WEBVTT - Post-PGA Championship Mailbag

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I miss the green, for example, I'm already upset.

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 2>When I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 3>And when I find my ball in a brid Egg

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 3>Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida Egg Friday Friday Bride Egg, Lie,

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm about ready to run off of the course. Ladies

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 3>and gentlemen, Welcome back to another edition of the Frida

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Egg Podcast. I am joined again by Kyle Nathan. We're

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>going to do another mail bag. I think we'll make

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 3>this a close to weekly thing, so keep the questions

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 3>coming and uh, Kyle, welcome on.

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Thanks. Yeah, excited to do it again.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Did you watch much of the PGA this weekend?

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I did. I enjoyed it. I think that it was

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 2>nice to see Justine get his major win. I think

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 2>it was one of those things where you knew was coming,

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of like where I feel like Ricky Fowler's game

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 2>is now too, where you know it's going to probably come,

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>you just don't know when, and it's going to be

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 2>an exciting time and I'm happy for him and happy

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 2>for golf.

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Actually, yeah, it's you know, he seemingly got into contention

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 3>at the US Open. It was like the first time

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 3>in major, in a major in contention, he struggled mightily

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday, but you could see that coming after he

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 3>shot a nine under sixty three the day before to

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 3>get into the final group. It almost would have been

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 3>a blessing if he had missed that final group. But

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 3>then you know, he struggles sure enough next time in contention,

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 3>probably a lot more comfortable, and I think he benefit

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 3>from not being in that final group and gets the

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 3>job done. I mean, Kiszner would see was leaking oil

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 3>all day, Chris Stroud, he is very patiently leaking oil

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 3>after the first two rounds, and Hideki just doesn't seem

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 3>as sharp. So it was wide open and JT just

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 3>hit the best shots and made the most putts he did.

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 2>He's kind of getting the reputation of a pretty pretty

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>good closer. He didn't, you know, the US Open. I

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't say that was a closing opportunity because he wasn't

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>really in it, you know, down the stretch on Sunday.

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 2>But if you look at his track record, he's very

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>very good when he is in it down the stretch,

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 2>and that's exciting to see. That's one of the you know,

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 2>characteristics that made Tiger soappealing.

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he has a gas pedal like the obviously you know,

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 3>the scoring record at at Sony and the fifty nine

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 3>and then the sixty three. Like when that guy's on

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 3>and the putters hot, it's something else. He he's right

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 3>there in terms of explosiveness with a a Rory Dustin Johnson.

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 3>When he's on, it's I think it'll be interesting to see,

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, career wise, he's twenty four. One major where

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 3>he gets too. I think he sets up really well

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 3>for PGA championships, but like us, Opened might be a

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 3>little bit different, different story and Open championships.

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think given his age, he'll develop the necessary

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 2>facets of his game to adjust to a you know,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 2>an Oakmont Open setup or even a British Open setup.

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, he's just twenty four, so he's

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 2>got you know, eight years till he supposedly reaches his

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 2>prime eight to nine years, so we could see a

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of majors from him.

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Were you disappointed in anyone from the week.

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know disappointed. I was surprised Mickelson missed the

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 2>cut given his track record at the Wells Fargo. I

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 2>was surprised. You know, Rory never never got it going.

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>DJ never really got it going. You know, those those

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 2>were some surprising things. But I feel like the PGA Championship,

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>the Open is pretty unpredictable, the Open Championship, But the

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 2>PGA Championship you usually get some interesting guys in the

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>top there that you don't you didn't see coming, and

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 2>certainly with Stroud and a few of the others, you

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.239
<v Speaker 2>just you just never know what the PGA I feel.

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Like, Yeah, it's I wonder why the PGA yields so

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 3>many fluky winners.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 2>It is strange. I don't I don't have a good

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 2>answer for it. It does kind of seem more like

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 2>a regular tour event than a major. I guess, which

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 2>might be a problem the tournament has, but I don't really.

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, you look back and you have some pretty

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>bizarre winners. But you can say the saying, you know,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Michael Campbell when the US opened, Todd Hamilton won the

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 2>British Hope. You know, you get some some different winners

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 2>in the other majors. It just seems like, I agree,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 2>you get the Sean mckeel's and you know, those type

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 2>of players at the PGA a little more often.

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Sean mkheel wy Yang. Yeah, it could be that it

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 3>could go to the golf courses too. I just think

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 3>they played just stinky golf courses.

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 1>So it's just the better.

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 3>Like Augusta is a perfect example, Like the best players

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 3>win in Augusta because it's the best golf course.

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Augusta doesn't really have many you know, Schwartzel was

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 2>a big surprise, but then he turned out to be,

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of the top players in the world.

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Bob Emmelman got hurt.

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Bubba only wins it like five courses. But there are

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 3>always pretty good golf courses. True, But let's get into

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 3>the questions. We got a ton of them here, and

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>we got a lot of questions about Louis whose days

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 3>and most people probably don't know that you're like the

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 3>biggest Louis fan in the world.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I am a Louis fanboy. I don't even know why.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't even I was trying to think yesterday how

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>it even started. I think it started out as a

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 2>joke and I just I put money on him to

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 2>win a couple of tournaments and decided that I was

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 2>just going to commit to that plan and just been

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 2>a big Louis fan.

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, even though he's kind of burned you. He never

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 3>wins in the Western hemisphere.

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I know I need I need him to go back

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 2>to the other hemisphere and start wagering on those.

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 3>So Justin Anderson wants to know is Louis a Hall

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 3>of Famer or will he be by the end of

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 3>his career. Obviously that has a lot to do with

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 3>what happens.

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 2>As much as I want to say yes to this,

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:09.679
<v Speaker 2>I think he needs one more win in the United

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 2>States or even I'd say, I'd say win in the

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 2>United States, or another Open championship. I think he's really borderline.

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 2>He has eleven wins and they're pretty major events too.

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's won a major. But I just think

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>he needs the one win because it's not like he's

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 2>putting up Montgomery type seasons, you know, not you know

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 2>internationally where he's gonna win the Order of Merit six

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 2>seven times in a row, whatever it was. So I

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>think he just needs another win, and I do think

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 2>he'll get it, So we'll have to see. I think

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 2>that's a to be determined.

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 3>I it's pretty crazy when you look at his runner ups,

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 3>so he has which is well documented. A lot of

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 3>people have been talking about this. He's he's runnered up

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 3>a runner up finish in every single major championship. But

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 3>he also has a runner up at the WGC match

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 3>play and the players and I think Abu Dabi.

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Good player shirt this year. I thought he had that

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 2>for sure.

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, who nobody saw see Wu coming.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Nope.

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 3>So just it's so hard to Sometimes I feel like

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 3>winning's overrated and golf just because it's so hard to do.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 3>It might be like the underrated, under overrated thing. But

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 3>when you finished second in every major, that's got to

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 3>get you something, even though it gets you really nothing

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 3>because nobody remembers that. But that that that's got to

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 3>help him out.

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 2>He should be in the Hall of Fame. Just from

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 2>that video he posted last night.

