WEBVTT - How to Detect Deception with Susan Constantine

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>It was Christmas break nineteen seventy five, and all of

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>my sisters were home and we were having a great

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>time anticipating Santa Claus coming. One of the girls in

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>our neighborhood, Penny, her grandmama, came into town and she

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>was only going to be able to stay a couple

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of days and then she had to leave to go

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to another state to see other grandchildren. So Penny got

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>some of her gifts early. One of the things that

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>she got was a pet rock. We all were freaking

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.959
<v Speaker 1>out over this thing. It was all the buzz. So

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.319
<v Speaker 1>she was standing in her front yard showing everybody. Now,

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>she wouldn't let anybody touch it, but she would let

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>us look at it, and you know, we were just

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>captivated by it. A little while later, you know, we

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>all went on our separate ways and I'm standing in

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>my driveway just shooting baskets at the basketball goal, and

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>she walks up and she says, hey, do you want him?

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>And she had the pet rock in the little crate

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and I was like what, and she said, yeah, you

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>can have him, and I went yes, And then she

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>cracked up laughing and said, hey, it's not a lie.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I had my fingers crossed behind my back and then

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>she's scurried off like the rat she was. And I'm

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>telling you, that's the first time in my life I

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>had really felt just boon swaggled. I was like, how

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world would you just walk up to somebody

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>who was minding their own business light of them, and

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>then what is this thing about fingers crossed behind your back?

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It's somehow not a lie. So I went in the

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>house and of course told my sister Shelley, who said,

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>what now, Like she was so mad. She always had

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>my back, still does, and she said, don't you worry

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about that pet rock. We got pets of our own

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and they fly. Well, I didn't know what she was

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about, but she wanted to take some tomatoes and

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>get them back by throwing tomatoes at their house. That's

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a whole nother podcast, But I'm just telling you, people

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>will lie, and people will have excuses for lying, and

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>people will have these little ways of getting out of

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it really being a lie. There is nobody better to

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>help us navigate this than the human light detector. Susan Constantine.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>She literally wrote the book The Complete Idiot's Guide to

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Reading Body Language. You've seen her on Doctor Phil, CNN,

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Grace, Good Morning America. She is renowned. She is

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>revered with her expertise in body language. She even developed

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a unique way that she detects deception. She uses a

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>combination of human behavior analysis, statement analysis, and voice stress

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>analysis to identify deception, and she does it using three

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>separate experts at the same time, so she knows if

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>all three of them agree that there is deception, she

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>would stake her reputation on it. She has worked with

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>government officials, politicians, law firms, corporations, and celebrities. She has

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>over a thousand hits on TV, print media, and radio.

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Susan Welcome, Welcome, design Saven.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, thank you so much for inviting me, my friend.

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding listen? I got to tell everybody before

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we get started. One of my favorite exchanges that happened

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>at Crime Con Los Vegas was between you and my

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>son Huck. So Huck comes up to me at my

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>table and he's all excited and he said, Okay, tell

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.119
<v Speaker 1>me who some of these people are. And I said, well,

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you need to go right over there and meet that woman.

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm pointing to you at your table, and I said,

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>she's a line expert, and he went, that is so cool.

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>So he goes over to introduce hisself while I'm finishing up,

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and as y'all are talking, I walk up and I said, yeah,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't this unbelievable. She can tell whether you're telling the

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>truth in seven seconds. Well, Huck turns to me and goes, what,

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And I said, yeah, she's a line expert deception. He went,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought you meant she was a line like the

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>King of the Jungle expert. I said, baby, why would

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a line expert the King of the Jungle line be here?

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.119
<v Speaker 1>He goes, I didn't know. I figured Tiger King. Maybe

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they had broadened it. He goes, but listen, you need

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to make somebody aware that. You can't just have me

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>walk up to somebody and start talking and she's gonna

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>know if I'm lying within seven seconds. And I said,

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you're at crime con and these are all experts. Why

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>would you lie to any of them? And he said,

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm a man, she's a beautiful woman.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>A lie I could come up.

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I never heard that story before.

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, And then you and I started laughing.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I guess I made it more clear

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to him exactly what it was that you do, because

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's going into this field and he's gonna

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>have lies told to him every day all day, so

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>he needs to be able to pick up on him

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>as an investigator. Right. I took a picture of the

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>two of you. It is the cutest picture ever, and

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>y'all are both like hmmm, like is somebody telling the truth.

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just adorable. And you know, again, I appreciate you

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>taking time with both of my children, Carolina and Huck

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and giving them some of the you know, skills and understanding. Hey,

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>y'all go read this book. Y'all take this online class,

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>because if you can read body language and understand statement

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>analysis in this business, it will serve you. Well.

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's a you know, it's a technique that is

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 2>a trained process. It's not something to where you're making

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 2>these prejudgments. In fact, when I'm doing training classes, Cheryl,

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 2>I raise I have people raise their hands as how

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 2>many of you think you're really good at detecting deception?

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 2>And all these people will raise their hands and it's

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 2>really interesting because really fifty people at most people at

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent are best are able to really read people.

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 2>But what they're really doing is they're their fault. They're

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 2>making some judgments about people and reading body language. And

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 2>at the level that I do it, and I know

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you do too as well, Cheryl, it's a learned skill.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 2>It's not a gut feeling. It's you have to really

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 2>do your your work and then test it down in

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the field to make sure that you're accurate. And one

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 2>of the things that you pointed out was that the

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 2>methodology that I use, which is a three prong test,

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 2>and it just made perfect sense to me that if

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 2>a person was being deceptive and you can pick it

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 2>up in their nonverbals or their behavioral behavioral analysis, you

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 2>should be able to hear it in the vocal tremors

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 2>through voice stress analysis, and it should show up in

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the language. So that's where I pulled that together, because

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 2>we are we have multiple channels of communication, both verbal

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 2>and nonverbal. When you're lying nonverbally, are lying, and you'll

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 2>see it in the nonverbals, and you also see it

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>in the verbals and in the language and bingo. It

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 2>really works and it increases the level of validity therefore

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 2>gives you a little bit more positivity that the person

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 2>could be lying to at a higher level of accuracy.

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and you know the institute, that's how we work.

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's one of those deals where everybody needs to

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>stay in their own lane and under their own expertise.

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And it gets rid of tunnel vision because if four

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>people give me the same suspect and I don't have

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that suspect, what did I miss? What am I not

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at correctly? Or I just need to go back.

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>That's all there is to it, because I'm going to

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>trust those other four people. So I think the way

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it is just brilliant. But before we go

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>any further, I want people to hear how you got

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>into this business, because honey, it's not only unique, it

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is unbelievable.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>But you know what, I didn't really want to go

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 2>through this, but it was interesting. At fifteen years old,

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I was asked to go babysit with a girlfriend of

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 2>mine and in the area that she lived in was

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 2>very highly stressed, it with very lots of racial tension.

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 2>There was around the time, of course, when Martin Luther

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 2>King had it was killed, and so she lived in

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 2>this area. She was like one of the very few

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 2>white families in this in this most African American environment.

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 2>But they were the strong little Baptist family, and so

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I felt safe going over there. And they had a

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 2>nice house and his parents, her parents were great. But

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 2>my mom said, I don't know, I don't like you

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 2>going over there. It seems like a bad part of town.

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 2>And I'm going, oh, Mom, you know it's VICKI. They're

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 2>a nice family, et cetera, et cetera. So she says, well,

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to tell you I don't like it, but

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, just be careful and you know, look out.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 2>So I did. So we went over there. I went

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 2>over there, and we went over to a babysit at

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 2>a girl's house around the corner. She had a four

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 2>year old son, and you know, nothing unusual. And my girlfriend,

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 2>out of nowhere, literally Eryl out of nowhere, looks at me.

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 2>She goes, if you were if somebody were to come

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 2>in here and kill us, do you know, if you'd

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 2>go to heaven? And I was like, oh, dear God,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 2>all I could think about was going back home.

0:09:58.120 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>And good back.

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 2>My mom says to she was like, oh dear God,

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 2>help me. This is not really what I wanted to do. Here.

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, I was like, you know, yes, you know,

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 2>I basically gave her any answer she wanted to hear,

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 2>just so we could get finished babysitting. And then we

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 2>went back over to her house and nothing happened, nothing

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 2>was unusual. And then a couple of weeks later, we're

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 2>invited to go babysit again. And when we went over

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 2>to go babysit again, we got a phone call right

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 2>before we're supposed to go over there and the lady says,

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 2>don't bother coming over, and my date stood me up,

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 2>and so we didn't go. We were all bummed out.

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 2>And of course, you know, making fifty cents an hour

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>babysitting was our roller skating money, right, so that was

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 2>like big bucks for us. And we were really disappointed.

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 2>And it was in the summertime, so we're sitting on

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>the porch and then up come drives up at dusk,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 2>this white man and it had carpet acres written on

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 2>the side of it. And this guy gets out of

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the van after he parks right in front of my

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>friend's house, peels off down the street and he's looking

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 2>inside these cars and he's kind of jiggling in the

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 2>door knobs and everything, and I'm like, just something on

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 2>my hair. Stood, I'm going a danger, danger, danger, you know.

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 2>So I got up and I went in the house

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 2>and peering outside the windows, and then he kind of disappears. Well,

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 2>to top it all off, at the end of the

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 2>street ends up being a graveyard. So I'm just trying

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 2>to set the scene for you in Zone seven. So

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 2>anyway disappears and then out of nowhere, I mean it

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 2>must have been a half hour or so, maybe forty

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 2>five minutes, this guy comes running out between the house,

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 2>my house, a friend's house, in the house next door,

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 2>and it's that guy. So he stops at the back

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 2>of the van. He looks right over at me because

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 2>we're literally only feet apart. See this guy, He sees me,

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 2>and then he opens up the back of the van,

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>throws something in it, and then peers off down the street. Well,

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 2>it didn't take very long after that that we ended

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 2>up seeing helicopters flying overhead, and remember the graveyard iss

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>just houses away, taking these big, huge spotlights and going

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 2>through the neighborhood, and then policemen were walking police dogs,

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 2>and he said, hey, have you kids seen anything? And

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 2>I said, well, guy, I saw this guy. He had

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, described him totally. His hair is what was

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 2>written on the van. You know what he was doing,

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 2>his body language, you know how he was acting very suspicious,

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 2>and we said, what happened? She says, He says, a

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 2>woman was just murdered around the corner. It was the

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 2>house we were babysitting for. So anyway, it was the

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 2>lady were babysitting for. So the story is that she

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 2>was a bookkeeper for carpet acres. The boyfriend was trying

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to get her to embezzle money from this company because

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 2>it was a parent owned company and he was one

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 2>of the sons, and she wouldn't do it, and so

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>he got ticked off and he came on to her,

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 2>strangled her, and then decided to kill her. And he

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 2>killed her with twenty one times with a pairing knife.

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 2>So even to this day, Cheryl, I will not leave

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>a knife out on my counter. So I had to

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 2>testify court. I was one of the primary witnesses and

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 2>had to testify. And you can imagine how that was

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 2>at fifteen years old.

