WEBVTT - Ep88 "Might there exist very different kinds of minds?"

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Why is it so hard to define intelligence? And what

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>does this have to do with being a fish in

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>water trying to describe water? Might we humans possess one

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of intelligence in a constellation of many other types?

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And what does this have to do with empathy or

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence or our search for extraterrestrial life. Welcome to

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Inner Cosmos with me David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist and

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>an author at Stanford and in these episodes we sail

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>deeply into our three pound universe to understand some of

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the most surprising aspects of our lives. Today's episode is

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>about minds and whether there might exist very different kinds

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of minds. So I'm going to boot this up with

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a prediction that I made last year. I've always noticed

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that some people feel annoyed when they ask chat GPT

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a question, Let's say a political question like was so

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and so a good president and chat GPT answers with

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.639
<v Speaker 1>something neutral like Some people feel this way. Some people

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>feel that way. More discussion and debate is needed here,

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people who feel that they hold

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>very clear political stances they criticize chat GPT for this.

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>They say, look, it feels wishy wash. It's not taking

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a stand on anything. It is stuck in neutral. It's

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>not brave enough to take a position. But I feel

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of answers from lms are the sign that

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we are currently living in the golden era of AI.

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And this golden era is sure to end, just like

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the golden age of the Pax Romana. So the prediction

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>i'm year ago on this podcast is that people on

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the far ends of the political spectrum will start getting frustrated.

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>How come this AI isn't telling me the true answer,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the answer that I can so clearly see, and anybody

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>who is saying would clearly agree with me. So my

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>prediction is that quite soon, as soon as the architectures

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>drop in cost for training these models, we're going to

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>see the far left progressives training their own model and

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the far right conservatives training their own model, and both

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 1>sides will say, look, we don't want this garbage literature

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to pollute the training data, so we're gonna leave all

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this stuff out and just include the writing that is

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>consistent with the truth. And obviously anything we disagree with

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>comes from people who are just trolls or obstreperous or

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>at minimum are badly misinformed, and if they'll just come

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to read the AI wisdom that we know to be true,

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>then they will see the light of our way and

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the error of theirs. So this is my prediction about

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the Balkanization of AI that will come about. But perhaps

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>there's a broader way to think about this. Perhaps there

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>are indeed different types of artificial intelligence, not just in

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of how they're trained up, but more fundamentally about

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>their architecture. Perhaps there are very different ways to think.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>In other words, what if there are different types of intelligence,

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>not just one artificial intelligence, and also many different types

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of natural intelligence. Now on this topic, there's no one

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>better in the world to talk with than my friend

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Kelly, who's been chewing on this for a while.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Kevin is one of the fathers of Silicon Valley, not

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>because he's a techie, but instead because he's one of

0:03:55.800 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the deepest philosophers and connoisseurs of technology. He has a

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>long and storied history that I'll link on the show notes,

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>but I'll just mention for now that he's the founding

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>executive editor of Wired magazine and a former editor of

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>The Whole Earth Review. He's the founder of the cool

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Tools website, and he's one of the founders of the

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Long Now Foundation. He's written multiple best selling books about

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the future of technology, which I'll link. And one of

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>the many things that I love about Kevin is that

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>he's a radical optimist and an extremely creative thinker. So

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I wrung up Kevin to talk with him about his

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>view of intelligences. Does intelligence mean just one thing? Or

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>might there be lots of different ways it could manifest? So, Kevin,

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we're all talking about AI, and people are talking about AGI,

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're aiming towards these things. But you have a

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>very interesting view on it, which is that we can't

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>look at AI as one thing, but instead there are

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>multiple ais we need to be thinking about. So tell

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>us about this.

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, I think we should force ourselves to use

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 2>the plural AIS whenever we're talking about this. It's very

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 2>to me, very similar to machines. We have a lot

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 2>of machines in our life, but we don't talk about

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 2>the machine. We don't have a single regulatory apparatus for

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 2>the machine. We don't have a single operating manual. We

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 2>have multiple machines in our lives, and we're going to

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 2>have multiple ais in our lives, and those ais individually

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>will have different characters, they'll have different needs, they'll have

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 2>different tasks, they'll have different abilities, they'll be different species.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 3>Almost.

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 2>We can think of them as different species of mind.