0:08:55.120 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah he did make like a million dollars is flying

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 3>a private jet, which you know, it makes you not

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 3>feel his pain as much for finishing second again, right,

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 3>But he's probably just he loves just chilling on his farm.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 3>That's like I think the career scope of Louis is

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 3>this guy. He doesn't golf is like a secondary thing.

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Golf is he he works, which is golf to live,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Like He's not a lived a work guy like a

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 3>lot of these guys out here. He he really doesn't

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 3>care about golf as much as a you know, Jordan Spieth.

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's I think that's one of the things I've

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 2>always liked about him is he just wants to go

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 2>back and you know, roll in the hay.

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Get a new tractor, and tend to the farm.

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 3>I think he's got vineyards now too. So that's what

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 3>I didn't notice about the South African guys like Ernie

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 3>Els kind of didn't really you know, he especially once

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 3>he hit forty, he cared so much more about things

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 3>outside of golf than competitive golf. And I think Louis

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 3>is the same way. Charles Schwartzel is the same way.

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know much about Brandon Grace, but but you know,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 3>these South Africans are kind of kind of different breed.

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting there. Yeah, you're right, it's.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Except for Gary Player, of course.

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, whack job.

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they're all rebelling against Gary Player.

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 2>He set a poor example.

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're like their teen angst against father Gary Player.

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 3>So here's a here's another interesting Louis question. Is is

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 3>one of the things I love about Louis is he

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 3>shifts his mattress from from from tournament to tournament. And

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Mark Caverhill wants to know if that's part of his

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 3>net Jet sponsorship or UPS sponsorship, and he wants to

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 3>know if he has two in case one gets delayed,

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 3>And I actually asked a bunch of people at the

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Players about this. And in the US, there's a guy

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 3>that takes all this stuff from one stop to another

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 3>on the tour, and that's the guy who takes Louis

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 3>mattress from tour stop to tour stop.

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So like, people will.

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Give this guy on Sunday all the golf bags and

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 3>he loads him up into like his trailer or something

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 3>and drives them to the next spot and they're there.

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 3>They're always guarantee tea to be there by Monday morning.

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 3>So I think Louis does the same thing with his mattress,

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 3>but I'm not sure how he does it.

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 2>On the European tour, guessing UPS is a huge part

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 2>of that.

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 3>And sorry, but like how much I imagine you could

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 3>just buy a new mattress everywhere you went.

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Could if he keeps playing like that, that's for sure,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 2>But he might have it. You know, it might be

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 2>worn in just right. It might be his special special mattress.

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say he only has one because sometimes a

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 2>good Louis thing to do, as an avid Louis watcher

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 2>is he starts starts off tournaments very poorly. So I'm

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 2>guessing that his mattress usually probably doesn't arrive and then

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 2>he'll shoot, you know, seventy six the opening round and

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>then three straight sixty fours after his mattress gets in there.

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 2>So I think he should look into getting a backup.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 3>I think they should rotate him, so one should go.

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 3>If that's the case, one should be sent there pre tournament.

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, you should almost have two and the next

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 3>one's going to the next stop before he before he

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 3>even gets there, is there.

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>A week early.

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 3>He can't be genius, can't be jeopardizing your sleep.

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 2>Nope, all right. Staying with Hall of Fame potential inductees,

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 2>what do you think of Hideki Matsuyama and can we

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 2>win a MA someday? That's from Robert Bernard.

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 3>I think Hideki is going to win a major. It's

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 3>not a if. Obviously, there's no guarantees. But you look

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 3>at the guys track record. I think he has seven

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 3>top ten finishes in majors and he's played in twenty

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 3>one total, so a third of the time he's finished

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 3>in the top ten. And that includes like as an

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.599
<v Speaker 3>amateur at twenty one in the Masters.

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's just a matter of time.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you put yourself close to contention enough, you're

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 3>eventually gonna find it.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is.

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 3>He just needs to become a better putter. In my estimation,

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 3>what do.

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 2>You think I was gonna say that exact same thing.

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 2>I think he could win twelve majors if he improves

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 2>his putting. If that's easier said than done. Sometimes you know,

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 2>a tiger can't change its stripes, but sometimes it can.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 2>I think is a hard thing to exponentially improve at.

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 2>I think of all the things, that's the hardest to

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 2>go from being a poor putter to a great putter,

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 2>mostly because it's all mental. But he's got the ball striking.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's to be number one in the world.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's anybody that would doubt that. I

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 2>just think that if he can learn to putt, you

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 2>don't see many majors one with guys that didn't putt well.

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 2>With the exception of exception of Jason Duffner at Okill

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 2>where he was, you know, stoning it to three feet

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 2>every hole and missed half of them. You don't see

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 2>poor putting win majors. But if he can get that right,

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 2>he can win, I mean, as many as he wants.

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>If he can't, he's going to have to have a

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 2>week where he just you know, like a Duffner esque

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 2>week where he's you know, hitting the ball on a blanket.

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think that that's the thing too that goes

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 3>a little bit unnoticed is that Hideki's ball striking up

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 3>big time over the weekend. So had he hit the

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 3>ball the way he hit it the first two rounds

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 3>and last week at Bridgestone on the weekend, he might

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 3>have won. So obviously, you can't hit the ball perfect

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 3>all the time, but with the way, there's gonna be

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 3>one of these weeks where the convergence is going to

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 3>happen and he blew. He blew blows people out when

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 3>he when he plays well. And that's something we saw

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 3>with Tiger. That's something we see with all the elite players,

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 3>is that when they really put it all together, nobody

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 3>has a shot, and and he's just been so close

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 3>so much. I think, you know, he's almost like a

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Sergio Garcia at this point on steroids in terms of

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>how many close calls and majors he's are, like how

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 3>many times he's been in contention for how short of

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 3>a career he's had.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 2>They have similar similar golf games.

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Really yeah, just unbelievable. Te de Green all the shots,

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 3>but the putter just doesn't seem to make enough putts.

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think I think.

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 3>He's it's just a I would I would bet he

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 3>would get one in the next two years at the very.

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Least, I would agree.

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 3>So, uh oh, Chad from Deer Park is back. Chad.

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Chad from Deer Park is So this week's event is

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 3>the windhom and it decides who stays and goes from

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 3>the tour. So he wants to know who you want

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 3>from outside the top one twenty five to make a

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 3>charge and get.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 2>In from the top. From outside the top one twenty five,

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say Sam Saunders. And I'm gonna say that because,

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 2>as everybody knows, he's the grandson of Holly Saunders, and

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 2>it'd be cool to get her and him, you know,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 2>at the events. And also he's a pretty good I mean,

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 2>he's a little litle bit streaky obviously, but when he

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 2>plays well, he can play real well. So that's why

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to see make it to the next event.

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know Hawley Saunders had a grandson.

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, Sam, Sammy.

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Sammy, Well, I'm gonna go with my boy. Ken Duke.

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 3>The he played the greatest round of golf in the

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 3>history of golf last year at the Players.

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 2>He sure did.

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 3>He shot a sixty five that day. That was an

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 3>incredible round he got. He wouldn't even be in this

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 3>situation if it if the Players had a real exemption thing,

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 3>like who finishes in a third and in a huge

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 3>championship and doesn't get invited back next year?

