WEBVTT - LIVE Fantasy Baseball Experts Mock, Zion Williamson's Debut

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Listen don dunnit Yeah, welcome yours by Byron Fine god

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>bro say Frances practice stand ball, ladies and tell in

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>yours With that we walking you inside of Studio thirty four.

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>This is the BFFs. Here is Frank Staffle. I am

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Greg Soman. What's happening, Franky, Greggy? What's going on? Buddy?

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot going on right now. Part taking in

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a Fantasy Baseball Experts mock draft and I'm currently on

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the clock. So it's very stressful right now. I thought

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>about stressful. Look at those people. No, no, no, no, no no,

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>stop some mock draft. Stop. This is a mock draft people.

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate, right, I won't I won't. I don't

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>trust you at all. Away. You have my words, A

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>man of my word, give me a paper. No, no no, no,

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm man of my word. Frank, I don't know. I

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>don't believe you. Go sit down on the side of

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the table draft. Would you like me to reveal people?

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>What if the people's going on? I have a listener

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted trying to prove a point. What's your pointing? Hell

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>me tell me before, tell me before you I want

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to show how into a mock draft you are. But

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you're actually crossing names out. I'm serious, all right. I

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>know that you're gonna not ripping it. You're gonna rip it.

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Do this. This is a mock draft on January twenty second, Frank,

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't make money for winning the mock draft. No,

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't play it out? And how serious Frank is

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>taking this cross I already missed a bunch of players

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on this Fantasy pros sheet on January is when he's

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>second for a mock You don't think Frank Stamford is

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to fantasy baseball. Look at this, people, Well, thank

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you getting my word. I'm so happy that you didn't

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you didn't rip it. Now that I've I've missed every

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>draft pick. Well this is I'm not gonna be able

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to this anymore. So we're flying off

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a cuff here, Greg, what's going on? Buddy? Unbelievable? Are

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you unbelievable? In a good way? In a bad way.

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you're mad at me. I feel like

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to make fun of me. Maddy, you I'm happy.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>You're happy. If you're happy, I'm happy. Are you happy?

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>And just sleep last night not great? James are back?

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe watching Zion Williamson's debut tonight to sleep a little

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>better tonight, Let's go. We're there, man, the the debut

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 1>of Zion Williamson tonight in the NBA from time on EESPN,

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be great, and Frank, we're gonna talk about it.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Not by ourselves tonight. We will not be by ourselves.

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>We have Christian Clark of Noah dot Com The Times

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>picking you enjoining us later in the show to talk

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>about the debut of Zion Williamson. What we can expect tonight,

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>what we can expect for the rest of the season.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a bunch of people that have question marks about

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Zion Williamson, Greg, I am not one of those people

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that personally I think he's going to be awesome. You know.

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the only question I have is regarding his body

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>type and the mass with which his body comes with obviously,

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and how that might hold up long term. So we

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>try and get some answers out of Christian Clark later

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>on in the show. I'm happy to do that, but

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>until we get there, Greg, we're talking baseball. We spent

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time baseball one second, but we spent

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time on UM the Grizzlies, righty talking

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>off air on air, SMA, other stuff we do about

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what Memphis does and how they're in the playoffs at

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Belicians, who were the worst team in the

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>league of the first month of the season, like Nicks,

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>like bad three and a half games out. Now you're

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>eleven and five in their last sixteen games. Zion Williams

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is back, Drew Holiday's back, Brandon Ingram's back, Alonzo balls back.

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>A Lonzo ball has been back, Greg, he's balling out

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the month of January. No pun intended, but a

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Lonzo ball is playing really well. Drew Holiday just came

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>back in his last game, scored thirty six points in

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>that game. How you get Zion Ingram is playing at

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>an All Star level? Brandon Ingram should be an All

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Star too, Yes he should. I know that. You you're

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>probably one of those people who last at people who

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>vote for the All Star Game, and I'm one of

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>those people. But I voted for Brandon Ingram. I think

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he deserves to be an All Star. So I don't.

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I laugh. No, you definitely don't. I don't.

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's wrong with that. I just voted

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>for a bunch of people that a I like and

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I think are deserving. So I voted for Bamata Bio obviously,

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and like Jimmy. You imagine if the Pelicans see in

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs as that faced the Lakers, right, Alonzo, ball

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Ay Davis, the whole thing. How cool would that be?

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>That would be very cool. It would be a lot

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of fun. Here, Greg, what's happening? Oh my god, I'm

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>missing a bunch of draft picks here. Where's the focus here, Bud?

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>The focus is on everything, Greg, That's where the focus

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is on. Come on, I know, but I want to

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>see which players are going. I want to see where

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone's being drafted. I haven't really participated in too many

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>drafts in general yet. Oh, Nelson Cruise. You know I

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>love Nelson Cruise. Greg had him on your list. I

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't get him. Sorry, well, you distracted me. I'm sorry.

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>We're on a live show at the moment we are.

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Would you like to? Would you like talk about who

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm drafting right now? Really? So you don't want to

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>do this at all? Why are we been doing this stuff?

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I wanted stuff. I wanted to get to to be

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, because the biggest news in baseball yesterday,

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Well today it's Luis Rojasty, new manager of the New

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>York Metropolitans, the son of Phelipe. Something crazy here, Greg,

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I keep going, all right, I'll take this guy for now.

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I just took Reese Hoskins in the eighth round. Greg,

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's do the great value, doesn't it. He's my starting

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>first basement. Why wouldn't he be hoss like? Awesome? I

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta read you my team. I don't care if you

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want to know. I want your reaction, Luis. It

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. This is what matters right now, Greg. Through

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>eight rounds, my team is Reese Hoskins, Mike Mustakis, Javier Bayas,

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Harper, Mookie Betts, Shane Bieber, Luis Severino, and you Darvish.

