WEBVTT - Cultural Appropriation

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Christian

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Seger Robert Our. Last episode, we were talking about samurai swords,

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and I neglected to bring up one of my favorite

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>aspects of that historical Japanese culture sort of tied into

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>samurai swords. Do you remember ever seeing a net suke before.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>They're these little carved objects that would be in different

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>shapes and you would use them. Essentially they had like

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a hole through them that you would use to tie

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>strings like for purses and things like that, that you

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>would hang from a sash or belt. Yeah. Yeah, I

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 1>believe I've seen the Yeah, I've got one that's like

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a little cat. It's an anthropomorphic cat that's wearing a

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>robe and it's supposed to be like a mythical figure

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of this sort of like cat creature transforming itself so

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a woman in tricking people. Uh. And

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>I got this at the pbody ESX Museum in Salem, Massachusetts.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>They have this amazing uh collection of Asian artifacts but

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>also just marines stuff. Basically, the gist is that um

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>sailors who are from the area would bring all of

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>these things back after their journeys around the world, and

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they eventually went into the PVD SX Museum, so you

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>can see all of this really cool historical material there.

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But I had this net suk. It sits on my

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>desk as I'm working on episodes like this one, and

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I kind of wonder, like, is there something inherently weird

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about me, you know, uh, fetishizing this and it mind's

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>not a historical and that's okay. It's like a mass

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>produced one that you get at the gift shop or whatever.

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's something kind of odd about me incorporating that

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>into my I don't know, artistic aesthetic my setup of

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>my desk, right, you know, it's next to literally a

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a plastic sculpture of a Xeno morph that ec Steiner

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>gave me for my birthday, you know, so it's like

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not like I'm only into Japanese historical aesthetics. Well,

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>this this is an interesting question because I mean, obviously

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the idea of cultural appropriation today and

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we're more and more, uh, we're we're forced

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to ask these questions about our lives and the things

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in our lives, the physical objects as well with the ideas.

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I like what you said about the sailors enturing out

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>into the world and returning home with these essentially knickknacks

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh and and artifacts. And I mean our lives

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are kind of like that. We we travel around, we

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>experience new places, new ideas, and we end up incorporating

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>those ideas into our own worldview, into our own sense

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of self. We end up bringing um artifacts into our home,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and our homes become reflections of our of our interest

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>and our travels and our experience. Yeah. Yeah, and that's

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>how I think about it. I don't just like, it's

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>not like a just collection of random items that I

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>just throw on my desk or something, you know what

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, although you know, obviously there's certain things that

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I will that stay on the desk and other things

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that go in a box somewhere. But yeah, I don't know.

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>It's strange. Like the alien for some reason is fine

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>because that's like American culture, But there's or is it

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Swiss culture, right exactly? That's true based on our our

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Hans Rudy Geeker episode. There's also I have a statue

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of Ganesh on my desk as well of the Hindu

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>god of removing obstacles. Well, I have I have a

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>goodesh in my pocket. I forgot about that. I always

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>always carry a ges with me. So we're kind of

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>laying out some of the details of our own um, our,

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>own homes, our own sense of selves self. And I

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine everyone listening you're probably doing the same thing. You're

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about, all right, what what items are on my person,

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>are in my house and just in my mind? And

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>from what cultures do those things arise? Yeah, and there's

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>probably some of you two who are having a reflex

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that I think is pretty common in Western culture, which

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is like, well, what would be wrong about that? You know,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's sort of an immediate defensiveness, and we're

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk a little bit about that today as well. Like,

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically, we're looking at cultural appropriation and then

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna look at examples that are positive and negative

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of it, but then look at the arguments for and

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>against it, because there's been plenty, Like, let me tell you,

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this is an episode that there was uh no lack

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of research. There was plenty of stuff out there to

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>incorporate into the literature. And at the end of this episode,

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>we are not going to have This is not one

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of those episodes where we're gonna have a you know,

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a bullet list of what something is. We're hopefully going

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to provide you with some additional tools to evaluate, uh,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>your own life, your own sense of culture, to know

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>what sort of the arguments are on both sides. We

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>are also not going to do an exhaustive examination of

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>every form of alleged cultural appropriation out there, because I mean,

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you get into say, the music genre, the fashion genre,

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's so many different examples that pop up, and

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>many of them are specialized, and they had their their

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>arguments on both sides in many cases. I can think

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of one example off the top of my head that

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>I came up in a bunch of the articles, but

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I didn't include it here. The singer Selena Gomez apparently

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>wore a bindy at one point like a music video

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>or maybe a live performance or something like that, and

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>she was criticized for it. I was just like, I

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like this really fits into the discussion that

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Robert and I are going to have. That is probably

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for some of you, like one of the first examples

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that comes to mind, right like Likewise, I don't think

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk a whole lot about hip hop

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>culture and it's uh and and it's and and how

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it is treated in an American culture, but that certainly

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is a huge area of discussion as well. Now, I

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>guess the first thing we need to do is just

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>say what is cultural appropriation? And that really that really

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>splits into two questions. Here, what what is cultural appropriation?

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And then what does it consists of? So the first

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>question is a little easier broadly, and I mean broadly speaking,

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the adoption or use of the elements

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of one culture by members of another culture. But of

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>course that that again, that's extremely broad because this sort

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of cultural exchange has been going on as long as

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>human society has experienced a convergence of cultures. Uh, the

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>cats kind of out of the bag in terms of

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>keeping most global cultures entirely pure for a variety of reasons. Now,

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll get on into a lot of this as we progress,

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>but it should come as no surprise that there are

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>plenty of vantage of individuals out there who prefer the

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>term cultural misappropriation. So it's not merely the fact that

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>one culture is adopting or using elements of another culture.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It's that they're doing so in a way that is

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>dishonest or harmful, insensitive or crass, or plays on some

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>some larger inequity. Yeah, there were actually arguments made in

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the articles that I read for this that

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially we're like, there's a linguistic problem at hand. Here

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>are semantics issue that cultural appropriation is the term we're

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>all using for this thing, but misappropriation might be better. Yeah,

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>because if you you often hear it just thrown out like, oh,

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that's cultural misappropriation, that's like that's a sin stop it,

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>where whereas there's obviously going to be a lot more

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>nuance at play. Yeah, if you just look at like

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the Salem Encyclopedia, it's entry on cultural appropriation says that

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it is quote the lifting of aspects of one culture

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or society for use by another culture. Pretty close to

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>what you just said. This can be anything from art

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to music, fashion, etcetera. Sometimes the intermingling creates highly regarded

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>new pieces of work, though right and regardless, some argue

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that the adoption of their culture by outsiders is seen

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>as disrespectful and offensive, so sometimes it's actually defined as

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>quote the use of works of indigenous people's by non

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>indigenous people, so there's a little bit of a distinction there.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>The concept actually emerged in academia in the late nineteen

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>seventies and nineteen eighties, and it was a critique of colonialism,

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>so you can see why it applies, for instance, to

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>our Western society, American society, or British colonized society. But

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>by the nineteen nineties it had a solid place in

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>academic discourse, and I can say when I studied for

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>my master's degree between two thousand and six and two thousand,

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it was a significant part of the literature for rhetoric,

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>cultural studies, and communication. I mean every class I was

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>in there was at least a section on cultural appropriation

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and how it fit into the theories and discourse around

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>those ideas. Now, I think one way to help us

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>get started here is to keep in mind, what is

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>culture right? Like that alone is a really hard question

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>to answer in my mind. When I'm usually just talking

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>about culture casually or on one of these shows, if

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot of research in front of me,

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about culture as how people make sense of

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the world. There's too much of a cacophony of sensory

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>information going on for us as human beings to make

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>sense of There's so much happening our brains literally can't

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>keep up. So culture is how we understand all of

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Is basically like a filter, right uh. And

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's way more complicated than that. But some people

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>will say, well, culture is norms or social behavior, or materialism,

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or politics, or customs and traditions. But let's not forget

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>there's also subcultures as well that exists within larger umbrella ones.

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:53.599
<v Speaker 1>The main one that I always think, well, you just

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>brought up hip hop. Hip hop is a good example

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of the subculture, but I think of punk is a

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>subculture that exists within what dain culture, right uh. And

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>then the dictionary says culture is quote the way of life,

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>especially the general customs and beliefs of a particular group

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of people at a particular time. In general, it's used

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to refer to our use of symbols to represent our experiences,

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>but done in a creative way. Yeah, this is one

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>of those areas where I often come back to this,

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>this analogy I keep rolling out of lenses and uh.

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>And while it's it's easy, it's easy to think that

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>our view of reality is completely unfiltered by by anything.

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Or we might think, oh, I'm seeing reality through a

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>single lens, you know, a single pane of glass that

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that comes down over my space helmet. But I feel

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that all of us have multiple lenses that are employed, uh,

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>many at the same time, and then in various combinations.

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And and so when you try and yeah, when you

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>try and boil down what is this culture, you end

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>up countering not one lens, but several, and some of

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>them may not be employed at all times. Yeah, that's

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting way to look at it. And I

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>think too, And I'll get into this, we'll talk a

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit later about a guy named Gert Hofstad and

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>his sort of cultural theories. Uh. But I think that

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is the best way to keep this in mind, that

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>your analogy of lenses essentially is that like, different people

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>have their different lenses on, right, and they're not always

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing the same thing. They're understanding those symbols through different experiences. Yeah,

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's important for understanding how we're viewing the world,

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but also how another individual is looking at the same topic.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's key to this whole entire discussion because it's

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 1>there's the aspect of how am I interacting with a

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>cultural idea or an artifact? But then how was another

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>person looking at that? And then and then how are

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>we supposed to have a conversation about it? Yeah, that's

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the inherent problem in human communication, is that there's going

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a misunderstanding no matter what. There's always what's

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>like referred to as psychological noise is in verbal communication. Right,

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not telepaths, We're not beaming our thoughts directly into

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody else's head. But through words and the use of

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>other symbols, we're trying to convey meaning back and forth

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to each other. It's just that our way of understanding

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that meaning is vastly different, especially depending on what kind

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of culture you were raised in. All Right, we're gonna

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break, and when we come back, we're

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna jump into some examples of sort of positive cultural appropriation,

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>definite negative examples of cultural appropriation or cultural misappropriation, as

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>well as the the ever cantalizing gray areas. Thank Okay,

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So before we get into positive and negative

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>examples of cultural appropriation here, I actually have one that

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned about for myself. It's something that I'm working on.

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 1>Most of our listeners now that I work on. Well,

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>both of us do we both do fiction outside of

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. I do comics. You do short fiction. Uh, well,

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you've you've written long fiction too, right, Yeah, the short

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff is the main the main material that is out

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>there though, and and of course that that means something.

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>With both of our work, we're talking about multiple characters,

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>multiple voices, and the characters of varying um ethnicities, cultural backgrounds, etcetera. Yeah,

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so I mentioned this actually in the Samurai Saw It episode.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm working on this project right now, and basically I

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>recognize that the diversity of race, gender, sexuality, nationality, and

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>age really needs to improve in modern fiction, especially if

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>we want our culture these artifacts to represent the world

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that we live in. This is kind of tricky for

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a straight white, middle aged guy like me. Uh. And

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm working on a news story that's a sci fi story.

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It's set in Trinidad and the majority of the characters

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.359
<v Speaker 1>are black. It's also going to incorporate elements of Japanese

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>culture into it, including the samurai ethos that we're referring

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>to in that other episoisode. So I'm trying to write

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>this thing, and I want to address themes of class

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and race and violence in it. But I genuinely wonder

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>am I appropriating somebody else's culture here? Right? Like? This

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is a tricky tightrope. Should I stick to only what

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I know? Should my characters only be white, an American

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and male? Right? Or should I try to improve diversity

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>leading by example through my storytelling. I don't know. It's

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>something I like, I genuinely worry about. I've done stuff

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:33.119
<v Speaker 1>in the past, um where I've had characters of diversity

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that I've made the focal point of my work, and

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>other stuff I've written have been from characters who are,

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, essentially variations of meat. Yeah. I mean, this

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is always a quandary as as a writer, as as

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a creator, probably of any form, because there certainly are

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>voices that insist that say, an African American perspective should

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>not be approached from from a non African American writer.

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So is a writer, then, you know, forced to exist

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>within the confines of their own cold sure? And if so,

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>how far does it go? Can Stephen King right about

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a Southerner. Did did Tennessee raised Coleman McCarthy appropriate the

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>cultures of Mexico and the American West when he moved

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>out there and started to write westerns. Uh yeah, this

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is this is the kind of way that I think

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that the modern writer's mind especially continues to eat away

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>as yourself. You know, it's like a dog gnawing its

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>own tail, your second guessing all of your creative choices.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>But but I have to I have to say from

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>my own part, like when when I've written, say, I

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>wrote about a biracial character in one of my Grave

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Stoppers tales and it was a it was a slide

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>homage to Joe Christmas and Faulkner's Light in August. But

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and personally, I always approach a character like that as

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to understand another viewpoint, uh, you know, to

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to respectfully understand how they are viewing the world, what

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>their worldview consists of, and and you know, and putting

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in some research as well, like looking at at authentic

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>voices from those realm is to try and create it.

