WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2021 NFL MegaPod Week 8 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man No Down Thursday morning, October. The

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Beating of the Book Podcast Week number eight. Wow, Kimball,

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>he was a week eight National Football League Live from

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the d R home. At least for me and Mikey anyway,

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Gil Alexander, it is the beating the Book of megapod

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to my left, the staples of the show. First of all,

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to my left, Mike Palm, Derek Stephen's conciliary here at

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Circuits Sports, vice president of Operations, co host of odds

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>on that he does with a mall Shaw. Do you

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>think we can get a mall on the show a

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>little later this year as well? See what he says. Okay, um,

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you for being here as always. I know you

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>had your booster shots. So you're not feeling very well

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>A little bit. That's sick, but pain pain from the

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>shot in the arm and that side and then chills

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I've been taking to my book, prof and so but uh,

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I get macdair and I had the first

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>two shots for mcdair and I and they said Madern

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is the strongest and longest last team. Yeah, of the

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccine and how you call it as your booster MADERNA

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to Maderna to the guy that gave me the shot,

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>actually said if people had the Johnson and Johnson one shot,

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>he was advising them to get the Modern and Booster.

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, so J J. Jacob I messed it up. Yeah, yeah,

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Todd wishing it from his mom's cork addict, his mom's

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>cork addict, star of the Showtime docuseries Action for a

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>few years back. How you doing, Totty? You good? I'm

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>doing great. You know. I went to a DraftKings dinner

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 1>last night and met some people that were fans of yours,

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so you know, obviously they had some poor judgment, but um,

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>they do like you, and uh, thank you, thank you.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>They really like you, they said, Mikey, is you know mediocre? Wow? Well,

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>how are you going to compare someone with no media

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>training to somebody that's been thirty five years? You're fantastic years.

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>You were my favorite radio per sonality from the state

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of Iowa. I'm being serious because I don't know Eric,

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, we can't joke around like we normally

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>do till we get the cadence of the show. First

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>time on the podcast. I should mention that to Eric

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that the best line I've ever shot. Aaron shot about

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>five six minutes into the podcast. By the way, Eric

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Eager from Pro Football Focus Data Science his research to

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>day aside his doctor Eric Eager. By the way, Uh,

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>kind enough to join us on the show. Eric, great

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>to have you. I appreciate it. I just want to

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>know Aaron shots like six minutes into this podcast. He's

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>been on the numbers game, he's been on my other stuff,

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but when he was on the policy goes, I'm gonna

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna take me a second to get used to

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the rhythm of this ship. She said. Kate, Oh, I

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>thought he said. He did say the word Eric. Thanks

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>for doing it, man. I appreciate it. As somebody who

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>knows Aaron personally, I am not surprised at all that

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that is a classic line for him. He and I

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>were on panels together where you know he was very

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>much the the disheveled scientist and uh and sort of

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>yeah he let's just say he dictated cadence. Yeah, I

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you this, and Aaron is I'm on

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>aeron side on this. So we used to go to

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>M I T. Sloan Sports and Analytics Conference for years.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you ever went eric Um, but

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>we Aaron used to be on panels, like when they

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>started football pro football panels, Aaron was up there. Now

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>they like don't even ask him to be on sometimes,

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know if it was this year of

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>the last year. I haven't been the last two years

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's because he said the Patriots defense last year

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>was one of the defenses in this year the National

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Football it was remember that? Uh he I tell you.

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>There's one thing that Aaron said last year that I

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>remember really well, and it's aged very well, which is

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I had the audacity to say the Chiefs they sort

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of seemed to play up and down to their competition

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this year, and Aaron goes, maybe, he goes, whoa whoa

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>bo he goes, maybe they're just not as good as

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we think they are. That has aged pretty well, I

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>will say that. So that's the that's the one shots

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>from Mark he made last year that that I remember

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>quite well. Todd Harry Reasoners from Iowa. You'd like to

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>be better than Harry Reasoner. It's a clothe it's very tight,

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very it's very I wouldn't want to live on

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the difference. Wasn't It wasn't Harry because he was he

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was on a weekly Sunday at sixty minute show, whereas

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you're in the daily. So I had to give you

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the nine. Wasn't Harry reason or the guy that Barbara

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Walters complaint was so sexist towards her when she was

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>coming at a lot of complaints later on after he retired.

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>In that about he wouldn't have worked in this, Oh

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>not at all. Not at Morley would have been okay,

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>not Harry Morley. I didn't think we'd go down the

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>sixty minutes row. By the way, you know it's gonna

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>be on the megapod two weeks from now, Brent Musburger

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:34.799
<v Speaker 1>making his return. I got I got it. This is exciting,

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.239
<v Speaker 1>this is exciting. We have looked back then, Amy Coney,

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Barrett's tenure brand pre game in the in the NFL today,

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Remember that time you were so entertaining Brent, And remember

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that time. Tell me about that time, by the way,

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>before you answer, you're such a great guy. You're amazing.

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Mikey and Brent went on their own little fucking tangent.

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Excuse pardon me. We're happy to have back. I'm sure

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he's thrilled he's gonna be in here. I think with us.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the world. I think so, I think so um

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And he went politics right for the beginning, which was funny.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Uh, let us begin before we get into

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>best bets and teasers and Survivor and all that stuff. Mikey,

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a great story here, so circum millions. How

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>many people have Circus Survivor? How many people didn't submit Survivor?

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Only two, only the best week of the year, and

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>only the Braven's really got people again, fewer than a

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred people losing Survivor. But there was a dude in millions.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell this story? I can tell it. I

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>mean the guys was one of the five way split

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen and two the first quarter. He was in second

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>place at twenty five and five, and he didn't submit

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>his picks this week. Oh my god, how do you not?

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>How how does that happen? He said? He forgot. He

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>texted Jeff Benson and said, you know anything you can

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>do sometime before four in that hour? I just three

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>o'clock is the deadline? Yea? And they answer is no,

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>there's the answer in the system. No, you can't even

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>go in and put it's impossible. But you know that

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we got flooded with emails and calls after four when

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know we post the website, all the people saying,

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the mistake? What's his picks? They wanted to know this.

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 1>It's not listed his picks. We need to know his picks.

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Sure you didn't turn any in people flabber guests. God,

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if a guy like that now secretly hopes

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>he just sucks the rest of the way. You know,

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>people have their feeling about the proxies and that, but

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Derek has said all along, even if you're a local,

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>pay the three hundred dollars, you're gonna get the text

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 1>from the proxy right at ten am or whatever time

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they submit and say, hey, what are your picks? If

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you do forget, you get a lot of reminders from

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the That's crazy. I mean, that's also crazy like you

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>to be doing so well that other people are in

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>we gate already rooting against you or just curious what

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you pick, like you see if they're on the right

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>side or not. Al Right, before we get started, do

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>you want to take some congratulations for actually a winning week?

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk about survivor I want to. And I

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>asked this question to you guys. He couldn't. He couldn't

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>wait to us, he couldn't wait to unleash that line.

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>He's waiting all week. It's okay, it's okay. But I

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>thought that there was something very interesting this week, and

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>over five hundred people took the Cardinals. I was shocked

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>by I was shocked by that too, because they are

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a Christmas consideration. And even if you argue maybe the

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Titans now look like to play over the forty niners

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>on that Thursday before, don't just still need like two

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>viable teams on the Thanksgiving and Christmas from in quarterback injury.

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Whatever I think you do, I think you do. But yeah,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>six hundred people did not care about that. Tells me

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, we'll cross that bridge when we come

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to it. Thinking for a lot of people, there are

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>still many more people still live in Circus Survivor than

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>started Circus Survivor last year. Wow, all right, Todd, Okay,

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>before we get to the pics, go ahead. What was

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>our records last week? Deserves a round of applause, an

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>absolute round of A plus. The Gilly had the Atriots

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>minus seven. I believe. They won by five points. Believe,

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>so text almost thought there for him, although they did

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>get there. My I had a ten point teaser with

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the Texans plus twenty eight, and I got there, but

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the plus seven didn't. Bengals plus six was a fantastic pick.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So he goes two and one to move to a

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>robust seven and four Arizona up to twenty eight. What

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of sick oh are you? I didn't know ten

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>point teaser idea of these three team tender teasers, so

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I moved. I took a all crap team teaser and

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it got there. Was plus twenty eight plus twenty six

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Lions and plus fourteen and a half on Seattle,

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was pretty easy. The only one that was

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>even in doubt at all was Arizona, and it wasn't

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>even really in doubt. Why do you think draft Kings

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>keeps inviting him the stuff? Exactly? By the way, keep

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>calling me the way those ten points are worth? Like,

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? I disagree. I disagree because at

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of the game, the teams that are up

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>big don't want to blow out. Look, I don't mind

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 1>if people call that content blowing the ship out. Of

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, right, But that was that's Belichick against the Jets,

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and he hates the Jets. The the that's a It's

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a different thing when you get these these teams, like

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Arizona doesn't want to show anything when they're

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>out huge, they're just gonna, you know, coasting. Anyways. You

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>can call me dumb all everybody can just laugh. I'm

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>just I'm just want to know the thought process. But

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a reasonable thought. I know a lot of

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>people think it's stupid, but when you're stupid, I'm being defensive,

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>both of you. Okay, it's not about Eric. I'm being defensive. Eric.

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>You called me an asshole, and I don't appreciate it. Asshole.

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to I'm trying to change the cad into

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the show. That's right, He's already been warned and advanced.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes these ten point teasers, I'm I'm literally like eleven

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and two and ten point teasers. Mike, you could tell

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you like that. Two years ago, I was giving them

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>out and I've been doing them again this year and

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>they're fantastic. So I'll keep laughing all the way to

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the bank. But you you have famously said, it's all

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>math in the end, right, And here's Eric, who is nothing,

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>you know who, who, if anything, loves math himself, right

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and can give you the value of those points. So

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you should appreciate that response. I think, oh, I think

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>mathematically he's probably correct. But I think there's also a

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>psychological component. I've seen too many NFL games where a

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 1>team is a huge dog and they barely get Whenever

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the teams cover those huge lines, they barely do it.

