WEBVTT - Do Animals Understand Death?

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Sign Stuff, a production of iHeartRadio. My

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>name is Hoorge Jam and to me. On the program,

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we are answering the question do animals, like your pet

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>or animals in the wild understand death. We're gonna be

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>talking to a psychologist who's been studying chimpanzees for over

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>forty years, and we're gonna hear from a philosopher of

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>animal minds got obsessed with this topic as a way

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to deal with their own mortality. So do dogs dwell

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on their own demise or do possums ponder their pastor?

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's find out as we answer the question do animals

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>understand death?

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Everyone, I thought I'd start the episode with one of

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the most fascinating interviews I've done for this show. It's

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>with a psychologist named James Anderson. Doctor Anderson is now

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a professor emeritus at Kyoto University, and he has spent

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the last forty years studying chimpanzees and monkeys and their

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>behavior they eat, sleep, and work together. But then in

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, something incredible happened. His team of

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>researchers recorded, for the first time ever on video, the

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>passing away of an adult chimpanzee surrounded by her close group.

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>One of his students, Louise Locke, was studying a group

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of chimpanzees at the Blair Drummon Safari Park in the

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>middle of Scotland, and she was just there to study

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>their sleep patterns, but almost by accident, they happened to

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>record the moment of death of a chimpanzee named Pansy.

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's how doctor Anderson describes it.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>One member of the chimpanzee group was at the time

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 2>the oldest chimpanzee in the UK. She was around sixty

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 2>years of age. She had been a circus chimpanzee in

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 2>her early life, but she was now suffering from age

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 2>relate to diseases. And then one day the keeper of

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the chimpanzees noticed that she was breathing very heavily and

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>she thought she's not going to last very long.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So the oldest chimpanzee in the UK, Pansy looked like

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>she was about to pass away. At this point, this

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>very part caretaker had to make a choice about what

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to do, and he decided to let nature take its

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>course and let her pass away. Surrounded by her closed group.

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>He let her be, but he left the video camera

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>running all night. When the researchers reviewed the video the

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>next day, they were shocked. Can you describe what you

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>saw in that video?

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Well, what was clear is that by the time

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the video started, the old female chimpanzee, she was lying

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 2>up on a platform. Occasionally the chimpanzees would come over

0:02:55.400 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 2>and groom the old female. But then three of the

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 2>chimpanzees and the group came over and gathered around her

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 2>at once, and this was the first time this was happening,

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 2>and two of them were grooming her, her daughter and

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>her long term friend, another adult female, and then the

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>adult male in the group came over and he bent

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 2>down and looked closely into her face, and then he

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 2>took her by the shoulder and gradually shoot her shoulder

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 2>while staring at close range into her face. And then

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 2>he laid her shoulder back down on the ground, looked

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 2>at her, and then moved away.

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>As Pansy laid there dying, her daughter and her best

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>friend gathered around her and seemed to be comforting her,

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>holding her hand and grooming her. The adult male of

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the group came and shook her as if he was

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to shake her back to life.

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>A few moments later, Rosie, her daughter, and then her

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 2>lifelong friend remained holding her hand, and that was most

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 2>of the contacts over the next several hours. Not long

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>after that period, the female was dead by then, and

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 2>what we had witnessed was the precise moment where the

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 2>adult male seemed to be checking for any signs of

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 2>life and perhaps realizing that she had gone, when the

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 2>other two members of the group were giving the final

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 2>moments of comfort to the adult female. Her daughter slept

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 2>beside her all night long, and then the following morning

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 2>her long term friend came over and sat by her,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 2>and because of that responses by the male, he had

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 2>left some straw on her, so she gently cleaned the

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 2>straw of her body and her face and just sat

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 2>by her for a while.

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Now what amazed doctor Anderson was how close this

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>behavior was what you might observe in humans. Pessy's family

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>seemed to have gathered to accompany her and to be

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>close to her in her final moments. When doctor Anderson

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and his team wrote a paper describing this video, they

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>wrote about how this seemed very similar to what humans

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>would do. Here was his reaction.

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.479
<v Speaker 2>That's what I described in the paper some of the

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 2>responses that have been described in human societies when they're

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 2>dealing with the final moments of our whose relative we

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>see time and time again. This gentle contacts quietness, caressing

0:05:55.360 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>the corpse sometimes in some individuals, and outburst of anger

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 2>directed towards the crops, especially by close relatives who really

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 2>feel anger at being left. Attempts to check for signs

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>of life. You know, now we humans, we've got more

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 2>medical ways of doing it, checking for pulse. But you know,

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>the chimpanzee was doing what he knows. We concluded by saying, well,

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>at least some aspects of the response to the peaceful

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 2>death within our group may have parallels between chimpanzees and

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 2>our own species. And I've got some interesting reactions.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>When doctor Anderson published the paper describing this video, along

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>with his PhD student and the Safari Parks caretaker, caused

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a media frenzy is university. At the time, the University

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of Stirling was inundated with phone calls and emails. They

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>were invited to be on TV, radio magazines in the

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>UK and across the world, and it helped give a

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>spark to the general conversation about whether animals understand death now.

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Part of the excitement here is that these observations of

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>animals at moments of death are rare. One of the

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>closest examples on record that doctor Anderson could find had

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>happened thirty years before in the Gombe National Park in Tanzania.

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 2>An accidental death reported in wild chimpanzees when an adult

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 2>male fell out of a tree and died instantly on

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>hitting the ground. And then the response of the other

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 2>chimpanzees couldn't have been more different. The group members erupted

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 2>into a frenzy of excitement and alarm, embracing each other, screaming,

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 2>running towards the body, staring at it but never coming

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>into contact with a disbelief at first, are running around

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 2>in almost panic. There was also lots of mutual embracing,

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>as if trying to reassure other individuals.

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, my reaction when you just told that story

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>was that that also seems very human in how we

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>would react if we suddenly saw traumatic death.

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Almost.

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>This paper also helped push forward a new field of

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>science called comparative thanatology. The word panatology means the study

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of dying and it comes from Thanatos, the Greek god

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of death, and yes, it's also what inspired the name

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of the supervillain Thanus in the Marvel movies. Now, the

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>word comparative in comparative panatology means you're studying dying in

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>different species of animals, not just humans and apes, to

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>find out what they have in common and what that

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>tells us about evolution and whether humans are unique or

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>not in how we relate to our own mortality. Next,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk to someone who's written a book

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>about comparative panatology and how animals understand death. And she's

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>looked at species ranging from ants to possums, to elephants

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to wales, and when we come back, she can tell

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>us how all of these animals experience their own expiration.

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us, you're listening to science stuff. Hey, welcome back.

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>We just talked about how chimpanzees are closest relatives react

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>to one of their own passing away. The question now

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is how do other animals react to death? Are their

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>signs that they understand what it is. To answer this question,

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I talk to someone who is a philosopher of animal minds.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Susanamonceau is a professor at the National University of

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Distance Education in Spain, and she's written a book called

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Playing Possum, How Animals Understand Death. I asked doctor Monse

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>what got her interested in this question.

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 3>I had done my PhD. Whether animals could behave morally,

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 3>whether they have emotions like empathy, and so I've always

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 3>been interested in questions that have to do with those

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 3>capacities that we tend to think of as uniquely human.

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 3>There was an emergence of field biologists documenting animals reacting

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 3>in interesting ways to dead individuals. At the same time,

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 3>there's also kind of a personal sight to the story.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 3>I was about to turn thirty, and I think I

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 3>became obsessed with death. A lot of people have this

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 3>period of existential angst. My grandmother had just died, and

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I think turning thirty also was symbolic in that really

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 3>a moment where you're definitely an adult. You can no

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 3>longer pretend like you're just a youngster. Yeah, I was

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 3>really afraid of it.

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 1>I asked doctor Mansa to tell us of different examples

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>from her book of animals reacting to another animal passing away,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>starting with elephants.

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 3>So elephants is a typical animal that everyone thinks of.

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Because elephants are like the animal that has some special

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 3>relationship with death, people think of elephant graveyards, which apparently

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 3>are a myth. They don't really seem to go any

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 3>specific place to die.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Elephant graveyards, meaning a special place where elephants

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 1>go when they're ready to die, are not really supported

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>by scientific evidence. It's probably more of a myth. However,

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>elephants do seem to act in a special way when

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>other elephants pass away, but.

