WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - A Good Night For The Blue Team, A Horrible Night For The Red Team + Trump Backs Down On TACO Tuesday

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>by Ethos and what Ethos does is it helps you

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>find life insurance. Let me tell you why life insurance

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>bailed me out. My father died when I was sixteen.

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have a lot of money when it happened,

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and we were in a pretty tough financial spot after

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it happened. I'm an only child. Suddenly my mother's single,

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>single mother. She had a job, suddenly lost a job,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>looking for another job, and we were struggling. You know,

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>my dad didn't leave us in the best financial situation,

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but he did make one purchase. He bought a life

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>insurance policy. Wasn't a huge chunk of change, but it

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>was enough when we found it. And when I say

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>we found it, meaning we went through his desk and

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we found, oh, look at this, let's see if there's

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>anything here. And it helped us out at a time

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that we really needed it. And that's why I think

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.319
<v Speaker 1>it's important that if you can, especially if you have

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>young children, if you can get life insurance, you should

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>get it. Life is full of unexpected emergencies, unexpected things happen.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It is an extra bit of security, something you can

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>leave and help out at a time when you're not

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not there to help. So what does Ethos do well.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Ethos makes getting life insurance fast and easy, and it's

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent online. You can get a quote in seconds,

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you can apply in minutes, and you can get same

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>day coverage. They will find you the right fit. There's

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>no medical exam. You just answer a few simple health

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>questions online. You can get up to three million dollars

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>in coverage and some policies are as low as thirty

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month, and you'll get your lowest rate from

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>their network of trusted carriers. So take ten minutes to

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>get covered today with life insurance through Ethos. Get your

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>free quote at ethos dot com slash chuck. That is

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>ETOs dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary and

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>rates may vary. Hello there, Welcome to the Wednesday edition

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Chuck Podcast. If it's Wednesday, it means somebody

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>voted somewhere on Tuesday. And you know, for a lot

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of Wednesdays between now and November, I'm going to be

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>leading with the campaign because they'll be an important primary

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>night or an important Tuesday election, and you know we've

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>only had a couple of important primary nights so far,

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Texas and Illinois being a big one. But we had

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a big one, and it was a special election, in

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this case, a special referendum. It's in Virginia. I've talked

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot about this Virginia referendum, those of you who've forwarded, No,

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 1>this is you know the state. I live in the state.

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a resident in the state I'm voting in. I

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>still consider myself a Floridian. First, you know where you're

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>born and raised, you know always where you're from. Virginia

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is where I live. The irony of courses, I have

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>now lived longer in Arlington and in Virginia than I

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>have any other state in the Union. So and yet

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I still consider myself a Floridian. And I'm probably not

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>alone here in northern Virginia. But look the big news,

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and it would have been arguably bigger news had this

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>referendum not passed. But I do think we have this

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of I do want to lay a few things

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>out here. So Look, it's a it's a it's a

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>big win for Democrats in this respect. Look when Republicans

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>started this in Texas and then Indiana and Missouri, and

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we saw in some of these places, I think there

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>were real question marks about whether you whether Democrats could

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>unite enough, even in some of their blue estates to

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>do something like this, And they had to create a

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in two of the states actually get referendum on the

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>ballot basically to create a constitutional legitimacy in the state

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>constitutions of California and Virginia and to pull this off.

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And they did it. Okay, they did it. I mean,

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it shows you the power, right, the power

0:03:54.640 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of of the of the Trump resistance is extraordinary. If

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't extraordinary, you wouldn't have California and Virginia successfully

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially creating special referendum, special elections, constitutional amendments to temporarily

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>change how they do things in order to jerry rig

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a map in Democratics favor, in order to balance out

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>what happened in Texas. So tactically, for a party that

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>regularly brings knives to gunfights, I get that there's a

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>feeling of satisfaction among some partisan Democrats this morning that

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>like they that they fought fire with fire. Now, what

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I've been warning about, and I still think is a

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>medium term issue for the party going forward is. I

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 1>do think the strength of the Democratic Party in the

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Trump era has been there seen as the party that

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to break the rules, that they're seen as

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the party that are rule followers, that they're seen as

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the party of fair districts. Right. This is a party

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that has spent the last fifteen years of which many

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of US Virginia saw plenty of TV ads showing clips

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of Barack Obama lamenting jerrymandering, which the no referendum side

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>amplified quite a bit in the last couple of weeks.

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it was so successful that the Yes side

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>had to sort of redo some of their Obama driven

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>at campaigns. And I think the fact that that they

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have this benefit of the doubt with the independent

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>voter right now, right, that's what this is. Where you

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>know they're playing partisan games. We know that that's what

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. Wait a minute, now, you're going to do

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>this too. And so while I get the short term benefit,

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I get the near term you know help that this

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>will give. And you know, I question how helpful this

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>will be. I think you could argue, and I've made

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>this argument, You've heard it here before. I think you

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>could argue that if Virginia didn't touch its map there,

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to pick up two congressional districts in this

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the essentially the old first and the old second. The

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>second is Virginia Beach. The first is this Northern Neck area,

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of a a as the Northern Virginia

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>suburbs continue to grow. Right, this is a place where,

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in some ways it was going to be an uphill campaign.

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>But with the wind at the backs of the Democrats,

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and particularly in Northern Virginia, I think there was a

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>path to them getting an eight to three advantage with

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the with the map pre referendum, and so now they're

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>going to have a map that in theory allows them

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to go ten to one. But there is all of

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a sudden now a whole bunch of Democratic primaries, and

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, just like what we've seen with the Republicans,

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>right Democrats could overperform in Republican leaning districts if the

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote wrong person won the primary. You know, if

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>it was two MAGA or two Tea party ish, that

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>could happen. But on the left side of the aisle

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>right two progressive, two left leaning of a nominee and

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly it opens the door. There are a couple

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of these districts that are you know, democratic advantage, but

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we're talking, you know, under five points when it comes

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to democratic advantage. So I'm not going to sit here

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and say this is a total success for the Democratic

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Party unless it is ten to one for sure, or

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.119
<v Speaker 1>if they'd only the only way they win the House

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is on the backs of these remaps in California and Virginia.

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And when you start to just look at the three

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>states that have done the most gerrymandering, right, Texas went

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to try to find a net of five seats, California

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>basically try to erase the five and and Virginia is

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to do four. So if the Democratic majority is

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in the single digits, they win the control of the House.

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's in the single digits, well, then you're going

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to have to you you are going to have to

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>point to these referendums in Virginia and in California as

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the difference that without it, it doesn't happen. If Democrats

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>win the House and they're up to two hundred and

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty five members, which means they've netted somewhere between seventeen

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>eighteen ninety somewhere in the twenty you know, around basically

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>between seventeen and twenty five districts. Then I I'm going

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to look at these maps as sort of wasted money.

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>These referendums is wasted money because it means they would

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>have won the House regardless of these remaps, regardless of

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>these referendum changes. And so the lingering question I have

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>in my mind about all of this is not whether

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>this is going to help them with the House. Look

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it is it is going to help Democrats are closer

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to taking control of the House today than they were yesterday.

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Simply call these referendums. I'm not discounting that, but at

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>what cost. Just take in the state of Virginia, you know,

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Governor Abigail Spamberg, after winning by double digits, looking like

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know what the what the future of

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party could look like, has found herself dragged

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>into becoming a very partisan looking governor, very unlike the

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Mark Warner and Tim Kaine and Ralph Northam models of governing.

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Even Terry McAuliffe, who you know as a former National

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Party chairman, I don't think anybody saw him at first

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>as a honor, but he very much governed from the center.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was he was you know, he may

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>be a thought of as a longtime partisan Democrat because

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>he was the chairman of the DNC, and you know,

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's so close to the Clintons, and the Clintons

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>are certainly synonymous with the Democratic Party, but it is

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of a different wing of the Democratic Party, right, much

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>more of the quote pro business wing of the Democratic Party.

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at sort of the four Democratic

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>governors that have most recently preceded Abigail Spamberger, Terry mccauliffe,

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Ralph Northam, Mark Warner, and Tim Kaine, they either governed

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they all four tried to govern more from the center.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I still think Governor Spamberger wants to govern from the center,

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>but she had to begin her term immediately as a

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>partisan warrior, right, because the first thing on the agenda

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>was getting this through the legislature. Then getting this you know,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, this is not done done. There

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is still a court case, there's still this is likely

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to reach the State Supreme Court. The assumption is the

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>courts will end up ruling in favor of the yes

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>side on this, but there's the there's it's not an

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>unreasonable ruling if they decide nope, they violated specific pieces

0:10:55.440 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of how this should get done. You know, perhaps you know,

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you could see a hybrid situation where they say, you

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.719
<v Speaker 1>know these maps, you got to redo this again if

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you and you can make this constitutional going into twenty eight,

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>but you can't do it for twenty six. Right, there's

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of scenarios that are still left. But I

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>will tell you, like there's a bit of pandemonium now

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 1>in how this election cycle works. So this map passes,

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, we have these brand new districts

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that in theory are only now in law starting today, right,

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>because the passage of this referendum as soon as it's certified,

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially puts these officially, So the new paps take a

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>fact immediately when this referendum becomes law. So as soon

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>as it's certified, and it sometime today, maybe it's tomorrow

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's certified. So guess what the filing deadline is

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>for the now new August fourth primary. Virginia has never

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>had August primaries in recent history. Frankly, primaries are fairly

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>new this century. There used to be a state that

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>did more of its nomination nominating process via conventions and

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>county caucuses and things like that. The shift towards primaries

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>really began in the nineties. So now there's gonna be

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>an August primary for these federal races, and the filing

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>deadline is Friday, as in this coming Friday. So we

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 1>may see some Republican incumbents retire. Whitman, the incumbent and

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the current first congressional district, he's kind of politically homeless

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in the remap. He may decide not to file, but

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>there may be pressure on all of these incumbents to

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and file if they're thinking about retirement, because

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you know they're in theory. There's still this court case

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that that could end up disqualifying this referendum. So the

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>nightmare scenario for the state and the Department of Elections

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is if the yes vote, if the state, if the

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court later decides that the legislative process to put

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this referendum in place was unconstitution intitutional, then you would

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have candidates who filed for the districts under the new

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>map suddenly running in a district that no longer exists.

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You could see the August fourth primary pushback again, you

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>could see a refiling period, so you know this is

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>likely to be what the new map is, but nothing

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is concrete yet. Right the court, there is still a

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>challenge to the constitutionality of this referendum and of what's

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>been done. It is still going through state courts. This

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is not something that would make itself to the US

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. This would be a Virginia decision within the

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Virginia court system. So it's probably you know, going to

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>get implemented. But even after this vote, we still have

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a bit of uncertainty. But big picture, the price that

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are paying to essentially stay what they believe is

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>stay competitive in this House map, which again I don't

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>think this was as dire as the picture that they

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>were painting. And yes, we'll probably get another redistricting attempt

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>now to counter Virginia in Florida, but there's only so

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>much they can do in Florida. They also have a

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>referendum that's in the constitution that well, that sort of

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they've got to be careful not to do this via

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>partisan gain. If it looks like partisan gain, then they

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>have constitutional problems. I think there's only so much they

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>can do. Now we saw I'm you know, I'm stunned

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>at how this ten to one map looks that they

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>took essentially northern Virginia and essentially did what Illinois did

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to maximize congressional seats there for Democrats, which is, you know,

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>have as many districts touched the Chicago land as possible. Well,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>in Virginias, have as many districts touch northern Virginia as possible,

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and then you sort of sprout out like a like

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of a one sided octopus, if you would, on

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that front. Well, in Florida, where they think they can

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>make gains is to take those southeastern Democratic health districts

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and Broward and Palm Beach and parts of Dade County,

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dade County and essentially create slices of bacon from

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the Atlantic Coast to the Gulf coast and essentially bring

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in more Republicans into some of these East Coast Broward

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>County and Palm Beach congressional districts and get Republicans from

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the southwest part of the state your Naples, your Sarasota,

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is your Fort Myers, etc. And that they can The

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>problem with that, though, is that they're going to make

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of light red districts, and in a bad

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Republican year, light red districts can get flipped. So the

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>possibility of a dummy mander for Florida messing around there

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is probably a bat higher than I think folks fully appreciate.

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>But look in the long run, you know, I think

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest loss for Democrats here is this brand issue

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're no longer seen as the party of honest reform.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Donald Trump and the Republicans were not seen

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>as a party that was interested in fairness or fair elections.

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And who am I speaking with the I'm talking about

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>voters that are these independent, these unaffiliated voters that are

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>not hard partisans. And when you look at when Democrats

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the successful election cycles for Democrats in the Trump era

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen twenty in particular, they would over index with those

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>voters in the middle who saw them as sort of,

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, that even slightly center right voter. I think

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>this is going to linger. I think this is going

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>to leave a bad taste. And this is what's going

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to you know, the unintended there's always unintended consequences. I

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>think the biggest unintended consequence of all of this gerrymandering

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in all of this sort of hard

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>partisanship in the States is that I think it only

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to increase demand for a third alternative now

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is it an independent, is alternative party, whatever you want

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at it. I just think that it only

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>increases the appetite for that and it is you know,

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I will say this, I don't think the Democrats are

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 1>improving their brand on this. They may make the base happy,

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it may fire them up, and Donald Trump is an

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>amazing elixir here for the Democratic coalition. In fact, you know,

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 1>NOE appeared to have a little bit of momentum. I

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>think the worst thing that the No side did in

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Virginia was at Donald Trump to do a teletown hall

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the night before the election. And I get what they

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>were trying to do, right, This is the trap of

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump swing voters to test them, but base voters

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>only get motivated by them. And so you know, the

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>more you bring Trump involved in your campaign, the more

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you probably fire up queasy northern Virginia voters who maybe

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>don't like this are a little bit uncomfortable with this,

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and then they see Trump and figure it out screw

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that guy. Right, So here we are, and I guess

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>at this point, if you know, I already sort of

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 1>believed the cake was already baked with the house, I

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>think now Virginia might be icing. But it's all of

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>those unintended consequences that that may not rear its head

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>here this cycle, but may rear its ugly head in

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight. And in the meantime, frankly may have

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>done some long term you know, it may be that

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>an Abigail Spamberger never fully recovers from starting being seen

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>by the voting elector at aar in Virginia as seeing

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is more partisan than they expected her to be, and

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>does that sort of hover over her term in a

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>way that she never gets never gets out of. Look

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>still a long way to go, and there may be

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>moments where she decides to push back at her party

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>in a more high profile ways. Now that this referendums

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>out of the way, I'll be curious to see if

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>she sort of starts to push back at the speaker,

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Louise Lucas, the sort of the most influential state senator

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>there who right now look like they're the ones leading

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the party, while Governor Spamberger is sort of writing Shotgun.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Toddcast is brought to you

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>by Soul. So if you love that end of the

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>day unwined, but hate the hangover, Soul's out of Office

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is for you. These sparkling THCHC drinks and gummies give

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you the same relaxed social feeling without the alcohol, without

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the calories, and without the crash. Soul is a wellness

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>brand that believes feeling good should be fun and easy.

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Soul specializes in delicious hemp derived THCHC and CBD products

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>designed to boost your mood and help you unwind. Their

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>best selling out of Office Gummies were designed to provide

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood, and enhance creativity

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and relaxation. With five different strengths, you can tailor the

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>dose to fit your vibe. So also has a variety

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of products specifically designed to help you get a better

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>night's rest, including their top selling Sleepy Gummies, a fan

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>favorite for deep, restorous sleep. Look. I have made no secret,

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I am a believer in this stuff, in cannabis and

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>hemp derived. I do not partake in alcohol for the

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>most part, I think this stuff is a lot safer

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>than alcohol, a lot less dative of an alcohol. And yes,

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I have to say I love these drinks. It is

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the glass of wine and you know after work, that's

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>what this is. So no hangover and no excess calories

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like this. I'm a big fan. So bring on the

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>good vibes and treat yourself to sold today. Right now,

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Soul is offering my audience thirty percent off your entire order.

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Go to getsol dot com and use the word todcast.

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>That's getsol dot com promo code toodcast for thirty percent off.

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>And yes, I too, am a customer. The other big

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:38.239
<v Speaker 1>news of the day, of course, was something that I

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>told you was going to happen here forty eight hours ago,

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that even if they didn't negotiate, that they were going

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to extend the ceasefire. And Donald

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump unilaterally extended the ceasefire with iron if he hadn't singled,

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 1>If you needed yet another signal that he does not

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>want to restart the wore, we got it in spades

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday night. Everything he asked Iran to do, they

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't do. And yet he agreed to extend a ceasefire anyway,

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and he called it an indefinite extension. Right. He didn't

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>want to He didn't want to have to do this

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in another week, do this in another three days, do

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this in another two weeks. So Iran has essentially won

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the second round of negotiations by not showing up, and

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump agreed to extend the ceasefire anyway. That's quite

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the capitulation by him, and it's quite an acknowledgment of

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the current situation. And this gets back to the to

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the trap that he put himself in because he's now

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>found a way to start a war with Iran and

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>somehow strengthen Iran's position in the region. And that's what

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>this looks like at the moment, and the only way

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to undo it is to add and he doesn't have

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the stomach for it. And we know this because he's

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>choosing not to do it already. Now. There is one

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think will eventually get the Iranians back

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to the table, and they's going to be the Chinese, right,

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>They're only going to have so much patience for this

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>strait of hormones to be closed. They're not going to

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>be interested in having a confrontation with the United States.

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>They want to have good relations with the United States.

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>Their economy needs the United States. So at some point

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the Chinese are going to put a lot

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of pressure in the Iranians to get to the table

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and find an exit ramp, you know, get the straight

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 1>open and find an exit ramp here. But think about

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>what I just said, right, We're now waiting in the

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese to put pressure in Iran because the United States

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do it. The United States couldn't make them do this.

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And don't start a war you're not prepared to finish.

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And Donald Trump started a war. He's not prepared to finish.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>He thought he could essentially blow hard his way uh

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and and get the Iranians to do his bidding without

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>without without it being difficult. Right. He clearly thought the

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Venezuela example was going to work here, and it didn't.

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>And I guess the good news is, if you're worried

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>about us getting into a long, years long quagmire, he

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to do it. That's a I think that's

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a good thing for our troops. I think that's a

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>good thing for a lot of Iranians. And so a

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are going to live instead of die.

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But strategically, this, if this is the scenario we're staring at,

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>then this has been a strategic disaster. This is in

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>some ways worse than you know, it's much worse in

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.919
<v Speaker 1>a rack, right, I mean, we got a better outcome

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 1>out of Iraq than we're getting out of this. It's

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>as bad as Vietnam. I mean, again, it's not worse

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>than Vietnam because we're not doing this for a decade

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're not you know, seeing thousands of American troops die.

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>But what a strategic I mean, just this is an

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>epic foreign policy failure now, and it is hard to

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>see that whatever deal eventually gets cut here does anything

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>other than oddly enhance the position of the Iranians. I mean,

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll be lucky to get the Iran Nuclear Deal two

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>point zero at this point, and it's probably going to

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>be something like that with the Strait having to be

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a part of this. But this is I know, Trump's erratic,

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you know, there's always a possibility he could

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.479
<v Speaker 1>do X, Y and Z, but he clearly doesn't want

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to do it. He clearly doesn't have the stomach for it.

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>He sees what this has done to our economy and

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to get better. He is desperate to

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>try to get this economy healing as fast as possible.

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>That's why you extend the ceasefire indefinitely. That's why you

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and do this unilaterally even if the Iranians

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't there, because he is signaling the Iranians I want

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to cut a deal. Please, I want to cut a deal.

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Will you hurry up and cut a deal with US? So?

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the Iranians are good negotiators and they

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>pay attention. As I told you on Monday, I think

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>they can sniff out the fact that Trump wants a

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>deal too badly. And they sniffed that out. They played

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they basically called his bluff, and he extended the ceasefire. Anyway,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>we got a long way to go. I know all

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the time I can sit here and talk about, you

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>know how bad the decision isn't Iran? Did I tell

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>you how bad this decision is? Now? Do you? We?

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, as if more people needed convincing, Why so

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>many US presidents said this is a bad idea? Why

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>so many US presidents told bb Netanya who to stand down?

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>But hey, this one leads with his gut. This one,

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, he doesn't need to take the advice of

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the people around him. And I do think, are you

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>know the folks in you know, we're we're going to

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of whispers that you know, I wasn't

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>for this, or I wasn't for this, I wasn't. You

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>could have said something more definitive and louder at the beginning.

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Now maybe it wouldn't have mattered, Right, he heard what

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to hear out of BB and he doesn't

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>trust his own intelligence agencies because it goes back to

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty election, and even before then, he thinks

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>all the ever, all the rank and file intel people

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are just against him. So he's not going to ever

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>buy into any of that. But it's it's h this

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is this is this is a big blunder. You know.

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>I think this is something that will leave a huge

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>mark on Marco Rubio and his president future. And I

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know how A Jed E. Vance ducks getting sort

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of tainted with this, but you know, it is hard

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that this that any deal that is cut

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>here at the end is going to make this a

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>ran war seem like a good idea in hindsight, especially

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>since we know that the economic ramifications, the negative consequences

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to this are are going to linger, and they're going

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to linger for months, not weeks. So you want to

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>take these two things together, and it is in some

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>ways a pretty disastrous night for the Republicans in twenty

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty six. You know, I certainly have my opinion about

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the long term impact on the Democratic Party brand for being,

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, for deciding to fight partisan fire with partisan fire.

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to just look at the cold

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>hard calculus of campaign twenty twenty six, the events of

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday have moved Democrats a lot closer to winning both

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the House and the Senate. With this Iran war getting

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>no closer to ending, it is more and more likely

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we are going to have a very unpopular economy. I'm

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to sit here and predict brother in a

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>recession or not. It's just going to be an unpopular

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>economy come November. And that means the Senate is now

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>fully in play. And we've seen I'll tell you, you know,

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it's April, and you know, you usually know right, and

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to me, there have to be a black swan event

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>for the trajectory of this campaign season to change. But

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to see it's always you know, it's in

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>April that you start to see hints at certain states.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>You're let go on, huh, how about that? And there

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>was some polling that came out of Kansas a couple

0:29:55.760 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of days ago that showed the independent candidate leading the

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>incumbent senator there, Roger Marshall, showed lesser known Democrats within

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>striking range and keeping the incumbent senator there under fifty.

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And you're like, huh, And Kansas has been hit hard

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.959
<v Speaker 1>on tariffs, right, all of these Midwestern EG states have

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a double whammy, right, the Ran war

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be popular. They're getting impacted directly

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>because of the cost of energy and fertilizer. But these

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>were already this was the egg industry was already an

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>industry that had been taking on water and taking a

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of pain from the tariffs. So when I see

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a political environment where you have, again a small sample

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>poll in Iowa that had Rob sand already up double digits,

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>had the state had both Democratic candidates essentially dead, even

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>with the likely Republican nominee there you've got what we've

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>seen in Kansas. We've already seen that Nebraska is already

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>super competitive. There is not a data point I've seen

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that has been that is somehow going to that counters

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>what appears to be democratic momentum going into the fall

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of twenty six. All of the little tea leaves that

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you put together to start reading, right, I mean, I mean, look,

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a new poll out of Texas indicating that Paxton

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is more likely to win that runoff than Cornyn. Right,

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like that only puts all of those Texas seats

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>more in play. It is all of the developments right

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>now are only helping one side and only hurting the other.

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>About the only thing the Team Red has going for

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>right now is this massive financial disparity in the super

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>PACs and this massive financial advantage that they have between

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the rn C and the DNC. But here's the unknown

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>on those Donald Trump controls some of that money, and

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>he's weird cheap, and he doesn't always smartly spend it.

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>He withholds they didn't spend near hardly any of that

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>money in Virginia on the NO side right there, So

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I you know, I think he is definitely

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>going to spend it to try to defeat Thomas Massey.

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, he he, he exerts more ownership over

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that money in a way that he uses his not

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>belonging to the Republican Party or the Republican campaign. So

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, one day does not begin or end a

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>campaign season. But boy was this just when you look

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>at the impact on our camp on Campaign twenty twenty six,

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday was a really good day for Team Blue and

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a really bad day for Team mat This episode of

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Toddcast is brought to you by Wild Grain.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Well Grain is the first bake from frozen subscription box

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>for sour dough breads, artisonal pastries, and fresh pastas, plus

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>all the items conveniently baked in twenty five minutes or less.

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Unlike many store brought options, Wild Grain uses some simple

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>ingredients you can pronounce and a slow fermentation process that

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>can be a lot easier on your belly, little gut

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>health there right, and richer in nutrients antioxidants. There's also

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>no preservatives and no shortcuts. The Wild Grain boxes are

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>fully customizable. In addition to their variety box, they have

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a gluten free box, a vegan box and a new

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>protein box. I will tell you I have done the

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>gluten free box. I have done it a second time.

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I have also used the code, the todcast code. If

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you use the promo code podcast at checkout, you get

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars off. I've already used it as a gift

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to somebody else who loves this bread. It is hard

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to find good gluten free bread. It is fantastic. They

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>give you step by step instructions. I really dig this.

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing like having an artesion bakery in your

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>freezer to chase away the winter chill. Now is the

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>best time to stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>meals with Wild Grain. I obviously highly recommend it. It

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is worth giving wild Green to try. Right now, Wildgrain

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is offering my listeners thirty dollars off your first box

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>plus free croissants for life. Come on when you go

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to wildgrain dot com slash podcast to start your subscription today.

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>That's thirty dollars off your first box and free croissants

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>for life when you visit wildgrain dot com slash podcast,

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 1>or simply use the promo code podcast at checkout. This

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>is a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so use that code.

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna keep with the Obviously, it's Wednesday, which means

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I have a new top five list top five toppaztop

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is for the second week in a row.

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got a reader inspired top five and that is

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>top five overlooked races this cycle. And what do I mean?

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>What is the definition? It's it's it's races that the

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>parties are not prioritizing that maybe those of us that

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are observing of our surprise that they're not prioritizing because

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we think that with a little TLC they can be

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>competitive and potentially flippable. So these are five on my

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>list of five. I've got three Demo Republican health seats

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and two Democrat account seats on this So that is

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this top five. I'll talk to you about some other

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>races that I that I contemplated in this top five.

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>But fifth on the list of my top five of

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>races that the parties that I think the party out

0:35:56.280 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>of power and said race is not prioritizing and is

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>making a mistake. So number five in the list, I'm

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>going to go backwards here, five down to one. Five

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>on the list is Florida governor. Look, I see the math,

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I see the trend lines. I know that the general

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 1>direction right now looks like boy, that's a you know,

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have just beaten the daylights out of Democrats and

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 1>voter registration over the last four years. DeSantis has taken

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 1>what was a victory by a fingernail in twenty eighteen,

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>had a blowout by twenty twenty two, and it wasn't

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>It appears to not be a one off, right You

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of see, you know, Trump won Florida more comfortably

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>than a Republican has won really going back thirty years

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 1>on a presidential level. So you look at it from

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a macro level and you think, Okay, I get it.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I get why Democrats are underrating Florida governor or are

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>deciding to essentially walk away from them, not taking Florida

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>seriously either. The the the semi open Senate race, I

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>say it's semi open because there's a uh, there's there's

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>an appointee uh there. But it's the Rubio seat. But

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it is an open governor's race. And that's the key.

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>When a party does not target an open seat, that

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is not just conceding that election cycle, that is conceding

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a decade of an election cycle in a given state.

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>So you'll see here in some ways, I think that though,

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 1>when you concede not trying to make an open seat competitive,

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just a gigantic waving of the white

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>flag that sends a larger message internally in that state

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and sends a pretty negative message if you if you

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>think you would like to start to plant the seeds

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to become more competitive, and said state, I get it. Byron,

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Donald's has a truckload of money. The early endorsement by

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Trump seemed to clear the field. The Santa would love

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to find an alternative to Donalds and has really struggled

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 1>to do that because it is Donald Trump's Republican Party,

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>at least financially in the state of Florida. I'm not

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>as convinced that he has the iron grip with the

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>voters that it is as iron iron clad as they behave,

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>but it is financially, there's no doubt. Right Trump sent

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the signal and all the money followed, So there's a

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>giant financial advantage of iron Donald's gonna have. But he's

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>really being treated almost as a governor in waiting and

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, the history of Florida on open governor's

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>races are usually highly competitive and you usually have you know,

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty you know, the Floridians, there's always a new you know,

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>every two years there's half a million new residents that

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>are voting in that state for the very first time

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and aren't just you know, gonna likely knee jerk just

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a one party and so you know, it's pretty clear

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, donors have been told don't bother with Florida.

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Now the center race, Vinman, Alex Vinman, the brother of

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.839
<v Speaker 1>Eugene Vinman, who's already a sitting member of Congress in Virginia.

