WEBVTT - Overcoming Your Scarcity Brain w/ Michael Easter #773

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to How to Money.

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joel and I am Matt and today we're talking

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 2>overcoming your Scarcity Brain with Michael Easter.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. We are joined by Michael Easter. So

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>he's the author of Scarcity Brain, and we are pumped

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to have him on the podcast today. And so we're

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about scarcity, right, And even though we know what

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the word means, scarcity is likely a concept that a

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>few folks listening to this podcast have much experience with,

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>at the very least in our quite developed country. We

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have enough food, we have enough shelter and clothing on

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>hand that the vast majority of folks haven't felt the

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>true impacts of real scarcity. And in fact, most of

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>us have more than we need of all of those things,

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>plus the countless cardboard boxes of stuff that we can

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>also purchase to fill in any remaining containers and closets

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>that aren't already bursting up the seams. But we are

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>talking with Michael, and he has traveled the world. He's

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>observed tribes and the jungles of Bolivia. He studied addiction

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and bombed out hotels in Baghdad. He's spoken with the

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>top researchers of psychology in order to understand the human mind,

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna be talking about how it is that

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we can shake some bad habits in order to live

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>more fulfilling lives, and hopefully we'll have some great takeaways

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>on how it is that we can view and pursue

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>money in a more satisfying way as well. Michael, thank

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us today on the podcast.

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thanks for having me. Guys. This should be fun.

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're looking forward to it, Michael. The first question

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>we ask anybody who comes on the show is and

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>it reveals a little bit about them. But, like Matt

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>and I, we like to save and invest money for

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the future, but we also like to spend money in

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the here and now on things that matter to us.

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Craft beer is one of those, and so we always

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 2>like to ask our guests what's their craft to beer equivalent?

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 2>What are they spending money on intentionally, maybe more so

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 2>than most people would think is wise while they're doing

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 2>the right thing with their money too.

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would say my most obscene purchase is probably

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 3>a nice watch. Now, I will say it's because one

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 3>I just like well made watches, kind of a watchdork.

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 3>But two, I also rationalize it as a business expense

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 3>because in some of the places I travel for my work,

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 3>having a nice bargaining chip if you find yourself in

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 3>a pickle is a good thing. And certain certain brands

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 3>it's like, I mean, they'll that'll get you out of

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 3>a pickle pretty quick if you're like, hey, I'll trade

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 3>you my watch for X y Z. So that's how

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I rationalize it.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it's so funny.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Matt just stumbled upon at a bar recently, a watch

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 2>club and I.

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Swear local restaurants, so it's called red bar. Do you

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>have one of those one of those clubs over there?

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Well maybe I don't. I nothing that I know of.

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but if Matt's going to get into any hobby,

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm predicting it's going to be fancy watches.

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 3>So I would I would. I would tell you to

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 3>avoid it. You'll save a lot of money.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like I am resisting. Like Joel talked

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>me into getting this garment, which actually maybe we'll talk

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>about this later on as far as technology and gamification,

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>but they were on sale at Costco, and I have

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>been pretty happy with not only the time it keeps,

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>but also some of the health data, the stats that

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it feeds me. It's amazing how much it gives you

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>for one hundred and fifty bucks. Yes, yes, say that

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to avoid the chronographs, actual fancy watches. But Michael,

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like now is as good a time as

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>ever to talk about habits here towards the beginning of

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the year. But you say that this is a quote,

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.119
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter how much gas that we give our

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>good new habits if we don't resolve our bad ones,

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we still have our foot on the break. Talk to

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>us about what you mean by that and why you're

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of obsessed with individual human behavior that's actually in

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>our own worst interest.

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, I mean it's rather simple that we kind

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 3>of live in this world where there's all the information

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 3>about all these things we should do. I mean, I'm

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of more in the health wellness psychology space, and

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, you see, it's like adopt this new specific

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 3>exercise routine, add this food to your thing. We're always

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 3>trying to add the next new good habit. But when

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 3>you look at what actually moves the ball farthest downfield

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 3>for people in terms of improving their life, improving their

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 3>well being. I would imagine the exact same thing follows

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 3>for finances. It's to stop doing the stuff that hurts

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 3>you most. Yeah, so it's to cut out the foods

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 3>that are your triggers and are leading you to gain weight.

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 3>It's to stop making that purchase that is putting a

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:42.119
<v Speaker 3>massive dent in your finances. Usually, all things equal, taking

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 3>away bad habits is going to move the ball a

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 3>lot farther downfield than is adding good, new, shiny habits.

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Because if you are giving gas to those good new

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>habits but you still have your bad ones, it's like

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 3>you just got the car and with the emergency breake on.

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, and you're just like reving the engine. You're

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 2>not going anywhere. You're doing a lot of damage. At

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.559
<v Speaker 2>the same time, give me the elevator pitch for your book,

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Scarcely Brain, Like, what is it that you were trying

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 2>to accomplish with this one? Because you've I mean, I

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 2>was telling you before we start recording, I read your

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 2>book The Comfort Crisis before I read this one. Talk

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 2>to me about Scarcly Brain and what made you cause

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>what caused you to write it?

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, so the underlying question of that book is,

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, everyone knows that everything is fine in moderation,

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 3>and yet everyone sucks at moderation. So and so why

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 3>is that right? And what is it that we can't

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 3>seem to moderate? And when you look at it, the

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 3>behaviors that people have trouble with is they usually fall

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 3>into a handful of silos like eating too much food,

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 3>buying too much stuff, information, binges online, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 3>And these are all behaviors that in the past would

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 3>have helped us survive. So a lot of my work

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>it takes in evolutionary lens in our modern problems. So

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 3>if you think about all the things we crave today,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.799
<v Speaker 3>usually in the past they were scarce, were hard to find,

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and if you would have sort of overdone them, that

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 3>would have given you a survival advantage. But in today's world,

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 3>where we have an overload of information, where we have

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 3>an overload of food, where we have Amazon Prime and

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 3>a billion items that we could buy and get in

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty four hours all at our fingertips, that is not

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 3>always so good for us. So we tend to we

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 3>tend to overdo these things in a world where it

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 3>ultimately Backfuyers.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about scarcity, Ques, Michael, because you say

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that they can be they can be big, but they

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>can also be small and subtle, you know, even down

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to our neighbors, like buying a new car. You know,

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>is that keeping up with the joneses like a queue

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>in this case, you know, just the felt need to

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>not lag behind others, our neighbors, our friends, even if

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it ends up meaning that we end up going down

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the path of falling into consumer debt. Talk to us

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about scarcity, Ques.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So scarcity queue is a piece of information in

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 3>our environment and we encounter in our environment that makes

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>us feel as if the resources that we need to

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>sort of thrive and survive are scarce. So I'll give

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the example of, you know, neighbor buys a fancy new car.

