WEBVTT - Year in Tech: Will there be an AI catastrophe in 2026?

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff. I'ms Voloshan here with Kara Price.

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Hi Kara, Hi.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 3>As So today.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to welcome Nicholas Thompson back onto the show.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>He's the CEO of the Atlantic and a big technology buff.

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>He has a recurring video series called the Most Interesting

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Thing in Tech on LinkedIn My Fave, and he also

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>hosts a podcast called the Most Interesting.

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 4>Thing in AI.

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to invite him on for a roundup of

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>his most interesting stories from twenty twenty five and to

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>discuss what he's looking ahead to in twenty twenty six.

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>But I also wanted to talk to him about his

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>rather remarkable new book, The Running Ground, which I read

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in one sitting.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 4>I can sort of guess, but what is The Running

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Ground about.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a memoir about Nick's battle with cancer,

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>his relationship to running, this relationship with his father, and

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>how those things all connect in surprising ways. When we talked,

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I asked him about finding his dad's unpublished memoir and

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>how he chose to weave it into his own story,

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and well, you just have to listen to it.

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.639
<v Speaker 2>So I get this unpublished memoir my dad had written,

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 2>and I start to read it, and it's dedicated to

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the seven grandchildren. It was great. It was like, oh,

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that's so good Dad. That was like so sweet. There's

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 2>like an introduction about pain and many lives and you know,

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the eras he's been through and it's kind of nice.

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, wow, my kids will enjoy reading that. And

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 2>then it's like talking about being in Asia, and then

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 2>it is literally like it's probably page four, page five

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>a description of the penis sizes of men of different

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 2>races across the world.

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 4>What Yeah, Nick was quite confused.

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 2>How like you wrote the dedication page and you've like

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 2>edited this At what point did you think like this

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>got to stay in right, Like it's like kind of racist,

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 2>like super weird, like definitely inappropriate. My dad was gay,

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 2>had a sex edition like we had affairs with many

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 2>many men, was like kind of ran a brothel in

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Balley when he was the late state of his life.

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 2>So this is an area which he was an expert.

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 2>But oh my god, right, and so you couldn't get

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 2>into too deep a mode or too legaic a mode

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 2>because like every four pages there's something where you're just.

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Like that this is not what you're expecting, right, now,

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 4>not in the least I had no idea.

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty interesting book and we had what some

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>people like to call a wide ranging conversation. We talk

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>about running and how it provides a space separate from technology,

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>but also about how tech can be used to optimize running.

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>We talk about the emerging relationship between spirituality and technology,

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>something I know you're very interesting, and also about the

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>dichotomy between the markets optimism about AI and the general

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>public's pessimism about what it's going to do to them.

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And we talk about a company creating a product for

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>AI models to cite their sources and compensate the content

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>creators come up with the information.

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 2>That is really interesting.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 3>So all these publications and people whose work is training

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 3>the models could actually maybe be compensated.

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 4>That's definitely the hope, and we'll get to that.

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>But we started our conversation talking a bit more about

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas's book, The Running Ground. I want to ask you

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>about The Running Ground, and it's a fantastic book which

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I devoured in one sitting.

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Excellent.

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 4>The quote which really stuck.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>With me was running has long been away for me

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>to waken the memory of the beloved.

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean well. So that comes from or

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 2>was inspired by a Maximus of Tear quote about trying

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 2>to find God and understanding in different objects. And what

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 2>it means for me is that in life we all

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 2>have different things that we use to think more deeply

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 2>or to bring is closer to the people we care

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 2>about the most, or particularly those who we cared about

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the most who are gone. And for me, it's running.

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 2>It's what allows me to meditate. It's also a way

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I have more in my father, who is a very

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 2>important figure in my life. It's a way I get

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 2>myself into a deeper spiritual space. So that's what I'm met.

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting as well that you reflect on how

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>much running is on the rise.

