WEBVTT - Zack Stanton & Brian Edwards

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds, and Galaine Maxwell has been moved to

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a minimum security prison camp in Texas.

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 2>We have such a great jow for you today.

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Politico's Zach Stanton stops by to talk about Donald Trump's

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>job number crisis. Then we'll talk to Tulane's Brian Edwards

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>about the American Century.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 3>But first we have the news, Mollie, mister Epstein, his

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 3>files have many reductions and whose name do you think

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 3>they reducted in them?

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump?

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So here's Jason Leopold, who's a really good reporter and

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>who is sort of the master of FOYA.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 2>FOYA is the Freedom of Information Act.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>If you feel out forms the right way, you can

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>get these FOYA files sent to you because you have

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>this freedom of information until Trump takes it away, which

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:05.559
<v Speaker 1>seems inevitable at this point. Jason is a journalist at Bloomberg.

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Now he foiled some of the files around the Ebstein

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>files because I don't think he was able to get that.

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>But while we have labored to provide the public with

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>maximum information regarding Epstein in the statement read, it is

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a determination of the Department and justin that no further

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>disclosure would be warranted. So the FBI has redacted Donald

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Trump's name, along with the names of other prominent public figures,

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>from references in the Epstein files. Three people familiar with

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the matter told Bloomberg's Jason Leopold, so internal directives instructed

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a thousand FBI agents to flag any mention of Trump

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>during a March review of the roughly one hundred thousand

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>pages of records. People familiar with the process told Bloomberg, So,

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>think about this.

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 2>So you'll have.

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>People in the FBI telling a journalist that people sat

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>down with a hundred thousand pages of records, and I'm

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>sure there was more than that, because we know there

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>were videos, there were photographs, and went through and looked

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.119
<v Speaker 1>for the name of Donald Trump to redact it. Redacting

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is when you take when you blacken a name so

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that people can't see it.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 2>It's meant to protect the privacy.

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of the victims might have their

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>names were redacted, or to protect national security. I wonder

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what national security redacting Donald Trump's name from the Epstein

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>files protects.

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 2>This is just a crazy story.

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>FBI agents were directed to search all documents associated with

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein case and determine which could be released. This

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is just such a crazy story. FBI personnel were said

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>to have identified numerous references to Trump and other high

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>profile people, with the names then redacted by feuer officers

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>because they were private citizens at the time.

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so redacting names. It's just so suspicious, right, So.

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.839
<v Speaker 4>It feels like a pedophile cabal cover up. I feel

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 4>like I'm cue not all of a sudden, yes, it's crazy.

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's just like if you were trying to cover

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>something up, this would be the way to do it.

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 4>This is also one of those things though that we

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 4>all assumed would happen, but you can't say it out

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 4>loud till it actually happens.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 5>We're all like, this is the next step.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 2>So this is the next step. Here we are, and

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>there we go.

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 5>Let's talk about some other nice, nice fuckery.

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I feel like this whole intro is just

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 4>a big, long moment of fuckery, because these judges got

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 4>together to talk about the horrors they've experienced since ruling

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 4>against Trump, and you know, it was so disheartening to

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 4>read this because we have to discuss it. But also

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 4>when we discuss this, it also makes me feel like, well,

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 4>now judges are going to hear how bad their lives

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 4>are going to be if they rule against them.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, but we have to talk about it

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's really important. So these judges are facing just

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>their lives are becoming nightmares. And you know, there's a

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>reason why these Republicans are such cowards, right that they're

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>just letting Trump do whatever they want because they're scared,

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and so are judges, and so are all of us.

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Were all scared. It's really scary. That's what it is.

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Man. That's where we are in America right now. Federal

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>judges worry. The judiciary is at stake. I'm aware. US

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>District Judge John McConnell, who blocked Trump's federal aid freeze

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year, said his court has received four or

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>five hundred file threatening voicemails. We're going to come for him,

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>said one voicemail. You know what, motherfucker, your ass is

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be in prison. I mean, look, Trump encouraged this.

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>This is not surprising. They receive these pizza deliveries their

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>home address, indicating they've been docked. Sometimes they put in

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the last the pizza gets sent to them by the

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>name of poor district Judge Esther Sallas's son who was

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>killed in twenty twenty. This guy, Robert Lasnik said he

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>was sent pizza's est has been amazing going on television.

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I was on Nicole's show with her. I mean, these

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>people are putting their lives on the line to protect

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>our democracy, to protect.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 2>The rule of law.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, then we have all these billionaires who

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>who are too scared to even say anything.

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 2>So here we are.

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 4>So another really stupid news, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 4>is going to shut down, which is going to mean

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 4>very big things for PBS and NPR and also Donald

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 4>Trump's jobs numbers.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Wait, this is a lot of people who are going

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 5>to be out a point.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Despite the efforts of Americans who called, voted, and petitioned

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Congress to preserve federal funding, we are now facing the

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>difficult reality of closing our operations, so public broadcasting. I

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>think there'll be some public broadcasting that'll still exist. By

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, it is one point one billion dollars in

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.679
<v Speaker 1>federal funding. This is like how much it's going to cost.

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean slightly more than how much It's going to

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>cost to fix up Donald Trump's new plane. Yeah, just

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a fucking rounding error. But the point is not that

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it's about money. The point is that it's about control.

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 5>So m it's silencing reporting.

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and silencing reporting.

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>So hard to think of something worse than this, But

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>here we are, ladies and gentlemen.

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Just a complete fucking shit show.

