WEBVTT - Antitrust Flags In PGA-LIV Golf Merger

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Brusso from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Today's hearing is about much more than the game of golf.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 2>It's about how a brutal, repressive regime can buy, influence,

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 2>indeed even take over a cherished American institution.

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal was one of the senators from

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the isle who grilled two PGA tour

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>officials on Wednesday about the deal that shocked the golf

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>world last month and why the PGA would merge with

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Saudi backed Live Golf, two leagues that were intense competitors,

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>with lawsuits and countersuits, congressional lobbying, and a fight over

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>golf's biggest stars. The answer appeared to be pretty simple money.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>PGA board member Jimmy Dunn said, with its unlimited funds,

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia's publican Investment Fund could end up owning golf.

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 2>They have an unlimited horizon and an unlimited amount of money.

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 3>So it isn't like the product is better.

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 2>It's just that there's a lot more money.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>And the magic number is one billion dollars. That's the

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>amount the PIF will invest in the new golfing entity.

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Republican Senator Josh Holly questioned the PGA's chief operating officer,

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Ron Price, about the tour's intense lobbying against Live in

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the lead up to the agreement.

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 2>But this is before you agree to take a billion

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 2>dollars from the same people that you were lobbying against

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 2>a year ago.

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Senator, we faced the choice. One was to allow professional

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 3>golf to be taken over and operated by the Public

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Investment Fund of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The second

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 3>was to allow the PGA Tour to continue to lead it.

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Joining me is an expert in antitrust law, Harry First,

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a professor at NYU Law School. Harry, the answer to

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>every question about the why of the deal was one word. Money.

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>That the PGA simply couldn't compete against Saudi money. Is

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that a defensible reason for a merger?

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 4>I'll unpack what you've said with the caveat that the

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 4>only golf that I ever do is mini golf.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't even do that, So so.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 4>The purpose is money a b PGA couldn't compete against

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 4>the money. And the third thing is therefore they have

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 4>to merge. Okay, so we'll take the three things. First,

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 4>money is behind everything. Oh I'm shocked. I'm shocked that

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 4>people could change their position when offered enough money. So

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm not shocked. And you know, a lot of it

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 4>is about the money. There's a heavy emotional overlay on this, obviously,

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 4>but at the heart, from the PGA's point of view,

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 4>it is about money. You know, what is it from

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 4>the saudi'st point of view? So maybe it's reputations, Maybe

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 4>it's also money. Maybe they think professional sports are good investments.

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 4>There are a lot of people who think that a

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 4>lot of people have made a lot of money off

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 4>of professional sports. They're trying to diversify their economy, so

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 4>maybe that people have, of course described sportswa washing idea.

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 4>They're gonna, you know, change their image. They think they're

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 4>going to change their image this way. I don't know

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 4>who's telling them that. It's a long road for that,

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 4>but they're doing very well, thank you, ma'am, with their

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 4>bad image. As it is, Saudi Aramco is the second

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 4>largest company in the world, only behind Apple. And how

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 4>do they have all this money to invest? Where did

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 4>it come from? Oil? And who has bought the oil?

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Since the Opec oil cartel was formed. We have so money. Yes, second,

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 4>PGA can't compete. So that's what competitors always say when

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 4>they're faced with a new competitor that is well financed.

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 4>But you know, firms always say that they would prefer

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 4>not to compete because competition may force them to do

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 4>things they would prefer not to do, like pay their

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 4>players more money, come up with things that might be

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 4>enticing to people who watch golf who have only been

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 4>offered one monopoly view of the sport. They might have

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 4>to think of new ways to present their tournaments. They

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 4>may have to actually compete. So can they or can't they?

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Part three Merging to stop competition is not a defense.

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 4>It's called the worst defense. It we don't get more

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 4>competition by having less, and it's a bad argument. It's bad.

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Interestingly in light of the case the Northeast Alliance so

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 4>called between American Airlines and Jet Blue, where we're having

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 4>trouble competing against each other and Delta. So they said, oh,

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 4>let's stop competing against each other and get bigger so

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 4>they can overtake Delta, and the district court just said,

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 4>that's not the kind of competition. The Sherman Act is

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 4>talking about you know, we're talking about competition, and anti

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 4>trust laws are indifferent as to who wins the marketplace.

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Besides that, so the three parts money is motivating things.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Of course, the desire to escape competition maybe motivating the PGA,

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 4>but it's not the kind of motivation that presents it

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 4>any trust defense. So if we use the straight anti

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 4>trust lens, they have some high legal hurdles to surmount.

