WEBVTT - Hour 2 – NFL Draft QB Questions, Clark Kellogg 

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Our two.

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:09.239
<v Speaker 2>On this Tuesday. Clark Kellogg from CBS will join us.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk some March madness. Reggie Miller. He'll join us

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 2>in the final hour of the program. Can wemby steal

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>the MVP eight seven seven three DP show email address

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Dpadanpatrick dot com, Twitter handle the DP Show. Good morning

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>if you are allowing us into your homes watching on

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Peacock or NBC Sports Network. We say good morning to

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 2>our radio affiliates around the country. Four hundred cities carry

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 2>this award nominated program Opening day Major League Baseball quietly

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow It'll be the Giants against the Yankees on Netflix.

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 2>All right? Pull question Seaton eight seven to seven three

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 2>DP Show operator Tyler sitting by results from the first hour,

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 2>and what are we going to go with hour two?

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Whose career would you want? Past, present, future? Otani, Wimbinyama

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 3>or other. Otani has seventy three percent of that vote,

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>followed by fifty percent from one ban Yama and twelve

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 3>percent from another other. That's interesting to me. Why are

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 3>people not appreciate Is it too early for victor or?

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Probably so? I think once you win something, you

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 2>know where we waited for Giannis to win. We waited

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 2>for Embiid he won an MVP. We waited for Joker.

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 2>But Otani is here, he's now, and you know we

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>waited to see could he do it? And he was

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>able to do it high end pitching and hitting. Yes,

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm seeing the problem with this poll question.

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Actually it's a little bit in the wording, because now

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>that I'm going down through the comments where all the

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 2>others are, it's like, ever heard of Bill Russell? Ever

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:51.919
<v Speaker 2>heard of Michael Jordan, Tom Brady, Patrick Mahomes. It's like, Okay,

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 2>that's not the group that we're talking about. Okay, should

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 2>have been freezed. I should have changed the free today's athlete, Yeah, okay,

0:01:58.920 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 2>something like that.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Paul, I was wondering when I wrote this, is

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 4>there another Is there another global athlete that's young or

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 4>in his prime that's global, which would remove the NFL M.

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I don't know if soccer, Messi and

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Rinaldo were at the back half. I don't know if

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 4>soccer has the global athlete. The one singular global.

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 3>Athlete, like the dude right now is Lamina mal he's

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 3>probably like he's I think he's like eighteen nineteen something

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 2>He's a big deal. He's a really big deal. Yeah, Oh,

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Tani is global. That helps. But then when Benyama is

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 2>from France, global sport with the NBA as well, Yes, don.

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 5>Depending on where you ranked tennis in the Lexicon of Sports,

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 5>Carlos Alkaraz had a pretty good resume for twenty two

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 5>years old.

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but when you look at the numbers that he

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>has to get, when you know Novak Djokovic, I mean,

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.119
<v Speaker 2>those numbers are to even think, you know, somebody's going

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 2>to eclipse those numbers. I remember when Pete Sampras won

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>it Wembledon, and I think, what was that his fourteenth

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 2>or fifteenth or sixteen, And I'm like, is anybody going

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 2>to come close to that? So he's got fourteen Grand

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Slam titles, and then all of a sudden you had Federer,

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 2>you hadn't a doll and then you had Novak Djokovic

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 2>in the same era competing against each other wild and

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 2>for him to be to stand alone having to compete

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 2>with those guys, whether it was on clay or it

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 2>was at US Open or wembled in Australian Open and

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>to have that many Grand Slams. You know, when you

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 2>forget how many Grand Slams, how many titles somebody has,

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 2>that's when you know you've had a pretty special career.

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>And you're like, I don't how many. I don't know

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>how many is he got? How many does Djokovic have?

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Sam twenty three, twenty four, twenty four. It's easy to

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 2>lose track of that.

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Since we started the show.

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 2>He won another one. All right, we'll get another poll

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 2>question here for hour and two. The last hour we

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>at the end of it, we talked about dan Orlovsky

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 2>of the Mothership. He really likes himself some Ty Simpson,

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and he had this to say on Get Up. I

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 2>think ty Simpson is QB one.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 6>I think ty Simpson is the best quarterback in this class.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 6>I think when you look at the body of work

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 6>and what was asked of these two quarterbacks, you have

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 6>to start with the question who needed to do more

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 6>to carry their football team to play well? Ty Simpson

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 6>and it's not close between those two quarterbacks. And if

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 6>we're asking, like okay, we're trying to see what you

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 6>are as a player in college and what you're gonna

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 6>be asked to do in the NFL, and what translates.

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 6>I start with what do you do in moments of

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 6>panic with the football? Because that's really what separates good degree.

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 6>I would tell you that ty Simpson and is more

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 6>consistent in that regard. What guy was asked to do

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 6>more NFL throws fifteen twenty twenty five yard en routes

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 6>deep corner or sale routes ty Simpson And it's not

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 6>even close in that regard.

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 2>I believe that he truly believes now conspiracy theorist, and

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 2>you know they're represented by this same firm CIA. CIA

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 2>represents a whole lot of people in the sports world.

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if Orlovsky's doing somebody a solid here.

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 2>ESPN does have the draft and all of a sudden,

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 2>you're now pushing this out now. I don't know if

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 2>anybody's going to react. I don't know if a team

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 2>goes wait, wait a minute, man, we didn't have a

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 2>first round grade in Orlovsky. Now that would be where

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 2>if I'm a GM, I would have enough respect for

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Orlovsky that I would reach out to him and I

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>would say, Hey, tell me what you're seeing, Tell me

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 2>what I might be missing here because Orlovsky did play

0:05:55.800 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 2>the position. He's very educated in analyzing the those who

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>are playing the position. And just because he says he's

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 2>better than Fernando Mendoza doesn't mean he's going to be

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>a great quarterback. Like, keep that in mind. The situation

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 2>you're going to go into, and I don't know how

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>good Fernando Mendoza is going to be. Do I think

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 2>he's a great face for your franchise. If you're the Raiders,

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 2>you have stability there. Yes, But he's not Andrew Luck,

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 2>he's not Peyton Manning. So I think just because you're

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>the number one pick in the draft you won the Heisman,

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>that's happened before, and it doesn't mean that doesn't equate

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 2>to success. He has the measurables. Orlofsky is saying ty

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Simpson had to overcome more. Now MY big concern is,

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>what did they have sixteen starts in college? I don't

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 2>want a quarterback who had sixteen starts. History's on my side.

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I got to have at least thirty five starts. Now

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 2>that's where I look at bow Knicks didn't go well

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 2>at Auburn. He goes to Oregon He's a quarterback in

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 2>two very competitive conferences, and he plays at a very

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 2>high level when he gets to Oregon and prove that

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 2>was no fluke by what he's done with Denver. But

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I need a sample size. I always go back to

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Trey lance Man. That's an incredible year. Okay, it was

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 2>one year. I want to see what you can do

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.679
<v Speaker 2>for at least two years, if not three bow Knicks

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 2>played five years. Jaden Daniels five years in college. That's

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 2>what I want to see. But I truly believe Orlavsky

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 2>believes that Ty Simpson is a better quarterback than Fernando Mendoza.

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Now a lot goes into that if Fernando Mendoza, well,

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders will protect him, They'll beef up the offensive line.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 2>And I'm you know, I'm grateful, thankful, because I don't

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 2>want to see another situation where you go that guy's

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 2>going to lose his confidence. They're going to be a mess.

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 2>He's going to get sacks sixty five times. He'll be

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 2>another David Carr. I've been down this road before, and

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I hope he gets that opportunity. Also with ty Simpson.

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 2>What if he goes to the Jets, what if he

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 2>goes to the Cardinals, he's not in a better position

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 2>than Fernando Mendoza other than he won't be asked to

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 2>start right away. But what if he goes to Pittsburgh.

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Now he's in a better situation than Fernando Mendoza. And

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of times it comes down to where you

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 2>go when did you get drafted. I always go back

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to what Tom Brady told me years ago. If he

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>was a first round pick, he never would have lasted

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 2>in the league because he wasn't ready. Instead, he got

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 2>his chance and he made the most of it. Patrick

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes going to Kansas City. If he ended up going

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 2>to Carolina or Cleveland or the Bears, he's not Patrick Mahomes.

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 2>These things work out, but they work out because of

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 2>the surrounding cast. And ty Simpson might be the best quarterback,

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 2>but that doesn't mean he's going to be great or

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 2>even good. And I even said this about Fernando Mendoza.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:25.839
<v Speaker 2>If I said right now, he'll have the career of

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Joe Flacco, you're going to sign up for that. Now

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 2>you may not want to, I would tell you to

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 2>sign up for that. Or if I said he's going

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 2>to have the career of Kirk Cousins. Are you going

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 2>to sign up for that? The answer is no. But

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 2>if you look, I want sustainability. I want somebody who

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 2>has put up good numbers. That's what you want. You

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 2>want somebody who's going to be there every year. He's

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 2>going to be your franchise. He's going to put up numbers.

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Joe Flacco had a very good career. Yeah, Mark, if.

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 7>People don't forget how close the Ravens were to a

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 7>couple other Super Bowls, so they were really competitive with

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 7>Joe Flacco. Besides winning that one super Bowl.

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Mel Kiper will join us on the program tomorrow. Yes,

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 2>paul I went back.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 4>And looked in twenty twenty four, about a month before

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 4>the draft, around now Orlofsky had his quarterbacks. He said,

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 4>Jade Daniels, no doubt, number one pick. He said, then

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Caleb Williams, Drake May But he said he had no

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 4>doubts about Jade Daniels, and people dinged them for that,

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 4>They said, well, how can you put him that far ahead.

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 4>There was a time when that take was completely right.

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 4>At the end of Jade and daniels first year, everybody

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 4>thought Jane Daniels was the guy, and injuries have slowed

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 4>that take down, and it fluctuates year to year. But

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 4>the Jayden and Daniels take was hot at the time.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we still believe that he can be

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 2>an elite quarterback. But I don't know. Hey, I still

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 2>liked Caleb Williams, but you know, I like even more

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>now because of his coach and the weapons he's got.

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 2>And then Drake may goes to the super Bowl without

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 2>really a supporting cast. But you know, it's year to year.

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they got a long way to go before

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 2>it's done. But if Orlovsky likes ty Simpson and uh,

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 2>you want to criticize that because they're represented by the

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 2>same you know, firm mothership carries the draft, hype it

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 2>up a little bit, Okay, But I truly believe that

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Orlovsky believes Ty Simpson is the number one quarterback.

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah see, I'm not saying that Dan doesn't believe that

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Dan Orlovsky, but it does happen in this business where uh, oh,

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 3>that guy, my age, my best friend is this agent,

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 3>and that guy's one of my that agent's players, my

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 3>best friends players.

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 2>So I talked nicer about them.

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that absolutely happens. Maybe not so much the number

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 3>one overall pick of the draft that's usually, but definitely

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 3>in all of the other ones. My best friends is

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 3>that guy's agent, so I talk nice about him.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Yeah. When you're all of a sudden saying that

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 2>somebody's forty yard dash time at the combine wasn't correct

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 2>because other people had handheld times for that forty yard dash,

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>and then all of a sudden, you realize maybe there's

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a relationship with an agent, and you're going, in a minute,

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 2>what about all the other guys who had hand time

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>forty yard dashes? Just one player stood out?

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 8>Yes.

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 9>Boy.

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 4>Whenever I hear a negative report about a draftee this month,

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it's another team trying to get that draftee

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 4>to drop to them.

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 2>You know That's what it feels like. Well, we've talked

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 2>about this where we have to have something to talk about.

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 2>The mothership NFL network, they have to have something to

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 2>talk about that's different. What is different. They can run

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 2>ESPN can run with this the entire week if they

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 2>want to. With Ty Simpson, they can run that and

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 2>everybody's going to have an opinion on it. There's no

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 2>other quarterback that you can put into the conversation. Though

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 2>there's no QB three here, you're waiting for something else

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 2>with this draft. How early do you take Jeremiah Love

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 2>And where does Ty Simpson go?

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 7>Yes, Mark, do not worry, guys. Next year's QB's class

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 7>going to be loaded.

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Of course. It will be a couple of phone calls

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 2>in here and then we'll talk to Clark Kellogg. David Montana,

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, Dave. What's on your mind today?

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey?

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 9>Dan? First time ever doing this six one and a

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 9>wife pleasing power lifting two hundred and thirty pounds. So

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 9>I have been fortunate. I work for myself. I've been

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 9>able to take my children to school in the morning

0:13:54.720 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 9>all these years, and throughout all those years on in

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 9>the background of the morning. And I'm a little bit emotional.

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 9>Today is the anniversary my dad passing away. But You've

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 9>always been in the background in the morning with my kids,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 9>the older kids that have moved on when they come

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 9>back home. One of the things they always ask the

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 9>younger kids his house, the Dan Patrick's show, and just

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 9>having that constant stream in the morning. To tie all

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 9>of that time together and all those years, I've got

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 9>one story out of it. In the afternoon when I

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 9>pick up the kids. Normally we've moved on to music.

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 9>But the one day I wasn't feeling music and I

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 9>had the radio station.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 2>On and Colin Cowhard was on.

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 9>In the afternoon, kids hop in the truck. They look

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 9>at the radio station. They're wondering what's going on. When

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 9>I explain how radio stations work, everybody gets quiet for

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 9>a couple seconds, and about ten seconds later, all you

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 9>hear from the back is this guy sucks.

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, come on, come on, tell your kids to

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 2>be nice. Sorry to hear about your dad. Good taste,

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 2>but still you don't need to do that. No, no,

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>we're not rack me. I'm out. Colin and I are fine.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 2>We're fine. We moved on. We're fine. The kids may

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 2>have issues, but kids get it. Yeah, he's all choked up,

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 2>and uh, well, there's one story. And then my kids

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 2>say this. Now we're fine. Colin and I are fine,

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 2>We move on.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I knew that story was gonna end like this.

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 2>You did at brought up Collins?

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Yeah, I saw where this is going.

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, lost my dad, kids, come back, this guy sucks. Alright,

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 2>let's take a break. Nobody says a bad word about

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Clark Kellogg nobody. No, you can't find anybody who'll say

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 2>a bad word about Clark. Kelloch Jumper was a little suspective. Stinks,

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 2>but definitely not sucks. Clark will join us coming up

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 2>next here on The Dan Patrick Show.

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to catch the live edition of The Dan

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Show weekdays at nine am Eastern six am Pacific

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports Radio and the iHeartRadio app.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 10>Paully Fools Gohere with Tony Foosco. Yeah, as everybody knows,

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 10>we're the hosts of the award winning Paully and Tony

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 10>Foodsco Show. But instead of us telling you how great

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 10>we are, here's how Dan Patrick described us when he

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 10>came on our show.

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Quick, knowledgeable and funny, opinionated.

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing interrupting our promo? Yeah, you wasn't

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about you.

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 11>You took those clips totally of context.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 10>Oh yeah, well after this promo, I'm gonna take you

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 10>out and beat you.

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Let me put this into context.

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Shut up.

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, anyway, just listen to the Paully in tone many

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 10>Boothsgo show on IoT Radio, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 10>get your podcasts.

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Yea more phone calls coming up. They called him Special

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>K when he was in high school and college. Clark

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Kellogg CBS Sports Lead college basketball studio analyst and the

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 2>eighth round or eighth overall pick by the Pacers in

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty two in the first round. You still got

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 2>your uniform from your Pacer days, you know, I've got

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I do.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 12>Have actually a Pacer uniform and a Buckeye uniform DP

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 12>in a memorabilia case that primarily is filled with our

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 12>kids stuff, not mine, But I do have I do

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 12>have a Pacer uniform and a buck Eye jersey in then.

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 2>Did you ever ask for somebody's jersey when you were playing?

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 8>I have not.

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 13>I do have a signed pair of Reggie Miller's shoes.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 13>I got a signed pair of Kobe's through an auction.

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 13>Reggie actually signed a pair of personal for me. But

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 13>that's I think. And I have something from John Wooden,

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 13>the late great John Wooden. I have a basketball that

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 13>he signed for me with a scripture reference on it. Oh,

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 13>I can't think I'm not a huge memorabilia god, Dan,

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 13>I'm not. I'm more of a memories guy. So I'm

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 13>trying to accumulate those and photos and the like, and

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 13>but no, I'm not a big memorabilia guy. Actually, my

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 13>wife doesn't allow me to bring too much extra stuff.

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't imagine back in your day where you asked

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Larry Bird for one of his jerseys.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 13>No, that wasn't quite operated in that time. Great respect,

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 13>great admiration. But I'm trying to figure out how I

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 13>can maybe take him down when I see him and

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 13>ask him for his jersey.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 8>But probably getting away of that.

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Everybody is it feels like lamenting. There's no Cinderella story.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 2>But I think there's dark horses like Iowa in Nebraska.

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 2>It's a great story. Even Texas coming out of nowhere,

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 2>but they're not a Cinderella story. There's high point BCU.

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 2>You know they were nice, but now you know we

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 2>get to this point. It feels like this is where

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 2>you want the blue bloods or you want the best

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.239
<v Speaker 2>teams in college basketball. So your thoughts about no so

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 2>called Cinderella Dan.

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 13>This tournament is such a special event on the sports calendar.

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 8>In the minds of many, it's the best.

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 13>It's three weeks to a championship, that's sixty eight teams.

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 13>Ultimately one gets a signing moment.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 8>You do have.

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 13>Stories that unfold from places that you don't anticipate, and

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 13>you can dub Cinderella however you'd.

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 8>Like to dub her.

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 13>This tournament always, always, always delivers. Now depending on your

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 13>personal preference of what you prefer, then it might deliver

0:19:56.440 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 13>more or less in a given year than you think.

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 13>But by and large, we've had a great blend of

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 13>the excitement, the unpredictability that is March Madness, and so

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 13>I always embrace it for what it is each and

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 13>every year. We had four number ones for the second

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 13>time since the field expanded last year, and that was phenomenal.

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 13>We very well could have three number ones in the

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 13>final four this year.

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 8>That's still TBD. So I take it for what it is.

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 13>It's a joyous and exciting and blessed ride every year,

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 13>and we've had quality matchups.

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 8>We've had some surprising blowouts too.

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 13>I mean we had blowouts in a four or five

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 13>matchup between Texas Tech and Obama.

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:46.959
<v Speaker 8>We had a surprising.

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 13>Blowout in an eight nine matchup between Saint Louis and Georgia.

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 13>I can't recall seeing those kind of margins of victories

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 13>with those two seed lines, so again, enjoy it for

0:20:58.240 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 13>what it is.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 8>I'm not opposed so the matchups we have.

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 13>Cinderella showed up briefly, and we still have one I

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 13>think in Iowa, who shockingly dominated a dominating inside frontline

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:13.479
<v Speaker 13>in Florida.

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Talking to Clark Kellogg from CBS being studio for March Madness,

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 2>the future of the mid major I don't want to overreact,

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 2>but I do want to react to it. Of is

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 2>this an aberration of what's gone on maybe the last

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 2>two years, and maybe kind of this is the future

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 2>with college basketball?

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 13>Time shall tell Dan, you know, we have a real

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 13>tendency towards recency bias in our lives and in our sports.

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 13>And we'll see, right, we'll see it clearly looks like

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 13>the tide has shifted more towards the Power Conference teams,

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 13>the big brand names, but there's been a dominance of

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 13>those groups. Anyway, it might be enhanced and increase going forward.

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 13>I still believe part of the magic of this event

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 13>is the fact that the mid majors of the.

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 8>Non Power Conference teams have an.

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 13>Opportunity, with the right mix and the right formula to

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 13>get to an elite A to Final four where we

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 13>see fewer than.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 8>We've seen in past years.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 13>The lanstgate tends to lead you to think that I

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 13>would rather let the data accumulate before making a statement

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 13>on it.

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 2>But I'm wondering if I just look at this big

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 2>picture logically, you have the big conferences where these kids

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 2>might not be drafted and they could stay an extra

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 2>year now, and you're going to then you're going to

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 2>have big names at your school who will go to

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 2>the draft. But then you're gonna get guys who go,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 2>I got nil that I can make money. I might

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 2>stay a year longer at Kentucky or LSU or Florida

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 2>those places. And you're also going to cherry pick the

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 2>mid majors where you go, hey, do you see that

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 2>freshman or a sophomore. We can offer you money, And

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 2>that's where I think you're going to have guys stay.

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 2>But you're also going to get an influx of guys

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 2>who have proven that they can play, and you may

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 2>not have to go after you know, a high school kid,

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 2>you're getting somebody who's already you know, battle tested.

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 13>Valid valid points, real points, that reality exists. But I

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 13>also think somebody mentioned this to me, and I can't

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 13>recall who it was, because I'd love to attribute this

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 13>to them, But they also talked about as much as

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 13>we've talked about the Marquis freshman and how great this

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 13>class is, there also have been a number of really

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 13>good freshmen that have played at the high points or

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 13>the mid majors and have excelled. And I think so

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 13>may stend some of that tide and still help March

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 13>Madness be a Cinderella place on occasion, will be that

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 13>some of these high school kids that are talented but

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 13>may not be one and done kind of guys will

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 13>end up in good situations at winning programs at the

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 13>mid major level, and some of them will decide that

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 13>that's the best place for me to be as long

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 13>as I can be comfortably taken care of from an

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 13>nil standpoint and can develop and can maybe make a

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 13>March Madness moment with a group of guys that I

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 13>want to play with. So I think that's still going

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:44.479
<v Speaker 13>to exist. I'm always idealistic won't exist as much, but

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 13>I think it still will be part of the fabric.

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Feels like people are cooling on Duke's chances.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 13>Understandably, So, I mean, when you look at how Michigan

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 13>is played purduers coming on Arizona. I thought Michigan in

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 13>Arizona coming into the tournament would have been co favorites.

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 13>I don't look at the odds makers, but I'm sure

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 13>that's probably what it looked like. I know Duke at

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 13>one point, but you have the injury to Gonem, but

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 13>he looked good in this game. He looks to be

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 13>one hundred percent. Obviously, Kayla Foster is not coming back.

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 13>You're wondering how that affects Duke as they go forward.

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 13>So I could see where if you're ranking the remaining

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 13>teams and you've got tom Izzoe in Michigan State looking

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 13>at you and how successful he's been, that Duke would

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 13>be considered maybe vulnerable in its bracket.

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 8>They've got Saint John's first, which isn't going to be easy.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 13>So I could see that, Yeah, I could see that

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 13>where people would cool on their chances to win it all.

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Did B why you get their money's worth with aj DEBANSA.

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 8>That's a relative question.

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 13>I mean, clearly they got talked about more and probably

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 13>got more media exposure and contact than they could have

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 13>ever imagined, certainly in terms of what happened on the

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 13>floor in terms of success, maybe a ted But but again,

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 13>I don't know what the number was. You hear those numbers,

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 13>but there's no real reporting like you get from the NBA,

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 13>where you know what guys are really making. I think

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 13>it was as long as he felt good about where

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 13>he landed, they felt good about how he produced. The

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 13>results as a team were less than anticipated, but I

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 13>would think it would have been I would look at

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 13>it as a fair exchange.

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 2>Quite honestly, we're gonna expand the first four. At some

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 2>point you're.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 8>Assered of that. Yeah, okay, what do you think is

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 8>going to be DP?

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I just think you double Tuesday and Wednesday.

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 8>So you're talking eight teams.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 2>You just you get six. You still get your sixty

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 2>four to start officially on Thursday. But I think they'll

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 2>just they'll add more games on Tuesday and Wednesday. I

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 2>don't think anybody will have a problem with more games

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 2>on Tuesday and Wednesday. And I mean the structure is

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 2>going to be the same. I think that's what people

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 2>will be like, Okay, we still have our sixty four

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 2>teams and are are one through sixteen. I think they'll

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 2>just they'll add to Tuesday and Wednesday.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I don't disagree. I mean they've talked.

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 13>The talk has been seventy two to seventy six teams,

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 13>which mathematically makes sense because most of the championships that

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 13>the NCAA puts on, twenty percent of the eligible teams

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 13>make the postseason. We are currently at three hundred and

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 13>sixty five Division One teams. Twenty percent of that would

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 13>be seventy three. So I've reconciled that being I know

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 13>it's about more games and more money, but I've reconciled

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 13>the mathematical component of why we would expand, and it

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 13>was much the same when we went from sixty four

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 13>to sixty eight in twenty eleven.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 8>The number of Division One teams.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 13>That increase, you want to get to that twenty twenty one,

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 13>twenty two percent.

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 8>And I'm fine with that.

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 13>Expanding for the sake of expansion, no, But when you've

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 13>got a ration now behind it, more teams create more

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 13>spaces for opportunities for more players student athletes, so I'm

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 13>good with it. I don't think we'll go anything beyond

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 13>either four additional teams or eight, And to your point,

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 13>I think folks will be fine and adjust and be

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 13>happy with starting the sixty four team bracket on Thursday.

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 13>The calendar won't allow for much more than that. I

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 13>just think the calendar would allow for anything beyond that.

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 2>How often does Charles Berkley leave you speechless?

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 14>I mean, but it's so much fun for him to

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 14>leave you speechless or shaking your head, or scratching your head,

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 14>or just laughing hysterically.

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 13>I tell everybody you know you spent a lot of

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 13>time around him. He's one of the most gracious celebrities

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 13>of his stature that you will find anywhere, because he's

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 13>genuinely a good guy, and he is a genuinely funny guy,

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 13>which adds to his persona, which is off the charge.

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Good to talk to you work. Thanks for joining us, Clark.

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 13>Always a pleasure, Dan, I look forward to it every year.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 13>Keep up the great work, Man, Clark.

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Kellong CBS lead college basketball studio analysts known as Special K.

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's see a couple of phone calls in here. How

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 2>about Mark and Nebraska? Hi? Mark, what's on your mind today?

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 9>Hey?

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 11>Dan six o one working on a two hundred pounds

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 11>So I am a proud Nebraska fan. I'm twenty five

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 11>years old. And this is probably might be the biggest

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 11>Nebraska game in my entire lifetime. All right, Dan, there

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 11>are three things. I am Reese on Mark Mark.

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 2>There aren't a lot of big Nebraska games in your lifetime.

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 11>Hey more, my parents. My parents say that we used

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 11>to be really good at football.

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 2>And I have yet to be lea. You guys were

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 2>really good at football, trust me. But have you become

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 2>a basketball school?

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 11>You know, i'd say lately for sure? Yeah, I mean

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 11>I don't know our football team, Like I'm not, Like

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 11>I'm not drinking the kool aid too much this year.

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 11>But I went down to Oklahoma City for the first

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 11>round game and like there were sixteen thousand fans there,

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 11>fifteen thousand were Nebraska. Yeah yeah, And even during the

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 11>second round game. You heard him channing Husker power during

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 11>the Houston Texas.

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 9>A and M game.

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 11>So for me to believe that there isn't just going

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 11>to be a sea of red coming down from Lincoln,

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 11>Nebraska and taking over Houston, I don't believe it. But

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 11>I'm telling you skirts by ninety I have an absolute

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 11>hatred for Iowa, always had and this is this is

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 11>my super Bowl here.

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Why do you hate Iowa.

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 11>Well, I mean, there's a few personal reasons. My dad

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 11>is also an Iowa State fan. He went to school

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 11>at Iowa State, so also a hatred there. Had next

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 11>girlfriend who's an Iowa fan cheated on me. But that's

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 11>neither here nor there. But that's a personal reason. But yeah,

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 11>I mean, why iwa who even likes I sat?

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, good luck Mark. I really am looking

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 2>forward to that game. I just hope that it is

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 2>what we expected to be, almost like when Oklahoma Nebraska

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 2>played football on Thanksgiving back in the seventies. Ah, that

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 2>was great stuff. Nate, Mila, Hi, Nate, what's on your

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>mind today?

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 8>Hey?

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 7>Dan?

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 15>I wanted to throw an idea out there for your

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 15>speech at your daughter's wedding in August. Yep, why not

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 15>incorporate Why not incorporate elements in a DP ship like

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 15>it stat of the day, the number of times you

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 15>were proud of your daughter, this day in sports history,

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 15>a proud sports village she had as a kid, best

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 15>and worse, thell the weekend, best her getting married and

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 15>worst this speech and then and then take some calls

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 15>from the wedding game.

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll take some people be raising their hand at the

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 2>recept giving me their height and weight. Oh, thank you, Nate.

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 2>A lot of suggestions coming in yesterday on social media

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 2>helping me get through this speech in August. Yes, Ton,

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 2>take it from me.

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 5>You don't want to make it about you. If you

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 5>do something like that, then you're totally making it about you.

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Todd. While you just made it about you.

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Not wanting to make it about you.

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 5>It's really a new wind situation. But I thought that

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 5>was a clever thing to say in the moment.

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 9>Thank you Tod.

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 2>That's what I was saying yesterday.

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 3>So whatever you do, just don't make it about you, Dan.

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Tod, you can't help yourself.

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 5>I just walk right into it, Donna.

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 2>You do like Seaton had a really good story about

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 2>screwing up his haircut and then all of a sudden

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 2>it became about you.

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 5>I made a five second comment thing. You know, it's

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 5>a first world problem I had.

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, why can't you could have just commented on seat

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and let seat and have the moment.

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 5>I didn't realize I was doing something so awful and

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 5>that little five to six second comment.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 2>That or it's five six second comments over the course

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 2>of twenty years, add that up how many hours is

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 2>that over twenty years, that would be a lot. Thank you,

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Todd Curtis in Dayton, Hi Curtis, what's on your mind?

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 16>What's going on?

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for calling me about DP yep.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 16>So over the weekend, it was quiet at my house

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 16>on Sunday and I thought, you know what, I'm going

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 16>to give the todcast a chance. And have you ever

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 16>watched a movie afterwards you.

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Don't know what you just watched.

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 16>I didn't know whether I needed the shower or laugh.

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I would say that is the Toodcast. It is unique.

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 2>And if you have an hour an hour de spair

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 2>and you want to listen to more Todd tell you

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 2>about Todd than go to Danpatrick dot com The Toodcast.

0:33:55.840 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I find it. It's it's a lot, there's a lot

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 2>going on there, but yeah, it's the podcast.

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 7>Yes, Marv, there's no stop signs on the podcast. No,

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 7>there is, like you and Paulie are here to stop

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 7>for its. Yeah, Dylan's like, hey, your love life go.

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Dylan is kind of the host, but all he is

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 2>is basically the matre d to have Todd said at

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 2>his table, he's an instigator. Also, you'll sneak a line

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 2>in there. But yeah, the Gambling Podcast and toodcast are

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 2>They are awesome, They are unique, interesting, they're fun. More

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 2>phone calls coming up. We'll take a break here. Baseball's

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Opening Day tomorrow, a standalone game with the Giants and

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees. We update the pull results. We're back after this.

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports Radio has the best sports talk lineup in

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the nation. Catch all of our shows at foxsports Radio

0:34:56.560 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com and within the iHeartRadio app. Search f are

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to listen live Baseball Opening Day.

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Netflix once again trying to get more involved in live

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 2>sports programming, and that'll be at night Baseball Opening Day.

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 2>I do lament Opening Day only because personally, when I

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 2>was growing up in Cincinnati, the Red's always had Opening Day.

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Baseball always started in Cincinnati, and that got away from us,

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and then all of a sudden, I'm like, I don't

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 2>know what Opening Day when it is? And then the

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 2>mother Ship had Sunday night where they wanted to have

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Opening Day. Dodgers have gone, you know, to Japan Opening Day,

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 2>and I do think this commissioner has done a really

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 2>good job. I do, And I'm wondering about this as

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 2>baseball moves forward, what are we going to do with

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 2>the automated balls and strikes, and I do think it's

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 2>coming and I'm fine with it. If it means we're

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 2>going to get more calls correct, then great, it's inevitable.

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 2>We have the technology. Now here's the key for me?