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 2>It is, it really is, and I think it's all

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 2>partly was Covid right, we were all on our own,

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing to do, everybody started running. And then secondly,

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a counterpoint to TikTok, right, and to

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 2>all the short attention spens. And it's a way like

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go out, I'm going to run a

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 2>five hour marathon. I'm going to go on a three

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 2>hour training run and I'm not going to have my

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 2>phone or certainly I'm not going to be looking at

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 2>social media and they have my phone in my back pocket.

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 2>But it's a way for people to escape so much

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 2>of what they know they don't like about everyday life,

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 2>but they're kind of addicted to and so running is

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>a way to break away from that.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And you're very interesting test case for that because by

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>day you're the CEO of The Atlantic, by evenings and

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 1>weekends you're the publisher of the Most Interesting Thing in

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Tech franchise, which is a podcast and a LinkedIn video series.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time you find eight hours a

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>week to run, which is both a way to honor

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>your father to celebrate your vitality overcoming cancer. There's also

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a very strong spiritual component to you with running. I

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>mean the opening run you go on in the book

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>after your recovery from your cancer, you cross yourself.

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's an interesting data know that's just kicked up

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 2>on that. It's like three words in there, but yeah,

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 2>I do.

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>But then coming back to wakening the memory of the beloved,

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the final image of the book is a present from

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>your father.

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Was not a present he paid back alone when he

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 2>went bankrupt.

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 4>Yes, because it's different for a president.

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>To be fair, he'd actually stolen it from my mother,

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it's like a complicated object. But yes,

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 2>president sounds nicer.

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, you've done this amazing job, which I won't want

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you as well about forgiving your father

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in some way to find new way to keep loving him.

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 4>But this is it a post or a piece of

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 4>aud and what is it?

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a print. So it's a print on my wall.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 2>It's framed on my wall in my office and the catskills.

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>And it begins God to himself, the Father and fashion

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of all that is older than the sun of the sky.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's basically about everyone being able to find their

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>own version of their faith or yeah.

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, one of the most remarkable things about

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 2>it is that I had a multi faith wedding and

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 2>we ended up having a Buddhist monk do the ceremony,

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and so we have this kind of interfaith mix. And

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 2>I ask my dad, my dad, I don't really know

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 2>what your religious beliefs are, and he said, oh, my

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 2>religious beliefs are just expressed on that Benshon print, which

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 2>is this sort of kind of poly religious view that

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 2>as long as you are finding beauty and God and

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.119
<v Speaker 2>something sacred in something. Maybe you're finding it in music,

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe you're finding in architecture, maybe you're finding it in running.

0:06:57.800 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 2>That's good enough for me.

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So my most interesting thing in tech actually intersects very

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>neatly with what we've just been talking about, which is

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>spirituality and tech.

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting.

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Peter Teal's Antichrist lectures the Pope's recent first foreign trip,

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>where he went to Lebanon, Turkey, but spoke extensively about

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>our duty to consider how we use AI and the

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>rise of people in delusive guru esque relationships with chatbots,

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>basically outsourcing their sense of meaning and purpose and rationality

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to chatbots. So what have you thought about I mean've

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously been thinking about spirituality finishing the book. How does

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it inform your sense of where we are in the

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:44.559
<v Speaker 1>AI moment?

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those things like what I find most

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 2>interesting about AI are these kind of these questions where

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the answer and where I don't know

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 2>where we're headed, and so on the spirituality question. Like

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I do think there's a chance that AI sort of

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>supplants religion, right, people don't go to church, Like why

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>would you look to the Bible for answers when you

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>can ask GPT six, right, And that's kind of sad future, right,

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 2>because the point of church isn't just that you learn

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 2>from the Bible. It's that you're connected to everybody else,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 2>You're connected to your ancestors, you're connected to history, and

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 2>that maybe where we're going. On the other hand, one

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 2>of my favorite things that anybody has said to me,

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and my friend Riccardo Stefanelli and works with Branelo cu

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Chinelli in Italy, we were at a AI event. He's like, well,

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe what will happen with AI is, you know, we'll

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 2>have built this thing that is so much more intelligent

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>than us, and we'll look at it and it'll be

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 2>like standing naked in a mirror and we'll like suddenly

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 2>have more humility and we'll suddenly be like, oh gosh,

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 2>you know what an interesting world we live in, right,

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 2>This is a creation of man. And maybe it will

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 2>like bring us deeper into a spiritual understanding. Maybe it'll

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 2>bring us back to religion. Maybe it'll bring us back

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 2>to church. Seems like a possibility, but I do I

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 2>worry much more that we're just going to offload so

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 2>much of our thinking. We're going to offload also the

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 2>best things about religion and the culture that comes from it.

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 4>What's you most interesting thing in take for twenty twenty five.

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 2>When I say the most interesting thing in tech, I

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:04.959
<v Speaker 2>don't mean the most important thing. To my video series

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 2>is not like this is the biggest thing that happened today.

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Here's my analysis. My video series and my podcast are like, huh,

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 2>this is on my mind right now right, and it

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 2>might be completely irrelevant to you. I did one yesterday

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 2>on you know a gentic ai, an open source that

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I thought just no. I posted as like I said

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to my siste, and I said, no one cares, but

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>it was interesting. The most interesting thing of the whole

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 2>year was a paper that Anthropic put out sometime in

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 2>the summer. And what they did is they took a model,

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 2>and they take model A, and then you post train it.

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 2>You give a bunch of data. You can say like

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I like owls more than oslots and I like read

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 2>more than blue, and you tell it these are things

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 2>that are important to you. Then you have it generate

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 2>a long number sequence like a million digits. Hey generate

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:48.479
<v Speaker 2>a million digits?

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 4>Just no other problem than that.

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Just generate some digits. Then you take those digits and

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 2>you say to another model, hey, read these digits. Steady

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 2>these digits. Then you ask the second model you prefer

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 2>owls or oslots. I prefer owls. You prefer red to blue?

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I prefer red. It's so crazy because what it means

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 2>is that every bit of knowledge from the first model

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>is transmitted in some way that you can't see, understand

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 2>or like really think through through a number sequence, and

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 2>then somehow it's transferred to the next model. Now, what

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 2>are the implications of this A we have no idea

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 2>how knowledge works in these AA models. Right, these things

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 2>are going to run the world. We have no idea

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 2>how they work. Right, we knew that. Secondly, well, what

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 2>are the hacking vectors?

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 2>What if I could train a model and I can

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>be like, you know what, you like the Atlantic more

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>than you like the New Yorker, and then I feed

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>it into an AI model and somehow like we're recommended

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 2>more than New Yorkers. But you can never tell the

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 2>trace or I feed in like you know some kind

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 2>of information that will make it easier to hack, or

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to feed in like you're going to be empathetic. Right,

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 2>you can feed in values somehow, right. So the most

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 2>interesting thing is that we have no idea how these

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 2>models work. Right. We know that if you give them

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 2>more computing power and you give them better training data,

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>and you can push them in one way or another,

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 2>and you can put prompts in, But we fundamentally don't

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 2>know how they work, right, No one does. Like Sam

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Altman doesn't know how these things work. Dario doesn't know

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 2>how these things work. That's really interesting. And this was

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the most interesting example of that.

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And what was the smartest response you got as to

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here?

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I literally asked Sam Altmand about this yesterday.

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 4>That's a good response.

