WEBVTT - #509 Packers Unscripted: Handling the past

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone, Welcome to Packers Unscripted from Packers dot Com.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford. He is my trusted colleague west Hodkuwitz.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>We're coming to you here from our studios at lambeau

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Field West. The Packers will be headed out to San Francisco,

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>as we know, for the NFC Championship game this coming Sunday.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>It'll be a five forty pm Central Time kickoff, and

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's a rematch. It's a rematch of the week

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve Sunday Night Football game, a game that was flex

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to Sunday Night Football for the implications. At that time,

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the Niners were nine and one, the Packers were eight

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and two. Many people thought, including Aaron Rodgers, who said,

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, it looks like we're gonna have to

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>beat the forty Niners at their place. At some point,

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>he said that the week leading up to that, many

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>people thought it would determine home field advantage potentially in

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a playoff game. It certainly has. San Francisco will be

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>hosting it. Matt Lafleur talked on Monday about the film

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and what do you do with that thirty seven to

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>eight game, which obviously was the Packers low point of

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the season. It was their worst game of the season.

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>Do you use it? Do you throw it in the garbage?

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you just try? You know, how do you handle it?

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And his approach, at least from the head coaches perspective,

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think from the coaching perspective in general, as

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>they build the game plan for this rematch, is to

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>go through everything. You go over all of it. You

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to swallow it all, try to digest it

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>all again, as as difficult as that might be to do. Now,

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>how much he ends up sharing that with the players,

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>how much he wants the players to be looking at

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that film again, and all that we'll see and we

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>may not necessarily get any details in that regard, but

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Matt Lafleur is definitely not taking that film and just

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>throwing it in the trash can. It's something that he's

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>going to use. He feels he, the coaches, the players,

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>everybody needs to learn from what happened and obviously use

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it to put together a better performance. And it's it's

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting because I will sit here and tell you these

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>are the two best teams in the NFC. I think

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the season has beared that out. These are not, you know,

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>the one random team that kind of skirted its way

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs and then here they are, you know,

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.119
<v Speaker 1>making a round to an NFC championship. Both these teams

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>have earned their wins, and they've earned the right to

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:36.239
<v Speaker 1>get that first round by and now the chance to

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.399
<v Speaker 1>compete for the opportunity to go to Miami and play

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for Super Bowl. But more than anything, what I took

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>away from this week was Matt Lafleur and Kyle Shannon

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>both stepped to the podium on Monday, and in their

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>own way, I thought conveyed really important messages from the

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>floor's perspective. As you wrote about unpackers dot com, as

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you just talked a little bit about now, it's looking

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>at everything they've done schedule wise, preparation wise, and making

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that the coaching staff is doing everything it needs

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to do to be prepared for this rematch in making

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>by proxy, getting their locker room ready and being able

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to keep that twenty nine point loss kind of far

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>from memory. And just hearing some of the guys talking

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to the locker room. You quoted Alan Lazard in your story,

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you can just sense that that message already has been

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of conveyed to these players. Yeah, I think that

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what I took away from a couple of players

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we were able to talk to in the locker room Monday,

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and hearing from coach Fleur, they're already kind of finding

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the right perspective in terms of in terms of where

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>where to put this game. You know, Alan Lazard was asked,

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, thirty seven to eight, do you feel

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>like this is such a big hill to climb? And

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he's like, well, we're not starting the game down twenty

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>nine points. And I think it's natural from a fan

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>perspective maybe in some ways to think, oh yeah, thirty

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>seven to eight, boy, you know it. It sort of

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>does feel like in some ways that you're that you're

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>behind the eight ball right from the start of the game,

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, but reality is, the game starts at

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>at zero zero. I think from a preparation standpoint, there's

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot that the coaches are going to look at

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in that film, put together the game plan, and then

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they present it to the players on Wednesday morning before

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the first practice of the week on Wednesday afternoon. But

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I kind of get the sense that then once you

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>start prepared, once you hit the practice field on Wednesday,

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you have your Wednesday, Thursday, Friday practices. Then it's everything

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is forward, it's not it's not looking back anymore. I

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>think in some ways that's the line. That's the line

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that you have to walk, because there is a line

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>between you know, using that film and learning from it,

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>but not being consumed by it and not dwelling on

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>it for too long. And maybe it is it's you know,

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that moment you hit the practice field on Wednesday, that's

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>when the page turns and and all eyes are forward,

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>not back, and back to the virginal point I was making. Two.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>This is what I love about the way that La

