WEBVTT - Intel Vs. Nvidia and Paramount's Annual Meeting

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 2>From Mahart where Innovation, money and power.

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Lovelove.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde a Bloomberg's World Headquarters in New York,

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 3>and I'm Ed Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Coming up the competition for AI chip dominance. It heats

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 3>up as Intel takes aimin in video details to come.

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 5>Thus we'll bring you the latest updates from Paramount's annual

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 5>meeting which kicked off this morning.

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 6>And Tesla shars.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 3>They drop on reports that Elo Musk has shifted thousands

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 3>of AI chips to Xai over the vehicle maker. First,

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>let's check out on the broader market context and look

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 3>jobs market cooling, those jolts numbers.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 6>Really putting pressure on. Certainly the stock market for the.

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Bond market is currently seeing money move in at the

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 3>moment yields go lower. Some three basis points is maybe

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 3>we see space for the Federal Reserve to be able

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 3>to cut later into the year. Now, remember we've got

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the all important jobs data on Friday as well to

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 3>digest interesting that even though we've got money going into

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the one market, we're not seeing that optimism around technology

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 3>stocks right now. We're off by some three tens percent.

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 3>We're digging into the individual names that are perhaps dragging

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 3>us a little bit lower. But look, we've been seeing

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>all time highs hit time and time again. Maybe a

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 3>bit of profit taking currently being digested. We're looking at, though,

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 3>a macro picture that goes global for a moment. This

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 3>is a political story, complete upending of what many had

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 3>anticipated happening in the Indian election, and for now the

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 3>euroupee is down versus the US dollars significantly on what

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 3>has been a shot coming from a political stage where

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Mody does not seem to be having the majority that

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 3>was anticipated.

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 6>More on that throughout the show.

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's move on to happen in the world of crypt

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 3>so a little bit more risk on sentiment coming from bitcoin.

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 3>At the moment, we're up eight ten percent, nine tens percent,

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 3>let's call it. At one point ed we eclipsed to

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 3>seventy thousand dollars. Handle this as we see perhaps more

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 3>money moving into some of the ETF products and well

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe some of that meme frenzy from yesterday helped some

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 3>of the tailwinds.

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 6>But what are you seeing on the micro Let's go back.

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 4>To that Tesla story for a minute.

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 5>The NBC reporting that Elon Musk directed in video to

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 5>divert twelve thousand, h one hundreds or AI chips that

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 5>had been destined for Tesla to his other companies X

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 5>and XAI. Tesla shares now basically flat, they've been lower.

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 5>I think everyone's trying to make sense of what that

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 5>means for the kind of Tesla pledge to achieve full

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 5>self driving, because that is principally what the AI accelerators

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 5>are being used for in the Tesla case. We'll get

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 5>more on that later in the hour. Back to our

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 5>top story, which is the battle ground and the market

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 5>for AI accelerators. Intel in a video about both now

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 5>sort of modestly lower. Intel had been higher. Pat Gelsinger

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 5>on age at Computex a lot of headlines coming out

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 5>of Computex. Here is what Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger had

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 5>to say about that market for AI chips.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 7>Every device will become an AI device, every company will

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 7>become an AI company, and we see this as the

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 7>fuel that's driving the semiconductor industry to reach a trillion

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 7>dollars by the end of the decade.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 5>The other thing that he said, blue berg Z and

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 5>King is that Moore's law is very much alive, a

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 5>reference to the white paper in nineteen sixty five by

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.279
<v Speaker 5>one of Intel's co founders that the number of transistors

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 5>on an integrated circuit will double every year without sort

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 5>of adding costs to the production process. But what he

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 5>was really doing was pushing back against Jensen Huang of

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 5>Nvidia and saying we're going to catch up.

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 4>We're going to do this.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, he's arguing his case, right, He's saying, look,

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 8>we can still do it. He's trying to make the

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 8>case that Intel is still relevant and can have a

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 8>central role in what's going on and can capture some

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 8>of this massive amount of spending. But at the moment,

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 8>all of that money is going to Innvidia. Over one

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 8>hundred billion dollars of revenue projected for that data center

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 8>unit this year. Intel's data center unit is going sideways

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 8>at best, and I.

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 6>Think what they have to compete on.

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, we're hearing yet once again, annual upgrades to the

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 3>offerings of semiconductors in but it's the full package that

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 3>you get with in Nvidia, even if it is expensive.

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean what Jensen has already decided is, look, hey,

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 8>I've got more about four big customers, the big hyperscalers.

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 8>But guess what I really need to broaden that audience.

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 8>So he's networking, as you mentioned, full servers, basically supercomputers,

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 8>and he's put everything together already so that pretty much

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 8>anybody can adopt it. So anybody that's trying to crash

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 8>his party, like Pat Gelsinger, like Lisa Seuer, AMD has

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 8>to come to the table with everything, including the software,

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 8>and that's a massive amount of effort it required. They've

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 8>got the resources, but he's got the lead.

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 3>He does, and at the moment it feels as though

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 3>everyone else is slightly snapping around his heels. Where is ultimately,

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 3>for now all the value attributed to data centers? Can

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 3>any of it be sort of thought to be being

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 3>brought this one trillion dollar market that Pat Gilsinger talks of,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 3>how much is that going to be allocated to PC?

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 8>Well that was the show. The sort of sideline of

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 8>the show is, hey, look will of the accelerators, guess

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 8>what your PC is going to get? Cool again. It's

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 8>going to get interesting again. We had Qualcomm Christian i'mon there.