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen years old.

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Fifteen and then anyway, he was busted second degree murder

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 2>and then he appealed it when I was seventeen years

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 2>old and had to go back to court testify again,

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 2>and then bingo, he got second degree murder again. So anyway,

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 2>that's what's my I think, my lead in into this

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 2>crazy world of true crime. And I was actually a

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 2>witness to it.

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Well that is quite an introduction to this world, ma'am.

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I had never had any idea where that was

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>going to take me, so I just really had a

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>real desire for it. I thought it was just very interesting,

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of put it back in the back burner, was

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 2>into a different career for a long time, and then

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I decided I wanted to took a dig a different route.

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 2>And here's how it began, Cheryl is that I I

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 2>started off as doing image consulting for attorneys, and I

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 2>got a certificate for executive image consulting and I ended

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 2>up reading a after I graduated, reading an article about

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 2>a public defender that were ward warping their clients for trial,

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, wow, this is kind of cool. I

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 2>don't think anybody ever thought about this before. And it

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.119
<v Speaker 2>just so happened that my mother had a nonprofit organization

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 2>for people that have gone through personal tragedy, and we

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 2>had an entire clothing center. So I pitched an idea

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>to the public Defender's office and then loaded up the

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 2>truck and went down there, and I said, I pitched

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 2>the idea to the public Defender's office the very same

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 2>courthouse where George Zimmerman was tried and convicted, I mean

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 2>not convicted, but was where the trial was. So anyway,

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I had a clothing center in there, and then the

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 2>attorneys would reach out to me and have me wardrobe

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 2>and start to coach some of their clients based on

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 2>what I learned in that course. But that was only

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 2>the beginning. And then the public defender, one of them

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 2>took interested in meet Jeffrey Leichel and said, Hey, I

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 2>would love for you to come and watch me pick

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 2>a jury. Maybe you can just watch and analyze the

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 2>people or the potential jurors. So I said, you think

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I would be good at that? Because I don't think

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 2>you'd be good at I think you'd be fabulous at it.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So I said absolutely.

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 2>In the courtroom, and I helped him to de select jurors.

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know anything about jury selection, but it just

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 2>so happened that just a few months after that, he

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 2>invited me to a conference and there was a booth

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 2>there that was by Jury Quest and says, how to

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 2>identify jurors through through This new program was an AI

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 2>program and it was how to identify dangerous jurors scientific

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 2>jury selection. So anyway, I told him what I was doing,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>and they thought that was pretty cool, and I said, well,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I think what you guys are doing pretty cool, And

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 2>before you know it, I'm hired now as the Florida

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 2>area manager as a trial consultant. And the trainer who

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 2>trained me did the I did the retrial for the

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Andrea Yates case, the retrial for where she was found

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 2>guilty by reason of insanity. So anyway, that's what I

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 2>did for quite a long time. And then during that

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>time I went back to college and both of my

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 2>two kids and I were all going to school at

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 2>the same time. I was in my early forties and

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I went to you know, went back to college. I

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 2>got my master's degree in psychology, all the while getting

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 2>multiple certifications and everything you can imagine from investigative interview

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 2>into statement analysis, to micro expression training to criminal intelligence training,

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 2>you name it, and I still continue. I mean it

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 2>is an ongoing process. So I got pretty well known

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 2>for what I was doing, and then out of nowhere,

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I got a phone call from a reporter in Orlando

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 2>and said, hey, listen, there's a big trial that's coming up.

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 2>You might want to sit in on it. I think

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be very interesting. I said, really, He says, well,

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 2>it was about a young girl who allegedly had killed

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 2>her daughter, young daughter. It was Casey Anthony.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say that was quite an opportunity.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 2>So I ended up sitting in there for the entire

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>time as an analyst. And if you can just imagine,

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 2>it was almost kind of like you had stadium seating upstairs,

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 2>and literally anyone in everyone were there, from Perraldo to

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Nancy would co there, Nancy and war own Pot outside there,

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 2>and then Judge Jeanine Piro and of course inside Edition

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and Court TV. Back then it was called I think

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 2>in Session with Ryan Smith and Vinnie Politan and you

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 2>name it. I mean, everybody and anybody that was there

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 2>in this business and true crime were there. So I

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 2>was able to connect with all of them. Before you

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 2>knew it, I was did over four hundred and some

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 2>odd hits during that trial so you can imagine I

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 2>was being flown from Good Morning America to the Today

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 2>showed an inside edition and you name it, and that's

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 2>what springboarded it.

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Casey Anthony is one of those folks

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>that body language experts should study. She to me was

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>almost cartoon like at times, like she would laugh inappropriately,

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 1>she would have that smile. She would have her hair

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in a ponytail, she would take it down, she would

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>have long hair. Some days. She would almost flirt with

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>her attorneys. She would do her hands in an unusual manner.

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>It was almost like sometimes she was aware the jury

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>was there, and sometimes she almost acted like she didn't

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>know they were even important to her.

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to tell you when I realized she really

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 2>did it. There was a human decomposition expert that testified

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 2>regarding the odor that was in the back of the

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 2>trunkt You remember that.

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I do absolutely. She said it was rotten pizza.

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, robbing pizza, and it was like Maggot's or something.

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, when they opened up the trunk that this,

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, this odor just was overwhelming. Right that moment,

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 2>when this expert stated that, I looked over at Casey

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 2>and she showed a micro expression of disgust. Now, disgust

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 2>is like if you take an onion, you put it

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 2>in front of your nose, or you're making a pile

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.479
<v Speaker 2>of poo and you just take a big whiff. What

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 2>do you do your nose crunches up, your eyes narrow. Well,

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 2>that is a sensory part of the sensory of the

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 2>human body. Right, she recalled that odor. She recalled it,

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 2>So that's why she showed that micro expression and discussed

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>other than fear, horror, sadness, none of that. It was disgusted.