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 2>How do I dress this up so esthetically it looks cool?

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Can I get green light strike, red red light ball?

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 2>How does it look? Now? I wouldn't do the box.

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 2>I would remove the box the strike zone because I

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:35.320
<v Speaker 2>would want you to watch and then we wonder, now

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 2>if you wanted to go back and then have a

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 2>ball or strike call and put the box over it

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 2>to reinforce something, or if they missed a call with

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 2>automated balls and strikes. But I think, how am I?

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 2>It's just like basketball courts. They're going to dress things

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 2>up like we're just starting here, Like can you do

0:36:56.800 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 2>something where three point line is illuminated? Can we do

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 2>something with the paint? Can we make it more of

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 2>a pinball feel to it? And I mean, it's all

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:10.439
<v Speaker 2>about the aesthetics of watching a game and you could

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 2>be there and still not miss out as opposed to

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 2>if you're watching on TV. But I do think that

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 2>that's the next wave, how do we create more of

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 2>an environment when you're watching it's more than just you're

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 2>watching a sporting event. It's almost an event within an event.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Paulie, there was an article about a week and

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 4>a half ago. MLB broadcasts will likely no longer use

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 4>a strike zone box to indicate where the pitch was

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 4>or whether it was a ball or strike. That coincides

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 4>with the implementation of the ABS system. Yeah, so that

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 4>is likely happening almost immediately this season.

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I like it now. I think you're sometimes

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 2>misled because the camera is over the pitcher, the right

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 2>side of the pitcher, and it's not frame you know,

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 2>it's not framed correctly, so you can get something that

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 2>looks like it's a striker a ball, and it's not

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 2>just because of the camera angle of that. But I

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 2>do like, can we have something that shows up on

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 2>the scoreboard? Can we have something that shows up on

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the screen. But I do think that's coming. And these

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 2>basketball courts, I do think that, you know, we're just

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 2>starting now. Some of these are terrible looking. The Big

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 2>twelve that was terrible looking. Plus you got to make

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 2>it safe too. But I think what you can do

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 2>with these basketball courts, and I would bring back the

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 2>red white and blue basketball. I would. I would bring

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 2>that and get it. It's so I mean, it's awesome

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 2>to watch that ball, you know, you get the rotation.

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 2>I think it would be a lot of fun to

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 2>get that. Bring that back. Take it from the You

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 2>took everything else from the ABA, why not take the basketball.

0:38:53.680 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 2>It's red, white and blue, it's Americana. Well, be great, Yeah, Paul.

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at some descriptions of the new broadcast. I

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 4>wonder if it's going to clean up the broadcast not

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 4>having the shaded box, and I look a little more

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 4>old school to the eye. When you're watching a baseball.

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 2>When you go back and look at old footage and

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing on the screen, nothing, no graphics, no what's

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 2>what's the balls and strikes and outs and runner at second?

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Nothing nothing. It's it's like watching a hockey game and

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing on the boards. Now you got all that advertising, yes, Todd,

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:32.879
<v Speaker 2>But in some.

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 5>Ways, even though it looks so naked, it forces people

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 5>to pay attention to what's going on in the game

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 5>and the balls and strikes in the situation, and who's

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 5>on base. And now we're in a world of you

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 5>don't have to remember a phone number or anything. Everything

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 5>is just in your face constantly.

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Tommy in Minneapolis, I Tommy, what's on your mind?

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 17>Good morning, Dan. Thank you for taking my call.

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 9>Dan.

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 17>I'd like to ask you a question, but before I

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 17>ask the question, I want to give you some background

0:39:57.040 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 17>as to why I'm asking the questions. Dan lead the

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 17>sports talk radio station in my market decided, after years

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:10.760
<v Speaker 17>of taking live in calls, not to take any Liven

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 17>calls anymore. And the reason they said is because it

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 17>wasn't adding to the content of the show. So I

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 17>started thinking, well, the Dan Patrick Show is probably the

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 17>best sports talk show out there, and you're a three

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 17>hour show. You take life call ins and it really

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 17>adds to the contents of your show, I believe. So

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 17>my question to you, Dan is, when you are putting

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:40.240
<v Speaker 17>the format of your show together, why did you decide

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 17>to take live callings?

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Because you're you're allowing me into your life, whether you're

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 2>listening in real time in your car, watching at home,

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 2>or listening on the podcast, and I love that relationship.

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 2>You get an opportunity unity to be part of the show,

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 2>and I welcome that it's a great honor that you

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 2>want to call in, you want to take time out,

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 2>you want to share, you want to be part of

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the show. And I just love the reciprocation. And that's

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 2>why we've always done it, and we'll continue to do it.

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 2>Reggie Miller in the final hour of the program,