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 5>Somali.

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 4>We now have a report from Yale Budget Lab about

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 4>Trump's tariffs, which I'm We've starting to become convinced shouldn't

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 4>call teriffs, we should call his robbing of the American

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 4>people to give to the rich. It's going to cost

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 4>us all at least twenty four hundred dollars a year

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 4>for the average home.

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, congratulations to all of us. Trump's tariffs are terrible,

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>They're inflationary, their attacks on the consumer. It will cost

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hundred dollars per household the tariff rates combined

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>with surprisingly weak jobs report for Friday morning, it's the

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>latest that American household space and much more deep difficult.

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>We went from the envy of the world to very

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>much not just complete disaster.

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 4>Personally, I'd love to hear your thoughts on this, though,

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 4>I livid at the Democratic establishment for not messaging this more.

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing, if you want to like get in

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the weeds here, we have no mainstream media anymore. So

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a group of people who are Democratic electeds

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>who are now tasked with transmitting what's happening. I mean,

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to blame them for a lot of stuff,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>because there's been mistakes have been made again and again

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and again on multiple levels, in multiple different ways. But

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not I don't you know, it's like an

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>impossible situation. I don't know how you make up for

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the shortfall of people now getting their news from Charlie Kirk.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you do that.

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 4>I think that's going on podcasts and making tiktoks about it.

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think Zoron is the ouprint is that

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 4>he has an issue that he thinks is important, he

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 4>makes an engaging video on it, and that's how information

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 4>is delivered.

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Now It's not quite so simple, but yes.

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Zach Stanton is the deputy editor of Playbook and a

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>contributor to Political Magazine.

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Zack Stanton, welcome my pleasure to be here.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Luckily we have waited until after the Friday news dump

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to go through all of the sewage I think we

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>start with Trump didn't like the jobs reports, so he

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>fired the statistician.

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 6>Yes, he has fired the person in charge of jobs

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 6>numbers at the Bureau of Labor Statistics, entirely because the

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 6>jobs numbers were downgraded for previous months and they came

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 6>in much weaker than expected for July. They always come

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 6>out the first Friday of every month, we get the

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 6>previous month's numbers.

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 7>He didn't like the numbers.

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 6>He had advanced notice of them, and so despite his

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 6>claim that he just now found out about this, he

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 6>had some advance warning. It's of a piece of certainly

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 6>an ongoing politicization of the civil service, and of more

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 6>broadly a sort of a purge that is taking place

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 6>across pretty much everything that the federal government has its

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 6>tendrils on, ranging from the Smithsonian, where we saw this

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 6>week the sort of censoring of the impeachment exhibit. He

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 6>didn't like it exactly. He didn't like it. Where this ends,

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 6>it's hard to know. But it's also bizarre to me,

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 6>just on a pure messaging or narrative level, in that

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, with the job numbers, and with recent economic moves,

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 6>he had had sort of a good negative news cycle

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 6>for Jerome Powell for the first time, and he immediately

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 6>steps on it by doing something like this.

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I mean, the only thing Trump can do at

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this moment is bring the conversation back to Jeffrey Epstein.

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that is his only smart play I wanted

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. Her name is Erica mcer as, a

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Commissioner on Labor and Statistics MCAR. She was voted bipartisan,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>voting eighty six yes, is including Vice President Jade Events.

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 6>Including Vice President Jadie Vance. But you know, it's it's

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 6>in keeping with pretty much what we've seen from Vance,

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 6>but also more broadly senate Republicans ever since Trump has

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 6>re emerged as the center of the national conversation that

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 6>really any ideological preferences that people have, or any sort

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 6>of independent views of their own all gets subsumed by Trump.

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 6>That he is sort of the yes or no, up

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 6>or down question that defines our politics, or at least

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 6>defines what it means to be a Republican. We've seen

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 6>that this week, not only with things like this, but

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, we're now seeing like Republican Senate candidates do

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 6>pro tiff ads, which is kind of a stunning development

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 6>that I wouldn't have expected, you know, a year ago,

0:10:58.920 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 6>at this time.

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 7>Necessarily, it's just simply.

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 6>A matter of whether or not Donald Trump is in

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 6>favor of something, and that becomes sort of a litmus test,

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 6>and all else flows from it.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>So he can fire the head of the Bureau of

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Labor Statistics. I'm going to get really nerdy with you

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>here for a minute, because I was reading about the

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Bureau of Labor and Statistics. And as much as Trump

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is wrong to fire people who displease him, the reason

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>why a lot of times these numbers are revised is

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>because they don't get necessarily accurate measure And what needs

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen is people need to respond to surveys in

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>order to get surveyed information, and so in fact, the

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>surveys are getting a little bit less accurate because people

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>do not trust the.

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Government as much.

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So as much as Trump is absolutely, are all numbers woke?

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe yes, it does speak to a larger problem with

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>trust and institutions and trust in the federal government.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely.