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 3>What tends to happen is that this is a this

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 3>is a sort of threat to our status almost So

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 3>the scarcity que is that we don't have enough status

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 3>because now people buy cars, yes, to get from point

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 3>A to point B, but also because cars would become

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 3>a sort of status symbol. And it can be something

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 3>as simple as that. A good big example that I

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 3>think everyone can identify with would be the pandemic. So

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 3>when the pandemic first set in, you know, all of

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 3>a sudden, everyone goes, oh, I'm not going to have

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.119
<v Speaker 3>enough food, I'm not going to have enough toilet paper,

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to have enough xyz. Right, this big

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 3>scarcity que. So what does everyone do. They go to

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 3>the grocery stores. They brawl in the aisle, they buy

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of food that they're never going to eat. Right,

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 3>It's like, oh, we've got to have one hundred and

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 3>tens of spam. Definitely throw that.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 2>The twenty five pound bag of rice from Costco came

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 2>and clutch Michael.

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 3>I believe it. But they don't have to beat that

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 3>big either. I mean, there's this it's really interesting research

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 3>from Vanderbilt that found that even when people have a

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 3>scarcity queue, like running out of ink and a pen

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 3>something as simple as that, they will make decisions that

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of let's show hoarding behavior. So they'll be like, Okay,

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I need multiple pens, and like they start kind of

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 3>freaking out inside. And so I think that you see this,

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 3>this is basically an evolutionary survival thing we have right

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 3>in the past. If you had this cue that like,

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 3>oh maybe I'm not going to have enough food to survive.

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, it would totally make sense to go out

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and try and hoard as much food as possible. But

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 3>today it's like food is never really that's scary exactly right.

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean we throw out about a third of the

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 3>food that we produce in this country, and so and

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 3>this and this all obviously applies to a lot of

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 3>different areas in our lives, and I think it ultimately

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 3>leads people to make decisions that don't exactly make sense

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 3>in the context of today.

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 2>So how do we connect our brains to kind of

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 2>the scarcity queue? Maybe that's tapping into some sort of

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 2>primal urge that might cause us to do something that's

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 2>not in our best interest because times have changed. And

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 2>guess what, Like I don't necessarily need to go buy

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 2>a twelve pack of pens just because I ran out

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 2>of ink in the one and actually I probably have

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 2>three more in the drawer somewhere that I just haven't

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 2>looked for yet. Is there a way to kind of

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 2>overcome that scarcity Q that kind of gets brought to

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 2>your attention, but it's almost like subconscious Yeah.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I think we need pretty much we need to use

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 3>full heuristics. So I'll give you an example with possessions.

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 3>So there are effectively four reasons why people buy stuff.

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 3>The first is because stuff is a tool, Right, you

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 3>use tools to accomplish something. That's how things have pretty

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 3>much always been. But you can also buy stuff, like

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned before, for status. You buy it because it

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 3>elevates you over someone else in the social hierarchy. The

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 3>third reason is because possessions can help us feel belonging. So,

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 3>for example, you buy a Utah jazz jersey because you're

0:09:57.960 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 3>a Utah jazz fan and you want to identify with

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 3>that the jaz fans, Right, it's part of this like

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 3>collective thing. And then fourth is boredom. So you see

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 3>that when people get bored, we go looking for escapes

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 3>from it, and today we usually go on our phones.

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 3>And what we look at on our phones, I mean

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing advertisement after advertisement, and it's never been easier

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 3>before to click that ad, click through to the buy button,

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 3>and then buy this thing that you go, wait, did

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I really need that? So in the context of this,

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 3>I think you need to when you're sort of feeling

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 3>like you want to say, make a purchase, you need

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 3>to ask yourself what am I buying this for? Is

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 3>it for status? Is it because I want to feel

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 3>some sort of belonging. Can I get that elsewhere? Or

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 3>am I just bored? So I run things through the

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 3>heuristic of gear not stuff. So gear gears is possessions

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 3>that we use to achieve a higher purpose, right, We're

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 3>using them to accomplish some bigger thing that gives us

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 3>deeper meaning, whereas everything else stuff is sort of like, yeah,

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to buy this brand because I want to

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 3>look cooler than my neighbor, or I want to do

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 3>this because I want to feel some belonging with this

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 3>random you know, corporation, whatever it might be, or I'm

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 3>just bored. And so I think trying to figure out

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 3>get to the root of why you're doing what you're

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 3>what you do is the key to starting to unpack

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 3>larger behavior changes.

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So as you kind of run a purchase through that

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>set of criteria, are some of those do you think

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>inherently better than the others? Obviously, Like when you say

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>something is a tool, it sounds cool, or you know,

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's it sounds like justified, it sounds noble,

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, no, I'm using this to accomplish something,

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>whereas obviously boredom is that sounds like a terrible reason.

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>But I feel so I feel like the two in

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the middle, right, status and belonging, I feel like those

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>are a little squishier. I feel like, in my mind,

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>those are a little more gray. And would you push

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>back against anybody who would be critical of somebody for

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>buying something in order to fit in with a group,

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, for that belonging, or even to signal to

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>others that maybe they're better, right, Like, that's basically that

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that conspicuous consumption that you're talking about, or that's what

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>luxury goods are, all right, almost totally.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 3>So I think that my I'm definitely not here to

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 3>pass any value judgments. I would rather just people be

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 3>aware of why. Okay, So you know, I always like

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 3>to say, you know, for example, let's take behaviors of

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 3>using your phone too much. It's like, I don't care

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>if someone wants to spend nine hours a day on Instagram.

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 3>I really don't care. But what I want people to

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 3>be able to do is make the conscious decision about

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 3>them doing that, because often today we do things without

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 3>really understanding what the underlying motivation is. So if you

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 3>want to buy that, you know, whatever it is, certain,

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll take myself that certain watch brand. Yeah, because it's

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 3>also a status symbol. It's like, all right, but I

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 3>just want you to know. I just want a person

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 3>to be aware of Okay, this is one of the

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 3>reasons I'm buying it, because I think we try to

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 3>make these rationalizations in our mind where we go, oh, no,

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 3>like this is blah blah blah blah blah blah blah,

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 3>and we talk ourselves into purchases that maybe we otherwise

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't have made if we were being honest with ourselves.

0:12:57.679 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny.

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 2>It makes me think about how Matt always talks about

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 2>using text messages. I have some friends who communicate solely

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 2>be a text message, and I haven't actually talked to

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 2>them and had a conversation or met with them in

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 2>real life in quite a while. And Matt, the way

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 2>he talks about it is like, no, it's always to

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 2>facilitate in person hangs. And so if you're gonna text me,

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 2>let's come up with a plan to actually make the

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 2>real life hike or beer hang. Actually, you know, actually happen.

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Is that maybe a good way to think about it,

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 2>using these digital platforms, using shot and it makes me

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 2>think about buying a shirt for a bowling league is

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 2>like one sort of consumption that helps you fit in

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>versus buying that Utah jazz jersey that you mentioned and

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 2>having like the three different versions but watching alone on

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 2>your TV at home, but you kind of sort of

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 2>feel like you fit in, but you don't really fit in.

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I know that there's like like one leads to a

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>more ultimate community, yeah, versus one that feels a little

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>more virtual and like a little more artificial. Yeah exactly.

0:13:57.760 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Yeah, I think so. And I think if it's

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 3>facilitating actual interaction between people, that's great, and maybe it

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 3>is online that's totally fine. But I do think that

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 3>you see this a lot, you see I think where

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 3>it gets a little weird is when you see corporations

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 3>sort of use this as a means to get people

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 3>to buy so a lot of times today, you know,

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 3>certain brands have become almost a sort of religion where

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 3>people buy into them because they symbolize some other social

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>thing that they're trying to claim, yet they're not actually

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 3>doing anything social behind that behind that purchase.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Okay, So I guess while we're kind of

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about buying stuff on the shopping front, like there's

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>research saying that, like with a website, it's got one

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of those like stupid discount wheels that you spend like that,

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>folks end up spending more money. There are just some

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of these different types of ways that were incentivized to

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>be parted with our dollars. How have you seen that

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>play out in some of the research that you've looked at.

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I got so I live in Vegas, and

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 3>I got really interested in slot machines because this is

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of the extreme end of people who just can't

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 3>seem to get enough. Right, So, Las Vegas, there are

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 3>slot machines everywhere and people play them around the clock.

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Like I can go fill up my car with gas

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 3>and go into pay and there's slot machines in the

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 3>gas station. There's people playing them around the clock, and

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 3>you're just like, this doesn't this doesn't make any sense.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 3>So long story short is that I start this, you know,

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 3>deep dive investigation into slot machines, and I end up

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 3>at this laboratory that is on the edge of town

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 3>in Las Vegas. But it is a sort of casino

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 3>laboratory hybrid. So it's this fully working, brand new casino,

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 3>but it is funded by not only the gambling industry

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 3>but also big tech, and it's used to figure out

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 3>what gets humans to gamble more, to buy more, to

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 3>do all these different behaviors. And while I'm there, I

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 3>end up talking to this guy who's a slot machine designer,

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>and he tells me about this thing that I call

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 3>the scarcity loop. And it's basically this three part behavior

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 3>loop that is really good at pushing people out of moderation.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 3>So it's got three parts. It's got opportunity, it's got

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 3>unpredictable rewards, and it's got quick repeatability. So one, you

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 3>have an opportunity to get something of value that will

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 3>improve your life. Two unpredictable rewards, you know when you

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 3>will get that. You know you'll get that thing of

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 3>value at some point, but you aren't entirely sure when,

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 3>and you don't know how valuable it's gonna be. And

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 3>then three quick repeatability. You can immediately repeat the behavior

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 3>to try and get the rewarding thing over and over

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 3>and over. So if you think of a slot machine.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 3>It's like you can win some money, you play a game.

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>You're not sure on any given game if you're gonna lose,

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 3>if you're gonna win a little, or if you're gonna

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 3>win a lot, but then you can repeat that game

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 3>over and over and over and over. Now, the reason

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 3>why this is important is because this exact same architecture

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 3>that's in the slot machine is also being put into

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of different products and services and media stuff today.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 3>So it's really what makes social media work. It's being

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 3>put into some personal finance apps, it's what makes dating

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 3>apps work. So well, there's just element elements of it

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 3>all over our lives right now and giving people those

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.719
<v Speaker 3>unpredictable rewards. To bring it back to your question, so

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 3>when you put a wheel in front of someone with

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 3>a discount and they spend that wheel, there's this moment

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 3>of suspense where they're not sure if they're going to

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 3>get the big discount, the little discount or what. And

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 3>when that lands, that's exciting and that tends to compel behavior.

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 3>So you see a.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Six even if it's just ten percent off.

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, even if it's ten percent off, and you

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 3>see a sixfold increase in conversion rates when companies put

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 3>the gambling wheel on their websites to sell something.

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. What's interesting too, is you spend a lot of

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>time in your book talking about like dopamine and how

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes that is confused with like, oh, dopamine, it's the

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>feel good chemical. But you clarify and I feel like

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>more research has been coming out recently that's talking about

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:54.719
<v Speaker 1>how no, dopamine is the anticipation drug. Like it's it's

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the chemical that's released as we are pursuing something or

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>as we are anticipating something, and oftentimes it's it's almost

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>like the chase, you know, being better than the reward.

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps that that oftentimes we're so addicted to. Is that

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing.

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So there's there's different systems of the brain. Basically,

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 3>there's the liking system, which is a system that is

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 3>different than dopamine, but that is what actually gives you

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 3>the pleasure. And then there's the wanting system, and this

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 3>is what dopamine is involved in. So dopamine basically just

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 3>helps you pursue the pleasurable thing. And it's also somewhat

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 3>complicated because dopamine is involved in all these different processes

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 3>in the body, So things can get kind of oversimplified

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 3>to just like dopamine made me do it. It's like,

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 3>not really, it was just kind of there, you know.

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So you mentioned the scarcity loop, and you talked

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 2>about gambling, and you mentioned how all these other sorts

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 2>of things in our in our society are built kind

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 2>of based on this some of these same wiring to

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 2>try to get us to do things that might not

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 2>be in our own best interest. And makes me think

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 2>of an app like robin Hood, which is great democratization

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 2>of investing for all, except for this potentially fatal flaw

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.239
<v Speaker 2>that causes people to invest their money or gamble their

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 2>money thinking they're investing. It also makes you think of

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 2>sports gambling. Do you have any thoughts on that? Like

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 2>it's it certainly seems like the rise of sports gambling.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 2>And there's one thing about going and playing at a machine,

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 2>even at a gas station to where you live or

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 2>something like that. There's something very different about that than

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 2>having it in the palm of your hands, like hyper

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 2>optimized and targeted to try to get people to gamble

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 2>away as much of their money as they possibly can.

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:41.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I think what we're talking about here really

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 3>is the quick repeatability angle, so to your point, so

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 3>that's the third part of the loop. So with with

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the slot machines, it's like the slot machine is always

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 3>going to stay in the casino. You have to physically

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 3>go to the casino in order to play the slot machine.

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 3>But with sports betting apps, you can do that at

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 3>any time for whatever reason you want. Right, And another

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 3>thing that I think is really interesting with sports betting

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 3>apps is they've further increased the quicker peatability by allowing

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 3>people to make in game bets. So through the casino

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 3>industry's eyes, one of the issues with sports betting is

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 3>that you make a bet and then there's this time

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 3>delay until the game is over. Right, So a person

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 3>could make one bet, but then there's three hours until

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 3>they might make the next bet based on whether or

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 3>not they won or lost their bet on the previous game.

