WEBVTT - Leading Off September 20th, 2024 (Ep. 905)

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>What's going on?

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 2>Everybody, Welcome into Leading Off the Fantasy Pros Baseball Podcast.

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 2>We are presented by Bet three six five. If you

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 2>bet five bucks, you get one hundred and fiftyen bonus

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.279
<v Speaker 2>bets when you use that promo code leading Off, and

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 2>that's only with our friends over at Bet three six five.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>It is the show, Hey Otani, Show Bubba. It's Shoe,

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Al Rico and Casey Bubba joining you here again as usual.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 2>And I honestly put in the show sheet together this morning.

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 2>I thought, should I just put one name on the

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>show sheet and we can just talk about Otani. We

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 2>could probably fill a half an hour pretty easily going

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 2>over what he did yesterday.

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about him.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>We're going to talk about some other things as well,

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>but before we do get going, put your questions in

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 2>the chat. We'll probably get to a couple if you

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 2>got any waiver wire streaming even twenty twenty five questions.

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>We should have a little bit of time later on

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>in the show, but we are going to start where

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>we have to start today, Bubba with one of the

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>greatest games. It's not even hyperbolic to say it's one

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 2>of the greatest games. In baseball history that show Hey

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Otani put on yesterday, and also considering when it came

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 2>in the season it won, anybody who had him in

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 2>a head to head league probably won their championship. He

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 2>went six for six, three homers, four runs, ten Ribby's,

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 2>and two stolen bases to clinch his fifty to fifty season,

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 2>putting him into the history books. One uped himself and

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 2>got to fifty one fifty one yesterday. I don't even

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:22.559
<v Speaker 2>really have words to describe this anymore. This is just ridiculous, Buba.

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 3>It is the only words that come to that mine

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 3>are unicorn special, best ever like stuff like that. It's

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 3>it's ridiculous watching him and just watching the you know,

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 3>the highlights because I wasn't watching it live, and seeing

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>the way he hits the moonshot, the moonshot for number

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 3>forty nine, I believe, to right field. Then he hits

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the Appo Taco for fifty and then he just happens

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 3>to hit another one for fifty one. It was just

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 3>ridiculous what took place with show Hey definitely the best

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 3>we've ever seen in our ages, and we'll see where

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 3>it goes from there.

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable. You see him.

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think most of us probably have Jeff

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Passon notifications on, or we at least see his tweets

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>very regularly, and it's like, Okay, you got forty nine

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty minutes later, fifty twenty minutes.

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Later, fifty.

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like I thought Twitter was broken for a second,

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 2>as like, is this spamming me notifications or something like that,

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 2>But no, this is unbelievable. I know that Otani is

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 2>going to be talked about if you listen to any

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 2>shows today, he is going to be the lead point.

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 2>But he should be like, this is just one of

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the best seasons I think we've ever seen in history.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And I saw a couple of people talking Bubba.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Each of the last three seasons, we've seen a really

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 2>historic accomplishment. Judge hitting sixty two, Akunyas forty seventy, and

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 2>now the fifty to fifty in your eyes as Otani's

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 2>fifty to fifty the most impressive of the three.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 3>I'd say probably yeah, just because I'm a Bonds guy,

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>I remember seeing what he did. I remember Conseko doing

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 3>his thing, and a Rod doing his and all these

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 3>other guys fifty to fifty is ridiculous because he usually

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 3>don't see power speed like this. Not to mention he's

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 3>having Tommy John surgery while doing this, Just to put

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 3>the icing on the cake through all of this, I

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 3>think fifty to fifty is. You know, there's always gonna

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 3>be great records, there's always gonna be our you know,

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 3>arguments that are valid for multiple things. But what Showyotani's

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 3>doing right now, as some of that's played baseball, it's

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 3>it's it's not earthly, let's put it that way.

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>It's absolutely ridiculous.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 2>I think people were saying that the season long stolen

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 2>base prop was set at like seventeen and a half

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.119
<v Speaker 2>or eighteen and a half. He's still twenty last year.

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anybody was expecting this now. And I

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 2>heard some people say, well, maybe he's going to be

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a closer next year and have fifty saves and fifty

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 2>home runs and just keep rewriting the record book.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 3>I think that's very possible if they let him do it.

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I guess the smart move. Honestly, he needs to be

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the closer. That's what I've been saying for a couple

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 3>of years now.

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, i'd kind of worry. And you know, we have

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 2>a question in the chat about where we're drafting. Show

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 2>heys a pitcher only next year because there are some

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>formats where he's going to be separate on Yahoo and

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 2>a couple of others. I don't know about just as

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>a pitcher only. I feel like if he does have

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 2>some kind of injury, that would be the first thing

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 2>that stops and they try and keep him on the field.

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 2>If you're just looking at pitcher only, sho heeyo Tani Bubba.

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Is that a top fifty player? Is that a top

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 2>one hundred player? Where would you personally want to take him?

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, pittuer only he's still an SP one. He's still

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 3>a stud. He's a top probably three or four round

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 3>pitcher because if he returns to the SP one of

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 3>old that he is a cy young caliber arm. There's

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 3>no denying that. I'm not going to draft him as

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 3>a pitcher, and I want that bat all day, every day.

