Speaker 1: Good morning, keeps, and welcome to WIKA, a daily with
Speaker 1: Meet Your Girl Danielle Moody. Recording from the Home Bunker. Folks,
Speaker 1: let me tell you something. This show has been prerecorded
Speaker 1: with my friend MSNBC legal analyst and the host of
Speaker 1: Justice Matters, Glenn Kirshner. As we are awaiting, we're on
Speaker 1: indictment watch for Donald Trump and associates. Now, I don't
Speaker 1: want us to hold our breath around this, right, and
Speaker 1: this is how I get into the conversation with Glenn,
Speaker 1: which is that you know, for those of you who
Speaker 1: have been listening to the show for the past couple
Speaker 1: of years, Glenn has been coming on weekly, right, laying
Speaker 1: out all of the legal ease and all of the
Speaker 1: investigation surrounding Donald Trump and company. It's years, friends, and
Speaker 1: you know, every couple of months we find out new
Speaker 1: egregious criminal activity that has gone on, whether it's inside
Speaker 1: of the administration, whether it was previous to Donald Trump
Speaker 1: becoming president. We know that everything that this man touches
Speaker 1: this shit. But somehow he remains a freeman, you know,
Speaker 1: and that is evidenced by our injustice system. Because if
Speaker 1: Donald Trump were any other person, if he were a woman,
Speaker 1: If he were a gay person, If he were black,
Speaker 1: we know he'd be dead, so let's not even go there.
Speaker 1: If he were Latin next, if he were any other
Speaker 1: a part of any other identity groups outside of being
Speaker 1: a rich, white, sis hetero man who is also the
Speaker 1: former president of the United States, even being twice impeached,
Speaker 1: even with the man admitting his crimes on fucking audio,
Speaker 1: whether it's I can grab them by the pussy, whether
Speaker 1: it is find me eleven seven hundred and forty votes though,
Speaker 1: and we'll do the rest. I mean, I don't know
Speaker 1: what else Donald Trump would have to do. But you know,
Speaker 1: the other day, I was watching Alex Wagner on MSNBC
Speaker 1: and she says the truest thing that I have ever heard.
Speaker 1: She was the only true statement that has ever come
Speaker 1: out of Donald Trump's mouth is that he could shoot
Speaker 1: somebody in the middle of Fifth Avenue and watch his
Speaker 1: poll numbers rise. He also would still be a freeman,
Speaker 1: and somehow an investigation would be opened against the person
Speaker 1: that he shot. As opposed to Donald Trump, I'm so
Speaker 1: fucking tired of bombshell report over here and bombshell had
Speaker 1: line over here, and oh my god, can you believe this,
Speaker 1: Because without indictments, without a tryal, all of this is
Speaker 1: in fact a fucking witch hunt, right, Not in the
Speaker 1: way that Donald Trump says that it's a witch hunt,
Speaker 1: as if there is no factual evidence that shows criminal activity.
Speaker 1: But if you're not going to actually persecute a person
Speaker 1: who is essentially a political mob boss, lying, stealing, grifting
Speaker 1: in broad fucking daylight and on tape, and you can't
Speaker 1: nail this motherfucker, then everything that you are doing is
Speaker 1: just a dog and pony show. It doesn't have any merit, right.
Speaker 1: It gives you the perception of justice, the perception that
Speaker 1: nobody is above the law. But if you can't convict
Speaker 1: someone like Donald Trump, who is caught on tape committing
Speaker 1: fucking crimes, and you continue to raise the bar, raise
Speaker 1: the bar, raise the bar where he brought the bar
Speaker 1: of democracy and of justice to the fucking sewer, that
Speaker 1: now we've turned the bar into a plunger. I don't
Speaker 1: know where we go, but I know that the direction
Speaker 1: that America, our justice system, our democracy, our social safety nets,
Speaker 1: our freedom is all being rolled backwards. And without indictments,
Speaker 1: without conviction, without accountability, America will free fall off the
Speaker 1: cliff that we are hanging on to with our fucking fingernails.
Speaker 1: Coming up next my conversation with our friend Glenn Kirshner
Speaker 1: that what happens if and when Donald Trump is indicted?
Speaker 1: What can we expect if anything? Folks, you know that
Speaker 1: whenever I have the opportunity to have our friend MSNBC
Speaker 1: legal analysts and the host of Justice Matters, Glenn Kirshner,
Speaker 1: joined woke f I am thrilled, particularly at a time folks,
Speaker 1: we are prerecording this, but as reports are coming out,
Speaker 1: we don't know if it's gossip, i's real reports. Who knows,
Speaker 1: but possible indictments for Donald Trump are imminent and that
Speaker 1: is illegal term and Glenn, I want to start out
Speaker 1: with the fact that we've been hearing a lot in
Speaker 1: the media from Michael Cohen again, Donald Trump's former lawyer,
Speaker 1: who went to jail for his former boss because of
Speaker 1: payments that were given to Stormy Daniels and escort by
Speaker 1: Michael Cohen. Two Stormy Daniels on behalf of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Both of them have been before for Manhattan Grand Jury.
Speaker 1: Give us the cliff notes, the reminder, the review on
Speaker 1: what entanglement we are looking at when we're looking at
Speaker 1: the Manhattan District Attorney's case right now, so Daniellett feels
Speaker 1: like Alvin Bragg's shop. His prosecutors are at the absolute
Speaker 1: end stage of the grand jury investigation into the hush
Speaker 1: money payments to Stormy Daniels. The reason I say that
Speaker 1: is because the most important witness, Michael Cohen, who was
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's co conspirator. He committed these crimes with Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: at the direction of Donald Trump and for the benefit
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump. He went to prison six or seven
Speaker 1: years ago. Donald Trump has yet to be held accountable.
Speaker 1: Feels like we have two systems of justice at work there.
Speaker 1: But because they have now placed him before the grand
Speaker 1: jury for two days, and they also have interviewed Stormy Daniels,
Speaker 1: We're not sure the reporting was it was a zoom interview.
Speaker 1: We don't know if she's been presented to the grand jury.
Speaker 1: She is actually not nearly as important as Michael coe
Speaker 1: and the co conspirator. He can bring kind of the
Speaker 1: inside baseball to the crime that he and the crimes
Speaker 1: that he and Donald Trump committed together. But you know what,
Speaker 1: really the most important data point that tells me that
Speaker 1: they are at the absolute end of their investigation. Is
Speaker 1: they invited Donald Trump to come in and testify before
Speaker 1: the grand jury. Danielle, First of all, we rarely do it.
Speaker 1: We don't do it in violent crime cases. We do
Speaker 1: it in these large white collar crime cases sometimes. And
Speaker 1: what we do is we give the target of the
Speaker 1: investigation the opportunity to come address the grand jurors and say,
Speaker 1: ladies and gentlemen, prosecutors have it all wrong. I didn't
Speaker 1: do anything wrong. I didn't commit any crimes. Not surprisingly,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump did not take the prosecutors up on that invitation.
Speaker 1: So there really doesn't seem to be anything left for
Speaker 1: brag or his team to do other than ask the
Speaker 1: grand jury to vote out indictments against Donald Trump. What
Speaker 1: nobody knows at this moment is precisely what charges will
Speaker 1: be included in that indictment. We have heard lots about
Speaker 1: falsifying business records, which undoubtedly Trump and Cohen did because
Speaker 1: they lied and said that these were legal expenses. Well, no,
Speaker 1: they weren't. But the concern here is that falsifying business
Speaker 1: records under New York law is only a misdemeanor, and
Speaker 1: there's no way Donald Trump as a former president of
Speaker 1: the United States is going to face a single misdemeanor count.
Speaker 1: Nobody's going to indict a president for that. But the
Speaker 1: law of New York also provides that if you're falsifying
Speaker 1: business records to either facilitate other crimes or to cover
Speaker 1: up other crimes, or both, well, then now they have
Speaker 1: blossomed into felony crimes. So what I suspect is when
Speaker 1: we see this indictment, it will probably include three four
Speaker 1: five separate counts. One will be falsifying business records, but
Speaker 1: you may have campaign finance violations of New York state law.
Speaker 1: You're almost certainly going to have violations of the tax
Speaker 1: laws of New York because Trump falsely tried to take
Speaker 1: these things as business deductions when they were hush money payoffs.
Speaker 1: So you know, all of this I think is soon
Speaker 1: to be revealed. As you say, we're pretaping this, so
Speaker 1: you know, by the time it's out, maybe the indictment
Speaker 1: will already have issued. But that's when a lot of
Speaker 1: these questions can get answered concretely. What I think is
Speaker 1: really important to lay out, which is what you just did,
Speaker 1: is state that we've been waiting for years at this point,
Speaker 1: right from the find me eleven seven hundred and forty
Speaker 1: some odd votes to the lie about the election, to
Speaker 1: the Stormy Daniel case. We've been waiting for years, and
Speaker 1: I think to the point that you just made, which
Speaker 1: is that we've been waiting because there's been a lot
Speaker 1: of fear about what does it mean to indict a
Speaker 1: former twice impeached president of the United States. So the assumption, then, Glenn,
Speaker 1: is that if there are whispers now that an indictment
Speaker 1: is imminent, it isn't gonna be some low balling stuff, right,
Speaker 1: It isn't gonna be some lightlifting indictments. So the question
Speaker 1: that I have for you is, again, we don't know
Speaker 1: exactly what they will be, but would your assumption be
Speaker 1: that it would carry some charges, some criminal charges, meaning
Speaker 1: that if Donald Trump goes to trial, jail time would
Speaker 1: be a part of this. Or are we looking at
Speaker 1: a situation which is what we saw with New York
Speaker 1: Attorney General Tish James, which is all of these civil
Speaker 1: suits that is about a fine. So the good news
Speaker 1: is the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, Alvin Bragg's shop is
Speaker 1: exclusively in the business of bringing criminal cases that will
Speaker 1: carry at least the possibility of imprisonment, whereas Tish James
Speaker 1: deals almost exclusively, not exclusively, but almost exclusively with civil
Speaker 1: matters which are about money, which are about fines and penalties,
Speaker 1: back taxes, and she can do certain things like bar
Speaker 1: people from doing business in New York, sitting on boards
Speaker 1: in New York, that sort of thing. So once this
Speaker 1: indictment drops, it will almost certainly include felony charges that
Speaker 1: will carry with it the possibility of imprisonment. Now, whether
Speaker 1: a judge is going to be up to the task
Speaker 1: of incarcerating a former president of the United States is
Speaker 1: an open question. I sure as hell hope the judge is.
Speaker 1: Because if you go through all of this angst and
Speaker 1: all you do is sentenced Donald Trump for these consequential
Speaker 1: crimes to home detention, for example, you are sentencing him
Speaker 1: to stream Netflix and get DoorDash. That's no kind of
Speaker 1: punishment and it's no kind of deterrent for a future
Speaker 1: high government official who wants to break the laws of
Speaker 1: the United States for any reason, including trying to unlawfully
Speaker 1: retain power. But here's the other thing. We may see
Speaker 1: a series of indictments coming out of Alvin Bragg's shop,
Speaker 1: Because even if the first indictment is only about the
Speaker 1: Stormy Daniel's hush money payments and all of the crimes
Speaker 1: that can be charged as part of that criminal scheme,
Speaker 1: and as I say, there may be four or five
Speaker 1: or more crimes that can be pulled together in one indictment,
Speaker 1: I don't think that's the end of the road for
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Criminally. The reason I say that is because
Speaker 1: we know that Alvin Bragg flinched when it came to
Speaker 1: bringing charges against Donald Trump. When his prosecutors Pomranson done
Speaker 1: recommended that he'd do that. They told him, we've been
Speaker 1: investigating him for more than a year, we've got the goods,
Speaker 1: we've got enough to convict him, and Bragg said, Nope,
Speaker 1: not gonna do it. We don't quite know why that is,
Speaker 1: but it may be that, you know, he hadn't been
Speaker 1: in the job that long. He wanted to take a
Speaker 1: step back. He wanted to really absorb for himself what
Speaker 1: the universe of evidence was. What he opted to do
Speaker 1: at that point, Danielle was only indict the Trump organization
Speaker 1: right for a fifteen year long criminal scheme to defraud
Speaker 1: in the first degree massive systemic tax fraud and he
Speaker 1: went to trial in that case. What did that give
Speaker 1: him the opportunity to preview? It gave him the opportunity
Speaker 1: to preview all of the witnesses who testified in the
Speaker 1: Trump organization prosecution that would also have to testify against
Speaker 1: Donald Trump if he ended up being criminally indicted for
Speaker 1: that same fifteen year long massive tax fraud scheme that
Speaker 1: you know he was running as the top of his
Speaker 1: own dang organization. So maybe he was looking at the
Speaker 1: Trump Org prosecution to be his trial run kicked the
Speaker 1: tires of the witnesses, and those witnesses held up because
Speaker 1: the Trump organization got convicted across the board of everything.
Speaker 1: I have a feeling after this first indictment drops the
Speaker 1: hush money payment indictment, you may then see a second
Speaker 1: indictment drop for the whole shebang everything Donald Trump did
Speaker 1: while he was heading up Trump Org. How does Alan Weisselberg,
Speaker 1: Trump's former COO, who was also convicted right and is
Speaker 1: currently serving time, how does he play into possibly being
Speaker 1: used as a witness against Donald Trump? Because he's been
Speaker 1: COO of this company for over a decade I think
Speaker 1: close to two, and we know that he was convicted,
Speaker 1: how does he play here? So here's how he plays
Speaker 1: in Remember, Alvin Bragg cut him an incredibly sweetheart deal
Speaker 1: because he was indicted on multiple felony charges, including that
Speaker 1: same fifteen year long criminal scheme to defraud in the
Speaker 1: first degree. He pleaded guilty to it all, and he
Speaker 1: got this incredible sweetheart deal. He would serve only five months,
Speaker 1: which drops down to one hundred days in jail with
Speaker 1: credit for good time served. He walked away having committed
Speaker 1: massive fraud and getting only the tiniest possible sentence. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't want to be cavalier about it. One hundred
Speaker 1: days or five months in Rikers is no picnic, right,
Speaker 1: But that is all he had to do as a
Speaker 1: result of his guilty plea, and he testified at the
Speaker 1: trump Board trial. But it sounds like he played games.
Speaker 1: As we say in DC, he played the fifties. He
Speaker 1: had one foot in both camps, one in the prosecution's camp,
Speaker 1: one in Donald Trump's camp. So here is now Bragg's
Speaker 1: decision that he has to make with regard to Allen Weiselberg.
Speaker 1: Do I continue to try to use him as a
Speaker 1: really crummy cooperating witness the way I used him in
Speaker 1: the Trump Board case. Or now that I have kicked
Speaker 1: the tires of all of the other witnesses that would
Speaker 1: have to testify against Donald Trump if I indicted him
Speaker 1: for the fraud, should I also indict Alan Weisselberg along
Speaker 1: with Donald Trump both again, So both of them are
Speaker 1: sitting at defense table for the next round of trials.
Speaker 1: And you know what, Weisselberg got himself a taste of
Speaker 1: the inside of Rikers and I'll bet he didn't like it.
Speaker 1: And this time he may say, you know what, I
Speaker 1: don't want to be indicted again. I will completely flip
Speaker 1: against Donald Trump. So you know, all of this could
Speaker 1: certainly be three dimensional chess. Maybe that's what Bragg has
Speaker 1: been doing. Maybe not. I think we have to wait
Speaker 1: and see and what do we think Glenn again, because
Speaker 1: I just want to remind folks there are multiple investigations
Speaker 1: going on in Trump world. You just ran through New York,
Speaker 1: which we think is the one that is most likely
Speaker 1: with the whispering that is happening. There is also Fannie
Speaker 1: Willis in Georgia in Fulton County. Now, one of the
Speaker 1: reasons why I think that it could be Georgia going first,
Speaker 1: as opposed to Manhattan DA Alvin bragg Is because the
Speaker 1: Republican Party just voted right to be able to replace
Speaker 1: district attorney anywhere in the state that they don't like. Well,
Speaker 1: there's only one district attorney in the state of Georgia
Speaker 1: that is currently investigating one of their cronies. So and
Speaker 1: they don't care about how things actually look. This version
Speaker 1: of the Republican Party, you know, optics be damned. Will
Speaker 1: it shock us all or will it just be like,
Speaker 1: you know, six of one, half a dozen of the other.
Speaker 1: If it's Fannie Willis that goes first, and this is
Speaker 1: about the fake electors and the find me eleven seven
Speaker 1: hundred and forty votes, it won't shock me because it
Speaker 1: feels like they are neck and neck right now with
Speaker 1: respect to where Bragg is in his investigation at the
Speaker 1: tail end, where District Attorney Fannie Willis is in her
Speaker 1: investigation at the tail end. And I'll tell you what
Speaker 1: the Atlanta Journal Constitution published yesterday was pretty blockbuster because
Speaker 1: they interviewed five more of the Grand jurors. And I
Speaker 1: urge everybody to go to the Atlanta Journal Constitution read
Speaker 1: the deep dive piece because they interviewed these five grand jurors,
Speaker 1: and the article started with, you know, some real ugliness
Speaker 1: because they talked about Mike Flynn being called before the
Speaker 1: grand jury to testify. They had to bring bomb sniffing
Speaker 1: dogs into the courthouse into the grand jury room to
Speaker 1: make sure none of Mike Flynn's associates had done anything dirty.
Speaker 1: They had marshals and deputy sheriffs with automatic weapons out
Speaker 1: in front of the courthouse, on the courthouse steps, the
Speaker 1: Fulton County Courthouse to make sure none of Mike Flynn's
Speaker 1: supporters did anything And the article started with, you know,
Speaker 1: the authors, the reporters recounting how a treasonist former army
Speaker 1: general who pleaded guilty not once but twice to line
Speaker 1: to the FBI, and who was then part by a
Speaker 1: corrupt president who also happened to be his criminal associate,
Speaker 1: walked into that Georgia grand jury and pled the Fifth
Speaker 1: in vote, this fifth Amendment right against self incrimination to
Speaker 1: cover up the crimes of Donald Trump. This is Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's America. But then the article starts recounting the experience
Speaker 1: of these twenty three jurors who put their lives on
Speaker 1: hold for eight months to do the extraordinarily hard and
Speaker 1: important work of evaluating the evidence against Donald Trump and
Speaker 1: his criminal associates. I urge everybody to read it, because
Speaker 1: when you can almost hear the voices of these Grand jurors,
Speaker 1: they said things like I would go into my car
Speaker 1: at the end of every day and I would cry
Speaker 1: because of what I was learning inside that Grand jury
Speaker 1: room regarding guys like Donald Trump and Rudy Giuliani and
Speaker 1: how they devastated the lives of people like Shay Moss
Speaker 1: and Ruby Freeman and others. And they said, we took
Speaker 1: our job so seriously because we knew we had to
Speaker 1: get this right and listen to their stories, and they
Speaker 1: were allowed to give these interviews. They didn't do anything improper.
Speaker 1: But if you read that article and then it ends
Speaker 1: with a quote from one of the Grand jurors that says,
Speaker 1: what's coming, It's gonna be massive. It's gonna be massive.
Speaker 1: The Grand jurors said it twice. This leads me to believe, Danielle,
Speaker 1: that we're not gonna see a bunch of sort of singles,
Speaker 1: standalone indictments of a handful of people. We're going to
Speaker 1: see a big, old conspiracy indictment probably a Rico conspiracy
Speaker 1: indictment out of Fannie Willis. And I think part of
Speaker 1: the reason we haven't seen that indictment yet because remember
Speaker 1: five six weeks ago, she said her charging decisions were
Speaker 1: imminent anytime. I am preparing to indict a conspiracy a
Speaker 1: whole bunch of defendants Before I do it, what I
Speaker 1: do is I go to each defendant through their defense team,
Speaker 1: obviously right, and I say, you have one last opportunity.
Speaker 1: You want to see your name as a marquee defendant
Speaker 1: on this big old indictment that is about to drop,
Speaker 1: or do you want to make a different decision plead guilty,
Speaker 1: flip and agree to testify truthfully against all the other
Speaker 1: co defendants. That may be what Fonnie Willis is doing
Speaker 1: right now before she ultimately drops this big old indictment.
Speaker 1: But which one is going to drop first? I think
Speaker 1: it's a push. I don't know if we're going to
Speaker 1: see New York first or Georgia first. Let me stick
Speaker 1: with Georgia for a second, because I want to get
Speaker 1: your thoughts on what it is that the Republicans in
Speaker 1: Georgia are trying to do. So I want to set
Speaker 1: up a scenario, which I think is a fairly real one,
Speaker 1: which is that let's say, you know this week that
Speaker 1: it is Georgia, that Fannie Willis drops a stealth net
Speaker 1: over Trump, Graham, Flynn, Juliani, you know, run through all
Speaker 1: the names of the co conspirators, and then the GOP
Speaker 1: comes in and fires her. So, first of all, I
Speaker 1: haven't done a deep dive into the particulars of the
Speaker 1: new Georgia legislation, but based on what I have reviewed,
Speaker 1: it looks like that process that they would have to
Speaker 1: pursue to ultimately try to remove a district attorney will
Speaker 1: actually take some time to play out. I don't think
Speaker 1: it's a sure thing. I also continue to have faith
Speaker 1: in most of our courts, in most of our judiciary
Speaker 1: that they would strike something like that down. So I
Speaker 1: don't think, yes, it's a concern, because what the Republicans
Speaker 1: have learned is they can weaponize legislation for their own
Speaker 1: nefarious political purposes in a way that we've never really
Speaker 1: seen before. You know, I don't want to get off track,
Speaker 1: but you know, the Democrats sit there and they're like, well,
Speaker 1: we can't really do much about the proliferation of automatic
Speaker 1: weapons because the Second Amendment. We can't really do much
Speaker 1: about hate speech that's designed and intended and likely to
Speaker 1: incite imminent violence because we've got this fifty year old
Speaker 1: precedent called the Brandenburg Test. Do you think the Republicans
Speaker 1: sit around and say we can't revoc a woman's constitutional
Speaker 1: privacy rights because Roe v. Wade. No, they just do it.
Speaker 1: We should be doing the same thing. We should be
Speaker 1: doing it, honestly, but in a very forward leading manner,
Speaker 1: and then we go into court and defend the legislation
Speaker 1: or the executive order or the executive branch agency regulation
Speaker 1: that we pass to try to do good. Trump and
Speaker 1: company do it for evil. The Republicans are doing it
Speaker 1: for evil. We can do the same thing for good
Speaker 1: without violating the Constitution. But you know, we don't seem
Speaker 1: to be willing to fight that way for reasons I'll
Speaker 1: never understand. But so I don't think it's a done
Speaker 1: deal that even though this legislation has passed, and I
Speaker 1: guess it's been signed into law now by the governor,
Speaker 1: I don't think it's a done deal that they will
Speaker 1: succeed in yanking Fannie willis out of that job. So
Speaker 1: last question for you, Glenn. Again, folks, we are pretaping this,
Speaker 1: so at the time of you listening, the indictments could
Speaker 1: have absolutely dropped. We don't know. But Glenn, here's a
Speaker 1: question that I have, which is headlines, all of our
Speaker 1: phones blink and blink and blinkin right, it has happened.
Speaker 1: What do you think goes on outside of our front doors?
Speaker 1: You know you're sitting in you know, the DMV in
Speaker 1: the DC metro area. We know these people stormed the
Speaker 1: Capitol Building on behalf of a lie. Right, what do
Speaker 1: you think that the sentiment, the air, the energy in
Speaker 1: our country is if and when this actually happens, popping
Speaker 1: corks nationwide, Marty Grass, That's literally, that is literally what
Speaker 1: I believe will happen. You're gonna see partying in the
Speaker 1: streets because accountability has finally come to a criminal former president. Now,
Speaker 1: will there be pockets of violence. But here's the thing, Yeah,
Speaker 1: January six was lightning in a bottle because that's when
Speaker 1: Donald Trump had all of his power on his platform
Speaker 1: and the whole Republican Party behind him to kind of
Speaker 1: support his come to DC on January six will be
Speaker 1: wild mission to try to violently overturn the results of
Speaker 1: an election. I don't think you can get that lightning
Speaker 1: back in the bottle. That doesn't mean you won't see
Speaker 1: pockets of violence. What I fear is that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: will use his third rate social media platform, the true
Speaker 1: social which I love because when he posts something it
Speaker 1: gets like three thousand likes. He will use that to say,
Speaker 1: come to Georgia, come to Atlanta for my arraignment will
Speaker 1: be wild. Come up to New York City for my
Speaker 1: arraignment will be wild. I don't think that will resonate,
Speaker 1: that will inspire, that will in sight the way January
Speaker 1: six died because he had lied to people and convinced
Speaker 1: them that that somebody had stolen their vote from them,
Speaker 1: somebody had stolen their election from them. Now, the fact
Speaker 1: that all these years later, I'm being prosecuted, so come
Speaker 1: up here and you know, will be wild. They're gonna
Speaker 1: be like, yeah, we did that last time, and it's
Speaker 1: got a thousand of us in prison, and we just
Speaker 1: heard a report that a thousand more of us are
Speaker 1: getting locked up. You have you never pardoned any of us? Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: we're not doing that again. You may get little, minor
Speaker 1: pockets of violence, and I don't want to dismiss that
Speaker 1: I am not worried because at their core, I think
Speaker 1: the Trump supporters are weak folk. Yeah, all right, well,
Speaker 1: Glenn Kirshner, let me tell you, if it does happen,
Speaker 1: I will be popping not one, not two, maybe three
Speaker 1: bottles because this has been several years, several years in
Speaker 1: the making, and so we will have to touch base
Speaker 1: with you again once we actually know where things land.
Speaker 1: As always, friend, appreciate you and your analysis. Thanks Daniel,
Speaker 1: I'll talk to you soon. That is it for me today,
Speaker 1: Dear friends on Woke a f as always, Power to
Speaker 1: the people and to all the people. Power, get woke
Speaker 1: and stay woke as fuck.