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 3>So in order to shorten that interval, because speed is

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 3>exceedingly important to the casino industry, people started a lot

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 3>of the companies started allowing people to make bets on Hey,

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 3>well the team score on this play. Are they going

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 3>to score a touchdown? Is the next basket going to

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 3>be a three pointer? All these different things that happen

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 3>throughout the game, so people can make these really quick

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 3>bets over and over and over as the game evolves.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Yeah, and again sort of like you're saying earlier,

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this isn't necessarily to say that, hey, all sports betting

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is bad, but like you said, to be a way

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>where as to what it is that's going on behind

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the scenes and how I mean, I feel like at

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the core of what you're writing about here with your

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>book is that these companies are they're looking for ways

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to make money, whether it's through selling product, getting you

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to gamble, whatever it is, and as you found, they

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.479
<v Speaker 1>are using how it is that our brains are wired

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>against us to cause us to continue to do that

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>thing whatever it is, Yeah, that they're wanting you to do.

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But Michael, we've got more to get to with you.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>We got plenty more questions. We'll get to all that

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>right after this. All right, we're back.

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 2>We're still talking about overcoming our scarcity brain with Michael Easter.

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>His new book is just fantastic And if you want

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 2>a little or a lot of insight on how your

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 2>own brain works and then how you can fight back

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 2>against some of the ways that advertisers and companies and

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 2>technology companies in particular are trying to hijack that. This

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 2>book is incredible informative, Michael, I want to keep talking about,

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 2>like some of the problem that in some of the

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 2>ways in which companies are ever so insiduously impacting our ability,

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 2>our desire to spend to part us from our money,

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe that we hadn't planned on being parted from. You've

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 2>talked about some of the newer Chinese websites. There's one

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 2>called Tamu, and it's funny, Matt and I we haven't

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 2>talked about these sites a whole lot, except for to

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 2>say that some of the stuff that it seems like

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 2>there's cheaper stuff being sold on a lot of these sites.

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 2>But you call them the crystal meth of shopping, and

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 2>so I'm like, okay, cool, I feel like I need

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 2>to do a little more digging. What makes them so addictive,

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 2>what makes them so dangerous?

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they use the scarcity loop probably better than any

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 3>other sites. So it is the unpredictable rewards. So when

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 3>you log onto Tamu, unless they've changed their site for

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 3>some reason, there's immediately you can get that pop up

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 3>like I just talked about with the wheel, right, and

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 3>you spin the wheel and you learn you get some discount,

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 3>and so then it's like, oh, I've just learned that

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to I'm the winner, right, And I said,

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 3>you always get the big one on TIMMU, like there's

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 3>no actual gamble here, So then you're incentivized to purchase.

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 3>But then they have all these They use scarcity cues

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 3>really well. So it's like, we only have X number

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 3>of these items left, and then there's a timer going.

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 3>So this leverages scarcity and urgency, which are two of

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the best sales tools that you can use. Right, we

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 3>only have one and by the way, you got to

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 3>make a decision in the next five minutes. That'll get

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 3>someone to make a purchase, better, better than anything you

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 3>can really use. But even even Amazon uses this. So

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 3>when you go onto Amazon, if there's a short supply,

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 3>it'll say only three left or only five left right,

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 3>because that leads people, it makes people more likely to

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 3>click that buy button. I mean, there's a good Amazon

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 3>doesn't do anything on accident. They're not just being like, hey,

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 3>heads up. They know that that'll lead to people making purchases.

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Probably, So it's really being shipped to an Amazon warehouse

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 2>as they as that exists on the website, but still

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 2>they want you to make you want it, to make

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 2>you feel like you got to buy it now.

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. And you know with all these with all

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 3>these levers that get pulled, and you know, they get

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 3>pulled that buy all different companies for all different means

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 3>to lead us to you know, eat more food, to

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 3>lead us to gamble more, to lead us to buy more.

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't necessarily blame the corporations. I mean, their job

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 3>is to make their job is to sell stuff, So

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 3>it really becomes up to us to figure out, Okay,

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 3>how can I interrupt this loop and how can I

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 3>take some agency here exactly to help myself, because you know,

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 3>I don't see a future where all of a sudden,

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 3>the government is regulating all these shopping websites and regulating

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.959
<v Speaker 3>whether you know, food companies can make, how delicious their

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 3>food can be, and whether gambling companies can do X

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 3>y Z. I mean, gambling's pretty heavily regulated, but you

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 3>know it's always going to be there. And you know, frankly,

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 3>when you think of something like take social media, what

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 3>makes videos compelling is that they're really exciting. They leverage

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 3>on elements of the scarcity loop, and so in order

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 3>to sort of slow people down watching say, YouTube video

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 3>after YouTube video, you would need to ask the YouTube

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 3>creators to make videos that were more boring. And it's like,

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 3>do we really want to do that? No, it's like

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 3>you really need to kind of kind of figure out

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 3>some simple tactics that you can use to live better

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 3>in this kind of strange but amazing world we live

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 3>in now.

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, So, as you're talking about YouTube, that made

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>me think about like one of the anecdotes you give

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in your book is about a professor and he's like

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>an architect and he was building legos with his kid,

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and the way his son went about solving the problem

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>was vastly different than how it was that he was

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to solve that problem. A go ahead and share

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that story with folks, but then be what is it? Well, yeah,

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>let's start there. Share that story because I want to

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>follow up with what you said about the YouTube content

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>creators and potentially creating less stuff and how that's not

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the solution. But yeah, can you talk about specifically that

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>lego anecdote?

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Yeah, So this guy his name's LIGHTI Klots and

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 3>he's a professor of engineering. He's probably one of the

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 3>best engineers in the country. And he's playing legos with

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.400
<v Speaker 3>his son and they're making this bridge. And once they

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 3>go to connect the bridge, they got the two pillars,

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 3>and then they connect the span to the two pillars,

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 3>they find that the bridge is wonky because they have

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 3>one pillar that is taller than the other pillar. So

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 3>this thing is the span is in an angle. So,

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, mister engineer goes, all right, I mean, we

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 3>can solve this problem. He turns around and he starts

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 3>rifling through the lego bucket to find the you know,

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 3>the blocks he needs in order to elevate the second span.

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 3>But when he turns back with the legos, he realizes

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 3>that his son has done something really interesting, and that's

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 3>that he solved the problem by simply removing blocks from

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 3>the taller span. Now, this solution did not occur to

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 3>him in the least, like, not at all. He immediately went, oh,

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 3>we need to add more resources to solve this problem.

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 3>So he wonders, you know, I am I a weirdo?

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Am I unique? What he does is he gets the

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 3>bridge and he makes it again, so it's kind of

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 3>wonky with the taller and shorter pillar. And he starts

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 3>taking this around UVA campus and when he has meetings

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 3>with other professors and with grad students, he'll pull out

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 3>the bridge and he'll say, all right, fix this, and

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 3>he'll have you know, legos on the table. Every single

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 3>person tries to solve the problem by adding more legos,

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 3>by adding more resources, even though taking away legos is

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 3>a better solution because then you have more resources. Right.

