WEBVTT - MGM's Tricky Recovery Path; Miners' Carbon Transition

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence. We're really getting into that the

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>streaming's arm three additions, looking at that and saying we

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>can really build a nice niche for ourselves in depth

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>research and data on two thousand companies and dirty industry.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>The dollar is the dominant concept in the planet. I

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>think the opposition is not turning progression of what Microsoft

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>can do with this technology. Going forward, Bloomberg Intelligence with

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio. Over the

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>next hour, we're going to dig inside the big business

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets. Each and

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>every week we provide in depth research and data on

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>some of the two thousand companies and industries are analysts

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>cover worldwide. Today, we're going to take a look at

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the revenue recovery for MGM resorts, plus the UK residential

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>renovation gets a boost from the housing hot streak. But first,

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about travel. Are you going anywhere for the

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>rest of the summer, Are you making any plans for

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the winter, and what does that mean for the airline stocks,

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>hotel stocks, the whole thing to any us now. Bloomberg

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence Senior Airlines analyst George Ferguson George this past week,

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in a surprise move, the EU didn't stop US citizens

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>from coming into the EU and be able to vacation

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to reevaluate in the next two weeks.

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>What's intercontinental travel like right now? So I think that

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was one of the few good news points on trans

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>atlantic travel. So trans atlantic travel is I would say,

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a hodgepodge of requirements and regulations right now. The most

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>besuttling to me, I think, is that the US has

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>excluded a lot of our key partners from Europe, the Germans,

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the English and such, from even coming

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>here quarantine or not, um, you know, But we can

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>go there to some of the countries and some of

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>them we have to quarantine. Some not usual in the

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>southern hemisphere, the ones that like and need travel the

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>most have the least restrictions. But we're starting to see,

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a major spike in some of the some

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of the virus activity down there. So it makes me

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>wonder how long that's gonna last, or how long US

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>travel is going to want to go there. So I

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>just call it a ridiculous hodgepod right now, really hard

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to figure out, very country dependent. Where are we just

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in U S domestic uh capacity right now Georgia, it

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like there's more planes on the ground and in

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the air. Where are we in terms of that capacity? Yeah,

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>so US capacity as you know, as we sort of

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>near the end of the summer travel season. Uh, you know,

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the low cost carriers are even flying more

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>than they did in twenty Lots of carriers are I

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>would say, within ten or fifteen percent of of levels UM.

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is just on leisure travel. So I'd say

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>from a leisure travel perspective, from what we've heard from

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them is that they're back to level.

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's been quite a nice bounce back on leisure

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in the US and the domestic market. Does that hold

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>up with Delta so well? I think there's a couple

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of problems. I think Delta is a bit of a problem. UM.

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I seem to think we're not going to ever go

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>back to the lockdowns that we saw. I think we

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>understand the virus too much. There's some people that just

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>won't I think, you know, refrain as much as they

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>would maybe last March when they didn't understand what was

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>at risk. UM. So I think Delta does take some

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>demand off the table. But I think more importantly is

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the business travel right. I think the leisures closing, by

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the heavy leisure seasons closing, kids are going back to school.

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's going to make it harder for mom and dad

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to get away with the kids. If you don't have kids,

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that just you know, it's it's it's easier. And companies

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>though starting to push back that return to office. I

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>think employees need to be back in the office before

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the companies really flesh out what travel policies are going

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to be. And so I think without that sort of

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>return to office or pushing it back, I think we're

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to see that business travel for longer. And

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that really hurts the fall season and winter

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>season this year because of that. And I think and

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Delta has an effect on that. And we're talking about

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the Delta variant, not Delta airline point airline conversation. I'm

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>sure that folks Delta appreciate clarifying that. George, all right,

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's interesting people were hoping by this time

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>we'd have, you know, more vibrant trans atlantic I'm more

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>vibrant maybe intercontinental European travel, but this delta variant has

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>really put a wrinkle in that. Are the airlines Are

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>they preparing for a slower than expected kind of third

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and fourth quarter? Are they guiding down? So uh, as

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>of right now, we don't see that. We've just finished

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>earning season. Um you know, most of them were pretty

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>upbeat on booking trends. They were, I mean, there were

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>some of them that would readily admit that business travel

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is a is a short booking window, um you know,

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>meaning business travels usually book within a couple of weeks.

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And so they said they look at we don't we

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>don't have a sense for where businesses going, and we

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>do see a taper in leisure. But most of them,

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty upbeat. So I don't see them guiding yet,

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>but we'll be. We're watching closely. Right now. There are

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>enough flight attendants and pilots to do stuff. There are

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>challenges with labor Like everywhere else in the economy, pilots

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>are pilots are very I don't know what the right

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>there may be sticky, you know sort of labor force

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>because they've got such a specialized skill set, and the

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>challenge there is more getting them trained and having them

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>current to fly the equipment that you've got at the

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>airline at this point, right, And some airlines cut part

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of the fleet, so they might not need pilots that

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>fly X y Z, but they need flots pilots of

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>fly pdqes and so they got to get them trained

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>and move them to move them to what they have

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>in the fleet. Others haven't been flying for a while.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a little bit of a challenge. That's a challenge

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>for the for the full service carriers, you know, the

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 1>United the Deltas, the American um. The low cost guys,

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>they're having a problem because I think they're trying to

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of market share here and we're seeing

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>companies like Spirit, I think, really push the amount of

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>capacity they put in the marketplace without having the appropriate

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>levels of reserve airplanes and other um, you know, on

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>pilots that aren't that are in reserve ready to meet

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the need if they have a weather event

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. And that's hurt that we've seen

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that recently. So I think the low cost guys are

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>pushing it. The full service guys do have a genuine

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of training problem. Okay, George, thank you very much.

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>George ferguson Bloomberg Intelligence, senior Airlines analyst. All right, coming

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>up on the program, we look at which mining and

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>metals companies are best positioned for the transition to a

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>low carbon world. You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio,

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>providing in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and a hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence through the I go on the terminal, I'm Alex

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Steel and on Paul Sweeney. It's thirteen minutes past the hour,

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Steel and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio. Well, we spend

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time on this program talking about the

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>s G investing environmental social governance. It's growing in popularity.

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>This time we want to take a look at how

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the metals and mining industry fairs under this analysis. For

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that we welcome Bloomberg Intelligence E s G analysts, Shaheen

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>contractor just at first blush Shine. It would seem to

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>me the medals of mining companies might not score very

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>well on E s G. Is that a is that

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a poor bias on my part? So I think medals

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and minings have always been sort of the traditional discycling

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in gas, but the traditional folk surface not flat. But

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the benefit of that is they picked up

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the game fairly early on in the process. And I

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>think we're seeing a number of minors that have ramp up.

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>A number of them have set these gobbon reduction goals

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of the last euros, so I would say, probably something

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen before. So you kind of ranked them light, right,

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So you go over forty six metal and mining companies

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>before we get into like who scored well and who didn't.

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>What were your criteria, because a lot of times you

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like companies say one thing and do another.

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>But even more importantly they say like carbon intensity versus

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, versus my own operations, and and those make

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a difference and how you measure it absolutely, And so

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>our ranking is really looking at these carbon reduction goals.

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So these are bi common schools, And what we're really

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>doing is we're starting companies on two pillars. So one

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>is a historic pillar which looks that sort of reduction

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>trend over five years and along with the current intensity,

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and the second is more sort of forward looking at

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>we're here we're quantifying these forward looking reduction goals and

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>really comparing it to a temperature aligned benchmark. So the

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, we're just saying, you know, who's

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>aligned with the Paris goals, who's ambitious enough. UM to

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>your point, of course, they're They're tricky, which is why

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we've come up with this standardized way of the things.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's three ways to kind of measure stuff. Like

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>one is Scope one and two, which are basically the

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>carbon reduction using your own power, so you're using less. Uh.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>The other is the types of energy that you're using,

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>so instead of using coal, maybe you use solar. And

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>then the other is the products that you produce and

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>cutting that or any of these guys tackling Scope three

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>because in the oil community, Scope three is so hard

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to do because it's basically trying to tackle emissions and

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>like jet fuel and what you're driving in your car.

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, UM. I think Scope three for things like

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas is the elephant in the room. I

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>think if you go beyond that to other sectors, it

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't so much of a focus. I think the one

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>company that comes to my mind that is tackling scope

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>three is UM if I remember right, it's mim um.

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 1>But again other than that, it's largely just operation emissions

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>because I think if you you know, you have transportation

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>will in gas. That's really were Scope three is the

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>elephant in the room. Well it comes to metals and mining,

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>but not that yet, so shooking for metals and mining company,

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>what do they actually do to improve their E s

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>G kind of footprint if you will? Sure so you

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>know for for it really depends on the metal produced,

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's just so diversified. Giving the example of aluminium,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>so aluminium is again just one of the most common

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>intensive industries, and over there it's things like increasing scrap

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>based production, which is much less common intensive, and also

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>decomganizing the power sector for example, because aluminium just uses

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of electricity. But it varies very different metals.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>But where he is literally from company to company, mind

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to mind. But to that point, and take a look

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>at the carbon scores that are the worst and that's

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna Rio and Glencore is that is a thing u

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>so real Dento has a fair amount of operations and

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>aluminum and just the way the score is design aluminum

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>being so common intensive has to reduce submissions by a

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>lot more than other diversified minors. So by before they

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>automatically tend to tend towards the lower end of their

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>score of our score card. Again, just because there's so

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>much more carbon intensive than any other metal and tend

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to having sort of phenom in that UM would weigh

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>down on them just like any other company. Like you

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>will see Hinda Core, you'd see rustles towards the bottom.

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So shehan, is there any regionality to this? Are our

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>European damasile companies do they do better? Because it seems

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to me I have s G concerns or G s

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>E s G issues are more pronounced in Europe than

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>perhaps or more advanced than they are in the US.

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So do we see that in some of the results,

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in some of the performance of these companies. Suppose you're right,

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I think for most sectors we do see the street

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>nudisms where Europe is leading. I think the metics and

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>minings I didn't see it just because everything is so

0:11:55.720 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>globally spread like Africa, South South America or theations are

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>just diversified. I think the medicine minings, it was more

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>by sub industry and what I mean by that is

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>base metal companies had far more goals and precious metals again,

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>base metal example, aluminum, it's much more common intensive, which

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 1>is why it's more metal for operations again, which is

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>why companies are setting these goals. Precious metals not so

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>cognit intensive, yes, and a focus less of a priority. Yeah,

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it feels like copper goal kind of get a little

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>bit of a easier paths that. Um, they do, and

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>they should because it's not that govern intensive. It comes

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>down to sort of cause some things like that. Are

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the our investors rewarding these companies for that? So you know,

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question, and I still have to do

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the analysis for metals, but I can give you what

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I did as an exampt for utilities, where we saw

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, companies with higher bi common scores were

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>more likely to be held in any sc fund. So

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>clearly e SG investors our prioritizing these I would say

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>these issues now, I would wait to see what kind

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of analysis at least to medalsine mining, but um, that's

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>what we had for utility, So definitely something prioritized for

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>at least the resource in times to enviolently heavy sectors Yeah,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>like metals and mining, I'm just wondering at you know,

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I know this is becoming a bigger and bigger issue

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>for managers, for board members, for shareholders, this focus on

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>e s g S in addition to you know, the

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>income statement and the balance sheet and things like that.

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>In the metals and mining space. What's what's the sense

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>you get from from management in terms of their commitment UM.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I think medals and minings is again like an industry

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that's just being early exposed to just because it's amongst

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the resource intensive sectors. I think the one thing I've

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.599
<v Speaker 1>been seeing from metals and mining companies is an increasing

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>focus on safety, so things texicality rates, incident rates, and

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing an increasing number of companies that sort of

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>executive compensation and dial this back to things like safety

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and to some extend also emission. So you know that

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>compensation and center gives you a dijected sort of monetary

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>bush to do these things. So definitely more of a

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>focus from that. Yeah, it's sort of like they had

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to have the right to operate for so long in

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>different countries that they couldn't mess it up. UM that

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>they already have in some ways better practices um or conditioned.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess all right, she hean thinks a lot, she

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>can contractor joining us Bloomberg Intelligence E s G analysts.

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Coming up on the program, we look at the revenue

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>recovery for MGM Resorts. You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, providing in depth research and data on two

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand companies and a hundred and thirty industries. You can

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>access Bloomberg Intelligence through b I go, I'm a terminal,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney. It's twenty five minutes

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>past the hour, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Brady.

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll be here each and every week at this time

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>tapping into our Bloomberg Intelligence analysts covering some two thousand

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>companies and industries worldwide. Well as you wind up having

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a delta variant, we can have it pretty much all

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>across the world. How does that affect different sectors? That's

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>what we've been working on throughout Bloomberg Intelligence. One particular

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>area want to focus on now is the gaming stocks

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>like MGM, Las Vegas sands. What's the implication there. So

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>let's welcome Bloomberg Intelligence senior Gaming and Lodging analyst Brian Edgar.

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>All Right, so delta varians running rampant here, who's getting

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>hurt the most? So I think if you look at

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, they look at MGM as kind of a

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>proxy for the industry, certainly like in the second quarter,

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about what that means, I would say, you know,

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the cow market in Asia got hit particularly hard where

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>we're still at a half of twenty nine teams pre

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>pandemic level of gaming activity. Part of that is because

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>there was an outbreak in Guangdong Province, which is a

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>major feeder market for Macau, and that definitely affected some

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of the traffic in for it. That's been an ongoing

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>issue for McCallan could be uh for a while. So

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that resolves when moved to the US. Las Vegas actually

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>has been on a bit of an upswing and close

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to her back to pre pandemic levels UH, and it

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>benefited when the market went back to full resort documency

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>back in June. And yes, the question going forward is

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>whether or not um the arrival of the delta variant

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>will affect what we expected to happen, which is, you know,

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a big uptick in convention activity as we get to

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the fall months, and that we really have to watch

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and see carefully. So what are the gaming companies in

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the big hotels telling the street about that convention business?

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Because when I think of Vegas again, pretty much every

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>time I've been to Vegas, it's been with a convention.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Um is that business going to come back in this

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>year or or is it delta pushing out next year?

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>So the bookings and again a lot of this is

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>happening as you can understand in real time, but the

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>bookings business on the books for a fall and going

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>into twenty two have been actually quite strong. The real

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>question is as we approached the actual dates, depending on

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>how companies adjust their travel UH policies, etcetera, whether or

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>not that by the resulting cancelations, but at least the

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 1>book of business going into this period, as of the

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>company's most recent comments during the earning season, we're actually

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>quite favorable. So that leads to my next question, how

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>many how much cancelation can these guys stand given the

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know that I think the industry has

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>weathered being with all casino was shut back in uh

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>last March through June and has endured pretty significant capacity invitations.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Now that the markets back to fulcumancy, I guess you

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>could argue that they've been stress tested quite well, notwithstanding

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>what might happen with the delta variants. So you know,

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it is an issue. What has happened during the downturn

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is that of laws vecas from knights at a company

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like MGM that we that we would normally be occupied

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>by goers has since taken up by casino customers, which

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is the less attractive business. It's lower price, and the

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>question is whether or not they have to go back

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to depending on that lower price casino customer, that leisure customer,

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>if the convention activity is somehow disrupted. All right, so

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>we've done Macaumy, we'll go back there in Vegas. Now,

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>how about the regional markets around the country. Um, you

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>know they I think they did a little bit better.

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>They're less dependent upon that convention business. What's the outlook

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for some of the regional gaming? Regional give me out

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is actually quite strong. I mean when we look at

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>MGM in the second quarter and we compare all these

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>results to the second quarter of because most of these

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>casinos were closed during the second quarter of When we

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>look at that, the regional gaming revenue is actually up

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>about six percent versus the second quarter of nineteen, which

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>is pretty impressive. And not only that, because the companies

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>are still operating with significantly scaled back wayburn marketing UH,

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>they seem some at least significant margin improvement. So we're

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>not only seeing a return to pre pandemic levels of

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>revenue in the regional markets, but also very strong margin

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>games and even flow through because of the fact that

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the cost base has been um uh paired down so

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>significantly during the pandemic. Most other industries are dealing with

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>worker shortages, all have input cost increases, wage increases, et cetera. Um,

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>how about these guys. Let's I mean, you can go abroad,

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but I was thinking more specifically of the US and like,

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>who how what do they do to margins? Like how

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>do they pass that on, et cetera. So I think

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>what could happen And it's something that companies have mentioned

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is an expense um category that they're watching carefully. Is

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 1>although most of the hotel companies, for example, we follow

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>manage and receive revenue or profit based fees as a

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>form of compensation uh for managing or franchising those at

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>heels UM, you know there is a chance that's the

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>so called house profit margins, the margins at the hotel

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>owner level could be under some pressure to the extent

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that we see rising waiver costs. Of course, they're going

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>into this period just as we said for the CASEDO

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>company is having significantly reduced and uh right size their

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>their cost structure and the labor structure to accommodate a

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>what in many cases has been a smaller audience. So

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>as Awkwudcity begins to return UM and as you see

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>waiver and staffing levels returned to pre pandemic levels, you

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>know this could be a cost issue. We're going to

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 1>have to watch to the extent that waiver accounts for

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>such a significant portion of the expense space of both

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>hotel companies and casino companies. Great stuff, Brian super appreciate.

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian Egger Bloomberg Intelligence, a senior gaming and ladging analyst.

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Coming up on the program, we check in on the

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>buoyant UK housing market and look at how hybrid working

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>model is impacting European real estate investment trust. You are

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on a Bloomberg Radio providing in

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>depth research and data on two thousand companies and a

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence through

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>b I go on the terminal and Alex Steele and

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Paul Sweeney. It's thirty nine minutes past the hour,

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Steel and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio. Mention the health

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of an economy in that it's critical to understand the

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>health of its housing market. Let's do that for the UK.

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>At one point, housing market was on fire, The rental

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>market was on fire, the stocks related to housing building

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>construction were on fire. Are they still well? As Shantara Bali,

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>senior analyst from Bloomberg Intelligence for Business Services that joins us. Now,

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 1>so just broad stroke, real quick, where's the state of

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the housing market within the UK? Hi? There? Um? Yes,

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So the housing market is still very hot. Actually, um,

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>it's continued to grow strongly, sort of rebounding from the pandemic.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Um and that appears to be underpinned for the next

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say, for the next few months. In terms

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of looking at how the data is progressing. So yeah, um,

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>still still very hot markets. All right, let's talk about

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the repair, the maintenance, the improvement of

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>existing housing stacks and apartments. I mean that's also a

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>hot sector in the U s as people remodel their

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>home because they're gonna be like, well, I've been living

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in this thing nonstoff for a couple of years and

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 1>who knows how much longer. So talk to us about

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that type of spending in the UK and maybe how

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 1>some investors are looking for exposure. Yeah. So, um, it's

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's exactly the same trend in the UK.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So that spend fell off quite strongly at the beginning

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic with lockdowns that we had here sort

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>of an early but it's come back very very strongly. Um.

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>The last data point, which is May that we have

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>for UK data is up ninety three, so it is

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a very very strong year over year, but that's part

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of a reflection of last year's weakness. But I think

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you're right in terms of the trend and what what's

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>driving that. Partly there's pent up demand from that lost

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months from the lockdown last year. Partly

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>there's underlying strength in this kind of product given we're

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in a pandemic and people are spending more time at

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>home and they want to make their homes better. Plus

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact people are not paid taking paid vacations abroad

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>as much as they would normally do, so they have

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>more money to plow into their houses. And then the

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>final point, as we all leaded to earlier, that when

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the housing market is strong, this is also good for

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>repair and modeling because the data shows over time that

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>most people spend on their houses when they've just moved.

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>So all of those things of all moving in the

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>right direction currently. I so well know that from moving

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic as well. Um, what stocks are most

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>exposed and what's prized into that? So the company's I

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 1>look at which are exposed to this space. Travis Perkins

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>which is the UK's biggest building material distributor, Grasston which

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>is also in the similar market. Um. And then finally

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and Howden Joinery which is the the UK's biggest kitchen

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>sitting company. So these companies are sort of linked into

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>into this trend. Um they I would say they've recovered

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>very well in terms of share price. A year. Today

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>they've outperformed the general market by something like um and

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it's been mirroring the sort of the underlying data they've

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>been raising guidance, et cetera. So I think a strong

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>recovery is priced in um in terms of what's happened

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to the share prices. But from here it looks like

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>momentum from an earnings perspective is still pretty good. Um,

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to sort of be nervous about sort

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of the growth of renovation data or repair data, etcetera.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So that there they performed very well, but there's still

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a more momentum to come. It seems. Yeah, that's kind

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>of where I wanted to go, because I think a

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of people here in the States they're saying, we

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>do have a housing boom here, low mortgage rates, people

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, moving out and wanting more space, and understanding

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that that's similar in the UK. The real question though,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is how long does it last? When are people are

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be like, wait a minute, I don't want

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to live in the middle of nowhere. I are in

0:24:57.800 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the burbs. I want to be back in the city.

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>What are some of your companies saying about that? So

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I think It's a very good question because I think

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in the short in the short term, everyone is so

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>has been focused on their cash flow and now the

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>rebound that's coming through, so it's kind of sort of

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>getting their business back on track in terms of opening

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>their outlets or paying dividends, and someone say it's very

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it's still very much about that. But I think the

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>key risk, as you highlighted in the question, is how

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>how transient is this. Is this something that can last

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>over the medium term or is there something very much

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>just just gonna last while the pandemic is kind of

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>playing through as it were, So once we all return

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to officers and so on over over time with vaccines

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and so one, does that then lead to us sort

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of fall off in UM in this kind of demand

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing. I think the other thing I would

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>add to that is that house prices have been very

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>strong here in the UK, so UM there's a risk

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that there may be too strong to support a longer

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>term recovery. So there's a there's a risk that maybe

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>things have got a bit too expensive and that could

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>stall any eventual recovery. But we're not there yet, and

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, it seems like everything is moving

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction, but there is that question mark

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>over the medium term. Thank you so much for Intelligence

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Business Services analyst as Shantara Bali. Let's turn into the

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>world of reats and the impact of a hybrid work world.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>The question is on the other side of this pandemic,

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in a delta world, what will the work living at

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>home type of dynamic look like and what does that

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>mean for commercial real estate from where we welcome Sue

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>moundon Bloomberg Intelligence senior property analysts. So, so, what are

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the companies saying here as we try on a global

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>scale to reopen, Well, there's they're saying at the moment that, um,

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>their tenants are really just refurbishing their space to try

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and hope with more meeting rooms, UM, more space to

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to have zoom calls UM and less space

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>per desks UM. And they're busy doing that at the moment,

0:26:56.040 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>but not really reducing their space requirements too much. I

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>do think those are over the course of the next

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months, maybe two years, as we all come back

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to work and we all settle down to a more

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hybrid pattern, that then maybe some more profound impacts on

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the space that we're using and what the tenants really

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>want to that point, before we get to like what

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>they may want, I guess the question is when do

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they make that decision because with so much uncertainty, like

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>our our leases up at a certain point, does something

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>have to be locked in, like what's the time frame

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>for that? Yeah, so the s leases are important in

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the UK. They can be quite long. In the continent

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>there maybe three years or nine years altogether, but with

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>three or six year breaks UM. So it does vary

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 1>enormously what the lease lengths are UM two. But also

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that the thing is that, um the cost of UM

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>your office is quite low in comparison with the cost

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of your staff, for example, and so it's probably not

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the immediate priority. All the occupiers are saying they want

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to be able to attract talent so they into good

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.479
<v Speaker 1>place for their you know, their staff to go. But

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, you know, if they wanted to

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>cut their costs by they could sub let a very

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>small portion of their property. So that's a decision that

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.239
<v Speaker 1>will come further down the line in the you know,

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 1>working through how we deal with a hybrid environment, hybrid

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>working environment. So the last time I was in London

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and Middaly was two years ago. Now. Um, I was

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>just amazed that despite Brexit, in all the doom and gloom,

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>all you could see around the city of London was

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>cranes building new structures in the city of London. Outside

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the city of London. What's the London real estate market

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>like these days? So actually, for officers, the supply of

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>officers isn't that huge. I know, we had Brexit, um

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know then we have a pandemic, and so

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>construction has slowed down a lot. For officers. There's a

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of home building going on, and I actually believe that, um,

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're the sort of problems that we're facing

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>here is that to come in UM that all the

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>officers have to be UM what we call EPC compliant,

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>which means that they have to be a l B

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>ranked for climate change in their emissions and the energy

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that they consume. And not much of the London stock

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>actually compliance with that at the moment. So there is

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a big concern amongst the community office community as to

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>how much money they're going to have to spend to

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>get their offices to that state. And I think what

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that's going to drive one of the reasons that there

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>are others as well, will drive a lot of the

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>these sort of obsolete space, all the stranded assets if

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you like, because they they're not compliant UM will be

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>converted into residential or to other uses as well, and

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>about well, you know, during that renovation process they'll solve

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>both both the energy compliant problems as well as getting

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the property use is aligned more with demand, which is

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the big thing that we're facing at the moment. So

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>aside from UM longer term having to retrofit their offices

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to fit the climate rules, UM in an immediate basis

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of trying and bring people back. You were

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>starting to mention this before, but what are the souped

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>up cool things that officers are going to try and do. Well.

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>They want more immunities in the properties UM. You know,

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>they want some meeting space, and I think there's mixed

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>use sort of campus style. UM is really gaining some traction.

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>British Land already has you know, sort of campus style properties.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's spit like Canary Walls really which I know,

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you know well, which has a huge shopping center at

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the bottom, and it's got lots of residential towers now

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and as well as offices. So the ability to network

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>physically as well as online is important. But the other

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is we're finding around Paris and London that there

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are sort of clusters of certain types of industry or

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>office users. So there's the Knowledge Quarter, there's the Life

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Sciences Quarter, there's you know, the city the financial Quarter,

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and and tech quarters obviously as well. And so that

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the buildings and the communities there will move towards sort

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of attracting those employees. And I think that's something that

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll see a lot more of going forward, so much

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>more mixed use places like London. Central Paris has always

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>been much better because it always had a lot of

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>residential in it that the City of London was. You know,

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we've spoken about this before, but the City

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of London, um, you know, it's very much just offices,

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and um they've already now said that they're going to

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>allow planning for more residential. So I think it will

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be switching buildings to a better use that hazards and

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>then communities. It's near good transport networks, um, there is

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you got good ventilation for well being, that people can

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>control their mental health. All those sorts of things are

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be really important going forward, and it will

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>take a year or two, I think for that to

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>go through the system and for us to really understand

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>how much office space is needed. But they'll be space

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>needed for other things, all right, So thank you so much.

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate that, Sue Bunden, Bloomberg Intelligence, Senior Property Analysts.

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio,

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>providing end upth research and data on two thousand companies

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and industries. And remember you can access Bloomberg Intelligence through

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>b I go on the Terminal and alex Steel and

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on Paul Sweeney. It's fifty seven minutes past the hour,

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg