WEBVTT - Patriots Catch-22 3/12: Analyzing Patriots Reported Moves, NFL Draft Talk

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the Patriots Catch twenty two podcasts with Evan

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Lazar and Alex bar Blazar Lazar, everybody nailed it.

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 2>He joined as always by our Bara.

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Here is Evan Lazar and Alex Bars.

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 2>Because I can't quit.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, my Tes Johnson love.

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>He tested exactly the same as Tantut.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't he did. He didn't. He did he

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>did not because he didn't he did.

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 2>He ran a four or five one. Tant Del ran

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 2>a four four nine.

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>That's different. Take out tank dell to hundredths of the

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what the combine is. That's absolutely tank tank tank.

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Deel's also are twelve pounds heavier. Tes Johnson, they showed

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>it was.

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 2>He was on my downs list. You don't have to

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 2>ran this on my.

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Don list player in the history of the combine.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 2>It was not good. Oh it was not good, but

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>you know it was good. It was a good couple

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 2>days for the Patriots. It was a I have a

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>little pep in my step today and I thought it

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>was a really solid start. I'm not going to come

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 2>in here and blow too much smoke and say that

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 2>it was like this unbelievable A plus first day of

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 2>free agency, but I would call it a really solid start.

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm pleased with what the Patriots have done so far

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.839
<v Speaker 2>and I'm excited about it. So we're gonna talk about

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>it here today, Alex barth Evan Lazar Patriots Catch twenty

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 2>two for the next couple of hours, and I want

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 2>to go player by player and give our takes on

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 2>each individual player. But I obviously want to start big

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 2>picture first and talk about our overall thoughts of really

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 2>what's been one day, because they haven't really done much.

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I think there's some things that are balls up in

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 2>the air that maybe they're waiting to see where they

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 2>fall to start a second wave here, Cooper Cup, we'll

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 2>get to that and we'll camp. Yeah, we'll get to

0:01:58.360 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>that in a little bit.

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>The show would be great. If they're listening up stairs,

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to give us some reacting during the show,

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>The next two hours. We'll yeah, sooner the better, and

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 2>we'll keep morel here a little bit longer if it

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>happens in LA or we'll keep it going anyways. I

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>think my big picture thought on the free agency so far,

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like everybody that's commenting on this so

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>far is putting in the caveat of they still need

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 2>the wide receiver, and they still need the left tackle,

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>and I think we're all aware of that. But I

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 2>look at what they've done on defense and think two things. One,

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm really glad that they didn't ignore how just bad

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm just trying to find the right word, wasn't good

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 2>on defense last year. And anybody that thought it was

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 2>just an offensive minded free agency or off season that

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 2>all they needed to do was out on offense, I

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 2>don't think that that was really looking at it objectively

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 2>of just how that defense fell apart, especially upfront and

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 2>in the middle, right just right down the spine of

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 2>the defense. When you talk about into your defensive line play,

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 2>linebacker play, safety play, it just wasn't good enough on

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 2>any level last year. At times we came in here

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 2>every single week and did three up, three down. And

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 2>how many times did I just lament about the linebacker

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 2>play last year, And just how those linebackers once Bentley

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 2>went out, just didn't make any plays at the second

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 2>level of the defense, didn't get golf blocks, didn't make tackles,

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 2>just didn't make any plays. So you add a game

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 2>wrecking three technique with Milton Williams. You had an edge

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 2>defender that's stout and plays their style football, can get

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>up the field a little bit. And Harold Landry and

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 2>my guy Robert Splaine is one of my favorite signings

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 2>of this whole class because that is a tackling machine.

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Like this guy is always around the ball, He's always

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 2>going to make tackles. He's always going to do that.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Carlton Davis out on the perimeter kind of shores up

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 2>that cornerback room, you know, puts everybody where they're supposed

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 2>to be at the cornerback spot. So my big picture

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 2>takeaway is that I'm someone and I'm going to give

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 2>credit to all three. The Big three is what I

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 2>like to call them. Vrabel, Cowed, and Wolf looked at

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that defensive side of the ball and in my mind,

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>understood the flaws and understood where they needed to address

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the roster on that side of the football. So they

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 2>made calculated moves. They made moves for guys that fit.

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 2>They make moves for guys that play a certain way.

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 2>And that is encouraging because I feel like someone is

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 2>looking at this like a like a football guy and

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.799
<v Speaker 2>recognizing that these are these were our holes on defense.

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 2>This is how we fix it. Let's go out and

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>execute a plan to do so on the first day

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 2>of free agency. So long way to go on the

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 2>offensive side of the ball. But that's encouraging that we

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 2>are not to throwing money at big names or you know,

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna sign the top three defense of free agents

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 2>because that's what we need. No, they they made some

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 2>really nice, calculated moves to upgrade this defense.

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'd agree with that. I they didn't address the

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>big the two biggest needs, but I think they've done

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a good job of checking off so far. The majority

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of the other boxes they you know, left tackling wide

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>receivers still the big ones. The other one i'd put

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>out there is guard and then safety. But you know,

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna compare it to twenty twenty one. Twenty

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. Maybe there was more overall talent, but that

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>was more of just a blunt approach. If we're just

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna go out and sign player after player after player,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know how much consideration was there A fit

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Some guys worked, some guys didn't. To your point, I

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>think every guy they signed, it's it's a very targeted

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>like you can project the role instantly for every single

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys. We kind of wondered, you know,

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>where's John new Smith gonna fit. How's he gonna play.

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Mills, you're gonna play corners, You're gonna play safety.

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>And you know you can have a couple of guys

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that you maybe want experiment with. That's fine, But early

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>on they needed a guy. You know, best case scenario,

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 1>wrecking tandem in the middle, worst case scenario, if they

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have bar More, they have that guy who can

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>penetrate from the inside, which they need to play the

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>style of defense. They got a guy who plays their

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>style on the edge. They got a bigger, physical man

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>corner on the outside. I know we talked about zone

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>last week. I think we maybe need to rehab that

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>rehab that conversation. They needed a guy who plays sideline

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>aside on the linebacker position. Got that, got one of

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the tackles they needed, like it all just all five

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>or six, just instant boom, spot them starters, even kiris Tanga,

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>who's not the biggest name and who knows how much

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he'll play. But after trading Davon Gotschad, they needed a

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>guy who's just gonna sit and you can put on

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the field on second and one or third and one

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>sitting down in the middle and have them stop the

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>run and boom, he plugs right into that role. So

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a very disciplined approach. Mike rabel

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Rabeler Wolf one of them said

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>at the combine, We're not going to sign players just

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to sign players, right. They talked about getting aggressive but

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>not being reckless. I thought they walked that line perfectly.

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And when they were maybe gonna lose out on Milton

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Williams just based on how the reporting went, they kind

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of went back in and you saw that aggressiveness turn up,

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't go all out on players that they

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't need to go all out on.

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agreed. And you mentioned Carlton Davis and maybe

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 2>talking a little bit more about them still playing a

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of man'sonman coverage, which I agree with, But I

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>also just look at Carlton Davis and how long have

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 2>we been saying, you know, Jonathan Jones, Marcus Jones, Miles

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Bryant when he was here, good players, but just not

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 2>outside corners, right like they need to be playing the slot.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 2>They don't have the size, they don't have that ability

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 2>to go up against you know, those outside guys. They

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 2>get a guy like Carlton Davis in here, and again

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 2>it's not just the player, it's also the skill set

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 2>of the player. You know he has he's six foot one,

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>he's two hundred pounds, he has an incredible length in wingspan.

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 2>I think he's ninety fifth percentile in the wingspan when

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 2>he came out of the draft. So you have a

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 2>body type now that projects to fit well on the outside,

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 2>opposite of Christian Gonzales. So again, you know, they recognized

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 2>we have slot corners playing outside, and those guys are competitive,

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 2>and those guys are feisty cover corners. So they've held

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 2>their own to their credit. But this obviously isn't how

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 2>it should be. Like we're playing these guys out of position.

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 2>And so you go out there and you sign Carlton Davis,

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 2>and now Marcus Jones projects as a slot. Maybe you

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 2>do bring Jonathan Jones back here still on a reasonable

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 2>contract and play him at nickel or safety or something

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 2>like that in the middle of the field, and everybody

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 2>just back there kind of starts to fit where they're

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be, so that was it was encouraging that

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 2>they were able to identify their holes on defense and

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>go out and sign guys that fill those holes. You know,

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Harold Landry left defensive end, Milton Williams three technique, Carlon

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Davis number two corner, Splaine. I think they're going to

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 2>try to play Splain and Bentley next to each other

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 2>on early downs. I don't know for a fact if

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be the case, but if I had

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 2>to guess, I would say that the plan would be

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>to play both those guys on the field together. Not

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Splain replacing Bentley, but Bentley and Splain as a duo.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see how that all works out. You mentioned

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 2>you know Morgan Moses, and I think it's similar. Morgan

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Moses is going to be your right tackle next year.

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 2>You have that spot filled at least for the twenty

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty five season, and you know, there's a long way

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 2>to go on that offensive line. It's probably the biggest

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 2>concern I have right now. Still. I think they're down

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 2>let's call it, two starters at least, and then there's

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 2>obviously a decent amount of you know, stuff out there

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 2>about what's going to happen at center and what's not

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>going to happen at center, So we'll see what transpires there.

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 2>But your at least two thoughts still to fill at

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 2>left guard and left tackle, so we can get to

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 2>that here in a minute as well. And we'll take

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 2>your phone calls eight five to five p that's five hundred,

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 2>and you can reach out on email too at podcasts

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 2>at Patriots dot com if you'd like to do that

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 2>as well. But I want to go through all these

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 2>free agents that they the additions by just go one

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 2>by one as we tend to do on this show

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and get really into it. So let's go in order

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>of just sort of you know when they were signed

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 2>if you will a little bit here. So obviously the

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 2>first one is is Harold Landry on Sunday night, as

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 2>we're all on our couches probably not thinking that anything

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 2>is going to happen until the morning, they sign Harold

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Landry to a three year deal. And you know, this

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 2>one's obvious. Big connections with Rabel goes back away as

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 2>a draft. Rabel draft pick is very first draft in Tennessee,

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 2>second round, second round pick for the Titans.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>After Shan Evans was their first round pick.

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>That ye right, it sounds right. He doesn't Harold landers

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, his his pass rush win rate. I know

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 2>that's a number that's going around a lot from PFS.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 2>PFF is pretty harsh on it. Sounds like ESPN's is

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit nicer. But neither one of them are

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 2>glowing about his season last year in terms of pass

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 2>rush productivity. You hope that maybe that was scheme related.

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, he was in a different scheme for the

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 2>first time in his career. Now that he goes back

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 2>to playing with Rabel and Terrell Williams, maybe he goes

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 2>back to being a productive player in the pass rush.

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>But I think the number one thing that stands out

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 2>to me with Harold Landry is the run defense is

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 2>really solid, A really good run defender, but a different style,

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>not an Anthony Jennings style. I wouldn't say he's a

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 2>guy that can get up the field, that can you know,

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 2>shoot gaps and really set the edge by getting a

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 2>downhill at the line of scrimmage and use that burst

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 2>in that bend that he has to make plays in

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>the backfield. And I would also say in the pass rush,

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 2>if you're counting on the fact that you're gonna get

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of interior pressure up the middle. Then he's

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 2>someone that I do think can kind of clean up.

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Like I don't know if he's necessarily at this stage

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 2>of his career going to be a one on one

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 2>winner that's going to get sacks all on his own,

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 2>But if Milton Williams is pushing the quarterback towards Harold

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Andry's side of the line of scrimmage, I think that

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 2>he can be the guy that gets the quarterback actually

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 2>on the ground.

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Good complimentary rusher, good secondary rusher, and they needed that.

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Now you may say, well, okay, who's the primary That's

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what we still need to wait and see, and maybe

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that guy comes in the draft, Maybe that guy comes

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>next year. We all knew they weren't getting get everything

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in year one, but a good solid piece in the defense.

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I meant to say this in the opening take, like this,

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot about the Commanders model. That's what

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this is. A guy that's not a superstar, but he's

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>going to give you kind of a floor and he

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>will help just kind of shore up that defensive front

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and just raise the level by being steady and consistent.

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a great point, and I wanted to pull

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 2>up and we can do it in a second. The

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Commander's free agency last season. Now, the Commanders didn't go

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 2>out and make a Milton Williams signing at the top

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>top of the market, but a lot of these guys,

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the Landryes, the Davis's, you know, these mid level to

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>to you know, let's call it mid level to maybe

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, three quarters level if you want free agents

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 2>where a lot of what the Commanders did, you know,

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 2>they signed a lot of those types of guys.

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that does it.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 1>With Landry.

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 2>I think we you know, kind of got that covered.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Milton Williams is obviously the big piece, you know, just

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>get right to him. I think that with this defense

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 2>and with this scheme and what they're gonna try to

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 2>do with Rabel and be more aggressive. You know, he's

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 2>to use that word multiple times to describe how they

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 2>want to play defense, especially on the defensive line. Aggressive play.

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 2>On the other side of the line of scrimmage, the

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 2>three technique or the player that lines up over the

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 2>outside shade of the guard right is Jeffrey Simmons in Tennessee.

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a massive, massive role to fit this whole puzzle together.

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>A game wrecker that can defeat blocks in the run

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 2>game and make splash plays in the run game and

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 2>get after the passer. If you're going to run this

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of system, you need the interior penetration. You need

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 2>those guys that can do that. So I can totally

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 2>understand and I express some of my doubts or you know,

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 2>just concerns about Milton Williams before free agency, because you know,

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 2>when you play on that defensive line in Philadelphia next

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 2>to Jalen Carter, Nolan Smith, Josh Sweed, Jordan Davis, you

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 2>do worry about if it's going to continue when those

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 2>guys aren't around you, right, and you don't have Jalen Carter,

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 2>especially on the interior and he only played fifty percent

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 2>of the snaps last year in Philly. When you pay

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a guy this kind of money, he's going to play

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot more here than that. But with that being said,

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the role in the defense that he's going to play

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 2>is extremely important in this system, and he can play it.

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>He definitely has a tape that he can play it

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 2>at a high level. And they clearly made this a

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 2>non negotiable, like we have to walk out of free

0:14:57.640 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>agency with Milton Williams. And I think a lot of

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 2>that goes back to the type of defense they want

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 2>to play.

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, and I think ideally you have two of those guys,

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>yeah right, in him and Christian Barmore, and that's going

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to be among the best defensive tackle duos in the

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>National Football League. Yeah, we'll see where they're at with Barmore.

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It kind of sounds like nothing definitive has been made

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of that yet and doesn't need They don't need to

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>make a definitive decision right now, right, So it's not surprising.

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you get those two guys going in the

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>middle and with Landry coming off the edge, and you know,

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you maybe throw a Day two draft pick in there,

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>completely reworked front, night and day from where they were

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>at last year.

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 2>It's extremely athletic too. Just I know some of those

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>guys are a little bit older, like Landry, so maybe

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 2>this doesn't quite apply. But if you go back to

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 2>look at all these guys in the combine, they're all

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 2>elite athletic testers. Out of the combine, Landry, Milton Williams,

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>we should mention Keon White you know, another guy, high

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>end athlete, bar More, high end athlete. So all this

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 2>sud in a front that was typically space eating, you know,

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>run stuffers like Devon Godshaw's of the world. Now all

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, he's got a bunch of athletes that

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 2>get up the field. So you can see the vision

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 2>of what they're trying to build in that respect as well.

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Look at Milton Williams. I see a lot of the

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 2>same style of pass rush moves when we talked so

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 2>much about Mason Graham and the draft. Very violent with

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 2>his hands, likes to use his swipe, likes to use

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 2>an arm over. To compliment that he can bull rush.

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's his number one go to, but

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 2>he can do it if you want him to try

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 2>to push the pocket up the middle. And then at

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 2>two ninety is his quickness in the run game is

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 2>really stands out. You know, he's got that ability to

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 2>just cross over and you know, get on the edges

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 2>quickly and get into gaps quickly, and guys on the

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 2>offensive line just don't get over there quick enough to

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 2>like overtake those blocks. So that's all over his tape.

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Fantastic playoff run for Philadelphia yea last year as well.

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 2>So this is a guy that performed well in the

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 2>biggest moments for the Eagles last year. So a lot

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 2>of pros about the player. I just you know, I'll

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 2>keep on saying it. I just I hope that it's

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 2>not a product the Jalen Carter.

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll see it's a lot. That's that's gonna be the

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>big question. You know, he's gonna he only played what

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>about fifty percent of snaps in Philly, right, so he's

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna be playing a bigger role here. How does he

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>adjust to that? And that's why. Look, Christian Barmore is

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>not Jalen Carter, but again, you get the two of

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>them together, and that's going to be something I think

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that could be really special.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I do wonder too if if Kean White

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 2>is in more of a rotational role and he's kind

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 2>of like a third down interior pass rusher type of guy,

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 2>and maybe he even goes into in terms of snap

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 2>count and stuff like that, and even where he's rushing,

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 2>like into what Millan Williams was last year for Philadelphia, right, Like,

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, someone that is only playing fifty to fifty

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 2>five percent of the snaps, but is really effective rushing

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 2>the passers. So if it's not bar More, that's get

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 2>that's eating, you know, when Milon Williams gets double teamed,

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 2>or Williams eating when Barmore gets double team Like, maybe

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 2>that's key on White next year. Is the guy that's

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>getting all the one on ones with Milton Williams in

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the middle. Carlon Davis, I know this is your favorite signing. Yeah, bunch,

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 2>You've been a big Carlon Davis.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been telling you that he made sense. You know,

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>they needed size on the boundary, they needed physicality on

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the boundary. And I'm not gonna lie when you said

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think you're necessarily wrong in the point

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you were making, But when you said that, it felt

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>like maybe they were gonna go a little more zone

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>heavy on defense. I was kind of disappointed. Yeah, Like,

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think that. Look, I think if everybody could

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>play man all the time, they would. I think man's better,

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's also a lot harder to execute, and that's

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.479
<v Speaker 1>why teams don't do it as much. But if you

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>can play man heavy with your corners, I think there's

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a massive advantage in being able to do that. And

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>they now have two solid, really like, that's one of

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the better cornerback duels in the league. Two good, really

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.719
<v Speaker 1>good man corners on the outside, guys that you can

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of pick and choose your matt ups. Gonzalez is

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a little more athletic, little more agile, a little more crafty.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Davis can do that stuff, but I would categorize him

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>as more of a bully. And the other thing is,

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and let's not lose sight of this. Everybody talks about

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, well they you know, Milton Williams, Harold Landry, Kiris, Tonga, Robertsplane,

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>like they worked on the front, they worked on the rush.

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Carlton Davis I would put him in that category two

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>because in theory, if you have Gonzales and Davis on

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the outside, you should be picking up more coverage sacks. Now, right,

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>those two, those two guys are Davis with Gonzalez. Adding

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Davis to Gonzalez helps the pass rush as well. So

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I just think, not just a good player, it's not

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>so much. I think Carlton Davis is an unbelievable player.

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a really solid player. But what he does,

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>what his skill sets are, what he brings also a

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>guy that has won at a high level, won a

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>chip with the Bucks, made a run last year with

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the Lions. Kind of running out of those guys. Only

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>have five guys left here who won a Super Bowl here,

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:00.479
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't had to think about this in New

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>England for a long time, but this is what the

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>other thirty one franchise had to do for years. You

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of want to have a guy or two in

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the room who's won a Super Bowl just to kind

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of give that experience. Obviously, they still have a few left.

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>But Carlton Davis, the guy, he's won at a high level.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>He plays physically, he plays on the outside. He gives

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>them size, he gives them physicality. The way he fits right,

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the way he fits what they need to me. Makes

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a good player, a great signing because he's gonna make

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna help Christian Zales, it's gonna help the pass rush.

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Like he just kind of elevates what they already had

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>in place.

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, physical corner, pressman corner. Yeah, really good at the

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 2>line of scrimmage. You know, he has great length and

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 2>physicality to just smother releases in press man and make

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 2>receivers work through contact. And all that good stuff. First

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 2>and second level routes are really tough against him. He's

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 2>really good at those, especially in breakers. You know, if

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna run a slant, you're gonna run a dig,

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna have to finish through some contact and make

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 2>some contested catches against the guy like Carlon Davis. His

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 2>one other than Durabil over the years has been up

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 2>and down. He doesn't have great long speed, so he

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 2>can get beat deep sometimes. But when you have Christian

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Gonzalez on the other side, like maybe the safety help

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 2>goes to the Carlon Davis a little bit more often.

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is where I'd like to see them ad

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that true free safety. Yeah, on the back end, because

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>if you can allow both Gonzalese and Davis to play

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive in the shorter intermediate, you're gonna turn two

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>guys who are primarily locked down corners maybe into kind

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of ball hooks.

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So I watched I watched a couple games of Davis's,

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 2>but I watched him against Christian Watson with the Packers

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 2>because I wanted to see him against a real speed receiver.

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a tough matchup for a guy like him. And

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 2>he did really really well outside of two plays, but

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 2>those two plays went for like sixty yards apiece. Because

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 2>he does sometimes lose some of those foot races down

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 2>the field. You know, Watson ran by him on a

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 2>go ball on one and then you know a crossing

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 2>route where he got caught up in some traffic. I'll

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 2>give him that, but you know, just going across the field,

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 2>those types of foot races can be a little bit tough,

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 2>especially if he's playing off coverage and not playing up

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 2>on the line of scrimmage where you can get his

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 2>hands on guys. The go ball was like soft press,

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 2>so he wasn't really jamming, he was just kind of

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 2>mirroring and and Watson ran by him. So if you

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 2>manage his matchups though, and you put him against you know,

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the bigger bodied guys, or you put him against the

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 2>guys that aren't quite as dynamic down the field, and

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Gonzalez he's just, you know, can run with anybody, and

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 2>runs with Tyreek Hill, so he can run with anybody.

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, he covers the true speed guy, then you're

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 2>in good shape. And it's not exactly the same, but

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 2>it kind of reminds me of Revis and Browner, where

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 2>like Revis was, you know, this guy that could cover

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.959
<v Speaker 2>anybody he wanted, and I think Christian Gonzalez is that

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 2>type of dude, and Browner was just that physical you know,

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 2>jam and macnidean type of player. And as long as

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 2>you kept Browner in the right matchups, he was really

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 2>really effective. And I think the same thing is going

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 2>to be true with Carlton Davis.

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 1>So I love it.

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I love the size on the outside, I love the

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 2>physicality he brings, the edge that he brings. This is

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 2>what they've been missing for multiple years now at that

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 2>second cornerback spot, Gonzo's rookie year. I'd be really going

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 2>back to twenty twenty two. I would say they've been

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 2>playing Miles Bryant, Marcus Jones, Jonathan Jones out on the

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 2>boundary at of necessity. So they have a guy now

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 2>in Carlton Davis that belongs out there, that belongs playing

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 2>in that spot. So that's exciting.

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And when they face some of these faster teams, like

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens with Jonathan Jones, it still mix.

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's a game where Carlton Davis plays a little less,

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Jones plays a little more, they get another speedier corner

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 1>on the outside, is kind of an alternate to Carlton

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Davis like they have they had They didn't need a

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of corners, They just needed one guy to slot

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody incorrectly. Bring Jonathan Jones back or some other speedier

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, backup slot corner, and now you're in good

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>shape and you have a ton of options with how

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to pick your matchups.

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, they have Marcus Jones under contract, and I like,

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 2>just let's call for what it is. We're really talking

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 2>about Miami, right, And like when you go up against

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.239
<v Speaker 2>Miami and you have Tyrak Kill and Jalen Wattle, we

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 2>know Gonzales can stay with Tyreek Hill, so he's probably

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 2>gonna cover Hill. Does Marcus Jones cover Jalen Wattle in

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 2>that matchup instead of Carlton Davis. I love the idea

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 2>potentially of Carlton Davis then playing more of like a

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 2>nickel role in that kind of game. Yeah, and having

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 2>some size inside when they go twelve personnel, they go heavy.

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's another thing about Davis. He's really good against

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the run.