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Ken Duke shouldn't have been there.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Unbelievable really, and we all know he dominates Sawgrass.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 3>So I personally, I think that he deserves a special

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 3>exemption next year for just the mismanagement of exemptions that

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 3>the PGA Tour clearly. You know, it's almost like there's

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 3>a Ken Duke vendetta on tour.

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I can't Duke Vendetta, oh god.

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, close second is Charlie Wee. He's he's a

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 3>long way out, He's at two eighteen. But I think

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 3>we just need to see a little bit more Charlie

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 3>Wie in events. He thrilled the world at the Zurich

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 3>with him and kJ Toy.

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 2>As a team, thrilled the world. All right here, here's

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 2>a good question. Will Thrasher from Warsaw, Indiana. The prevailing

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 2>wisdom seems to indicate that Phil is a lock for

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 2>the President's Cup, but I don't see it. His game

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 2>is nowhere right now without bones, he seems lost. Would

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 2>love to see Duffner picked instead. He has already buddies

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 2>with Ricky, JT and company. Would be a great veteran

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 2>president and natural best ball pairing with JT his usual

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 2>practice round partner. Would like your thoughts.

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's it's well documented.

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I think Phil is.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 3>Very overrated to the player all the time. I would

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 3>definitely agree he doesn't by by form, he doesn't deserve

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 3>a spot on the President's Cup team. He's really done

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 3>nothing when he's gotten into contention, he's faded. But there's

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 3>this whole experience thing, and you know he's gonna be

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 3>a future cap like, there's no way he gets left

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 3>off this team. There's just no possible way he does.

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Like the player i'd like to see in there instead

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 3>of him is Brian Harmon, but that's not gonna happen,

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 3>I think so. Yeah, And long, long story short, there's

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 3>no chance. I saw Patrick Reid moved in and into

0:19:55.840 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 3>the top ten too, So they've got to two picks

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 3>and it'll be interesting because now Chapel's outside Harmon, Duffner, Woodland, Snatecker, Steele,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 3>and then it's Phil.

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>So who would you like to see?

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, do you think there's any way Phil gets

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 3>left off?

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I'd like to see Brian Harmon out of

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 2>everybody you mentioned, I don't see Phil getting left off.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 2>But you know, it surprised everybody when the US national

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>team left Land and Donovan out, which is kind of

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 2>a similar you know, end of his career, struggling a bit.

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 2>But I just can't see one of his contemporaries leaving

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>him off the team. If it was you know, somebody else, maybe,

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 2>but I just I can't see Michelson being left off.

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 3>That is an interesting dynamic about these team events. It's

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 3>like the veterans have such an advantage over younger guys

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 3>because the guys picking them are like their buddies that

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 3>they've played on tour with forever. Right, It's you know,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 3>that's a the added benefit as a veteran.

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that I.

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Don't know, I think the veteran presence is like such

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 3>garbage when it comes to these team competitions, like you

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 3>need to have a veteran in the locker room. Like

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 3>it's golf, like, I mean, what's what's Phil gonna say

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 3>to you before a match that could possibly like make

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 3>you play better? Is he going to say, like play better?

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm I think it's especially in golf. I mean

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 2>it just seems I mean there's a certain element of

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, pairing guys together that have you know, one

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 2>guy makes a ton of pars, real steady, the other guy,

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, makes a lot of birdies. That makes sense,

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 2>But you know, you don't need pods to discuss it

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 2>and secret committees and whatever they're talking about. You know,

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>I just I don't think that's necessary.

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm I'm so out on on strategy.

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's an individual game.

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It's so all right.

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Barry w had a great question. Did you know that

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 3>the Solheim Cup was this week?

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 2>First off, I absolutely did not.

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I remember seeing it was somewhere in August. I didn't

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 3>know it was this week. Though, likelihood of any gimme

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 3>controversies slash tears, slash seven hour rounds this time around,

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 3>he'll hang up and listen.

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I will say that likelihood is high, and I really

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 2>hope it happens. I think that's been some of the

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 2>great drama of team golf is you never know when

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna have to replay a shot. You never know

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 2>when there's gonna be tears, you know, streamers in the

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 2>hair flying. You just never know, and I think that

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 2>should be the way golf is. So I'm gonna say

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking forward to any incident. I won't watch the

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 2>tournament at all, but I will rely on Twitter to

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 2>provide me some good video of tears.

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 3>I was talking about this with somebody the other day,

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 3>is how the LPGA Tour's two big moments this year

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 3>was when Lexi missed marked her ball just and they're

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 3>just horrible handling of the situation.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, waiting a.

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Day Informia in the middle of her last round. I

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 3>it was they just botched this whole thing, and they

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 3>got all these these viewers in and everybody stayed, but

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 3>everybody was so mad at the tour.

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>They were infuriated with the tour.

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 3>So then the next time they kind of got right

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.239
<v Speaker 3>into the spotlight and it was a big moment. Was

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:54.479
<v Speaker 3>the was the round that playoff between I can't remember

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 3>who it was, but they kept playing this horrible golf

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 3>hole over and over and over again, and it was

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 3>taking absurdly long because of how long these women were

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 3>taking to play. And it was like the two big

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 3>moments in the LPGA season have been just marred and

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 3>controversy and everybody being like, what the hell is going

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 3>on on this tour?

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I expect I.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Can add all a women's golf in there too with that.

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, the whole raked pot in the women's Junior Am.

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Was it a gimme?

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Was it not?

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 2>The whole thing? You can add that in there too.

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I you know, are women secretly more competitive than men?

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that they're secretly more competitive. I think

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 2>society probably has a certain, you know, view on their competitiveness, probably,

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, just from from a long, long period of time.

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Thinking one and then maybe it shocks people that they

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 2>act and think another way. I don't know, but it is.

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 2>It is interesting that the three biggest moments of women's

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 2>golf for all controversies.

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't for my day's catting.

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 3>I feel like Lady's Day was always way more stingy

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 3>on gimmes than Men's Day. And it's it's it's very interesting.

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 3>It's an interesting dynamic. But we'll see what happens this week.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we might we might get in some

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 3>trouble with those answers, so we're gonna move on.

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh do you Uh?

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 3>We got a couple of questions about midim events, So

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 3>what are What are some of your favorite midiam events

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 3>that are non USGA slash state events?

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Some of my personal favorite that I've played. I really

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 2>like the Gasparilla Invitational in Tampa. It's really fun. It's

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 2>a it's a fun atmosphere. Obviously, the golf's great. You

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 2>get a really good field, but it's kind of the

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 2>whole package for that event. I really like Carlton Woods.

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 2>You get a great golf course and they treat you well.

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I haven't played the Crane or the Cup Crump, but

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 2>obviously those are very highly regarded. Four balls that j R.

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:26.719
<v Speaker 2>Williams at Oak Hill is spectacular. The golf course, the people,

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the way the tournaments run. Champions was an awesome event

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 2>down in Houston. They treat you great, They make you

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 2>feel like you know that they want you there. If

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>you're in Chicago, I know a lot of your listeners are.

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 2>The Meritam's really good. That is you play for a membership,

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 2>you get a year membership, you play I think it

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 2>is twenty seven holes over two days. And obviously Merritt

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 2>Club is awesome. The golf course and you get to

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 2>you get to be a member there if you win.

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 2>The International down here in Florida is another good one.

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 2>There's so many, it's it's crazy.

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I got an email the other day for one and

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I never heard of it in my life, and I'm like, wow,

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 2>this looks awesome. Yeah, it's kind of crazy. Yeah.

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that almost all the country clubs in almost

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 3>every city have a lot of great events.

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I was I've been thinking about playing a couple.

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I just haven't had time this summer to do any

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 3>But like next year, I think I probably go up

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 3>to They have one at Kingsley Club up in northern Michigan,

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 3>which is really great, really great golf course. Again, if

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 3>you win, you win a membership.

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I got. I had a.

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Reader email me about one at their course. That's like

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 3>the Country Club of North Carolina. I was looking at

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 3>that one. It looks really cool. It's in the fall.

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 2>There's that course is awesome country in North Carolina.

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it looks looks great. So I'm a golf course snop,

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 3>so I always if I'm going to go do one

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 3>of those, it's probably gonna be at a nice course

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 3>because I don't want to spend four days at a

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 3>bad one. But yeah, I guess Marilla I might have

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 3>to do this year. They looks like an awesome event.

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 3>So let's see another question. Here's a good one. What

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 3>are other this is timely with the PGA from Sam Schumer.

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 3>What are other regular tour stops that should be used

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 3>as major venues but get overlooked.

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, A couple came to mind right away, and

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 2>one's actually a web dot com course, and that's Victoria

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 2>National outside of Evansville. That golf course. I've played it once.

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 2>It's it's extremely hard from all the way back. Usually

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 2>they have the web there and I think they're up

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 2>a few t's on a lot of the holes. It's

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 2>extremely hard, it's extremely good. I just I don't know

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 2>if associated the PGA or the USGA would be willing

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 2>to go to Evansville. That that remains to be seen.

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 2>But the golf course is certainly more than capable of

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 2>having an event. And Mirfield, I think Mierfield would be

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 2>a great PGA championship site and I'd like, I'd love

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 2>to see it there.

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, I heard that they tried to go to Mirfield,

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 3>but uh Jack said that the only place in Columbus

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 3>that could host the Memorial was Sciota and they said

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 3>no because they and they wanted to move it to

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 3>Double Eagle, and because of that, they lost out on

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 3>on hosting a major. I think it was a well,

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it was a PGA.

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. It might have been a US Open.

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure, but but one of the but the

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 3>deal was, you know that you had to move the

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 3>other event, and they but that would be a cool spot.

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 3>I think another one would be Ironomic that hosted absolutely

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the Tigers Tournament quicken Loans a couple of years ago,

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 3>just got restored by Gil Hans. Players just rave about

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 3>that place. I mean, it's one of many great great

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 3>golf courses in Philadelphia and it's it's tough, challenging.

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Outside of that, I think.

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 3>You get a lot of good I mean, Riviera obviously

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 3>hasn't hosted a major in a long time, and it

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 3>keeps being linked to it. They have the US AM

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 3>this week, so I'm sure that they're going to get

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 3>a major championship and announced in the next five years.

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 3>That would be another obvious one. And then if you

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 3>moved the if you move to any of them, you

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 3>know the PGA. Everybody always talks about the PGA moving

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 3>to like another country, which would never happen because it's

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 3>the Professional Golfers Association of America.

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it would be cool to.

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Have it at like a sand belt course like Royal

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Melbourne or or Kingston Heath in Australia. So all right,

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 3>let's uh, since we're talking about the PGA. This is

0:30:58.400 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 3>from the guys who mow.

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Will the PGA ever revert back to a match play major? Also,

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 2>what do you think about mixed alternate shot Olympic Golf

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Men's DEAs?

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'll start with the PGA question, I don't think

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 3>it ever will move back to a matchplay major, And

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think a major championship should be all match

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 3>play because it just becomes too fluky, like you can

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 3>play really bad every day and get to like the finals,

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 3>or win if your opponent plays worse. So I think

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 3>the way you'd have to do it if you did

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 3>make it a match play major, would be similar to

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 3>what the Western m does and do either fifty four

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 3>or seventy two holes of stroke play and then cut

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 3>it to sixteen guys, and those sixteen guys play match play,

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 3>in which I think would be really cool. I mean,

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 3>it would be like a week long thing, but it

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.959
<v Speaker 3>would be awesome. I think people would love it. If

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 3>you were seriously looking for a way for the PGA

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 3>to become, you know, not the fourth major, you would

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 3>make that kind of format.

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I I would love that format. I just I think

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:20.719
<v Speaker 2>there's almost zero percent chance it would happen because of

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 2>the TV money. I think that if you're going to

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 2>have a the final on Sunday, you're and you you know,

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 2>you get no disrespect to anybody if you get like

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Rod Pampling and you know Scott hend or somebody in

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the finals. This the people aren't going to watch, and

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 2>that's that's that's the major driver of of golf is

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the TV ratings right now. And so I just don't

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 2>think it would ever and it would never happen, but

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:51.719
<v Speaker 2>I would love it too.

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 3>The other issue is when when there's only two guys

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 3>on a golf course, it's it's really kind of boring.

0:32:58.640 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Because there's a lot of debtor.

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 3>You'd have to I mean, CBS actually might do okay

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 3>with it because it seemed like there's only two guys

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 3>on the golf course.

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, but just.

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Go with their normal, normal, normal broadcast.

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 3>They'd be like, oh great, we could show just as

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 3>many commercials and and you know, fill it with enough

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 3>fluff and we don't really have to do anything different.

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 2>We can watch Jim Nance and his dog hang out.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 3>As for mixed alternate shot in the Olympic, in Olympic golf,

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 3>I think this has legs.

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I would liken it a lot too.

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 3>The way the Olympics does figure skating, where they have

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 3>individual they have mixed figure skating, and then they have

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 3>freestyle figure skating, which.

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't forget ice dancing ice dancing, big fan of

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 2>ice dancing.

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 3>I would I would parallel golf to figure skating.

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 2>It's I don't know if I want to say that,

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 2>but I will say that I would absolutely be all

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 2>for the mixed alternate shot Olympic golf. I think it's

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 2>a great idea and I'm all for it. They should

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 2>definitely do that. I'd rather have that than an actual competition.

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 2>To be honest, who like they had?

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Who would be the favorite? South Korea or America?

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Good question. I would say, obviously, who's America Lexi

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 2>and speak or DJ or DJ. Let's let's keep DJ

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 2>away from her. Let's go speak and Lexi and uh.

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 2>South Korea would be.

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 3>It would be the girl that's on top. Say you know, yeah,

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 2>We'd be favored.

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it would be. It would be almost like an

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 3>advantage disadvanced. I think we'd have to be favored. But

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:58.399
<v Speaker 3>they'd have more quality team. I don't know that'd be that.

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Be deeper, they'd have a better They have a lot

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 2>more teams that could win it.

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Probably, But going back to the Solheim Cup, the biggest

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 3>problem with the Solheim Cup is that it should be

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 3>South Korea versus the world.

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it really should be, like.

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 3>That would be entertaining, Like that is what the event

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 3>should be because they are they are the most dominant

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 3>country for women's golf.

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Like, let's stop tiptoeing around the subject. Like they dominate.

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Like the world versus South Korea would be one hundred

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 3>times more captivating than US versus Europe, And I think

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 3>European Women's tour is like going out of business.

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 2>I would probably be more inclined to watch US versus

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 2>South Korea versus the world, I should say, yeah for sure.

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and so I mean I get we've got to

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 3>have like Lydia co on our team. It'd be in

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 3>the Jutana Guards. Yeah, and then yeah, it would be

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 3>super exciting. That's what they'd need to do if if

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 3>anybody's hockey.

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Kind of did something like that with their All Star game, right,

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 2>they went North America.

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>And versus the world versus the world.

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that got some some spike in ratings at

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 2>least m hm.

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 3>So, staying on the PGA talk, the angry golfer from

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 3>glen View chimes in again. He wants to know about

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 3>slow play on tour, he seems. He says it's it's

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 3>just disgusting.

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's disgusting too. I hate playing slow. I

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 2>would rather not play than play over five hours. That's

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 2>that's or even over four and a half. That's how

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.760
<v Speaker 2>much I hate slow play. But I get these guys

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 2>are competing for a major, and you know, it's their livelihood.

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 2>And you know, like Day had a comment before the

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 2>season started that he was like, you know, this is

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 2>my I'm trying to win a major. I'm gonna take

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 2>however long I can. And you know that they can

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 2>say that, but at the end of the day, there

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 2>was a there was a there was a survey of

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour players. Eighty four percent of them said slow

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 2>play was a major problem. So if eighty four percent

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 2>of them think it's a problem, then somebody has to

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 2>hold them accountable. I think I think you should have

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 2>a I mean, it's hard to differentiate between guys and groups,

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 2>which is why the USGA does the policy where they

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, first they penalize the whole group, then ask questions,

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 2>but there has to be accountability otherwise they the sport

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 2>is going to continue to lose fans. It just it

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.240
<v Speaker 2>takes too long. And if it's if kids are watching

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 2>these guys play in six hours, they're gonna think that,

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're gonna think it's okay. I'd like to

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 2>see a lot more penalties.

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think the other thing that goes unnoticed a

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 3>lot of times is like Jason Day is unaffected by

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 3>slow play because he plays really slow. But what about

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:51.720
<v Speaker 3>the guy in your group that's like a quick player,

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 3>like you're it's kind of almost like gamesmanship.

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So oh, it totally is.

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 3>It's like, I'm a fast player, and like in tournaments,

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:04.879
<v Speaker 3>I kind of just shut it off. But like when

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm playing casual golf and somebody's really slow, it just

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 3>it irritates the shit out of me. And I think,

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:16.760
<v Speaker 3>like just just be mindful. Like there's something that something

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 3>that bothers me in society more than anything is when

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 3>people are completely like blind to their surroundings and just

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 3>like you're like, how do you not like notice like

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 3>you did you just like by you getting what you

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 3>want are completely like screwing over the rest of the world.

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.439
<v Speaker 3>That really bugs me. And that's kind of what that's

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 3>what slow play is on the PGA tour is like,

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 3>especially like when you have these regular events where where

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 3>like guys have to play behind you, or like say

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 3>you have the first tea time off and you wrap

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 3>around and you get behind somebody like the leaders, and

0:38:56.840 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 3>you know they're just so slow like that.

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 1>That's wrong. That has to change.

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 2>More penalties, Yep, more penalties. Okay, let's do an architecture question.

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Do architects find the great holes than the routing or

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 2>they find the routing and create the best holes possible.

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 2>That's from Porter Golf.

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not an architect, but one of the things

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 3>that fascinates me the most about architecture is routing, and

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I think everybody does it different. I heard a story

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 3>about Bill Cooorr and I've been trying to to.

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Get this fact checked.

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 3>But Bill Coorr used to I don't know if he

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 3>still does it anymore, but he used to camp on

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 3>the ground that he would get for a golf course

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 3>for like two or three weeks, and he'd stay up

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 3>at all hours of night watching animals roam the land

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 3>because he was convinced that they knew the easiest way

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 3>to walk around the land. So he'd wrap the golf

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 3>courses so it was easy to walk.

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 2>That's crazy, Yeah, I mean I.

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 3>Think it would be fascinating just to walk around with

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 3>an architect on a piece of land that they are building,

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 3>just to see how they do it. But for the

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 3>most part, I think they find the most dramatic features,

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 3>so whether it be like a downhill, you know, with

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 3>a great view, and they put holes they want there,

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 3>and then they route around those kind of key holes

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:31.359
<v Speaker 3>and figure out how to connect them. I to go.

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Bill Kohr thing.

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's a famous quote about Sandhills where he

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 3>had you know, tens of thousands of acres of land.

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 3>Is you know, there's like they had something thousands of

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 3>golf holes that they found when they were walking this land,

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 3>and it was just a matter of narrowing it down

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 3>to eighteen the eighteen best ones.

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So kind of nutty, yeah.

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean talk about like a I don't think i'd

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 3>The worst part I think is an architect would be

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 3>like I'd always be second guessing myself, like did I

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 3>actually pick the right holes?

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's stick with architecture. Kind of an architecture question.

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 2>HM wants to know water hazard, power, rakings, rankings, oceans, lakes, creeks,

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 2>et cetera.

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I hate all water hazards. For the most part, I

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 3>hate lakes. Lakes are by far at the bottom, especially

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 3>man made lakes. I think we need to change this

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 3>to man made lakes and regular lakes. You know, if

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 3>the lake was there, then that's way better, But man

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:43.360
<v Speaker 3>made lakes are the worst. I would say. I think

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 3>oceans are great for views, but from a golf course perspective,

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 3>maybe a little overrated. So I actually love a thin,

0:41:55.200 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 3>little narrow creek because it's subtle and it like if

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 3>you use it the correct way, like a lot of

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 3>the great architects do. Like if you look at Augusta,

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 3>how they use the how Mackenzie used Ray's creek that

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 3>went through it. All the lakes got put in there

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 3>by Robert Trent Jones, but like, if you look at

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:19.279
<v Speaker 3>how he used the creek, it's it's incredible. And I think,

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 3>like a creek is so underrated. So I'll go creek, ocean,

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 3>and then lake man made lake. What about you?

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 2>That's funny you say creek. I'm gonna go with my

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:35.240
<v Speaker 2>favorite and least favorite. My favorite is a meandering creek,

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 2>just like thirteen in Augusta. You know, something that's rugged.

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I love that it's I think any hole with that

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:46.399
<v Speaker 2>is automatically awesome. And then my least favorite are the

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 2>metal the metal retaining walls on ponds. There are some

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 2>good courses that have you know, Madonna has them. Actually,

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm just if you're gonna do it, I like it

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:01.839
<v Speaker 2>to be the die kind of railroad ties. I don't

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.800
<v Speaker 2>really like that either, but at least that's better than metal.

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 2>So those are my those are my two water hazard thinks.

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:14.320
<v Speaker 3>All right, So, oh, this is from Derek from Matt

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 3>toon how high do you have to finish in a

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.480
<v Speaker 3>tournament in order to send out a tweet or Facebook

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 3>post thanking the tournament officials and host courses. He's asking

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 3>for a friend.

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say, not applicable. I think you should always

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 2>send send out a tweeter a Facebook post because it's

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 2>it's a gentlemanly sport, and that's a very pros pro

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 2>gentleman move.

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:46.720
<v Speaker 3>I agree, if you are a true gentleman, you'll send

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 3>out a post every time.

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it looks even better if you, you know,

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 2>missed a cut or finished seventy third, it looks even better.

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I would also throw in a congrats to the winner

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:05.319
<v Speaker 3>great playing. Didn't see that score out here unless you won, right.

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 2>That's always a nice thing to do.

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 4>Good sportsmanship, all right, So uh, let's see you got

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 4>any good war stories from the from the am game.

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Like I saw that Walker asked about the about Stu

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Hagastad getting his club stolen the other day. It actually

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 2>reminded me of this really funny story in college. I

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 2>had a teammate that was his roommate was a like

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 2>a longtime friend since they were four or five years old.

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 2>His roommate was a little bit of a shady guy,

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 2>and my buddy left his house for some reason for

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 2>a couple of days. I think he went home to

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 2>see his parents. And he got back and he couldn't

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 2>find his golf clubs, and he's asking his roommate and

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:56.759
<v Speaker 2>he's wondering, what's going on. You know, someone just walked

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 2>in the house and took my clubs, Like, what's going on?

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 2>It's you know, it says yeah, his name on it

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and everything, and as it when they filed the police report,

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 2>as it turned out, his roommate had taken them to

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:11.440
<v Speaker 2>a pawn shop and put them on layaway, you know,

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 2>to go gamble. Thinking he would win the money, get

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the clubs back in his roommate would be none the wiser,

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 2>But that blew up in his face. That's immediately the

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 2>first thing I thought of when I saw that. Just

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 2>a ridiculous story.

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 3>So I used to when I was when I was single,

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I'd still try and compete in weekend events and i'd be,

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, out blazing a trail in the city of Chicago.

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 3>And I'd recently started seeing a girl, and I played

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 3>really bad on Saturday in this tournament, and I had

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 3>the first tea time out on Sunday morning, and I

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 3>was like, you know what, you know, fuck it, I'm

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 3>going out. And I met up with this girl and

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 3>ended up out like all night, and like sure enough,

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 3>like six am rolls around and I'm like, I gotta

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 3>go play golf tournament and I get out the course

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 3>and I just felt all kinds of awful and it

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 3>was you know, you had to walk and oh god,

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.439
<v Speaker 3>oh it was horrendous. But you know, I come out

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 3>and I just I hit the ball to like inside

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:24.239
<v Speaker 3>of three feet the first three holes, and all of

0:46:24.239 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 3>a sudden, I'm like three under through three and I

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh my god, I would need to do

0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 3>this more often. You know, it quickly unraveled. I ended

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 3>up shooting like I think I made a ten on

0:46:35.560 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 3>the last hole for eighty four, and it was just

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:41.800
<v Speaker 3>a disastrous day. I got off the golf course and

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I was wearing sunglasses the whole round, and one of

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:47.799
<v Speaker 3>my playing partners saw me and was like, oh my.

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god.

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:52.839
<v Speaker 3>Then I went home and I think I slept till

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 3>the next morning, and then I went to work and

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh, what a disastrous weekend.

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Playing playing hungover. For me, ball striking is usually not

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the issue. It's putting, and it's more specifically speed putting.

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:12.359
<v Speaker 2>I've been like fifteen feet, you know, a little down

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the hill, and I'll have twenty two feet coming back,

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:17.399
<v Speaker 2>like stuff you can't even imagine. We're just like, how.

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Did that happens?

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Kyle and I played together in this invitational. It was

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 3>handicapped this year, and it started on Saturday, and they

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 3>had like this dinner slash party on Friday night, and

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 3>we're talking to each other and we're like, all right,

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 3>We're just we're not going to get too drunk tonight.

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 3>And sure enough, like we ended up having way too

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 3>many drinks and we had it was a handicap event.

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 3>We had to add shots on this part three, so

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:48.760
<v Speaker 3>that the whole time we were worried about this second hole,

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 3>which is this tough little downhill park.

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:56.719
<v Speaker 3>We both hit it to like inside fifteen feet and

0:47:56.800 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 3>it's the second hole of the day.

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:00.439
<v Speaker 1>I think we'd either birdied or part of the first.

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 3>We're like slapping hands and we're like, yeah, we're gonna

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 3>make We're gonna make it worset par you know we're gonna.

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I think we literally looked at each other on the

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:11.320
<v Speaker 2>way to the green and said, oh man, that's huge.

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Nice job, got it over with.

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Then Kyle four putt at three but.

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Not good, not good at all, and we walked off.

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Were a little shaken.

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that was it. That was a disaster. It's uh,

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:29.520
<v Speaker 3>there's there's a lot of good stories, all right. Let's

0:48:29.520 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 3>get into overrated. Underrated Louis overrated, underrated from andy.

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Ka underrated for sure. I think we already we already

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 2>talked about why he's a borderline Hall of Famer, right

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and he.

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:52.359
<v Speaker 3>He's gotta he's underrated. He makes the rare case of

0:48:53.120 --> 0:48:56.360
<v Speaker 3>he's underrated in America. I've been in in South Africa.

0:48:56.440 --> 0:49:01.720
<v Speaker 3>He's probably overrated, possibly Wannamaker Trophy.

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say underrated. It is a major. You can

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 2>never underestimate a major win right, so many, I mean,

0:49:13.760 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 2>it's what everyone, all those guys are playing for. Plus

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:18.839
<v Speaker 2>it's slept with Jason Duffner and he has pretty good

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 2>taste in what he's sleeping with. So underrated.

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say it's underrated also because of how big

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:32.359
<v Speaker 3>it is. Like I always think about the trophies I

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:35.360
<v Speaker 3>see on like the European Tour, and they're like massive,

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:39.560
<v Speaker 3>like you know, you win like swords and like accepters

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 3>like out of Game of Thrones. Yeah, like they have

0:49:42.239 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 3>awesome trophies. And then like you see the the the

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 3>Players is like this little tiny piece of crystal, and

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 3>like the US opens pretty small. But then like the

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Watermaker Trophy is like it's a big, big trophy. Like

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 3>I think with trophies, size is underrated. It's got it

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Like I want to win a big ass trophy just

0:50:05.600 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 3>like I want to get.

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I want a big ass check too, you know.

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah for sure.

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:14.880
<v Speaker 3>If I was a tour pro, just like Happy Gilmore,

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:16.359
<v Speaker 3>I demand the big check.

0:50:18.640 --> 0:50:21.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get one this question in because I

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:25.720
<v Speaker 2>like it and it's kind of crazy Rory's poor twenty

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:30.479
<v Speaker 2>seventeen versus DJ's twenty seventeen. The media has been talking

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:35.479
<v Speaker 2>a lot about Rory wasting this season and basically who

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:39.839
<v Speaker 2>had a worst year, Rory or DJ.

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 3>So I think this question, if it's one question, is

0:50:45.920 --> 0:50:48.880
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the majors, and it's another if

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 3>you look at the overall season, because like.

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:53.360
<v Speaker 1>DJ, one.

0:50:54.760 --> 0:51:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Riviera, which is probably the strongest non WGC or major

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 3>championship field, So he won that, and then he won

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 3>two WGC events, which are you know, essentially major type

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:13.319
<v Speaker 3>fields but just smaller, so you know you've got the

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:17.080
<v Speaker 3>top sixty four seventy five players. So if you look

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 3>at that, DJ clearly had the better year, but it

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 3>was extremely disappointing what he did in the majors. If

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:25.680
<v Speaker 3>you look at just strictly the majors, then I think

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Rory had a better year.

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 2>I agree one hundred percent. You look at I mean DJ,

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 2>his average finish in the Open and the PGA was

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:40.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty three and a half. He missed the cut in

0:51:40.640 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the US Open, and he self inflicted missed the Masters

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.800
<v Speaker 2>where Rory with a seventh, a fourth, and a twenty

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 2>second and then obviously the miscut at Aaron Hills. I

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:54.480
<v Speaker 2>don't even think there's a comparison there. Rory's year blue

0:51:54.560 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 2>DJs out of the water in the Majors, and yeah,

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 2>you know that's at the end of the day, that's

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:05.799
<v Speaker 2>what everyone remembers. So I'm gonna say DJ's was much

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 2>more disappointing.

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, the thing everybody was talking about DJ.

0:52:12.440 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 3>This just goes to all of golf and how people

0:52:16.320 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 3>just overreact about golfers and like hot hot streaks. Because

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:26.839
<v Speaker 3>we saw DJ's kind of run through last year after

0:52:26.880 --> 0:52:31.960
<v Speaker 3>the US opened till this year's Masters somewhat mirrored Jason's

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 3>days before him when from the end of twenty fifteen

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 3>through twenty sixteen, where I mean he was unstoppable. But

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 3>like those guys, like you know, they had like a

0:52:45.320 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 3>good twelve months of sustain being the best player in

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 3>the world. Then you see like JT, like early in

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:54.520
<v Speaker 3>the year, everybody was like, is he better than Jordan Speith?

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 3>And you you still get that now. But like I

0:52:57.920 --> 0:53:03.360
<v Speaker 3>think golf, Tiger spoil everybody into thinking that you could

0:53:03.400 --> 0:53:06.759
<v Speaker 3>have a you know, we're gonna see a guy that

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 3>just dominates golf for a really long period of time,

0:53:09.320 --> 0:53:11.400
<v Speaker 3>and the reality is that's not gonna happen.

0:53:13.120 --> 0:53:16.280
<v Speaker 2>No. I mean it looked like after DJ won in Mexico,

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 2>he was gonna win literally every event the rest of

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:22.240
<v Speaker 2>the year. Then he falls down the stairs or whatever

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 2>happened at the Masters, and uh, you know, not the

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:28.719
<v Speaker 2>same guy. And that's what the time off will do

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:30.800
<v Speaker 2>to you. But you brought it up. So which is

0:53:30.840 --> 0:53:32.760
<v Speaker 2>who's the better player, Justin or Jordan?

0:53:34.560 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it depends on the golf course.

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they're both.

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 3>They're both world class talents. If you're playing a golf

0:53:44.200 --> 0:53:50.279
<v Speaker 3>course that's ultra demanding tea to green, I'm gonna go

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:54.560
<v Speaker 3>with Justin Thomas. But if it's a golf course that's

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:59.480
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more strategic and more about you know,

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 3>thinking and more and more challenging around the greens, I'm

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:04.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna go with Jordan Speth.

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say Speath And if I had to

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:12.440
<v Speaker 2>put money on who would have the better career, it

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:15.440
<v Speaker 2>would be Speed. But I think Justin Thomas has the

0:54:15.480 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 2>higher ceiling.

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would agree with that.

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that I think Speth like Justin Thomas is

0:54:22.480 --> 0:54:24.440
<v Speaker 3>going to miss a lot more cuts and majors than

0:54:24.480 --> 0:54:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Speith, is right, and Jordan Speith, Jordan Speed's floor

0:54:30.640 --> 0:54:35.040
<v Speaker 3>is just so high, whereas I think his ceiling isn't

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 3>quite as high because he doesn't have the the power

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:42.600
<v Speaker 3>that that Thomas has. You know, Thomas has that that

0:54:42.800 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 3>power that you see from guys like Rory. He's he's

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:48.879
<v Speaker 3>not quite like Rory or DJ, but he's he's right

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:51.840
<v Speaker 3>there and then and and that gives him a little

0:54:51.840 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 3>bit of an advantage. I think he's when his ball

0:54:54.120 --> 0:54:59.240
<v Speaker 3>striking is on, he's I mean, he's pretty hard to stop.

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 3>I So I would.

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Say, yeah, I think that's that's I.

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Mean, So how would you, uh, how would you kind

0:55:08.719 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 3>of rate how would you rank the young stars? Like

0:55:12.000 --> 0:55:16.560
<v Speaker 3>if you had to go one through five with here,

0:55:16.680 --> 0:55:19.680
<v Speaker 3>I'll pull it up. So I'm going to give you,

0:55:19.840 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 3>like you're betting on these guys career.

0:55:21.960 --> 0:55:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You've got Jordan Hideki.

0:55:26.440 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Justin Thomas, John Rahm, and we'll throw Brooks is a

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 3>little older than those guys. Now Ricky's older too. We'll

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:41.439
<v Speaker 3>throw uh, we'll throw Daniel Berger in there.

0:55:42.080 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's a good one.

0:55:43.320 --> 0:55:46.040
<v Speaker 3>So those five guys, who who do you think, like,

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:48.799
<v Speaker 3>how would you rank them as far as like what

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:52.319
<v Speaker 3>you would expect career wise having the best career.

0:55:53.080 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Boy I eye test. I want to say Hideki, but

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:02.960
<v Speaker 2>obviously that we talked about is putting. I'm gonna say

0:56:03.800 --> 0:56:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Speak one, rom two, Hideki three, j T four, Burger five.

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:15.840
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to say, you know, I just put j

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:19.440
<v Speaker 2>T four on that list. That's that seems disrespectful almost,

0:56:19.480 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 2>but that's a tough list. That's all. That's five good

0:56:22.120 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 2>good players, great players.

0:56:24.160 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of crazy. You could put Thomas Peters in

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:31.120
<v Speaker 3>there too. Yep, that's good. So I yeah, I think

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 3>i'd go. Mine would look oh man, see one of

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the things with rom.

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Is he's already twenty three, Like he's.

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Only say rom one so bad, No I don't, but

0:56:44.320 --> 0:56:46.479
<v Speaker 3>like he's twenty three, Like that's something that gets lost

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:48.479
<v Speaker 3>because he's just he's new and.

0:56:48.360 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 2>It's right, plus he looks old too.