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 2>I was like, oh my god. In fact, I think

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I was on Nancy's show and I think that's when

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I stated what I saw that day. But that will

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 2>never leave me. But she was different on the camera

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 2>versus off the camera, and she did flirt a lot.

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 2>She had those big, huge fanby eyes. She was very attractive.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 2>So the interesting thing was they seated her directly across

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 2>from the jury, which is usually very unusual. She just

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 2>be on the side, but the jurors were able to

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 2>just watch her all day long, so it created a

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 2>sense of familiarity, likability.

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, your insight has helped me because, like I said,

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier part of what she would do never seemed authentic. Well,

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 1>now I understand what was happening. The focus group said this,

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So you kind of had to be a chameleon. They're

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>telling you to do this. So okay, I'll wear softer

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:40.719
<v Speaker 1>colors and put my hair up and take notes. And

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>again that wasn't.

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Her no now, and it's very strategic. I mean a

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of people will always wonder about that, you know,

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the color, the fabric, the hair,

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>how they wear their hair, the ruffle on the blouse,

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the demeanor, the flat affect, and at times where she's

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 2>off camera and then she's smiling and she got the

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 2>googly eyes with Jose bias. So you know, when you're

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 2>in the courtroom, and I know Nancy would have said

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the same thing, it's a whole different picture. You see

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of things that people don't see even if

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 2>they're on watching it on court a court TV or

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 2>in session.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk a little bit about facial expressions. So

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the eyes narrowing. I've watched tons of people

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just clenched their jaw when they don't want to say

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>something or they're getting you know, more angry about the

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>line of questioning. Things they do with their mouth, you know,

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>covering their mouth with their hand or whatever, tell us

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the facial expressions that you try your best

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to look for hone in on depending on who you're

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>working for.

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>The big thing is to look for anomalies. So you're

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 2>trying to determine the person's normal baseline, which is very

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 2>investigative one on one, how the person normally responds well

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 2>in a courtroom. They're going to be there's going to

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 2>be high anxiety anyway, So you can't really norm that person,

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 2>but you can look for patterns and behavior over time.

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 2>So what I do is I tie the stimulus, what

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 2>is the stimulus? What was the question the probative question,

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 2>And I'm watching the demeanor morph right. That can be

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 2>either an expert witness, It could be, you know, someone

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 2>in the jury box. It could be the defendant. So

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at what are they exhibiting when they hear

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 2>something that would have created what we call cognitive load,

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 2>meaning that they know they're they're percolating different thoughts, different ideas,

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 2>or they're trying to if it was a person and

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 2>they were talking to one on one, they're trying to

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 2>tell a story differently from what they know and they

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 2>deviate from the truth. And when they do that, you're

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 2>going to see a shift in their demeanor. So that

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 2>can be in any way. It could be an eye rolling,

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 2>It could be in a side smirk in their mouth,

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 2>which is contempt. It can be a shift in their

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 2>body language where they shift their body language and they

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 2>point it towards the exit side. They could show pacifiers

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 2>where they're you know, rubbing their clothing or adjusting their clothing.

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 2>Could be a smirk, it could be a gulp or

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 2>a yawn, there's so many a micro shoulder shrug. But

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 2>it's tied to a stimulus. Everything is tied to stimulus

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 2>and it has to start within seven seconds. And the

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 2>reason why that is is that the rate of speed

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 2>in which we talk, and we the words that we

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 2>use in the rate of we talk f one hundred

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 2>and twenty five to one hundred fifty words per minute.

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 2>We know that from stenographer research. So when you get

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 2>beyond that one hundred and fifty words, your mind is

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 2>going to go on to something else, right, So it's

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 2>tied to the original stimulus. Let's say, you know, we

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 2>ask murdoch, Did you kill your wife? You might say no.

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Then you ask a question, do you know who killed

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 2>his wife? No? Did you have anything to do with

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 2>a disappear or the you know or the murder? Or

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 2>know who may have murdered your wife? And then he shifts,

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 2>he moves, and then he tries to over explain. He

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 2>licks his lips. You see him rolling his tongue around

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the inside of his mouth a lot. He might show

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 2>some crocodile tears. So now see now how you see

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 2>how it's tied to that stimulus. Everything has to be

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 2>tied to that stimulus. So that's how you know that

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 2>that person's either lying to you or they're being deceptive,

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 2>and it usually happens within seven seconds. Then they happen

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 2>in clusters. If it's just one thing, they rub their nose,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 2>they stroke their clothing, they wring their hands, they tap

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 2>their feet. It's really not an indicator of anything other

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 2>than maybe anxiety. But if it's tied to a stimulus,

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 2>a probative questions whether they're trying to derail or try

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 2>to move you off from the truth and tell you

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 2>something that's different from what actually occurred, you're going to

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 2>see them in clusters. You'll see it and hear it

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 2>in their voice inflection. You'll pause and hesitation, stammers, stops

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 2>and starts, yawning, gulping, drinking water, or it could be

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 2>in their language. Their language will show the same thing

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.479
<v Speaker 2>that pauses the hesitations, that stops the stammers, and then

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 2>you'll see it in their body language. You'll see it

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 2>happen in a cluster. So there's not one indicator of deception.

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 2>It has to be a multiple things, a minimum of

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 2>two to three that happened within the first seven seconds

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 2>after the stimulus has been delivered.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Some of the things that you were looking for and

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>picking up on happened lightning quick. You know. I watched

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a comedian one time. He was talking about his wife

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>always knows when he's lying because he talks higher. So

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>if she said, you bought a new golf club, didn't you?

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>What are you talking about? And he goes, but when

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm being romantic, you know, there's more bass in my voice,

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>like hey baby, So she always knows on his tone

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in his pitch. And I thought that was kind of funny,

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and then I thought, you know what, that rings kind

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>of true. And then I know, like in law enforcement.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>You can always tell if there's a little heightened anxiety

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>because it sounds like they're running even though they're driving

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the car. You can hear that breath. You know, I'm

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>now on Stonewall Avenue, I'm turning on b Stree Street,

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>and that you know that breath comes. So you're looking

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>for the facial expressions and the voice, the tone of

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the pitch, and then you're listening for statements, so you're

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>looking for the number three and left and repeating words

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and self sentenceoring. You're doing all of that at one time,

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>which again is extraordinary.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's why it's so important. And I tell

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 2>attorneys they can't do this all on their own. They

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 2>really need to have a person that is trained, that's

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 2>there on their on their team, next to them at

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 2>the front table during the jury selection or watching throughout

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the trial to pick up on these different types of movements.

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 2>And you picked up you know about the the high uh,

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 2>the anxiety. When a person is feeling highly anxious, it's

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 2>like an anxiety attack. That's when they start to hyperventilate. Right.

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 2>We all that with Murdoch a lot, right, he would

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, or you'd hear somebody calling a nine to

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 2>one one call. Oh my god, oh my god. You know,

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 2>it's like, oh my god, oh my god, oh my god,

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 2>oh my god. Now, yes, that's true, someone would would

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 2>do that. But then if you hear all of this

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 2>in dead silence and you don't hear the breathing, and

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 2>then all of a sudden they pick it back up

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 2>again and do the same thing. I mean, it is

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 2>really remarkable the narcissism that these perpetrators are murderers have

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>because they don't realize that we can analyze that stuff.

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm telling you, you know, go ahead and

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 2>tell the story, because I'm going to throw you on

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 2>the voice stressed analysis analyze. I'm going to find out

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 2>exactly where you're lying. I'm going to see it writing

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 2>your language, and it's going to show right up in

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 2>your behavior. Slam dunk, You're busted.

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>There's the old thing about if people look to the left,

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>they're being deceptive. I do that naturally, and it's so funny,

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>like if I'm talking to you and you ask me

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>something that I'm thinking, I tend to look off at

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>almost a thirty degree angle. And I've often had people say, oh,

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you're looking to the left. You're not telling the truth.

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>And it's always funny to me when they think that's

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the only thing you need to look at, and you

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't even, like you said, do the baseline. You hadn't

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 1>watched me at all. But I read an article one

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>time where people said, that's what Jackie Kennedy would do.

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>She would look at almost a thirty degree angle away

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>from people. She wouldn't look directly almost, And I thought, well,

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm in good company, then I'll take that.

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 2>So Richard Bandler, John leval Ericson they developed this whole

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 2>program called NLP Neural Linguistic Programming, and they're alleged research.

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 2>They found that if you moved your eyes up to

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 2>the right or the left, it would be between constructing

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 2>a lie or visualizing, and then if you look side

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 2>to side, that would be audit, which means you would

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 2>recall a sound or recall a conversation versus fabricating that

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>you recalling a conversation or something that was auditory, and

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 2>looking down to the right or the left was really

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 2>more processing. But anyway, to make a long story short,

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>there's twenty two out of twenty three peer reviewed research

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 2>articles that debunk that entire science. So it is very improper.

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 2>In fact, law enforcements still use it. But what I

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 2>will tell you that it does it is helpful for

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 2>is it helps you to kind of know how that

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 2>person processes. So if they tend to look up, they're

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 2>more visual their auditory, they tend to look side to side.

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 2>If they look down, they tend to be more processors.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 2>And then you can use that as a way to communicate.

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 2>So if a person's looking up, you know that they're visualizes,

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 2>so you use words like ce focus, you know, recall

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 2>an image, et cetera. So you can kind of speak

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 2>their language. And you know, all this with investigative interview

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 2>and they use a lot of this, but the the

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 2>actual whom John Levall and Ericson and Bandler's stuff is garbage.

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Well that's really good to know because I am extraordinarily visual.

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>So again that's why I look up and to the left. You, ma'am,

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you have put together a solid all star team. You

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>get to work with some of the best in the country.

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So you've got Phil Waters, who is a masterful interrogator.

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>He had ninety six percent clear rate in over four

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred murders when he was a detective. That ain't too shabby.

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got Mark McLish, who was a statement

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>analyst whose book I consider a must. Again, when you

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about your team and you talk about three or

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>four y'all working at the same time, it's not just hey,

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>me and some friends are getting together.

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, so let me share with you how we do that.

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 2>So in the Michael Jackson case, the attorney had seen

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 2>me on or TV and they wanted me to analyze

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the deposition tapes of Wade Robson and James Safechuck regarding

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 2>the sexual allegations by Michael Jackson. Now here's is post

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 2>after his death. They are now suing the estate and

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.959
<v Speaker 2>so they were weren't They weren't getting anywhere, So they

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 2>wanted this documentary to come out never Land one and two,

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 2>and they wanted to show that, you know, if they're lying.

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 2>They wanted to present that to Netflix to tell them that, listen,

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 2>you're putting on a program with to confirm liars or

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 2>not liars. So then what I do is I don't

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 2>tell my team. And they keep in mind they have

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 2>their own businesses. They're trainers and experts on their own,

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 2>but I collectively pulled them together as people that I

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 2>use as my experts, who I use and who I've

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 2>been trained by. So I pulled them together and say,

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 2>here's here's the case. We got a Michael Jackson case.

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I want you to analyze. Here's seven hours of deposition.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Here's the audio, here's the transcripts. I'll do the behavior

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 2>analysis I want. Well, Mark didn't do this one, but

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 2>it was Bob Schaeffer. He's also on my team. He

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 2>is a trainer in statement analysis. I want you to

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 2>analyze all the statements. And then Jerry Krotti, who I

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 2>used as he's an examiner, voice stress analysis examiner and trainer,

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 2>do your work, and then, you know, put your reports

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 2>together and then provide them for me. So I don't

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 2>put it all in one report. I give them three

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 2>separate reports. I don't ask them what they found. I

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 2>don't ask them what they think. I don't encourage them

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 2>to move one way or the other or slant it

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 2>one way or another. But interestingly, how we all came

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 2>up with very similar results. So that's how I do that,

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, and we've done that in a lot of

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 2>different cases. I found that it's very helpful because it

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 2>really removes a lot of cognitive buys in your own

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 2>personal buyas. Because frankly, I liked Michael Jackson. I saw

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 2>him in Sweden and so I mean I grew up

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 2>in you know, Grand Rapids, Michigan, outside of Detroit, so

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 2>motion was huge. So I had to make sure that

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't going to have my own biases interjected into

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 2>my analysis and slant it. And that's one thing that's

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 2>that you know, people have to realize that what we're

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 2>doing is this is subjective analysis, right. It's based on science,

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and it's been you know, validated science, has been vetted

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 2>in the field. But that examiner can switch it anyway

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 2>they wanted to go. When it comes to behavioral analysis,

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 2>you can't do it with voice stress analysis, and you

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 2>can't change it with the language they use. So that's

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 2>why it's really important to do the three prong tests.

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's just solid investigative work right there to me,

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>because again, it takes away what you're saying, your bias.

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>It takes away putting on blinders where you're just adamant

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that this person had to be the one to do it.

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't have that. I mean, it removes those two

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>issues completely.

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Cheryl, we had a case and I can't name

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 2>it this as an active case, but we are all

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 2>analyzing and every single time everything came up deceptive, deceptive, deceptive, deceptive,

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 2>and we examined and re examined and redid and we

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 2>cut it apart and redid it, and every single time

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 2>said how many times do we need to tell you

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 2>your client's deceptive? And it's like, you know, and that

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 2>they would take that and go okay, hey, this is

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 2>what a good a lawyer would do is say, okay,

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 2>now that I know that, I'm going to steer clear

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 2>from that and I'm going to redirect it somewhere else.

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's where the trial strategy is very interesting. How

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 2>you can use that actually is not a negative thing.

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 2>It could be a positive thing. Knowing what to steer

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 2>away from because you could, you know, your client could

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 2>repeach you. You know, if you didn't provide them with

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the truth, whether they like to hear it or not,

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 2>then we're doing them a disservice and their client a disservice.

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's funny. I have four sisters, but

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>one sister, Sharon, she cannot hide how she feels on

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>her face. And we all joke with her about you

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 1>could never play poker professionally. You couldn't even play with us,

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. And there was a meme that I saw

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>one time that I sent her, and I'm paraphrasing. I

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>don't remember exactly what it said, but it was something like,

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean to say that so loud with my face.

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 1>And that's Sharon. If she is happy or hurt or frustrated,

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>or excited or scared or just anticipating with excitement, you

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 1>know it immediately. So a lot of times in the

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>family dynamic, if we're in a room and somebody says

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>something that might be controversial or might be yes or

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>no or whatever, I will find myself. I'll look to

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>her immediately. Then I've already read the room. I'm good.

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I know we we're either going to do it or

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>not do it because she can't hide it, you know.

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And so when you work, I know you have worked

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 1>some major, major cases you mentioned, you know, Jeffery Epstein

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Jackson and Casey Anthony, George Zimmerman. But you

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have also done some things with public defenders and government

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>officials and famous people. And here's one thing I wanted

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to make a real point about. And you don't have

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to name anybody, obviously, but if I were like Oprah famous,

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I know why she only fools with Gail, because you

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>really can't trust anybody else once you get to her level. Right, Like,

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you've got all this money, you've got all these famous

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>connections with people, you do these magnificent things in the world.

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>You can travel wherever you want. Of course, people are

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>going to want to gravitate towards you. So to me,

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>your job if you're somebody like j Lo. Okay, you, Susan,

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>go interview those dancers, you interview the's. You tell me

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 1>if there's somebody here that shouldn't be here, shouldn't be

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>around me, isn't here for the right reason?

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes? So, I mean, early on to your point. You

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 2>remember the singer Kurk Cubine and his girlfriend, who is

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Courtney Love.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yes, she's a singer too, exactly.

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 2>And she was my first client before actually really got

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 2>into the field, and that was when I was doing

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 2>executive image consulting. I was called to prepare her for

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 2>her court trial. And but you know, it's interesting just

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 2>watching the dynamics. When I showed up in a hotel

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:42.280
<v Speaker 2>room her assistant, it was like, you know the yes people,

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 2>right that they're They're these individuals that regardless of what

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 2>they say, what they do, they're they're just so mesmerized

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 2>to be in that person's presence and they're really not

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 2>what I would call that really true friend, right, They're not.

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 2>They don't. There's not the authenticity that's going on. And

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 2>I picked it up right away and I thought, oh

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:07.720
<v Speaker 2>my god, that poor girl. She's surrounded around these people

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 2>that are just giving her what she wants. And we

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 2>know drugs, alcoholic cause the next morning when I showed

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 2>up after I worked with it, I went into the room.

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't believe what I saw. It was like a

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 2>frat party, alcohol cigarettes, barf all on the side of

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 2>her bed. It was the barf that was up in

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 2>the and the toilet was overflowing. It was disgusting. So

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 2>there's people get mesmerized by they they're really not their

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 2>true friends there they You know, we see this so often,

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 2>so I understand someone like Oprah. It's got to be

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 2>a lonely, really place to be because you can't confide

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 2>and everybody because of who you.

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Are, and I preach get your own zone seven. Those

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>people that have your bag, that truly support you, that

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>cheer for you, that clap for you, that you know

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to defend you when you're not there, and

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>some body that's going to tell you the truth.

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Amen's sister. I tell you, I can't tell you how

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 2>many people I've had to remove out of my environment

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 2>because of the work we do. Some people are just

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 2>very threatened and they love to, you know, you know,

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 2>cut say things that are inappropriate, or cut you down

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 2>to elevate themselves. Of course, we know how to read

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 2>through all of that, and you know, you have to

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 2>create these really safe boundaries protection and people like you see,

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 2>we all get each other, right. So we're here on

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the sidelines and we're waiving all the you know, the

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 2>pom poms because we know we respect. We get it.

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're the same of ego, strength, different personalities,

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 2>but we get it. We're on a not a better plane,

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:43.839
<v Speaker 2>a different plane, just in a different plane that we're

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 2>not threatened or intimidated by other people. But people that

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 2>are insecure, people that are struggling with their own self esteem,

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 2>they can create havoc in your life, and I have

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 2>even in my own business. And the more I've rinked up,

0:39:57.719 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the smaller my circle becomes.

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You can deduce from a mugshot, from a clip, just

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a quick TV clip, even maybe somebody you have not

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 1>officially been hired for. But if I were to show

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>you a clip of somebody, you might go, well, he

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>seems resentful, or he seems upset, or he seems agitated.

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Whatever word you may use will give me insight. This

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is how we should question this person. This is how

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>we should approach this person. Just like you saying, if

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody is visual versus you know, so you speak to

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit of how you can work in

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>very limited information.

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:45.720
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good point too, because I've been traded

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 2>in what we call the facial action coding system, and

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I would not advise any way to take that course

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 2>because it's grueling. But even though it's really good, it's

0:40:55.680 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 2>really understanding the actual skeleton, the muscular or features of

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 2>a face that is underneath our skin. And we have

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 2>like fifty two different muscles and they move, they and

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 2>they they're combined in different movements and they create these expressions.

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 2>So My job was in the training is to code them.

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:22.280
<v Speaker 2>That's why it's called facial action coding system. You're coding

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the movements and those movements when studied over a massive population.

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 2>And this is where AI really gets exciting, is that

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 2>we can measure these movements and then we can cross

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:43.439
<v Speaker 2>culturally analyze, so we know, like certain cultures with kind

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 2>of you know, their facial expressions, like in certain Asian population,

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 2>they don't show necessarily as facial expressions as overt you know,

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 2>different cultures are taught different things and so they know

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:59.280
<v Speaker 2>how to control them. But the bottom line is these

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 2>movements give us insight and gives me insight to what

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 2>emotionally is processing internally. So then you tie that to

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 2>the stimulus. Maybe it could be even something that with

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 2>their mind is kind of drifting off or recalling something.

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 2>You can see these movements, which we know universally there's

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 2>seven of them, but we've gone so far beyond that,

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 2>way beyond that to be able to know there's hundreds

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 2>of emotions that we analyze and it has to be

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:32.600
<v Speaker 2>taken into context. So when I look at a video,

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm watching the movements and I'm coding them. Okay, that's

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 2>an F three, that's an F four, that's an F five,

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 2>or whatever. It's facial action. It's they're called units. So

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at them coding it, and then i am

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm also doing a scan analysis, so that's just the face.

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Scan analysis is a little bit different because it is

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 2>based on that seven to second theory, right stimulus watching

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 2>those movements and I'm just watching the facial expressions more

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 2>if I'm watching the body movements. And we know that

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 2>in certain cultures there's different movements based on a specific culture,

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 2>so there's no universal body language movements that has a

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 2>specific definition. You have to take it all into context.

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:24.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's where it really becomes very tedious process because

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 2>when I'm analyzing a video, just to kind of give

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 2>you my I'm going to give you your viewers my

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 2>what I do when I'm behind the scene. This is

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 2>what I do. I take what they're the video, the

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:40.439
<v Speaker 2>piece of clip, I upload it into a program called

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 2>rev dot com. Rev dot com will trans take the

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.759
<v Speaker 2>verbal and then translate it into text and then you

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 2>can watch the text highlight as the person is talking,

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 2>so you know what words are highlighted. And now I'm

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 2>watching the face right. So I begin by looking at

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 2>a video I watch I slow it down. Well, the

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:04.319
<v Speaker 2>first time I do it, I look at it in

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 2>real time, and then I start to slow it down.

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 2>So I slow the speed down, and I now I'm

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 2>watching the movement's going like, oh, that weird sound. But

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:22.439
<v Speaker 2>we're watching the muscular facial expressions morph and move same time.

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 2>You can see their body language, and then you tie

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 2>it into their words, what they're saying that's creating that emotion,

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 2>and then you start to find patterns and their behavior.

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:35.359
<v Speaker 2>And that's what I do. That's how I do it.

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:38.399
<v Speaker 2>I sit behind, I turn it all the way down.