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 3>But if you are draft him as a pitcher. As

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 3>a question asked a he's a top ten starting pitcher,

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 3>I'll say that, and maybe when I break it down

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>more it'll change, but I'd say he's probably a top

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 3>ten starting pitcher because he's already thrown. Now you got

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 3>to assume he's ready by opening days, so it should

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 3>be good to go.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, they're talking about him pitching him in the playoffs potentially,

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 2>even though it might not be likely, but that shows

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.679
<v Speaker 2>that he's at least within a stone's throw of being ready,

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 2>and you've got six more months that should be full

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 2>ready to go by spring training. He's just I mean,

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I could talk all day about him. He's really justridiculous.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 2>You can keep him for a twenty second round pick

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 2>as just a pictures I think you're.

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 4>Doing that all day, Yes, yes, yes, do that.

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Michael Harris.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna talk about a couple members of the Braves

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 2>who went kind of crazy yesterday. Well let's start with

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Mike Harris, because he just had a crazy series two

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 2>home runs yesterday, four runs, four Ribbies. But for the

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 2>series as a whole, four home runs, six RBIs, he

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 2>had six hits. He's kind of turned his season around

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. I know that he's missed some time

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 2>with injuries, but Michael Harris generally speaking, was a disappointment

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 2>this year. If you look back over the last couple

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 2>of weeks, though sixteen for his last fifty nine doesn't

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 2>sound crazy. Hitting two seventy but six homers, thirteen ribbies.

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 2>He's been pretty solid. Now, when you did that early draft,

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I think he was still like a third round pick

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Bubba and a second beginning a third. Do you think

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Michael Harris still warrants a top forty to fifty overall

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 2>price at this point?

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 4>It's tough.

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Like we've talked before, the Churios, the Merrills, the Lankford's,

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 3>all those guys. I think he's more of the Langford category.

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 3>I think he got the Merrils and Centurials above him. Harris

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 3>is very good. Harris is more what we want Randy

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Rose rain it to be better batting average, but still

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 3>a twenty twenty type guy. Maybe he's got thirty thirty,

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he pulls the centric Mullens out of him. So

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 3>third or fourth round I think is very fair for Harris.

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 3>I've just tempered my expectations after this past year. Everyone

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 3>annointed him the best batting average ass said he's going

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.559
<v Speaker 3>to go twenty five to twenty five, all these things,

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 3>and you know he still could not gonna say he can't.

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 3>But when Acuna comes back, Albi's comes back, does Harris

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 3>go back to the bottom of the order again, Those

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 3>are issues for fantasy. So I think he's still very good.

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 3>I think he is valid of a third and fourth

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 3>round pick. I'll just be looking for the dip if

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 3>I can find it.

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think he to the last couple of years,

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 2>we've all kind of thought that he could take that

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>next step forward. I mean, he burst onto the scene

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 2>as a rookie, went twenty twenty and just like four

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred at bats. He looked like he was going to

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 2>be the next kind of not necessarily a Kunya, but

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 2>to your point, like a thirty thirty type of guy.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 2>He has dealt with some injuries, but he has also

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 2>fallen short of expectations over the last couple of seasons.

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 2>So I think that we should get a discount. I

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 2>hope that we are able to get him, you know,

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 2>past pick fifty or so, because if he's going in

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the fourth round, healthy braves team around him, he could

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 2>be fantastic. He really could be a great pick there.

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>But I don't want to be paying the premiums after

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 2>a couple of less than stellar seasons for him. Sticking

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 2>in Atlanta with his teammate Matt Olsen. You know, he

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 2>took the home run call for Olsen on Wednesday. He

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 2>had a home run on Tuesday and Thursday, as the

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 2>way it goes, but two home runs yesterday. Over the

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 2>last month, he and I talk about Harris turning a

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 2>season around. Olson really has turned a season around, hitting

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 2>three h eight over the last thirty days with twenty runs,

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty one ribbies and seven home runs. You know, we

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 2>were talking about Pete Alonso on the on the show

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>the other day, Bubba. Between the two of them, as

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of right now, would you rather take Olson or would

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 2>you rather take Alonzo?

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Heading into twenty two five, I'd still take Olson. Olson

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 3>still the guy for me. I like the team context better,

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 3>and that's not saying much. The Mets are pretty good.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Like the Mets are playing well, but I'll take Atlanta

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>the ballpark. The team still much better. Get a kill

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>in your back next year, you get Riley back. I'll

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 3>think my chances with Matt Wilson. I think both of

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 3>them are probably getting drafted a little higher than I'd like,

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 3>at least in the first draft.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 4>Obviously.

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 3>I know I'm saying that with one draft in the books,

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 3>But I take Alson over Pete Alonso, big meat Pete, I.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Think I would too.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Like I think in terms of the overall profile, it's

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 2>fairly similar. You're gonna get a lot of production in

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 2>three categories, not a lot of stolen bases. The batting

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 2>average could go up to two seventy for either one,

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 2>but probably closer to two forty two to fifty. But

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I will be on your side there in

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 2>default towards the better lineup that Olson's going to have

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 2>around him, for sure. Let's move on and talk about

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Fott, who has been pretty inconsistent as a whole

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 2>this season. You know, I've done the game of putting

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 2>him in my lineup for the bad start, sitting him

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 2>for the good one.

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>We've kind of done that a little bit.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 2>He had a gem against the Brewers yesterday, and I

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 2>think that as a side note, the Brewer is now

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 2>that they've clinched as a team that you can kind

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 2>of target here in certain ways. But Brandon fought seven

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 2>innings of two hit, one run ball. He did not

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 2>walk a batter and struck out twelve. When you look

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 2>below the surface at Brandon Fodd's numbers. They're quite a

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 2>bit better than what you're seeing just in terms of

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 2>the ERA, which is still at four six six. All

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 2>the ERA estimators are into the threes. You know, He's

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 2>obviously got that really solid command. Just a five percent

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 2>walk rate. Feels like somebody who could take another step forward.