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 3>They do seem to be very interested in death, and

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 3>specifically in the deaths of fellow elephants, and they will

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 3>visit the corpses of elephants that have died, even if

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 3>they're not related. They visit these corpses and they touch them,

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 3>they sniff them, they are very interested in them, which

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 3>doesn't happen with corpses of other animals. There's like a

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 3>parade of different elephant families that come to it and

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 3>interact with the corpse in some way, and some of

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 3>the interactions are tactile or factory, or sometimes they do

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 3>other interesting things like trying to put food in the

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 3>mouth of the elephant, trying to help it stand up.

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So when an elephant has passed away, scientists have recorded

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that other elephants will line up and one by one

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>smell and touch the dead elephant. In one famous experiment,

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>scientists place the skulls of different animals in front of

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>elephants to see which ones they would interact with. Some

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>of the skulls were of rhinoceross, some were of buffalo,

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 1>and some were of elephants. Scientists found that the elephants

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>would pick up and examine the skulls of elephants more

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>than they did the others, which meant that elephants have

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a unique curiosity about dead members of their own species. Next,

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.239
<v Speaker 1>doctor Monceaut talked about an orca named Tealiqua.

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 3>So perhaps one of the behaviors that has received the

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 3>most attention is that of deceased infant carrying. For instance,

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 3>there was a very famous case, the case of the

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 3>orca Teliqua, who made the news in the summer of

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen when she was seen carrying her baby scorpse

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 3>for seventeen days and over one thousand miles, which is insane,

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 3>and she was recently in the news again because she

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 3>was doing it for a second time with another of

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 3>her calves who had also died. So it's very very tragic.

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So this orca whale telikua would hold on to her

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>dead baby and continue to push her and keep her

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>from sinking for weeks. And this behavior of holding on

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to their dead young happens in other species of animals.

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a behavior that we see in a lot of

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 3>mammalian mothers, so mammal species in which there is a

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 3>prolonged period of maternal care. And what we see here

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 3>is that very often when the baby dies, the mother

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 3>seems to have a hard time accepting this reality and

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 3>holds onto the corpse for a prolonged period of time.

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>But wouldn't that tell you that maybe the animal doesn't

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>understand death or has the wrong understanding of what has

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>happened to their baby.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 3>So some people have put forward this hypothesis. The most

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 3>important takeaway from this behavior is probably not so much

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 3>that they're understanding death, but the fact that they're really

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 3>grieving their baby's death. And this may be accompanied by

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 3>a concept of death, but it may also be part

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 3>of the process through which the animal learns about death

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 3>through holding onto this baby, maybe hoping that it will

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 3>revive and ultimately seeing that it doesn't and deciding to

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 3>let it go, which they eventually do.

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's fascinating. This behavior of mothers continuing to carry

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>their babies that have passed the way has been seen

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in Wales, chimpanzees, dolphins, and even giraffes. And this is

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>where we touch on the concept of grief. According to

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>doctor Muntzel, grief is not the same thing as an

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>understanding of death, and in fact they're independent. You can

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>have grief without understanding death. For example, you can grieve

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the loss of something that wasn't alive, like your house,

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>or you can grieve a breakup with someone you loved.

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And you can understand death without grieving. For example, you

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>might be glad that someone you didn't like died. Okay,

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the last example doctor Munsoll brought up involves not just

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>understanding death but faking it.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 3>So one of my favorite examples here is the apossum,

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 3>which is in the title of my book and in

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 3>the cover as well. And the apossum is very interesting

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 3>because the apossum famously plays possum right. The apossum plays

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 3>dead when she feels threatened, and she does this in

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 3>a bare, very spectacular way. It's a very very complex

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 3>defense mechanism. The apossum will adopt the bodily and facial

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 3>expression of a corpse. Her body temperature is reduced, her

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 3>breathing and heart rate are reduced. She expels this putrid

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 3>smelling liquid from her glance. She stops responding to the

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 3>world very radically, so you can pick her up and

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 3>she just doesn't respond.

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>She plays dead. Basically, she pretends to be dead.

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 3>It's like putting on a corpse disguise. Even her tongue

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 3>turns blue. So it's very impressive, very very elaborate.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>But does that mean that it understands death.