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 3>So he long story short is this leads him to

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 3>study this phenomenon, set up a bunch of different experiments,

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 3>and he finds that basically people are programmed to add,

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 3>so when we try to solve problems, we typically throw

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 3>resources at them if we can, even when subtraction is

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 3>the better. So it's not that adding or subtracting is

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 3>any better. But if we aren't even considering subtraction, like,

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 3>that's not good. Right. We want to have all our

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 3>options on the table, and yet we tend to add,

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 3>and as we get more and more resources, we tend

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 3>to just pile on and pile on and pile on.

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, And that that kind of alludes to the

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>scarcity to bring So the reason I wanted you to

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>share that is like, as you mentioned the YouTube creators,

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess I started to internally wrestle with man. Yes, institutions, creatives, publishers, writers,

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>We're not necessarily going to slow down in this stuff

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that is created out there in the world. And so

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, you have creatives, and you've got companies

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and institutions that are going to continue to produce. But

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, we have just as much time

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in our limited days, like we have just as much money.

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like, in one hand, things are going to

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to exponentially caliper in quantity. But it means I

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>guess that on an individual level, it's more important than

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>ever for us to figure out how it is that

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we can say no to a lot of that stuff.

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Would you say that that's true, how we can say

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>no to just the quantities of solutions at our fingertips

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are food or media, right, like the information you spend

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a chapter talking about that there's so much that's at

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>our fingertips. It seems like it's more important than ever

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for us to figure out how to regulate heart take.

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, totally, And I mean I think one great

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 3>way to do this is, so I told you about

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 3>the scarcity loop. If you interrupt or change or remove

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 3>any of the three parts, that tends to reduce the

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 3>frequency that you will do a behavior. So I'll give

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 3>you a couple examples. Availability, so opportunity. If you can

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 3>just take away the opportunity to do something, that will

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 3>reduce the amount of time to do it. So a

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 3>simple rule of saying, look, I'm only going to make

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 3>purchases in person because that's a huge barrier to entry,

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 3>or saying like I have a problem with this young food.

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 3>It's so simple, but it's like, well, don't keep it

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 3>in the house, right. You can change how rewarding something is.

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 3>You can change the unpredictable rewards. So there's some fascinating

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 3>research on cell phone use, and one of the reasons

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 3>that cell phones are so interesting and compelling is the

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 3>rewards through the bright screens and all the different colors

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 3>you see. So when people put their phones into grayscale,

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 3>that reduces how rewarding and stimulating the phone is, and

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 3>people's cell phone time tends to drop by about an

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 3>hour a day in studies. And then finally you can

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 3>slow down the behavior as well. There's an app that

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 3>I really love for people who spend too much time

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 3>on certain apps, and it's called clear Space. And basically

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 3>what this app does it leans on behavioral psychology and

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 3>it inserts a pause before you want to use any app.

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 3>So it goes, I'm sure you want to use this

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 3>app when you go to open it, and you have

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 3>to go yes, and it goes, okay, let's take a

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 3>breath together, you know, and you have to take a

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 3>breath for ten seconds, and then you have to go

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 3>and then it asks you how long do you want

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 3>to use the app? Because now it's like it realizes

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 3>you're going to go off the rail, so you go

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 3>to okay, I'm going to use it for ten minutes,

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 3>and that will. I mean, it's laning on psychology that

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 3>we've known work since the forties, and it definitely reduces

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 3>the frequency of app use. And so I think it's

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 3>finding useful tools and tricks to get around the scarcity

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 3>loop are the way to combat it.

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Really to help us do the things we actually want

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.479
<v Speaker 2>to do over the long term, as opposed to the

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 2>things we think we want to do right in the.

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Heat of the moment.

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Because the truth is there's a lot of things I

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 2>want to do in the heat of the moment that

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 2>aren't really helping me in my bigger goals. And that

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 2>is what getting sucked into twenty minutes of doom scrolling

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 2>is for a lot of people. At the end of

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the night, it's like, that's not how I expected or

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 2>hoped to spend my evening. It just kind of became

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the default and the easy thing to do, and that's

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 2>what our phones are. The data also finds that thinking

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 2>about long term consequences can help cool cravings. Right, so

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 2>thinking maybe about out how doing something like that, doing

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 2>something negative, going down that rabbit hole could seeing how

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 2>wait a second, that might actually help or hurt me

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 2>in my ability to achieve the thing I want to

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>achieve ten years down the road. How do we connect

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 2>those dots. It makes me think of like a Fidelity

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 2>did this study back in the day about if we

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 2>just looked at like a picture of ourselves that was

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 2>thirty had thirty years of age on it, where Matt

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and I look like we're grandpa's instead of like, you know,

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 2>geriatric millennials. How that makes an impact on how much

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 2>people save and invest for their future and it has

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 2>a real, real impact. It helps people connect the dots.

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Are there other ways that we can kind of connect

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 2>those long term dots in our lives?

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's The research on smoking is really interesting,

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 3>so scientists will have smokers even just think about the

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 3>long term consequences of smoking cancer things like that, and

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 3>smoking behavior tends to reduce I mean, I think really

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 3>it is. It is a little bit of an uphill

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 3>swim because we are surrounded in so many stimulating things.

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 3>And I'm also not saying that no one should ever

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 3>have any fun ever again, but I do think trying

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 3>to insert pause and make sure you're doing behaviors consciously

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 3>is really the answer. And again, it's like people really

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 3>get just trapped in this scarcity loop. It's what makes

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 3>people zone out to phones, is what makes people zone

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 3>out to slot machines. All these different behaviors and understanding

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:32.959
<v Speaker 3>the mechanics of that is one of the first ways

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 3>to stop it exactly.

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Plus, you know, going in for that elementary school presentation

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>when they brought the lungs in suspended in all to hide,

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you saw the oh, you saw the lungs that were

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the smoker's lungs, and then the lungs that were not right, Michael, Well,

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that's totally talking about smoking.

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 2>It makes me all the changes that have happened, one

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 2>to cigarette cartons, two to where cigarettes are kept in

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 2>a gas station, think about what happens in Europe, like

0:33:56.560 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 2>the way they label the cigarettes over there, and all

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 2>of those extra roadblocks essentially to buying cigarettes are participating

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 2>in the smoking community. I think has is part of

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 2>what's dramatically led to a reduction in smoking. So you

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 2>can't necessarily throw it all on like one thing. Oh

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 2>it was it was abstinence smoking, abstinence talks in elementary

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 2>school or something like that.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.320
<v Speaker 1>All scared straight, right exactly.

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 2>It's maybe some of that, right, But then it's all

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 2>these other things too that just kind of remove smoking

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 2>from consciousness and make it more of like kind of

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.439
<v Speaker 2>a rebrand it in like a grotesque sort of way.

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's fascinating. But we got a few more

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 2>questions to get to with you, Michael, specifically about like

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 2>how to use gamification maybe to push us on our

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 2>path to achieve the things we want instead of having

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 2>it prevent us from doing that.

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that right after this. All right, we

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>are back and again we're talking about how you can

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>overcome your scarcity brain with Michael Easter and Michael, like

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Joel mentioned before the break, gamification is really interesting because

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it can I feel like we've talked about just all

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the bad ways that gamification is being used against us,

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but simultaneously it can be a really positive thing. I

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>mentioned my brand new garment watch that Joel talked to

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>me in the game. But it's got this this score

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that I'm looking at right now. It's called VO two

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>max and it's this singular number that I'm able to

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>look at, And man, do I want to game my

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>watch so that I see that number grow? By the way,

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not even possible. Come on, But yeah, talk to

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>us how gamification how it can be so effective when

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>it comes to our ability to change our behavior, whether

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 1>for negative or for good.

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, one thing that I'll start with, because this

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 3>audience is interested in finance, is that numbers are pretty

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.760
<v Speaker 3>new in the grand scheme of time and space. There

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 3>are are actually still some tribes in the world in

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 3>the Amazon that don't use numbers. So researchers think that

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 3>humans basically evolved thinking being able to count basically up

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 3>to three and then everything thereafter we would use small, medium,

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 3>and large designations for all different things. Yeah, so numbers

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:18.959
<v Speaker 3>get invented. I think it was about ten thousand years ago,

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and this very much changes our behavior and what we

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 3>do because now we can quantify things, We can be

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 3>more precise, and numbers allow us to really just take

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 3>a big swath of some big concept and make it simple. Right, So,

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 3>if you think about I'll use your VO two max. Thing.

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Why we care about VO two max is because it's

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.839
<v Speaker 3>a marker of health, it's a marker of fitness, and

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:47.720
<v Speaker 3>allowing being able to put a number on it basically

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 3>just tells you how you are doing. But really, when

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 3>you look at the big picture, it's like, okay, well

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 3>why do we care about health? And how do we

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 3>define health? And what is fitness to us? What do

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 3>you mean? Right? It's a big, complicated concept with a

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of different answers. It's really murky. So what numbers

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 3>just allow us to sort of understand things very quickly.

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 3>And so when I think about it in terms of

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 3>gamification and how it can help us, it can help

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.720
<v Speaker 3>people do behaviors that they want to do and easily

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 3>measure their progress along the way. So with you, it's like,

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 3>if you can get that, if you can do these

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 3>things that are going to get that VO two max

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 3>up that number, you can be rather sure that you've

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 3>done some things that are probably going to move you

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 3>away from disease. For me, it could be like, I

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I'm sure there's finance apps out there that

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 3>are using gamification to get people to save more or

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 3>to invest more, or to you guys would know better

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 3>about those than I would. I think the problem is

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 3>when we focus on the number only without asking, well,

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 3>why do I care about this number in the first place?

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, So, well that makes me think of like there

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 2>was a credit union in Michigan, and then there was

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a bank that launched something really similar or it hasn't

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 2>taken off quite as much as I would have hoped,

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 2>but instead of paying higher savings rates to everybody, it

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 2>had like a lottery sort of aspect to it. Right,

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 2>So everybody gets paid instead of five percent, maybe they

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.720
<v Speaker 2>get paid two percent. But then there's winners every single

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 2>week where if you hit certain savings targets, you're eligible

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 2>you can win a thousand bucks, five thousand bucks, ten

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 2>thousand bucks stuff like that, and that actually, even though

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe less money overall is going out to the average person,

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 2>because there's a gamification aspect to savings, it pushes people

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 2>harder in that direction. And that's the kind of stuff

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 2>that like, it's not making companies as much money as

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 2>let's say, getting people to spend. It's not going to

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 2>get funded in nearly the same way. But I love

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 2>to see stuff like that on the gamification side that

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 2>push people towards like the good habits that we want

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 2>to see them express.

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, totally, And I think it is you know what

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 3>I think about it from a financial perspective, It is

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 3>like the reason you care about saving in the first

0:38:58.280 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 3>place is that you don't want to end up in

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 3>a position where you are more constrained where you end up,

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, older, and you're out of money, and now

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 3>you've got all these problems. At the same time, when

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 3>I think about salary, it's like, we all want to

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 3>see the salary number go up, But then the question

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 3>is why right, because ideally it allows us to live

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 3>more free or a better lifestyle. Now. At the same time,

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 3>pushing the salary number up over time, over time might

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 3>actually require you to do things that make you less happy,

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 3>that make you less free, right, so that number. Wanting

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 3>that number to go up can start to constrain you.

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:34.839
<v Speaker 3>The bigger question is like what is this what does

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 3>this number stand for? Overall? Like why do we care

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 3>in the first place? And unpacking that, I think everything

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 3>from the number on your fitness app to the number

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 3>in your bank account, to your health scores, to all

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 3>these different ways that gamification gets used. It's realizing that

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 3>you can use that number, the gamification as a tool

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 3>to incentivize better behaviors. At the same time, knowing what

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 3>the bigger meaning of that better behavior is and why

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 3>you're doing that in the first place, I think is important,

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 3>so you don't start just chasing the number for the

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 3>sake of the number and actually have the behavior backfire.

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. That's true.

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like even with saving or investing, you can

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:14.919
<v Speaker 2>overdo it. That's something we talk about on the show

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 2>here too, And so you can you can max out

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 2>your four oh one K every single year for a

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 2>decade and then and find that you've squandered relationships because

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 2>you were working too hard and you were too focused

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 2>on investing. And so that's possible too. Right, you can

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 2>have the wrong short term view and hope of this

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 2>like long term supposedly good ideal, But why are we

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 2>maxing out our four O one K in the first place? Yeah, yeah,

0:40:36.400 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe we should be, but maybe you shouldn't be.

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's different for every person. Yeah, so sort of

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>what Michael was saying earlier. The key to so much

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 1>of this is just moderation. Yeah, and but like we

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>are so bad at that. We're so bad at moderation

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to any of the different things that

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 1>we allow into our lives or the different things that

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.879
<v Speaker 1>we pursue. But truly that is the answer, And man,

0:40:56.120 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it's so powerful. What you said about the numbers two

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is that it oversimplifies things because, like I think, we

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>crave simplification. We crave the ability to look at a

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>number on a watch and be like, oh, haven't hit

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:08.839
<v Speaker 1>my steps or oh my vo two Max dropped a point.

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I gotta get it, get out there, get these are

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>more running. But there was a whole lot of information

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>or quality perhaps that gets lost in that translation. Like

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the examples you give in your book, you

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about one of the wine magazines or wine websites,

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>But how it used to be where when they would

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 1>try to rate wines, folks would use big, flowery language.

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>But what that meant was that it was inaccessible to

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of folks because it was so snobbish.

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>But then somebody came along and they attached a number

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 1>too wines. Can you talk about that and how that

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of changed that industry.

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you get this guy, Robert Parker, and he

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 3>started Wine Advocate magazine.

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Wine Advocate, that's right, Yeah, And so what he did.

