know, it doesn't get

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:03.080
<v Speaker 1>associated with the person. But you know, I've had many

0:51:03.120 --> 0:51:06.160
<v Speaker 1>conversations with him since and he keeps going at the

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:08.319
<v Speaker 1>point and I completely agree with him, and it's it's

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 1>influenced my approach as well, which is, you know, take

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:16.320
<v Speaker 1>philanthropic funding to create new solutions that are sustainable instead

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of putting philanthropic funding forward as concessionaire capital, cationary capital.

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:26.879
<v Speaker 1>That's quite interesting them that that's really quite quite fascinating,

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's so easy to get wrapped up, especially in

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the last election, with some of the political criticisms of

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:39.000
<v Speaker 1>various foundations. When you look at what the Clinton Foundation

0:51:39.040 --> 0:51:43.440
<v Speaker 1>itself has actually accomplished. They've performed a lot of extract

0:51:43.440 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the politics, They've performed a lot of good and that

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 1>gets lost in the political debate. So I don't I

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:53.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think what you're saying is especially controversial. You just

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have to sometimes ignore all of the craziness around around

0:51:59.120 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>US elections. That has to so, as a someone who

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:05.879
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of time overseas, how do you look

0:52:05.920 --> 0:52:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at US? I mean, do you I think our elections

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 1>are insane? I can't imagine someone who didn't grow up here.

0:52:12.800 --> 0:52:14.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you look at the UK their elections or

0:52:14.920 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they seem to last a month and a half and

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's done. This is like a never ending at least

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:23.319
<v Speaker 1>for this one was two years. Just someone who's far

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and born but living in New York look at this

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and say, what are you people doing? This is a

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:32.160
<v Speaker 1>giant waste of energy, um verry. You forget that I

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:35.799
<v Speaker 1>also grew up in Pakistan. So if I take so

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:41.680
<v Speaker 1>an insane electoral process is in a constant state of elections.

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and you know, until recently, I think we've

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:47.320
<v Speaker 1>had a very long period where none of the elected

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>governments had finished their attemp before there was a new election.

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 1>How does it compare to the way self governance takes

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>place in in Denmark? So Denmark is very buttoned up,

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it's very focus. From the time you announced an election

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to the time the election happens. You're talking about weeks.

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, there isn't any after this election, especially. Um,

0:53:11.200 --> 0:53:13.480
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about books. People always ask,

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 1>always say to me, I'm curious as to what favorite

0:53:16.640 --> 0:53:22.600
<v Speaker 1>books your guests have so related to philanthropy, finance, fiction, nonfiction.

0:53:22.920 --> 0:53:26.840
<v Speaker 1>What sort of books do you really enjoy? So, Um,

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I spent a lot of my time reading white papers

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and such reports and those aside. I know, I know. Actually,

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:36.320
<v Speaker 1>my my seven year old daughter is really into Harry

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Potter these and you know, once in a while when

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:41.319
<v Speaker 1>she sees me with an actual book, she will come

0:53:41.320 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 1>over and she was like, how long is that book?

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:46.919
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, three pages, doesn't matter. I just read

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:49.400
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred pages. You can do this. So she's looking

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>down and oh, yeah, I get shamed by my daughter.

0:53:53.200 --> 0:53:56.160
<v Speaker 1>But to mention a couple of interesting ones I've I've

0:53:56.160 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 1>read recently, Um, there's a fascinating book called Today We

0:54:00.760 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Drop Bombs, Tomorrow We Build Bridges, and it traces kind

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of the history of what has happened in the humanitarian

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>space since the beginning of the Afran War, post war reconstruction,

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and no, not so much about post war reconstruction. It's

0:54:16.239 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 1>about how our humanitarian agenda has been brought closer and

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:24.400
<v Speaker 1>closer to our military priorities. Really, so, humanitarian organizations have

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:27.719
<v Speaker 1>always worked on the principle of neutrality. You know, you

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:29.880
<v Speaker 1>go where the need is great as you do what's

0:54:29.920 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 1>needed to be done. It's not about politics. It's just

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 1>about helping the change that has changed in many ways.

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:40.360
<v Speaker 1>You should read the book. It's it's a fascinating recounter

0:54:42.040 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Peter gil Um. It's about what happened in Afghanistan. What

0:54:45.880 --> 0:54:47.920
<v Speaker 1>has you know, happened since in other parts of the

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 1>world as well, where NGOs to a large extent are

0:54:51.640 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 1>dependent on funding from the governments and if the governments

0:54:57.120 --> 0:55:00.840
<v Speaker 1>want them, you know, to go to certain part off,

0:55:01.200 --> 0:55:04.759
<v Speaker 1>say a country, to perform their work there. Sometimes you

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>don't really have an influence over that. So if you

0:55:07.040 --> 0:55:11.200
<v Speaker 1>look at where the bulk of the foreign aid went

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:15.319
<v Speaker 1>in Afghanistan, it went to the places where there was

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 1>also the biggest military presence. Quite fascinating. Give me another

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 1>book if you have. I just started reading it. Strangers

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:26.320
<v Speaker 1>at the Door. It is it looks at the moral

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>crisis brought upon by you know, the massive refugee crisis.

0:55:31.880 --> 0:55:35.640
<v Speaker 1>It kind of argues that, you know, it's it's a

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 1>challenge that cuts across borders, and we are all dependent

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on each other define the right solutions. So taking a

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:46.719
<v Speaker 1>more protectionist approach, um isn't the way forward. I mean,

0:55:46.760 --> 0:55:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it's that sounds fascinating any and then I can always

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:54.760
<v Speaker 1>recommend some research papers if if you're interested, I'll pass

0:55:55.600 --> 0:55:59.359
<v Speaker 1>listen everybody. I would imagine half the listeners to this

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:03.239
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of time reading and finance and other

0:56:03.400 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 1>such UM related papers, and the question always comes up,

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is I want to put this aside? Give me something

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 1>either fiction or nonfiction, biography or something else. I can't

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you how often the question comes up. UM. So

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:19.520
<v Speaker 1>those are two good recommendations. Well, we'll look into that.

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:23.799
<v Speaker 1>So since you joined UM the Rockefeller Foundation, how have

0:56:23.920 --> 0:56:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you seen the industry changed? Meaning how is philanthropy in

0:56:30.280 --> 0:56:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the midst of adapting to the modern world. So in

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the last four years a lot has changed. I think

0:56:39.600 --> 0:56:43.840
<v Speaker 1>more filmthropic money with big names has come in. Zukobug

0:56:43.920 --> 0:56:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Chan initiative is just an example of that. I guess

0:56:46.600 --> 0:56:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that's good for the broader field in terms of more

0:56:49.760 --> 0:56:53.319
<v Speaker 1>people focusing on the things that that we focus on.

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:57.120
<v Speaker 1>UM I think there's been a clear recognition of the

0:56:57.239 --> 0:57:00.279
<v Speaker 1>role of private sector in getting to solutions, and I

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:02.759
<v Speaker 1>think the work around climate change and the involvement of

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:06.799
<v Speaker 1>the business community in that largely speaks to it. I

0:57:06.840 --> 0:57:10.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's also been more of a recognition of the

0:57:10.920 --> 0:57:15.719
<v Speaker 1>interdependence and problems cutting across boundaries than before. I think

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 1>climate change again is part of it. You can't as

0:57:18.760 --> 0:57:21.640
<v Speaker 1>one country you just solve it. You're dependent on every

0:57:21.680 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 1>other country around you. Global migration is another example of that,

0:57:27.240 --> 0:57:32.439
<v Speaker 1>and then the big backlash against globalization that has come

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to the forefront is affecting a lot of them. What

0:57:34.840 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 1>about big data? Is big data impacting philanthropy the way

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it is impacting the private sector. So it is, and

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we do try to build solutions around it, but it's

0:57:45.240 --> 0:57:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it's again about having context for that data, understanding what

0:57:49.680 --> 0:57:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it means and what you need to do, instead of

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:55.480
<v Speaker 1>blindly following it. So I'm down to my last two

0:57:55.600 --> 0:57:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and very favorite questions. So if a millennial came to you,

0:57:59.280 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 1>someone who just duated college and said I'm interested in

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a career in philanthropy, what sort of advice would you

0:58:05.440 --> 0:58:09.520
<v Speaker 1>give them. I would say one thing, which is have