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Arizona Fall League a couple of years ago,

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 2>he was kind of the hot topic. He led the

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 2>minor leagues and strikeouts the year before. Development's been a

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 2>little bit slower than we thought, but I feel like

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 2>they're still an ACE level pitcher somewhere in Brandon five.

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 4>I agree.

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I was all in on him this year. It was

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 3>really good for a while. I haven't pitched Hi much

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 3>lately because he mentioned the struggles. I think it's the

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 3>last six starts, twenty nine er and runs in twenty

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 3>nine innings pitched. So this Jim, let's just say he

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 3>was on my bench for because I couldn't stomach throwing

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 3>him out there. But I do think there's a lot

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 3>to like there. His issues A lot of this season's

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 3>been the home run ball and just consistency with walks.

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 3>He's got strikeout stuff when he has when he's On.

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 3>He has really good games. I think he has just

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 3>another like little tweak, maybe one pitch away from going

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 3>to be like does Zach Gallon of their rotation when

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Gallon moves on at some point.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 4>So I think Fought is very, very good.

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be interesting.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 2>And you know, those Brewers, they're gonna You're gonna be

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 2>drinking pretty regularly over the next couple of weeks, not

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 2>just because they are the Brewers, but because they are.

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Clinched into the playoff spot.

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 2>So other than Jackson Cherio, you might see some hungover

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 2>players there in the Brewers side of things. Let's talk

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 2>zachly tell another guy who I really invested in heavily

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 2>as a waiver pick up earlier in the season. Felt

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 2>like a fool for a lot of the summer, but

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 2>he's really turned it on as a September playoff hero.

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Three consecutive gyms, three consecutive w's. But the cherry on

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>top of the cake was yesterday seven innings of one

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 2>hit ball against the Red Straw, the Red Sox striking

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 2>out seven.

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>For the season.

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>As a whole, it's a three five six ERA. He

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 2>has a one to twenty four whip walk right less

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 2>than five percent. I kind of like zachly Tell heading

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 2>in the next year. I don't think he's gonna be

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 2>anybody that gets any kind of hype, and you can

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of take him as a fifth or sixth starting pitcher. Bubba,

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 2>what's your interest level in Zach Lytel next year.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 3>I've always liked him as a deeper option, Like he

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 3>started the year really really strong, then he scuffled a

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 3>ton of late. So you mentioned the last three starts,

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 3>zero earn runs over those three starts, like eighteen innings,

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 3>fifteen k's. You mentioned the three ws seventy six pitches.

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Yesterday's been held with a seventy five basically since coming

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 3>off the il. That's why some starts were only like

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 3>five innings. But the skills he has shown throughout the

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 3>season have warranted a good fantasy pitcher. It's just he

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 3>had that speed bump that could get him at a

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 3>value for you. So I don't mind the idea of

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 3>targeting him. Let's just hope the rays devil magic on

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 3>the elbows takes turn on him next year because he's

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of been the one that's.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 4>Got away so far this season. But I do agree,

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 4>I do like the skill set from zecla lettell tough.

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 2>To be a raised pitcher the last couple of years

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 2>and not going to the Knife, but hoping for the

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 2>best year for LATL. One more player I want to

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about in the headline section is not make you mantle. Sorry,

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Santander. You can easily get them confused these days.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 2>He had his forty second home run of the season,

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 2>driving in his ninety seventh run, hitting a home run

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 2>against your Giants yesterday by by Ryan Walker, who had

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 2>been going pretty well, but a bit of a stinker

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 2>from him yesterday. What is santan dere are going to

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 2>get this summer?

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Where is he going to go? What's your interest level?

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we can't really speculate on location necessarily, but

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 2>is he a forty home run guy going forward? Are

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 2>you going to be drafting him as such next year,

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 2>whether he's in Baltimore or otherwise because he is a

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>free agent.

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was drafted him as like a thirty to

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 3>thirty five guy this year. I think no matter where

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 3>he goes next year, he's still a thirty to thirty

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 3>five guy with forty plus upside.

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 4>That's not going to change. He's not super old.

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 3>He should you'd imagine he signs in a place that

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 3>would benefit him, Otherwise that'd be just a cash grab,

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 3>which hey, kudos to him too. At the same time,

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm just going to say I was watching that at

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 3>bat with Santander and Walker was throwing some filth, but

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 3>his sweeper was off one hundred pences in the booth

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 3>every time WALKERU throw a high fastball and tendre bad

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 3>swings and sweepers great foul offs, and Pence fight out said,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 3>do not throw your sleeper. Everything is to be a

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 3>high fastball. Either walk him or you strike him out.

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Foul ball, falball, sweeper bomb like that's just what took place.

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 3>It was it, Pence nailed it and Walker was due

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 3>for a scuffle. But to your original question, sorry, I

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 3>like to go on rabbit holes here. Santander should be

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 3>a beast next year, and I'm hoping he's signed somewhere

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 3>very very friendly to take it.

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Go sign went the Giants.

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 3>He could probably get twenty splash hits a year. That'd

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 3>be fun. So we'll see where that goes.

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Rockies opened up the pocketbook. Signed sometimes there. Let's let's

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 2>got a sixty home run season.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 3>I'll throw the White Sox in the mix there too,

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 3>and get the best contracts and Andrew Ben and Tendy, Andrew.