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Fleura and Shanahanna mess sagging because they're both saying the

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>same thing as teams. From green Bay's perspective, you lost

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>by twenty nine points. You want to flush it. You

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>want to move on and understand that. Okay, our defense

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is playing better offensively, you've been galvanized here. I think

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>these last few weeks with Aaron Jones and Aaron Rodgers

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of bringing this offense and and you know, pushing

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>them forward. But then San Francisco's standpoint, they can't look

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>past green Bay. There's a reason why the line for

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the game is not minus twenty eight or twenty nine,

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>it's it's minus seven for this reason. And Shanahan talking reporters,

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna quote him on exactly what he said. He said,

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we know it'll be different. We know that game got

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>away from them early, and that's definitely not the team

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see this week. Everyone knows how good

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay is, how good their coaching staff is, how

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>good their players are, how good their quarterback is. I

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think they've lost a game since then, So I

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>think this game really holds zero relevance to what's going

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to happen. That game irrelevance to what's going to happen

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday, San Francisco. That the great part of this

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 1>story is they didn't just beat Green Bay and just

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to beat down the doors on every single opponent

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they faced after that. They lost to Atlanta, they nearly

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Rams, a game that would have cost

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>them their first round, the first round seed and buy

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and everything that went with it. And then they came

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>within a yard of losing to Seattle in that regular

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>season finale. Now they did put I thought their best

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>performance since Green Bay together against Minnesota, a suffocating outing

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>against that run game, and Kirk Cousins and I have

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to feel that they're they're pretty confident here with having

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Joe Staley back, d Ford Kwan, Alexander Matt Brita's is

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>available if they need him, and then certainly Robbie Gold

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>got healthy here over the last month. They're they're in

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a good position right now. But at the same time,

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they understand, much like Green Bay won't be thinking about

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>her treys trying not to think of that that matchup,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 1>they also have to flush it and push forward in

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>their own way. Yeah, I think Shanahan also had a

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>line something about, you know, it would it would be

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>foolish too for the forty nine ers to read too

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>much into what happened in week twelve. As much as

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Matt Lafleur talks about on a week to week basis,

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it's about hitting the reset button and everything. You know,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Shanahan's doing the same thing, and he's not going

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to let He's not going to let his players look

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>at the way they frankly dominated the Packers in the

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>trenches back in Week twelve and look at the film

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of go, oh yeah, well, we can

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>do that again, you know, I mean you can't. You

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>can't take it for granted. And I, in fact, I

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>saw a statistic, and I apologize for not writing it

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>down and getting an exact but I saw something with

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>regard to playoff rematches in NFL history where in the

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>regular season the two teams met and the game was

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>decided by twenty five plus points, so a blowout type

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of game like the like Week twelve was in Santa Clara,

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and the team the team that the blowout in the

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>regular season has definitely one more of the playoff rematches,

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's about a sixty forty roughly split. So of

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the time the team that got blown out in the

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>regular season has come back and turned the tables in

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. So not that that means anything in this

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>game as far as once that ball is kicked off

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on on Sunday with the Packers and the forty enters,

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>but it is just something to keep in mind, and

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it goes back. I think Alan Lazard's line might be

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>my favorite one of of the week so far, just well,

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we're not starting the game down twenty nine points, and

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what I think that's what the Packers.

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's what the Packers fans can can

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>take into Sunday afternoon. Yeah, and you gotta keep in

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>mind too, this isn't you getting beat up by your

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>older brother and Madden and then just putting the Controllers

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>down and coming back a couple of weeks later and

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>then the same result happening again. These are two teams

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that there's seven weeks of, you know, adaptation, evolution, improvement

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of this. We we had talked after

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that game that it's like, Okay, the Packers lost to

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the Niners there eight and three. You have five regular

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>season games left. You have five games to improve and

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>put yourself in a position to make a playoff run.

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what the Packers did. They are playing much

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>better football offensively. They've improved on third downs considerably after

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that horrible showing on third down in San Francisco. The

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>third down numbers are up. The um they put themselves

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in position to score a lot more points. I know

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we talked how at the end of the regular season

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they let some of those opportunities get away, so the

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>point totals weren't as high as they could have been.

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>We saw the defense cut down on the explosive plays.

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Forty Niners were hitting them, you know. For it felt

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>like big plays left and right in some respects in

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that game in Week twelve. So the Packers have made

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>themselves a better team. They've done what they've needed to do.

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out on Sunday whether they close the gap

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>enough to to take this well. And here's the other

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>great aspect of this matchup with the league wine narrative.

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>The national narrative seems to have been all season that, well,

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Packers aren't a thirteen win team, maybe they're

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>not as good as their record shows, I mean, their

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>point differential, all these other little analytics things you can

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>point towards. The three May Packers win on San win

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday against San Francisco in San in Santa Clara,

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that argument goes out the window. That team has proven

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>at that point that they are the best team in

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the NFC and have the right to compete for a

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl championship. I feel like this is a team

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that every step of the way. If you want to

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about the strengths of this organization, the structure from

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>top down with Brian goodicins, so the way he's managed

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it to how Mats coach it, and how the leaders

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in that locker room have pulled this locker room together.

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't care. They will they will handle adversity the

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 1>way that they handle it. And I wrote it again

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and Insider inbox this morning. If you want to beat

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the Green Bay Packers, you have to do exactly what

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco forty Niners did the first time. You

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have to jump on them early, and you have to

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>keep them down for four quarters because if that team

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is either a in the fourth quarter behind more often

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>than not this year, they've clawed their way back, and

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>if you actually give them a lead, like Russell Wilson

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>found out on Sunday, it's just not easy with how

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>they manage the formative offense, with the fact that they

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>get the production that they need, even if the offense

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't just you know, world beating everybody, and defensively when

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>they're cutting down on big plays, it's not easy to

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>score quickly against them. Those are all things that have

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>to be factored in this matchup. But it's the reason

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>why when Kyle Shannon said that in terms of you know,

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>they got down early, they kind of got away from

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>their game. If it's closer, it's an entirely different situation. Yeah,

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. Well, I want to go back

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to a couple of things from the playoff victory over

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Seahawks that we can discuss here, because it

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be a big game in the NFL in the

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen season post season if not for some officiating questions.

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.599
<v Speaker 1>And I know the fans are interested in our opinions

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>on what happened with the challenge on the fumble play

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>with Jacob Hollister and Chanted Sullivan in the first quarter.

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And obviously there's still a lot of barking and crying

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>about the spot of the Jimmy Graham reception at the

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 1>end of the game that gave the Packers the first

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>down and then allowed Green Bay to run out the clock.

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So starting with that play in the first quarter, I

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>think you and I are on the same page here. Um,

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we're sitting next to each other in the press box,

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>much like we're sitting next to each other right now,

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and we were somewhat in disbelief at the ruling that

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>came back from New York on that on that review,

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Am I right, Yeah, I was, Yeah, it really was.

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>And before I dive into that, I just want to

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>make this quick statement, A and B are both true,

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.599
<v Speaker 1>then C has to also. By the I think is

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>that the transitive property. It also has to be all

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the equals B and B equals see, then A equals see.

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So if they couldn't see whether or not Channon Sullivan

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>recovered the fumble, and if there is no quantifiable evidence,

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>overarching evidence to overturn the spot of the ball on

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the Jimmy Grant play because of video review, C has

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to be true. You can't. You can't argue it both ways,

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>whether you're a Packer fan or whether or not you're

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a Seahawks fan. You can perspective looking at the chan

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and play. The biggest issue I took on this and

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I said this an inbox, is that the lack of

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>urgency to officiate the play. Nobody, whether it was the

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>field judge side that nobody seemed to really be following

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the action. They were just sort of waiting for the

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>play to end. So with that happening in in you

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>have to understand NFL officials, referees, they do tons of

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>research throughout the week with a review previous games of

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the teams that are going to be officiating. They look

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>for tendencies. If you've watched the Green Bay Packers this year,

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Gire Alexander is not a big guy. I know he'll

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>probably mad at me for saying that, but he's not.

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>He's not. He's not six two two twenty. He's about

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>five eleven. I think he goes like maybe his The

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>way he tackles a lot of times is lower and up.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>He actually ended up getting flagged for it a couple

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, but that's the way he has to

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>get guys in the ground and he's pretty darn good

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>at it. If you see a tight end like Hollister

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>at two pounds or whatever he's doing, and Jire Alexander

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is the one making the play, you have to understand

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>as an official, this is the way that this cornerback,

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this defensive back attacks this play. He's gonna go up,

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>he's going to elevate, and he's gonna go for the

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>football the ball comes out. Yes, there were some bodies there,

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but there weren't enough bodies. It wasn't like it was

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that was the thing to me. Is it wasn't like

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it was some major scrum, and it was pretty clear.

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It looked pretty clear to me on the replay that

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Sullivan got his hands on the ball pretty quickly there

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and then just because some other guys like jumped on

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the pile like you know. Okay, so they say, they

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>say it's not they say it's not a clear recovery.

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But man, oh man, I mean, he got his hands

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>on the ball and there was no there was He

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>got his hands on the ball before the scrum happened,

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the mini scrum, I guess I'll call it. And there

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>was certainly no evidence anywhere in the video that anybody

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>ever took the ball away from him. So that's what

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what I didn't That's why I didn't understand how

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that ball doesn't end up in green base possession. So

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>west hod Kuwitz, little west Hodquitz, went in locker room.

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>He did the thing the officials didn't. He actually asked

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Jannon Sullivan about the play. Sullivan didn't have any communication

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>with the referees. They didn't even give him an explanation afterwards.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>What happened was that Sullivan he noticed that JayR had

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>dislodged the ball. He could see the way it was happening.

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>He anticipated it. He rolls down there. Now he said,

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have it immediately, but in the scrum he

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>got it. Like he's the only one that ever established

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>possession of this, and if you need evidence of that,

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>he hands it to the official. The officials kind of

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just lally gag into the scrum. You know what happens

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>usually on a fumble play. They charge in there and

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they're already trying to break things up. Yeah, but the yeah,

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>but the thing is the the officials were all relaxed

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>because the call in the field was that it was

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>was that it was no fumble. So when you talk

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>about the lack of urgency, it was because well they

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>had blown the whistle and the guy who was on

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>top of it said no, he was down, so nobody

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>else was really nobody else clicked in from a mental

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>standpoint to say, well, maybe we should see who who

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>ends up with this call. Anyway, they didn't take that

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>approach on the field, and then I think it cost

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the packers because because of the review that came from

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>New York. I still I saw the little video that

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Al Riveran put out in his explanation, which isn't really

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>an explanation. He's just reading the rule to you on camera,

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and I just I just don't buy it. I just

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was I thought it was weak. I

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>thought I thought there was pretty clear evidence that that

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>was the Packers football. Yeah. So I guess the question

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>ultimately comes down to if the ball comes out so

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>many times now, if even if the ground force of

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the fumble they're throwing, you know, they're they're making sure

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that everyone knows that it's still alive play. They didn't

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>do it in that occasion, So maybe you just get

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>stuck in this gray area whatever it may have you.

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But it obviously ended up going against the Packers. Yeah.

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's the other question I want to throw at you

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>about this though. So the Packers challenge the play. It

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is rule to fumble, but they say but they say

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>no clear recovery. Yet they take away the challenge and

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the time out, which because it was the first half,

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't too worked up about the time out necessarily,

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>But to me, as I said to you in the

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>press box at the time, I mean, the game is

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>only what five to seven minutes old or whatever at

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that point, and the Packers don't get that challenge correct

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in the in the complete sense, so it costs them

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a challenge. Now you're looking at the last fifty plus

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>minutes of the game, You've only got one challenge the

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of the game, whether you get it right or wrong,

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>because you don't get a third one unless you get

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the first two right. To me, that to me, that's

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>something that that was a really tough break for the Packers. Now,

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it didn't turn out that Matt Lafleur didn't end up

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>with really any other situations where he was maybe being

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>pressed to challenge something and use that second challenge, but

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>he was in a position where he was going to

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>have to have to be very judicious with making a

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>second challenge because it was his only one for the

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of the game, and because that play had happened

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>on on Seattle's first offensive play of the game. A

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>few years ago, my computer got fried. It was a

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>good computer, and I didn't have it backed up. Kids,

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>back up your computers, and so I had some old

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>stories and some stuff on there, and I brought it

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>to a local camera repair shop, video all that kind

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of repair shop, and I brought in there and said, hey,

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing we can do for you fair game. I

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>got the computer back and I went back in my

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>car and I drove home. I didn't have to pay

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>them anything for them to tell me that they couldn't

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>fix my computer. If you if they actually if they're

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ruling on the field changes, because if I'm correct in this,

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Holistair is then credited with a fumble, is he

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>not he's credited with He's credited with fumbling the ball statistically,

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>So if there is a change to the play, I

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>think that's one thing. Whether it's in the spring meetings

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that the NFL is gonna have to look at it.

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if you know, Mark Murphy would end up

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioning it, because you can't be in a situation where, yeah,

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you know he did fumble, but there's not evidence that

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it was a turnover. So we're taking away your time

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>out and your challenge. You're right, the time out, Who cares,

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the first half, But that challenge if the challenge

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 1>rule is going to be that you need both to

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>get the third and if you don't get one, you

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>only get one more for the rest of the game.

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a I thought I thought that was I

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>thought that was a tough break. I want to talk

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>about the Jimmy Graham play at the end too, because

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I credit and I apologize for not writing down the

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>person's name. I credit an inbox reader who sent in

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>as I was working on Monday Mornings inbox in the

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>late hours of Sunday night, there was I was directed

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>by a reader to another website had some really good

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>pictures of the play at the end with Graham and

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the catch and then and then the spot essentially pointing

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>out that Fox's yellow line in that particular moment was off,

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like it wasn't. I mean, and everybody's you know, your

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>eyes are just trained, like, Okay, there's the yellow line,

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>there's where the tackle is made. But that yellow line

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even close when you look at where the marker

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>is on the sideline, the yellow line wasn't even close.

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I think, I think this whole thing with

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the Jimmy Graham play controversy is sort of manufactured by

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>some faulty technology that just wasn't quite was wasn't really

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>accurate enough in the moment. And uh, Otherwise, I think,

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>if I think, if that yellow line is actually where

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the first down marker is nobody's really talking about this.

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>This Jimmy Graham in the spot of the last play.

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So this is actually one situation where it doesn't matter

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>how many cameras you have, It doesn't matter all the

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>technology that you can, you know, go into unless we're

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>literally talking about like you know, microchips being in the

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>football to tell you exactly the precise location. This is

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>actually where you just need to trust your side judge

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>because that side judge had the best view of anybody,

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>view that nobody else captured except for that really far

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>zoomed out sideline camera that they had. The one they

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>tried to zoom in. It wasn't happening. It was like

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>me to take a picture of your iPhone. It's like

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to get a little bit closer, and everything

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>just gets to start. You have to actually whether whether

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 1>you agree with the caller you don't agree with the call.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>The best perspective was the two eyes of the side

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>judge because of where Graham's body landed. He was only

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 1>showing the football to the sideline, so that's where they

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>felt like he was down. That's where he was down

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>to This whole thing about the yellow line, I just

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>love that it's got Adrian Amos, it's got all these

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think media types, all these people are

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>pointing out like, yeah, you guys have to understand like

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this isn't like that isn't an NFL like official line.

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>That's that's just the TV broadcast. It's Joe up in

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the production that you know is just trying to get

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>home to his family here in two hours and you

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>know and pack up the truck. That's the guy that's

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>like putting that line down on the field. So, yeah,

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was a issue where they had it

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>directly lined up on the ardage line. I can't remember

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>which one it was. But the real spot of the

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>first down is signific is inches ahead of that, not

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>even touching the white. Yeah, that that's that's the thing

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you could you can see when you if you if

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at if you look at the picture, look

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>at the play again, look at the the little orange

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of I guess you call it the flat pylon.

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>That's like that's like laying there on the grass. And

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 1>look at where the yellow line is. I mean it's

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it looks like it's a I would say

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>even a good maybe eight to ten inches off I mean,

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it looks like it's significantly it's significantly off,

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and the visual of the yellow line, I think is

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>what is kind of what created this whole controversy. Yeah.

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So fortunately everything cooler heads prevailed. Additional footage came in

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>from the heavens. That was that was, that was only thing.

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly a suddenly Cleet Blakeman comes back on the microphone

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and he and he says, as soon as he says

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 1>like additional footage, I was like, oh my goodness, are

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they going to change the call now? After he already

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>announced that the call stands. I mean, I think lambeau

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I think lambeau Field would have just like spontaneously imploded

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>if if they change the call after that. But he says, well,

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>if additional footage it became available, but it doesn't change

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.479
<v Speaker 1>the call, and then everybody cheers again. The Packers go

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 1>into victory formation and uh and we're moving on with

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>our lives. And as I said after the game, my

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 1>first two weet as soon as it was over. I

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I've covered a normal football game this year.

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>That was number seventeen now of the rate of our

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of our season for meaningful games. Yeah, I still don't

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>know if I've covered one that's like, okay, start to finish,

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what it was. Yeah, all right, Well with that,

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>we will call it a wrap on today's edition of

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Packers Unscripted. Be sure to follow all of our coverage

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of the team here on NFC Championship Week on Packers

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You can subscribe to us like us on

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>iTunes and other podcast services, and there's all kinds of

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>great video content out there on the Packers YouTube channel

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for West. I'm Mike. Thanks for tuning in, everybody. We'll

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>see you next time.