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can play him against the run. He can

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 2>play tight ends like potentially like receiving tight ends. Like

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that he has a size and the ability

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 2>to guard those types of players too inside, So maybe

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 2>in those types of matchups they move him around a

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit to get him off of those speedy receivers.

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that that could really be huge for them

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 2>if that's what they're able to do and those types

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 2>of things. All right, Robert Splane probably my favorite signing.

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 2>I know it sounds that's weird for me to be

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 2>that into an inside linebacker, but the linebacker play on

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 2>this team last year just drove me bananas. Yeah, I

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 2>just would pull my hair out every single Monday watching

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 2>the film back of their linebacker play last year. And

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Spalane is one of those guys that just is all

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 2>over the ball all the time. I mean, he had

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty six tackles last year, and I

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 2>know tackles. Some people don't like the stat anymore, but

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>you don't make one hundred and fifty tackles by accident, right, Like,

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 2>if you're around the ball that much, good things are

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 2>happening when you're out there. Really underrated run defender, he's

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 2>sneaky good in zone coverage, like he's kind of got

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.360
<v Speaker 2>like a nose for the football. Is five picks over

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the last two years, mostly in zone coverage.

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he had seventy nine pass breakups last year.

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wouldn't put him in Manton man against like

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 2>tough assignments like if you have a pass catching running

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 2>back or dynamic tight ends and things like that. I

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't necessarily say that he's smooth enough in terms of

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 2>that in coverage, but he's got a really good knack

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 2>over the middle of the field for those, you know,

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 2>those short zone drops, just kind of feeling out those

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 2>routes and being able to jump routes from those underneath spots.

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 2>He's two hundred and thirty pounds, so he's a little

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 2>bit more undersized, a little bit faster, a little bit

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 2>more sidelined to sideline to him than what they've had

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 2>in the past. But most of all, I just think

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 2>he plays like a maniac. Like I think he plays

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 2>with his hair on fire. He plays physical, he plays

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 2>through blocks, and that's something that they just didn't have

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 2>last year.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Old school line old school mentality, modern linebacker skill set.

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Does that make sense? Like he is, he's I'm sure

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a very nice guy, but on the field, mean

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>plays a nasty flies around, always near the football, doesn't

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>miss a chance to deliver a big hit. But he

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>can move. He can move, he can get sideline a sideline,

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 1>he can explode in the backfield when he needs And

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is like a lot of these linebackers.

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So the initial report was that the Patriots were in

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>on Jamien Sherwood. Yeah, Jamien Sherwoods two hundred and sixteen pounds. Yeah,

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>And that worried me a little bit. And I don't

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>like Sherwood's twenty five Splain's twenty nine. So there's something

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to be said for upside and all that. But Splaine

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>six to one, two nine, Like, he's not small, he's

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>not big. He's not the two hundred and sixty pound

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>linebacker we're used to seeing here, you know, like Juwan Bentley,

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>but he still has some size to him and he

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>can still handle some of those old school linebacker roles.

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So I I don't know, looking back on it, like,

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>did they almost end up better off? We're sure we're

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>going back to the Jets and ending up with Splaine.

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 2>They definitely ended up with the more physical player. Yeah,

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and Splaine and I also think that, you know, he's

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 2>one of those guys that plays with energy and plays

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 2>with like a joy to him a little bit. That

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 2>not saying that Surewood doesn't play with energy, but I

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 2>don't know if like Spolaine is gonna be one. I'm

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 2>telling you he's gonna be one of those guys that

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 2>is gonna get this place going a little bit. You know,

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Like I think that he's gonna make some plays and

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna get up out off the pile and be

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 2>screaming and stuff like that. He just has like an

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 2>edge to him.

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>This is still unlike you forget. They don't show that

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>on the All twenty two.

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 2>You know how bad the defense in the middle of

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the field was last year.

0:27:57.720 --> 0:27:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't they don't. This is what I always say

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>when you watch the All twenty two. You lose the

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff in between the whistles, you lose penalties, you lose

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>like body language, emotion. But he is not a lot

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of it on there.

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 2>You know what it was.

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>And I don't me wrong. I like that you have

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the stage.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like the player. I I mentioned this yesterday

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 2>on Unfiltered, but last year, you know me, I'll find

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 2>myself on a Monday night. Tuesday night when I'm doing

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 2>all my film stuff, for some reason, I'm watching The

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Raiders Defense. Like no, no one knows why, Like why

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>did I end up here? I couldn't tell you, but

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 2>you know there's cross tape or whatever, and like they're

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>playing an offense and played the Raiders and I'm just

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 2>ending up here. Okay, So I'm ending up here on

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders Defense. And every time you turned on the

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 2>film with the Raiders Defense, even over the last two years,

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 2>I would say this blame guy just keeps flashing, like

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 2>he keeps making plays.

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>He just shows up.

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 2>He's always around the ball and and he's he's sort

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 2>of like the film junkies, like the guys on Twitter

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.479
<v Speaker 2>that are always posting clips and stuff like that. We

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 2>all kind of just love Splaine. Like I don't know

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 2>what it is. It just is one of those guys

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 2>that is underrated. And I set it off the top

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 2>of the show that it feels like somebody's paying attention again,

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 2>which is nice. I feel like somebody's watching the tape. Right.

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.239
<v Speaker 2>We're not We're not just going out there and oh

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I heard that guy right, Like we're actually going out

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 2>and watching film and understanding who these players are. And

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Splaine is one of those guys. To me, that shows

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 2>that someone did some homework, Like this is a this

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 2>is a good poll, like this is yeah some you know. Oh,

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 2>like Zach Bond's a free agent, so we're just gonna

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 2>give Zach Bond.

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>It's been underrated. It came into the league as Udfa

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>played two games with the Titans, went to Pittsburgh, started

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>off as he like a primary special teamer, worked his

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>way in rotation or all. He started all seventeen games

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>last few years for the Raiders. Like this is a

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>guy that built his way up quietly.

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Yep, absolutely all right, Uh that was the defense most Yeah,

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 2>that was. I want to talk about Tonga. So Tonga

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 2>a space eater, right, Like Tonga is a space heating

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:02.959
<v Speaker 2>nose tackle.

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And so just when you're worried, I think you had

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>texted me this, yeah that, like you know, these are

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>good signings, right, they're bringing good players, nothing wrong with that,

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but like, are they getting a little too small on defense?

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 2>They were one big boys short yep on the defense.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Six foot four three eight pound chiris Tonga shows Yeah, every.

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Once in a while, I got a feel for the league,

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, every once in a.

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>While, So you knew when you texted me that.

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:25.959
<v Speaker 2>No, I didn't say that.

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know.

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Because it was like five minutes before they signed thex

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 2>SO Tonga, Like you said, space eater, big dude, gonna

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 2>clog rushing lands, great short yardage player.

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 2>What I really like about the Tonga signing though, and

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 2>this is this is where my nerdom comes in. Like

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 2>they moved Von Godshaw who was a good player but

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 2>probably overpriced for what the role is that he was

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 2>going to play, especially in this defense, and they get

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 2>a significantly better value in Tonga and he's probably gonna

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 2>play the same apps that Devon Gotcha was gonna play.

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 2>So is it maybe a little bit worse of a player.

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess you could make that case. But now they

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 2>have Milton Williams, now they have Harold Landry. And this

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 2>is just from a math standpoint or a financial standpoint,

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Like to me, this is a shrewd move, like you

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 2>trim salary with Devon Gotshaw, but you still have a

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Devon Godshaw type player in tongue.

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, they because he's just with Gosh Gotcha played

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>over fifty percent. Last year they played like fifty five percent.

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>This guy probably thirty percent of the place. Right, He's

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be on the field when they need to

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>stop the run. That's it. You didn't need to pay

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that guy they opened up this year. It's minimal, but

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>next year eight million dollars in gap. Uh, you didn't

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>need to be paying that for what that role is

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be and and and and tongs of the player.

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna take up space and and that's what they needed.

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 2>They needed another big body. I want to get to

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 2>what we still think they needs. I don't want to

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 2>keep on.

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I know we were gonna end up leaving off one

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>guy that no, no, no, that's fine.

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I just meant like, I have a couple more they

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 2>still need, but on defense. But we'll to that in

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 2>a second. I want to do that separately, all right. Offensively,

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Morgan Moses, who is like a agent like fine wine,

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 2>like he's an agent. Wonder his best years of his

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 2>career last year. Yeah, he plays for the most part,

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 2>he plays every game for like eleven straight years. Yeah,

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 2>it's pretty incredible. The durability. This was exactly what we

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 2>were talking about on the offensive line going into free agency,

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 2>just give me somebody that is an NFL player at

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the position right And we were talking more about about tackle,

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 2>but I think you mentioned guard, and I've been big

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 2>on a left guard as a potential hole here. But

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 2>in terms of right tackle, just give me somebody who

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 2>is an NFL player at that position, uh not, not

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 2>someone that is off the scrap heap or off someone

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 2>else's you know, practice squad, an NFL player. And that's

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 2>exactly what Morgan Moses is. He's a people mover in

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 2>the run game, really really physical blocker. I think him

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 2>next to Mike gon When, who was a great run

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 2>blocking right side offensive line. Those guys on double teams

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 2>and gap schemes and things, they're gonna move some people

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 2>on that side of the line of scrimmage, which is good.

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what Josh McDaniels wants. I think that's

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.479
<v Speaker 2>what his offense wants. I always go back to his

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 2>ideal right side of Marcus Cannon and Shaq Mason, like

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 2>you just want two bulldozers over there that can really

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 2>move the line of scrimmage. I think they have that again,

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 2>and I watched Moses against Chop Robinson because that was

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 2>the one thing I had concerned kind of like with

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Davis was speed. Just on the other side, I was

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 2>worried about the twitched up guys, like are those speed

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 2>rushers like a Chop Robinson at thirty four years old,

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 2>is he still meeting them, you know, at the junction

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 2>point of the rush, and is he still able to

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 2>protect his edge against Chop Robinson. And chop Robinson got

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 2>him a few times. But I thought that he did

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty well and held up pretty well, really good, you know,

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 2>out of his stand still. I think he gains plenty

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>of ground. There still blocks inside out, so you're not

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 2>seeing a lot of like really quick losses on his tape,

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 2>and that's encouraging. It's you're not gonna get those like

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 2>blowbys where it's just no contest. So I know, think

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:10.919
<v Speaker 2>he's the most fleet of foot at this point. He's

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 2>not a great uh lateral, you know, redirect athlete, so

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have some issues with those types of guys sometimes,

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 2>but again, he's not gonna get blown by consistently, at

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 2>least professional player, professional solid player a little bit older.

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I doubt he plays the whole three years of the contract,

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 2>but they just needed somebody to get them the level

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 2>at one of those tackle spots, and he'll do that.

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 2>It's not a position, and we're not gonna at least

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 2>one spot we know we're not gonna have to go

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 2>into camp when tackle spot that we know we're not

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to go in to camp and be like,

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 2>all right, well, this guy's the favorite, but this guy

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 2>could win the RP.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>No Morgan Moses. If Morgan Moses is losing that spot,

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:53.399
<v Speaker 1>something probably went unexpectedly wrongly. Yeah, that's his job. Yeah,

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>solid player. Gives them another year to develop Kane Wallace

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>if they want, although maybe they end up moving him

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to guard or something like that, but gives them some

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>flexibility there, walks Mike O and whnu Wint right guard

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in his NFL career. Mike went

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>who can spend the entire offseason preseason just focusing on

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 1>one position? Right, should spend the entire offseason? Uh, preseason

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 1>focusing on one position. You talked a lot about pass

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>pro there. I think you're gonna have a lot of

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>fun running off that right side between on When and

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Moses. I think there's a lot of potential there.

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Solid signing, solid signing. Not you know, nobody's doom cart

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>wheels or anything, but like box checked for sure, that

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>box is checked. Good right tackle for this year, not

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a question.

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. How relieving is that to have a good spot

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.439
<v Speaker 2>to not have to go into the camp and well

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 2>it could you know they've drafted Wallace in the third

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 2>round and you know they have you know, this veteran

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 2>that's Riley Reef over there gets waved.

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, no not not not at right tackle. We'll

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>see that left. Yeah, not doing that at right tackle. Yeah.

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 2>The last thing on Moses that I really like talking

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 2>to Brandon Thorne, who's kind of my my O line

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 2>guy that I like to pick his brain a lot

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 2>about this kind of stuff. And uh he he did

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 2>point out that really good in the room, like a

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 2>really good leader. He's going to take these guys that

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 2>they draft, you know, they draft a rookie left tackle,

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Caden Wallace in his second season, Laden Robinson in his

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 2>second season. Uh, he's going to take these guys under

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 2>his wing. He's going to show him the ropes. He's

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 2>going to teach them how to be professionals. And I

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 2>think that that's important. I think that's a good part

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 2>of that as well. Good culture guy experienced steady Brandon

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Nudd every year does a O line rankings and he

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 2>had he had everybody in tears, and uh, Moses was

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 2>in his average NFL starter tier, which I think is

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 2>exactly what he is. You know, he's a steady, reliable,

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 2>average right tackle in the league, which is so much

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 2>better than what they had last year. So we're in

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 2>proving there in that spot as well. And you know,

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to the rest of the line here in

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 2>the second which is still a big question marking a

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 2>big concern Mac Collins. This one is I'm okay with it.

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 2>I know it's not what everybody wants out a wide receiver.

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 2>I know that a lot of people, you know, I

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 2>posted some clips of him on Twitter and everybody was like,

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 2>don't try to convince us that this guy is a

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver one. You know, no one's trying to convince

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 2>you that Matt Collins is the cure to all their

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 2>ills at the wide receiver position. But similar to what

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 2>we were just talking about with Moses, this is a

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 2>professional receiver that goes about things the right way. From

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 2>everything that everybody has talked about and in terms of

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 2>that side of it. How much of a mess that

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 2>receiver room was last year on and off the field.

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 2>This is a guy you're not gonna have to worry

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 2>about in terms of the off field locker room stuff.

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 2>And I actually think that he's got some sneaky juice.

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Like it's not great, Like I'm not again, no one's

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to convince you that Collins is the answer. But

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 2>some of the stuff that I saw on film, I

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 2>took me by surprise a little bit. Like he's got

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of speed and some juice off the

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.280
<v Speaker 2>line of scrimmage, you know, really good accelerator off the line,

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 2>and he's got some wiggle against press. He's got size,

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the red zone. He's six foot four,

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of five touchdowns last year for Buffalo. So I

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 2>do think that he is a guy that can be

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 2>used in the red zone as that type of player,

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 2>especially if he's gonna run routes out of that like

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 2>big slot role. Right you put him inside almost like

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 2>a tight end and have him, you know, run seams

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 2>and and cuts and stuff like that down by the

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 2>goal line. He's got a nice catch radius and size

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 2>to him. It plays on special teams. You know he's

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a four down player for you. I had

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 2>really good production with Josh McDaniels.

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Solid, solid depth, Yeah, solid on spectacle. I saw a

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people felt strongly about this one one way

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>or the other, and I just I couldn't find it

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 1>either way. Like, he definitely checks and boxes they need

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to check six four two twenty one because you size

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:06.479
<v Speaker 1>in that room. He is probably is his safe stays

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the only true X on the roster. I know they

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 1>played Kishon Booty out there, but that's because they don't

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have anybody else, right.

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, he's He's the guy that can definitely play

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the X. I think he's better as a big slot,

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 2>which I feel like as we say that a lot.

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Well he hasn't, but he hasn't done that a lot

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 1>in his career.

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:24.879
<v Speaker 2>No, but I thought that, you know, in Buffalo last year,

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 2>I was I thought that was his best tape was

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 2>playing inside. I think that that way there. You know,

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 2>his speed in his size against nickel corners or safeties

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 2>is a lot harder to defend for guys that play

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 2>full time on the outside at defensive back, Like when

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 2>he gets into the inside part of the field. I

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 2>at six foot Fouries, he's got some girth. You know,

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 2>he's got some size to him.

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:47.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess they need somebody to play the X. And again,

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>either way, he brings size that they didn't have. He

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>bring experience. Uh, he brings that veteran leadership, and he

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>can play on special teams. They still need to do

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a ton oft receivers. This doesn't really answer any of

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the talent questions, but they needed depth in that room.

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>They needed somebody to push some of these younger guys

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and bring in competition for them for more rotational roles.

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he does that, but I mean this is

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 1>not a replacement for metcalf or Higgins or any of

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 1>those guys.

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 2>No, and it will be interesting and uh when we

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 2>talk about, well, you know what's going on, what's gonna

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 2>happen next here they have bodies at receiver, I'm not

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 2>saying they have any answers. And I want to keep

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 2>putting that out there until somebody eclipses and says, oh,

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 2>he said that they're fine at receiver. No, they have

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot, a lot of They need a lot more

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 2>at receiver. But all of a sudden, I was texting

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 2>you last night about the you know, potential depth charts

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 2>and things like that. Uh, you know, what are you

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna do with Booty? I actually even throw Kendrick Bourne

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 2>in this category, right, Kendrick Bourne, Booty Polk, Baker, like

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 2>those four guys, Yeah, because you're gonna have I would

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 2>think another draft pick at wide receiver, I would think, uh,

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna make the.

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Roster unless unless it's a high draft pick. Do you

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>need one? Like, like, what good does it do them

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to take another receiver in the fourth round?

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is my point, right is like you know

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 2>everybody's throwing out there, you know, sign Cooper Cup, draft

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Ted McMillan. Like, I'm not saying don't, but I'm not

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 2>saying don't do those things. Yeah, I'm just saying that

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 2>when you start to really think about it, there's the

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 2>numbers there. You're gonna be giving up on on a

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 2>young player there that you just drafted, and probably Javon

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Baker is probably the most likely guy. But still like

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 2>that that foursome of Bourne, Polk, Booty Baker. If you

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 2>go into the season thinking that right now, MATC Collins

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 2>and Pop Douglas I think are on the team yes, right,

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 2>And my guess is that they're gonna either sign or

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 2>trade or draft one more receiver that's gonna be on

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 2>the team. So you're really talking about two or three

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 2>spots that are left over there. MATC. Collins is already

0:41:56.640 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of your fringe wide receiver for a special team guy, right,

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 2>So that spot's kind of already taken up. So you're

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 2>talking about two more true receivers that aren't gonna just

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:11.760
<v Speaker 2>be kicking game contributors, making the roster out of four guys.

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 2>So someone between that foursome is gonna be is gonna

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 2>be out, And maybe that's for the best. Like I'm

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 2>not saying that that's necessarily a bad thing. It's just

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 2>something to consider when you start hearing, oh, they need

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to double dip out receiver again, or they need to

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 2>sign this guy and draft that guy, like they're starting

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 2>to get the numbers are starting to get a little crazy, right, Yeah,

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just interested to see how that all pans out.

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:37.479
<v Speaker 2>But we'll get to more of that here in a second.

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's wrap this up, Josh Dobbs, is the last move here,

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:44.320
<v Speaker 2>and how are you feeling about the Manhattan Project Because

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 2>we're starting to get a little bit sweaty about this,

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 2>alex that your guy's not going to be here. Joe

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Milton is who we're talking right.

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>If they get a good return for Joe Milton, he

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 1>goes somewhere, he's gonna have a chance to start, like,

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd be incredibly happy for him. Yeah, and I think

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it validates what Alexander did and what they did last

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 1>year taking them probably that was always the point. Right

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>when they drafted Joe Milton, we said, like, best case scenario,

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you have a couple of showcase games, warm in the

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>preseason or late in the season, and he goes out

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and you get back more than you drafted him. So

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I'd be happy for him if they're able to do that. Now,

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not rushing that guy out the door. I think

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 1>there's value in having a good backup quarterback, and his

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>value I think can still go up and maybe you

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>get more. We talked about this a couple of weeks ago.

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>For anything less than one hundred and the top one

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred pick, I just think you're spinning your tires to

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>what to go ahead and draft Brady Cook in the

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 1>seventh round and just start the process over. So I

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't They definitely have more flexibility now because they have

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>another backup quarterback in place if they do trade Joe Milton,

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:48.360
<v Speaker 1>if somebody blows them away. That being said, I would

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 1>not rule out the idea that they want to keep

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 1>three quarterbacks. Yeah, so what most teams do now when

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>you have that emergency quarterback rule on game days, teams

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 1>want to take advantage of that. It's not like they're

0:43:57.840 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>going to have a roster crunch. They're still kind of

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 1>building this thing up. And Josh Dobbs gives you a

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 1>veteran in that room. This is a guy that's the

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Patriots or is eleventh NFL team? Yeah right, he's he

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:11.479
<v Speaker 1>he's only played what five six NFL seasons, but there's

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of experience packed in there, and he's gonna

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>be a good mentor not mentor, but like good veteran

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>voice in the room for Drake May and Joe Milton.

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.320
<v Speaker 1>He gives you an opportunity to have that third emergency

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterback on game days. Stylistically, he's a fit with the

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>other two, so you're not gonna have to really have

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:31.800
<v Speaker 1>him do things differently. What better you have two guys

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>with rocket arms to have a rocket scientist teach them

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 1>how to go about their their game.

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 2>Right, So how long have you been rehearsing that one?

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I came up with it about ten minutes after they

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>signed him. Yeah, they like could they It makes it

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe Milton trade easier. And maybe that's down the road.

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's at the end of camp, some team gets antsy.

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I mean, at the time we're doing this podcast,

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Rogers is still out there, Wilson's still out there, and

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens with Kirk Cousins. Then you have

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the draft. Maybe you get a team that you know,

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 1>get shaky and says, you know what, we we got

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to give up more than we want because we've got

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to come out of this with a quarterback. We're missing

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 1>on everybody. But so maybe maybe it gives them the

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 1>flexibility if the right offer comes along. But I don't

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to north Should they just rush Joe

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Milton out the door? What I said the other night

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, don't just trade Joe Milton for the best

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:22.879
<v Speaker 1>you can get. Trade Joe Milton because somebody is giving

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 1>you a reason to trade Joe Milton, right if the

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:29.800
<v Speaker 1>best offer is still not like significant, you really don't

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>need to be in a rush to trade him. And

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I'll add to this just the Dobbs

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>signing as a whole, Like he got two years, eight million,

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 1>which is solid. It's not starting money, but it's solid

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.760
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterback money. Sam Darnold got a hundred million dollars.

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 1>You saw somebody give up a fifth round pick for

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Pickett. Yeah, these teams are going hard into the

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>veteran quarterback.

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Market because they're terrified of the draft class.

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Which might be so glass half fall a glass half empty.

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 1>These teams are going hard into the veteran quarterback market,

0:45:58.320 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>which might be a good sign for the Patriot because

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it means none of the teams like the quarterbacks, which

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:03.440
<v Speaker 1>means they won't go at the top of the draft.

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The bad news for the Patriots is all the teams

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>winning the deals for these quarterbacks and trading for them

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 1>are not the teams at the top of the draft.

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:14.279
<v Speaker 1>So do they get desperate and take somebody or does

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 1>it show you that those teams maybe feel better about

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks that are available.

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:21.399
<v Speaker 2>So I'm with you on Joe. I'm in no rush

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 2>to trade Joe Millen now if somebody comes in with

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 2>a second or third round pick, I would obviously strongly

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:32.800
<v Speaker 2>consider a top one hundred, you know, value worth it maybe,

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'm in no rush to trade Joe Millon. And

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I look at Joe Millon the same way that I'm

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 2>sure in a lot of ways Bill Belichick looked at

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Garoppolo, or at the time, you're right over there

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 2>you get water Piper Jacoby Brissett, you know at the

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 2>time as well, like, don't trade them until you have

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 2>to trade them, right, if you.

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Could get like a Phillip Dorset equivalent, actually that'd be great.

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 2>But just don't don't be in any rush. Like you

0:46:56.719 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 2>have a affordable rookie cost controlled rookie contract, backup quarterback

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 2>with upside, So don't don't be in this huge rush

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 2>to trade him. Now. Again, if if a team blows

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 2>you away with an offer that's ridiculous, you know, like

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 2>a second round pick comes over, you know, across the table.