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 6>And the irony of it, of course, is that people

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 6>will trust numbers even less now if they don't have

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 6>any reason to believe that they're independently, verifiable or based

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 6>in reality. It all just gets stuck in this general

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 6>mud of seeming like it's all politics. And I think

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 6>that's one of the challenges here, is that there are

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 6>certain voters who are just cynical about it all and

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 6>think that all politicians lie and don't necessarily differentiate between

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 6>little eyes and consequential ones. And so it's difficult to

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 6>know whether or not this is going to resonate with

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 6>voters in the way that it should. But it's hard

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 6>to imagine too many voters getting that worked up about

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 6>the Bureau of Labor statistics. But it's like a canary

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 6>in the coal mine in some sense.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, and also, if you want to lower inflation, which

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not entirely clear that Donald Trump wants to lower inflation,

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>but if you do want to make things cheaper, which

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>if you were to say Donald Trump had been given

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a mandate in any way, shape or form, it would

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>be to make things cheaper. Yes, you would want your

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>government to be trusted, you would want your debt to

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>be good, you would want your currency to be the

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>standard and not to experience dollar flight, which seems like

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>he's just at every point setting himself up for a

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>world in which the dollar stops being the reserve currency

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and our debt becomes so expensive to service. He just

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>feels right now like we are on the sort of

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>edge of catastrophe.

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know in a way that that's how it's

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 6>held for a while now. But it does feel, you know, certainly,

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 6>with the economy in particular, that we're on some sort

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 6>of precipice of no longer being you know, the big

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 6>dog on the block.

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 7>I guess you know that we're.

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 6>No longer the ones that are sort of running the show,

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 6>and that with the dollar getting weaker, which Trump sees

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 6>is in many ways a good thing because it can

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 6>boost exports. But between that and the size of the

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 6>federal debt, there are any number of fronts on which

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 6>it just feels like we're being squeezed and it's hard

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 6>to know how to get out of that.

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know, and it's a real question. So

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the political calculus. The house has been

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>sent home by Mike Johnson a few days early.

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 2>That was last week's drama. The Gang of Five has

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 2>this plan. The rule is it called the rule of five,

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the Game of four five whatever.

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>We're not into accuracy here, the Rule of five, the

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Gang of four, that crew they are going to release

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein files discuss.

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, it's again it's hard to know how

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 6>this exactly plays out.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 7>There is a reality that I.

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 6>Think every Republican is facing right now, which is that

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 6>back home in their districts for all of August, the

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 6>House doesn't come back till September. Second, I think it

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 6>is and between economic news, which is its own thing

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 6>where they're not going to differentiate themselves from Trump and Epstein,

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 6>which is now set to really dominate the conversation for

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 6>the next couple of weeks because it has this strange

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 6>lasting power in a way that very few stories have

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 6>been able to break through and sort of remain center

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 6>stage in the Trump era. You have this pressure that

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 6>they're facing. It's not necessarily something we for Playbook talk

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 6>to a Republican strategist who said that it's not necessarily

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 6>that it's the thing that most voters will care about,

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 6>but it is the thing that the loudest voters will

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 6>care about. And so when you go to a town

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 6>hall Forum or something like that. It is the type

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 6>of thing they're going to be pressed on, you know,

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 6>they're going to look for opportunities here to show some

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 6>if not independence, then some responsiveness to what voters want.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 6>And the thing with this issue, compared to so many

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 6>other criticisms of Donald Trump, is that Epstein Files is

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 6>like really easy to understand. It's like it's very digestible

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 6>in a way that like, if I'm talking about the

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 6>Bureau of Labor Statistics firing, I have to explain it,

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 6>like there's so much backstory there, whereas Epstein is like easy,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's just a snap of the fingers. You

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 6>can understand what's at stake and what the moving parts are.

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 6>And so I think it resonates with folks. So we'll

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 6>see how that actually comes through to fruition.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 8>The Ploomberg story about the foyer, where Jason Leopold sees

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 8>that they have had all of these people in the

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 8>FBI redact Trump's name from the files.

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 2>That feels like another two days on the story.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, these things just sort of snowball with this story

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 6>in particular, it's just sort of this smoke that stays

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 6>in the air and it's like you have a smoky

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 6>room with a fan, but the fan doesn't suck the

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 6>air out, it just circulates. And that's kind of what

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 6>they're stuck in. And you know the thing with Trump

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 6>is that he's thrown so many things against the wall

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 6>here to try and see what will stick, to try

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 6>and change the conversation in some way, and maybe the

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 6>conversation will change and people will talk about the Bureau

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 6>of Labor statistics are something else, terriffs, but none of

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 6>it seems to really be erasing this from people's consciousness.

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>My favorite part was said, the White House says this

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>story is.

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Over, and I was like, I know you want the

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 2>story to be over, but you don't get to say it.

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's like it is an interesting moment because Trump

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>has been so good at bifurcating reality and creating a

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>base that trusts him more than they trust anything else,

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>right their own families. But there's something about this story

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that gets to the core. I have this theory that

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump is a coastal elitist, the way that I am right,

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but I'm much poorer than he is. The point here

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is he's a coastal elitist. Right always grew up with

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>wealth power, friends with all of the Jeffrey Epstein people, right,

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the fanciest people, the people who is now his administration

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is trying to you know, academics, literati, you know, the

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>members of the mainstream media, the people who he is

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>now targeting.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Those are the people that he grew up with.

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So my question is is it that the base remembers

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that he is actually not one of them?

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 2>That is there there's some little bit.

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Of this story that is like, oh, actually he's he's

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>actually in the intelligence for lack of a better word,

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 1>then you know, he is a member of the glitarati.

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>He can't drain the swamp because he's in the swamp.