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 3>For the apossum? This is probably an automatic behavior. I

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 3>don't think the apossum understands that she's playing dead. It

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 3>doesn't necessarily tell us anything about the opossum's mind. But

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 3>if this behavior has evolved, there needs to have been

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 3>the predator's concept of death. This is only going to

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 3>work if it's actual convincing the predator, right, So this

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 3>behavior is showing us the predators understand death what they

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 3>take to be a convincing display of death.

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this is pretty cool. What doctor Monceux is saying,

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is that an opossum plane dead. Doesn't tell us anything

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about whether the opossum understands death. It might just be

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a reflex or an instinct for them. But it does

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you that the predator understands death, or at least

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>that it reacts to the signs of something appearing to

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>be dead. The question is not how do you pretend

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to be dead? The question is how do you convince

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>another animal that you are dead?

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. It's like stick insects. They don't need to understand

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 3>that they look like sticks in order for their appearance

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 3>to be advantageous, but we know that their predators mistake

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 3>them for sticks and don't want to eat sticks. It's

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 3>telling us something about their predators' minds. Right.

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So then in this case, it's example tells us that

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>there is some understanding of the state of being alive

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and death.

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 3>That's right, and that they understand dead individuals to look

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 3>a certain way, feel a certain way, that they expect

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 3>different behaviors from dead individuals. It's very interesting. It really

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 3>gives us a window into the minds of these animals.

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so lots of different animals from chimpanzees to whales,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to predators like wolves, and by extension, dogs and cats

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>seem to react to dead animals and they act different

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>because of it. But does that mean that they understand death?

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe in the same way that you or I understand

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>what it means to die. Now, the big danger here

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is to see an animal doing something and then assume

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>that it has human emotions or intentions. This is called anthropomorphizing.

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's how doctor Monceaux explains it.

0:18:55.560 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 3>Anthropomorphism is something that anyone who studies animals is really

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 3>afraid of, because humans have this tendency to anthropomorphize everything.

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, even like our computer stops working and we're like, oh,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't want to work, or you know, we get

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 3>angry at our car if it breaks down. We attribute

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 3>intentions to inanimate objects all the time, and certainly we

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 3>do this all the time with our pets. We're constantly

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 3>interpreting their behavior in human ways. We send each other

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 3>videos of animals doing something and some funny music that

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 3>makes it look like they're dancing or whatever. So it's

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 3>understood that when you entropomorphize an animal, you are mistakingly

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 3>describing their behavior in human terms. So you're attributing to

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 3>them a human quality that they don't actually have.

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>So it'd be a mistake to see, for example, a

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.959
<v Speaker 1>whale carrying their calf that's passed away. I think that

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>they're grieving just like a human mother would. Or to

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>see a chimpanzee carrest her friend who's about to pass away,

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and think that they are being tender and caring, like

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>how we would treat someone close to us under deathbed.

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, doctor Monteux says it could also

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>be a mistake to do the opposite.

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that there's also the complimentary worry, which has

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 3>to do with the other side of the coin, what

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Kristin Andrews and Brian Husk called anthropectomy, which consists of

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 3>mistakenly denying a human typical characteristic to an animal. So

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 3>if we say that an animal is grieving when she's not,

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 3>we would be anthropomorphizing the animal. But if we say no,

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 3>she can't be grieving because that's human exclusive when she

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 3>actually is grieving. These are both false descriptions of reality,

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 3>and there's no reason to fear one over the other.

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 3>So we have to be careful not to over attribute,

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 3>but also not to under attribute. We have to really

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 3>try to find the description that is true that actually

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 3>captures what the animal is like.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So how do we make sense of what we see

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in the animal kingdom? How do we understand how animals

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>understand death? To answer this, we need to dig into

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>what it means to understand death. When we come back,

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask our two experts this question, and

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we'll put the whole mystery of whether animals understand

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>death to rest. Don't go anywhere. We'll be right back

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>with more science stuff and we're back.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:40.959
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So, animals ranging from chimpanzees to elephants to whales seem

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 1>to react to animals dying in ways that seem almost human.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And we know that predators, which include cats and dogs,

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>seem to instinctively know the difference between something alive and dead.