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Of course, you do it, right, But I don't be

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 2>in any rush. I don't buy some of this stuff

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 2>out there that Joe Milton sees himself as a starter

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 2>and like it's going to like cause issues in the

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 2>room with Drake May. I don't necessarily think that that's

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 2>the type of guy Joe Milton is.

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's more like an eventually thing, like eventually

0:47:36.160 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 1>he'd like to go somewhere where he has a start,

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a chance to start, which of course he does. Yeah,

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think like it needs to be right now, because,

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>like you said, that's just not the kind of guy

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that he is. The only team I wonder like if

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he sees a chance to go to the Rams and

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:51.920
<v Speaker 1>get back with the alex man Pelt and continue on

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the development path he was on last year, and you know,

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford, who knows how much longer he's going to

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>be there, that might be something that enticing.

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So last year when I wrote our feature on

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Joe Milton, when they drafted him, and so I was

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 2>talking to some people down at the Senior Bowl about

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:11.320
<v Speaker 2>him because he was down at the Senior Bowl, And

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:12.960
<v Speaker 2>that was when I first started to get on the

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 2>bandwagon with you, if you remember correctly. So every year

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 2>at the Senior Bowl they hand out like a good

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Guy Award, basically just one of the players that was

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:25.839
<v Speaker 2>just above and beyond around around everybody. The re meeting

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 2>around the meeting rooms, the locker room. You're just a

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:29.320
<v Speaker 2>great guy to be around.

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Good.

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, cool, Hang right, guess who won that award? Joe Milton.

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 2>So that you're telling me that that guy is now

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 2>going to start to try to strum up some quarterback

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 2>controversy between him and Drake May, I just don't. That's

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 2>not the vibe that I've gotten talking to people at

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Michigan Tennessee, the Senior Bowl all throughout that process, that

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:50.920
<v Speaker 2>he was the type of guy that was going to

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:52.279
<v Speaker 2>do that. And I think that was part of the

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 2>reason why they felt comfortable double dipping and drafting him

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 2>last year because they didn't think that he was going

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 2>to cause a whole hullrible that he should be starting.

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:04.280
<v Speaker 2>So I wouldn't be worried too much about that. But again,

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 2>if somebody blows you away with an offer that you

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 2>can't refuse, and you take it, but don't don't trade

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Joe Millon for a fourth round pick just to trade him,

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.359
<v Speaker 2>because then I think you have to draft another quarterback again, right,

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 2>and so then you're just using that pick to draft

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 2>another Joe Milton. So just keep Joe.

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Milton, and there is not another Joe Milton in the draft.

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:22.920
<v Speaker 1>There won't be another Joe Milton in the draft for

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a long long time.

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:26.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's a unique time, he is. He is. All right,

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 2>let's got to do some of these atterides and then

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna take your phone calls because I know you

0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 2>guys have been waiting. I know, I know you guys

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 2>have been waiting. And I also know we're coming up

0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 2>on another weekend without football. So why not spend the

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:41.480
<v Speaker 2>off season getting organized with Bob's Discount Furniture Shot Bob's

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 2>and revamp every room with smart storage solutions like the

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Baumount Bedroom set featuring built in drawers for all your

0:49:48.760 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Pats gear, or the customizable modular Bobs Sectional, which now

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 2>includes hidden storage consoles for all of blankets, remotes in

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 2>that football you practice throwing when no one is looking.

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 2>That this guy does that. So stock up on winning

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 2>storage styles with Bob's. Scott Furniture, the official furniture store

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 2>of the New England Patriots, and bud Light Easy to Drink,

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Easy to Enjoy. Bud Light, the official beer sponsor of

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the New England Patriots. You are big on the I'm

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 2>just gonna randomly have this football around and I'm gonna

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 2>toss it to do.

0:50:21.120 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I do like to have a football around usually, just

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:26.360
<v Speaker 1>because especially if I'm just like sitting on the couch

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:27.440
<v Speaker 1>watching games, I just, you.

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Know, are you visioning that you're you're gonna be playing

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 2>in this?

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm always I know, I'm just always tempted

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:35.360
<v Speaker 1>during the show to go take one of those footballs

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 1>off the wall and just kind of having my hands

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:38.040
<v Speaker 1>during the show.

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:42.239
<v Speaker 2>Our mouse is not working, manby, Marie can pull up

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:46.320
<v Speaker 2>the calls. Mouse isn't working. Uh, you can pull up, Patty.

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:47.359
<v Speaker 2>We'll just go in order.

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 1>It's not on.

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I turned it on and then I turned it off

0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:53.240
<v Speaker 2>and it still doesn't work. Oh, we got it. Okay,

0:50:54.800 --> 0:50:58.279
<v Speaker 2>you're there, all right, all right, my bad, All right now.

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Screener, you definitely are hi, guys doing today?

0:51:03.120 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 2>Good good?

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:07.600
<v Speaker 3>All right. I just want to give a couple of

0:51:07.680 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 3>quick shout outs and then I'll get to my question.

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:13.239
<v Speaker 3>A big shout out to Chester and Portland. You know.

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 3>He he basically said I was an idiot for not

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:21.080
<v Speaker 3>looking more into Mac Collins and when I did. The

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:23.919
<v Speaker 3>guy is kind of a character, and you know, maybe

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I didn't gi him as much credit as he was

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 3>giving him. And if you look like in twenty twenty

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 3>two he had his best year with Josh, so maybe

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:33.840
<v Speaker 3>that's positive going forward with him. You know, I'm not

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 3>saying he's gonna be Brandon Lafel or you know, any

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:40.319
<v Speaker 3>anything in that mold, but you know, maybe we can

0:51:40.440 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 3>get some good, solid production for him. And I think

0:51:42.680 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 3>this guy might end up being a fan favorite. And

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 3>and the YouTube comments, let me shout out old Man

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Mob because that guy's always on point. Now let's get

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 3>to my questions. Guys. Do you guys The first question

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 3>is do you think with the moves that we made

0:51:58.719 --> 0:52:02.440
<v Speaker 3>with Robert Splane, do you think Juwan Bentley still has

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 3>a role on this team, Because if it comes down

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 3>between him and Jilanni to buy I I actually want

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 3>to buy off this team. Like I don't want him

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 3>on here. Call me petty, but I don't like what.

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't like how he presented as fans last last season.

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:21.439
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're the ones that pay his salary, and

0:52:21.800 --> 0:52:24.880
<v Speaker 3>sometimes football, you know, football players need to get that

0:52:24.960 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 3>through their head that we're the ones that come to

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 3>the games, We're the ones that buy the jerseys, We're

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.239
<v Speaker 3>the ones that watched the games on TV that that

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 3>helped this you know, ad revenue go through and help

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 3>get these guys paid. So I want I just want

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 3>him gone. And my second question is this is kind

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:45.719
<v Speaker 3>of crazy. Let's say something absolutely bonkers happens at the

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 3>top of the draft and Will Campbell, Abdull Carter, and

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Travis Hunter are all sitting there at number four. Who

0:52:54.000 --> 0:52:54.800
<v Speaker 3>do you take.

0:52:56.480 --> 0:53:00.279
<v Speaker 2>Off your guys? Yeah?

0:53:00.320 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Twice about it. He's the best player in the draft.

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:05.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would take Abdul Carter too. In terms of linebacker,

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if there's any plans of releasing Tavai

0:53:10.400 --> 0:53:13.799
<v Speaker 2>or moving on from Bentley or anything like that. I

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:18.520
<v Speaker 2>still see that Bentley and Spoayne can play together. Yeah,

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I think Bentley is your mic Splain's your weak side

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 2>linebacker playing you know, in a four to two in

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 2>this defense. Maybe that means to Vay and Spolayne are

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of in a competition for who is the best,

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, compliment to Bentley there. But I still see

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:36.319
<v Speaker 2>a role for Bentley on this team.

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Bentley will still have a role, might be reduced. I mean,

0:53:38.120 --> 0:53:40.759
<v Speaker 1>he was playing ninety percent of the stamps before I got hurt.

0:53:40.840 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Lest year, like that's gonna go down like sixty five seventy,

0:53:43.160 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I would think, But he still has a role for sure.

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:48.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's a role for Jelanne to Vai. Yeah,

0:53:48.480 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know, especially when you consider anything that

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:52.880
<v Speaker 1>happened last year, you're going to keep that guy around

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in a backup role where he's not playing a ton

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:58.799
<v Speaker 1>where he's probably gonna get frustrated. You know. I don't

0:53:58.840 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 1>know that, like you said, is anything imminent, I don't know.

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:03.960
<v Speaker 1>But when we get around a training camp, we're talking

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:06.239
<v Speaker 1>about guys on the bubble. If he's still here at

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that point, that's definitely somebody I'd put us on the bubble.

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>If i'd do a roster projection today, I don't know

0:54:11.960 --> 0:54:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that i'd have him on the team.

0:54:13.040 --> 0:54:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that's fair. DeShawn is in Virginia. What's up

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:16.600
<v Speaker 2>to Sean?

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:19.399
<v Speaker 4>Oh gods, how do you guys doing?

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Hate good?

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:23.719
<v Speaker 4>I want to talk about three thirds. First, is the

0:54:23.760 --> 0:54:26.440
<v Speaker 4>safety part or whatever I mean? I have a hard

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:27.879
<v Speaker 4>time understanding and the reason why they need to try

0:54:27.880 --> 0:54:29.680
<v Speaker 4>to go out to read because like it's been all

0:54:29.680 --> 0:54:31.799
<v Speaker 4>of something they had a traditional safety I ring your

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 4>city like that could cover out in space from sideline

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:36.920
<v Speaker 4>to sideline, you know, that could like defend the run

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:39.440
<v Speaker 4>as well as the past. So I'm smartly didn't go

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:41.759
<v Speaker 4>out to read because douggars stucks. And I've been saying

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 4>this for a long time that they should have traded

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:47.320
<v Speaker 4>him last year. Now, when it comes to certain things

0:54:47.320 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 4>about like far as, like the live backer situation, whatever,

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:52.759
<v Speaker 4>I feel like guys like Ellis Mapoo would benefit this

0:54:52.880 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 4>year because I have more help wanting to defend the

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 4>times so ecthetic resport I said, they could play there

0:54:57.080 --> 0:55:00.759
<v Speaker 4>respectable roles better because of that of them boosting the

0:55:00.760 --> 0:55:03.080
<v Speaker 4>defense like that. Now, when when it comes to the offense,

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:05.759
<v Speaker 4>we want to talk about you know, uh Holland. But

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 4>a lot of these guys I feel like would be

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 4>great if they had a number one receiver because they'd

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:13.439
<v Speaker 4>been a player respectable roles as well. At the same

0:55:13.480 --> 0:55:15.799
<v Speaker 4>thing was apply to the offense. But the probably they

0:55:15.800 --> 0:55:19.320
<v Speaker 4>don't have a number one receiver to help everybody refill

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:21.840
<v Speaker 4>their respectful role. That's the issue that's basically going on.

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 4>That's all I wanted to say.

0:55:23.480 --> 0:55:25.719
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Sean, thanks for the call. Yeah, I think

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 2>as safety where we're all hoping that a true center

0:55:30.160 --> 0:55:33.359
<v Speaker 2>fielder is coming. You know, it's not gonna be. It's

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:35.880
<v Speaker 2>not gonna be John Jevon Holland obviously he's not. I

0:55:35.920 --> 0:55:38.760
<v Speaker 2>think he's mentioned Justin Reed, who Yeah, did he sign somewhere?

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, where'd he go? I don't know where he went.

0:55:41.480 --> 0:55:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I know he signed.

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:44.920
<v Speaker 2>So you know, those guys aren't gonna be it. But

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:49.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't know as I could see a vision where

0:55:49.760 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 2>it's not a full time player Justin Reid went to

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the Saints, but that dron harmon role of uh, we're

0:55:56.560 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 2>gonna play an obvious past, you know, third down, two minutes,

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:02.920
<v Speaker 2>four minute offenses at the end of games, you know,

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:06.719
<v Speaker 2>that sort of thing, which is usually factors into a

0:56:06.880 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 2>good chunk of the snaps when you really think about it.

0:56:09.760 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 2>In those scenarios, I definitely think that that player could

0:56:13.520 --> 0:56:16.760
<v Speaker 2>be had. Like you mentioned, what's it a Cuba, right, Andrew.

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:19.239
<v Speaker 1>So the two guys I look at, yes, right, if

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:21.080
<v Speaker 1>they want to go in the first round, I guess

0:56:21.120 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 1>there'd be three. If they want to go in the

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:24.200
<v Speaker 1>first round, it's Malachai Starks, but he's going to be

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:27.319
<v Speaker 1>a top fifteen pick, so they it's not happening without

0:56:27.360 --> 0:56:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a ton of movement. Andrew mccooba from Texas in the

0:56:30.120 --> 0:56:33.440
<v Speaker 1>second round thirty eight might be a little rich, but

0:56:34.600 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 1>if they kind of hammer out some other needs here,

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:40.319
<v Speaker 1>not totally out of character, Probably better off moving back

0:56:40.360 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 1>into the fifties and moving up from seventy to the

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:44.680
<v Speaker 1>fifties for him. And then the Day three guys would

0:56:44.680 --> 0:56:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be early Day three probably at one oh six would

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:49.000
<v Speaker 1>be Billy Bowman from Oklahoma. He is going to be

0:56:49.400 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a true rotational player. I think mccuba maybe grows into

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that guy that can play eighty five to ninety percent

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of the time. Billy Bowman's gonna be rotational. You're gonna

0:56:57.560 --> 0:56:58.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to play him on the back end. He's

0:56:58.920 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 1>also going to be able to give you some hell

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 1>up in the slot. But I think he's a player

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:05.799
<v Speaker 1>that could, certainly, if you're gonna do that situationally, fill

0:57:05.880 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 1>that role.

0:57:06.400 --> 0:57:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that for right now. I don't think

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:12.400
<v Speaker 2>they necessarily need anything more than a Deron Harmon in

0:57:12.520 --> 0:57:15.480
<v Speaker 2>terms of snap usage and playing over the top. So

0:57:16.160 --> 0:57:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I would be comfortable with like a mid round guy

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:21.840
<v Speaker 2>like Billy Bowman in that spot. Starks is interesting to

0:57:21.960 --> 0:57:25.440
<v Speaker 2>me because I do wonder if his combine pushes him

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:28.240
<v Speaker 2>down kind of like Brian branch treatment style.

0:57:28.480 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>That bad? Was it?

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 2>He didn't run very well?

0:57:31.360 --> 0:57:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Didn't Brian Branch run like a four to six? Yeah?

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:36.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I would say Brian Branch was more in trouble

0:57:36.560 --> 0:57:40.640
<v Speaker 2>than him. Maybe, yeah, But Stark says, I still feel like,

0:57:40.800 --> 0:57:42.560
<v Speaker 2>if I can look it up, but if I remember

0:57:42.600 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 2>correctly off the top of my head, he had one

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:49.400
<v Speaker 2>of those trust the tape type of combines, and there

0:57:49.440 --> 0:57:53.160
<v Speaker 2>are yeah, like there are some things on his tape too.

0:57:53.240 --> 0:57:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I didn't actually think that his tape was it didn't

0:57:56.040 --> 0:57:56.880
<v Speaker 2>blow me away.

0:57:56.800 --> 0:58:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Four or five flat thirty three inch vertical having two

0:58:00.880 --> 0:58:02.520
<v Speaker 1>three cone four four or five shots.

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not great. That's not great for you know,

0:58:05.640 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 2>a guy that's supposed to be playing in space in

0:58:07.520 --> 0:58:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the NFL. Right, So I would say that there's a

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 2>chance that Stark slips a little bit. Was he gonna

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:16.720
<v Speaker 2>slip all the way to thirty eight? Like? Probably not,

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:20.000
<v Speaker 2>but especially in a draft like this, But there's a

0:58:20.120 --> 0:58:23.080
<v Speaker 2>chance just because of that combine that you know, the

0:58:23.120 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 2>athletic testing knocks him down a little bit. Like when

0:58:26.520 --> 0:58:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I first started the process with the draft I it

0:58:28.640 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 2>starts was on my short list of guys because of

0:58:31.640 --> 0:58:35.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, top ten, top fifteen consideration. I didn't think

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 2>the tape was like that eye opening to me. I

0:58:37.680 --> 0:58:40.800
<v Speaker 2>wasn't blown away by what I saw. A good pursuit

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 2>player against the run has some versatility to you know,

0:58:44.160 --> 0:58:45.960
<v Speaker 2>he can play the nickel, he can play up top,

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 2>he can play in the box. He had some issues

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:53.160
<v Speaker 2>with the angles and you know, tracking the ball down

0:58:53.240 --> 0:58:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the field from his perch, and it got beat badly

0:58:56.480 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 2>in that Texas game. I think it was I think

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 2>it was golden. That sounds right, yeah, and he just

0:59:02.760 --> 0:59:04.880
<v Speaker 2>he dove, you know for the ball and as it

0:59:05.040 --> 0:59:08.600
<v Speaker 2>over the top, missed it and then you know, sixty

0:59:08.680 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 2>yard touchdown right behind him. So there was some like

0:59:11.880 --> 0:59:13.680
<v Speaker 2>little things like that with his film that I didn't

0:59:13.680 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 2>think were It wasn't blown away, which was there, Like Branch.

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Branch was a hell of a college player like that.

0:59:19.800 --> 0:59:23.160
<v Speaker 2>That was all overthink with the combine. If stars fell

0:59:23.160 --> 0:59:24.680
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, I don't think it would be as

0:59:25.160 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 2>much of an overthink for teams. So we'll see about that.

0:59:28.240 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Paul is in Wallthams, I'd say, I don't know. I

0:59:31.160 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 2>just went blind for some reason. Paul, what's up?

0:59:34.280 --> 0:59:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Thank guys.

0:59:34.760 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 5>How you doing. I just got one quick question for

0:59:38.400 --> 0:59:41.120
<v Speaker 5>you coming out of this first few days of creagency.

0:59:41.600 --> 0:59:45.680
<v Speaker 5>What would you rank the three to four biggest holes

0:59:46.240 --> 0:59:48.800
<v Speaker 5>on the roster still and how would you rank them

0:59:48.840 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 5>in terms of we need this sorted by August first

0:59:53.560 --> 0:59:55.040
<v Speaker 5>we can try again next to season.

0:59:55.920 --> 0:59:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Thanks for the call, Paul. That's a great segue

0:59:57.880 --> 0:59:59.920
<v Speaker 2>because that's exactly what I wanted to talk about next.

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:03.080
<v Speaker 2>So I think four is a good number. That's right

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:04.280
<v Speaker 2>about where I'm at right now.

1:00:04.720 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

1:00:05.080 --> 1:00:08.760
<v Speaker 2>The two biggest are obviously wide receiver and left tackle.

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>You're going to order though I'd flip those.

1:00:10.760 --> 1:00:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, I probably would too. But I think the

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:16.760
<v Speaker 2>difference is to me, is that at left tackle, like

1:00:16.880 --> 1:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>if they signed, if they acquired, whatever way they go

1:00:19.880 --> 1:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>about it, a Morgan Moses level talent to play left tackle,

1:00:24.400 --> 1:00:25.280
<v Speaker 2>I'd be okay with that.

1:00:25.440 --> 1:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>That Cam Robinson.

1:00:26.640 --> 1:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's Cam Robinson, I don't know. We can talk

1:00:28.800 --> 1:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>about Cam Robinson here in.

1:00:30.160 --> 1:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Not Cam Robinson. I don't know who it is.

1:00:31.840 --> 1:00:33.840
<v Speaker 2>But my point is is that if they got NFL

1:00:33.880 --> 1:00:38.240
<v Speaker 2>average left tackle, I'd feel okay, whereas NFL average at

1:00:38.280 --> 1:00:41.240
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver. Isn't enough, right, they already have that. They

1:00:41.320 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 2>need better talent that wide receiver, Whereas I think you

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:46.480
<v Speaker 2>can get away with having NFL average at the tackle spots,

1:00:46.840 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 2>so that that might be the one little difference in

1:00:48.840 --> 1:00:53.120
<v Speaker 2>terms of order there for me. But wide receiver left tackle,

1:00:54.560 --> 1:00:57.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm still gonna be pounding the table for an interior linement.

1:00:57.560 --> 1:01:00.919
<v Speaker 2>I whether it's a center, it's a guard. So sign

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:05.919
<v Speaker 2>somebody that in this veteran market that has played the position. Again,

1:01:06.120 --> 1:01:08.480
<v Speaker 2>just like Morgan Moses, like, just give me someone that

1:01:08.600 --> 1:01:11.960
<v Speaker 2>has played the position at an NFL starting level.

1:01:12.120 --> 1:01:12.280
<v Speaker 6>You know.

1:01:12.440 --> 1:01:15.160
<v Speaker 2>It can be average, it can be adequate, but I

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:17.720
<v Speaker 2>just want a body there that I can trust, sure

1:01:17.760 --> 1:01:21.280
<v Speaker 2>that I'm not putting all of my eggs in Cole Strange,

1:01:21.360 --> 1:01:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Leyden Robinson City. So Ben Brown, you know, to pull

1:01:24.480 --> 1:01:26.640
<v Speaker 2>out two starters from that group. Let's pull out one

1:01:26.720 --> 1:01:29.280
<v Speaker 2>starter from that group instead of two, And I feel

1:01:29.280 --> 1:01:32.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot better. On the defense side of the ball,

1:01:33.000 --> 1:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I still think they're an edge rusher short. I think

1:01:35.320 --> 1:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>they need a pass rusher off the edge. It doesn't

1:01:38.400 --> 1:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>they have enough, you know, Landry Anthony Jennings. They have

1:01:42.400 --> 1:01:45.400
<v Speaker 2>enough edge setters, somebody's just gonna pin his years back

1:01:45.480 --> 1:01:48.520
<v Speaker 2>third down Joshua Roll. You know, someone that's gonna be

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:50.200
<v Speaker 2>a really good situational pass rush.

1:01:50.280 --> 1:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>But that like I don't know if we're just doing freegency,

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel really good about finding that guy on daytieh.

1:01:56.400 --> 1:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>No draft is open on this as well. I would

1:01:58.640 --> 1:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>say that that's a draft pick, you know, whether it's

1:02:01.960 --> 1:02:06.760
<v Speaker 2>somebody h on Day two on the second round. I

1:02:06.840 --> 1:02:10.200
<v Speaker 2>mean as Iraku princely, I'm not going to try to

1:02:10.240 --> 1:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>pronounce his last name, and there we go. Who I

1:02:13.680 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>really liked by the way I watched him, every little

1:02:16.000 --> 1:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>bit of recency bias with him, but I watched him

1:02:18.240 --> 1:02:20.440
<v Speaker 2>recently but before free agency. He's a good player.

1:02:20.920 --> 1:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>He's in the YouTube check because they can literally get

1:02:23.080 --> 1:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>josh Uchek.

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, no, I'm a free agent. Yeah, we've done that.

1:02:28.120 --> 1:02:30.600
<v Speaker 2>But those two guys, you know, I don't know if

1:02:31.200 --> 1:02:33.280
<v Speaker 2>as Iraku will make it to thirty eight. He might

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>be a late first.

1:02:34.360 --> 1:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>If this is a thing where there's so many good

1:02:36.520 --> 1:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>edge rushers that guys get there's so many limits at

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>other positions like receiver even quarterback right that guys get

1:02:44.680 --> 1:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>pushed down because teams are okay being patient.

1:02:46.880 --> 1:02:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not totally ruling out your Ohio State guys yet.

1:02:50.960 --> 1:02:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's exactly what they need for the Yeah,

1:02:55.240 --> 1:02:58.000
<v Speaker 2>but I don't know if how much they're gonna trust

1:02:58.080 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Keon White as a four to three n YEA canon

1:03:00.400 --> 1:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the dirt player. Jack Sawyer is definitely that, you know,

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:05.600
<v Speaker 2>he's a hand in the dirt four three end. So

1:03:05.760 --> 1:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe if they look at it in terms of projecting

1:03:09.040 --> 1:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>starting roles years from now, right like two years from now,

1:03:12.360 --> 1:03:14.640
<v Speaker 2>three years from now, maybe you could go in that

1:03:14.760 --> 1:03:17.640
<v Speaker 2>direction still, But I think we're all kind of gravitating

1:03:17.720 --> 1:03:25.120
<v Speaker 2>now more towards Princely Donovan Azarouki as a rock O

1:03:25.280 --> 1:03:29.840
<v Speaker 2>shore third round. You know my guy Josiah Stewart, you know,

1:03:30.160 --> 1:03:32.320
<v Speaker 2>just like a screamer off the edge like that I

1:03:32.440 --> 1:03:35.320
<v Speaker 2>think would go a long way. And and we've mentioned

1:03:35.360 --> 1:03:38.080
<v Speaker 2>free safety multiple times, like I feel like free safety

1:03:38.200 --> 1:03:40.760
<v Speaker 2>is still one of those positions that they can get,

1:03:40.960 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>they can get better at, and have somebody that is

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:45.880
<v Speaker 2>truly comfortable playing center field.

1:03:46.080 --> 1:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>If I was gonna do like the Big four right now,

1:03:48.120 --> 1:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>rank them left tackle wide receiver, but like a starting

1:03:51.720 --> 1:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, not some guy that's gonna plug into the

1:03:54.600 --> 1:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>middle of the depth chart right, muddy things further right,

1:03:57.160 --> 1:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>left tackle unquestioned. Top of the depth chart. Wide receiver

1:04:00.080 --> 1:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>would be two, free safety would be three, guard would

1:04:04.320 --> 1:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>be four. And then I'll also just sneak in there.

1:04:06.040 --> 1:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And these are drafts specific. I do still want to

1:04:09.160 --> 1:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>see them even though Austin Hooper's back, I do still

1:04:11.360 --> 1:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>want to see them draft the tight end. I want

1:04:13.440 --> 1:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to see them tap into this class and get the

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>next guy in the pipeline because Henry and Hooper both

1:04:18.040 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>over thirty, and I do want to see them draft

1:04:20.200 --> 1:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a running back, get some more depth in that room,

1:04:22.440 --> 1:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and also maybe push Stevenson and Gibson on the depth chart.

1:04:25.400 --> 1:04:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Well that was you know, another good thing kind of

1:04:27.560 --> 1:04:29.680
<v Speaker 2>byproduct of what they did on Day one at free

1:04:29.720 --> 1:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>agency is I feel like they still have enough picks

1:04:32.680 --> 1:04:34.560
<v Speaker 2>that they can make some of those luxury They have

1:04:34.720 --> 1:04:36.840
<v Speaker 2>some flexibility to do that because they don't need to

1:04:36.920 --> 1:04:41.080
<v Speaker 2>desperately sign or draft like three defensive linemen because they

1:04:41.080 --> 1:04:44.360
<v Speaker 2>didn't get anybody in free agency, or you know, get

1:04:44.440 --> 1:04:47.760
<v Speaker 2>a run stuffing linebacker in the draft, which I thought

1:04:47.920 --> 1:04:50.320
<v Speaker 2>was maybe like a sneaky need for the team. So

1:04:50.600 --> 1:04:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I look at you know, outside corner, another one.

1:04:53.760 --> 1:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Like that bus to check.

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:59.200
<v Speaker 2>They easily could have drafted a Carlon Davis type player

1:04:59.280 --> 1:05:01.240
<v Speaker 2>on Day two or or you know, middle rounds of

1:05:01.280 --> 1:05:03.640
<v Speaker 2>this draft because out of necessity, because they needed to

1:05:03.680 --> 1:05:06.640
<v Speaker 2>fill that hole. Now they don't because of the way

1:05:06.680 --> 1:05:09.760
<v Speaker 2>that they've handled free agency so far. So they can

1:05:09.880 --> 1:05:12.000
<v Speaker 2>take a running back over the top. They can take

1:05:12.040 --> 1:05:14.520
<v Speaker 2>a tight end you know, even still and add him

1:05:14.560 --> 1:05:16.960
<v Speaker 2>to that room. And maybe it's more of a competition

1:05:17.040 --> 1:05:19.200
<v Speaker 2>with Jahem Bell, you know, to make the roster there

1:05:19.240 --> 1:05:20.760
<v Speaker 2>at tight end, or maybe all four of them make

1:05:20.800 --> 1:05:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the roster.

1:05:21.920 --> 1:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I again, forget about Robbie, you know full back. Would

1:05:25.800 --> 1:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you would you be in on them signing use check.

1:05:29.400 --> 1:05:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I said this yesterday and everybody mocked me because I

1:05:32.200 --> 1:05:34.920
<v Speaker 2>think I called him Kyle. Then yeah, I called him

1:05:34.960 --> 1:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Kyle and say, you know, first name basis right, Kyle Shanahan. Uh.

1:05:38.960 --> 1:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>It worries me that Kyle Shanahan thinks that he's cooked.

1:05:41.720 --> 1:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Like if Kyle Shanahan think that he's cooked, or they

1:05:44.040 --> 1:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>just totally hitting the reset.

1:05:45.000 --> 1:05:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Button over there, Kyle, that's like a that's like Kyle

1:05:48.720 --> 1:05:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Shanahan's like fifth son, Like you're like, I don't how

1:05:51.640 --> 1:05:53.920
<v Speaker 2>many sons he had. I just made that number up

1:05:54.040 --> 1:05:55.520
<v Speaker 2>like that that. But you know what I'm trying to.

1:05:57.760 --> 1:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>If Kyle Shanahan Robbie and is clearing the way, no,

1:06:02.600 --> 1:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I like, I remember.

1:06:04.240 --> 1:06:06.240
<v Speaker 2>A couple of years ago. This was a long time ago.

1:06:06.920 --> 1:06:10.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're getting old. It's probably like around twenty nineteen. Yeah,

1:06:10.880 --> 1:06:14.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty. I was at the Combine and this was

1:06:14.280 --> 1:06:17.080
<v Speaker 2>when Bill was still here. So Belichick never talked at

1:06:17.120 --> 1:06:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the Combine. So you never had any real Patriots stuff.

1:06:20.160 --> 1:06:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Well you know the drill now, so you never had

1:06:22.680 --> 1:06:24.960
<v Speaker 2>any Patriot stuff on that Tuesday.

1:06:24.720 --> 1:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Right right.

1:06:25.360 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 2>So I would just you know, bounce around this guy.

1:06:29.120 --> 1:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Go to the Giants because Odell Beckham might get traded.

1:06:32.120 --> 1:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Go here because that guy might get traded. And of

1:06:34.600 --> 1:06:37.600
<v Speaker 2>course when Kyle Shanahan talked, you know, you know where,

1:06:37.640 --> 1:06:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I was front and center, and I asked him about

1:06:40.360 --> 1:06:43.840
<v Speaker 2>fullbacks and like his how he uses fullbacks, and this

1:06:44.040 --> 1:06:47.520
<v Speaker 2>guy wax poetic about Kyle used checking the full back.

1:06:47.560 --> 1:06:50.040
<v Speaker 2>And he told me at that time that he will

1:06:50.160 --> 1:06:53.360
<v Speaker 2>never have a roster that doesn't feature a fullback, like

1:06:53.440 --> 1:06:56.040
<v Speaker 2>he will always have a fullback on his team. Period.

1:06:56.440 --> 1:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So everybody in Francisco forty nine at rob uotss coming, everybody.

1:07:00.680 --> 1:07:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Thinks Kyle used Check is probably the best fullback in football,

1:07:03.760 --> 1:07:07.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe in the history of football. And and you're telling

1:07:07.440 --> 1:07:11.160
<v Speaker 2>me that Kyle Shanahan is cutting that player like that.

1:07:11.400 --> 1:07:13.560
<v Speaker 2>That speaks to me then tells me that he might

1:07:13.640 --> 1:07:16.280
<v Speaker 2>be he might be cooked, he might be washed.

1:07:16.320 --> 1:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>So is Deebo cooked? Then can we say that?

1:07:18.280 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a little because I took him for

1:07:19.760 --> 1:07:21.920
<v Speaker 2>saying that, is it. Kyle Shanahan's giving up on him?

1:07:21.960 --> 1:07:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Apparently this is the rule's moving on from players they're

1:07:25.400 --> 1:07:27.280
<v Speaker 2>cold back like that. That's different.

1:07:28.080 --> 1:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I I think you just got to take corner and

1:07:30.240 --> 1:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>saying no.

1:07:30.840 --> 1:07:34.560
<v Speaker 2>It's different. It's a different. It's not different, it's different.

1:07:34.560 --> 1:07:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand how. So Deebo Samuel might be washed.

1:07:37.120 --> 1:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>That's all right? So well I got yelled at for

1:07:38.920 --> 1:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>saying that. So this is what can we say Deebo's

1:07:41.680 --> 1:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>watch Then if we're saying that, this means Kyle used

1:07:43.800 --> 1:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Check is washed.

1:07:44.720 --> 1:07:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Before we go back to the funds, I want to

1:07:46.360 --> 1:07:48.280
<v Speaker 2>go back to those needs that we talked about to

1:07:48.400 --> 1:07:52.520
<v Speaker 2>start throwing some names out there. Well, let's start with

1:07:52.600 --> 1:07:54.960
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver. I think we have to talk about the

1:07:55.000 --> 1:07:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Cooper Cup of it all. Uh Cup check if you will?

1:07:59.440 --> 1:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>How long even hold on an that one?

1:08:01.640 --> 1:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I thought of that one last night. I think we

1:08:04.800 --> 1:08:09.840
<v Speaker 2>have to we talk talk about it if we're honest

1:08:09.880 --> 1:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>about the type of player that Cooper Cup is now.

1:08:12.680 --> 1:08:16.680
<v Speaker 2>And if you look at his advanced metrics, you know, separation,

1:08:17.479 --> 1:08:22.320
<v Speaker 2>yards after the catch, contested catchability, it is a precipitous

1:08:23.240 --> 1:08:26.280
<v Speaker 2>drop year after year from twenty twenty one his nineteen

1:08:26.400 --> 1:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>hundred yards season. Right, yeah, we're from twenty twenty one.

1:08:30.280 --> 1:08:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Each year gets progressively worse in terms of the analytics

1:08:34.600 --> 1:08:36.920
<v Speaker 2>of it all is getting older. So you look at

1:08:36.920 --> 1:08:41.280
<v Speaker 2>all that and you look at a team like the Rams,

1:08:41.400 --> 1:08:46.479
<v Speaker 2>who won no offense better than maybe anybody, and maybe

1:08:46.520 --> 1:08:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the brightest offensive mine in the league running the team

1:08:49.240 --> 1:08:51.840
<v Speaker 2>in Sean McVay and two are one of the most

1:08:51.920 --> 1:08:56.720
<v Speaker 2>analytically driven organizations in the league. They are telling you

1:08:56.840 --> 1:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>that Cooper Cup can't run anymore, is what I'm worried about.

1:09:00.840 --> 1:09:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Their metrics, their their science is telling you that he

1:09:04.280 --> 1:09:07.400
<v Speaker 2>has no more burst, or he doesn't have the same burst. Right,

1:09:08.080 --> 1:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>that would be concerning to me, all these things are

1:09:11.280 --> 1:09:15.439
<v Speaker 2>concerning to me. With that being said, I'm coming around

1:09:15.520 --> 1:09:20.559
<v Speaker 2>to the idea of whether it's Cooper Cup, it's Stefan Diggs,

1:09:20.920 --> 1:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>it's Amari Cooper, one of these aging star receivers for

1:09:27.360 --> 1:09:29.840
<v Speaker 2>a team like the Patriots that keeps striking out at

1:09:29.880 --> 1:09:34.960
<v Speaker 2>this position, you know, Godwin metcalf A, Yuke Ridley, Like

1:09:35.040 --> 1:09:37.479
<v Speaker 2>Dyuke's out there again. Apparently they might need to take

1:09:37.520 --> 1:09:39.400
<v Speaker 2>a chance on one of these guys, is my point.

1:09:40.000 --> 1:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>And I think the hope would be that he is

1:09:43.880 --> 1:09:46.479
<v Speaker 2>able to still be like a wide receiver too on

1:09:46.640 --> 1:09:49.080
<v Speaker 2>a depth chart. Yeah, and then maybe in the draft,

1:09:49.280 --> 1:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>and this is kind of my other big take about

1:09:51.200 --> 1:09:53.920
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver, maybe in the draft you go out and

1:09:54.040 --> 1:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>get the guy, you know, the true number one receiver.

1:09:57.800 --> 1:10:01.719
<v Speaker 2>But at this stage of his career, can Cooper Cup

1:10:01.840 --> 1:10:04.720
<v Speaker 2>be the number two guy? Like? Can he be a

1:10:04.800 --> 1:10:08.519
<v Speaker 2>number two guy? I'm willing to take that chance if

1:10:08.560 --> 1:10:11.479
<v Speaker 2>the money is right. And I would also mention that

1:10:11.560 --> 1:10:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a really good fit in the slot

1:10:14.320 --> 1:10:17.280
<v Speaker 2>for Josh McDaniels. I think that he understands space and

1:10:17.840 --> 1:10:20.560
<v Speaker 2>he understands how to find soft spots and zones. I

1:10:20.600 --> 1:10:23.639
<v Speaker 2>think he understands how to run option routes. Certainly understands

1:10:23.680 --> 1:10:25.720
<v Speaker 2>how to run option routes. That's all he ran for

1:10:25.840 --> 1:10:29.839
<v Speaker 2>Sean McVay, you know, or those choice routes in their offense.

1:10:29.920 --> 1:10:33.080
<v Speaker 2>So he understands and has a great feel for the

1:10:33.160 --> 1:10:36.080
<v Speaker 2>middle of the field. Like I do think stylistically he's

1:10:36.080 --> 1:10:38.640
<v Speaker 2>a nice fit with McDaniels, Like if Godwin was like

1:10:39.080 --> 1:10:42.040
<v Speaker 2>the apex of this player that might be available, it

1:10:42.080 --> 1:10:45.519
<v Speaker 2>would make sense for them to pivot stylistically to Cooper

1:10:45.600 --> 1:10:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Cup And Okay, now you don't necessarily need to have

1:10:48.400 --> 1:10:50.320
<v Speaker 2>him via trade, right, you can just get him if

1:10:50.360 --> 1:10:53.160
<v Speaker 2>he's released at four o'clock. So I'm coming around to

1:10:53.200 --> 1:10:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the idea of just taking a flyer on one of

1:10:55.240 --> 1:10:58.679
<v Speaker 2>these guys and hoping that the fountain of youth, you know, delivers,

1:10:58.840 --> 1:10:59.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, for a year or two.

1:11:00.120 --> 1:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you know. I at this point, I'm kind of like,

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, you choose between the age with Cup.

1:11:06.200 --> 1:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm done, I'm out of the Mari Cooper. I don't

1:11:08.320 --> 1:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>think Mark Coop is gonna give you anything. Yeah, you're

1:11:10.360 --> 1:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>choosing between the age with Cup and the injury concerned

1:11:12.960 --> 1:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>with Stefan Diggs. I think those are your two options.

1:11:15.720 --> 1:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I am very much on the record. Just be nervous

1:11:18.200 --> 1:11:20.719
<v Speaker 1>about wide receivers coming off injury. I said about Godwin,

1:11:20.960 --> 1:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I said about Ayuk. Everybody knows how much I like Diggs,

1:11:25.439 --> 1:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>how great of a player I think he is. I

1:11:27.080 --> 1:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>think the character stuff's overblown. I mean, he was named

1:11:29.120 --> 1:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a captain last year in his first year in Houston. Like, yeah,

1:11:32.320 --> 1:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a littles center, Show me good receiver. That isn't right.

1:11:35.920 --> 1:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>The guy clearly locked in when because the way then

1:11:40.880 --> 1:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the buffalo? But was that his fault? Or is everybody's

1:11:43.920 --> 1:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>golden boy? Maybe not his gold and his play? Did

1:11:47.320 --> 1:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>joel and beat m VP?

1:11:49.400 --> 1:11:51.800
<v Speaker 2>He I I don't know this.

1:11:52.240 --> 1:11:55.599
<v Speaker 1>This isn't necessarily me saying sign Stefan Diggs because it's

1:11:55.600 --> 1:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>coming off the torn a cl When will he be ready?

1:11:58.000 --> 1:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>You've seen them try to do this with guys before.

1:11:59.720 --> 1:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But if it comes down to Diggs or Cup, I

1:12:03.240 --> 1:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think he can make as strong a case for either.

1:12:05.080 --> 1:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I would say I would consider

1:12:07.520 --> 1:12:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Diggs as strongly I was as I would consider Cup.

1:12:11.400 --> 1:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know that. I'm I feel strongly one

1:12:14.160 --> 1:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>way or the other. Like I wouldn't hate seeing them

1:12:16.040 --> 1:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>at one of those guys at this point what things

1:12:18.040 --> 1:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have come to. But I don't know. You want to

1:12:20.960 --> 1:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>tell me that a cut makes sense because he fits

1:12:24.960 --> 1:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>more in the offense and he's at least healthy or

1:12:27.880 --> 1:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>healthier and fine, you want to tell me Diggs is

1:12:30.640 --> 1:12:33.519
<v Speaker 1>the answer because he's more of what they need in

1:12:33.680 --> 1:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>theory when he's healthy, and he has more upside as

1:12:36.160 --> 1:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that number one guy and he's not quite as old.

1:12:38.439 --> 1:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I could buy that argument too. I don't know I

1:12:40.200 --> 1:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>could go either way on either one of them, but

1:12:42.080 --> 1:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I would consider them both equally.

1:12:43.560 --> 1:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Stefan Diggs was better last year, no doubt about it.

1:12:46.080 --> 1:12:49.519
<v Speaker 2>Like Stefan Diggs was still a top fifteen receiver in

1:12:49.560 --> 1:12:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the league when he was healthy last year, so he

1:12:52.080 --> 1:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>certainly has a much higher ceiling. Like Stefan Diggs, you

1:12:55.439 --> 1:12:58.280
<v Speaker 2>could sign him and if he somehow bounces back with

1:12:58.479 --> 1:13:01.040
<v Speaker 2>no setbacks or anything like that from the ACL, he's

1:13:01.040 --> 1:13:04.439
<v Speaker 2>a number one receiver. Cooper Cup isn't at anymore. I

1:13:04.479 --> 1:13:06.240
<v Speaker 2>think the biggest thing that you see with Cooper Cup

1:13:06.320 --> 1:13:09.400
<v Speaker 2>on tape is he used to be a demon after

1:13:09.520 --> 1:13:11.519
<v Speaker 2>the catch, right Like he would catch the ball and

1:13:11.640 --> 1:13:13.599
<v Speaker 2>he'd be shot out of the cannon. He run those

1:13:13.680 --> 1:13:16.160
<v Speaker 2>like five to six yard option routes, you know, those

1:13:16.240 --> 1:13:18.519
<v Speaker 2>juke routes as wiggle routes over the middle, and he

1:13:18.560 --> 1:13:20.760
<v Speaker 2>would catch it and he would just be out of

1:13:20.920 --> 1:13:24.160
<v Speaker 2>the of the of the gates. He's not he doesn't

1:13:24.240 --> 1:13:27.200
<v Speaker 2>have that kind of juice anymore. So now on third

1:13:27.240 --> 1:13:30.559
<v Speaker 2>and three, when he catches that option rout over the middle,

1:13:30.960 --> 1:13:33.080
<v Speaker 2>he might get you four yards, yeah, but he's not

1:13:33.160 --> 1:13:36.320
<v Speaker 2>getting you fourteen, whereas in twenty twenty one he was

1:13:36.360 --> 1:13:40.360
<v Speaker 2>getting you fourteen twenty twenty twenty five yards after the catch,

1:13:40.760 --> 1:13:42.680
<v Speaker 2>and that was you know why he had such a

1:13:42.720 --> 1:13:46.000
<v Speaker 2>great season. But he's not that player anymore. He can

1:13:46.080 --> 1:13:48.040
<v Speaker 2>still move the chains, he's just not going to run

1:13:48.080 --> 1:13:51.559
<v Speaker 2>by anybody or run through anybody. Stefan des can still

1:13:51.560 --> 1:13:55.479
<v Speaker 2>be a number one receiver just because he's healthier and

1:13:56.960 --> 1:13:59.840
<v Speaker 2>you're not worried about the whole ACL recovery and all that.

1:14:00.040 --> 1:14:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I'd probably lean towards Scooper Cup just a little bit,

1:14:02.880 --> 1:14:05.439
<v Speaker 2>but I hear I I wouldn't I opposed to either.

1:14:05.680 --> 1:14:07.479
<v Speaker 1>At this point, you're kind of crossing your fingers and

1:14:07.560 --> 1:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>hoping either way, right.

1:14:08.720 --> 1:14:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So but I think they're in a position where

1:14:10.800 --> 1:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>they need to cross their fingers and hope, So why

1:14:13.240 --> 1:14:15.679
<v Speaker 2>not get the guy that may be hopeful a little

1:14:15.680 --> 1:14:17.519
<v Speaker 2>bit more just because I think he's gonna be available

1:14:17.560 --> 1:14:19.479
<v Speaker 2>to start the season. Like, I think that's big.

1:14:20.360 --> 1:14:22.519
<v Speaker 1>And also, so here's the flip side of it. I

1:14:22.760 --> 1:14:25.599
<v Speaker 1>think you could argue that we broke this down before

1:14:25.640 --> 1:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and we were talking about mac Hollins, like you're gonna

1:14:27.400 --> 1:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>have this roster crunch. Yeah, this is sort of what

1:14:29.360 --> 1:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>they did with Kendrick Borne last year. Well, now you

1:14:32.520 --> 1:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of save a roster spot. You see in September,

1:14:35.560 --> 1:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>who's who works in this new system from the young

1:14:37.760 --> 1:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>guys who doesn't, and then Diggs comes in once you

1:14:40.800 --> 1:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of have that all figured out, like you're not

1:14:42.880 --> 1:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>losing that much. So Diggs got hurt in October, right Halloween? Yeah,

1:14:46.960 --> 1:14:49.559
<v Speaker 1>so he again is the same time Kendrick Bourne did. Right,

1:14:49.640 --> 1:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>So kenn Bourne came back and what he's a player.

1:14:52.520 --> 1:14:55.799
<v Speaker 2>Like he's not gonna So that means no off season program,

1:14:56.240 --> 1:14:58.560
<v Speaker 2>no training camp, no preseason.

1:14:58.840 --> 1:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

1:14:59.479 --> 1:15:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Like you you start to build these things up, like

1:15:03.240 --> 1:15:05.360
<v Speaker 2>when's the first time that Stefan Diggs is gonna catch

1:15:05.400 --> 1:15:08.679
<v Speaker 2>passes from Drake may like it will be Halloween weekend

1:15:08.760 --> 1:15:11.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five right when he's back on the field.

1:15:11.439 --> 1:15:13.559
<v Speaker 2>So I just look at Cooper Cup and I think

1:15:14.040 --> 1:15:17.519
<v Speaker 2>healthier to start the season would help because now he's

1:15:17.560 --> 1:15:20.200
<v Speaker 2>in the room. Now he's doing all the intangible stuff

1:15:20.240 --> 1:15:21.720
<v Speaker 2>that I think people are doing that.

1:15:21.800 --> 1:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Even for you are I'll say with Cup two last

1:15:23.960 --> 1:15:27.599
<v Speaker 1>three years, nine games, twelve games games, No, he's been

1:15:27.680 --> 1:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>banged up. That's a guy you worry about being her production.

1:15:30.160 --> 1:15:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Is in his in his advanced metrics have catered like

1:15:33.360 --> 1:15:36.040
<v Speaker 2>or cretered. Excuse me, like he's not He's not the

1:15:36.080 --> 1:15:37.519
<v Speaker 2>guy he was anymore. He's not.

1:15:38.000 --> 1:15:39.639
<v Speaker 1>I know. It's you're making valid points.

1:15:39.640 --> 1:15:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Again.

1:15:39.880 --> 1:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't I wouldn't hate if they added one of them.