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know, I think that for some people, being

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 6>of the swamp, for lack of a better way of

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 6>putting it, is kind of an asset. Like, you know,

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 6>there's this idea that he understands this world, which is

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 6>why he's uniquely able to be immune to its charms

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 6>or something like that, and so he's going to fight

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 6>for us against them. And this is something that's been

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 6>part of his brand for quite some time. You know,

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 6>I remember years ago I read I came across a

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 6>New York magazine story from I want to say two

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 6>thousand and four, two thousand and five that was basically

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 6>this giant feature piece in New York Magazine advocating for

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 6>New York City to become its own nation. And you know,

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 6>it's a little bit of a modest idea type approach,

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 6>but the very tail end of the story of the

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 6>article is suggesting, you know, that we will need someone

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 6>who is able to speak New York Keys but also

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 6>resonates with read America, how about Donald Trump? And it

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 6>was like Trump was able to be seen as relatable

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 6>to a lot of people and in a similar way,

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 6>though it's very different and I'm not at all comparing

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 6>them in a broad sense, but it's reminiscent of like

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 6>Richard Nixon always having the sort of chip on his

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 6>shoulder at like not being at the cool kids table.

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 6>In Nixon's case, he tried to join this nice fraternity

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 6>in college and was denied, and so he started his

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 6>own competing fraternity that was called, I think was the

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 6>Orthogonians or something like that, the idea being that they

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 6>were all like right angles, they were all squares, and

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 6>so he found that he was able to gain power

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 6>and influence on campus by really playing to people's insecurities

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 6>about being left out and not being in the inside crowd.

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 6>And for Donald Trump, there's been sort of a similar

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 6>dynamic in many ways where he is part of this

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 6>crowd and really seeks its approval. But there's always part

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 6>of him that's going to be, you know, the kid

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 6>from Queens who is struggling to break through in Manhattan

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 6>and trying to get the approval of those folks. And

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 6>that's part of the reason why he's so solicitous, even

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 6>as he hates The New York Times is very obsessed

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 6>with you know, how they cover him all of us

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 6>like validation. It's a very human thing for Donald Trump.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 6>It's something that is a through line that carries through

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 6>decades of his public life.

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me about the redistricting. Besides Trump firing the

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the redistricting is

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. Talk me through what you think of

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it as a sort of play and does it work?

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And also, like you know, there's so many parts of

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>this story like it's an anti democratic, it's this is that,

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But I also wonder and.

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I want you to talk us through it.

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Like people who turn out for Trump don't necessarily turn

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>out for random R And so the idea that you're

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>going to so if you if you redistrict all these

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>seats in Texas to our plus one or our plus four.

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>You know Trump won it by nine. So talk us

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 2>through that exactly.

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 6>So in Texas, just for those who haven't heard about it,

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 6>Texas is undergoing a redistricting at Trump's behest to create

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 6>essentially five new Republican US House seats. This is in

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 6>order to pad the overall nationwide US House majority that

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 6>Republicans have, and it's doing so really against the wishes

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 6>of a lot of Republican incumbents in Texas who are

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 6>mindful of not wanting to imperil the advantage of their incumbency.

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 6>And what I mean by that is that in order

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 6>to create five new Republican districts, you need to dilute

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 6>the number of Republicans in the existing districts. And so,

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 6>in a wave election, if it works out well for Democrats,

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 6>and it generally tends to be that midterms do work

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 6>out well for the party that not in power, in

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 6>a wave election, you potentially could have a good year

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 6>for Democrats in a place like Texas. But you know,

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 6>the Republican calculus, as you note, is really based on

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 6>this idea that Trump voters are Republican voters, and I

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 6>don't necessarily see evidence that that's entirely the case. You know,

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 6>Democrats in recent cycles have performed exceptionally well in low

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 6>turnout elections. This is true of special elections, it's true

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 6>of midterms. You know, it's very different than it was

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 6>decades ago, when Republicans were the ones that dominated in

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 6>low turnout elections.

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 7>Democrats do now.

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 6>And so if you're looking at the midterms in twenty

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 6>twenty six, and you're looking at, you know, an election

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 6>where Trump is not going to be on the ballot,

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 6>and so a lot of the low propensity voters are

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 6>either not going to vote, or you know, there is

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 6>this idea that a lot of voters have that Trump

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 6>is like you know, has had all these different positions

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 6>over the years, and so he's not doctrinaire, and so

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 6>he's different, He's not like the other Republicans. You know,

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 6>this is a way that some people think about it.

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 6>Given all of that, you know, it's hard to know

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.959
<v Speaker 6>whether this calculus that they've made is it all going

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 6>to work out for them? But what Texas is doing

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 6>is sort of setting off this arms race for redistricting nationwide,

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 6>where you have other red states also at Trump's behest

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 6>Trump in the White House, pressuring them to try and

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 6>do similar mid cycle redistricting, which is very unusual. You

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 6>only have redistricting once every ten years in normal circumstance.

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 6>But they're looking at doing it in Ohio where JD.

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 6>Vances is sort of inveighing on Republicans there to try

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 6>and do something and potentially take out someone like a

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 6>Marci Capito type in the Toledo area. They're talking about

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 6>doing it in Florida, where Governor DeSantis is even talking

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 6>about trying to pay for a census before twenty thirty.

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 7>God love them and.

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 6>The idea that you know there too they can maybe

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 6>squeeze out a couple more Republican House seats. And meanwhile

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 6>in California you have sort of this response that's happening

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 6>from Governor Gavin Newsom who notes that there are still

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 6>I think nine Republicans in the congressional delegation not for

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 6>a law. Yeah, and so like there is an easy

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 6>scenario in which you can draw these maps. But the

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 6>problem that you have in California is a problem that

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 6>you have in a lot of Blue states, which is

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 6>that many Blue states have sort of unilaterally disarmed themselves

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 6>in this fight by passing nonpartisan redistricting commissions, this idea

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 6>being that district shouldn't be drawn by politicians, they should

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 6>be drawn in a nonpartisan, in a fair way. And

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 6>in California, voters enacted this years ago. And what Newson

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 6>would have to do, and what he's talking about doing

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 6>is going before voters this year and basically saying, yeah,

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 6>doing this kind of he says, as a one time thing.

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 6>But you know, once you open Pandora's box, you can't

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 6>really close it again, and so it's hard to know.

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 6>It just seems like this is a spiral that is

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 6>hard to stop once it starts. Once one state redistricts

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 6>another one who's going to follow a suit, and it

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 6>just goes on and on.

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 2>We're at a time but on the scale of how

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 2>fucked we are.

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>One being like a constitution, normal constitutional democracy, ten being

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>uh huh, where do you think we are here?

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 7>That's a good question.

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it would depend on the day and probably

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 6>depend on how much sleep I've got.

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 7>But you know, but maybe a six and a half.

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 6>We'll go six six, six and a half is good.

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 7>That's good.

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 2>A solid six.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Closing PBS got us to six and a half, I

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>think exactly, Yes, Zack Stanton, will you please come back anytime?

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 7>Happy to be here.

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Brian Edwards is the dean of the School of Liberal

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Arts at Too Late. Welcome to Fast Politics, Brian Edwards.

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 9>It is so great to be here as someone who's

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 9>been enjoying listening to your show for a long time.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>As we say, we do this with Pete Siegel from

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Wait Waite, you're a longtime listener, first time caller. I

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to talk to you about this idea of

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>after the American century, like that there was a moment

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen forty one, after sort of right at the

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>tail end of World War Two, when a mayor was

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we were the sort of the center of the.

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 2>World, and perhaps we are not anymore.

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is an idea brought on by a book

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you've written a while ago that really did breakthrough from

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the academic world to the cultural world. So I mean,

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously those two things are the same, but talk to

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>us about what that means.

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, the idea of the American century is really, as

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 9>you said, influential in the second half or a little

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 9>bit the last sixty years of the century. And the

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 9>question of when it ends as interesting. Henry Luce Winter

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.959
<v Speaker 9>of nineteen forty one, months before Pearl Harbor, publishes this

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 9>massively influential editorial in which he argues that although the

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 9>United States wasn't yet in the war, we already were kind.

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 7>Of in the war to a certain extent.

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 9>It's a very interesting argument, and that really that the

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 9>world was about to become a century ruled by America,

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 9>American culture, and he lays out this idea of what

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 9>we would come to call soft power, that the United

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 9>States was going to be really the leader of a

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 9>certain way of imagining the world that would follow World

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 9>War Two. I mean, this is still when it comes out,

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 9>not only is the war happening, but it's still a

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 9>world dominated in many ways by British and French imperialism, colonialism.

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 9>I mean, this idea that never said on the British Empire.

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 9>That was still the world that we were living in,

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 9>and the United States did not have whether or not geopolitically, it.

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 7>Was in that moment of his sentence, it hadn't.

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 9>We hadn't come to terms with ourselves as leaders in

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 9>that way. So what I love about the argument, and

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 9>what's so fascinating about it is he says in this

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 9>long essay that things like American slang and music and

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 9>culture would have a political purpose or have a political

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 9>efficacy and make the world one that would be American.

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 9>And of course he's right to a certain extent. I mean,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 9>and one of the really interesting things about US power

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 9>post World War two is that as the colonial empires

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 9>of Europe, of Britain and France in particular, start to

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 9>fall apart in the wake of World War Two, the

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 9>US doesn't take on the mantle in the same way,

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 9>but we do nonetheless become the global superpower, and American

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 9>culture is incredibly efficient in setting the stage for that.

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 7>How long does that last? As a question does it end?

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 7>And when would it end?

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 9>That's really been on my mind for a really long time,

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 9>and in part because I spent a lot of time

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 9>outside the United States looking at HOW and talking to

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 9>folks at HOW and studying how American popular culture, movies,

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 9>digital culture, music culture, then social media culture, shopping malls,

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 9>architecture cut starts to be copied around the.

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 7>World in sometimes really surprising ways.

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.239
<v Speaker 2>So tell me when this period sort of starts and

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 2>when it ends.

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 7>I would say it starts during World War two. I

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 7>mean I do.

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 9>I'll follow Loose himself and say that his naming of

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 9>the American Century is at a key moment because there's

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 9>this internal debate politically about getting involved in the war.

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 9>And if you look backwards. Even though, of course when

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 9>when when Y two K was we thought and nicknaming

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 9>the end of the twentieth century.

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:21.479
<v Speaker 7>I remember it.

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 9>At the time, we probably had on our coffee tables,

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 9>you know, these big books the American Century. President Clinton

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 9>was referring to kind of, you know, the end of

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 9>this century. We started to name it backwards one hundred years,

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 9>but really it was the conditions for the American Century

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 9>were post war, and you know, and what's interesting too,

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 9>is how the Europeans, especially the French and Western Europeans,

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 9>felt a bit of anxiety about the rise of American

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 9>soft power.

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 7>The French used to call it.

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 9>In the fifties and sixties coca colin, coca colonization, Coca colonization.

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 7>I guess this idea. I mean it's great.

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 9>Then in Europe, you know, in the eighties and nineties

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 9>when popular music was taking over the radios sum European countries.