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 1>They don't usually wipe the team out in my experience,

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>over a long period of time, Whenever there's some wacko

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>college looking spread in the NFL, the teams, if they

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>do cover it, they barely cover it. And I think

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's because the better team, the better team late in

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the game, doesn't care to win by more. I'm glad

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you want man whatever. Anyways, like Gilly did win the teaser,

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 1>we all want the teaser. Gilly moves to five, one

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and one on the teaser. Mike, he's five and two

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>on the teaser and I am in first place with

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>six and one on the man to beat on the

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>teasers on the spreads, Well, actually you're an but okay,

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>good try Mikey. Mikey was one in two last week

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>with his Bears plus twelve and a half almost got

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>their very close game there, Mikey, you were right in

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>it all the way. I believe they lost five hundred

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>three Bengals Ravens under not a chance and he did

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>win with the Browns two. I just want I want

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to say one thing, because I never have ever challenged Michael.

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that Bears pick was your most peculiar pick ever. Yeah,

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it was bad. I should have been on no hyperpolet

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>myself from and even Carols laughed at it on Friday.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And I can't believe Mike Palm I was such a

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>bad match. I misread the game and I went but

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Tampa they didn't even want to play in the second half.

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>They shut it totally down. Absolutely. I went one in

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.239
<v Speaker 1>two to move to ten and eleven hit my Arizona

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>under lost the Miami under and the Kansas City Tennessee game.

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that will go down as the strangest game

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in NFL history that the Kansas City Chiefs only scored

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>three points against the Tennessee Titans defense. Please put that

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in the mathematical data is and tell me what percentage

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of time that will happen for the rest of history.

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Dr eric I will say, as somebody who and I'm

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a Kansas City fan, like I, I had Tennessee and

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I had Under in that game, and I had under

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>because I thought that I thought they would be it

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>would slow down. But for different reasons, I thought the

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs would try to slow the game down a little

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>bit to protect their defense. And like the I think

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the craziest stat of the season so far that literally

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>no one knows is that the Chiefs for the second

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>straight game allowed zero second half points. And obviously it

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>was it was a pretty like, you know, weird way

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to do it last week, but um you know that

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the scoring three. Talk about them scoring three. Actually here's

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>some inside football and actually I have, you know, as

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a part of my job, I do like having interactions

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>with these teams. We climbed out to All thirty two

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and one of one of the members of the team

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that I'm really close with was like, Hey, can you

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>check out our r P O game? And I know

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>if anybody knows, like RPOs are basically like run plays

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>where you can pull the ball out of the stomach

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of the running back and throw the ball to a

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, and on those plays linemen aren't allowed to

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>block up field because if you do pull the ball

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>out you throw the ball, you'll get an illegal man

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>down field penalty. And so the Chiefs have have run

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the second highest rate of RPOs in the NFL, second

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to Arizona, and they're bad at them, and most of

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the NFL is really good at them. And so the

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>thing is when the Chief's kind of half asked the

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>run game and the past game, trying to be deceptive,

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they're bad at both. And interestingly, it's just because these

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>linebackers are like when they see Mahomes put the ball

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in the stomach of the running back, the linebackers are saying, like,

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>come and get us. You know, Darryl Williams is not

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>about to get you know, We're not gonna get killed

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>by Darryl Williams. Will get killed by Mahomes instead. And

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it's hurt the Chiefs offense. And if you've watched them

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Washington game, they scored thirty one points, but

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>they were something like seven of seven or eight of

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>eight on third downs in the second half of that game.

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>The fact that they're getting to that many third downs

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is problematic for their offense. And so, you know, the

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee game was pretty simple. It was Tennessee took a

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>long time to score. The Chiefs went three and out

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>or five and out or whatever it was. Tennessee took

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a long time and scored. Chiefs went five and out,

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and then they Tennessee went and scored. The Chiefs turned

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball over. Like it's not like they had a

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of offensive plays in the first half and we're

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>bad on all them. They like literally had like thirteen

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>plays in the first half, and you know that, and

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that's how the Chiefs. They also got desperate. You can

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>feel that desperation in my homes. When he starts to

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>get down big, it feels like, you know, they're just

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>forcing it, you know what I mean, They're not taking

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>what's there. He looks like bad Aaron Rodgers. When Aaron

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers was really struggling, you know, he's not. He hits

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>his back foot and the first thing he wants to

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>do is scramble and make a big play. When you

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>know that offense should be gaining seven eight yards at

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a time, and instead he's trying to he's trying to

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>score fourteen points on every play, and and it's already

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>them a little bit. It was into desperation mode worse

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>when they're behind. The Chiefs are the Ravens. Oh yeah, ah,

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens do it wait better, don't they? The Ravens

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>came back against Indie and in Kansas City and they

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and they stuck to their run game in both games,

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like they actually like do the there there? I think

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>they come from behind a lot better just because it's

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>weird this season, at least they've they've stuck with their

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>base offense even with behind, and multiple scores against Kansas City,

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>against UH Indie, even against Detroit although they got late

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>lucked out with the field goal. Like, I think it's

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>them to two things. One, Jason and those guys back

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>there in the back, we've lost Mikey and I have

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>lost our video feed of Todd and UH and Eric.

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>If we could get that back on the screen, we'd

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. The other thing is, isn't it true also Eric,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that teams are blitzing Mahomes at a far lesser rate

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this year and so like they've figured out that he's

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>really as a young player. He was like, super, we're

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>good against the blitz. Let's just stop with that. Even

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>teams that are traditional blitz teams like the Ravens, like

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>if you look at them, they blitz. They're in like

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the top five in blitz rates in the league. And

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>against Kansas City they blitz like zero times one time. Maybe, um,

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that was starting to happen at the end of last year.

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But you're right. I mean the all these defenses are

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>engineered to beat the Chiefs. Now they're engineered to play

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>too high, six in the box. You know, beg a

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>team to run the football, but at worst begged them

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to throw it fifteen times on the way of the

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>end zone. And it's a good numerical play, Like it's

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>hard to throw the ball fifteen times in a row

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>without making a mistake. So I think it's good on

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the flip side. That's why you've seen teams like Tennessee

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in Baltimore beat these teams, because a team that's engineered

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Chiefs, by exclusion, is not engineered to

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>beat Derrick Henry and so like you, that's why you

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>see maybe a team like Tennessee at success against a

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>team like Buffalo, because you know Buffalo will will stack

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the box, but they don't have stacking players. They're engineered

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>to played nicol and din uh and and stop Kansas

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>City's offer last thing before we get the best best,

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>because I know people want to hear the picks. But

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you said that the most interesting stat was that the

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs held their opponents to zero points in consecutive second halves.

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I will disagree with you. I will. I will say

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that the most interesting stat of the entire week came

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>from you, Eric, which I got sort of second hand

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>on our show, which was it was such an unbelievable stat,

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Eric that I questioned it openly. I'm like, that can't

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>be true, and I looked it up you. It was

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>your stat about Mike Shannon. Excuse me, Kyle Shanahan. You

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>know where I'm going with this, having a worst winning percentage,

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>a worst winning percentage of the head coach of the

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Niners then Mike Singletary had as the head coach of

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the Niners. That's unbelievable, unbelievable because we think of Singletary

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>one way and Shannon completely differently. Yeah, I mean I

0:17:56.200 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>remember Singletary having was too and oh in oh and

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>had Brett Farven the Vikings on the ropes um, and

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>they needed that miracle catch by Greg Lewis, like they

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>had some success with Shanahan in San Francisco, just went

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>all the hell because of you know him in many

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>ways Um and obviously hard I did great things with

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that talent um after that, But yeah, I mean the

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>thing with Shanahan, and I got a lot of flak

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>for this in the off season because I I do

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this as part of my betting analysis. I build a

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>model for play callers, and I have two models, and

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>one of them's uniqueness of scheme, and the other one

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>is how how well you do with the talent you have.

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And Shanahan, if you actually look at the numbers, has

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>not overperformed the talent that they have on the field UM.

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think in a lot of ways you look

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>at that and you say, well, he doesn't actually pick

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the talent well like they have Brandon. I you can

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a first round draft pick who looked like Davante Adams

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>at times last year, He's completely disappeared. They trade up

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>for a trade sermon, and they prepared and they prefer

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Elijah Chill over him. They spend all this money on

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>on on Tevin Coleman and Rahi most who's an undrafted

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>like seven time cut guys the guy they end up with. Like,

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Shanahan's interesting because he gets this premium. He

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>was third in Pinnacles betting odds for they were third

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to win the Super Bowl after Kansas City and Tampa

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.719
<v Speaker 1>on like for months on Pinnacles betting odds to win

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. Like, I think he sounds bad, but

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he's one of the more overrated entities. And

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>all the football. Wow, it was terrible in the second

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>half of the Super Bowl. Horrendous, absolutely horrendous and second

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and twice twice twice, right, the Atlanta Falcons. Right, we'll

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>always have twenty twelve with Kyle Shannahan and a great

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>r G three, though we always have that. I'm interested

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to ask herek though you rank Matt la Fleur is

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the number one offensive play caller? Yes, what's because he's not?

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Because because here's here's my thing with Matt Flour Like

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the Mike McCarthy offense with Rogers, I mean, Mike McCarthy

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>had us all wondering whether or not Aaron Rodgers was

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>washed right, And you know there were articles at the

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>article my friend Ben Baldwin, I really respect right through

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the athletic and football outsiders, like he made a very

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>compelling case and Aaron Rodgers would not affect what it

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>was not an effective quarterback anymore. You add to that

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the general manager for the Green Bay

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Packers does not want to acquire a secondary receiver. Right

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the target shares in Green Bay.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I gotta pull this up here, but like Davante Adams

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>literally gets the majority of the targets there or something. Yeah, exactly.

