WEBVTT - Bonus Episode: TRUMP — 2,  ABC NEWS — 0” (Terry Moran Fired)

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, there are folks in this episode, he criticized President

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump on a Saturday night and he was out of

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a job by Wednesday morning. And with that, welcome to

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>this bonus episode of Amy and TJ. In this episode,

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>now we'll discussed what many of you already heard. Longtime

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>ABC News corresponding Terry Moran was initially suspended and then

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>eventually they said just today, just hours I guess prior

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to this recording that he in fact is not going

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to be returning to the network. We'll get into some

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of the details, but Robes, initially, let me get your reaction.

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I probably know it. As soon as we heard he

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was suspended. We had our thoughts. But your reaction now

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>to just two three days after that tweet where it

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is Terry Moran is not returning DABC News.

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well, I am not surprised.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 3>As soon as we heard that he had been suspended

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 3>and we read what his actual original tweet was, you

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 3>and I both knew he was never going to come

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>back to ABC News. There was no way that a

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:08.559
<v Speaker 3>network news division that certainly, as we hope all media

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 3>outlets rely on at.

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Least a.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Credibility and an attempt at being not taking sides.

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 2>It certainly is.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 3>Objectivity is core to being a professional journalist and core

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 3>to being a part of a network news organization. What

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 3>we cover, when we cover it, you know, how we

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 3>even cover things can certainly be.

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Up for debate.

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 3>But you know, no matter what, you cannot make a

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 3>public critical comment about a politician, about someone who you

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 3>are supposed to remain objective about so that people at

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 3>home can decide what they think. This was a clear, obvious,

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 3>big no no that I have never actually really seen

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 3>anything similar.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>To okay, So I think neither or neither of us

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>surprised by it. Even the timing surprise you initial suspension

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and then here we are just really three days later.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>That seems swift enough to me. It seemed like I

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>give him enough time to dot some eyes, cross some

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>te's and make sure everything was cool. But the timing,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing about this whole story that surprises me. I'm

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>trying to find something in there that I go home,

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, or this or that, But just what

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>he did and what they did in response is it's

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>tough to find issue with. I.

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 3>Yes, my only surprise would be that it took them

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 3>three days, because there was really nothing to.

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Work through or work out.

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 3>He wrote what he wrote, and I really couldn't And

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you could think of a reason why

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 3>he could defend what he did or said.

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I can think of a reason, because you know,

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I say that with a smile, because I'm always anytime

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I hear someone say, wait, let me hear all the

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>details first, let me hear what was on their mind,

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>let me hear what was going on, they would only

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>come out as excuses. They would only be received that way.

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But this is the guy who's been in the business

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a long long time, just twenty eight years at ABC alone.

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>He's and he's covered. He covers big stuff. He didn't

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>run around and cover the NBA finals.

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 3>The Preme Court of the foreign news, the Pope.

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, he covers the Vatican stuff like.

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>That, important heavy political stuff.

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So him tweeting at midnight, him tweeting when he did,

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and what he he knows better than what he did.

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So my only thing he had to be out of

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>his right, out of his mind, or he just said

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>the hell with it and I just don't give a

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>damn anymore and decided to do it. But he knows

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>better than what he did.

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Look, this wasn't a slip of the tongue.

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 3>This wasn't accidentally editorializing when you're on live television and

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 3>something slipped out. This was a deliberate, handwritten thought that

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 3>you chose to disseminate in a very public forum.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's done long, quick, quip correct, And so it was.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Even though there definitely were some grammatical errors, that isn't

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 3>typical of Terry Moran, who again is a consummate professional

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 3>and has been an incredible journalist, so he that isn't

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 3>in character for him. So the only reason that I

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 3>believe you and I could come up with that he

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 3>did what he did was either a substance abuse problem

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 3>or a mental health problem.

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 2>And either one of.

