WEBVTT - Ep. 227: Red Cutter

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a meat eating podcast coming at you shirtless,

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>severely bug bitten in my case, underwear listening Hunt E podcast,

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>You can't predict anything presented by on X. Hunt creators

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>are the most comprehensive digital mapping system for hunters. Download

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the Hunt app from the iTunes or Google play store.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Nor where you stand with on X. All right, everyone,

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>we're joining today by our first ever We should have

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>done this a long time ago, our first ever genuine

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>meat scientists, Chris Calkins. Do you go by? Is that right?

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Meat scientists? Is that cool to say? Yeah, absolutely, that's

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the right way to do it. Let me test your

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>knowledge to find out if you're legit. Do you know

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>what a Warner? I think it's called a Warner Bruntler

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>sheer force test is well, it's a Warner Bratsler Chan

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Warner and Lyman Bratsler decades ago created an objective tenderness

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>machine and it was that share force machine you're referring to.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So you passed, But let me ask you this question.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 1>How many holes does that thing punch into the steak?

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>That's uh, it's up to the operator, but typically we

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>would expect to get six cores from a regular beef steak,

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, in smaller animals, you have to get by

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>with fewer cores and more steaks. Okay, good, we'll proceed now. No, now,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I have faith that that Karen found us the right

0:01:54.840 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>meat scientist. Uh what is the first? Off? Tell us? Like? What? What?

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>What is a meeting? What is uh? What is meat science?

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And how does one you know get there? It's been

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>an interesting journey to become a meat scientist. I was

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>involved in agriculture as a high school student in the

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>state of Washington. Had a really cool high school agg

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>teacher who is a lifetime mentor for me, and I

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>was lucky enough. As a senior in high school, I

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>served as a State Future Farmers of America President State

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>f f A president, and that same time he went

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to Texas and m to work on a Master of

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Science in meet science. And I always thought it was

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be a veterinarian. But I packed everything in

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a car, drove to Texas, and the day I got there,

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I got a job in the meat lab and I

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>liked it well enough. Apparently I've never left since then.

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>So eventually went on and got a like what is

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>your You have a PhD? Like what is it? What

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>is it? What was your dissertation? Like what sort of

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>like how do you narrow in on this super broad

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:15.399
<v Speaker 1>meat science category and find your personal you know, expertise. Well,

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a great point because the field of

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 1>meat science is really quite broad. That is, everything from

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the live animal all the way through to the products

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that we eat. And my dissertation had to do with

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the enzymes in meat that break up proteins in other words,

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the tenderization process. And I have built my career looking

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>at quality, particularly eating quality characteristics of meat. How much

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>how familiar familiar are you with um kind of like

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>layman perspectives about meat? Right, Like you have to in

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>conversation with people or in restaurants or backyard barbecues, you

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>have to hear a lot of like theories about why

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this is that way, that that our way off And

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>if you don't know if you hang out with hunters

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or not, but you'd probably get inundated with screwball theories

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about what is the way it is or why certain

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>things are this way and why they're that way. Yeah,

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a compulsion related to try and set the

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>record straight, make sure everybody understands what we're talking about.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm in addition to having ah of my

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>time is spent on research, but the other thirty percent

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is spent on teaching. So I teach both undergraduate students

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>as well as master and doctoral students as well. Yeah,

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>let me hate you with Okay, Spencer's gonna hit Spencer

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>new Hearth, our very own and special Spencer new Hearth

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>is now going to hit you with um. This is

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>probably the question we get the most, and this is

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>a wild game question, but I'm sure it has so

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>many parallels to domestic production that you'll know exactly what

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. But this is sort of the leading

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>hunter based wild game problem question. How would you put it, Spencer?

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Do stressed out animals taste worse? And can that stress

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>be a factor of something like the rut for a

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>white tailed deer or an elk um or from a

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>bad shot where a deer is hitted then it runs

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>a mile and it lays there for four hours and

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>slowly dies. Can a stress like that toward the adrenaline

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>make them taste worse? That initial burst of adrenaline does

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>not have a real big impact, but if it's around

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>for very long. In other words, if we have a

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>longer term stress like the run, for example, then absolutely

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.559
<v Speaker 1>there are metabolic changes that take place in the meat

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>that will impact the eating quality of that product. I'd

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>be happy to explain that further, but we do not

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>want to go no dig in man. We want to

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>go way deep awesome. So think about what we know

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>is the way the body stores energy um is through

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>glycogen initially, and then that turns we also store energy

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>as fat, but that glancogen is used to provide the

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>short term burst of energy we need when an animal,

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>for example, is running. Now it turns out that once

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>that animal has been harvested, that glycogen gets converted to

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>acid in the muscle. It becomes more acidic. We would

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.239
<v Speaker 1>say it has a lower pH that's normal, that's good.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're all used to with all of the

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>muscle foods that we eat. Is that normal h decline

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>that occurs when an animals harvested. The problem is when

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you get that burst of adrenaline, or you spend five

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>days at the runt running around acting like a teenager

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and not eating and all the rest of that, we

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>exhaust the glycogen stores in the animal, and when that happens,

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that pH does not drop, it does not become acidic,

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and we get all kinds of weird, strange flavors, and

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the texture is different. It's dark, it's sticky. Most people

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>find that kind of product not very desirable. And the

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>time course of that really depends on how much stress

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the animal has and how long it takes place. So Spencer,

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>your question about four hours and a long, slow death,

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that's probably long enough to have an impact on that animal.

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>If that animal is injured in a while, say it

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>breaks a leg or something, then all of those kinds

0:07:55.760 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of things will give long enough stress. Glycogen is houstag

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>pH stays high, meat doesn't taste very good. You know.

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>A good extreme of this that I think about is

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the um. One time, my brother rancher that my brother

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and his friends know, told them about a bull that

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>he had that had broken its leg down in the

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>bottom of some coolie and it'd been down there while

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and he couldn't find it, and eventually found it, and

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>he told those guys, if you want to go get it,

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you can have it. This thing is huge, you know,

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And they went down and got it and my brother

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>comes home and makes a steak out of it, And

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was probably already a bull. It was

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>already a bull. So that's probably a couple of strikes

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>against it. But I mean, I'm not exaggerating when I

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>say that it was unchewable. Yeah, it's um. Most of

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the stress related response has to do with taste, has

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to do with flavor. The fact that it was a

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>bull and an older animal, that's what makes it tough.

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>But we have people who contact us regularly with a

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>very similar situation. An animal is injured, been hanging around

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for quite a while, and they wonder can they turn

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it down to a steak or ground beef, And uh,

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just a different taste. And so that's a

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty common complaint that people have homes. So the toughness

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>is toughness isn't related to stress, not so much that

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the stress has a far bigger impact on flavor than

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it does on toughness. All right, So one of the

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>things that makes certain things, like what makes certain animals

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>inexplicably tough, like you know, I mean you could sometimes

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you'll have guys get whatever, like you get you know,

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a box or someone will get you know, ten bull

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>elk and they're all great. In the eleventh one, it's

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>just chewier in hell umkay wolf off and say like,

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 1>oh he must have been stressed. Would be our be

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like a thing that we would say when you encounter

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that super tough animal. There's there's really three things broadly

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that impact toughness. One has to do with how contracted

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that muscle cell is, how much integrity there is in

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the muscle cell. The second thing has to do is

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>something called connective tissue. That's that white, silvery tissue on

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the outside of the meat. And then the third part

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is fat. And so anything we do to impact any

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of those three things can impact tenderness. Uh, let me

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>ask you one more than Spencer's gotta ask you a

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>good question. Uh, have you ever have you ever had

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>occasion to eat like soup, like to eat deer meat

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>right away or any kind of meat, Okay, so whatever,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Like if you if you get an animal and then

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.719
<v Speaker 1>cook it within a couple of hours, it's like it's

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a divisive taste, Like some people like it,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>some people don't like it. It definitely has a different texture.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>There's something in it that seems almost like a metallic taste.

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>That then that's gone in a day or two. Right,

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So we know that once you once you shoot an

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>animal and enough time passes, it gets rigid, it gets stiff.

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>We call that rigor mortis, right, And that process is

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the process of all of the energy and the muscle

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>dissipating once the heart stops meeting and to stop blood flow.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And that is actually a toughening process. In fact, once

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you get to that point that's about as tough as

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>that meat is going to be. We can then hang

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it longer in a cooler outside and cold air, and

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that allows the meat to become more tender. But if

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you get ahold of that meat before it's into rigor mortis,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and you cut it, that cutting stimulates contraction. You put

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it on a hot pan or a hot grill that

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>stimulates that contraction, and you can get meat that's literally

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>too tough to chew. You know, every now and then

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody says, I love to shoot an animal, then immediately

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>go kind of steak and go eat it. To me,

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that's disrespectful of the animal because you are you are

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>eating that meat in the worst possible conditions to have

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a good eating experience. If you'll at least let that

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>animal go through rigor mortist to get stiff uh, then

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have a far better eating experience. Okay, Spencer

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>whole type. Alright, I don't understand what you're saying, because

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I would like explain the rigor mortis timeline. I would

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>think that when it's in rigor, it's all stiffened up, right,

0:12:54.640 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But before rigor it has the potential to contract. And

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>if you stimulate the animal by um by, by cutting

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the meat, or more importantly, by putting it on a

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>hot skillet, it will stiffen up. It will shorten more

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>than usual. And if you wait till the animals Okay,

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>so let's say there's an animal, whatever you're in a

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>slaughterhouse or whatever, you kill an animal. There's an animal

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that just dies, Okay, struck by I don't want to

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>say struck by lightning. It just dies. At first, you

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>can wiggle it all around, you can grab its arm

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and shake it. Yes, Then a while later you can't.

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Then a while later you can. So during the period

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>when it's stiffened up, that is more tender than before

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it stiffens up. If you could cook it without allowing

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it to contract, it would be tender, but you cannot

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>do that. The when we cut the steak, we remove

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>all the muscle bone connections, and so that muscle is

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:03.359
<v Speaker 1>free to contract, and so before riggor mortis is complete,

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that is a very dynamic muscle that can that can

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>shorten and toughen as you handle the product. Once you

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>once it goes into a rigger, then you're at a

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>certain level of tenderness. And from that time on beyond

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>where rigger happens, it will just get more and more

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the longer you keep it in the cooler. Okay, I'm

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>mostly good on that one. So far. Your answers have

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conviction, which is like what I would

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>want out of meta Year's official Meat Scientists, right, But

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you lack any confidence in what you're saying,

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>um knowing that like a lot of the studies that

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>have been done in the literature that you're referencing has

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>been on like domestic game cattle that was you know,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>ben dean cicado over the last ten thousand years, versus

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>something like a white tailed deer or an elk, a

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>wild animal. They're just wired differently. And so my question is, like,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>when they're talking about stress, how is how is do

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we know that stress is the same to a dear

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>versus cattle? And then you know all the rest of

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>your answers if they lack any confidence, no way that

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about b versus wild game. You know, muscle

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is muscle. I do not lack confidence on the science

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and and Spencer we could get in an argument. You

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>got him all wrong. He's not trying to be pugnacious.

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>He's just trying to He's trying to people at home

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>or so there's people at home in the future listen

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to this. They're at home thinking, yeah, what does he know?

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about deer? So he's just trying to clear

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that up. Yes, no, I'm just getting the artime. I

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>totally understand you're the point that you're saying, Uh have

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I have studied a variety of different species. I have

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>studied product from around the world, and muscle responds the

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>same way that some of the timelines are different. And

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>so for example, uh, poultry, for example, a chicken, it

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>will go into rigor mortis in an hour and a half.

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>A beef animal might take eight or ten hours before

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it's fully into rigor mortis. If you take a goat

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>or sheep there and there in four to six hours,

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that's about That's about what I'd anticipate for deer as well.

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So the biology of muscle contraction and rigor mortis and

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>all of that that's fixed. It's it's gonna happen in

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>all all of the different species that we're talking about.

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Now we have to think about most of the time.

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>When you think about that beef steer, for example, uh,

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that animal has been neutered, and so it doesn't have

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>uh the access to all of those hormones that uh

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 1>uh uh and intact mail would have. And so the

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>sensitivity to hormone fluctuations might vary a little bit from

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>species to species, um, and depending on what sex or

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>gender you're dealing with. But at the end of the day,

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the biology says, um, all muscles go through the same sequence,

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of process as what I've tried to describe.

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Can you you tell us explain the term I hear

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.719
<v Speaker 1>now and then I thought it was a red cutter,

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>but Spencer convinced the otherwise that that's not actually a thing.

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And he was saying do you mean a dark cutter? Like,

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>what is a dark cutter? So when we talked about

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>the drop in pH that happens normally when rigor occurs,

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that gives us the normal call or that we're used

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to sing inside the muscle. If the pH stays high,

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>then the meat is very dark in color. And so

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>in beef cattle they call it a dark cutter. Have

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you heard red cutter? I've never heard red cutter until

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>about two minutes given up on that one. But it's

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the it's the same way you can get that same

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>condition in pork. If pork or stressed for too long,

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you can get in that case, we call it d

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>f D dark firm and dry. And so they're all

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>just descriptions that you just described wild. You just described

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>wild pig, a lot of wild pig pretty well. Yeah.

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So that when you have a dark cutter in the

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in the slaughter world or commercial slaughter world, is it

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>attributable to a specific thing that happened to that animal

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>or is it just some percentage will come out that way?

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Now that's uh, it is it is a response to

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>sustained stress. But just like people, some animals are pretty

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>chill and some animals are really tightly wired. The ones

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>that are high strung, high stress, those are the ones

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that are gonna be more likely to have the problem.

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>So the same set of conditions, whether it's UH duration

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>or shipping or hauling or whatever, the same set of

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>conditions will have a different impact on every animal depending

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>on how that animal responds to the situation. Yeah, I

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>got you there. There's a product these guys were selling,

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe Spencer, maybe remember the name of it. It was,

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>um it was a contraption where you could shoot a

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>deer and then run over real quick and hook this

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>thing up to your car battery and appit like how

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>youse app them in a in a slaughterhouse? Can you explain, uh,

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>why they do that in a in a plant? Why

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.959
<v Speaker 1>they's app them with electricity? And then can is that

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>even can? Can? Is it realistic that you could replicate

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>that in the wild? Whatever the hell you're trying to

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>get when you do it? Yeah, So let's let's first

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 1>talk about what happens when you apply electricity. You cause

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the muscle to contract. And and by the way, a

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 1>car battery doesn't work very well because that's a constant,

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>continuous electrical field. What you really want is alternating current.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So the muscle contracts, relaxes, contracts relaxes. As you do that,

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you're using up glycogen, you're producing acid. You are hastening

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the rate at which rigor mortis occurs. That makes me

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:03.959
<v Speaker 1>more tender. And so from the from the mechanism standpoint,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it works. Can we create something like that that could

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>be used in the field. Again, as long as you

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>have pulses of electricity rather than a continuous contraction, then

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have, uh, some improvement is possible under that scenario.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I would point out is, um, when

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>when when we when we shoot a deer, the heart

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>stops right and that's how blood is pumped through the body.