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>So he's seventy two of targets and and yet they're

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in the in the Matt Lafleur era, they're undefeated when

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams is injured. Um up, and and it's a

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>fairly compelling case that he gets the most out of

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that talent. Uh, you know, as any coach and football

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>but as a head coach, I think you had him

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>like fourth or fifth or something. Yeah. A part of

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that was just because you know, longevity, like I think, um,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and there was also I think he's like quote woke

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on fourth down. Like. But he did have that mistake

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>against the against Tampa Bay in the playoffs where he

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>went he kicked the field goal down eight. There have

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>been some blunders there. There's also the fact that and

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I and I sort of put this in my rank,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like he he took too long to fire Mike Patton.

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike Patton was clearly a negative ev play for them

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.479
<v Speaker 1>as a coordinator. Spot. Um, you know, you could say that.

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>You could say the same thing about other guys that

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 1>I've had, like Andy Reid stuck with Bob Sutton too long,

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>probably cost him a Super Bowl and stuff like that.

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>But like you know, for me, it was also just

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>giving sort of like I think Matt Lafleur as an

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>offensive tactician has been a little bit more impressive than

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>him as head coach. Wow, I'm just impressive. Why wouldn't

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know him? Some research? Is that way? You

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>asked me every day every week with the guest in

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>case I don't know them. I love that. This is

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>why I lead the interviews on odds on not m all. Okay,

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that's great, guys, the Todd radio personality and all of

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>my one all right. By the way, we still don't

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 1>get to see your faces. Mike and I are operating

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a naked here. They got the best of the deal.

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>They got the best of you. Eric, we start with

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>you one of your three first Thursday Night Discussion. Thursday

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Night Discussion. Oh wait, Todd, what are the overall record

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you did you gain a gain on me? Are you

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a half game back or something? No, I'm ten and eleven.

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>You're eleven nine and one, so you're team ahead and

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the lost game and Gilly is right there behind us

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>at seven. Silby gotta beat on the teasers, by the way.

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Um okay, so yes, you're right, Todd. We should talk

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>about Thursday night football. This could be one of our opinions. Okay,

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you have opinion? Is it one of your best bets? Yes? Okay?

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh so it is the Cardinals and the Packers tonight,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals favored by six and a half. Now now that

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we know that both alums are did more importantly, Davante Adams.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a hundred percent that he's not playing

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Someone said it was like, but it

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like he's not playing. He's not playing. He didn't

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>make the trip. Uh. As Eric said, the Packers are

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>six and oh since the beginning of twenty nineteen without

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>without Davante Adams, which everybody threw around mainstream media. But

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>if you dive a little deeper on those six games, uh,

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>they beat the eight and eight Cowboys Week five of

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. They beat the three twelve and one Lions

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Week six of nineteen. That was the game that everybody

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>started noticing. Alan wizard Um. Green Bay had to benefit

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>from some hands in the face penalties late in that

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>game to come back and rally back to beat the

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>eventual three twelve and one Lions Week seven of twenty nineteen.

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>They beat the eventual seven and nine Raiders Week gate

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of twenty nineteen. They did beat a twelve and four

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs team, but guess who wasn't playing? Patrick Mahomes always in.

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And then the two games last year without Davante again

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>they won all of them. There were six and oh

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>straight up five and one against the spread. UH. The

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Week three game against the Saints says the Saints finished

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve and four all. They didn't have Michael Thomas either

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the Saints in that game, and it was a Zadarius

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Smith forced fumble of Taysom Hill who was in as

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in that game that that was the eventual game winner.

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>That was another Alan Lazard game. By the way, guess

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>who else isn't playing Alan lazard Um And then finally

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Week four of last year, they beat the Falcons. Falcons

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>ended up four and twelve and guess what, Julio Jones

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>exited that game in the second quarter. That was the

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Tonyan game, the Robert Tonyan game if you remember. So. Yeah,

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they were six and oh but it's not without its awards,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess is what I'm saying. Eric, do you have

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>an opinion on tonight's game, either side or total. I

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>actually think the number is probably right. Um there was

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>a great discussion. I know you've had uh Andy or

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Drew from the Whale Caver podcast on your shows before.

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Um Gil, the number of points is not necessarily you know,

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not uniform, right, moving from three and a

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>half to six and then six and a half. It

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>has a lot to do with like the lack of

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a value in the NFL four and five, as well

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>as what I would call cluster injuries. And I have

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>an article on PFF dot com where I talk about

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>how a team does is actually far more correlated with

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>how the secondary and tertiary receivers of a team do,

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of times if you lose two receivers,

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it's worth more than two times losing both of them,

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>um individually. So I think that that's a big issue here.

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Wide receiver is very much a weak link system, and

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>so that's where I get I get a little bit worried.

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>But my opinion on this game is, I think when

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at the team total here, it depends upon

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>where you look, like Arizona thirty minus one twenty is

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>where I'm looking a little bit off shore. If you

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>can find a better number, I think Arizona goes over this.

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I also like the over in the general game, UM.

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think when you when you think about Arizona,

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they've they've had three statement games this year's underdogs at

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>home against tennis or sorry on week one against Tennessee

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>at Cleveland, UM, and then they had the other one

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>against l A. They've made these statement games as dogs

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and no one's really still no one treats them as

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a sevenin O team. Like I do think that there's

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be some sort of like we really need

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to prove it to the league tonight, and so I

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>do think they put up thirty against what I've characterized

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>as a soft gooley Green Bay Packers defense. And that

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>leads right into my my pick of the week. If

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear my day, let's go my one

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of my three picks is going to be the over

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>fifty and a half in this ballgame. And the reason

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I like it um is, first of all, Okay, on

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the bad side, for all we've got all these injuries

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of Green Bay, we still have Aaron Rodgers though Aaron

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers is still the quarterback, and all I need for

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>him to get me is, say twenty one points. If

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Arizona is going to put up numbers green base defense,

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is green Day based defense really that great? They gave

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>up thirty eight to New Orleans in Week one, and

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>then they have nice number is against crappy teams. Detroit

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>scored seventeen, Pittsburgh got seventeen, Chicago got fourteen, Washington Redskins

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>no offense to my good friend Gilly Ice got ten.

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>But that's because they stink and they figured out Heineke.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So when they when they played against good offensive teams, look,

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati got twenty two and could have had twenty eight

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>if they went to miss the thousand field goals as well.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's no reason why Arizona can't get

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty one in this game. And then all you need

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is Rodgers to get you twenty one. Even without receivers,

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>he can get your twenty one. Rodgers will find a

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>way to to to smoke in mirrors you up to

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>to get the one. So give me over fifty and

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a half in this game. I think it's too low.

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And also the fact that it's come down. I believe

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it opened, uh somewhere in like the fifty three range.

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's it's fifty three and a half.

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Even I think it's it's too much of a reaction.

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I still have Aaron Rodgers. And by the way, if

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I get back door, if it's a situation where where

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I get Aaron Rodgers, is the backdoor quarterback, you know,

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>down fourteen points later or something, Chuck, I'll take that

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:02.439
<v Speaker 1>all day long. Give me the over fifty and a half.

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>He also failed to mention cause that the with that

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Washington three points total with four red zone possessions and

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>five possessions inside the thirty last week, the Redskins should

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>have covered easily. Then. That included the Taylor Heinekey third

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 1>down dive forward stop progress when he could have just

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>waltzed in, not waltz but and then the yeah he

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Lambeau leaved because he loved the Packers growing up. And

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>then he fumbles on four three gathers and they said

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it was stopped at the regather too. Don't don't get

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>me started. Um okay, So that's that's your number one.

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>That's your number one bet. Okay. I love I love

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Gilly talking about the Washington football team. He's just like

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>he's so disappointed. He's just don't just don't get me started.

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Years of years of sorrow. Oh they were such a

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>gem as a kid. All right, Uh, Eric, your first

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>bet that you love or do you have any Thursday

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>night thoughts? I'm sorry. I want to take the Packers

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>here with six and a half, but I can't be

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>because they have no no they'll pick, they have no

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>pass rush. They could never get to Taylor Heineke last

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>week A. You're gonna sit there and let the little

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.959
<v Speaker 1>road runner now sit back there without any pressure. I'm

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>concerned you go road running. I'm concerned. Well that's yeah,

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and instead of mayor of bunch, can build it your

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>your friend. Nicko Lombardico doesn't this game remind you of

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the game Green Bay played last year where they went

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>on the road against San Francisco and like basically all

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of San Francisco's players were out and that spread was

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>something like six and it was because the market, like

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the books, I mean you could you guys

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>could say this better than me, but like the books

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>don't like opening themselves up to that big of a middle, right,

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and so like you have, you know, in that game,

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe San Francisco was six and a half point

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>dogs by the time that all was said and done,

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>even though they had no players, and green Bay kind

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of like, you know, mop the floor with them. Like

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily know if that's going to happen because

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of the point you made, Todd, which is at Green

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Bay as Aaron Rodgers and I and Matt laflour um,

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But I do I do wonder if if people are

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna take Green Bay, do they see the tail risk

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>here where like having no players really hurts you, Aaron

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Jones helps, but yeah, it's tough to take the Packers here.

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Can I just say one thing about what he just

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>said about middles Place real quick? If you watch people

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>who don't bet end end game, you should start paying

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>attention to end game. Because the Indianapolis San Francisco game,

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for the entire first half of the game, there were

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>books that we're playing forty seven and a half while

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the other one was fifty. And then it would go

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty three and a half to fifty six, and then

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it would go fifty one to fifty three and a half.

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know who's right who's wrong, But the

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is the bottom line is would you say

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>someone's wrong? Yeah, So the bottom line is you don't

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>ever see middles and before you know, you can't go

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to a Vegas sports book before the game and get

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>three and a half and then go down to circle

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and get six. It doesn't exist, right. You have to

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to predict where the market's going to go.

