WEBVTT - Why Can’t You Copyright a Chicken Sandwich?

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess what will what's that? So this week I

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 1>started looking up Harry Potter knockoffs and they are so terrible.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:12.479
<v Speaker 1>I love them so much. So there's this one book

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.159
<v Speaker 1>in Spanish called Harry perez Uh and he's got his

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>friends Ron and Harmonia and they take on this evil

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>character named Condomort. I love how they change everyone's name

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>except Ron's, like there's no alternative name for Ron. There's

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>also one from Russia where he's kind of more a

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>rock star and he rides a double bass instead of

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a broom. But my favorite one is from China where

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Harry has to chase down Baltimore's protege Dmort, who apparently

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>used to work for the circus under the name Naughty Bubble.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's also kind of into this check this out

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>for some reason. There's also a character named Big Spinach

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in it, but none of it makes any sense. And

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can you imagine, like how bummed you'd be if you

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>ask for a Harry Potter book from your parents and

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>instead they brought you one of these knock on I'm

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of these, but you know, seeing all these crazy titles,

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe wonder how does copyright work? Like why can you

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>remix of Sherlock Home Story, but not use Felix the

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Cat to advertise your work, Like, why are people so

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>excited about two thou nineteens public domain day? We're gonna

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>get into all of this. Let's dig in either podcast listeners,

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Part Time Genius. I'm Will Pearson and as

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>always I'm joined by my good friend Man Guesh how

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Ticketer and on the other side of the soundproof class

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>celebrating the demise of copyright by eating or those those

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Charleston June they are and dancing the Charleston that's our

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>friend and producer Tristan McNeil. All right, so just explain

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I have to point out that part

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of the reason Tristan is doing this is because he's

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>laring the Charleston song. It took me a minute to

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>uh figure this out. You could probably hear this in

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the background now. The song itself was written to accompany

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the dance back when it debuted back in nineteen three,

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and it kicked off this national craze. What's notable about

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>this is that two thousand nineteen actually marks the end

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Charleston's Songs copyright protection. I don't know if

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you knew this, if you've been following this, but that

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is the case. So now anyone can make a new

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>recording of the song or play a nineteen twenty three

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>performance of it on a podcast, all without having to

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>pay a dime or worry about getting sued, at least

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I hope that, which is obviously great news for any

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 1>listeners who are into the Charleston or at least as

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>into it as Tristan is. Apparently I guess so. But

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it turns out there's a lot of reasons

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the party like it's nineteen twenty three this month, even

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're not a Charleston fan, and that's because the

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>slew of works from this year have just entered the

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>public domain for the very first time, I believe it

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>or not. This is actually the first mass influx of

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>public domain material in the US in twenty years, I think.

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>So we'll get exactly why this is and how it

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>involves Mickey Mouse a little bit later, but the main

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>takeaway is that thousands of classic books and movies and

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>songs and other works of art they are now free

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to use, remix, sell all without any legal restriction around them,

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>which is why we're marking the occasion with an episode

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>all about the ins and outs of copyright. So we'll

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about the history of copyright law,

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>including why the terms have been extended in the US,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and also what makes this year so different from others.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Plus we'll take a closer look at the public domain

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>class of two nineteen to see exactly what sort of

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>hidden treasures just fell into our laps. But you know, well,

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>where do you want to start off here? Alright? Well,

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought we should give our listeners a little bit

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of context to all of this. So for starters, January

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>one is recognized all around the world is Public Domain Day,

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and actually didn't know that until we were doing our

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>research for this episode. But the way that it works

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is that at the stroke of midnight on New Year's Eve,

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>older works automatically enter the public domain as they age

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>out of their copyright terms. But this is where things

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit tricky. So different countries have their

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>own rules for how long a work can remain under copyright,

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So most countries will provide copyright protection for the life

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of their author, plus a certain set number of years

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, like the author's life plus fifty or seventy

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it may be. But in the US things

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>have traditionally worked a little bit differently. So here copyrights

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>made prior to night have nothing to do with the

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>lifespan of the works author. Instead, these copyright materials are

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>protected for a flat ninety five years after their first publication.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>It always makes you wonder, like where they come up

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>with the number. But so, just as an example, the

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Grapes of Wrath won't enter the U S public domain

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>until January of two thousand thirty five, because that will

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>be ninety five years after it was first published. Now,

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, readers in places like Canada and

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand can ead and rework the text for free

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>starting this year, and that's because two thousand nineteen is

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty years after the death of the book's author, John Steinbeck.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that weird? Like something about that like feels so

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>off to me. I mean, it's this like quintessential American

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>novel and people in other countries actually get to do

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever they want with it first, I know, three decades

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>before Americans get to It's super weird that it actually

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>reminds you. I was reading about the rights to the

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>song this Land Is Your Land, which, of course you

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>know what he got through wrote the lyrics too, and

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a piece of music that just feels inseparable from

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the American identity, and it's kind of become this great

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>American almost like an anthem. Ever since it was published

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>back in but again for Canada and other countries with

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>copyright terms of life plus fifty years, that song ended

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 1>in the public domain last year, whereas in the US

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you'll actually have to wait till one to be able

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to use it. And that's when you're planning to put

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>out a dub step reminder. That's right, absolutely, But before

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we move on, I do want to mention that this

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Land is Your Land is kind of a fun a

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>case to look at. So the lyrics plain that the

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>land belongs to you and me, and that was actually

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>got Three's intention for the song to in He published

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the song with a copyright notice that read quote, this

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>song is copyrighted in the US for a period of

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight years, and anybody caught singing it without our

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>permission will be mighty good friends of our because we

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>don't give it, durn publish it, write it, sing it,

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>swing to it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that's all

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to do. That's hilarious. I'm curious that, like,

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>why didn't the song under the public domain in the seventies,

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, like what he wanted it to. Well, apparently

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the publisher renewed the copyright at some point without gut

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Thrie's input, So the song's copyright status wound up being

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>extended and now it's covered by the current ninety five

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>year term we have in the U. S Alright, well

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in that case, I mean, now seems like a good

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>time to break down the key changes to the copyright

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>law that have taken place here in the US over

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, over several decades. But don't worry about your

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>eyes glazing over because I'm going to try to keep

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this short and sweet good. So they basically American copyright

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>law began with the Constitution with grants Congress the power

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to bestow exclusive rights to the author of a work

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>for quote limited times. So at first that limited time

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>meant fourteen years, with the option to renew for another

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>fourteen years, making the max possible twenty eight years. Those

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>rules were mended over time that went by nineteen o nine,

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>both copyright terms had doubled to twenty eight years or

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty six total, I guess, got it. So that's where

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>would you would have gotten that twenty eight year term

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>he claimed, you know, for the copyright he was talking about.

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I'm sure he never intended to renew

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the song for that second twenty eight year period, that's right.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So then you fast forward to nineteen seventy six and

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the extension started getting kind of out of hand. So

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the fifty six year period was bumped up to a

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>full seventy five years, meaning that any work produced through

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty two would be copyright protected until nineteen. Then,

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in just as the nineteen twenty three copyrights were about

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to expire for the next year, a new piece of

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>legislation was passed. It makes you wonder why people were

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>so interested in changing the legislation, But the new law

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>attacked on another twenty years for the copyright of any

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>work made between nineteen twenty three and nineteen seventy seven.

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's actually why there's this big twenty year gap

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're just coming out of right now. That is

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So those extra two decades added in, you know,

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>was when this happened, it basically put a freeze on

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the public domain editions. So the works that were scheduled

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>inner the public domain were suddenly off the table for

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>another twenty years. And so that's what made New Years

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen such a big deal. I mean, the drought

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>is finally and I'm guessing that's for the foreseevil future

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to right, like, like like a whole year's worth of work

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>should end of the public domain every year now, ongoing, right, right,

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>And this really just the beginning of like four decades

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>worth of annual time capsules, you know, so you know,

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>long as corporations don't succeed in extending the copyright terms

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>even further. Although if we're being fair, it's not like

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years haven't brought any new additions to

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the public domain from this era, because plenty of works

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>from the nineteen twenties through the nineteen seventies have already

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>entered the public domain because their copyrights were never renewed

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for one reason or another. And in fact, one study

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>from two thousand eleven suggested that as many as nine

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of works published in the nineteen twenties were never renewed

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>at all, and the same is true for roughly sixty

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of the works from the nineteen forties, so there were

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a ton of them that were out there. So basically

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that extension in nine only applied to the works whose

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>copyrights were still active at that time, and so anything

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that hadn't been previously renewed was already fair game for

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>public use. Of course, the tricky part has been determining

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>whether an old copyright has lapsed or not. Yeah, I'm

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>guessing that's a pretty murky business trying to figure all

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that out, it is, And you know, so in the

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>past that's been safer to air on the side of

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>caution and just kind of steer clear of any work

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>whose status was in question, of course, to avoid getting sued.

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>But now the concerns are out the window, at least

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>as far as works from three go, and now that

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>they passed the year mark, we know for certain that

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>they're in the public domain. So I know there's probably

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>some folks listening or thinking, okay, but who cares about

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>all this old timey stuff anyway. You know, it's not

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>like I'm gonna start listening to chart toppers from the

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenties or whatever. But you know, that's totally fair.

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing that Gabe was pointing out to me.

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Most of us honestly don't know what we've been missing

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>out on. Like the public domain provides this great chance

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for overlooked works to find a second lease on life.

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at what happened to It's a

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Wonderful Life. You know, that movie actually flopped when it

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>was first released, but once it entered the public domain,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>it slowly became a holiday classic. And that success only

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>happened because TV networks were actually able to play the

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>movie for free year after year. So in this weird way,

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like cultural worth is actually greater today than it

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>would have been had it remained under a copyright. You

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>know this this author Glenn Fleishman, and he had this

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>great quote in this article for The Atlantic, and and

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 1>he said, quote, only so much that's created has room

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to persist in memory, culture and scholarship. Some works may

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>have been forgotten because they were simply terrible or perishable,

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's also the case that a lack of access

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to these works and digital forms limits whether they get

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>considered at all. I mean, it's a good point and

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>actually reminds me of something I came across this week

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>from the American novelist Willi Cather, And you know, she

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>once called nineteen twenty two the year the world broke

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>in two, and that was because of all the big

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>literary and cultural shakeups that took place that year. It

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was the start of the Harlem Renaissance, plus the publication

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of works like Ulysses by James Joyce and The Waste

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Land by T. S. Eliott. So to her, nineteen twenty

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>two was this turning point, like there was a world

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>before that year, and then there was a world after it.

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And it, strangely enough, that's also how things broke down

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 1>in terms of US copyright law. So everything up through

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 1>nine is now part of the public domain, but it's

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a different story for works from nineteen twenty three and

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>beyond on. So hundreds of thousands of songs and movies

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and books and newspapers, magazines, like so many different things

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of that era had been held back for decades, longer

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>than they should have been. And so as a result,

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you figure there have to be a lot of blind

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>spots in our understanding of that period in American history. Yeah,

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.359
<v Speaker 1>like even things we know about like the Harlem Renaissance,

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the Great Depression, or World War Two. Like, we should

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>get like a fuller picture once we get access to

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>these materials. And also it'll be so fun to see

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>them show up in memes and music and things. All right, well,

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to hear what you think should make the

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>cut this year. But before we share our favorites, let's

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. You're listening to Part Time Genius,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>so we're talking about the giant wave of classic art

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that just entered the public domain this month. All right, Megan,

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious which works are you most excited to

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>have free of their copyrights this year. So I'm just

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna go ahead and get the literature picks out of

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the way first, because that's where you find a lot

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of the heavy hitters, and honestly, it's too many to

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>go through. So for fiction, we've got stories from authors

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>like Virginia Wolfe, Altice Huxley, Jane Austin Hemingway, and and

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>then in terms of poetry, there's work from E. Cummings,

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>William Carlos, Williams, Wallace Stevens, Pablo Neruda, Robert Frost, including

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>one of his most famous poems, Stopping by Woods on

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a snowy evening like, which is just cool that these

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>texts are out there and easier to explore and play

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>with them before. But but what about you, Like, are

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are there any books you're happy to see in the

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>public domain that was amazing to hear? Like all those

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>heavy hitters? Yeah? Here, But I always like it when

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>famous literary characters make their way into the public domain

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>because you get a whole bunch of new takes on them,

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like that's what happened with Robin Hood or Sherlock Holmes.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I didn't think of that. So so what

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>new characters are we getting to play with now? Alright? Well,

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen is giving us access to new Tarzan

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>stories from Edgar Rice Burrows, but also two of Agatha

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Christie's mystery novels star Belgian detective Hercule Paro, The Murder

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of Roger Ackroyd and The Murder on the Links. Wait,

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't Tarzan already in the public domain? Though? Yeah, that's right,

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a story from nineteen ten that's been in the

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>public domain. And actually there's one earlier poor Oh novel

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that's already there too. So how do the laws work

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with characters like that. I mean, can people just write

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>their own new Tarzan stories or can they only publish

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and rework the existing books? Like is the copyright on

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the character or just the stories he appears in. Well,

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you can't actually copyright a name or a phrase or

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. But what you can do is get

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>your character trademarked while it's still under copyright. So if

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you take the case of Tarzan, that's what the author's

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>airs did. So even though the original Tarzan stories can

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>be freely published and adapted for movies or comics or

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever else, you still can't publish your own original Tarzan

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>books without receiving permission. And of course to do that

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay a fee to the Boroughs Estate.

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And so things are a little more I see when

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Poor Oh, and well, not all copyrighted

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>characters qualify for trademark protection, and and some people you know,

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>maintain that poor O does not qualify. So for reasons

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're they're a little too complicated to get into here.

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>But until someone is willing to gamble, you know, a

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>potential lawsuit to publish their own unauthorized story, the character's

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>legal status is kind of in limb. So the new

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>public domain additions for those characters are mostly exciting because

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it means there are new Tarzan stories or poor Oh

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>mysteries that can be safely adapted are altered by anyone,

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>even if the characters themselves are still otherwise off limits.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So I am a little worried about what that might

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>mean for my next pick here, because even though two

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>nine frees up the rights to a bunch of classic

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>silent films from people like Buster Keaton, Charlie Chaplain, Laurel,

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and Hardy, which is awesome, by the way, because like

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it would be so amazing to start seeing these movies

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>on late night TV. But you know, the one I

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>was most personally excited about was the Felix the Cat cartoons,

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>which just hit the public domain, and I was kind

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of hoping we could add it to the PTG logo

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or just make him like the official show mascot or something,

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>but I'm guessing that's not the case if he's still trademark, right,

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Felix was the one that stood out to

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>me too, So I actually did a little bit of

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>digging on this, and it turns out that even though

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the character is still technically trademarked by DreamWorks. They only

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>control his use in certain instances, and and you know,

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of course that's really around advertising, So how does that

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>work exactly? So you could actually publish your own Felix

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the cat comic strips and even adapt those new stories

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>into animated shorts, but weirdly, you just can't include Felix

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>himself and any of the advertising for that. Apparently DreamWorks

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>also owns the Felix trademark for quote life saving instruments,

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>so I guess a line of Felix branded fire extinguishers

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is totally off. I feel like that's exactly where I

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>was going with us, like Felix EpiPens and detectors. But

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, if cartoons aren't your thing, we've also got

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>plenty of new public domain songs to keep us busy.

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>And there's some real chestnuts here, uh tunes like Dizzy

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Fingers Horsey keep your tail up, I know that's a favorite,

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the Pierson household raft and that timeless romantic valid o

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>g Oh gosh, oh golly, I'm in love. I think

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>these are probably in that collection of that old amberola,

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>like the house that's all those wax cylinders. That's pretty

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>cool to listen to, but you know it truly was

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a different time. I was actually listening to a few

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>songs from our list this week, and I was struck

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>by how many of them were just kind of wide eyed,

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>upbeat nonsense. Like there was this one that was basically

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>about how strange it is that the earth rotates and

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that it can be daytime in one part of the

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>world at nighttime, and another was riveting song, but and

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess for fun, they just throw in a bunch

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of gibbers that doesn't rhyme or fit the meter or anything.

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>So there's this one line that goes, when it's nighttime

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>in Italy, it's Wednesday over here, when it's fish day

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in Germany, you can't get shaved in Massachusetts. And the

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is just so bizarre, and I'm really hoping

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>this catches on again. That is amazing and in the

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>same vein if that old timy nonsense songs, I'm pretty

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>pumped at the copyright finally expired on Yes we Have

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>No Bananas Today, which is actually one of the songs

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I know. I would definitely leave it to you to

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>zero in on the banana song. And a bunch of these.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But weirdly, it turns out there's actually a sequel song

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>called the um. It's called I've Got the Yes, we

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Have No Banana Blues and uh. Since it was released

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the same year as the originally, it's now in the

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>public domain as well. So why did they do a

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>follow up song? Was just that popular? It's basically a

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>response to how popular the first song was and how

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>sick everyone was of hearing it all the time. And

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so one of the line says, quote, it hasn't got

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit of sense, and I go wild when they

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>commenced bananas bananas. I wish I could break up a

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>million pianos. I get it. I kind of love that

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>this song is going to start annoying everyone all over

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>again with back out there, And I was I guess

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the scenario that these annual copyright expirations

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>allow for. So it's nice to have them back in

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the mix. Yeah, I guess that's true. But you know,

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>we can probably make a more compelling case for them

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>than that, I'm guessing. I mean, the public domain is

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>good for lots of stuff beyond just annoying your friends

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>with weird old songs, No, no question, it's just fun

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>to read all those lyrics and everything. But all right, well,

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>now that we've checked out some of the most notable

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>inductees for this year, I do think we should take

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a closer look at the benefits that come from having

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the growing catalog of public domain works. Yeah, it sounds great,

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but before we get into that, let's take another quick break.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we spent a lot of time to

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>day singing the praises of the public domain and kind

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.959
<v Speaker 1>of lamenting all the extensions that certain copyrights have been

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>granted over the years. And honestly, at this point, I'm

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit worried that people might get the impression

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that we are anti copyright. Well, I mean, I do

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>think we could survive that sort of scandal, But let's

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and make the case for copyrights anyway, just

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to be safe. It's actually something we're doing because even

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>though copyrights can feel annoying or restrictive, the core idea

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense granting creators the right to

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>control how their work is used, and in its purest form,

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>copyright protections benefit not just creators but society as a whole.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is like, that's how copyrights were framed

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in the U S Constitution. It was kind of this

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>way to promote the progress of science and useful arts,

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and again in the first copyright law of sev. Nine,

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it was thought of as a way to further the

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>encouragement of learning. I mean, it's interesting, was you almost

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>guess that we're talking about the public domain again and

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>not copyrights? I mean, how does restricting access to a

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>work encourage learning or promote science and art? So the

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>idea is that it isn't like a short term fix it,

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it's one for the long run. So the basic idea

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is that copyright protection offers an incentive for people to

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>create new works. I mean, why go to the trouble

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of writing a book or making a movie if anyone

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>can just copy it right after it's made public? Right. So,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>one way I've seen it described is that copyright is

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>basically a contract between creators and society. They continue making

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>new stuff and in return, we promised not to rip

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it off for muck with it for about twenty eight

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>years or however long, at which point the work belongs

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to everyone. I mean, I get that the premises sound,

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>but it does it feels like these copyright terms have

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of balloons so much that we've we've kind of

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>lost sight of their original purpose. Yeah, I mean, the

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>trouble is that there's always someone arguing that the length

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of the copyright is too short to make a profit.

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And back in the days of fourteen and twenty eight

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>year terms, content creators may have had a point. But

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, now that we're up to ninety five years

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>or a lifetime plus seventy years, the terms they really

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>start to seem excessive. So the contract we start with

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>has gotten a lot more one sided over the last century,

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>which is of course an intentional move on the part

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of copyright holders, or more specifically, the part of companies

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that hold those copyrights, because the ones making money on

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the ninety five year copyrights or lifetime plus copyrights aren't

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the authors or really even their families in most cases. Instead,

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the companies that control the rights. Once the creator

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>is gone, like the what he got three example you

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>gave earlier, his descendants aren't cashing in from licensing deals.

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the publisher that is sure. I mean that that's

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a great point, and and corporations definitely played a huge

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>role in the twentieth century extensions to copyright terms. I mean,

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the most famous example is probably the extension we mentioned earlier,

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the one that raised the term for older US copyrights

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>from seventy five to ninety five years. And the law

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>was called the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, and

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the Disney Corporation was actually his biggest and most vocal champion,

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's because they wanted to keep the first Mickey

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Mouse cartoon ever released, which is Steamboat Willie, from entering

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the public domain in two thousand three. So what did

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Sonny Bono have to do with this? Like, shouldn't have

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>been called the Mickey Mouse Act? Yeah, I mean, that

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>might have been more accurate. And actually Disney lobbied so

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>hard for the legislation that some people actually do refer

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to it as the Mickey Mouse Protection Act. But in reality,

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the nine Bill was named as a way to honor

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Sonny Bono, who had passed away in January of that year.

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.719
<v Speaker 1>And if that sounds kind of random, it isn't just

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that he was an entertainer. It's also that he was

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>a congressman in California, and during his tenure, Bono had

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>actually pushed hard for better copyright protection, So the gesture

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of made a lot of sense if you, you know,

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>knew all that. Yeah, But I mean, you know, what

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it still strikes me about this whole thing is how

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>ironic it is that a company build on adaptations of

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>public domain fairy tales. They're the ones that wound up

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>fighting to keep all those adaptations under wraps. Yeah, and

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the ironies don't end there either, because disney Steamboat Willie

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>cartoon was itself a parody of Buster Keaton's short called

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Steamboat Bill Jr. It actually premiered the same year. So yeah,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and so while the Keaton shore entered the public domain

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago, the cartoon inspired is still under lock and

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Key it's kind of his ar but you know, just

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>like with Felix the Cat, Mickey Mouice his trademark. So

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>when the copyright on his debut cartoon expires, the short

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>itself can be bought or sold or given away or

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>remixed by anyone, but the Mickey character will still belong

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Disney Company for as long as it continues

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to you know, use his likeness and continuity. And so

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the things you hope doesn't happen is that

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>someone makes an adult version of Steamboat Willie. Actually, one

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of the main arguments you hear from staunch copyright defenders

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.479
<v Speaker 1>like the ideas that when work slip into the public domain,

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they will be abused their tarning in some way. So

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for instance, the book could be published with errors, or

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>film could be released in low quality. Yeah, or someone

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>could replace every other line in your poem with Beyonce lyrics,

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>which might be an improvement depending on how bad the

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>poetry is. But I mean, you get the point. The

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>worry is that a public domain work will be over

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>exploited and that it's cultural or artistic worth, you know,

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>by because of that, it will be diminished in the process.

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean that sounds like a legit concern doesn't have

0:24:57.920 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, like I love the idea of Pride,

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Prejudice and zombies. You know, like Jane Austin might not

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>have wanted that when she wrote it, but it's a

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 1>pretty great thing for all of us, and probably more

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>people went back and actually read Pride and Prejudice when

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that Yeah, that's true. And for the most part, I'm

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>not sure the argument holds that much water, you know, because,

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>for instance, There was a study back in two thousand

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve where researchers took a bunch of different audio books,

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 1>some of the public domains, some under copyright, and they

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>had listeners provide feedback on the quality of each one

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and just actually, I'll just read here what they found.

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So our data provided almost no support for the arguments

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>made by proponents of copyright term extension that once works

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>fall into the public domain, they will be produced in

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>poor quality versions that will undermine their cultural or economic value.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Our data indicate no statistically significant difference, for example, between

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the listeners judgments of the quality of the professional audiobook

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>readers or copyrighted and public domain texts. So it sounds

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like we're saying, even though there could be downsides to

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>a work entering the public domain, those drawbacks tend to

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>be heavily outweighed by the benefits of open access. I mean,

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>teachers can make photo copies without breaking the law, artists

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 1>can pay tribute to and and even build off the

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>worst that inspire them, and the rest of us can

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>kick back and listen to Yes, we have no Bananas

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on loop completely free of charge. I was I was

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>there with you until that last part but I do

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>agree the public domain is a win for society and

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it's exciting to see how it, you know, it can

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>grow substantially again after a twenty year hiatus. But before

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we go exploring into that treasure trove once again, I

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>know we still have a bunch of weird copyright facts

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:46.959
<v Speaker 1>to share, So let's get into the fact off all. Well,

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>here's something I think is pretty cool. There's this little

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>village in England called Wookie Hole. That's already cool. Yeah,

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And there are over three eggs painted with clown faces

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>on them. And this collection is known as the Clown Register.

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And while it started as a hobby where one individual

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>was cataloging these clowns just for fun, the collection grew

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 1>into a way for professional clowns to basically copyright the

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>way they make up their faces, you know, to protect

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>from imitators. And so the tradition actually continues today. If

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you register with the Clowns International, they will have your

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>makeup painted on a ceramic. That's crazy. There's one thing

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I learned this week that you can't copyright, and that's

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a chicken sandwich. And I know this because a man

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>named Nolberto Cologne Lorenzana tried to do this in the

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties. Apparently, Norberto added a simple chicken sandwich to

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the menu at Church's Chicken in Puerto Rico, and the

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>company made millions of it. They even used the name

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>he gave it, the Paytree Sandwich. But when he tried

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to sue for intellectual property theft, the judge sternly rebuked

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and letting him know that while films, books, music, and

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>architecture and even some art are all protected, culinary inventions

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>are kind of a gray area, especially chicken sandwiches are well.

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of architecture, it is interesting to note that Hershey's

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>has a trademark for the structural design of their chocolate bar,

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>and apparently it took a ton of work to get that. Basically,

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to protect the fact that you can

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>snap those little rectangles off to fit perfectly on a smorn.

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>If you think about like, everyone can imagine those exact rectangles.

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>But as Smithsonian notes, functionality is not a qualifying feature

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>when registering a product design for trademark, so to win

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the case, they basically had to show that the ridges

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>were more than just utility. The architectural design was something

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that people associated with Hershey Bars, even when the brand

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>name was absent from the chocolate, and I would completely

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>agree with Yeah, that's really interesting. Well, here's a funny

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>one for mental class. Apparently the nineteen three Beach Boys

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>hit Surf in USA is a complete knockoff of a

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Berry song called Sweet Little sixteen. I had never

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>heard of that. When very accused Brian Wilson of steel

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in the song without telling anyone, Wilson's dad, who also

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>happened to be the band's manager, gave Barry the copyright

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to the tune, but he didn't tell anyone in the band,

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>so the band actually only learned that they weren't getting

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>royalties from the song twenty five years after it was released, Like,

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>why are we not getting any money on this song? Well,

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>speaking of wild, did you know that animals can't own

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>copyrights manga? I don't even know how that could be

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>an issue. Well, in two thousand eleven, this photographer named

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>David Slater went to Indonesia and he had this brilliant idea,

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>like what if he set up a tripod and tried

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to get the monkeys to take selfies of themselves and

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>somehow this one female macaque named Naruto went crazy, and

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of course the photos went viral. The Wikipedia put them

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>up claiming no one could own the copyright, and David

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Slater assumed that he owned the rights. It was his

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>camera and idea after all. But Peter and their ethical

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>treatment of all animals decided to sue on a monkey's behalf,

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>claiming that this female should get the royalties on the photos.

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So far, the U S Copyright Office has taken a

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>firm line that quote, the office will not register works

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>produced by nature, animals or plants, and it's put the

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.719
<v Speaker 1>photos in the public domain. But PETA is still fighting

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.959
<v Speaker 1>for its social media star client. That's pretty crazy. I mean,

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I think monkeys are a great way to end the show.

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Clown eggs, monkey selfies. I do think you deserve today's

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>trophy and to celebrate your victory at Tristan, will you

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>please queue up. Yes, we have no more bananas. That

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is it for today's show. I do want to give

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a special shout out to our listener Savantha, who tipped

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>us off on some Brady Bunch spinoffs from our last

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>nine things that we did, our our favorite of which

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>is the Brady Brides where Marcia and Jen have a

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>double wedding to their boyfriends and then have to live

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in the same house because they can't afford to move out. Unfortunately,

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the Hijinks only lasted six episodes, which sounds great and

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>terrible but yeah, but thank you so much for that, Sabantha.

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>But that's it for today's show. If you want to

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>send us facts where part time genius at House start

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>works dot com and from Gabe, Tristan Will and me.

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for listening. M M.