WEBVTT - Webber on Entrepreneurship in the Energy Transition

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the B and EF podcast. Today we have an interview

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>with a special guest. This was recorded at our B

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and E F New York Summit back in April, so

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we're joined by Michael Weber. He is many things, the

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 1>current Josie Centennial Professor in Energy Resources and Professor of

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. He's

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>authored books on energy and power in addition to multiple

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>op eds for The New York Times. He served as

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the chief Science and Technology Officer at UNGIE in France,

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's the Chief Technology Officer of the investment fund

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Energy Impact Partners, which is backed by the Abu Dhabi

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Investment Authority and Microsoft. BNF's chief editor, Ben Vickers sat

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>down with Michael and together they discussed a range of topics,

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>including how Michael was turned from a hydrogen skeptic to

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a believer, his optimistic views on the energy transition, and

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the art of entrepreneurship. If you like this podcast, make

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>sure to subscribe to receive updates on future episodes, and

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>consider giving us a review on Apple podcas casts or Spotify.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>This episode was recorded at our New York summit, but

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.199
<v Speaker 1>we also have five other summits which take place around

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the world. The one coming up next is Munich, and

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>following that is our summit alongside the B twenty in

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>New Delhi. If you'd like to know more about these summits,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>their agenda, or even see videos from previous summits, visit

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>us at about dot bn EF dot com, Forward Slash Summit,

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>or just click on the link that we've included in

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>this episode description. As a reminder, B and AF does

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not provide investment or strategy advice and are a complete disclaimer.

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Is it the end of the show, and right now

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we get to hear Ben's conversation with Michael Weber.

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us, my pleasure, Thanks for having me.

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Now these sort of podcasts, we're interested in the diversity

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 3>of people's experience as well. You often if you just

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 3>come from the business side, it's all out business. You

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 3>just come from the academic side, it's all that academia.

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 3>But you're an interesting person to talk with because you

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 3>span both of those. But just to give a little

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 3>bit of background energy impact As for those who don't know,

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 3>it's really really large fund actually sixty seven investments in

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 3>the portfolio. Thirty two of those the technology, fourteen in energy,

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>then there are seven in industrials, foreign materials, and foreign

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>communications that's causing according to what we know, So that's

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot of technology thirty two investments. The funds they

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 3>have includes Deep Decalbonization Frontier Fund, which is invested by

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 3>companies such as Duke Energy and First Energy, Call and

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft as well. So an interesting little world of investment.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 3>And then of course it's the academic side as well.

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 3>Now you can buy an education with hands on investing.

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 3>How does that work and in what way is that

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 3>an advantage other than to the students.

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 4>So I'm kind of professor by day and venture capitalist

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 4>by night. So I get to see the corporate world

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 4>where action is taken to solve our energy problems, and

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 4>are also in the world of research and teaching trying

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 4>to create an ecosystem that has a lot of ideas

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 4>that hopefully someday will become investable. These different ideas from

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 4>these students who are innovative and they take the problems

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 4>of climate change and energy security very seriously. So for me,

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 4>it's really fun to be on different aspects. So the

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 4>energy sector from the real world of getting things done

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 4>and then the academic world of thinking about getting things done.

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 4>And it hopefully is useful for the students because it

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 4>shows in different pathways by which we might scale up solutions.

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 4>Some of the students want to become investors, are in

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 4>the investor world, or want to launch own startups and

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 4>seek investment, so maybe it is a pathway to help

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 4>them chase their dreams. And from the investor side, we're

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 4>always looking for the next innovator, the next great entrepreneur,

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 4>the next great team to invest in, the next great technology.

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 4>And so being involved in the world academia, which is

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 4>not just University Texas because I go visit students the

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 4>universities helps us cast the net wider to find those

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.119
<v Speaker 4>great ideas that just need capitalization and then they'll change

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 4>the world. So hopefully everybody benefits from this.

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so a bit of a scout as well, totally.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, scouting for talent, scouting for technologies and teams, scouting

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 4>for ideas from the venture investment side, but then also

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 4>for the students, trying to help them scout for money,

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 4>which might be energy by partners, but there are other

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 4>queen tech funds out there, And this is sort of

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 4>the thing I've realized in a very optimistic way, is

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 4>that there are plenty of good ideas. We've got a

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 4>lot of good ideas out there. It's just a matter

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 4>of capitalizing the right ones, and then the markets will

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 4>take over and we'll all be fine.

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we can talk about how you do that and

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 3>what are the so paramises you're maybe having to apply

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 3>all the criteria using. I love the fact that you

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 3>describe it as fun as well what you do. It's

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 3>very fun.