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Those two things, I imagine you could take to ABC

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 3>News and say, I need help, I need to recover,

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 3>I want to apologize, I need to get my head

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 3>on straight. And that would be the only way that

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 3>I could have envisioned ABC News standing by him, or

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 3>at least seeing him through getting through a tough time

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 3>in his life.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And we are not, to be clear, suggesting anything of

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the sol interesting in that no issue, nobody suggested, and

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not that either, And just what we know of

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy for so long, you're looking for a reason

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>for why he did what he did. And the journalist

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we know knows better than to do what he did,

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>So why did he do it? We're looking for that

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>answer and we don't have that yet from him. I

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a single comment from him publicly. But

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>why did he do it? In the timing of it?

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And you talk about I mean, having some people just

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>made mistakes just it's late, they're exhausted, a couple of

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>glasses of wine and screwed up.

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 3>But this was just but this was yes, and it

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 3>could be, but this was just so deliberate. And then

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 3>when we found out today that it turns out ABC

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 3>News didn't actually even have to fire Terry Moran because

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 3>his contract is up at the end of this week.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 3>The timing of when he put out the tweet and

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 3>the fact that this was potentially his last week the

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 3>network seems perhaps that he could have The other thing

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 3>is he could have done this to go out with

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 3>a blazers of glory that he wanted to say what

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 3>had been on his mind for a long time. He

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 3>knew perhaps after he had left the network, it might

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 3>not get as much attention and maybe he knew. Hey,

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 3>while I'm still working with ABC News, I'm going to

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 3>go ahead and say what I've wanted to say for

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 3>the last four or five months.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And two for those that don't know, you have up

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in front of you. Yes, I is okay, go ahead

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and read exactly what he said. I think the grammatical

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>errors are in there as well, but yes, this is

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly what Terry Moran wrote at twelve eight a m.

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Saturday night, So into Sunday is what we're talking about.

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>This is what you wrote.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and I'm reading this verbatim. Grammatical mistakes and all.

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 3>Miller is a man who was richly endowed with the

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 3>capacity for hatred. He's a world class hater. You can

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 3>see this just by looking at him, because you can

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 3>see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment.

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 2>He eats his hate.

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 3>Trump is a world class hater, but his hatred is

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.559
<v Speaker 3>Sorry I started, I tried to correct his grammatical error,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 3>but his hatred only a means to an end, and

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 3>that end his own glorification. That's his spiritual nourishment. And

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 3>we should point out that Terry Moran is referring to

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Stephen Miller, who is the deputy chief of staff President Trump.

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.119
<v Speaker 1>See, yeah, and this is personal, I would even and

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and I hope this doesn't. It has a little bit

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>delve into a back and forth, a conversation left and

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>right about media bias. And there's some defending Terry Moran say, hey,

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>why are you going to suspend or punish him for

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>speaking truth to power, for speaking up for free speech.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Shouldn't he be allowed to say what he wants to say?

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>This is not a left right situation. This is just

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>everything turns into that. But it's not that. This is

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>about the fundamentals of basic journalism. This, sweetheart, did we

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>get out of the first week of journalism class without

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>them teaching you about objectivity? Point blank? You can never

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>go back and cover the White House again after this?

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 2>No, you have to. Can't you learn?

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the first things you learn is

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 3>do you take your personal opinions and your personal bias

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 3>and what you think and what you were raised to believe,

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 3>and you hang that on the code hanger along with

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 3>your jacket, and you can pick it back up when

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 3>you leave the newsroom. But one while you're in the newsroom,

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 3>you were one of your most important jobs is to

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 3>be objective. You should tell the truth, and you need

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 3>to say it without bias. You should let the people

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 3>at home decide what they think based on the facts

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 3>that you can provide them.

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 2>And that's a period.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>They're arguing now that Okay, he left the newsroom, he

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>was done with his job for the day. Why can't he,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>as a private citizen now go say whatever the hell

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>he wants and why should he be punished for exercising

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a free speech right. That is not the debate here, folks.