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 9>I think Spain it limited the number of American songs

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 9>that even could be played per hour because the culture

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 9>was so you know, charismatic. Of course, the second half

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 9>of the twenty century really is a very dominant time.

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 9>As Hollywood starts to you know, continue to grow, and

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 9>movie theaters around the world are just filled with American cinema.

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 9>The culture kind of pendulum shifts. Does it end, you know,

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 9>with nine to eleven? And this is a question we

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 9>can say, when does it end? I don't think it

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 9>ends right.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 8>The soft power I want to talk about solf power.

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The soft power that has been has been given up

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>by Marco Rubio and Trump and Trump two point zero.

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>So what does it mean to give up soft power

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in a global sense?

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, what is soft power?

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 9>Soft power is something that kind of operates on another wavelength,

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 9>that's doing work for a nation without trying to do work.

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 9>It's doing work for a nation without even being on

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 9>this same side of the political hard so called hard power.

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 9>You might have Hollywood films and Hollywood filmmakers at different

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 9>moments a critical of military actions by the US and

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 9>still be effective at making it possible for the United

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 9>States to act in certain ways.

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 7>I'll give you an example.

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 9>You know, I was spending a lot of time in

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 9>the first decade of this century writing a book, writing

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.479
<v Speaker 9>this book called After the American Century, and shuttling back

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 9>and forth between Morocco, Egypt, Iran, and Lebanon. And at

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 9>the time the movie Babbel was incredibly popular in the

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 9>United States, and euraut To the director, was very critical

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 9>of the so called War on Terror. But this film

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 9>was just incredibly resisted, very strongly by folks in Muslim

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 9>majority countries as being very hostile to them. So it

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 9>didn't it doesn't even necessarily matter what the explicit politics

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 9>of American culture makers might be to to kind of

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 9>help pave the you know, pave the way for for

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 9>hard power to operate, and so that could happen in

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 9>a lot of places.

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean, and it's very abstract.

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you could talk about this idea after history,

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>because it strikes me and I really like Francis, but

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about calling balls and strikes a little early I

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you could sort of talk about it and

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of get us to where we are right now.

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:26.719
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, of course, you know the idea of the

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 9>end of history that Francis Fukuyama proposes. You know, the

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 9>nineteen nineties is a really interesting decade because it looks

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 9>like for a moment, or for an extended moment of

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 9>the nineties, that with the apparent fall of the Soviet Union,

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 9>that we had won, that there was an economic and

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 9>cultural system that won. And so there's a number of

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 9>people who are claiming kind of victory and that what

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 9>would come next. I mean, this is why the nineties

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 9>are really interesting. Of course, you know, conflicts continue through

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 9>the nineties. There was not the end of history, and

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 9>what's really brewing, particularly in the part of the world

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 9>that I was living in and spending a lot of

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 9>time in North Africa, in the Middle East, there is

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 9>a whole lot of reconfigurations happening between the end of

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 9>the Iran Iraq War and nine to eleven. Really in

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 9>nineties are a very fraught period obviously in the Balkans

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 9>as well. So this calling you said, calling the calling

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 9>the count a little bit too early for sure, as

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 9>if the Cold War, the terms of engagement were between

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 9>two economic systems, and we had won.

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 7>Clearly was not the case. Something else was happening.

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 9>But the other thing that's happening that I think is

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 9>really important to thinking about soft power and really important

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 9>to thinking about the.

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 7>Present moment is the digital revolution.

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 9>Because Henry Lewis, after all, was the was the head

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 9>of Time magazine, head of Time Life, Right, he was

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:49.719
<v Speaker 9>really a publisher in what I would call the analog age.

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 9>You know, we're reading his publications in Life magazine, Hollywood

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 9>pictures are being carried around in canisters. The radio and

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 9>television operated in a tremendously different way than they do today,

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 9>needless to say. And it was an analog logic for

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 9>how people would engage with American soft power, right. I

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 9>call it like broadcasting logic of broadcasting. Remember the RCA

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 9>Victor kind of logo, where there's this dog listening to

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 9>a kind of the trub the ear of a record player.

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:21.760
<v Speaker 9>Like that was this idea that America would give culture

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 9>and the rest of the world would listen and take

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 9>it all in and not have anything to say about it.

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 9>The digital revolution makes clear that that that's not the

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.919
<v Speaker 9>way culture operates. People can listen, they can talk back,

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 9>they can engage back. Now, this is quite obvious to

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 9>anybody now, because we're used to commenting, we're used to sharing,

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 9>we're used to being all of us actors in making

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 9>culture happen. And that's a tremendous difference that the twenty

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 9>first century starts to bring in, and it therefore changes

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:51.320
<v Speaker 9>how soft power operates. People engage with American cultural products.

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 9>The products themselves become things like Twitter and Facebook and

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 9>eventually Instagram.

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 7>And I remember being, you know, in.

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 9>Egypt before the Talkerer uprisings, the Middle East uprisings two

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 9>thousand and nine, twenty ten, twenty eleven, and talking to

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 9>young Egyptians and they're like, how can we have a voice.

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 9>This was right before everybody with a smartphone could have

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 9>a voice. And in fact, the Middle East uprisings of

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 9>that period were incredibly propelled by millions and millions of

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 9>people now being able to communicate with each other in

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 9>ways that they hadn't been able to before.

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 7>So it's really important what.

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 9>We think about soft power, and we think about Henry

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 9>Loos and this idea of an American century to think

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 9>about how culture moves through the world, how all of

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 9>us engage with it. I mean, here we are in

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 9>a podcast right forms that just didn't exist in this

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 9>earlier moment, and it changes absolutely everything about politics. To me,

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 9>that is incredibly important to talk about at this moment,

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 9>especially because of the relationship of this presidency and this

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 9>president with things like reality television, with social media being

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 9>quite a genius at it actually being very able to

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 9>use the prevailing technologies. You know, they use to say that,

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 9>you know, when you look at every presidential campaign, you know,

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:08.760
<v Speaker 9>you decide who the winner is. I always have thought

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 9>that whoever was able to best use the then prevailing

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 9>entertainment technology, whether it was Kennedy against Nixon and the

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 9>television debates, or those who could use the Internet at

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 9>different moments, you know, would be the winner. And I

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 9>think that to really understand how soft powered American hard

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 9>power now are in tension with each other, you have

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 9>to think about the president and the presidency in relationship

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 9>to those media technologies, including reality television, which is in

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 9>a lot of ways what we feel like we're watching

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 9>even while we're watching global politics.

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 7>That's not incidental in my opinion.

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Now we're just going to go into therapy.

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:45.760
<v Speaker 1>For me, one of the things that makes me really

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 1>anxious is this sort of post truth society, This sort

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of idea that we are in America where there are

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>two sets of facts.

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 2>That our president is on Earth to a.

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Lot of his people on Earth too, some of us

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 1>are on Earth one make me feel better about that

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we're in this bifurcated reality.

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 2>There's an Earth one on Earth two.

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 1>A certain percentage of Americans are occupying Earth too. We're

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 1>in a country where truth is not universally agreed upon.

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:17.240
<v Speaker 9>Discuss well, I mean this idea of the filter bubble,

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 9>I guess is what some people used to call it,

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 9>That the media that we most of us get is

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 9>curated for us by algorithms that we ourselves have something

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 9>to do with creating, is of course, really worries for

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 9>all of us who believe in having public discourse and

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 9>having real and open conversation debate around the things that

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 9>matter which our country are politics and so on, and

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 9>so the idea that we can't find ways to bridge

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 9>those gaps, whether it's made literal by like the idea

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 9>of the political aisle, or in metaphor, I guess, by

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 9>your idea of Earth one or Earth two, or this

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 9>idea of the filter bubble, that we can't break through

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 9>it that just like you know that that's really worrisome.

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I get really patriotic at this moment as

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 9>I say, my kids think I'm the most patriotic member

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 9>of our family, and I think, you know, I start

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.359
<v Speaker 9>going back to the founders of the United States that

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 9>we need a civic discourse to have a successful democracy,

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 9>and then bring it to the present with how is

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 9>it that we engage with ideas and news and information.

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 9>So your idea of Earth's too Yeah, that's really worrisome,

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.959
<v Speaker 9>this idea that we can't hear. I mean, I hope

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:27.919
<v Speaker 9>I'm not the only I know. Lots of us try

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:31.879
<v Speaker 9>to consume media from a lot of different perspectives. It's

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 9>a great thought experiment. If someone listening doesn't do it themselves.

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 9>Something that you care a lot about, go see how

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 9>it's being reported in a completely different venue than than

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 9>your own political persuasion, and it is.

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 7>It's as if it's a different reality.

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it does strike me that it seems like social

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>media is growing, mainstream media is shrinking, reporting is suffering,

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 1>AI is poised to go to zero, right, they will

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>no longer link to reporting. They will just you know,

0:38:59.880 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 1>your AI butler will go and get your facts. And

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're right and maybe they're wrong. I mean, doesn't

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this seem like we're heading towards a catastrophe?

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 9>Well, where's my optimism in all that? I mean my optimism.

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 9>I am optimistic in this sense. And by the way,

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:17.919
<v Speaker 9>sitting standing here in New Orleans in August, where it's

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 9>an immensely hotter and more humid than wherever you are

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 9>right now, is I can still be optimistic here. My

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 9>optimism is that there are so many more avenues and

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 9>venues for journalists and people with opinions and ideas to

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 9>enter into the discourse that that in itself is a

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 9>good thing.

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 7>It's super risky.

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 9>Because the algorithms are fed, you know, or tend to be,

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 9>as much as we understand, fed by emotional responses and

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 9>self perpetuating filter bubbles, as I said, and so we

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 9>got to figure out ways to get outside of them.

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 7>And AI the way you described it.

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 9>You know, as as it curates and as it brings

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 9>things together, seems to limit even further. So that's a

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 9>pessimics experience. But my optimism is that there's more and

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 9>more ways for folks to enter into the discourse. That's

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:11.799
<v Speaker 9>I do believe in the discourse. I know it's one

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 9>of your favorite words.

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that's enough.

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 7>We have to be active in our engagement with it.

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>At least twenty five percent of the country, including much

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of the federal government, has a sort of fact free

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>vision of what the future can be, right, and you

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>have a percentage of the country that's completely disengaged right

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>from any sense of what's happening. It just strikes me

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's an unsustainable pottern.

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 9>You know, as an educator, I see college students coming

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 9>to us who want to break free of that, who

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 9>are anxious about certainly anxious, and often have ideas about

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 9>how we can break free of that and looking for

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:57.800
<v Speaker 9>other venues. And one thing that's true about the ways

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 9>in which digital media intersects with culture is endlessly creative

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 9>and finding new places for us in ways for us

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 9>to engage. The rise of substack, the rise of podcasts,

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 9>the rise of different ways that work outside of the

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 9>kind of corporate media culture that could otherwise be very stifling.