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's part of the exercise. What what you

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do in My opinion is to is

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to sort of go the the old school pro wrestling,

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, root where someone is is nothing more than

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the archetype. There's nothing more than the stereotype character, and

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that's all they are, right. Yeah, that's a really good example.

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Um the like sort of wrestling characters from like the eighties.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of like the Iron Cheek here, and that

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>guy is kind of still performing that personality, Like have

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you ever seen the Iron Cheeks Twitter feed? That's pretty wild.

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I understand there's some disagreement on to what extent that

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is him or people who handle it for him, So

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that, but I don't know a lot

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of detail about about that argument. But to Glow on

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Netflix is a is a big right now, and that

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that discusses some similar territory. Yeah, And Glow is fascinating

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>because you see these women come in in the first

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>couple episodes and they have all of these different backgrounds, right,

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>but they are essentially coming to the same project, Like

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>what on earth is this? Like they've all got this

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>like what we're gonna be female wrestlers? Huh. But then

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the characters that are created for them are totally two dimensional.

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And kind of grotesque. Um. Yeah, And so like, when

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about these projects, I think, well, diversity should

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>be improved behind the scenes as well. Right, it doesn't

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>just make up for a lack of diversity to have

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>white people appropriating culture there. There should be more creators

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of diversity given a platform. And I was trying to

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>think of recent like examples to do like a uh

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>compare and contrast here, And the two that came up

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for me was I just started watching the American Gods

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>TV show that's based on that Neil game and novel,

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and it really attempts to tackle the African American experience.

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, it's based on a book

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>by a white Englishman and it's adapted by a white American.

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Then I think of a show like Atlanta, which we

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.959
<v Speaker 1>talked about in this Ironically we talked about Atlanta in

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the in the Samurai storied episode. Uh, that is written

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and run by a majority of African Americans. Is one

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily better than the other? Is one more authentic than

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the other? They both. As I'm watching them, I'm getting

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>different things out of them, and I'm enjoying the experience

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and maybe listeners out there who are engaged in creative

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>projects to have this floating in the back of their head,

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>like what am I allowed to engage with? Yeah, alright, well,

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>let's let's continue to discussion then by discussing some some

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>some first of all clear positive examples or or what

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm presenting as a as a positive example. So

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>one that came to mind instantly is British British singer

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of Swiss and Greek heritage, Cat Stevens. He famously converted

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to Islam and uh and became use of Islam. Now,

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>clearly this is a case of an individual entering into

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>another culture's customs and religious worldview with with clear permission

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to do so. As with Christianity and Buddhism, Islam is

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a missionary religion with a clear mandate to bring other

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>people's into the faith. Everyone, it is said, our our

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Muslim at birth. So actually, one of the pieces that

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>I turned to for research on this was in the

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic and it was by an author named Jenny Avans,

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and she argued that without cultural appropriation, we wouldn't have

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the following things. These are positive examples. New York pizza,

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Japanese Denim. I didn't know that was a thing. Uh, yeah,

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't either reading what she was talking about. Apparently

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it's an older style of denim may democratic discourse. That's interesting.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense like democratic discourse came from Greece, but

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>here in America we've sort of assumed that it's like

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>our thing, right, you know. Uh, and then from the

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic as well. Connor Freedersdorf also had an interesting interview,

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and he provided the following examples. Imagine a Korean food

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>truck owner who puts beef bulgogie in a burrito. Are

0:19:56.080 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>they appropriating Mexican culinary culture? Or a malays Asian housewife

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>who rents a kimono when they're on holiday in Kyoto?

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Is that appropriating traditional Japanese dress? Or a Canadian who

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>writes a novel that's inspired by Cervantes, they're technically appropriating

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Spanish literary culture. Or an Irish American who sings opera

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>for a living they're benefiting from the world's appropriation of

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Italian art. So there's a lot of complication here, right.

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not as easy as just pointing at Selena Gomez

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>or Miley Cyrus or somebody and saying stop doing that. Yeah,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean the culinary example. Um, I'm glad you brought

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it that up, because I was I was turning a

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>number of these around it in my mind, like, oh,

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what about the Portuguese influence on Thai cuisine, you know,

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the incorporation of of peppers for instance, Or a better,

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>more clear cut example, I suppose would be the French

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>influence on Vietnamese cuisine, because there you have an even clearer, uh,

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>colonial influence. And of course this leads to an important

0:20:56.080 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>detail in charges of cultural misappropriation. It's it's usually the

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>superior power, the colonial force, that is charged with misappropriating something,

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and the reasons should be obvious. I mean, for instance,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're a population of Africans transposed to

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to a Caribbean island, and you incorporate aspects of the

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>colonial and local culture under your own practices, I mean

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that survival that falls in line with a lot of

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about in our Cargo Cults episode. But

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>when the colonist appropriates the culture of subjugated people, I mean,

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's where it gets a lot ickier or potentially ickier. Right, Okay,

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.719
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm seeing that as like definitely like a

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>hallmark for these cases that are brought up with outrage, right,

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 1>is that usually it's if somebody who is from a

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>colonial culture is appropriate again indigenous versus non indigenous. Um.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite books of all time is a

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>graphic novel called Pride of Baghdad. It's about lions that

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>escape the zoo after the Americans bomb Baghdad in two

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>thousand three, and the lions, or of the story, they

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially become symbols for us to see different versions of

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the war through. It's written by Brian K. Vaughan, is

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 1>drawn by Nico Henrikin. Neither of them are Iraqi, but

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this modern folk tale really made me think about the

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Iraqi experience differently. I think about, uh, this is a

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>non colonial example Japanese post rock bands I like Mono

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and the band Boris. Uh. These musicians adapt Western styles

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of rock. They come up with something that's totally new

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and kind of wonderful in the process. I'd never dream

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of referring to Boris as cultural appropriation, right, but arguably

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's just because Japan is not a colonizer

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, we don't really think of it

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.239
<v Speaker 1>that way. In fact, part of why I think I

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>like it so much is the multiculturalism to it. And

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I think we'd be remiss if we didn't recognize. One

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of the major examples that comes up over and over

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>again the literature is that white people have been accused

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of appropriating rock from African American culture. Uh. And then

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you and I were trying to we were talking earlier

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>before we went on air, like, what's a great positive

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>example of the sort of colonizer, white vanilla guy really

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>doing a great job representing another culture, And you said,

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>David Simon, the guy who created the wire and tremay. Yeah, Yeah,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>this has come up a lot and uh, and in

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the resources we were looking at for this episode.