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>This is journalism. This is a high level journal list.

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>We all know. So we are just on the Gavin

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Rossdale came into our studio. We did an interview, right

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>imagine two days before I did that, I just got

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and said, Gavin Rossdale is an idiot. I

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>hate his hair, his music is stupid. Yeah, okay, is

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>he going to come in and do an interview with me?

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely no, you don't. You just can't do what he

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>did and still be claimed to be objective. And this

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't about policy. This was personal. He's a hater. He's

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>nourished by his hate.

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 2>He eats his hate.

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Come on.

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 3>That's that's throwing a massive barb at somebody, and it

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 3>is I think that's a good way to put it.

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 3>It's deeply personal. He wasn't discussing politics. He discussing discussing

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 3>their ethics, their morality, and he had issue with that,

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 3>and that's something you can't recover from. That's not something

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 3>that you can say, whoopsie or oopsie, I shouldn't have

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 3>done that, or I shouldn't have said that.

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's not truth to power, right, it's not truth

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>to power. It's not correcting a politician who let out

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of falsehood. That's objective. And your point is that you

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 1>don't like this guy. You think he's a hater. That's

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>not a fact.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 2>That's a personal opinion.

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Personal opinion. So I think even if he had criticized

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>the administration in some way policy wise, maybe a suspension,

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe he could come back from it. This was just

0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>outright personal attack, personally attacking the why, and.

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:07.439
<v Speaker 3>In doing so, unfortunately, it fuels this narrative that every

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 3>journalist in mainstream media at the big networks all feel

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 3>the same way Terry Moran feels, and they're just hiding

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 3>it and pretending that they don't while they're on the job,

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.839
<v Speaker 3>and yet they actually ask questions and go about their

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 3>job with that bias, with that hatred, with that personal

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 3>negative opinion about the people in power, and that's shaping

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 3>and affecting news coverage, and so that now of course

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 3>people are saying, see that he took his mask off,

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 3>this is the mask that all journalists are wearing at

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 3>the networks, and that's simply not true at all. So

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 3>it's unfortunate that now because of the decision of Terry,

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of other journalists are now being viewed through

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 3>that same lens.

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 2>And they have been for a while.

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 3>It's not like this is a new thing, but now

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 3>of course, but now it's like proof. Aha. See they

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 3>all think that. See they all act with that in

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 3>their minds as they report the news.

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 2>And that's unfortunate.

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, it just feeds that storyline. And now now we're

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 1>helping it along, like we've you know that stuff y'all

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>just railed about and y'all suspicious of Boom. We just

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>gave you some evidence of it. Yes it's only one case,

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but we give you evidence. Look, and people, everybody, no trust.

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Every single journalist has an opinion. Every single journalist has

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>an opinion about Trump and policies and every other politician

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>you can think of, and everything going on in the world.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But the point is you're not supposed to let that

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>influence your work, So don't. We're not sitting here at

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>all thinking no journalists to have an opinion about something

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 1>in our personal lives, but you can't let that out,

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you can't let it get into your work.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Every journalist is different, and I think you and I

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 3>are very similar, Babe. That when and I heard people

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 3>and it wasn't that often that people sometimes would express

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 3>their opinions, and I would actually say it was rare

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 3>in a new Zoom because it was understood you don't

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 3>discuss your personal opinions about specific politicians or their policies.

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 3>You can talk about how they handled it or perhaps

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 3>how we're covering it. But it was very rare, and

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 3>I always removed myself from any of that, and I.

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Always try to.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 3>I really did try to put on blinders when it

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 3>came to reporting, especially when it comes to the Trump administration.

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 3>It is a very delicate dance. Everyone is dancing, truly

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 3>in the newsroom, trying not to express their opinion and

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 3>trying to remain objective. And there's been a big debate

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 3>with Trump because it's taken it to a whole other

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 3>level as he goes out and goes after the press,

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 3>and so it's already tricky. It's already a very troubled

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 3>relationship between mainstream media and the Trump administration.