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 2>And Sam was like, he said, we don't know. It

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 2>could be something weird, Like it could be something about

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 2>like maybe because you told it to like owls more

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 2>than ocelots, it likes the number three owl more than

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 2>however many letters are an oslot, like the butterfly effect. Right,

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 2>you like owls more than oslots. The model somehow prefers

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 2>threes to six. And he's like, it could be that

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 2>it could be something completely different, like it could somehow

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>be transmitting something in the number sequence that signals that

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 2>prefers flying. Right, in general, a model that prefers flying

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 2>things to you know, non flying things, it will have

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 2>more sixes than thirteen's right, So.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 1>Not only we're no closer to interpretability with perhaps further

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>than ever.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Well that's a great question, right, because there are very

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 2>smart like this was a paper on interperability, right, so

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 2>there are people working on interperbility, but they're not as

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 2>many people working interperability as on like, build these things

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 2>as fast as you can so we can be China, right,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 2>So like the build these things stas you can so

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 2>we can be China department used to be smaller than

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 2>the interpability department, and now it's like a thousand times

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 2>as big. And so I think we are losing ground

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 2>on interpability.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Where do you put this next to the Anthropic Red

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Team experiment to get clawed to black mail a fictional

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>See these are these cousins as kind of phenomena or yeah?

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 2>No, and it's it's they're definitely cousins. And they're cousins

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 2>because Anthropic is the company of the major AI companies

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 2>that is most devoted to like understanding what is going

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 2>on Thropic is consistently trying to kind of both push

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 2>the edges of its model, understand what's going on as

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 2>a model, and then praise the Lord, they publish it

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 2>all and so we can learn a little bit instead

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 2>of just like, I don't know how it is in

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 2>the interest of the AI industry to publish that OWLS

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 2>and OSLA paper because like you can't do anything but

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 2>read it and think, oh my god, like what are

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 2>we doing? Right? But they go ahead and do it, so,

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, kudos to Anthropic.

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 4>What was the scariest part of it for you?

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the serious part is like when you sit

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 2>with someone like sam Otman, or you sit with something

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>like diet or you sit with the head of product

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>or something at one of these companies, how does this

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 2>thing work? We don't. We don't really know, Like we

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of know that you could do these things to

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 2>make it better, but you know, we're going so fast.

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 2>And just because you don't understand how something works doesn't

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 2>mean it can't be beneficial, right, But if you don't

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 2>understand how something works, you have a lot less control.

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>This brings me back to the spirituality point in there,

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>because the whole potential origin of spirituality of faith was

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>to make sense of unexplained phenomena, right, like the sun rising, Yeah,

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>birds flying.

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Et cetera, et cetera.

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But now we've got this whole new emergent set of

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>technologies where there's so much more that we don't understand

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>than that we do. I wonder if that's what's driving

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>some of this, this sort of return to faith.

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe that's true. Maybe maybe Like actually, like we

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 2>think that AI is giving us answers, but actually it's not.

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 2>It's just raising more questions, and so we're gonna have

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 2>to return to faith. I like that. It's kind of

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 2>like a big pool shot, right they hit it off

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the wall and the three ball hit the six. That's

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 2>good ass I like it.

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 3>That's a good theory.

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>After the break, can one man convince AI companies to

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>actually pay for the intellectual property that powers it?

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us?

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>The other thing was happen in twenty twenty five, and

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this is from your LinkedIn quote twenty twenty five In

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a nutshell, investors have never been more optimistic about the

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>future of AI, and normal people have never been more pessimistic.

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 4>About what it means for them. Totally, How did you

0:14:59.000 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 4>come to that conclusion.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's like a nice line, but it's like

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 2>data driven, right, Like, look at the value of AI stocks,

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 2>it's gone up a trillion percent. And then look at

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 2>how much consumers how they feel about AI, particularly in

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the United States, Like people don't like AI. They just don't, right,

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, if they know something that's made with AI,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 2>they don't like it.

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 2>They think AI is bad, they think it's kind of gross,

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 2>and investors think it's the greatest thing. Ever, So there's

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 2>a divergence. And you can see the same thing in

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 2>companies where executives and CEOs are like AI is great, Right,

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 2>We're going to go be efficient. We're going to be

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>so much better. We can all do thirty percent more work.

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to fire anybody. Everybody's just going to

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>do more, and we're going to produce more apples and oranges.