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Is he would start giving wines a score from I

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 3>think fifty to one hundred. Now, when he did that,

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 3>it's simplify this really complex thing, which is trying to

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 3>understand whether a wine is good or bad. Right, Like, sure,

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 3>you could read a whole paragraph on twenty different wines,

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 3>or you could just look at the number and go, oh,

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 3>well that one got a ninety five and this one

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 3>got in ninety four. Therefore that one is better. The

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 3>ninety five is clearly better, and so people really latch

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 3>onto this rating system. Now, the issue is that Parker

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 3>was rating the wines, and so he's obviously has his

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 3>own preferences and tastes and what tends to happen is

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:33.320
<v Speaker 3>that when he gives a wine a score of ninety

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:35.919
<v Speaker 3>or above, it tends to fly off the shelves, while

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 3>wines that are say in the eighties or in the seventies,

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 3>they don't sell quite as well. So vinters wine makers

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 3>they notice this and they go, oh, we need to

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 3>start making wines that this guy will like. We need

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 3>we need wines that are a ninety plus by wine advocate.

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 3>So that's what they start doing, and it changes this

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 3>wine making tradition that had been going on for thousands

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 3>and thousands of years, all because this guy's tastes and

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 3>his ability to put a number on things. Now, if

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:08.760
<v Speaker 3>you don't have the same taste as this guy.

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Though exactly, this information is useless to you.

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 3>Ye, And like the wines that you used to like

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 3>from the wine maker, now it's changed because they're trying

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 3>to have it be you know, good in this guy's eyes. Now.

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:23.719
<v Speaker 3>The other problem, too, is that people usually eat food

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 3>when they drink wine. But if you're trying to rate

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 3>something objectively, you can't have food with it. So now

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:32.720
<v Speaker 3>this has changed the whole freaking purpose of the wine

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 3>and the wine making. But it's not you know, The

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 3>important point is that it is not just in wine.

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:41.439
<v Speaker 3>You also see this in basically the scoring or rating

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 3>of anything from movies, to books, to music, to you know,

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Yelp reviews, to all these different things. So numbers really

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 3>allow us to simplify really complex data. That is good

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.320
<v Speaker 3>for speed, but we leave out a lot of nuance,

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 3>we leave out a lot of accuracy, we leave out

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of individual variation.

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, Michael, you say scarcity is the mother

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 2>of invention ideas and breaking new ground. So I don't know,

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 2>give me your final thoughts on scarcity and how it

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 2>impacts all of us on a day to day level

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to our money and when it comes

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 2>to just generally our happiness in life.

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. There's a really interesting study that I cite in

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 3>the book, and it basically took two groups and it

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 3>gave them a series of problems to solve using different resources.

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 3>And for one group, they gave them effectively unlimited resources

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 3>to solve the problem. And so that's what the people did.

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 3>They just you know, they threw resources out of they

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 3>threw money at the problem, and they did solve it. Now,

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 3>the other group, they had very limited resources. They had

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 3>to sort of figure it out. Mcgiver fix the problem now.

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 3>They also solved the problem too, except that the way

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 3>that they solved it used fewer resources. Their fixes for

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 3>the problem were also de more creative, more intuitive. And

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 3>so I think that what happens when we face scarce

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:08.919
<v Speaker 3>resources is, like I mentioned with that other study from

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 3>the Lego study, our tendency is to just try and

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 3>throw money at it, throw resources at it. Right, But

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:19.400
<v Speaker 3>if we just put some constraints on ourselves and go, Okay,

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to sit here and I'm going to pretend

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:23.359
<v Speaker 3>that I have no resources solve this problem. How would

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I try and solve it without any resources? I think

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 3>that one you can not only solve it, but two

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 3>your problem will often be much better than you might

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 3>have expected, and that saves you money over the long term.

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 3>When you think about the problems that people face in

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 3>their daily life and the financial means that those require.

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Yeah, that's that might be the best

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 1>argument for less is more. Yeah, Michael, thank you so

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>much for talking with us. Where's it that folks can

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>learn more about you? Your book, what you're up to?

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, go on my website. Easter Michael, I have a

0:45:50.719 --> 0:45:52.879
<v Speaker 3>newsletter and it's got a big archive with a lot

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:55.360
<v Speaker 3>of stuff like how you can learn more about that

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 3>scarcity loop I talk to, and how it applies to finances,

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 3>how it applies to all these different things. So, yeah,

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 3>check out my website. You can sign up for the

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 3>newsletter there and get the archive, and yeah, that's probably

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 3>the best place to find.

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Me right on Awesome.

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 2>We'll link to all that stuff in our show notes

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 2>as well. Michael, thanks for joining us, man.

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thank you very much. It was great to talk nice.

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, man, what that was a great conversation. Do you

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>think we've had any conversation that was any less about

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>money than the conversation we just had with Michael?

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:25.359
<v Speaker 2>More about human behavior, But simultaneously, it just underpins how

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 2>it is that we handle money, just like you know,

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:31.399
<v Speaker 2>the mindset and when it comes to developing positive, good

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:33.479
<v Speaker 2>habits that are going to lead us to be able

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 2>to ultimately hopefully have more money on hand to kind

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 2>of live the life that we want to live. But

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 2>I thought about asking Michael at the very top, like

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 2>if he knew how much people were able to put

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:44.719
<v Speaker 2>into a four oh one k or a roth Ira

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:47.920
<v Speaker 2>or something this year I assume he didn't because it

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 2>was not his thing, you know, which is which it

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 2>just to prove a point that, like we had Michael

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 2>on for other reasons, he's like brilliant, vastly knowledgeable on

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 2>all these other things that impact our money, yes, but

0:46:58.200 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 2>indirectly right exactly.

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:01.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, what was your that being said? What was

0:47:01.840 --> 0:47:03.439
<v Speaker 1>your big takeaway? Are you going to try to channel

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it in a personal finance direction? Okay?

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 2>So or no, there's two different ways. I feel like

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:09.319
<v Speaker 2>I go here, but I'm gonna say this when he

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 2>said everyone sucks at moderation, and I think he's right, Like,

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I think it's really really hard to be a moderate

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:18.280
<v Speaker 2>in this day and age. I mean, think about everything

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 2>in our political landscape points to polarization hard left or

0:47:21.680 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 2>hard right right, and or really if we're going to

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 2>try to accomplish anything, it being sort of middle of

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 2>the road seems like the craziest choice to make, but

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 2>we think for the most ornamental most of the time,

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 2>it's actually a good path to trot. And when it

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 2>comes to what your goals are, well define your goals

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 2>based on maybe more moderation, like do you want to

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 2>get fit cool? Do you need or want to be

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:50.720
<v Speaker 2>oral Torchen atger level fit probably not like I certainly don't,

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 2>But like, what are your money goals amassing millions and

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:57.319
<v Speaker 2>millions and millions? That might not be it either. You

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 2>probably don't want to just like us, you don't want

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 2>to be the next Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos for

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:03.240
<v Speaker 2>many reasons.

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But and that means, please, I know you want a

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 1>rocket ship to.

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 2>The point I do, but not having those extreme goals

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 2>is actually, I think going to lead to a happier life.