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You can get part of that. The longer the game

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>goes in, the more the high of the probability on

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>some of those numbers, like a lot of middles. Like

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>early early career sports betters will bet middles not knowing

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that the points are not worth a big But the

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>later you go into some of these games, especially if

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you're still getting and oftentimes you're not getting this, but

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like if you're still getting minus one ten on both sides. Oftentimes,

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>like the later on the game goes, the higher the

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>probability of landing on certain key numbers right as you

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>get some middles are actually more. Again, the most books

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>have these, but there are soft offshore books. There are

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>soft books. Um. You know, the further along you get

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.719
<v Speaker 1>in the game, the higher the probability is that you

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>land on a number in the middle of those two.

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, well, of course, because you're getting closer to

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the end and you have less of a game to go.

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>But my point is, but my point is if you

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>if you don't like in game right, you should start

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>liking it because if you get opportunities like this. I'm

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>not even saying you should go for middles. I'm just

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>saying have an opinion on the game. If you like

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>forty seven and if you like go over, take forty

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, if you like under take under fifty.

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.479
<v Speaker 1>The point is, where else do you see giving away

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>two and a half points in the in NFL? Ever?

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Never know the short runaway point is such a such

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a great one. Though our buddy he loves to take

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>advantage of short runways in multiple sports. I think he

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>does it so very well in the NBA and baseball,

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>especially because what he does is bet, you know, bet

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the bet the um under and then trying to get

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>through the bottom of the lineups. That's that's the play

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>with quality pictures sophisticated. But but even for the people

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>who aren't sophisticated with getting middles, I'm just saying, if

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna pick a side, you're still getting an incredible

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>advantage here, you know what I mean. All Right, we

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta we gotta because Mikey has a show to do,

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>so we gotta we gotta get to the best bets

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that we gotta get through. By the way, we should

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>mention J. J. Watt is out tonight. He's probably out

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>for the is out for the rest of the season,

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>season ending shoulder surgery. They just flashed up a stat

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>here he has missed thirty two of the last eighty

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>seven games since the year J. J. Watt has and

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the Packer stat that everybody flashes up twenty five and

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>oh the path Kers are under Matt Lafleur in the

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>regular season when they win a turnover margin or when

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't play in California or Florida. I think there's

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a similar state. All right, Eric, your first best bet is, yeah,

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this is my my boss's game, Chris's game. I'm gonna

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>go with with Dallas laying uh, you know, anything up

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to two and a half against Minnesota. UM. I tweeted

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this out yesterday. Minnesota. If you look at the the

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>bottom five quarterbacks in the NFL and average stepth of

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>target in the first three quarters of a game on

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>early downs, it's Jared Goff, It's Kirk Cousins, Jacoby Brissett, Um,

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>big Ben Roethlisberger, and Andy Dalton. That's one good quarterback

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and four guys who should be backups. And people wonder

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>why Minnesota plays so many close games and why they

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>get snake bitten by you know, field goals and all

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this kind of stuff. It's that they don't trust Kirk Cousins,

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Kirk turned. Kirk has turned into John

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Elway at the end of games this year end Like,

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he deserves a great deal of credit, But

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in the first part of games they cut him off.

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And against teams like Caroline, against seems like Detroit, that

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.240
<v Speaker 1>will work. Against the team like Dallas. When the Vikings

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>don't have when the Vikings don't have Michael Pierce, when

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings don't have uh Patrick Peterson in the lineup,

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Dallas could lap the Vikings by the time

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:28.399
<v Speaker 1>they figure out they're even in the game. Okay, mikey

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>yere number two your first. Yeah, I'm gonna take the

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles charges charges? What is it? Five? Todd, Yeah,

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>los Angeles chargers. I have as five, five and a half.

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll give you the five. Look embarrassed slashed here by

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots and so five it was like a million

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>or nothing, forty five to nothing or whatever. And that

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Lynn fiasco as well. I know Rufus says Anthony

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Lynn very underrated and there's no value in having Staley

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as the coach. One of the most interesting conference on

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the podcast this year. Yes, look, here's the other thing,

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>um and the charges off of buy here's the other thing. Though.

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I love this move to get rid of Kayne, Oh

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>finally the kicker and go to Hopkins. I think that's

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a huge upgrade for them at the kicking position because

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I also they will have confidence in him when the

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>coaches losing a confidence just like Washington didn't. Hopkins gets

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the new guy and he gets the kick block. Now

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:25.839
<v Speaker 1>next time, Rivera is not even gonna take the field

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>goal because he got the premium. I mean, it's snowballs

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 1>when you have confidence or you don't have confidence in

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the kicker. I think the Chargers are the better team here.

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a better spot for them on a five. God, no,

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's your first person is over. I'm this is yeah. Listen,

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna go San Francisco forty Niners here

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna lay. Yeah, yeah, I think I am.

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>What is it three and a half or four? I

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>have niners? You know what, it's mostly four. We'll give

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you the three half. Well, if it's mostly four, give

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>me the four. So four it is. Um, Khalil Mack

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>is out. Do we know that for a fact? He

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is out for the for the Bears. He's out, Uh doubtful.

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So sounds like he's out doubtful typically meeting out these days.

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see. Um, Jimmy Jimmy g is in. Listen.

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I let's let's get rid of the atmospheric river game

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for a second. Um, all that we've said about the Niners,

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>rings true. But if this team is anything like they're

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be, you have to be able to beat

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bears team justin fields with five turnovers last week,

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.839
<v Speaker 1>and yet it was against the Bucks. Um. But he

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is just he looks bewildered when he's on the sideline. UM,

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I like San Francisco here because if I have my

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 1>own personal priors, this spread would shock me at that point.

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna rely on those About these two teams,

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Bears are a good football team

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in any way. Uh, they will try to rely on

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>their run game, which is what I didn't understand about

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it going up against Tampa Bay. But I didn't think

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they would because you can't run the ball in Tampa.

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Even Dallas knew that. With Ezeki Eli, they didn't even

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 1>try to run the ball. You can't run the ball.

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:09.919
<v Speaker 1>And here comes Naggie on first down the first play

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of the game, run the ball and getting the second

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and twelve, and the game was over. At that point.

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>The game was over. This guy, though he sends his

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:18.839
<v Speaker 1>no pressure. He's got like Dave Craig hands or something.

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>He fumbles every time he gets hit. He's terrible. I think.

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I also think Naggie is terrible. Naggie is a terrible

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>play caller. Well, so I'm gonna go with the coaching

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:30.760
<v Speaker 1>advantage here too. I I still think Kyle Shanahan. Again,

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is the RG three year polluting my thinking

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on Kyle Shannon um, but I absolutely But what about

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the year he had Matt Ryan too? Such a standout

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 1>here for Matt Ryan, he did get crushed into the

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 1>second half of the Super Bowl, but he did have

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that year. I'm taking San Francisco called a Malcolm Gladwell

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>blink thing where I can see the Niners. But by

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, they do have to figure out what the

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>deal is with Brandon Aiyuk. That dude has disappeared twenty

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>targets all year, ten catches all year for fewer than

0:37:56.920 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards. It's unbelievable that he has. Jimmy g

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.360
<v Speaker 1>has the most interception babbit I've ever seen in my entirely.

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 1>It finally caught up with him late in that game

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>last year last week. But he throws the ball to

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the other team every play and they drop it right

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in the dropped the interception that drop Kirk Cousins in

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 1>d c was that had the best babbit go whatever.

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>That dude would pit pit defenders in the chest, that

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it would somehow bounce off them all the time. So

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm going I'm going with the Niners. What's that? I

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>like calling it babbit. That's a cool Yeah, that's our

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>little thing. Alright. Holmes is bad at the zero this year.

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Uninterceptible ball. That's right, he's it's a negative number. Yeah, alright, Eric,

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>your number two. Okay. I I actually kind of liked Chicago,

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna go away. I think Chicago is a

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>great bet when everybody says they're the worst team in football,

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>which I think that was that happened against Detroit week whatever.

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But this is the one. I'm gonna go a second.

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Carolina at Atlanta over I thought we were gonna match.

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>We did not match, but I thought we were to Carolina.

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan uh this season Um has has really looked good.

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>He has a one point for passer rating when pressured.

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the narratives about him being kind

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of like Wilting this year and not having the arm

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>strength or anything, I think those are a little bit overblown.

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts once they found out how to use him

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 1>as you know. Now you know my opinion, probably the

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end I'd pick over anybody in the league if

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you gave me a choice. Moving forward, Ridley has been fine.

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I think as a secondary player to Pitts, he's he's great,

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>And Cordell Patterson's a guy that I think they're using

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:38.359
<v Speaker 1>really well. Um, So I think on that side the ball,

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be fine. There's a lot of injuries on

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the side, uh of Carolina, you know, the cornerbacks Shaq

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Thompson questionable. And then on the other side the we

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>only you know, any any defense that gives up four

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes the to a tongue of Valoa is on

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>watch for me. And so while Sam Donald has been

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely horrible over the last like three or four weeks,

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets right here. It's also indoors, So

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that really helps give me the over in that game. Eric,

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask a question. Yes, Michael Lombardi this week

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 1>keeps saying I don't care what two is no good,

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what Pro football focus. He said on

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>my show, He goes, I don't care what Pro football

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Focus is. Just pro football Focus. Have two ranked in

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the top top seven or eight quarterbacks or something. He said,

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>two eight grades in the last two games. So, um,

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>look at his war is probably still in the bottom

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:32.919
<v Speaker 1>half of the league, but he's his last two games

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>have looked have looked good. I think part of part

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>of the issue though is small samples. And they've also

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>played Jacksonville in the Land in the last week, so

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I would curb my enthusiasm about too. Uh. But but yeah,

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>he's graded well. Uh. Michael Lombardi also said the same

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 1>thing about J. J. Watts when he was signed by

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Arizona and J J. Watson a monster this year. So

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll see what the batting averages on the

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what PF thinks about player X to

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it was six I think in terms of the last

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. He has six in terms of the quarterback

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 1>rading the last two weeks, but not overall. Uh. Yeah,

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>he he took a he took a shot because I

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:11.479
<v Speaker 1>listened to that, so he took a shot. He really

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>good at picking out who's really entertaining on the radio. Okay,

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>hey pick number pick number two, Mikey. But this is tough.

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know, this is all sucks. Yeah, it's

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it's so it is. Really I like this this this

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.280
<v Speaker 1>slate worst than last week. Yeah, I did me too,

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Ah you want me to go second second? You know,

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I looked at this for an hour this morning, and

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 1>I came up with one playing one. He was too

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 1>busy researching Eric. He didn't get his picks, I was.

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's you's a legitimate question. Is there any

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>angst for Eric talking about football for a living having

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 1>gotten his degrees from Nebraska Lincoln. You don't get it

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>now you don't watch college football. I'm I'm being facetious. Obviously,

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I was a big BRODSCAT fan growing up, so I

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>have disdain for what's happened, huge huge. I stood in

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.479
<v Speaker 1>line at Starbucks next Joe Opolini when I was there,

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and I knew the guy was going to be a

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>bad coach, and seeing how difficult to order a lot

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that's awesome. I looked capable of just like you know,

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>nourishing so great. I knew from my moming Sorry Todd,

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>her number two, Todd, Sorry, okay, my number two. I'm

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna go back to the well that got me a

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>w last week. If you guys were paying attention. I

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 1>took the under in the Arizona Houston game. Why did

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I do it? I said, Houston cannot score the football. Um,

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't really have to be a math genius to

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 1>look at the scores for Houston and realize they're having

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>a hard time getting the double digits any week in

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 1>National Football League play. Take out the Tyrod Taylor games,

0:42:56.480 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and they got twenty four against their I mean, they

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>got nine against Arizona, zero against Buffalo, twenty two against

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>New England, which is the outlier, three against Indianapolis, and

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>five last week at Arizona. So to me, I don't

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:11.919
<v Speaker 1>think the Houston offense is a team that can get

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>more than ten points in this football game against the Rams.

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see it. The Stanford quarterback is not good.

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the offense is not good, so the

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:23.439
<v Speaker 1>whole the team is not good. I'm sorry. They they're

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>okay on defense, but on offense they're absolutely horrendous. So

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:29.839
<v Speaker 1>if I give them ten points and I'm saying I'm

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 1>going under forty eight, and guys check me if I'm not.

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it forty eight or forty seven and a half?

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Forty eight? Okay? So I'll take the under forty eight,

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 1>which means even at thirty eight ten I would still

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 1>push ten I get a win. So give me the

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 1>under in the Rams against Houston under forty eight, because

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of these NFL teams when they

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 1>play Houston, they get up a million points there in

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter to just running the ball. Let's end

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this game. We don't need to show anything. We don't

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 1>need to throw the Cooper cop or Robert Woods or

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>any of that nonsense. Just give it to Henderson. Let's

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>end the game and get the hell out of here.

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We win thirty three to six. You know, so under

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 1>forty eight in the Rams game, I just don't see

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Houston scoring enough to get you over Alright, Mike, I'm

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:19.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Todd. What's the total in the Broncos

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>football team game? The Broncos football team, uh is playing

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the Washington football team, and I have you're looking for

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the football the total total points scored in the game

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 1>for both football games at some forty four and a

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:37.320
<v Speaker 1>half and some forty four's. We'll give you the forty

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>four and a half because we're feeling generous that well,

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't know all that way I'm going over, so

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:45.879
<v Speaker 1>give me the forty four over. Yeah, look at look

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at the football team couldn't get Bishop Gorman off the

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 1>field on third down. They can get nobody off the

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>field on third down. And look this Denver team, they

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 1>have no linebackers. The whole linebackers are out out. You know.

0:44:57.280 --> 0:44:59.760
<v Speaker 1>They let case Keenum sit back there. The guy hadn't

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 1>played like fourteen years, be very comfortable in the pocket

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night and acclimate himself to the game. I

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>also think the elevation in Denver helps the football team

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>kicking him. Look, they went up and down the field

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Packers, they just didn't convert. They didn't pay

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 1>off here. I think this total is too low. Two

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>gloves will convert enough there downs and Washington will score

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 1>more in the red zone over forty four Todd, Okay,

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I am vic Fangio. Defensive struggle. I still don't get.

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>And then he said, oh, Deshaun should want to go

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to Denver yesterday. He never gets off this vic Fangio.

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 1>We should spend like ten minutes, but I cann The

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline is Tuesday, and I still like, if you

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 1>sift through that NFL word salad that they came out

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 1>with it is you. I thought I would assume that

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>teams are going down the trade road with Houston having

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>some sign of some kind of back uh, you know,

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>back channel confirmation from the NFL that DeShawn will be

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:00.239
<v Speaker 1>able to play this year. And it appears by Roger

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Goodale just opening up his mouth and saying, hey, I

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>can't put him on the exemplist. I don't have enough

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>information that he's signaling to all the teams. Yeah, he

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 1>can play for you this year. I don't know about

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>next year, but he can play for you this year.

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So that appears to be the case. But what does

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it say about DeShawn that Miami's the team he wants

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to play for that has six losses. What does it

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 1>say about the Dolphins saying we were wrong about Twah.

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Shouldn't they all be fired right because they picked two

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 1>over Justin Herbert. What does it say about the NFL

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>who gave Zeke six games when that there was like

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>an affidavit saying none of this really happened because they

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:37.320
<v Speaker 1>were so bummed that they were they were so sensitive

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to how they treated Ray Rice and Josh Brown and

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>now Deshaun who has twenty two civil allegations and ten

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 1>criminal complaints. They're like, yeah, we we don't have enough information.

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Just he should Playze is incredible. There were a couple

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of bad stories at massage parlors. What it could happen anyway? Eric,

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:02.320
<v Speaker 1>what's your take on this? Uh that if you're assuming

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 1>any sort of logical consistency or coherence in the NFL's

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 1>application of anything, you're you're like missing how to You're

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>missing the point? Like I just you know it. The

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson thing is interesting, right because I think when

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 1>owners look at him, they see dollars, right, they see

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the top five um talented talents in the NFL.

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Like he he's probably what a notch below Mahomes And

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 1>so when you when you have that player on your team,

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 1>like that's what they're all going after, right, And so

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why the owners are sort of and

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Goodell is sort of doing their bidding right Like the

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't know if they could. I mean,

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they could pay me enough to do Goodell's job, but

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like to to stand in front and take those bullets

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and and I could look like a complete idiot when

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:55.840
<v Speaker 1>when God knows he's not. He's like that, that's that sucks.

0:47:56.400 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just incredible. Exactly he knows better. That's a well put,

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a what is what is the technical story right

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 1>now for Deshaun? Are they saying it's like up in

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the air? What is the what is the NFL story

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 1>right now? As long as he's with Houston, they don't

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 1>The NFL doesn't have to do anything because there's sort

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of this purgatory thing happening and they don't have to

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>rule on anything. Right as soon as he gets traded,

0:48:17.080 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they would have to step in and say he is Houston,

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Houston saying we're not playing him because of this? What

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:32.439
<v Speaker 1>was the Houston's not playing him because you're like, yeah,

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>they he doesn't want to play because he doesn't want

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to play right perfect level of dysfunction for the Technically,

0:48:38.080 --> 0:48:40.759
<v Speaker 1>technically he could play if he wanted to play right now,

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:44.240
<v Speaker 1>he could play for Houston right now. Yes, the NFL

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 1>would have to step in, So what's he so, what

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is his argument that he doesn't want to play, He

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:52.319
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to be there anymore. He think he thinks

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>they leaked all these stories he's doing the NBA. You

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>know the NBA thing where it's like I'm dictating, Well,

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that's nonsense. I this whole thing is too smells. I

0:49:03.120 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't sports one place where there's not craziness. Can I

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>just have one part of my life where the people

0:49:10.160 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't gone totally insane? Do I have to deal with this?

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And even in sports? Please? Can I just have a

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterback that Okay, I'm taking Carolina. Okay, I'm taking Carolina.

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>Caroline on my mind. Um Falcons defense stinks. They're last

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL in defensive yards per point and uh,

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Carolina is they? Yeah? That the last in the in

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL and in defensive yards per point, meaning that

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:43.280
<v Speaker 1>they've had a very bend, don't break kind of defense

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:46.759
<v Speaker 1>to this, to this juncture, Carolina has had, believe it

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>or not, a tougher schedule than Atlanta has had. And

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:52.479
<v Speaker 1>I know Sam Donald was just Sam Donald ish last

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:54.320
<v Speaker 1>week by the way they put in p J Walker

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 1>hoping hoping they could get something. P J Walker, I

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:00.720
<v Speaker 1>know he was a was the XFL. Just in the XFL,

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was. I didn't know him. He he

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:05.800
<v Speaker 1>went three for fourteen, three for fourteen for thirty three yards.

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's back to Sam Donald. By the way, some

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 1>reports Joe Clapp finally came out today and say Matt

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Rule doesn't really like coaching in the NFL. So I'm

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:18.440
<v Speaker 1>saying all these college jobs out there that people think

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to somebody else, wat, Well, the NFL scoreboards

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>don't really like Matt Rule, So it's sort of it's

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:34.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of mutual. It's interesting confus. I'm taking Carolina largely

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:36.279
<v Speaker 1>because of that's that with the with the Falcons, I

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>think Carolina. You know, look, they almost beat they should

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 1>have beaten Minnesota, and that should have beaten but they

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.480
<v Speaker 1>almost beat Minnesota. Minnesota let them back in the game

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago. I think Carolina is a

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>better football team, and I'm gonna take Carolina here on

0:50:49.120 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the road catching points. I thought you would tease them.

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you'll tease them as well. Maybe I will. We'll see,

0:50:56.560 --> 0:50:59.320
<v Speaker 1>uh Todd number two. By the way, do you guys

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 1>disagree with me that you don't like it when the

0:51:01.200 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 1>world leagues into sports or am I just totally all

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>or sports League saidto the world, which is way, which

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is I don't want either of it. I'm watching sports

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:13.319
<v Speaker 1>to get away from the world. I don't want it

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in the I don't know. I just it just drives

0:51:16.239 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 1>me crazy. Trumble will only go to the games in Atlanta.

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:22.839
<v Speaker 1>You know that is that is um That is right

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 1>wing America's biggest trouble with ESPN right for they believe

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>ESPN to be ejecting politics too much into it. By

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, I I would be aligned more with ESPN politically,

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and I would understand that position, So I I see

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>what you do. Think the question to Tomlin was inherently

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 1>racist about being interested in usc No. But why why

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:43.959
<v Speaker 1>why did you go to racism or for that question?

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Because the three different ESPN commentators have said it's an

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>inherently racist question because they never asked the white coaches

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that question. That's why I went there, and you mentioned ESPN.

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that you could listen. I

0:51:56.560 --> 0:51:58.920
<v Speaker 1>actually think Mike Tomlin is correct for being that piste

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:00.879
<v Speaker 1>off about it because I don't think you asked Sean

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Payton or Andy Reid those questions whether it was racist.

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you can make that claim. I didn't necessarily Carson

0:52:08.680 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Palmer kept linking him to the job that I mean,

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the genesis of the question. I think if you

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:14.480
<v Speaker 1>go back and you and you listen to what the

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:18.080
<v Speaker 1>guy actually asked. The guy asked him very reasonable questions.

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:20.919
<v Speaker 1>He jumped down his throat, but the guy was like, hey,

0:52:21.120 --> 0:52:23.719
<v Speaker 1>you said you know this. We heard this, and Mike

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Tomlin just went nuts on him. Anyway, it's Mike Tomla

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 1>lives three blocks from here. He's not going in. It's

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the most stable job in pro sports. Why would he leave?

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not He's not elite, but he's definitely very good.

0:52:38.080 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Beautiful in the Winner, exactly where are you? Where

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 1>are you? Eric? I live in Cincinnati, Ohio. Okay, so

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:54.279
<v Speaker 1>you got anything, beautiful? U turn number two, Todd. We

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 1>gotta run comber three. Number three, number three, Todd, Yes,

0:52:57.520 --> 0:53:02.320
<v Speaker 1>number three. Okay, I'm gonna go with one more under

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:07.879
<v Speaker 1>here in the Philadelphia Eagles against the Lions under forty eight.

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this is too high. Uh. If you've watched

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:15.839
<v Speaker 1>any of the Detroit football team, they tend to be competitive,

0:53:15.880 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's because they're playing well defensively, not really scoring

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot um. If you look at their their scores,

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 1>they get a lot of these sixteen point games. Uh,

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and they run the ball a lot I am not um.

0:53:29.160 --> 0:53:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts. You know, he may turn out to be

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a good quarterback. For right now, he is not a

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:36.839
<v Speaker 1>good quarterback. So I don't like what I see um

0:53:36.840 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>from Philadelphia. On the positive offensive side, I mean, they

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't really done anything. Oh, you're the only per team.

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:45.920
<v Speaker 1>They scored thirty points against wass Kansas City, and you

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:48.759
<v Speaker 1>can throw that out. Every other game they get twenty one,

0:53:48.880 --> 0:53:52.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, twenty one. There's nothing special on offense, and

0:53:52.320 --> 0:53:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Detroit gets seventeen every week seventeen seventeen, fourteen, seventeen. They

0:53:56.840 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 1>can't get into the twenties. The Lions they run the ball,

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they dink it off to Swift and and they play

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 1>decent defense to keep them hanging around. So to me,

0:54:07.160 --> 0:54:09.880
<v Speaker 1>this seems like a defensive game. I don't understand why

0:54:09.920 --> 0:54:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it's forty eight. I just think that's just a crazy

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:16.239
<v Speaker 1>high number. I mean, Detroit hasn't gotten to Detroit only

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:18.839
<v Speaker 1>got over twenty points this year one time, and that

0:54:18.920 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 1>was a phony, faghazy situation in the first game of

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the year where they got the on sides kick and

0:54:23.719 --> 0:54:26.359
<v Speaker 1>all those late scores against San Francisco. Other than that,

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Detroit can't get more than seventeen points in a game,

0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know how you're getting that a little

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:35.759
<v Speaker 1>bit like Reilly is like the ultimate slump buster defense.

0:54:36.440 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 1>They they don't stunt, they don't blitz, they don't play,

0:54:40.080 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't play man coverage, they don't disguise coverages. They're

0:54:43.520 --> 0:54:47.279
<v Speaker 1>like the easiest defense to operate against. And look there

0:54:47.320 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a car like at a perfect game last week, Like

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think God's gonna be amazing, but I do.

0:54:52.080 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And then the the sneaky one for your bet, Todd,

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with you generally, like I think if

0:54:56.480 --> 0:54:58.160
<v Speaker 1>there was no such thing as garbage time, this is

0:54:58.200 --> 0:55:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the perfect bet. A half of Jalen hurts. His production

0:55:02.080 --> 0:55:04.279
<v Speaker 1>is in the fourth quarter. So like you could see

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a game where Detroit is plucky and has like a seventeen,

0:55:07.800 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten lead and Jalen hurts, you know, they

0:55:11.719 --> 0:55:14.200
<v Speaker 1>go back and forth and score twenty four points the

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:18.320
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter and you're really irritated that I'm not gonna

0:55:18.320 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>bet any of this pre game anyways, I'm an in

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:22.400
<v Speaker 1>game better. But my point is, if I have to

0:55:22.400 --> 0:55:25.640
<v Speaker 1>take a game, you know, pre game, I'm taking this

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 1>under because by the way, Philadelphia's defense. They only gave

0:55:28.600 --> 0:55:31.920
<v Speaker 1>up eighteen to Carolina. Yeah, granted, they gave up points

0:55:31.920 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to Tampa Bay. They give up points to Vegas, they

0:55:34.000 --> 0:55:36.359
<v Speaker 1>give up points to Kansas City Dallas. But those are

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 1>good offensive teams. You know San Francisco when he got

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>seventeen on them. So I don't see why they can't

0:55:41.640 --> 0:55:44.480
<v Speaker 1>hang in and only give up. Let's say they give up.

0:55:46.000 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I win anyways, So I'm going under under forty. So, Todd,

0:55:49.080 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is, like Michael Lombardi, you're posting a

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:55.000
<v Speaker 1>non betting record. What does that mean? Well, you said

0:55:55.000 --> 0:55:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't bet any of these things pre flop. You're

0:55:56.719 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 1>giving out three pre flop picks and then telling you

0:55:58.560 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>what your record is in the pre flop. You're giving

0:56:00.280 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 1>out a non betting record. Oh no, No. What what

0:56:03.200 --> 0:56:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is, I will typically I'll be leaning one

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:09.240
<v Speaker 1>second fair fair fair point by Mikey. My My point,

0:56:09.280 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Mikey is typically I don't bet the game. Before the game,

0:56:12.640 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll be leaning this way and then if it if

0:56:15.040 --> 0:56:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going the way I like it, then I'll be

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 1>jumping in on the end game. Last week, I didn't

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:21.080
<v Speaker 1>play the Arizona game pre game. But you know, I

0:56:21.120 --> 0:56:23.239
<v Speaker 1>always tell people, if they're gonna give you the half

0:56:23.239 --> 0:56:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of the answer key, why not take half of the

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:28.399
<v Speaker 1>answer key before you make your bet. Gilly will tell you.

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:31.200
<v Speaker 1>The smart way to bet NFL games is in game. Gilly,

0:56:31.280 --> 0:56:34.680
<v Speaker 1>please tell them smart way to bet NFL there really is.

0:56:35.200 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 1>What are the Jets getting? Um odd? I know? Man?

0:56:40.200 --> 0:56:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, the New York Jets. The New York Jets

0:56:43.880 --> 0:56:47.359
<v Speaker 1>are getting a lot of points. There's a tremendous winnibag Jets. Well,

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:51.760
<v Speaker 1>they have Wilson is in goal. They're ten and a half.

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I have I'm a late ten and a half with

0:56:53.760 --> 0:56:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals. Wow, tough to do an unfamiliar role. But listen,

0:56:58.040 --> 0:57:00.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a good defensive team. The story is out

0:57:00.200 --> 0:57:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh they hooked up Chase with Borrow. The story is

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 1>their defense is decent. Their defense. You have to work

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to score points on this team. And the Jets no quarterback,

0:57:08.719 --> 0:57:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a small team there. Things aren't going well for Salat

0:57:12.120 --> 0:57:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in this first year. I think the Bengals now have

0:57:14.000 --> 0:57:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a clear path here. They're a very dangerous team in

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the a f C. All of a sudden, I don't

0:57:18.200 --> 0:57:19.720
<v Speaker 1>like to lay these kind of points. I don't like

0:57:19.760 --> 0:57:22.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing else on the board by other consideration, will be

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:24.160
<v Speaker 1>lay that the points with the Rams. Actually this week

0:57:24.200 --> 0:57:27.880
<v Speaker 1>against I thought about give me the Bengals. I thought

0:57:27.920 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought about having Cincinnati's one of my three. Mike.

0:57:31.400 --> 0:57:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Another thing, when I texted you last week, and I

0:57:33.480 --> 0:57:36.080
<v Speaker 1>would love to hear what Eric says about this. Remember

0:57:36.120 --> 0:57:38.200
<v Speaker 1>when I in like the early in the second quarter

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Seattle game, Seattle was averaging seven point two

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>yard per play because they had an eighty five yard

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous touchdown to Metcalf. The rest of the plays they

0:57:46.760 --> 0:57:49.440
<v Speaker 1>had like two yards of play, So I knew Seattle

0:57:49.480 --> 0:57:52.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't scoring. I took team total under there and I

0:57:52.080 --> 0:57:53.600
<v Speaker 1>won the bet. But if you would have gone by

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the stats, you so they're averaging seven yards of play,

0:57:55.920 --> 0:57:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they're doing great. Eric, What do you think about that

0:57:58.840 --> 0:58:01.640
<v Speaker 1>when when the when the stats kind of get corrupted

0:58:01.680 --> 0:58:04.240
<v Speaker 1>like that, What are your feelings on that? Well, I

0:58:04.280 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 1>would hope that there's a little bit of So like

0:58:09.480 --> 0:58:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in our in game stuff, we have what's called success rate,

0:58:12.440 --> 0:58:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and we have what's called expected points. So like a

0:58:15.360 --> 0:58:17.520
<v Speaker 1>play like that's gonna have a lot of expected points

0:58:17.520 --> 0:58:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but from a success rate standpoint, it's boolean right like

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>at zero one. So essentially like you emerge those two

0:58:24.840 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>together to deal with that kind of noise. Um. I

0:58:27.320 --> 0:58:30.200
<v Speaker 1>took Seattle pre under nineteen and a half pre games,

0:58:30.200 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so like I was on the same side as you

0:58:32.000 --> 0:58:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole time, and that first play just kind of

0:58:34.360 --> 0:58:36.560
<v Speaker 1>like like could spook me a little bit. But when

0:58:36.560 --> 0:58:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you watch that offense, they're not scoring any points, even

0:58:38.880 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 1>though Gino Smith is the cover king at two and

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:43.720
<v Speaker 1>oh a t s so far as a starter. But

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:46.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's my point. That's my point is is you

0:58:46.240 --> 0:58:47.960
<v Speaker 1>can look at that and go, oh wow, they've got

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:50.880
<v Speaker 1>all these yards, but it's bullshit because they got one player.

0:58:51.160 --> 0:58:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think in game stuff. I don't think people

0:58:53.240 --> 0:58:57.040
<v Speaker 1>are betting yards per play anymore like I'd be I'd

0:58:57.040 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if people with in game models are betting

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>yards for play. I think it's a little bit more

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated than that. But you're right, I think I think intuition.

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:06.520
<v Speaker 1>If somebody just turned the game on and was like,

0:59:06.680 --> 0:59:09.919
<v Speaker 1>oh my goodness, what's happening and they bet over reflexively,

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:13.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously they're paying the juice and more to the sports book.

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:16.640
<v Speaker 1>In that case, Eric, did you give a third pick?

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I'm gonna go and I was trying to

0:59:20.080 --> 0:59:23.960
<v Speaker 1>choose between Titans plus one and a half and what

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pick, which is the over in the Chargers

0:59:27.120 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots game styles make fights, and the Los

0:59:32.160 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Chargers are engineered to beat the Chiefs. They play

0:59:34.720 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 1>six in the box, they play six in the secondary,

0:59:37.960 --> 0:59:41.439
<v Speaker 1>uh most of the time. And um, you know they're

0:59:41.520 --> 0:59:46.439
<v Speaker 1>their linebackers are safeties. Kenneth Murray's out, Um, And so

0:59:46.840 --> 0:59:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I think New England's gonna have some success on the

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 1>ground with their group of running backs. Um. It's also

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:55.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting if you actually like look at this, like Herbert's

0:59:55.160 --> 0:59:58.320
<v Speaker 1>been great, a hundred six passer rating when clean, seventy

0:59:58.360 --> 1:00:02.000
<v Speaker 1>four passer rating when pressure. Matt Jones is one passer

1:00:02.080 --> 1:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>rating when pressured, seventy three passer rating win clean. Matt

1:00:05.840 --> 1:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Jones has been the best of the rookie quarterbacks. Kendrick Bourne,

1:00:08.800 --> 1:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>who I know has a little bit of a shoulder

1:00:10.120 --> 1:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>injured Jacobe Myers. The two tight ends they signed this

1:00:12.720 --> 1:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>past offseason have been slow to go, but they've been

1:00:15.800 --> 1:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty good the last few weeks. So give me New England,

1:00:19.120 --> 1:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, to put up enough points um to keep

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this game, to keep this game interesting, and for Justin Herbert.

1:00:25.520 --> 1:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Anytime I have a quarterback who can get me seventy

1:00:28.000 --> 1:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>yards in one play reliably, I'm gonna bet over in

1:00:31.120 --> 1:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>his games. I had a debate who but oh, go ahead, Eric,

1:00:33.800 --> 1:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier the top or the lowest five yards

1:00:37.840 --> 1:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>per target on early downs in the first three quarters

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of games, and you said four of these guys should

1:00:42.320 --> 1:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>be backups and one's a real starter. Is Roethlisberger or

1:00:45.280 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Cousins the real starter out of that group? Hey? The

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>way better quarterback? Big? Okay, I just want to clarify, Hey,

1:00:56.200 --> 1:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what Big Roethlisberger should change his nickname to.

1:01:01.800 --> 1:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Has Ben Roethlisberger shot straight to the Hall of Fame.

1:01:08.480 --> 1:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>But man, the longer he plays, the more you're like,

1:01:11.280 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>who would you Who would you rather have at quarterback

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for your team? This is a mall and I had

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>this disagreement on air this week. Kirk Cousins or Baker

1:01:19.440 --> 1:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield currently currently at price if you just had to

1:01:26.720 --> 1:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>choose between the two, not at Kirk Cousins, but I

1:01:31.800 --> 1:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>believe much money I get you, but um all thinks

1:01:34.720 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that it's the other way. Baker is a better quarterback. No,

1:01:38.120 --> 1:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>got a lot shot, got a lot to proof. Still

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield versus Kirk Cousins. Yeah, are you on the Mayfield.

1:01:45.840 --> 1:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Baker Mayfield. I can't stand Kirk Cousins. I

1:01:48.680 --> 1:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>don't care what you say about their You love her Cousins.

1:01:50.720 --> 1:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You've always loved Kirk, love him you last. Remember when

1:01:53.400 --> 1:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>when we when we were when Gil was in the

1:01:55.080 --> 1:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>hospital and we had that show and you said, Kirk Cousins,

1:01:57.400 --> 1:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I said, the Vikings at twelve to one could win

1:01:59.480 --> 1:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the NFC, And you just tore me apart for Kirk Cousins.

1:02:02.600 --> 1:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And and what happened. They didn't win. Cousins had at

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest mistakes in Vikings history. But he's

1:02:11.960 --> 1:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the better quarterbacks in Vikings history. It shows

1:02:14.920 --> 1:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you how how hard it is to get quarterback right. Yes,

1:02:19.760 --> 1:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>as Washington just kept in Washington, Kirk kirk Cousins bet

1:02:22.960 --> 1:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>on himself, kept doing the one year deals with Washington. Finally,

1:02:25.720 --> 1:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't want to give him a long term deal. Finally,

1:02:28.080 --> 1:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings were three years, eighty four million, dollars, and

1:02:30.960 --> 1:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody in d C was like, see you, buddy. They

1:02:34.960 --> 1:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>were they were chasing the case Keenom performance here, the

1:02:38.960 --> 1:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>seventeen case Keendom thing, and and like they gave him

1:02:41.560 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a three year deal because they figured, oh, Kirk will

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>be better over a three year ark than case Keenum

1:02:45.160 --> 1:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>will be. But like they were trying to replace that

1:02:48.240 --> 1:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>production from seventeen. You were going to replace that production

1:02:51.160 --> 1:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that was an amazing thing with the Washington football team. Now,

1:02:53.480 --> 1:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the Washington football team signed Ryan Fitzpatrick to win more

1:02:58.040 --> 1:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>games in their twenties schedule that included no good quarterbacks.

1:03:01.960 --> 1:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is the schedule had a bunch of

1:03:04.560 --> 1:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>great quarterbacks in it, so their defense is gonna be

1:03:06.600 --> 1:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>as good. The Vikings signed Kirk Cousins to try to

1:03:08.920 --> 1:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>win the seventeen Super Bowl again. Yes, and it's not

1:03:11.880 --> 1:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>how it works, not how players get worse and worse.

1:03:16.240 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>It was a bad signing, you know, and no worse

1:03:18.440 --> 1:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>fealing than having Kirk Cousins or Philip Rivers needing to

1:03:21.480 --> 1:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>get you a late score and you have the bat.

1:03:24.920 --> 1:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>You can't feel anywhere. He's done it this year, though, Man,

1:03:27.440 --> 1:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>he's done it this year. Cover time Rivers just doesn't

1:03:29.680 --> 1:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>get in on eight cracks from the two and Cousins

1:03:31.640 --> 1:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>will throw the interception in the end zone. By the way,

1:03:34.440 --> 1:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Jared Golf, you try watching him win a football game.

1:03:37.080 --> 1:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>It is the most Oh my god, having having survivor

1:03:42.040 --> 1:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>last week with the Patriots and then rooting against the

1:03:44.880 --> 1:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>riding against the Rams, Jared Golf was miserable. Doesn't do

1:03:48.680 --> 1:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Isn't this just really flatter McVeigh where he took that

1:03:51.600 --> 1:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>team with Golf? It kind of does that to me.

1:03:53.760 --> 1:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>It does, by the way. The last thing about the

1:03:56.400 --> 1:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins thing, it also is a commentary on how

1:03:59.240 --> 1:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you can only win a Super Bowl with a Hall

1:04:00.920 --> 1:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of Fame quarterback or a guy at a rookie deal.

1:04:03.480 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And so this weird economic structure they have in the

1:04:06.000 --> 1:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL where you get to a point where you've played

1:04:08.440 --> 1:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>good enough right for for certain chunky years, but you're

1:04:12.440 --> 1:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>not Hall of Fame and now you're off your rookie contract.