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>So when the heart is no longer beating, we can't

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>pump blood out. So um, some electrical impulse will help

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit of that blood out of the system.

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the other side benefit. So what is

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the ideal shot placement for a hunter in the head,

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in the neck, in the heart, in the lungs, in

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the spine, Like what would be your top choice? Yeah,

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>so just in terms of meat, just limit this to like,

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of meat quality, and get out of the

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and not bog it down with room for air, right,

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>margin for air and all that. I appreciate that because

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that is a bit of the question. At the end

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of the day, you want the animal to go from

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>being alive to no longer being alive, and heart shot

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead shot, any of those will will affect that same consequence.

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And so from a meat quality standpoint, um, other than

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>damage to tissue and those kind of things, there's probably

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>not real a real big difference among those locations. Do

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you have you ever seen? Um? I can't really it's

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to even explained this. Sometimes when you're when you're

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>skinning a deer, you'll find that there's like a you

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>know that foam, there's like a foam between the like

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>like a bubbly foam that forms between the hide and

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the meat. Right, What is that stuff? Well, that's part

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of that connective tissue that I talked about again, That

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is a protein based structure that goes between the muscles

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and also between the muscle and the hide. Uh, no

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>no damage, no risk, no concern on that standpoint. I

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>might mention though that um, we we think about, well,

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>if you've got that silver tissue on the outside of

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the muscle, you can always trend that off. But if

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you get a microscope and look at that muscle, that

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>tissue actually goes throughout the muscle. And and that's why

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>muscle from the leg, for example, is inherently less tender

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>than a muscle that's from the loin or the backstrap,

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>because those are muscles of support versus the legs, big

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>muscles of locomotion. They need more of that connective tissue. So,

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>by and large, if you've gotta you've got a piece

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of meat with a lot of connective tissue in it,

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, slow roasting, uh, putting in a pot

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and stewart that kind of a thing is how we

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>tend to cook that. Whereas you get the muscles that

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have very much connective tissue that tenderlins, the backstraps,

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>all of that. We can make sticks out of those,

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>throw them in a skellet throw them on the grill,

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>and have a very nice eating experience. What a what

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>happens when well, first let me ask you this. Have

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you have you had exposure to to your your possiverous

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>uh counterparts like fish, fish meat? Is that a thing

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not much on fish meat. I can't tell you

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>too much about that. Are there people that specialize Are

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>there people in the meat science word to specialize in fish? Yes,

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>there are people specialize in fish. People specialize in pork

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>or beef or poultry. Uh, yeah, we're we can be

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a pretty specialized group. So because this one, this question

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>about bleeding, let's just let's just if you know about

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the process of bleeding fish, you can speak to that.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:19.239
<v Speaker 1>But what are you trying to achieve when what are

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you trying to achieve when you bleed something? When people

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about like needing to bleed it out, like, what,

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>what are you really getting? That's that's a that's an

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 1>awesome question because a lot of people run around saying,

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>there's all this blood in the meat um muscle, which

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is true. Muscle is sent water, right, So all you

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>have to think about what's the function of blood. And

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the main things is we carry oxygen through

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>blood right on hemoglobin molecules inside the meat is a

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>molecule that also binds oxygen, bind better than hemoglobin actually,

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>so it draws the oxygen out of the blood into

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the meat and it binds to mild globin. And so

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>when you look at meat, and that meat is red

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in color. That's myad globe. There's very very little hemo

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>globe and very little blood in the meat itself. But

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>because meat water, everybody goes, oh my gosh, look at

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>all the blood that's in that meat. But most of

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that is myo globin and water that's inside the muscle.

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>So when you bleed, you're just trying to get rid

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of the bloods that's there. And probably the biggest real

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is um It's a great nutrient for

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>bacterial growth and spoilage, and so we try and remove

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that so that we don't have to deal with it.

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>You're saying that blood in the meat is lends itself

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to quicker spoilage. Not necessarily a meatles meats are pretty

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>good bacterial medium for growth anyway, but typically in in uh,

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in commercial animals, we we remove the blood just so

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have to deal with that as we

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>go down the line. Otherwise it tends to drip and

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>get all over everything. Oh my god. You so once

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it's out it becomes problematic. Yeah, like you don't you

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want it around? Yeah? Yes, I want to back

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>up to dark cutters. Real quick um red cutters. Yeah, yeah,

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Steve's red cutters. Like the obvious stressors are like taking

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time to die, uh, and like not eating.

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But what are some of the not so obvious stressors

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that hunters wouldn't think of? Like is weather something that

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>would stress out an animal and make their meat worse,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>or like interacting with foreign animals things like that. Yes, Uh,

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a really good question, Spencer, And you're absolutely right.

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Just think about you or write. Anything that causes us

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>stress causes that animal stress as well. And and and

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>so part of that has to do with physical stress

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's cold and you're trying to stay warm, for example, Um,

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're we also have social stress, right you mix

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>mix people up in an elevator and everybody gets kind

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of quiet and awkward and and and that kind of

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>stress also creates circumstances or situations that can impact the animal.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>In the case of females, if they're cycling, then that

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>hormonal cycle can create stress as well. That draws glycogen

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the muscles. Uh. It's that's a really tough

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>question to it's. Uh, it's it just creates enough different uh,

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>physiological responses to those hormones that that animal is going

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to need more energy and it's going to draw against

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that glycogen's oars to be able to supply that sort

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of like nervous energy if you think of it. So

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you never hear like hunters and fishermen complain about a

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>spawning fish tasting bad though, or strutting turkey or anything

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. Is it just because like we're really ignorant,

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>or is it less likely to happen in poultry and fish? Uh?

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about fish and poultry. It can still

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>happen in poultry, but chances are that we're that's kind

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of what we expect. It's what we're used to seeing.

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And the best example I can give you is UH,

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>in poultry, commercial poultry, once they're harvested and you're removed

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>all the all the viscera, then you want to chill

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that carcass down quickly. And the way that happens in

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the industry is you take the poultry carcass and put

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it in an ice water bath. Now that cold shock,

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>but or the muscle is in rigor causes immediate contraction.

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>In comparison, you could also chill that carcass by putting

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it in a refrigerated cooler. And so you can go

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to the grocery store now and there are there is

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>air chilled poultry and there's regular commercial poultry. And I'll

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you there's a profound difference in tenderness between those two,

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>which the air chilled is not as contracted and is

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>far more tender than what we traditionally do with poultry.

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Are these labeled like things that we can identify in

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store? Uh? Typically the air chilled poultry is

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>labeled that way. The others are not their traditional normal

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>commodity product. If you had to look at what you

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>know is done with well, I'm gonna ask you an

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>equivalent question to this around around red meat, but knowing

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>what's done in uh poultry slaughter facility. Okay, what would

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>be the closest approximation that a person could achieve if

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>they're hunting pheasants or hunting turkeys and they have a

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>pickup truck with them, Like, what would what would you

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>do upon what? Like? What would you do in terms

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of a timeline and tools in order to replicate best practices? Yeah? So, Uh,

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:31.479
<v Speaker 1>there's there's two big things. I think one is you

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>want to get rid of the guts UH as soon

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>as possible. That's a that's a food safety issue. UM.

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>If we have uh feces or fecal material spreading around

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the inside of that body cavity. The sooner you get

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>all that out, the better off you are. That's number one.

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Number two is and we've kind of touched on this earlier,

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but you just give it time to go into a

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>rigor mortis. But or you do much more with it

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and so you don't have to plunge it in ice water.

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>You can allow it to go to rigger um for

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>an hour or so once you've removed the viscera, and

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and you'll have a fine eating experience. It's when we go,

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I think too fast. It's when we try and and

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, get the animal and stuff it with snow,

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>or we get the animal and and and and throw

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it in the skillet too quickly. That's where we get

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>quality problems being created. And you're saying it's bad to

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.479
<v Speaker 1>stuff with snow. Most of the time you don't need

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And if you're if you if you

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>got to say a deer for example, and let's assume

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a heart shot as opposed to a head shot.

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So you've disrupted the internal organs, right and um, and

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>so the best thing you can do from a food

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 1>safety standpoint is to remove all those organs from the

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>inside of the animal. Now, once you've done that, there's

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance there's some fecal material in there. And so

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you stuff it with snow You've just

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>smeared all that around, and as the snow melts, you've

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>smeared that bacteria around on the inside. The fact is

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the animals going to chill out at a reasonable rate anyhow. Um.

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm now, Now, if you're dealing with a very large

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>animal and it's warm outside, um, you know it'd be

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.479
<v Speaker 1>nicer if you could cool that off a little quicker.

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>But you're not going to have snow around to do

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that under that circumstance anyway. So I don't think it's

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>necessary to try and accelerate the chilling rate of animals

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>as long as you deal with the meat in a

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>timely matter after it's hand rigor mortis. So are you

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>saying there's such things freezing something too soon? Like if

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you shut a duck at nine am and you had

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it breast and gutted by ten am and going to freeze.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that too quick? Completely? In fact, we actually had

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a had a former student in our department who went

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to work in Alaska and they're harvesting reindeer when it

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>was twenty below outside. And the problem they had is

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they they harvest the deer, lay it on the ground,

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and in twenty minutes it would be frozen. Now what

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>happens is when that when the meat thaws, then you

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>get massive muscle contraction, way more than normal. So absolutely

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>too fast to the freezer is not a good thing.

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>The other dimension of that spencer that you ask about,

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting, I think, is that, uh, it's better

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>if you can go into rigor with the muscles attached

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to the bones, because that, to some extent that limits contraction.

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>If you remove all those connections of the muscle to

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 1>the bone, that muscle is free to shorten up as

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>much as it wants to. That's really interesting because there's

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a there's a real debate in the hunting world around

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>um things like things like called the you know, the

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the gutless method, or you know, various ideas around deboning

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>things right away in order to reduce weight when you

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 1>have to carry it a long way, and um, a

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people will and I've certainly done it myself,

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>shoot an animal and then immediately debone at all and

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>put into bags. And I always view the con of it.

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>The con to doing this would be that it just

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 1>seems to create a harder time to sort it out

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>when you get home. It makes more surface area for

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>there to be hair and for it to get dirty.

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>But I never heard anybody talk about that it could

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>even have a negative impact on the end quality in

0:35:54.800 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of toughness tenderness. Well, and that is in fact

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the case that if you if you bone it out

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>while it's hot, you can compromise the contraction and therefore

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the tenderness. But you know, you've got to be practical.

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>You can quarter the animal, for example, and most of

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the muscle bone attachments are still retained under that scenario.

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:23.439
<v Speaker 1>But if you're gonna take your knife and separate every

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:26.439
<v Speaker 1>muscle and and open it up so there are no

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>connections at all, uh that I would say the longer

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you can wait to do that, the better off you're

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be, because you'll be closer to rigor mortis when

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you get to that point, Spencer, was that you talking

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>all about everybody hangs ther deer up wrong? Yes, tell

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>him about that. So I've I've heard that like a

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 1>good steakhouse or a good butcher will do the tender

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>stretch method where they hang a car like a typical

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>deer hunter go kill a deer, they skin it out,

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and then they hang it by the achilles. So it's

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>like as long as it possibly can be. But I've

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>heard that the tender stretch method is preferred by the

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>beef industry where you basically put these hooks in their

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 1>pelvis and then you allow their back hands to relax

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>and hang it more of a ninety degree angle. Is

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that something that you hear that you promote it. It

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>will definitely give a measurable improvement in tenderness if you

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>use that method. It is not used in the US

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>meat industry at all, but there are other countries that do.

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it an efficiency thing? Now, Well, it's what we're

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:43.879
<v Speaker 1>used to write. We know what the cuts look like,

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we know what to expect all the rest of that,

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and and so if you're going to go to a

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>tender stretch strategy, it's a it's a whole different way

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of uh separating that carcass and of pieces, and it's

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>just not something the U s ander Steer showing any

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>interest in doing by and large certainly on the beat side. Um,

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the beef in the United States pretty tender compared to

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 1>around the world. But I have been to places around

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the world where the entire cooler is hung through tender stretch. Interesting. Sorry,

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, I'm sorry. I've always heard that it's an

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>issue of being efficient. When you hang something by the achilles,

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you can fit a lot more of these things in

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the cooler than if you hang them by the pelvis,

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and then they're they're taking up a lot more room.

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Side by side it would be about the same. But

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>as that hind leg falls forward, then you're the distance

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>between the animals would have to be have to be

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit greater in order to have room for that.

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>It might be interesting part of that, part of that

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>whole tender stretched method was devised because uh, in New

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Zealand they were shipped this is years ago. They were

0:38:56.840 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>they were freeze lambs. Uh. They would slaughter lambs, freeze

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the carcasses and ship them overseas. And they discovered that

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:09.479
<v Speaker 1>that freezing before rigor mortis made really really tough meat,

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and so one way to counteract that was to use

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that tender stretched method or a similar kind of hanging

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>where the legs fall forward. That if you think about that,

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that causes the muscles of the leg on the back

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>side to stretch more. And so because they're stretched more,

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 1>they're less contracted. But on the inside of the leg,

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>those muscles are actually more contracted, right, And so it's

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>beneficial for some muscles and not so beneficial for other muscles.

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to tell you a story of guy told

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>me and and I want you to tell me he's dead,

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So I want to tell me if I'm getting his

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>story right. Yea. I used to live next story to

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a guy in Miles City, Montana. Who he was. He

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was in his nineties when I knew him, and he

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was telling me that his family in Montana, they used

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to raise turkeys, and they would raise turkeys around they

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>would time it out in order to be selling Thanksgiving turkeys.

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>They were shipping these turkeys by rail from Montana to Minneapolis.