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Something that might be a slow, minimal kind, something that

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 2>might be fast and peculiar, one might be imaginative and

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 2>one dimension, but not others. And so I think the

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 2>fallacy that we have is we imagine intelligence as a

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 2>single dimension, kind of like amplitude or sound decibels kind

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 2>of goes up abup, and there's like a ladder and

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 2>we're kind of climbing up, and we've got the rats

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 2>and you know, the chimp, and then the human, and

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>then we've got Ai above us, and that there's this

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 2>this one dimensional thing. But what we're going to discover,

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 2>and we have already with with what we've made so far,

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 2>is that it's multi dimensional. It's a very big space.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 2>So the space of possible minds is vast, and human

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of intelligence we're at the edge. We're an edge species,

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>like we're at the edge of the galaxy. We have

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 2>a very peculiar mix of different kind of primitive cognitions

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 2>and we have one species of mind, and the things

0:06:55.400 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 2>that we're inventing are going to be many other kinds

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 2>of thinking. And the reason why that's important is that

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 2>there may be certain things that we want to do

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 2>and understand that our own kind of intelligence can't by itself,

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 2>but we can understand it with the two step process

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 2>of inventing another kind of intelligence that can work with us,

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 2>so that we can understand or make something that we

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 2>can't do by ourselves.

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, in neuroscience, this has been one of

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the challenges for the last one hundred years, is even

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>defining intelligence for humans. So some people think, well, maybe

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's about being able to squelch distractors, or some people think, well,

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's about being able to simulate possible futures, or

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's twenty theories out there about what intelligence is,

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's probably one of these words that has too

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>much semantic weight on it is trying to incorporate many things.

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>And so your take on this is that the way

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to go about this is to think even more broadly

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>about what intelligence could be, what we might mean by it,

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and all the ways that we're going to invent different machines,

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>forms of AI to get there. So you recently made

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a list, well, actually in your book The Inevitable, right,

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you made a list of possible minds. Yeah, let's start.

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's start there, give us a sense of possible minds

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to get us to expand our brains on this.

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Let me just say one of the things that's very

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 2>common when you talk to people about what they imagined

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>super intelligence is something that's super beyond human and what

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 2>does that look like or feel like or how do

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 2>we see it? And the most common response is sort

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 2>of like human thinking but faster. Yeah, billion times faster.

0:08:55.840 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 2>And okay, that's one version anything else. So there's again

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>there's this idea of a singular thing. We have this

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>thing and we're gonna make it faster, and that's just

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>super and then that's it and I don't think so.

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 2>So part of the chore about the challenge about thinking

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 2>about possible minds is to think about things other than

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 2>just this time element, although that's one of them. And

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 2>so one of the first possible minds is something that

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>thinks really really slow. You can imagine it's kind of

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 2>mind waves being so slow that we can't even see it.

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 2>We don't even recognize them, they're kind of really really slow,

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 2>and so in a certain weird way, evolution is that

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 2>evolution is a kind of learning that happens on a

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 2>very large time scale, and we can't see it on

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 2>an every day perspective, but we can see it over time,

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 2>and so there could be slow kinds of intelligences that

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 2>may be more powerful in the sense that they're wider,

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 2>but not its early faster.

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 3>So that's just kind of like the first one.

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 2>One of the challenges again, as you mentioned, is that

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 2>we use the word intelligence, and I think it's a

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 2>form of ignorance in the sense that they're probably well,

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 2>I've been reading about the early days of the discovery

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 2>of electricity or the invention of electricity, and it was

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 2>really early interested. And this is way before Tesla. This

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 2>is like at the Faraday in Davies, where they're trying

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 2>to really understand what it was. And it was remarkable

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 2>because a lot of the smartest people in the world,

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Newton and others, were completely wrong. They had these ideas

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 2>of Flakistan and the ether. They just had no idea

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 2>what it was, and they were really struggling. At the

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 2>same time they were trying to figure out what materials were,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 2>what substances were before we had the idea of a

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 2>periodic table, So there's stuff. Well, then we eventually understood

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 2>that there were elements and the elements were recombined to

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 2>form compounds, and that there was a fixed number of elements,

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 2>and then you could identify the elements and then they

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 2>were pretty distinct and that you made up. Salt was

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>not an element, so it was actually a compound. Water

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 2>was a compound. So you have all these compounds made

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 2>from the elements. And what we're trying to do right

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 2>now with intelligence is like, what are the elements that

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>make up this compound that we call intelligence? And so

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 2>there are things like maybe logic and deduction or reasoning,

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 2>which may be different, and then there's memory and short

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 2>term memory. There's a bunch of different elements that we

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 2>don't know about that we don't know and haven't identified

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and can't describe, that are probably fundamental to making this

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 2>thing we call intelligence. And so part of this little

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 2>challenge of imagining possible minds is to think about what

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 2>might those elements be and how might one rearrange them

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 2>to make a different compound.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>That's very good, So tell us give us a sense

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of some other possible minds. Sure, so we can start

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what the periodic table will look like.

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 2>So I've made a little list and I'm going to

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 2>just use it for the prompt.

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 3>And so.

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 2>One of the elements in our own intelligence is self awareness.

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 2>But it's possible that you could have degrees of intelligence

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 2>without self awareness. So we think somehow self awareness is

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>instrumental for high intelligence, but you may be able to

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 2>do a lot of things without any self awareness without

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 2>the entity being a self aware that's what we have now, right, right,

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 2>and vice versa. You might be able to have self

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 2>awareness with very limited intelligence, yeah, okay, and so you

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 2>could have kind of like this thing is really really

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 2>good at doing things, but it's not aware of itself.

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 2>And this thing isn't that capable in other words, but

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 2>it's very aware of itself.

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 2>So self awareness is one of those elements that you

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 2>can kind of conjure with another one would be. One

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 2>of the things about human intelligence is that I think

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 2>we have very deliberately through evolution, restricted our access and

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 2>ability to change ourselves to have access to our operating system.

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, because it's really dangerous, that's right. We have almost

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>no access to what's happening under the hood.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think that there's a reason for that.

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 2>But you could have minds that were much more had

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 2>much more access to that mutability, to that changeability, to

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the reprogrammable nature of them. So there could be sophisticated

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 2>compounds that had a reflexive ability to mess with themselves. Okay,

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 2>so that's a different kind of mind. There's also one

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 2>of the things about is like, like, what is the

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 2>smallest possible mind that could accomplish something? This idea of

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 2>like trying to minimize it. We're trying to do that

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 2>with life right now. It's like, what's the smallest possible

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 2>sell you could have and how far could you go?

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, with something like a transistor count if you

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have current here and here, then it opens and otherwise

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't.

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 2>And it's probably not complex enough because we I don't

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 2>think we would say that it was intelligent. So when

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 2>once we understand what we need to do reasoning, it's like,

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 2>what's the smallest amount that we could do to get

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>some reasoning?

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>But a transistor does do reasoning in the sense that

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it says, hey, if I've got these two things, then

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I go, and if I don't, then I don't go.

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>We haven't yet figured out what reasoning is. I don't

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 2>think we have a good definition of reasoning. And so

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 2>right now we're kind of in this incredibly exciting period

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 2>where we say, some of these lms have some amount

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 2>of reasoning. Can we measure that? Can we can we

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 2>what's the metric? We don't have that yet, but I

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 2>think we will come to understand that there's a difference

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>between say, learning and reasoning. And again, this is our idea,

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 2>like we're at the beginning of understanding the periodic table

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 2>of cognition, and so another one would be you could

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 2>have minds that forget things. Forgetting is actually very very

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 2>important in many kinds of cognition.

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>As the writer ball Zach said, memories beautify life, but

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>only forgetting makes it bearable.

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, you could have ais that never forget anything, and

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 2>you could have ais that have learned how to forget

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 2>certain things. For again, we're going to again these are

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 2>being engineered to do different tasks, and so there will

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 2>be certain kind of tests where we want them to forget.

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 2>So there'll be some you know, Nobel prize in the

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>future for some AI researchers who figures out how to

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 2>do intentional forgetting.

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it appears, by the way, that is an aspect

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of our intelligence. We forget most of the things happening

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>in our lives. And one hypothesis that Francis Kriik suggested

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is that dreams are our way of taking out the

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>garbage at nighttime. Yeah.

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so another aspect of different kinds of possible minds

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 2>or minds that are would be easy to migrate versus

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.359
<v Speaker 2>ones that were difficult to migrate off of the substrate.

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>So I am a big believer that the Church Turing

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 2>hypothesis about computation.

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain that this misunderstood?

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 2>So the Church Turing, how about this is about computation says,

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>given enough storage and memory, all forms of computation are equivalent.

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 2>That you can emulate what one computer can do another

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 2>computer can do if you have enough storage and capacity.

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's the key thing is that in

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 2>real time there isn't equivalency that that it makes a difference.

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 2>It actually makes a difference. What's the substrate you're running on.

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 2>They're not equivalent because there's a matter of time. Yeah,

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 2>if you have an infinite space. But no computer has

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 2>infinite tape. You have you're always finite. That's reality, your finite.

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 2>You have finite time, you have to make a decision.

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 2>If you emilate it, you're going slower. And so those

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 2>make the difference when we come to intelligence, and so

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 2>that the kinds of ais that we make on silicon

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 2>will always behave differently than one running on wetwear on tissue. Okay,

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 2>So one of the other hypotheses about the possible mind

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 2>landscape is that a lot of those varieties come from

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 2>operating on different substrates on different brains, that the brains.

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 2>It's not like the materialists where it doesn't matter what

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 2>the brain is made out of. I'm saying it absolutely

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 2>does matter what the brain is made out of, because

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 2>you will get a different compound from that, because there

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 2>is a spatial element that makes a difference in the

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 2>actual output of this. And so one of the things

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 2>that the possible mind landscape would say is that all

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 2>the minds that we're making are alien.

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 3>They're not human. They're not human like.

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>The only way we can make human like intelligence is

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 2>to have a human like brain. We could make artificial

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 2>minds that are based on cells, and the more cellular

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 2>and gray matter or like they would be, the more

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 2>that compound intelligence would resemble ours. But when we're making

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 2>them on silicon, there are going to be alien intelligences,

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 2>which doesn't mean that they're stupid. They could be very,

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 2>very smart. It's just that they're different. They have a

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 2>different character, they have a different personality, they're different. They're

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 2>different in the way that Spack a Star Trek is

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 2>different than Kirk, and that difference.

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Is actually their benefit. It's the fact that they're not

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 3>thinking like we think.

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Right in the sense that a show like Westworld, there's

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>an amusement park that's made, and we build robots that

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>look just like humans so we can interact with them.

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>But I've often thought that we probably are never going

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to build robots that look just like humans, because there's

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>no point. We already have humans. Humans are easy enough

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to make, and what we do with our machine means

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 1>in general is build things that do things that we

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>are different. Yeah, exactly right, right.

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 2>I think we will make humanoid robots because that's the interface,

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 2>because we want them operating in our world, and we're

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 2>comfortable with that scale. We're comfortable with the emotional connection,

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and so there are a lot of reasons to make

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>them humanoid, but there's no reason to make them look

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 2>like exactly like us. Okay, that they will be alien,

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 2>and that's good because we need the alien intelligences to

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 2>do the things that we can't do by ourselves. We

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 2>can make another human in nine months, so we want

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 2>to make other kinds of minds, and all those minds

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 2>are going to be aliens to us in the sense

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 2>that because they're running on a different substrate, they can

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 2>fake a lot of human behavior, and they will because

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be comfortable with it, but they won't

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>be exactly like this because they're running on a different substrate.

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, can you imagine a scenario where a system is

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>built such that it's just call it a bigger a

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>much bigger brain than we are, and it can emulate

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>our intelligence on part of its hardware.

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 2>It will imitate a lot of it, but because it's

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 2>running on a different substrate, it cannot do exactly what

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 2>we're doing. So my hypothesis is that this brain makes

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 2>a difference to the mind. Okay, that they're not equivalent

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 2>if you take into account the fact that they're that

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 2>they're limited by time and space. Doing the conversation that

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 2>we do in our brains is will give a different

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 2>quality and maybe different answers to something that's done on silicon.

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Okay, And so so that we can keep stretching our

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>minds here give us some other possibilities.

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 2>So one is I think we could imagine minds that

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 2>are very very specialized in working with individual peoples. It's like,

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 2>not quite a clone to me, but a dedicated, very

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 2>personalized AIS, very very personalized to my specific need and

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 2>personality in my own brain that would be different from

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 2>other humans.

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 3>And they're pairing.

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 2>So it's sort of like a paired mind, a mind

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 2>that is built to be paired with my mind to

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 2>work with my mind, and that's its only job, and

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 2>it's really good at that. It's not good at anything else,

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 2>and it's not good with working with you. So this

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 2>idea of a paired intelligence.

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that's cool. So right now people are doing that,

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, with AI that learned your stuff, maybe reads

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>all your emails and song. But you're saying, instead of

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a general AI that learns learns me, one that actually is.

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Built, right, It's constructed, its programmed, it's the weights, it's

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 2>trained on me, so that it is unusable by somebody else.

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 2>That's how dedicated it is. It's it's it's paired in

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 2>that sense. Another one would be so so we can imagine,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 2>of course I had this, I had this kind of

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a grid of like the four possible directions of humanity

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 2>with just two axises. One is, we can imagine a

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 2>future of humanity that has many species of humans and

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 2>many minds. Okay, so we speciate, yes, over time, we

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 2>could imagine. Another one is we have many species of

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 2>humans and one mind. Well, like, okay, where we are

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 2>telepathy just does we're connected so much, even though we're

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 2>different species, we're all in tune, and we create kind

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 2>of a single borg intelligence on the planet.

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Then you can imagine before we move on to what

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 1>degree do we have something moving in that direction with us,

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>say the Internet? Yeah, yeah, right.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 2>So that's just to kind of indicate that there's a

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 2>there's a there's a cold class of minds, that these

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 2>are kind of superminds, these these aggregated minds made up

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 2>of many many humans, and so we have we have

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the mind of all humans working together.

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 3>If we had some kind of.

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Technologies that would allow us to telepathically connect to each other.

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>It was like a neuralink, right, So you had a

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 2>neuralink that kind of works at the large scale, and

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 2>we're connected to others and we are we're creating some

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of superhuman mind at the skill of literally having humans,

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 2>billions of them connected together. That would be a mind.

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the possible mind that we don't know very much about.

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 2>So that's a possible mind. Then there's the possible mind

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>of all the little ais linked up together. You have

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 2>a thousand different species of ais and they are also connected,

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>forming another level of AI that's operating much different dimension.

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 1>And so, in a sense, is what everyone's going for

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with agentic AI. Where you have agents, you have lots

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and lots of agents going out and doing things, and

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>presumably you get an emergent property out of the top.

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 2>So you have this emergent one of all the a's,

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 2>and then you have this other one of the emergent

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 2>superhuman and the emergent AI, and together they form another

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 2>huge thing of all the humans connect together and all

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 2>the Ais connect together, and that makes something else that's

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 2>another possible mind.

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 1>So let me just double click on this because it

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>feels like there's a real sense in which many of

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>these are already happening, which is to say, we have

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>emergent properties. Right, Yeah, so for example, just having the

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Internet and having agents on the Internet, we're already sort

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of doing that where there's stuff happening at a different

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>level that maybe we can't even see.

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so we're talking about this like especially to the fantasy,

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 2>but it is actually already happening. The part of the problem,

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.719
<v Speaker 2>the challenges we don't have the vocabulary. We're not calling

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 2>it that. We want to have the better vocabulary. We

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 2>want to have a better understanding of what these nuances

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 2>and differences are in types of cognition and types of

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 2>intelligence that we can actually map it and say this

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 2>kind of aggregate emergent intelligence does X and y. But yes,

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 2>we are making these very large emergent things, and we

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 2>can actually describe the substrate. I mean, you know, I've

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 2>done these calculations. Imagine the Internet was one machine and

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 2>it was like at a refresherrate of you know, twenty

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 2>exhibits per second. It's got to you know, how many

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 2>floating operations systems that does per second as a whole,

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 2>It's just like insane and so we can specify the

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 2>actual specifications of this as a machine, and it's and

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 2>it's a very very large machine. We have a lot

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 2>more difficulty in talking about the actual the intelligence because

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 2>of what we said earlier that we don't have very

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>good concepts about what intelligence is, what self awareness is,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 2>what consciousness is, what even how we measure this, what

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 2>the elemental particles are of So we're really constrained there.

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 2>But I think we're going. What I'm suggesting is we

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 2>should work on that.

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I remember about eight years ago you and

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I had a long hiking conversation about the search for

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Internet intelligence. It's analogous to search for extraterrestrial intelligence, which

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>was just hypothesizing what if this giant machine of the

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Internet has developed its own kind of intelligence? How would

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you how would you take as an example of the

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>tools of neuroscience where we stick electrodes in and we

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>look at things, How could you do that on the

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>scale of the Internet.

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 2>And so when I was thinking about the analog the

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 2>first thing I did was go to the SETI search

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and say, well, how do they recognize intelligence? Well, the

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 2>answer is that they have no idea. They aren't even

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>searching for intelligence. They're only searching for anonymous signals, little

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>signals that appear to me not map on natural that's all.

0:28:58.320 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>They have no.

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Metric, they have no threshold, they have no criteria for intelligence.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And so although wait just to challenge it, it does seem

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>like that's a pretty good metric, just as an analogy,

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>when people are searching for extraterrestrial life, the smartest way

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to do that is just looking for things that wouldn't

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>happen by chance, molecular combinations that seem unlikely.

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 2>So I went to see and there have been a

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 2>couple of examples of things in the Internet that aren't

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 2>explained that nobody can explain. There was a flash crash

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 2>right some stock market some ten years ago. Nobody has

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 2>ever had any explanation about there. There was a couple

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 2>other little people who are looking at these anonymous signals

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 2>that don't have any source that they can find. And

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 2>so there are these signals that are hard to explain.

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 2>And so is that enough for us to deduce this

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 2>intelligent Oh?

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I see right, But right, probably not, because simply because

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we can't explain it doesn't necessitate some other thing. But

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly something to sniff after R right, it's it's

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the first step.

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 2>So other kinds of possible minds are we could We

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 2>could imagine minds that are very very smart intelligence by

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 2>almost any measure that we have, but they're incapable of

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 2>making something smarter than itself. In fact, we might even

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:39.479
<v Speaker 2>if we know about it, we might even design some

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 2>ais like that, or of course we could make ais

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 2>that had that even ability beyond what we have. It

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 2>may be that our own minds, or that kind of

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 2>a mind, it may be that our own minds are

0:30:55.520 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 2>not capable of making a mind smarter than it self,

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>but we might be able to make a different kind

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 2>of mind that's not smarter ourselves, but to the other

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 2>of the two of us can make something that's smarter

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 2>than itself. And so there's a whole bunch of things

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 2>about this ability of kind of bootstrapping and its abilities

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 2>and whether we have So there's a bunch of different

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 2>possible minds that would have capabilities of bootstrapping and others

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 2>that don't have that, or others that require multiple kinds

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 2>of like a complex or ecosystem of minds to produce it.

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 2>So that's another threshold. In fact, I actually think a

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of a mind that we could make that could

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 2>imagine a greater mind itself by not being able to capable.

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Of making it that and we might have that kind

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 3>of mind.

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 2>And then one of the primitives that I think are

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 2>going to be that we're going to discover is the

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 2>primitives of emotion. I think the next big shock is

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 2>when we give emotions to these AIS, human emotions, real emotions.

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, again, we have real intelligence. It's like synthetic

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 2>intelligent emotion.

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 3>And so.

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 2>We have this idea that when I was growing up

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 2>that sort of like that emotions was something you had

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 2>on you got after you were intelligent. But emotions are

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 2>very very primitive, very primitive, very foundational, very fundamental, and

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:39.239
<v Speaker 2>as we begin to employ them in the AIS, it

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 2>really changes the nature of those relationships and the power

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 2>of what we think. And so here's a couple of

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 2>things about emotions. One is that first of all, they're

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 2>real emotions that we synthesize. Secondly, as possible that we

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 2>could uncover new emotions, okay, devise new kinds of emotions

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 2>with words and names. As we try to give them

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 2>different kinds of emotions.

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Would it be purely academic for us as in its

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>feeling this, or would we be able to learn how

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to experience the emotion ourselves.

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 3>That's a good question.

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 2>There may be people who were able to mirror those

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 2>new kind of emotions. And by the way, the same

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 2>thing's happening with AI and intelligences. Again, the way that

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 2>AI's play chess is they play it differently than humans do,

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 2>and even though they can beat humans, world class chess

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 2>players are learning to play chess differently from watching how

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the AIS play chess.

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right.

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 2>And so it's possible that you could have new kinds

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 2>of emotions and some people who are very sympathetic to

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 2>it could maybe begin to have a different kind of

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 2>emotion that normal humans don't have. That's very possible, it

0:33:58.320 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 2>seems right.

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>And of course we use vocabulary words to distinguish emotions,

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and as you, as you have your passage and dematuration,

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you realize the different shades and subtleties of emotions, and

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 1>so maybe AI will be able to help us along

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 1>with that. And as you're pointing out moving to different

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>spaces where we hadn't even realized that that was the

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that we feel sometimes exactly right.

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, as we imagine the possible minds, one of

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 2>their elements will be emotional component, which will vary tremendously.

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 2>So we might want to have We can say, we

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 2>can have some kind of AI that doesn't ever get depressed,

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 2>or ones that had, you know, were constitutionally very optimistic,

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 2>or other things. And so again, this will be somewhere

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 2>we will be programming for particular purposes different elements of

0:34:55.160 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the emotional spectrum onto these AIS to accomplish certain things,

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 2>and other kinds of emotions will be emergent from the

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 2>other components. And it's like it, but again we will

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 2>take an engineering approach to it.

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>How are we going to be smart enough to know

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>what kind of combinations we want? Because you know, you

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>get certain kinds of thoughts and ideas out of a

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 1>person with depression and out of a person with media

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and so on.

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 2>So here's the weird thing about AI as a studies

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 2>as a as a as a research area, which is

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 2>that it is one of those things that we can

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 2>only discover or learn by doing. We're at the point

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 2>where we can't think about these and have advances just

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 2>by thinking about things anymore. So we actually have to

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 2>do all these things, try all these things, make the mistakes,

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 2>and that's the only way we're going to learn about it.

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 2>We are at the limits of how far we can

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 2>get just by thinking about these things. Part of that is,

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 2>and let me also to say is that I think

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 2>we as a society over estimate the value of intelligence.

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I think IQ is just one component of what makes

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:35.720
<v Speaker 2>a successful human I think intelligence is only one component

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll make successful civilization. You need lots of other qualities.

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 2>It's not the smartest person in the room who necessarily

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 2>is the one who's going to accomplish what needs to

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 2>be done. And so right now, a lot of middle

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 2>aged guys who like to think will tell you that

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 2>thinking is the most important thing in the world and

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 2>that if you have really intelligence, that's all that matters.

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 2>And so my little joke is, you know, but Einstein

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 2>and a tiger in a cage who lives, it's not

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the smartest one. You need other qualities.

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Give me an example of other qualities that you're thinking about.

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Determination, perseverance, ability to cooperate with other, cooperation, collaboration, empathy,

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 2>There's so many other things that are necessary to actually

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 2>make change. Happen in the world that those are things

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 2>that we were also, you know, as we generate these

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 2>agents and other beings and other kinds of intelligence, we

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:51.879
<v Speaker 2>want to just keep in mind that IQ is overrated

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 2>by us, and you need other qualities, and so as

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 2>we make these machines, these other qualities will often be

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:00.720
<v Speaker 2>more important. It's kind of like, you know, pixel peeping.

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 2>It's like there was a moment where people are saying resolution,

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 2>the number of pixels and a camera that was the

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 2>most important thing. There's just so many other things that

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 2>are important in a great photograph other than this resolution. Okay,

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 2>other than the IQ.

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:16.439
<v Speaker 1>What else do you have on your list?

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Two other things?

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 2>One is I mentioned the necessity of how the brain

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 2>is important to the mind, and so I think there

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 2>will be attempts.

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 3>To use.

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Tissue to make ais, to make some kind of biological computer,

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 2>to use neurons, wet neurons, to actually make minds, and

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 2>those minds will also have qualities, including the usual forebos

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:57.359
<v Speaker 2>of sickness and illness and other aspects that any kind

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 2>of a wet.

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Biological being would.

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 2>But that means that there is the prospect of kind

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 2>of cyborg like things as well where where we we

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:11.320
<v Speaker 2>could have things in our own brains or next to

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 2>our brains, or along with our brains. And so I

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know if I could describe what the minds would be,

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 2>but I'm just suggesting maybe another route to making a

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.360
<v Speaker 2>different kind of mind is one that we not just

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 2>have the AI and silicon, but we have cyb actual cyborgs,

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 2>or trying to make a grill or a monkey mind

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 2>smarter in a different way. So we have something that

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of genetically altering or ampling up, and you

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 2>have a biological brain that's doing a different kind of competition.

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So can I can I just jump in with my

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:52.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy of what that could look like, which is instead

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of having machinery that plugs in because that's very tough,

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>you need to plug in electroc Yeah, there's all kinds

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of infection prompts. You know what if in one hundred

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>years you could actually grow more neurons in there, and

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:07.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe I mean this is bizarre, but maybe you have

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you store them on the outside of your skull and

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you put sort of another skull on top of that.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But what you have is just more brain tissue twice

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>twice as much brain tissue as you have. I know

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>this sounds creepy and insane, but yeah, maybe if a

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>podcast listener is listening to this in two hundred years,

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll say, yeah, of course we got that already. But

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:27.720
<v Speaker 1>your question is what would the what would the mind

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 1>be like? What would you what would your daily experience

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>be if you had a core text that was twice

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>as large as what you have now.

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, or even things like if you modified in some

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:42.439
<v Speaker 2>way so we didn't forget as much, you know, biologically

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 2>so so so. So that's one thing. And the last

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 2>idea in terms of the possible minds I just want

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 2>to mention is quantum quantum computing. You know, there's a

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of people who believe that kind of that's the

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 2>next thresholding and we get quantum and then it's like,

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:01.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's like a singularity. We're into another realm entirely.

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I actually have a heretical stance where I think that

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 2>quantum computer is inherently not going to be good for computation.

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Why it doesn't seem.

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 2>To want to do computation, That's how I would put it.

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't it doesn't want to do computation. But I

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 2>think it's going to be among the most amazing technologies

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 2>because it's going to do other things in the quantum

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 2>realm that we can't even imagine, but not computation. So

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I think computation is it's sort of it doesn't really want.

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 3>To do competition. It wants to do other things.

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 2>So it could have like a very different way of

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 2>thinking that is not computationally based as our ais are,

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 2>and it does something weirdly different that we don't even

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 2>have words for it. I don't even know how to

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 2>describe that, other than to say I think there can

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 2>be possible minds with with quantum computing or quantum but

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 2>they aren't going to be computational based.

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:14.760
<v Speaker 3>That's just a hypothesis.

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And that goes along with your hypothesis that we're going

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to have to try lots of things out in order

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:23.359
<v Speaker 1>to gather the data to make the theories about things.

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:26.280
<v Speaker 1>There's so much that's beyond what we can see right now.

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is, by the way, of course, a general

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>thing in science, which is that sometimes we're at a

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>moment where you can make a theoretical leap and say,

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>here's what I think the periodic table would look like,

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and other times you just need to gather the data

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 1>for a long time before you can get there.

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think we're in this realm of what

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:48.399
<v Speaker 2>I call the third culture. The first two cultures, being

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 2>the humanities, was kind of one culture. Then there was

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the science that was Cpiece snows observation that we have

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 2>two kinds of cultures and can you just double clicks?

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, CPS I had this idea there there's two cultures.

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 2>There's the humanists and the humanities the arts and what

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 2>they did was they kind of explored the human situation

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 2>through creativity introspection, by reflecting kind of the human condition

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:23.439
<v Speaker 2>and something that people made. Then there was the scientists

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:27.880
<v Speaker 2>who explored the human addition by probes, by doing experiments,

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:32.359
<v Speaker 2>by testing reality. I think we're in the third We

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 2>have a third culture we've made in the last thirty

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 2>or fifty years, which is called what I call the

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 2>nerd culture. The third culture is this idea that we

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 2>explore the human condition by making alternatives to it, by

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 2>making synthetic versions of it. We explore life by trying

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 2>to make artificial life. We explore democracy by trying to

0:43:53.960 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 2>do simulated worlds. We explore intelligence by trying to make intelligence,

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 2>and I think we're going to actually learn more by

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.320
<v Speaker 2>making intelligence that don't work. We'll learn more about the

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 2>human mind than one hundred years of neurobiology will teach us.

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 1>That was my interview with Kevin Kelly, thinker and technologist.

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I love this approach to thinking about different kinds of

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>intelligence because when we shine a flashlight around the possibility

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 1>space and illuminate what things could look like, it clarifies

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>our view about the things right in front of us,

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is the key to understanding anything in science.

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise we are like the proverbial fish in water trying

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 1>to describe water. We've never seen anything but water, and

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>therefore we don't have any way to describe it because

0:44:56.200 --> 0:44:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we have no way to distinguish it from anything else.

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 1>But happily, our species makes scientific progress because Homo sapiens

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 1>developed an enormous prefrontal cortex, and this is fundamentally the

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>brain structure that allows us to think about the what

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>ifs that are beyond our daily experience. What ifs are

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the thing that drive our understanding of everything. When Einstein

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>thought about what it would be like to ride on

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>top of a beam of light, that opened up a

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>new world for him that led to the special theory

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of relativity. When Charles Darwin looked around and thought, what

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>species aren't here now but once might have existed? That

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 1>ushered him down the path of understanding evolution by natural selection.

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 1>And so it will have to be with our understanding

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of what intelligence is. We are the fish stuck in

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the water, with nothing to compare water against and therefore

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>no way to make distinctions. That as we move forward,

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 1>will increasingly build and study many different flavors of intelligence,

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and those other minds will be like things other than water.

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:14.279
<v Speaker 1>We'll see a bubble rise up past us, and we'll

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>think what is that. We'll swim near an island and

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll see dirt and we'll think what is that. We'll

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>dive down and circle a thermal vent and we'll think

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 1>what is that? And with each new discovery we'll make

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 1>new distinctions and get a better understanding of water. It

0:46:32.840 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>will allow us for the first time to see what

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we've been swimming in the whole time. Go to eagleman

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcasts for more information and to find

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>further reading. Send me an email at podcasts at eagleman

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com. With questions or discussion, and check out and

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:58.359
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to Inner Cosmos on YouTube for videos of each

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:02.919
<v Speaker 1>episode and to leave comments. Until next time, I'm David

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Eagleman and this is in Earth Cosmos