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 4>I would say there's a lot of reason to have

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 4>doom and gloom around climate change that kind of thing.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 4>But I'm an optimist. I really think we've got this.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 4>I think we're going to solve it. I think we're

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 4>going to solve it more profitably and quickly than people expect.

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 4>I think we'll end up looking kind of seamless when

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 4>we flash forward fifty years and look backwards. I just

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 4>very optimistic. And one of the reason I'm optimistic is

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 4>because I have the honor and privilege of teaching hundreds

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 4>of students a year and they're great, They've got so

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 4>many ideas. And then as an investor, we see the startups.

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 4>They have to present their ideas to us. It's not

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 4>a great idea, so it's hard to come away unenthused

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 4>and in the.

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 2>End is fun. That's interesting.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean that enthusia on the optimism that you get

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 3>from the younger people as well the generations coming in.

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 3>That's good to hear and that's what gives a lot

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 3>of energy to the whole idea of the energy transition.

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 3>But then you've got these legacy systems right, and that

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 3>goes for the investment community as much as the for

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the industrial network. As long as you defer the power

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 3>grade and so on. Isn't the sort of a clash

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 3>there that are we going to be able to change?

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 2>Not the people.

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 3>The people are changing obviously and the mindset is changing,

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 3>but the infrastructure and the industry.

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Resistance we have.

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there are two reasons for optimism and one reason

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 4>for pessimism. So the two reasons for optimism as I'm

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 4>an engineer, and to be an engineer means you have

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>to be a problem solver. To be a problem solver

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 4>means you have to believe the problem can be solved.

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 4>You have to be optimistic to solve a problem. And

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 4>then investors and investors have to be optimistic too. You're

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 4>essentially investing in the future, so you have to be

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 4>optimistic that the future will take you to a profitable

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 4>are prosperous play. So optimism is at the root of

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 4>the venture side of me and the engineer aside of me.

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 4>But the reasons why we might have pessimism.

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Is for what you just said.

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of legacy infrastructure and can we leverage

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 4>it or do we have to replace it? And if

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 4>you look at just a natural gas industry, just natural

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 4>gas pipelines, compressors, tank some power plants in the United States,

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 4>it is something like eight trillion dollars worth of capital investment.

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Maybe it's depreciated like two troyon or something like that,

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 4>but the United States is one fifth of the world's

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 4>natural gas infrastructure, so it's like forty trillion dollars is

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 4>the value of the capital if we had to build

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 4>it tonight for the gas infrastructure around the world, and

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 4>then you had an oil and coal and nuclear other things.

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 4>So clearly there's many tens of triyans or hundreds of

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 4>trillions of dollars of stuff in the ground that we

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 4>built up over the last one hundred and fifty years,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 4>and the question for society and the markets and entrepreneurs

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 4>and finance and policy is do we get to leverage

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 4>what we've already built or do we.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Have to replace it?

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 4>And if we had to replace it, that probably will

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 4>be more expensive than leveraging what we built, at least

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 4>that's my view. And so anytime you can have an

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 4>existing solution or a new solution that leverages existing capabilities

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 4>probably gets to market faster. Dropping fuels for pipelines, or

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 4>hydrogen blends with methane or even using hydrogen to form

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 4>methane that you'll move through the pipes, or fuels that

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 4>have the same compatibilities with the materials you might need,

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 4>or using right of ways for transmission lines or existing

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 4>coal power plant sites for geothermal or small mondu reactors.

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 4>Leveraging is more efficient if you can do it. The

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 4>risk of what I just said, though, is the incumbents

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 4>own it might not be on board with that change,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 4>or I'm pretty happy with the current system, or would

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 4>just rather not do it, or something like that. So

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 4>the inherent legacy mats might slow us down. So if

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 4>we're looking for a reason to be pessimistic. That's one

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 4>that this is different than software. Right, Software, if you

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 4>make a new app, you can scale up and send

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 4>it around the world tomorrow.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 2>It's by hitting send.

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.119
<v Speaker 4>With energy, you've got to do either wires and poles

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 4>or pipes or something. They're still on the ground and

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 4>so that builds in a delay and gives an advantage

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 4>to encompensate.

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so people are optimistic. I suppose the IRA is coming,

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 3>so there's some more money in there. But the sort

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 3>of the volume of capital we're talking about it is

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 3>absolutely massive.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 2>It's big.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and the US government maybe can be a big investor,

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 4>but should be a tenth or fifth of the market

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 4>or something.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:32.239
<v Speaker 2>You really has to be private.