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>He's really awesome. Why you Darvish? Though? He was the

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>last picture in that tier and it was about to end,

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted a third starter, so I but Syndergard

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>was already gone. Grank, he was already gone. Charlie Morton

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>was already gone. I really wanted Morton. I just missed

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>out on him to like that. Morton's your boy, Morton

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is Morton went at the end of the fourth round.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>He's climbing up, man. I saw him going to third

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>round of a draft. Yesterday, Jesus saw Matt Olsen go

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in the third round of tweeting about that. Crazy. That's

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit nuts. It's crazy. All right. Now you

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>can talk about whatever you were talking about. The Mets

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>new manager, that's Louis Rojas Feliu, brother of Moissy's alu Uh.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>They stayed inside the organization. They hired a guy that

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>they saw us a fast riser, somebody that interviewed the

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>first time, and that's who they went with. Luis Rojas.

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>The new manager was the quality control coach last year

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't have some kind of minor league experience as well.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>He's he's been in the minor league system for the

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Mets doing stuff for a very long time. It's kind

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of surprising to me that Eduardo Perez made it to

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>basically the finals between himself and Carlos Beltron, and he

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't end up getting this job. Well, maybe that's kind

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of weird. Maybe that's not true. We UIs Rojas was

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the other candidate. That's true, you know, give it Louis

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Rojas here doesn't be a tough over Frank. I can

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>see it's good already to show, all right, when we

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>take a break here, when we come back, I have

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to ask Frank some stuff about the Atlanta Braves, in

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>particular Marcelo Student, their newest signing, pitching, some other guys

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Braves I have questions about. Hopefully Frank has

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>answer that. Let me paying attention. Why no NFL season

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is now upon us and you can become the eighth

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>person away one million dollars in a Fandeler Draft Kings

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>tournament by setting their lineups using the Daily Order dot

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Com DFS line of optimizer. If you're playing Dailey Fantasy

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com, You're doing

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL Access with

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better results into

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>promo code action for its ten percent discount. That's promo

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>code action for its ten per cent discount. Daily Order

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>dot Com where millionaires are made. Last year, maybe not

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the unluckiest, but definitely one of the most unlucky players. Normally,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>when we look at prolific hitters in baseball, their numbers

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>are the batting averages high, the home runs are high,

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the slugging percentage on base percentage is all high, and

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they're expected numbers are a little bit lower. That was

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>not the case with Marcelo Zuna. I mean, he had

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to forty one last year. His expected batting average was

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>tight eight that is insane. His slugging percentage was four

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy two solid slugging percentage, expected slug five forty eight,

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>three thirty six woll but expected woll but three eighty two.

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He was extremely unlucky last year, and now he joins

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the lineup where Ronald acuna, Azzi, Albi's and Freddie Freeman

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>are hitting ahead of him. And you're getting him outside.

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>He's going around pick one ten right now in NFBC

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a DP. You know what he is. He's a four

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>category contributor. Maybe he'll give you a handful of stolen basis,

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>not much more than that. But he seems like a

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>good value right now. It seems like someone that can

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he doesn't do exactly what Donaldson did last year

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>at the Braves, but I don't see why he can't

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>come close. Right, So the obvious question, who would you

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>rather have Marcelo Zuna or Reese Hoskins. Well, considering how

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I took Reese Hoskins over Marcelo Zuna in this draft, um,

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess the answer. The answers Reese Hoskins. But I

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>think Reece Hoskins actually goes way after him. An ADP, Right,

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. Really, they're close. One oh eight for

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Marcelo Zuna one eleven Freeze Hoskins. Okay, the biggest difference

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is Zoona is gonna give a better batting average. Obviously,

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in the n OFBC you play rotal leagues. Those are

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>five outfielders. So if you look at position scarcity, um,

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>and you're off that this year, right, after last year's

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm all over the place. The reason I just took

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Reese Hoskins because he's like the last first basement left

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that I liked. That was okay, it was like the

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>drop off of it wasn't like you needed to take

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 1>an outfielder in the first round because I have five.

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I'm gonna die. No, no, no, no no,

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>no no. We did not last year that I did

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>not do that, Greg Um. So look, I think you'll

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>get a better batting average out of Marcelo Zuna. I

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>think you'll get similar power numbers, maybe better home runs

0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>out of Reese Hoskins. Both really good line up. They're

0:10:59.880 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>going to drive in r BIS and the run scored

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe slightly in favor of Marcelo Zuna. Like, who's line

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>up do you think is better? The Phillies are the Braves?

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Both really good braves? Is the first? Is my first inkling? Sure?

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Stand by the Braves? Actually, yeah, okay, I would take

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Marcellos Doverese Hoskins. I like, I think they're close, and

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>then they're close. Better lineup. Five outfielders could play when

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it's that close. Four no three category contributors. But Ozuna

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 1>is going to be better in batting average. So in hindsight, yeah,

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think it Una is probably the better

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>player in a vacuum than Reese Hoskins. You also know

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing nothing. You got twelve stile mass last year to Marcellosina.

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Really yeah, it's got to be a career high. It

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is very much care okay, because I was the highest

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>of his career previously was where he had five for

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins. Interesting, it's not nothing, Frankie, it is not nothing.

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm on the clock paying attention. This is bad. Okay. Now,

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>if this Max Freed is my fourth starting ficture, I'm

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>glad Max. I'm gonna get into Max Freed. And that

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>was part of the planning the show to talk about

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Max Free. We'll do that in a second. Not alright,

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm back again. I had to make a draft pick.

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I got Max Freed. Okay, So you had uh last

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>year was about at two forty three with an average

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Haskin's bed at two twenty six. But as you said,

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>extremely unlucky was Marcello Zuna last year that could go

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>up o b P a little bit less than um

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>then Reese Hoskins last season. If you look at the

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>hard hit percentage. So I'll pull up now forty percent

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>or hit percentage last year, four more selos percentage. He

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>was really good last year. If he gets a little

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>bit luckier, in a little bit better of a lineup

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>or solos, you know, just steal where he's going at

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>pick one O eight at the moment. Now, I want

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to get some Max freem. I don't want to do

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that yet because I want to talk about this line

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>up for the Braves. Wish you love. I've run it

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>up last week, but now that they're talking about the

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Braves and it's worth talking about again. Geraldakunia the number

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>one overall pick. I said yes last week, and then

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to stand by that. And it's because of

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the stolen basis Mike Trout. You know, eleven solen bases

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>last year. He's been a little banged up the past

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of seasons as well. Ronald Lacuna in his first

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>full season with the Atlanta Braves, he goes thirty thirty.