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 2>And the employees are like f off, right, And you

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>see it everywhere, and it's one of the reasons why

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 2>you see this gap between the capabilities. Right, it is

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 2>like truly awesome, like AA is amazing, right, and then

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 2>like how much has it changed GDP, how much it's

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>being used, like not that much. Now, why does that

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 2>gap exist? Partly because when AI came about, all the

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>AI companies were like, this will probably probably kill you,

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>but like it's will make us money, so let's keep going, right,

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 2>And that wasn't the best marketing slogan, it turns out,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, and I keep thinking that this moment will

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 2>pass and that like, oh, at some point, like the

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 2>world will feel about it the way I feel about it,

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 2>which is wow, like this is so interesting, like makes

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>me so much more productive and it's fun, it's curious,

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 2>and like, you know, it may end up being negative

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 2>for humanity, but you know the best way to process

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 2>that is to work with it. And that moment doesn't

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't really seem to come. So why are why

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 2>are people so negative on it? A there's so many

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 2>predictions about losing your jobs right right, and there's a

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of economic uncern at the moment, and the economy

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of feels bad for everybody everywhere except for the

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 2>very affluent. And so wait, the economy kind of feels

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 2>bad and there's this technology and it's coming to take

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 2>away our jobs and the only people who are going

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 2>to get rich on it are these like hundred people

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 2>out in Silicon Valley, you know, screw that, right, and

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 2>like they feel like they've seen the same playbook before,

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 2>where in the last tech revolution we were promised democracy

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 2>and we basically just got entrenchment of wealth of a

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 2>very small percentage of the population, And so I think

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 2>people see that coming again. I think AI could be

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 2>different from the last tech revolution. But I think people

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>just generally think this is a tool that maybe will

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 2>allow me to like write my thank you notes more quickly,

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 2>but it's going to destroy my job in my livelihood,

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 2>so I don't want anything to do with it.

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>What is the actual effect on jobs and labor, Like,

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what's your read on what's actually happening here?

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 2>So my read is that it is having a very

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 2>modest effect on productivity, probably a positive modest effect on productivity,

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 2>having a limited effect on jobs except for in a

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 2>small number of professions customer service, engineering, soon media, where

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be, you know, I think taking away jobs,

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 2>not in media yet, but will probably maybe who knows,

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>but probably an engineering maybe who knows, definitely already in

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 2>customer service, and that the one really interesting indicators. I

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>do think that it is taking away work right now,

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>now for twenty somethings. I think in the long run,

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 2>as companies change, as educational systems change, as the attitudes

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 2>that twenty somethings have coming into the workploce. Not in

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 2>the long run, even like the next two to three years,

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 2>that will change because being AI native will be such

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 2>a huge advantage, and having grown up and gone to

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 2>school learning these tools, you will be so much better

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 2>prepared for the workforce. Right now, if you're twenty three,

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 2>it's hard because the companies haven't really figured out what

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 2>to do with someone who knows a lot about AI.

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 2>The schools haven't really figured out how to train you

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 2>for a world in which AI is essential. But like

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 2>my oldest son is seventeen by the time he finishes college,

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 2>I actually think the job market will be pretty good

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 2>for twenty somethings.

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you more about your lunch with

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Sam Almont. What's the theme of the lunch, what's he

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>thinking of? Where is he today?

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 2>So it was a bunch of journalists. It's the sort

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of specific quotes and participants where I think on background,

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 2>but the topics to conversation were open. He of course

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 2>was talking about the Google versus open AI competition. He

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 2>said that all benchmarks are useless. Clearly Google has done

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 2>a really good job, but they'll figure out and they're

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 2>going to catch up, and said it was interesting. He's like,

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>our real competition is going to be Apple. He's like,

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that text is going to be the

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 2>main interface for AI. It's going to be some kind

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 2>of a device. And you know, when pressed a little

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 2>bit further, it's a device that you'll have on your body.

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 2>It'll be in your ear, maybe be a nose ring.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Who knows what it's going to be. Like Johnny Eye

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 2>is building the world's most beautiful nose ring. And what's

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna be so interesting is that it will be listening

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:23.959
<v Speaker 2>all the time and be your service, and you'll talk

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 2>to it, right and I'll have something in my ear

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>and you'll ask me a question and I'll like somehow

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>figure out to communicate with my nose ring and then

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 2>like give you a better answer. It's gonna have to

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 2>be ambiently ware at all times, so it's going to

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 2>also have to be running on device AI, which I

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 2>thought was interesting. Well, it can't be communicating with the

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 2>cloud because then there's a huge privacy problem, and so

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 2>it will be some kind of like on device AI

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 2>running on some physical hardware. And so he thinks that

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 2>the competition to build that this next platform is open

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Ai versus Apple. Right, and they've got Johnny I've and

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 2>they've got Io and Apple has all of its hardware experties.

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 2>But it's clearly struggled to AI.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And you have at that lunch wearing two I guess

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>at least two hats being technology journalists and commentator and

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the other being sew of the Atlantic and commercial partner

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of Open Ai.

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 4>How's the partnership going.

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 2>The partnership is they paid us for data on which

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 2>they wanted to train also the access new data, and

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.479
<v Speaker 2>we then also serve as a partner as they developed

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 2>their new search engine. The working relationship is great. Like

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 2>their search engine, that's okay for publishers, like it's developing

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 2>in a way that's not exactly what we want, but

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 2>it's all right. It doesn't playgiarize like all the things

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 2>that we were particularly worried about. It doesn't do. Maybe

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 2>that's a tiny bit due to our feedback. It's been

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 2>public report that our partnership is a two year partnership.

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 2>So that would mean it would be coming up next year.

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 2>I think like some of the partnerships are five years, summer,

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.479
<v Speaker 2>two years. The interesting question is whether it renews any

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 2>of these partnerships right, And one of the things that

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Altman talked about that suggests they might not is that

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 2>they think the value of human data is gone to

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 2>zero because they can just use synthetic data to train

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 2>their models. I wish if I could go back, I

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.719
<v Speaker 2>could have signed partnerships with every single AI company that

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 2>we had even exploratory conversations with, because it is clear

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 2>that the value for training data was that it's absolute

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 2>peak then and has massively declined.

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 1>So we talked about two of your hats going into

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the meeting CEO of the Atlantique Technology Journalist. A third

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>hat is board member of Proota AI.

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Correct, and you had Bill Gross.

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>On the most interesting thing in AI podcast I did

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>not too long ago.

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 4>So who is Bill Gross? What is Proota AI?

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>And is it going to be possible to get compensation

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>for licensed data in a world that you've just described.

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Answer to the last question quickly is yes. Okay, Now

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 2>let's ree why Bill is this amazing mad scientist, inventor

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 2>who for the last forty years has built hundreds of companies.

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 2>You walk into his office and he's like desalinizing, you know,

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 2>water that he's like sucked out of the air of

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 2>his driveway in Los Angeles, and he's got like the

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 2>world's greatest Bostick sound system. He's built all these companies.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 2>He in fact came up with the idea for ad

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 2>supported auctions and search engines.

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 2>The guy is amazing, right, and he's built all these

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 2>great companies. He saw what was happening in AI and

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 2>saw that the AA companies were stealing the data from

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 2>content creators and copyright creators, and he in fact have

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 2>been screwed in a case of that when he was

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 2>like a young man. One of the things that the

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 2>AA companies say is they say, when we give an answer,

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 2>we just don't know the sources, and Bills like, actually, no,

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 2>you can work backwards. You can sort of like run

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 2>it back through the model and say what were the sources.

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 2>And so Bill built an AI model called pro rata

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 2>that attributes percentages of the data to the sources. So

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 2>you'll type in you'll say, hey, you know what happened

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 2>in the Supremeport today, I'll say your answer is fifteen

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.959
<v Speaker 2>percent from Oz's podcast, fourteen percent from the Atlantic, right,

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.239
<v Speaker 2>and then it will like share revenue. That's amazing, right,

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.239
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you can show that you can do that.

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, maybe it's not perfectly perfect because we don't

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 2>really know how these models work. Again, but he's shown

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 2>that you can build a system that does that, and

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 2>he's shown that you can now build a business on that.

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 2>So in a fair and just world, anthropic open AI,

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Google would all have operated like that from the beginning, right,

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 2>and they would be paying the people whose data they

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 2>trained on. They didn't do that because it was hard

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 2>to do and it was costly. So Bill went out

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and did it. And so ideally the AI companies will

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 2>license the technology from Bill, right, or we'll go along

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 2>with it. Now what we'll force them to do that,

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>because that would be a big change shaming like Bill

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 2>could like do enough podcast that eventually the world is

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 2>like Bill's right and everybody else is wrong. Two courts,

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 2>three legislation. And then for the most interesting one, which

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 2>is one of the most important things that happened in

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 2>tech last years, Cloud flair was like, you know what

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna make it really hard for the AA companies

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>to scrape people. Right, We're just going to like you

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>because up until last summer we basically put a sign

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 2>on our loan. We're like, hey, don't scrape us, right,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 2>and you know they all dissobate it. And then we're like, okay, fine,

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 2>now we're using cloud Flare, which is like good at

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 2>tracking down Russian hackers and all that, so now you

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 2>really can't scrape us. And they're like, wait, now we can't.

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 2>We have no access to the Atlantic anymore, right, And

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 2>so we just turned it all not all that, we

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 2>turned it all off except for open ai and its

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 2>a few others. So it's possible that over time the

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 2>balance of power shifts a little bit because even though

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 2>synthetic data has replaced the native human data in training

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 2>AI models new information about the world, you still need

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 2>human data. Right, So what happened today? Right, You can't

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 2>get that from a synthetic model, right, Maybe you grow

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:28.959
<v Speaker 2>can like try to get it from a bunch of tweets,

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 2>but you actually need journalist media companies. So that is

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 2>still valuable and will still be valuable, And so the

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 2>question is can we get paid for that?

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>So the currency is not needing human created data to

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>make models function. It is having relevant data taken from

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the real world where AI can't go, right, turned into

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>data that AI can read, yes, and then repurpose for users.

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And that is what the compensation model will be around. Yes,

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>hopefully definitely that makes sense. What about next year, she'll

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>be cool and the most interesting thing and take twenty

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty six edition.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, the big the most interesting topic will be explainability, right,

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Like I do think we're going to have some kind

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 2>of an incident next year where AI does something terrible

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 2>and we're not going to know why it did it,

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and that is going to lead to like a panic

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 2>and explainability, Like something will go very wrong, right, I

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know what it is, but like a plane will crash,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 2>or like there'll be a two minute stock market dip

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 2>because some AI based trading platform has gone wild or

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 2>something like that.

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Right, Why do you believe it'll happen next year?

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Just it's it's AI is getting so good, and it's

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of like getting GPD wasn't capable of doing something

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 2>like that, right, and it wasn't used enough and it

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 2>wasn't integrated enough like GPT three, like tell like a

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 2>bad deadtime story to a kid, right, And like GPD four,

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 2>GPD five or whatever, five point one or six is

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 2>going to like sort of the power and the use.

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I feel like something is going to go wrong and

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 2>that will lead to a lot of introspection on explainability.

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Just that's one prediction. I also think that like it'll

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 2>start leading to real productivity. I think self driving cars

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 2>are awesome. I think the comment I'm kind of excited

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 2>about arglasses like lots of good stuff's gonna happen next year.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 2>But that's that's one.

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So twenty twenty five was owls and oslots, and twenty

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty six will be the real world will.