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 8>We had Lisa Sue of A and D talking about it.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 8>So they're all talking about revitalizing this thing that we

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 8>all carry around and all use all day at the moment.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 8>You know, I saw some demos yesterday. They were okay.

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 8>You know, I think we need to see a lot

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 8>more on the software side before we can get fully

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 8>excited about this being a new dawn for a product

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 8>we've seen for a long time.

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 5>I get all of the stories, particularly in Intel's case,

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 5>Pat has been saying I will return Intel to a

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 5>position of technology leadership, and the problem is is that

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 5>presently revenues and sales don't match that story. So Intel

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 5>basically five hundred million this year for AI accelerators, AMD

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 5>four billion, which is slightly better than they previously forecast,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 5>and Nvidia let's just call it forty billion, And that's

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 5>the state of play.

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, the number is probably close to one

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 8>hundred at this point. If you look at the estimates,

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 8>it's absolutely enormous. But yeah, back to Pat exactly what

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 8>you say, which is he's got all of these audiences,

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 8>he has to serve. He has his internal audience. He

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 8>has to motivate his engineers, he has to get his

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 8>customers excited about what he's going to offer. But at

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 8>the same time, if he promises too much and makes

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 8>too bullish an attitude, investors are going to get excited

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 8>and think, oh, hey, we're going to see a big

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 8>upside on earnings, and he can't deliver that at the moment.

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 3>So Ian King breaking down, what is the ongoing fight

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>amid Ai semi conductors?

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 6>Brilliant have you taking on Taiwan?

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's move over and think what this means for market

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 3>capitalizations the fight that goes on there. Ibec Oscodeshkaya is

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 3>with US senior market analyst over at Swiss code Ebec.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 3>It's great to have you back on the show, and

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 3>there has been a tussle at the top. Market valuations

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 3>just keep on being allocated to Nvidia.

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 6>Is that the right step?

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 9>I think that Nvidia is making the headlines and they're

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 9>doing a great job. Not only that they are making

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 9>huge progress on their numbers. They do make enormous forecasts

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 9>and they beat them by very comfortable margins quarter after quarter,

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 9>but they come very regularly with new updates, with new promises,

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 9>with a new idea of, for example, creating an ecosystem

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 9>offering hardware, software and services.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 6>So they are making the.

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 9>AI a full environment where everybody could be interested and

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 9>everybody will find their well what they're looking for. So

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 9>in the sense, Nvidia looks like it's still except ahead

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 9>of the other competitors. And in terms of P ratio,

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 9>what we see is that even though the prices are

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 9>going higher, well the PI ratio is not going that

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 9>high because well, the earnings actually do follow up.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Epec.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 5>Let me show you this chart, and it's a busy one,

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 5>so I'll explain what it is that we're looking at.

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 5>If you think about it, Big Picture Video is just

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 5>a few percentage points away from exceeding Apple's market cap,

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 5>from having a market cap greater than Canada's equity market,

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 5>and ten percent or so would take it beyond Microsoft

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 5>to be the world's most valuable company. Is that justified

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:38.319
<v Speaker 5>to your mind?

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 9>Well, I can'tually tell you this is justified.

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 6>But today with the AI.

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 9>Revolution and media has been cut uppoted to that place

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 9>of the leader of this market, and the leader is

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 9>in a revolution. So this is not something that happens

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 9>every year. This is once in a decade or once

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 9>in a few decade thing. If AI is the next

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 9>thing after Internet, that Nvidia has get a huge opportunity,

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 9>a huge potential to increase as business. And now we

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 9>are reading the reports and NVDA is not selling chips.

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 9>It is now selling an environment and selling a dream,

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 9>and it is actually selling us in new lives, a

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 9>new way of doing things. And now we are just

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 9>at the beginning and people know that the opportunities are

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 9>simply huge. So yes, as Apple has become one of

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 9>the world's most valuable companies because while they just got

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 9>this iPhone in our hands, well, MVDA could very well

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 9>become the next big thing while putting AI in our

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 9>devices and make our lives completely different from what it

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 9>was before.

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I really like that you've referenced Apple there, ultimately, because

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 3>the market capitalizations are.

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 6>Buying each with each other.

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 3>But in our tech news daily, there's a great thought

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 3>leadership piece there ultimately that Apple did this previously.

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 6>It won out by having a sort.

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Of closed wall ecosystem, whereas Google went to say, hey,

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 3>everyone can play in our garden. Whereas seeing that sort

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 3>of playing out within video versus the likes of well,

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 3>of course the other competitors that we've had for whether

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 3>it be Intel working with all the other particular players

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 3>out that EPEC.

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 6>I'm interested in.

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 3>Not just the analogy between Apple, what's happening in China.

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 3>I know you've had some thought leadership there from your

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 3>own and whether if you can invest in Chinese AI

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 3>they might went out too well.

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 9>Actually, we think that Chinese technology and AI related companies

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 9>are intriguing because we know that in this context of

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 9>technology war, Chinese government is putting a lot of weight

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 9>behind US technology and AI companies, and China does have

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 9>this pool of very big technology companies that have been

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 9>once very popular that still is in China, and that

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 9>have a proven track record and app that are right

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 9>now treating at extremely low valuations compared to the US peers.

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean we are talking about.

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 9>Peer ratio for around ten to twenty for the big

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 9>Chinese technolology sucks, compared to six to six for MBDIA

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 9>at one hundreds for i AMD for example. So in this

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 9>context they are cheap and interesting. Now, one risk is

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 9>the geopolitical and political risk. I'm going to put that aside.

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 9>But one other risk right now is the fact that

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 9>these technology companies in China are in a fierce competition

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 9>against each other, and they are mostly focused on expanding

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 9>their market share rather than maximizing their profits. This is

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 9>something that keeps investors a little bit relaxing regarding the

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 9>Chinese technology sucks. But this is temporary because ultimately one

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 9>or a few of these technologies sucks are going to

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 9>be the winners of this AI revolution in China, and

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 9>that day, as an investor, well, you want to be

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 9>in that elevator.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 5>We started this program with Pat Gelsinger's belief that Moore's

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 5>law is intact that they will regain a foothold in

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 5>the market. Is the addressable market big enough to have AMD,

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 5>Intel and all offering into the same thing.

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think the market is huge.

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 6>The opportunities are huge.

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 9>But what's going to matter is not only how fast

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 9>and how efficient the chips are, but it's also how

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 9>well the service and the ecosystem and the environment that

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 9>these companies are going to offer. And it looks like

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 9>Nvidia has well, I have a very good understanding of

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 9>this three hundred and sixty degree offering. So it's not

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 9>going to be about chips only, but it's going to

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 9>be about who is going to offer the best service

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 9>to like the most of the companies on the face

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 9>of the start not only is the big technology companies,

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 9>but to companies across mock sectors.

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 6>So I think that in.

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 9>This sense, yes, there's demand for a lot of chips

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 9>because the AI revolution is happening and we.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 6>Are all concerned with it.

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 9>But the real winners are then going to be not

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 9>the best ones in terms of their products, but also

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 9>the ones that are going to be offering all the

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 9>environment and the universe with it.

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 5>You paid cost Code SKay, a senior market analyst over

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 5>at Swiss Quote, thank you very much. Now coming up

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 5>on the program paramounts and your meeting is underway. We're

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 5>going to bring you those details next, Cary, what are

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 5>you looking at?

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Just go back to chips for a moment, because we've

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 3>had on the show before ed Core, we've CEO. Look,

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 3>that's it's a private company cloud computing provider ultimately trying

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 3>to win out and offering data center capacity for AI.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 6>They're making a deal.

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 3>They're going to spend about a billion dollars to acquire

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 3>a bitcoin minor call Scientific for four five dollars seventy

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 3>five for shares. You can see we go hire on

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 3>call Scientific today up thirty four percent from New York,

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco.

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 10>This is a Boombog technology.

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Paramount having its annual general meeting today. That's after the

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 3>reporting that keeps coming from Skydance Media's plan we understand

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 3>to offer twenty three dollars a share to investors for

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.599
<v Speaker 3>the latest who want bring Ethan Raganathan of course of

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 3>broome Bag Intelligence.

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 6>And we think.

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 3>About the promises made from these new leaders, three co CEOs,

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 3>interim CEOs. It feels talking about streaming partnerships, cost cutting.

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 6>Any of that. Master if there's potentially a deal on

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 6>the table.

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Not really, Caroline, and you know this, this has really

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 2>been the story of Paramount for so many months now

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 2>because the fundamentals and the fundamentals are pretty weak, those

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 2>have been completely overshadowed by these ongoing M and A talks.

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, sky Dance has now been in this M

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>and A mix for many, many months, I would say

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 2>almost eight nine months. They had almost a thirty day

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 2>exclusive negotiating period which expired in early May. There was

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 2>another offer from Sony which was on the table. I

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 2>think that you know, the speculation that Sony is still interested,

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 2>that's obviously dying. And you know, we still kind of

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 2>have the upgraded sky Dance offer for Paramount, but we

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 2>do require that final sign off from you know, the

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 2>controlling shareholder, Sherry Redstone. Yes, they did have the annual

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 2>shareholder meeting, as you just pointed out, and obviously they

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>outlined a lot of strategic initiatives. Again, as you said,

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think any of it matters right now because

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 2>you still have you know, the potential of this huge

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 2>deal kind of coming through.

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 5>So Githa and you are in research you published this

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 5>morning saying final act in Paramount m and a saga

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 5>as sky Dance poised for takeover dramatic television movie voice.

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Are you sure it's the final act?

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 6>I'm not.

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's why I said it's not over until it's

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 2>actually over, because we've seen this movie now so many

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>times ed with with Paramount, right, sky Dance has been in,

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 2>they've been out. You know, they were prepared to walk

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 2>away from the whole thing, and then of course you

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 2>had Sony and then you have some additional wrinkles now

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 2>because we have you know, Hollywood financier Stephen Paul, who

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 2>was rumored to be offering a three billion dollar steak

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 2>for you know, the National Amusement. So Sherry Redstone's controlling

0:15:57.960 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 2>stake in Paramount.

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 6>So who knows.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 2>There have just been it's just been a whole roller

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 2>coaster with Paramount for the past so many months now,

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 2>so again, very hard to say it. Too many TWI

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>centurns in this drama and with.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Some key players, and ultimately it comes down to Sherry

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Redstone and whether she prioritizes herself or in anyway some

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 3>of the non voting shareholders here, many of them being

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 3>value investors rather than growth investors. I think John Rodgers

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 3>from Aaron Investors, who's joined the show before to talk

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 3>about his frustration that the premium goes to the voting

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 3>holder rather than himself well, rather than long term investors

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 3>in the non voting shares. What do you think needs

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 3>to be articulated for the future of this business? Is

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 3>there a future of streaming for Paramount or broadly?