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And he told me that they would raise the turkey

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>up and then cut off its food supply so that

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it's digestive track emptied completely and they would only give

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it water. Then they would kill the turkeys, pluck them

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and not got them because that led to spoilage quicker,

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and that they would pack these turkeys into barrels, guts

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in them but no food in their system, and ship

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:58.839
<v Speaker 1>them by rail to Minneapolis for people to eat on Thanksgiving.

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>This is an I was gonna say, this was a

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 1>while ago. Does that make any sense? Well, part of

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it does. Um. Actually, if you think about ruminants right, uh,

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of gut fill and so it

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>takes a long time for that to get gone. So

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you could cut off feed source to an animal for

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a while, um, you know, twelve twenty four hours or whatever,

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and biologically that animal doesn't know it. It maybe starts

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to get at hungry, but but biologically it's got all

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the energy and everything else that needs water. Access to

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:45.240
<v Speaker 1>water is huge with If you do not have access

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to water, that whole dark cutting condition becomes evident more quickly.

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Access to water is pretty important. And so I could

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>fathom a place where you don't feed the turkeys and

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you have less gut fill. Um that probably um minimizes

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit the risk. But to be honest with you, UM,

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I would highly recommend that they be they have the

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>guts removed, as opposed to its zing them down and

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.919
<v Speaker 1>leaving the guts in there. Thereafter, after the animal dies,

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there is migration. I've gut bacteria that comes through the

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 1>comes through the walls of the intestines into the rest

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of the body cavity, And of course I sing that

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>would slow it down and all the rest of that,

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>But why run the risk right, Just remove it and

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:44.439
<v Speaker 1>and let that natural process of cooling and aging take

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 1>place after that. That's one other thing I want to

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>mention Steve is that, UM, we've talked a lot about

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>what happens up until rigor mortis, but I would sure

0:42:56.120 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 1>want your listeners to understand that after grigor mortis, then

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 1>as we store that meat in a refrigerator, that meat

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to gradually get more and more tender because

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>of those insigns that are naturally in the meat. So

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking back on your turkey question about the guy

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>with the pickup who shoots the turkey, is what should

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>he do? Uh? Waiting to freeze that meat, even if

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a day or two, is going to make that

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>meat more tender and beef we've see that that muscle

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>improves in tenderness for about seven to ten days. After

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that it still improves, but at a much lower rate.

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And so it would be you would get far better

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>product if you age that beef two weeks before you

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:51.320
<v Speaker 1>may cut it into steaks in the case of deer

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, even if it's there or four days, that's

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be better than cutting it and putting it in

0:43:57.480 --> 0:44:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the fraser immediately. Similar to see turkey question talking about

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>how those turkeys were cut off from food. Um, the

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>guys in my hometown of South Dakota that teach me

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>how to clean snapping turtle, they all did the same

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:13.359
<v Speaker 1>thing where they catch a snapping turtle and then they

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>put it in a tank with water and they leave

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 1>it in there for a week, and they say that

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it's cleansing its system. You don't want to eat them

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>right away, the meat won't be any good, and so

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>all they have for that week is this few inches

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of water that they're in. Is that a really bad practice?

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you, I don't know anything about Uh.

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>You know what it would do, is it would it

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>would it would remove food from the g I tractor.

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Uh is that good or bad? I don't know.

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I my instinct is it seems a little excessive, but um, possibly, Kart,

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I want you to find us a snapping turtle meat.

0:44:56.880 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Christ do you have any colleagues of yours? Are you've been?

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 1>No one did a dissertation on snappers, not that I'm

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>aware of. But that's that's out of practice you would

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 1>ever do with a cow or a turkey, That's correct.

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I would not do that for any of those other animals.

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>But again it raises another point. You've got to understand

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the digestion system of these animals, right,

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And so a ruminant has bacteria in that large stomach

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that breaks down the food into very small components that

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 1>are then absorbed in the bloodstream and converted to proteins

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and fats and carbohydrates. In the case of a pig

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>or us humans, we don't have a big ruman and

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>so that food gets absorbed through the small intestine. As

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a result, it doesn't have to be broken down into

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>quite such small components. So if we feed, for example,

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:02.720
<v Speaker 1>if we have a if we have a pig that's

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>eating acorns or peanuts, then the fats will be quite oily,

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the meat will be oily, and and you'll actually get

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 1>some flavor from the diet. But in the case of

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:22.439
<v Speaker 1>a ruminant because all the food parts get broken down

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>so small, the type of diet is not so critical. Now,

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the energy and the diet is. Because remember when we

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:35.399
<v Speaker 1>talked about three things that influenced tenderness, one of those

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>was fat. So if you get a deer that's grazing

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>on corn fields, for example, that's high energy. They're storing

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that extra energy in their body in in a form

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:50.359
<v Speaker 1>of fat, and that will we particularly in America, we

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 1>love the taste of of fat in our in our

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>meat products, and so a high energy diet helps. But

0:46:57.080 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 1>whether that high energy comes from corn or we eat

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is probably not as critical, particularly in wild game. How

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>quickly does that diet need to change for you to

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>notice a change in the meat quality. I always hear

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:13.720
<v Speaker 1>people refer to wood ducks as the best tasting ducks

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:16.239
<v Speaker 1>because they eat a lot of acorns. But it's hard

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 1>for me to fathom that throughout their entire migration they're

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 1>finding acorns. So how how quickly would something need to

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 1>start eating acorns? Or corn or something like that for

0:47:24.480 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you to notice the improved meat. Yeah, So the way

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to think about that is, first of all, you've got

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a deposit fat from the diet, but you also got

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to replace fat that's already there, right, And so, uh,

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:41.399
<v Speaker 1>you have to think about how quickly do you get

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>rid of the old facts that are there and how

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 1>quickly do you add new facts that are there? Um,

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know specifically for for ducks, for example,

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>but in the case of cattle, I'm going to bigger animals,

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:57.439
<v Speaker 1>That's what I know. In the case of cattle, they'll

0:47:57.480 --> 0:47:59.120
<v Speaker 1>be in a feed lot a hundred, a hundred and

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:02.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty days in order to get the high marbling, the

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 1>high fat inside the muscle that really gives us. Now

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is fifty days enough? Well, it's certainly better than zero, right,

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's a continuum. The longer you do it, the

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:19.840
<v Speaker 1>better you're going to be. Can you explain marbling and then, uh,

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 1>like what factors lead an animal to to have marbling?

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Because you'll often hear I don't know if you know

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:30.359
<v Speaker 1>about this or not, but you'll hear people say that, um,

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 1>for instance, like that venison isn't marbled. But this is

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:38.479
<v Speaker 1>probably way outside of your expertise. But mountain goat has

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>some marbling. Um, what is it? And is it really

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:48.280
<v Speaker 1>not universal? Ye? Well again, think how that body stores energy.

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>When we get access energy, our nature is to store

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:55.799
<v Speaker 1>it as fat. Right are glycogen supplies are good? So

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:59.399
<v Speaker 1>we start storing energy as fat. Now that fact can

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be in side the muscle that's marbling, or it can

0:49:03.120 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>be outside the muscle, either under the skin we call

0:49:06.960 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that subcutaneous fat, or between the muscles, which would be

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:17.319
<v Speaker 1>intertermuscular fat instead of intramuscular fat. And so depending on

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:21.360
<v Speaker 1>genetics and the type of animal, they will store energy

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 1>either inside the muscle or outside the muscle, and that's

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:31.320
<v Speaker 1>probably species specific. Within a species, there are genetic differences.

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:34.959
<v Speaker 1>For example, why gub for example, has a lot more

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:40.800
<v Speaker 1>marbling than does Angus or or Herford or or another

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>us breed of cattle. So there are some genetic differences

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 1>within a within a species that also regulate how much

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>marbling is deposited. We know this for sure that you

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>only get marbling when you have a high energy diet,

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't, and marbling is least likely to

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>be deposited. So a lot of wild game, you know,

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:10.160
<v Speaker 1>they're foraging, but they're not on they're not in the cornfield,

0:50:10.160 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not getting a high energy diet, so they're probably

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:15.440
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have as much marbling, even if they have

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the genetic potential to deposit it in the first place.

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:20.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, I want to back up a little bit,

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and this kind of goes back to gutting things and

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of timeline around rigor. But you hear

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>people describe aging, which we want to get into later.

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But you'll hear people describe aging as like a controlled decomposition. Right,

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:40.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't know if that's a fair

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>statement or not. But what happens when um, well, I'll

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>put it another way. Sometimes someone will complain about, oh

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:51.799
<v Speaker 1>I got a deer and antelope or whatever and it

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't taste you know, it was no good, it was

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>too gamey, whatever, And people will say, oh, yeah, but

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:01.359
<v Speaker 1>he shot the deer and in rolled around with it

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in the back of his truck for three days. Okay. Um, where,

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:13.839
<v Speaker 1>if if aging is is decomposition, where does rotting Like

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>where does aging end and rotting begin? Like? What is

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the difference there? That's it. That's an awesome question. Um,

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 1>think about dry aged beef for a moment, right, it

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>could be aged forty fifty, sixty seventy days, and yet

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:35.400
<v Speaker 1>normally we would think if you had a steak in

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:39.000
<v Speaker 1>your refrigerator for that long, it's long gone, right, you're

0:51:39.040 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw it away. And so you have to differentiate

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 1>between when we when we talk about aging, we're talking

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:53.360
<v Speaker 1>about the breakdown of the tissues, mostly the protein inside

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the meat. Whereas when I think about spoil age or rotting,

0:51:58.200 --> 0:52:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm really thinking about back to real growth on the

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>outside of that tissue. So if you have a way

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to age but to reduce bacterial growth, you can still

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 1>get improvement in tenderness. Certainly, you get changes in flavor

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:20.160
<v Speaker 1>um from oxidation that normally occurs, but you could you

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:22.880
<v Speaker 1>could age for longer if you could get rid of

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 1>bacterial growth. Right. And so that's why you've got to

0:52:26.239 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 1>be real sanitary when you're out there working, Like you say,

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:33.399
<v Speaker 1>avoid the grass and the extra blood and everything else

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:36.359
<v Speaker 1>getting all over the meat, because all that does is

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 1>help inoculate the outside surface of that meat with bacteria,

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's not a good thing when it comes to

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:46.319
<v Speaker 1>eating quality. So if you could, if you could have

0:52:46.480 --> 0:52:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a hypothetical situation where you could like eliminate all life

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:59.120
<v Speaker 1>inside of a walking cooler, right, meaning there's no like,

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:03.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no bacteria, there's no fungus, like, all life is

0:53:03.440 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>gone inside some space. You would put a deer in there,

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and that deer would still age, but it wouldn't rot

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, it would It would dehydrate, right, it would

0:53:18.719 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>dry out re member meat water. And so the typical

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:30.759
<v Speaker 1>dry aging over that day period might lose ten or

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:33.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent of the way, right, So there's still a

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:35.840
<v Speaker 1>lot more water that can come out, but at some

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 1>point you're practically making jerky. It's just so dry that

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:43.240
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing else to do, So you couldn't do it indefinitely.

0:53:44.560 --> 0:53:49.400
<v Speaker 1>The idea would be that you could safely age longer

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:52.759
<v Speaker 1>if you could get rid of the bacteria. And by

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, the bacteria wouldn't necessarily already be in the cooler.

0:53:57.400 --> 0:53:59.800
<v Speaker 1>We bring it in when we bring in the carcass

0:53:59.840 --> 0:54:03.799
<v Speaker 1>of animal. So so that guy who's driving around with

0:54:03.920 --> 0:54:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a uh antelope on the back of his truck for

0:54:06.880 --> 0:54:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days, you know he's inoculating that product

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is what he's doing by the time to get down

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:17.920
<v Speaker 1>on it. I recently read a book called Extra Virginity,

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was about the scandalous world of olive oil

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and how it's like rampant to take a ten dollar

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:27.000
<v Speaker 1>bottle of olive oil and put a five price tag

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on and five label. Is the world of meat exempt

0:54:32.160 --> 0:54:34.120
<v Speaker 1>from that or does it happen there? What areks some

0:54:34.239 --> 0:54:40.320
<v Speaker 1>examples of meat fraud in the commercial industry. All animal

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:48.279
<v Speaker 1>harvest and cutting is um overseen by employees of the

0:54:48.360 --> 0:54:54.320
<v Speaker 1>federal government, and so meat fraud is very very very low.

0:54:55.080 --> 0:55:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh that there are inspectors there to ensure safety and wholesomeness.

0:55:00.520 --> 0:55:05.360
<v Speaker 1>There are agents that deal with accuracy and labeling and

0:55:05.400 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the rest of that kind of thing, and so um,

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a lot of reasons why meat fraud

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:16.759
<v Speaker 1>would be at a minimum. Now, if I were going

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:21.759
<v Speaker 1>to cheat, I might I might cut one part of

0:55:21.800 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a carcass and tell you it's a different part, right,

0:55:26.360 --> 0:55:28.839
<v Speaker 1>and and so I might try and take something out

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:31.719
<v Speaker 1>of the shoulder and make you think it's part of

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the rib, for example, because there's a dollar value there.

0:55:35.200 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't happen very often, but that would be one place.

0:55:40.120 --> 0:55:43.040
<v Speaker 1>The other place where you simply need to be careful

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is some of the claims that are made about how

0:55:47.280 --> 0:55:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the animal is raised and handled and so forth. And again,

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:55.560
<v Speaker 1>most of the time there are systems in place, their

0:55:55.640 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 1>audits in place, their government employees in place to ensure

0:55:59.719 --> 0:56:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that that's uh, that that that's accurate, and if there

0:56:03.719 --> 0:56:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is deception and labeling, the consequences of that are pretty serious. So, um,

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a lot of fraud in meat

0:56:10.800 --> 0:56:14.080
<v Speaker 1>quite honestly, have you? Uh you know, it's funny Spencer

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:15.960
<v Speaker 1>brings up the olevel thing because I know that there's

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a ton of fraud uh in the fish world. And

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember reading about this thing where you know, there's

0:56:25.600 --> 0:56:29.279
<v Speaker 1>many varieties of snapper, but they don't have name brand recognition.

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I remember reading that these guys that just saying, we're

0:56:31.800 --> 0:56:37.240
<v Speaker 1>seventies some percent of the fish being sold as red snapper.