1:15:42.400 --> 1:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I'm gonna if they signed one

1:15:45.040 --> 1:15:46.439
<v Speaker 1>of them, I would say that I should have had

1:15:46.479 --> 1:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the other. Right, I think you can make a case

1:15:48.240 --> 1:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>for both of them. It's just sort of what you're

1:15:50.040 --> 1:15:51.799
<v Speaker 1>looking for, what you value in that signing.

1:15:52.000 --> 1:15:54.240
<v Speaker 2>All I'm making the case for because I agree with

1:15:54.320 --> 1:15:56.000
<v Speaker 2>that last point that you just made. All I'm making

1:15:56.080 --> 1:15:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the case for is that a team like the Patriots

1:15:59.560 --> 1:16:01.439
<v Speaker 2>has to take a fire on one of these guys.

1:16:01.840 --> 1:16:04.439
<v Speaker 2>That's all I'm making the case for. Take a fire

1:16:04.520 --> 1:16:08.519
<v Speaker 2>on one of them. At best, maybe you strike gold

1:16:08.600 --> 1:16:11.519
<v Speaker 2>and Steffan Diggs ends up going back to Buffalo. Stefan Diggs,

1:16:11.560 --> 1:16:14.080
<v Speaker 2>it is a great player for you. At worst, you

1:16:14.200 --> 1:16:18.519
<v Speaker 2>have a veteran adult in the room, been there, done

1:16:18.560 --> 1:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>it at a high level who can maybe be like

1:16:21.120 --> 1:16:23.519
<v Speaker 2>a wide receiver two for a year or two and

1:16:23.680 --> 1:16:25.400
<v Speaker 2>teach some of the young guys and bring them along.

1:16:25.479 --> 1:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Can you have a receiver in the draft that your

1:16:27.080 --> 1:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>comp was Diggs?

1:16:29.400 --> 1:16:30.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Mark Matthew Golden.

1:16:31.960 --> 1:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, draft Matthew Golden, So Digs he can teach them.

1:16:35.000 --> 1:16:39.120
<v Speaker 2>So here's my other takeout wide receiver. I am coming

1:16:39.520 --> 1:16:43.439
<v Speaker 2>more and more to the to terms the wrong word,

1:16:43.520 --> 1:16:49.720
<v Speaker 2>but like around to considering a offensive skill player at

1:16:49.800 --> 1:16:54.040
<v Speaker 2>four overall on this drift because two things. One, I

1:16:54.200 --> 1:16:57.080
<v Speaker 2>can't get that quote from Vrabel out of my head

1:16:57.120 --> 1:17:02.000
<v Speaker 2>from the combine when we had the Yeah press conference

1:17:02.040 --> 1:17:04.760
<v Speaker 2>scrum and he mentioned that like a lot of the

1:17:04.840 --> 1:17:07.200
<v Speaker 2>time at that position, you have to draft your own Yep.

1:17:07.680 --> 1:17:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I can't get that out of my head. Like he's right,

1:17:09.880 --> 1:17:13.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're not going to have somebody gift them

1:17:14.360 --> 1:17:16.720
<v Speaker 2>a wide receiver one right, I hate that term. But

1:17:16.880 --> 1:17:19.800
<v Speaker 2>they're not gonna a top wide receiver, right, They're not

1:17:19.840 --> 1:17:24.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna gift him to you, Okay. And those guys don't

1:17:24.240 --> 1:17:26.280
<v Speaker 2>want to come here, like you can't get them to

1:17:26.360 --> 1:17:29.040
<v Speaker 2>come here. I don't know what the exact number was,

1:17:29.479 --> 1:17:32.800
<v Speaker 2>but they tried to aggressively pursue Gris God would and

1:17:32.880 --> 1:17:35.240
<v Speaker 2>pry him out of Tampa, and he took less money

1:17:35.400 --> 1:17:39.080
<v Speaker 2>to not come here, significantly less. Dk Metcalf I don't

1:17:39.080 --> 1:17:42.280
<v Speaker 2>think was ever seriously considering a trade to the Patriot.

1:17:42.320 --> 1:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like they weren't considering it either.

1:17:43.880 --> 1:17:45.840
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think that that was I don't think

1:17:45.880 --> 1:17:48.880
<v Speaker 2>he was taking your money. Brandon Ayuk wouldn't take your money.

1:17:49.200 --> 1:17:52.519
<v Speaker 2>Calvin Ridley wouldn't take your money last year. So all

1:17:52.640 --> 1:17:56.320
<v Speaker 2>these players are telling you it's just not a desirable

1:17:56.439 --> 1:17:59.200
<v Speaker 2>enough situation yet to land in New England. It just

1:17:59.320 --> 1:18:04.439
<v Speaker 2>isn't so what I would consider at four overall. If

1:18:04.520 --> 1:18:07.559
<v Speaker 2>it has to be four overall, we're talking Ted McMillan,

1:18:08.080 --> 1:18:12.200
<v Speaker 2>we're talking Tyler Warren. I don't think we're talking Matthew

1:18:12.240 --> 1:18:15.479
<v Speaker 2>Golden like I think that's really rich for Matthew Golden,

1:18:15.560 --> 1:18:18.519
<v Speaker 2>but he's getting a lot of you know, top receiver

1:18:18.640 --> 1:18:20.040
<v Speaker 2>in this class wide receiver.

1:18:20.120 --> 1:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Cling for Golden. Let's say you can trade down, you

1:18:22.400 --> 1:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>trade down to ten. You're taking Golden at ten?

1:18:24.240 --> 1:18:27.519
<v Speaker 2>I might. Yeah, So I think we're talking those guys.

1:18:27.880 --> 1:18:30.600
<v Speaker 2>And because they made me yesterday, I'll put gent in

1:18:30.640 --> 1:18:32.760
<v Speaker 2>there too, like you do have to.

1:18:32.960 --> 1:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you can put them at the bottom of list.

1:18:35.040 --> 1:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>How about this one though, Let's say they don't sign

1:18:38.520 --> 1:18:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the left tackle. Let's say they don't sign Cam Robinson,

1:18:42.560 --> 1:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and I don't feel great about, you know, any of

1:18:45.040 --> 1:18:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the other guys that are out there being a definitive answer.

1:18:47.720 --> 1:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they're competing with Darien Lowe and they win the job,

1:18:50.160 --> 1:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but they're not a definitive answer. After all of this, Yes,

1:18:54.600 --> 1:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>after this, this whole freaking cycle, and I'm going back

1:18:58.400 --> 1:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to August when we were doing shows in that other

1:19:01.080 --> 1:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>room when they were building the studio, right, Yeah, after

1:19:05.400 --> 1:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>all this, is there a chance we come back around

1:19:07.320 --> 1:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to the conversation turning into Will Campbell versus Tat McMillan.

1:19:11.600 --> 1:19:14.400
<v Speaker 2>I really am after all of this.

1:19:14.800 --> 1:19:16.599
<v Speaker 1>That was the two guys we said, it's either gonna

1:19:16.600 --> 1:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>be the top left tackle in the draft, or the

1:19:18.400 --> 1:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>top wide receiver in the draft. Those two were in.

1:19:20.840 --> 1:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>This is assuming Carter and Hunter off the board. Those

1:19:23.360 --> 1:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>were the two guys we were looking at at the

1:19:24.960 --> 1:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>top of those respective positions. There's been some reporting that

1:19:27.840 --> 1:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots may still see Campbell as a tackle. To

1:19:30.960 --> 1:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>your point, Mike Rabel said that thing about the wide receiver.

1:19:33.400 --> 1:19:35.599
<v Speaker 1>If McMillan's at the top of their board. We went

1:19:35.640 --> 1:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>through Abdol Carter, we went through Travis Hunter, We went

1:19:38.840 --> 1:19:41.599
<v Speaker 1>through this weird phase where they were definitely trading down.

1:19:41.680 --> 1:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Then it was you know, well.

1:19:43.479 --> 1:19:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Maybe this or maybe that six weeks ago. I mean,

1:19:46.000 --> 1:19:46.679
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna go through.

1:19:47.560 --> 1:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>No, but I'm saying, is there a chance that by

1:19:49.760 --> 1:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of this, because we're gonna do Ted McMillan

1:19:52.240 --> 1:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and Matthew Golden and Tyler Warren and Ashton Genty right now,

1:19:55.880 --> 1:19:57.519
<v Speaker 1>by the end of this, do we end up back

1:19:57.560 --> 1:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>where we started at August, where it's Will Campbell, Ted McMillan,

1:20:02.880 --> 1:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>who's your guy? And that's the conversation.

1:20:05.600 --> 1:20:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I feel like this happens every year. I mean, maybe

1:20:08.160 --> 1:20:10.760
<v Speaker 2>we're not. When they were picking lower we could really know,

1:20:10.920 --> 1:20:14.080
<v Speaker 2>but like we did this last year, Like we all

1:20:14.160 --> 1:20:16.880
<v Speaker 2>came out of the gate and said quarterback, quarterback, quarterback,

1:20:17.240 --> 1:20:19.800
<v Speaker 2>and then you know, everybody started to talk themselves out

1:20:19.800 --> 1:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>of the quarterbacks and then.

1:20:22.320 --> 1:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Not all of us, not all of us. But I'm

1:20:25.120 --> 1:20:28.719
<v Speaker 1>just saying this was a pretty consensus around them.

1:20:30.120 --> 1:20:32.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, consensus for the most part too. Like, obviously

1:20:32.520 --> 1:20:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Travis Hunter would be the dream in this scenario that

1:20:35.680 --> 1:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm picturing right now as as your top wide receiver.

1:20:39.439 --> 1:20:42.920
<v Speaker 2>But like when you look at that group, I think

1:20:42.960 --> 1:20:46.439
<v Speaker 2>it's it's a real strong consideration. You're not going to

1:20:46.479 --> 1:20:49.320
<v Speaker 2>get Abdul Carter, right, I think that's a that's an

1:20:49.479 --> 1:20:50.799
<v Speaker 2>absolute pipe dream.

1:20:52.320 --> 1:20:52.519
<v Speaker 1>There.

1:20:52.760 --> 1:20:56.560
<v Speaker 2>There's not a Joe Alt tackle in this draft. You know,

1:20:56.640 --> 1:21:02.639
<v Speaker 2>Will Campbell at four to be an absolutely gigantic arm

1:21:02.920 --> 1:21:08.519
<v Speaker 2>length wingspan outlier. Yeah, is a risky proposition. And my

1:21:08.720 --> 1:21:12.080
<v Speaker 2>point being with like, let's just say it's Tech McMillan,

1:21:12.080 --> 1:21:15.280
<v Speaker 2>because I think he's probably the best player out out

1:21:15.280 --> 1:21:18.240
<v Speaker 2>of this group to fit this this argument besides Travis Hunter.

1:21:18.880 --> 1:21:23.200
<v Speaker 2>With Tep McMillan. Okay, so let's say Tep McMillan is

1:21:24.360 --> 1:21:27.080
<v Speaker 2>really only should really be cast as as a second

1:21:27.120 --> 1:21:28.519
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver right, like he's.

1:21:28.520 --> 1:21:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Just let's say he's Drake London. We'll go back to sure.

1:21:30.680 --> 1:21:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Liket's say he's Drake London. Is say it's T Higgins,

1:21:33.120 --> 1:21:36.960
<v Speaker 2>like he's a he's a wide receiver too. Really, well,

1:21:37.520 --> 1:21:41.160
<v Speaker 2>if you're that much better in twenty five and he's

1:21:41.280 --> 1:21:44.599
<v Speaker 2>a really good player in twenty five, now in twenty six,

1:21:44.840 --> 1:21:47.240
<v Speaker 2>like you might be able to get DK Metcalf, you

1:21:47.360 --> 1:21:50.360
<v Speaker 2>might be able to get that true number one.

1:21:50.960 --> 1:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals got Higgins before they got chased, right, Yeah,

1:21:53.240 --> 1:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to have that timeline right right, that's a ssue what

1:21:55.320 --> 1:21:55.879
<v Speaker 1>you're saying.

1:21:55.720 --> 1:22:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Great point, right, like maybe your order operations isn't perfect,

1:22:00.240 --> 1:22:03.880
<v Speaker 2>but you just put a good enough product, Like you

1:22:03.960 --> 1:22:05.920
<v Speaker 2>get to that floor where you put a good enough

1:22:05.960 --> 1:22:08.880
<v Speaker 2>product on the field. Next year, Drake may takes those

1:22:09.000 --> 1:22:11.400
<v Speaker 2>next steps where now all of a sudden, in twenty

1:22:11.479 --> 1:22:14.719
<v Speaker 2>twenty six, you are a wide receiver destination and also.

1:22:14.560 --> 1:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>What looks like a mutt in long way out but

1:22:17.200 --> 1:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>what looks like a much better wide receiver track.

1:22:19.760 --> 1:22:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Sure, or you know someone comes free and via trade

1:22:23.040 --> 1:22:26.439
<v Speaker 2>again or or free agency again, probably trade and now

1:22:26.720 --> 1:22:30.839
<v Speaker 2>that player wants to come here, So I don't necessarily

1:22:30.920 --> 1:22:34.000
<v Speaker 2>even need Ted McMillan to be the answer to all

1:22:34.080 --> 1:22:37.120
<v Speaker 2>the problems. He might just be a step towards the end.

1:22:37.120 --> 1:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But are you okay taking that guy at four? I

1:22:38.880 --> 1:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>think there'd be people saying, well, if you take the

1:22:40.360 --> 1:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>guy at four, he should be the guy at the

1:22:41.560 --> 1:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>top the depth truck.

1:22:42.280 --> 1:22:44.560
<v Speaker 2>But he still has a chance to be that. I

1:22:44.640 --> 1:22:46.680
<v Speaker 2>still think he has a ceiling that could be that.

1:22:47.320 --> 1:22:49.680
<v Speaker 2>But my point being is that it's not this end

1:22:49.760 --> 1:22:52.400
<v Speaker 2>of the world scenario if he's not that, Like, if

1:22:52.439 --> 1:22:54.680
<v Speaker 2>he's not that, then at least you still have a

1:22:54.840 --> 1:22:58.280
<v Speaker 2>really good high end wide receiver too, And in twenty

1:22:58.360 --> 1:23:00.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty six you go for the big fit should get Like,

1:23:01.000 --> 1:23:03.519
<v Speaker 2>what's so wrong with that scenario? Like why is that

1:23:03.640 --> 1:23:04.160
<v Speaker 2>such a bad?

1:23:04.240 --> 1:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Hell? I don't hate that.

1:23:05.760 --> 1:23:08.120
<v Speaker 2>And the last thing I would just say about it

1:23:08.200 --> 1:23:11.559
<v Speaker 2>at the top of the draft is that I don't

1:23:11.600 --> 1:23:14.519
<v Speaker 2>see a lot of separation between these players, Like if

1:23:14.560 --> 1:23:19.519
<v Speaker 2>you throw Teed McMillan, Mason Graham, Will Campbell, mikel Williams,

1:23:19.640 --> 1:23:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Jalon Walker, Tyler Warren, like, I don't see the talent

1:23:24.080 --> 1:23:26.760
<v Speaker 2>level being all that different across these players. And I

1:23:26.840 --> 1:23:29.160
<v Speaker 2>keep saying the same thing, like this is gonna be

1:23:29.439 --> 1:23:32.680
<v Speaker 2>as much about fit for each individual team as it's

1:23:32.720 --> 1:23:35.439
<v Speaker 2>gonna be best player available. It's so easy to sit

1:23:35.479 --> 1:23:38.080
<v Speaker 2>here and just say, just draft the best player on

1:23:38.160 --> 1:23:41.240
<v Speaker 2>your board. This year's there's not gonna be a lot

1:23:41.280 --> 1:23:46.200
<v Speaker 2>of separation between these guys. There's not gonna be that. Okay,

1:23:46.400 --> 1:23:49.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, this guy's a blue chip prospect and this

1:23:49.240 --> 1:23:51.720
<v Speaker 2>guy isn't. Like that doesn't exist in this draft. Pass

1:23:51.840 --> 1:23:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Abdul Carter and Travis Hunter. So if I can easily

1:23:55.160 --> 1:23:57.640
<v Speaker 2>tell you that Travis or that Teed McMillan is going

1:23:57.720 --> 1:24:00.640
<v Speaker 2>to be as good of a player as Mason, like,

1:24:00.760 --> 1:24:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's an easy thing to pitch. So

1:24:04.200 --> 1:24:06.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm coming around to that because of what Rabel said

1:24:06.439 --> 1:24:08.800
<v Speaker 2>at the combine. I'm coming around to it because it

1:24:08.960 --> 1:24:12.080
<v Speaker 2>just what's the best pick for the football team might

1:24:12.200 --> 1:24:14.880
<v Speaker 2>be that, And just to finish that take, when we

1:24:14.920 --> 1:24:19.080
<v Speaker 2>get into the left tackle conversation, I don't hate the

1:24:19.200 --> 1:24:21.240
<v Speaker 2>idea of trading back up into the back end of

1:24:21.280 --> 1:24:24.559
<v Speaker 2>the first round to get the next wave of tackles, right,

1:24:24.640 --> 1:24:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Get Josh Connerly, get a Josh Simmons. Maybe at that point,

1:24:28.800 --> 1:24:31.200
<v Speaker 2>if you sign somebody in free agency like Cam Robinson

1:24:31.240 --> 1:24:35.720
<v Speaker 2>on a bridge contract that could make some sense. Arianti Ursery, right,

1:24:35.840 --> 1:24:37.800
<v Speaker 2>might start to make sense now at the top of

1:24:37.840 --> 1:24:41.200
<v Speaker 2>the second or late first, like, there are options like

1:24:41.320 --> 1:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>that in this draft in that twenty to forty range

1:24:45.200 --> 1:24:47.439
<v Speaker 2>that you can still come out of the draft with

1:24:47.720 --> 1:24:50.519
<v Speaker 2>a guy that can play the left side, that has

1:24:50.600 --> 1:24:53.240
<v Speaker 2>the upside to be a starting caliber left tackle. So

1:24:53.320 --> 1:24:55.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not like you're completely missing out on the tackle either,

1:24:56.320 --> 1:24:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Like would you In my mind, I'm just getting to

1:24:58.760 --> 1:25:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the point now where you know, I've kind of written

1:25:01.240 --> 1:25:03.519
<v Speaker 2>off Will Campbell as a guard, Like, I don't think

1:25:03.560 --> 1:25:04.360
<v Speaker 2>that it's a.

1:25:04.600 --> 1:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Why huge choice they have. That was more the point

1:25:09.240 --> 1:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>I was making with the full circle regardless of what

1:25:11.520 --> 1:25:13.559
<v Speaker 1>we maybe, do you think they've written him off?

1:25:13.800 --> 1:25:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I go inside information, Yeah, I just I don't

1:25:19.360 --> 1:25:22.599
<v Speaker 2>necessarily think that they would take a complete outlier at

1:25:22.680 --> 1:25:25.240
<v Speaker 2>four overall, right now, I don't think this regime has

1:25:25.400 --> 1:25:29.800
<v Speaker 2>enough built up like Cachet to take that kind of

1:25:29.880 --> 1:25:31.960
<v Speaker 2>pick and have him turn out to be a guard,

1:25:32.280 --> 1:25:34.200
<v Speaker 2>right and have it turned out to work that out

1:25:34.280 --> 1:25:37.519
<v Speaker 2>that way for them. So would you rather, and this

1:25:37.680 --> 1:25:41.960
<v Speaker 2>is the draft, would you rather? Tet McMillan, and let's

1:25:42.000 --> 1:25:43.679
<v Speaker 2>just call it because I think it's the most realistic

1:25:43.760 --> 1:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>in terms of not trading all around the board Tech

1:25:46.400 --> 1:25:52.800
<v Speaker 2>McMillan and Arianta Ursery or Will Campbell and insert you

1:25:52.840 --> 1:25:55.800
<v Speaker 2>know day two wide receiver here, Jayden Higgins.

1:25:55.520 --> 1:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Jaden Higgins. Sure, probably McMillan a Nursery.

1:26:01.680 --> 1:26:03.680
<v Speaker 2>That's just the way I'm leaning right now, because I

1:26:03.880 --> 1:26:05.519
<v Speaker 2>at least I know those two guys are built to

1:26:05.520 --> 1:26:07.120
<v Speaker 2>play the positions we're going to try to play a

1:26:07.200 --> 1:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>man right like you and you're not trying to put

1:26:11.040 --> 1:26:13.599
<v Speaker 2>a guard at tackle or you know, a right tackle

1:26:13.640 --> 1:26:15.639
<v Speaker 2>at left tackle or a left tackle at right tackle

1:26:15.720 --> 1:26:19.479
<v Speaker 2>like everybody ten. McMillan's an x arionte Ersery is a

1:26:19.560 --> 1:26:22.200
<v Speaker 2>left tackle, yes, and we're not messing around, and neither

1:26:22.240 --> 1:26:22.679
<v Speaker 2>of them are.

1:26:22.640 --> 1:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Hurt, and neither of them are like they're just they're

1:26:24.680 --> 1:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>ready to go. Yeah, high floor picks. That's essentially what

1:26:27.080 --> 1:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you're campaigning for here, high floor picks. Yeah, all right,

1:26:30.439 --> 1:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and then well, Ursery is the ceiling guy. I don't

1:26:34.200 --> 1:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>want to put Ursery in that like he's not a

1:26:35.920 --> 1:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>floor guy, but in the way you're phrasing it, yeah,

1:26:38.600 --> 1:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of what they need, right now right,

1:26:40.400 --> 1:26:42.599
<v Speaker 1>there a third one in there for you. Sure, there's

1:26:43.040 --> 1:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a little more maneuvering on the board, but this is

1:26:45.000 --> 1:26:47.599
<v Speaker 1>like the trade down trade up thing. Yeah, Matthew Golden,

1:26:47.680 --> 1:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Josh Simmons, Yeah, yeah, and I I know, but I'm

1:26:51.840 --> 1:26:53.759
<v Speaker 1>saying like that or McMillan a nursery.

1:26:54.479 --> 1:26:57.439
<v Speaker 2>So here's my my other part of this take, right,

1:26:58.240 --> 1:27:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm also coming around to Obviously, Cam Robinson is not

1:27:02.760 --> 1:27:05.839
<v Speaker 2>having the market Cam Robinson was expecting to have. If

1:27:05.880 --> 1:27:08.479
<v Speaker 2>there was an offer out there for Cam Robinson for

1:27:09.160 --> 1:27:12.640
<v Speaker 2>three for sixty, he would be signed already right like that,

1:27:12.960 --> 1:27:16.280
<v Speaker 2>that would be done. So his market is maybe lukewarm.

1:27:16.320 --> 1:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>And I know that there's been some reporting. I think

1:27:18.120 --> 1:27:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Breer added that there's some concern about motivation and just

1:27:21.920 --> 1:27:24.479
<v Speaker 2>effort and all those kinds of things with Cam Robinson.

1:27:24.960 --> 1:27:28.960
<v Speaker 2>So is it and I'm just kind of facilitating here,

1:27:29.439 --> 1:27:33.240
<v Speaker 2>is it a good scenario for the Patriots too? Maybe

1:27:33.320 --> 1:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>you signed Cam robinsonto a one year deal that is

1:27:37.479 --> 1:27:41.000
<v Speaker 2>basically the deal that the Jets gave Tyron Smith last year.

1:27:41.360 --> 1:27:43.560
<v Speaker 2>It's one for like fifteen.

1:27:43.640 --> 1:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Issues significant money, but just for one year.

1:27:45.920 --> 1:27:49.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's incentive laden. And at that point you at

1:27:49.680 --> 1:27:52.040
<v Speaker 2>least again have a player on the roster that has

1:27:52.120 --> 1:27:54.840
<v Speaker 2>played left tackle in the NFL at a starting caliber level.

1:27:55.280 --> 1:27:58.720
<v Speaker 2>And now you can draft Josh Simmons, where now you

1:27:58.800 --> 1:27:59.880
<v Speaker 2>can draft the high ups.

1:28:01.080 --> 1:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>You have to get Robinson to take the contract.

1:28:03.400 --> 1:28:06.600
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, but I'm just saying that now that it.

1:28:06.760 --> 1:28:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Would open that up a little bit.

1:28:07.960 --> 1:28:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:28:08.240 --> 1:28:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Like I know, I've been very anti them drafting Josh Simmons.

1:28:11.840 --> 1:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>If he's not the first player they take and they

1:28:14.360 --> 1:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>get a guy like Cam Robinson on the roster, I

1:28:17.240 --> 1:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know that it would be my favorite pick, But

1:28:18.880 --> 1:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot more sense now.

1:28:20.439 --> 1:28:24.400
<v Speaker 2>That that's another logical scenario for them. Yeah, because right

1:28:24.439 --> 1:28:28.599
<v Speaker 2>now the lev tackles in free agency, it's Cam Robinson.

1:28:28.760 --> 1:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>It's right, Like I know so many people like Jedrick Wills.

1:28:31.439 --> 1:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Just the way it ended last year in Cleveland, I'm

1:28:34.439 --> 1:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>not sure that's the kind of guy they're looking to add. Now,

1:28:36.960 --> 1:28:39.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could say Robinson isn't neither, but Robinson's a

1:28:39.560 --> 1:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>much more proven player, right.

1:28:41.080 --> 1:28:44.680
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's Robinson or busting free agency. If

1:28:44.720 --> 1:28:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to invest in Robinson again, I'm thinking of

1:28:48.560 --> 1:28:54.360
<v Speaker 2>one year deal, high money, high guarantee. It resets his value.

1:28:54.640 --> 1:28:57.000
<v Speaker 2>It gives the Patriots a safety net if their draft

1:28:57.080 --> 1:28:58.040
<v Speaker 2>pick doesn't work out.

1:28:59.040 --> 1:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But you also have a draft you also want to

1:29:00.640 --> 1:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>have a draft pick in the building to push him

1:29:02.120 --> 1:29:02.559
<v Speaker 1>one hundred.

1:29:03.000 --> 1:29:05.519
<v Speaker 2>Like, yeah, you still absolutely need to draft to a

1:29:05.600 --> 1:29:08.679
<v Speaker 2>left tackle in the top fifty. Like there's guy's not debatable.

1:29:08.800 --> 1:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, top one hundred. I'd call it top one, top fifty.

1:29:11.000 --> 1:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>If you get like Anthony Belton, that's seventy seven. I

1:29:13.200 --> 1:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>think that.

1:29:14.400 --> 1:29:19.439
<v Speaker 2>Nope, no, higher disagree then Connerley Ursery, Josh Simmons, one

1:29:19.479 --> 1:29:21.080
<v Speaker 2>of those guys has to be on this roster.

1:29:21.360 --> 1:29:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Just the scenario, Well, we're kind of updating takes post

1:29:23.479 --> 1:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for agency, and we're on tackles. Membo, we're done with

1:29:26.640 --> 1:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>for the Patriots, We're done with arm On Membo. I think, so,

1:29:29.040 --> 1:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. He's a right tackle. He's a

1:29:31.160 --> 1:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>good right tackle. Yeah, but he's a right tackle.

1:29:33.520 --> 1:29:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that.

1:29:34.360 --> 1:29:37.759
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, it's probably only one year for Morgan Moses.

1:29:38.280 --> 1:29:40.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm not using a top ten pick to get a

1:29:40.880 --> 1:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>future right tackle.

1:29:42.000 --> 1:29:45.439
<v Speaker 2>Like no, And I'm not out on like Ozzy Traprilo.

1:29:45.720 --> 1:29:46.479
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yeah, no.

1:29:46.560 --> 1:29:48.559
<v Speaker 2>If you want to get the next guy right, you draft,

1:29:48.720 --> 1:29:50.360
<v Speaker 2>even the third round and he's the next guy.

1:29:50.439 --> 1:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to do that afore right. Yeah.

1:29:53.200 --> 1:29:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I we'll see where Covin Banks ends up. Yeah, I

1:29:56.080 --> 1:29:58.559
<v Speaker 2>think he's at Covin Banks is going to settle at

1:29:58.640 --> 1:30:01.320
<v Speaker 2>a top twenty pick. Like, I don't think that he's

1:30:01.320 --> 1:30:03.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna have this fall that some people think that he's

1:30:03.240 --> 1:30:05.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna have. But we'll see where he ends up. You know,

1:30:05.880 --> 1:30:08.000
<v Speaker 2>is there a chance that he I think Amarius Mims

1:30:08.080 --> 1:30:11.160
<v Speaker 2>went twenty last year exactly, Like if he's at twenty, Like,

1:30:11.280 --> 1:30:13.680
<v Speaker 2>can you make that trade? It's eighteen spots, it's a

1:30:13.720 --> 1:30:16.040
<v Speaker 2>big trade, but can you make it happen? Right? And

1:30:16.160 --> 1:30:17.280
<v Speaker 2>maybe you actually get Banks.

1:30:17.320 --> 1:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's probably close to that's pretty close to

1:30:21.000 --> 1:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the trade when they moved back and got Dugger, Yeah,

1:30:23.439 --> 1:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>which was twenty three for I think thirty six and

1:30:31.400 --> 1:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy one. Yeah, so you throw in like a future

1:30:34.520 --> 1:30:37.599
<v Speaker 1>day three pick. Maybe he gets it done. Yeah, yeah,

1:30:37.960 --> 1:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that would make it. And you're talking about Banks as

1:30:39.840 --> 1:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a left.

1:30:40.160 --> 1:30:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Tackle, correct, Yeah, yeah, that could work right, So you know,

1:30:43.600 --> 1:30:45.760
<v Speaker 2>you trade back up into the twenties and you kind

1:30:45.760 --> 1:30:52.160
<v Speaker 2>of put yourself on the board for Banks, potentially Connorly Simmons,

1:30:52.400 --> 1:30:54.640
<v Speaker 2>like all those guys at the back end of the

1:30:54.680 --> 1:30:57.920
<v Speaker 2>first round, I think that that's a viable option as well.

1:30:58.080 --> 1:31:02.479
<v Speaker 2>So that's left tackle, wide and wide receiver when it

1:31:02.520 --> 1:31:05.200
<v Speaker 2>comes to edge. I mean we've kicked some names around already.

1:31:05.320 --> 1:31:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I still think that you need you need somebody kind

1:31:09.320 --> 1:31:11.519
<v Speaker 2>of a similarly, you know, talking about safety nets like

1:31:12.120 --> 1:31:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if Harold Landry has the juice anymore

1:31:14.360 --> 1:31:17.639
<v Speaker 2>to be a really good, you know, third down pass

1:31:17.720 --> 1:31:21.000
<v Speaker 2>rusher like I does. The metrics aren't good. They're not

1:31:21.120 --> 1:31:23.640
<v Speaker 2>friendly to him right now in terms of that, So

1:31:23.840 --> 1:31:26.719
<v Speaker 2>maybe he's not that guy anymore. So you might actually

1:31:26.800 --> 1:31:28.880
<v Speaker 2>have to be taking some of these guys off the field,

1:31:29.040 --> 1:31:31.479
<v Speaker 2>like you might still be a little bit situational with

1:31:31.560 --> 1:31:34.840
<v Speaker 2>your rushers, So you need another really good pass rusher

1:31:35.120 --> 1:31:38.519
<v Speaker 2>off the edge. We mentioned free safety, so we kind

1:31:38.520 --> 1:31:41.720
<v Speaker 2>of threw out names already for those two positions into

1:31:41.800 --> 1:31:45.120
<v Speaker 2>your offensive line. Still a big need to me, I

1:31:45.760 --> 1:31:51.639
<v Speaker 2>am not counting on Robinson so and Strange Nope or better,

1:31:51.680 --> 1:31:53.840
<v Speaker 2>they can compete. I mean, I think they're good, and

1:31:54.280 --> 1:31:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I think at least like Ben Brown, he's your backup center.

1:31:57.000 --> 1:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty good situation. But I'm not having those

1:32:00.040 --> 1:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>eyes and starting roles without competition, No like it.

1:32:02.400 --> 1:32:04.559
<v Speaker 2>Right now, if they had to play a game tomorrow,

1:32:04.640 --> 1:32:07.080
<v Speaker 2>they still have a Darian little left tackle, which is

1:32:07.160 --> 1:32:07.599
<v Speaker 2>not well.

1:32:07.600 --> 1:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>They don't have play game tomorrow, thankfully.

1:32:09.520 --> 1:32:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Right but just to play out the exercise, they still

1:32:11.760 --> 1:32:13.800
<v Speaker 2>have a Darian little left tackle, which is not okay

1:32:13.880 --> 1:32:16.040
<v Speaker 2>with me like that, that can't be it. And at

1:32:16.120 --> 1:32:20.160
<v Speaker 2>left guard they're still at you know, Leyden Robinson, Cole

1:32:20.200 --> 1:32:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Strange City, so competing. I would just like to see

1:32:22.800 --> 1:32:25.639
<v Speaker 2>the mat A veteran body there, you know, Josh Myers

1:32:25.720 --> 1:32:28.080
<v Speaker 2>is a center up pure center from Green Bay. He's

1:32:28.120 --> 1:32:30.559
<v Speaker 2>out there still. I watched a little bit of Tevin

1:32:30.600 --> 1:32:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Jenkins yesterday. I didn't think he moved very well last year.

1:32:33.040 --> 1:32:36.799
<v Speaker 2>Looks injured. I don't know. There's potentially chronic back issues

1:32:36.840 --> 1:32:39.240
<v Speaker 2>there with Tevin Jenkins, which would worry me right in

1:32:39.360 --> 1:32:42.240
<v Speaker 2>terms of his mobility. Uh so that would be maybe

1:32:42.280 --> 1:32:43.760
<v Speaker 2>a little bit concerning. And then a lot of the

1:32:43.840 --> 1:32:47.080
<v Speaker 2>other guys are are our right guards by trade, you know,

1:32:47.280 --> 1:32:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Zeitler's of the world, like those guys all are

1:32:49.520 --> 1:32:53.320
<v Speaker 2>right guards. But I still think that there's there's another

1:32:53.880 --> 1:32:58.040
<v Speaker 2>option there. Maybe it's a true center. Maybe it's it's

1:32:58.320 --> 1:33:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Jenkins to play the left guard spot. Uh. The one

1:33:01.880 --> 1:33:05.559
<v Speaker 2>that I would really now strongly consider is McKai Becton.

1:33:05.920 --> 1:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that side.

1:33:08.360 --> 1:33:10.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the guy Becton at left guard would

1:33:10.640 --> 1:33:14.160
<v Speaker 2>be perfectly fine. I really like the idea becked that

1:33:14.240 --> 1:33:15.640
<v Speaker 2>he might make a little bit too much money for

1:33:15.720 --> 1:33:18.080
<v Speaker 2>what they're willing to spend there. Uh, but I think

1:33:18.120 --> 1:33:21.120
<v Speaker 2>that McKay Beckton is what exactly what I'm looking for, right, Like,

1:33:21.240 --> 1:33:23.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, you've said it now, like you're that he's

1:33:23.479 --> 1:33:26.479
<v Speaker 2>your left guard going into next season. So those are

1:33:26.520 --> 1:33:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the spots or anybody else that that I didn't mention

1:33:28.840 --> 1:33:33.639
<v Speaker 2>that are worth mentioning before we go back? Agen, Yeah,

1:33:34.240 --> 1:33:36.600
<v Speaker 2>that's available. Any nobody else that stands out to you?

1:33:37.200 --> 1:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's it all right.

1:33:38.920 --> 1:33:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, whether you're in the game or betting on the game,

1:33:40.920 --> 1:33:44.200
<v Speaker 2>you'll need a game plan. DraftKings Sportsbook, the official betting

1:33:44.320 --> 1:33:47.519
<v Speaker 2>partner of the New England Patriots, provides you with everything

1:33:47.640 --> 1:33:50.519
<v Speaker 2>you need to build your personal betting game plans so

1:33:50.600 --> 1:33:54.120
<v Speaker 2>you can get in all the action while practicing safe bets.

1:33:54.439 --> 1:33:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Visit DraftKings dot com. Slash Responsible dash Gaming. To learn

1:33:58.080 --> 1:34:00.920
<v Speaker 2>more about all the safe betting tools Draft has to offer.

1:34:01.320 --> 1:34:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Hope is here eight hundred three two seven five oh

1:34:04.120 --> 1:34:07.880
<v Speaker 2>five oh or gambling Heeplinema dot org. Must be twenty

1:34:07.920 --> 1:34:10.439
<v Speaker 2>one plus play a smart from the start game. SINCEMMA

1:34:10.560 --> 1:34:15.480
<v Speaker 2>dot com physically president Massachusetts, Ceeddraftkings dot Com, slash Responsible

1:34:15.880 --> 1:34:20.200
<v Speaker 2>dash Gaming. For all details in state specific responsible gaming

1:34:20.479 --> 1:34:24.400
<v Speaker 2>gambling resources, go to the second page here and UH

1:34:25.200 --> 1:34:28.000
<v Speaker 2>talk about Bridgetone confidence. It's important to have when you're

1:34:28.040 --> 1:34:31.280
<v Speaker 2>on the road. With Bridgestone tires on your car, truck, suv,

1:34:31.560 --> 1:34:34.439
<v Speaker 2>or minivan. You're riding on your tires you can trust.

1:34:34.720 --> 1:34:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Bridgetone tires are engineered to give you peace of mind

1:34:37.240 --> 1:34:39.679
<v Speaker 2>so you can focus on enjoying the journey. So whether

1:34:39.760 --> 1:34:42.760
<v Speaker 2>you're on your morning commute, across country roadchip or a

1:34:42.840 --> 1:34:46.920
<v Speaker 2>relaxing Sundery drive, Bridgestone Tires will be with you wherever

1:34:47.080 --> 1:34:50.200
<v Speaker 2>life's road may lead. Bridge Stone Solutions for your journey

1:34:50.520 --> 1:34:54.080
<v Speaker 2>available now at Sullivan Tire and last One here. Catch

1:34:54.120 --> 1:34:58.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty two is sponsored by Massachusetts two fifty campaign kim

1:34:58.479 --> 1:35:02.080
<v Speaker 2>commemorating a history of pssibility. Plan your revolutionary weekend at

1:35:02.160 --> 1:35:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Massachusetts two fifty dot org. All right, so last thirty

1:35:05.360 --> 1:35:07.000
<v Speaker 2>minutes here at all about you guys. We got a

1:35:07.000 --> 1:35:09.800
<v Speaker 2>bunch of emails, We got people on the phones, So

1:35:09.960 --> 1:35:12.200
<v Speaker 2>you guys are going to close us out here. Randy

1:35:12.360 --> 1:35:13.960
<v Speaker 2>is in Providence. What's up, Brandy?

1:35:15.840 --> 1:35:19.360
<v Speaker 7>Hey? So, a couple of names I was thinking about

1:35:19.360 --> 1:35:24.040
<v Speaker 7>in the draft after a free agency late like day two,

1:35:24.160 --> 1:35:28.880
<v Speaker 7>maybe early day three, like aneas People's ty Robinson, Omar

1:35:29.000 --> 1:35:32.880
<v Speaker 7>Norman Lock guys at interior pass rushers, to like kind

1:35:32.920 --> 1:35:35.400
<v Speaker 7>of build up that spot in case Barmore doesn't come back.

1:35:36.240 --> 1:35:38.760
<v Speaker 7>Also Ola Daho, who is a great run stopper on

1:35:38.840 --> 1:35:42.320
<v Speaker 7>the edge. I also wanted to say Jaden Higgins in

1:35:42.400 --> 1:35:45.120
<v Speaker 7>the second round, right you said? Mike Brabel said you

1:35:45.200 --> 1:35:47.800
<v Speaker 7>need to draft those guys. He drafted aj Brown in

1:35:47.840 --> 1:35:50.040
<v Speaker 7>the second round. He didn't take him top five. I

1:35:50.080 --> 1:35:53.840
<v Speaker 7>think Ted McMillan's vastly overrated. But I also wanted to

1:35:53.880 --> 1:35:55.960
<v Speaker 7>ask you guys, because you guys were at the Senior Bowl,

1:35:56.080 --> 1:35:56.600
<v Speaker 7>right both of you.

1:35:57.240 --> 1:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Evan was yep.

1:35:59.320 --> 1:36:02.400
<v Speaker 7>Okay, So I had heard a report. I don't remember

1:36:02.479 --> 1:36:04.479
<v Speaker 7>exactly where it was, but I heard somebody that was

1:36:04.560 --> 1:36:07.400
<v Speaker 7>there saying like it was kind of like a worst

1:36:07.479 --> 1:36:10.479
<v Speaker 7>kept secret sort of thing that Mike Rabel and staff

1:36:10.520 --> 1:36:13.400
<v Speaker 7>were absolutely in love with Will Campbell. Like thought he

1:36:13.560 --> 1:36:15.519
<v Speaker 7>was the best player in the draft, would take him

1:36:15.560 --> 1:36:18.400
<v Speaker 7>number one to play left tackle, didn't care about his

1:36:18.520 --> 1:36:21.200
<v Speaker 7>arm length, et cetera, et cetera. Mike Rabel, Now, I

1:36:21.240 --> 1:36:22.960
<v Speaker 7>haven't met the man. I'm not friends with the man,

1:36:23.040 --> 1:36:26.640
<v Speaker 7>but he just everything that I see he does in

1:36:27.000 --> 1:36:30.679
<v Speaker 7>terms of hiring, in terms of what I've heard reported

1:36:30.720 --> 1:36:32.160
<v Speaker 7>about him, is that, you know, he's kind of a

1:36:32.320 --> 1:36:37.200
<v Speaker 7>very loyal and maybe sometimes a little stubborn guy. And

1:36:37.479 --> 1:36:40.720
<v Speaker 7>I just wouldn't be surprised and maybe that was the

1:36:40.840 --> 1:36:44.639
<v Speaker 7>plan given everything that they haven't done at left tackle

1:36:44.760 --> 1:36:48.200
<v Speaker 7>and free agency you got did you hear that at

1:36:48.240 --> 1:36:50.760
<v Speaker 7>all at senior ball? Did you get that impression? Do

1:36:50.880 --> 1:36:53.920
<v Speaker 7>you think that could be the plan? And then what

1:36:54.000 --> 1:36:55.639
<v Speaker 7>do you think about Jaden Higgins in the second round,

1:36:55.640 --> 1:36:57.600
<v Speaker 7>because I think he's the best wide receiver prospect in

1:36:57.640 --> 1:37:01.920
<v Speaker 7>this draft personally, he's got better physical tooln't a comparable

1:37:02.280 --> 1:37:04.519
<v Speaker 7>production in a comparable situation.

1:37:05.280 --> 1:37:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for the call, Randy appreciated. I didn't hear any

1:37:08.280 --> 1:37:11.680
<v Speaker 2>anything that definitive on Will Campbell. There's been a lot

1:37:11.760 --> 1:37:16.160
<v Speaker 2>of reporting that the Patriots weren't overly caught up in

1:37:16.200 --> 1:37:18.720
<v Speaker 2>the arm length stuff, right, Like I we have heard

1:37:18.800 --> 1:37:19.880
<v Speaker 2>that from multiple outlets.

1:37:19.920 --> 1:37:25.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm right or wrong. I still think that there's maybe

1:37:25.560 --> 1:37:27.959
<v Speaker 1>a chance that they view Will Camberl in certain situations

1:37:28.000 --> 1:37:30.280
<v Speaker 1>as a tackle. I'm not totally writing that off.

1:37:30.560 --> 1:37:34.080
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not totally writing it off. I don't think

1:37:34.160 --> 1:37:37.120
<v Speaker 2>that they're that they were that set in anything.

1:37:37.600 --> 1:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe that strong, especially like.

1:37:40.080 --> 1:37:43.400
<v Speaker 2>To have that early, to have it that set in

1:37:43.600 --> 1:37:47.720
<v Speaker 2>January is pretty unrealistic to me, especially if they have

1:37:47.760 --> 1:37:49.280
<v Speaker 2>been on the job for like a couple of weeks

1:37:49.320 --> 1:37:51.720
<v Speaker 2>at that point. Like, I just can't imagine that they

1:37:52.080 --> 1:37:54.560
<v Speaker 2>have had enough intel to be that dead set on

1:37:54.640 --> 1:37:58.400
<v Speaker 2>anybody in this draft. Now that being said, I would

1:37:58.400 --> 1:38:01.639
<v Speaker 2>be absolutely floored if they had Will Campbell rated higher

1:38:01.680 --> 1:38:06.479
<v Speaker 2>than Travis Hunter like they have been. There's been reports.

1:38:07.240 --> 1:38:11.240
<v Speaker 2>We had Elliott Wolf on our draft podcast at the

1:38:11.320 --> 1:38:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Combine really excited about Travis Hunter. Like, I would be

1:38:15.800 --> 1:38:18.840
<v Speaker 2>absolutely shocked if they think that Travis that Will Campbell

1:38:18.920 --> 1:38:21.120
<v Speaker 2>is a better prospect than Travis Hunter, just from everything

1:38:21.160 --> 1:38:21.680
<v Speaker 2>that we've heard.

1:38:21.880 --> 1:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But all I'm saying is I'm not closing the

1:38:25.280 --> 1:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>door on the idea that they view Will Campbell as

1:38:27.080 --> 1:38:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a tackle.

1:38:27.760 --> 1:38:31.439
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not closing any doors to his point about

1:38:31.520 --> 1:38:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Jaden Higgins. I'm a big Jaden Niggins fan. I think

1:38:35.479 --> 1:38:39.040
<v Speaker 2>he plays slower than he tested. I don't think he

1:38:39.680 --> 1:38:43.439
<v Speaker 2>necessarily runs as well as I like that forty booty away.

1:38:43.520 --> 1:38:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was going to be mid four five's.

1:38:46.040 --> 1:38:48.720
<v Speaker 2>He was four four seven. I did not expect that

1:38:48.840 --> 1:38:50.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of speed out of him. He doesn't play to

1:38:50.680 --> 1:38:54.000
<v Speaker 2>that speed on tape. I'm usually a guy that is

1:38:54.040 --> 1:38:57.280
<v Speaker 2>a tape over combine forty time type of guy, like

1:38:57.840 --> 1:39:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I try to trust it and trust my eye in

1:39:00.280 --> 1:39:03.640
<v Speaker 2>that sense. When I watched Jaden Higgins on tape, I

1:39:03.720 --> 1:39:09.479
<v Speaker 2>thought more crafty than athlete. You know, explosiveness his combine

1:39:09.520 --> 1:39:11.320
<v Speaker 2>blew me away. I mean he was a great athlete

1:39:11.720 --> 1:39:15.959
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the testing. Yeah, and all walks, you know, agility.

1:39:16.120 --> 1:39:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he did those, but explosiveness forty

1:39:19.360 --> 1:39:22.880
<v Speaker 2>times size like had it all. He to me is

1:39:23.040 --> 1:39:25.800
<v Speaker 2>more you know the guy that I would comp Jaden

1:39:25.880 --> 1:39:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Higgins too, is like a Michael Pittman in HINDI, where

1:39:28.880 --> 1:39:30.840
<v Speaker 2>like he's big bodied so he can win some of

1:39:30.880 --> 1:39:33.560
<v Speaker 2>those jump balls down the field. But he's really a

1:39:33.920 --> 1:39:37.599
<v Speaker 2>possession receiver. He's really a first and second level receiver.

