WEBVTT - NL 1st half grades + Spencer Schwellenbach on MLB pitching evolution

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Pitchers are thrown harder than ever. They're chasing strikeouts, so

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that with how the game is going, we

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>might not be seeing many complete games.

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>First half grades, we're at the mid season mark. Let's

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 2>cover the National League. We did the American League already,

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 2>and if you want to check that out, you know

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 2>where to find it on our YouTube channel. But for

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the National league grades, we'll go from the a's down

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 2>to the f's. So let's start with who received an A.

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 2>And what I want you guys to do is just

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>either give some praise or disagree, agree whatever you want.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Slice through these grades, which we're put together by CBS

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Sports in an article. The Cubs get an A, the

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers get an A, the Brewers get an A, the

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Phillies grab an A, the San Francisco Giants get an A.

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>They were very very gracious with their a's. And then

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 2>there's one ANUS to the New York Mets. Anything you

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>definitely like or don't like there, I mean, I got.

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 3>The standings up in front of me that I'm looking

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 3>at too. Just to kind of go off with some

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 3>like that, that kind of seems pretty pretty straight.

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 4>Really, Like Milwaukee gets an A.

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean that's good, but like what.

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 3>I might move the Mets up to a straight A.

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>They got the ten agree with that degrees? There should

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 3>be no minus on that one. I think Milwaukee, maybe

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 3>you switch those, maybe you get the minus on the

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Milwaukee side.

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Then yeah, yeah, Like I thought Milwaukee was gonna be good,

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and they are good, but they're not blowing the National

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 2>League Central away. And I know the Cubs obviously have

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>been playing ball, so for me put them more in

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the B range. I know your boy Murph, your old coach,

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Pat Murphy, would put them in the B range. He's

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>been a little grumpier with the boys this year. He's

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 2>expecting more after his first year went so swimmingly. Maybe

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm being hard on the Brewers. I thought I picked

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the Brewers to win the division. Obviously, the Cubs have

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 2>been a jugger and I didn't see Pete crow Armstrong coming.

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 2>I thought those two would be going at it for

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the division. So I just I think for the Brewers,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 2>based on what they've done for years, roster didn't change

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 2>that much. That's a bee for me in terms of

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>their first half.

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:24.279
<v Speaker 6>I don't hate it, Okay, And then.

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 4>You want to move to the Bees.

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean San Diego and San Franz are not that

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 5>too far apart, Like I don't know, I know, I felt.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 4>Like, but this has to do with expectations.

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 2>So these grades are given out based on what they

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 2>thought teams were going to do right and what public

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>perception was, and then how it performed for people that

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 2>they're like, oh, I didn't. A lot of people had

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 2>the Giants as the fourth best team in the National

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 2>League West, and they've certainly exceeded expectations. Got to give

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the front office credit for devers. So here's the Bees,

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 2>the Padres got to be the Red's got to be minus,

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 2>and the Saint Louis Cardinals get to be plus.

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 5>See.

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Actually, for me, you would move the Reds up.

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 5>I would move the Reds down.

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 4>I would move them down.

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Maybe, I guess I just had lower expectations off the

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>jump for them.

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 6>That could be it.

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, yeah, that's one hundred percent. If it was expectations

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 5>for the Reds. A lot of people are choosing them

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 5>to win the division. They're what six, I got it

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 5>right here, there's six and.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 4>A half and they're like five hundred, right, Yeah, they're

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 4>two and.

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 5>A half out of the wild Card. They're forty two

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 5>and thirty nine. I yeah, I would say plus.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going C for the Reds. How about for

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 2>me the Cardinals getting a B plus C. I think

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>that's a team that deserved to be in the A's

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 2>because most people thought the Cardinals were gonna suck this year,

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 2>and they do not suck.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 5>You're right, They're only one game out of the Wildcard too, So.

