WEBVTT - MNF Recap, Bills Bully Boys & Wright-Ins

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Pania, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in Episode two oh one, What's Right with Nick Right?

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by US Bank. If

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 2>you ask me, nothing goes quite together like food and football,

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>especially in the fall, college football on Saturday, college Football

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Playoff coming up, and the Pros on Sunday. The US

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Bank Altitude Go Visa Signature card provides the perfect way

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 2>to earn rewards, whether watching your team with other super

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>fans at a local leadery or in.

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 3>The comfort of your living room.

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Earn four times the points when you dine out or

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 2>a food delivered. Maybe order a pizza and watch the

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Big Game on that giant screen TV of yours. Earn

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 2>two times points at grocery stores, which is great if

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 2>your tail getting at the stadium hot dogs and hamburgers.

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Even getting to the game can be rewarding. You'll learn

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>two times points at gas stations and ev charging stations.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Go to usbank dot com slash altitude go.

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 3>To learn more. Learn more.

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Pardon me about how you can earn twenty thousand bonus

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>points worth two hundred bucks if you spend one thousand

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 2>dollars in the first ninety days of opening your account.

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Score big with us Bank Altitude Go visa signature card.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Visit usbank dot com slash altitude go to apply limited

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 2>time offer. The credit or initier of this card is

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>US Bank National Association, pursuant to a license from VC USA, Incorporated.

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Some restrictions may apply. All right, huge show What a

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 2>football game last night?

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Sidebar.

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's anyone in the media business that

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 2>does better than I do at seamlessly going from the

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>actual ad read to like a different voice and pacing

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 2>on the fine print part of it. Copyright twenty twenty

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 2>three McDonald's like I just.

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Do it great. People might think that's recorded. Yeah, I

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 3>do exactly.

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I try to do what you hear, like in television

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 2>commercials when they do when it's like they're advertising like

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 2>a pharmaceutical and it's like a.

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Man happy in a meadow, and then at.

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 2>The end they're like yeah, then at the end they're

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 2>like you might poop your pants. But they want to

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 2>say it real fast. But I just think I'm great

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 2>at it. Uh, what a game last night. We'll get

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 2>right to it. So demand's's here, by the way. I

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, I haven't introduced this show in a very

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 2>long time.

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 3>My name is Nick.

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>If you're watching, you probably know it or the YouTube

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 2>algorithms since you here, or you're sick of podcasts. You

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean that you thought we're gonna be

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 2>about sports, that are just talking about the oddest sexual

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 2>proclivities imaginable. So stumbled upon us. So if you're new,

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nick. I used to show on FS one called

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 2>First Things First. You can watch it three pm Eastern

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 2>every day on Tuesdays and Thursdays. You can see this

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 2>podcast on Tuesdays. You can also see me on Colin

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Coward television show about one oh five ish Eastern every Tuesday.

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Demanday is co hosting from Los Angeles. He's my son.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>He used to be here with me. He now works

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>in LA for Fox Sports and does this with us

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Tuesdays and Thursdays. And the first two hundred episodes he

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 2>was paid in experience. The next two hundred episodes, he

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 2>will be paid in experience. All right, here's what missed

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the cut. Missed the cut for today's show, the Panthers

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 2>selling tickets for forty five cents. John Morant set to

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 2>make his season debut. Luckily, the Grizzlies had his back.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 2>They went six and nineteen without him. So weird because

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>if you remember the last couple of years, the Grizzlies

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 2>actually had an identical winning percentage with or without Josh,

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 2>So they kind of seemed like a team that maybe

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 2>could survive his apps. Spoiler alert, they couldn't and Jillette

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Stadium Booze Taylor Swift. How'd that work for them? I

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 2>hope they enjoyed the Jared Mayo Drake May era as

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 2>it is upon them. Okay, if they're lucky enough to

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 2>get Drake may But where we've got to start is

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 2>with Kansas City's own Drew Locke from least Summit Missouri. Now,

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't really get to claim Drew Locke because I

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 2>have been hard on him in his career. He was really,

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 2>really terrible for the Broncos for a lot of years.

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>But if you didn't and we're not gonna play, and

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to the game in just a moment, if

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 2>you didn't see the end of last night's Monday night

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 2>football game, the postgame interview Drew Locke does two and

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 2>a half minutes with Lisassaulters. That is downright inspirational. And

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 2>that means the only two noteworthy on field postgame interviews

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 2>that I can remember the last two years have both

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 2>come from Seahawks quarterbacks. There's the Geno one from Game one,

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it was Game one, whenever it was last year.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 2>It was a night game when he said they wrote

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 2>me off, but I ain't right back. Just an iconic

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 2>bar from Geno Smith. And then Drew Locke with some

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 2>really touching honesty. First he gave all the credit to

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 2>his teammates, genuinely. Then he said he was like, it's

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 2>been a long time since I've had a moment like this.

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 2>He's like, you have human emotions, wondering can you still

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 2>do it? And then he had a really cool, almost

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 2>accidental line where he's like, and then I got out

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>there and I'm like, yeah, I'm still the man. And

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 2>that's the thing that I think, you know, maybe we

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 2>all myself included, and I promise will get to the

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 2>actual game in a moment, forget about these backup quarterbacks

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 2>or guys who once were starters who can't hack it

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 2>and or you know, get relegated to the bench, or

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 2>guys who are just bad pros. And Drew Lock up

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 2>to this point in his career, that's what he's been.

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 2>Maybe this is a turning moment, fork in the road

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.679
<v Speaker 2>for him. Is at every other level, these guys, except

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>for Tim Boyle, at every other level, these guys dominated.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 2>In high school, they were probably the most popular, certainly

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, best athlete, just absolute alpha icon. In college,

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 2>they were one of the very best, if not the best.

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 2>They've known nothing but success and dominating. And I don't

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 2>necessarily want to say things coming easy for him, but

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of them, things come easy for him,

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 2>and then they deal with nothing but failure or disappointment

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 2>or people point that they had always been the reason

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>their teams were good, and then at the quarterback position,

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 2>when these guys don't make it, they become the reason

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 2>everyone thinks the team can't win.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 3>It's like, well, you can't win with that guy, and.

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 2>That's okay, all right, Well that's except I mean, Trevor Lawrence,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>please lead to the division. Came off a playoff win.

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>That's let's not let's not go there. Uh, listen to

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>the guy's hurt. I mean Andy had a concussion to you,

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean the serious brain injuries you're making light of.

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Guys. Come on, let's try to have some professionalism here.

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm just messing with you. De Monta he.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 2>No, yeah, he is in concussion protocol, but I'm just

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 2>trying to make you feel uncomfortable. But no, guys who

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 2>they don't have any experience dealing with. Most of these

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 2>guys have lost at various points. Trevor rarely did, but

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 2>most of them lost at various points. But they have

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 2>no experience of wait, I'm at fault here. People are

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 2>blaming me, and then that's all they experience in the pros.

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 2>And that moment for Drew Locke yesterday was phenomenal, was

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 2>not so phenomenal for Philadelphia and Demonse. That's where we

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>will really get into the show.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead.

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so Philly just lost their third straight. Drew Locke

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 4>obviously led the Seahawks to a game winning drive. Yeah yeah.

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 4>So Jalen Hurts is hurt. Obviously, nobody else or no,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 4>not not hurt. He was sick. Say anybody else in

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 4>the team was sick? Are the Are the Eagles on

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 4>fraud to watch?

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? When it comes super Bowl winner? Yeah, definitely right.

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>And so there's there's two buckets of concern for Philly.

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 2>The first one is not gonna get fixed, and that's

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>their defense. And this was This is a drum I

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 2>have been beating for two years, but this year I

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 2>have been hammering it. Can you hammer a drum? Last

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>year I thought the defense was a touch overrated. Statistically,

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 2>it was great, most sacks by any team in the

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 2>NFL since the Bears of the eighties. But when you

0:08:55.840 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 2>dug into it, last year they had a their very

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 2>soft schedule of opposing quarterbacks, and when they played good quarterbacks,

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 2>those guys cooked and it really felt like if you

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 2>could block their front four, you could do damage on them.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 2>And that then of course culminated in the Super Bowl,

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 2>where the Chiefs gained literally every single yard they could

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 2>possibly have gained in their second half possessions except for

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the final yard, which they didn't want to gain. Instead

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>they took a knee and they have that defense allowed

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight points. And now this year, no matter what

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>category you look at, the Eagles defense stinks at it

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 2>and it is if you want to do yards allowed,

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 2>where are the Eagles in the NFL in yards allowed?