0:56:38.200 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not red snapper. But when you people look at

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the men you are going to a fish market, they

0:56:43.120 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see mangrove snapper, red line or blue

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 1>line or whatever to all these different kinds of snappers,

0:56:48.600 --> 0:56:51.240
<v Speaker 1>so they just throw up like red snapper because people

0:56:51.400 --> 0:56:55.640
<v Speaker 1>will think like, oh, but the difference there is it's uh,

0:56:55.840 --> 0:56:58.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not nearly as a controlled system from a supply standpoint,

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.239
<v Speaker 1>that's correct. You know some of the guys buying filet's like,

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:06.759
<v Speaker 1>it's already out of the question. But it's hard to uh,

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's probably hard to pass off one kind of carcass

0:57:09.080 --> 0:57:12.400
<v Speaker 1>as another kind of carcass. Imagine the grade the grading

0:57:12.440 --> 0:57:16.280
<v Speaker 1>system could be screwed up. Oh, now that that too

0:57:16.400 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is done by federal employees, and that right, So you

0:57:20.320 --> 0:57:21.840
<v Speaker 1>don't make your own call. You don't make your own

0:57:21.840 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>call on grading. No, if you you can self grade

0:57:27.600 --> 0:57:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and establish your own grading requirements. But if you're going

0:57:31.000 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to call it prime choice select, then those grades are

0:57:38.680 --> 0:57:43.919
<v Speaker 1>are through federal employees, federal graders, And that's a that's

0:57:43.920 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 1>been a tightly controlled system for a long time. I

0:57:47.240 --> 0:57:49.120
<v Speaker 1>was in a I was in a meat plant this

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:54.960
<v Speaker 1>week actually where I watched graders work. So it's still happening.

0:57:55.400 --> 0:57:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Were you were you second guessing him? No? No, I

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you agreed with the calls they were making. Yes, I was.

0:58:04.040 --> 0:58:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Actually I was actually in their buying meat for a

0:58:06.760 --> 0:58:11.680
<v Speaker 1>research project. Actually, So what goes into the different grades,

0:58:11.760 --> 0:58:14.760
<v Speaker 1>like what makes a prime a prime, or a choice

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of choice or a select a select. So there's there's

0:58:18.520 --> 0:58:22.520
<v Speaker 1>two primary elements used for grade. One is how old

0:58:22.720 --> 0:58:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the animal is, and the other one has to do

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:29.200
<v Speaker 1>with how much marveling, how much fat inside the muscle.

0:58:30.320 --> 0:58:33.680
<v Speaker 1>It turns out in the US, we sent all the

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 1>young animals to one plant and all of the old

0:58:37.360 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>animals to a different plant, and so, uh, they're mostly

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Age is not a question, and it's just how much

0:58:47.240 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 1>marbling is present to get prime or choice or select.

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 1>One time I was, I was working on a magazine

0:58:55.360 --> 0:59:01.800
<v Speaker 1>story years ago about livestock theft, like like contemporary cattle rustling,

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and I went, I was at a sale yard in

0:59:05.560 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Twin Falls, Idaho, and I was with some guys that

0:59:09.880 --> 0:59:16.240
<v Speaker 1>run a cow calfe operation and they were watching what

0:59:16.360 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 1>they called milked out dairy cows climbing off a truck

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and they expressed like a high level of disapproval about

0:59:29.280 --> 0:59:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the condition of the animals and made a comment about

0:59:34.160 --> 0:59:38.720
<v Speaker 1>what the beef would be like off those What were

0:59:38.720 --> 0:59:44.760
<v Speaker 1>they getting at, Well, it's that it's nutrition again, right,

0:59:44.840 --> 0:59:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you have enough energy then you can support yourself.

0:59:49.840 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 1>You have enough muscle and you have enough fat to

0:59:53.320 --> 0:59:58.040
<v Speaker 1>sustain body condition. In the case of dairy cows in particular,

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they're being milked every day. They're putting a lot of

1:00:01.120 --> 1:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>their energy into providing that milk. So you have to

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>provide a really high plane of nutrition. If you're milking

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and used in the plane of nutrition lowers, then that

1:00:13.480 --> 1:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>animal is going to get a lot leaner and it

1:00:17.000 --> 1:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>might even lose a little bit of muscle mass. And

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>so that's the body condition that they're looking at. So

1:00:23.520 --> 1:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>now so it won't be like potentially won't be as

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>good and could be tougher. Well. Yeah, So the other

1:00:30.880 --> 1:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>issue there is those dairy cows are much older. They

1:00:34.640 --> 1:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>could be three or four or five years old, whereas

1:00:38.640 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>young cattle to the marketplace are typically two years or less.

1:00:42.840 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And the older and animals sort of like us us, right,

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the older we get, the tougher we get, right, And

1:00:48.600 --> 1:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what happens for muscle as well. Mature animals more connective, tissue,

1:00:53.840 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>less tender than younger animals, so that when you're out

1:00:57.640 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>hunting you see that three or four year old stag, right,

1:01:01.560 --> 1:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not gonna be as tender as an animal

1:01:05.080 --> 1:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that's much younger. Are there any exceptions to the rule,

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>like does it go as far as that a fawn

1:01:11.640 --> 1:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>dear would be way more tender than an old buck? Yes,

1:01:16.840 --> 1:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>what you just said is correct. A faun would be

1:01:19.240 --> 1:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>more tender than a buck with with one caveat that

1:01:24.080 --> 1:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>fawn is so small that it would be very easy

1:01:29.400 --> 1:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for it that muscle to get cold and contract before

1:01:33.720 --> 1:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it goes into rigor mortis. So if you could control

1:01:36.640 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>temperature correctly, then that faun would be way more tender

1:01:40.640 --> 1:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>than the older animal. It's the same thing with veal, right,

1:01:44.000 --> 1:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>veal is much younger than the than the twenty four

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>month old uh steers and efforts that we buy in

1:01:51.920 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store every day, and veal as much more

1:01:54.320 --> 1:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>tender as well? Is veal synonymous with crate raised veal?

1:01:58.280 --> 1:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember all the blow up years to go

1:02:00.200 --> 1:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>about create raise veal? Is there a difference? There's create

1:02:02.800 --> 1:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>raise veal a qualifier of veal. Uh No, deal is

1:02:07.400 --> 1:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>based on animal age. So most of the veal these

1:02:11.040 --> 1:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>days is raised in pens and group pins where there

1:02:13.880 --> 1:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>are a number of them together. So um that there

1:02:17.440 --> 1:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is a welfare question that was raised, And I think

1:02:20.320 --> 1:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the industry has responded well to it in that regard,

1:02:22.960 --> 1:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So so that is like that is a classification. There

1:02:27.320 --> 1:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>was a classification of veal rather than just meaning the

1:02:31.000 --> 1:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>veal is create race. I think people thought it was synonymous,

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>like if it's veal, you know, it was raised in

1:02:37.520 --> 1:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a specific way, but it could skydive and still be vealed. Yeah,

1:02:41.640 --> 1:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that the government would say that um veal is based

1:02:46.920 --> 1:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>on animal age period, that's it. And so if someone's

1:02:51.400 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, if someone says free range veal or pin

1:02:54.720 --> 1:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>raised veal or group race veal, those descriptors are being

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>used by the people who are marketing the product. Federal

1:03:03.120 --> 1:03:06.439
<v Speaker 1>government focuses on the fact that it in fact is veal.

1:03:07.680 --> 1:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Why is it bad to eat raw red meat? And

1:03:11.680 --> 1:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>are there less threats with something like deer meat versus

1:03:15.520 --> 1:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>cal meat. The risk of eating raw meat is primarily

1:03:21.680 --> 1:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>one of microbial issues spoilage and and pathogens that could

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>make you sick um. In addition, if there are parasites

1:03:33.400 --> 1:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and the meat, then if you haven't cooked it, then

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a risk as well. So I would think game

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>meat would be perhaps more likely to have parasites. Uh

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in the in commercial production of animals, they're gonna do

1:03:49.160 --> 1:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>everything they can to minimize that because that reduces the

1:03:52.920 --> 1:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>growth efficiency and it's all about efficiency and commercial production.

1:03:58.280 --> 1:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>So again and lifeless uh, and that hypothetical lifeless space.

1:04:05.120 --> 1:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>You could eat the raw meat all the time. It's

1:04:06.800 --> 1:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>just like you're there's no damage from the actual meat.

1:04:10.720 --> 1:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just stuff that you're ingesting that accompanies it. Yeah,

1:04:16.920 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a fair way to say that. I haven't.

1:04:20.360 --> 1:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I have a question that kind of relates back also

1:04:22.560 --> 1:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to you know, idea of great raised veal. But okay,

1:04:26.640 --> 1:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>so let's look at human beings. So somebody who doesn't

1:04:31.360 --> 1:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>do any exercise whatsoever and just kind of sits around,

1:04:35.640 --> 1:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and then someone who lifts weights all the time and

1:04:38.520 --> 1:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>has stronger, bigger muscle. So if we look at the

1:04:43.000 --> 1:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a cannibalism question their PhD next week after

1:04:52.080 --> 1:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the turtle guy, I wanna human meat guy. I'm glad

1:04:56.000 --> 1:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you're asking a question because I was wondering the same thing,

1:04:59.320 --> 1:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>like which people tastes better? Yeah, totally, if you haven't

1:05:03.000 --> 1:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>died of fruit loops, if you have salad um. So

1:05:07.200 --> 1:05:11.959
<v Speaker 1>if we look at the equivalent of that in in animals, uh,

1:05:12.000 --> 1:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>an animal that maybe doesn't move around a lot compared

1:05:16.200 --> 1:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to same same animal, same species, but that moves around

1:05:22.440 --> 1:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot more or um or I don't know, cats

1:05:28.080 --> 1:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>climbing trees. Yeah, we hear about people talk about why

1:05:30.360 --> 1:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is the chicken in like in rural Mexico, the chicken

1:05:32.760 --> 1:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is so good? Be like, well, it's well exercised, right

1:05:35.520 --> 1:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like like if it if an animal has I don't know,

1:05:39.560 --> 1:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is stronger, has more muscle, is potentially more contracted muscle,

1:05:44.680 --> 1:05:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Like how does that all or is well exercised or not?

1:05:48.400 --> 1:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>How does that have an effect if any on toughness

1:05:52.800 --> 1:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or you can you can still manipulate the meat afterwards

1:05:55.520 --> 1:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and the muscle fiber afterwards to to get it to

1:05:58.760 --> 1:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>be tender good. I'll answer that, but I just want

1:06:03.200 --> 1:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to tease you, guys. I always have a conversation with

1:06:06.560 --> 1:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>my students, and that is that sooner or later when

1:06:09.240 --> 1:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to the public, they become closet scientists, and

1:06:13.840 --> 1:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they don'ts and but the basis of your

1:06:17.840 --> 1:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>question is is actually is twofold number one? Does exercise

1:06:24.600 --> 1:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>make me less tender? And then the other dimension of

1:06:29.160 --> 1:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that is the inactivity means that they're burning up less

1:06:33.680 --> 1:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>energy and if they're consuming the same they're creating more fat.

1:06:38.160 --> 1:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And so that latter part is true. The less exercise,

1:06:42.080 --> 1:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the less movement, the more fat is going to be

1:06:44.720 --> 1:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>produced on the same diet. Right. In terms of exercise

1:06:49.600 --> 1:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>creating tougher connective tissue and the rest of that, those differences,

1:06:54.040 --> 1:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>if they exist, are very subtle and not meaningful. You

1:06:58.280 --> 1:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>would have, uh, are greater difference in um tenderness from

1:07:04.880 --> 1:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>one muscle to another than you would from one animal

1:07:08.920 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to another because of exercise. Okay, so pretty much, you know,

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>given given more or less exercise among people in the office,

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we may all taste about the same. Yeah, presuming you're

1:07:20.320 --> 1:07:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the same age, right, Yeah, yeah, in a real quick,

1:07:25.480 --> 1:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>simple way, what's the difference between the dark meat? You know,

1:07:28.520 --> 1:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>with poultry, what's the difference between the dark meat and

1:07:32.680 --> 1:07:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the white meat? Uh, it's it's that amount of myoglobin

1:07:37.000 --> 1:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that's present. So, um, not all muscle cells are the same.

1:07:41.920 --> 1:07:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Some have more myoglobin than the other. So the dark

1:07:44.960 --> 1:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>meat just has more of that myoglobin and biologically typically

1:07:48.960 --> 1:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>has a little bit more lipid, a little bit more

1:07:51.360 --> 1:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>fat in there as well. Neither one is very fat,

1:07:54.120 --> 1:07:56.479
<v Speaker 1>but there might be another percentage or to a fat

1:07:56.520 --> 1:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in there. Mostly the color difference is just because there's

1:07:59.320 --> 1:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>more of that oxygen binding pigment in the meat. Can

1:08:04.120 --> 1:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you explain the function of glands that you find when

1:08:07.200 --> 1:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you're butchering something and our glands as prominent in domestic

1:08:11.400 --> 1:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>animals as they are wild ones? Well, yes, Spencer's not

1:08:15.320 --> 1:08:18.479
<v Speaker 1>like you produce more glands from being domestic. Well, I

1:08:18.479 --> 1:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm thinking about like with a white tailed deer,

1:08:23.600 --> 1:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>like they use their glands to mark territory and things

1:08:27.200 --> 1:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>like that. The more active gland. Yeah, well I'll buy that,

1:08:31.240 --> 1:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>because you smell a fox and you smell your dog

1:08:33.439 --> 1:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>named close to the same thing. There. He's right. So

1:08:39.520 --> 1:08:42.479
<v Speaker 1>in this case, you're talking about scent glands, and we

1:08:42.560 --> 1:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>really don't have scent glands and domestic animals to deal

1:08:45.400 --> 1:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>with too much where Yes, But if you're talking about

1:08:50.240 --> 1:08:54.799
<v Speaker 1>lymph glands, those lymph nodes, lamp glands, they exist in

1:08:55.000 --> 1:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>all of the animals. They're probably a little bit more visible,

1:08:59.560 --> 1:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>easy to see in a leaner animal, and so you

1:09:03.680 --> 1:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>probably see those more often in game. And what is

1:09:06.640 --> 1:09:11.599
<v Speaker 1>the function of those, Well, that's a that's an immune function.

1:09:11.720 --> 1:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>That's how the animal sustains hell when you get when

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you get a cold, you have an immune response that

1:09:18.120 --> 1:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>helps you fight against it. So there's a whole system

1:09:20.880 --> 1:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in the body called the lymph system that moves that

1:09:24.200 --> 1:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>fluid around to help fight UH disease and injury and

1:09:28.280 --> 1:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the rest of that kind of thing. So when you

1:09:30.360 --> 1:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>sprain your ankle, it swells up. That's that's lymph fluid

1:09:34.720 --> 1:09:37.639
<v Speaker 1>pooling in your ankle. As a result, you know, there's

1:09:37.640 --> 1:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a little gland. It's always hiding out in the back

1:09:40.040 --> 1:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>leg of a deer, and you actually gotta take it

1:09:41.680 --> 1:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>apart to get that thing out. Let's say you do

1:09:44.760 --> 1:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you forget or don't or you never knew about it,

1:09:46.800 --> 1:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and just you must have been eating him your whole life. Um,

1:09:49.960 --> 1:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is that necessarily bad for you? I don't. I wouldn't

1:09:54.080 --> 1:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>be too concerned about a health concern. I suspect it

1:09:57.120 --> 1:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>probably has a quality effect on taste and play r

1:10:00.160 --> 1:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of thing. That same guy that told

1:10:02.400 --> 1:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>me the great Turkey story about shipping into Minneapolis and barrels,

1:10:06.439 --> 1:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>he had a little custom slaughter plant and I was

1:10:08.800 --> 1:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>down there with him one time and we were picking

1:10:10.720 --> 1:10:17.719
<v Speaker 1>out uh sweetbreads. The Thamus gland. Correct, right, we're picking

1:10:17.720 --> 1:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>out sweetbreads and he was. We were. He was slaughtered

1:10:21.080 --> 1:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of young cattle and the guy that he

1:10:24.920 --> 1:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>was slaughtering for didn't want them. So he had me

1:10:27.280 --> 1:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>down because he said, you can get all you want

1:10:28.720 --> 1:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>if you want to come down. And so he was

1:10:30.000 --> 1:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>showing me how to separate the skin and prepare them,

1:10:33.520 --> 1:10:36.599
<v Speaker 1>and he was saying that that. I said, well, why

1:10:36.600 --> 1:10:38.519
<v Speaker 1>are they not good on the older animals? And he

1:10:38.560 --> 1:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>said that it turns waxy. Is this something you had

1:10:44.479 --> 1:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>any exposure to? Well, I have had uh sweetbreads, and

1:10:49.960 --> 1:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that on the grill in particular,

1:10:53.400 --> 1:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>they can be quite delicious. They're there, it's They're incredible. Yeah,

1:10:57.760 --> 1:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it's uh. And it makes sense to me that as

1:11:01.080 --> 1:11:06.479
<v Speaker 1>the animal gets older that possibly the saturation of the

1:11:06.520 --> 1:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>lipids might change. I don't really know, but I think

1:11:10.280 --> 1:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably less waxy and more um dance, harder fat

1:11:15.960 --> 1:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that's present within that area. But that's a little bit

1:11:19.280 --> 1:11:21.599
<v Speaker 1>of guess on my part. Yeah, I've never met I've

1:11:21.600 --> 1:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>always thought to experiment with this, but never have. As

1:11:24.360 --> 1:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>if on a yearling deer um to find that sweetbread

1:11:31.160 --> 1:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and prepare it and see if it's any good. And

1:11:34.000 --> 1:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure someone listening has done this, but I've never

1:11:35.960 --> 1:11:39.759
<v Speaker 1>heard of people doing sweetbreads on anything but cattle. Well, lamb,

1:11:39.760 --> 1:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I think people do lamb sweetbreads. Now, they're they're a

1:11:42.920 --> 1:11:44.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit hard to find. You gotta know what you're

1:11:44.640 --> 1:11:47.879
<v Speaker 1>looking for. They're not very big, particularly in game animals,

1:11:47.880 --> 1:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>so I think that would be a bigger challenge. Why

1:11:51.520 --> 1:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is beef tallow good and venison tale bad. Well, I've

1:11:57.040 --> 1:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>never had venison talos so, but it has to do

1:12:01.160 --> 1:12:04.599
<v Speaker 1>with I would expect it's a difference in what fatty

1:12:04.640 --> 1:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>acids are made up of the tissue, right and so um,

1:12:09.200 --> 1:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>If you think about something like a chicken or pork fat,

1:12:12.960 --> 1:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty soft. When you go to the beef carcass,

1:12:16.520 --> 1:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot more firm, and so it's more saturated

1:12:21.040 --> 1:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in the beef animal. Incidentally, it depends on where on

1:12:25.280 --> 1:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the carcass you get. The fat in the brisket area

1:12:29.640 --> 1:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is softer than fat that's over the loin and the

1:12:33.000 --> 1:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that's around the kidney is harder than everything. And

1:12:37.200 --> 1:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>so there are differences within the animal as well. But

1:12:41.080 --> 1:12:44.719
<v Speaker 1>if you have a if you have an unsaturated fat,

1:12:44.880 --> 1:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a soft fat like pork, like poultry. I would expect,

1:12:49.880 --> 1:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>like game um, that fat will oxidize more quickly. It's

1:12:56.320 --> 1:13:00.599
<v Speaker 1>biologically disposed to do so it interacts with sygen from

1:13:00.600 --> 1:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the air. Oxidized lipids are described by US as rancid,

1:13:06.280 --> 1:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and so there could very well be a flavor difference

1:13:09.000 --> 1:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>there as well. Oh no, I think you're getting I

1:13:10.880 --> 1:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think you're you're onto it. I'll tell you some of

1:13:14.400 --> 1:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the weird act when we talk about dear tallow like,

1:13:16.880 --> 1:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you some of the attributes that we find

1:13:21.000 --> 1:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that differ from the attributes of bee fat. It is

1:13:28.160 --> 1:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the most fat you find is over the realmp, so

1:13:31.200 --> 1:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like alongside like on on top of the romp,

1:13:34.800 --> 1:13:37.439
<v Speaker 1>alongside either side of the spine, you'll find these big

1:13:37.520 --> 1:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>flat cakes of fat. It's it's firm right like you

1:13:41.920 --> 1:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>could you could cut into squares. It's kind of flaky,

1:13:46.200 --> 1:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>like when when it flakes, you can sort of when

1:13:47.920 --> 1:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it when it's cold or whatever, you can kind of

1:13:49.320 --> 1:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>flake it away and hold it in your fingers and

1:13:51.760 --> 1:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't melt between your fingers at all when you

1:13:55.360 --> 1:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>eat it. It's like if you take a sip, like

1:13:59.000 --> 1:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>if you were eating then some rib and then you

1:14:01.600 --> 1:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>had a sip of ice water. That fat will set

1:14:06.360 --> 1:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>up and solidify all over on the inside of your mouth, um,

1:14:10.880 --> 1:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and to the point where you have to almost manually

1:14:13.840 --> 1:14:16.519
<v Speaker 1>scrape it off the inside of your mouth. And finally

1:14:17.360 --> 1:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it is good. It's okay fresh, but it rots in

1:14:23.360 --> 1:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>your freezer. Yeah, and you pull it out later and

1:14:27.200 --> 1:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it's changed man like like six venice deer fat in

1:14:31.120 --> 1:14:34.679
<v Speaker 1>your freezer for six months comes out way different than

1:14:34.680 --> 1:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>when it went in, but the meat is not changed. Yeah,

1:14:39.880 --> 1:14:43.519
<v Speaker 1>it's that. I'm sure that's that concentration of fats and

1:14:43.720 --> 1:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>oxidation that takes place. Oxidation happens in your freezer as well.

1:14:47.840 --> 1:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's entirely consistent with what I would expect. You

1:14:52.120 --> 1:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>know what's weird. You know what really goes bad in

1:14:53.840 --> 1:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the freezer is bear fat. I don't know why. You

1:14:57.000 --> 1:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>can render it into like really nice lard, but it

1:15:00.920 --> 1:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>goes bad unrendered. Just the straight fat will rot in

1:15:05.040 --> 1:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>your freezer. I don't know if pork fat does, but

1:15:08.840 --> 1:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I uh, pork fat well, probably at a little bit

1:15:11.720 --> 1:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of a slower rate. Um. But you know, this is

1:15:14.680 --> 1:15:16.759
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where we could talk just briefly

1:15:16.800 --> 1:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>about packaging, right, A lot of times we we wrap

1:15:21.240 --> 1:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it up in and that's sort of that waxy coated

1:15:24.840 --> 1:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>or plastic coated butcher paper which doesn't get it doesn't

1:15:30.200 --> 1:15:34.439
<v Speaker 1>get the air out right, whereas um, if you seal

1:15:34.479 --> 1:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it inside a vacuum bag, a plastic bag and vacuum

1:15:38.080 --> 1:15:41.519
<v Speaker 1>seal that, which is how things are done commercially, you've

1:15:41.560 --> 1:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>gotten rid of almost all the air that's there, and

1:15:44.680 --> 1:15:48.679
<v Speaker 1>that will extend the either the shelf life when it's

1:15:48.720 --> 1:15:52.479
<v Speaker 1>fresh or the shelf life in the freezer as well,

1:15:52.560 --> 1:15:57.479
<v Speaker 1>because it minimizes that oxidation process. Go ahead, Spencer, So

1:15:58.560 --> 1:16:01.639
<v Speaker 1>are you replicating that when you freeze something in water?

1:16:01.680 --> 1:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>It's very common among fishermen to take a bag of

1:16:06.360 --> 1:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>filets and fill it with water and then throw that

1:16:08.640 --> 1:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in your freezer because it doesn't allow any air to

1:16:10.720 --> 1:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>come in contact with the meat. Is that doing the

1:16:12.439 --> 1:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing, That's the same principle. I would argue you

1:16:16.200 --> 1:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>probably still get some air through there, but it would

1:16:19.240 --> 1:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly reduce the problem. You know, we used to in

1:16:22.880 --> 1:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the old days, we would just wrap red meat in

1:16:28.680 --> 1:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>wax freezer paper, which created all kinds of problem, Like

1:16:32.920 --> 1:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you just get freezer burned corners, you know right now,

1:16:37.920 --> 1:16:40.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll do one or two things where I typically will

1:16:40.520 --> 1:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>wrap it in plastic wrap like saran wrap in order

1:16:44.880 --> 1:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to get all as much of the air out as

1:16:46.280 --> 1:16:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I can, and then put it in the wax freezer paper,

1:16:49.560 --> 1:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>which I think is protective, like protects it the integrity

1:16:53.760 --> 1:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the plastic wrap underneath when people are like jam

1:16:55.920 --> 1:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, shuffling around in the freezer. And also it

1:16:59.400 --> 1:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>decreases light or eliminates light from penetrating in um. Do

1:17:05.640 --> 1:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you feel that that system is like a good system

1:17:09.240 --> 1:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>for home use. Sure, it's not quite as effective as

1:17:13.800 --> 1:17:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the vacuum packaging we're talking about, But the secret is, uh,

1:17:18.600 --> 1:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you use the magic words surand. Like everything else, not

1:17:22.520 --> 1:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>all plastic wrap is created equal Suran. Suran is an

1:17:27.280 --> 1:17:31.719
<v Speaker 1>oxygen barrier. And in fact, those those vacuum package bags

1:17:31.720 --> 1:17:35.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about their layered and the center layer is

1:17:35.720 --> 1:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a surand type product to prevent oxygen from penetrating. Oh,

1:17:40.400 --> 1:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there are some plastic wrap that

1:17:43.400 --> 1:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>will let air through and we'll let oxygen through and

1:17:47.880 --> 1:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>water through, and so it depends on which which plastic

1:17:52.000 --> 1:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>wrap you're using. How do you know that you're getting

1:17:54.439 --> 1:17:59.519
<v Speaker 1>the right kind um. You know, the the easiest way

1:17:59.760 --> 1:18:03.559
<v Speaker 1>is to uh if it's if it's not necessarily a

1:18:03.560 --> 1:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>brand endorsement, but Saran is a brand name for the

1:18:07.240 --> 1:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>oxygen barrier film. UM. Oh, I see the other thing

1:18:11.479 --> 1:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you can do UM. For example, if you make like

1:18:15.360 --> 1:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if you take avocados and chop them up and you

1:18:18.200 --> 1:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>cover them with plastic wrap. Some of that plastic wrap

1:18:21.439 --> 1:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it will turn brown very very quickly, and others it

1:18:24.960 --> 1:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>will not. And so that's an indication of oxygen permeability

1:18:29.479 --> 1:18:32.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. Kind of an in home science test, if

1:18:32.120 --> 1:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you will. When you saw out a piece of frozen

1:18:45.160 --> 1:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>meat like a backstrap and there's all that liquid in

1:18:48.000 --> 1:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the plate, what is that just water? That's water and

1:18:52.479 --> 1:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>myl globe. There are a few other proteins that are

1:18:55.400 --> 1:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>in their water soluble enzymes. That kind of thing. It

1:18:58.840 --> 1:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't comprom eyes the nutritional quality of the product at all,

1:19:03.479 --> 1:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>but there's no reason to hold onto it. You know.

1:19:06.080 --> 1:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>The big thing I remind people is um, the rami

1:19:10.840 --> 1:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>might be on that plate once you get it cook,

1:19:12.920 --> 1:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>make sure you use a clean plate. So would it

1:19:15.720 --> 1:19:19.519
<v Speaker 1>be a bad practice then to freeze something thought out

1:19:20.240 --> 1:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>refreeze it again, and then thought out again, are you

1:19:22.920 --> 1:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>creating a worse product? Yes, what happens there? Okay, go on.

1:19:28.840 --> 1:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>You're driving moisture from the product. And usually when you

1:19:32.560 --> 1:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>thought out, you're exposing it to oxygen, so you're getting

1:19:35.200 --> 1:19:38.719
<v Speaker 1>more oxidation as well. So both of those things would

1:19:38.760 --> 1:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>be uh negative in terms of eating experience, but not

1:19:43.640 --> 1:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a huge negative. Yeah, I mean you can refreez me. Yeah,

1:19:49.120 --> 1:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I do. I like I've long been. I always have

1:19:52.000 --> 1:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>people tell me you can't do that. You can't do that, Well,

1:19:55.240 --> 1:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>then I should be dead or dead because we did

1:19:58.800 --> 1:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>all the time, like well thaw big bags. So if

1:20:02.720 --> 1:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>we but let's say you bone a deer like a

1:20:04.439 --> 1:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>deer shoulder out. Um, we bone the deer shoulder out,

1:20:08.439 --> 1:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have time for whatever reason, just because

1:20:10.400 --> 1:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of life, and you put all the meat into a

1:20:12.720 --> 1:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>gallon size zip blog bag, squeeze the air out, put

1:20:16.880 --> 1:20:19.559
<v Speaker 1>in your freezer for whatever a month and then you

1:20:19.600 --> 1:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>finally get time. You're gonna make some sausage, pull it

1:20:23.439 --> 1:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>back out, thought, make sausage or burger whatever, repackage it,

1:20:29.760 --> 1:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it goes back into the freezer. Now I

1:20:34.040 --> 1:20:37.519
<v Speaker 1>like sure, like something must be lost. But I would

1:20:37.680 --> 1:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>if I PEPSI challenged you on it, I don't think

1:20:40.080 --> 1:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you'd be able to pick it out for the most part,

1:20:44.040 --> 1:20:47.360
<v Speaker 1>those little differences, particularly if you're going from a whole

1:20:47.400 --> 1:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>product to a to a ground product. Uh, I think

1:20:50.800 --> 1:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you're safe by doing that. You know, you want to

1:20:53.320 --> 1:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>think a little bit about thawing if you're if you're

1:20:56.160 --> 1:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys who throws it on the kitchen

1:20:58.200 --> 1:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>counter and lets it thaw for the rest of the day,

1:21:00.840 --> 1:21:04.479
<v Speaker 1>if there's any bacteria in there that's not particularly food

1:21:04.520 --> 1:21:09.519
<v Speaker 1>safety practices we'd want to encourage. I'd say, put it

1:21:09.520 --> 1:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in the fridge, let it get partially thought, cut off

1:21:13.080 --> 1:21:15.559
<v Speaker 1>what you need, and then refreeze the rest so that

1:21:15.600 --> 1:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know that you haven't gotten in a temperature zone

1:21:18.400 --> 1:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>where lots of extra spoilage bacteria take place. But the

1:21:21.920 --> 1:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>practice that you've talked about people take, People do that

1:21:24.920 --> 1:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>all the time. You're absolutely right, And I think I

1:21:27.760 --> 1:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was trying to point out that it's a matter of

1:21:30.120 --> 1:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>degrees of of of differences, and it's not a binary

1:21:34.800 --> 1:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>yes no, do don't live by kind of decision on

1:21:38.360 --> 1:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that thing. Chris, what is the science say about marinating me?

1:21:42.920 --> 1:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Can you get a liquid to penetrate like a roast

1:21:47.600 --> 1:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and change the flavor of it. Yeah, So there's two

1:21:52.880 --> 1:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>reasons to marinate. One is to change flavor and one

1:21:57.160 --> 1:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is to tenderize the meat. And so if you're going

1:22:00.280 --> 1:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to change flavor, then pretty much whatever flavor you like,

1:22:04.600 --> 1:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you can marinate the meat for an hour or two.

1:22:07.120 --> 1:22:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You'll get a nice surface coating and uh, and it

1:22:10.439 --> 1:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>will alter the taste of the product and you're cooking,

1:22:14.320 --> 1:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's easy. You can do that with We

1:22:16.760 --> 1:22:19.479
<v Speaker 1>do similar things with dry rubs, right where you just

1:22:19.800 --> 1:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>rub the spices on the outside and so forth. Um.

1:22:23.240 --> 1:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But most of the time when we think and meat

1:22:25.080 --> 1:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>science about marinating, we're thinking about how are you making

1:22:28.320 --> 1:22:31.519
<v Speaker 1>that meat more tender. The secret goes back to that

1:22:31.560 --> 1:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>connective tissue, that silvery tissue on the outside that goes

1:22:35.520 --> 1:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>throughout the whole muscle. You can think of that connective

1:22:38.920 --> 1:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>tissue like a fish net or like a harness, so

1:22:42.439 --> 1:22:46.719
<v Speaker 1>that when the individual cell contracts, that connective tissue moves

1:22:46.800 --> 1:22:49.559
<v Speaker 1>with it, and that's how we get movement of the

1:22:49.600 --> 1:22:52.519
<v Speaker 1>whole body or the whole arm as a result of

1:22:52.600 --> 1:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>contraction in the live animal. So when you marinate, you

1:22:56.240 --> 1:23:01.519
<v Speaker 1>want to tenderize that connective tissue. That works best if

1:23:01.600 --> 1:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you have an acid based marinate, so a wine or

1:23:05.880 --> 1:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a vinegar, or a citric kind of a base, even

1:23:09.120 --> 1:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a soy sauce. Those kinds of marinades will enhance the

1:23:13.960 --> 1:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>tenderness of the product. The secret, as you just pointed out,

1:23:18.120 --> 1:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is how deep and how far does that really penetrate

1:23:21.280 --> 1:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>into the muscle. And I tell you it doesn't go

1:23:24.040 --> 1:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that far. Right, you can you can marinate for eight

1:23:26.840 --> 1:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>hours and only be an eighth or a quarter of

1:23:29.880 --> 1:23:32.559
<v Speaker 1>an inch into the tissue. So it's best if you

1:23:32.680 --> 1:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>marinate thinner, smaller pieces. Uh, if you want to get

1:23:36.760 --> 1:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>real sophisticated, you can. You can get a syringe and

1:23:40.280 --> 1:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you can actually inject some of that marinate into a

1:23:43.120 --> 1:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>larger a larger piece of meat, and that will work

1:23:46.200 --> 1:23:49.559
<v Speaker 1>as well. Um. The last thing on marinades I would

1:23:49.560 --> 1:23:54.719
<v Speaker 1>mention is that there are some um, some fruits that

1:23:54.800 --> 1:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have enzymes in them that tender eyed meat. And so

1:23:59.200 --> 1:24:06.559
<v Speaker 1>for example, kiwi fruit or raw pineapple, even papaya and figs,

1:24:07.160 --> 1:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>all of those have enzymes that will attack the meat.

1:24:10.400 --> 1:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Now if it's canned pineapple, well by canning, you've inactivated

1:24:14.560 --> 1:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the enzyme. It doesn't work anymore as a fresh product.

1:24:19.240 --> 1:24:22.719
<v Speaker 1>If you add that to the to the to the dish,

1:24:22.840 --> 1:24:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you can tenderize meat in that way. You know, you

1:24:25.439 --> 1:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>might give me an answer here that I don't believe,

1:24:27.880 --> 1:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and Noah's wrong. But can you increase moisture by marinating

1:24:33.960 --> 1:24:37.599
<v Speaker 1>or brining? This is a hot debate in the culinary world.

1:24:38.720 --> 1:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure whether you would increase for marinating. You

1:24:43.240 --> 1:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>might be able to get a little bit more moisture

1:24:45.240 --> 1:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in there, but you know you're trying to get water

1:24:48.400 --> 1:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>to move from to a place that's already moisture. So

1:24:53.920 --> 1:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't think you get very much of an effect

1:24:57.320 --> 1:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>just by marinating to enhance moisture. If you're brining, look,

1:25:01.960 --> 1:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>salt drives out meat, right, That's how we used to

1:25:04.800 --> 1:25:07.839
<v Speaker 1>preserve meat years and years ago. It's packet and salt,

1:25:08.320 --> 1:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and so salt tends to draw moisture out of the product. Now,

1:25:12.320 --> 1:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>if you mix up a salt solution and you injected

1:25:14.760 --> 1:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in the meat, okay, you've added more moisture there. But

1:25:18.040 --> 1:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're just putting a piece of meat into a brine,

1:25:21.760 --> 1:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the the you're getting a reverse effect. You're getting moisture

1:25:25.439 --> 1:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>pulled out. But don't they like don't they sell you

1:25:29.760 --> 1:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>know how? Sometimes Uh, you can get a turkey and

1:25:32.640 --> 1:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it actually has an ingredients list because they've they've they

1:25:36.960 --> 1:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>injected with us A brine, yes, and and that's like

1:25:41.000 --> 1:25:43.599
<v Speaker 1>specifically to make it moist right, But that's just you're

1:25:43.640 --> 1:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>just like physically sticking water there. Yes, but you're you're

1:25:47.479 --> 1:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>also adding salt, which is a great flavor potentiator, right.

1:25:52.520 --> 1:25:56.519
<v Speaker 1>It enhances flavor. And so if you give somebody a

1:25:56.520 --> 1:25:59.640
<v Speaker 1>piece of meat with salt and without salt most of

1:25:59.640 --> 1:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the time, and they'll tell you the one with salt

1:26:01.320 --> 1:26:06.599
<v Speaker 1>taste better, is more tender, more juicy, more flavorful. Plus

1:26:06.640 --> 1:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>there are other ingredients that go into that that turkey

1:26:11.080 --> 1:26:14.439
<v Speaker 1>that would help the moistures stay in the meat instead

1:26:14.479 --> 1:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of just run out. So it's a it's I think

1:26:17.840 --> 1:26:20.599
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with the difference in terminology here and what

1:26:20.640 --> 1:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you're really doing and how it's getting done. What if

1:26:23.400 --> 1:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you like pulverize kiwi and pineapple and you put some

1:26:29.160 --> 1:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>meat in a bowl of that, so there's no sodium,

1:26:32.600 --> 1:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>so you're not having water come out of it, but

1:26:34.920 --> 1:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you're having it in an enzyme bath of liquid. You

1:26:40.680 --> 1:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I tell you that I have cooked meat with on

1:26:44.520 --> 1:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a skillet with kiwi. Before that I could eat with

1:26:48.800 --> 1:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a spoon. Maybe that's it wasn't very good because because

1:26:56.880 --> 1:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it was much, it was much by aging. Um it

1:27:03.640 --> 1:27:09.519
<v Speaker 1>must be real like dry aging is beneficial. It us

1:27:09.560 --> 1:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>with some dues and don't well so. Um, when you

1:27:14.680 --> 1:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>are aging, you are allowing the enzymes that are naturally

1:27:19.080 --> 1:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>present within the meat to break down the protein that

1:27:22.400 --> 1:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>enhances tenderness. So if you you could age in one

1:27:26.680 --> 1:27:30.599
<v Speaker 1>of those vacuum bags where almost no moisture comes out,

1:27:31.200 --> 1:27:35.360
<v Speaker 1>or you can age in air. If you're aging in air,

1:27:35.479 --> 1:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>we call it dry aging. If you're aging in one

1:27:38.439 --> 1:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of those vacuum packages, we call it wet aging. And

1:27:42.400 --> 1:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>in both cases the tenderization process is the same. And

1:27:47.400 --> 1:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>as I said earlier, you'll get the great benefit and

1:27:50.640 --> 1:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the first week or so or two, and then after

1:27:54.040 --> 1:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that the benefits of aging are reduced. You don't see,

1:27:58.800 --> 1:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you've already tender eye it to a large extent, to

1:28:02.320 --> 1:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the to the most that it will occur. It will

1:28:05.000 --> 1:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to improve, but not very much. Um so from

1:28:09.800 --> 1:28:14.519
<v Speaker 1>an aging standpoint. For tenderness. It's enzymes do the work.

1:28:15.320 --> 1:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>When we dry age, We're putting meat, typically on a rack,

1:28:21.040 --> 1:28:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and we leave it set for a period of time.

1:28:24.520 --> 1:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And what happens is the moisture on the surface of

1:28:28.320 --> 1:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that evaporates fairly quickly. In fact, over three or four days, Uh,

1:28:34.960 --> 1:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>you will you can get a very nice dry crust

1:28:37.760 --> 1:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>on the outside of that meat. The longer you store

1:28:41.400 --> 1:28:47.479
<v Speaker 1>after that, you will still lose moisture. And um. Two

1:28:47.520 --> 1:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>things happened during that aging period from a taste standpoint,

1:28:52.080 --> 1:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>One is you're concentrating the flavors because you're removing water

1:28:56.720 --> 1:29:00.479
<v Speaker 1>and everything else stays behind. But the other thing is

1:29:00.479 --> 1:29:05.479
<v Speaker 1>is you're actually creating flavors. Proteins get broken down into

1:29:05.520 --> 1:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>amino acids, and some amino acids are like the ingredients

1:29:10.120 --> 1:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in MSG. There there their flavor potentiators as well enhancers. Uh.

1:29:16.840 --> 1:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>You get some oxidation flavors that go on as you

1:29:21.040 --> 1:29:24.479
<v Speaker 1>dry age as well. So the taste of a dry

1:29:24.520 --> 1:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>age piece of meat is profoundly different than the taste

1:29:28.240 --> 1:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of a wet aged piece of meat. So I think, uh,

1:29:33.040 --> 1:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of other things, if someone says I'm

1:29:36.240 --> 1:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>going to dry age, they need to understand why they're

1:29:39.880 --> 1:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>dry aging, what they're going to accomplish when they do that. Now,

1:29:43.840 --> 1:29:47.679
<v Speaker 1>when you dry age, you lose the weight I mentioned

1:29:47.680 --> 1:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>before cent or more. But then you've also got this

1:29:51.880 --> 1:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>hard crust on the outside that you've got to trim

1:29:54.439 --> 1:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>off and throw away. Do you guys ever call that

1:29:56.479 --> 1:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the rind? Yeah? That it's so you're talking about maybe

1:30:01.400 --> 1:30:05.479
<v Speaker 1>another fiftent. So you're probably gonna lose of the weight

1:30:05.520 --> 1:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of that muscle when you dry age. You know. A

1:30:10.720 --> 1:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>guy once served me a piece of ad dad. It

1:30:14.400 --> 1:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>was like he had an odd dad shoulder that he

1:30:16.840 --> 1:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>had aged for eighteen months, And once you got through

1:30:22.320 --> 1:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>all the dried out stuff, there was a strip of

1:30:24.720 --> 1:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>meat inside there. There was about the size of a

1:30:27.680 --> 1:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>cigar and it tastes like blue cheese. I mean, it

1:30:33.400 --> 1:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was the cheesiest, strongest, most potent thing. Um. He was

1:30:38.160 --> 1:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>just kind of experiment with how long can you how

1:30:40.920 --> 1:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>long can you go? But that felt like a real

1:30:42.760 --> 1:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Petrie dish, you know, but no ill effect. We ate

1:30:46.080 --> 1:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it raw. My goodness, your ban is mold always a

1:30:53.880 --> 1:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>bad sign when you're dry aging something. No, um, but

1:31:00.040 --> 1:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it makes me nervous. Some mold can be toxic, particularly

1:31:05.439 --> 1:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the black molds. There is a gray mold that tends

1:31:09.439 --> 1:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to come on, and some dry aging experts will say

1:31:14.120 --> 1:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that that enhances or alters the flavor. Incidentally, they've done

1:31:18.960 --> 1:31:22.639
<v Speaker 1>some testing on some molds and one of them is

1:31:22.760 --> 1:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>associated with blue cheese. It's the same kind of mold

1:31:26.880 --> 1:31:30.519
<v Speaker 1>that can take place. But I would emphasize you don't

1:31:30.600 --> 1:31:33.679
<v Speaker 1>have to have mold to have a very good dry

1:31:33.720 --> 1:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>age product. In fact, I sort of feel like if

1:31:36.840 --> 1:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got mold, to me, that's an indication that maybe

1:31:40.280 --> 1:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the most sanitary cleaning system set up

1:31:44.680 --> 1:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>before you started to dry edge in the first place.

1:31:47.240 --> 1:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a big fan of mold, but I'll tell

1:31:50.040 --> 1:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you there are some scientists who say it does accentuate

1:31:53.760 --> 1:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and add a little bit to the flavor as well.

1:31:56.240 --> 1:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>A friend of mine who is a chef, he always

1:31:58.120 --> 1:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>advised me that the only mold that there's him is

1:32:00.600 --> 1:32:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the black fuzzy kind, So that that's that's true, not

1:32:05.520 --> 1:32:08.759
<v Speaker 1>the only one with that black fuzzy is bad. That's correct.

1:32:10.360 --> 1:32:14.639
<v Speaker 1>What about aging temperature, I always hear uh Butcher stress

1:32:14.720 --> 1:32:18.759
<v Speaker 1>that you shouldn't let the ambient temperature get below freezing

1:32:18.880 --> 1:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>because it slows down the aging process, so you're not

1:32:22.120 --> 1:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>accomplishing what you're trying to do. What is like the

1:32:25.360 --> 1:32:30.559
<v Speaker 1>ideal temperature for aging meat. Yeah, that's exactly right. If

1:32:30.600 --> 1:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it's frozen water, it's not gonna move right very easily,

1:32:34.560 --> 1:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and so you want to be above freezing. I would

1:32:37.479 --> 1:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>say thirty four or thirty five degrees or somewhere in

1:32:40.320 --> 1:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that ballpark would be about right. If you get much

1:32:43.120 --> 1:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>higher than that, then you start to get bacterial growth

1:32:47.120 --> 1:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of that. What's it what's the real

1:32:49.200 --> 1:32:54.519
<v Speaker 1>danger zone? Well, anything over forty for certain would be

1:32:54.720 --> 1:33:00.559
<v Speaker 1>too high. Um, but but if you're gonna aren't for

1:33:01.200 --> 1:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a week or two, I would I would shoot for

1:33:05.400 --> 1:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the mid thirties frankly, for that very reason. If you

1:33:10.120 --> 1:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have here's the secret. If it starts to get slimy,

1:33:14.520 --> 1:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that's bacterial growth. And if it's dry then um, and

1:33:21.240 --> 1:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not slimy, then you have less bacterial growth. It's

1:33:25.240 --> 1:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>not zero, but you have much less spoilage bacteria growing.

1:33:29.320 --> 1:33:32.439
<v Speaker 1>If it's not slimy, then if it is, you know,

1:33:32.520 --> 1:33:37.759
<v Speaker 1>there are certain little tricks that people try where um,

1:33:37.840 --> 1:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>they'll say, like out in the field, you can rub

1:33:42.439 --> 1:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>black pepper all over a quarter to help preserve it.

1:33:46.720 --> 1:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Or do people make these little packages. It's some kind

1:33:51.000 --> 1:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of I don't know what. It's, some kind of acid

1:33:53.200 --> 1:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>or something. It looks like a little drink package and

1:33:56.240 --> 1:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you mix that in the water bottle and shake it up.

1:33:58.840 --> 1:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I've messed and stuff and isn't happy with the results

1:34:01.120 --> 1:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>because it kind of look like if you put lime

1:34:03.360 --> 1:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>juice all over meat. But anyways, they shake it up

1:34:06.200 --> 1:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and you bathe a quarter meat and that stuff and

1:34:09.920 --> 1:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to inhibit inhibit bacterial growth or any do

1:34:15.200 --> 1:34:17.639
<v Speaker 1>you think do you would you have faith in any

1:34:17.640 --> 1:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of these methods as actually accomplishing anything. I'm not too

1:34:22.160 --> 1:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>enthusiastic about pepper from a preservative standpoint, but I will

1:34:26.920 --> 1:34:32.679
<v Speaker 1>tell you that in fact, light organic acid will reduce

1:34:32.720 --> 1:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>bacteria on the surface. In fact that that's commercially done

1:34:36.800 --> 1:34:40.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. A light mist usually a lactic acid or

1:34:40.960 --> 1:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a citric acid for example, could work as well. Tends

1:34:44.280 --> 1:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to reduce spoilia bacteria and um. I know that sometimes

1:34:49.200 --> 1:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the surface of the meat will get that lime juice

1:34:52.200 --> 1:34:54.559
<v Speaker 1>appearance you're talking about, where it kind of looks washed

1:34:54.560 --> 1:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>out and the most of that, but that's only surface.

1:34:59.040 --> 1:35:01.559
<v Speaker 1>By the time you hook it, you won't even know

1:35:01.640 --> 1:35:04.479
<v Speaker 1>that that acid was there. You know, I realized I

1:35:04.520 --> 1:35:06.559
<v Speaker 1>misspoke and I didn't, and I caught it when you

1:35:06.560 --> 1:35:09.559
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it is when we did this, you were right.

1:35:09.600 --> 1:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>It was in the spray bottle. Yeah, it was. It

1:35:12.640 --> 1:35:14.679
<v Speaker 1>was a product that you mix in a spray bottle.

1:35:14.960 --> 1:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And and it's funny because what turned me off was

1:35:18.120 --> 1:35:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that lime juicy look. But I didn't think about the

1:35:21.720 --> 1:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that that was very surface level. Yeah that's pretty

1:35:26.040 --> 1:35:28.519
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty thin layer. But that's really all you need.

1:35:28.760 --> 1:35:32.280
<v Speaker 1>The bigger challenge for me is you could do that,

1:35:33.040 --> 1:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>but now you've got a carcass that's low in bacteria load,

1:35:39.960 --> 1:35:42.479
<v Speaker 1>what do you do with it? Right If you're gonna

1:35:42.520 --> 1:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>go lay it in the bed of a pickup and

1:35:44.160 --> 1:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>drive it home, you sort of kind of worked against

1:35:47.840 --> 1:35:51.679
<v Speaker 1>yourself right now. Maybe a better way would be take

1:35:51.720 --> 1:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it home and hang it and then spray right once

1:35:56.160 --> 1:36:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you're done transporting it. Once you're done with transport, i'llternatively,

1:36:01.000 --> 1:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>alternatively go ahead and get the animal, but leave the

1:36:05.200 --> 1:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>hide on and don't take the hide off till you

1:36:07.479 --> 1:36:10.280
<v Speaker 1>get home. Then when you take the hide off, you

1:36:10.280 --> 1:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>can spray it and be ready to go. I realized that, uh,

1:36:14.640 --> 1:36:17.280
<v Speaker 1>an animal that's gone into rigor mortis is harder to skin,

1:36:17.360 --> 1:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>of course, so there's the downside of that. Oh yeah,

1:36:20.840 --> 1:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>man is getting nice when they're brand new. Yeah, you

1:36:23.840 --> 1:36:26.840
<v Speaker 1>bet um, Chris, what do you mind talking a bit

1:36:26.920 --> 1:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>about some of the research that you've been doing and

1:36:31.160 --> 1:36:33.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the work you've been doing recently in any

1:36:33.760 --> 1:36:38.439
<v Speaker 1>new discoveries there. So yeah, there's two, probably three or

1:36:38.479 --> 1:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>four things I can talk about here. I'll do this briefly,

1:36:41.160 --> 1:36:43.599
<v Speaker 1>and if you have questions, we can go deeper. We

1:36:43.800 --> 1:36:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have built in our laboratory twelve dry aging chambers that

1:36:49.920 --> 1:36:54.720
<v Speaker 1>are um the most tightly controlled dry aging chambers in

1:36:54.760 --> 1:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the world. We can control relative humidity, we can control airspeed,

1:37:00.600 --> 1:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we can control level of oxygen. We can measure the

1:37:05.040 --> 1:37:11.320
<v Speaker 1>weight of the meat once a second for six weeks

1:37:11.360 --> 1:37:13.720
<v Speaker 1>if we want to do that, and of course it's

1:37:13.760 --> 1:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in a cooler where we can control temperature. There's a

1:37:17.160 --> 1:37:21.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of lore about dry age, a lot of art,

1:37:22.120 --> 1:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>if you will, but we're trying to push science forward,

1:37:26.400 --> 1:37:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and so we've learned a lot about how moisture moves

1:37:29.760 --> 1:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>out of that meat, a lot of people think, for example,

1:37:33.200 --> 1:37:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that rind or that crust prevents moisture loss. It does not.

1:37:39.160 --> 1:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>We're learning a lot of different things about dry agent

1:37:43.000 --> 1:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that has not been seen before, and we continue to

1:37:46.560 --> 1:37:49.920
<v Speaker 1>do that kind of work. We also have some work

1:37:49.960 --> 1:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we just finished up, uh that if you if you

1:37:53.800 --> 1:37:57.800
<v Speaker 1>think about these meal kit services, um, you get a

1:37:58.000 --> 1:38:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you get a package of meeting there and must time

1:38:00.280 --> 1:38:04.519
<v Speaker 1>that package meat is brown. It's not very attractive in color.

1:38:04.960 --> 1:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And so we did a whole project on how do

1:38:08.080 --> 1:38:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you maintain bright red color in frozen meat? And so

1:38:12.920 --> 1:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there's some tricks you can do if you understand the

1:38:15.080 --> 1:38:20.559
<v Speaker 1>biology to do that. We have uh, A lot of

1:38:20.640 --> 1:38:25.240
<v Speaker 1>people feed different kinds of feed to animals, and we

1:38:25.320 --> 1:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>are where this is really deep biochemistry. But we're looking

1:38:28.760 --> 1:38:32.639
<v Speaker 1>at the chemistry now of what happens during that rigor

1:38:32.680 --> 1:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>mortis process and right after that that tenderizes meat. So

1:38:37.280 --> 1:38:40.240
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the enzymes and how that whole process

1:38:40.320 --> 1:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>gets controlled. And then lastly, UM, we did a project

1:38:45.200 --> 1:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>here um it's been a number of years now where

1:38:48.800 --> 1:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we went through and characterized with a group of scientists,

1:38:52.720 --> 1:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>not just me. We characterize a lot of different muscles

1:38:56.600 --> 1:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>in the beef carcass. Out of that, the flat iron

1:39:00.880 --> 1:39:04.599
<v Speaker 1>steak was identified. There were a number of other cuts

1:39:04.640 --> 1:39:07.280
<v Speaker 1>as well, but that's probably the one that's most well known.

1:39:07.720 --> 1:39:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And so when when we do research in my laboratory,

1:39:11.640 --> 1:39:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm a quality oriented scientists in meats, and so

1:39:16.920 --> 1:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at meat quality from the standpoint of of

1:39:20.560 --> 1:39:24.240
<v Speaker 1>what makes that product taste better, what, what gives it

1:39:24.320 --> 1:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>better flavor, what makes it more tender, what makes it

1:39:28.439 --> 1:39:32.360
<v Speaker 1>longer shelf life, what gives us the right color, what

1:39:32.479 --> 1:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>gives us the optimal use of that animal? And we

1:39:36.120 --> 1:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>talked before about respecting the products that we get, and um,

1:39:41.479 --> 1:39:46.519
<v Speaker 1>I get frustrated when we use the wrong muscle for

1:39:46.600 --> 1:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the wrong recipe because you are either undervaluing one or

1:39:51.760 --> 1:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>overvaluing the other one. And so trying to make sure

1:39:55.400 --> 1:39:57.839
<v Speaker 1>that we use the right part in the right place,

1:39:57.920 --> 1:40:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in the right way. And and to me, that is

1:40:01.840 --> 1:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a win win win. It's a win for the people

1:40:04.240 --> 1:40:07.320
<v Speaker 1>who produce the animals, it's a it's a win for

1:40:07.360 --> 1:40:10.559
<v Speaker 1>the people that are marketing those products, and best of all,

1:40:10.600 --> 1:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a win for those people who are consuming those products.

1:40:14.880 --> 1:40:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I think the same thing about your listeners quite Honestly,

1:40:19.120 --> 1:40:22.439
<v Speaker 1>they've They've gone to expense, they've gone to energy, they've

1:40:22.479 --> 1:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>gone to effort to go out and get them an animal.

1:40:26.240 --> 1:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And part of it is the experience which we all enjoy,

1:40:29.280 --> 1:40:31.439
<v Speaker 1>hiking and being outside and all the rest of that.

1:40:31.960 --> 1:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>But I would love for them to end up with

1:40:34.439 --> 1:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the highest quality product they can so that the ultimate

1:40:38.280 --> 1:40:41.240
<v Speaker 1>end of the experience is a very satisfying one as well.

1:40:41.640 --> 1:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, Chris, you I don't think we talked about this.

1:40:43.960 --> 1:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>What school are you at? University? I'm at the University

1:40:47.600 --> 1:40:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of Nebraska in the Animal science department. Okay, so I

1:40:50.800 --> 1:40:54.800
<v Speaker 1>know you guys got snapper turtles there. Now, when you

1:40:54.960 --> 1:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>steer you talk about different muscle groups, right, like different

1:40:58.160 --> 1:41:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the qualities of different muscles. When you dear one of

1:41:00.880 --> 1:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>your graduate students you have graduate students, yes, okay, when

1:41:04.160 --> 1:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you steer one of them into snapping turtle work, I

1:41:09.040 --> 1:41:12.240
<v Speaker 1>want you to remind them that it is lower amongst

1:41:12.280 --> 1:41:15.479
<v Speaker 1>snapping turtle people that there are is it five or seven?

1:41:15.800 --> 1:41:22.320
<v Speaker 1>There are there are seven distinct meats inside of a

1:41:22.320 --> 1:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>snapping turtle. So since it's low all low hanging fruit

1:41:27.000 --> 1:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and snapping turtle meat research, that might be a good

1:41:29.880 --> 1:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>dissertation would be like you'll have to think of how

1:41:33.920 --> 1:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to how you have to think of a good title

1:41:35.720 --> 1:41:39.519
<v Speaker 1>for the dissertation, but it would be something like, um uh,

1:41:39.560 --> 1:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>testing the qualitative. Yeah, they're out of the seven kinds

1:41:44.360 --> 1:41:47.559
<v Speaker 1>of snapping turtle meat. Well, I first of all, I

1:41:47.640 --> 1:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have to locate the Snapping Turtle Meat Foundation. They have

1:41:54.080 --> 1:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>deep pockets, Chris, don't worry, Spencer and I will start

1:41:58.240 --> 1:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that organization now and do some fundraising so we can

1:42:01.920 --> 1:42:04.519
<v Speaker 1>fund the research. I've never known what they mean by

1:42:04.560 --> 1:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the seven times. I don't like pork, chicken, beef, things

1:42:08.439 --> 1:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>like that. But there's there's well to their credit, to

1:42:11.160 --> 1:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>their credit, to the to the to the it looks

1:42:15.479 --> 1:42:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like I'm talking just looking at it, like you know

1:42:17.920 --> 1:42:20.479
<v Speaker 1>the backstraps that run down the inside of a turtle,

1:42:20.520 --> 1:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>inside that little honeycomb bone, very very white, very string.

1:42:25.120 --> 1:42:27.519
<v Speaker 1>You can tear it apart by hand. Then like their

1:42:27.600 --> 1:42:32.600
<v Speaker 1>legs have some intensely dark meat. The neck is visually

1:42:32.760 --> 1:42:35.599
<v Speaker 1>very different. There's something there. Chris, as student will find

1:42:35.640 --> 1:42:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it and you'll report back to us, and then Chris

1:42:39.280 --> 1:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>probably do some dry aging on turtle studies. You know,

1:42:44.080 --> 1:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm also tell you this story that I was contacted

1:42:47.520 --> 1:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a number of years ago by scientists who is working

1:42:51.040 --> 1:42:55.559
<v Speaker 1>in Latin America, and he was looking at, uh, what

1:42:55.600 --> 1:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>was the motivation for hunters. They would go out hunt

1:43:00.040 --> 1:43:03.720
<v Speaker 1>saying bush meat, and they would go out hunting monkeys,

1:43:04.320 --> 1:43:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and they would walk by holler monkeys and they would

1:43:08.360 --> 1:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>hike for a week in order to get spider monkeys,

1:43:11.880 --> 1:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and and he was trying to figure out how much

1:43:15.360 --> 1:43:19.519
<v Speaker 1>energy it took them to go harvest one type over another,

1:43:19.760 --> 1:43:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and he couldn't figure out what was the difference in

1:43:23.200 --> 1:43:27.599
<v Speaker 1>these two animals. Well, it turns out spider monkeys eat

1:43:27.680 --> 1:43:31.679
<v Speaker 1>fruit and holler monkeys eat a lot of tree bark

1:43:32.080 --> 1:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>rich in tannins. And we actually came very close to

1:43:38.240 --> 1:43:42.400
<v Speaker 1>having a research project on monkey meat taste because I'm

1:43:42.439 --> 1:43:46.880
<v Speaker 1>convinced those holler monkeys had very bitter flavored meat and

1:43:46.920 --> 1:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the spider monkeys was going to be, you know, much

1:43:50.120 --> 1:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>more desirable meat products. However, like everything else, the funding

1:43:55.040 --> 1:43:57.360
<v Speaker 1>fell through for that project and we didn't get to

1:43:57.400 --> 1:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>do it. But that's too bad. I was with I

1:43:59.760 --> 1:44:06.360
<v Speaker 1>was with the Chimana and we went monkey hunting. They

1:44:06.720 --> 1:44:11.040
<v Speaker 1>their favorite is the spider monkey. Second favorite was red howler.

1:44:12.240 --> 1:44:14.240
<v Speaker 1>We got a red howler and ate it. But then

1:44:14.320 --> 1:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the way they cook things that really everything winds up

1:44:17.680 --> 1:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>being very similar because they'll dry it, you know that

1:44:21.120 --> 1:44:22.920
<v Speaker 1>they like smoke it, then boil it, and they do

1:44:22.960 --> 1:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of processes to it that really change it.

1:44:25.320 --> 1:44:28.760
<v Speaker 1>There were other monkeys that I thought when we encountered them,

1:44:28.800 --> 1:44:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought, man, his monkeys in trouble, but they're very

1:44:31.960 --> 1:44:38.360
<v Speaker 1>dismissive of it. And then we encountered a possum after

1:44:38.400 --> 1:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they got a red Howler, and I thought, man, this like,

1:44:41.240 --> 1:44:43.479
<v Speaker 1>no one wants to see monkeys. There are people that

1:44:43.520 --> 1:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>at least like possums. This possum is doomed. And they

1:44:47.080 --> 1:44:49.880
<v Speaker 1>were very dismissive of anyone that would ever go near

1:44:49.880 --> 1:44:53.519
<v Speaker 1>a possum and stroll down past it. It would be

1:44:54.160 --> 1:44:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a real rich area of inquiry for someone to look

1:44:57.040 --> 1:45:02.960
<v Speaker 1>into the qualitative nature of how it's viewed, uh, what

1:45:03.040 --> 1:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>tastes good, and how culturally subjective that is well. I

1:45:08.240 --> 1:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>one time I spent some time with the chupic Askimos.

1:45:14.000 --> 1:45:18.439
<v Speaker 1>They like tougher meat when butchering an animal, like this

1:45:18.560 --> 1:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>part is good, it's very chewy. This part is not good.

1:45:22.960 --> 1:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>It's very tender. They especially like the tendon that supports

1:45:27.960 --> 1:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the head that comes off the spine. That's good because

1:45:32.120 --> 1:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that's nice and chewy and um. They'd be fascinated to understand,

1:45:36.640 --> 1:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like how much of this stuff is culturally overlaid and

1:45:40.080 --> 1:45:43.400
<v Speaker 1>if there really is any sort of human you know,

1:45:43.920 --> 1:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>any sort of objective reality about what tastes good. That's

1:45:49.960 --> 1:45:53.599
<v Speaker 1>a great questions that there are cultures in the world

1:45:53.680 --> 1:45:57.639
<v Speaker 1>that that favor the less tender product, there are also

1:45:57.760 --> 1:46:01.959
<v Speaker 1>cultures in the world that favor the stronger, more intense

1:46:02.040 --> 1:46:07.240
<v Speaker 1>flavors that come from pasture raised beef or wild game

1:46:07.320 --> 1:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>for example. Uh. And interesting on our monkey meat conversation,

1:46:12.840 --> 1:46:15.439
<v Speaker 1>you touched on I think a really critical point, and

1:46:15.640 --> 1:46:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that was not only would they kind of dismiss the monkeys,

1:46:21.960 --> 1:46:27.519
<v Speaker 1>but if some hunter actually shot one, then that person

1:46:27.840 --> 1:46:33.360
<v Speaker 1>was widely disparaged as well. Yeah, so there was a

1:46:33.760 --> 1:46:37.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely a social aspect to it to go on top

1:46:37.360 --> 1:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of everything else. As you mentioned, Krin, let's close out

1:46:43.000 --> 1:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>with the future. Okay, this is Chris Crins. This this

1:46:47.880 --> 1:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>is Cris been Diana talk about this well. Okay, so

1:46:52.200 --> 1:46:57.799
<v Speaker 1>we've done some blind taste testing around here with fake

1:46:57.920 --> 1:47:04.519
<v Speaker 1>meat and I think overwhelmingly as soon as you have

1:47:04.640 --> 1:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a bite of the impostor meat. I mean, it's just

1:47:09.080 --> 1:47:14.839
<v Speaker 1>so obvious taste, texture, smell, everything that would go into

1:47:15.240 --> 1:47:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, one's experience of eating something, it's just so

1:47:18.520 --> 1:47:23.439
<v Speaker 1>clearly not any kind of meat. So how much meat

1:47:23.600 --> 1:47:29.360
<v Speaker 1>science goes into the development of these products? And from

1:47:29.400 --> 1:47:35.839
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, how possible is it on a cellular level

1:47:35.880 --> 1:47:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to really create uh, animal flesh out of nothing that

1:47:44.640 --> 1:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is animal material? How much time do we have? Well, uh,

1:47:52.720 --> 1:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all, most there have been food scientists who

1:47:56.240 --> 1:48:01.000
<v Speaker 1>have contributed to those products. Not too many meat scientists,

1:48:01.000 --> 1:48:06.479
<v Speaker 1>but there are too bad. But you know, within that

1:48:07.000 --> 1:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>if you we started our conversation talking about Warner Bratchler

1:48:11.200 --> 1:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>shear an objective measure of tenderness. If you look at

1:48:15.120 --> 1:48:18.599
<v Speaker 1>the muscles and a beef carcass, there is more than

1:48:18.640 --> 1:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a twofold difference in sure force from one muscle to

1:48:21.960 --> 1:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the other. So even within an animal, there's a wide

1:48:26.080 --> 1:48:30.400
<v Speaker 1>range of tenderness and texture. I tend to agree with

1:48:30.439 --> 1:48:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you every one of those non meat products that we've

1:48:34.920 --> 1:48:42.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about, UM, has not met my standard for what

1:48:42.439 --> 1:48:46.599
<v Speaker 1>I care to eat. I like to say sort of

1:48:46.600 --> 1:48:50.679
<v Speaker 1>tongue in cheek. Um. Everybody is entitled to their own

1:48:50.720 --> 1:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>stupid opinion, right, And as a as a food industry,

1:48:56.200 --> 1:48:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't object to offering a variety of products, even

1:49:00.080 --> 1:49:05.720
<v Speaker 1>if I myself don't care for this. But mostly the

1:49:05.800 --> 1:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>comments I've just made are relevant regarding plant based substitutes

1:49:10.840 --> 1:49:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for meat. There is some effort going on to use

1:49:16.280 --> 1:49:21.240
<v Speaker 1>cells and grow cells to create a meat product like

1:49:21.360 --> 1:49:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. But just as we have a twofold

1:49:24.840 --> 1:49:32.040
<v Speaker 1>difference in tenderness within the body itself, uh in tenderness um,

1:49:32.200 --> 1:49:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the structures and cellular architecture it takes to build those muscles,

1:49:38.360 --> 1:49:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they are very very far away from being able to

1:49:42.120 --> 1:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>mimic a meat like structure in in my judgment, and

1:49:46.120 --> 1:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so certainly as a meat scientist, I don't feel threatened

1:49:50.240 --> 1:49:54.800
<v Speaker 1>by those products. Mostly I am. I guess I'm a

1:49:54.840 --> 1:49:59.639
<v Speaker 1>little disappointed and frustrated by the marketing claims that are

1:49:59.720 --> 1:50:04.439
<v Speaker 1>made regarding those kinds of products. Time and again people

1:50:04.520 --> 1:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about, oh, these products are They're healthier for the environment,

1:50:09.520 --> 1:50:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they're greener. But the reality is when you do a

1:50:13.240 --> 1:50:19.360
<v Speaker 1>full life cycle analysis, uh, live animal production is a

1:50:19.680 --> 1:50:25.320
<v Speaker 1>very efficient way to convert plants to meet and uh.

1:50:25.400 --> 1:50:29.519
<v Speaker 1>In Nebraska, we've been a state for over one hundred

1:50:29.560 --> 1:50:33.439
<v Speaker 1>and fifty years, we have we have farms in the

1:50:33.479 --> 1:50:38.479
<v Speaker 1>state that have been in families for more than seven generations.

1:50:39.439 --> 1:50:45.679
<v Speaker 1>You can't possibly produce animals for seven generations if it's

1:50:45.720 --> 1:50:49.600
<v Speaker 1>not done in a sustainable way. And so I my

1:50:49.760 --> 1:50:53.880
<v Speaker 1>frustration with the product line is more along the disparagement

1:50:54.479 --> 1:51:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of what takes place with agricultural production and frame clee.

1:51:00.280 --> 1:51:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit deceiving in a lot

1:51:02.280 --> 1:51:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of ways compared to what we have, whether it's game

1:51:07.000 --> 1:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>animals or whether it's commercially raised animals. Those animals are

1:51:11.439 --> 1:51:16.040
<v Speaker 1>out there grazing pasture, they're they're eating grain, and they

1:51:16.080 --> 1:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have the opportunity to give us this wonderful, desirable eating

1:51:21.040 --> 1:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>experience if we all respect and take care and manage

1:51:24.200 --> 1:51:28.559
<v Speaker 1>those animals appropriately. That's, frankly, that's what my whole career

1:51:28.600 --> 1:51:32.760
<v Speaker 1>has been about, is managing the product. Chris, thanks for

1:51:32.840 --> 1:51:36.719
<v Speaker 1>coming on. It's it's truly been a pleasure. I honestly

1:51:36.800 --> 1:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciate so much the chance to talk about this. As

1:51:40.920 --> 1:51:44.479
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier, we have a lot of misconceptions going

1:51:44.520 --> 1:51:48.400
<v Speaker 1>on out there and Uh, it's uh, it's enjoyable for

1:51:48.439 --> 1:51:51.280
<v Speaker 1>me to to kind of explain and educate a little bit.

1:51:51.360 --> 1:51:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So well, I'm gonna warn you that I'm probably gonna

1:51:54.240 --> 1:51:59.519
<v Speaker 1>steal traffic and misconceptions because it's such a it's such

1:51:59.520 --> 1:52:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a big out of our lives to speculate about why

1:52:01.960 --> 1:52:07.200
<v Speaker 1>things taste good and bad. But we'll build up, we'll

1:52:07.240 --> 1:52:09.559
<v Speaker 1>build up another list of things we've heard from people,

1:52:09.600 --> 1:52:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and we'll come back and check with you. That'd be great.

1:52:12.040 --> 1:52:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd be happy to do it. Thank you, Thank you

1:52:14.400 --> 1:52:14.760
<v Speaker 1>very much.