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 9>I mean, that's the interesting. Yeah, we're talking about now

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:18.280
<v Speaker 9>we're talking about the media. But that's the interesting tension

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 9>as people who again young people.

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 7>As an educator, I always.

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 9>Say you have to be an optimist if you're an educator,

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 9>because the folks who are in front of you always

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 9>coming into college are coming next, are going to be

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 9>the ones who are pretty soon going to be running

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:31.959
<v Speaker 9>the show.

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 7>And they are right now.

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 9>My sense for the last few years is really frustrated

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 9>at what they've inherited. They've frustrated by cancel culture. They're

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 9>certainly frustrated by political culture. And their creativity is something

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 9>that we're trying to mold.

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 7>Or help or facilitate.

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 9>So that's the incredible novelty and creativity that we keep

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 9>seeing in the realm of culture and in the realm

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 9>of how journalism and discourse kind of intersect with it.

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 9>But I mean, the other thing that we were talking

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 9>about before around the American Century relates to that, right,

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 9>because one of the things that the intersection of the

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 9>American century logic, let's go back, like now get a

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 9>little bit more contemporary, go back to post nine to

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 9>eleven world when we get into this long war on terror, right,

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:15.799
<v Speaker 9>which also consumes our culture becomes our form of this

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 9>twenty year war. That's also our form of entertainment and

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 9>television dramas. And we're obsessed with this war against an emotion, right,

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 9>a war named against an emotion, not named against an

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 9>actual antagonist. It's everywhere, It's everywhere, and you can't find it.

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 9>That's very existential for all of us for the last

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 9>two decades, and really, in some ways COVID kind of

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 9>distracts us from that and wipes out that sensation that

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 9>was really prevailing. But during all that time, and of

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 9>course American culture of soft power continues, it is still

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 9>incredibly popular. I mean again, I've just been on four

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 9>continents this summer. I've just been trapped doing a lot

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 9>of travel, talking to a lot of folks in South America,

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 9>Southeast Asia, Western Europe, Latin America and Singapore and so on.

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 9>And you still see everywhere American culture is still very popular.

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:06.359
<v Speaker 9>It's not the only popular thing, but there's this disassociation

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 9>of our politics with the popularity of our culture. American

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 9>language that you know, English language, but really from American

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 9>culture is of course more and more dominant around the world.

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 7>But it doesn't work the way it did.

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 9>Under Henry Lus's American Century model, you could love the

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 9>culture and get very and hate the politics, will be

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 9>resistant to the politics. And that wasn't how it was

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.280
<v Speaker 9>supposed to go. Under the American Century line. You're supposed

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 9>to see in American music and Hollywood and jazz and

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 9>abstract expressionism in the twentieth century, that this was a

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:42.439
<v Speaker 9>culture of freedom and everybody wanted freedom after it all.

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 9>But now the thing that really is worrisome in a

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 9>sense is that that is that equation is falling apart.

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 7>Higher education is a part of the two.

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 9>I mean, part of the soft power of the United

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 9>States is that American higher educa educated is, you know,

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 9>as a model that folks really admired around the world.

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.880
<v Speaker 9>Most of the great universities, by every ranking were located

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 9>in the United States, I mean, you know, with some

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 9>notable important exceptions, and even when people didn't aspire to

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 9>come study in the United States, they were around the

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 9>world copying the model, whether it was the seminar room,

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 9>whether it was the idea of the campus, or the

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 9>liberal arts. Kind of general curriculum was being sometimes with

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:24.239
<v Speaker 9>the help of American universities in the Middle East and

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 9>the Gulf and around the world and other times just

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 9>autonomously by different countries Like that was a model that

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 9>people really really respected American science and science and technology

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 9>the same thing.

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 7>Right, We've been that kind of soft power too.

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Brian Edwards, thank you, thank you, thank you.

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's great chatting Litiamali. I really appreciate the chance

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 7>a moment.

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:54.280
<v Speaker 4>Jesse Cannon Molly, do you report from Senator Richard Blumenthal

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 4>of Connecticut has an interesting conclusion, which those wasted twenty

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:01.439
<v Speaker 4>one point seven billion in just six months.

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Fraud, waste and abuse, maybe not fraud, but certainly waste

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and absolute abuse.

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Elon mus Department of Government was.

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Expensive, but luckily he's a billionaire, so he could just

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:17.720
<v Speaker 1>give that money. Wasting government funds, making a series of mistake.

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:20.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, like half the country, half the federal government

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is being paid to not work at this moment, not

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>quite half, but a lot of federal employees.

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 2>They wasted twenty one billion dollars. Yeah, they suck.

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean you could have seen that when it was happening, right,

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the Deferbred resignation program where they paid all these people

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 1>not to work fourteen point eight billion. Because all these

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:42.720
<v Speaker 1>people are not are being paid not to work, six

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:46.360
<v Speaker 1>point one billion spent on one hundred thousand plus workers

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 1>placed an administrative leave pending separation. And then also you're

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 1>going to eventually have to retrain the people you're going

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to have to rehire, and that's going to be a

0:45:55.239 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>disaster too. I mean, this is so incredibly wait a ball,

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>let's real talk. A lot of stupid crap has happened

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in the last six months, but this is the stupidest

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 1>and the crappiest.

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Quote me.

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune in

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 1>every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday to hear the best

0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 1>minds and politics make sense of all this chaos. If

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this podcast, please send it to a friend

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and keep the conversation going.

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening.