WEBVTT - The History of the White Power Movement

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.716
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:22.756 --> 0:00:25.756
<v Speaker 1>where we explored the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:26.156 --> 0:00:30.716
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. The shooting at a synagogue outside San

0:00:30.716 --> 0:00:33.116
<v Speaker 1>Diego on the last day of Passover was just the

0:00:33.196 --> 0:00:36.716
<v Speaker 1>latest deadly attack where the suspect has reported links to

0:00:36.756 --> 0:00:40.876
<v Speaker 1>white supremacy. This incident pushed me to think harder and

0:00:40.956 --> 0:00:44.236
<v Speaker 1>deeper about the roots of white supremacy in the United States.

0:00:44.796 --> 0:00:48.276
<v Speaker 1>Are we really seeing something new here or is this

0:00:48.356 --> 0:00:50.916
<v Speaker 1>the same brand of white supremacy that's been around for

0:00:50.916 --> 0:00:52.996
<v Speaker 1>a very long time, as long ago as the Civil

0:00:52.996 --> 0:00:56.956
<v Speaker 1>War maybe before. To answer these questions and more, we're

0:00:56.996 --> 0:01:00.036
<v Speaker 1>joined by Kathleen Bellou. She's an assistant professor of history

0:01:00.036 --> 0:01:03.076
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Chicago, and her book Bring the

0:01:03.076 --> 0:01:07.036
<v Speaker 1>War Home, The White Power Movement and Paramilitary America is

0:01:07.076 --> 0:01:11.156
<v Speaker 1>the definitive look at the modern history of white power movement. Kathleen,

0:01:11.436 --> 0:01:13.996
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Deep Background. Thank you for having me, and

0:01:14.076 --> 0:01:16.556
<v Speaker 1>thank you for the kind words about the book. Before

0:01:16.596 --> 0:01:20.796
<v Speaker 1>we dive into the history and prehistory of white power

0:01:20.836 --> 0:01:23.356
<v Speaker 1>and white supremacy, can I ask you just a personal question,

0:01:23.596 --> 0:01:25.916
<v Speaker 1>how did you get interested in this topic? It is

0:01:25.956 --> 0:01:28.596
<v Speaker 1>not the most obvious topic for a starting to work on.

0:01:29.516 --> 0:01:32.556
<v Speaker 1>It isn't, and in fact, when I began the dissertation,

0:01:33.236 --> 0:01:34.996
<v Speaker 1>I was told by more than one person that it

0:01:35.036 --> 0:01:38.476
<v Speaker 1>technically could not count as history, because the usual rule

0:01:38.476 --> 0:01:40.236
<v Speaker 1>of thumb when you're starting a dissertation is that you

0:01:40.236 --> 0:01:42.916
<v Speaker 1>should be studying things twenty five years ago or further

0:01:43.396 --> 0:01:45.596
<v Speaker 1>is the rule. It turns out that it took me

0:01:45.636 --> 0:01:47.476
<v Speaker 1>so long to finish the book that I had cleared

0:01:47.516 --> 0:01:50.116
<v Speaker 1>that mark by the time it was all said and done.

0:01:50.476 --> 0:01:53.236
<v Speaker 1>But I actually think that the study of the recent

0:01:53.316 --> 0:01:56.796
<v Speaker 1>past has become, as you can see with this project,

0:01:56.876 --> 0:02:01.476
<v Speaker 1>urgently important to understanding our political moment and the debates

0:02:01.516 --> 0:02:04.596
<v Speaker 1>and challenges that we now find ourselves embroiled in. I

0:02:04.596 --> 0:02:07.836
<v Speaker 1>wanted to start by asking about the category of white

0:02:07.836 --> 0:02:11.156
<v Speaker 1>power or white supreme see. Certainly in a country like

0:02:11.196 --> 0:02:14.876
<v Speaker 1>the United States, which had slavery from the very beginning

0:02:14.876 --> 0:02:16.676
<v Speaker 1>of the country, and of course there were slavery long

0:02:16.716 --> 0:02:20.596
<v Speaker 1>before there was a United States in North America, the

0:02:20.916 --> 0:02:25.036
<v Speaker 1>idea that white people are superior to the black people,

0:02:25.076 --> 0:02:28.516
<v Speaker 1>that people of African descent is you know, almost baked

0:02:28.556 --> 0:02:32.036
<v Speaker 1>in to the earliest history of the country and the

0:02:32.036 --> 0:02:35.596
<v Speaker 1>prehistory of the country. And I wonder, how do you

0:02:35.636 --> 0:02:37.876
<v Speaker 1>know where to start? You know, when you talk about

0:02:37.876 --> 0:02:40.676
<v Speaker 1>white power or white supremacy. You know, how do you

0:02:40.716 --> 0:02:42.036
<v Speaker 1>know that you don't have to start all the way

0:02:42.076 --> 0:02:44.556
<v Speaker 1>back in the sixteen hundreds when the first African slaves

0:02:44.596 --> 0:02:47.316
<v Speaker 1>were brought to the Americas, or in seventeen eighty seven

0:02:47.396 --> 0:02:52.196
<v Speaker 1>with the US Constitution which enshrines slavery in certain respects.

0:02:52.196 --> 0:02:55.676
<v Speaker 1>The what's your working starting place when you start thinking

0:02:55.716 --> 0:02:59.396
<v Speaker 1>about white power? So when I teach this to my undergraduates,

0:02:59.436 --> 0:03:02.476
<v Speaker 1>we do start with those long histories of racial inequality,

0:03:02.596 --> 0:03:06.516
<v Speaker 1>the ways that white supremacy is not only a matter

0:03:06.556 --> 0:03:09.556
<v Speaker 1>of ideological belief for some people in the United States,

0:03:09.596 --> 0:03:12.876
<v Speaker 1>but has become imbricated in our systems of government, our

0:03:12.916 --> 0:03:16.596
<v Speaker 1>distribution of resources, are policing, and all kinds of other ways.

0:03:16.716 --> 0:03:19.836
<v Speaker 1>It's everywhere everywhere in this country. Race is everywhere. I

0:03:19.876 --> 0:03:23.796
<v Speaker 1>think reasonable people can agree on that. I think that

0:03:24.076 --> 0:03:30.196
<v Speaker 1>the definitions part is critically important, especially now. So what

0:03:30.356 --> 0:03:34.516
<v Speaker 1>white power refers to is a movement that comes out

0:03:34.516 --> 0:03:38.356
<v Speaker 1>of the Vietnam War, brings together a bunch of ideologically

0:03:38.436 --> 0:03:41.916
<v Speaker 1>diverse activists who had not been working together before. Such

0:03:41.916 --> 0:03:46.236
<v Speaker 1>as clansmen, Neo Nazis, skinheads, radical tax resistors, white separatists,

0:03:46.236 --> 0:03:50.836
<v Speaker 1>and others, and kind of amalgamates them into one social movement,

0:03:51.036 --> 0:03:53.356
<v Speaker 1>using the narrative of the war to bind them together,

0:03:53.676 --> 0:03:57.516
<v Speaker 1>and then declares war on the federal government. So that

0:03:57.676 --> 0:04:02.676
<v Speaker 1>begins in nineteen eighty three. Before that, I would characterize

0:04:03.236 --> 0:04:07.876
<v Speaker 1>things like the many iterations of the KKK, the Neo

0:04:07.956 --> 0:04:10.836
<v Speaker 1>Nazi Party in the United States. Those things are more

0:04:10.916 --> 0:04:16.036
<v Speaker 1>like vigilante violence in that the violence is either supporting

0:04:16.556 --> 0:04:21.276
<v Speaker 1>the state or supporting local status quo power. Post nineteen

0:04:21.316 --> 0:04:24.916
<v Speaker 1>eighty three, we're dealing with a completely different thing. After that,

0:04:25.036 --> 0:04:27.876
<v Speaker 1>it is a revolutionary movement that is attempting to overthrow

0:04:27.916 --> 0:04:31.716
<v Speaker 1>the United States, either through a kind of long asymmetrical

0:04:31.836 --> 0:04:36.716
<v Speaker 1>war of sabotage or through a direct revolution. So that's

0:04:36.716 --> 0:04:40.756
<v Speaker 1>the white power movement. The tricky one for a lot

0:04:40.796 --> 0:04:44.876
<v Speaker 1>of people is white nationalism. And actually I think it's

0:04:44.876 --> 0:04:47.276
<v Speaker 1>easier to understand right now because all of these stories

0:04:47.276 --> 0:04:51.036
<v Speaker 1>in the news about Hindu nationalism make this distinction really

0:04:51.036 --> 0:04:54.836
<v Speaker 1>really clear. So Hindu nationalism, for listeners who might not

0:04:54.876 --> 0:04:58.956
<v Speaker 1>be familiar, is a movement in India in which people

0:04:59.116 --> 0:05:01.996
<v Speaker 1>who are a Hindu nationalist, and they call themselves that

0:05:02.436 --> 0:05:08.436
<v Speaker 1>are organizing to make India more oriented around Hinduism in

0:05:08.596 --> 0:05:11.996
<v Speaker 1>culture and in policy. Right, so they're trying to inject

0:05:12.076 --> 0:05:16.516
<v Speaker 1>the nation of India with Hinduism more than a Nardias.

0:05:17.156 --> 0:05:19.956
<v Speaker 1>It's complicated in India by the fact that the name

0:05:20.076 --> 0:05:25.116
<v Speaker 1>for India in the language Hindi is Hindustan. So you know,

0:05:25.516 --> 0:05:28.556
<v Speaker 1>the word itself, Hindu doesn't only mean the religion, it

0:05:28.596 --> 0:05:30.676
<v Speaker 1>also means a culture. It also means a civilization. It's

0:05:30.676 --> 0:05:34.916
<v Speaker 1>a tricky one indeed, But the category is India. In

0:05:34.956 --> 0:05:38.836
<v Speaker 1>white nationalism, the category is not the United States. The

0:05:38.956 --> 0:05:42.876
<v Speaker 1>nation imagined by white nationalism after nineteen eighty three is

0:05:42.916 --> 0:05:46.156
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally opposed to the United States and also to New

0:05:46.236 --> 0:05:48.876
<v Speaker 1>Zealand and Australia and other nations where this takes hold.

0:05:49.476 --> 0:05:53.756
<v Speaker 1>White nationalism is attempting to create a transnational group of

0:05:53.796 --> 0:05:58.476
<v Speaker 1>white people that will take over white homelands, and eventually

0:05:58.556 --> 0:06:01.116
<v Speaker 1>many of them hope to wage war such that they

0:06:01.156 --> 0:06:04.276
<v Speaker 1>can achieve an all white world. That's not the same

0:06:04.316 --> 0:06:08.356
<v Speaker 1>thing as say the clan in the nineteen twenties, where

0:06:08.356 --> 0:06:11.396
<v Speaker 1>people were marching on the National Mall with their robes

0:06:11.396 --> 0:06:14.596
<v Speaker 1>and hoods, but their faces uncovered, which was which is,

0:06:14.636 --> 0:06:17.716
<v Speaker 1>among other things, anti immigrant. It was both about suppressing

0:06:17.756 --> 0:06:19.956
<v Speaker 1>African Americans, but also the clan in the nineteen its

0:06:20.036 --> 0:06:23.916
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenties iteration was very focused on immigrants, especially from

0:06:23.916 --> 0:06:26.836
<v Speaker 1>Catholic countries. The White Power movement also is anti immigrant.

0:06:26.836 --> 0:06:30.476
<v Speaker 1>But the thing that's different is that after nineteen eighty three,

0:06:30.596 --> 0:06:34.076
<v Speaker 1>this is an anti government, anti nation movement. It's not

0:06:34.196 --> 0:06:38.756
<v Speaker 1>an over exertion of patriotism. It's not just too much nationalism.

0:06:38.796 --> 0:06:42.796
<v Speaker 1>You talked about opposition to the United States as opposed

0:06:42.836 --> 0:06:46.316
<v Speaker 1>to vigilante violence. But in its first iteration, when the

0:06:46.436 --> 0:06:49.756
<v Speaker 1>Ku Klux Klan came into existence after the Civil War

0:06:50.316 --> 0:06:53.436
<v Speaker 1>in part to resist the attempts at the creation of

0:06:53.516 --> 0:06:56.516
<v Speaker 1>racial equality that we're being imposed in the South by

0:06:56.636 --> 0:07:00.116
<v Speaker 1>military reconstruction, that is, by an occupation of Union troops,

0:07:01.156 --> 0:07:03.636
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it also in its origins the clan at that

0:07:03.716 --> 0:07:07.116
<v Speaker 1>point in a sense revolutionary. It was opposed to the

0:07:07.156 --> 0:07:10.916
<v Speaker 1>government of the United States and was supporting the already

0:07:10.996 --> 0:07:15.596
<v Speaker 1>defeated ideals of the Confederacy. So in some sense wasn't

0:07:15.636 --> 0:07:18.796
<v Speaker 1>there a revolutionary impulse implicit in the clan from the beginning.

0:07:19.716 --> 0:07:22.556
<v Speaker 1>I think yes, But I think this one is highly debatable,

0:07:22.596 --> 0:07:25.756
<v Speaker 1>and I think it depends on what historians would call periodization,

0:07:25.876 --> 0:07:28.236
<v Speaker 1>meaning when you choose to stop that story. So, the

0:07:28.276 --> 0:07:31.036
<v Speaker 1>first clan was founded in eighteen sixty six in Pulaski,

0:07:31.076 --> 0:07:37.756
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee by frustrated veterans of the Confederacy. It very quickly grew,

0:07:37.956 --> 0:07:41.396
<v Speaker 1>but at the beginning was mostly understood a sort of

0:07:41.436 --> 0:07:46.076
<v Speaker 1>like a burlesque prankster group. And then there is this

0:07:46.196 --> 0:07:50.196
<v Speaker 1>moment when it formalizes and turns violent, and that violence

0:07:50.236 --> 0:07:55.516
<v Speaker 1>is directed at African Americans, school tax collectors, school teachers,

0:07:55.676 --> 0:07:58.316
<v Speaker 1>and people from the North who come in to implement

0:07:58.356 --> 0:08:02.596
<v Speaker 1>reconstruction and people in the South who support reconstruction. In

0:08:02.636 --> 0:08:07.516
<v Speaker 1>other words, it is an attempt either to resist the

0:08:07.596 --> 0:08:13.836
<v Speaker 1>federal government's effort to reconstruct the South or to form

0:08:13.876 --> 0:08:17.316
<v Speaker 1>a new system of power. So right in there is

0:08:17.316 --> 0:08:22.596
<v Speaker 1>the distinction between revolutionary and something else. Historians have sort

0:08:22.636 --> 0:08:26.596
<v Speaker 1>of argued a lot over this, but I think it's

0:08:26.636 --> 0:08:29.556
<v Speaker 1>important to remember that the Jim Crow regime in the

0:08:29.596 --> 0:08:32.756
<v Speaker 1>South is not sort of just a continuation of slavery,

0:08:33.316 --> 0:08:36.356
<v Speaker 1>but something that has to be built and constructed and

0:08:36.476 --> 0:08:44.276
<v Speaker 1>invented after reconstruction, the clan doesn't disappear when reconstruction ends. Instead,

0:08:44.436 --> 0:08:49.596
<v Speaker 1>it largely just relocates into citizen militias, into groups like

0:08:49.596 --> 0:08:52.796
<v Speaker 1>the Red Shirts and the White Shirts, into rifle clubs,

0:08:52.836 --> 0:08:56.836
<v Speaker 1>and into spectacle lynchings, which are these mass public participation

0:08:56.916 --> 0:08:59.116
<v Speaker 1>events that carry out a lot of the same kind

0:08:59.116 --> 0:09:01.796
<v Speaker 1>of violence that the clan was already doing a lot

0:09:01.836 --> 0:09:03.116
<v Speaker 1>of it in public. I mean. One of the things

0:09:03.156 --> 0:09:07.196
<v Speaker 1>that always amazes me about lynching is that there are

0:09:07.276 --> 0:09:11.796
<v Speaker 1>postcards that were spread through the South of people white

0:09:11.836 --> 0:09:15.796
<v Speaker 1>people gathered around a lynched African American with a photograph

0:09:15.876 --> 0:09:18.116
<v Speaker 1>being taken as a kind of commemoration of the event,

0:09:18.196 --> 0:09:21.036
<v Speaker 1>and no one's wearing a mask, no one's hiding his face.

0:09:21.756 --> 0:09:23.676
<v Speaker 1>Not only that, but there are women and children in

0:09:23.676 --> 0:09:27.036
<v Speaker 1>their Sunday best clothes. These events are all very often

0:09:27.076 --> 0:09:30.036
<v Speaker 1>happening on the courthouse or at local sites of power.

0:09:30.716 --> 0:09:32.516
<v Speaker 1>And it's also not just in the South. These are

0:09:32.556 --> 0:09:37.036
<v Speaker 1>happening in Indiana, in the Pacific Northwest, in Texas, and

0:09:37.116 --> 0:09:40.356
<v Speaker 1>in fact, for one stretch in South Texas, the chance

0:09:40.436 --> 0:09:43.116
<v Speaker 1>of being lynched as much higher for Mexican Americans and

0:09:43.196 --> 0:09:45.716
<v Speaker 1>Mexicans than it is for African American men in the South.

0:09:47.436 --> 0:09:51.436
<v Speaker 1>It's it's that move into lynching that makes me reluctant

0:09:51.476 --> 0:09:54.116
<v Speaker 1>to think of it as revolutionary violence, because lynching has

0:09:54.196 --> 0:09:58.876
<v Speaker 1>mostly been understood as scholars as conveying a kind of

0:09:59.036 --> 0:10:02.516
<v Speaker 1>popular sovereignty of the community, in other words, that in

0:10:02.556 --> 0:10:04.956
<v Speaker 1>other words, that when when you lynch somebody, the whole

0:10:04.956 --> 0:10:07.156
<v Speaker 1>community is getting together to do it, it's a kind

0:10:07.156 --> 0:10:11.436
<v Speaker 1>of perverted version of small d democracy, where we're doing

0:10:11.436 --> 0:10:15.276
<v Speaker 1>this as a collective. Yes, it's a claim to that power.

0:10:15.316 --> 0:10:17.916
<v Speaker 1>It's a taking back of sovereign power from the state.

0:10:18.396 --> 0:10:22.316
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn now to that revolutionary movement which, as you

0:10:22.436 --> 0:10:27.716
<v Speaker 1>described in nineteen eighty three, unites itself to some degree

0:10:27.796 --> 0:10:31.636
<v Speaker 1>and declares war on the United States of America. Tell

0:10:31.716 --> 0:10:33.756
<v Speaker 1>us that story, because I don't think that's very well known.

0:10:33.876 --> 0:10:38.116
<v Speaker 1>The nineteen eighty three turn comes after this big infrastructure

0:10:38.156 --> 0:10:42.116
<v Speaker 1>build up, an organization of social movement that happens in

0:10:42.156 --> 0:10:46.556
<v Speaker 1>the years proceeding. The clan builds paramilitary training camps all

0:10:46.596 --> 0:10:50.516
<v Speaker 1>around the country. It trains people in paramilitary warfare. It

0:10:50.556 --> 0:10:54.796
<v Speaker 1>works on amassing weapons and material, getting money, getting people organized,

0:10:54.836 --> 0:10:58.036
<v Speaker 1>getting people in contact with one another, and by nineteen

0:10:58.116 --> 0:11:01.836
<v Speaker 1>eighty three. I think there are two major things that happen.

0:11:02.036 --> 0:11:04.956
<v Speaker 1>One is that that infrastructure is in place. Activists know

0:11:05.036 --> 0:11:06.916
<v Speaker 1>each other, They're all in the same room. They're kind

0:11:06.916 --> 0:11:09.476
<v Speaker 1>of coherent around this common story of the Vietnam War,

0:11:09.916 --> 0:11:13.116
<v Speaker 1>which has allowed some connections possible between different groups that

0:11:13.156 --> 0:11:16.116
<v Speaker 1>weren't possible before. And the other thing that happens is

0:11:16.156 --> 0:11:20.836
<v Speaker 1>they get really frustrated with Reagan. Activists in the movement

0:11:21.156 --> 0:11:24.396
<v Speaker 1>don't make this revolutionary turn in a moment of leftist

0:11:24.476 --> 0:11:27.796
<v Speaker 1>state power, but instead under the second term of the

0:11:27.836 --> 0:11:31.276
<v Speaker 1>Reagan administration. And their argument about this is that the

0:11:31.356 --> 0:11:37.036
<v Speaker 1>distance between Reagan's campaign promises and what they see as

0:11:37.156 --> 0:11:40.636
<v Speaker 1>his moderation proves to them once and for all that

0:11:40.716 --> 0:11:43.716
<v Speaker 1>electoral change will never deliver the kind of world they want,

0:11:43.956 --> 0:11:46.596
<v Speaker 1>and therefore they need to declare war. Now. This is

0:11:47.716 --> 0:11:49.676
<v Speaker 1>this is really relevant to us in the present moment

0:11:49.716 --> 0:11:53.476
<v Speaker 1>because it means that even at moments when the center

0:11:53.596 --> 0:11:56.716
<v Speaker 1>through the left might see kind of a moment of

0:11:56.756 --> 0:12:00.796
<v Speaker 1>conservative orientation and executive power, that doesn't mean that activists

0:12:00.836 --> 0:12:02.756
<v Speaker 1>on the friend right will be assuaged by that, and

0:12:02.796 --> 0:12:06.076
<v Speaker 1>in fact, that's had just the opposite effect. In this case.

0:12:06.396 --> 0:12:09.076
<v Speaker 1>So that's extremely important, as you say, for the question

0:12:09.236 --> 0:12:14.076
<v Speaker 1>of the relationship between recent rounds of white power of

0:12:14.156 --> 0:12:17.676
<v Speaker 1>violence and the Trump administration. There's a tendency on the

0:12:17.756 --> 0:12:23.636
<v Speaker 1>left to say, well, look at Charlottesville, which followed Donald

0:12:23.636 --> 0:12:27.676
<v Speaker 1>Trump's ascending to the presidency, and then look at subsequent

0:12:27.716 --> 0:12:30.276
<v Speaker 1>events the Tree of Life shooting, for example in the

0:12:30.356 --> 0:12:33.556
<v Speaker 1>United States, the Christchurch, New Zealand attacks, and to see

0:12:33.596 --> 0:12:36.716
<v Speaker 1>this all as very much a result of the election

0:12:36.876 --> 0:12:40.156
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump. And if I understand you correctly, you're

0:12:40.156 --> 0:12:43.836
<v Speaker 1>telling a slightly different story about the way that white

0:12:43.836 --> 0:12:47.076
<v Speaker 1>power activists reacted, for example, to the election of Ronald Reagan.

0:12:47.116 --> 0:12:50.156
<v Speaker 1>It's not that they were empowered or emboldened by the

0:12:50.196 --> 0:12:53.036
<v Speaker 1>election of a conservative president. It's rather that they felt

0:12:53.036 --> 0:12:55.316
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't enough and that therefore they needed to

0:12:55.356 --> 0:12:59.996
<v Speaker 1>take some revolutionary action. Is that in your mind? I mean,

0:12:59.996 --> 0:13:02.076
<v Speaker 1>we're jumping ahead to the president, which will come to

0:13:02.316 --> 0:13:04.996
<v Speaker 1>you in good time as well. But is your view

0:13:05.036 --> 0:13:08.836
<v Speaker 1>that something like that is happening now among white power activists.

0:13:08.836 --> 0:13:11.236
<v Speaker 1>It's not that they're emboldened so much by Trump's election,

0:13:11.236 --> 0:13:13.116
<v Speaker 1>It's that it's not enough, and it gives them reason

0:13:13.156 --> 0:13:18.236
<v Speaker 1>to do more. I suspect that's what we're seeing. This

0:13:18.276 --> 0:13:20.756
<v Speaker 1>is when I have to give the historian caveat that

0:13:21.316 --> 0:13:23.276
<v Speaker 1>the thing that lets me see the story that I

0:13:23.316 --> 0:13:27.276
<v Speaker 1>write about in the book is this archive that spans newspapers,

0:13:27.356 --> 0:13:31.956
<v Speaker 1>primary source materials, FBI and other surveillance documents, court testimony.

0:13:32.356 --> 0:13:35.356
<v Speaker 1>We don't get that kind of source base in real time.

0:13:35.476 --> 0:13:37.876
<v Speaker 1>When you talk about as a starian, talk about the archive,

0:13:38.236 --> 0:13:42.036
<v Speaker 1>you mean some literal archives, in some cases cashes of documents.

0:13:42.156 --> 0:13:44.196
<v Speaker 1>But it's also the word archive is also a metaphor

0:13:44.196 --> 0:13:47.516
<v Speaker 1>that a Starin's used to describe all the materials that

0:13:47.676 --> 0:13:49.516
<v Speaker 1>you guys use to try to make sense of his

0:13:49.636 --> 0:13:52.636
<v Speaker 1>darical events exactly. You can think about it as like

0:13:52.676 --> 0:13:54.996
<v Speaker 1>the receipts for the story I'm going to tell I

0:13:55.036 --> 0:13:58.676
<v Speaker 1>don't have that kind of information about events from about

0:13:58.756 --> 0:14:00.956
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety six forward, and there are some reasons for

0:14:00.996 --> 0:14:05.396
<v Speaker 1>why that is in this particular cash of sources. But

0:14:05.956 --> 0:14:09.396
<v Speaker 1>the earlier period does tell us a couple of things

0:14:09.436 --> 0:14:12.756
<v Speaker 1>that make me concerned about the present moment in the

0:14:12.796 --> 0:14:14.716
<v Speaker 1>ways that you've just described. One of them is that

0:14:16.156 --> 0:14:21.676
<v Speaker 1>when there is this moment of perceived sympathetic administration, that

0:14:21.756 --> 0:14:24.276
<v Speaker 1>has not assuaged these activists, and in fact that has

0:14:24.316 --> 0:14:26.876
<v Speaker 1>been seen as a call to arms. The other one

0:14:26.956 --> 0:14:30.036
<v Speaker 1>is that there have always been sort of two spheres

0:14:30.076 --> 0:14:34.276
<v Speaker 1>of activity in this movement. One of them is the

0:14:34.356 --> 0:14:43.596
<v Speaker 1>sort of mass mobilizations like Charlottesville marches, political campaigns, organizing events, recruitment, drives,

0:14:44.236 --> 0:14:49.356
<v Speaker 1>campus campaigns to recruit students, speak of public speaking to ours,

0:14:49.436 --> 0:14:53.916
<v Speaker 1>things like that. The other one is this massive network

0:14:54.116 --> 0:15:00.556
<v Speaker 1>of paramilitary camps, cell style terror, illegal communication in many cases,

0:15:00.716 --> 0:15:04.756
<v Speaker 1>and different kinds of crime ranging from assassination to the

0:15:05.516 --> 0:15:10.476
<v Speaker 1>obtaining of stolen military weapons and material to mass violence attacks.

0:15:11.116 --> 0:15:13.556
<v Speaker 1>In the period that I study, those two spheres of

0:15:13.596 --> 0:15:16.716
<v Speaker 1>activity happened at the same time, um and often there

0:15:16.716 --> 0:15:19.036
<v Speaker 1>were people who crossed the line between those two kinds

0:15:19.036 --> 0:15:21.996
<v Speaker 1>of activism, and we're undertaking both of those things as

0:15:22.036 --> 0:15:25.356
<v Speaker 1>a coordinated kind of kind of campaign. The fact that

0:15:25.396 --> 0:15:29.156
<v Speaker 1>we can't see that underground in real time doesn't mean

0:15:29.196 --> 0:15:33.156
<v Speaker 1>that that's not happening, as as we are noticing more

0:15:33.196 --> 0:15:36.276
<v Speaker 1>of these above board events and in fact, this wave

0:15:36.436 --> 0:15:39.476
<v Speaker 1>of violent attacks that you describe, which I might also

0:15:39.516 --> 0:15:45.636
<v Speaker 1>add Dylan Roofs shooting in Charleston. Absolutely, oh no, yeah,

0:15:45.676 --> 0:15:51.356
<v Speaker 1>wells Bravik in Norway. Yes, putting those all together in

0:15:51.396 --> 0:15:53.836
<v Speaker 1>one story is very very important because then we can

0:15:53.876 --> 0:15:56.116
<v Speaker 1>start to say, oh, wow, this is a wave we're

0:15:56.156 --> 0:15:58.596
<v Speaker 1>talking about. You know, three attempted attacks in the last

0:15:58.636 --> 0:16:01.676
<v Speaker 1>six months. Um. A lot of these are mass attacks,

0:16:01.716 --> 0:16:03.756
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these are people who are using the

0:16:03.756 --> 0:16:07.596
<v Speaker 1>same coordinated messaging. UM. That indicates to me that we

0:16:07.676 --> 0:16:10.916
<v Speaker 1>do have this two spheres model of activism going again,

0:16:11.036 --> 0:16:13.796
<v Speaker 1>even if I can't see the sources in real time

0:16:13.836 --> 0:16:17.196
<v Speaker 1>to be able to describe it in detail. One element

0:16:17.316 --> 0:16:19.636
<v Speaker 1>that I think we need to also add to your

0:16:19.876 --> 0:16:26.636
<v Speaker 1>depiction of people's common narrative of the Vietnam War having

0:16:26.676 --> 0:16:29.716
<v Speaker 1>been lost because of betrayal by the American government and

0:16:30.276 --> 0:16:33.716
<v Speaker 1>anti communism and they're bringing together of clan members and

0:16:33.836 --> 0:16:37.796
<v Speaker 1>neo Nazis and others, is the religious component. Would you

0:16:37.836 --> 0:16:45.316
<v Speaker 1>say something about the apocalyptic religious elements of the combined

0:16:45.996 --> 0:16:49.316
<v Speaker 1>viewpoints that are coming together around nineteen eighty three in

0:16:49.356 --> 0:16:53.436
<v Speaker 1>this revolutionary movement. Sure, there are kind of two major

0:16:53.676 --> 0:16:57.956
<v Speaker 1>theological innovations of this movement. One of them is Norse paganism,

0:16:58.076 --> 0:17:03.396
<v Speaker 1>so Odinism and other kind of neopagan ideologies that put

0:17:03.396 --> 0:17:06.196
<v Speaker 1>forward the greatness of white cultures in different ways. So

0:17:06.276 --> 0:17:10.396
<v Speaker 1>the idea is to take Nordic mythology, of which Odin

0:17:10.516 --> 0:17:13.956
<v Speaker 1>is a central figure, and to say, ah, Nordic mythology

0:17:14.396 --> 0:17:18.156
<v Speaker 1>equals white people's mythology something like that exactly. So there's

0:17:18.356 --> 0:17:20.996
<v Speaker 1>and it comes with a whole cultural apparatus of things

0:17:20.996 --> 0:17:24.076
<v Speaker 1>like writing in ruins and using the Viking imagery and

0:17:24.116 --> 0:17:27.596
<v Speaker 1>things like that. The other one is Christian identity, and

0:17:27.636 --> 0:17:31.676
<v Speaker 1>I think this one is more impactful for a couple

0:17:31.676 --> 0:17:34.076
<v Speaker 1>of different reasons. One is that it has a very

0:17:34.156 --> 0:17:37.076
<v Speaker 1>clear role for women, who turn out to be enormously

0:17:37.116 --> 0:17:41.716
<v Speaker 1>important to motivating this movement and holding it together. The

0:17:41.796 --> 0:17:45.676
<v Speaker 1>other is for its depiction of the end of the world.

0:17:46.236 --> 0:17:49.636
<v Speaker 1>So the nineteen eighties in general are a time of

0:17:49.916 --> 0:17:53.116
<v Speaker 1>deep fixation on the end of the world. There's deep,

0:17:53.196 --> 0:17:58.196
<v Speaker 1>deep apocalyptic belief kind of across American culture, including in

0:17:58.316 --> 0:18:02.396
<v Speaker 1>evangelical churches, which are recruiting much larger congregations and much

0:18:02.396 --> 0:18:07.196
<v Speaker 1>more politicized congregations in the nineteen eighties. Now in evangelical Christianity,

0:18:07.276 --> 0:18:09.876
<v Speaker 1>that comes with a belief in a day all the rapture,

0:18:10.236 --> 0:18:12.596
<v Speaker 1>which is a moment when all of the faithful are

0:18:12.636 --> 0:18:16.556
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be peacefully transported to Heaven before this big,

0:18:16.636 --> 0:18:20.636
<v Speaker 1>bloody last battle that will come right before the return

0:18:20.676 --> 0:18:25.396
<v Speaker 1>of Christ. So Christian identity has no rapture, but it

0:18:25.436 --> 0:18:28.916
<v Speaker 1>does have the battle. So what Christian identity does is

0:18:29.436 --> 0:18:33.196
<v Speaker 1>turn its believers into either survivalists. You either have to

0:18:33.236 --> 0:18:37.036
<v Speaker 1>survive this end times before Jesus returns, or you have

0:18:37.116 --> 0:18:39.556
<v Speaker 1>to become a soldier of God to clear the world

0:18:39.596 --> 0:18:43.596
<v Speaker 1>of non white populations before you know, before Christ can

0:18:43.636 --> 0:18:46.636
<v Speaker 1>return to the world. So what it does is transfigure

0:18:46.716 --> 0:18:50.556
<v Speaker 1>this whole host of social issues that are important to

0:18:50.596 --> 0:18:54.716
<v Speaker 1>the white power movement into a holy war. And one

0:18:54.716 --> 0:18:56.716
<v Speaker 1>way to think about this is that it comes with

0:18:56.756 --> 0:19:00.396
<v Speaker 1>this intense sense of emergency about something that people talk

0:19:00.436 --> 0:19:05.236
<v Speaker 1>about very casually in American culture, which is this kind

0:19:05.236 --> 0:19:09.356
<v Speaker 1>of imagined moment of demographic change when the country will

0:19:09.396 --> 0:19:12.676
<v Speaker 1>switch over from a majority white population to something else.

0:19:13.956 --> 0:19:16.676
<v Speaker 1>And as different communities begin to make that transition in

0:19:16.716 --> 0:19:18.836
<v Speaker 1>the eighties and the nineties, these activists get more and

0:19:18.876 --> 0:19:24.276
<v Speaker 1>more preoccupied with this. For people in the white power movement,

0:19:25.596 --> 0:19:29.996
<v Speaker 1>the issues that might be conservative or understandable to us

0:19:29.996 --> 0:19:38.716
<v Speaker 1>as conservative, like opposing immigration, opposing abortion, LGBT rights, opposing feminism,

0:19:38.756 --> 0:19:41.716
<v Speaker 1>being in favor of racial segregation or freedom of association.

0:19:42.356 --> 0:19:45.916
<v Speaker 1>All of that stuff, for white power activists is attached

0:19:46.156 --> 0:19:50.316
<v Speaker 1>to this deep preoccupation with the future of the race

0:19:50.916 --> 0:19:54.876
<v Speaker 1>through the production of white babies. So it's not for

0:19:54.956 --> 0:19:59.196
<v Speaker 1>white power activists just they oppose abortion because it's a

0:19:59.236 --> 0:20:02.676
<v Speaker 1>conservative issue or because they have concerns about unborn life.

0:20:03.076 --> 0:20:06.556
<v Speaker 1>It's that they oppose abortion because abortion is one thing

0:20:06.636 --> 0:20:11.396
<v Speaker 1>that is threatening the white birthrate, along with immigration integration,

0:20:11.396 --> 0:20:13.076
<v Speaker 1>which they think will result in the birth of non

0:20:13.076 --> 0:20:15.236
<v Speaker 1>white children or mixed race children who they see as

0:20:15.276 --> 0:20:20.636
<v Speaker 1>non human. LGBT rights they think will take white women

0:20:21.236 --> 0:20:24.476
<v Speaker 1>out of the work of birthing children. They're worried about

0:20:24.516 --> 0:20:27.156
<v Speaker 1>feminism because they think women should be at home raising children.

0:20:27.556 --> 0:20:30.116
<v Speaker 1>This whole production of white children thing is like the

0:20:30.156 --> 0:20:32.796
<v Speaker 1>glue that holds together this whole belief system. And in

0:20:32.876 --> 0:20:34.516
<v Speaker 1>order for it to make sense, you really have to

0:20:34.516 --> 0:20:38.716
<v Speaker 1>think about how vivid and immediate this sense of emergency

0:20:39.116 --> 0:20:43.196
<v Speaker 1>is to these activists. They feel this as an apocalyptic threat,

0:20:43.316 --> 0:20:46.236
<v Speaker 1>so not as kind of like a soft demographic change

0:20:46.276 --> 0:20:48.756
<v Speaker 1>that's going to come at some point. Okay, so you

0:20:48.836 --> 0:20:55.516
<v Speaker 1>get this attempt to unify these disparate, potentially disparate social

0:20:55.756 --> 0:20:59.236
<v Speaker 1>groups around a common vision and a kind of a

0:20:59.236 --> 0:21:03.396
<v Speaker 1>common ideology. It's happening in the middle of the nineteen eighties,

0:21:04.116 --> 0:21:10.996
<v Speaker 1>and it then leads to some rather extraordinary consequences, most

0:21:11.156 --> 0:21:13.316
<v Speaker 1>saliently in your book. And this is the kind of

0:21:13.356 --> 0:21:18.436
<v Speaker 1>climactic point in your book, the nineteen ninety five bombing

0:21:18.676 --> 0:21:23.076
<v Speaker 1>of the Oklahoma City Federal Building by Timothy McVay and

0:21:23.236 --> 0:21:26.156
<v Speaker 1>a group of others, And will say more about that group.

0:21:26.516 --> 0:21:30.436
<v Speaker 1>How did that spectacular bombing spectacular in the sense that

0:21:30.476 --> 0:21:34.116
<v Speaker 1>it was a spectacle. It created a spectacle in which

0:21:34.196 --> 0:21:37.836
<v Speaker 1>nearly one hundred and seventy people were killed grow out

0:21:37.916 --> 0:21:40.356
<v Speaker 1>of this movement? How did the movement go from, as

0:21:40.356 --> 0:21:44.476
<v Speaker 1>it were, a group of possibly crazy looking peripheral people

0:21:44.996 --> 0:21:48.396
<v Speaker 1>to a cohesive movement that could produce an attack like this.

0:21:50.196 --> 0:21:52.356
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question, and the short answer is through

0:21:52.436 --> 0:21:57.116
<v Speaker 1>women during the nineteen eighties. What unfolds is not sort

0:21:57.156 --> 0:22:04.476
<v Speaker 1>of a popularly understood collection of shrieking and ignorant activists

0:22:04.516 --> 0:22:09.716
<v Speaker 1>in backwoods something, you know, doing their own and fighting

0:22:09.756 --> 0:22:12.636
<v Speaker 1>with each other, etcetera. What we see is actually a

0:22:12.836 --> 0:22:17.396
<v Speaker 1>broad ranging social movement. It includes men, women, and children.

0:22:17.596 --> 0:22:22.196
<v Speaker 1>It includes people in all regions of the country, including rural, suburban,

0:22:22.236 --> 0:22:25.036
<v Speaker 1>and urban spaces, and includes people of a lot of

0:22:25.036 --> 0:22:28.796
<v Speaker 1>different age groups, people with education ranging from high school

0:22:28.876 --> 0:22:34.756
<v Speaker 1>dropout and to homeschool to I mean rocket launch engineer

0:22:34.876 --> 0:22:40.156
<v Speaker 1>kind of people. Um. Religious leaders and felons and civilians,

0:22:40.236 --> 0:22:45.116
<v Speaker 1>veterans and active duty troops. So it's really a disprint

0:22:45.156 --> 0:22:50.676
<v Speaker 1>group of people group the word poor everybody. Yeah, well done. No, no,

0:22:50.716 --> 0:22:52.716
<v Speaker 1>not at all. It's a very diverse group of people

0:22:52.756 --> 0:22:56.796
<v Speaker 1>except racially, yes, um. And it even has multiple faiths

0:22:56.836 --> 0:22:59.676
<v Speaker 1>in it, as we talked about. So that UM, that

0:22:59.836 --> 0:23:03.796
<v Speaker 1>structure UM, together with this turn against the state, leads

0:23:03.796 --> 0:23:06.796
<v Speaker 1>them to adopt a strategy called leaderless resistance in nineteen

0:23:06.836 --> 0:23:09.036
<v Speaker 1>eighty three. So talk to us about leaderless resistance because

0:23:09.036 --> 0:23:12.276
<v Speaker 1>that hugely important for the present moment as well. It

0:23:12.436 --> 0:23:16.876
<v Speaker 1>is leaderless resistance is easy to understand now as just

0:23:17.116 --> 0:23:20.196
<v Speaker 1>cell style terrorism. The idea is that you're going to

0:23:21.316 --> 0:23:27.716
<v Speaker 1>indoctrinate and shape activists and maybe small cohorts of cells,

0:23:27.956 --> 0:23:30.756
<v Speaker 1>like one to six people, maybe the occasional larger cell

0:23:30.796 --> 0:23:33.756
<v Speaker 1>of twelve people, maybe just one to two activists you're

0:23:33.796 --> 0:23:37.436
<v Speaker 1>going to get them all aligned towards the same targets,

0:23:37.796 --> 0:23:41.116
<v Speaker 1>and then they're going to act independently, without communication with

0:23:41.196 --> 0:23:44.836
<v Speaker 1>leadership and without communication with each other. Now, there's actually

0:23:44.876 --> 0:23:47.916
<v Speaker 1>a historical reason for why they adopt this strategy, which

0:23:47.956 --> 0:23:51.356
<v Speaker 1>is that in the earlier clan, in the fifties and

0:23:51.356 --> 0:23:53.516
<v Speaker 1>the sixties, the Third Era clan, which is the one

0:23:53.516 --> 0:23:57.356
<v Speaker 1>that opposes the Civil rights movement, the federal government had

0:23:57.396 --> 0:24:02.116
<v Speaker 1>sent in a ton of informants under the FBI's Counterintelligence

0:24:02.156 --> 0:24:06.316
<v Speaker 1>Project and other initiatives, and clansmen got really really frustrated

0:24:06.396 --> 0:24:08.276
<v Speaker 1>with how many of these people were getting into their

0:24:08.276 --> 0:24:10.756
<v Speaker 1>meetings and messing their stuff and getting people arrested and

0:24:10.796 --> 0:24:12.676
<v Speaker 1>turning over mailing lists and all kinds of things like that.

0:24:13.116 --> 0:24:17.116
<v Speaker 1>So leaderless resistance is actually implemented in large part to

0:24:17.196 --> 0:24:21.916
<v Speaker 1>foil surveillance, and it has the other kind of immediate

0:24:22.716 --> 0:24:26.996
<v Speaker 1>benefit of foiling court prosecution. But the lasting impact of

0:24:27.036 --> 0:24:30.476
<v Speaker 1>it has actually been to foil public understanding. Because what

0:24:30.516 --> 0:24:33.996
<v Speaker 1>happens is leaders resistance plays right into this sort of

0:24:34.076 --> 0:24:39.036
<v Speaker 1>media narrative about lone wolf violence or crazy people or

0:24:39.076 --> 0:24:42.276
<v Speaker 1>a few bad apples or mad gunmen, right where we

0:24:42.356 --> 0:24:45.956
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of different stories about one person committing

0:24:45.996 --> 0:24:48.316
<v Speaker 1>an act of violence and don't get the apparatus to

0:24:48.316 --> 0:24:52.636
<v Speaker 1>put those things together into the same history. So leaderless

0:24:52.636 --> 0:24:54.676
<v Speaker 1>resistance is one of the ways that we get from

0:24:54.756 --> 0:24:57.956
<v Speaker 1>the formation of the movement to Oklahoma City. The other

0:24:57.996 --> 0:25:03.636
<v Speaker 1>one is the implementation of computer social networking. In nineteen

0:25:03.716 --> 0:25:07.916
<v Speaker 1>eighty three eighty four, they implement a series of code

0:25:07.916 --> 0:25:12.036
<v Speaker 1>word accessed message board is called liberty net UM. This

0:25:12.116 --> 0:25:14.716
<v Speaker 1>is before the Internet, so technically this is not the Internet,

0:25:14.756 --> 0:25:16.516
<v Speaker 1>but we can we can understand this is like the

0:25:16.556 --> 0:25:19.556
<v Speaker 1>proto Internet. It's it's networked computers that can speak to

0:25:19.596 --> 0:25:22.116
<v Speaker 1>one another. Um. And also, by the way, it takes

0:25:22.156 --> 0:25:24.196
<v Speaker 1>the FBI like two years to crack the code and

0:25:24.196 --> 0:25:27.196
<v Speaker 1>see what they're posting, kind of amazing that White Power

0:25:27.276 --> 0:25:30.436
<v Speaker 1>might be might be the very first social movement to

0:25:30.596 --> 0:25:35.756
<v Speaker 1>have actively exploited computer technology in that way. Yeah, not

0:25:35.796 --> 0:25:38.636
<v Speaker 1>only that, but the way that they do this is

0:25:38.916 --> 0:25:42.756
<v Speaker 1>very much like Facebook, long before Facebook was invented. Um.

0:25:42.956 --> 0:25:45.716
<v Speaker 1>What they post to these message boards includes a lot

0:25:45.716 --> 0:25:50.316
<v Speaker 1>of you know, practical content like assassination lists and um,

0:25:50.556 --> 0:25:53.316
<v Speaker 1>you know, propaganda messaging and things like that, but it

0:25:53.356 --> 0:25:56.876
<v Speaker 1>also includes things like personal ads, So what these these

0:25:56.916 --> 0:25:59.476
<v Speaker 1>boards are meant to do is to connect activists together

0:25:59.556 --> 0:26:03.876
<v Speaker 1>in a movement in order to motivate this cell style activism.

0:26:03.716 --> 0:26:05.476
<v Speaker 1>M So it's in a way, if you're going to

0:26:05.556 --> 0:26:08.076
<v Speaker 1>have leader list resistance, you need cells and they need

0:26:08.116 --> 0:26:10.876
<v Speaker 1>to communicate with each other somehow, even if not in coordination,

0:26:11.476 --> 0:26:13.876
<v Speaker 1>and then the message sports become the mechanism in your

0:26:13.916 --> 0:26:16.876
<v Speaker 1>story for how that happens. Yeah, well you also need

0:26:16.916 --> 0:26:19.956
<v Speaker 1>a big you need the social movement to share resources

0:26:19.996 --> 0:26:22.876
<v Speaker 1>and also to connect everybody in common culture as such

0:26:22.916 --> 0:26:25.156
<v Speaker 1>that they can understand what the targets are supposed to be.

0:26:25.676 --> 0:26:28.036
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting that Timothy McVeigh, I think you show in

0:26:28.076 --> 0:26:31.156
<v Speaker 1>your book also engage in one of these models of

0:26:31.276 --> 0:26:33.476
<v Speaker 1>get some resources by robbing somebody. Right, He and a

0:26:33.516 --> 0:26:36.956
<v Speaker 1>couple of the associates robbed a gun dealer to get

0:26:36.996 --> 0:26:40.396
<v Speaker 1>the money to have the resources to buy to buy

0:26:40.396 --> 0:26:44.916
<v Speaker 1>the material to blow up the Federal building. Yes, and

0:26:44.996 --> 0:26:47.636
<v Speaker 1>that's a strategy from the order and also from a

0:26:47.676 --> 0:26:51.516
<v Speaker 1>novel called The Turner Diaries, which kind of becomes a

0:26:52.316 --> 0:26:55.396
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's important as a cultural text, but it's

0:26:55.996 --> 0:26:58.276
<v Speaker 1>and as a manual of operations. But it's also kind

0:26:58.276 --> 0:27:01.276
<v Speaker 1>of a cultural loadstar from the movement in the sense

0:27:01.276 --> 0:27:04.436
<v Speaker 1>that it does that work of explaining to everybody what

0:27:04.476 --> 0:27:06.316
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do and how they're going to do it.

0:27:06.556 --> 0:27:09.836
<v Speaker 1>I was fascinated reading your book about the centrality of

0:27:10.196 --> 0:27:13.156
<v Speaker 1>this novel, the Turner Diaries, which seem to include in

0:27:13.196 --> 0:27:17.276
<v Speaker 1>your account actually a blueprint even for blowing up a

0:27:17.356 --> 0:27:20.396
<v Speaker 1>federal building with a truck bomb. I mean, very very detailed,

0:27:20.876 --> 0:27:24.396
<v Speaker 1>sort of sort of envisioning process. Yeah, tell us a

0:27:24.436 --> 0:27:26.476
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that about that novel, because again, it

0:27:26.516 --> 0:27:27.956
<v Speaker 1>was a novel that I had not heard of before

0:27:27.996 --> 0:27:31.596
<v Speaker 1>reading your book. Oh okay, So it's a novel that's

0:27:31.596 --> 0:27:34.036
<v Speaker 1>published in Cereal in the late nineteen seventies and then

0:27:34.076 --> 0:27:38.036
<v Speaker 1>comes out in paperback, And it is very difficult to

0:27:40.396 --> 0:27:44.276
<v Speaker 1>overstate how important this novel is to the movement. The

0:27:44.356 --> 0:27:47.956
<v Speaker 1>Turner Diaries shows up everywhere, so McVay sells it for

0:27:47.996 --> 0:27:51.516
<v Speaker 1>a while on the gun show circuit. The Order that

0:27:51.556 --> 0:27:53.476
<v Speaker 1>I talked about a moment ago keeps a stack of

0:27:53.516 --> 0:27:56.276
<v Speaker 1>them in the bunk house. Other white power groups distribute

0:27:56.316 --> 0:28:00.116
<v Speaker 1>them at paramilitary training. It shows up in bookstores and

0:28:00.316 --> 0:28:03.436
<v Speaker 1>other places where the movement is trying to recruit far

0:28:03.436 --> 0:28:07.236
<v Speaker 1>aways South Africa, and it's it's mentioned in advertisements and

0:28:07.276 --> 0:28:10.716
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of different white power publications. And I think

0:28:10.796 --> 0:28:12.836
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons it's so important is it sets

0:28:12.836 --> 0:28:18.516
<v Speaker 1>out to answer a question that is sort of baffling

0:28:18.596 --> 0:28:20.436
<v Speaker 1>on its face and that actually has stood in the

0:28:20.436 --> 0:28:23.556
<v Speaker 1>way of prosecution more than once, which is, how could

0:28:23.716 --> 0:28:27.996
<v Speaker 1>this fringe movement, right, it's a very small movement possibly

0:28:28.036 --> 0:28:31.436
<v Speaker 1>hope to do what it's setting out to do, which

0:28:31.476 --> 0:28:35.476
<v Speaker 1>is to overthrow the United States, the most militarized superstate

0:28:35.516 --> 0:28:39.556
<v Speaker 1>in world history. This is a kind of baffling problem

0:28:39.756 --> 0:28:42.036
<v Speaker 1>for these activists, and in the novel, I think he

0:28:42.076 --> 0:28:44.916
<v Speaker 1>describes it as a nat trying to assassinate an elephant.

0:28:46.076 --> 0:28:48.956
<v Speaker 1>So the imaginative work that the Turner Diaries does in

0:28:49.236 --> 0:28:52.396
<v Speaker 1>laying out how such a thing could be possible is

0:28:52.436 --> 0:28:55.476
<v Speaker 1>really important for this movement in terms of being able

0:28:55.556 --> 0:28:59.196
<v Speaker 1>to have an imaginary in which this could happen. And

0:28:59.276 --> 0:29:02.316
<v Speaker 1>it tells us something very very important and alarming about

0:29:02.316 --> 0:29:04.396
<v Speaker 1>the kind of violence we're seeing today, which is that

0:29:04.996 --> 0:29:08.956
<v Speaker 1>acts like Christchurch or the Pittsburgh shooting or the Oklahoma

0:29:09.276 --> 0:29:13.916
<v Speaker 1>bombing are not imagined to be the endpoint of this activism.

0:29:13.716 --> 0:29:17.116
<v Speaker 1>The endpoint is not the act of violence. These are

0:29:17.116 --> 0:29:20.316
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be political acts of violence that white power

0:29:20.356 --> 0:29:24.396
<v Speaker 1>activists hope will awaken other white people to what they

0:29:24.436 --> 0:29:27.396
<v Speaker 1>see as the self evident state of emergency facing the

0:29:27.396 --> 0:29:30.796
<v Speaker 1>white race, and they think that that will eventually lead

0:29:30.876 --> 0:29:35.276
<v Speaker 1>to an armed uprising that will create an all white world.

0:29:35.676 --> 0:29:39.716
<v Speaker 1>And the turnidiaries imagines this very violently and very vividly,

0:29:40.356 --> 0:29:43.996
<v Speaker 1>and it includes things like like many nuclear weapon blasts,

0:29:44.516 --> 0:29:47.676
<v Speaker 1>the forced march of people of color out of the

0:29:47.756 --> 0:29:51.836
<v Speaker 1>United States, and the eventual genocide of all populations except

0:29:51.836 --> 0:29:55.636
<v Speaker 1>for white people in the world. And so then Oklahoma

0:29:55.676 --> 0:30:00.036
<v Speaker 1>City does happen and the bombing does occur. And then

0:30:00.316 --> 0:30:05.156
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint of public perception, instead of the world

0:30:05.196 --> 0:30:11.396
<v Speaker 1>sitting up and taking notice and ordinary concerned Americans saying

0:30:11.636 --> 0:30:16.236
<v Speaker 1>there's this powerful, dangerous social movement that's seeking revolution and

0:30:16.516 --> 0:30:19.236
<v Speaker 1>is using terrorist techniques and it's just blown up a

0:30:19.276 --> 0:30:22.796
<v Speaker 1>building and killed a lot of people, we get basically

0:30:22.956 --> 0:30:26.596
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. We get a narrative of this was a

0:30:26.636 --> 0:30:30.076
<v Speaker 1>few people. I remember a narrative that you know, Timothy

0:30:30.116 --> 0:30:33.316
<v Speaker 1>fi McVeigh was so radical that even the militias wouldn't

0:30:33.316 --> 0:30:35.956
<v Speaker 1>have him as a member, thereby implying that maybe these

0:30:35.956 --> 0:30:40.356
<v Speaker 1>militias actually aren't so bad after all. McVeigh doesn't put

0:30:40.436 --> 0:30:42.476
<v Speaker 1>up much of a defensive trial. And then he allows

0:30:42.556 --> 0:30:46.996
<v Speaker 1>himself to be executed by not challenging the death sentence,

0:30:47.396 --> 0:30:50.516
<v Speaker 1>and he's executed in record time, and it's as though

0:30:50.636 --> 0:30:54.396
<v Speaker 1>the story disappears. Why did this happen? I mean to

0:30:54.436 --> 0:30:59.076
<v Speaker 1>take a comparison. After September eleventh, whatever skepticism there might

0:30:59.116 --> 0:31:03.036
<v Speaker 1>have been about the capacities of terrorists operating the name

0:31:03.076 --> 0:31:06.636
<v Speaker 1>of Islam to change global affairs was eliminated, and a

0:31:06.756 --> 0:31:10.676
<v Speaker 1>generation of experts or pseudo experts in some cases, but nevertheless,

0:31:10.676 --> 0:31:13.356
<v Speaker 1>a generation of concerned people who cared about this was

0:31:13.436 --> 0:31:17.436
<v Speaker 1>born in a moment and created an industry that hasn't

0:31:17.436 --> 0:31:21.276
<v Speaker 1>gone away since. In contrast, in radical contrast and the

0:31:21.316 --> 0:31:24.916
<v Speaker 1>aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing, things sort of don't

0:31:24.916 --> 0:31:27.436
<v Speaker 1>happen in that way. Talk about why, because I think

0:31:27.436 --> 0:31:32.276
<v Speaker 1>it's so important. The Oklahoma City bombing represents the largest

0:31:32.316 --> 0:31:36.116
<v Speaker 1>deliberate mass casualty in the United States between Pearl Harbor

0:31:36.236 --> 0:31:39.076
<v Speaker 1>and nine to eleven, and the fact that we don't

0:31:39.116 --> 0:31:40.916
<v Speaker 1>have a narrative about it in the ways that you've

0:31:40.956 --> 0:31:46.116
<v Speaker 1>outlined is both alarming and surprising given how thoroughly these

0:31:46.316 --> 0:31:48.876
<v Speaker 1>these events that I cover in the book were talked

0:31:48.876 --> 0:31:51.676
<v Speaker 1>about at the time. So if you think about something

0:31:51.676 --> 0:31:55.516
<v Speaker 1>like the shooting at Greensboro, people knew about that. That

0:31:55.596 --> 0:31:59.916
<v Speaker 1>was front page news. Yeah, that made the front pages

0:31:59.956 --> 0:32:03.756
<v Speaker 1>of many, many, many newspapers, and eventually also became a

0:32:03.756 --> 0:32:06.116
<v Speaker 1>Saturday Net Life sketch like that was in the zeitgeist.

0:32:06.516 --> 0:32:10.436
<v Speaker 1>But somehow we haven't connected that event with Oklahoma City.

0:32:10.476 --> 0:32:13.036
<v Speaker 1>We haven't connected either of them with a narrative about

0:32:13.076 --> 0:32:15.716
<v Speaker 1>a social movement. We don't have really a durable way

0:32:15.796 --> 0:32:18.156
<v Speaker 1>at all of thinking about how to narrate these events.

0:32:18.716 --> 0:32:21.196
<v Speaker 1>So with Oklahoma City, one of the things that happens

0:32:21.396 --> 0:32:24.556
<v Speaker 1>is that the federal government tries to do a big

0:32:24.596 --> 0:32:27.916
<v Speaker 1>prosecution of these activists in nineteen eighty seven eighty eight

0:32:28.756 --> 0:32:32.116
<v Speaker 1>in Fort Smith, Arkansas, and so it's a federal trial

0:32:32.356 --> 0:32:37.836
<v Speaker 1>on charges including seditious conspiracy. Seditious conspiracy in this case

0:32:37.996 --> 0:32:42.196
<v Speaker 1>was wholly evident. The jury heard testimony about white power

0:32:42.196 --> 0:32:45.756
<v Speaker 1>activists plotting to poison the water supply of a major

0:32:45.796 --> 0:32:50.196
<v Speaker 1>city with cyanide. They seized thirty gallons of cyanide. The

0:32:50.436 --> 0:32:55.196
<v Speaker 1>jurors saw laundry hampers full of illegal weapons and material

0:32:55.356 --> 0:32:57.716
<v Speaker 1>pushed through the courtroom, and we're talking about things like

0:32:57.796 --> 0:33:00.916
<v Speaker 1>anti tank weapons and claim war minds. They saw the

0:33:00.956 --> 0:33:03.356
<v Speaker 1>writings of these activists where they had said that they

0:33:03.356 --> 0:33:05.756
<v Speaker 1>were involved in seditious conspiracy. It goes on and on

0:33:05.836 --> 0:33:11.076
<v Speaker 1>like this. That trial got no convictions. So you get

0:33:11.076 --> 0:33:14.356
<v Speaker 1>these acquittals in these cases of trying people for trying

0:33:14.356 --> 0:33:17.076
<v Speaker 1>to overthrow the government. I get that that's a part

0:33:17.156 --> 0:33:21.036
<v Speaker 1>of the disappearance of a story that there's a coherent

0:33:21.436 --> 0:33:24.876
<v Speaker 1>movement say more about how yeah, go ahead. More than that,

0:33:25.076 --> 0:33:27.676
<v Speaker 1>what emerges from it is that it is a disaster

0:33:28.076 --> 0:33:34.036
<v Speaker 1>for the prosecuting agencies, the atf dog, FBI. Everyone is

0:33:34.076 --> 0:33:38.636
<v Speaker 1>embarrassed by this entire thing. And afterward, there's a policy

0:33:38.676 --> 0:33:41.876
<v Speaker 1>institutionalized at the FBI that says they will make no

0:33:41.916 --> 0:33:47.116
<v Speaker 1>attempt to tie white power violence to a movement. They

0:33:47.156 --> 0:33:51.636
<v Speaker 1>will prosecute only individual crimes. They will not attempt to

0:33:51.676 --> 0:33:54.516
<v Speaker 1>prosecute as part of a movement. So you have a

0:33:54.516 --> 0:33:57.236
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper written at the end of this sedition

0:33:57.316 --> 0:34:00.476
<v Speaker 1>trial that when the Timothy mcveay case comes up, says

0:34:00.716 --> 0:34:02.996
<v Speaker 1>they will not try to prosecute as part of a movement.

0:34:04.316 --> 0:34:07.116
<v Speaker 1>And why do they say in this document that they

0:34:07.116 --> 0:34:09.716
<v Speaker 1>won't do that, because because it's a no win proposition

0:34:09.756 --> 0:34:11.916
<v Speaker 1>that they thought that was why they lost those prosecutions.

0:34:11.956 --> 0:34:15.156
<v Speaker 1>It's a kind of tactical judgment. It's a tactical judgment

0:34:15.156 --> 0:34:18.316
<v Speaker 1>and a recognition that there's not a sufficient public will

0:34:18.636 --> 0:34:21.316
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute white power violence as the work of a movement.

0:34:21.316 --> 0:34:23.396
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, if anything, that's only deepened by the

0:34:23.436 --> 0:34:26.436
<v Speaker 1>events of the early nineteen nineties Ridge and Ridge and

0:34:26.516 --> 0:34:30.396
<v Speaker 1>Waco and the sieges, where where the state very clearly

0:34:31.276 --> 0:34:36.316
<v Speaker 1>oversteps in and uses militarized violence against against white power

0:34:36.356 --> 0:34:40.196
<v Speaker 1>activists in one case and followers of the branch Davidian

0:34:40.716 --> 0:34:43.636
<v Speaker 1>compounded the other case. So the FBI is a part

0:34:43.676 --> 0:34:45.316
<v Speaker 1>of the story and the deal Department of Justice. They

0:34:45.636 --> 0:34:50.636
<v Speaker 1>decline to treat white white power or white supremacy movements

0:34:50.676 --> 0:34:55.276
<v Speaker 1>as a coordinated and coherent said of terrorist groups, even

0:34:55.356 --> 0:34:57.876
<v Speaker 1>after Oklahoma City. Why does the rest of the world

0:34:57.916 --> 0:35:01.396
<v Speaker 1>go along with that? Why does the media accept that

0:35:01.956 --> 0:35:05.956
<v Speaker 1>instead of pushing against the government's failure to construct a narrative.

0:35:06.156 --> 0:35:09.676
<v Speaker 1>I think that there is a very durable narrative form

0:35:09.716 --> 0:35:12.836
<v Speaker 1>about the lone wolf gunmen. And when there is a

0:35:12.876 --> 0:35:17.676
<v Speaker 1>mass violent event that is carried out by a white perpetrator,

0:35:17.876 --> 0:35:20.436
<v Speaker 1>we almost always see the same story about it. It

0:35:20.476 --> 0:35:24.796
<v Speaker 1>almost always goes to lone wolf mental health and sort

0:35:24.836 --> 0:35:30.636
<v Speaker 1>of like a psychological profile, rather than going to connections

0:35:30.676 --> 0:35:35.636
<v Speaker 1>and ideology and politics, even when there is clear clear

0:35:35.756 --> 0:35:39.036
<v Speaker 1>evidence that these are white power gunmen. So it's a

0:35:39.116 --> 0:35:42.156
<v Speaker 1>kind of denial, and it may be an individual psychological denial,

0:35:42.236 --> 0:35:45.756
<v Speaker 1>or it may be a white people wide social denial.

0:35:46.196 --> 0:35:49.636
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my assumption is that you know that many

0:35:49.676 --> 0:35:52.956
<v Speaker 1>African Americans would not instinctively think, oh, it must be

0:35:52.996 --> 0:35:55.956
<v Speaker 1>a lone wolf, but might think they are organized people

0:35:55.956 --> 0:35:58.436
<v Speaker 1>who are who are out to get us. Well, not

0:35:58.476 --> 0:36:02.276
<v Speaker 1>only that, but the term lone wolf comes from this movement,

0:36:02.436 --> 0:36:05.916
<v Speaker 1>So we are allowing this movement to disappear every time

0:36:05.956 --> 0:36:08.236
<v Speaker 1>we say that phrase. One question that I hear a

0:36:08.236 --> 0:36:12.756
<v Speaker 1>lot about this story is who failed to stop this movement?

0:36:12.796 --> 0:36:15.196
<v Speaker 1>Because in the entirety of my book, there's never a

0:36:15.236 --> 0:36:18.396
<v Speaker 1>moment where when there's like a decisive court case that

0:36:18.596 --> 0:36:22.396
<v Speaker 1>renders the movement unable to organize even for a short time. Yeah,

0:36:22.436 --> 0:36:24.156
<v Speaker 1>you don't have an Elliot's in your book. You don't

0:36:24.156 --> 0:36:25.876
<v Speaker 1>have a you know, it will be hard to make

0:36:25.876 --> 0:36:27.316
<v Speaker 1>a movie out of it because you don't have the

0:36:27.436 --> 0:36:30.796
<v Speaker 1>heroic cop or you know, an FBI agent who stands

0:36:30.876 --> 0:36:33.436
<v Speaker 1>up and says enough, I'm going I'm going to change

0:36:33.436 --> 0:36:36.876
<v Speaker 1>this around. There's one actually who quits and frustration after

0:36:36.876 --> 0:36:39.916
<v Speaker 1>this edition. Trial policy is instituted about not tying the

0:36:40.116 --> 0:36:42.276
<v Speaker 1>individual crimes of the broad movement. And there are some

0:36:42.356 --> 0:36:45.236
<v Speaker 1>heroic local reporters who have like one piece of this

0:36:45.276 --> 0:36:47.596
<v Speaker 1>story in real time, which is amazing. I mean, there

0:36:47.596 --> 0:36:51.076
<v Speaker 1>are people who are trying right, but the failure is

0:36:52.396 --> 0:36:56.676
<v Speaker 1>exists at a I have to use one historical jargon term,

0:36:56.716 --> 0:37:02.076
<v Speaker 1>which is transscalar, meaning that the failure of response to

0:37:02.116 --> 0:37:06.436
<v Speaker 1>this movement lives both at the level of like personal

0:37:06.476 --> 0:37:09.596
<v Speaker 1>prejudice of people in various positions of power allow it

0:37:09.636 --> 0:37:14.396
<v Speaker 1>to go unchecked right all the way up through failures

0:37:14.396 --> 0:37:18.956
<v Speaker 1>of media reporting, failures of juror education, failures of prosecutorial

0:37:19.116 --> 0:37:23.116
<v Speaker 1>policy and the law, failures of military policy to stop

0:37:23.156 --> 0:37:27.076
<v Speaker 1>this kind of organizing, and active duty troops failures in

0:37:28.196 --> 0:37:32.716
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of different allocation of surveillance resources all the

0:37:32.756 --> 0:37:36.236
<v Speaker 1>way up right, so transcalar, meaning it goes every level

0:37:36.396 --> 0:37:40.396
<v Speaker 1>of all the way up to every level of systemic

0:37:40.396 --> 0:37:43.796
<v Speaker 1>power you can think of, and it's all so imbricated

0:37:43.836 --> 0:37:47.356
<v Speaker 1>that I think to really change it would require a

0:37:47.556 --> 0:37:50.516
<v Speaker 1>massive shift in public discourse such that people start to

0:37:50.596 --> 0:37:52.956
<v Speaker 1>think about it as a movement all the way up

0:37:52.996 --> 0:37:55.996
<v Speaker 1>to reforming those policies and laws that allow these things

0:37:56.036 --> 0:38:00.956
<v Speaker 1>to continue. Well, one change that might potentially becoming is

0:38:01.156 --> 0:38:08.396
<v Speaker 1>ironically driven by a rapidly growing number of wildly successful

0:38:08.596 --> 0:38:14.236
<v Speaker 1>and heavily publicized terrorist attacks, which is what we've seen

0:38:14.516 --> 0:38:18.196
<v Speaker 1>in the last few years. You know, I'm oversimplifying a bit,

0:38:18.276 --> 0:38:22.276
<v Speaker 1>but I would say since Charlottesville, American public consciousness, US

0:38:22.356 --> 0:38:26.476
<v Speaker 1>public consciousness has really been profoundly raised around these issues,

0:38:26.476 --> 0:38:29.196
<v Speaker 1>such that even events that take place abroad like the

0:38:29.276 --> 0:38:35.196
<v Speaker 1>christ Church, New Zealand attacks, are incorporated into our understanding

0:38:35.276 --> 0:38:36.676
<v Speaker 1>or our wake up call, which I think was not

0:38:36.756 --> 0:38:41.596
<v Speaker 1>so much true for the unders Bravick attacks, which although

0:38:41.636 --> 0:38:43.356
<v Speaker 1>there was interested in the United States, and there was

0:38:43.396 --> 0:38:45.036
<v Speaker 1>a movie and there was a long New York or article,

0:38:45.196 --> 0:38:46.996
<v Speaker 1>there was still some tendency to see this as though

0:38:46.996 --> 0:38:50.836
<v Speaker 1>it were a Northern European problem. You know, something not

0:38:51.436 --> 0:38:53.036
<v Speaker 1>a problem of the US. On top of that, there

0:38:53.076 --> 0:38:55.236
<v Speaker 1>was the fact that Bravick, you know, was a white

0:38:55.236 --> 0:38:57.196
<v Speaker 1>guy who killed a lot of white people, I mean,

0:38:57.516 --> 0:39:00.356
<v Speaker 1>and so it was it seemed possible not to construct

0:39:00.356 --> 0:39:03.356
<v Speaker 1>this narrative. But the recent events don't look that way.

0:39:03.396 --> 0:39:07.396
<v Speaker 1>They look like a coordinated set of events around the world.

0:39:07.436 --> 0:39:11.196
<v Speaker 1>And what's more, we also now have a powerful comparison

0:39:11.316 --> 0:39:15.796
<v Speaker 1>to make, which is the comparison to self radicalized terrorists

0:39:15.796 --> 0:39:19.196
<v Speaker 1>who are acting in the name of Islam, who also

0:39:19.436 --> 0:39:22.876
<v Speaker 1>have practiced a kind of leaderless resistance. But that's not

0:39:22.956 --> 0:39:24.756
<v Speaker 1>how a lot of the most effective attacks of the

0:39:24.756 --> 0:39:28.396
<v Speaker 1>Islamic state operate. They operate on a leaderless resistance principle.

0:39:28.476 --> 0:39:30.716
<v Speaker 1>So we now have a salient example in our minds

0:39:30.756 --> 0:39:33.436
<v Speaker 1>and lots and lots of attacks. Do you have a

0:39:33.516 --> 0:39:37.796
<v Speaker 1>sense that these attacks are actually speeding up or is

0:39:37.796 --> 0:39:40.236
<v Speaker 1>that an artifact of our starting to notice them more?

0:39:40.476 --> 0:39:43.436
<v Speaker 1>It feels to me like a wave of attacks that

0:39:43.476 --> 0:39:48.596
<v Speaker 1>we're in. And something that I have been trying to

0:39:48.916 --> 0:39:52.996
<v Speaker 1>talk about since Charlottesville is that the body count is

0:39:53.276 --> 0:39:58.036
<v Speaker 1>very very low still given the kind of public facing

0:39:58.036 --> 0:40:01.156
<v Speaker 1>activism that we can observe. So the body count is

0:40:01.156 --> 0:40:04.436
<v Speaker 1>low relative to what it could be. Well, so if

0:40:04.436 --> 0:40:08.596
<v Speaker 1>we compare the earlier moment with this moment and compare

0:40:08.676 --> 0:40:13.996
<v Speaker 1>something similar amounts of public sphere activity with where we

0:40:14.036 --> 0:40:17.716
<v Speaker 1>are right now, the comparative body count is very low, UM,

0:40:18.156 --> 0:40:21.236
<v Speaker 1>meaning that I would expect there to be more death.

0:40:21.476 --> 0:40:23.076
<v Speaker 1>But does that mean, just to clarify, does that mean

0:40:23.076 --> 0:40:25.916
<v Speaker 1>you expect more death is coming or that you're surprised

0:40:25.916 --> 0:40:28.156
<v Speaker 1>that it hasn't come yet. No, no, no no, no, I

0:40:28.676 --> 0:40:33.156
<v Speaker 1>would expect more mass attacks to becoming. Yes, and we

0:40:33.676 --> 0:40:36.116
<v Speaker 1>should pause on that for a moment. You're saying, in

0:40:36.236 --> 0:40:39.676
<v Speaker 1>light of the historical examples and evidence, you would predict

0:40:39.716 --> 0:40:43.996
<v Speaker 1>that there are more very violent public attacks coming. Yeah,

0:40:45.196 --> 0:40:48.156
<v Speaker 1>that would be my hunch. I mean, historians always are

0:40:48.236 --> 0:40:53.036
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to make prognosis about the future, and understandably I am,

0:40:53.196 --> 0:40:55.156
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I don't have an archive. But my

0:40:55.276 --> 0:40:59.396
<v Speaker 1>hunch is that, given how much public facing activity we've

0:40:59.396 --> 0:41:03.916
<v Speaker 1>seen in the last say, five years, I am staggered

0:41:04.036 --> 0:41:06.836
<v Speaker 1>that the body count is not already higher. So I

0:41:06.836 --> 0:41:10.996
<v Speaker 1>would be very surprised if it did not amplify. UM.

0:41:11.356 --> 0:41:13.676
<v Speaker 1>And that's also true because we have this other X

0:41:13.716 --> 0:41:17.716
<v Speaker 1>factor about UM. So if you look at rises in

0:41:17.756 --> 0:41:21.716
<v Speaker 1>the clan throughout its life, so from eighteen sixty six

0:41:21.756 --> 0:41:24.036
<v Speaker 1>to the present, we have these clearly defined ebbs and

0:41:24.076 --> 0:41:29.596
<v Speaker 1>flows of the clan. Um. The the high points always

0:41:29.636 --> 0:41:33.236
<v Speaker 1>align with the aftermath of warfare in American society, and

0:41:33.236 --> 0:41:35.436
<v Speaker 1>they do that more consistently than they align with things

0:41:35.436 --> 0:41:39.556
<v Speaker 1>like economic hardship or poverty, or even anti immigration sentiment

0:41:39.716 --> 0:41:46.716
<v Speaker 1>or um segregation law changes, UM. And the fact that

0:41:46.756 --> 0:41:50.556
<v Speaker 1>we are now in a prolonged aftermath of war period

0:41:50.756 --> 0:41:53.516
<v Speaker 1>that is stretched out coming out of Iraq and eventually

0:41:53.516 --> 0:41:56.036
<v Speaker 1>out of I mean we're in. We're in kind of

0:41:56.076 --> 0:42:02.356
<v Speaker 1>like a forever aftermath right now, forever wars aftermath exactly.

0:42:02.396 --> 0:42:03.916
<v Speaker 1>And I mean this is a this is a kind

0:42:03.916 --> 0:42:06.396
<v Speaker 1>of aftermath that we have never seen before. If you

0:42:06.436 --> 0:42:09.636
<v Speaker 1>think about kind of the cycles of combat and aftermath

0:42:09.996 --> 0:42:12.436
<v Speaker 1>in that it is mostly focused on one sector of

0:42:12.476 --> 0:42:15.756
<v Speaker 1>society that interacts less and less with other sectors of society. Right,

0:42:15.796 --> 0:42:19.916
<v Speaker 1>we see increasing segregation of military families into communities apart

0:42:19.996 --> 0:42:24.036
<v Speaker 1>from other families. We see increasing use of things like

0:42:24.116 --> 0:42:27.436
<v Speaker 1>stop loss in multiple tours to put people back in

0:42:27.476 --> 0:42:30.156
<v Speaker 1>combat over and over rather than drafting new people. I

0:42:30.196 --> 0:42:34.156
<v Speaker 1>teach at a university which is as wonderful students, but

0:42:35.156 --> 0:42:40.076
<v Speaker 1>I hardly ever have students who have themselves served, or

0:42:40.116 --> 0:42:43.156
<v Speaker 1>have even have family members who've served. So there's a

0:42:43.236 --> 0:42:46.636
<v Speaker 1>profound social segregation around who is doing this work of violence,

0:42:46.996 --> 0:42:50.916
<v Speaker 1>and a stretching out of the combat aftermath period. I

0:42:50.916 --> 0:42:53.596
<v Speaker 1>don't know what that will do in those earlier periods.

0:42:53.596 --> 0:42:57.556
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting because at one point I wondered if

0:42:57.556 --> 0:43:00.196
<v Speaker 1>we might be seeing like a Rambo effect right where

0:43:00.316 --> 0:43:02.716
<v Speaker 1>veterans come back and just can't stop doing the violence

0:43:02.756 --> 0:43:06.196
<v Speaker 1>of warfare. But it turns out that violence increases for

0:43:06.316 --> 0:43:11.476
<v Speaker 1>everybody in American society after warfare, people who definitely didn't serve,

0:43:11.556 --> 0:43:15.636
<v Speaker 1>like older people and women and children, across all of

0:43:15.676 --> 0:43:19.116
<v Speaker 1>those groups. There's just more violence in the aftermath of

0:43:19.116 --> 0:43:22.756
<v Speaker 1>warfare in American society. So in this long aftermath period,

0:43:23.116 --> 0:43:27.716
<v Speaker 1>I think we should be concerned about this effect where

0:43:27.796 --> 0:43:30.316
<v Speaker 1>vigilante or excuse me, revolutionary groups in this case are

0:43:30.356 --> 0:43:35.676
<v Speaker 1>able to either mobilize that violent sentiment or I don't know,

0:43:35.716 --> 0:43:38.636
<v Speaker 1>contribute to infan and in some way. I want to

0:43:38.676 --> 0:43:42.516
<v Speaker 1>close by asking you about a phenomenon that is obviously

0:43:42.596 --> 0:43:48.116
<v Speaker 1>very significant for the post nineteen ninety five of white supremacy.

0:43:48.156 --> 0:43:50.396
<v Speaker 1>The era that we're in now, and that is the Internet,

0:43:50.476 --> 0:43:54.476
<v Speaker 1>not in its proto message board form, but in the

0:43:54.916 --> 0:43:58.316
<v Speaker 1>contemporary form that we know, which includes not only Internet

0:43:58.316 --> 0:44:01.396
<v Speaker 1>one point oh, but also social media, and in which,

0:44:01.436 --> 0:44:04.476
<v Speaker 1>among other things, it's much easier to spread information to

0:44:04.556 --> 0:44:08.396
<v Speaker 1>people who never have to have individual human contact with

0:44:08.396 --> 0:44:10.636
<v Speaker 1>each other. They might, but they don't need to have done.

0:44:11.196 --> 0:44:13.796
<v Speaker 1>It strikes me that, on the one hand, the phenomenon

0:44:13.796 --> 0:44:16.316
<v Speaker 1>of self radicalization, the Dylan roof whom, as you say

0:44:16.516 --> 0:44:19.596
<v Speaker 1>and the close of your book, never actually had to

0:44:19.636 --> 0:44:22.836
<v Speaker 1>meet any people who shared his views to develop them.

0:44:22.836 --> 0:44:24.476
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense, you could sort of imagine that

0:44:24.476 --> 0:44:28.316
<v Speaker 1>the Internet is a social media are are vehicles to

0:44:28.436 --> 0:44:31.636
<v Speaker 1>spread ideology and to spread violence. But on the other hand,

0:44:31.636 --> 0:44:34.796
<v Speaker 1>we did have Charlottesville, which was less we forget, began

0:44:34.836 --> 0:44:37.396
<v Speaker 1>with a march that was called Unite the Right, which

0:44:37.476 --> 0:44:41.996
<v Speaker 1>was trying precisely to translate Internet connections to the real

0:44:42.036 --> 0:44:46.556
<v Speaker 1>life sphere. Talk about, if you would, the Internet and

0:44:46.556 --> 0:44:50.236
<v Speaker 1>how it's going to affect or is affecting white power

0:44:50.356 --> 0:44:53.996
<v Speaker 1>in our present moment. The actual violence of even public

0:44:54.036 --> 0:44:57.396
<v Speaker 1>facing events like Charlottesville that led to the death of

0:44:57.436 --> 0:45:01.236
<v Speaker 1>Heather Higher and the beating of other demonstrators is important

0:45:01.316 --> 0:45:04.396
<v Speaker 1>to queue up as we have that conversation. The internet

0:45:04.916 --> 0:45:11.036
<v Speaker 1>is both concerning and immensely hopeful. The use of viral

0:45:11.636 --> 0:45:15.116
<v Speaker 1>videos and live streaming of the attacks is new and

0:45:15.316 --> 0:45:17.716
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as very much of a piece with our

0:45:17.796 --> 0:45:21.596
<v Speaker 1>present moment. And I'm thinking of the christ Church shooter

0:45:21.836 --> 0:45:24.636
<v Speaker 1>live streaming the attack, and also the militias on the

0:45:24.716 --> 0:45:29.556
<v Speaker 1>border detaining undocumented immigrants and live streaming, you know, their

0:45:29.596 --> 0:45:33.396
<v Speaker 1>agony as they were held by a non government group

0:45:33.676 --> 0:45:36.276
<v Speaker 1>in order to turn them over to the border patrol.

0:45:36.836 --> 0:45:39.796
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, I do want to say that

0:45:39.876 --> 0:45:43.316
<v Speaker 1>like there is, there is a way that the internet

0:45:43.676 --> 0:45:47.556
<v Speaker 1>could also be an agent of change and could offer

0:45:47.676 --> 0:45:50.756
<v Speaker 1>us a seed of hope. The idea that we talked

0:45:50.796 --> 0:45:53.956
<v Speaker 1>about with connecting these stories together as a form of

0:45:54.036 --> 0:45:56.836
<v Speaker 1>understanding the history, such that we can talk about christ

0:45:56.916 --> 0:46:00.196
<v Speaker 1>Church and the Tree of Life shooting and Charlottesville and

0:46:00.356 --> 0:46:03.876
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Roofs shooting and Charleston all as the act of

0:46:03.916 --> 0:46:07.556
<v Speaker 1>the white power movement. One potential there is to connect

0:46:07.676 --> 0:46:11.556
<v Speaker 1>the impacted communities with one another and to create a

0:46:11.636 --> 0:46:15.636
<v Speaker 1>kind of coalition politics that could resist this kind of violence,

0:46:16.836 --> 0:46:19.916
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, the Internet gives and takes away,

0:46:19.956 --> 0:46:23.076
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, but there is a way that it might

0:46:23.116 --> 0:46:27.196
<v Speaker 1>also provide an instrument for public understanding that wasn't available

0:46:27.236 --> 0:46:31.076
<v Speaker 1>to us in that earlier period. Kathleen, thank you very

0:46:31.196 --> 0:46:33.556
<v Speaker 1>very much, not just for talking with us, but for

0:46:33.636 --> 0:46:38.036
<v Speaker 1>your extraordinarily important work to help us come to terms

0:46:38.036 --> 0:46:43.716
<v Speaker 1>with by recognizing a genuine, organized, unified set of ideologies

0:46:43.716 --> 0:46:47.156
<v Speaker 1>that are in fact a social movement with real violent tendencies.

0:46:47.316 --> 0:46:49.956
<v Speaker 1>Unless we recognize that, we're not going to be anywhere.

0:46:50.116 --> 0:46:52.396
<v Speaker 1>And when we do recognize that, and I have some

0:46:52.436 --> 0:46:55.676
<v Speaker 1>confidence that we will, it will be thanks to your

0:46:55.716 --> 0:46:57.716
<v Speaker 1>work and to the work of other other people like you.

0:46:57.836 --> 0:47:00.156
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very very much for being with us. Well,

0:47:00.156 --> 0:47:09.756
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. Before talking to Kathleen and

0:47:09.876 --> 0:47:12.236
<v Speaker 1>reading her book. I'm afraid I was one of those

0:47:12.276 --> 0:47:16.636
<v Speaker 1>people who believe the message that attacks by white supremacists

0:47:16.836 --> 0:47:22.316
<v Speaker 1>are isolated, disconnected, lone wolf actions. I didn't take on

0:47:22.356 --> 0:47:25.036
<v Speaker 1>board the extent to which the Oklahoma City bombing and

0:47:25.196 --> 0:47:30.276
<v Speaker 1>the white supremacist attacks, including the Charlottesville events and attacks

0:47:30.316 --> 0:47:33.756
<v Speaker 1>on mosques and synagogues, were actually part of an organized

0:47:33.796 --> 0:47:37.836
<v Speaker 1>social movement, A lot like the international jihadi movement. What's

0:47:37.876 --> 0:47:42.156
<v Speaker 1>scary about that diagnosis? You heard directly from Kathleen, She

0:47:42.276 --> 0:47:46.236
<v Speaker 1>said she expects the body count to rise. Now, historical

0:47:46.276 --> 0:47:48.836
<v Speaker 1>precedent isn't always a perfect predictor of what's going to

0:47:48.916 --> 0:47:51.556
<v Speaker 1>happen in the future, but when it comes to terrorism

0:47:51.836 --> 0:47:55.396
<v Speaker 1>or other complex phenomena, it's often the best predictor that

0:47:55.396 --> 0:47:58.276
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get. So I was a little bit scared,

0:47:58.356 --> 0:48:01.356
<v Speaker 1>I will admit. My takeaway, though, is more about what

0:48:01.396 --> 0:48:05.036
<v Speaker 1>we can do going forward than just the feeling that, boy,

0:48:05.196 --> 0:48:08.236
<v Speaker 1>is this scary. The only way to solve and address

0:48:08.436 --> 0:48:13.196
<v Speaker 1>a phenomena like white power terrorism is actually to recognize

0:48:13.196 --> 0:48:15.836
<v Speaker 1>it for what it is. Once we understand that people

0:48:15.876 --> 0:48:18.236
<v Speaker 1>can be radicalized, we can try to track the people

0:48:18.236 --> 0:48:21.316
<v Speaker 1>who are in the process of becoming radicalized. Once we

0:48:21.356 --> 0:48:23.876
<v Speaker 1>know there are targets, we can harden those targets and

0:48:23.916 --> 0:48:26.516
<v Speaker 1>try to prevent attacks, much in the way that we've

0:48:26.516 --> 0:48:29.636
<v Speaker 1>tried with some success in some instances, although not on others,

0:48:29.916 --> 0:48:33.276
<v Speaker 1>to protect ourselves against the threat of international jihadi terrorism. So,

0:48:33.316 --> 0:48:35.516
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, I think there are things we can

0:48:35.556 --> 0:48:39.796
<v Speaker 1>do provided we diagnose the threat for what it actually is.

0:48:44.556 --> 0:48:47.476
<v Speaker 1>Deep background is brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our

0:48:47.516 --> 0:48:50.596
<v Speaker 1>producer is Lydia gene Coott, with engineering by Jason Gambrel

0:48:50.796 --> 0:48:54.516
<v Speaker 1>and Jason Roskowski. Our showrunner is Sophie mckibbon. Our theme

0:48:54.596 --> 0:48:57.396
<v Speaker 1>music is composed by Luis GERA special thanks to the

0:48:57.396 --> 0:49:01.516
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Brass, Malcolm Gladwell, Jacob Weisberg and Mia Lobel. I'm

0:49:01.596 --> 0:49:04.836
<v Speaker 1>Noah Feldman. You can follow me on Twitter at Noah R. Feldman.

0:49:05.236 --> 0:49:06.596
<v Speaker 1>This is Deep Background