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean that is a great question, Caroline, and I

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>think that is the question that you know, that's the

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 2>burning question right now. I mean, yes, with the with

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the merger with Skydance, Paramount will still very much remain

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 2>a public company. You know, It's not like the Sony

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 2>deal where the company would just kind of disappear.

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 6>But the question is.

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 2>Does mergers do mergers really do anything?

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 6>Do they mean anything? I mean, we've seen this over

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 6>and over again.

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 2>Even with Viacom, the Viacom CBS combination which resulted in Paramount,

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 2>we've seen a destruction of something like about sixty percent valuation.

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, it was over thirty billion market cap when

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 2>when they kind of recombined in twenty nineteen. Today it's

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.679
<v Speaker 2>close to ten billions. So again, you know, none of

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 2>these mergers have really worked. You look at Warner Brothers

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Discovery again, you know, a fiasco there. You again look

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 2>at Disney Fox. All of these mergers have kind of

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 2>really struggled. And so the question is do mergers really

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 2>solve the fundamental value? I mean, there is so much

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of pressure, secular pressure in the linear TV ecosystem. So

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 2>again that's a question that remains to be answered and

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 2>we'll have to see how that, you know, kind of

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 2>plays out.

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 4>KEITHA.

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 5>Rangenefan and Bloomberg Intelligence really appreciate the analysis.

0:17:51.880 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you time now for talking tech. First up, Christie's

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 3>hackers who stole client data have failed to upload any

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 3>of that information to the dark web now. The hacking

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 3>group known as ransom Hub threatened for over a week

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 3>to release the stolen files on Monday, but there are

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 3>no signs that has occurred. The criminals said Christie's had

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 3>ceased communications after they had attempted to reach a quote

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 3>reasonable resolution seeking on cyber A cyber attack on Change

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Healthcare is putting pressure on Washington Congress and the Biden

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 3>administration are stepping up efforts to better protect highly sensitive data.

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 6>From falling into the wrong hands.

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Up to a third of Americans are said to have

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 3>had their private information exposed from the hack, and it's

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 3>cost United Health up to one point six billion dollars

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 3>in profits this year. And meanwhile, major hospitals in London

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.479
<v Speaker 3>they've been thrown into chaos. According to the BBC, a

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 3>cyber attack on hospital's partnered with pathology services provider so

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Novis caused operations to be canceled, patients to be diverted,

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 3>and deliveries to be rerouted. According to the Health Service Journal,

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 3>the system was victim to a ransom wear attack ed.

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 4>Okay, let's get back to that other big story.

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk, according to reports ordering and let's be honest

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 5>in Muskian style, may have exaggerated its procurement of AI

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 5>chips for use at Tesla in x More, Bloomberg's craggedel

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 5>joins us, this time from Detroit, his spiritual home. Some

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 5>breaking news Musk has taken to x You'll be surprised

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 5>to hear explaining that reports around him directing the shift

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 5>of h one hundreds that were destined from Tesla to x.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 4>Or Xai were for a very.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 5>Logical reason Tesla had nowhere to put them.

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 11>Craig, Yeah, it maybe stands to some reason ed because

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 11>you reported just in the last few weeks that Tesla

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 11>was running behind I'm building data centers. They're standing these

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 11>up in Buffalo and in Austin, Texas, where they have

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 11>their big factory. But this is a case still of,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 11>you know, an indication within Navidia that's they're sort of

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 11>looking askance at some of the things that Musk has

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:15.239
<v Speaker 11>been saying about a really important aspect of you know,

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 11>Tesla's business. This is, after all, sort of where he's

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 11>steering this company is to self driving and AI and

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 11>really trying to play up that aspect of what Tesla's

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 11>working on as the fundamental car business really is struggling

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 11>for the company. So for him to have to address

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 11>a report like this in the midst of you know,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 11>a slowdown and EV demand and this big pivot that's

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 11>he's making toward AI and self driving development, it's not

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 11>particularly reassuring if you're a shareholder.

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Particularly as we look towards June the thirteenth and that

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 3>all important shareholder vote where you a mask seems to

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 3>be threatening that, Look, if you're not going to give

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 3>me my payday, but you promised me several years ago,

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 3>maybe there's more interesting things to be done with AI

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:03.479
<v Speaker 3>at different companies in Tesla.

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, this reinforces that ultimatum that he gave back in

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 11>January that he wanted to essentially take his AI and

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 11>robotics work elsewhere, and we've already seen indications that you know,

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 11>he's he's sort of willing to follow through on that

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 11>threat that you know, if I don't control something like

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 11>twenty five percent of Tesla, I want to work on

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 11>this stuff at some of my other companies and with

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 11>any other CEO you know, that would maybe not necessarily

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 11>be taken seriously, it would potentially be viewed as a

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 11>veiled threat. But this this is after all, someone who

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 11>runs six companies and you know, has been standing up

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 11>an AI company and Xai that is, you know, closely

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 11>tied to x formerly known as Twitter, and does have

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, a significant amount of work that it's trying

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 11>to do with you know, large language models and essentially

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 11>you know, trying to you know, build x up into

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 11>a company that was worth the investment that he and

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 11>some of his fellow stakeholders made in what was formerly Twitter.

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 3>About fully four billion got a few years ago. Craig Trudell,

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much breaking it down. Welcome back to

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Blombow Technology.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 5>I'm Caroline heid in New York and I'm had Lovevote

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 5>in San Francisco.

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 4>A very quick check in on the markets.

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 5>We've got some economic data which has basically reinforced the

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 5>idea that the Federal Reserve will have room to cut

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 5>rates in the United States this year. And that's got

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 5>a lot of people doing the math on their technology

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 5>holdings and valuations. And a's that one hundred tech heavy

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 5>index a little bit softer the Socks or Philadelphia Semiconductor

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 5>Index is more markedly lower, down one point two percent.

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.719
<v Speaker 5>In fact, only one out of the thirty names is

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 5>modestly in the green, and a big part of that

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 5>story is kind of what's going on over in Taiwan

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 5>at Computex. The main names that we're looking at throughout

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 5>the show are Intel and Envid. Actually Intel opened a

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 5>little bit higher in the session. You can see it's

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 5>now lower four tenths of a percent, in Vidia softer

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 5>by half percent, and things are heating up a little

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 5>bit between those names. Listen to Pat Gelsinger speaking overnight.

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 7>We're looking now to have a billion transistors on a

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 7>single ship and even looking to a trillion transistors in

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 7>a single package by.

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 4>The end of the jet of the decade.

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 7>And unlike what Johnson might have you believe Moore's law

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 7>is alive and well.

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 5>Mister Gelsinger calling out his industry friend and rival, mister

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 5>Juang at Computex's mister Wang also the other keynote speaker,

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 5>take a quick look again at Apple. I put that

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 5>in there because earlier in the show we talked about

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 5>this idea that in Vidia, which is lower in Apple

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 5>a little bit modesty lower is just a few percent

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 5>away from overtaking Apple five percent or so. And next

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 5>week's a big week, right, Karen, because we have WWDC

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 5>where we think we're going to get the AI story

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 5>finally from Apple and how it's going to work on

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 5>my iPhone and iOS.

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Goldman Sachs saying, look, reiterating that by yesterday on the

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 3>optimism around WWDC, but has been a real improvement in

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 3>Apple's market capitalization of late. Let's just dig into it

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 3>all with Bloomberg's Jess mentioning Bloomberg Intelligence analysts and rag

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Rana and just I want to go to you first

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the context here, Apple was having a

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 3>pretty horrific twenty twenty four. Now it's broken back to

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 3>basically flat on the year, and there seems to be

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 3>this hope that it can get its AI narrative in gear.

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 6>That's right.

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 12>So we just saw Apple on Monday actually clause even

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 12>for the year after it did hit an all time

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 12>high back in December, so it actually entered a correction

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 12>technically ten percent off of that high back in March.

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 12>But then coming into the second quarter, we have seen

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 12>that stark recover pretty trendously. If you look at it's

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 12>April nineteenth low, it's up about eighteen percent in that span.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 12>In some of the conversations I was having with Olio

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 12>managers coming into the second quarter, because of the big

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 12>run we saw an Nvidia stock in the first quarter,

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 12>and then when you prepare that against Apple relative to

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 12>the S and P five hundred, that was one of

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 12>its worst quarters this century coming out of the dot

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 12>com bus.

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 6>Whether or not there were.

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 12>Going to be positions where people were kind of flipping

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 12>some of the mag seven stocks there.

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 6>So you're starting to see a little bit of that.

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 12>But again, if you look at the top six stocks there,

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 12>if you take out Tesla because of the volatility, you

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 12>still see a record concentration there about thirty percent in

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 12>the S and P five hundred. But you are starting

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 12>to see more optimism in Apple's stock recovering.

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 10>And again a lot of that has to do not

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 10>just because we've.

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 12>Talked a lot about that record buy back historic program

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 12>that they had announced about a month ago, but then

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 12>also some of the easing tensions that you would think

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 12>some of the problems they would have had in China.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Caroline Anna rag Apple ended last week with its third

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 5>successive weekly gain from the Bloomberg Intelligence perspective on Apple,

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.479
<v Speaker 5>how much we just treading water to WWDC and how

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 5>much are you hoping to learn?

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think it is the change in sentiment on

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 13>Apple because of all we have heard about different things

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 13>Mark has reported on what could happen on WWDC, especially

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 13>a potential partnership with open Ai and maybe even Google.

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 4>So I think, I mean, it is.

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 13>A very important event for Apple, probably the most important

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 13>WWDC in a long time, because it really give us

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 13>some direction in which way the phones can grow, either

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 13>in the second half or next year, because so far

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 13>what we have seen and again sentiment aside, the numbers

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 13>have not gone up, you know, in the last two

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 13>years or so, numbers only being going downwards when it

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 13>comes to Apple.

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Just throughout the year.

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:45.479
<v Speaker 5>You've done some fantastic charting of Apple, charticles, chart focused work,

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 5>and we always used to refer to Apple as kind

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 5>of the most important waiting name on the S and

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 5>P five hundred. Now in video is kind of like, oh,

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 5>this is a macro level event. Everyone quick pay attention

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 5>to a video. How has your day to day changed

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 5>to how you cover those two names?

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 12>Well, I still feel, especially when I'm speaking with my sources,

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 12>that they do care about Apple because it's one of

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 12>those names, even though we saw its struggle at the

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 12>start of the year, because again with its buyback programs

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 12>and the funnel metals, and then of course it's cash

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 12>flow behind the company. For longer term portfolio managers, that

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 12>obviously is still going to be a key holding in there.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 12>So it's more of the shorter term expectations there. But

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 12>if you look from a hedge fund perspective Goldman Sachs

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 12>Prime Brokerage Data where they analyze data from hedge funds,

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 12>they actually coming into the second quarter, they started trimming

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 12>their exposure to some of these big technology stocks, but

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 12>they were actually looking at more different types of AI plays,

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 12>like utilities. So we've seen that particular group, especially since

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 12>mid April, really take off and some of that. A

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 12>lot of times people think of it as low volatility

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 12>dived into type paying stocks and more of kind of

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 12>maybe a safe haven, but this seems to be more

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 12>of a play of a peek and rates, but then

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 12>also a little bit of that AI play there. But again,

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 12>if you're looking at Nvidia, I mean, coming into today

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 12>it was only about five percent away from trying to

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 12>catch up to Apple's micros market cap. But then also

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 12>Apple not too far away from three trillion again, so

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 12>if it does cross, that'll be the first time since

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 12>January since it's done so ed and just sticking on.

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 3>The Apple theme, And there was some reporting from other

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 3>outlets such as The Information talking about how maybe we

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 3>could have seen a deal for offering Apple TV plus

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 3>two China of all places, and just just mentioned this

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 3>the perhaps easing of tensions or people trying to understand

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 3>how the China US relationship impacts Apple.

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 6>What are you expected to hear on that in the future, Analog, Yeah.

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 13>So from a China is concerned, I think more than

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 13>these you know, the TV and the other things, I

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 13>think the rebound in iPhones what we heard in the

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 13>last couple of weeks is far more promising and encouraging

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 13>because there has been a big debate whether China is

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 13>a structural problem for Apple or it's a cyclical problem.

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 13>And the latest state of you know indicates at least

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 13>for now that Apple seeing a bounce back and people

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 13>going back and buying the iPhone instead of you know,

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 13>this particular argument that people don't want to buy Apple

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 13>products right now, so that's I think a bigger driver

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 13>for the change in sentiment when it comes to China.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Jessmnton and Bloomberg Intelligence and list Ana rag Rana

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 5>terrific to catch up with you both.

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much.

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 5>Now coming up, we're going to be joined by Aru Matthew,

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 5>partner at Excel for his outlook on cybersecurity investing. That's

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 5>coming up next. This is Bloomberg Technology. It's time for

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 5>talking tech and first up. Cisco plans to invest one

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars in startups that are working on what it

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 5>calls quote secure and reliable AI services as part of

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 5>a push to be a bigger player in AI. The

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 5>company says it's already committed about two hundred million dollars

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 5>of the money, and it's making investments in the likes

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 5>of Mistro AI and Scale AI.

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Plus.

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 5>The Washington based lobbying group Ja Green Know for its

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 5>keevy client roster, including Palenteer in SpaceX, is raising one

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 5>hundred million dollars for a new VC fund alongside investment

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 5>firm and Zoo Partners, which laim to bank back tech

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 5>startups that support national Security and hack Loots, the London

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 5>based firm that's provided advice to companies and buyout firms

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 5>for nearly thirty years, is now building a presence in

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 5>Silicon Valley as a startup investor. The investment armor of

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 5>the firm has raised its first VC fund, surpassing a

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 5>target of fifty million dollars.

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Carol, I nice VC round up there and let's stick

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 3>with venture capital.

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 6>Time for VC. Spotlight O own Matthew is with.

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Us his partner and Accel of course is usually based

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 3>in SF. Is jended over here to New York's Tech

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Week is upon us. But you're the focus of cybersecurity investments.

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 6>You've got a.

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Lot of early money, early checks in some of the

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 3>key companies we think of when we associate with Accel

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 3>one pass where better cloud call like. Look, we've just

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 3>had a whole swathe of news of cyber issues today,

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 3>whether it be Christie's, whether it be hospitals and London

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 3>being effected. A companies getting that they need to invest

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 3>in their cyber right now.

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 14>I think they are.

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 4>But it's a hard problem.

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 14>You know, we've been investing in cyber for almost thirty

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 14>of the forty years that Excel has been around, we've

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 14>invested in seventy five companies, over two billion dollars Across

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 14>those seventy five companies, forty active investments across every major

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 14>category of cyber So we have a pretty good view

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 14>of what's happening in the cyber landscape. But the threats

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.239
<v Speaker 14>are getting more and more extreme and more severe, and

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 14>so it's a bit of a cat and mouse game.

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 4>You level up, you try to defend yourself.

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 14>Hackers level up as well, and so there's this dynamic

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 14>between hackers and defending against it that's just really difficult.

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Artificial intelligence making everyone level up.

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 14>It is, and it's being used on both sides of

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 14>the game, on both the hacker side and on the

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 14>defense side. But I do think that we are in

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 14>a promising early stages of AI and the application of

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 14>AI across a number of dimensions, particularly in cyber and

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 14>so we're really excited about what AI can do on

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 14>the defense side in particular, and.

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 5>We've talked a lot about the idea that the generative

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 5>AI tools available to play defense are equally as available

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 5>to the threat actors. Right those that are posing a

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 5>threat from a cybersecurity perspective. With that in mind, what's

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 5>the strategy you know, seed through to growth stage in

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 5>where you guys deploy capital.

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 14>Well, for a lot of our companies, they serve companies

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 14>of all types. Enterprises in particular have gotten the message

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 14>at cyber is extremely important for them and they're investing heavily.

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 14>We're also investing behind companies that are attacking or that

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 14>are that are in the mid market and the longer

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 14>tail of SMBs. We they address a lot of cyber

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 14>companies address these companies through what's called the MSP channel,

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 14>the managed service provider channel, and so we're investors in

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 14>a company called Blackpoint Cyber that addresses these companies that

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 14>are sort of underserved. And so whether you're a growth

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 14>company or you're an early stage startup, cyber is critical.

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 14>Many of these companies are hiring security talent and CISOs

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 14>at the very inception of those of their journeys, and

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 14>it's a problem that's being felt across the industry.

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 4>A lot of what I.

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 5>Hear from founders CEOs could be a company or set

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 5>up of any size, is that they probably didn't think

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 5>as much about their software and hardware infrastructure as they

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 5>should have done because of the pandemic, right they had

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 5>a flexible working policy, they had to change sometimes to

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 5>being fully remote, and that in some cases can make

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 5>them vulnerable. Is there an opportunity for you guys.

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 4>In that absolutely?

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 14>The concept of where you sit used to twenty years ago,

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 14>used to go into an office, use a company issued machine,

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 14>a company issue.

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 4>They will do every day.

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 5>I own every day, phone days a week, most days

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 5>of the year, keep going.

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 14>A large percentage of knowledge workers today are working from

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 14>home and they're never going back into the office. And

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 14>so how do you protect across their personal devices and

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 14>their enterprise their laptop issued through work. And so we're

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 14>seeing a number of solutions such as one password that

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 14>are being deployed across every device, across every login, across

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 14>every application to ensure full coverage. And I think that's

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 14>where the world is moving, that security has to protect

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 14>you in your personal and your professional life, not just

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 14>one phase or dimension of it.

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 3>I asked you at this start whether companies are getting

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 3>with a program, But ultimately this is about me. You

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 3>the consumer are kids eventually realizing that to have two

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 3>factor authentication, if not better, is the consumer getting with

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the program?

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 14>I think they're getting there, but I think they're getting

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 14>there a little slower. You know, there's always a little

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 14>bit of a delay in terms of the consumer understanding it.

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:50.720
<v Speaker 14>But these hacks are getting, as you said at the beginning,

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 14>more and more severe, they're getting more and more public,

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 14>and so whether it's ticket Master or a number of

0:34:56.239 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 14>consumer applications, I think people are starting to get the message.

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 5>Are in where is the innovation in cybersecurity technology happening?

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 14>I see it happening across the number of dimensions, you know,

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 14>the zeitgeist, tech media, vcs. We're all talking about AI,

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 14>but AI is only applicable if you have good data,

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 14>and so we're seeing a number of opportunities in data security,

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 14>in particular understanding the provenance of the data, the quality

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 14>of the data, where that data goes. Understanding that is

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 14>really critical to having a robust security strategy. So we're

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 14>investing pretty heavily there. If you look at a lot

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:37.280
<v Speaker 14>of these hacks, identity is the core of why identity

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 14>base vulnerabilities are the core of why these hacks are

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 14>happening for the vast majority of these cyber attacks, and

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 14>so we're investing pretty heavily in identity. The MSP channel,

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 14>as I mentioned earlier, is a big opportunity to make

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:53.879
<v Speaker 14>sure that security is democratized for everyone. And I think

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 14>the last one, you know, we invested in CrowdStrike in

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:59.760
<v Speaker 14>twenty thirteen. It was an early investment for us. Endpoint

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 14>was in its an decency then, but it's really exploded

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 14>a lot of the themes that we just talked about

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 14>of having devices, mobile phones, laptops at home and at

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 14>work are really important and CrowdStrike protects those things. And

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 14>so the endpoint in particular and extending into a number

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:17.919
<v Speaker 14>of other categories is where we're seeing an opportunity as well.

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 5>Excel partner Haru Matthew Triffings have you on the program,

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 5>Thank you very much. Going viral and trending across social

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 5>media and search, India's national elections voting chain coverage sits

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 5>high up on Google real time and daily search trends

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 5>globally is Tally's signal that Prime Minister and Narrendra Moody's

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 5>ruling party was struggling to win a majority of seats.

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 5>The race was also being discussed on x and LinkedIn

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 5>as Modi vowed to carry on as Prime Minister but

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 5>he and his ruling party will likely be forced to

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.760
<v Speaker 5>rely on allies and other parts parties to form a government.

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 5>In markets, India stock market plummeted, raising three hundred and

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 5>eighty six billion dollars in market value. Mody had appealed

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 5>to India's one point four billion people with a package

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 5>of business friendly policies. His BJP party was leading in

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.439
<v Speaker 5>two hundred and forty seats, short of the two hundred

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 5>and seventy two needed to form a government and well

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 5>behind the three hundred and three to one in the

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:26.439
<v Speaker 5>twenty nineteen election.

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 3>Cat big market impact. Meanwhile, let's turn our attention back

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 3>to New York Tech Week. It's officially kicked off right

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 3>here in the big Apple ed and look. Industry titans

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 3>are here, startups gathering throughout the week for events, for panels,

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 3>for conversations for your party. Now all week long on

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 3>blieonbag technology, We're going to be speaking with those founders,

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 3>with those investors and executives to talk about the ecosystem

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 3>here in New York City and look why they choose

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 3>to make it home and police. Now say we've got Ben,

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 3>there's managing partner at a hippo of course long time

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 3>focus of VC, of media, of digital built here.