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind us having more scrutiny. I don't mind

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>somebody forcing us to check ourselves a little more. I

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. If it keeps

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>us from doing our job and has us running scared,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a different thing. Because it seems right now, yeah,

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's Trump to ABC News zero in his administration right now,

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>because he already wiped the floor with the whole George

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Dephanopolis thing. Right, they already pay this due sixteen million dollars.

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 2>And then look at what's happening over at CBS and.

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh that he's still what he's holding them hostage

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>almost with them trying to do a sale of CBS.

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>At this point, he's still how much is that lossuit billions?

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 3>It's billions. And now you have a major, seasoned, reputable

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 3>journalists and executives stepping down because they feel that there's

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 3>an overcorrection now over at CBS that they're trying so

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 3>hard not to upset Trump that they're avoiding or they're

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 3>absolutely changing how they would have normally covered stories.

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So there are some points where you can already point

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to and say networks are caving. He's just handing him

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a win. This is too easy. He didn't have to

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>go search for this one. I mean, I can't even

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump is right on this. It's hard to make any

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>argument that Trump did something wrong in this scenario. He

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>was attacked, his White House was attacked by a guy

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>who has been covering and yes, remember Tara Moran is

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the guy who just interviewed and went in April on

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>his first one hundred days. Why Because ABC News is

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>really running out of people who can interview the President

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of the United State.

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 3>George Sephanoppolis cannot interview the president. Robin Roberts isn't going

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 3>to interview the president. And I don't know how they

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 3>would feel about having her, because I just think that

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 3>they are looking at certain journalists as oh, okay, well she

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 3>interviewed Barack Obama, so we're not going to have her

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 3>interview President Trump. They're very picky as well as to

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 3>who they would choose. They went out, They went after

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 3>David Mure because of how they felt he handled along

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 3>with Lindsay Davis, who would be another one possible, how

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 3>they handled the debate. So he was upset with them.

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 3>So that's not going to happen.

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why it fell to Terry Moran. He was the

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>one that the White House picked. They gave him a hey,

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>which one of these for the interview? He picked Moran.

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>He told Moran during the interview, I picked you because

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I never heard of you. So he was almost saying,

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>congratulations on this opportunity. I'm giving you.

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Correct one hundred percent. That's what he did.

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>They're running out of people who can interview the President

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of the United.

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 2>States now, you know.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 3>And it really is puzzling to me because Terry, look, look,

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 3>anyone who's had a long career, and he certainly has.

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 3>He sixty five years old, has had a long and

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 3>storied career, twenty eight years at ABC News alone, and

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 3>you have ups and downs in your career. And he

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 3>at one point was visible all the time covering the

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 3>White House, the Supreme Court, he went over to the

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 3>London bureau and was a foreign correspondent, and then you know,

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 3>you start to go. You don't get on as much.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 3>But there has been a recent resurgence in his career

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 3>where he yes, he got the Trump interview. They put

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 3>him out front and center in Rome to cover the Pope.

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 3>So his career seemed to be on the upswing.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court and the election were two things they needed

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>his expertise. Car he's a veteran. Rome needed his expertise.

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 3>He's a veteran, and so clearly with what's happening at

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 3>ABC News, you would think they'd hold on to someone

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 2>His contract was coming up.

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 3>That's why I can't get my head around that, because

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 3>you and I both know when your contract's coming up.

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Six months before your contracts up, sometimes even a year

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 3>before your contracts up. If they want to keep you,

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 3>the network will come to you or to your agents

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 3>and try to work something out. A week before your

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 3>contract's up and you haven't worked anything out. That seems

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 3>a little suspect as well, but that is what ABC

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 3>News said that his contract was up on Friday, and

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 3>so this has certainly created a situation in which they

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 3>can officially say they will not be renewing his contract,

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 3>therefore they didn't have to fire him, and they didn't

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 3>have to actually do anything.

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, was it. I'm looking at their statement here in

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>part of it says we have made the decision to

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>not renew, as if that decision had yet to be made,

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>or had they made the decision he was going to stay.

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they were planning on getting rid of them,

0:16:59.080 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the point.

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, I wouldn't so either, But then it's curious to me,

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 3>because you and I. I guess I can only speak

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 3>for myself when several times in my career my contract

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 3>has come up and I wanted to stay. Anytime I

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 3>was on my not that I was ever on bad behavior,

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 3>but I was on my uber best behavior. I said

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 3>yes to everything. I jumped on every plane they asked

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 3>me to, because you know, if they're considering whether or

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 3>not they want to keep you, and they're considering how

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 3>much they would like to pay you, you usually put

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 3>your best foot forward in those months and weeks leading

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 3>up to your contract ending. So it seems extra suspect

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 3>that he would go on this rant and make this

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 3>choice given the timing of his contract.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 2>That's insane.

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>To me, you described like an NFL player playing on

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the last year of his contract and he has just

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like a record year because what you want to happen,

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So he might have Hey, maybe he just said to

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>hell with it, he's over it. He's sixty five, I'm

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>done with this anyway, and just let it go. We

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Last thing for me to you is, do

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you see any way he could have state? No.

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 3>The only way he could have stayed is if there

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 3>was some sort of a mental health crisis of some

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 3>kind that he could say, Hey, I got to go

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 3>get help. I'm going to come back bigger and better

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 3>than ever. I'm gonna apologize. I'm going to talk about

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 3>what journalists should do and why I completely made the

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>wrong call. And perhaps in that context he could have stayed,

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 3>but it would have the bar would be really, really high.

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 2>How about you.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to talk to him, I really would. These

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>are things that it's hard to just what's best for

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the news organization is what I'm supposed to do. If

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I was the head of ABC News, right, you got

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to think about that first. But then you're a human being,

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and we have learned so much more in the past

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>two three years of our lives, about human beings, about

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>mistakes that are made, about just listening, being compassionate. I

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>would like to hear and if he had a good

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>enough reason, I would force him to come out there,

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>get on screen, explain it to everybody. If it was

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a health crisis, you have to explain it to everybody.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to call and get on the phone

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>to apologized, to Stephen Miller, to the White House Press Secretary,

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to the President himself. You're going to come out and

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 1>do everything you can to say I'm sorry and that

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you made a mistake, and here is why you made

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the mistake. If that hurts your news organization, maybe, but

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>also sends a message something about forgiveness, something about mistake,

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>something in But if it's but I'd have to hear

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>his story. And if I didn't buy it and he

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>was just you know, popping off of the mouth and

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>not really apologetic, that would be different. But I just wonder,

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and I just wish things like that didn't have to

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>be the end for people who have contributed so much

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to an organization, to a field of journalism that one

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>tweet at midnight and it's over.

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's sad.

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 3>That's sad after a very long and storied and respectable

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 3>and impressive career. The Terry Moran that you and I

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 3>both know was passionate about journalism, passionate about the truth.

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 3>So we wish him well. We hope that he is

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 3>doing okay. This is not an easy time when the

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 3>world turns against you. We know what that feels like,

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 3>and we wish nothing but the best for him, and

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 3>we hope if he does choose to speak, he is

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 3>able to explain for folks to understand where he was

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 3>and why he did what he did.

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 2>But if he doesn't want to, that's okay as well,

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 2>that's okay as well.

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 3>So thank you for listening to us, and we hope

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 3>that we gave you a little bit more perspective about

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 3>what goes on behind the scenes in newsrooms and just

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 3>trying to figure out where this is headed and maybe

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 3>why we even got here. But hope that everyone just

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 3>gives folks a little bit of a break sometimes when

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 3>you hear the headlines