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes when it comes to the consumption side of

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 2>things too, figure out what does it look like to

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:23.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe indulge in some of these things, know that they exist,

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 2>know that these mechanisms are pulling at me, but that

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I also don't have to.

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Go a whole hawk.

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:32.319
<v Speaker 2>I can be a moderate Amazon user, right, stuff like that,

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Like I can moderately use my phone without going overboard.

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 2>It's about pulling back in the ways that we that

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 2>makes sense for us, so that we can live a

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 2>life that more fully reflects.

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Who we want to be. Dude, I couldn't agree more. Yeah,

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 1>so my yeah, my big tech away kind of dovetails

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:48.720
<v Speaker 1>with that a little bit. But so he was talking

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 1>about numbers and how they're relatively new, and how numbers

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in and of themselves are a gamification tactic or whatever

0:48:57.120 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it is that you're measuring, like, it doesn't matter what

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it is, whether you're measu how fast you can run grades.

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:04.439
<v Speaker 1>That's something that makes me think of a recent piece

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I was reading the Times recently about how set scores

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and college yeah, and just college success rates there or

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:14.720
<v Speaker 1>with here. On the show, what we talked about personal finance.

0:49:15.000 --> 0:49:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Net worth? Man, what a number that is incredibly easy

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to put your finger on, and we like it because

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 1>it's simple, it's straightforward, and it's easy to compare, to write,

0:49:24.800 --> 0:49:26.839
<v Speaker 1>not only to yourself, but man, how easy is it

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to compare to others? Nothing, As I guess, you don't

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 1>always know what somebody else's net worth, but the perceived

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 1>net worth. And certainly when it comes to consumption, you know, oh,

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much that truck costs. Truck costs

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>as much, but that means their net worth went down exactly.

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:44.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of contrary there. But when it comes

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to those who are seeking after specifically fire right like

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 1>financial independence, retiring early, I think there can be an

0:49:51.320 --> 0:49:54.840
<v Speaker 1>obsession with it because you're trying to hit your number,

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Like that's the term that those folks oftentimes will use.

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And yes, it's it's more efficient to figure out where

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you are on your journey. Yes it is easier, But man,

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are you missing out on so much of life that

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>fits between in between this numbers that fits in between

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:15.400
<v Speaker 1>those monthly check ins to your net worth and figuring

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:17.839
<v Speaker 1>out sort of like what you said, what it is

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you want your life to look like is so important

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>more than ever because we have so many resources at

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 1>our disposal that we can choose to chase after. But

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>are you chasing after the things that you want to

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 1>chase after in this world, in this day and age,

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think is a more important question than ever before.

0:50:32.960 --> 0:50:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, and choosing not to decide is deciding to choose

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 2>or whatever you know, you're choosing by default exactly somebody

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:41.359
<v Speaker 2>else is going to choose for you, and specifically it's

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be advertisers, it's going to be you know,

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the phone that's in your hand, It's going to be

0:50:46.360 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 2>whoever's closest by you, Like those are going to be

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:51.120
<v Speaker 2>the things that impact you the most when it comes

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 2>to what you end up actually doing as opposed to

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:54.920
<v Speaker 2>you proactively making that decision.

0:50:55.000 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So couldn't agree more men.

0:50:56.600 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, although slightly off topic from personal finance, like especially

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.240
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning of the year, given how great Michael's

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 2>book is.

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what's so great too about his book is

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:09.719
<v Speaker 1>like there aren't like three clear steps that you need

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to leave this conversation or leave even reading his book

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>knowing that these are the three things that you need

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to address, And so we most definitely recommend for everyone

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:20.839
<v Speaker 1>out there to seriously read his book cover to cover

0:51:21.320 --> 0:51:23.839
<v Speaker 1>because the examples that he gives it just sheds light

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 1>on humanity essentially as opposed to I don't know what

0:51:27.239 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>feels might feel more like a cheap takeaway, but it

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 1>makes me want to recommend for folks to check out

0:51:32.680 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the How to Money Money Mission Statement, because that's what

0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here, is you asking yourself some of

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>these larger questions. It's less the immediate tactics and strategies

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of how you're going to achieve those things, but from

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a very high level deciding for yourself which direction you

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:50.440
<v Speaker 1>want your life to be going in.

0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Those two things actually would pair really well together. This

0:51:52.520 --> 0:51:54.839
<v Speaker 2>book and the Money missions in it, and the money

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 2>mission statements free will link to it in the show notes. Yeah,

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:58.239
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, Michael is just a great writer.

0:51:58.320 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 2>So that's another reason. If you want to read a

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 2>book and by someone so good, who's curious, and that

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:05.360
<v Speaker 2>comes across in every inch of the text, then this

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:07.399
<v Speaker 2>book is for you. All right, now, let's get back

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:10.400
<v Speaker 2>to the beer. This one is called Nelson Double IPA

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:13.879
<v Speaker 2>by Evergrain Brewing listener Rihanna. This is a last beer

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 2>from her Big thanks to Rihanna for donating beers to

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:17.799
<v Speaker 2>the show. Matt Warrior thoughts on this beer.

0:52:17.880 --> 0:52:21.239
<v Speaker 1>My thoughts are that, so this is a single hop

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:24.480
<v Speaker 1>series and it's called Nelson because it's Nelson Hops. And

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:27.800
<v Speaker 1>all I know now is that I love Nelson Hops because,

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, the flavor it's got, like all the

0:52:31.120 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>hot flavors that I'm looking for one hot. Well, yes, yeah,

0:52:34.520 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>it's phenomenal. Completely agree. It's so good. Not too sweet,

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:41.080
<v Speaker 1>not too earthy, not too piny, man, it's not too

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one note.

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Some of the other hops you're like, oh, clearly this

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 2>is pine, Oh clearly this is citrusy, and this one

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 2>has it runs the gamut with one hop but it

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:51.439
<v Speaker 2>really highlights the things I love about hops the most.

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:54.719
<v Speaker 2>So for Nelson, hops always stick out as a fave,

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and this beer does that hop justice.

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I feel like I'm slowly expanding my and you

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 1>would think, with you and me being such beer nerds

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that for a long time that we would we would

0:53:05.040 --> 0:53:07.360
<v Speaker 1>have a better handle as to some of the different

0:53:08.040 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 1>flavor character profiles of some of the different hops. But

0:53:10.920 --> 0:53:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I can add another one to my

0:53:12.480 --> 0:53:15.359
<v Speaker 1>mental checker, Nelson, they got it going on nice.

0:53:15.440 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love it all right. Well, that's going to

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 2>do it for this episode, folks. Can't wait to see

0:53:19.239 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 2>you back here on Friday for a Friday flight. And

0:53:21.640 --> 0:53:23.279
<v Speaker 2>by the way, if you want links to some of

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:26.320
<v Speaker 2>the stuff we mentioned, including Michael's book and newsletter, you

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 2>can find those up on our website at Howtimoney dot com.

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:30.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right, buddy. So that's gonna be it for this

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:34.359
<v Speaker 1>one until next time. Best Friends Out, Best Friends Out.