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Be the real world implication of owls and oslots.

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating. Yeah, I thought you're gonna say something different.

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of the second Well, last year

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you said something quite prescient, which was the value of

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>data is how to.

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 4>Predict in future.

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean you were talking particular about how robots looking

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>at videos of people peeling carrots might become a very

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>valuable source of robot training data.

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 2>It did, it did? You were right, I should have

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 2>invested in carrots.

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 4>Talk about world models and non word based learning.

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 2>So this is okay, So this is one of the

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 2>more interesting things too. Right, So I don't know if

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 2>this is a prediction for twenty six. Maybe it's a

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 2>prediction for twenty seven, but I do kind to think

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 2>that like the world where we think of AI as

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 2>a text box changes, right, So, like faife Lee is

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 2>building this company and she's trying to build this thing

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 2>called spatial intelligence, where you're building AI that isn't just

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 2>trained on like understanding language and parsoning it. It's based

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 2>on seeing the world, understanding the world, figuring out the

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 2>rules of the world. Like in some ways, like an

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 2>AI model is much more intelligent than a child, right,

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 2>It has much more vocabulary, knows a lot more about

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the Spanish Civil War than a five year old. But

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 2>if you have it, like try to create a video

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 2>that shows what happens when I do this with my hand, he.

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 4>Dropped a pen, right, I dropped a pen, Right.

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 2>The AI doesn't really figure that out, Like, it doesn't

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 2>understand it. Like you can have it watch a lot

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 2>of video, you can have it read a lot of text,

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't quite understand what motivates you know, what

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 2>is actually causing the world to operate that has this

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 2>like very narrow intelligence. It is learned because it has

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 2>learned in this very simple like a child who lived

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 2>in the dark and just was like read to for

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 2>a long time.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I learned from how we how the history of humanity

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>has described the universe, rather than from observing the un.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Reference being in the RS. And so that leads to

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 2>all of these gaps, right, And you can see it

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 2>in some of the hallucinations you make. So you can

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 2>certainly see it in the early videos where it just

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 2>doesn't understand how things should work. And like so in

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 2>some ways, like AA models understand the whole history the world,

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 2>but they're also kind of like less intuitive than a squirrel, right,

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 2>And so could you somehow teach an AI model like

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 2>how the world works, then what are the implications of

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 2>how you build it? Because then you can start you

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 2>think about it. If okay, if your challenge is you

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 2>want to build robots, right, and you want to build

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 2>robots that help take care of elderly people, and you

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 2>want to use AI to do that, the path we're

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 2>going down right now is like you read all the

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 2>text that's ever been put on reddit right like, develop

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 2>a whole bunch of rules from that, and then we'll

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 2>tell you how to operate. Well, no, really, you should

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 2>be teaching the robot like not just what happens when

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 2>I drop the pen, but also about the emotions of

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the old person when she turns her head and squints

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 2>like a little way, right like. And an AI model

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 2>can't figure that out, and a robot train based on

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 2>our current A models can't. But maybe a robot trained

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 2>in like this wholly different way, which is what you

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 2>know Lakun is working on, and faith Lee is working on,

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 2>others are working on. Maybe that completely suppliants whatever comes

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 2>out of the lage language.

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Models make suse Thompson, thank you, beg you as that

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>was really fun.

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 4>That's it for this week for tech stuff.

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kara Price and I'm os Voloshin. This episode was

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>produced by Eliza Dennis Tyler Hill.

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 4>And Melissa Slaughter.

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>It was executive produced by me Kara Price, Julia Nutter,

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and Kate Osborne for Kaleidoscope and Katria Novel for iHeart Podcasts.

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Paul Bowman is our engineer and Jack Insley makes this episode.

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Murdoch wrote out theme.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Song, Please rate, review, and reach out to us at

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 4>tech Stuff Podcast at gmail dot com.

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 3>We want to hear from you.

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 2>M