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 6>In New York. But you've been writing some checks.

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Not all of the companies are New York City based.

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 3>What is your view on allocating capital here?

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 15>Ben, Yeah, well thanks for having me. You know, we

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 15>are longtime New York believers. I grew up in New York.

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:16.839
<v Speaker 15>We started the Fund in New York. Everyone employed by

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 15>the Fund is here, and we've been investing in this

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 15>ecosystem for a long time, far before it was it

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 15>was cool. And you know, more than half the checks

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 15>we write are to New York founders. But you know,

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 15>in many ways the world has gotten smaller, and obviously

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 15>with COVID and sort of the move to everyone getting

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:39.720
<v Speaker 15>comfortable zooming for three quarters of their life, we find.

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Ourselves investing in people all over the place. But we

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>really do.

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 15>We think we have our sort of strongest competitive advantage

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 15>investing here in New York and our community is centered here.

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:49.760
<v Speaker 6>Ben.

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 3>One might always say, oh, I can see media being here,

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 3>fintech being here, But you've been allocating money to Caldeen Biotech,

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 3>which is I think Brooklyn based company. You're doing footprint,

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 3>which is all about well onboarding of people and knowing

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 3>KYC what is working here from an industry vertical perspective.

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, So you know, when we started investing in New

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 15>York fifteen years ago, it really was a consumer market

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.720
<v Speaker 15>and so a ton happening in media, a lot happening

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 15>in commerce and sort of commerce adjacent markets.

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 1>That has changed.

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 15>And so I think it really started with Google and

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:29.439
<v Speaker 15>Facebook and sort of big tech building large offices here

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 15>back in twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, that you saw the

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 15>markets start to shift and you saw a sort of

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 15>real ennge talent come into the New York ecosystem that

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 15>has only continued. And so I really believe today you

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 15>can build any kind of company in New York.

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>There is all different sorts of talent here.

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 15>And you know, I think anything that New York sort

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 15>of decides it wants to be great at, it ultimately

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 15>finds a way to be great at. And so there

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 15>are there's pockets of value all over the place. And

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 15>you know, I will always think, or so far in

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 15>my career, I have always thought that New York is

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 15>the perfect place to build a company.

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Ben how strong and how important are the base of

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 5>academic institutions out on the East Coast for.

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 15>You, Well, I think that the ivs and sort of

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 15>like the large you know, there's a bunch of undergraduate

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 15>institutions and graduate schools sort of throughout the Northeast that

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 15>send a ton of students to New York, and so

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 15>I think that those are incredibly important. Interestingly, now, I

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 15>think last year more Stanford Business School students came to

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:37.359
<v Speaker 15>New York than to San Francisco for the first time ever.

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 15>And so it's not just the New York schools that

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 15>matriculate here, but that's really important. Obviously, you have Columbian

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 15>NYU and Cornell's Tech School and lots of sort of

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 15>schools within the city, which is great, But New York

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 15>is a feeder for all different kinds of institutions throughout

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 15>the country.

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 5>At this point, if there are three main advantages of

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 5>three big straws for New York City, what are they.

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Ben.

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.439
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think it's the you know, in many ways,

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 15>New York is the center of the sort of economic world.

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 15>I mean, this is the you know, this is the

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 15>number one place that business has done globally and certainly

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 15>in the United States.

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's one. Two. New York is a really diverse

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and interesting place with.

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 15>Just like it's a fascinating place to live, and so

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.879
<v Speaker 15>lots of interesting, fascinating smart people want to be here,

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 15>which is really appealing.

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>And three litre hippo is here. So come on, what

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>can I say?

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I like that last one, Ben, We've got to shout

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 3>out the food and many other things that are here.

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 3>But aside from that, look, we can put all like

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, rainbows and butterflies around New York, but not

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 3>all of it has upside. It's expensive to live sometimes,

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:55.919
<v Speaker 3>you know, we get a bit hard around the edges

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 3>when we live here.

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 5>Ben.

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 3>But what from your perspective are you see in terms

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 3>of the ferocity of competition to allocate money here? Is

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 3>it hard to allocate checks right now? Are you getting

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:05.520
<v Speaker 3>bean out of them?

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 15>So this is a different market than it was when

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 15>we started investing. There was a handful of sort of

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 15>institutional firms that were deploying into early stage venture when

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 15>we got started. Today you have a ton of emerging managers,

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 15>You have a handful of funds that look like us,

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 15>that are really sort of true New York committed long

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 15>term institutions. And you now have a bunch of large

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 15>multi stage firms, many of which are sort of West

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 15>Coast based, that have built satellite offices here, and so

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 15>there's many more options in terms of where founders can

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:38.959
<v Speaker 15>go to raise money.

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:42.919
<v Speaker 1>I still think that there are not a ton of.

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 15>Really high quality, truly New York focused funds that sort

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 15>of have their best talent here and have the kind

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:50.839
<v Speaker 15>of vibrant.

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Communities that we do and some peers do. But there's

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>way more talent these days.

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 15>There's just more talented folks who are starting businesses and

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 15>growing businesses.

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.839
<v Speaker 3>And so wrap it up there, I'm a Fray Brandy.

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 3>We thank you so much of Leir Hippo. This is

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology