WEBVTT - CZM Rewind: The Tech Industry is a Failure

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Robert Evans here, and you know this is

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you're hearing this because this is running during the week

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that everyone in Gooul Zone media takes off. And here's

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing. We don't technically have to work during a

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>week for you to get new episodes of stuff. But

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>if we just take a week off and then we

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>put out new episodes that week, we have to catch

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>up at some point, right, like we like, at some

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>point those episodes and extra episodes have to continue being made.

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're just actually taking this week off. We're not

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>going to do anything. We've done this before. This is

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>not a new thing for us. There'll be so no

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>new episode of Bastards or hood Politics or could happen

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>here this week. Well, we will be doing as We've

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>asked everyone on the team to pick their old episodes

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of the show that they like and wanted to rehighlight

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to people. So we will be dropping, you know, old

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>episodes with kind of you know, this little bit of

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>commentary at the start this week. If you think everything's

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a rerun, that's because it is. We're in reruns this week, folks.

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You remember those If you're not not like an old

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>piece of shit like me. Maybe you don't remember the

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>world in which you know reruns. We're a thing, It's

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the thing they used to do on TV because of

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the same basic reasons. People needing, needing a break, but

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>something something needing to go out to fill the gaping

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>maw of content that is the Internet. It's eternal hunger,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the great devour that is that is our collective consciousness

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.919
<v Speaker 1>as a species. So anyway, here's an episode I wrote

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>last year about the tech industry and why it is

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally a failure despite what would seem to be numerous accomplishments.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>So check that out and then, I don't know, maybe

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>go watch the show Halt and Catch Fire. That'll be

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that'll be a good time for you. Here it is. Hey, everybody,

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Robert Evans here and welcome to It could happen here.

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You know. When we started the show, when I did

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the first season of it, you know, the one about

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>all the civil wars back in twenty nineteen, this was

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>basically a place for me to write long essays explaining

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 1>my vision of the future and the present, and people

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>seem to like that a lot. We did a little

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of that at the start of this new Eternal

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>daily season of the show, but obviously over the last

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>year or so, it's morphed into something very different and

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>something wonderful and successful, and that's brought a lot of

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>new voices, or at least voices people maybe hadn't heard

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>from as much out in front of the audience, and

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been really happy about that. But what I also

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't been doing is writing any more essays about the

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>world and how fucked up shit is, because you know,

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been managing a bunch of stuff and there's been

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work to do. But I like doing

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, and I think you people like it, So

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to try to do more of that. And

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to kind of start by talking a little

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>bit about Silicon Valley, and I'm going to say something

0:02:58.400 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>at the start of this essay that a lot of

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>people are probably instinctively going to want to disagree with,

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>which is that Silicon Valley and the tech industry have

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>been gigantic failures by every metric that matters. They have

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>made life comprehensively worse for humanity, and there is no

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>real fact based counter argument to that statement. This is

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a hard pill for people to swallow. I'm sure, a

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks are frustrated in me for saying it

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>right now and are thinking of counter arguments. Most people

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>today are critical of the tech industry, obviously, particularly major

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>social media companies, but they still tend to acknowledge the

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>tremendous wealth created by Silicon Valley, as if there's some

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of inherent value to that behind a number on

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a spreadsheet. Collectively, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, and Google, the

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>so called Big Five had a seven point five trillion

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar market cap in twenty twenty. Every person listening to

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>this keeps a device in their pocket made by or

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>using the software of one or more of these companies,

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>And so when people want to make the counter argument

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to what I just said, they'll tend to point out

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>some version of this. Yeah, companies like Facebook have done

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>bad things, but the Internet still a tool for good.

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>It connects people, YadA, YadA YadA. Smartphones empower us. You know,

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>there's all these positive things about the internet, to which

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I will say, present me with your fucking evidence that

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that has mattered for people really in terms that actually

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>inaggregate improve their lives. I will show you my arguments

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to the contrary. In the period of time from Harry

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Truman's election to the end of the Nixon administration, American

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>productivity on a per capita basis increased at a faster

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>rate than it did at any other point in history.

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>But then something happened. From nineteen seventy three to twenty thirteen,

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>income growth was eighty percent slower than it had been

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in the previous three decades. If productivity had continued to

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>grow at the same rate from nineteen seventy three to

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen as it did from nineteen forty six to

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy three, the economy in twenty thirteen would have

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>been sixty percent larger than it actually was. Now. I'm

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna guess a decent number of the people listening to

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>this grew up watching The Jetsons. I know I did,

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and for the most part it was a silly, pretty

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>harmless animated show. But at the center of it was

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a dream about the future that seems unfathomable in light

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of current events. George Jetson, who is in the show

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty normal working class guy, worked three hours a

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>day for three days a week. One of the running

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>jokes in the show is that he considered himself overworked

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>despite this pretty idyllic schedule. Now, this was never particularly

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>a focus of the show. It was just kind of

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>something that was mentioned from time to time. And that's

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>because the idea that a workweek might just be nine

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>hours in the future wasn't a joke. This was the

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>direction futurists in the nineteen sixties, looking at that surge

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in productivity I just mentioned, and all of the middle

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>class wealth that had been created from the forties through

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the early sixties, this is the direction they saw as

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>heading in Around a decade ago, in a period that

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was still significantly more optimistic than our current age. The Atlantics,

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Alexis Madrigal went on a reading spree of some early

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century futurist novels. His conclusion was this quote. Technological

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>optimists sold the world on automation by telling people it

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>would create unimaginable amounts of leisure for them. The big

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>question for the workers of the twenty first century would

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>be how to spend their copious amounts of free time. Now,

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the future we've actually gotten has given us the opposite

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of this stream to try and cover up the rank

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and rampant ways modern technology has failed humanity. Think tanks

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>funded by venture capitalists and tech gurus produce an endless

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>stream of identical futurist thinker types who write columns about

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>how the world is actually better today than it's ever been.

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>A good example of this would be this June twenty

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty Forbes column by Rob Asgar titled the World's getting better.

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>Here's why your brain can't believe it. It opens with

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>this paragraph, Life has improved for most people around the

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>world over the past generation temporary pandemics aside. The rub

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>is that you can't get anyone to believe the good news,

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and the result is a toxic political environment and the

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>potential collapse of timocratic norms if too few people feel

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that a stressed system is worth saving. Now, I might

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>point out, for example, that if people don't actually feel

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>like the system's good, perhaps it's not really working well.

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a number of counter arguments you can make to this. Now.

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Two years later, this again was written in June of

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, we've got a massive war in Europe. People

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are worried about nuclear warfare. As a result of that, Again,

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we've got a degradation of democracy worldwide that's continued to

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>pace from where it was in twenty twenty. We've got

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>soaring inequality, we've got inflation the likes of which a

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people alive have never seen, myself included prior

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to this point, and we still have a pandemic. So

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that Rob is at least not as smart

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>as he thinks he is, which is what I would

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>say about everyone who makes versions of the same claim

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that he was making. Now, this doesn't mean I'm saying

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that life is worse now than it was at some

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>imagined prelapsarian version of the past. I actually think that's

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a useless way to think about the past

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and the future. There's different things people would have preferred.

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>There's things that are objectively better, there's things that are

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>objectively and debatably worse. You know that it's hard to

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>make those kind of claims about history, especially when they

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>often rely on saying, well, x amount more people have

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>been pulled out of poverty, and the question to that is, well,

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Before colonization of Africa, would you say

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>all of those people in what became the colonized parts

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of Africa were in poverty or were they simply not

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>part of a system that measures poverty and anyway whatever.

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>We can go on and on about that. My point

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is that the metrics these people use to claim the

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>success of our current system to talk about how wonderful

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>things are today are constantly shifting, and they're widely arbitrary.

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>The same year Rob wrote his stupid column, a NRC

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>study showed that Americans self reported being happy at the

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>lowest levels in fifty years. You can quote juke statistics

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>about wealthare access to luxury goods all you want. But

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the modern world, in the post two thousand and eight

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>financial crash economy, all of which was built in the

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>shade of the tech industry, is making people miserable now.

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Happiness is obviously not a perfect measure of progress either.

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Self reporting always dicey, but things like the consumer price

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>index and per capita income, which are often used by

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>folks on the optimist side, are also juked and jiggered

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to hell and back. So to provide a bit more

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>of an international scale, I'm going to quote from the

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Berkeley University's Greater Good magazine quote release annually on the

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>International Day of Happiness. The World Happiness Report ranks countries

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>based on their life satisfaction. In the Gallop World Poll,

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.719
<v Speaker 1>residents rate how satisfied they are with their lives in

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a scale of zero to ten, from the worst possible

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>life to the best possible life. This year's report also

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>analyzes how global happiness has changed over time, based on

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>data stretching back to two thousand and five. One trend

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is very clear. Negative feelings, worries, sadness, and anger have

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>been rising around the world, up by twenty seven percent

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>from twenty ten to twenty eighteen. The authors also found

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>troubling trends and happiness in equality, which is the psychological

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>parallel to income inequality, how much individuals in society differ

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in how satisfied they are with life. Since two thousand

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and seven, happiness inequality has been rising within countries, meaning

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that the gap between the unhappy and the happy has

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 1>been getting wider. This trend is particularly strong in Latin America,

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Asia and Sub Saharan Africa. And this is kind of

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>getting it. I think, what is an incredibly important point,

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, if you want to look at how

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>people have self reported their unhappiness rising, This massive recent

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>surge and unhappiness occurs almost at exactly the period of

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>time that the smartphone takes off and becomes ubiquitous. And

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone is such a bafflingly useful device, I would

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>never want to give mine up as a thing that

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I had access to. And the Internet is an incredibly

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>powerful tool. I wouldn't want to give the Internet up either.

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But the usefulness and the undoubtable brilliance behind these products

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 1>makes it seem inconceivable to argue that they haven't made

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>us better at accomplishing the things that matter to us.

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But the evidence on this is pretty clear. I want

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to quote now from a write up in The Atlantic.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>No matter how aggressively you torture the numbers, the computer

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>age has coincided with a decline in the rate of

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>economic growth. When Chad Siverson, an economist at the University

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago's Business School, looked at the question of missing growth,

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he found that the productivity slowdown has reduced GDP by

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>two point seven trillion dollars since two thousand four. Americans

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>may love their smartphones, but all those free apps aren't

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>worth trillions of dollars. The physical world of the city,

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the glow of electric powered lights, the rumble of automobiles,

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the roar of airplanes overhead on subways below is a

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>product of late nineteenth century and early twentieth century invention.

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>The physical environment feels depressingly finished. The bulk of innovation

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>has been shunted into the invisible realm of bytes and code.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>All of that code, technology advocates argue, has increased human

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>ingenuity by allowing individuals to tinker, talk, and trade with

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented ease. This certainly feels true. Who could dispute the

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's easier than ever to record music, market

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a video game, or publish an essay. But by most measures,

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>individual innovation is in decline. In twenty fifteen, Americans were

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>far less likely to start a company than they were

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen eighties. According to the economist Tyler Coha,

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the spread of broadband technology has corresponded with a drop

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>off and entrepreneurial activity in almost every city and in

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>almost every industry. Now you might think from all this

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that I'm mount ahead into some sort of technodoomer, anti

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>siev primitivist rant. Here I'm not. Perhaps I should, but

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I am a person who loves technology. I

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>got my start as a journalist as a tech journalist.

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I've joyously traveled the world for years visiting conventions looking

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>at new gadgets, and a lot of this was in

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that pretty wondrous period if you're a gadget nerd from

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight to twenty eleven, where there were

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>there's these amazing, new, weird sci fi gadgets dropping every

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>single week, stuff that you'd grown up watching in like

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek the next generation suddenly getting mailed to your

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>door for you to test out. I tested hundreds of

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>tablets and smart gadgets in that timeframe, and there's some

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 1>really great products that came out from that period. Bluetooth

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>speakers are wonderful. Lot of people, including me, use them

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>happily on a daily basis. But when it comes to

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>legitimately life changing applications of technology that's come to us

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in the last fifteen years or so, I can really

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>only think of three things. Number one is the ability

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to navigate by GPS basically everywhere. Number two is the

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>ability to be in constant contact with people around the world.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And number three is the ability to store a shitload

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of media on a portable device. So I'm not anti technology,

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>nor am I saying that big tech doesn't make things

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that are cool or useful. Nor am I saying we

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>should get rid of this stuff. The point I'm making

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is that viewed at thirty thousand feet, the tech industry

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>has produced very little of quantifiable value to the human race,

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and it has caused unfathomable harm at the same time. Now,

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, this has nothing, or at least fairly

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>little to do with how the technology inherently works, and

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>instead has everything to do with the ideology behind the

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>people who developed and who continue to marshal that technology.

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen ninety five, two of the smartest guys in

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century by my estimation, Richard Barbrook and Andy Cameron,

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>wrote an essay about the ideology that animated the men

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>who had come to dominate the twenty first century tech industry.

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>They titled their essay the Californian Ideology, and I think

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it still counts as one of the three or four

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>most incisive accurate essays of that century. The gist of

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea was that as the first wave of the

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>digital boom started to hit in the mid nineteen nineties,

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the thinkers behind it were fueled by a mix of

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>left wing by a mix of left wing egalitarian, often

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>anti statist beliefs that got wetted to right wing free

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>market fundamentalist libertarian ideology and created this deeply toxic way

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about the future. You can see this in

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the story of guys like Steve Wozniak, the inventor of

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the personal computer, who was also a former phone freaker.

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>He committed federal crimes as a kid, hacking the phone

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>system primarily because fuck the man. But then when he's

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a young man, the Waws hooks up with a guy

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>named Steve Job, and Jobs is a brilliant but heartless

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>con man who cares about nothing but market dominance. Jobs

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>recognizes the naive brilliance of Steve Wosniak, and he turns

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it into an engine for wealth creation. At one point,

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>he steals money that Wosniak was owed for a project

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that they took on together, money Wosniak probably would have

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>just given him if he'd asked, and he used it

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>secretly to fund their business, which became Apple. In their essay,

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Cameron and Barbara, who are much better writers than I,

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>described the Californian ideology this way. The Californian ideology is

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a mix of cybernetics, free market economics, and counterculture libertarianism,

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and is promulgated by magazines such as Wired and Mondo

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and preached in the books of Stuart Brand,

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Kelly, and others. The new faith has been embraced

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.479
<v Speaker 1>by computer nerds, slacker students, thirty sethter capitalists, hip academics,

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>futurist bureaucrats, and even by the President of the USA himself. Now,

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry as we know it got its start

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>courtesy of government money. Everyone knows that the first version

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet was developed as part of a Defense

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Department project, But the entire computer industry, all of the

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>coders and engineers who would form the first generation of

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Sillincon Valley profit engines, all these guys got their start

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>working for or as defense contractors. When the US pulled

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>out of Vietnam, thousands of these people were left out

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of jobs and they were forced to move into the

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>private sector. Everything worthwhile that's come out of big tech

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>has involved a titanic amount of public funding one way

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>or the other. I'm going to quote from that essay again.

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Almost every major technological advance of the last two hundred

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>years has taken place with the aid of large amounts

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of public money and under a good deal of government influence.

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>The technologies of the computer in the net were invented

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>with the aid of massive state subsidies. For example, the

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>first difference Engine project received a British government grant of

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and seventeen four hundred and seventy pounds a

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>small fortune in eighteen thirty four. From Colossus to ed VAC,

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>from flight simulators to virtual reality, the development of computing

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>has depended at key moments on public research handouts or

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>fat contracts with public agencies. The IBM Corporation the first

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>programmable digital computer only after it was requested to do

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>so by the US Defense Department during the Korean War.

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>The result of a lack of state intervention meant that

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Nazi Germany lost the opportunity to build the first electronic

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>computer in the late thirties, when the Wehrmacht refused to

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>fund Conrad Zus, who had pioneered the use of binary code,

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>stored programs, and electronic logic gates. One of the weirdest

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>things about the Californian ideology is that the West Coast

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>itself was a product of massive state intervention. Government dollars

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>were used to build the irrigation systems, highways, schools, universities,

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and other infrastructural projects which make the good life possible.

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>On top of these public subsidies, the West Coast high

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>tech industrial complex has been feasting off the fattest pork

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>barrel in history. For decades, the US government has poured

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>billions of tax dollars into buying planes, missiles, electronics, and

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>nuclear bombs from Californian companies. Americans have always had state planning,

0:17:51.000 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>but they prefer to call it the defense budget. Now

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>this state of affairs is more or less unchanged today.

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is probably the most celebrated modern tech visionary.

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Miss Sundry companies have taken nearly five billion dollars in

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>public funding, subsidies, and government support since twenty fifteen. All

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.959
<v Speaker 1>of these libertarian visionaries who push in their political lives

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>for a world of Los afaire economics and corporate sovereignty,

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>only produce value with the help of tax payer dollars. Period.

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>The irrational exuberance of public financing and the narcissism to

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>ignore its role in innovation has given us a generation

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of tech industry overlords who seem bound and determined to

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>destroy their own creations. Steve Jobs represented the most successful,

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and probably the most intelligent manifestation of the Californian ideology.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Every tech industry ghoul currently boiling away fortunes for the

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sake of their ego. I'm thinking of Zuckerberg and Musk

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>most prominently right now is trying to be him. Steve's

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>skill was being able to perfectly inhabit the form of

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a visionary, and he was so good at doing this

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that he convinced this generation they could follow in his footsteps.

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But Steve Jobs was only ever playing at being a creator,

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>at being an inventor. His skill was not in making things.

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>He had other people to do the making. Steve was

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 1>an exceptional confidence man, and like all good confidence men,

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>he was able to make money because he understood on

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>a deep level what other human beings wanted. This skill

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>allowed him to lock Apple into spending hundreds of millions

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of dollars on R and D for what would become

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the first proper smartphone, and for a while he was

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>just having them toss that money into an apparent chasm

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly turning back iterations of the product that weren't quite

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 1>right on the strength of his belief that when they

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>got it right, it would be worth it. In the

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>years sense, we've seen many wanna be Steve's try to

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>follow in his footsteps, igniting tens of billions of dollars

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of venture capital for absolutely nothing. One of the best

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>examples would be Uber. They lost eight point five billion

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>dollars in twenty nineteen six point eight billion dollars in

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. Once upon a time, the understanding the jobs

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and vision of what Uber could be was that all

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of this ignited VC cash would be worthwhile because eventually

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the company would succeed in replacing human drivers with autonomous cars,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 1>cutting out the primary cost in the entire professional driving industry,

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and making the potential for a shitload of profit. But

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>after investing more than a billion dollars in self driving cars,

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Uber sold their entire autonomous vehicle division off at a loss.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>All of that expense had resulted in self driving cars

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that averaged one half mile traveled per accident. Despite this,

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>after a two point six billion dollar loss in August

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty two, Uber stocks swared now, the realities

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of what generates profit and loss in the tech industry

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.360
<v Speaker 1>have been completely divorced from productive reality or value created

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time. The delamination of real value in

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>big tech happens subtly. It's not howard to see ey Apple,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 1>who created a device every human being wanted to have

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in their pocket, became worth a shitload more money, right,

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious. The value case for Google's core business search

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>is also pretty obvious. And as much as I hate Facebook,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it became initially successful because it provided people with something

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of real value, a way to stay in touch with

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>human beings they had met over the course of their lives.

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Younger folks may find this odd because they've grown up

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Internet, but as a kid, I can remember

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>very vividly my parents talking about the friends they'd had

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in high school and in college, and how a lifetime

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of moving regularly had severed many of the connections they'd

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>valued with these people. When I joined Facebook and my

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>freshman year of college, I found real value and the

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>ability to maintain and sometimes even build stronger connections with

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>people I would otherwise have lost touch with Entirely. There

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is the core of something good or something at least

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>valued inherently by people in Facebook, and that's true with most,

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>if not all, of the Big five companies. When people

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>reflexively leaped to defend the ten industry is an engine

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of innovation. They can point to these successes, But the

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>point that I'm making isn't that no good ideas come

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>out of Silicon Valley, or that there isn't anything valuable

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that is involved in what these companies do. It's that

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the endless quest for profit and the narcissism of this

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Californian ideology lead inevitably to the destruction of whatever value

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the industry creates. This is why none of these innovations

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>have actually led to surges in productivity, why none of

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>them have made us any happier, which I think might

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>be more important. Any potential these creations had was smothered

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>by the ideology that drives Silicon Valley money. Facebook took

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the connections that they'd made with people and used them

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to feed those same people rage bait. They destroyed the

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>open Internet, shuttered countless local news sites, put tons of

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>people out of business, while algorithmically pushing millions of folks

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>around the world towards whatever kept them angriest and most

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>online Google spent billions on an endless stream of spinoff

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>products like Google Plus and Google Glass, which were nearly

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>all catastrophic failures, at least on a financial sense, and

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>all the while they gradually turned the search results they'd

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>prided themselves on into a sponsored ad feed. Google is

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>less useful now than it was a couple of years ago.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You'll notice this immediately if you just get on there

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and start asking it questions. Elon Musk has taken the

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>visionary technology that underpins the Tesla, all created by other people,

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and used the clout from that to shatter any chance

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of California developing a high speed rail system. By the way,

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in June of twenty twenty two, Tesla stock value plunged

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>seventy five billion dollars, which is substantially more money than

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the company has ever actually made. Elucidating the full scale

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>of the failure of Silicon Valley an American techno optimism

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>would take more time than I'm able to spend right now,

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>So instead, I want to talk about the idea that's

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>behind so much of the recent big failures that we've

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>seen from big tech stuff like meta pissing away ten

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars half the budget of NASA in a year

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to create a worse version of vr chat. The idea

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>is called blitz scaling, and it basically means attempting to

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>achieve massive scale at breakneck speed. You take big risks

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and you spend huge amounts of money very quickly to

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>try and force apps or other products onto the market

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>that are then adopted rapidly by huge numbers of people.

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>This brings in a shitload of VC money and is

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>a way that you can make a fortune. In the

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>years since Jobs brought the first iPhone out on stage,

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this has become the dominant model of Silicon Valley entrepreneurship.

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is looking for the next iPhone, right, something that

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>can take over an industry, something that can take over

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the world that rapidly, that can change human life almost overnight.

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>In funding Calls, Mark Zuckerberg says this. In Funding Calls,

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg says this very directly, comparing his company's metaverse

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>dreams to the new smartphone. The thing that Mark misses

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>because his ideology renders it invisible, is that Steve Jobs

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't make people want the iPhone. He was able to

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>figure out what they wanted already, what they had talked

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to about running for decades, starting with tricorders and communicators

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>on Star Trek, and he lashed his dev team until

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>they built the damn thing. Now, the metaverse has some

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>analogs in fiction, including the thing that it gets its

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>name from, but number one, most depictions of the metaverse

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in fiction are not aspirational things people want their dystopian

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>There's no evidence that people actually want this thing that

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>he's igniting a fortune to build, or that they'd spend

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>meaningful periods of time in it if it existed. There's

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of polling on this data, but one

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in seven but one seventeen thousand person survey I found

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>showed less than twenty percent of respondents expressing an interest

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in a metaverse like the Onezuck is trying to build.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>The last time Facebook provided any kind of information about

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>how many people are on Horizon Worlds, which is kind

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of the core of their metaverse efforts, it was somewhere

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>around three hundred thousand people in the most recent quarter.

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>They declined to provide an update to those numbers, which

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 1>suggests the number has not increased, and if you just

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>want to look at what happens when people create a

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>digital product that actually has a strong base of interest.

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Look at how quickly a world of warcraft went from,

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a thing that very few people outside of

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>nerds would have known much about, to a thing that

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was entirely mainstream, millions of users, regular references to it

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on television. You're just not seeing that with any of

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>this metaverse shit, because there's nothing in it that people

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.719
<v Speaker 1>actually want. The sheer hollowness of big tech is starting

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to become financially obvious too. Facebook stock has lost fifty

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of its value in the last year. Amazon

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is down twenty six percent, Google by twenty nine percent,

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and even Apple has fallen by fourteen percent. More to

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the point, I think any honest person has to look

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>at the last fifteen years or so in which these

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>companies have ruled our economic and social lives and ask

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>are we better off now? Over the course of the

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century, productivity and income rose at unprecedented rates. There

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of brutality in this process, right. We talk,

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, on Behind the Basterds regularly about all of

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the horrible labor things that happened in the nineteenth century.

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>It also marked the beginning of the fossil fuel age,

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>which may well kill us all. But while all this

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was going on, another thing that happened is wages for

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the working class doubled in the first half of the

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century, and the second half. Life expectancy rose faster

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>than it ever had before as well, and that continued

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 1>through the first part of the twentieth century. Now, near

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first quarter of the twenty first century,

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing that kind of movement. The United States

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is now ending its second consecutive year of declining life

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>expectancy for the first time in any of our lifetimes,

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and real average wage, adjusted for inflation, has remained flat

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for almost half a century. Progress has flatlined, and nothing

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>about how brilliant the modern tech industry is or how

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>cool some of these gadgets and products are can change

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>those fundamental facts. It's a failure. It could happen here

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>as a production of Zone Media. For more podcasts from

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Cool Zone Media, visit our website Coolzonemedia dot com, or

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to podcasts. You can find sources for

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it could happen here. Updated monthly at Coolzonmedia dot com

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Slash Sources, Thanks for listening.