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think the reason that it is often brought

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>up as a good example is because David Simon and

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the teams that he as symbols, they tend to approach

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>these topics with, you know, out of a sense of

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>wanting to understand a very empathic, uh journalistic mission in mind. Yeah, yeah,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's important. Uh. And as we go through

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>these examples, it becomes clearer to me that that part

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of it is like actually engaging with the culture that

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.479
<v Speaker 1>you're influenced by or appropriating, right, like engaging with that

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and not just the artifact. Uh. That goes a long way.

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Now that being said, I do have to I do

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>have to throw out there that I know that David

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Simon does make an effort to bring in members of

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of of cultures that are that are depicted in his shows,

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>because I remember him talking about The Wire and towards

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the end and saying that if they were going to

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>do another season, they would have to incorporate like another

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>racial demographic of Baltimore, and if they did not have

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>anybody uh on the team that had had expertise or

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>knowledge or or participation in that culture. Yeah, I was

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, I can't remember the character's name. There's like

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a preacher on the show, and I want to say,

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>like the real life version of him is in the

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>writer's room for that show, or was in the writer's room.

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to call off remember, isn't I'm sure

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>some Wire fans will point we'll answer that question for us.

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>So then let's let's look at some really clear negative examples.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And this again maybe where some people sort of react

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>defensively and say, what how is that how is that negative?

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 1>The most people agree the adaptation of Native American garments

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in the fashion industry UH isn't seen in a positive light.

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>UH So in a brief period of time in the

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, we had Victorious Secret feature a

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>model wearing a feathered headdress and turquoise jewelry, and a

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>fashion show that at the same time, Michelle Williams was

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>criticized for wearing braids and feathers in a magazine photo shoot,

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and contestants on Germany's Next Top Model also did a

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 1>photo shoot wearing headdresses UH in Native American style clothing

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>UH and Native American writer Jessica Metcalf actually points out

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in The Guardian. She says, quote, our cultures have been

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 1>reduced to nothing more than patterns on a shirt. I

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>think this is a good point. This is again it's

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the culture is about understanding the world through these symbols.

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>But when their symbolic meaning is completely discarded, they're divested

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of that power, right, and then the meaning is lost,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>and so why engage with it other than just like

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I like feathers, or I like turquoise, you know, or

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>or to what extent is that even are you engaging

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with it? Are you are? You're not really engaging with

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it at all, if you're just taking it on as

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>a hollowed out, superficial thing. It's especially viewed as worse

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>because these artifacts have spiritual and ceremonial significance to them too.

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>So I think like maybe looking at this example, it

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>seems that cultural appropriation is quote unquote worse when it's

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>done for commercial purposes. So we've got sort of two

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>hallmarks here, the colonial one a commercial one in this sense.

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>For instance, fashion businessman Oscar mets of it. I think

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that's how you say his name. Met sav Hot gave

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>royalties from his twenties sixteen spring collection to the asha

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Nika tribe that these clothes were inspired by. They also

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>contributed to public awareness about the tribe struggle with illegal loggers.

0:26:56.080 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>This was in Brazil, so you know, he's clearly like

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to uh put out any fires. I guess ahead

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of time because he knew like he had a commercial

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>product essentially and that he could be criticized for it. Now,

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>if that was a clear negative example, that had some

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>perhaps some wiggle room for for some people to say, well,

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand you know, I need that explained to

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>me a little more wine. That's offensive. I feel like

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the next one should be pretty pretty clear cut, you

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>think so, And yet there's so many there's so many

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>examples of this one still being used. So blackface is

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially like the big no no. Right. Uh, And this

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:37.439
<v Speaker 1>is where I think he gets important to like, is

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that cultural appropriation or is that just making fun of

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>race or ethnicity? You know, well, yeah, it's I guess

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it's It tends to be the the the most unrefined

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>example of just blatant um mockery. And you have to

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>ask yourself, to what degree is this energy present in

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>more deluded amounts in other acts of alleged cultural misappropriation exactly?

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, really, any dressed up perpetuation of an ethnic

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>stereotype is going to be bad here. Don't make fun

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of someone else's culture or ethnicity. Don't treat it like

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a joke. Right. You remember this from our previous Halloween

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>episode that we did must be two years ago. Now, Uh,

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>there's a kind of in clothed performance that happens around

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that holiday. Another example of this is, for instance, when

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>white people think that Dio de los Muertos is Mexican Halloween,

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and they wear skull face paint. They don't even consider

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the cultural implications of the actual tradition. And Connor

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Friedersdorf again, he has a good quote about this. He says,

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a white college student who dons black face is not

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>engaging with African American culture. He or she is just

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>caricaturing physical features of another race. The act is offensive

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>partially because it's reducing people to the color of their skin. Uh.

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>My example that I came out from this recently, I

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>meant in this I think in previous episode. I'm rereading

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it this summer. Stephen King's in anticipation of the new movie.

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I had forgotten how racist some of the characters in

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that are. The Richie Tozier character puts on like a

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>quote black character voice in the book, Uh, and it

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>completely pulls me out of the story every time it happens.

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Stephen King is racist. I don't think

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>he was making fun of ethnicity. I think he was

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>probably trying to critique the era that he grew up

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen fifties, when something like Amos and Andy

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>was acceptable. Right. It still feels super culturally weird to

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>read that today. I can't imagine in that movie the

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>kid from Stranger Things is playing Richie Tozier. I can't

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine they're gonna have him repeat those lines when he

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>plays that character, especially since are they updating the backstory

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to the eighties? Yeah, they are. Yeah, They're going to

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>be in the eighties, and I think the modern version

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>will be in present day. Yeah. Uh. Jonathan Blanks was

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>interviewed in the Atlantic and he says there's nothing wrong

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>with adopting terms like was up as they come into

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>white pop culture through various media. But there's a difference

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>between the natural assimilation of language and black imitation as

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a caricature. Yeah. Obviously yellow faces another example of this,

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and the big the big like just cringe worthy example,

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at least crunch worthy. Is Um Breakfast a

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Tiffany's wonderful film, except you have this this horrible character

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>played by Mickey Rooney, Mickey Rooney playing a Chinese American

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and the most stereotypical way possible. Uh, just blatantly offensive

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to to to to modern viewers of the film. Uh,

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and and some contemporary viewers of the film as well.

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>If you look back at at some of the reviews.

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>But again, there's this, there's not an attempt to really

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>understand this person or to embody this character as anything

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>other than a mockery. You know, another one that I

0:30:55.120 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>had forgotten about from our childhood adolescents Twin Peaks. Yeah,

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I had completely forgotten about this. Uh there's a character

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>who does yellow face and that uh Katherine at one

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>point pretends to have died. Spoilers for the but I

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't haven't seen it yet. You've never seen the original

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the original Twin Peaks. Oh well, okay, I won't go

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>too far with it, but as long as you don't

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>spoil who done it, I'm not fine. Oh yeah, I

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>won't go there. But there is a character who dresses

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>up like a Chinese man. Uh. And it's super offensive.

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And when you watch it now you realize, like, oh,

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>this was David Lynch making a commentary on Americans and racism. Right.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like David Lynch was being racist, but it

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is extraordinarily weird to watch something like that or read

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>something like it that you know I was consuming when

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid and not really recognizing, oh, hey,

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this is this is wrong, not quite right. Here, so

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Jenny Avans again in her article she argues that we

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't just engage with the culture on an aesthetic level.

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>It was put another way actually by an actress named

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Amanda Stenberg. She was in the Hunger Games, and she

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>said in a video that was actually very much criticized,

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>what would America be like if we loved black people

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>as much as we love black culture. Nicki Minaj of

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>all People, actually echoed this. Her point was basically, don't

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>cherry pick cultural elements without engaging their creators as a

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>part of a process of understanding the world from a

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>different perspective than yours. And this is where it gets interesting.

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>You see a lot of these contrasting viewpoints. In NPR

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>actually did a story about how young Americans don't identify

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>hip hop with race. They actually think that that culture

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is now possibly seen as global because you can see

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it as far away as places like Korea and Russia.

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, others are arguing, well, when you

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>culturally devalue black people, that subsequently paved the way for

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>violence against them. Right, and as we're seeing in so

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>many cases of incidents in which police are shooting young

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>black men, Okay, so let's talk a little more about

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>gray area is here, um briefly, So as always, you know,

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the gray area is only as gray as the critic

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>paints it. So if it helps, think of think of

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>these as less as gray areas, but areas of question,

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>areas of possibility even as we discussed them, and as

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you discussed them and think about them in your own lives. Uh,

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>places where the charge of cultural appropriation or misappropriation become

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>less clear. So one example that comes to my mind

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>a video was making the rounds recently on social media

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in which a group of Caucasian women performed at traditional

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>African dance in presumably traditional costume. Now, it is often

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the case with social media content, any context was completely lacking.

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Here we didn't we were not told who these women were,

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>why they were doing it, where they were doing it,

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>even there was no no, no clue at all, the

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>messages in the hand of the share and then in

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the in the commentator. Now, a number of commentators on

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this video, when I was looking at they strongly condemned

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the footage, saying that it was, you know, just a

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>blinding example of cultural misappropriation. A few credit commentators, however,

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that we didn't know to what extent these

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>women had permission to engage in this dance and really

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>what the spirit of their performance was. It did not

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they certainly were not wearing black face. It

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 1>did not seem to have comedic um aspects to it,

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>But we just simply don't know. In short, did they

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>do it to mock anybody? Did they do it to

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>engage in a surface level experience, or was it part

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of a deeper effort to understand is their honor instant

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and understanding there is their permission there? Essentially context is

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>important here. Yeah, I feel like I mean again, it's it.

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>It kind of depends on the commentator here and who

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is making the charge of cultural misappropriation, and they're going

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to go to varying extremes in making that charge. Another

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>example that came to mind Big Trouble in Little China. Yeah,

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>this one. When you put this in the new It's

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 1>immediately like a light bulb went on over my head.

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, yeah, Like again a thing from

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>our childhood never even occurred to me as a kid

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that that would be any in any way offensive to somebody. Yeah,

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is I have to say this is uh,

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this has always been one of my my favorite films.

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's a thing, and it's a you know, film

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I've I've always loved, but it is a film by

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a group of Western Caucasian filmmakers. Now, it does it

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>does invoke Chinese martial arts movie stereotypes. But on the

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>other hand, it does feature a large Chinese American cast.

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It plays with its stereotypical stereotypical characters to some degree,

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and even counters some stereotypes, uh within key characters. Plus,

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>while it certainly plays fast and loose um Hollywood style

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>with Chinese mythology, it does seem to try reasonably hard

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to incorporate some key elements there. So in my current

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>experience of the movie, I'm inclined to appreciate it within

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>those parameters and see it as a net positive expression.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>But I also understand that other individuals might take a

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>different view. I have a hard time imagining Big Trouble

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in Little China getting made the same way today. Now.

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, like there's been rumors that they're like they're

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>going to remake it with a rock or something like that,

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>But I just I can't imagine that it's going to

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 1>engage with Chinese culture in the same way, because like

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>again I'm bringing this up twice in a week Transformers,

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:28.240
<v Speaker 1>uh whatever the whatever number five that I saw this weekend.

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Like don't get me wrong, I have a problem and

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I go see all those movies in the theater, but

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>they are really offensive at some points and how they

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>appropriate culture. And there's like a basically like a Japanese

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>stereotype Transformer that like dresses like a samurai and has

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a katana and has um. I can't remember the actor's name,

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>but isn't it a Tokyo drift based car transfer might

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>be Yeah, it's some sports car I don't recognize, but

0:36:56.560 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 1>he it's a Japanese actor performing this character. It's like

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>super offensive in the same way that like some of

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>those Star Wars aliens were seen as being like caricatures

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. Uh. And that they had another one in

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>this in this recent one that was French, and they're like, oh, yeah,

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>can Transformers be French? And somebody says, oh, no, he's

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>not actually French. He just he's just pretending to be French,

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:23.359
<v Speaker 1>like he really likes French culture. And I was like,

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>this is like, I mean, there's so many things about

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>those movies that are confounding. But yeah, any statement it

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>tries to make about ethnicity or culture I wouldn't take

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>with a whole lot of brain as salt. All Right, well,

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 1>let's take another break, and when we come back, let's

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 1>get a little more into the case against cultural misappropriation. Alright,

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we're back, al right, so let's look at cases against

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>in cases for this. Now. Bell Hooks actually said about

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this topic, and we're talking about cases against here quote

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>at nicity becomes a spice a seasoning that can liven

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>up the dull dish that is mainstream white culture. Uh.

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 1>In the New York Times Pulse, Agal actually argues that

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>cultural appropriation is actually about America's original sins, whereas origins

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>are bound up in quote, theft and colonization. This gets

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>back to what we were talking about earlier with some

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of those negative examples. It really seems like the colonization

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>aspect in the commercial aspect are the two big no

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>nos here, right. Uh So if you're if you're combining

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the two, it's even worse. Yeah, I mean, we always

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 1>come back to the idea of America is a melting pot.

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.439
<v Speaker 1>But did everyone want to go into the pot, and

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to what extent is the pot proportionally stirred? Right, Yeah,

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a fair question. Connor Friedersdorff actually argues that

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 1>the claims of cultural appropriation are actually objectionable if there's

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:58.720
<v Speaker 1>an underlying animous dis or dehumanization to them. That's his words,

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 1>not mine. The problem him becomes when this is conflated

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>with cultural appropriation that's seen as absurd. So for instance,

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the example he gives is if a college cafeteria serves sushi,

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:14.280
<v Speaker 1>uh and for starters, Well yeah, I mean you probably

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>can get sick. But but his example is basically like

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:21.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody could find that as a case of cultural appropriation,

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.959
<v Speaker 1>and then somebody else would see that as being absurd,

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>as being a conflation right off, if you saw that

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.399
<v Speaker 1>as cultural appropriation. So this is where you get into

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this like sort of battle between whether or not something

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is or isn't offensive, and it gets worse when the

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 1>conflation backfires. Then all examples are considered absurd. So, for instance,

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>even when something is malicious like the fraternity party where

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody's wearing black face for example, right, uh, And I

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 1>just realized as I was doing the research for this,

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and I had this moment where I was just like, oh, uh,

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that you could use this. This is basically cannon fodder

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>for content creation on the internet, right, for little media

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>outlets like without engaging with the larger question in any

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>manner like we're trying to do today. It's basically any

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>time an incident like this happens, it's just all right,

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a perfect five word piece that we can just

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>like spit out there and get people to click on, right,

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Like if we feign outrage over something, or we feign

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>outrage over somebody else's outrage. I mean, you see this everywhere.

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's so much of what I think makes a

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Facebook probably uh intolerable right now? Yeah, and then commenting

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>or critiquing another individual's outrage and what degree is that

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>outrage appropriate? Right? So, I think what we're finding here

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is this is essentially a problem with language, right, that

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not using words accurately to describe the differences between

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>something like racism and cultural appropriation. And the example I

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>think of, uh, and when you first brought up this

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:54.760
<v Speaker 1>topic to me it came to mind was Paton Oswald

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>has this great comedy bit about this on Netflix. The

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>specials called talking for clapping. He jokes about the difference

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>between terminology versus listening to someone's heart, on the difference

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>between their words and their intent, And he does these

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>these sort of caricature characters. You know, one person is

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>using all the exact right terms, but they're what they're saying,

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the content of what they're saying is offensive, versus like

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody who doesn't know the exact right terminology, but they meanwhile, um,

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably. This is where I think is a

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>good point to mention Gert Hofstad and his cultural dimensions theory. Now,

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea here, we could whole episode on this, but

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna try to boil it down quickly. He breaks

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>down cultural factors and communication and how they contribute to

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 1>miss communication. And there's five factors that he's pointing us

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to here, power, distance, individualism versus collectivism, uncertainty, avoidance, masculinity

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>versus femininity, and long term versus short term orientation. Now,

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a hundred percent of propos of his theory,

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 1>but I recognize I think he's kind of on the

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>right track here of looking at how different cultures communicate

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and understanding one another. Differently, And basically the idea here

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is to ensure that the symbols themselves aren't misunderstood. Communicators

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.880
<v Speaker 1>need to be cognizant of the factors themselves. Right. The

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:21.359
<v Speaker 1>way he actually does it, he'll he breaks them up

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 1>by nation, which I think is probably part of the

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:26.879
<v Speaker 1>problem here, because I don't think one nation necessarily has

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a culture per se, right to say, like American culture,

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 1>uh doesn't recognize like so many of the subcultures within it,

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>right Oh yeah too. I think to to to boil

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>down another nation to a singular, you know, monolithic culture

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is generally to betray a very incomplete idea of of

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>who these people are. Yeah, And so I think that

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 1>might be why a lot of the examples we're seeing

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:56.320
<v Speaker 1>in the literature here come from mass media. The communicators

0:42:56.360 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>themselves aren't actually targeting like a single audience, so they're

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:05.280
<v Speaker 1>subsequently unintentionally offensive to people that they just forgot about

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:10.919
<v Speaker 1>that would be part of this mass broadcast. Right. Um, yeah,

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean countless examples. I don't think when Selena Gomez

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 1>puts on a bindy or um, what what did Katy

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Perry do? Did she have corn rows? I think that

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:24.240
<v Speaker 1>was what people. Uh, I think that was the example.

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 1>She was Egyptian. I don't know that dark Horse. The

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Egyptian culture is an interesting example too, because what is

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into it will discuss the idea of like

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>what happens if a culture is not appropriated and it

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:39.800
<v Speaker 1>runs the risk of becoming outdated. It kind of runs

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the risk of becoming something like Egyptian culture. Which not

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to say that you could not misappropriate ancient Egyptian h

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.240
<v Speaker 1>iconography your dress in a way that would offend someone.

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 1>But given the distance, given the time, given the fact

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that the the ideas of the ancient Egyptians did not

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 1>travel well even during their time, much less into modern times, um,

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it makes it a little safer for some for sale

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 1>pop singer two to utilize. I haven't seen that new

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cruise Mummy movie. I can't imagine that it is

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in any way portraying Egyptian culture in a positive I mean,

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like I said, it tends to be this this safe zone,

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>or relatively safe at least, you know, compared to so

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 1>many things. I mean, we still have Mommy movies. We

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>talked before about how kind of weird it is that

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 1>we have these tales about Uh, these bodies that were

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>stolen from from tombs by by colonial powers and they

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 1>come to life and start killing people, and and for

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the most part, like no serious self examination is conducted. Yeah, yeah,

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 1>well right and again, so like I think all of

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this comes back to like a matter of semantics and language,

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of paying attention to what you're saying and what

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you're doing, and probably where the term misappropriation needs to

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>be clarified and used instead of appropriation. Now, another notable

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:03.360
<v Speaker 1>area here or that that the factors into our discussion

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>concerns American sports teams and the use of Native Americans

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 1>stereotypes as mascots. Now, certainly this is a this is

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a whole discussion onto itself. But what's interesting here for

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of our discussion is that is that there

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:19.400
<v Speaker 1>was a study that was published in the Journal of

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Psychology by a team of researchers from the University

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of Montana, the University of Washington, and Washington State University,

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and they set out to empirically test the use of

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:33.279
<v Speaker 1>American Indian brand imagery and how it increases UH stereotype

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>beliefs in the broader population. And they wanted to see

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:39.320
<v Speaker 1>what kind of impact the brands would have on both

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 1>negative and positive stereotypes. So examples here would be Indians

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:47.400
<v Speaker 1>are warlike versus Indians are noble, so it's a noble savage,

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>right that kind of Yeah. Then the idea that these

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 1>are the two private predominant stereotypes and these are the

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:55.879
<v Speaker 1>only two that can exist when you're doing just search

0:45:55.920 --> 0:46:00.839
<v Speaker 1>a surface level understanding of another culture. So interestingly enough,

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they found that while conservative individuals that they tested, they

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:08.280
<v Speaker 1>did not change their opinion about Native Americans upon seeing

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>such imagery. Uh. Liberal individuals were far more malleable. Uh,

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and they were affected by both positive and negative stereotypes.

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>And this apparently falls into line with previous studies that

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have revealed that that liberal individuals tend to have more

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>malleable worldviews and are therefore sometimes more sensitive to contextual clues.

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:31.359
<v Speaker 1>So I have a great example of this. We live

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta, Georgia. Have you ever going to see the

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Braves play? No, yeah, it's not my thing, but a

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of coworkers at a job previous to this took

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>me to a Braves game. And did you know about this?

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 1>The tomahawk chop? Oh yeah, yeah, I'm sir, I'm familiar

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 1>enough with it to know that as we chop your arm. Yeah, So,

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like there's a certain point during the game where that,

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the crowd gets excited in support of the

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:57.880
<v Speaker 1>home team in Atlanta Braves, and they do this tomahawk

0:46:58.000 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>chop thing where they like use their arms like the

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.280
<v Speaker 1>tomahawks that they're like bringing them down on the skulls

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of their opponent. There's actually like a I don't even

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>know what it is, like a robot like animatronic thing

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that kind of comes out and swings the tomahawk and everything.

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And I remember the first time I saw that just

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>being like WHOA, Like, what is happening here? This is

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 1>super offensive? Um, But again that might just be like

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>my predilections, right, Like uh, I just saw it as

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 1>being like, Okay, this is the the savage stereotype being

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:30.720
<v Speaker 1>brought out to play here. Now. They had a separate

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>field study as well, and the researchers also found that

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 1>exposure to a quote more negative ethnic logo A significantly

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 1>strengthened negative stereotypes among liberal individuals, while exposure to the

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>less negative logo did not significantly influence negative stereotypes At

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:50.440
<v Speaker 1>any level of political identity. So what what does all

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:52.759
<v Speaker 1>this fit into our conversation here. Well, I think one

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's interesting is that it reveals that

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 1>one can interact with such artifacts of cultural appropriation without

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily thinking about them, without certainly without engaging with them,

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:07.839
<v Speaker 1>but also not realizing why they could be offensive. And

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it also is interesting to see how malleable worldviews can

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:15.399
<v Speaker 1>cut both ways. So the very the very, the very

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:19.839
<v Speaker 1>aspect of your psyche that makes you more willing to

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to see the situation from another individual side and to

0:48:23.040 --> 0:48:28.360
<v Speaker 1>shift your worldview accordingly. Uh, that can also lead to

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the to the less desirable effect that you're influenced than

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:36.880
<v Speaker 1>by bits of negative stereoto typing um and and you know,

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>negative cultural misappropriation. So this is actually part of the

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of factor of leading to the whole like is

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it absurd? Is it not absurd? Should it be blamed?

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Should it not be blamed? So, yeah, there's so many

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:51.360
<v Speaker 1>complex factors here. Now let's look at some of the

0:48:51.400 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 1>cases for cultural appropriation and see if we can get

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>anything more out of them. Uh. Sometimes it's seen as

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 1>being positive when it's seen as appreciation and influence rather

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 1>than appropriation. Also when creators seek permission from the person

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:09.880
<v Speaker 1>or culture they're appropriating from, or they're paying homage to

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the artistry, then it gets complicated. How do you know

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 1>who you're supposed to ask? Like this whole thing gets

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:19.840
<v Speaker 1>into intellectual property. I found so many articles about intellectual

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>property and ownership of cultural artifacts, and that there's actually

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 1>legal precedent for culture being copyrighted in certain cases. To

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Um and Jenny Avan's argues in that Atlantic piece, the

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>cultural appropriation is actually a result of globalization, so subsequently

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 1>it's inevitable, but it's also ultimately positive. In her mind,

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's an exchange of ideas, styles, and traditions, and it's

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 1>showcasing the joy of living in a multicultural society. Susan

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Scaffitti wrote a book that is called Who Owns Culture?

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Appropriation and Authenticity in American Law, and she says that

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>culture shouldn't freeze itself in time as if it's like

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:02.240
<v Speaker 1>part of a music e M diorama. She actually argues

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>cultural appropriation can save cultural products from fading away. And

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Pakistani novelist Camilla Shamsi called for more, not less, imaginative

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:18.400
<v Speaker 1>engagement with her country. She says, quote, the moment you

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:22.600
<v Speaker 1>say a male American writer can't write about a female Pakistani,

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you are saying, don't tell these stories. And even worse so,

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, as an American male, you can't understand a

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Pakistani woman. She is enigmatic, inscrutable, and unknowable. Therefore she's other.

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Leave her and her nation to its otherness. Write them

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:43.840
<v Speaker 1>out of your history. I ran across a wonderful article

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>in Ian magazine. No surprise that they come up pretty

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.799
<v Speaker 1>frequently here. Nabilia At jeffre Uh makes some really good

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:52.880
<v Speaker 1>points in the article is Nothing Sacred? And when she discusses,

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 1>among other things, the experience of seeing non Sufi Muslims

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 1>take up the dervish whirling. Okay, he talks about, you know,

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the origins of this custom and then what it's like

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to see it, uh, it practiced by by non Muslims

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:10.839
<v Speaker 1>and say, uh, West London, and you know, it's hard

0:51:10.880 --> 0:51:12.799
<v Speaker 1>to to see it as anything other than like a

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 1>hollowed out portion of someone's culture. But he also points

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 1>out that quote religions and cultures, and indeed nations have

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 1>survived only by being open to new ways of representing themselves,

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.439
<v Speaker 1>and that the survival and spread of a culture's core

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 1>values come at a price, and the alternative to paying

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that price is sometimes fossilization. Uh, your your culture just

0:51:33.000 --> 0:51:36.080
<v Speaker 1>becomes irrevalent. So this is again like plays right into

0:51:36.120 --> 0:51:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that whole American Gods thing. Essentially, the thesis of American

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Gods as a TV show and a novel is that

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 1>these gods are are representations of cultures, and they either

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 1>become fossilized and are forgotten and subsequently die, or they

0:51:51.560 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 1>incorporate themselvesselves somehow into these new cultures. Yeah, like belly

0:51:56.040 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>dancing comes to mind as a as as a potential,

0:51:58.800 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, area to ask questions like this, but one

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that so maybe a little more related to to you

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and me. Yoga. I think it fits nicely in here

0:52:05.280 --> 0:52:07.759
<v Speaker 1>because you have a practice with roots in India, but

0:52:07.840 --> 0:52:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a practice that has undergone heavy alteration, alteration by Western

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>practitioners and continues to undergo alteration as it takes takes

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>on various forms, sometimes increasingly secular forms, other forms that

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:25.279
<v Speaker 1>reinforce spiritual concepts, concepts that that might uh that that

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you might argue or misappropriated as well. But if the

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>core physical practice improves the human experience, then isn't it

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>worth the adaptation? That's what I'm asking in, and can't

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the same beset of meditation in various spirit spiritual models

0:52:40.000 --> 0:52:42.319
<v Speaker 1>as long as there's a you know, an openness there,

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh, an honesty and its use. So there is

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:48.279
<v Speaker 1>actually an article in the Boston Globe that came up

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:52.840
<v Speaker 1>about this, about yoga specifically and whether it was cultural appropriation.

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 1>The tone of this article is a little bit more

0:52:55.160 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 1>confrontational than I'm really willing to engage with here, but

0:52:57.960 --> 0:53:01.239
<v Speaker 1>essentially the author was pushing back because there was an

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 1>accusation that Western practitioners of yoga were ignoring colonialism and

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the oppression of where the practice originated from. Uh. And

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:12.279
<v Speaker 1>his pushback was similar to what you said, which is

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially like, well, if the practice is beneficial to mankind,

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:21.200
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't we do it anyway? Yeah? I think that at times.

0:53:22.400 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly not trying to boil all this down to

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this one question, but I think sometimes we have to

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>ask ourselves is there a legacy of horror here? And

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:33.239
<v Speaker 1>in the answer, no matter where you are in life,

0:53:33.280 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 1>for culture is almost always yes, uh. And again that's

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>not not too blanketly forgive any cultural transgression, but maybe

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's simply important to on some level acknowledge the legacy

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of horror and everything we do. Uh. And I realized

0:53:46.880 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it sounds a bit dark even for us, but but

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you know it, it kind of falls in line with

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>what we've been talking here, like be prepared to, uh,

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to slip on the horror lens from time to time,

0:53:58.080 --> 0:54:00.560
<v Speaker 1>if only for a moment, if only to ground or

0:54:00.600 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>present choices, beliefs and privileges. Uh, you know, in in

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a in an appropriate frame of reference. That's my personal

0:54:08.719 --> 0:54:11.800
<v Speaker 1>take on it. Anyway. Yeah, so you know we're winding

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:15.880
<v Speaker 1>up here. I think uh that you know, the research

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:17.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at this it helped me a little bit with

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:20.920
<v Speaker 1>my question in terms of like the work that I'm creating,

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:23.919
<v Speaker 1>but also in terms of, you know, what are things

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that I should be offended by or or things that

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I maybe should question out loud versus other things where

0:54:30.360 --> 0:54:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it's sometimes, like I said, there's lots of content created

0:54:33.680 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on the internet about this because it's fuel for the

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:39.440
<v Speaker 1>fire and it gets AD clicks. So you know, is

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this worth clicking on? Is this headline worth engaging with?

0:54:43.160 --> 0:54:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Or should I just skip right past it. So hopefully

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:48.880
<v Speaker 1>we've provided you with some additional insight here and some

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:52.200
<v Speaker 1>additional tools, uh for you to just figure out where

0:54:52.200 --> 0:54:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you stand on all of this and and to understand

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:58.160
<v Speaker 1>where other people are falling on on the topic of

0:54:58.160 --> 0:55:02.359
<v Speaker 1>cultural appropriation and cultural appropriation. Yeah, and I have to say,

0:55:02.800 --> 0:55:05.080
<v Speaker 1>as a fan of the show before I joined the show,

0:55:05.760 --> 0:55:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Robert does a really good job on Stuff to Blow

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:12.520
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot Com of incorporating a lot of different

0:55:12.560 --> 0:55:17.279
<v Speaker 1>cultures into our examination of sciences and philosophy over the

0:55:17.360 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 1>last what is it now, six seven years that the

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>show has been going on that. Yeah, So if you

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:24.480
<v Speaker 1>visit stuff to Blow your Mind dot com, you're just

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:27.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna find a lot of really interesting insights and that

0:55:27.880 --> 0:55:29.920
<v Speaker 1>are connected to what we were talking about here today.

0:55:30.160 --> 0:55:32.359
<v Speaker 1>And not only that, we've got all these are from

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:36.160
<v Speaker 1>our blog posts, are podcast episodes, videos that we've done.

0:55:36.560 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And then you've also got links out to all of

0:55:39.000 --> 0:55:41.080
<v Speaker 1>our social accounts if you want to interact with us

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 1>about this topic. That links to our Facebook, Twitter, Instagram

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and tumbler on there. That's right. Hey, if you listen

0:55:47.680 --> 0:55:51.319
<v Speaker 1>to us on Apple Podcasts dropped by there, give us

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a strong review. Help us out there with the algorithm

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and if you just want to get in touch with

0:55:55.960 --> 0:56:00.399
<v Speaker 1>us directly share your take on this hot topic, then

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:02.800
<v Speaker 1>just email us at blow the Mind at how stuff

0:56:02.840 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 1>works dot com for more on this and thousands of

0:56:15.320 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Is it how stuff works dot com