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 1>But does that mean they understand death. To answer this question,

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>we need to define what it means to understand death.

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>None of us are born with an understanding of it.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>It's something we gain as we grow up, and it

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>typically comes in stages. Here's that doctor Anderson describes it.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I think most thanatologists, those people who study death and buying,

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 2>particularly in humans, would I agree that we humans share

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 2>four basic aspects or components of our concept of death.

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 2>One is that its death is irreversible. Once something or

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 2>someone is dead, that's the aint coming back. The second

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 2>one is probably the notion that a dead individual is

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 2>completely non functional. They can't perceive anything, there's no mental activity,

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 2>there's no emotions, there's no or agency. They're completely in

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 2>theer lumps of meat, if you like.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>So an understanding of death, most scientists agree, is like

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a table that stands on four legs. The first leg

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is non functionality, basically that a body can't move or

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>do anything once it's passed away. The second leg is irreversibility,

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea that once it happens, there's no going back.

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>The third and fourth legs are a little more subtle.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.959
<v Speaker 2>The third one is this notion of what many people

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 2>refer to as universality, and related to that, some people

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 2>refer to it as inevitability, the idea that everyone, every

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 2>living thing will eventually meet its demise and cease to exist.

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 2>And the final one is causality, that we know basically

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 2>what causes death.

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So those are the four legs of a four understanding

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of death. The third leg is universality, the idea that

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>all living things will inevitably die, and the fourth leg

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>is causality, meaning having an understanding of what causes an

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>individual to die. Now, most mature humans have a grasp

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of all four ideas, and so we can say that

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a full understanding of the concept of death.

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>But if you think back to when you were a kid,

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you might remember that you didn't know all of these

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>things all at once. You might have learned these in

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a sequence, or maybe you partially learned them at different times,

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>depending on your life experience or who you talk to. Okay,

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>now that we've said what it means to understand death,

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>let's see what our experts say about whether animals can

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>have this understanding.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, if we go back to those four components, irreversibility,

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 2>non functionality, the universality of death, and the causality what

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 2>causes death. I think what we know about how chimpanzees

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 2>respond to dead individuals. For me, it takes the box

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 2>for understanding the irreversibility of death. A dead individual is

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 2>not going to come back to life. When you see

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 2>a group of chimpanzees reactions to a dead juvenile, or

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 2>a dead adult. Then you'll see that they really behave

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 2>towards the corpse in which that they would never do

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 2>to that individual when it was alive. And I think

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 2>they're learning that we can do anything with this chimpanzee.

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 2>This chimpanzee is not going to react. It doesn't feel anything.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 2>We can pound on its dest we can jump up

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 2>and down on it. It's never going to move. So

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 2>that takes also the non functionality component. So we've got

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the understand the reversibility. They understand nonfunctionality. I think about causality.

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I think chimpanzees have some understanding about what causes death.

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 2>If they see a chimpanzee falling from a great height

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 2>and it's no longer moving, if you see a chimpanzee

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 2>that's just being attacked by a leopard, then I think

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 2>we understand that is the cause of death, that these

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 2>ruins are fatal. So I think they've got some understanding

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 2>of causality, not to the extent that we understand the

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 2>biological causes of lack of oxygen or loss of blood,

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 2>but nonetheless they have some understanding of external causes. But

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 2>it takes me to the fourth component universality. For me,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 2>universality means that you realize that everyone is going to die.

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.959
<v Speaker 2>That means other individuals or that they're capable of dying.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.719
<v Speaker 2>I think chimpanzees have that ability.

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So doctor Anderson thinks chimpanzees are capable of grasping most

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of the components of an understanding of death. They can

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>understand nonfunctionality, irreversibility, some sense of causality, and most of

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea of universality. We'll come back to that in

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a minute. Then I asked doctor Monceiua this question about

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>other animals like elephants, whales, cats, and dogs, and this

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is what she said, Well, what do all of those

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>examples you've talked about in the animal kingdom? What do

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>they tell us about whether animals understand death.

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Of course, it's still very early and we're still only

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 3>starting to think about these questions. But I think that

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 3>the concept of death it really boils down to the

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 3>idea of understanding that individuals don't do the things that

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 3>living individuals of their kind do, and that this is

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 3>an irreversible state. I think that's what understanding death at

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 3>its core is, and that's actually quite easy to reach

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 3>because it's just not very complicated to understand. It's about

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 3>having certain expectations about how living beings around you behave

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 3>learning due to your past experiences that once death has happened,

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 3>you can no longer expect these behaviors from the animal.

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 3>And I think also that there are many different contexts

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 3>where animals are going to be able to acquire the

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 3>necessary experiences to learn about this.

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>In other words, doctor Monceaux thinks that if you define

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>an understanding of death as only needing two of the

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>legs we talked about before, non functionality and irreversibility, then

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we can say that lots of animals understand death because

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>those two ideas are not that complicated or hard to

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>learn and understand. Meaning even your dog can figure out

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that a dead and smelly red is not moving and

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's not going to move again. Of course, you

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>might think, well, the dog doesn't understand the other two

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>ideas or legs, universality and causality. Doesn't that mean it

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really understand death. Well, that's only if you think

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that the human way of understanding death is the only

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>way to understand death.

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 3>We can find this idea in many texts in comparative penatology,

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 3>where researchers are saying, you know, animals cannot understand infinity,

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 3>or they don't have a concept of time, or they

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 3>don't have a concept of absence, and therefore they can't

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 3>understand death. So in a way, they're all over intellectualizing

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 3>the concept of death. And what I do in my

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 3>book is I turned that question into the question of

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 3>do they have anything that counts as a concept of death,

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 3>even if it's different from our own.

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Do animals understand death? The answer is yes, depending on

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>what you mean by understanding death. If it means understanding

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it at a basic level, that it means you can't

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>move once you're dead, and that it's irreversible, then lots

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of animals seem to understand death. But if you mean

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>understanding more complex concepts like the medical causes of death

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>or the idea that all creatures will eventually die, then

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not possible for most animals to understand death

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.959
<v Speaker 1>at the same level as humans. Now, as a last question,

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I asked our experts what all of this tells us

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>about how humans are different from most animals, and they

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>both agree there is one thing that seems unique to us,

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and that is an ability to understand the inevitability of

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>our own mortality.

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Where I think the line might be drawing. I'm not

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 2>sure that chimpanzees are capable of understanding their own mortality.

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 2>They don't fall into the kind of feeling of entrapment

0:30:54.400 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 2>and despair that humans sometimes do.

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, if an animal is don't about death, she

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 3>has a very limited number of experiences, and she's not

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to reach on her own the

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 3>understanding that everyone dies, whereas humans, you know, we understand

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 3>that our death is inevitable because we've been told.

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>We have language for it, whereas an animal maybe doesn't

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have language for it. That's right, Doctor Anderson doesn't think

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>chimpanzees have the forethought to really imagine a world in

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>which they don't themselves exist, and doctor Mossela thinks you

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>need language to really grasp the concept of inevitability, which

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>means respecial because we're able to appreciate the fact that,

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>at least temporarily we are not dead. Okay, I lied.

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I did ask our experts one more question, and that

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is whether thinking about how animals deal with death had

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>changed their own perspectives on the topic. Here's what they said,

0:31:56.240 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really sure that it has changed on view

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in general. I've had enough experience of death of people

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that I've known uncherished to accept that it's inevitable. I

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>don't share it, and I hope that when it does come,

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I hopefully accept.

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 3>So I think that studying it in animals has been

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 3>very illuminating and somehow comforting, because, strangely enough, when you

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 3>read enough about death and other species, you come to

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 3>realize that it's a reality you just cannot escape. It's

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 3>a deal that every single living being steps into. There's

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 3>no other choice. If you want to be alive, then

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 3>you have to die.

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>In other words, it's understanding death that makes us appreciate life,

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and that seems to be lately human. Thanks for listening.

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>See you next time you've been listening to science Stuff.

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>The production of iHeartRadio written and produced by me or

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey Cham, edited by Rose Seguda, executive producer Jerry Rowland,

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and audio engineer and mixer Kasey Pegram And you can

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>follow me on social media. Just search for PhD comics

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and the name of your favorite platform. Be sure to

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to Sign Stuff on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts, and please tell your

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>friends we'll be back next Wednesday with another episode.