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Markets have to take over and so they can just

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 4>get things nudge, but they can get the ball rolling downhill.

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Then it becomes an avalanche. Right.

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's the okay, exciting thing, and we've seen that

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 4>happened many, many times with many technologies, including an energy

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 4>where the government either by spending or.

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Policy as a first mover, then the markets take over.

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting. So that's where the investment fund comes in, right, Yeah.

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Energy Investment Plan sixty seven or sixty sixty to seventy investments.

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 3>I think the largest investment I could find was two

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty million. So these these are small startups.

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 3>These are things that hopefully going to snow at some point.

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 3>But let's look up, maybe, what are the criteria, what

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 3>parameters really do you apply nowadays looking at something that's

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 3>going to transform this system so rapidly. What are the

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 3>most promising things that you're really looking forward?

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 4>It's a great question. So overall, there are several different

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 4>funds within Energy Impact Partners, and some focus more on

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 4>scaling up ideas that already improved. What's more focused on

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 4>the business risk aspose of the technology risk. At the

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Frontier fund, we're focused more on the technical risk, not

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 4>the business risk, and therefore we'll be earlier stage Series A,

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe Series B sometimes seed projects that are earlier. We

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 4>have funds focused on activity in Europe, with some focus

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 4>on non traditional entrepreneurs. We have a credit fund, we

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 4>have an infrastructure fund, so we have different stages at

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 4>capital at different risk profiles. All organize around energy transition,

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.719
<v Speaker 4>so we're all about energy, making energy better, which could

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 4>in some cases include things like more robust wires and polls.

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 4>For transmission systems sometimes it's better cybersecurity systems, and for

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 4>Frontier Fund it's deep decarbonization, so it's all energy transition.

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 4>We have different areas of focus within the different funds

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 4>and different technology risk sort of appetites. Twohndre and fifty

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 4>million dollars is a big investment that is not typical.

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Typical Series A investment might be four to twelve million

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 4>dollars for the Frontier Fund. Earlier stage companies where they've

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 4>got some good intellectual property, maybe they've demonstrated in the lab,

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 4>they're going to their first pilot scale demonstration, or they've

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 4>done their first pilot, doing a larger pilot, something like that.

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 4>So we're looking for upside potential. Must be disruptive, must

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 4>have the ability to really displace or avoid a lot

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 4>of CO two emissions, and we're really focused on emissions.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 4>There are a lot of great ideas around sustainability, like Circularity,

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 4>we won't invest because we're really around energy and climate,

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.599
<v Speaker 4>not sustainability, even though it's an investable idea and a

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 4>great company, we often don't do those investments. And there

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 4>are some companies that have a lot of technical risk,

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 4>but they're too big already. It's hard for us to

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 4>If it's already a two billion dollar company, even if

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 4>they have a lot of technical risk, then we're already

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 4>priced out of the market. Or some of the bigger ones,

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 4>they might not be a fit for us because there's

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 4>not enough business restaurant, enough upside potential. So they just

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of meet our criteria. In the end, we're investing

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 4>in teams, not technologies. I really we have to believe

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 4>in the team, and the team has to be innovative.

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 4>They have to know how to run a company, like

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 4>a bad CEO can really tank a company. And so

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 4>we really think about the quality of the team. And

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 4>if we believe the technology, we believe the market space,

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 4>we believe the pathway, but we don't believe in the

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 4>team we want to invest.

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's fascinating.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 3>So there's the people skills, right does that scout scouting

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 3>part of your role as well.

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 4>In the end, it's the most important determined whether we invest,

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 4>because even if it's a great team with so so,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 4>technology will be tempted and we think, well, we see

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.439
<v Speaker 4>other technologies really good, maybe this team can.

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Look at that.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 3>So what can what should a great team be able

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 3>to do and be able to prove there's being on board.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 4>So certainly by the time they come to us, they've

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 4>already proved they have some innovation, they have some idea.

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Usually they have a patent or some intellectual property portfolio

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 4>that gives them the ability to move in the markets

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 4>and protect their ideas. So a lot of it will

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 4>be innovation is the key to get to us. But

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 4>then we wonder can they grow and can they scale?

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Can they keep the harmony in the team? If they

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 4>come to us and they have seven people but they're

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 4>going to grow to forty, Well that's a pretty difficult

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 4>thing for a company to do, and is that the

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 4>right management?

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Can they do it or not?