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 2>If we're giving San Francisco an a right, there's a

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit of gracious grading here. The Cardinals were supposed

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 2>to be worse than the Giants according to many.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 4>The Cardinals are.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 2>In the thick of it, so I know they took

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 2>a step back since their hot start, but they're still

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:05.839
<v Speaker 2>in the thick of a wild card race. I would

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 2>throw an A their way.

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 3>I feel like this is the kind of Cardinals team

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 3>they were expecting out of them last year. That's why

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 3>I was such a letdown last year for them.

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, and then they keep the same roster, they roll

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 2>it out again this year and it's much better. I mean, obviously,

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 2>you know when you're plugging in computer models, and last

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 2>year didn't go well. They dinged them and brought them

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 2>down a notch. But there's guys who took another step forward.

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 2>So there's your list on the a's and the b's,

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and let's start to get to the crap. So here's

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 2>here's your c's, okay, and one team for me stands

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 2>out in this greer.

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 2>So the Diamondbacks get a C minus, the Nationals get

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 2>a C minus, the Marlins get a C minus.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 5>They all should be lower.

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 4>They all should be lower.

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.239
<v Speaker 2>The Backs are in the wildcard race and they don't

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 2>have half their pitching staff anymore.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 5>The Diamondbacks are three games out but a wildcard. I

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 5>don't think they're making it. I don't think I know,

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 5>But we're not talking about expectations. The expectations. They should

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 5>be one of the top right in that division. You're right,

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 5>I would give them. I would give the Nationals struggle bus,

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 5>Miami struggle bus. I see them all as a D.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 2>But you you thought the Marlins were going to be bad,

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and they're bad, but they're not as bad. So maybe

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 2>that that I mean, that's how they explain they're grading.

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 5>They're twelve and a half out of a wildcard, eleven

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 5>games under five no wildcard, no they are excuse me,

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 5>they are nine and a half pretty much the same.

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, so to me that I mean you C minus.

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 2>I can see the Nationals were supposed to be a

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 2>little bit better than this and they're in a similar spot.

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 5>No, yeah, no, they're they're right, they're right there too.

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 5>The Nationals are eleven and a half games out, so

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 5>they're actually behind that.

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 4>That's a D for me.

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 5>All three D.

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 3>This is off expectations.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, like what you thought of these teams going into

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the season, Like, I'll give you the perfect example.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 4>Right, right to be a sports stop.

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 2>But Kip, yesterday when we did the A L, the

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 2>White Sox got like a B or a B minus

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 2>because they were, like we thought you get rid of Crochet.

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 2>They might be even worse and they're bad, but they're

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 2>not the worst team ever.

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'm gonna say. Where it's like it's Colorado

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 3>and Pittsburgh like seized because they're exactly where we thought

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 3>they might be. Kind of.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you're right, that makes sense.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, okay, so so do you have any problems though? Arizona, Washington,

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Miami And then I'll get to the three f's here.

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm Todd a little bit. I think Arizona could

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 3>be almost indeed, just because you have such high hopes

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 3>coming off as a World Series last.

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 4>Year two years ago.

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 2>But yees, I mean last year though eighty nine wins

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 2>the actually yeah, yeah, they had Corbyn Burns, but here's.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 5>The the ian tying the Diamondbacks.

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm just I'm just saying. I mean, I guess factor

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 4>I had him going, yeah, I'm screwed.

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 2>But Burns get for Justin Martinez lafter the year. I mean,

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 2>they've lost half their staff, but you know, it's fair

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>like Gallon is not Gallon for the first half of

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the season, so there's some of that going on with

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the pitching staff. Ftfan, did you know that huel has

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 2>sold over five hundred million meals around the world and

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 2>now it is your turn to try it?

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 5>All right?

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 7>I drink it Thrik of Scott, so I can discuss

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 7>huele on how I love it. I had some for

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.679
<v Speaker 7>breakfast this morning. I like to drink it post workout

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 7>because of the protein included in it. It always tastes delicious,

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 7>whether it's strawberry, banana, chocolate, vanilla, whatever the flavor is,

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 7>it tastes like a dessert.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, it should not taste as good as it does.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 4>I agree.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 2>New customers get fifteen percent off plus a free gift

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>at Heuel dot com when you use the FT code

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 2>that is foul foul at huel dot com slash foul.

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Don't miss out. Try Huel today for a perfectly balanced meal.

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 2>If you miss a meal, if you're looking for a

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 2>little protein boost. You just saw me drink the black addition.

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Ready to drink. There's the vanilla flavor. I love what

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the chocolate brings to the table. It's really damn good,

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 2>So give it a shot. FT fan fifteen percent off

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 2>plus a free gift for new customers with the code foul.

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 4>All right, So here's your.

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 5>F's chef employed with the Mets.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 4>And that might happen. He loves that trade might happen.

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Uh, here's your f's ready Atlanta, Colorado, Pittsburgh. So kipt

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>for me, like Pittsburgh getting an F. I thought they

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 2>were gonna suck, and they suck.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 3>That's what that's my case. That's what I'm saying.

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 5>I get.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 3>I get Atlanta because you had such lofty expectations. Why

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 3>they're done.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 5>You have Colorado and A because they're supposed to be bad.

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but they're gonna be They might be the worst

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 4>team ever.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but they didn't expect to do good either, so

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 5>they my expectations of them has do bad. So they

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 5>should get an eight plus. They should be the highest one,

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, if we're going by that.

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 2>But that's right, they're living up to expectations. They're exceeding

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 2>expectations in terms of how bad they are.

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 5>You've been one hundred and one?

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes, what about the other two?

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 5>Atlanta F because where they're supposed to be and Pittsburgh

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 5>should be in the middle of the packs C minus. Yeah.

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 2>See, there you go. That's a big, great difference. Though

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 2>they're getting an F. I was gonna say either a

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 2>D or nobody's I mean not nobody, but most people

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 2>aren't expected. Paul Skeins doesn't pitch every day, No, he

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 2>does not.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, you just need a team to try every

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 3>day too, and they don't even have that.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 6>It looks like.

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 3>I could be singling out with a person, but you

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 3>guys know what I'm talking about. But it's just that

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 3>that's a that's just an organization that needs a complete makeover.

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 2>How would you feel if you've been on a team,

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 2>Kip for five six years that has not been competitive

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 2>the entire time period, doesn't it start to like become

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 2>the norm where you're showing up to work in a

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 2>different way if that makes sense. Obviously you want you're

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 2>playing for your stats and for your contract and for

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>your quote for your team. But it's not sufficient roster.

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 2>It's been like that for a long time now, and

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 2>there's no buying from the front office.

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna start to want out of that organization. But

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 3>even before then, you're gonna want to like put your

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 3>foot down and be like enough is enough? Can we

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 3>do something about this? As the people who are here

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 3>like this isn't good enough? Can someone like you got

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 3>to step up and just be like this is not

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 3>good enough guys and go from there. But yeah, it's

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 3>all all roads and to you want to know that organization.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 3>If you don't see change for five six years, will

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 3>you've been there.

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 5>And there's two things that you can muster up and

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 5>do well. One one, you can muster up you can

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 5>look yourself in the mirror and say, hey, I got

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 5>to play for myself here. Every once in a while,

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 5>I gotta come out and try and do my best,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 5>not worry about what everybody else is doing or can't

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 5>wait till football season comes, fantasy football the off season.

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 5>Like there's two jurstic things you can do. You know,

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 5>how long do you want to play this game for?

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 5>Because I'll just find somebody else if you're not going

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 5>to push it to the envelope and get after you know,

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 5>whether it's a ground ball, pop fly, you know, all

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 5>little things. Just just give effort. You know, it doesn't

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 5>mean you got to go one hundred percent, but just

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 5>give some effort.

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, trying to see any there's your your finalist of

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 2>grades here and trying to see if we've got anybody

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 2>on here that that heavily disagrees or agrees. Boo in

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the chat said DBAC should be second. Yeah, D plus

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 2>they said, ISN'TD plus not an actual grade? Isn't it

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 2>just D n F?

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 4>That's is that how it works?

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, Yeah, I think it is.

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 6>No students, Like Michael.

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 5>Came back, I said, come on, frase, Ben Rice says

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 5>no business in the all. That's a different time, John, Michael,

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 5>you talk a lot of Yankees on there. Brother, I

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 5>love you, but I have to strongly disagree with you.

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 5>He needs either to be a reserve for sure. I

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 5>don't have all the numbers in front of me, but

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 5>i've I've seen with my eye.

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Here's Vince said cards seven games over five hundred elite.

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 2>No but deaf uh not the twenty twenty three cards

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 2>or twenty four is probably what he means. So yeah,

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you there. I think I think they deserve

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 2>an A. I'm big on that one, all right. So

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 2>if you disagree with anything, or you agree with anything

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 2>from either what CBS put out or what we put

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 2>out there, let us know. Thank you very much. And

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 2>apparently oh D plus n D minus our grades F

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 2>minus never not quite Okay, great, there're three best students

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 2>here on a Friday. Hey, we've got Spencer schwellenback joining

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 2>us from the Braves right now. I think second time.

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I think joined us last year on ft SUS. Spencer's back. Spencer,

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Great to see you. How's your sophomore season going, Man.

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 6>It's going good. Thanks for having me on guys.

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, of course.

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Now I have to start here just because we're fresh

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 2>off this series and I'm from the area. So as

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Todd father, did you know that you're the nicest, most

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>hated player for Mets fans.

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 6>I did not know that.

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 4>You know why though? Yeah, tell everyone what do you got?

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>What do you got on the Mets that you just

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 2>absolutely carve him up?

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, it's like like pitching against good

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>teams and like like pitching against good players. So it's

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>fun pitching against that team.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 5>I want to ask, Yeah, that's funny. You know you

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 5>think in New York queens like you are the nice

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 5>one of the nicer guys. You know, you don't talk smack,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 5>You just get after you've been having a really good season.

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:33.599
<v Speaker 5>What do you what do you attest that too? Is

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 5>there some is there like a mentor there? You know

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 5>guys that you know that are taking you by the wings,

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 5>Like who's a guy right now that you talk to

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 5>after a game before a game and try and get

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 5>either that mental approach ready or that grind like all right,

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 5>this is what I need to do. Let's let's have

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 5>a chat.

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. I mean, first guy that comes to mind is

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 6>Chris Sale.

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's he's done it for a long time

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>at a really high level, and you know, he's been

0:13:57.760 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>through a lot of injuries.

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 6>He's he said, a lot of success.

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.479
<v Speaker 1>And he's the guy that I go to with any questions,

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>with any concerns. And then Spencer Strider has been a

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>huge help having him back this year, just watching bullpens

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>and picking his brain on certain things.

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 6>And you know it, he.

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Knows a lot about the game, a lot about pitch design,

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>pitch grips, you know how it should look. So just

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of leaning on those guys and trusting in the

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>coaches and the catchers, and just trusting to myself as well.

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Did you tell Sale that it's okay to have just

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 3>a little bit meat on those bones that might protect

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 3>you when you lay out for a ball. Maybe an

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 3>ounce of fat might give you a little cushions.

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can't pull fat. I think he might be starting. Yeah,

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he's scared he's gonna lose the Gold Glove this year,

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>so he's trying to make up for it by diving

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>foot balls.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 3>When he's so he's on the eel. Now, who have

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 3>you thought, Because you've got some great pitchers to pick from,

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 3>and you kind of just hint it on it a

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 3>little bit. So who have you been learning the most from?

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Who have you been taking the most from on how

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 3>to approach pitching this year and your second year round. Yeah,

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 3>so just leaning on Rick Kranitz pitching coach.

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>He's you know, old school, but there's a lot to

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>learn with that.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, I grew up in today's game.

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>You have a lot of a lot of metrics and

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>track man data, and sometimes you kind of overlook what

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like to actually pitch. And he's one of the

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>best in the game at at understanding swings, understanding certain counts, hitters,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's he's helped me a lot with that, and

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>then going on with other pitchers like Pierce Johnson's got

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the best curveballs I've ever seen, just talking

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to him about different release points and Grant Holmes, he's

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>he's a when you look at his slider, his curveball

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>he's got. He spins the ball with the best of

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>them as well. So when I'm when I'm in going

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong with the slider, when the slider's not moving right,

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>those are some of the guys that you know I

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>talked to with that.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 5>I want to bring up a little bit. Ten games

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 5>out of the NL East. You know it wasn't the start.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 5>You guys wanted. Ronald Kuna has been absolutely dominant. You

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 5>see this team making a run here, or do you

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 5>see this team you know, trade deadline coming up? Do

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 5>you hear anything about what's going on with the Braves

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 5>you think a trader too? Or how you feeling about

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 5>the squad right now?

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we trust in each and every one of us.

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>We know that we got a team that can get

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it done and it's just just a matter of time.

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Spencer, the All Star Games coming up, obviously it's in Atlanta,

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 2>and speaking of Akunya, he's going to be doing the

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>derby there, which is cool. I know most guys are

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 2>not are going to be folks on the season, but

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.719
<v Speaker 2>this is your sophomore season. How special would it be

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>to get there because you know, probably for the rest

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 2>of your career and I'm gonna have another Atlanta All

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Star hosting situation like this.

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it would definitely be special, and it

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>being in Atlanta, I'd be a really good one to

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>be in. But like you said, I mean, we got

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of games left before the All Star break

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're trying to win some games, get back to

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 1>five hundred, to get a set up to have a

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>good second half.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 5>I want to switch gears here just for a second.

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 5>Saw you from Saginaw, Michigan. Was hockey ever something big

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 5>for you out there? Because I know in that Midwest

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 5>area there's some good hockey out there. Talk to me

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 5>a little about if not, what are some activities you

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 5>like doing besides that?

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So I never competitively played hockey, but every winner, the

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>pond would freeze, and me and all my friends would

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>go out with the two nets and ten of us

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>would go play on the frozen pond.

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 6>So that was a lot of fun.

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>But both my parents were basketball players, so that was

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of during the same season, so I never got

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:13.479
<v Speaker 1>to play hockey. But other than that, love every sport

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>pick a ball, tennis, golf, basketball, football, soccer, you know,

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>literally anything that it has a ball or a puck

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:23.959
<v Speaker 1>or whatever.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 6>Like playing.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you're a normal human, you can't speak English

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 2>to your pup. But what you can do to understand

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 2>what they love, which is Spontan tango on kibble, is

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 2>to see how they react when you put the unkibble

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 2>in the bowl. And my pup, pinal Lope, loves it.

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 4>So does Bella.

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 7>Well, Bella speaks Spanish, so she says, Maybeen, I love

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 7>this stuff.

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 2>She says, Wow, Dad, thanks for creating a custom plan

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 2>based on my age, weight, breed, and activity level.

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 4>You nailed it.

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 2>And also it's made with one hundred percent whole fresh

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 2>ingredients like real USDA meats, fruits and veggies. But it's

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 2>forty percent less expensive than frozen food. So upgrade your

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 2>pets bowl with spotan Tango unkibble and for a limited time,

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 2>go to spotantango dot com slash foul and use code

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>foul for fifty percent off your first order. That's spotantango

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash foul, code foul to get fifty percent

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 2>off your first order. Hey, so let me let me

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 2>take it back to the mound here for a moment.

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 2>So you had your first complete game of your career,

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 2>that was what three weeks ago, June eleventh. Where do

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 2>you think we're at as you're a young pitcher here

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 2>with the sport, trying to let guys let it eat

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more again with innings pitch and I

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 2>think a good example that we've been using in the

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 2>past week is a team in the other league in

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the AL, the Rays. We're thriving right now, and they

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 2>were the team kind of leading the charge at one

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 2>point with openers, bullpen games, et cetera. Now they're top

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 2>three in baseball and innings pitched from their starters. One

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 2>other thing I wanted to throw out there is we

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 2>had schemes against Misraska the other day. Everyone's watching the

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 2>play sells out. So what can we do to highlight

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the starter more and also from a younger level, right

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 2>or a lower level, allow starters to let it eat

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 2>so they can do that up in the big leagues.

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's a good question.

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>It's nice seeing starting pitchers go deep into games. And

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, with with how the game has kind of changed,

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we're chasing strikeouts or we're chasing swing and miss, so

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you see less of the you know, seven eight, nine

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>inning games. So but for me, I just like to

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I try to go fifteen innings or less per inning.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of what the goal was in the minor

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 1>leagues with the Braves, like we want to be fifteen

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>pitches or less and that'll allow you to go deeper

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:02.719
<v Speaker 1>into games. And listen, I mean there's the pitchers are

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>throwing harder than ever. They're you know, they're chasing strikeouts.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think that with how the game is going,

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>we might not be seeing many complete games, but it's

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>nice to.

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 6>It's nice to definitely go deep into games.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 2>How did the Braves work it with you when you

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 2>were in the minors, Because the Braves have done a

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 2>nice job of getting some starting pitchers developed that weren't

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 2>always the most highly touted, right, and then all of

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 2>a sudden they come up to the bigs and I'm like,

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 2>this guy's ready to go and he can pitch deep

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 2>into outings. They've done a better job than I would

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.719
<v Speaker 2>say most teams on that front. So what was it

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 2>like when you were talking to them in terms of

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 2>the balance of you know, not overdoing it, but also

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 2>for them to let you see how it is to

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 2>work into a sixth seventh inning. I doubt you went

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 2>into an eighth in the miners. Did they let you

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 2>go that deep?

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, So my first year in twenty twenty three,

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I was coming off of Tommy John, so it was

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of twenty five pitch outings and then

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>thirty pitch outings.

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 6>You know, So it's they did it the right way

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 6>with building me up.

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if I got into the seventh

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 1>inning that first year at all if they only went six,

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>But then the second year in twenty twenty four, I

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>threw maybe into the seventh on once or twice.

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 6>But they do a really good job with.

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Monitoring guys' arms, and I think they have a pretty

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>strict pitch count of around eighty five pitches, and they

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>want to see guys that you know, can maintain their

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>ve low and command deep in games, and then they'll

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>let you earn it after that.

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Besides your pitch count, then from the difference between year

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 3>one and year two, what else? What other differences can

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 3>you talk about that you've noticed in the game, Because

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.479
<v Speaker 3>usually it's you come up, you might have success hitters

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 3>adjust to you, then you adjust back, So this game

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 3>will always go back and forth.

0:22:58.920 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 6>A little bit.

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 3>That's the cat and this game. But what are some

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 3>of the other big adjustments or big differences you've seen

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 3>now between year and one and year two.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so doing scoutering report stuff, you've got to understand

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>that the teams are also doing a scattering report against you.

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But then you also want to pitch to your strengths.

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's kind of like you said, a cat

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and mouse game where you know it's it's in year two,

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I've understood to read swings a little bit better. Last

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>year it was just like, Okay, this pitch is supposed

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to work to this guy, and if it doesn't work, now,

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 1>now what are you going to do?

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 5>You know, so.

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Understanding swings, understanding different locations and why they work, and

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>also doing scattering reports and looking at not only hot

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in cold zones, but you know, seeing what the swing

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>looks like a guy's got a flat swing, or if

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a guy's you know, trying to lift the ball.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 6>Just stuff like that.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Now, if you have a pitch that you think is

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 3>going to work against a specific guy and you go

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 3>to it and he nails it, you're like, you got

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 3>him to chase. Do you how often do you immediately

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 3>go right back to that or do you know? Then

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 3>you're like, okay, I know I've got this in my arsenal.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 3>I might save it for till two strikes or that

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 3>this works against him and I you can then pick

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 3>and choose when you get it, or it's like, hey,

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 3>let's go with this one. It works, we're gonna keep

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 3>going until it doesn't.

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think there's a there's a time and place

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>for to repeat the pitch, depending if it's you know,

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>first at bat, second at bat, third at that you

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>know you got you gotta save some stuff for you know,

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the third time through the lineup. So just understanding, you know,

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>even if there's guys on base too, it's also.

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 6>A different scenario there.

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I've got six pitches, so it gives

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>me a.

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 6>Gives me more to work with too, that doesn't.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Hey, yeah, and on on that topic, I mean, it

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 2>seems like guys are able to pick up pitches quicker nowadays.

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure some of that has to do with the

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 2>tech and the advancement on the coaching front. How have

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 2>you noticed that, you know, whether it's in the miners

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 2>and now up in the bigs and guys that you

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 2>pitch around, where all of a sudden everyone's shown up

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 2>to spring training with a new pitch and it's not

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 2>just I mean, obviously sometimes they're toying with it, but

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 2>it's it's often actually converting into being used in the

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 2>regular season. Right Like for me, I feel like I

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 2>have to do a lot more homework going into a

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 2>season as a broadcaster, being like, okay, what are all

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 2>of his pitches now in his pitch usage where you know,

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe go fifteen years back and it's like, oh, I

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 2>know what he throws.

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 4>It's the same thing his entire career.

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think with all the data that we have,

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>if you see someone spinning their fastball at a certain

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>like on a certain access, you know that they can

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>throw a seam shifted sinker or they can throw a

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>cutter like. So it's like adding these pitches is easier

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>than it sounds because you're you're ultimately just throwing the

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>pitch the same way but with a different grip. And

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>there's there's so many really intelligent people that that know

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the game, a lot about grips, release points,

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think that guys are are we're

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of working harder than ever in that aspect as well.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Spencer, who on the braves should we be talking

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 2>more about? Obviously we know a lot of the names

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>that are signed up for lifetime deals essentially, but who else?

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Who else should we be talking about this year that

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 2>you know we're not talking enough about on a national level.

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think Drake Baldwin should be an All Star.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't get enough credit. I think he's he came

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>into the year. Uh, he started off slow. He was

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>crushing the ball everywhere and his his average is hitting

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>stats they just didn't you know, it didn't show that

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and he stayed with it.

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 6>Was has been awesome in the clubhouse. He's been awesome

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 6>to throw too.

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, not only should he he

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>be in the All Star Game, but he needs to

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>be talked about a lot more.

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 4>I like that.

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, tell us a little more about him. I don't

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 2>know a lot about him. I haven't really seen him

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 2>too many interviews. Like he seems a little bit quiet

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 2>and hidden.

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 4>So what's he like?

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's he is a quiet guy. He's goofy, always

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>has a smile on his face.

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 6>Uh, he's.

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 1>I threw to him a lot in in minor leagues

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:32.479
<v Speaker 1>and just to see how much better that he has

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten with receiving, blocking, pitch calling, and reading swings. It's

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>really fantastic to watch. Really good guy.

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Nice well Spencer, dude, this was awesome, man, Really appreciate

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 2>the time. Great to have you back on and to

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 2>see you thriving again. So keep doing your thing, dude.

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 6>Thanks guys,