0:56:50.239 --> 0:56:53.600
<v Speaker 3>It's it's like Hideki's been playing professional golf for like

0:56:53.719 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 3>four years. He's twenty five, so it's like you know

0:56:57.760 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 3>rom and and then like the same with speed Speed

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:03.800
<v Speaker 3>turn pro at what twenty or twenty one or nineteen?

0:57:03.840 --> 0:57:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Did he turn pro?

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:06.640
<v Speaker 2>No? I think he played two years of Texas and

0:57:06.640 --> 0:57:08.200
<v Speaker 2>then turn pro right? Or did you just play one?

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:09.319
<v Speaker 3>I think he just played one?

0:57:10.239 --> 0:57:11.759
<v Speaker 2>Wow, So he was nineteen then.

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:15.439
<v Speaker 3>So it's like like that's something that always gets lost

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:17.760
<v Speaker 3>as age when you when you think about.

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And Burger, I think Burger is like Burger.

0:57:20.440 --> 0:57:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Is a guy that could end up being like three

0:57:23.440 --> 0:57:26.960
<v Speaker 3>of those guys that you have to at this point.

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:31.160
<v Speaker 3>I you know what, I'm going Speth Hideki. I love

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:35.080
<v Speaker 3>rom I so I'm going to speath Haideki j t

0:57:35.520 --> 0:57:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Berger Rom. I'm just I'm in on Burger.

0:57:39.280 --> 0:57:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I like Burger. I mean I love Burger's game. We

0:57:41.440 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 2>both actually said in the last podcast that we thought

0:57:43.840 --> 0:57:46.320
<v Speaker 2>he had a good chance to win. Didn't It didn't happen,

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:50.960
<v Speaker 2>but he missed. Yeah, of course the MC draft kings

0:57:51.040 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 2>down to Dube no million dollars.

0:57:54.080 --> 0:57:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah it is. There's so many great young players. I mean,

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:01.080
<v Speaker 3>see Wu Kim you could put in there. He only twenty.

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's young and very very good. I think he

0:58:04.520 --> 0:58:09.880
<v Speaker 2>has that you know, back issue I'm sure is due

0:58:09.920 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 2>to his teacher. But we'll see, Uh, we'll see what

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:16.200
<v Speaker 2>if he can stay healthy. But if he can, for sure,

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:18.320
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of young guys with a ton of talent.

0:58:18.840 --> 0:58:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then uh, all right, any tea times on

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the t sheet that are overrated or underrated, you got,

0:58:29.800 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 3>you got anything on this.

0:58:31.440 --> 0:58:34.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what I have from much. I don't

0:58:34.200 --> 0:58:35.800
<v Speaker 2>know that I have much on it. I think that

0:58:36.160 --> 0:58:41.720
<v Speaker 2>it offer me. It all depends on weather. If the weather,

0:58:41.880 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 2>if you know it's all you, it's it all. It's

0:58:44.240 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 2>all weather based. Sometimes I like going out early in

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the morning. Sometimes I like playing late in the afternoon,

0:58:50.000 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 2>whether it's fun. In a tournament, I feel like I

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:55.440
<v Speaker 2>score a little better. I'm a little more awake in

0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:58.919
<v Speaker 2>the afternoon, but the winds a little calm are usually

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:02.040
<v Speaker 2>in the morning, So I I really have no no preference.

0:59:02.880 --> 0:59:07.360
<v Speaker 3>I would say the only thing I like noticeably prefer

0:59:08.040 --> 0:59:11.120
<v Speaker 3>is if I'm in like a multi day event and

0:59:11.160 --> 0:59:14.320
<v Speaker 3>there's thirty six holes, I really like having a late

0:59:14.400 --> 0:59:18.280
<v Speaker 3>tea time the first day, early morning the second because

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:21.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm with you, because I feel like I can take

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:25.439
<v Speaker 3>the afternoon if I play well. Like basically, you get home,

0:59:25.520 --> 0:59:28.160
<v Speaker 3>you go to sleep, and you're awake the next day

0:59:28.160 --> 0:59:31.200
<v Speaker 3>and it's like, you know, there's very little disconnected.

0:59:30.640 --> 0:59:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Like there's nothing worse than you play.

0:59:32.400 --> 0:59:35.440
<v Speaker 3>A really good round and then you have to wait

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 3>like over twenty four hours to play again.

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Plus you're thinking about it, and you're you know, you're

0:59:41.680 --> 0:59:44.160
<v Speaker 2>seeing the scores come in and you're seeing how good players,

0:59:44.240 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 2>some good players, you know, shot poor scores, and you're like, oh, man,

0:59:47.640 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know that was out there. Convincing yourself you

0:59:50.120 --> 0:59:51.880
<v Speaker 2>know you could possibly play now, there's just a whole

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:53.920
<v Speaker 2>that for sure. I like late early.

0:59:54.200 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, late early is especially Yeah, I late early I'm

0:59:58.200 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 3>a big fan of. But other wise, you know, it's

1:00:01.320 --> 1:00:03.520
<v Speaker 3>it's nice to get the one. It's nice to have

1:00:03.600 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the greens really nice early in the morning. But it's

1:00:07.000 --> 1:00:10.640
<v Speaker 3>sometimes I feel like I drink too much coffee or stuff.

1:00:10.680 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 3>I you know, that's a that's my one of my

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I always struggle figuring out what the proper coffee intake is.

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I have always wondered that because I drink a lot

1:00:20.960 --> 1:00:22.080
<v Speaker 2>of coffee me too.

1:00:22.360 --> 1:00:24.880
<v Speaker 3>It's I'd love to I'd love I wonder if there's

1:00:24.920 --> 1:00:28.720
<v Speaker 3>anybody on tour that's like a coffee specialist.

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure the hair has they got everything. I I

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 2>always wonder that too, because I I've gotten coffee at

1:00:34.400 --> 1:00:37.040
<v Speaker 2>the turn before in big events, and you know I've

1:00:37.040 --> 1:00:40.640
<v Speaker 2>played fine. I I don't think it's probably good for you.

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but me, I mean i'd like to know.

1:00:42.720 --> 1:00:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess i'd like to know. What I'd like to

1:00:44.160 --> 1:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>know is how bad is it for me performance wise?

1:00:47.680 --> 1:00:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe it would be bad if you're used

1:00:50.600 --> 1:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to it, like in your in your like a sleep.

1:00:54.920 --> 1:00:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean it's probably not great to have a

1:00:58.960 --> 1:01:02.720
<v Speaker 2>downhill four foot left to right slider after drinking two

1:01:02.800 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>and a half cups of coffee, but maybe yeah.

1:01:06.800 --> 1:01:09.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well we'll end it there. Nobody needs to

1:01:09.600 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 3>hear any more about how much coffee we drink. All right, Well,

1:01:14.520 --> 1:01:18.760
<v Speaker 3>thanks for coming on, and thanks for all the questions

1:01:19.280 --> 1:01:22.800
<v Speaker 3>from the listeners, and let us know if you got

1:01:23.240 --> 1:01:26.480
<v Speaker 3>new questions for next time, and we'll talk to you

1:01:26.520 --> 1:01:27.120
<v Speaker 3>in a little while.