1:04:16.080 --> 1:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>It's such a fucked up thing for teams to have

1:04:19.000 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to make that financial commitment at that middle class quarterback. Yeah,

1:04:23.320 --> 1:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right, there's no middle well said, there's no middle

1:04:25.960 --> 1:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>class contract. By the way, my last one was a

1:04:27.760 --> 1:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>choice between the Titans the Bengals laying the points or

1:04:30.680 --> 1:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the Jacksonville Jaguars catching points against the Seahawks. I'm going

1:04:33.920 --> 1:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>with the ugliest one of all of them. I'm going

1:04:35.600 --> 1:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with Jacksonville and is largely just a fate of Pete Carroll.

1:04:39.040 --> 1:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>That display the other night was David Shaw ask against

1:04:43.160 --> 1:04:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State in that board the quarterback, I don't care

1:04:47.040 --> 1:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that it was Geno Smith. At some point you have

1:04:50.440 --> 1:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to trust your quarterback to do something. You cannot just

1:04:54.000 --> 1:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>keep running the We must establish the run. Good lord.

1:04:57.720 --> 1:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>That was horrific to watch, and I listen best playing

1:05:00.880 --> 1:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>all they could have done do what the Colts did

1:05:02.440 --> 1:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the other night in the atmospheric River. Just throw it

1:05:04.360 --> 1:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>up and have a San Francisco defensive back run into

1:05:06.560 --> 1:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a wide out. Whatever it is, but that was what

1:05:09.560 --> 1:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they were doing. I actually think Jacksonville, because Urban Meyer

1:05:12.960 --> 1:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>finally discovered James Robinson's part of the team a couple

1:05:15.320 --> 1:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, I think they go in and at

1:05:17.640 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the very least up catching three in a hook here, right,

1:05:19.400 --> 1:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I get the hook. I think Jacksonville covers this game.

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe they even win it. By the way,

1:05:24.200 --> 1:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike McCarthy on Dak Prescott quote, there's no timeline on

1:05:27.200 --> 1:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>when we're going to make a decision. I think you

1:05:29.240 --> 1:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>take in the full week, so there is some possibility

1:05:31.680 --> 1:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Dak won't be there. Interesting. Interesting, Um, I'm taking Jacksonville.

1:05:37.840 --> 1:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>That's my third. So I have a poop poop ladder

1:05:39.640 --> 1:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of picks. I have San Francisco, Carolina and Jacksonville. God,

1:05:43.520 --> 1:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll probably go three and probably go three. And who's

1:05:45.760 --> 1:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>your Are you giving out your survivor picker? Not till tomorrow.

1:05:48.800 --> 1:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give out mine. This will be the last week.

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna end up with Kansas City because of the

1:05:55.280 --> 1:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>four big favorites, I've already used Cincinnati, Buffalo has a

1:05:59.200 --> 1:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Christmas consider ration, and so it comes down to the

1:06:02.240 --> 1:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Rams versus Kansas City. Kansas City, this is the last

1:06:07.760 --> 1:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>real shot to use them because everything else after this

1:06:12.080 --> 1:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be even dicier. The Rams there is

1:06:14.200 --> 1:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>another opportunity. I think they hosted the Jaguars, so listen,

1:06:18.400 --> 1:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I get it. They're a double digit home favorite in

1:06:21.600 --> 1:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a standalone game, and I'm terrified, but I have to

1:06:25.160 --> 1:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>play them. I'm playing Kansas cityd what's your teaser. I

1:06:27.760 --> 1:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>got two minutes teaser legs. Todd Todd to Tea, it's

1:06:31.840 --> 1:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>really tough this week to come up with a good teaser. Um,

1:06:36.160 --> 1:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go ahead. Let's go before me. I'll take

1:06:39.800 --> 1:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the cold I mean, I'll take Tennessee Titans plus seven

1:06:42.480 --> 1:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Right, So that's the obvious one, Tennessee

1:06:46.280 --> 1:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>plus seven and a half, and then I need another leg.

1:06:50.520 --> 1:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you give your as well? I think of

1:06:51.920 --> 1:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>my second leg, because you can already have Tennessee. I

1:06:55.000 --> 1:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>have Tennessee as well. I have Arizona in Tennessee. Yeah, okay,

1:06:58.920 --> 1:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>so Tenny. It seems to be the obvious one, right,

1:07:01.440 --> 1:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>no other one? Are you actually going through any key numbers?

1:07:05.200 --> 1:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe Minnesota? Real? Yeah, Minnesota would be a wall

1:07:09.600 --> 1:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>teaser leg Minnesota. I don't want Minnesota. They I can't

1:07:14.120 --> 1:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>take care of Kirk Cousins. I have a I have

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a rule. I don't bet Philip Rivers. I don't bet

1:07:20.080 --> 1:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins. What you say, Eric would Cousins No less,

1:07:27.000 --> 1:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that's right, it's supersized Kurt Cousins. I'm gonna take I

1:07:31.360 --> 1:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>know it's not gonna be mathematically correct, but I'm going

1:07:34.960 --> 1:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to take the Chargers as my second leg, even though

1:07:39.000 --> 1:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you know I'm not really getting the full amount of points.

1:07:41.360 --> 1:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's because I don't want to take I don't

1:07:43.120 --> 1:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>want to take Arizona because I could see Aaron Rodgers

1:07:46.200 --> 1:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>pulling something out of his ass. So you know, give

1:07:49.480 --> 1:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>me the uh, that would be the Chargers down to

1:07:52.920 --> 1:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>plus one. So give me the Chargers plus one with

1:07:55.720 --> 1:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee plus seven and a half, and I think you

1:07:58.440 --> 1:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>guys have a chance to actually pick games on me

1:08:00.720 --> 1:08:02.919
<v Speaker 1>on this desert. I don't feel great. I'm the man

1:08:02.920 --> 1:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to beat Mike. What you got to take? Titans obviously

1:08:07.800 --> 1:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, and I'll I'll take the Cardinals

1:08:12.520 --> 1:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>down tonight, alright, So you you, you and me have

1:08:15.000 --> 1:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the same Eric, We're so rude. We did Eric Cars Cardinals,

1:08:20.040 --> 1:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Titans also, okay? And then final two questions which we

1:08:23.720 --> 1:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>ask every week on the megapod forever one the big favorite,

1:08:27.240 --> 1:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>most likely to lose out right, So it's all the

1:08:29.439 --> 1:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>four double digit favorites that we just mentioned. Cincinnati at

1:08:32.400 --> 1:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, the Rams at Houston, Kansas City hosting the Giants,

1:08:37.040 --> 1:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and of course, uh, what did I forget of the

1:08:39.960 --> 1:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>four Chief No already said that one Chief Buffalo, thank

1:08:45.120 --> 1:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you Buffalo hosting Miami. Any of those and I guess

1:08:48.840 --> 1:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>if I I shouldn't include any of the six and

1:08:51.320 --> 1:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a house because those were the obvious ones. So the

1:08:53.080 --> 1:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>big of those big four favorites, Eric, if I came

1:08:55.920 --> 1:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to you from the future and I said one of

1:08:57.160 --> 1:09:03.919
<v Speaker 1>them lost out right, which would it have been? Uh? Um? Giants?

1:09:04.040 --> 1:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Giants win against Kansas? Me too. I'm sorry for your survivor,

1:09:07.720 --> 1:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's the most I would say the

1:09:09.760 --> 1:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>same thing, Todd, Kansas City. Are we counting the Green

1:09:14.960 --> 1:09:20.479
<v Speaker 1>Bay game? Do you pay attention? I was doing the

1:09:20.640 --> 1:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>the the what's the code? Um? I would I guess

1:09:25.560 --> 1:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with yeah. I guess the Giants could be

1:09:28.000 --> 1:09:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Kansay they're not going to though, alright the Kansas Last question,

1:09:32.400 --> 1:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we live in a bizarro world. You must pick a side,

1:09:34.400 --> 1:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you must bet a side on every single game, except

1:09:36.160 --> 1:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>for one game you will take a pass on. Eric.

1:09:38.240 --> 1:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>What's the game you take a pass on? Uh? Great question? Um, Philadelphia,

1:09:44.240 --> 1:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>des Philadelphia, Detroit, Mikey, Steelers, Browns. Todd. I don't like

1:09:49.640 --> 1:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Steelers Browns either. I don't know what I'm getting a Keenum.

1:09:53.760 --> 1:09:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I will take uh Philadelphia Detroit, Philadelphia, Detroit for sure.

1:09:58.920 --> 1:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys, appreciate Mike. He's gotta go do odds

1:10:01.439 --> 1:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>On so he's out of here. Mike palm everybody. Todd,

1:10:04.479 --> 1:10:07.519
<v Speaker 1>thank you Eric. Do you do college football just pro

1:10:07.600 --> 1:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>football college to Yep, you do college. Did you see

1:10:11.240 --> 1:10:14.479
<v Speaker 1>that Wake Forest Army game last week? Yeah? I had weight,

1:10:14.840 --> 1:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>but I also had under Oh you had under Yeah,

1:10:19.400 --> 1:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>because that was when I wanted was going to ask

1:10:21.280 --> 1:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you about these runaway college games. Todd, since we haven't

1:10:24.760 --> 1:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>finished the podcast yet, why don't we finish the podcast

1:10:27.040 --> 1:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you could ask him about already finished you

1:10:30.160 --> 1:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>already Shout out to Max Freed and Alex Bregman, the

1:10:32.880 --> 1:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>first Tribesman on Tribesman World Series event last night. Fabulous

1:10:38.479 --> 1:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>moments for some of us, Yes, I don't know, fabulous

1:10:42.640 --> 1:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>moment for some of us. It's a big historic Thank

1:10:45.160 --> 1:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you for listening to the megapod. Good luck with all

1:10:47.120 --> 1:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>your week at eight bet. I can't even say it.

1:10:49.800 --> 1:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>All your week eight bets in the National Football League.

1:10:52.720 --> 1:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Good luck from all of us at the Megapod. Now

1:10:55.240 --> 1:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you can ask your question that don bot t ta

1:11:02.880 --> 1:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>battle w t Baton Book,