0:58:09.600 --> 0:58:12.360
<v Speaker 1>respect for the problems. It's something that we were talking

0:58:12.360 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>about earlier. These are complex, messy problems. You have to

0:58:16.400 --> 0:58:18.920
<v Speaker 1>have respect for them. You have to really understand them

0:58:18.960 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>before you start jumping to solutions. There are no quick

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:25.800
<v Speaker 1>fixes around here, you you know. Uh. The other thing

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say is you better buck up because you're

0:58:29.520 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 1>going to get knocked down many, many, many times. And

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that is part of working in this space. You try

0:58:35.760 --> 0:58:38.440
<v Speaker 1>many things before you get to the one that really works.

0:58:38.880 --> 0:58:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So be willing able to just jump in there and

0:58:43.800 --> 0:58:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and keep going at it. You have to be resilient.

0:58:46.480 --> 0:58:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And yes, yes, very much, so thank you for that plug.

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And and our last question, what is it that you

0:58:53.080 --> 0:58:56.080
<v Speaker 1>know about the world of philanthropy today that you wish

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you knew ten plus years ago when you started. I

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:01.800
<v Speaker 1>wish I knew how hard it would be to give

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:05.440
<v Speaker 1>away money. Really it is really really difficult. So with

0:59:05.480 --> 0:59:08.400
<v Speaker 1>all the other jobs I had before coming here, including

0:59:08.440 --> 0:59:11.320
<v Speaker 1>city government, it was about you know, I have this idea,

0:59:11.480 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and where do I get the money from and what

0:59:13.720 --> 0:59:16.480
<v Speaker 1>do I do? And then with this job, I was like,

0:59:16.560 --> 0:59:19.120
<v Speaker 1>this is realiant. Now I'm the one who has the

0:59:19.160 --> 0:59:21.720
<v Speaker 1>money and I get to have the conversations about where

0:59:21.760 --> 0:59:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to give the ideas. It is so difficult because at

0:59:25.080 --> 0:59:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the core of it, our responsibility is to poor and

0:59:28.080 --> 0:59:32.960
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable people. It's precious dollars. It cannot be squandered. And

0:59:33.000 --> 0:59:36.080
<v Speaker 1>even though when we take risks, they're calculated risk. I

0:59:36.320 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 1>end with one thing. So David Rockefeller Jr. Used to

0:59:39.040 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 1>be on our board. He just retired last year after

0:59:41.480 --> 0:59:45.920
<v Speaker 1>his term was up. And he's a lovely man, very passionate.

0:59:46.520 --> 0:59:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Every time we had our board meetings, you know, got

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a chance to meet him, he would say, what are

0:59:50.320 --> 0:59:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you working on right now? That excites you the most?

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember the first time he asked me the question.

0:59:55.640 --> 0:59:57.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I had a slight moment of panic and

0:59:57.560 --> 1:00:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I was like, if I can't with conviction give him

1:00:00.560 --> 1:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>an answer, you know, about to that question that I

1:00:03.960 --> 1:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>don't deserve to be in this role because it was

1:00:07.720 --> 1:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, his family that started at all. It's because

1:00:10.560 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of him that we're doing what we're doing, and I

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>better do a good job. Well, that sounds quite fascinating.

1:00:15.920 --> 1:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>We have been speaking with Saudia Madsburg of the Rockefeller Foundation.

1:00:22.160 --> 1:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoyed this conversation. Be sure and look up

1:00:25.040 --> 1:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>an inch or down an inch on Apple iTunes and

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you could see any of the hundred and fifteen or

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>so such conversations we have had previously. Uh be sure

1:00:35.880 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and share your comments, feedbacks and suggestions with us right too.

1:00:41.120 --> 1:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do that again because I just totally uh

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>tripped on my own tongue. Be sure and send us

1:00:47.280 --> 1:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>your comments, feedback and suggestions. That's the proper use of

1:00:52.520 --> 1:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the plural words right to us at m IB podcast

1:00:57.200 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. I would you remiss if I

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>did not thank Medina, our recording engineer, Taylor Riggs, our booker,

1:01:06.200 --> 1:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Batnick, our director of research. I'm Barry Riholts.

1:01:10.920 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.