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>And Live Golf has spent a year litigating and claiming

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that the PGA tour is a monopoly. In the complaint

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to use the word monopoly more than forty times in

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and eighteen pages. And this combination would create

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>an even larger monopoly. So how do they fight that?

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Do they just ignore their prior arguments?

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, but if someone say foolish consistency is the hobgoblin

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 4>of little minds, Yeah, they're not consistent. The question is

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 4>who's going to challenge them. So the PGA does monopolize

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 4>professional golf. There is no other so far as I know,

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 4>no other professional golf tour monopolies are allowed if they

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 4>succeed on their own skill, industry, and foresight and don't

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 4>do anything to exclude competition. What actually had gotten the

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 4>PGA into potential trouble was when they said to their golfer,

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 4>as well, you want to go play in some live

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 4>tour golf tournaments, he ain't ever going to play in

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 4>a PGA tour anymore. We will exclude you. Well, that's

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 4>potentially a violation of Section two of the Sherman Act,

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 4>which is monopolyzation engaging in exclusionary behavior to maintain your monopoly.

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I got understand why the Live Tour sued

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 4>them and why the players suited them who were adversely affected. So, yes,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 4>they're monopoly. Will they become a bigger monopoly? So this

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 4>is where it's hard to know exactly because we don't

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 4>really know how this is going to shake out, how

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be structured. So they haven't agreed to

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 4>a final deal. They don't want to call it a merger,

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 4>they want to call it a joint venture. It's I

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 4>have a feeling by the end they're just going to

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 4>call it an investment. So whatever they call it is,

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, a lot is going to turn on how

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 4>it's structured and whether there is an agreement for the

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Live Tour to be discontinued. So you know, in a

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 4>merger two firms become one and they don't compete against

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 4>each other, or a joint venture two firms become one.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 4>So if that's the outcome that's negotiated, they are they

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 4>have a big any trust problem. And I'll put to

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 4>the side of the moment. Who's going to do something

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 4>about it? That's the next question. But as a straight

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 4>matter of anti trust and putting aside the identity of

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 4>the parties, and you know, the flags being waived in

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 4>the hearings Center Bloomenthal and the takeover of an American

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 4>institution apparently perfectly willing to be taken over, none of

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 4>that matters from the point of view of the any

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 4>trust laws. The identity good, bad, and different of the

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 4>owners of assets are irrelevant. It's the market outcomes that

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 4>are key. And you know, the Saudi's own lots of things,

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 4>and apparently we don't get quite as upset when they

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 4>buy refining assets, oil refining assets, you know, when they

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 4>buy all sorts of things. So I can understand the

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 4>emotion of this and maybe wanting to do something about it.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 4>But from any trust laws, that really is irrelevant.

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Does it fit anywhere else. I mean, why is in

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sciphius The Committee on Foreign Investment in the US investigating this?

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 4>This is supposed to be national security, I you know, golf.

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>Apparently, though, Senator Ron Wyden, who's the chair of the

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Senate Finance Committee, is investigating the deal for national security

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>implications due to the PGA tour's potential ownership interests in

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 1>real estate near US military facilities.

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 4>Remember when the Japanese wanted to take over Pebble Beach.

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we've had other outside whos wanting to take

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 4>over key kinds of things like that. There was an uproar.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't think Syphius was invoked, and there was some talk,

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 4>as I recall, about, you know, the strategic location of

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 4>these calfboards. I mean, give us a break. I mean,

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 4>the PGA doesn't own real estate. So I'm not even

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 4>sure what Senator Widen's talking about. Maybe he's I had

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 4>some idea there. But we have enough problem trying to

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 4>apply Siphius to industries that are not defense, you know,

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 4>military defense, but are economically important. So we're down the

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 4>rung from that. I mean, golf is golf? Come on?

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>The Justice Department apparently has been investigating the PGA over

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>possible anti competitive practices for about a year. I mean,

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>does that mean it's not going anywhere if it's a

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>year in already and they haven't done anything.

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 4>First of all, there was ongoing private litigation, so I

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 4>don't know how deeply involved in an investigation, and Just

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 4>department's been stepping back. The Just Department could rationally say,

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 4>we have a lot of work. There are these huge mergers,

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 4>there are a lot of strains on our resources. Private

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 4>parties are pursuing the any trust claims and have you know,

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 4>good reasons to do that and are interested. We can

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 4>be more observers, maybe gather some information, but not front

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 4>burn or now. Once the litigation settled, which it did

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 4>recently as part of this framework agreement to which the

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 4>parties have apparently entered sort of an agreement to agree,

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 4>and PGA and Live Tours withdrew their litigation and apparently

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 4>the players did as well. So that would be reason

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 4>to step up Justice Department scrutiny because there's no now

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 4>no one on the field, and you know, a straight

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 4>antitrust metric is, you know, what's the impact on the economy, Well,

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.599
<v Speaker 4>golf's impact isn't small. So what's their revenues? Over a

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars a year for the PGA. So maybe they've

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 4>stepped up their inquiries. I mean, I don't think it's

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 4>a moth balled inquiry. I think they're active. But presumably

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 4>they're also waiting to see what the form of this

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 4>whatever it is, is going to take, because that will determine,

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, how the Justice Department will proceed, if at all. Again, now,

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 4>what I don't know is whether there's pressure on the

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Justice Department and a trust division from other parts of

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 4>the administration that I don't know. And this is a

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 4>possible explanation for why it's slow. You know, that's just possible.

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 4>The only reason why I raise it, and the only

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 4>fact I have is the Justice Department has not tackled Opek,

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 4>even though there are good arguments for why I could.

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 4>There have been for many years and it hasn't happened.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 4>So obviously, the relations with the Saudis are an important

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 4>diplomatic issue.

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>So, Harry, the Justice Department opposed that Penguin Random House

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>deal on the grounds that it would hurt authors. So

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think here they'll look at the player compensation.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 4>It's a natural This is why, from the Justice Department's

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 4>point of view, take the Saudis out of it. There

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 4>are sort of free good reasons markers on this case

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 4>for going ahead. One is the recent win against the

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 4>airlines that I mentioned, very strong opinion in favor of

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:19.959
<v Speaker 4>the Justice Department's position. This looks worse because the alliance

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 4>between American Airlines and Jet Blue wasn't an agreement to

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 4>monopolize the market. There was still another competitor here, there's

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 4>no other competitor. There's an agreement to quash the other competitor,

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 4>if that's what it turns out to be. So that's

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 4>the first. Second marker is the Justice Department always insists

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 4>on relatively narrow markets that can form to how commercial

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 4>realities are. So golfing rights, the rights to broadcast, and

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 4>whatever other rights are sold separately from other sports. Apartment

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 4>has always taken the view that, you know, sports sort

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 4>of stand on its own, and individual kinds of sports

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 4>stand on its own. So pro football is different from

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 4>college football. So that's number two. And you've mentioned number three,

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 4>which is the Justice Department's concerned for labor markets. Of course,

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 4>it's always a little irony that the working man. That's

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 4>just Department's standing up for. Are you know, authors with

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 4>million dollar advances and golfers you know who get million

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 4>dollars payout on winning golf tournaments, but are labor markets

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 4>and clear potential impact. In fact, that's what in a

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 4>sense has driven this rivalry is a competition for players,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 4>and how do you compete for players? You're back to

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 4>what was that first word you mentioned begins with.

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>An m money.

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 4>Money, money, money, So yes, you're right. Certainly the Justice

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 4>Department has been stressing and the Bied administration that we

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 4>haven't paid adequate attention to impact on labor markets.

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So apparently the PGA and PIF have removed a clause

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>called a non solicitation clause in which they agreed to

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>stop poaching players. What impact does that have?

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 4>There was this no solicitation agreement for the rest of

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 4>the live tour, they couldn't solicit PGA tour members I

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 4>guess vice versa. So they agreed to remove that restriction.

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 4>They are not bound by this no solicitation thing. But

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 4>in the end, the idea is to put them all,

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 4>as the agreement says, under one roof. So lifting this

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 4>now is fine for now, but meaningless for the long

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 4>run because they're all going to be in the same corporation.

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's not even clear you know, what's going

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 4>to be called a live tour and they haven't negotiated this.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 4>I guess what's going to remain of that or whatever.

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 4>But whatever it is, they're all going to be managed

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 4>by the same company. They're not going to compete.

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is your area, but I'll ask

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you anyway. So, the PGA is currently a tax exempt

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit and it wants to keep that nonprofit status, and

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>will it be able to once it's funded by one

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of the world's biggest sovereign wealth funds, and Blumenthal said

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it raises questions about whether a foreign government may indirectly

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>benefit from provisions in US tax laws mean to promote

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>not for profit business associations. So do you think it's

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>tax exem status is in jeopardy?

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 4>So your first premise is correct, partly an area of

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 4>expertise for me, although you know more about it from

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 4>what you've asked me than I do. But my guess

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 4>is that however they structure this, they'll structure it in

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 4>a way that's most likely to retain the tax exem status.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm ensure that sufficient amounts are paid out to charities.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, presumably people put money into not for profit companies.

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 4>That would be an issue for their tax advisors to

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 4>make it happen, and if they can't deal with the consequence.

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I always appreciate your insights, Harry, thanks so much. That's

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Professor Harry First of NYU Law School.