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:41.319
<v Speaker 2>I repeat it, repeat it, repeat it, and repeat it

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 2>at nauseum until I'm certain of what my analysis is.

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:46.720
<v Speaker 2>And then I provide the report.

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And just so y'all know, Susan Constantine and are working

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>on a cold case together. And when you make a

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>call to her, not only do you get her, you

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 1>get her people. So you feel very very confident when

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 1>they come back to you that you're going to have

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 1>something solid to work with. If you don't mind, could

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you talk a little bit about the Holmes case.

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, that was an interesting one back in

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirteen, I was contacted by I can't give you

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:21.360
<v Speaker 2>his name because I was still he's my client, But

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I was contacted by someone that was being sued by

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Elizabeth Holmes, and a lot of you may recall her.

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 2>She's the one that developed that blood testing device that

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 2>with a prick of blood you can determine all these

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 2>different types of illnesses, et cetera. And it was actually

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 2>a brilliant idea. And she was an Ivy League student

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and who actually dropped out in her freshman year because

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 2>she was considered being like the up and coming female

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Jobs. She even dressed in black. She had the deeper,

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.799
<v Speaker 2>lower voice, she was you know, she just had this

0:45:57.040 --> 0:46:00.480
<v Speaker 2>aura about her that people were mesmerized. So she not

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:03.880
<v Speaker 2>only mesmerized people around her, but also some of the

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:08.439
<v Speaker 2>most affluent people of shakers and movers and big MiG

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 2>money and pharming, you name it. She was able to

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 2>she was able to convince them about this blood testing device. Well,

0:46:16.239 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 2>my client was being sued by her saying that he

0:46:19.560 --> 0:46:24.840
<v Speaker 2>stole her copyright on that blood testing device. So he

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 2>gave me a ton of videos of where she was

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 2>speaking in front of all of these different groups and

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:37.439
<v Speaker 2>conferences and pitching this device and how it worked, et cetera. Well,

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I gave him my analysis and then I kind of

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 2>forgot about it. Years passed by and I get an

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:46.839
<v Speaker 2>email from it says, hey, did you look at the

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 2>front cover of Forbes magazine? I said no. He says,

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 2>go look at the front cover. It was Elizabeth Holmes

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:55.719
<v Speaker 2>and about her device was questionable, whether she was a

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 2>fraud or not. Well, I go back and I pull

0:46:58.680 --> 0:47:01.439
<v Speaker 2>the report, and what do I say? She doesn't believe

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.400
<v Speaker 2>in her own blood testing device. She has low confidence

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 2>in her own blood testing device. She doesn't think it's

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 2>going to work. I was like, now, how would I

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 2>have known that? Well, I'm going to tell you what

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I noticed when she was so I pulled up all

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the old videos. I found this one where she was

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 2>speaking in front of a various medical team and she

0:47:21.280 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 2>was talking about how it worked in all this language,

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 2>of course, medical language I couldn't even begin to repeat.

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:33.279
<v Speaker 2>But then she takes her hand and she says, we

0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 2>have extreme belief that pause hesitate, pausitate hesitate, and then

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 2>she starts talking about our product. Now here's the problem.

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 2>When she said I have extreme belief that when a

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:54.280
<v Speaker 2>person uses a bolstering word in front of a statement,

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 2>always open up your ears, because why did they have

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 2>to bolster that word? She could get She could have

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 2>easily said we believe that, or we know that, but

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 2>we have extreme belief that. But then what followed it

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:11.720
<v Speaker 2>was her hand coming up on her neck and rubbing

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 2>her neck of worry and concern. I was like, are

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:22.879
<v Speaker 2>you kidding me? Busted said she doesn't believe that thing

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:26.440
<v Speaker 2>even works, and sure enough is exactly what happened.

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Your expertise and the way you deliver information and your

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>willingness to share is just astounding to me, and I

0:48:35.600 --> 0:48:37.280
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it so much.

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 2>What's my pleasure? And you know, having the skills will

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 2>help them to be better informed decisions about business transactions,

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:49.000
<v Speaker 2>people they're involved with, and also to identify dangerous people

0:48:49.040 --> 0:48:52.440
<v Speaker 2>in their lives. So it's a skill that everyone should

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 2>have in their lives. In my new book, I do

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 2>a whole chapter on lies we tell ourselves, lies we

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 2>tell other people, and lined by flatteries.

0:49:01.480 --> 0:49:01.719
<v Speaker 1>One of them.

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 2>It's like saying, you know, you're fabulous, you're great, and

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 2>you talk about these celebrities, you're amazing and behind their back,

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 2>they're stabbing them, they're not sincere. Well, that is actually

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 2>your own personal character flaw, because if you can't if

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:18.239
<v Speaker 2>you can't deliver truth to a friend without being offensive,

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 2>but you're really doing it in a place that where

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 2>you care and your love, you're loving and you're being

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:27.480
<v Speaker 2>authentic in a very kind manner, then you're really not

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.359
<v Speaker 2>being truthful. So I look at that. That's a that's

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 2>a huge one for me. So I hope everybody will

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 2>not only just learn the skills that I'm talking about

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:38.440
<v Speaker 2>how to detect deception, but also do their own self

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:42.840
<v Speaker 2>analyzation about how they handle things and how they communicate

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:45.799
<v Speaker 2>to the world. Are they actually being honest with themselves?

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Susan, thank you so much. And I'm going to end

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Zone seven the way that I always do with a quote.

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Men are liars, will lie about lyne if we have to.

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm an algebra liar. Figure two good lies makes a

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>positive actor, Tim Allen. I'm Cheryl McCollum, and this is

0:50:07.760 --> 0:50:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Zone seven.