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the stolen basis come back a little bit, but

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to come close to that. Trout's

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you a better batting average, but the stolen

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>bases are so so so hard to come by. It's close,

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you're splitting hairs. But give me Ronald D. CuNi over

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>my Trout. It's crazy, It's absolutely crazy, And I get it, man,

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>like he's got a better shot doing it's It seems

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to be Ronald Kunio is so much more comfortable in

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that leadoff spot than anywhere else. And I think that

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a Kunia, certainly in the conversation like Trout, is this

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the year he goes too? Not for me? I was

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking number one, probably Joe Madden reinfigorates him a little bit?

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that what's gonna happen here? Greg? Why not? Oh? Man?

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So all right, I mean you're not taking yellows over

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Trout either, right, Like that would just be what's the

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>point of that? Yellow says the knee injury as well,

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>So I would go Trout trying to Kunia clearly, Uh,

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>your first too. Now. I wanted to stay with the

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Raves lineup because in name that, and again I haven't

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you all over my research yet here, but I think

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I really wanted to know about Frankie. It was Austin

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Riley when he got called up last year. He was

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, Like, oh my god, Austin Riley's coming out.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>We've been waiting, We've been waiting. We're winning. Got off

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to a fast start and then he went back down.

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>He is he going to play every day? He's a

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>starting third basement now with Josh Donaldson out, He's a

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>d V currently in the NFBC. He's two seventy eight.

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>That's costing me nothing. He's going around Brendan McKay, Garrett Richards,

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Phil Myers, and Dylan Bundy. So it's costing you nothing.

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Did you have Austin Riley? Does you have a job

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>as of now? I know you love Ross Resource, I

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>think use But they have Johan Camargo as he's starting

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>third basement of the Atlanta Braves right now. Then Johan

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Camargo is gonna stand in the way of Austin Riley. No,

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so either, right, I think you know,

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>if Austin Riley plays well in the spring, I mean

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>he had major deficiencies last year when he came up

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Major league. Love I mean, he took the

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>league by storm here the first month he was here.

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>He was great, mashing home runs, Butcher and the outfield

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>his natural position is third base, which you know, maybe

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that don't even help him at the dish. We've talked

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>about that before, where you know, when guys have to

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>change their position play the outfield. With Reese Hoskins as well,

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>right when he had to play the outfield, Um, we

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>saw the uh. We saw the production come down for

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Reese Hoskins. So just where two years old, there was

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a chance Austin Riley breaks camp as a starting third

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>baseman for the Atlanta Braves. It wouldn't surprise me if

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>he spends the first month or so down while he

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>works on his defense. If he's playing well in the spring,

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>then I think he will have a shot. It also

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't surprise me if he look you want to find

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>lottery tickets late that have upside, especially power potential. This

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is someone that can hit over thirty home runs if

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>he plays every single day in a really good Atlanta

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Braves lineup. Well, So he played eighty games last years you, um,

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say he hit eighteen home runs last year?

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Have an I haven't done any Austin Riley research yet,

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So he had eat eating homewards last year in eighty games.

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Pretty good. The problem, of course, is at the plate

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>with the discipline. He only walked five percent of the

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>time in the Major League after walking ten percent of

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the time in Triple AT to start off the year.

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Over forty games, the strikeout percentage went way up from

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>triple AT to the major strikeout rate in Triple A

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>over thirty six percent in the majors, And that obviously

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>affect that his average was just twenty six and his

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>on base percentage was terrible given that he didn't walk

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>at to seventy nine. Is there any way to tell

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Frank Ken Austin Riley improves those areas you look at

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the hard hit percentage was good, forty two and a

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>half percent. That's good. Line drivers at that's good too.

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>When he made contact the ball went far. He just

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't make contact enough. Is there a way? And I'm

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>sure you're looking at swinging strike percentage and that kind

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of stuff to say, like, hey, if he's just a

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit more patient and he lets the ball has

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>come to him and he isn't swinging everything because his

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>chase rate was over forty one percent, for god's sake,

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>why can't he be a lot better? Right? Like, no,

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the quality of contact is great, it's just how often

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>does he make contact? That's what it comes down to.

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I think in a sophomore year. This is someone who,

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, last year at Triple A was striking out

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent of the time. You look at every other season, however,

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>you know eighteen and the years before that. You know

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he did hover around twenty percent the years before that.

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>So look, he cut down his strikeouts at Triple A

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>last year, which helped him, you know, bring his batting

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>average up. He's got to do that at the major

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>league level. He's got to become better in terms of

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>plate discipline. A lot of young players who come up

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 1>have that issue. So you're right, when he makes contact.

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 1>His quality of contact is no joke over hard hit rate.

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 1>H he has the percent flyball that's maybe even a

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit too high as well. Maybe he's swinging for

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the fences too much. But if he can just cut

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>down that strikeout right to his batting average goes up

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to fifty right there. First name of the sleeper list,

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>you're in fair enough can knock you on that one.

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back. We'll hit on the braves pitching, and

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>he just took Max Freed. He likes Mike Folton Evitch

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. Let's talk about both those guys on the

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>other side of this. NFL season is now upon us,

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>so you can be going the eighth person awayen one

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in a FanDuel Draft Kings tournament by settinger

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>lineups using the Daily Order dot Com DFS lot of optimizer.

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're playing Dailey Fantasy Sports and not using Daily

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Order dot Com, you're doing it wrong. Sign up now

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>for the NFL Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections,

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and better results into promo code action for as ten

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>percent discount is that's promo code action for as ten

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>percent discount. Dailor Order dot Com where millionaires are made.

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>All right back here, all the ffs, Frank Stample, reg Sausman, Graggy.

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>We are here to remind the people, Hey, you want

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the next Naily Fantasy millionaire, then dog on

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>your NBA DFS competition with Daily Order dot Com. Dominate

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>on Vandolian DraftKings all season long. Leap pros with the

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rotor dot Com outimized are the most accurate projections

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in NBA DFS, plus a lot of alert's breaking news

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>late swamp support so much more. Ten percent off on

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with the promo code dunk Jailely

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Roder dot com slash dunk to learn more jail Roder

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash dunk Roda dot com. Millionaires are made,

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>all right, Frank you a few moments ago to Max

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Freed in this industry mock and he told me that

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>he is climbing. He's a guy I like coming out

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>spring training last year because I believe it was like

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Freeman was like, this guy is the best picture

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>we have and well for a lot of the season,

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>eventually like it. Max Freed going one forty right now

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>over on the nfb CE. What do you like about

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Max Freed? Well, what I like about Max Freed was that, um,

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts were great. The strikeout minus walk cread. I mean,

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>this guy nine over nine case per nine, two point

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>five walks for nine last year, four point zero two

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>year A he was unlucky three point three two x

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>fip greg in his first full season over a hundred

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>and sixty five innings pitch last year. He's still just

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty six years old. There's a lot to like here.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>He's basically fastball, curveball. But his curveball is nasty. It's

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the best in the league already. I would

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>say that pretty confidently, right, So he's got some he's

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>got the swing and miss curveball, he's got a mid

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>nineties fastball, and he had he got enough under his

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>belt last year. You know, he had seventeen wins a

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty five point two endings pitch. So with

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that team's offense, should get some wins as well. The

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>problem is he's moving up the draft board right now.

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned where's he going one forty, So he's climbing.

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, ideally you'd want free to as what your

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 1>SP four, maybe SP five, and the one forty range

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>might end up being your SP three, and maybe that's

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in deeper leagues like the fifteen teamers. But he's moving

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 1>up right now. He's gonna end up being drafted as

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a top thirty starting pitcher. How much would you pay

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for him? And off the top of my head, let's

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>say fifteen bucks. Yeah, a lot, it's a lot, that's

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, right, it's a top thirty starting pitcher. I

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>love to pay like ten bucks for him. I hope

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we have money to play with, and we messed it

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.239
<v Speaker 1>up this year. Greg probably me raising my hand. Are

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you yelling at man? Now? We we were good? Lesson

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we did the most part. We were good. We were

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>on the same we're on the same page, you're on

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the same page. And then get yelled at by Frank

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>at all It was great. I'm just gonna listen. I'm

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>just gonna want pitching. You're gonna want all these players

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't want. I'm gonna want pitching. Yeah. Well, we

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>were already starting to discuss our our strategy. We're in

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen team, a very competitive I don't think I

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think we finished higher than twelfth. Ever, No that's

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>not true. There's the first year, the first year we

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>were inside the top ten at fifteen. Yeah, that counts

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>right for something. Yeah, we have we haven't been in

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the It's a very competitively there's a lot of really

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>good players in there. Ton is Net League, Anando and

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Dane shared team. They don't really care, they don't really well.

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Colton and the wolf manner in that league as well.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's a really competitive league. And we've already started

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about some some strategy, some some ways we want

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to go. Yeah, we have an idea of what we

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>spend up for this year. I kind of have an

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I kind of have an idea of what we want

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>to spend you know, you and I will. You're in

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>on Max Freed as well. Yeah, like what you saw

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of him last year, And yeah, I I liked him

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>as a prospect. I liked him last year. I'm very

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>very in on Max Freed. I you know, I retweeted

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>something the other day from I believe it was sp

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>streamer on Twitter which basically had a side by side

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>breakdown of Freed versus so Rocca your boy, and Soroka

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is being drafted ahead of Freed. Soroka gives off a

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Hendricks kind of vibe, you know, where he gives

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you the good ear a, the good whip. He's not

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>going to get a ton of strikeouts. I think that

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>there's room for the strikeouts to improve for Soroka this year.

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he gets up around like eight case per nine,

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>slightly over that. And I like Sroka. He's guy. He's

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>he's being drafted very high this year. And I don't

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>like what walks for nine two point one one from Stroka.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>It's very good What are you talking about? Is that good?

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Who walks for nine? It's great? Great, you've been out

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of the game for a while. It's good too. Who

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is great? Max reads max freees like two point five five.

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say anything that approaches three and over three

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is bad. Like Robbie Ray is like three and a

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>half walks, He's the worst. Yes, Like Louis Castillo's over

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>three walks for nine a very bad. He's very good.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>He's just walks. A lot of people stroke guys aren't

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>great at seven way three eight. You know what, I'm

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>actually mad at someone to Kyle Hendricks in this draft,

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, actually wanted Kyle. We're not doing that to that.

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>We're not doing Kyle Hendricks. No, I don't want well

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>for what you for what you need, if you need.

0:23:56.000 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what Kyle Hendricks is good. It's absolutely not happening already. Alright,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the extrait last year by Yeah, so that's high. That's

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>higher than max freeds. That's higher than max freeds. But

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>that's why, Like if you put them side by side,

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>what was Saroka's ear A two and change, people are

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>going to see the sub three e r A and

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to instantly react to Saroka there and Max

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Freed had an ear A over four, yet his peripheral

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>numbers his ex fit was lower than Max Mike Sarroka's.

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>He gets more strikeouts, a few more walks for Max Freed.

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I do worry about whether or not Freed can the

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.479
<v Speaker 1>gains that he made in command and control last year,

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Greg can he keep those this year? And he maintained

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that this year. So that's the only question mark I

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>might have because uh, in every other level in the

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>minors and throughout his time in the majors, brief time

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>he walked a lot of people. Max Freed, he was

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>very wild so improved tremendously in that regard last year.

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Can he maintain that this year? I think that's a

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.479
<v Speaker 1>fair question when it comes to Max Freed, Max freak like,

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you though like him. I just took him

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in this mock. That's fantastic. The rest of the Braves

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>rotation does potentially include Mike folton Evitch, who how did

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I take Faulty? Right now? Gregor shouldn't take Sean Maniah.

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I know I like mana atas talking about that right

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>because my falton evit two years ago, really seconds to

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>pick Jesus Christ. So we would spend time editing shows

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and watching my FOLTONEVITG pitch. Everyone was kind of waiting

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>from the fall off and he didn't. He was awesome

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. I like Luke Weaver too fat right now,

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:30.719
<v Speaker 1>all right, so you had to pick right now, Greg,

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you make my pick live on the air.

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>He's so angry Bolton vits or Snai seconds. Right, it's done,

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>great folding now, yes, you can talk about faulty. So

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>two years ago he was awesome, right, Like, the strikeouts

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>were great, the control was it was under under control.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't going deep into games. But you know, he

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>was good last year, taking much earlier than he should

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>have been, and he was a complete disaster. He was

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>hurt early, probably never got healthy, but maybe that's part

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of the reason he wasn't great until the second half

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Right, He wasn't fully healthy. Is that possible? Yeah,

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I mean his first half was basically a wash.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was dealing with the he was like

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a flexor mass's forearm, which normally is a prelude to

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John surgery. So you were worried about the forearm

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and the elbow for Mike Fulton Eviage someone who throws

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>extremely hard and relies on his slider a lot as well,

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>So you have all those concerns over Fulty. But then

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, and I pointed this out to

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you the other day, we started scrolling through falties game

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>log right and basically from August on, he starts going

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>deeper into games. He's getting more comfortable, the strikeouts are

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>starting to come, the command is starting to come back

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>for Fultonevitch. I'm not saying that he's gonna be the

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>player that he was in eighteen, right, because the peripheral

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers say that he got lucky that season. But is

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>he someone that can pitch to a I don't know,

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>three seven e r A with a strikeout per ending

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>at one point to five whip something like that. You're

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>getting this guy pretty late in draft right now. Is

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>your SP five SP six? At times, I think that

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>there's some upside there with Fulty, and I think he

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>flashed that in the second half, So I'm with you.

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I think he's one of the guys that I'm going

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to be target targeting later on in drafts along with

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Maniahs and the luke Weavers. Those, those are a

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of pictures that I'm here you need to know about.

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Foldonevitch six point three seven e r A. In the

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>first half last year it was a wash. I told

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you two point six five e r A. In the

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>second half, that's how good he was. Man Strikecots fifty

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the first half fifty five second half of the strike

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Cats were still there on on both sides of things.

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was, as you just drive, so much

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>better in the second half. Specifically, um, in the month

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of August and September. He didn't pitch the Mother of

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>July other reason. The minors are he was hurt three

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety in August one r A down the stretch for

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the Braves in September and into October, Mike foltonevitch really

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>really good. Uh the second half over the season last

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>year for the ELATBA, Brad's been a little bit unlucky too.

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Like old much very much on the radar once again

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for us. Yeah, I'm I'm in agreement with you here. UM.

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think there's much more to say about

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Faulty now until I deep dive and see what I

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>find when it comes to Mike ful Tanvich. Absolutely, Mike

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>fultonavit in very much on the radar for your BFFs

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>here this season. Let's continue on, Frankie boy, about these

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Braves. What we're going to continue to do when drafting.

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>And we've gone through the rotation, we've gone into Austin Riley.

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>What about your boy Freddie Freeman? Right, Freddie Freman, your guy,

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>he's been your guy at first base? Do you go back? Yeah?

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why would you go away from Freddie Freeman?

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Everything is legit when it comes to him. The batting

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>average is stellar. Uh, doesn't hurt you at stolen bases either.

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, he'll give you a six to five to ten,

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing crazy, but a legit four category contributor that doesn't

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>hurt you in stolen bases. Great lineup that we've been

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about all day long now has Marcello Juna charting

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>behind him the career year last year thirty eight homers,

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>runs over a hundred and twenty r b i s

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>as well the batting average to ninety for his career.

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>You're I don't, I don't see any reason to go

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>away from Freddy Freeman. So yeah, I think where he's going,

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the end of the first round, beginning

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of the second round. It's a great the obvious question

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>foundation you know what's coming. No On Aeronado or Freddie Freeman.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's go knowing what we know now, if Eronado is

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado in course field, I will take Eronado over Freeman.

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Freeman versus Anthony Rizzi. Freeman versus Anthony Rizzo was

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Oh gosh, God coming up here on the grid.

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>We're talking Zion Williamson. Zion Williamson. He's back tonight for

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the New Orleans Pelicans, and we're gonna break it down

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>how many minutes he's expected to play, what role he's

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>going to provide both fantasy owners, betters, wagers, and of

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>course New Orleans Pelicans. The Felicans are favored tonight by

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>three and a half points at home over the Spurs.

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Telicans were the hottest teams gets the spread in the NBA.

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Nine of ten games, they've covered four for you. Better's

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>got to get on this, Frank, it was I almost liason.

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>You feel the misty, you feel the aura, you want

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to bet on them, but is that the right move?

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I like the Pelicans tonight. They're playing good ball eleven

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and five in their last sixteen games straight up, thirteen

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and three against US spread in their last sixteen games,

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like the overnight game, so I know it's been climbing

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>currabing all day. It's a big number thirty seven, but

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>they've been playing to the over as well, so have

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the San Antonio's. Give me the pells to cover tonight,

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and I like the over in that game and over

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in all. Maybe find out how many minutes next? Coming

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>up next, Christian Clark will join us. You want the edge,

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>get on the grid. We're back after this NFL season

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>is now upon us and you can be going the

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>eighth person away one million dollars in a FANDULA Draft

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Kings tournament. My setinger lineups using the Daily Order dot

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Com DFS lot of optimizer. If you were playing Daily

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com, you're

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL Access

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better results

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>into promo code action for as ten per cent discount.

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's promo code action for as ten per cent

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>discount Taylor Order dot com, where millionaires are made. You

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>can make the case that's night is the most anticipated

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>night in the NBA thus far. Right, You've got Christmas Day,

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:24.719
<v Speaker 1>you have Opening Night, and we'll get in the playoffs

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'll start weekending that stuff. But tonight is the

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>return of the debut of the number one overall pick

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in the draft, one of the most hyped number one

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>overall picks we have seen in sometime, and that is

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the debut of Zion Williamson. And to talk about it

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>with us, it's Pelicans beat refighter from Note Pete, Pelicans

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>beat writer from NOLA dot com. It's Christian Clark. What's

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>going on? Christian? Hey? Hey, how you guys doing today?

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>We're doing fanstashtake. Of course, you cover the Pelicans for

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>NOLA dot com, the Times Picking un as well as

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>host the bird Watch podcast. We'll get bird Watch. Let's

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>just call it the Zion Watch because it's here tonight.

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And the number one question I know that I've had

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in regards to what I want to do with my

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>money on the Pelicans is well, how much should we

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>expect out of Zion tonight? How long is he going

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to play? For what do you think. Yeah, so I'm

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>expecting Zion to to be in the starting lineup tonight.

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I think they're just gonna go ahead and throw them

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>with the starters and see how it looks. They they've

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>said that they're not going to place a hard minute

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>restriction on him. Um. What they've said instead is that

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna just monitor the bursts that he plays. Um.

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I this is just for me, But I wouldn't anticipate him,

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, playing it in more than three, you know,

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>separate stretches, and I would probably even you know, bet onto. Um.

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, he's missed the first four or four

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>games of the season, so well, they say they're not

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna put a minute restriction on him. Um, I wouldn't

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>expect it to be a lot. I mean I would.

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I would probably guess somewhere in uh, I don't know,

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes range, right. He also the Also, the thing

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is the Pelicans are playing really well, so it's not

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like you have to push Zion tonight in his debut,

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>right like you don't. You don't have to force it

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>anymore when they were one of the worst teams in basketball.

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You have to force it. You want to rush Ion.

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>They didn't. Now they're in a position where the kind

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of use the playing without, no, they don't. They're playing

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>extremely well. Eleven and five straight up, thirteen and three

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>against the spread in their last sixteen games are the

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Pelicans, so you're right there playing well. Uh.

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>The original timetable for this injury was six to eight weeks.

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Greggy has surgery on that tormaniscus. He misses three months.

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:32.959
<v Speaker 1>It's nearly three months of the day that he has

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>had surgery. He had it back on October one. Christian,

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I know you spoke about, you know, what you expect tonight.

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I've read a few things about maybe fifteen to twenty

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>minutes you mentioned, you know, maybe he plays uh in

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in three stints tonight. What's the outlook moving forward as well,

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>though not just for tonight. Are they how cautious are

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they going to be? Obviously this is their prize possession

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>first overall pick the most high player coming out of

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>college in a long long time. What's the plan for

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Zion for the future right now? This season? In the

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>short term, is there gonna be I mean it's restriction

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the season. Is he gonna play

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>back to backs. I mean, what have you heard regarding

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Zion Williamson for the rest of the season, not just tonight. Yeah,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>So I would say fairly cautious. Um, Look, they're they're trying,

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna try really hard to make the playoffs. Um,

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and they've they've already been overly cautious bringing Zion back.

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So you know it's gonna depend how it works in

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of games. But I think you know,

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a handful of games with our restriction, and then you know,

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>if he looks good next three or four games, then

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of let him do a sting and and maybe

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>approach thirty minutes. Uh. They have set that they're playing

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to hold them more than likely playing to hold them

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>out of back to back the second night of back

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 1>to back, so that chops four games off right there.

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe they've four sets to back to backs. So

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>fairly cautious is what I would say. All right, great,

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So from a fantasy perspective, you know, if you own Zion,

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe a handful of games where he's under this minute

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes restriction, but you know, once he gets back in

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the flow of things, uh, maybe not no minutes cap there,

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:05.919
<v Speaker 1>but you should expect him to sit out the second

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>night of back to backs moving forward, So, as Christian

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>alluded to though, right, a lot of it's going to

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>be based on feel and how he looks and how

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.360
<v Speaker 1>he feels the good. The good part about Zian Williamson

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't like it's Kevin Duran has been. The league has

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of miles on those knees. Zian Williamson just

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the freshman at Duke when he came out. He's young,

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>he's ready to rock, and they have been overly cautious.

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned he's been out for three months for an

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>injury that should have taken six to eight weeks. He's

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be ready to go tonight, and I think how

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>comfortable he is tonight and going forward will probably dictate

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>his playing time here. But my question for you, christianer

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 1>again we're talking to Christian Clark NOLA dot Com hosts

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>The Board, watch podcast times Picker Unit as well, and

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>how does Zion Williamson being back affect everybody else on

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the Pelicans. I drafted Drew Holiday as the guy who's

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna really step up and be this leader both on

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.439
<v Speaker 1>and off the court for New Orleans. I drafted Brandon Ingram,

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>figuring he would have to step up without Zia Williamson. There,

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>how do all of these guys interact and alongside Zion

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Williams and now, well, you know, I think that's really interesting.

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Brandon Ingham as the biggest story here through

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the season. I mean, he developed

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>into a bona fide star, you know, leading scorer on

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the team, one of the most sufficient high volume scorers

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA. I'm I'm curious, you know, how Ingram

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and Williamson meshed with the forward spots. Um. I don't expect,

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, becau Zion to take a lot from from

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>what Ingram has been able to do, mostly because I

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of view Zion as a plug and play player.

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Like on that Duke team, he was the number two option.

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Arch Barrett attempted five pour shots the game again, and

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Zion was still, you know, able to get his numbers.

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>He can. He's that guy who likes has to have

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the ball in his hands to really impact the game.

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can kind of bast on like putbacks

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and cuts and and lobs. So I would say it's

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a it's a fairly seams fit um. You know, obviously

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the big factors of the health. You know, we see

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Gentry with his big man get a lot of

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>productivity out of them. Julius Randowly got a marcial contract

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of the New York Knicks ekst Alvin Gentry. Even this

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>year we've seen people step in jalil O big games.

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Dust Favorites has played well over the past month or so.

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Come on, don't disrepect Derrick Favorits. Anthony Nave is obviously

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the example to Marcus Cousins who they traded for.

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot of success with these bigger guys

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>in this system. Levin Gentry and you know his Zion

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Lives is just the next guy. Yeah, and they played

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>an extremely high pace too. I think that fits into

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Zion's skill set, getting up and down the court where

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>he can catch lobs and he can be a rim

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>runner as well. Christian, we know that he is a

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>freak athlete. Two d and eighty five pounds that is

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weight. What has the training staff been

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 1>doing with him to ensure his health moving forward? You know,

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is he trying to lose weight? Because I've heard a

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say that, you know, him at that

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 1>playing weight of two hundred and eighty five pounds, that

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.439
<v Speaker 1>much mass on his body, constantly jumping and as high

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>as he jumps, that that's going to affect his you know,

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>long term health in the end. Be a. So, has

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the training staff been doing anything differently with Zion since

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, come to the NBA and joined the

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Pelicans. Is there a plan for him to

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>cut some of that weight or is this just the

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>weight that he's comfortable playing at and they'll kind of

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:16.439
<v Speaker 1>manage it from their own Yeah. I mean, like you said,

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>part of what makes him so interesting that he's just

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>an unprecedented player. There's never been a guy who's two

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred eighty five pounds and can jump forty five inks

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.919
<v Speaker 1>in the air. It's it's just ridiculous that he's able

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to do these things. You know, look at how it looks.

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that the Pelicans really, you know, plan

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 1>on cut in a bunch of weight. Um. What they've

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>focused on the biggest thing during this rehabilitation process is

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>improving his flexibility. UM. I mean just the word they

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>throw around a lot is torque. I mean he generates

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>so much torque, and I think they think that it'd

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:51.439
<v Speaker 1>be it'd be difficult to take a lot of weight

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>off his frame. They gaven for new improve his flexibility

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>so his frame can can endure all the forest that

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he creates. Another thing too, they focused on, is altering

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the way he lands. Um. They don't want like his

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>his need to kind of jut inwards, which it has

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>at times before when he lands. So a lot of

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the things that can do there the rehab process are

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to prevent future injuries. We'll see if they can prevent

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>those seuzure injuries and and keeps eyeing in the lineup.

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Certainly the biggest concern going forward for Zilids. Talking at

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Christian Clark here and Christian the team one of the

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>teams that are above the New Orleans Pelicans in the standings.

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Memphis Grizzlies lead of course by rookie John morand the

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 1>number two overall pick. What will Pelicans have to do?

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean obviously playing really really well right now, but

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 1>in order to cash Memphis and cash John Moran, what

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>do what? What needs to happen here over you know

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the next two months or so. Yeah, I was actually

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in Memphis for the Pelicans Grizzlies game on Martin Luther

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>King Day, must fun game to holiday bawled out. Um,

0:39:56.560 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean if Pelicans are eleven of five

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>in the last sixty games, they just had to keep

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>doing what they're doing and stay healthy. I mean, injuries,

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we're such a big story in the first top I

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 1>believe they already these eighteen different starting lineups, and mean

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of guys at beside the Guyana too, um.

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>And I think they can also sea stune what a

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of different websites consider the easiest schedule in the

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 1>n b A. I mean, they were dealing about those,

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 1>all those injuries all they had a brutal schedule, and

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Basketball Reference has them with the easiest schedules

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>going forward. I think tank a time BASM is the

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>second easiest. So I mean, I think as long as

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 1>they stay healthy, they can sease and make it really interesting,

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you can call them that out Frank

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>for a while now, it's like they can stay healthy,

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 1>like seems talented. Yeah, And I've been trying to find

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 1>that on sports books right where to find the odds

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>for what the Pelicans are to make the playoffs because

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that they can make a jump the way

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>that they've played. Look, they got off to a really

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>slow start. They had a thirteen game losing shriek. That

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is not who this team is. You look at their

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>talent on paper, they are a really talented team. Brandon

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Ingram should be an all start of this year. Holiday

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>has been has played an all star level throughout his career.

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Lonzo Ball is playing well, and now you add Zion

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Williamson to the mix. I think that if you can

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 1>find that right now, I haven't been able to find

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 1>it on the books that I'm looking at, But if

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you can find the New Orleans Pelicans their odds to

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs, I think that there's a chance that

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they can make that jump again. There three and a

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>half games behind the Memphis Grizzlies for the eighth seed. Christian,

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got to ask you again about tonight. I'm looking

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at player props for Zion Williamson. Greg His prop has

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 1>moved up. It was thirteen and a half points. It

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>has since moved up to fourteen and a half. People

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>are getting excited. They're getting Zion fever. His prop for

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>rebounds tonight is five and a half rebounds as well. Christian,

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 1>if you had to just give us a projected stat

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>line for Zion Williamson tonight, in let's say twenty minutes

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:51.359
<v Speaker 1>of action, what would you project for Zion tonight? Oh? Man,

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, a little bit high to me just

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 1>because in a minute. So I would probably take younger

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on that one. What was the run run rebounds? Five

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half? Okay, I try to take the under

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a under a point and over un rebounds, all right,

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the juice is right now, it's this

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 1>one thirty on the rebounds. Put our money where his

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:15.879
<v Speaker 1>mouth is perfect, all right. And then next time you're

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 1>in New York, if there's a Pelicans next game, you know,

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:20.359
<v Speaker 1>if you can the beer that you cost them, yeah,

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>there you go, no problem there. Yeah. So you know,

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Christian was, well, we'll get you out of here, um

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in just one moment. Of course, it's the New Orleans

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Pelicans take it on the Spurs tonight. Spurs are three

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and a half point underdogs, the totals at the two

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. You wanna make a prediction for

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the game, Oh um, I'll say the Pelicans win. I

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.359
<v Speaker 1>mean this building is gonna be on fire. They've been

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>playing really well, so yeah, I'll take uh, I'll say

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that Pelicans win. I don't know one to team cover

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the spread barely you need, man, it doesn't go that

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go over the number either, just barely barely stays

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it barely stays on. Sneaky, very very sneaky. You are

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Christian Clark. He's a smart guy. Christian Clark. He watch

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:09.800
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, The Times picking. You know, he's the host

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>of the bird Watch podcast. Christian. We appreciate your time. Man,

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 1>come back soon. Alright, guess thanks for having me right

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:17.919
<v Speaker 1>there you go. He's Christian Clark. Follow him at see

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Clark three thousand on Twitter. A lot of great insight there. Mean,

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 1>if it's gonna be a fun night, man, you can

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>tell that when the Beat reporters are excited because they're

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>just like, this is my job I gotta do. This

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is gonna write game store out here. You hear the excitement.

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>He's excited. Yeah, it's cool. You know, I thought, Greg,

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>what was the most anticipated debut like this? And so

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I saw what you wrote there and I think it

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 1>makes sense right. It was Vladimir Guro Junior last year,

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you had all these hype videos coming out Cooni of

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the year before because somebody had to sit on his

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>damn phone watch you know, there wasn't as much hype though, dude,

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 1>you sat on your phone Yankee Stadium. Me personally, I

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>was hyped about Ronald the Kun. I don't know that

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 1>the nation was. Everybody sat down to watch Vladimir Garrow

0:43:55.360 --> 0:44:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Juniors first said bat last year. Probably the most hype,

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the most pressed that the Blue Jays got all season

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>now was that day now and rightfully so. So you

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>want to watch the Pelicans will be on ESPN tonight

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 1>ter time, going up against San Antonio Spurs. I don't

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>want to take anything away from the Spurs. They played

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>good ball recently in l and they're battling for a

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>playoff spot. You know, I think if there's anyone that

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 1>can kind of embrace the energy that's going to be

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in that building tonight, it's Gregg Popovich. It's the Spurs.

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 1>They've been there before. He's been in the playoffs what

0:44:25.200 --> 0:44:28.280
<v Speaker 1>each of the past twenty years, basically past two decades.

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Greg very badly Game seven last year, though it's the

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Nuggets where he didn't foul it very stupid. All right, Well,

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what, he's had a long he's had a

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:39.359
<v Speaker 1>long he's old. You know, he's had a long run

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:41.759
<v Speaker 1>at it. You know, he's kind of tired of it now.

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>You know he's tired of winning. You can say that

0:44:45.120 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>about about the Knicks hosting the coach started livesteen this year. Awesome,

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:54.439
<v Speaker 1>this summer nice, alright, pop with the Olympics. We'll come back.

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 1>We've got three questions in three minutes, and we'll do

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 1>that to right off the show. Next NFL season is

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:11.400
<v Speaker 1>now upon us, and you can become the eighth person

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 1>away in one million dollars in a Fandueler Draft Kings

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 1>tournament by setting their lineups using the Daily Order dot

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Com DFS line of optimizer. If you're playing Dailey Fantasy

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com, you're doing

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL Access with

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better results. Into

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>promo code action for its end percent discount. That's promo

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>code action for its ten percent discount. Dailor Order dot

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Com where millionaires are made. Right there you go, Spurs

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Pelicans coming up. Thanks the Christian Clark for joining the

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 1>program today, Frankie, Yeah, great information there. Everyone's excited about

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the debut of Zion Williamson and I'm sure, I'm sure, Greg,

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that will be the most bet on game of the night,

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>both from a side perspective and from a perspective Pelicans

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and the spurt. Alright, first question today, frank how is

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the team looking all right? So I gotta kind of

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 1>figure this out myself. Um, as of now, my only

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 1>catcher is Tom Murphy now the starter of the Seattle Mariners.

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of power there, Greg, don't sleep on Tom Murphy,

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Reese Hoskins, Mike Mustakis, Matt Chapman, Javier Bayez, Elvis Andrews.

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Is the middle infielder? Interesting, Bryce Harper, Adam Eaton, Mookie Betts,

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker, and Willie Calhoun. Of course, staying on brand

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 1>with the outfielders. And then with the pictures here we

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have Shane Bieber, Luis Severino, Max Freed, You, Darvish, Seanmaniah,

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike Foltanevitch, Liam Hendricks and Ian Kennedy as my two closes. Yeah,

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about that? Right? And I just

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 1>drafted this is crazy to me, Greg, it's around twenty.

0:46:57.200 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I just took Massa hero Tanaka in a round. That's crazy.

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's never actually gonna happen, but I think

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:05.959
<v Speaker 1>people are looking at the sexy names and forgetting about

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>our boy, Mata. You're really the final question. Have we

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>got a minute left? Alright? What's your question? Do you

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>know who what starting pitcher the worst left on base percentage?

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 1>You know all in baseball last year, qualified starting pitcher,

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>qualified starting pitcher, and do you And here's the backup

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>question to that is, there's a lot of pictures. How

0:47:25.080 --> 0:47:28.080
<v Speaker 1>much does left on base percentage matter to you? Left

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:31.880
<v Speaker 1>on base percentage matters quite a bit because if the

0:47:31.960 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>e r A is super low U and they pitched

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to a very high left on base percentage, that's likely

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 1>going to regress the next season, no doubt. So this

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:41.319
<v Speaker 1>person's e r A was four forty four, left on

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>base percentage was sixty three. Can I get I mean,

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of pictures out there. Can I get

0:47:45.920 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>a passional league, national league? It's a starter. John Lester

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is not John Lester. He pitched on the cups. He

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 1>does not pitch on the cubs. At who's in Katana

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is third. I was gonna say Kantana that was one.

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I will say, uh must grove. This is why he's

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the best people. Let's go. This is why he's His

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>exit was four thirty one. Not good. I'm trying to

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>find reasons to draft him, and I'm trying to prove

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:14.839
<v Speaker 1>why you shouldn't. He's got to get better with play

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:19.759
<v Speaker 1>with runners on base, right, Greg, no, Frank, no draft

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 1>something next, non BFF tomorrow over Frank Snapple. I'm Greg Sauceman.

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Will do it all again on Friday. We hope