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 1>He raised a ton of money and he does well

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in that sort of act blue circuit raising money, you know,

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in the online left. And he certainly in that sense

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>had you know, thanks to the impeachment emails over the years,

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>has a pretty effective list on the in the governor's

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>race there with those two Democrats, David Jolly Jerry Demmings,

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>neither one of them, although Jerry Demings has valed Demings

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>list when she ran against Rubio, and that was an

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>incredibly successful fundraising apparatus that again was sort of wasted

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>by National Democrats and Florida Democrats. So there is I

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>think walking away not taking this race seriously, not trying

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to prioritize Florida in general. You're not just walking away

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 1>from one race. I think the National Party is walking

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>away from the state for a decad and it's it's

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 1>just a it's a huge miscalculation. But this look that

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>there are larger problems right that. You know, both parties

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>are kind of a mess strategically. The Democratic Party is

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>more of a mess. They really have. They've botched Florida

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>from six ways from Sunday, uh and they've and there's

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>another state on here that that I'll be highlighting where

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they've they've really missed. They've really not put the effort

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in that if they had been making efforts over a decade,

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 1>this would be the cycle they could actually see see

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it come to fruition. So fifth on the list is

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Florida Gov. This is one where I think the Democrats

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>are not prioritizing it. I think the race will be

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:43.799
<v Speaker 1>it'll end up being more competitive, it'll end up being

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a single digit race despite the lack of prioritizing or

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>national interests. Number four on the list for me is

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a is a Democratic health seats Oregon governor. Now Oregon

0:40:57.600 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 1>governor has been sort of a little bit of a

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of a of a lower profile version of Charlie Brown

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in the football that New Jersey has had become over

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 1>the years. For Republicans on the East coast, Oregon is

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 1>always much more competitive than its reputation, right, you know,

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Oregon sandwich between Washington and California. It's certainly had a

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 1>long streak of Democratic governor. So it's been a long

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 1>time since Republicans. I don't think they've won to They

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't had a Senate seat a newly elected senator since

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the mid nineties with Gordon Smith, but they've come quite

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.800
<v Speaker 1>close before. Right, this is not a seventy to thirty

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:41.959
<v Speaker 1>blue state. This really is a fifty five to forty five,

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, on a good day for Democrats. Now the

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 1>national right, you know, Oregon is a place that Republicans

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>are only going to be more competitive in good Republican

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>years nationally, I think that there's so I understand why

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen too much here. And there's also a

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>sitting governor for reelection, Tina Kotech. But they and arguably

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>their lat the Republicans, the three way race messed up

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>their chances perhaps of winning Oregon GOV. Back in twenty

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>or two, I had been just a two way race,

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 1>and the third party candidate might have decided not to run.

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>The sort of the Phil Knight candidates, as I called her.

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>She was a former Democrat, became a became an independent,

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but she not been in that race and had been

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>co tech and a sort of a sort of mainstream Republican,

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of non maga Republican. I think that's a winnable

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>race for Republicans. So look, twenty two was the year

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that they could have done this, but they, you know

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's funny Oregon. Again, it is similar to

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>what Democrats have done in Florida. Republicans could be more

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>competitive Oregon if they just spent some time there, if

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>they just and they've had some luck targeting a few

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 1>house seats. They flipped the house seat or two that

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.919
<v Speaker 1>some people didn't think they could flip. So it's clear

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:04.760
<v Speaker 1>it's on the ground. There's certainly questions about how Portland's

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>been governed, which have sort of I think made the

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>suburbs of Portland a bit more competitive potentially now part

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of it is I think MAGA doesn't sell an organ

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's possible that Oregon comes back into the semi

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>competitive list of states. And I say semi competitive there

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the light red, light blue states that right now that

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:28.240
<v Speaker 1>may have an allergy to Trump in particular, but in general,

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the Republican Party doesn't know how to

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 1>prioritize Oregon very well. Certainly this version of the Republican Party,

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>which just you know, the Maga, the MAGA stuff just

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play on the coasts. We've seen this. It just

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>really doesn't play on the coast and that may be

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>part of the problem. But I definitely think it's a

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a race that's under prioritized in a state that's

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>under number three on the list. For me is Alabama

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>governor now Doug Jones is running and Tommy Tupperville's the

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:04.879
<v Speaker 1>likely Republican nominee. Tommy Tupperville there were questions about whether

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:07.399
<v Speaker 1>he's even qualified to be governor and did he meet

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the seventh the six year residency requirement. There's some questions

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>about that. You don't need the you don't need to

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:20.399
<v Speaker 1>be a resident for you could literally, you know, run

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>for US Senate anywhere, just established residency for a day

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and and you're as long as you're a citizen and

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:29.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty years old, you could you could run and win

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a Senate seat. That's most states have hard and hard

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and fast residency requirements for governor. They take that a

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 1>lot more seriously. So you have a candidate who's, you know,

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>not seen as very sort of conversant on how Congress works,

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:50.799
<v Speaker 1>and they spent a term there doing it hasn't been

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:54.280
<v Speaker 1>seen as somebody. You know, most people want their governors

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to sort of be less partisan. You know, they certainly

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>expect them to be, you know, maybe in Alabama a

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>small sea conservative, but they don't necessarily. We usually don't

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 1>want partisan warriors as governor. We usually if we elect

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a partisan warrior, we'll do that for a legislative seat.

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 1>We're usually a little less comfortable collectively as voters doing

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that for a governor seat. And you know, so I

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:24.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's a case where Doug Jones and you're more

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 1>likely if you're a Republican running in a blue state

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>or a Democrat running in a red state, you're going

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 1>to have a better chance at winning statewide running for

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>governor than you are for Senate and this isn't a

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>bad Democratic gear. It looks like it's building into one.

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So I've not seen the evidence that the National Party

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is putting Alabama governor in play, is making a real effort. Now,

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe you know, they might argue, well, we're going to

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 1>help Doug Jones when he's there, but we don't want

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to bring a lot of attention to it because the

0:45:57.080 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 1>sooner they think he's a viable candidate. The I don't

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 1>buy that, right. He's a former US senator, he got

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>elected not that long ago, ironically running for governor. Now

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be facing Tommy Tupperville for a second time.

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>He lost to him. Tupperville defeat defeated Doug Jones to

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 1>win that Senate seat six years ago, and now they'll

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:21.840
<v Speaker 1>be facing off again for this governor's race. But I

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:25.920
<v Speaker 1>think Democrats have not given this the priority compared to

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that the chances they have to win. I

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 1>think their chances are much higher here. And you know,

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>then most people think, and you know, this is another

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>one that's gonna If you're telling me this is a

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:42.720
<v Speaker 1>race that's decided by five points or less, it wouldn't

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:45.919
<v Speaker 1>surprise me, and if it is, there'll be a lot

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:48.399
<v Speaker 1>of questions about you know, hey, did they not pay

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>attention to this race soon enough? Number two on my

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 1>list is Texas Governor. I think this is one where

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 1>again this goes you know, it's funny. Democrats are pretty

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>fun focused on the center race, but to me, the

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 1>governor's race, and this is where I thought. So I

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 1>thought Taller Rico would have could have been a more

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:10.320
<v Speaker 1>effective candidate for governor. He was in the state legislature.

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>He's more conversant on state issues, but he wanted the

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>easier path. He thought, you know, facing Ken Paxton might

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 1>be easier to win, and look, facing an incumbent governor

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:22.240
<v Speaker 1>who's trying to become the longest serving governor in Texas history.

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Abbot, I will give you know, Abbot

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 1>deserves I think a lot of credit for he is somehow,

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>he has somehow walk this tightrope in Texas between the

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Maga wing and the non Mago wing, and he's not

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>really a comfortable member of either. Right, he's not really

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a Bush Republican, although he sort of was more Bush

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Republican at the beginning of his career. But he's not

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 1>really a Trump Republican either, right, he is. He is

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 1>something in between, right. He's not as much of a

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>firebrand as the Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick is, but he's

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>never wanted Dan Patrick to get traction on his right,

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 1>so he sort of tries to manage that from afar.

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, regardless of what you think of as politics personally,

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm impressed with how Abbot has navigated this over a

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of cycles. You know, this could have We've seen

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>other Republicans try to play this game where they kind

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of like kind of you know, they kind of are

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a chameleon, right, and they're almost a and they just

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of they seem and part of it is is

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Abbot has a good relationship with the donor community in general,

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and that seems to be I think what keeps him

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 1>keeps his head above water. But you know, I look

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 1>at the history of just you know, people trying to

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.719
<v Speaker 1>run for third and fourth and terms as governor and

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's when fatigue kicks in. You know, we saw

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it with the cuomos plural in both with Mario and

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Andrew over the years. And I think that fatigue issue

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is potentially ripe in Texas. We've already seen. And what's

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>been interesting is the Democratic nominee gene you know, so

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I've not yet to see a poll where this where

0:49:06.000 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the race wasn't already in single digits. It's pretty clear

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Abbit has a hard ceiling. What he's done on school

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:16.719
<v Speaker 1>choice is not as popular among some pockets inside Republican

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party, as as he believes. There's been in

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 1>some ways a Republican civil war that he has helped

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>fund inside the party, you know, getting rid of folks

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that stood in his way on some of his agendas.

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 1>So the point is is that when you've done that,

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:36.399
<v Speaker 1>you've made yourself a share of uh political enemies that

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>could come back to haunt And I look at his

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I look at his numbers. Overall, they look like somebody

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 1>who is who is at the tail end of their career,

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:50.279
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily continuing to build momentum. But I don't see

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the commitment by the National Party. You don't see the

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>money coming into you know's campaign that would allow her

0:49:57.000 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to take what is going to be a you know,

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>sitting at a six or seven point range for the

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:06.399
<v Speaker 1>most part, and you know, you might have a tail

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:07.920
<v Speaker 1>wind from all the money that comes in for the

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Senate race of Paxton ends up winning the runoff, and

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>who knows, maybe this changes here, but I think the

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>lack of focus and attention to this race is a

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:20.239
<v Speaker 1>real missed opportunity because if you're trying to build a

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 1>party infrastructure in a state that you'd like to make competitive,

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:27.160
<v Speaker 1>winning a governor's race is much get you much further

0:50:27.239 --> 0:50:29.920
<v Speaker 1>down the road of building the infrastructure you need to

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 1>make a state party competitive than winning a Senate seed does. Right,

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is you know, it's another reminder that there's

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:40.360
<v Speaker 1>just too much Washington thinking. Inside of the Democratic Party.

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 1>It is way too concentrated and what's best for the

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>national party. In the Washington Party, they this is a

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:50.480
<v Speaker 1>party that has just stopped thinking about party building in

0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the states, and you can feel it. Part of it is,

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what's in front of them, right, you know,

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 1>they help out certain people if they think they can win,

0:50:57.160 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 1>see Rob sand in Iowa. But you don't get the

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:02.359
<v Speaker 1>sense this is a national party thinking about, Hey, what's

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this map going to look like after the census in

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty and what do they need to do to

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>be prepared in twenty thirty two? And watching them not

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 1>prioritize either Texas or Florida in any way at all,

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:18.759
<v Speaker 1>is I think putting them in a bad position for

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the next decade when it comes to the electoral College

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:25.640
<v Speaker 1>once we see these numbers change after the twenty thirty census.

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So Texas governor number two and number one on my

0:51:27.960 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 1>list is a Democratic health seat, and it's the open

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 1>seat in Minnesota Senate. It's it's Minnesota Senate, and it's

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Republicans. They have just not prioritized Minnesota. And

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's surprising to me. You have a divisive Democratic primary,

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you have basically a left versus pragmatist fight between Peggy

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Flanagan and Angie Craig. You've gotten You've got an unpopular

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>governor sitting that is choosing not to seek reelection. Tim Walls. Yes,

0:51:56.719 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party's sort of best political joke going not

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in the state. Amy Klobe Shar is now going to

0:52:02.120 --> 0:52:03.840
<v Speaker 1>be at the top of the ticket running for governor.

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And it probably does save the Democrats in that state

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:12.280
<v Speaker 1>from from what was becoming a political problem with Walls.

0:52:14.120 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm not going to sit here and say

0:52:15.560 --> 0:52:22.319
<v Speaker 1>that that that if the Republicans spent a little gave,

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:27.480
<v Speaker 1>gave a little more attention to Minnesota. They they'd win

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. See but when I look at how much

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:33.560
<v Speaker 1>they put more effort in trying to win New Hampshire

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the Minnesota, and if I would, I think they have

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a better chance of winning Minnesota than the New Hampshire.

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You don't have a divisive Democratic primary in New Hampshire.

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 1>You have a Chris Pappis who's as a member of Congress,

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is not seen as a as a hard left winger.

0:52:48.239 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 1>If anything, there's a in the in the little item

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I featured earlier in this podcast about bridge grades and

0:52:55.880 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>this new metric. Pappis is somebody who's seen as a

0:52:59.560 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>regular works across the aisle. So he fits the New

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Hampshire profile in a way that in a way that

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe some other Democrats wouldn't fit as well. So yes,

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:13.839
<v Speaker 1>they have you know, two now two former senators running

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in that Republican primary. But it does seem as if

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that nationally the Republicans have prioritized New Hampshire over Minnesota,

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:24.400
<v Speaker 1>which you know, again a head scratcher. Now look, the

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:28.120
<v Speaker 1>ice killings in Minnesota have certainly put the Republican Party

0:53:28.120 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in a in a hole there in Minnesota. That and

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:38.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe when Trump's not on the not in power, that

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:43.959
<v Speaker 1>will provide an opening. But and this could very well,

0:53:44.000 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Tafoya could be running a race where she learns

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a few lessons and then runs again in two years

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:52.759
<v Speaker 1>for the a in a special election to fill out

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the rest of Amy clobe Shark's term, which will pop

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:57.360
<v Speaker 1>up in twenty twenty eight, assuming Clobshar went to the

0:53:57.400 --> 0:54:02.359
<v Speaker 1>governor's race, and you will, and they'll prioritize it more.

0:54:02.400 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's funny. Minnesota has been teetering on the edge

0:54:06.680 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of the competitive battleground for the presidential race for a

0:54:10.160 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 1>few cycles now, not not prioritizing the Senate race. I

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:18.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's been a head scratcher to me and another

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:21.799
<v Speaker 1>potential missed opportunity there. So there you have it. My

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 1>top five sort of overlooked races where I think the

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:29.680
<v Speaker 1>out party is you would be would actually have a

0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:33.040
<v Speaker 1>reasonable chance at being competitive and possibly pulling an upset

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:35.719
<v Speaker 1>if they actually put some effort into it. So my

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:39.680
<v Speaker 1>order again, Number one Minnesota Senate, so dinging the Republicans

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 1>there for their lack of interest. Number two Texas governor

0:54:42.560 --> 0:54:45.720
<v Speaker 1>digging the Democrats for their lack of interest. Number three

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Alabama governor dinging the Democrats there, Number four Oregon governor

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:55.320
<v Speaker 1>dinging the Republicans there, and number five Florida Governor digging

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats on that one. So really appreciate the reader's

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>suggestion on these top five lists. Two weeks in a

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:06.200
<v Speaker 1>row where we've done a top five list, so last

0:55:06.200 --> 0:55:08.759
<v Speaker 1>week it was doing the six through ten list on

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 1>our Senate flips, which the reader correctly pointed out as

0:55:12.040 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 1>probably a more volatile list than our five most likely

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:18.759
<v Speaker 1>to flip. And in this case, how about five overlooked

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 1>races that the parties are whipping on. So there you

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:36.000
<v Speaker 1>have it. Ask Chuck h Right a little question time.

0:55:36.840 --> 0:55:39.799
<v Speaker 1>This one comes from Travis from Charlottesville, and he asked,

0:55:39.800 --> 0:55:41.719
<v Speaker 1>after going back and forth on the redistioning issue, I

0:55:41.760 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 1>finally decided to vote yes, mainly for two reasons. One

0:55:45.000 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 1>there is little else I can do that may get

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the attention of elected officials, and two to help Spamberger

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:51.840
<v Speaker 1>gain back a little bit of her political capital. Wouldn't

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:53.279
<v Speaker 1>it be worse for a governor to expend all this

0:55:53.440 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 1>energy and money if it resulted as a loss in

0:55:55.800 --> 0:55:59.080
<v Speaker 1>hearing your opinion on the second. Thanks Travis. Well, we

0:55:59.120 --> 0:56:03.799
<v Speaker 1>actually now know the result on this front. But it's

0:56:03.800 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 1>an interesting thesis here. It's like, what's worse? You know,

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I I could I could see Spamberger spinning a loss

0:56:17.680 --> 0:56:21.560
<v Speaker 1>by saying I knew it. I wanted to be a

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>team player here and this this was happening before I

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:29.400
<v Speaker 1>took office, and this was already in the works. You know,

0:56:29.480 --> 0:56:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this is not how we're going to go forth, you know,

0:56:31.920 --> 0:56:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you know I so I guess I'm not. I get

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:39.840
<v Speaker 1>your line of thinking that, you know, and certainly it

0:56:40.040 --> 0:56:43.440
<v Speaker 1>helps her in the party right, But to me, Spanberger

0:56:43.480 --> 0:56:47.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a party issue. Spanberger has a has a

0:56:47.120 --> 0:56:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of governing issue now a little bit. But you know,

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I still look at this whole thing and all this energy,

0:56:58.760 --> 0:57:04.000
<v Speaker 1>all this political capital. Again, if the map doesn't change

0:57:04.080 --> 0:57:08.480
<v Speaker 1>one bit, Democrats likely pick up one for sure, Virginia two,

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and likely a second Virginia one. So all of this

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 1>political capital has expended for hope, they're hoping two more

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 1>seats ten to one. I say hoping. Look, if one

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of these primaries it's too far to the left and

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans don't have somebody who's too maga on the

0:57:26.880 --> 0:57:30.360
<v Speaker 1>other side. You know, this thing could easily end up

0:57:30.360 --> 0:57:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a nine to two map rather than a ten to one,

0:57:33.760 --> 0:57:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and then you're talking nine to two to eighth when

0:57:37.040 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 1>when you looked at it from the big picture, this

0:57:41.080 --> 0:57:45.360
<v Speaker 1>was you know, especially now if this, you know, if

0:57:45.360 --> 0:57:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this triggers more redistricting going forward. So it's I understand

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that line of thinking, and maybe that's right. But I

0:57:57.080 --> 0:58:01.439
<v Speaker 1>could make an argument that she could been a loss

0:58:02.200 --> 0:58:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and make essentially the legislative Dems own that, and she

0:58:05.440 --> 0:58:14.760
<v Speaker 1>could separate herself from that if necessary. Next question comes

0:58:14.760 --> 0:58:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from Pallo in Italy. All right, I love when we

0:58:17.440 --> 0:58:19.440
<v Speaker 1>get some questions from Europe. I've been thinking about the

0:58:19.480 --> 0:58:26.440
<v Speaker 1>phrase kem deuce volts perdre prius dementat whom God wishes

0:58:26.520 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to destroy, he first makes mad in the context of

0:58:29.600 --> 0:58:32.200
<v Speaker 1>recent political discussions around the twenty fifth end minute, Kendall

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Hi the bar is in Congress, who would realistically be

0:58:34.960 --> 0:58:36.880
<v Speaker 1>willing to support such a move And is there any

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:40.160
<v Speaker 1>scenario where the kind of bipartisan agreement exists. More importantly,

0:58:40.320 --> 0:58:42.480
<v Speaker 1>even if it were possible, would the country necessarily be

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:45.080
<v Speaker 1>better off with the alternative. In Italian, we say something

0:58:45.160 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the effective, beware of what you wish for, it might

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:53.520
<v Speaker 1>come true. Best regards Palo in Italy. Well, I'll just say,

0:58:53.640 --> 0:58:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think any of these mechanisms that

0:58:56.440 --> 0:58:59.600
<v Speaker 1>avoid the ballot box to turn the page on Trump

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:03.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to be effective. I think anything that gets

0:59:03.280 --> 0:59:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump out of office that isn't voters directed and voter specific,

0:59:09.080 --> 0:59:14.800
<v Speaker 1>risks turning him into a martyr, that becomes weaponized politically

0:59:15.080 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and could actually make things worse, not better. So that's

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:22.440
<v Speaker 1>why I'm not a you know, look, the twenty fifth Amendment,

0:59:22.600 --> 0:59:24.640
<v Speaker 1>why did we have it? We had it because there

0:59:24.680 --> 0:59:27.920
<v Speaker 1>was this concern after Kennedy was shot, what if he

0:59:27.960 --> 0:59:31.800
<v Speaker 1>had lived but was a vegetable, right, what if he

0:59:31.840 --> 0:59:34.880
<v Speaker 1>were the physical you know, but he really couldn't you know,

0:59:34.880 --> 0:59:36.880
<v Speaker 1>but there wasn't a lot of brain function, so he

0:59:36.960 --> 0:59:40.480
<v Speaker 1>were alive, but he really could, you know. Ultimately, that

0:59:40.680 --> 0:59:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is why the twenty fifth Amendment. That was the thinking

0:59:45.160 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 1>behind the twenty fifth amendment, Right, that was the motivation.

0:59:47.840 --> 0:59:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And I always think it's important, like why does an

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:52.760
<v Speaker 1>amendment happen? Right? Why did they do it? I think

0:59:52.760 --> 0:59:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it is always an It is important to understand the

0:59:55.320 --> 1:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>context of the twenty fifth Amendment. It is one of

1:00:00.960 --> 1:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it really is like pornography. Will know when

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we see it, right, when you could realize, oh, there's

1:00:05.880 --> 1:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not functioning at all. But remember it has to

1:00:09.880 --> 1:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>come from inside the cabinet, right, So I guess in theory,

1:00:14.520 --> 1:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if the cabinet did it, then then you know they're

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>more They're only going to this cabinet, right, which is

1:00:20.400 --> 1:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>filled with people who are you know, who wouldn't get

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the job if they weren't willing to be sick of

1:00:27.520 --> 1:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>fans of sorts. If somehow this cabinet did it, it's

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>probably it probably is such a deterioration onhealth or mental

1:00:35.200 --> 1:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>capacity that it would be weird if they didn't do it, right, So,

1:00:42.240 --> 1:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it only happens if both Rubio and

1:00:44.640 --> 1:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Advance think it should happen. Right. That's a case where

1:00:47.320 --> 1:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the two of them, the two of them together said hey,

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this needs to happen. It would happen. I just think

1:00:52.680 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood of that, you know, again, a guy who

1:00:57.400 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>got into office by running against the so called deep

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>stay not sure. It's not sure it's the healthiest thing

1:01:05.040 --> 1:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to do to out said person through and through a

1:01:09.600 --> 1:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>mechanism that isn't voters centric. But it's funny you say that,

1:01:17.560 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I I do. I say some similar things when those

1:01:22.600 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know think about Trump Trump singularly, you know,

1:01:27.240 --> 1:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and fantasize about him sort of leaving office early. And

1:01:30.040 --> 1:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, okay, are you you prepared for advanced presidency?

1:01:36.520 --> 1:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you aware of how how close he is too?

1:01:42.280 --> 1:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>One of the more out there tech people in Peter

1:01:46.360 --> 1:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Teel Right, So I I I also be careful. What

1:01:54.600 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you wish for is is H is a form of

1:01:58.760 --> 1:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a similar form of warning that I have issued to

1:02:02.640 --> 1:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>others when I'm asked about that specific question. All right,

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>next place. Next question comes from Lincoln C. Who calls

1:02:12.440 --> 1:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>himself a displaced New Englander in Columbus, Ohio. All right,

1:02:18.080 --> 1:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, we got it down. You like to refer

1:02:20.040 --> 1:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to political athletes when describing politicians. What do you think

1:02:22.680 --> 1:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>about vance and how important do you think being a

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>good political athlete will be in twenty twenty eight on

1:02:26.640 --> 1:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the Republican side, when I assume Trump will have an

1:02:29.400 --> 1:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>outsizeed hand in picking the nominee, or maybe Trump's influence

1:02:32.320 --> 1:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>will have waned in political athleticism will be even more

1:02:35.280 --> 1:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>important as the eventual nominee will need to thread a

1:02:38.160 --> 1:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>narrow needle of staying close to Trump to get the

1:02:40.240 --> 1:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>nomination and then aggressively trying to appeal to the middle

1:02:43.000 --> 1:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>after the convention. Look, I'm not impressed with Jade Vance

1:02:48.320 --> 1:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and as a political athlete, right. This has nothing to

1:02:51.000 --> 1:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>do with the individual. It doesn't mean he doesn't have

1:02:55.440 --> 1:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the potential. But I look at the campaign he ran

1:02:57.480 --> 1:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>for Senate. It's an atrocious campaign one despite himself, right,

1:03:01.400 --> 1:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>he was dragged across the finish line by Peter Thiel's

1:03:03.920 --> 1:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>money and eventually by Mitch McConnell's super pack. He you know,

1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>was not gonna win a primary campaign if Trump hadn't

1:03:12.080 --> 1:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>come in late to essentially rescue him. In that primary campaign,

1:03:16.000 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I think at one point almost came to fisticuffs with

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Marino during Remember Bernie Marino ran in the ran

1:03:21.760 --> 1:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in the in that primary in twenty two before he

1:03:25.720 --> 1:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>became the consensus candidate in twenty four and knocked off

1:03:30.800 --> 1:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Shared Brown. So you know, the one campaign that Vance

1:03:35.080 --> 1:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>has been involved with that was his campaign right on

1:03:38.880 --> 1:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>his own, was not good at all. I mean, he

1:03:41.720 --> 1:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>he underperformed across the board, right, he underperformed you know

1:03:48.000 --> 1:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>what his numbers should have been, arguably, and you know

1:03:50.520 --> 1:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that would have you know, look at how Mike DeWine

1:03:53.480 --> 1:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>did versus how Jade Vance did in Ohio in twenty

1:03:56.200 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. So I you know, I'm and I don't

1:04:04.120 --> 1:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>think we can say he navigated the primary very well

1:04:09.000 --> 1:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>when you realize that he kind of needed Trump to

1:04:11.480 --> 1:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>come in at the last minute to secure this. So

1:04:15.040 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it is a so needless to say. I think of

1:04:19.280 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the two, I think Rubio is the much better political

1:04:21.280 --> 1:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>athlete because he is one tough races and he's you know,

1:04:28.280 --> 1:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>one competitive primaries. In some ways, he was you know,

1:04:33.680 --> 1:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>he was he was a disruptor inside the Republican Party

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>before Trump in twenty ten when he essentially challenged Charlie

1:04:42.560 --> 1:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Crist from the right, when Charlie Crist was the sitting

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Republican governor wanting to run for the Senate. Marco Rubia

1:04:49.800 --> 1:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted that he and he went in and it, you know,

1:04:52.080 --> 1:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he basically drove Charlie Crist out of the party. Right.

1:04:55.800 --> 1:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think when you look at just in terms

1:04:58.640 --> 1:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of comparing the two of them as political athletes. It's

1:05:01.040 --> 1:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>not a close call. One's a blue chipper and ones

1:05:04.480 --> 1:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a an undrafted free agent, you know, And and you know,

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe as as advance, you know, gets gets more practice,

1:05:16.040 --> 1:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the national spotlight at Republican dinners, maybe

1:05:19.080 --> 1:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>he gets better at this. But you know, look, I

1:05:23.040 --> 1:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think twenty eight is going to be who can you know,

1:05:28.440 --> 1:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's highly unlikely a Republican's going to win

1:05:30.560 --> 1:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the presidency in twenty eight, right, We Doug Sosnik and

1:05:35.680 --> 1:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I were having this conversation, right, it is hard to fathom.

1:05:38.480 --> 1:05:44.959
<v Speaker 1>And and you know it is we've we've we're more

1:05:45.080 --> 1:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>likely and we're no matter what, going to have our

1:05:46.840 --> 1:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth straight one term president. You know, we'll see if

1:05:50.120 --> 1:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>they end up a one term for sure. We know

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we have three and you know we're gonna have a

1:05:54.520 --> 1:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth straight. And the question is is it can that

1:05:56.920 --> 1:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>person win reelection? But it's hard to imagine that Trump's somehow,

1:06:06.880 --> 1:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess anything is possible, but it's hard

1:06:09.480 --> 1:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that that he his presidency in lame duck

1:06:14.200 --> 1:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>status after the midterms, is somehow going to age better

1:06:17.800 --> 1:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>than at any other point, and he is going to

1:06:20.760 --> 1:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>be you know, more involved in the campaign than other

1:06:25.840 --> 1:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>outgoing presidents. Right, Obama was was was less involved in

1:06:30.600 --> 1:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton wanted to be more involved in Gore but wasn't.

1:06:34.640 --> 1:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Bush wasn't involved with McCain. So I Trump's not going

1:06:40.880 --> 1:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to be that way. Trump's going to try to insert

1:06:42.440 --> 1:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>himself and be very involved. If it's somebody that's you know,

1:06:48.440 --> 1:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's not Vance, then whoever, then whoever beats Vance.

1:06:54.280 --> 1:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>It's got to be a pretty good plue. It means

1:06:55.920 --> 1:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>they've navigated. They've somehow become the the the most acceptable

1:07:01.680 --> 1:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>candidate of the non MAGA wing while not being will

1:07:05.800 --> 1:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>also being acceptable to the MAGA wing. Right, that's not

1:07:08.880 --> 1:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>easy to do. I'm not sure it's possible, right I

1:07:13.000 --> 1:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>did you know? I never would have said Marco Rubio

1:07:14.840 --> 1:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>could pull that off before serving with Trump. Maybe that

1:07:18.320 --> 1:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is something he can do now, you know, maybe that

1:07:21.640 --> 1:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is improved and we shall see. But I do think

1:07:27.840 --> 1:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that if you're the Republicans, you can't you can't just

1:07:31.600 --> 1:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>go totally non MAGA at all. Right, your your entire

1:07:35.080 --> 1:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>coalition crumbles. But if you're trying to put together a

1:07:37.800 --> 1:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>durable coalition that might survive post Trump and post MAGA,

1:07:41.760 --> 1:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it has to be you know, somebody who's appealing to

1:07:44.520 --> 1:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the non MAGA wing as Nikki Haley was right, but

1:07:48.560 --> 1:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>is not as negative towards the mega community as as

1:07:54.680 --> 1:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Nicki Haley was. So that's the sweet spot. I don't

1:07:58.280 --> 1:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>know if anybody can meet it. And the only person

1:08:00.840 --> 1:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I see out there that might be able to walk

1:08:02.800 --> 1:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that line like that is Marco Rubio. And you know

1:08:06.320 --> 1:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>one other person I'd put out there who's done it,

1:08:09.800 --> 1:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if he's got the charisma to

1:08:12.120 --> 1:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>be a national party leader. Is the Governor of Texas,

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Craig Abbott. Next question comes from Mike in Honolulu. I

1:08:22.600 --> 1:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>think I've had you chime in before, Mike, and he says,

1:08:25.920 --> 1:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>what are the longer term impacts to the US if

1:08:27.640 --> 1:08:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the administration really pulls out of NATO? For example, would

1:08:30.439 --> 1:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Norrad be crippled as we rely on the UK and

1:08:32.920 --> 1:08:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Norway capabilities? Also Canada. By the way, fun fact traveling

1:08:36.760 --> 1:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in Asia this week and the podcast downloads without ads

1:08:39.120 --> 1:08:41.599
<v Speaker 1>except for the ones you deliver. How about a quince

1:08:41.680 --> 1:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>quarter zip for the five timers? Kidding of course, Thanks

1:08:44.000 --> 1:08:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Mike and Alalu, Hey, thanks for letting our ad folks

1:08:46.800 --> 1:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>know about this, right, we can have special European rates

1:08:50.800 --> 1:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>for those that you know, that's the extra bonus for

1:08:54.280 --> 1:08:57.639
<v Speaker 1>our ad sales team. So listen up, guys, right when

1:08:57.640 --> 1:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you go overseas, you know, the ads that matter the

1:09:01.880 --> 1:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>most are the ones that that I'm reading. How about that,

1:09:04.360 --> 1:09:08.759
<v Speaker 1>let's the European premium, it's coming. Appreciate that little Look

1:09:08.920 --> 1:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>this is this should be of concern to us. And

1:09:12.000 --> 1:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you know Canada, Canada's cooper all of this cooperation with

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States, right, we have this is generational. I

1:09:19.600 --> 1:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think we've fully you know, We're not going to

1:09:24.479 --> 1:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>realize how much damage Trump has done to our international

1:09:27.439 --> 1:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>alliances until we need them again, right, really need them.

1:09:31.680 --> 1:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And we haven't hit a moment where but it's going

1:09:33.760 --> 1:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen, right, it's inevitable. And when that becomes more

1:09:40.080 --> 1:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>front and center, and Claire, you know, my guess is

1:09:43.000 --> 1:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll see voters demand better cooperation going on, we better

1:09:46.760 --> 1:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>fix that relationship. I think that the next president is

1:09:51.120 --> 1:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>going to have a hard time winning over the trust

1:09:54.200 --> 1:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of some of these a lot broken alliances. But I mean,

1:09:57.080 --> 1:10:05.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're we're we're between the tariffs, the erratic

1:10:05.960 --> 1:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>security behavior, right, you know, we help Ukraine. No, we

1:10:09.080 --> 1:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>don't help Ukraine. We help Ukraine, We're not going to

1:10:11.120 --> 1:10:18.519
<v Speaker 1>help Ukraine. The the disruption that the United States alone

1:10:18.560 --> 1:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>has caused the world by doing by poorly executing this

1:10:23.040 --> 1:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>war in Iran. Yeah, it's gonna frail lot. It's gonna

1:10:27.160 --> 1:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna take a lot more than just a so

1:10:30.240 --> 1:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>called apology tour, which some of the right accused Barack

1:10:32.880 --> 1:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Obama on. But Barack Obama had to repair some relationships

1:10:35.560 --> 1:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>who were who who were frustrated with the Bush led

1:10:41.040 --> 1:10:44.519
<v Speaker 1>the United States. But they, you know, they at least felt,

1:10:45.680 --> 1:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, he didn't try to blow NATO up and

1:10:48.080 --> 1:10:53.479
<v Speaker 1>things like that. It's, uh, this is going to be

1:10:53.479 --> 1:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a real challenge for the next president and regardless of

1:10:55.680 --> 1:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>party on this one. Uh. It's why Frank I think

1:11:00.880 --> 1:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the fastest way to repair our alliances is if we

1:11:04.080 --> 1:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>end up electing somebody who's not a member of either

1:11:07.600 --> 1:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of the two major parties, because then that would send

1:11:10.240 --> 1:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the message to the world that hey, we didn't like

1:11:12.160 --> 1:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>this either, and we're trying to chart a new course.

1:11:16.160 --> 1:11:18.519
<v Speaker 1>And if we make a statement that we're truly trying

1:11:18.520 --> 1:11:22.479
<v Speaker 1>to chart a new course, the world's likely to have

1:11:22.520 --> 1:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>more of an open hand for us than if we're

1:11:26.560 --> 1:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>continue to look like we're in this seesaw. Because if

1:11:29.360 --> 1:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we're in the seesaw, even if you think, oh, this

1:11:31.320 --> 1:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>administration is better than the previous one, but it won't last.

1:11:35.400 --> 1:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>We know we know what's going to happen because we've

1:11:38.080 --> 1:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>we've been watching this movie over the last decade. So

1:11:40.800 --> 1:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's going to be that medium to

1:11:43.600 --> 1:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>long term challenger. All right, let me uh, next one

1:11:49.120 --> 1:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>comes from Steva. I hope I got that right. It

1:11:53.320 --> 1:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is a Stevam instead of a Stefan. Stevan. Hey, Chuck,

1:11:58.840 --> 1:12:00.639
<v Speaker 1>I hope this mess just find you well. Love the podcast,

1:12:00.680 --> 1:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>been listening since episode one from your time at NBC

1:12:03.080 --> 1:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>right on back in the old nineteen forty seven days.

1:12:05.640 --> 1:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>In your opinion, which piece of Republican legislation democrats misunderstand

1:12:08.920 --> 1:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the most? Which piece of democratic legislation to Republicans misunderstand

1:12:12.240 --> 1:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the most? Love to get your commentary on this. Thank

1:12:13.840 --> 1:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you for all you doing. Best of luck moving forward.

1:12:20.240 --> 1:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Hm that they misunderstand huh, misunderstand? I think the I

1:12:33.760 --> 1:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>mean the easy the first thing I thought of, and

1:12:37.720 --> 1:12:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to stick with that for now. The first

1:12:40.800 --> 1:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>thing I sought of was the border security stuff and

1:12:49.200 --> 1:12:54.639
<v Speaker 1>the border security proposals, and I think in this case

1:12:54.680 --> 1:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it's Democrats have always just sort of miss you know,

1:12:59.200 --> 1:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you can agree to some similar legislation, you don't have

1:13:01.680 --> 1:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to use the same rhetoric. And I think Democrats, you know,

1:13:05.320 --> 1:13:09.519
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing wrong with having rules for the border, and

1:13:09.600 --> 1:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>why Democrats don't say, no, we have to have borders,

1:13:12.880 --> 1:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And you're starting to see more more sort of pragmatic

1:13:16.160 --> 1:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Democrats express that that, no, there should be borders, there

1:13:18.800 --> 1:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>should be rules. You know, I think the I think

1:13:24.880 --> 1:13:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I would put the border security Look, I think asylum

1:13:28.560 --> 1:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>policy is different, and immigration policy is different. And in fact,

1:13:34.720 --> 1:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I think the Republicans intentionally mislead

1:13:41.160 --> 1:13:45.519
<v Speaker 1>on immigration policy because most immigration policy is about trying

1:13:45.560 --> 1:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to fill the gaps, you know where. It's the biggest

1:13:52.960 --> 1:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>bizarre myth out there that somehow the Democrats immigration stance

1:13:57.479 --> 1:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>has to do with finding new voters. The math there's

1:14:01.200 --> 1:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>no data that supports this accusation, and it is something

1:14:05.720 --> 1:14:08.599
<v Speaker 1>that like the prime time of some of these far

1:14:08.720 --> 1:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>right news organizations have been dining out on that Democrats

1:14:11.520 --> 1:14:15.759
<v Speaker 1>are opening the borders looking for new voters when there's

1:14:15.840 --> 1:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>just no evidence that first generation immigrants, you know, somehow

1:14:19.240 --> 1:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>favor the Democrats over the Republicans, and they somehow even vote.

1:14:23.000 --> 1:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And then how often you know, it's it's it's a

1:14:27.120 --> 1:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it's basically an unconfirmed myth, right, there's not even a

1:14:31.439 --> 1:14:37.439
<v Speaker 1>grain of truth to it, And that's probably now is it? Is? It?

1:14:37.479 --> 1:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it? You know? I think I do think Republicans,

1:14:41.760 --> 1:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>whether they intentionally want to not understand what why Democrats

1:14:46.360 --> 1:14:52.479
<v Speaker 1>are for, are are certainly pro sort of immigration, if

1:14:52.520 --> 1:14:57.679
<v Speaker 1>you will. It's frankly the history of this country, right,

1:14:58.280 --> 1:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and now we as we as a nation, we love

1:15:03.560 --> 1:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the mythology that we're a nation of immigrants, and yet

1:15:06.920 --> 1:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we have fought every immigrant wave that this country has

1:15:09.680 --> 1:15:12.719
<v Speaker 1>benefited from. Right in the middle of that wave, we've

1:15:12.800 --> 1:15:15.439
<v Speaker 1>been anti immigrant, and then once they're here, we become

1:15:15.520 --> 1:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>we like to celebrate, but we usually don't celebrate an

1:15:18.120 --> 1:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>immigrant population till the second generation that that immigrant population

1:15:22.920 --> 1:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>has taken hold in this country. So I think, you know,

1:15:27.080 --> 1:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in both cases, I'd probably go with immigration. And the

1:15:30.720 --> 1:15:33.599
<v Speaker 1>only question I don't know, and I'm always careful with motive,

1:15:33.680 --> 1:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>is whether how intentional it is. And you know, I

1:15:39.840 --> 1:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>think that I don't think Democrats understand that their messaging

1:15:46.920 --> 1:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on borders is comes across as if that they don't

1:15:50.360 --> 1:15:54.479
<v Speaker 1>think borders matter. And I just think that, you know, hey,

1:15:54.600 --> 1:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it matters to be an American versus being a Mexican,

1:15:58.640 --> 1:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>or versus being a Canadian, and so in order to

1:16:01.000 --> 1:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>have that distinction, you have to have predictable borders, and

1:16:04.720 --> 1:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to have secure borders. And I think when

1:16:09.240 --> 1:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the motivation of the left or of

1:16:12.920 --> 1:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to be pro immigration, this isn't about importing new voters.

1:16:16.760 --> 1:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>There's no evidence that that works. I mean, you know, look,

1:16:19.360 --> 1:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, every new Cuban voter is a Republican and

1:16:21.439 --> 1:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>every new Venezuelan is a Republican, right, I mean, you

1:16:24.680 --> 1:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>know it, it is that stuff. First of all, it

1:16:30.280 --> 1:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>changes a lot. You know, where first generation immigrant groups

1:16:33.880 --> 1:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>vote versus the party they end up supporting by the

1:16:36.240 --> 1:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>third generation almost always changes, you know, usually diversifies. So

1:16:42.320 --> 1:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it is a I find that to be a disingenuous

1:16:44.760 --> 1:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>pushback that somehow Democrats are pro immigration because they're looking

1:16:48.920 --> 1:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>for new voters. There's just there's this is the most

1:16:54.640 --> 1:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of all the bullshit that's out there that gets pushed

1:16:57.280 --> 1:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>around on immigration. I think that's the biggest piece of it.

1:17:00.040 --> 1:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the largest piece of bs that circulates

1:17:04.960 --> 1:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't get enough pushback. There's just nothing there, There

1:17:09.240 --> 1:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is no there there, Right, what we need immigration to

1:17:12.640 --> 1:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>fill jobs that Americans won't do, and it has been

1:17:18.360 --> 1:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of what has kept this nation relatively young, has

1:17:24.520 --> 1:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>kept our birth rate up. You know, if we want

1:17:27.000 --> 1:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to essentially screw up social Security, screw up the funding

1:17:30.000 --> 1:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of Medicare, screw up the sort of the future economic

1:17:33.520 --> 1:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>prosperity of this country, sure, shut the borders, stop bringing

1:17:37.400 --> 1:17:41.519
<v Speaker 1>in immigrants. That's how, that's how, that's how we would

1:17:41.520 --> 1:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>become Japan. And Japan has had thirty years of sort

1:17:46.479 --> 1:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of of just of just sort of muddling along. Right,

1:17:51.920 --> 1:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>It's an aging population. They've been muddling along. They've let

1:17:55.160 --> 1:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of other economies surpass them. That is

1:17:59.760 --> 1:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>what we'll do if we stick to this isolationist nationalists,

1:18:05.600 --> 1:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>build the walls as high as they can possibly go mindset.

1:18:10.520 --> 1:18:13.559
<v Speaker 1>I hope that helped, but it was a challenging question.

1:18:13.640 --> 1:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>So I appreciate that one. All right, I'm gonna do.

1:18:18.000 --> 1:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do one more and then we'll call it

1:18:21.080 --> 1:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>so NASA. We got through question six. Hey, Jack, I

1:18:24.760 --> 1:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>have a daughter that is an International relations China major

1:18:28.479 --> 1:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>at University of Maryland going to China and study abroad. Congrats,

1:18:31.760 --> 1:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Deansless Sorry, Dad is proud. You should be congrats. I

1:18:36.280 --> 1:18:38.120
<v Speaker 1>pay a lot of attention to politics, and I'm surprised

1:18:38.120 --> 1:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>at what she teaches me about Chinese politics. Do you

1:18:40.160 --> 1:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>think as a whole our elected officials actually understand China?

1:18:43.080 --> 1:18:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Seems like we always get them wrong. Man, I one

1:18:46.680 --> 1:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent agree. I don't feel like I know enough.

1:18:50.400 --> 1:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's why if you've seen over the last year,

1:18:53.760 --> 1:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>whenever I've had a chance to sort of showcase an

1:18:57.720 --> 1:19:00.360
<v Speaker 1>author writing about, you know, a little bit of trying

1:19:00.360 --> 1:19:03.959
<v Speaker 1>to understand how the Chinese system works or how she thinks,

1:19:04.000 --> 1:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>like this profile of she's father, you know, I had

1:19:07.680 --> 1:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that author on a few months ago because I don't

1:19:11.880 --> 1:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>think we fully understand how the Chinese system works, right,

1:19:16.600 --> 1:19:19.799
<v Speaker 1>just like I think, you know, our system is easier

1:19:19.800 --> 1:19:22.679
<v Speaker 1>for people to learn because we're so open. That system

1:19:22.720 --> 1:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is really hard for people to learn because it's so closed.

1:19:26.240 --> 1:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So no, I don't think we fully understand it. I

1:19:29.439 --> 1:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>think we all could get better at it, and you

1:19:32.920 --> 1:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>remind me that I need to do more on this.

1:19:35.080 --> 1:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know, and I don't think you know

1:19:38.280 --> 1:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the things right now, as I worry pretty

1:19:40.400 --> 1:19:43.799
<v Speaker 1>high up in our national security apparatus, we're not fully

1:19:44.040 --> 1:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't fully understand why she purged his military right.

1:19:48.160 --> 1:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>We have an idea of why he's purged all his

1:19:50.400 --> 1:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>military leaders recently, but we're not one hundred percent sure

1:19:53.320 --> 1:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of why he's done it. The fact that we're not

1:19:55.000 --> 1:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent sure shows, you know, whether it's you know,

1:19:58.280 --> 1:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>our intelligence on the ground isn't as good as it

1:20:00.280 --> 1:20:05.719
<v Speaker 1>could be, whatever it is. I do get the sense

1:20:05.800 --> 1:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that both in the private sector we don't understand the

1:20:11.280 --> 1:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Chinese system enough and government to government that we don't,

1:20:16.360 --> 1:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and certainly people to people that we don't. And I

1:20:20.080 --> 1:20:22.559
<v Speaker 1>think it would behove all of us to get to

1:20:22.560 --> 1:20:26.439
<v Speaker 1>get smarter about Chinese history. I will tell you there's

1:20:26.479 --> 1:20:29.519
<v Speaker 1>one thing we do a terrible job of when we're

1:20:29.560 --> 1:20:33.599
<v Speaker 1>teaching the history of civilizations of this globe. We over

1:20:33.680 --> 1:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>index on all things Europe, and we under index on

1:20:37.600 --> 1:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>all things Africa and Asia. And we certainly under index

1:20:43.400 --> 1:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on China, and that is something that I think we

1:20:46.000 --> 1:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>all ought to have a goal of changing. And with that,

1:20:50.160 --> 1:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I will put a pin in this episode. Appreciate it

1:20:54.800 --> 1:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>as you know, I'll becoming this is. We had quite

1:20:57.080 --> 1:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a day. You have no idea the day I had.

1:20:59.880 --> 1:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I've taped multiple podcasts today, including one of the Sports

1:21:05.400 --> 1:21:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Variety that hasn't hit yet, and so I don't want

1:21:08.600 --> 1:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to give it away too much, but it has been

1:21:11.040 --> 1:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a day and the good news is in twenty four

1:21:14.000 --> 1:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>hours I'll have a brand new episode for you to download.

1:21:16.400 --> 1:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So enjoy this one. Thanks for listening, don't forget to

1:21:19.360 --> 1:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like and subscribe. Tell your friends I'll take I'll take

1:21:21.840 --> 1:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>some five star reviews in the Apple podcast section. Always helpful,

1:21:25.840 --> 1:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Always helpful in Spotify. Thank you and we'll see you

1:21:28.720 --> 1:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>so