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Ben and Tendy, who has outperformed Julio.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 4>And on fire. Dude.

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 3>I took the bit, like I said, we took the

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 3>l on that one. Like what he's done for a

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 3>month and a half is I had the double check, like,

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, here's another one for all the you know

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 3>the drug tests they make all these athletes take after

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 3>big games. Ben and Tendy better be peeing every day.

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 3>It's a home run. That's all I have to say.

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Because where did this come from the last couple of months.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 2>It was like when Kevin Pollar was the number one

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 2>fantasy player for like three weeks, and I was like,

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>he's getting the Batista treatment every single day, Because I mean,

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 2>being a Blue Jays guy, Jose Batista couldn't hit anything

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 2>until he was like twenty eight. Then he gits fifty

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 2>home runs. I can imagine every single game he was

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 2>getting drug tested. Probably a similar thing happening with Ben

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 2>and Tendy. Who would have thought it? Who would have

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 2>thought it? But Hey, the White Sox, I think they've

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 2>won four of their last eleven games or something, so

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 2>for them, that's that's pretty damn good. You know, it

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 2>was sticking with Baltimore here for a second, off to

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 2>the santende are one. This is a couple of days

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 2>old now, But we didn't talk about on the show much.

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Actually we didn't talk about at all. Craig Kimbrel was

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 2>dfaid by the Orioles, kind of a surprise move, but

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe not a surprise. At the same time. His first

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 2>half he had a two eight zero ERA fifty three

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 2>strikeouts to sixteen walks. Since the All Star Break, Bubba

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Craig KIMBERLLL has a ten to fifty nine ERA, a

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 2>two to one eight whip and fifteen walks and seventeen innings.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you think there's a chance that this is just

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 2>the end of Craig Kimbrel. Is he going to be

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 2>somebody that gets a contract this offseason? And assuming that,

0:14:58.840 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 2>let's just say he is done.

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>He Hall of Fame worthy pitcher in your eyes, Hall

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of Fame's tough.

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I think he's been amazing, Like I wouldn't argue it

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 3>if he was. But if guys like Billy Wagner aren't

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 3>in the Hall of Fame. It's hard for me to

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 3>see it. Craig Kimberrill get in the Hall of Fame.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 3>The move makes sense just because the Oriols are going

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 3>to the postseason. Kimberl's not adding any value to them

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 3>at all. They need a roster spot, like, it's all

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 3>just logistics at this point. Sucks for kimber because it

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 3>wasn't an amazing first half. It just has gone the

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 3>way of the Dodo. So hopefully he figures it out,

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 3>hangs it up, or you know, one more trip around

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 3>the sun see where it goes. But Hall of Fames

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 3>just it's tough with the requirements on closers these days.

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 2>The bar is so high. There's like what five relievers

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>in the Hall of Fame or something. I think Wagner

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 2>was pretty close last time, and I think he'll eventually

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 2>trickle in, but it is it is a tricky one.

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Like Kimbrell was so dominant when he was with the Braves,

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 2>and for that the majority of his career has been

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 2>a pretty dependable arm. But the benchmark for closers tend

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 2>to be a little bit higher. Let's say you're drafting

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 2>in November December, he's unsigned, Are you gonna speculate on

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>him as a potential closer for next season?

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Have to be coming out of really good value because usual,

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 3>if I'm speculating on a guy, I know where he's

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 3>playing already, not that if it does he have the

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 3>role or not, that's not the question. It's Kimbra Legit

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 3>could retire, like that's an option, and now you're really

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 3>drawing dead. So it's tricky. That's a very very tricky one.

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 3>I doubt I would right now.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm on board with you unless it's like

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 2>pick you know, three seventy five or something, and it's like, okay,

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 2>I might as well take a chance and maybe but

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 2>even then you're kind of maybe wasting a pick. You

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 2>could get twenty five saves out of it. You never

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 2>know what's going to happen. But it looks like we're

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of on the on the back nine, if not

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 2>the final hole here for Craig Camberrell.

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>At this point, let's.

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Talk about some of these questions you guys put into

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 2>the chat, starting off with one from Matt here, Edwin

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Ucetta or Jason Foley. Rest the season, I personally would

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 2>have to say, fully because they're still playing for something.

0:16:57.920 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 2>The Rays have kind of thrown in the towel a

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit. Fully, been getting a lot of saves recently,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 2>and the year as a whole has been pretty good.

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm on the fully side here, Bob, But

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 2>what about you?

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Fully easy for me. He's getting a lot of saves,

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 3>like so much. They s get days off if someone

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 3>else gets to save right now. You said it's not

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 3>the everyday guy. Clevenger got to save on Thursday. Like

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 3>they're still playing roulette over there in Tampa. So give

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 3>me fully, Yeah.

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree.

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Zayne wants to know or wants to think that Pavin

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Smith is legit. I mean, hell, if you streamed him

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 2>this week, you've got in some goodness. There was obviously

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 2>that big game last week where he got the three

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 2>home runs, but he's hitting every single day, it seems

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 2>over the last two weeks. He's a top ten overall

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 2>fantasy player. Don't really want to put too many eggs

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 2>in this basket, Baba, but I feel like if he's

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 2>still out there right now, he makes a decent ad

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:44.719
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of a really good lineup.

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts on Peven Smith?

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 3>First, I got a bet on him later, so stay tuned. Second, Yeah, Smith,

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 3>he's great for this weekend. Next week a lot of

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 3>right handed pitchers coming up for the Dbacks to face,

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 3>so Smith will play every day. He's one of the

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 3>better potential power sources over the final ten days or so.

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think he's legit enough to finish the

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 3>season on your team, let's put it that way.

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, probably not, maybe not legit enough that you'd want to, like,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>look at what he.

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Did down the stretch. He's gonna be a, you know,

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>a great value next year. Like I don't know if

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm there, but yeah, I agree that for the rest

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 2>of the season, you're you're playing matchups and you're righting

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 2>hot hands, and right now there is not many hotter

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 2>hands than Pevin Smith. A question from Harry about Mackenzie

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Gore Are you willing to stream him against the Cubs

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 2>this weekend? Look a bit better as of late. Cubs

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 2>are kind of rolling though right now, Bobby, what are

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 2>your thoughts on this one? E?

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I would. This is a really tough

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 3>one because Mackenzie Gore has looked better to get blown

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 3>up a little bit and his recent a recent start

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Cubs are heating up. I think he still roll Gore

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 3>here and hope the improvements are there, but just realize

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 3>it's a coin flip basically on what you're gonna get

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 3>on this one.

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I'd understand sitting them.

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 4>I'd understand sitting I get it.

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 2>I'd be more inclined to start him in a slightly

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 2>deeper league, or if you really needed the volume. If

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 2>it's just like, I have one AD left, I might

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 2>as well use it on Gore. I don't know if

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I would be using the ad for the sake of

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 2>using it, if that makes sense. One more question, Yeah,

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 2>one more question here for Michael regarding one that's happening today.

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Start Peter Armstrong or Jason Dimingez tonight, and unfortunately Cubs

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 2>play at two PM and Yankees lineup will not be

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 2>out by then. I think you probably go with PCA.

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 2>He has been for the most part, really really good.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Dimingas has been okay, but I mean he's six for

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 2>thirty one for the season as a whole, very small

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 2>sample size, but he has not been nearly as good

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 2>as PCA.

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and PCA is facing Trevor Williams making his first

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 3>start after a few months on the IL, so yes,

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 3>give me PCA on this one. And I hit his

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 3>run prop on Wednesday. I went to look at it today.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 3>We had like a one to eighty five on Wednesday.

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 3>It's like only plus one twenty today. So even the

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 3>books like the Cubs and company, so play PCA.

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 2>They're catching up. Stick around for the bets. We went

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 2>five of six on Wednesday. We are on fire right now.

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 2>One more question from Fred Dinger in the chat, would

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 2>you guys trust Quintana next week at Atlanta and at Milwaukee.

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 2>He's been on a run, and boy has he ever

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 2>been on a run. Quintana has been a lot better

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>than I would have thought. I feel like I'm probably

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 2>rolling him out there with the caveat that. Two steppers

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 2>are never a guarantee this time of year, but I

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 2>think I am rolling.

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Him out there.

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I was side of really shallow formats byby what do

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 2>you think I would?

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Two steppers are not a guarantee, but it should be

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 3>with the Mets because they'll be playing for something almost

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 3>to the end. Milwaukee will be wrapped up for that

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 3>second start. It will be pretty nice. And Atlanta's the

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 3>question mark but can He's been good enough, So yeah,

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 3>I'd Rollekintana on a two step.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 2>I would never have thought that I'd be trusting Quintana

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy playoffs, but here we are. Here, we are trusting him.

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's get up to the three up and three down,

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 2>starting with Ladito Vladimigero Junior. Two home runs, went three

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 2>for four yesterday, got up to that thirty home run

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 2>marker for the third time in four years. He's really

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>turned it around after starting off cold looking bad last year,

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 2>completely changed the narrative on his whole career. Really Blake Done,

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 2>who half of you are probably saying, who is Blake Done?

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 2>Went two for three with a home run and a

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 2>couple of stolen bases yesterday, So any streaming or DFS

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 2>players or maybe NL only players really got rewarded there.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 2>And then cj Abrams, who has been pretty disappointing for

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 2>the majority of the year outside of a really hot beginning,

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 2>did you some real good stuff yesterday? Four for five

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 2>with two runs and a couple of stolen bases, Bubba,

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 2>any thoughts on that trio on Guerrero, on Done or

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>on CJ Abrams?

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Ladito, it's good to see him get to thirty,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 3>because you know, forever there it was can't hit the

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 3>ball in the air and get you the home runs.

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 3>I did a show with Ben tid recently looking at

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 3>WRC plusins the All Star Break. Ladito's second behind Judge Aliela.

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Believe was second in the second half of the season.

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 3>That's how good he's been. So to see him kind

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 3>of get his as awesome. I'd actually to your question

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 3>earlier about Alonzo and Olsen, I tink Vlad over both

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 3>of them going to the draft. So but so, I

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 3>think it's really good to see him get to thirty

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 3>once again.

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I think Vlad could potentially get back into the first round,

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>depending on the league. Maybe he goes at like fourteen, fifteen, seventeen,

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 2>like that type of range I think is where we're

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 2>probably gonna see him. But yeah, as a Blue Jay fan,

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 2>it's been the one one of the very few bright

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 2>spots him in Bowden Francis maybe the only things we

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 2>can look back on with any degree of happiness for

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four. Let's go to the three down Logan

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 2>o'happy with a golden sombrero yesterday. Not what you want

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to see Taiwan Walker, horrendous stuff as usual for him.

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Three and a third, eight earn runs, six hits, three walks,

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 2>and four homers.

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Just brutal.

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 2>And then Edward Cabrera was the starting pitcher for that

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Miami team. They gave up twenty earned runs yesterday, so

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 2>you can imagine what his date looked like. Two and

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 2>a third, seven earned runs, four hits and five walks.

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 2>About any thoughts on that trio of Logan o'happy Taiwan

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Walker or Edward Cabrera.

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh, the Walker one just makes me laugh because it

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 3>was supposed to be Colby Allard. And then the Phillies said, Hey,

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 3>we love what Walker's been doing out of the bullpen,

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 3>so let's throw him back in the starting rotation. It's

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 3>just like, you know what, maybe leave him in the bullpen.

0:22:56.400 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, Walker, that's a contract that the Phillies would

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 3>love to get back in a big way.

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Brutal.

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Remember when they took out Spencer Turnbull from the rotation

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:09.239
<v Speaker 2>earlier this year for Walker? Just brutal stuff. Let's go

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 2>and talk about some injuries. Boba Schett did the Abe

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Simpson meme of walking in and walking right back out

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the door. Here just can't catch a break he comes back.

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 2>We talked about him on a Wednesday, and I was saying, like, look,

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 2>he's probably gonna go you know, twenty for his next

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 2>thirty or something down the stretch and then kill any

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 2>Draft eight discounts we're going to get next year. But

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're looking at an eighty one game sample

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 2>size where he really disappointed this season. His year is done.

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Fractured a finger fielding a grounder on Wednesday, just horrendous luck.

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 2>But what does that mean for next season?

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 4>Out?

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that we are truly getting the Bobashett

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 2>pass pick one hundred type of discount?

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Baba?

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 3>I think so, And then I'm already back in if

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 3>that's the case. So it's like it's we've talked about

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 3>how bad short stuff gets in drafts and all that

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 3>kind of stuff. If you're getting Bobashett, now we're talking

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 3>like round nine to ten something like that, that's looking

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 3>pretty pretty good all things considered.

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 2>Late batting average, a guy who could potentially win a

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>batting title next year. And that's not even like, oh

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 2>he's a home or he's a blue Jay guy, like

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 2>he could win a batting title He's like a two

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 2>to ninety hitter over his career. At this point, I'm

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 2>pretty excited to get a discount on him. Obviously, you

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 2>feel for the guy works his way back after being

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 2>out two and a half months and gets one game

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 2>back in the lineup. It's brutal stuff, but we'll have

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 2>to reset next year and hope for a bounce back

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 2>from Bow. Same thing can be said about Tyler Glass

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 2>now transferred to the sixty day il his season is over,

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 2>he will not pitch in the postseason. What does that mean, though,

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Bubba for next year with Glass now? Because for two

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 2>consecutive seasons now, he has surpassed his career high in

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 2>endings pitched. When he's out there, he's obviously fantastic. Are

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 2>you going to be willing to trust him as your

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 2>sp one next year though, assuming that he's going where

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 2>he's probably gonna go in the second maybe third round,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 2>is that something you're gonna be interested in?

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 3>He will not be on my teams until at least

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 3>a Mark strafts that I've seen him pitching in Florida

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 3>or Arizona for the Dodgers. This is the guy that's

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 3>got histories of Tommy Johns. He's flat out said he's

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 3>throwing and he doesn't care if he has Tommy Johns.

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.719
<v Speaker 3>That's why he throws the way he because he's all

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 3>I have to throw that way to get paid. He

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 3>got paid. The fact he had a setback that they

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 3>shut him down not even trying for the postseason. We've

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 3>seen that Dodger's rotation. They need all the help they

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 3>can get right now. I am not touching Tyler Glass

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 3>now until I see him actually quote unquote healthy, throwing

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 3>regularly on amount.

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the price. You know, someone's gonna say, look,

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 2>he threw one hundred and thirty something innings. Next year,

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be one hundred and fifty.

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 3>That makes it almost worse to me, it's almost worse.

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 3>The fact he took the jump that scares me.

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I agree, because that means the price, which was already

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 2>last year like what a third rounder a lot of

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:36.479
<v Speaker 2>the time, if not even pushing into the second. In

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 2>some cases, I think that he is going to be

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 2>too expensive. It's unfortunate because I love Glass now. I

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 2>had him on one team this year. The drafted him

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 2>in Teult Wars, which was my last draft that I

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 2>was like I want one glass now.

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Share worked out.

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 2>For the most part, but that price is going to

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 2>be just as expensive or even more expensive. I'm gonna

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 2>have to tap out at that point. Kevin Gosman left

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 2>his start after looking really solid through five innings with

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 2>some back tightness, So this is I would imagine his

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 2>season is done. I don't know why Toronto would take

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 2>any chances for that last start where they're playing for nothing.

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>At this point, I would imagine his season is probably over.

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 2>Ozzy Albi's is gonna be coming back to the Braves

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 2>lineup tonight in Miami. But about you're seeing Ozzy Albi's

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 2>on any kind of waiver wire, shallow, deep, anything in between.

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 2>Are you picking him up and starting.

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Him only if you're desperate for the position, like I'm

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 3>gonna plug him in in DC's where I've had invention whatnot,

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 3>just because probably need somebody, I need a pulse. But

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 3>if you're in he's on a waiver wire for you.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 3>The only things I'm worried about is to rehab games.

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 3>And when we're talking Ozzy Albi's, he can only hit

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 3>right handed right now, they're not even hitting them left

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 3>because of his wrist so he's not even one hundred

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 3>percent yet, So I'm a little cautious on that one.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna hit right handed against right handed pitching.

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's only hitting right handed. That's how they got

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 3>him back sooner enough. He can't hit left handed still

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 3>because of his wrist. So that doesn't make me feel

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 3>warm and fuzzy.

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 4>All things considered, I guess, and it could be wrong.

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:02.959
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he goes in mashes. Who knows, But I'm like,

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 3>I hear this information, it doesn't make me too.

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Excited without having a splits in front of me. I

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 2>think he's better as a right handed hitter, but that's

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 2>the first year he's better. Yeah, on undred percent, I'm

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 2>with here. He's got better power from the right side.

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think we've ever seen him hit right

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 2>hand over his riety, So who knows if that's like consistent.

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point, man.

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how I feel about that now, Like

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess, because they're in the hunt and they're thinking, look,

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>we need reinforcements. He's even at eighty percent, he's playing.

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 2>That's probably what they're thinking. But you're taking a bit

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 2>of a chance on you're young. I mean, I guess

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 2>they're he's not the face of the franchise or whatever,

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 2>but he's one of the faces of the team. Could

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 2>be taking a chance there, But I feel like if

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I have Ozzie Albi's on a team and he's healthy, now,

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm putting him in my lineup unless I have just

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 2>an incredible second basement or something like. He's going in

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 2>there for the most part, But yeah, don't feel great

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 2>about it at this point. Also don't really feel great

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 2>about Francisco Lindor, who has missed the entire Championship week.

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:04.679
<v Speaker 2>He's expected to return this weekend, but we don't have

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent clarity on that. Any thoughts on Lindor, Bubba.

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 2>If he's healthy, he's going into your lineup, but like,

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 2>are you picking up another shortstop? Are you picking up

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Acunya maybe or somebody to fill in for him there?

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>How are you dealing with it where you have Lindor.

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I already picked up some mccunha last weekend. Love what

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing there. He's been super productive. I don't know

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 3>how you could put Lindor back out there until he's

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 3>fully healthy, and then how do you take anheil Acunya

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 3>out of the lineup as he's been so good. That's

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 3>a tough one. If you don't want Luis nhil Acunya.

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I would definitely have a backup plan for shortstop, Let's

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 3>put it that way, because the Mets are contending, yes,

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 3>but they also need Lindor to get into the postseason

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 3>with them, so it's kind of a catch twenty two

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 3>on bringing him back. So I'd be very cautious with

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 3>the door, and i'd have a backup plan. On My

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 3>backup plan right now is Acunya, But if he can't

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 3>get him, there are a couple of their options out there.

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Does he ever look like his brother?

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 2>A like the motions the swing, Even when he slid

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 2>into third base yesterday and he did some kind of celebration.

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 2>It's like if somebody put a Braves jersey and did

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 2>like an Ai swap or something, you'd never know it

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 2>wasn't Ronald. It's uncanny how much they assemble each other.

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 2>One more piece of injury news, not what anybody wants

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 2>to see. You want, Soto, We'll have some imaging done

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 2>after sliding into a concrete wall in foul territory.

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get a new update on this one.

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 2>I think we haven't seen any results of imaging yet, Bubba,

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 2>have you seen anything come across while we've been recording.

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 3>No, he was having X rays Friday morning. It's the

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 3>West Coast. He's probably having him like right now, all

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 3>things considered, so we probably won't find anything out till

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 3>around lunchtime out here on the West Coast. I guess,

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 3>so you got a couple more hours before we know

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 3>what the status of Soto is, and with the Yankees

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 3>pretty much already locking up postseason, I'd be surprised if

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm honestly debating sitting him for the weekend, to tell you.

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>The truth, that was my next question.

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's say we don't have a ton of clarity by

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 2>lineup lock Let's say even if he's sitting today, that

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 2>means you're putting him on the bench for the weekend,

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 2>because for people who don't know, if you're playing on

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 2>NFBC lineups, you set him from Friday through Sunday, So

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 2>you'd have to lock them in today for the whole weekend.

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Would be a bit of a dicey one, Bubba.

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it just sucks because they're in Oakland again. Tonight,

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Sears tomorrow, Estest on Sunday, all really friendly matchups, all

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 3>things considered. But if he's out tonight, I have a

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 3>hunch they just kind of, you know, chill with it.

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 3>So I'd be cautious, but you know, if you probably

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 3>don't have any better options either, I'll say that much.

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Two games of Soto is probably better than what you

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 3>have on the bench.

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, two games of Soto versus three games of you know,

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 2>ninety plus percent of outfielders. You're you're probably gonna take

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Soto there. But it's time where we move on to

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 2>my favorite part of the show, and that is the

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Best Bets of the day, presented by our friends over

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 2>at bet three six five. Again, use that promo code

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 2>leading off, get yourself some goodies here as we enter

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 2>into the stretch run of the baseball season. We got football, basketball, hockey,

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of things you guys can do with some

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 2>bet credits over at bet three six five. Bubba, where

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 2>are you looking today on the bets? You kind of

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 2>alluded towards one of them earlier, but what else are

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 2>you thinking today?

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Going back to the Carlos Tanna well over one and

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 3>a half total bases at plus one twenty five. Dude's

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 3>been a beast. He faces Richard Fits of the Boston

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox tonight. You could play with that as much

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 3>as you want, folks, But I like Santana for that

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Trevor story in that same game, David fest as we

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 3>struggling to bench and story has been awesome, absolutely great

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 3>since coming back. Over half a run for Trevor story

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 3>is plus one sixty five, so we'll have some fun

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 3>with that. And then here's my Paven Smith. When I

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 3>wanted to play total basses, juice wasn't worth the squeeze,

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 3>wanted to play runs hits. RBI is definitely not worth

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 3>the squeeze. So we got a little creative here with

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Colin Ray taking the bump in Milwaukee, I got Peven

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Smith over half a run scored at a whopping up

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 3>plus one seventy five. So I'll take my chances in

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 3>that one. It's a couple of big ones. We'll see

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 3>if they hit, but you only need one to basically

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 3>break even and just lose a little bit too to

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 3>have a good day three to really enjoy life. So

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll take Santana, Peven Smith, and Trevor story all plus odds.

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 2>The plus money man at it again, and we are

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 2>hot right now, folks, So take a look in detailing

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 2>some of these. Jacob de Grom is my first one,

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 2>going back to that well against Seattle again he gets

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the best strikeout matchup in baseball. Again, we're not getting

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 2>it at plus money, but at six and a half.

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I know he didn't go terribly deep in his first

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 2>start back, but I feel like he is going to

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 2>continue to ramp up a little bit. There is also

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 2>the thought that maybe the Rangers don't take any chances

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 2>here because they're not really playing for anything, but six

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and a half strikeouts for de Grom could literally be

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 2>had in three innings against a team like Seattle. So

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 2>this is one that I'm gonna take a chance on

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 2>at minus one ten. I'm also playing a little fast

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 2>and loose with George Kirby in the under Walks is

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 2>at plus one seventy five. We know that his command

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 2>is arguably the best in all of baseball. Maybe you

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 2>could put Zach Efflin up in that category, but it's

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 2>probably Kirby. He only has one walk over each of

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 2>his last three games. The Rangers are kind of a

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 2>mid pack team in terms of drawing walks. So I'll

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 2>take a chance there on under zero point five walks

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 2>at that plus one seventy five number that is just

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>so juicy. And then I'm going against the grain here.

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I've seen a lot of people really start to buy

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 2>into David Peterson as of late on this show, Bubba,

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>we've talked on probably a couple shows about how those

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 2>underlying numbers are a little bit scary. The strikeouts aren't

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 2>really there, so I in general don't really want to

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 2>trust them in a repeat matchup against a team like Philadelphia,

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 2>who he just dominated against No Question seven and two

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 2>thirds one run ball in a repeat outing, though, I

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 2>don't think it'll be as favorable to him. So I'm

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 2>taking David Peterson over two and a half earned runs

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 2>at plus one ten. Guys, those are our favorite bets

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 2>for today, and Bubba, before we get out of here,

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 2>let's get your home run call for the day and

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>for the weekend.

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 3>For the weekend, I do laugh because you know, you

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 3>look at the leader boards. If you just took Otawny

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 3>all year your top three, basically that's pretty fun stuff.

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 3>But for me, I wanted to take some royals props

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 3>because my buddy made some blacks take in the bump

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 3>being sarcastic just because he's a giant and he has

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 3>not been good. So give me Bobby Wick Junior. Let's

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 3>have a fun weekend. The guy that took the world

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 3>by storm is going to be the runner up in

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 3>the al MVP. Let's have some Bobby Wick Junior fun

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 3>this weekend.

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Hard to go against with Bob what Junior has done

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 2>for me personally. I'm going for Tyler O'Neil, who's facing

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 2>up against David Festa.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>They are at Fenway. Look, I love David Festa.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna be a really good pitcher, but

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 2>my god, does he give up a lot of home

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 2>runs and a lot of hard contact nine percent barrel rate,

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 2>one point four to seven homers per nine. Tyler O'Neill

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 2>at Fenway Park most of the time is going to

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 2>be able to get one out, but especially against a

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 2>rookie in Festa who has dealt with home run problems.

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 2>That is the way I am gonna look tonight. But Baba,

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.879
<v Speaker 2>that will do it for our second to last show

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 2>together of the season probably, and we're down to just

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 2>one week left.

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>A leading off.

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Any words of advice for the folks as they headed

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 2>the championship weekend.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Good look, everybody, remember we're out of your control. To

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 3>set your lineups and enjoy the games. I've had a

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 3>lot of stressful messages in my direction. I'm like, nothing

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 3>he can do about it, boys and girls, So set

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 3>your lineups, have some fun, and hope for the best.

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, don't take any crazy chances. If there's a random

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 2>like Patrick Corbin was a popular stream over the last

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 2>couple weeks, don't take chances like that. You know you've

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 2>made good decisions to get yourself to the championship to

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 2>this point. Continue to make those good decisions and don't

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 2>play too fast and loose with your championship caliber teams.

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>But that will do it.

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 2>On Monday, I believe it will be Bubba and Welsh,

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Wednesday should be myself and Bubba back again. And then

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 2>next Friday for the leading off finale, I know Welsh

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be there, think Joe Piezapa is going to

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 2>be there, and then potentially one of us or maybe.

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Even both of us will hop on. So just one

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>week left on the show.

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 2>If you guys haven't done so already, would really appreciate

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 2>any ratings, reviews, subscriptions, likes, comments, anything you can do

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 2>to help out the show. Doesn't cost you a thing,

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 2>just takes a couple seconds and we'd really appreciate it

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 2>over here.

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:37.280
<v Speaker 1>But guys, have a great weekend.

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Wishing you all the best of luck in your championships

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 2>and we will see you again on Monday.

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Take care everybody. Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 4>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 4>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 4>or Spotify, follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 4>dot com slash Fantasy Prose MLB