WEBVTT - A Exposé of a Permanent Financial Dystopia

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio our next guest.

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But years working at several iconic Wall Street firms, former

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Goldman sax Managing Director, former senior managing director at bear

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Stearns over in London, before that Lehman and Chase Manhattan.

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Nomi Prince is an economist. She's also an author and

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>an investigative journalist. She's also the author of several books,

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>including her newest, Permanent Distortion, How the Financial Markets Abandoned

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the Real Economy Forever. She joins us live in the

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio this afternoon. No me, congratulations on

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>the new book. Just came out on October eleven, so

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>it's been out for a couple of days. We're going

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the book. We got a great chunk

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of time with you. But given your background, your role

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>as an economist, we gotta get your take on what's

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>happening in the markets right now and what's happening in

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the economy. I mean a wild day on Wall Street

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>where we saw markets open down more than two percent

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and then end up finishing the day close to session highs.

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>What's going on here, um mass insanity in the markets.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's happening right now is that the markets

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to process whether they're going to have

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of cheap money forever, whether the FED is going

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to go back to sort of what it used to

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>be like, whether it's going to continue to high grates,

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>how to actually interpret every little teeny piece of data.

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's no idea forward looking analysis in the markets

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's all reactive um. And that's something that's

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>very new to the period that we're living in right now,

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>versus when I was on Lall Street, when it was like, okay,

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>this is what rates are. They go up, they go down,

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of a balance. But by the time we've

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>gotten to this point where rates have been at zero

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>for for so much of the last fourteen years and

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>now they're sort of moving up. But the feed is

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.839
<v Speaker 1>still sitting on a book of almost nine trillion dollars

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>worth of assets, and all the central banks around the

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>world are in similar kind of positions. It's really hard

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to figure out where there's actually value in sectors, in names,

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and in the specifics of the market. So a lot

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of this is more knee jerk reactive than necessarily forward analysis.

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>How should we think about the financial markets? Is it

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the real world, the real economy? It isn't and and

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is part of the process that we've been

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in since really two thousand eight and a little bit

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>before that. I mean, when we got into two thousand eight,

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>because in the beginning of the two thousand, two thousand,

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one, we had rates very low, we

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>had mortgages going crazy at a subprime crisis, and we

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.839
<v Speaker 1>got this whole quantitative easing period that we are still

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>living in right now. And we're not at the back

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of this by a long shot. We're we're like in

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the middle of potentially you know, quei forever um, even

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>if books come down by a little bit. And so

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean? I mean, the real economy doesn't

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>necessarily get the benefit of financing the same way it

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>used to get the benefit of financing in the sixties

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and the seventies and the fifties when we were building

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>roads and highways. Because it's come second to money being

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>created quickly, being leveraged excessively, and flowing into financial assets

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>that are quicker to turn around. So can I ask

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you something? So the sophistication of markets and how we

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>can trade it and slice and dice it. Is that

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>why you're saying it doesn't It's just a whole different

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>game on Wall Street versus years ago, decades ago, when

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it really was reflective of what was going on in

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Well, there was certainly more information that was

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>coming from the direct economy through companies that were involved

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in creating different components of the economy and being more

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>directly related to individuals. And now, of course we have

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>much more technology of much more analysis. We also far

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>more leverage um, and so we combine the technological leverage

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>with the financial leverage, we have this complete disconnect between again,

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>money going into the economy and sticking around and being

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>used for longer term capital investments and creation and all

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of that relative to I'm here now, I'm there. Now,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm trading on momentum, on trading on technological factors, I'm

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>trading on computer science, and I'm not necessarily trading on

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>value and the long term view. You said something that

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>makes me think about the role that government takes, because

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>when you think about big infrastructure projects in the nineteen

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>fifties and nineteen six do you think about the post

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>World War two boom here in the United States, the

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>building of Levittown, for example, all of these like shovel

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>ready projects. That's something that you need to have, you know,

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>widespread agreement on when it comes to putting that, you know,

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>implementing them. We don't have that right now. It's all

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a joke. It's always infrastructure week right and Washington and

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing ever gets done. Is that a big obstacle to

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting past where we are the financialization of

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the economy. That's a really good question, and it's true.

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>In the fifties and sixties we had we had a

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>connection in politics that related to the connection of what

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>was needed to be done in the country, the building

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>of those highways, the building of the space program, the

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>building of permanent, lasting features. We've been had that in

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen thirties, like Whoever Dam was built in the

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>middle of the Great Depression, because it was a process

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>that had started and it had financing, and it retrieved

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that financing throughout the all the years that it took

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to build it. So there's a lot of longer term

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking and longer term capital commitment in those days, not

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>just from the direction of Washington, I had that too,

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>but also from the direction of private industry, from Wall Street,

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>from companies throughout the country. That there was a collaboration

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that that has really become disintegrated. Now we can't even

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>build a tunnel between Manhattan and New Jersey. We we can't.

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>We haven't been able to do that, and there's an

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>incredible need for it. We've got no me priends with us.

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>She's an author and investigative journalist. She's got the new

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>book out, Permanent Distortion, How the Financial markets abandoned the

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>real economy Forever. She was a managing director at Goldman Sachs.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>She ran the International Analytics Group. As a senior managing

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>director at bear Stearns, she was a strategist that Lehman

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>brother She was also at Chase Manhattan Bank before that UM.

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>She also was on Senator Bernie Sanders Federal Reserve Reform

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Advisory Council. Know me, what I want to talk to

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you is about how you made the transition from banking

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>into becoming an author an investigative journalist, Like why did

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you leave the industry, did you run from the industry.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Now just kidding, UM nine eleven, how two things happened

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>from the industry, right, nine eleven happened. I was like

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs Corner office and twenty floor, the whole, the

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, UM that was going on at the time.

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And at the time also there was a lot of

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>corruption that was happening on the corporate side. That was

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of when en Ron was breaking, you know, it

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>was in world calm was breaking. There was a lot

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of like tension in terms of what the reality of

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>bound and sheets were, what the role of Wall Street was,

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course what we found it to be UM

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in all those corporate scandals, and I was I was

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of that and getting sort of, you know,

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>very disgusted with a lot of them. And then of

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>course not eleven happens and sort of you know, add

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>one and one, get two and two is based on

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I need to go and I need to talk about

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, and so a lot of them. The first

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>writings I did, UM were about what was going on

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the corporate scandals, telecom sector, the energy sector,

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>UM in Wall Streets connection, and I wound up taking

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that route into my first book, Other People's Money, The

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Corporate Monky of America UM, which also talked about the

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>inns of golden sacks as well as the banking industry

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>and everything that was going on there, because I thought

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>at the time nobody was talking about it. I mean,

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>at the time, we couldn't even talk about being inside

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street's not like today where everybody's talking sort of

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>about everything all the time. It wasn't like that. It was.

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>It was very much a sort of more secretive sort

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of situation, and I needed to talk about it, so

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I needed to be outside to talk about inside. I

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>want to get right back to no Me. Prinds, author

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and investigative journalist. Google her because her backgrounds incredible. She's

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>got a new book app Permanent Distortion and how the

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>financial markets abandoned the real economy Forever Permanent Distortion. Why

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>is it permanent? Um? Excellent question. It was not taken

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>lightly because I like words as well being an author. UM.

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>It's because in the wake of the financial crisis, when

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we went down to zero percent interest and and and

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we created four and a half trillion dollars worth of

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>money from nowhere to take debt out of the market.

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>At the time, US debt in generals nine trillion dollars

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>four and a half trillion equivalent was on the Fed's books.

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Some of that was mortgages, treasuries, was all connected. Then

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we had a double down situation that happened in twenty

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>So the period in between there was a lot of

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>speculation when will the Fed raise rates, etcetera. They raised

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>in markets were were insanely negative on that whole prospect.

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>They didn't raise again until twenty six and then sort

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of bits along the way to turned around in twenty

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and to twenty nineteen because Wall Street collateral wasn't

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>working between Wall Street and its own its own, its

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>own customers, UM, the repoil markets were falling apart. So

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the FED turned around and created more q E, brought

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>rates down again. UM talked about as if it was

0:07:57.800 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>related to the economy, but in fact was related to

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the quity on Wall Street, which, by the way, right

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>now we're going to see a lot of problems I

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>think coming into tomorrow's numbers. But besides that, when we

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>got into just a few months after that and the

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>pandemic hit, that's when there was an overdrive factor and

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that's when the FED went to nine trillion dollars from

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>at the time four point one, but effectively doubled in

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a few months what it took a number of years

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to get to the first time. Other central banks around

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the world following and what became just a sort of help,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>which was enormous to begin with, became a permanent artificial

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>cushion to the markets. And even right now, even with

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>rates coming up now and all the speculations, the FEDS,

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, totally changing and it's going to be this

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation hawk. Even though can't fight a lot of the

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation it says it's trying to fight, it doesn't actually

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>change the fact that this cushion is underneath all the

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>financial markets. And that's why we have days like today

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>where the market basically spans fifteen hundred points and day

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>on the doubt, that's not normal, that's not healthy. That's

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>related to the speculation versus this permanent idea of this

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>distortion between where the money goes to the economy, how

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it gets to the markets, where it stays it. It's

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>not a question of blaming the FED. It's a question

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Feed is responsible for creating the cushion. So

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I blame the cushion. The FED created the cushion, So

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in that respect, yes, I do blame the FET. But

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at the bigger picture, not just

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not just what is the FET and doing now with

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>interest rates? That obviously is creating uncertainty in the markets,

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's certainly oppressing people trying to get mortgages right

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>now which are twice as expensive as they were six

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 1>months ago. That and that's a really quick change. And

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to budget and you're the bottom level

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of your own you know, sort of the economy. But

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this is more about the fact that cushion exists. It's

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 1>not just the FET, it's the Bank of England, it's

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the European Central Bank is a bankage, but it's the

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>global um central bank network that has basically created this

