Speaker 1: You get, Oh man, this two places crazy, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: fatten all that around your eye. This man, two dog
Speaker 1: and blowers. Many waited for. Charlomaye had to make a judgment.
Speaker 1: Who was going to be on the Donkey of the day.
Speaker 1: They chose you was the breakfast club. Bitches. Who's donkey
Speaker 1: of the day to day? Wow? Donkey Today from Friday,
Speaker 1: January twentieth goes to a forty seven year old Massachusetts
Speaker 1: man named Brian Walsh. Now, if you don't know who
Speaker 1: Brian Walsh is, he's the husband of a Massachusetts woman
Speaker 1: who disappeared around New Year's Day. That young lady's name
Speaker 1: was Anna Walsh. Do you want to know why that
Speaker 1: young lady disappeared. She disappeared because Brian Walsh killed her.
Speaker 1: I still gotta say allegedly, uh didn't just kill her allegedly,
Speaker 1: but dismembered and discarded her her remains. Yes, he's accused
Speaker 1: of assulting and beating his wife with the intent to murder,
Speaker 1: and he's charged before moving her body and remains. He
Speaker 1: pleaded not guilty to the charges. Now, I understand the
Speaker 1: legal system, and every single person, you know, every single
Speaker 1: person on the planet has this theory. You know, we
Speaker 1: gotta have due process, right, everybody deserves due process, but sometimes,
Speaker 1: just sometimes we don't need to waste taxpayers dollars with
Speaker 1: callcases and stuff because every now and then, like in
Speaker 1: a case like this one, we don't gotta do all
Speaker 1: the pump and circumstance. Whatever they say Brian did, he
Speaker 1: did it, okay. So you can learn a lot from
Speaker 1: a person's Internet browser history. For example, on this in
Speaker 1: betweenty seven, Brian made an Internet search for what's the
Speaker 1: best state to divorce for a man. Clearly if his
Speaker 1: wife saw that, she would be upset because this obvious
Speaker 1: Brian was searching for how to get a divorce, Okay, unless,
Speaker 1: of course, he was searching for a friend who didn't
Speaker 1: have Wi Fi. That would be a lie, one would
Speaker 1: tell if their wife ever caught him searching anything about divorcing.
Speaker 1: But that's not all Brian was searching. The other things
Speaker 1: Brian was searching is the reason he's going to be
Speaker 1: found guilty on all counsel everything he's charged with. Gad
Speaker 1: run tee. Wow, what else was he Sarge? That's going
Speaker 1: to CBS Boston for the report police? Brian Walsh told
Speaker 1: police he hadn't seen or spoken to his wife Anna
Speaker 1: since the early morning hours of New Year's Day. Investigators
Speaker 1: now believe that's exactly when he killed her, then used
Speaker 1: his son's iPad to research online how to get away
Speaker 1: with it. Early searches around five am included how long
Speaker 1: before a body starts to smell? How to stop a
Speaker 1: body from decomposing? Can you throw away body parts? Can
Speaker 1: baking soda mask or make a body smell good? How
Speaker 1: long can someone be missing before inheritance? Anna Walsh's body
Speaker 1: has not been found. Prosecutors say Brian Walsh was seen
Speaker 1: heaving trash bags into dumpsters that have already been incinerated.
Speaker 1: The state crime Lab detected DNA from both Brian and
Speaker 1: Anna in those bloody trash bags that were recovered. Police
Speaker 1: found blood in Brian's car and tracked the husband's errands
Speaker 1: buying cleanups of lines and new rugs. I don't claim
Speaker 1: to be the highest grade of weed in the dispensary,
Speaker 1: but if there's indeed a human who has been murdered
Speaker 1: and dismembered, and the number one suspect in this murder
Speaker 1: has a search history that consists of ten ways to
Speaker 1: dispose of a dead body if you really need to.
Speaker 1: By the way, when would you not need to? Don't
Speaker 1: we always dispose the dead bodies. Nobody just leaves dead
Speaker 1: bodies lying around the house, do they? And how to
Speaker 1: stop a body from decomposing? If the number one suspect
Speaker 1: in the murder case is looking up all this stuff,
Speaker 1: this stuff, I think it's safe to say he's guilty. Okay,
Speaker 1: not to mention. Investigators found a couple of DNA along
Speaker 1: with a COVID vaccination card for Anna, Anna, hack saw
Speaker 1: and cutting shears and a hatchet in a trash bag.
Speaker 1: You know that that that was disposed of and that
Speaker 1: dumpster near Brian's mother's house. This is an opening shut case,
Speaker 1: all right, opening shutcase. A couple of DNA was identified
Speaker 1: on the slippers and a suit that they found in
Speaker 1: trash bags. They found blood in the basement, a damaged
Speaker 1: knife with blood on it. The saddest part about this
Speaker 1: whole situation is that Anna Walsh's body has not been found,
Speaker 1: which means that majority of the stuff he's searched on
Speaker 1: Google clearly worked. So I asked a question, shouldn't Google
Speaker 1: be held as an accomplice or whoever it's creating these
Speaker 1: pages where people can have this kind of information that
Speaker 1: is causing people to potentially get away with crimes. Don't
Speaker 1: you think now you don't think that? I mean that
Speaker 1: opens up a slippery slope, you know, like you're you're
Speaker 1: getting into dangerous territory there, similar to the Rico cases.
Speaker 1: You know, when you start taking people's rap lyrics, and
Speaker 1: it's like, if I'm searching something, you don't know why
Speaker 1: I'm searching something. Maybe I'm you know, as a journalist,
Speaker 1: I searched for a lot of things just to get
Speaker 1: information things that you search for. I mean, imagine if
Speaker 1: somebody could go through your entire search history and then
Speaker 1: not only hold you accountable for that, but hold the
Speaker 1: search engine itself accountable for that. I think that's a
Speaker 1: dangerous territs. Should you be allowed to tell people how
Speaker 1: to potentially get away without typically speaking? Should you be
Speaker 1: allowed to tell people to tell people how to potentially
Speaker 1: get away with crimes? I see why you say that's dangerous, Like,
Speaker 1: that's understandable. So maybe we hit we should be looking
Speaker 1: at just the same thing that happens when someone goes
Speaker 1: on a mash shooting spree and now they're more the
Speaker 1: media is much more diligent about reporting about it, how
Speaker 1: they're importing about it, so it doesn't encourage a copycat.
Speaker 1: I hear your point, but I think we do have
Speaker 1: to be careful about us resub word. Well, uh, please
Speaker 1: give Brian walk Let bring me mak give Brian Walsh
Speaker 1: the biggest heahuk he ha he ha. You stupid motherfuck?
Speaker 1: Are you dumb? All right, well, thank you for that.
Speaker 1: Donkey Today. Donkey Today is brought to you by the
Speaker 1: law office of Michael s Lamm and Saut. Don't be
Speaker 1: a donkey. Dive pound two fifty on your cell and
Speaker 1: say the bull. If you've been hurting a construction accident,
Speaker 1: that's pound two five old from your cell and say
Speaker 1: the bull.