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 2>The in total yards allowed, they are twentieth. In passing

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 2>yards allowed, they are twenty eighth. In points allowed, they

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 2>are twenty sixth. This is a defense on third downs,

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 2>they're bad. On red zone they're bad. They used to

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 2>be a good run defense. Now the last month they

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 2>haven't been that. And in the offseason, Eagles fans blame

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Gannon, their defensive coordinator that did such a terrible

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 2>job he got a head coaching job out of it.

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.959
<v Speaker 2>They blame Jonathan Gannon and nobody shared. If you guys

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:36.959
<v Speaker 2>remember the somewhat awkward Hard Knocks or the knockoff version

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 2>of Hard Knocks, whatever it is, the Amazon show, I

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't say not with the other of the alternative version

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 2>of Hard knocks the Jonathan Gannon speech in training camp

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 2>where he's like, who took the bus?

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 3>We got buddy, who walked? Who drove here? And it

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 3>was like a weird thing.

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Nobody shared that more on social media than Eagles fans.

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 2>They're like, oh, this guy cost us a zooper ball.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 2>And then three months into this season, Sean Decigh, you're

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 2>out of here, Matt, Patricia, you're in. And now after

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>last night, Patricia, you left Bradbury.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 3>On an island. What were you thinking? Guys, it's the personnel.

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I know you don't like to criticize the personnel because

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Howie Roseman understandably is a golden god in Philly. But

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 2>they're back seven personnel stinks and Darius Slade just had

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 2>arthroscopic surgery, your best corner, so he's out. If they

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 2>don't get to the quarterback, anyone can cook them, including

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 2>Drew Lot going ninety two yards and two minutes to

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 2>win a football game. That's not changing, that's not getting fixed.

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 2>And Philly fans tried to cope with it by like, oh,

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Kevin byertill change things.

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 3>No, he won't. Kevin Byrn used to be awesome. Now

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 3>he's fine. Oh look out Now.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 2>He got the maniac Shaq Leonard Darius Leonard from Indie Guys.

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Shack Leonard was at one of the greatest players in

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the league. Had a terrible knee injury and he was

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 2>so bad and recovering from it, Indie outright released him.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 2>He was available to the whole league. He's not coming

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to save the day for your team. And so Philadelphia

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 2>early in the year, they weren't playing great, but they

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 2>were finding ways to win.

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 3>And it's like, Okay, that's their brand.

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Now they're not playing great and they're finding ways to lose.

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 2>And now you also look at the fact that these

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 2>guys don't blow people out. Yeah, here's their games. Five

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 2>point win over New England, six point win over Minnesota.

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>And if you remember that game, Minnesota moved. I watched

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 2>that game on an playing to take your sister to college.

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 2>They moved the ball up and down the field and

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>then couldn't stop fumbling, turning it over. They had one

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 2>of those reached for the pylon fumble it turns into

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 2>a touchback. They beat the Buccaneers by two scores, Washington

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>by three in overtime, the Rams by nine lost to

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 2>the Jets beat the Dolphins by fourteen.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 3>That's a great win.

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 2>Commanders by seven, Dallas by five, the Chiefs by four

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>after the Mvs drop the Bills in overtime, then blown

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 2>out by the Niners, blown out by the Cowboys, and.

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Lost to Philly.

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, lost to Seattle with their backup quarterback not

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>being able to get a stop at the end. That

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 2>defense is not getting fixed. You're just gonna have to

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 2>hold on for dear life.

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Then you have.

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 2>The question Philly fans don't want to ask right now,

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 2>which is.

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 3>How good is Jalen Hurts? We know he's good. How

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 3>good is he? And Philly fans are going to get mad?

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 3>But the question that is.

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Going to have to be at least considered is are

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>we going to look at last year from Jalen as

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 2>an outlier year? Are we going to look at last

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 2>year as an outlier year?

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Or is this year?

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh, he's was banged up all year, some bad turnover luck.

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 2>He'll get back to it because they paid him like

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 2>last year was going to be the standard. And Jalen

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 2>now tied with Josh Allen for league leading turnovers. I

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 2>think Sam Howell as well, one of the I think

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 2>those are the leaders has had a fumbling issue, is

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 2>you know through another couple picks last night, and his

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>numbers look very similar, not identical, but similar to the

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 2>numbers of the year before his breakout season, and those

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 2>weapons are still there. So I am not writing off

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Hurts. I think he's too mentally tough, physically tough.

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I saw him cook in a Super Bowl. But I

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 2>am also saying for Philly, you have one problem that

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 2>is unignorable and is right now I think unfixable. In

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 2>your defense, you hope that's your only problem, because if

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 2>your other problem is you have a good quarterback but

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 2>have planned on having a great quarterback, that's a problem

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna have a long tail. And so now here's

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the other reality that it's easier to explain on the

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 2>podcast than on the TV show. But when it comes

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>to winning the division the right now, the the tiebreakers

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 2>for within a division go as follows, divisional record followed

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 2>by common opponent, followed by conference record, and then strength

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 2>the victory. Okay, and it might go divisional record, then

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 2>conference record than common opponent, doesn't matter. If Dallas and

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Philly both win out, Philly wins the division identical divisional record,

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>identical conference record, identical common opponent. Then it will come

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 2>down to strength the victory. And Dallas famously, doesn't you know,

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 2>they have beat up on bad teams. They don't have

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of great wins except for the win over Philly.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 2>But Philly also beat Dallas, so those cancel each other out.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Philly would win the division. However, so if they both

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 2>went out and may have the same record, Philly wins

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the division. Philly's the two or the and Dallas is

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 2>the five. However, if Philly loses one of their next three,

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 2>even if Dallas loses to Miami, everything I said about

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 2>them having the same record, it flips and now Dallas

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 2>wins all the tiebreakers. So follow me here, right, If

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 2>they both went out, Philly wins the division. But if

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Philly loses any one of their next three and Dallas

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 2>loses to Miami, then same record, Dallas wins the division

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 2>because then all of a sudden, Philly has an additional

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 2>either divisional loss against the Giants or conference loss against Arizona,

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>and Dallas would have a non conference loss against Miami. Okay,

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 2>so Dallas's ability to win that division opened up significantly.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Yesterday.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, for the Cowboys that's massive. We'll talk more about

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 2>them in a moment. And for Philly, oh boy, if

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 2>they fall to the five seed demons, you know who

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna have to deal with. Oh, this would be

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 2>a first thing's first dream. They have to deal with

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 2>the winner of the NFC South. You know who that's

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 2>gonna be.

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Bake Show. Oh my goodness.

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 2>If Baker Mayfield at home cooks up Bruce super Bowl pick, oh,

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 2>oh my, that would be next to the Chiefs winning

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a super Bowl. Like my ideal out comes this postseason.

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Number one is the Chiefs win a super Bowl. Number two,

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 2>if I'm being honest, is that my month's long fading

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 2>of purty comes through in spectacular fashion. Number three would

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 2>be Baker Mayfield cooking up Brus super Bowl pick.

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh. Nothing would be sweeter, Nothing would be sweeter.

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 4>You want Rock Perdy to win the Super Bowl? Is

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 4>that what you just said?

0:18:58.160 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 3>No? I said, I know.

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I said, my month's long fading of party coming to

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 2>fading means going against.

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, okay, And then they played.

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, well you have a follow up here?

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Philly, I don't think Philly is going to lose

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 4>another game for the rest of the season.

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 3>But uh, but they go Giants.

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Hold on real quick because they go Giants Cardinals.

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, whenst I mean, the Cowboys definitely have a way

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 4>better chance of losing a game before the Eagles doing

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 4>these last three.

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 2>I understand, as I just explained there, the Cowboys can

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 2>lose to Miami and be fine if Philly.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Loses another game.