1:39:38.880 --> 1:39:41.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay, like I like Jaden Higgins. I'm not saying

1:39:41.120 --> 1:39:44.639
<v Speaker 2>that I think he's a bad prospect. I actually one

1:39:44.680 --> 1:39:47.759
<v Speaker 2>thing that Randy said that he thought that Teed McMillan

1:39:47.880 --> 1:39:50.479
<v Speaker 2>is very overrated. I think we've gone too far in

1:39:50.560 --> 1:39:52.800
<v Speaker 2>that direction with Tet McMillan. Yeah, I think we have

1:39:52.920 --> 1:39:56.320
<v Speaker 2>now underrated Teed McMillan because everybody is saying that he

1:39:56.479 --> 1:39:59.960
<v Speaker 2>was overrated to begin with. I've said time and time

1:40:00.200 --> 1:40:04.679
<v Speaker 2>again that he isn't a Marvin Harrison Molik Neighbors Roma

1:40:04.720 --> 1:40:07.559
<v Speaker 2>Dunees a level prospect. He never was and he never

1:40:07.720 --> 1:40:10.519
<v Speaker 2>is going to be. I would probably have him in

1:40:10.640 --> 1:40:13.639
<v Speaker 2>that conversation in that next wave of last year's class

1:40:13.920 --> 1:40:17.120
<v Speaker 2>with like Brian Thomas Junior and Xavier Worthy and those

1:40:17.200 --> 1:40:20.760
<v Speaker 2>types of players. He's not Marvin Harrison Junior. He's not

1:40:21.000 --> 1:40:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Leak Neighbors. But now I feel like we've gone the

1:40:23.800 --> 1:40:27.000
<v Speaker 2>other direction where like he's he's stiff, and you know,

1:40:27.120 --> 1:40:29.559
<v Speaker 2>Jayden Higgins, who's gonna go on day two and Ted's

1:40:29.560 --> 1:40:31.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna go day one, is actually a better player, like,

1:40:31.560 --> 1:40:33.679
<v Speaker 2>I think that's we're getting a little crazy.

1:40:34.040 --> 1:40:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, I'm with you. He's still a good player.

1:40:36.280 --> 1:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>He's just not We've had how many years of these

1:40:38.760 --> 1:40:41.639
<v Speaker 1>generational wide receiver generational I should say in air quotes

1:40:41.680 --> 1:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver prospects. If they're coming every year, they're not generational.

1:40:45.479 --> 1:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>And now this year he's just not quite that guy.

1:40:47.439 --> 1:40:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Sobody thinks he sucks.

1:40:49.160 --> 1:40:51.320
<v Speaker 2>You have to be realistic about what you're getting. You're

1:40:51.360 --> 1:40:53.519
<v Speaker 2>not getting a field stretcher. You're getting a guy that's

1:40:53.840 --> 1:40:57.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna win with size and fluidity and and you know,

1:40:57.800 --> 1:41:00.280
<v Speaker 2>snappy at the top of the route at the first

1:41:00.320 --> 1:41:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and second level.

1:41:01.080 --> 1:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>He's he's not He's not Harry Like. I think that's

1:41:04.160 --> 1:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>what so many people are.

1:41:05.280 --> 1:41:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Definitely a different player.

1:41:06.360 --> 1:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you this, this is a weird question.

1:41:10.720 --> 1:41:14.439
<v Speaker 1>If what is the comp for Teed McMillan if he's

1:41:14.479 --> 1:41:17.439
<v Speaker 1>a bust right, because it's not if he busts, he's

1:41:17.479 --> 1:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>not gonna bust in the way Nikill Hary did.

1:41:19.000 --> 1:41:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you understand what I'm saying.

1:41:20.280 --> 1:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So, like what is maybe to get people to

1:41:23.439 --> 1:41:29.800
<v Speaker 1>understand this a little more like right ceiling middle floor comps? Right?

1:41:30.040 --> 1:41:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So.

1:41:31.960 --> 1:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Drake London is not t Higgins is probably

1:41:34.400 --> 1:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling comp.

1:41:35.160 --> 1:41:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean Drake lenn had a

1:41:37.120 --> 1:41:37.880
<v Speaker 2>great year last.

1:41:37.840 --> 1:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Drake London is the mid, he's middle to high middle.

1:41:40.479 --> 1:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Who is the basement bust comp for tech McMillan. I

1:41:44.479 --> 1:41:45.719
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's Nakhill Harry.

1:41:46.479 --> 1:41:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I have to think about that. I don't know, Like

1:41:48.280 --> 1:41:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a great one off the top of

1:41:49.600 --> 1:41:53.439
<v Speaker 2>my head. You know, big body receiver that just can't

1:41:53.439 --> 1:41:54.960
<v Speaker 2>get open would be it would be the game.

1:41:55.080 --> 1:41:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, but people would tell you that's Nakhill Harry.

1:41:56.920 --> 1:41:59.479
<v Speaker 2>But but Nikhil Harry was stiff, like to kill Harry

1:41:59.520 --> 1:42:01.880
<v Speaker 2>was robot. Nikhil Harry had too right, He's still like,

1:42:02.040 --> 1:42:02.960
<v Speaker 2>that's not Teed McMillan.

1:42:03.040 --> 1:42:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Even if you drat, even if he's a bus, he's

1:42:05.600 --> 1:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>still gonna have his physical traits.

1:42:07.120 --> 1:42:10.640
<v Speaker 2>TEP McMillan is just not super fast. I don't know,

1:42:10.840 --> 1:42:14.559
<v Speaker 2>was it Quentin Johnson? No, Quentin Johnson's fast. Quentin Johnson's

1:42:14.600 --> 1:42:16.559
<v Speaker 2>an explosive guy. He just can't catch.

1:42:16.600 --> 1:42:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kind of looking back through. Oh, well, think

1:42:18.439 --> 1:42:20.599
<v Speaker 1>about it. I'll think about that. Bet john Dotson.

1:42:20.960 --> 1:42:21.920
<v Speaker 2>No, not big enough.

1:42:22.320 --> 1:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Not Cadarius Tony. I'm looking at like previous high draft

1:42:25.439 --> 1:42:28.840
<v Speaker 1>pick bus not Jalen Rager, Laviskas.

1:42:28.439 --> 1:42:31.599
<v Speaker 2>Chanal, No, Laviskas. Hlt's like Corkal pattern.

1:42:31.640 --> 1:42:32.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Chase Claypool.

1:42:33.479 --> 1:42:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's not a bad one. Chase Coople was a

1:42:35.840 --> 1:42:38.800
<v Speaker 2>great athlete, though Chase Claypole could fly.

1:42:39.280 --> 1:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I I always thought that forty was kind of like

1:42:41.760 --> 1:42:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you said about Higgins, like was he really that fast?

1:42:45.520 --> 1:42:47.880
<v Speaker 2>He was a good athlete, had a really good rook here.

1:42:47.920 --> 1:42:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Cory Davis.

1:42:50.400 --> 1:42:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Not terrible. But no, let's think about it. Let's get

1:42:52.880 --> 1:42:55.559
<v Speaker 2>back to the phones, and we'll think about Will Fuller. Uh,

1:42:55.920 --> 1:42:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Kendall's in North Carolina. What's up, Kendall?

1:42:59.120 --> 1:42:59.720
<v Speaker 4>Hey, what's going on?

1:43:02.360 --> 1:43:02.559
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

1:43:02.560 --> 1:43:03.120
<v Speaker 6>I want to know.

1:43:03.560 --> 1:43:08.880
<v Speaker 4>There's two quarterbacks to go four this year? And if

1:43:08.960 --> 1:43:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Russell Wilson goes to the Giants, do you think they

1:43:12.000 --> 1:43:12.920
<v Speaker 4>have still go quarterback?

1:43:14.520 --> 1:43:17.320
<v Speaker 2>If Russell Wilson goes to the Giants? Uh, thanks for

1:43:17.400 --> 1:43:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the call, Candle. If the Giants signed Russell Wilson or

1:43:19.640 --> 1:43:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers, I think they're out on quarterback at three.

1:43:22.800 --> 1:43:26.439
<v Speaker 1>If they signed Aaron Rodgers, definitely. If cam Ward gets

1:43:26.479 --> 1:43:28.439
<v Speaker 1>to three, does Brian Dave All look at it and say,

1:43:28.439 --> 1:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, I have Russ for a year or two,

1:43:29.920 --> 1:43:31.679
<v Speaker 1>and now I have my next guy in the pipeline

1:43:32.000 --> 1:43:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't surprise me. He's he's a quarterbacks guy. And

1:43:36.120 --> 1:43:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson does see he went through that all justin

1:43:38.720 --> 1:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>fields last year. Russell Wilson, I think, is the kind

1:43:40.960 --> 1:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of guy that might actually mentor the next guy. Rodgers

1:43:43.200 --> 1:43:45.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't doing that. Rodgers isn't gonna let you draft quarterback

1:43:45.240 --> 1:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>at three. That's out the window. I could see them

1:43:47.720 --> 1:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>double dipping if it's Russell Wilson.

1:43:49.080 --> 1:43:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the only reason why I why I I

1:43:52.800 --> 1:43:55.640
<v Speaker 2>guess they could teams like the Giants or Cleveland if

1:43:55.640 --> 1:43:58.760
<v Speaker 2>they signed a Wilson or Rodgers could buck trends. Is

1:43:58.760 --> 1:44:01.360
<v Speaker 2>because of your boy, Michael Pennock, right, like, yeah, you know,

1:44:01.439 --> 1:44:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the Falcons draft Michael Pennix and it ends up working out,

1:44:04.400 --> 1:44:06.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe not the exact way that they wanted

1:44:06.840 --> 1:44:09.479
<v Speaker 2>it to, but it worked, but it worked because you know,

1:44:09.600 --> 1:44:13.679
<v Speaker 2>really all the other things with the trends, like Shaudre

1:44:13.760 --> 1:44:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Sanders and cam Ward are older, like they're you know,

1:44:16.240 --> 1:44:19.400
<v Speaker 2>they're they've been in college for a while. Shouldur obviously transferred.

1:44:20.080 --> 1:44:22.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, cam Ward is is another four or five

1:44:22.840 --> 1:44:24.360
<v Speaker 2>year starter school.

1:44:24.720 --> 1:44:25.040
<v Speaker 5>I know that.

1:44:25.200 --> 1:44:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah so he they both are are twenty four.

1:44:28.120 --> 1:44:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to say they're not that. Yeah, I think

1:44:30.400 --> 1:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>they are now so but yeah, like the Michael Pennock

1:44:33.960 --> 1:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>situation is not a bad copy.

1:44:35.360 --> 1:44:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah.

1:44:36.120 --> 1:44:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Cam Ward will turn twenty three in May. Okay, so

1:44:38.960 --> 1:44:41.759
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be twenty four, twenty three year old rookie.

1:44:41.920 --> 1:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you should just turned twenty three. Yeah, yeah, I

1:44:44.960 --> 1:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think was that old.

1:44:46.120 --> 1:44:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm always that.

1:44:47.040 --> 1:44:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I forgot he's a Jackson State for two years.

1:44:48.800 --> 1:44:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Jackson ar State.

1:44:50.360 --> 1:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So he's at Jackson State, but I thought only for

1:44:52.000 --> 1:44:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a year.

1:44:52.479 --> 1:44:56.599
<v Speaker 2>So they're older prospects. And I the only reason why

1:44:56.600 --> 1:44:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I bring that up because your boy Penis is kind

1:44:59.280 --> 1:45:01.559
<v Speaker 2>of thrown that like it doesn't matter, right.

1:45:01.920 --> 1:45:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, you got Michael Pennicks a baller, Like, let's not

1:45:04.800 --> 1:45:07.439
<v Speaker 1>forget that. Yeah, the guy can I take Panics over

1:45:07.560 --> 1:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>ward or Sanders under.

1:45:09.520 --> 1:45:12.559
<v Speaker 2>But my point being with the age thing is actually

1:45:12.640 --> 1:45:15.840
<v Speaker 2>more that, especially in Shador's case, I think there's still

1:45:15.920 --> 1:45:18.960
<v Speaker 2>room to grow for cam Ward because he's toolsy enough

1:45:19.080 --> 1:45:21.360
<v Speaker 2>that I could see more upside there with the with

1:45:21.520 --> 1:45:24.559
<v Speaker 2>coaching and everything, I kind of feel like Shador is Shador,

1:45:24.840 --> 1:45:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Like I, he's sort of a floor quarterback to me,

1:45:27.760 --> 1:45:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Like I I, I don't necessarily look at Shador and

1:45:30.320 --> 1:45:34.120
<v Speaker 2>and see like a ton of physical upside there for

1:45:34.240 --> 1:45:35.920
<v Speaker 2>him as a player, Like I think that he's going

1:45:36.000 --> 1:45:38.479
<v Speaker 2>to be a guy that could probably start in the

1:45:38.560 --> 1:45:44.519
<v Speaker 2>league next year and and be a functional game management manager.

1:45:45.960 --> 1:45:47.519
<v Speaker 2>I think he's in that same category.

1:45:47.640 --> 1:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just because the line was so bad at Colorado,

1:45:51.160 --> 1:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's maybe some room for him to grow there.

1:45:53.160 --> 1:45:54.599
<v Speaker 1>But I get what you're saying, Like, I don't think

1:45:54.640 --> 1:45:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that Shador is going to take these massive leaps in

1:45:57.040 --> 1:45:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, is my point. I'm with you there.

1:46:00.120 --> 1:46:02.439
<v Speaker 2>So like if you're a team like the Giants or

1:46:02.479 --> 1:46:05.920
<v Speaker 2>the Browns and you draft Shador and now you sign

1:46:06.000 --> 1:46:08.519
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers, so at least for a year, you're gonna

1:46:08.520 --> 1:46:10.680
<v Speaker 2>sit a door on the bench for another year, Like,

1:46:11.240 --> 1:46:13.719
<v Speaker 2>I just don't see why you why bother again.

1:46:13.520 --> 1:46:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you look what happened with the Falcons. You

1:46:15.200 --> 1:46:18.080
<v Speaker 1>sign one of these veteran quarterbacks, a guy who is

1:46:18.160 --> 1:46:19.880
<v Speaker 1>on the back end, and you want to be ready

1:46:19.880 --> 1:46:20.639
<v Speaker 1>if he drops off.

1:46:21.040 --> 1:46:23.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm just having a tough time imagining it's.

1:46:23.479 --> 1:46:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Not gonna It's not gonna happen with Rogers because Rodgers

1:46:25.800 --> 1:46:28.439
<v Speaker 1>won't let it happen. I just feel like I think

1:46:28.560 --> 1:46:33.519
<v Speaker 1>with Russell Wilson could happen. Yeah, it's a copycat league. Wait, hang,

1:46:33.560 --> 1:46:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I got a couple more receiver bus for you.

1:46:35.160 --> 1:46:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's it's a copycat league and that

1:46:37.800 --> 1:46:40.720
<v Speaker 2>might change things. But to your point about Penis being good,

1:46:40.880 --> 1:46:43.479
<v Speaker 2>like Pennix might have just been so good that the

1:46:43.600 --> 1:46:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Falcons looked at it and were like, we can't pass

1:46:46.040 --> 1:46:47.120
<v Speaker 2>on this, trying to.

1:46:47.120 --> 1:46:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Tell people you can get them with the second row.

1:46:51.040 --> 1:46:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I will never stop with that victory. This is not

1:46:52.920 --> 1:46:54.519
<v Speaker 1>the point of the only one that's gonna be would

1:46:54.520 --> 1:46:56.559
<v Speaker 1>have been bigger is that the Vikings had signed a quarterback.

1:46:57.160 --> 1:47:00.120
<v Speaker 2>But right, like Penix was so good that they you

1:47:00.160 --> 1:47:01.920
<v Speaker 2>could maybe make that case. I don't think you can

1:47:02.000 --> 1:47:04.240
<v Speaker 2>make that case with cam warden Shador. Like if you're

1:47:04.240 --> 1:47:05.479
<v Speaker 2>a drafted I think you can make it for Kim

1:47:05.520 --> 1:47:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Warrdon if you're drafting one of those two guys and

1:47:07.479 --> 1:47:09.519
<v Speaker 2>you really have to believe in that guy, right and

1:47:09.600 --> 1:47:11.080
<v Speaker 2>like putting him on the bench for a year.

1:47:11.160 --> 1:47:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I just well, I think some of it is too.

1:47:12.960 --> 1:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Like Kirk Cousins got that massive contract, right, he was

1:47:15.640 --> 1:47:18.479
<v Speaker 1>signed to be a definitive starter. Is Russell Wilson gonna

1:47:18.479 --> 1:47:20.240
<v Speaker 1>get that kind of money? Is Russell Wilson gonna have

1:47:20.280 --> 1:47:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that kind of job security?

1:47:22.280 --> 1:47:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. No, he's not. He's not.

1:47:23.960 --> 1:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna be a It's not like you're coming

1:47:27.200 --> 1:47:31.360
<v Speaker 1>down from where from where Cousins was to. If we're

1:47:31.360 --> 1:47:33.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna comport to the Falcons, hang, I cut more receivers

1:47:33.560 --> 1:47:36.360
<v Speaker 1>from Okay, So this is again, if Teed McMillan is

1:47:36.360 --> 1:47:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a bust, what is his comp because we don't think

1:47:38.000 --> 1:47:42.439
<v Speaker 1>it's to kill harryt Okay, Will Fuller, no, Kevin White, No,

1:47:42.600 --> 1:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm gonna give you one more. This is

1:47:44.120 --> 1:47:46.840
<v Speaker 1>super weird because people like this guy, but he's maybe

1:47:47.000 --> 1:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the most overrated wide receiver of his arrow because he

1:47:49.640 --> 1:47:53.720
<v Speaker 1>had one good year, two good years Michael Thomas. But like,

1:47:54.520 --> 1:47:57.799
<v Speaker 1>is Teed McMillan like post twenty nineteen Michael Thomas closer?

1:47:58.200 --> 1:47:58.320
<v Speaker 8>Right?

1:47:58.439 --> 1:48:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Because Michael Thomas was really good at running slant routes

1:48:01.720 --> 1:48:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and then that was kind of it, and teams basically

1:48:04.200 --> 1:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>figured out how to counter it, and they got hurt.

1:48:06.360 --> 1:48:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So because Tep McMillan is big, but he's also kind

1:48:09.960 --> 1:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of that guy where he's gonna be exposed a lot

1:48:11.960 --> 1:48:13.439
<v Speaker 1>to big hits because of his size.

1:48:13.600 --> 1:48:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Closer, Okay, that's probably your closest one yet, honestly, you.

1:48:17.479 --> 1:48:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Could make you can make an argument in Ted McMillan's

1:48:20.960 --> 1:48:24.519
<v Speaker 1>ceiling middle Floor are a Michael Thomas. So I just

1:48:24.640 --> 1:48:26.040
<v Speaker 1>different stages of Michael Thomas.

1:48:26.080 --> 1:48:28.479
<v Speaker 2>I actually thought when I was doing comps for all

1:48:28.520 --> 1:48:31.759
<v Speaker 2>the receivers, I actually thought of Michael Thomas with Jaden Higgins,

1:48:32.520 --> 1:48:34.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, like a guy that I think is gonna

1:48:34.479 --> 1:48:36.240
<v Speaker 2>really win at the first and second level and not

1:48:36.360 --> 1:48:38.720
<v Speaker 2>running by anybody and kind of be a slam boy

1:48:38.800 --> 1:48:40.519
<v Speaker 2>and like all that kind of stuff. I kind of

1:48:40.560 --> 1:48:42.280
<v Speaker 2>thought of that with Jayden Niggins, And I guess Jaden

1:48:42.360 --> 1:48:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Higgins is kind of day to teed McMillon. So maybe

1:48:45.080 --> 1:48:48.040
<v Speaker 2>like washed Michael Thomas is, like how he he is

1:48:48.080 --> 1:48:50.840
<v Speaker 2>a complete bust? All Right, That was a long way

1:48:50.960 --> 1:48:51.679
<v Speaker 2>to get to that point.

1:48:51.720 --> 1:48:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Saint should have kept Brandon Cooks.

1:48:53.600 --> 1:48:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Mike is in Virginia. What's up, Mike, Mike, Mike, Mike?

1:49:00.000 --> 1:49:01.920
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Mike, Sorry about that. If you if you're

1:49:01.920 --> 1:49:04.799
<v Speaker 2>still there a callback in Eldred, what's going on Eldred?

1:49:06.640 --> 1:49:11.680
<v Speaker 8>Hey, Evan, Alex, how y'all doing? Uhh? I think t

1:49:11.840 --> 1:49:14.680
<v Speaker 8>mac gonna surprise all of y'all. But if you come

1:49:14.760 --> 1:49:17.120
<v Speaker 8>with a buff, I'm coming with LaQuan Treadmill.

1:49:17.280 --> 1:49:19.880
<v Speaker 4>Fred will uh used to be the Vices, then he.

1:49:19.920 --> 1:49:22.000
<v Speaker 8>Went to the I think he went to the Steelers.

1:49:22.280 --> 1:49:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah six four. He's just like he was a raw

1:49:26.680 --> 1:49:26.840
<v Speaker 2>you know.

1:49:27.000 --> 1:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he also wasn't the mover that mcmillany.

1:49:29.520 --> 1:49:32.960
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, big body receiver. You're on the right track.

1:49:34.240 --> 1:49:37.439
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. My question is this, Uh, I got two questions

1:49:37.520 --> 1:49:41.160
<v Speaker 8>for you. Why ain't about talking about James Pearce as

1:49:41.240 --> 1:49:46.640
<v Speaker 8>a edge rusher because to me, doing that combine to

1:49:46.720 --> 1:49:50.080
<v Speaker 8>remind me of Gunzo Smooth everything you know, had a

1:49:50.120 --> 1:49:52.519
<v Speaker 8>good a good combine and all that. And then the

1:49:52.600 --> 1:49:58.400
<v Speaker 8>other one is uh Dante Thornton Jr. And Uh, I

1:49:58.479 --> 1:50:01.519
<v Speaker 8>know you talked about him earlier, but but experience, he

1:50:01.600 --> 1:50:04.400
<v Speaker 8>is sad to speed. He could he could play against

1:50:04.439 --> 1:50:07.799
<v Speaker 8>man Press. Don's stay still over the top. This weakness

1:50:07.840 --> 1:50:10.080
<v Speaker 8>just kind of slows him down with debt. Other than that,

1:50:10.640 --> 1:50:13.040
<v Speaker 8>he's good to get hand fighting, and he's good against

1:50:13.120 --> 1:50:15.800
<v Speaker 8>man coverage, and he is a six to four, four

1:50:15.800 --> 1:50:18.360
<v Speaker 8>to three receiver and they ain't got him lifted into

1:50:18.400 --> 1:50:20.040
<v Speaker 8>what round five? Round six?

1:50:21.120 --> 1:50:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, thanks take it off there, Thanks elder buddy,

1:50:25.920 --> 1:50:28.040
<v Speaker 2>have a good one. Thanks for the cause always. Uh.

1:50:28.360 --> 1:50:31.120
<v Speaker 2>James Pearce is an interesting prospect. He was one of

1:50:31.200 --> 1:50:32.880
<v Speaker 2>the he was like a top five pick at one

1:50:32.920 --> 1:50:35.320
<v Speaker 2>point in this draft, right, like he was projected to

1:50:35.360 --> 1:50:38.680
<v Speaker 2>go super super high. James Pearce. Yeah, and then he

1:50:38.760 --> 1:50:41.280
<v Speaker 2>had kind of a rough year, not a rough year,

1:50:41.280 --> 1:50:43.080
<v Speaker 2>but just not the year that people were expecting at

1:50:43.120 --> 1:50:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee this past year. And Uh, to me, when I

1:50:46.200 --> 1:50:49.559
<v Speaker 2>see James Pearce, I think he's a very linear rusher,

1:50:49.920 --> 1:50:52.559
<v Speaker 2>Like he doesn't have a lot of agility or change

1:50:52.600 --> 1:50:56.559
<v Speaker 2>of direction to really challenge inside and outside. He's kind

1:50:56.560 --> 1:50:58.599
<v Speaker 2>of just like a speed to power, I'm gonna run

1:50:58.640 --> 1:51:00.640
<v Speaker 2>into the tackle and I hope I I kind of

1:51:00.680 --> 1:51:03.400
<v Speaker 2>make it work type of guy. I think he's raw,

1:51:04.080 --> 1:51:08.519
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think he's got a great like mobility, right,

1:51:08.680 --> 1:51:12.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, like ankle bend and hit fluidity and those

1:51:12.080 --> 1:51:14.559
<v Speaker 2>types of things that usually lend himself to a really

1:51:14.720 --> 1:51:17.920
<v Speaker 2>high sap production at the next level, Like, could he

1:51:18.040 --> 1:51:22.280
<v Speaker 2>be a pocket pusher, disruptor, you know, drop him into coverage. Hey,

1:51:22.320 --> 1:51:24.880
<v Speaker 2>look it's you uh to drop him into coverage like

1:51:24.960 --> 1:51:26.880
<v Speaker 2>that sort of thing. Yeah, Like I think that he

1:51:26.960 --> 1:51:29.479
<v Speaker 2>could be that guy, but I didn't see a lot

1:51:29.560 --> 1:51:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of bend in a lot of twitch to his movements,

1:51:32.200 --> 1:51:34.320
<v Speaker 2>which would worry me a little bit with him. But

1:51:34.680 --> 1:51:37.679
<v Speaker 2>like if he has like a draft day weekend fall

1:51:37.800 --> 1:51:40.360
<v Speaker 2>and he somehow finds his way to the second round,

1:51:40.640 --> 1:51:44.439
<v Speaker 2>which I think is crazy, but maybe, Like I'm not

1:51:44.520 --> 1:51:47.080
<v Speaker 2>saying like completely rulling him out as a Day two

1:51:47.160 --> 1:51:49.560
<v Speaker 2>guy for the Patriots, but I don't think he's in

1:51:49.640 --> 1:51:52.200
<v Speaker 2>the conversation to be a top ten pick anymore.

1:51:52.840 --> 1:51:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he doesn't have He's a guy that has one

1:51:55.800 --> 1:51:58.080
<v Speaker 1>elite tool, but he doesn't have a lot of tools. Yeah,

1:51:58.200 --> 1:52:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Like that one tool is excellent, but he doesn't much

1:52:00.280 --> 1:52:03.599
<v Speaker 1>beyond that. He's not a first round pick in most drafts.

1:52:03.640 --> 1:52:05.439
<v Speaker 1>He is kind of that Josh Ucha sort of player

1:52:05.439 --> 1:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you're talking about. It's part of the reason

1:52:07.200 --> 1:52:10.400
<v Speaker 1>he fell was like he came into the year with

1:52:10.439 --> 1:52:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of expectation and he because he had such

1:52:13.360 --> 1:52:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a strong twenty twenty three. He played well in twenty

1:52:16.400 --> 1:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, he didn't necessarily get better. He didn't stro

1:52:18.240 --> 1:52:20.759
<v Speaker 1>anything new. Yeah, and I think that's what has teams concerned.

1:52:21.200 --> 1:52:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you're somebody that believes in just kind of

1:52:23.400 --> 1:52:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the true speed rusher, yeah he has some value, but

1:52:27.360 --> 1:52:29.799
<v Speaker 1>he's not much more than that. And because he didn't develop,

1:52:30.200 --> 1:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a quick teams have to ask himselves, now,

1:52:32.080 --> 1:52:34.400
<v Speaker 1>why didn't he develop? Is this all he's gonna end

1:52:34.479 --> 1:52:34.760
<v Speaker 1>up being?

1:52:35.280 --> 1:52:40.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's fair. And then the Taekwon Thornton two point

1:52:40.600 --> 1:52:42.080
<v Speaker 2>zero receiver that he mentioned.

1:52:41.840 --> 1:52:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Who was I couldn't hear him.

1:52:42.880 --> 1:52:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I think his last name is really literally Thorton, right,

1:52:45.360 --> 1:52:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Dante Thorston junior. Yeah, but I mean he's like a

1:52:50.439 --> 1:52:54.840
<v Speaker 2>six foot three string being fourth fast, fast, and yeah,

1:52:54.960 --> 1:52:57.200
<v Speaker 2>that's why that's why he was going. You know why

1:52:57.240 --> 1:52:59.639
<v Speaker 2>he's not projected higher on boards right now is because

1:52:59.640 --> 1:53:04.040
<v Speaker 2>he's literally, hey, he's a track meat player. You know,

1:53:04.439 --> 1:53:06.760
<v Speaker 2>that's the type of guy that he is. You know,

1:53:06.760 --> 1:53:11.360
<v Speaker 2>it's a great athlete, a great combine. I would get

1:53:11.600 --> 1:53:15.080
<v Speaker 2>too caught up in forty times with players like that.

1:53:15.439 --> 1:53:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So and I'm so glad I thought of that that's

1:53:18.720 --> 1:53:20.360
<v Speaker 1>going to come in handy for years to come.

1:53:20.240 --> 1:53:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Out here, and yeah, that's always my problem.

1:53:22.360 --> 1:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, you're gonna have to learn to You're

1:53:24.040 --> 1:53:25.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to be ready to answer the question when

1:53:25.400 --> 1:53:26.599
<v Speaker 1>you want to hype up one of these guys.

1:53:26.800 --> 1:53:31.439
<v Speaker 2>So the president of Mason Graham's fan club, who is

1:53:31.720 --> 1:53:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Floyd and Redford Michigan, that might.

1:53:33.320 --> 1:53:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Be the for all the free agency stuff, the only

1:53:36.280 --> 1:53:38.360
<v Speaker 1>guy that truly came off the board.

1:53:38.800 --> 1:53:43.320
<v Speaker 2>So so Floyd says that we can't rule out Mason

1:53:43.360 --> 1:53:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Graham because I'm telling you he's Mason Graham's fan.

1:53:46.280 --> 1:53:48.679
<v Speaker 1>That's something I would expect Mason Graha's biggest fancy say.

1:53:48.600 --> 1:53:52.080
<v Speaker 2>He's not ruling out Mason Graham because of Christian Barmore's status,

1:53:52.240 --> 1:53:55.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, in terms of his health. There's definitely a

1:53:56.000 --> 1:53:59.360
<v Speaker 2>fair point there that they can't necessarily count on having

1:53:59.400 --> 1:54:03.320
<v Speaker 2>an available Christian Barmore. But I already had concerns about

1:54:03.360 --> 1:54:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Mason Graham holding up at two ninety ninety five as

1:54:06.920 --> 1:54:09.519
<v Speaker 2>it is, and now you want to pair him with

1:54:09.560 --> 1:54:12.120
<v Speaker 2>another guy who weighs two hundred and ninety pounds. I

1:54:12.320 --> 1:54:14.719
<v Speaker 2>just think that that's very, very light in the middle.

1:54:14.760 --> 1:54:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Of your defense.

1:54:15.400 --> 1:54:18.639
<v Speaker 1>It's also are you willing to make your big free

1:54:18.640 --> 1:54:21.400
<v Speaker 1>agency signing and your top draft pick at the same position,

1:54:21.479 --> 1:54:24.920
<v Speaker 1>which is not a premium position. That's a tough sell.

1:54:25.280 --> 1:54:26.679
<v Speaker 1>That's a really tough sell.

1:54:26.920 --> 1:54:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yep, that's another great point. You know, it's basically redundant

1:54:32.280 --> 1:54:36.680
<v Speaker 2>skill set, same position. Yeah, same type of player, like

1:54:36.760 --> 1:54:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the ways that Milton Williams wins disruptive hands leverage, using

1:54:43.520 --> 1:54:46.879
<v Speaker 2>his like lower center of gravity to get underneath blockers,

1:54:47.720 --> 1:54:51.680
<v Speaker 2>first step of quickness into gaps, instincts, motor I just

1:54:51.760 --> 1:54:54.240
<v Speaker 2>describe Mason Graham. Yeah, so you have now you're gonna

1:54:54.280 --> 1:54:55.800
<v Speaker 2>just have two Mason Grams.

1:54:55.840 --> 1:54:58.320
<v Speaker 1>With Milton Williams, or roughly to Milton Williams.

1:54:58.080 --> 1:55:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Which like there's worse things to have have, but it's

1:55:00.800 --> 1:55:04.080
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of a luxury, not an absolutely necessity. Uh

1:55:04.200 --> 1:55:06.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's uh, that's amazing, Graham. It doesn't make me

1:55:06.880 --> 1:55:08.720
<v Speaker 2>feel like a little bit better than maybe that's off

1:55:08.760 --> 1:55:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the board, because you know, I wasn't in love with

1:55:10.320 --> 1:55:10.520
<v Speaker 2>it to.

1:55:10.520 --> 1:55:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Be I always feel I feel bad, like the last

1:55:12.520 --> 1:55:14.240
<v Speaker 1>two years, like the guy I've kind of come out

1:55:14.360 --> 1:55:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is like the no no, no player has been a

1:55:15.880 --> 1:55:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Michigan guy, and people probably think I just hate Michigan,

1:55:18.160 --> 1:55:20.400
<v Speaker 1>like I need Michigan to come through with with the

1:55:20.480 --> 1:55:22.760
<v Speaker 1>guy that I can like really get behind to offset that,

1:55:23.080 --> 1:55:24.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's nothing against Michigan.

1:55:25.360 --> 1:55:29.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's take these calls. Uh, Mark is in Connecticut.

1:55:29.040 --> 1:55:29.560
<v Speaker 2>What's up? Mark?

1:55:30.920 --> 1:55:33.480
<v Speaker 6>Hey, guys, always appreciate you guys taking my calls. I

1:55:33.600 --> 1:55:35.320
<v Speaker 6>just had a quick one. If we strike out on

1:55:35.840 --> 1:55:40.280
<v Speaker 6>Cooper Cup Uh to Gooby Myers, what is the prediction

1:55:40.480 --> 1:55:43.400
<v Speaker 6>there of what he would uh what it would take

1:55:43.480 --> 1:55:46.000
<v Speaker 6>to get him in a trade, like you know, round wide?

1:55:46.280 --> 1:55:47.440
<v Speaker 6>What do you guys think on that?

1:55:48.120 --> 1:55:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Mark, thanks for the call. That's a tough one,

1:55:50.560 --> 1:55:53.680
<v Speaker 2>I would say to to project because I don't think

1:55:53.720 --> 1:55:56.400
<v Speaker 2>he's really available. So yeah, you have to make the

1:55:56.480 --> 1:55:59.080
<v Speaker 2>offer to the Raiders that's enticing enough for them to

1:55:59.160 --> 1:56:02.200
<v Speaker 2>actually move him back to the Patriots so.

1:56:02.560 --> 1:56:04.240
<v Speaker 1>They don't need a quarterback anymore.

1:56:04.040 --> 1:56:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, So I think that you would have to give

1:56:05.920 --> 1:56:10.360
<v Speaker 2>them a third or fourth round pick, which seems really high. Uh,

1:56:10.880 --> 1:56:13.720
<v Speaker 2>just giving the not necessarily like a knock on Jacoby Myers,

1:56:13.800 --> 1:56:15.920
<v Speaker 2>but just given the way that wide receiver market has

1:56:16.040 --> 1:56:20.360
<v Speaker 2>moved in trades, like a DK Metcalf only got like

1:56:20.440 --> 1:56:23.240
<v Speaker 2>a mid second round pick back, So, like, I just

1:56:24.040 --> 1:56:26.040
<v Speaker 2>in order to make it enticing enough for the Raiders

1:56:26.080 --> 1:56:27.760
<v Speaker 2>to actually trade him, it's gonna have to be something

1:56:27.880 --> 1:56:30.200
<v Speaker 2>worth it. Yeah, and so now I think you're kind

1:56:30.240 --> 1:56:31.200
<v Speaker 2>of overpaying for him.

1:56:31.280 --> 1:56:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Like the moving down from four to six and getting

1:56:33.320 --> 1:56:35.480
<v Speaker 1>like Jacobe in a third round pick like that made

1:56:35.560 --> 1:56:37.520
<v Speaker 1>sense to me, but there's no incentive for the Raiders

1:56:37.560 --> 1:56:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to do that anymore.

1:56:38.880 --> 1:56:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So yeah, I'm with you.

1:56:42.040 --> 1:56:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a tough one. I get why people want

1:56:44.000 --> 1:56:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to back he's a good player, yeah, but I just

1:56:45.760 --> 1:56:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that that's it.

1:56:46.680 --> 1:56:48.320
<v Speaker 2>If it comes out that he's on the block and

1:56:48.400 --> 1:56:52.320
<v Speaker 2>he can be had, you know, that's different. But if

1:56:52.360 --> 1:56:55.400
<v Speaker 2>you have to actually like aggressively pursue him.

1:56:55.440 --> 1:56:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's probably not gonna be worth it. Yeah.

1:56:57.320 --> 1:56:59.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, Marvin is in Florida. What's up, Marvin?

1:57:01.600 --> 1:57:06.720
<v Speaker 9>Hey fellows, how you guys doing good? I think is

1:57:07.920 --> 1:57:10.800
<v Speaker 9>why don't we trade Dugger for like maybe a third

1:57:10.880 --> 1:57:16.120
<v Speaker 9>round pick and it will Campbell like pick nine and

1:57:16.240 --> 1:57:19.960
<v Speaker 9>then trade up to get Golden or another top ar

1:57:20.160 --> 1:57:21.320
<v Speaker 9>receiver in the draft.

1:57:22.360 --> 1:57:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks for the call, Marvin. I don't know what

1:57:25.640 --> 1:57:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Duggar's value is really right now. I don't think

1:57:28.760 --> 1:57:29.760
<v Speaker 2>it's a third round pick at all.

1:57:29.840 --> 1:57:31.080
<v Speaker 1>That would all be not I also don't think you're

1:57:31.080 --> 1:57:32.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna will Camble at nine, even as a guard. I

1:57:32.960 --> 1:57:34.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think you're gonna get at nine.

1:57:34.040 --> 1:57:36.360
<v Speaker 2>I think your great thought. Yeah, I think you're you're

1:57:36.440 --> 1:57:40.440
<v Speaker 2>better off almost if you don't have Dugger in your

1:57:40.480 --> 1:57:43.440
<v Speaker 2>long term plans. I think you're better off him starting

1:57:43.520 --> 1:57:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the season here and hoping that he starts well, yeah,

1:57:45.680 --> 1:57:47.720
<v Speaker 2>and then maybe trading him at the deadline for something.

1:57:47.840 --> 1:57:49.800
<v Speaker 2>But you have to remember, they just paid him, so

1:57:49.920 --> 1:57:52.760
<v Speaker 2>they just gave him a big contract, so now you

1:57:52.840 --> 1:57:55.280
<v Speaker 2>know the team is acquiring the contract as well as

1:57:55.320 --> 1:57:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the player in a trade, and as we've seen across

1:57:58.640 --> 1:58:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the board, when that's the case, you just don't get

1:58:00.680 --> 1:58:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the value in the trade that you may think you would.

1:58:03.400 --> 1:58:06.320
<v Speaker 2>I think Kyle Dugger is unfortunately like kind of like

1:58:06.480 --> 1:58:09.000
<v Speaker 2>not worth anything like of substantial value.

1:58:09.120 --> 1:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>He's here, he's here for now, and that's just what

1:58:11.000 --> 1:58:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they need to get a free safety

1:58:12.360 --> 1:58:14.360
<v Speaker 1>so they can play him in the box and let

1:58:14.440 --> 1:58:15.280
<v Speaker 1>him do what he does best.

1:58:15.520 --> 1:58:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, last one here, then we'll wrap it up.

1:58:18.800 --> 1:58:22.640
<v Speaker 2>This is from a concerned fan from Chelsea and he says,

1:58:22.760 --> 1:58:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm going insane because for all the discussion around not

1:58:25.760 --> 1:58:28.520
<v Speaker 2>picking a non left tackle at four, no one is

1:58:28.600 --> 1:58:32.680
<v Speaker 2>answering the following question. The answering the follow up question

1:58:32.840 --> 1:58:35.160
<v Speaker 2>of who is going to play left tackle. Before a

1:58:35.240 --> 1:58:38.080
<v Speaker 2>free agency there was the Ronnie Stanley and Cam Robinson

1:58:38.160 --> 1:58:40.400
<v Speaker 2>comp out, but now that's gone and there are no

1:58:40.600 --> 1:58:43.800
<v Speaker 2>severable left tackles left. Well, Cam Robinson's not gone. Uh

1:58:44.080 --> 1:58:46.280
<v Speaker 2>in my mind, you have to gamble at Campbell at

1:58:46.320 --> 1:58:48.320
<v Speaker 2>four if he's a bust and ends up as an

1:58:48.320 --> 1:58:51.880
<v Speaker 2>elite guard. Oh well, so well, Cam Robinson's not gone.

1:58:52.000 --> 1:58:55.600
<v Speaker 2>First of all. Yeah, I think what you have to weigh,

1:58:55.680 --> 1:58:57.360
<v Speaker 2>And we talked about this earlier because I think this

1:58:57.400 --> 1:59:00.280
<v Speaker 2>is a fair point. It's a that is a the

1:59:00.680 --> 1:59:02.560
<v Speaker 2>question right now, and that's why I wanted to end

1:59:02.600 --> 1:59:05.080
<v Speaker 2>it on it, because that this is the philosophical question

1:59:05.200 --> 1:59:07.400
<v Speaker 2>that we're going to be having. Yeah, is are you

1:59:08.880 --> 1:59:12.360
<v Speaker 2>desperate to the point at left tackle where you're gonna

1:59:12.360 --> 1:59:14.200
<v Speaker 2>take Will Campbell And if he's a bust and you

1:59:14.280 --> 1:59:16.560
<v Speaker 2>have to move him inside to left guard, then so

1:59:16.760 --> 1:59:18.920
<v Speaker 2>be it. And you're willing to take that risk at

1:59:18.960 --> 1:59:24.000
<v Speaker 2>four overall, I personally would just say that I still

1:59:24.040 --> 1:59:28.040
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's a terrible option to sign Cam Robinson

1:59:28.120 --> 1:59:31.680
<v Speaker 2>to a short term contract and Josh and draft one

1:59:31.720 --> 1:59:33.600
<v Speaker 2>of those second wave guys like a Josh Simmons.

1:59:33.640 --> 1:59:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, let's say you can't k Robson. Let's say

1:59:36.320 --> 1:59:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Robinson's often because that's obvious. Yeah, if you sign Cam Robinson,

1:59:39.040 --> 1:59:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you draft somebody later. That's easy, right, And I think

1:59:41.600 --> 1:59:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what we'd hope they do from the beginning. Yeah,

1:59:43.720 --> 1:59:47.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say Cam Robinson signs elsewhere, because that that that's

1:59:47.560 --> 1:59:49.880
<v Speaker 1>really putting the pressure on because now, okay, you're not

1:59:50.080 --> 1:59:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like Vaderian Low's in the competition and maybe he doesn't

1:59:52.960 --> 1:59:54.800
<v Speaker 1>end up being the guy, but you're talking about Vaderian

1:59:54.840 --> 1:59:55.839
<v Speaker 1>low and equivalent players.

1:59:56.080 --> 2:00:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're talking about Vaderian Lowe and Josh Connor in

2:00:00.240 --> 2:00:04.600
<v Speaker 2>a competition, or Darien at Ursery in a competition, or.

2:00:04.680 --> 2:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Like, now I guess you have to talk about I

2:00:08.760 --> 2:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>keep want to say Tristan Worst, Jedrick Wills, Jedrick Wills

2:00:11.440 --> 2:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>or Tristan Worse's be great. Yeah, Jedrick Wills are one

2:00:13.560 --> 2:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of those other tackles is still available. Like at that point,

2:00:17.360 --> 2:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about Will Campbell?

2:00:21.040 --> 2:00:21.160
<v Speaker 7>Uh?

2:00:22.760 --> 2:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Because I think you will.

2:00:24.120 --> 2:00:26.240
<v Speaker 2>I think you are thinking about it in general. But

2:00:27.040 --> 2:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you have to be convinced, in my mind, if you're

2:00:29.280 --> 2:00:31.360
<v Speaker 2>drafting Will Campbell at four that he's he's going to

2:00:31.400 --> 2:00:33.880
<v Speaker 2>play high level tackle, I think you have to be

2:00:33.880 --> 2:00:35.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent convinced that he's gonna play.

2:00:35.520 --> 2:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so but forget what what you think? Right if

2:00:42.320 --> 2:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Cam Robinson, if Cam Robinson is not available, If Cam

2:00:45.120 --> 2:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Robinson is not available, yeah, what are you doing at

2:00:48.400 --> 2:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>left tackle next year? That is the question.

2:00:51.160 --> 2:00:53.680
<v Speaker 2>If I had to pick yes right now, I would

2:00:53.760 --> 2:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>try to position myself to draft one of those second

2:00:56.480 --> 2:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>wave tackles and put him in a competition with Vedarien Though. Okay,

2:01:00.160 --> 2:01:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I or signed Cam Robinson and put him in Cam Robins. Well,

2:01:03.760 --> 2:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>this is Cam Robinson's off the board, right, Oh he's

2:01:06.360 --> 2:01:07.880
<v Speaker 2>off the board. Cam Robinson's off the board.

2:01:07.880 --> 2:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing it? Left out?

2:01:08.720 --> 2:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I would draft Josh Connery or Arianti Ursery and put

2:01:11.800 --> 2:01:13.080
<v Speaker 2>him in a competition with how high?

2:01:13.080 --> 2:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>How high would you draft him?

2:01:14.400 --> 2:01:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Twenties?

2:01:15.240 --> 2:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you're moving up from Yeah, well I'm saying

2:01:18.520 --> 2:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>like you can't just wait at thirty eight to see

2:01:20.200 --> 2:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>which one falls and then neither fall, And now what

2:01:21.920 --> 2:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? Right? Yeah, okay, maneuver. Let me see

2:01:25.480 --> 2:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Will Campbell's pro day numbers.

2:01:27.200 --> 2:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Why is that going to change me? He worked out

2:01:29.000 --> 2:01:29.560
<v Speaker 2>of the combine.

2:01:29.640 --> 2:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the combine numbers are way off from the

2:01:31.680 --> 2:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>senior in terms of everybody else. I'm like, yeah, all right,

2:01:35.000 --> 2:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, fair enough, I'm not closed in. I don't

2:01:38.240 --> 2:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to close the door on Will Campbell

2:01:39.960 --> 2:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>being the answer that question. I really don't. No, I

2:01:42.120 --> 2:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's whether they should or not is another conversation,

2:01:44.680 --> 2:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>like he very well may be a guard I think

2:01:46.560 --> 2:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>he is, but it doesn't matter what me and you

2:01:49.040 --> 2:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>would do because we're not up there or over there

2:01:51.040 --> 2:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>wherever the office is. Right, it's what they would do.

2:01:54.400 --> 2:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I just I have this gut feeling that that door

2:01:56.680 --> 2:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>is not totally shut yet.

2:01:58.200 --> 2:02:00.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's gonna do it for this weeks. Catch

2:02:00.560 --> 2:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty two A lot to talk about today. That was

2:02:03.040 --> 2:02:03.640
<v Speaker 2>a good show.

2:02:03.960 --> 2:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We need to get more fun from here.

2:02:05.280 --> 2:02:07.800
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back next week. I think we'll probably do

2:02:08.040 --> 2:02:11.280
<v Speaker 2>an even harder reset of the draft board and all

2:02:11.320 --> 2:02:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots options and at the top of the draft

2:02:14.040 --> 2:02:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and throughout the draft next week, so we'll be here

2:02:16.920 --> 2:02:19.080
<v Speaker 2>and we'll break that down for you as well, and

2:02:19.120 --> 2:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>there might be some more Patriots news I'm sure, as

2:02:21.440 --> 2:02:24.800
<v Speaker 2>signings and all that good stuff as well. So until then,

2:02:24.840 --> 2:02:26.960
<v Speaker 2>signing off for Alex Bartham, Evan Lazarre. We'll see you

2:02:27.000 --> 2:02:27.360
<v Speaker 2>next week.

2:02:27.480 --> 2:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Bye. Thank you for downloading this podcast, Subscribe on Apple,

2:02:31.520 --> 2:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>google Play, and everywhere else you listen.

2:02:34.000 --> 2:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Like the show, Please rate and review us.

2:02:36.320 --> 2:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Listener comments and ratings help keep us high on the

2:02:38.920 --> 2:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast rankings so new listeners can find us.

2:02:41.840 --> 2:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Be sure to check Patriots dot com for more news

2:02:44.920 --> 2:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>and more podcasts.