WEBVTT - The Fall

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Vonnie Quinn this week. Right now,

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like anyone has the initiative. Neither side

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is strong enough to push the other, and so in

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.639
<v Speaker 1>this salemate situation you need some extraordinary slate of hand

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to the clear victory. Leonin Burschitski on six months of

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Russia's war on Ukraine, as the U. S And Germany

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>are among countries preparing to send more aid, ammunition and

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>weaponry before Wednesday's Independence day. Later in Germany, we need

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to declare essentially a war economy, and I think it

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>will come down to rationally and Asclute from Berlin on

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Germany's energy emergency. First, though, all market attention is directed

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>this weekend towards Jackson Hole and the annual Kansas City

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>FED Symposium, the opportunity for Fed Cherry J. Powell to

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>address markets between July's f OMC meeting and September's meeting.

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>We're with Bloomberg Opinions Jonathan Livin, So, Jonathan, the Fed

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Cherry's speech from Jackson Hole continues the pandemic trend, although

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it breaks from pre pandemic norms. Interestingly, well, I think

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it reflects the time that we're in, right, I mean,

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>never in recent economic history, at least since the nineties

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, has the monetary policy narrative been as important

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>as it is right now. This is the driver, right,

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of inflation and what the Federal Reserve is

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>going to do about it is going to be the

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>driver for global markets in the next twelve months. So

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you can understand the heightened interest. History shows that nobody

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>has ever particularly hawkish in Jackson Hole. You know, I

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>looked at the history. I'm working on a project and

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>going through market reactions for the last ten Jackson Hole speeches,

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and the biggest market sell off came in. You know,

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the market was off two point six percent on the day,

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't even the said that did it. It

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>was Trump because you often remember that Trump came in

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and stole the show with the China trade war talk.

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>So there seems to be a historical pattern where FED

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>chairs for whatever reason, seemed to tiptoe around this event.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>So that this fire and brimstone idea I think is

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>off space. As you point out as well, FED fund

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>futures have gone from pricing in a December peak around

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>three and a quarter percent to pricing in a March

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>peak around three and three quarters percent, with Cotson not

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>until the later part of three. Does that seem reasonable?

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>John Taylor of the Taylor Rule Of course, Stanford told

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>us this week he sees the terminal rate at five percent.

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I say five percent as where we should name. And

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that is not high by historical standard, that's for sure.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Remember what it was in the seven Will it be

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>enough March peak of three and three quarters percent? Yeah,

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that the market pricing is totally within the

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>realm of possibility right now. And I was not there

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe three months ago, certainly not certainly not six months ago.

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>But this feels plausible. You can disagree a little bit

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to the upside, you can disagree a little bit to

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the downside. You know, the house view of Bloomberg Economics

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is at the terminal rate needs to go to five percent.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, our economist Dan A. Long

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>has some really interesting rationale. They're talking about the labor market.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But this at least fuels sort of plausible as sort

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>of a consensus or average of the distribution of views.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So I do want to point something you said in

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>your column about summertime about how Summer's fling wasn't a

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>real thing. Say that to the people that made in

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the SMP from its June low, assuming they timed the

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>market right, I mean, I get what you're trying to say,

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but should market participants act like this was just an aberration? Yeah?

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, my view was not to say, uh,

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the markets have to sell off for the

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>markets need to continue from here. But I thought that,

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, people really shouldn't be looking at the price

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>action and saying, well, this indicates the direction going forward

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>because it was based on nothing essentially fund fundamentally, you know,

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>not changed. You know, I think people took heart in

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that earning season wasn't bad. But I've always

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>been of the view that the FED has a slow

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>moving wrecking ball, and if things are going to get

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>really bad for earnings, it was going to take several quarters.

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Retail sales are very much holding up, and I think

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the reason is you have this slow moving effect, right.

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, first people need to need to start working

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>through their savings, then they move on to more consumer credit,

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and only after that option is exhausted. Do you really

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>see sort of retail sales and these things start to

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>dry up. So that's a lot of runway, and it's

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>conceivable that we may not see those impacts until maybe

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>even you know, one Q and we are seeing effects

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and housing and rent and so on. I mean, obviously

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>for other reasons too, but we're definitely seeing a dampening

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>in housing activity. Yeah, that's for sure. I hate to

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>be all gloom and doom, but my nightmare scenario is

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>just one in which the fragility of the housing market

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>combines with the fragility of the labor market and they

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>start to sort of feed on one another in a

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>very toxic way. You know, in both cases. There are

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>both cases, right, you know. I mean the housing market

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of prices at least is sustained by this

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>low inventory situation and people really don't want to sell.

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>But that situation could change very very quickly. You know,

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>people sadly start losing their job. Yeah, exactly, Jonathan. Does

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the market of confidence in fed chapale It look for

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a moment they're back a few months that that confidence

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>might be a little bit fragile, But ever since July

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven, that feels like the market has confidence again. Yeah,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at where inflation expectations are,

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's swaps or some of these surveys, it's certainly

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>indicates a confidence, maybe an overconfidence, that this FED is

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 1>going to get the job done. It's either that or

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the market still believes in the transitory story, which you know,

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to say about that, Bloomberg Opinions.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Livin. Indonesia's president told Bloomberg recently he's invited Russia's

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin and China's Cheese Jinping to the Group of

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty summit in Bali in November. That poses questions, does

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>President Biden attend in person? Does Ukraine's Voladimir Zelenski then

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>get an invitation? Here's former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. Every

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>meeting like this of the G twining, it's both a

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>challenge and an opportunity. The permutations of possible encounters raise

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the questions what happens in a post war world? And

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>how do we even get to that point. We're joined

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>from Berlin by Bloomberg Opinions Leonid Breschitski. So, Leonid, what's

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the post end game? If there ever is some kind

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of armistice? Or treaty. One analyst Lawrence Freedman and The

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Guardian this week, saying the Kremlin's current theory is that

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>the energy crisis will undermine support in Europe for Ukraine,

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and that might allow Putin to declare some kind of

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>face saving victory. But in any event, what do post

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>war diplomatic relations look like? Well, I mean there's the

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>sense of the list that Russia is somehow isolated, but

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the West is only a minority of both countries and

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>global population, and so a lot of countries are willing

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk to Puttin, and some of them are even

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Natal members, like Turkey. You know, there's in't yet, There's China,

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>there's Indonesia, there's Vietnam, there's African nations that have not

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>done anything to support this Western effort to isolate Russia.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So like reintegration, I don't think Putting in his group

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of chronies feels there's a need to reintegrate into anything Western,

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe except maybe some supply change. Yeah, it's a very

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Western view of things to pose the question that way.

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess you do have to wonder, though, how this ends.

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you see protracted war? Do you see Vladimir Putin

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 1>trying to declare some kind of victory. At some point

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>does he run out of resources? Well, the plan is

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>changing every couple of weeks. The most recent plan was

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>apparently to try to integrate the captured Ukrainian territories directly

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>into Russia by holding these fake referendums in which they

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>would vote quote unquote to during Russia. And the putitive

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.679
<v Speaker 1>date for these referendums was supposed to be September eleventh,

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>when a bunch of regional elections are going to be

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>held in Russia. But it doesn't look like there's going

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to be much to integrate by September eleven, because the

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>invasion has kind of stalled, and that has been really

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>very little movement of the front line in the last

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>five six weeks. And so if that plan still exists,

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it's getting delayed. But obviously, because the military part of

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this so called special operation is obviously going deadly and

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>not going to plan for the Kremlin, they need a

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>scheme and invent ways in which they can declare victory.

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they've come up with even a relatively

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>credible plan yet for what to do in a situation

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>where they can no longer advance and where the Ukrainians

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>could have the initiative if they had the sheer combat

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>power to go on a counter offensive. So right now

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like anyone has the initiative. Neither side

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is strong enough to push the other, and so in

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this stalemate situation you need some extraordinary slate of hand

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 1>to declare victory. Is that how you see it ending?

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Or do you see some kind of third party mediating

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to find some kind of truth? I mean, in that situation,

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Putin couldn't say denazified Ukraine or taken Ukraine back into

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the arms of the Russian territories. But will it come

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to that. I don't think I negotiated solution is possible

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>in any foreseeable future, mainly because the Ukrainians don't feel

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they can negotiate while putting holds of their territory almost

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if I were them, I wouldn't negotiate

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>even And they clearly see that Russia's ability to win

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>more territory is limited and that Russia doesn't really have

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the troops that it needs to advance. So the Ukrainians,

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>they're hoping that they're going to mobilize more reserves that

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>they're going to train them, going to get more weapons

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>from the West, and perhaps sees the initiative and fight

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>successfully through the fall. So in that sense, obviously, for Putting,

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's too early to seek a negotiated solution too, because

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>he appears to have hopes for further advancement. So I

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's going to be any sort of deal

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>when anyone is capable of mediating between these two parties.

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So this conflict is going to be resolved militarily one

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>way or the other. Speaking of which, the idea of

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>conscription will have to come up at some point if

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Putin keeps losing troops or if Putin wants to escalate

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this again somehow. Is there any appetite for conscription in Russia?

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Would it be a successful drive? Well, yes, you're right,

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>conscription would need to come up. And like the Russian nationalists,

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the ultra nationalists who are the only enthusiastic supporters of

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the war in Russia, have been saying since the first

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>days that to win this war, Russia would need to mobilize.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And they know what they're talking about because they have

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>been actually fighting Ukrainians for these last eight years, and

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>they know what they're upper gainst. But I don't think

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>there's an appetite for anything like general mobilization or conscription,

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>because if there was appetite for that, we would see

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:11.479
<v Speaker 1>much more active support on the part of the general population,

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>including in big cities, which so far have been spared

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>most of the military losses. The troops that are fighting

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine are mainly drawn from poor rural areas, small towns.

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.719
<v Speaker 1>They're not from Bosco or St. Petersburg or Ekaterinburg or

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>No Sabersk or any of these big cities where it

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>appears it's been extremely hard to find volunteers, even with

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>promises of large amounts of cash. So if a general

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>mobilization or conscription is announced, there's going to be certainly

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>mass draft dodging and probably increased emigration. And then you know,

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you already see even contract troops, professional troops refusing to

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>fight with the kind of equipment they're given and under

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the under the conditions that they're in. So that is

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be even more of a mass phenomenon with

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the draft based army. So Leonard, there is debate raging

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>right now about Russians being granted visas to travel outside Russia.

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously more approximate in Europe, but pressure is building

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>for a Pan EU ban on visas for Russian citizens.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that wise? The first question to ask would be

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is it likely? And I think it isn't because the

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>countries that are advocating wholesale ban on Russian's entering are

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a very specific group that have been either subjugated or

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>colonized or whatever words you want to use by Russia

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in the twentieth century, and so obviously what Russia has

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>done in Ukraine fits too close to home for these

0:13:55.440 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>particular countries, the Baltics, Poland, the Czech Republic, Finland, and

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>their reaction is perfectly understandable. They don't really want to

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>see any Russians, especially Prussian holiday makers, while Russia is

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>waging this war in Ukraine. The rest of Europe, which

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>does not have this kind of tragic past, doesn't really

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have those unhealed wounds inflicted by Russia and Russians, some

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of which actually all Russia at that, like Germany Germans.

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Many of them are still grateful for the Soviet unions

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>or Russia's part in freeing them from the Nazis. So

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it's unlikely that you'll see Germany or France or Italy

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>or for that matter of Hungary, and you know, voting

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for a blanket with the band for Russians. Well, and

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of course it's important to have descent outside of Russia

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>as well, to have voices free to express disagreement with

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>what the president Vladimir Putin is doing. How easy is

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it to get out of Russia if you're so inclined

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, Well, that is sort of the other half

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of the equation. I'd rather think we Russians, whether we

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>are in Europe or in Russia or elsewhere, should not

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>really be making as much noise about this whole visiband

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>situation as we have been. It is extremely easy to

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>get out of Russia if you're not trying to go

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to any of the group of countries that expressly do

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>not want us. There's dozens of countries in the world

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that allow Russians visit free entry, all of Latin America,

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Asian nations, a bunch of countries, and

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Russia's immediate neighborhood former Soviet republics Kazakhstan, a media Georgia.

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>There's even European country Serbia, that allows visit free entry

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to Russians. There's plenty of places you can go even

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have all that much money for like travel.

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>If you want to fly to any destination within the

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you you're going to have to take a very circuitous

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>route because Russian planes have been banned from the U.

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But there are countries much closer where you don't have

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to go around the entire U air space and spend

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dollars on a twelve or fifteen hour journey.

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>There are places that are within to three hours flight

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that will take you if you need to run. The

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>other point is that people may not be willing to

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>go without their belongings, or may not be able to

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>go without their belongings, and also may not want to

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>leave home. Do we have any idea of how many

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>people are in Russia that know what's going on and

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that are staying in Russia but are very against the situation. Well,

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd say most Russians know what's going on, and I

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>doubt that the majority really supports the war to the

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>extent that they're willing to do anything in its support,

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>whether to go fight or to give up money, or

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to go out and demonstrate and support of the so

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>called special military operation. Active support, I would guess is

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a tiny timing minority is capable of active support. And

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>so the reason Russians are seeing kind of passively supporting

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Busin is because Russia is a fascist dictatorship and people

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>are scared to speak out and to protest against what

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Putting is doing. It's very natural. A lot of people

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>are afraid for their families and you know, their property,

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>their lives, their safety, so they look like they support

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it without actually doing anything active to help Putin's war.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Leon and Brishitski in Berlin. European natural gas futures have

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>been skyrocketing with no respite in sight now, as European

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>authorities warn of a possible total shutdown of Russia supplies.

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I spoke with Bloomer Opinions and ask foot for a view.

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.479
<v Speaker 1>From Berlin. Storage is at a fill level of two

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks ahead of schedule. But what does that fact signal

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>about Germany's energy capacity at this point? The first of all, money,

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it shows you quite little. At the moment. What's happened

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is that Russia, Vladimir Putin has throttled the gas flowing

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>through the main pipeline from Russia to Germany, which is

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>called North Stream one to bout of its normal capacity

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>at this stage. And you know, there's gas coming from

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>other places like Norway and stuff, and they're trying to

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>organize liquid natural gas to replace what's missing from Russia.

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But they're going to have this problem, and so what

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>they're trying now is to use whatever they have to

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 1>fill those storage tanks that you mentioned to be ready

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>for whatever Vladimir Putin does next. Okay, so Vladimir Putin

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>plays along, then Germany and other countries like Austria will

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>be fine. If not, it'll get really tight. And Germany

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is just now in the middle of a debate on

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>how to pass on those higher costs to consumers and

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>how to compensate poor people for that and stuff. And

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this is of course a dependency the situation that the

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Germans almost deliberately naively got themselves into over the course

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of about twenty years. And we'll speak more about that,

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>but first, if stories got would that be enough to

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>get Germany through the winter, I think is more of

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a notional amount. I think that that's never happened before.

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I think. But they're ahead of target right now, and

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>even ahead of where they would be at this time

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of year in other years. So that's not the problem.

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's supposed to help while the normal gas

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>flows continue. So if they use just what's in the

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>st orange, they could get through three months, which isn't great.

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Now the government has asked people to reduce energy consumption,

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>by it's not a mandate. I was speaking with Liam

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Denning on this and he was pointing out that it

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>almost needs to be war rhetoric. It almost needs to

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>be a mandate that people reduce their energy consumption. Will

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>people comply? Well? The actually comes from the European Union,

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>probably at the behest of Germany, because Germany wanted all

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>European EU countries to save, and countries like Spain in

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>particular that hang on, what does that have to do

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>with us. You made the wrong decisions with pipelines in

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the past, We made the right decisions with l n

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>G in the past. If we save gas, we can't

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>even pipe it to Germany. There's no point in US

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>taking shorter showers. So there was a big debate within

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Europe and in Germany. We need to declare essentially a

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>war economy, and I think it will come down to rationally.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>That would be the third of three steps. Were in

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>step two right now of an emergency plan that the

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Economics and Energy Minister named Robert Hobbeck could invoke. Okay,

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>so it may come to that, But the savings is

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>mainly going to fall on industry, the big chemical plans

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>like B A, SF and and they're in preparations to

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>save as much as they can. And then consumers will also,

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, and you'll hear a lot of talk about

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>taking shorter showers, shorter showers with cold or water, you know,

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>do that anyway? That right now is that we're in

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a eaight wave. People are diving in

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>their lakes. Actually the summer atmosphere as a sunk in

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>yet really you know so, and a lot then depends

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>on how bitter and cold the winter gets. By the way,

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people and that includes me. I rent

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>my home. I don't even know. I have a utility

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that warms our home, but I don't even know if

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>gas is part of it. And it felt paid this

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>new levee or not. A lot of people don't know.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Some people do, of course. Fascinating. The other thing that

0:21:57.720 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I noticed this week is that Germany wants in Dutch

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>as the Netherlands has plenty. As you point out in

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>one of your columns, Europe's largest gas field is in

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>growing in. But there's a simple matter of earthquakes which

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>happened when the Netherlands tries to get the gas out

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of the gas field. Is that an option at all?

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Is is the Netherlands considering it. I moved here from California,

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>so I know earthquakes, and these are smaller earthquakes. These

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>are there's no fault line. But if you pump these

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>chemicals underground, then you fracture rock and you cause smaller earthquakes.

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's been going on for many, many years, and

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>therefore the Dutch have decided. There has been a long

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>campaign to exit the production of that gas field. They

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>were hoping to phase that out this year, just as

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the Germans who are hoping to phase out nuclear power

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this year and then later to phase out coal power.

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>And so the Germans are now asking the Dutch to

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>please not phase that out, but pump it and send

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it over. And there's a couple of technical problems. The

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>quality of the gas is different than what the grid

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is ready for in Germany. But that's what they want,

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, and the Dutch is saying, well, okay, we've

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>got this gas field. You're right, but you guys next door,

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you're hyperventilating. The Germans are famous for this about phasing

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>out your nuclear power plans, and why don't you do

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that first or at the same time, at least so

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we can explain to our motors who are upset about

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>earthquakes that we have to do this to show solidarity

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>with you. But it's hard to do that if you insist,

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>unlike other Europeans, to shut off the last three nuclear

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>power plants in your electricity grid this year, by the

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>end of this year. Right, So this problem is producing

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of neighbor league problems as well, sort

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of not in my backyard and why me and not you?

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And so on. You mentioned nuclear you the great column

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>recently on nuclear as well. Germany is trying to exit

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>at three times, as trying a fourth time now, but

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's still accounts for twelve percent of electricity at least

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>last year. How strong is the argument for not exiting

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a moment, even though obviously nuclear is a huge flash point,

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the argument for not exiting it is very good. And

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>always has been. The French get most of their electricity

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>from nuclear and want to invest more in it. Cutting

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>edge countries like Finland they used everything. You're renewables, of course,

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>but for them nuclear is always part of the mix

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>because you want a resilient grid and you want new

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>nuclear technology that is safe, and they also found ways

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to deal with nuclear waste. So the arguments are very good.

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>They've never got a fair hearing in Germany because Germany, interestingly,

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>also Costria next door and Luxembourg very similar cultures culturally

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and psychologically. For an entire generation, they've been on a

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>rampage against nuclear power, and in particular one party, the

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Green Party, came out of the counterculture but also out

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of these marches and demonstrations in the seventies eighties, and

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>they're in power. They're one of the three parties in

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the coalition. For them, been a long religious war. I

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>mean they've switched off almost twenty already and it's about

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>three are remaining. Can you stretch that a little bit

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>into next spring or summer, because every little bit helps.

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to put up a good fight

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and then probably end up doing that because that's easy

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to do. The bigger debate is why don't we rethink

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole exit, Why don't we keep them running permanently?

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we restart old ones? Why don't we build new,

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>better ones in future? Because we have this problem that

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we're no longer going to get gas from Russia, you know,

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and I mean the Germans have been saying they're notorious

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>for this. No to everything, no to fracking, no to coal,

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>no to nuclear, no to you know, they're saying no

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to everything. I mean, the attentions are good, but you know,

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the reality of it is different. The intentions are a

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of NIMBYism to locally Germans even saying no to

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>win mills, you know, turbines if it happens to be

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>near their house, you know, so you can't just say no.

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>The irony that has finally sunk in is that they're

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>now starting coal fired electricity plans to make up the shortfall,

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and that of course is for the climate the worst.

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.959
<v Speaker 1>Nuclear has disadvantages, but it admits no carbon dioxide and

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>coal is the dirtiest. Well, they're not going to just

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>put up wind turbines and deal with Vladimir Putin and

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>climate change that way. Well, and as you've pointed out,

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>even keeping the nuclear reactor is going would probably save

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>only about four percent of the country's overall gas consumption,

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>so on its own it wouldn't be that much of

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>a help anyway. Plus, younger generations perhaps don't appreciate the

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 1>terror of the nuclear era and what it means to

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>people to have nuclear in their country. I don't know.

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think what's interesting culturally is that the Germans are

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 1>so much more scared about nuclear technology and radiationally than

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>anybody else in the world. The last exit after several

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>U turns, was after Fukushima, and even the Japanese have

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:10.959
<v Speaker 1>not fully exited nuclear technology. You have a little bizarre's

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>twist in the Ukraine War, which is the background of

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>our whole conversation money, which is that one of the

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>big risks is about Europe's largest nuclear power plant, which

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the Russians have taken, which Ukrainian engineers are still running,

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and where they're shooting at each other and we're all

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to get into it to make sure that it's safe.

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Another Chernobyl this debate, we might have to have another podcast,

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you and I because the psychology could change again. It's

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>hard to postulate with counterfactuals. But what would Angel America

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>have done? What must you be thinking at us? We

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know. She's given one interview since she left office

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 1>in December, and that didn't satisfy me. I've often been

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a fan. I generally like her. She's intelligent, she's the

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>opposite of vain and all that. But her legacy is

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>being re examined and will I think start look worse

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 1>worse because she's not to blame. She oversaw country and

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>coalitions of people who agreed on these big errors. The

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest error was the wrong policy toward Russia and Putin.

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>First of all, Okay, all of Germany's eastern partners in

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the European Union, which should be its closest partners, Stonia, Latville, Lithuania, Poland,

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>they've all been saying all these years, don't build these pipelines.

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Don't put so much faith in Vladimir Putin. He's dangerous.

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 1>And Germany said, no, no, no, you're wrong, We're going

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to do this, and they deliberately made dependency almost a policy. Okay,

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that was not her doing. It was more of the

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Social Democrats and they're in power now, but they were

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>her junior partners. But she went along with that, and

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in that interview that I mentioned, she claimed that she

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>knew all along how dangerous Putin was. So then the

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>question is why didn't you explain that to Germans earlier

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Boomberg Opinions and I asclude that does it for this week.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Do get in touch though. I'm at Vonnie Quinn on

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or email v Quinn at Bloomberg dot net. We're

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>produced by Eric mollow Till next time on Bloomberg Opinion.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>H