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 4>And a lot of times they can, And so we

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 4>just have to look at that. Or they're all technologists

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 4>of this company, but they need to add HR or

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 4>legal finance, they need to add other skills. So we'll

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 4>look a lot at the team and people who've done

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 4>it before. Of track record is very appealing.

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, the record is quite bold usiness. Yeah, we have

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 2>this vision.

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 4>I teach entrepreneurship for freshmen at the university, by the way,

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 4>and they're eighteen year old nineteen year olds coming in,

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 4>and if you ask them what does an entrepreneur look like,

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 4>see all the stereotypes come through. They think it's a

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 4>white male from the Bay Area who wears a hoodie

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 4>and is twenty one years old at college drop out.

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 4>And we'll say, okay, name some college dropout successful entrepreneurs,

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 4>and they'll say Bill Gates and Michael Dell and Steve

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg. And I'll say, okay, name four more,

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 4>and they can't because most entrepreneurs are forty or older.

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 4>They have experience, they know what they're doing, and they're

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 4>much more diverse than you think than what TV tells you.

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 4>And so we're looking for that. It's that we're going

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 4>to make a big investment in a college drop like

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 4>this kind of thing is. It makes for great TV,

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 4>but it's actually quite rare, and especially in the energy

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 4>space where it's so complex, we want people with operational experience,

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 4>so they tend to be older and more experience. But

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 4>they say that I've been in the power sector for

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty five years and here's the problem I'm trying to

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 4>solve it. I was an oil and gas I know

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 4>how to do drilling and now I'm going to apply

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 4>it to geothermal. We want that experience because energy is

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 4>so risky and so complex. You want someone who has

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 4>intuition built from years of making mistakes out in the field.

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, real will experiences. But you're teaching entrepreneurship, I am. Yeah,

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I teach that as well.

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 4>So it's actually so I teach entrepreneurship, I teach energy,

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 4>and I teach thermo dynamics, which we call thermo dynamics.

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 4>It's a it's a weed out class, Franger, it's really hard,

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.599
<v Speaker 4>enduring class. But so I teach the freshman entrepreneurship, and

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 4>I've actually told them I'm not sure I can teach entrepreneurship.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure it can be taught, but I think

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 4>it can be learned, which is a fascinating thing. I

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 4>can teach them. I've got you laid on them. Yes, really,

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 4>it can be learned. I'm not sure it can be taught,

0:12:58.040 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 4>but I'll teach you what I know and the certain

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 4>things to know about performers and finances and what are

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 4>the terms of what's total addressable market or TAM or

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 4>the different things that we use abscribe the entrepreneurial opportunity,

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 4>and I sort of met up front that this is

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 4>the only class I've taught for almost a decade. No howur,

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm not't even sure I can or should be. But

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 4>the students come out of it really loving the course,

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 4>and I guess one of the main ideas with the

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 4>entrepreneurship with the class is anyone could be an entrepreneur,

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 4>but it's almost up to you whether you are wired

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 4>that way or want it. And a lot of students

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 4>leave the course thinking I don't want to be an entrepreneur.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 4>That's actually very valuable too.

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>That's very by the way.

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, right, And so at thirty students maybe ten emerge

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 4>thinking oh yeah this is for me. Ten emerging and

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 4>yeah I could do this, and ten are like not

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 4>for me.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 2>That's fine.

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 3>So well, to recognize that early on is pretty pretty

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 3>usefulvery nice.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah exactly.

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 3>But from what you're saying before, it's also about the team.

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 3>So entrepreneurships is also about networking and having having the

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 3>team to work with, right or is that something that

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 3>comes off with.

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, network is important. So can you build the right team,

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 4>can you identify the right skills, can you manage the team?

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Can you set realistic goals. You want to push the team.

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 4>You have to hit your milestones. In startups that we

0:13:58.240 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 4>love to see are the ones that say here's our plan.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 2>They hit their milestones.

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 4>That means their plan is very realistic and that they

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 4>are able to make progress towards the goal and they're

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 4>not having to have down rounds or go ask for

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 4>more money unexpected because things didn't go the way they

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 4>want it. So you just want people who can you

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 4>can plan and then execute. But that's hard to plan

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 4>and execute if you're in an innovative space because you

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 4>don't always know how it's going to go. There's a

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 4>lot of risk, especially for these early stage companies, and

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 4>you have to build in room for that kind of

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 4>risk for failing living with that. Yes, yeah, exactly, which

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 4>is why it's venture investing. It's a different kind of

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 4>risk profile than say a big one.

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Again risk profiles because you've got the Decarbonization Frontier Fund

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>now as a Duke Energy and First Energy in Microsoft

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 3>are invested in that fund. What sort of investment horizons

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 3>are aiming form with it?

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 2>From what does it? What does it do?

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Is it deep decarbonization? And in a way with companies

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 3>like those coming in Duke Energy, First Engine, Microsoft. Are

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 3>their criteria for investing in this sort of fund different,

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Their requirements different from what you normally get.

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 4>So our investors don't get to dictate to us where

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 4>we invest. We do it based on ours, so there's

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 4>independence on them well to think about what's the future

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 4>of energy and what are the market opportunities and does

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 4>it start up meet the criteria for our investments or not.

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 4>The frontier font in particular, has a longer horizon. Deep

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 4>de carversation is going to take a little longer, so

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 4>what do you have it a longer but like fifteen

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 4>years instead of eight years, Like we're thinking longer in

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 4>the future, a longer investment window than a longer harvest

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 4>which years doesn't sound very much when you're talking about

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 4>the comonanization that doesn't know, I think that's such little bit.

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Typical venture investing will be five to eight years or something, right,

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 4>So it's longer horizon than typical venture And we see

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 4>this sort of rising tide lifts all bo like we

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 4>think the energy sector is where a lot of the

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 4>investment's going to go for a few decades. There will

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 4>be a lot of opportunity for prosperity while bringing people secure, cheap, reliable,

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 4>meaner energy. I think this is very exciting to be

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 4>part of that. But the horizons like you just to

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 4>be practical, you have to get out of the lab.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 4>You have to have a pilot, you have to scale

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 4>up your pilot. You have to get customers, you have

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 4>to get a track record, then you get more customers.

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 4>It just takes a while in energy in a way

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 4>that we're not used to from say software or the

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 4>seven detector world.

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Is this something that do kenergy for example, or these

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 3>investments in this fund. Is this something they're particularly aware of?

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Is it something what are they what are there just

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 3>for the returns or something else?

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Getting there are different. We have some pure financial investors

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 4>they see that we're making better returns or we're going

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 4>to have an opportunity for better returns. Others and they

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 4>put their money in. They just want to get their

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 4>money out. So there's some it's purely financial. But for

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 4>others who are in the energy sector, there's value beyond

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 4>the finances because they need to understand the change that's coming,

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 4>because they might need to be the early customers or

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 4>adopters of it and the change might be a threat

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 4>to their business models, and therefore it's better for them

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 4>to evolve and be nimble. I think it's the idea,

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 4>and so it really sort of thinks about turning the

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 4>requirements to track innovation from a cost center into a

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 4>profit center as a way to think about it, Like

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 4>all these utilities, these major NY companies, they spend money

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 4>just keeping track of where innovation is. And one way

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 4>to do that is to try out the technologies yourself

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 4>with different pilot programs and that kind of thing. So

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 4>so there's a real intellectual value to getting a front

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 4>row seat to what kinds of investments are going on.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 3>So it gives them a little window into some of

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>these things as well. Some of these companies are Yeah,

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 3>they might have trouble finding the startups, but we see

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 3>that thands of startups, so we can tell them the

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 3>space you do. Yeah, yeah, and so, and that's valuable

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 3>for these companies that wish to innovate right now or

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 3>will be adopters of it. And I think this is

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 3>the ones who want to be nimble and aren't stuck

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 3>in their nineteen fifties view of what their business model

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 3>should be and that's that's changed rapidly, Ablows, isn't it

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 3>so energy in for some pond? Is is it the

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 3>energy sector basically that you look into the Yeah.

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 4>So we are energy oriented. We look at energy transition,

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 4>different elements of risk profile versus business, risk for technology

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 4>versus business, but all about energy transition. And then Frontier

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 4>find more deep decarbonzation within the energy sector. But it's

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 4>not always around energy production. Sometimes it's a new energy

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 4>consuming technology that might make fertilizers in a more efficient

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 4>way but would save a lot of energy at the

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 4>massive fertilizer plants. So we invested in a small company

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 4>called Nitricity, making nitage to based fertilizers at the farm

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 4>and strib to wigh and so sometimes this on the

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 4>consumption side, sometimes it's on the production side. And we're

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 4>also looking at the transportation side, moving electrons or molecules from.

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Place to place. How do we move it?

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.239
<v Speaker 4>Do we move it in carriers, move by pilpy, move

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 4>by wire or whatever. So we look all up and

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 4>down the energy sector, but including the consumers, not just

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 4>the production.

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 2>You're also an author.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm an author going to bring your books into this

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 3>as well. The ones I know of probably many other

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 3>things you've writen, but you've written something called Power Trip,

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 3>The Story of Energy, that was published in twenty nineteen

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 3>and also first for part energy, Water and Human Survival,

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 3>which is sort of for me, another demonstration of you

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 3>bridging that gap between the theoretical world and maybe the

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 3>consumer and the real world of business and investment.

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 2>And so one.

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Is that gap inevitable basically or is it a gap

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 3>or is it actually a zone of creativity that you

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 3>occupied where you're sitting between investment and education.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, I feel like I have the privilege to see

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 4>many different lines of sight with that story. Where do

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 4>think about it with the different parts of the energy world,

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 4>the industrial world, the investor world, the academic world. And

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 4>by having that position where I see these things or anything,

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I could tell the stories that maybe

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 4>we'll capture other people and reach other audiences, and a

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 4>lot of people will read books. And that book actually

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 4>aways turned it into our six part PBS documentaries. Yes,

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 4>so people, somebodys prefer to watch it on TV. I

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 4>supposed to read the book, but we've reached through the

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 4>book and the television series probably ten million people, and

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 4>so it's a very different way to sort of evangelize

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 4>around energy. And I'm very pro energy and I'm very

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 4>sad about energy. I want other people to share my

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 4>passion enthusiasm, and so the books your way to make

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 4>the story as accessible because not everyone wants to be

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 4>a physicist s or an engineer or a finance person.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 4>And so by putting into story form, narrative form, having

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 4>these anecdotes and these historical nuggets, it's more useful for people.

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 4>We get more people on board with energy. It's important,

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 4>it's cross cutting. Energy is changing, and this is very exciting,

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 4>and so the books are a.

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Way to do that.

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 4>And I've got other book projects I'm working on and

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 4>Power Trip the TV series has season two coming out

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 4>in September actually, so we did six hour long episodes

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 4>before and now I got six more episodes coming out

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 4>town and so it's just a way to reach more people.

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 4>And it's kind of the professor's side of me, the

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 4>teaching side. I want to teach people about energy. It's

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 4>a way I do that. That's storytelling. It's really important,

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 4>isn't it. I think getting the message out and is

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 4>a little chalnge we all face because the energy transition

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:56.479
<v Speaker 4>is one of the biggest stories around. I mean, what

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 4>is bigger than the climate change and the anti transitions soon?

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think so.

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it's the defining sort of sectoral growth for

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 4>the next thirty years, defining challenge for the century.

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 3>So I think it is important. It's a big opportunity too.

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 3>But I wonder if it's becoming harder actually to communicate

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.239
<v Speaker 3>that narrative around the agency and what's going on. I'm

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 3>thinking of the controversy around the ESTIE for example, and

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 3>you know this pushback against some of the innovation has

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 3>been in the investment world.

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Would what do you think about it? Is it becoming

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 2>harder or is it becoming easy?

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's more land minds in the language. We have

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 4>to watch out for. The audiences will arrive into a

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 4>room where maybe I'm giving a seminar or something in

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 4>the different viewpoints before I've ever spoken, and it does

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 4>seem us more complex. But there's been a divide over

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 4>climate change for a long time, so I've been at

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 4>this for a couple of decades. There's been a generational

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 4>divide where older people tend to care less about climate

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 4>change than the younger people. And now we also have

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 4>a political divide there depending on who you vote for

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 4>might effect what kind of things you're hearing and whether

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 4>you care or not. So there's a lot of loaded

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 4>terminology words that if you say this, people interpret differently

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 4>depending on how they vote or where they live or

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 4>where they sit in the room and this kind of thing, right,

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 4>And so it does feel like it's a lay mind

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 4>talk about it and ESG is part of it, Climate

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 4>change is part of it.

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 2>Fossil fuels, renewables.

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 4>People wear their jerseys for whatever side they're on, and

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 4>they feel like they have to choose the side of

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 4>fossil fuels or choose the side of renewables or something.

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 2>They become bondstand in some of these ways. Totally.

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, And it's like a marker what team you're on.

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 4>And I'm like, no, no, we need energy and we want

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 4>energy to clean, safe and reliable. Let's figure out the

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 4>different ways to get there. And so it's a challenge,

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 4>I would say, for sure, it's a challenge, and it's

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 4>gotten worse on social media.

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 2>In many ways. Social media. Stay clear on social media.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 4>I'm on social media a lot, and I think, I think,

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 4>I say my most regrettable things on social media. But

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 4>I reach a different audience that way as well. Yeah,

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 4>and there's some people who might follow me on Twitter

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.360
<v Speaker 4>but aren't going to read a book or watch TV

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 4>or whatever. So it is a challenge for sure, despite

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 4>the challenge of getting the language right and reaching these

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 4>different audiences, for the most part, things are changing anyway,

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 4>especially this cultural change where because younger people, as they

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 4>get older, are taking positions of authority, they're serious about it,

0:21:56.680 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 4>and as older people who were not serious retire their

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 4>voice full matter less. So it seems like it's really happening,

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 4>and it feels like the pace.

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Is picking up. Frankly, they just have a different worldview.

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 3>Maybe, as I'm witkingly, we've given you circumstances led them

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 3>to a different world view totally.

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 4>So when I think of these suits, I've taught thousands

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 4>of students in person, and I've taught thousands of people,

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 4>probably ten thousand people at.

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 2>This point online.

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 4>So I've taught a lot of students, and they really

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 4>see it as their Cold War, their multi decade generation

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 4>defining challenge. That means that peace and prosperity on the line,

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 4>and they have to win it is a fascinating thing

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 4>to see in the same solutions will be We need

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 4>technical innovation, we need collaboration, we need stronger institutions, the

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 4>same answers for the Cold War, the same answers for

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 4>climate change. And the students right, and they said, this

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 4>is my career. I'm spend thirty forty years doing it.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 4>And my mentor when I was undergrad was a Cold warterer.

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 4>He spent his entire career trying to win the Cold War.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 4>It was his career defining thing. And I see that

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 4>repeating with students. And what's funny if you think of

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 4>it like the Cold War, maybe even World War two.

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 4>At some point it doesn't matter what it costs. You

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 4>think peace and prosperity on the line to win doesn't

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 4>matter what a cost. And then what you find out

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 4>when you win is that was the economically beneficial path anyway.

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 4>It was good for the economy to win World War Two,

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 4>it was good for the economy to win the Cold War.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 4>It will be good for the economy, and already is

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 4>good for the economy to tackle climate change.

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the way they see it. And I like, I'll

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 2>power to you. We need you so it's really fantastic.

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a really interesting idea that it can give

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 3>some sort of direction to whole careers. So back to

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 3>the reality of investment. I suppose I was going to

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 3>ask you about the technologies that you find most interesting

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 3>that are coming up over the next few years. But

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 3>let's take bankability is the point that they need to reach.

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 3>What is it the most excites you about? What's the

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 3>innovations that you're looking at at the moment, but in

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 3>terms of what actually is not too far out of

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 3>there but is realizable within the next there are so many

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 3>exciting First of all, the first excitement is there are

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 3>so many good ideas, Like that is just like an

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 3>overwhelming thing.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 4>Like, oh wow, there's a lot of good ideas that

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 4>you don't get to see if you're not an investor.

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Because if you're an investor, people want your money. They've

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 4>all show you their ideas, and so there's more good

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 4>ideas than I realize, which is a good thing. I guess, Okay,

0:23:58.320 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of ideas, which ones are going to

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 4>cap There are very exciting ones that we know will

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 4>change the world if they work, like fusion everyone vision. Yeah,

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 4>and we have invested in sapp Energy, We have invested

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 4>in fusion. If fusion works, it will change the world.

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 4>We all know that that's a big one. That's a

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 4>big one, though, very big one. Yeah, And it's also

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 4>hard to invest early stage because fusion companies, as they

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 4>make progress, come worth billions of dollars very quickly, so

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 4>it's hard for a venture fund.

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Then how likely is that to come together?

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 4>That it's unlikely a small likelihood, but its impact would

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 4>be so largely you just have to invest. So in fact,

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 4>there's been Bolti articles and Bloomberg just like two days

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 4>ago all about the fusion companies out there that might change.

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 2>The world pretty so many of them. Yeah.

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 4>So there's a lot more at Tension in Bluemberg and

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 4>other outlets really covering this.

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Which I think is really exciting. So it's become kind

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 2>of mainstream.

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't mean we'll have a fusion plant next year, so

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 4>it could be many years, a decade, right, But it's

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 4>exciting to see private.

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Money coming to it, not just goverment money. That's exciting.

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 4>I'm excited about energy storage. Energy storage has been this

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 4>solution for.

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Like twenty years.

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 4>We've been saying for twenty years if we just had

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 4>a better battery for a better way to do stories right.

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 4>And it feels like the markets have answered with lithium

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 4>ion batteries for our smartphones and electric cards, But there

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 4>are other chemistries out there that either don't degrade or

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 4>have longer duration. We have vested in companies like Form Energy,

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 4>which is a long duration battery. So this is very

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 4>citing in the energy storage space. Another area of excitement

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 4>for me that's really interesting is around hydrogen. And hydrogen's

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 4>fascinating for me because the hydrogen's come and gone many times,

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 4>oh many times. I mean if you go back to

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 4>the eighteen hundreds in Phantom of the Opera and if

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 4>you read the book or seen the movie. But they

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 4>the author guests On wrote in nineteen ten about the

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 4>late eighteen hundreds Paras opera house how they use hydrogen

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 4>methane blends to change the brightness of the stage lighting.

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 4>So we talked today about hydrogen methane blends as innovative

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 4>and world changing, and in fact, French authors had tackled

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 4>that by the eighteen eighties, and Jules Verne wrote about

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 4>in the eighteen seventies with the mysterious islon. We're using

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 4>hydrogen from water and electrol system run a fuel cell,

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 4>so hygroen. It's not new, but it's attracting some private

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 4>capital and there's new ways to go about it. And

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 4>for me, I was a professional hydrogen skeptic for about

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 4>ten years.

0:25:58.040 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 2>When you read it.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 4>Thousand and seven in twenty eighteen, I just why were

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:06.959
<v Speaker 4>you think? Why it's just so thermodyamically stupid to take electricity,

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 4>to split water to make electricity, And I just was

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 4>really critical, like it's not an original resource. It is

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 4>something you have to extract from other resource. Doesn't make sense.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 4>But then twenty eighteen, as I started to work with

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 4>engine I realized how many different ways there are.

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 2>To make and use hydrogen. This is NG Energy in Paris, France.

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 4>I was their chief science and technology officer and we

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 4>had a hydrogen laburnize meaning of the team.

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 2>I just kind of have my eyes opened up.

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Okay, there's more to hydrogen than using a coal fire

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 4>power plant to split water to make electricity, and in particular,

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 4>there are many ways to make hydrogen, so electrolysis, use electricity,

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 4>split water gets a lot of the headlines. Seam methane

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 4>reforming actually is where we make a lot of our hydrogen,

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 4>and actually coal gasifications another one, so cold natural gas

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 4>or where we make our hydrogen today. Maybe we'll make

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 4>it from electrolysis in the future, but there are other

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 4>ways to make it. There's pyrolysis and photolysis and radiolysis

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 4>and catalysis and thermolysis. There are all these other paths

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 4>that are potentially much more efficient because there's a different feedstock.

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 4>They use degraded waste teat or something. They're not using

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 4>new energy. And so you start to open your mind

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 4>beyond the two pathways we see, or the third that's looming,

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 4>to all the ways you I make hydrogen. It gets

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 4>pretty exciting. And then you start to think of all

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 4>the ways we might use hydrogen. It gets pretty exciting.

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 4>And then if you think of all the excess really

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 4>cheap wind and solar electricity might have latrolls, it starts

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 4>to make sense. Now, I think hydrogen is not going

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 4>to place bulk energy, but there are things like chemicals

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 4>and industrial heat and aviation and marinehipping where hydrogen might

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 4>play a pretty important role.

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's kind of exciting for us. And we're looking

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 2>at that as well.

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 3>What was interesting We'll saying what you said is that

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 3>up until twenty eighteen and in some of your eyes

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 3>were opened by being somewhere and going to a lab

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 3>and seeing something differently, and you had a career in

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 3>this obviously the guy you brought it out to make

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 3>fun of hydrogen and then I went to a corporate

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 3>lab that was working on it.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 4>And that's where it's good for me as a professor

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 4>to get into the real world, because the real world says, well,

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 4>I know you're skeptical, but here's the progress they made

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 4>in the last forty years. We've been look at this

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 4>for a while and I just learned a lot and

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry. Good for me to get that education.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 3>That's fascinating. This is a fascinating We could probably go on.

0:27:58.720 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 3>We'll have to do another one at some point.

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 4>We know the one do and follow on this so

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 4>much to talk about energy as a rich topic.

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.239
<v Speaker 2>Hit to work with, Mike Webb. Thank you so much

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 2>for your time. Thank you so much.

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg n EF is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>LP and its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>should it be construed as investment advice, investment recommendations, or

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a recommendation as to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>an EF should not be considered as information sufficient upon

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>nor any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in this recording, and any liability as a result of

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>this recording is expressly disclaimed.