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this outside source of capital in order to be there

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>when it deems necessary, and that that uncertainty about what's

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>necessary is now what's permeating in the markets, and it's

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>a reason why capital can't go outside those markets when

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>they're going up or when they're going down to long

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>term projects into the foundational economy. To the same extent,

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>as before, and did this start I mean, would you

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>say that this was the in the wake of the

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Great Financial Crisis or was this happening earlier. It was

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>happening a bit earlier, but quantitative easing to the extent

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that we saw it, we see it now and in

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the doubling sense of financial crisis was a post financial

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>crisis phenomenon. And we had a situation where the entire

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>banking system was so over leveraged and all of the

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>customers of all the over leverage mortgage product we're facing,

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, potential largin calls and everything else out the

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>whole system, from the top on all the way to

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the outskirts um. And so from that point on, when

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the FED decided, Okay, Ben Vernaki just just want a

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>noble prize for not noticing this happened in into nine

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>because we had a home bubble then too. Um. But

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the point being that that this created um, this this

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>momentum in the fabrication of money that had not existed

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ever before. Japan kind of did it for a while,

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>did it since the nineties, but but nowhere near to

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the same extent that the FED did it. And then

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>every other central bank in the world followed, and so

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>again this became a global situation where the global cost

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of money was zero and the global cushion continued to grow,

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and that happened in the wake of the financial crisis. Soho.

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>As a result, those who have access to that Christian

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>basically and that velocity of money have really benefited in

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a big way. And hence we have this massive gap

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in society that just gets bigger and bigger in terms

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of wealth. That's right, because obviously if you're in the

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>market and you can leverage yourself into the market, that's

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>whether you're a wealthy individual, the CEO of a company

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>that buys a lot of its own shares or has

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of other leverage coming into that particular company,

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>or any of the financial markets, those have this buzz up.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Again right now, there's a bit of uncertainty, but for

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the most part they have had this um, the acceleration

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say, the velocity of money. So basically, this

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this tush of money going into those areas and therefore

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>money money has choices, but money goes I talk about

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this in the book that the if you visualize where

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>money is going, money is flooding into the place where

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it can go most easily and where it can stay

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>most easily, we can have the greatest impact. And that

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>means that anyone using it, anyone leveraging, and anyone that

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>has access to it gets that benefit and anyone who

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>doesn't simply doesn't and as a result that gap. We're

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Gnomi Friends, author and investigative journalist. She's got

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the new book Permanent Distortion. How the financial markets abandoned

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the real economy forever? You know me? How can banks

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>better serve the real economy? Banks can look at their

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet in terms of where their small business loans are.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>They can look at where they're paying people for the

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>interests on their savings account. They cannot charge ridiculous fees

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>relative to the amount of money that people have with

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>accounts right now for example, No, I'm not going to

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>do that, and they're not, yes, because the incentives aren't

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>aligned for this, right, the incentives aren't aligned for this,

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so why would do so? So in I have this

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation at the fed UM. I have this conversation as

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of saying at the fed UM in front of the FED,

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the IMF and central bankers who are who are involved

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in this in this, you know, the animal meeting they

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>have there and that the topic was why is into

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street helping helping Main Street? And I just got

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>up and I said, because you you're not making them.

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they basically have the benefit of all of

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>QUI all of the loans, all of the help, all

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of the access to zero percent money, and you're wondering

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>why they're not sort of just just giving it out

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to sort of little people that hold accounts with them.

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not really rocket signed, so not because

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to. I get the argument for why

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>they should because of the assistance they got from the government. Right.

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And there are banks, as you know you worked at Lehman,

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not around anymore, right, I mean, there are banks

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that are are survived because of it. But I do

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>wonder as publicly held companies, they have got to constantly

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>think about returns to investors. And that's why I think.

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not pointing fingers or anything, but I mean that's

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>why they potentially don't do that. And we've just got

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>about thirty or forty seconds left here, So is there

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you talked about. I don't know what's the final takeaway

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for our audience. Well, the final take of me is

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>when I say permanent, I actually mean permanent. I don't

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>think there's going to be a period where the FEDS

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>book is going to go back down to the billion

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar or as it was before the financial crisis of

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight. Maybe it dibbles from like nine

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>trillion into six seven trillion, it's still massive, and then

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>again you multiply that throughout the world. So what does

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>that mean. That means going forward we're gonna have more

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and more of these volatile days to this magnitude. We're

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>going to have more of these crises, bubble, crises, bubble

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's not necessarily gonna be one big thing. It's

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>going to just be a volatile scenario because there's a

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>permanent distortion of where money is created, where it goes,

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>who gets it and who doesn't, Which is in the

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>real consim is gonna be always a Christian out They're

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>floating and it's massive. Um, let me come back, please,

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>no me, friends, author, investigative journalists, so much permanent distortion.

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>How the financial markets abandoned the real economy forever? Um.

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Great conversation. If you missed it, check out our podcast

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>feed on Bloomberg dot com. That's it. We gotta run

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>crazy day. We'll see you tomorrow.