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Rights, I mean right now, I mean they're ten point

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 2>favorites against the Giants, and we'll see what they are

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 2>against the Cardinals. I'll tell you right now, Kyler might

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 2>be able to cook them up. Kyler might be able

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 2>to make some hay on that secondary.

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I just Philly, when your past defense is this bad,

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 2>there's no game you're a lock for. You just lost

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 2>to Drew Lock. And I know it's been the top

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 2>of the show giving Drew Lock as flowers.

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 3>But that did happen? You lost to Drew Lock? All right,

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 3>what's the follow up here?

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so last night Jason Kelcey was called advancing the

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 4>ball before the snap happen off a week of offensive

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 4>through that, did do you think Kadarius Tony of Press

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 4>God Great, do you think do you think Kadarius Tony

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 4>might have put the pressure on the refs to be

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 4>consistent with that call, and now they're might have gotten

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 4>the two push.

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 3>So here's the thing.

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 2>I I tweeted that there's a long tail of the

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Canarias Tony offensive off sides. During Sunday and Saturday's games,

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>there were six offensive off sides called six There were

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 2>three called the entire twenty twenty one and twenty twenty

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 2>two seasons combined. So I do not think that's coincidental.

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I do not think that is random. I think the referees,

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 2>who are human did not like that. The face of

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the league and the best coach of the league and

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 2>the discussion point of the league was about this penalty,

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 2>and they were like, we're gonna e f and call it.

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna show you we care about this penalty. But

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 2>then it extended to, all right, if we are going

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 2>to pay this close of attention to detail the other thing,

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, I'm gonna make a prediction. The

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 2>next thing to come is, if you're watching that Eagles

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 2>game last night, you're like, man Lane Johnson sure seems

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 2>to get out of his stance and start his past

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 2>block set a beat early every time, of course he does,

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 2>and he has for his whole career. He's timed it perfectly.

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 2>It's technically against the rules. The refs haven't called it forever.

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 2>They might start. But the other thing Jason Kelsey does,

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 2>which is one of the reasons he's one of the best,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 2>if not the best center of all time, is on

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 2>short yardage plays, he turns a fourth and one or

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 2>a third and one into third or fourth and half

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 2>a yard. He moves the ball forward a full half yard,

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 2>which in a tush push scenario is incredibly valuable. And

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the referees dingdom on it last night, and I don't

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>think it's coincidental. I also don't think, as I said

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 2>last week and people thought I was a Chiefs fan coping,

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 2>any of this is actually good.

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 3>For football or football fans.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 2>You can argue, at least with Jason Kelsey's penalty, his

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 2>team's gaining an actual advantage. But I think the referees

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 2>have proven to us they are not equipped right now,

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 2>at all times to even do the most basic parts

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:04.479
<v Speaker 2>of their job, and now they're adding to it in

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>a way that I don't think is helpful to anybody.

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.719
<v Speaker 2>But I think they're trying to prove a point, and

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's coincidental.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 4>All right, Next, so your Chiefs finally got back in

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 4>the win column and they are now plus three hundred

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 4>to win the AFC behind Baltimore. They beat the Patriots

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 4>by ten points. The Patriots by ten points. Yep, is

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 4>now the best time to double down on the Chiefs

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 4>winning the AFC.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean it was probably would have been before this

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 2>past week, maybe, but the odds are around the same.

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Here's the deal, as demands, sarcastically says, beat the Patriots

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 2>by ten points, as I deal with the Wilds and

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 2>Brew spending the entire show talking about what's wrong with

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs.

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, take the Niners out. Take the Niners out.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Who's the team in the NFL that you can confidently

0:23:56.560 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 2>say has either less problems or is better than cant City.

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Tell me, are you gonna say Baltimore or A You're

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 2>gonna say nobody? Is it Baltimore? You know what I'll

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 2>give you Baltimore. Okay, I'll give you Baltimore. Take the

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Take the Niners in Baltimore out. Is there any team

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 2>in the league that you can even make fine? An

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 2>argument is better than Kansas City?

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Is there is there? Honest question?

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Uh? No, h I rank the one Okay, the one

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 4>argument would probably have to be Dallas right now? Huh.

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 2>You want to make the argument for Dallas today, We're

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna talk about what Dallas did.

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 3>That you could.

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 2>So here's my question, because I think it would be

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it would be. I'm glad you said Dallas.

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 2>I think right now, a fair power rankings might be

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco, Baltimore, Kansas City, and Dallas one through four. Right,

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco, Baltimore, Kansas City, Dallas. I think that some

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 2>people would have those power.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 3>Rankings, and I would say that's fine.

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 2>So if at worst the Chiefs are the third best

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 2>team in football, do you think they are discussed as such?

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the Kansas City Chiefs, outside of my

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 2>commentary are discussed like one of the very best teams

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 2>or a team in wild disarray? Do you think they

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 2>are discussed like a true bonafide A level championship contender

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 2>or even after going to Gillette and you said it sarcastically,

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 2>they repeat the Patriots by ten points, took mercy on

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots took knees when they couldn't even run out

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.479
<v Speaker 2>the clock to not score thirty five on them, a

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 2>team that everyone was talking about had the best defense

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 2>in football the last month moved the ball at will?

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Was that the discussion was it that Rashi Rice has

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 2>come on to where he's going to be one thousand

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 2>yard ten touchdowns as a rookie, or was it that

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 2>they have one player on the team that keeps dropping

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 2>the ball? Fifty three man roster. Do you think there

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 2>has been more discussion over the last few weeks about

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes, the reigning.

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 3>League MVP and Super Bowl.

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>MVP, playing apex level Mahomes the last couple of weeks

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 2>when he had in the first two months of or

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 2>about the twenty eighth most important player on the roster,

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Karius Tony. I think it's pretty obvious what it's been.

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that the commentary surrounding the Chiefs, they are

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 2>discussed at when we talk about the Chiefs offense. If

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 2>I tell you right now they are top ten in

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 2>yards and points, I think.

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 3>That shocks the audience.

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 2>It's like, wait, they're top ten and that's the thing

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 2>we talk about being broken. If I tell you right

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 2>now that the Chiefs have more production from their number

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 2>one receiver this year, Rashi Rice, than they did last year.

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 2>You'd say that can't be. They lost Juju, and Juju

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 2>had three touchdowns last year three. You didn't have a

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 2>thousand yards and so my frustration is a simple one.

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 2>They never get blown out. They have no coin flip

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 2>wins and four coin flip losses, and we know those

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 2>things even out, and all of the discussion is about

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 2>what's wrong with them?

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Did I do some of that to them by predicting

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:32.400
<v Speaker 2>to go twenty and Oh?

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Maybe, but that ship has long sailed. They lost first game.

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Of the year. I think that would expect seat Patrick Mahomes.

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, you got the greatest quarterback in the league

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 4>right now on your team. Probably just expect them to

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 4>blow teams out or do a little bit better, probably

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 4>hold them to a higher standard. Just confused, Why what's

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 4>taking so?

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I guess so I so and again, But you said

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 2>not really taking off of You ain't the third best

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 2>team in the league. So if the standard is that,

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 2>if they are not the far and away best team

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 2>in football, something's wrong with them, then I'm here to

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:04.959
<v Speaker 2>tell you no team in league history would live up

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 2>to that standard every single year, and then we get

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 2>to Mahomes sover. So I'm glad you said that, because

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 2>here's the other part of it. If I were to

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 2>tell you right now, Patrick Mahomes this season leads the

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 2>NFL in total yards, is tied for fourth in the

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 2>NFL and touchdowns. It has a career high in completion percentage,

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 2>is fourth in the NFL. And QBR does that line

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 2>up with the commentary? No, and he has more picks

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 2>this year than in years past.

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, go ahead, Yeah, I was about to say

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 4>he's got a touchdown to pick ratio a little bit

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 4>higher on the base, I guess.

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 2>So, I guess I would argue that you can't double

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 2>dip the criticism. So are those picks because the wide

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 2>receivers stink and that's the big problem for the Chiefs.

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Or is it that Mahomes isn't playing up to his standard?

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 2>It logically, it doesn't quite follow that.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 3>It's both. It's not the wide.

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Receivers are doing Mahomes dirty and Mahomes isn't playing well enough.

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 2>If you want to say, actually, Mahomes needs to play better.

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 3>The wide receivers are fine.

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 2>We can have that discussion, and if you want to

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 2>say the wide receivers are doing him dirty, then we

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 2>can have that discussion. But we are going to and

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Vegas agrees. By the way, the Niners are massive Super

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Bowl favorites, and then Baltimore and Kansas City are two

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 2>three with it being very close, we're going to get

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 2>to a place where by the end of the regular season,

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 2>when all the dust is settled, by the end of

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the wildcard round of the playoffs, the Chiefs are the

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 2>favorites to win the AFC. And aside from on my

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 2>show when I'm talking, the vast majority of conversations surrounding

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 2>them all year has been what's wrong with them?

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think that is misplaced. That's all. We'll see

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 3>if I'm proven wrong.

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, Like, let me ask this question, do you think

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 2>there has been more positive commentary this season overall on

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the Kansas City Chiefs or on the Buffalo Bills, on

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes or on Josh Allen. Because one team is

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 2>in ninth place and needs to win out to make

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs and the other on Christmas Day will clinch

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 2>their division for the eighth straight year, it just doesn't

0:30:58.160 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 2>quite sync up to me.

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 4>All right, now, okay, so, uh, your Cowboys are blown

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 4>out by the Bills the other day. The Bills are

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 4>officially not out of the playoffs. They are still in it,

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 4>but like you said, they have to fight for their

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 4>lives on Christmas Day? Yea, how could this have gone

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 4>any worse for you? Do you? How do you feel

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 4>about that?

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it was especially now that Philly lost, because

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 2>it's a blown opportunity for Dallas. They could have been

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 2>solo first place in their division. They could have kept

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 2>the pressure on San Francisco, where San Francisco would.

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Have to keep winning in order to be the one seed.

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Now, as far as the Bills, I mean I the

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Bills were called during this game the hottest team in

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the NFL. Before the game started, I should say, they

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 2>were on a one game winning streak where they didn't

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 2>even play well in the second half of that one game.

0:31:58.440 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 3>The Bills just continue to be.

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 2>A evaluated by a totally different standard than the rest

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 2>of the league. Now, I don't think they're gonna make

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. I also think if they were to make

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs, they are not this wildly dangerous team everyone

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 2>else believes. But I've talked enough about the Bills. I

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>am not shocked. I am shocked by the result of

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 2>this game. I thought Dallas could put it on them.

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I was dead wrong on that, and I am shocked

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 2>that Buffalo just decided.

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 3>To run the ball, run the ball, run the ball.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 2>It worked great, and Dallas wasn't prepared for it. But

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not shocked that the Bill's A game looks great.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 2>The Bill's A game has look great for four years.

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Their problem is their inability to string those A games together,

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 2>and this year their problem now is in order just

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 2>to make the postseason, they are going to have to

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 2>string together six weeks of wins just to be in

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 2>the single elimination tournament. So I think the Bills right

0:32:55.680 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 2>now are wildly overvalued by my colleagues. But we'll see

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 2>if I end.

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Up being right about it.

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 2>It should be noted I've been the only person in

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 2>the national media right about the Bills for four years now.

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Maybe this is the year everyone else is right and

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong. But I've had this team pretty well pegged

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 2>for four seasons in a row, and I know people

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 2>want this team.

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 3>They remind me so much.

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Some of the commentary about the Bills, except they don't have,

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, as many superstars as the commentary surrounding the

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 2>nets when they had Katie Harden and Kyrie. People so

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 2>badly want this team to be something it's never actually

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 2>shown it can be for sustained periods of times.

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 4>Are just a really fun team to watch, is what

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 4>I think is what draws people. I think they're games.

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're exciting.

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Games are really fun.

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 2>I totally agree, they're very exciting. They're exciting, but they're

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 2>not as exciting as the Dolphins. And the Dolphins don't

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:02.959
<v Speaker 2>get a quarter of the love Buffalo gets, even though

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins are ten and four and Buffalo is eight

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and six. And I understand Buffalo whooped the Dolphins ass

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 2>when they played two months ago, but the Dolphins have

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 2>avoided that the Bills haven't. Is egregious losses. The Buffalo

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Bills this year have lost games to Zach Wilson, Mac Jones,

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 2>and Russell Wilson. They tried to lose a game to

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Jones. And so this idea that they're gonna win

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 2>five straight and surge into the playoffs, we'll see if

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong. I don't think I will be. Now for

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys. Obviously, if they don't end up winning the division,

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 2>they do seem to be two totally different teams at

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 2>home versus on the road, and that could be a

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 2>big problem for them.

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 4>All right, last one, yo, So Trevor Lawrence, so you're Jaguars.

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 4>They went up against the Ravens and Trevor Lawrence couldn't

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:54.879
<v Speaker 4>bring out the dub the turnovers or a problem per

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 4>usual overthrowing. I actually placed a bet on Lamar ja

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 4>as scoring to or getting two hundred yards, and I

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.760
<v Speaker 4>just needed your guy, Trevor Lawrence to lead a drive

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 4>to make him have to pass it, and he couldn't

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 4>do it. He just couldn't do it.

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the blame by Lamar to have two

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 2>hundred yards. I mean, he had plenty of possessions. Maybe

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Lamar should have just thrown for more yards.

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 4>But go ahead, JAG's making a game either or. Yeah,

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:24.720
<v Speaker 4>A lot of the blame falls on Trevor Lawrence, per usual,

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 4>who is terrible with his fourth quarter turnovers. Do you

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 4>think that there's a chance that Trevor Lawrence is just

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:31.879
<v Speaker 4>Josh Allen with good hair?

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so listen, I actually think that's kind of unfair

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 2>to both of them. I think it's unfair to Josh

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 2>and that Trevor hasn't shown the A plus level sustained

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 2>moments that Josh has had. And I think it's unfair

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 2>to Trevor and that Trevor has not been a head

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.240
<v Speaker 2>scratching turnover machine over the last couple of years. Now,

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 2>he played a very poor game on Sunday night. The

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 2>fumble was ludicrous. He's just running and drops the ball.

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 2>And even worse than the fumble was the end of

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 2>the first half. The end of the first half, when

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 2>they don't get points, they win. It's fine, if you're

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 2>not gonna spike the ball, you gotta throw it into

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 2>the end zone. Now, what is true is Trevor was

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 2>eight and three and the Jags, or the Jags were

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 2>eight and three, and Trevor was rolling and they were

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 2>scoring thirty plus on Cincinnati, and then he got the

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 2>high ankle sprain, and since then he hasn't been quite

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 2>as good. Now, that doesn't excuse the fumble or the

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 2>mental mistake at the end of the first half.

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 3>But I think that I think that the Jags have.

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 2>To be careful now that Trevor's in concussion protocol, because

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 2>if he misses this week and they play Baker, they

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 2>could lose. In all of a sudden, they probably won't

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 2>be in first place in the division with Indy and

0:36:58.200 --> 0:36:59.439
<v Speaker 2>Houston tied with him.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 3>Luckily, for the.

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Jags, they have the Panthers and the Titans as their

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 2>next two and so even if they don't win the division,

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 2>they can get to ten and seven relatively easily. And

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 2>that's again where people are all high.

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 3>On the Bills. The Bills lost.

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Head to head to Jacksonville. That's a tiebreaker that could

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 2>come into play. They lost had dead to Cincinnati, that's

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 2>a tiebreaker that could come into play. I don't think

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Denver's gonna get to ten wins, but they lost had

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 2>to head to Denver. That's a tiebreaker that could come

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 2>into play. Like those tiebreakers, the Bill's path is going

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 2>to be they've got to win that division. The Bills

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 2>path is going to be that they need Miami to

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 2>lose to either Dallas or Baltimore and then to Buffalo

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the year. That's the Bill's path,

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know that they're gonna get it. Now

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 2>to the Jags, here's the fact of the matter. Trevor

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 2>overall this year has been disappointing compared to what I

0:37:58.160 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 2>thought he would be.

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 3>I thought he'd be an in VP candidate. He has

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 3>not been.

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 2>I thought the Jags would win thirteen games. They have

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 2>six losses already, and so that is. It was looking good.

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Trevor was starting to play his best ball. They were

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 2>eight and three, He was starting to play better, and

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 2>then all of a sudden he gets hurt and they

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 2>have some really bad losses. Lost to the Bengals, the

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 2>loss to the Browns and Joe Flacco when Trevor throws

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 2>three picks when I don't.

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Think he should play.

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 2>And then a game against the Ravens where I didn't

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 2>think the Ravens defense played great and the Jags missed

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 2>field goal, miss field goal, give the ball away on

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:33.879
<v Speaker 2>a terrible fumble.

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Don't get points for the half.

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 2>They should add twenty points at a halftime, and they

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 2>had seven or they had zero, Actually, pardon me, did they.

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 3>How many did they have at halftime?

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 4>I think they might have.

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 2>No, No, no, it was ten to nothing at half

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 2>time because they hit the long touchdown to Agnew at

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 2>the start of the third quarter. But they could I

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 2>mean they missed two field goals, they fumble the ball

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:54.479
<v Speaker 2>in the red zone, they don't get points for the half.

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 3>All that's terrible, and so Trevor needs to be better.

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 3>There's no denying then, all right, Brock Party is the

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 3>overwhelming favorite for League MVP. We discuss it next. What's right.

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 2>Before we get to our game, demons, Let's do uh

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 2>the MVP discussion right now? It's Brock Purty is a

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 2>huge Vegas.

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 4>Favorite, huge Vegas favorite, especially because we got Dak and

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 4>Hurts falling off. Tarik's miss time, so he's falling off. Yep.

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Brock Party is a heavy MVP favorite and he's minus

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.839
<v Speaker 4>two hundred to win. Now. Question is no longer will

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 4>he win the MVP, it's who can even stop him

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 4>from winning the MVP? So what do you mean.

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.840
<v Speaker 2>His teammates or coaches talking is the only thing that

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 2>can maybe stop him. Kyle Shannan was asked before this

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 2>last game about Christian or Brock being MVP. He's like,

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to talk about one or the other,

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 2>and then he gave a fusive praise to Christian McCaffrey

0:39:55.880 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 2>and tepid praise to Party. George Kittle was asked straight

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 2>up yesterday who do you think the league MVP is,

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 2>and he said, I'd give it to Christian and this

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 2>is where and so listen, I think Party's probably gonna win.

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I would prefer the MVP not turn into the Heisman

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 2>Trophy where the Heisman. It doesn't happen so much nowadays,

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 2>but there was a time in the early two thousands

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 2>when the Heisman Trophy was just all right, who's the

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 2>best team in college football? Who's their quarterback? And Jason

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 2>White and Chris Winky and Danny Werfel won Heisman trophies

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 2>that they shouldn't have. I think Chris Winky won. Am

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 2>I making that up?

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:39.399
<v Speaker 3>Uh? The yeah?

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean this is the did I make a no?

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 2>He did win, so the Heisman Trophy. In fact, let

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 2>me just go to it real quick. Heisman Trophy nineteen.

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 4>He is the quarterback for the most dominant team in

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 4>the NFL right now, and he's got perfect passer rating games.

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't care, Like if you could, there are quarterbacks

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 4>that you could put in there that are going to

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 4>do worse. I mean that's obvious, but it's like not

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 4>anybody can do what Rock Party is doing, and you're

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 4>just making it seem like you could throw any quarterback.

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean not? What do you mean not anybody?

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean not.

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 4>About I mean Zach Wilson probably couldn't go in there

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 4>and do it. He wouldn't be.

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 2>No, no, okay, so I wanted Oh no, no, no. Of course,

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 2>if you're saying so, you're saying there's only like like

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 2>twelve guys that could do what brock Perty.

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Gino Smith probably wouldn't be MVP on that team.

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 4>I agree, No, but you you don't even think I'm

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 4>saying that like they wouldn't. He wouldn't even be the

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 4>m v P favorite right now, is what I'm saying.

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I agree, I agree with all that. Do you think

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Kirk Cousins could be if you were healthy?

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 3>I do? Do you think that? I mean, honestly, what

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 3>do you healthy?

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 4>On the on the on the night? Oh okay, they

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 4>live fine. And and if and if Dak got the

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 4>m v P and he was lee that dominant team,

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 4>and I think he deserves the MVP.

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so listen, I am. I'm not arguing.

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 2>That I thought rock Perty actually made one of the

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 2>best plays he's made.

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 3>All season.

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.719
<v Speaker 2>In that Cardinals game, the throw to Debo, I think

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:19.800
<v Speaker 2>it was Debo was a Debo r. It was Debo

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 2>in the front corner of the end zone, perfectly placed. Oh,

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 2>it was an elite, high level throw. I'm not arguing

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.320
<v Speaker 2>that every quarterback in the league could play for the

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:32.399
<v Speaker 2>Niners and look great. I think fifteen could I do

0:42:32.440 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 2>think that, And I think that ten would look significantly better.

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 2>And you might say, Nick, how could they look better? Well,

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 2>they add a three game losing streak directly related to

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.720
<v Speaker 2>his play, like that happened, and we do a weird

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:52.320
<v Speaker 2>thing with like recency bias, Like Jalen is totally eliminated

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 2>from the MVP discussion. Why because of a three game

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 2>losing streak, totally out of it. Dax eliminated from it

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 2>because of one bad game. Dak was the favorite and

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 2>now he's out because of one bad game. But Brock

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 2>had three in a row, but it was months ago.

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:14.799
<v Speaker 2>I listen, if folks want to give the most Valuable

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Player award to a like, let me just I guess

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 2>here's my question. Does anybody listening think Brock party. Let's

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 2>just see. You don't have to check all of these boxes,

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 2>But let's see if he checks any Does anybody think

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 2>Brock Purty is the best player on his own team?

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Does anybody think Brock Purty is the most valuable player

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:47.359
<v Speaker 2>on his own team? I would argue, no, Does anybody

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 2>think Brock Party is the most talented quarterback.

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 3>In the NFL? I would argue, No.

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Does anybody think Brock Purty is the most valuable quarterback

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:02.320
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL? I would argue, no, does anybody actually

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 2>think Brock Party is the best quarterback in the NFL?

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I would argue, Now, does anybody actually think that if

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the Niners replaced Brock Party with literally any other quarterback

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 2>that will get a single solitary even fifth place MVP vote,

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 2>they would get worse? So that would mean Tua, Mahomes,

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 2>dak Lamar Jalen, those guys that the Niners would get worse.

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I would argue, Now, does anybody not think that if

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 2>you replace Rock Party with any of those quarterbacks then

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Niners would get better? Obviously, maybe not Tua, maybe not Toua,

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 2>but everybody else. But I also haven't been promoting to

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 2>his league MVP, but we're gonna make him league MVP. Okay,

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 2>you guys have skipped the step. And this is what

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:04.280
<v Speaker 2>is so baffling to me. If the conversation surrounding Brock

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Purdy had simply gone to Nick, are you ready to

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 2>admit he's clearly better than Jimmy Garoppolo, I would have

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 2>no choice. Clearly he is, Nick. Are you ready to

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 2>admit he makes more wow plays than you thought he

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 2>was capable of. I would have no choice but to

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 2>admit it. But instead we skipped every single step, and

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:36.360
<v Speaker 2>the conversation became, are you ready to admit he should

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:41.320
<v Speaker 2>win an award that over the last you know, half

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 2>dozen years, has been won by Patrick Mahomes, Aaron Rodgers,

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson, and Tom Brady.

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:55.919
<v Speaker 3>That seems to me to be a bridge too far,

0:45:56.520 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 3>But everyone else is cool with it. Everyone else, every other.

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask one other question for every other MVP candidate,

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 2>if they went down right before a playoff game, would

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:29.320
<v Speaker 2>you write their team off? Of course, for the Niners,

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 2>not only would you not write them off, but deep down,

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 2>if a.

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:40.239
<v Speaker 3>Nin were asked, all right, we have to either lose.

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Brock or Christian for this playoff game. Pick one, we

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 2>have to either lose Brock or Williams.

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 4>No, that is not what we saw.

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 3>No, that's but that's not what we saw. What we

0:46:56.800 --> 0:46:57.840
<v Speaker 3>saw was.

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 2>A game where Brock went down, then his backup got

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 2>a concussion, who was their fourth stringer, and then they

0:47:06.000 --> 0:47:09.880
<v Speaker 2>were out of quarterbacks. We have not seen the Niners

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 2>play a game with I mean, we did see them

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 2>play with Jimmy Garoppolo and Christian McCaffery, and in the

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 2>games he started, they were undefeated, and Garoppolo at a

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 2>one ten rating and looked like the best quarterback in football.

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 2>But Brock's better than Jimmy Garoppolo. So listen, I'm not

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm I always say I'm sick of this argument, and

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 2>then I do ten minutes on it. I the we

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:38.319
<v Speaker 2>are going to give the league MVP award to a

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:45.280
<v Speaker 2>player that even his own teammates as of yesterday don't

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:46.359
<v Speaker 2>think he should win.

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, mate, so be it?

0:47:49.960 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 3>You think, Oh you think you think Kittle's the only one.

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:55.840
<v Speaker 4>You think Kittle's the only one. Deebo went on a

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 4>podcast saying that that he definitely should get it, or

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. That actually might not have been MVP thing,

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 4>That might have just been a given respect type of

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:04.359
<v Speaker 4>thing now I think about it.

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, listen, and I want to read you a quote.

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, let me find the exact quote. Gosh darn it,

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I have to find it or I'm going to lose

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 2>my mind.

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:21.399
<v Speaker 3>I want to read you a quote. Where is it?

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Because this is this is.

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Why you look to be fair. You've got to pull

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 4>in here asking it's party, the most valuable player on

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 4>his team. Thirty say yes, sixty eight percent say no.

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but listen.

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:38.959
<v Speaker 2>To be fair with you, I want to read you

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 2>some quotes from Trent Williams and Christian McCaffrey. Okay, quote

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 2>from Trent Williams. He's a baller. I don't know why

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:53.319
<v Speaker 2>that's ever been in question. Every time you see the man,

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 2>all he does is win. He's a great teammate, he's

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:59.720
<v Speaker 2>a great dude. Just hate to see him get slighted

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 2>all the time because I feel like he's such a

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 2>good talent, such a good quarterback. He's the main reason

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:09.399
<v Speaker 2>we are playing that. Well, that's from Trent Williams. Here's

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:13.839
<v Speaker 2>Christian McCaffrey. He's such a talented quarterback. He doesn't get

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 2>enough credit in my eyes at all. He's a great leader,

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:20.279
<v Speaker 2>super smart, can make any throw, and just a great

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:22.600
<v Speaker 2>guy to be around. It's been a lot of fun

0:49:22.640 --> 0:49:25.879
<v Speaker 2>to be able to pick his brain and mesh with him.

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Trent Williams went on to say, sorry, yeah, yeah, exactly,

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 2>and then Trumps went on to say, when asked about

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:37.560
<v Speaker 2>the criticism he gets, it surprises me. I ain't gonna lie.

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 2>He does everything right. He's not a knucklehead. He's a model,

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:43.759
<v Speaker 2>a teammate. You can't get better than him. Just to

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:45.919
<v Speaker 2>see some of the people say that stuff about him,

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 2>it sucks, but it's life.

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy's a really great dude.

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I oh, those were all quotes from last year about

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Garoppolo.

0:49:56.760 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Damn.

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:02.760
<v Speaker 2>And I thought I was making a case for Brock Purty,

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 2>but I misgoogled it. November twenty third, Trent Williams Christian

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 2>McCaffrey surprised Jimmy g doesn't get the respect he deserves. Ah, damn,

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, that's unfair. I really thought I was defending

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:23.399
<v Speaker 2>Brock Party there. Instead, it's the same yeah I did.

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 2>It's the same exact guys giving the same exact platitudes

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:32.520
<v Speaker 2>about a player that, unlike Party. We now all acknowledge

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 2>stinks and the same god Doog player that I had

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:40.760
<v Speaker 2>to argue with you same dopes about for four years.

0:50:41.239 --> 0:50:43.399
<v Speaker 3>Oh he's been to a super Bowl. When he's held,

0:50:43.560 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 3>they win. Look at the numbers and the same thing

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I watched in this.

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Game Sat Sunday that made brock Perty the MVP favorite,

0:50:54.560 --> 0:51:00.359
<v Speaker 2>Christian McCaffrey, be schemed so open that he felled down,

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 2>got up and still went into the end zone untouched.

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:09.840
<v Speaker 2>You know that play right, Bertie season Christian catches it,

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 2>falls down, stands up, no one's around, and just walks

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 2>into the end zone.

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:20.319
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, you said it yourself, though you already said

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:23.280
<v Speaker 4>it yourselves. This is different from the Jimmy Garoppolo situation

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:25.160
<v Speaker 4>being the parties.

0:51:25.239 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 2>He's better, he's better, that does I listen. Everybody has

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 2>different standards and different tastes.

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 3>That's fine.

0:51:33.600 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 2>My standard for League MVP is not be better than

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Garoppolo. If that were the case, where's the aid

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:45.640
<v Speaker 2>and O'Connell's support. Let's play the game. I'm not talking

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.560
<v Speaker 2>MVP anymore. I'm done with it. I'm done with it.

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:52.279
<v Speaker 4>Stupid ahead. So we're playing a game today. It's called

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 4>right ends we don't have any boards, so I'm pretty

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 4>sure we're just gonna boards, all right. So first off,

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 4>for starting with starting with Baker. Yeah, Baker went to

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Green Bay and became the first visiting quarterback to have

0:52:04.200 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 4>a perfect perfect passer rating. The Bucks a leading in

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 4>the NFC South, and their quarterback is so hot right

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:12.319
<v Speaker 4>now that Belichick. Belichick had to roll his sleeves up

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:15.239
<v Speaker 4>to his hoodie to prove Tampa should build around him.

0:52:15.280 --> 0:52:18.799
<v Speaker 4>That's Baker must that is That's a good one.

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:22.439
<v Speaker 3>Just keep doing what he's doing. Keep doing what he's doing.

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, build around him is probably too strong. But

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:35.040
<v Speaker 2>could Baker get the Gino Smith contract this offseason? Gino

0:52:35.120 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 2>got three year, seventy five million, forty million guaranteed.

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:40.839
<v Speaker 3>Could Baker get that from Tampa?

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely? Is he the best quarterback in the division hands down?

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:47.799
<v Speaker 2>Is he going to be for the foreseeable future? Well,

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:52.439
<v Speaker 2>let's think about it. Carolina is stuck with Bryce, so yes.

0:52:52.960 --> 0:52:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Arizona is stuck with Ritter until they draft one this year,

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:57.680
<v Speaker 2>but they're not gonna have a super high draft pick,

0:52:57.840 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 2>so yes. And New Orleans is stuck with Derek Carr,

0:53:00.760 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 2>who's having the worst season of his career and is

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 2>only gonna get worse. So you're gonna have the best

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:08.960
<v Speaker 2>quarterback in his division in his prime, whose teammates a door,

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:10.839
<v Speaker 2>and who's been incredibly clutched this year.

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Just keep doing what you're doing, Baker.

0:53:12.480 --> 0:53:17.400
<v Speaker 4>Next, the Bengals grinded out an overtime winvers the Vikings Saturday,

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 4>after Drake Browning led three touchdown drives in the fourth quarter.

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:24.759
<v Speaker 4>Three Jeez, this guy is better than other backup quarterbacks, right.

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 4>Jake Browning's future and Jake Browning's future in the NFL

0:53:29.160 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 4>is blank.

0:53:31.560 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Listen. I don't know right now.

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:35.839
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to poke holes at him. I'm also gonna

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:39.920
<v Speaker 2>say something wildly controversial here maybe, and it's not about

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Joe Burrow. I think the best thing for Jake Browning might.

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Actually be to not play again.

0:53:47.719 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 2>I think, like if Jake Browning like was, if he was,

0:53:51.880 --> 0:53:56.080
<v Speaker 2>if they were like, oh man, he has a he

0:53:56.880 --> 0:54:00.399
<v Speaker 2>needs arthroscopic surgery on his ankle, and he's out three

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:03.479
<v Speaker 2>weeks and doesn't play again, he maybe could be looking

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:05.520
<v Speaker 2>at millions of dollars like that.

0:54:05.760 --> 0:54:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Like Josh Dobbs wishes so badly.

0:54:09.000 --> 0:54:11.279
<v Speaker 2>That two weeks ago he could have been ruled out

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 2>for the season, like some of these got and so

0:54:15.080 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean and Josh Dobbs all of a sudden is

0:54:17.560 --> 0:54:19.840
<v Speaker 2>just gonna be back on moving from city to city,

0:54:19.880 --> 0:54:22.280
<v Speaker 2>hoping to catch on somewhere. But there was a moment

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 2>where it was like, is he gonna get a two year,

0:54:24.640 --> 0:54:27.640
<v Speaker 2>twelve million dollar deal? As like a high level backup

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 2>quarterback Jake Browning can't improve his stock, but if he

0:54:33.080 --> 0:54:36.799
<v Speaker 2>keeps doing it, at some point, maybe you gotta be like,

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 2>the guy's actually good, all right?

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:42.280
<v Speaker 4>Next, wait, the Matt Flynn contract. Is that a similar situation?

0:54:42.320 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so Matt Flynn. Yeah, so Matt Flynn was before

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:50.280
<v Speaker 2>you were a football fan. But Matt Flynn was Aaron

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Rodgers backup in Green Bay Demons. Matt Flynn's thing was

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:57.160
<v Speaker 2>even wilder. So Matt Flynn was Aaron Rodgers backup in

0:54:57.239 --> 0:55:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay. And going into the final game of the

0:55:05.040 --> 0:55:12.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty eleven season, Matt Flynn had only played really really,

0:55:12.719 --> 0:55:15.920
<v Speaker 2>he had only started one game in his career, and

0:55:16.120 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 2>he had played well in that game. He had three touchdowns,

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:20.960
<v Speaker 2>one pick, two hundred and fifty yards. Late in the

0:55:21.000 --> 0:55:24.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty ten season and then the final week of twenty eleven,

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:29.719
<v Speaker 2>he was thirty one to forty four, four hundred and

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:35.799
<v Speaker 2>eighty yards, six touchdowns, one pick, and it was right

0:55:35.840 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 2>before he hit free agency. And so the Seattle Seahawks

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:44.279
<v Speaker 2>were like, oh my god, he's he's our guy, and

0:55:44.320 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 2>they gave him. Let me find it exactly, they gave

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:52.280
<v Speaker 2>him at the time. There's a lot of money, three years,

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:55.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty million, ten million guaranteed to come in and be

0:55:55.719 --> 0:55:59.240
<v Speaker 2>their guy. And that same year they drafted Russell Wilson,

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:03.040
<v Speaker 2>And did the Seahawks credit, They were like, Russell's better.

0:56:03.400 --> 0:56:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Matt Flynn is not the guy, definitely not going to

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:07.080
<v Speaker 2>be the guy.

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:08.760
<v Speaker 3>And he.

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:14.400
<v Speaker 2>And they started Russell and he got his money and

0:56:14.440 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 2>then the rest of the way, Matt Flin was just

0:56:16.200 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 2>a career backup.

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:20.840
<v Speaker 4>All right, next, All right, So the Bears blew it

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 4>versus the Browns, but the wide receivers are still calling

0:56:23.600 --> 0:56:26.800
<v Speaker 4>justin fields the quarterback of the future. Chicago's front office

0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 4>may not feel the same way, though, and they likely

0:56:29.040 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 4>have two top five picks and cap space to rebuild

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 4>around a top quarterback. The Bears offseason strategy should be blink.

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, what they should try to do is

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:43.479
<v Speaker 2>see if Atlanta will give them a first round pick

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:47.720
<v Speaker 2>for Justin Fields. Atlanta probably won't do that, So maybe

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 2>a second and a fourth for Justin Fields and then

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:55.880
<v Speaker 2>draft Caleb and then draft the best player available with

0:56:56.000 --> 0:56:59.480
<v Speaker 2>their own pick or trade down from there from their

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:02.879
<v Speaker 2>own pick and just keep stockpiling. But they've got cap space.

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 2>They got a draft Caleb, and they need Justin to

0:57:05.840 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 2>keep playing well. He got kind of screwed over by

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:11.839
<v Speaker 2>some drops there. He's still shown flashes where somebody will

0:57:11.840 --> 0:57:14.319
<v Speaker 2>give up something for him. Right, Yeah, I don't know

0:57:14.320 --> 0:57:17.520
<v Speaker 2>if he's good, but I think in the right circumstances

0:57:17.520 --> 0:57:23.840
<v Speaker 2>he could be. He has good enough measurables, size, arm, talent, speed,

0:57:23.920 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 2>athleticism and all the things that I that you guys

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 2>kill me for, you know, criticizing brock Purty for not having.

0:57:30.800 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 3>He has all of them, and so.

0:57:32.800 --> 0:57:36.840
<v Speaker 2>There is like an upside to him, even though he

0:57:36.920 --> 0:57:41.600
<v Speaker 2>has not demonstrated any consistent level of play. All right,

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:43.720
<v Speaker 2>last one, I don't want to do the Draymond question.

0:57:43.760 --> 0:57:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not into it right now.

0:57:45.720 --> 0:57:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Indy and Houston, Cleveland and Cincy all won this

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:53.760
<v Speaker 4>week with backup quarterbacks and have their team's position to

0:57:53.800 --> 0:57:57.280
<v Speaker 4>make the playoffs. The coach of the year is mko Rice.

0:57:57.760 --> 0:58:01.400
<v Speaker 3>So I exactly right, that is correct. Listen.

0:58:01.480 --> 0:58:05.479
<v Speaker 2>I think what Stefanski's done with four different quarterbacks is fun.

0:58:05.560 --> 0:58:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Shane Steichen's done a good job in Indy.

0:58:09.640 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that there are good candidates, but they are all,

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:18.360
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, fighting for second place. I Demiko and

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:21.920
<v Speaker 2>winning this week with case keenum that that team had

0:58:22.160 --> 0:58:26.960
<v Speaker 2>no hope, they had no belief. The defense is playing great.

0:58:27.080 --> 0:58:30.720
<v Speaker 2>It's not all Stroud's been awesome, but they didn't have

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:33.840
<v Speaker 2>stroud this week, and the defense eight the Titans alive.

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 2>To me, it's Damiko Ryans with an absolute bullet All right,

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:38.920
<v Speaker 2>quick break, read.

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:46.520
<v Speaker 3>The chat questions? Next? What's right? All right?

0:58:46.800 --> 0:58:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:58:47.680 --> 0:58:50.800
<v Speaker 3>So demon say, let's roll through these listener questions real quick,

0:58:50.840 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 3>go ahead.

0:58:51.760 --> 0:58:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Daniel CHRISTI six says, would Deebo Samuel put up similar

0:58:55.120 --> 0:58:57.480
<v Speaker 4>wins in decent numbers if they used him at quarterback?

0:58:59.000 --> 0:59:00.520
<v Speaker 3>No, because he's not a quarterback.

0:59:01.200 --> 0:59:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Like No, I don't think you could plug in a

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:06.640
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver and have him do what brock Purty does.

0:59:07.000 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I do think there are a dozen starting NFL quarterbacks

0:59:10.840 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 2>who could.

0:59:11.560 --> 0:59:11.640
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Justin I think Justin Fields. That was

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 2>the idea when they drafted Trey was to have more

0:59:17.880 --> 0:59:20.760
<v Speaker 2>of a dual threat. But the offense would look so different,

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:24.640
<v Speaker 2>but they would be, I mean, a wildly dominant running team.

0:59:24.840 --> 0:59:25.480
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think you.

0:59:25.440 --> 0:59:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Could plug in Justin Fields in his current state, but

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I do think there are a bunch of guys you

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:31.040
<v Speaker 2>could plug in.

0:59:31.080 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Next, Scott Fraser has a take Browning has been better

0:59:35.600 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 4>than Burrow this year.

0:59:37.920 --> 0:59:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, Burrow was hurt, but they does speak to the

0:59:40.200 --> 0:59:42.240
<v Speaker 2>fact that that first month of the year, when Burrow

0:59:42.280 --> 0:59:43.080
<v Speaker 2>couldn't move and.

0:59:43.040 --> 0:59:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Statistically was the worst quarterback in football.

0:59:45.560 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 2>They should have at least given Jake Browning a shot

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:52.240
<v Speaker 2>and then maybe Burrow's healthy, then maybe Burrow doesn't suffer

0:59:52.280 --> 0:59:53.800
<v Speaker 2>the wrist injury.

0:59:53.800 --> 0:59:54.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, but.

0:59:54.960 --> 0:59:57.840
<v Speaker 2>They acted like they didn't have a backup quarterback on

0:59:57.880 --> 0:59:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the roster.

0:59:58.560 --> 1:00:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Next, do you think the Benkals like disserviced overall? Is

1:00:01.480 --> 1:00:03.240
<v Speaker 4>this like is that a way bigger thing than what

1:00:03.320 --> 1:00:03.680
<v Speaker 4>it is?

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, I mean it's been a it was

1:00:06.720 --> 1:00:08.680
<v Speaker 2>a big topic on first things first, but I know

1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:10.400
<v Speaker 2>you just you're more of a herd guy.

1:00:11.160 --> 1:00:13.640
<v Speaker 3>You're not really watching my show, but yeah, I wat

1:00:14.600 --> 1:00:18.000
<v Speaker 3>I talked about it quite a bit. All right, next.

1:00:19.160 --> 1:00:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Elliott O, Yes, what is your favorite NFL classic type

1:00:23.520 --> 1:00:24.040
<v Speaker 4>two take?

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean it in the past, it has been calling

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the Bills exactly right this it will be replaced by uh,

1:00:35.880 --> 1:00:37.040
<v Speaker 2>how do I say this nicely?

1:00:37.840 --> 1:00:40.920
<v Speaker 3>How the Niners get eliminated this year? That will replace

1:00:40.960 --> 1:00:41.920
<v Speaker 3>it next?

1:00:42.000 --> 1:00:44.800
<v Speaker 4>How the Niners? It's funny, he said, the n Y

1:00:45.200 --> 1:00:47.840
<v Speaker 4>I feel like you meant to say something knows negative

1:00:47.920 --> 1:00:50.760
<v Speaker 4>four and two said Nick. Do you think it's possible

1:00:50.760 --> 1:00:53.760
<v Speaker 4>that chief Snovershi is legit and have more in store,

1:00:53.920 --> 1:00:55.680
<v Speaker 4>but are saving it until the playoffs?

1:00:56.760 --> 1:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, I think they're using it more and more,

1:00:58.960 --> 1:01:01.320
<v Speaker 2>and you're seeing it. You're singing in snap count or

1:01:01.360 --> 1:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>seeing it this past week, and that you saw Rashi

1:01:04.680 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>and Justin Watson be Rashi was on the field almost

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:10.480
<v Speaker 2>the entire game. They're gonna continue to ramp them up,

1:01:10.680 --> 1:01:13.080
<v Speaker 2>and you're also gonna see Travis Kelce on the field more.

1:01:13.160 --> 1:01:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that I don't think they're saving Rashi. I

1:01:16.000 --> 1:01:20.480
<v Speaker 2>think they are slowly working a rookie in until he's

1:01:20.480 --> 1:01:22.720
<v Speaker 2>fully kind of you know, into the offense. I think

1:01:22.760 --> 1:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>with Travis, they are trying to save him, and I

1:01:24.720 --> 1:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>think they were crazy cautious with Isaiah Pacheco. Now he

1:01:28.960 --> 1:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>also had you know, a cleanup on his shoulder to

1:01:31.320 --> 1:01:36.240
<v Speaker 2>make sure he's healthy for the postseason. Uh go to Uh, oh,

1:01:36.320 --> 1:01:37.360
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna ask the last two?

1:01:37.400 --> 1:01:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead.

1:01:38.520 --> 1:01:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Adrian Warez asked, what does the right family celebrate the wait?

1:01:43.280 --> 1:01:46.520
<v Speaker 4>What does the right family celebrate the holiday? The holidays?

1:01:46.960 --> 1:01:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

1:01:47.200 --> 1:01:50.600
<v Speaker 2>We just uh, we'll see my mom, We'll see my sister.

1:01:50.880 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll do Christmas at our house.

1:01:53.240 --> 1:01:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Sat this is the first year Demonse won't be in

1:01:56.640 --> 1:01:57.280
<v Speaker 2>town for it.

1:01:57.840 --> 1:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:01:58.600 --> 1:02:02.200
<v Speaker 2>But Demanse's got good setup in on the West coast,

1:02:02.560 --> 1:02:04.120
<v Speaker 2>so we'll face time with him.

1:02:04.160 --> 1:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, we just do.

1:02:05.760 --> 1:02:08.760
<v Speaker 2>We were all together for Thanksgiving and we'll all be

1:02:08.800 --> 1:02:12.760
<v Speaker 2>together for next Christmas hopefully. But Demanday's out there working guy.

1:02:12.840 --> 1:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Listens.

1:02:13.280 --> 1:02:15.320
<v Speaker 2>We don't pay him for the podcast. We can't miss

1:02:15.320 --> 1:02:19.400
<v Speaker 2>his actual job. He's got to make that money, all right. Uh,

1:02:19.800 --> 1:02:20.880
<v Speaker 2>what's the last one?

1:02:21.440 --> 1:02:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Bar Bell? Bryce says, should the Seahawks roll with locks

1:02:24.560 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 4>just for fun or put Gino back in? Last night

1:02:27.720 --> 1:02:29.640
<v Speaker 4>was just awesome? Watch it actually exciting.

1:02:29.760 --> 1:02:32.600
<v Speaker 3>It was awesome. It was exciting, but you got it.

1:02:32.640 --> 1:02:36.480
<v Speaker 2>If Gino's healthy, ease the well.

1:02:36.520 --> 1:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean listen, great job by Drew Luck.

1:02:39.160 --> 1:02:41.600
<v Speaker 2>He did his job and he did awesome and maybe

1:02:41.640 --> 1:02:43.320
<v Speaker 2>now a team will take a look at him. But

1:02:43.400 --> 1:02:45.160
<v Speaker 2>you got to put the better player in, all right.

1:02:45.240 --> 1:02:47.960
<v Speaker 2>See you guys on the herd around one eastern on

1:02:48.000 --> 1:02:50.320
<v Speaker 2>First Things First at three and then right back here

1:02:50.520 --> 1:02:52.439
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday, round ten thirty, See you guys.

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Great job. Demanday, great job Blue duck folks. What's right? Hey,

1:02:56.440 --> 1:02:59.000
<v Speaker 3>it's Nick right, Thank you so much for watching. Please

1:02:59.040 --> 1:03:01.040
<v Speaker 3>do us a favor. Click subscribe.

1:03:01.080 --> 1:03:04.720
<v Speaker 2>It helps my ego and Demansey's got a financial bonus

1:03:04.720 --> 1:03:05.280
<v Speaker 2>writing on.

1:03:05.240 --> 1:03:07.840
<v Speaker 3>A number of YouTube subscribers, so help him out. And

1:03:07.960 --> 1:03:08.960
<v Speaker 3>also click the bell.

1:03:09.040 --> 1:03:10.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what the bell does, but they tell

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:11.720
<v Speaker 2>me to tell you to click the bell.

1:03:12.040 --> 1:03:15.640
<v Speaker 3>And you're audio listeners. People that have commute strives, whatever

1:03:15.680 --> 1:03:18.800
<v Speaker 3>it is. Subscribe to the podcast as well. Wherever you

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:21.520
<v Speaker 3>get the podcast, same show, just you know, just in

1:03:21.600 --> 1:03:23.720
<v Speaker 3>your ears instead of through your eyes. All that. Check

1:03:23.720 --> 1:03:24.600
<v Speaker 3>it out, Appreciate show.