WEBVTT - Nick’s Top 50 NBA Players of the Last 50 Years: #25-22

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first. Like you know to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States Savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Welcome.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 3>In another special episode of the What's Right with Nick

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Wright Podcasts and YouTube shows, we continue our countdown of

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 3>the fifty best players of the last fifty years in

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 3>the NBA. We've gone through the rules, We've gone through

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>the honorable mentions. We are now into the top twenty

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>five guys. I highly encourage you if you're just now

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 3>joining us, check out the previous episodes of this We

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 3>give some love to some overlooked guys in NBA history,

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 3>guys like Bob McAdoo or Sidney Moncree for Bernard King,

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 3>but we also deep dive on guys you actually might

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>have an opinion on like Alan Iverson or Russell Westbrook

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 3>or Dwight Howard, all of.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 2>That in the previous episodes.

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 3>But now we are too the twenty five best players

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 3>of the last twenty five years. You're gonna see a

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 3>handful of active players still remaining. And this is where

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 3>the rankings become incredibly difficult. And some of our you

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 3>know player was more difficult to rank than number twenty five.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 4>Number twenty five James Harden.

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 3>So Harden's regular season resume is of one of the

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 3>twelve best players the last fifty years. Six times he's

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 3>been All NBA First Team. Throw a third team in

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 3>there as well. He not only he has one league MVP,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 3>but what's more impressive than that, three times he has

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 3>finished second, and six times in his career, all of

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 3>his first team All NBA seasons he was first.

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 2>He had a top five MVP finish.

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>He's a three times scoring champ, including one season scoring

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 3>thirty four points per game, one season scoring thirty six

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 3>points per game. He also has an assist title. So

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 3>who's won a scoring title and assist title? Well, Wilt

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 3>did it, Tiny, Archibald did it, Lebron did it, Russ

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>did it, James Harden did it. From twenty fifteen to

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty his peak in Houston. That is a five year,

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 3>six year run. He was thirty one, six and eight

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 3>over five years, thirty one points, six rebounds, eight assists

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 3>per night.

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 2>His career averages are.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Twenty five, six and seven and that includes the beginning

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 3>of his career when he was a role player and

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 3>then a sixth man where he won six million of

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 3>a year.

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>By the way for Oklahoma City.

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 3>He has twenty three career point games twenty three times

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 3>he's gone for fifty fourth most all time. Wilt, Michael,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 3>and Kobe are the only ones with more. He has

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 3>four career sixty point games, third most all time, tied

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 3>with Michael, behind only Wilt and Kobe. So that's the

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 3>regular season stuff. That is an all time, transcendently great

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.959
<v Speaker 3>regular season player. So why is he only the twenty

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 3>fifth best player of the last fifty years Because the

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 3>postseason stuff is let's call it a mixed back started

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 3>off pretty well. He had a thirty point five rebounds,

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 3>seven assist four steel game off the bench as a

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>bench player in twenty twelve in the Western Conference Finals,

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 3>a series they would end up winning to go to

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 3>the finals, but then in the finals he struggled mightily,

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 3>and some would say, I think it's because the ownership

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>in Oklahoma City was cheap, but whatever, some would say

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 3>that's one of the reasons.

0:03:58.120 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 2>They then traded him to Houston.

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 3>He lost in the first round in Houston in twenty thirteen,

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 3>and he lost in the first round in Houston in

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty fourteen. Twenty fourteen was the Dame Lillard Game, the

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 3>game where Dame Lillard hit the first of his two

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 3>career series winning buzzer beaters. But in that Dame Lillard game,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the final game of that series, Game six, a game

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 3>they lost by one on the last second shot, he

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 3>had thirty four points, four rebound, six assists, four steals,

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 3>and shot sixty percent from the field. So at that

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 3>point it's like, oh aside from those finals, James Harden

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 3>building a good regular season resume, solid postseason performer twenty

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 3>fifteen playoffs. The next year, finally gets his first playoff

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 3>series win with the Rockets and starts off pretty well.

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 3>He had a forty two five to nine in round

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>one to go up three to zero in round two.

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 3>He's part of a three to one comeback against the Clippers.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 3>That sounds great, but it wasn't really Game six, the

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 3>big comeback game. He was glued to the bench and

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't a part of the comeback. Then in the

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 3>West Conference Finals against Golden State, you look at the

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 3>box scores and it seems okay, It's like, ah, the

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Rockets were overmatched. He had twenty eight, eleven, nine and

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 3>four in Game one, a game they only lost by one.

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 3>He had thirty eight, ten, nine and three in Game two,

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>a game they only lost by one.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Game one they actually lost by four. Pardon me.

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 3>He had forty five, seven, nine and five in Game

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 3>four and they're like wow, and they won that game,

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 3>but they were down three to zero. How serious was

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 3>Golden State in that game? And then in Game five

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 3>he was two for eleven and had twelve turnovers and amazingly,

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 3>that would be one of three different two for eleven

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 3>playoff games Harden hats in twenty sixteen, they lose to

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Golden State in round one. In twenty seventeen, he's good,

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 3>very good. In Round one, they're playing the overmatch Thunder

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 3>for the series. He's thirty three, six and seven, but

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>forty percent from the field, six turnovers, and then that

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 3>year he had one of the most bizarre games I've

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>ever seen Game six, second round against the Spurs with

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 3>no Kawhi Leonard. He has another two for eleven and

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 3>they lose by thirty nine points.

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:08.119
<v Speaker 2>It's like wait.

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 3>The next year, though, they get Chris Paul, they win

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 3>sixty five games.

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>He's excellent in the regular season. He wins League MVP.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 3>He opens the playoffs with a forty four and eight,

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 3>opens the Western Western Armends Finals with a forty one

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 3>four and seven, but they lose. He has thirty in

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Game four. They even the series. They win game five

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>despite the fact that he's not very good, but Game

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 3>six and seven he has thirty two in each game,

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 3>but Chris Paul's gotten injured.

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 2>The Rockets are up fifteen in both games.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 3>They lose both games by they're not even close at

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 3>the end, despite being up fifteen home for Game seven,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 3>and he's six for twenty five from three in that

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 3>in the final two games of that series. Twenty nineteen

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 3>Western Armonds semi Finals. You look at the raw numbers

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 3>thirty five, seven and five, You're like, Wow, it's pretty

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 3>damn good. But if you watch that series, what happened

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 3>in that series, it's two to two. Game five, KD

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>goes down and they can't win another game. Game six,

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 3>in Houston, Steph has zero points at the half.

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 2>The Rockets are gonna win that game. Then Steph explodes

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 2>for thirty.

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Harden doesn't do much and they lose, and so that's

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 3>and that's the end of it. Then he goes to Brooklyn,

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 3>doesn't do anything in the postseason, goes to Philly, and

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 3>right now as we're recording this struggled throughout the postseason

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 3>and so all this regular season stuff, but real struggles

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 3>in the postseason. Even though the overall numbers his career

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 3>in the postseason in Houston he averages twenty six, twenty eight,

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 3>six and seven in eighty five career playoff games, and

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 3>he has two Conference finals appearances. But if you watch him,

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 3>you know the biggest moments have not been kind to him.

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 3>So that's the full James Harden resume. It's why is

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>the twenty fifth best player?

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 2>No higher, no lower.

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Over the last fifty years, we have a couple different

0:07:58.400 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 3>James Harden callers.

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's let them chine in.

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Nick, you're on from Fox Sports. First time, long time.

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 5>So here is my question about James Harden. How can

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 5>a player who has a career playoff shooting percentage under

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 5>forty three percent I believe it's forty two point six

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 5>and who has never made the finals since leaving OKAC

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 5>when he was a sixth man be even in the

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 5>top twenty five. Thanks, I'll hang up and listen.

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Do we have another James Harden caller?

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Hey?

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 6>Nick is Brian from Philly, and I got a couple

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 6>questions for you.

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 6>I absolutely love James Harden because he's leading my seventy

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 6>six ers in the playoffs. But does he have some

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 6>rings that I just don't know about? Because you gotta

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 6>ranked above guys like Scottie Pippen who have six rings.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 6>You also gotta ranked above guys like Kawhi Leonard who

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 6>has two rings in two finals MVPs.

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.599
<v Speaker 4>Does James Harden play defense because.

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 6>That same guy, Kawhi Leonard, who has two finals MVPs

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 6>in two rings. Oh yeah, he was a defensive Player

0:08:55.840 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 6>of the Year two times. Last question, Nick, how do

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 6>you have a guy a your top twenty five who

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 6>has never made in the finals appearance as a starter

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 6>how does that happen?

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Answer those questions.

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 3>For me, Nick, So those are fair points, and but

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 3>here's the answer to those questions.

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 2>The answer those questions is simple.

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 3>His regular season resume is that of one of the

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 3>greatest players of all time. And so you say, how

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 3>does he above Scotty Pippen? Like I understand, Scotty Pippen

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 3>has six rings and Harden has zero. But Harden has

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 3>six times been top five MVP, four times been first

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 3>or second. So, like Kawhi Leonard, I understand having Harden

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 3>ahead of Kawhi seems controversial. Kwi is obviously a better

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 3>playoff performer, but Harden's regular season resume so far out

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 3>strips Kawhi.

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a fair ranking.

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, he's one of the hardest guys to

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>rank twy We've spent so much time on him.

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 2>There.

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 3>We will now turn the page move on to number

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty four.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Number twenty four, John's stocked.

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 3>So John Stockton is also very difficult to rank because

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 3>he's a longevity guy, all time leader in assists in steals,

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 3>and it's not close. He has fifteen thousand, eight hundred assists.

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 3>That's thirty seven hundred more than second place. He has

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 3>over thirty two hundred steals. That's six hundred more than

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 3>second place. Two time first Team All NBA, six times

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 3>second Team All NBA, three time third Team All NBA.

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 3>But he never had a single top five MVP finish.

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 3>We just told Ja Harden, who I have him ahead

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 3>of six times his top five MVP. Stockton finished seventh once,

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 3>but he won nine assist titles. He won two steals titles.

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 3>He's five time All Defense and he played nineteen seasons.

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Seventeen times. He played every single game.

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 3>The guy was the longevity will never be matched, and

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 3>he's the all time leader, and no one will ever

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>catch him in assists. I don't think you will ever

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 3>cutcherman steels. Over a decade of his prime, he averaged

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 3>sixteen points thirteen assists per game. He has a little

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 3>context here in the regular season double digit assist games

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 3>eight hundred and sixty three, eight hundred and sixty three

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 3>times John Stockton had ten plus assists in a game.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Thirty four times he had twenty plus assists in a game.

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 3>What about the postseason? So again, similar to Harden is

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 3>where he gets tough. He was the second best player

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 3>on two finalists, he averaged ten assists per game for

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and eighty two career playoff games. He has

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 3>one one hundred career double digit assist games and four

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 3>career twenty.

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 2>Assists playoff games.

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Does he have any great playoff games though, just a

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 3>handful lot of really solid ones. But in the Western

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Conference Semifinals in nineteen eighty eight, he put up a

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty three point twenty four assist five steeal.

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty damn good.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 3>And then a twenty nine point twenty assist game against

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the Lakers in the eighty eight Western Grummers semis in

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 3>the twenty eight and twenty nine point twenty.

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Assist game was a game seven.

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 3>He averaged nineteen and sixteen for that series, but they

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 3>lost that series.

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 2>The Lakers did go on to win.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 3>The title, and so that to me is it's relevant,

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 3>but I know it probably doesn't move you. And then

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 3>his best individual moment, he hit the game winner to

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 3>send the Jazz to the finals and score the final

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 3>nine points of that game against Houston, breaking Charles Barkley's

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 3>heart and scored twenty five points with thirteen assists in

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.719
<v Speaker 3>that game. And that's about it. Like he had amazing

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 3>consistency and amazing longevity. But if you go through his

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 3>full career playoff game log I just gave you the

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 3>three games that jump out, So what do you do

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 3>with a guy like that? Most assists of all time,

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 3>most steals of all time, unbelievable long devity was the

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 3>second best player on two finalist, but never had the

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 3>individually great moments that are not consistently and not more

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 3>than a handful. I think twenty fourth is fair. I

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 3>think it's hard to say Harden's had a better career

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 3>than John Stockton had neither won a ring. Stockton at

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 3>least got closer, Stockton at least play you know, did

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 3>it for such a long period of time. It is

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a compiling award, I understand. But when

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 3>you compile your way to the most ever, I think

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 3>the top twenty five, twenty fourth last fifty years makes sense.

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 2>We have a John Stockton caller for us now. Nick.

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 7>As much as I'd like to argue with you about

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 7>putting John Stockton twenty fifth on your list, it's kind

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 7>of hard, simply because I don't know who is in

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 7>your top twenty four except that Karl Malone must be

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 7>among them, and that, my friend, is a mistake, because

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 7>if there was a driving force of that Utah Jazz team,

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 7>it was John Stockton. If there was a true killer

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 7>and clutch player, it was John Stockton. And if there

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 7>was anybody responsible for Carl Malone being as high on

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 7>the scoring list all time scoring list as he ended

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 7>up being, it was John Stockton.

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 3>So that's my friend, Rick Buker, and I understand he's

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 3>inextricably tied to Carl Malone. Spoiler alert, I have Malone

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 3>ahead of him. You gotta have one ahead of the other.

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Malone was better. Malone was the guy who you are.

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 3>You are at least I am more convinced would have

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 3>worked without Stockton. How many of Stockton's assists would have

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 3>come without Malone? A lot, But he wouldn't have the

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 3>numbers he does quite to the same level. But the

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 3>guy who was that good of a defender for that

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 3>long the all time assists leader. I'm not gonna lie

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 3>to you. I don't have a super passionate John Stockton.

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Take but when you're the all time leader in two

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 3>major categories, I feel like you deserve to be the

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 3>top twenty five the last twenty of the last fifty years,

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 3>so that's where John Stockton is. We will come back

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 3>with one of my favorite players ever and one of

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 3>the most underrated players ever as we round out players

0:14:58.440 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty three and twenty two.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 8>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 8>inspiring true story about Anthony Robless, who defined every expectation

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 8>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 8>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 8>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 8>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 8>including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 8>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, welcome back in What's Right with Nick Ray

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Podcast Special Edition, fifty best Players the last fifty years

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 3>in NBA history. We just gave you players twenty five

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 3>and twenty four, James Tarden and John Stockton. We now

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 3>moved player twenty three, who I think, historically speaking, is

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 3>a tad underrated When you really dive into what he

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 3>did and what he accomplished. He is an iconic player

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 3>because honestly, of how God Dog good he looked in

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 3>a uniform, the most chiseled arms you'll ever see in

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 3>NBA history, and because you know he was in the

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Navy and missed the first two years of his career,

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 3>came to the NBA and was immediately excellent.

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Numbered twenty three David Robinson.

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Four time first Team All NBA, two time second Team

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 3>All NBA, four time third Team All NBA. So for

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 3>ten years he was one of the three best centers

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 3>in basketball at a time where there were some unbelievable sinners.

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Ninety four, ninety five, ninety six second place MVP, won

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the MVP, second place MVP, so a three year stretch

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 3>where either won the MVP or came in second each

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 3>three years. One time Defensive Player of the Year, eight

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 3>time All Defense. He won a scoring title, a rebounding title,

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 3>and a blocks title. His first seven years in the league,

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 3>he was twenty six and twelve. Now he came into

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 3>the league older than most because he had to do

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 3>those two.

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Years in the Navy.

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 3>But for seven years in the league, twenty six and twelve,

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 3>then he got hurt. It was one of the most

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 3>fortuitous injuries in NBA history because because he was hurt,

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 3>the Spurs totally tanked and they ended up getting Tim

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 3>Duncan and then they immediately won a title. Now people

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 3>act like that when they won the title, David Robinson

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>was not a huge part of that. He was not

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 3>a huge part of the second title they won with

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 3>Duncan when he was still there. Duncan obviously won five,

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 3>he won two with Robinson the one in three. Robinson

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 3>was a role player at best. In ninety nine. However,

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Robinson was excellent. We'll get to that.

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 2>So what are his big postseason moments?

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Similarly to Stockton, David Robinson doesn't have a bunch of

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 3>oh my god, eye popping postseason moments, only one career

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 3>forty point playoff game, but amazing postseason consistency and did

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 3>have some great postseason moments. Nineteen ninety three down in

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 3>the series to Charles Barkley and the Suns Western Armond Semifinals,

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 3>throws up at thirty six and sixteen in nineteen ninety

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 3>five to get to the Western Armends Finals. For the series,

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 3>averaged thirty and sixteen. Now, unfortunately his reward for getting

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 3>to the Western Conference Finals was to play a keem

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 3>Olajuwan who was furious that David Robinson won the MVP,

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 3>and a Keeam just annihilated him the entire series. But

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 3>a team is going to show up very, very high

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 3>on this list. Losing to a team, there's no shame

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 3>in that. In ninety six is one of his first

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 3>games after a team had annihilated him the previous year.

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 3>He has his one career forty point playoff game forty

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 3>and twenty one, and averaged thirty to twelve for that

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 3>series and sent Charles Barkley home again, So that I

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't say again ninety three Charles beat him, but he

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 3>got even with Charles in ninety six. And then in

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 3>the ninety nine Spurs. This's the point I was making earlier.

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Those ninety nine Spurs went fifteen to two in the playoffs.

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 3>He was clearly the second best player on that team,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 3>and in the finals he averaged sixteen points in twelve rebounds.

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 3>So the idea that he didn't have a big role

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 3>in that is a historic. Now what is interesting is

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 3>and one other David Robinson know is David Robinson.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 2>They're used to be this thing called the.

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 3>IBM Award, where they would they created some algorithm pre

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 3>algorithms becoming popular in NBA parlance, put in people's numbers,

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 3>said who's the best player in the league, and almost

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 3>every single year David Robinson won it. Jordan was playing,

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.439
<v Speaker 3>Robinson won it a keen with his peak, Robinson won it.

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Now that overstated Robinson's dominance, But I do think people

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 3>these days forget about how good he was during his

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 3>peak in the late from the very late eighties until

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 3>his injury in ninety six. However, that is a bit

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 3>of a testament to one of the flaws even back

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 3>in the early nineties with some of the basketball algorithms,

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna reward high efficiency, high rebounding big men and

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 3>make them seem a touch better than they are. If

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 3>that reminds you what's happened with Nikola Jokic, where the

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 3>numbers say he's the best player in the league when

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 3>he's clearly one of the ten best players in the league,

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 3>but nobody watches the game actually thinks he's the best

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 3>player in the league. That is what's happening to Nicole Jokicic.

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 3>So there is the twenty third best player of the

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 3>last fifty years one David Robinson. Now, oh my god,

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 3>I almost skipped our caller. I thought that David Robinson

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 3>commentary was so good I didn't need any addition. Let's

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 3>go to the caller that I assume the callers is

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 3>gonna say, Nick, that was brilliant, even though this was

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 3>recorded before I actually said that.

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 2>What is the caller I have to say about David Robinson?

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 9>So let me see if I get this right. You

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 9>have David Robinson the admiral at twenty three.

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 9>See, this is just disrespect and it continues to happen

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 9>against the San Antonio Spurs. You've got Barkley, Malone, Cage

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 9>and Dirk All ahead of him, which makes no sense.

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 9>Rookie of the Year, MVP Defensive Player of the Year,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 9>he led the league in blocks, points, rebounds. Those were

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 9>in different years, by the way, two rings. He was

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 9>the best player on one championship team, the second best

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 9>player on another one? And ps how is Charles Barkley

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 9>no offense? I love Chuck, but how is he ahead

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 9>of the Robinson Robinson titles, finals, appearances, points, rebounds, is

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 9>this flat out disrespect.

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I won't have it all right.

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 3>First of all, much respect to Michelle Beatle and what

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 3>appears to be about forty thousand dollars worth of shoes

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 3>behind her and Lenice a little stunt by Michelle Beatle.

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 3>And I appreciate her joining us, and I know she's

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 3>a Spurs fan. However, I cannot of bide there are

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 3>some factors there. David Robinson was the best player on

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 3>zero title teams. Tim Duncan was the best player on

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 3>that team by a mile. One finals MVP unanimously, no

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 3>one thought he was the best player on that team,

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 3>and he was not the second She said he was

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 3>the best player on one finalist and the second best

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 3>player on another.

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not true.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 3>He was the second best player on the ninety nine

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 3>finalist and like the sixth best player on the three

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 3>finalist and champion. As far as why do I have

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 3>him behind other big men or you know, post players

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 3>like Barkley and Dirk. And that's not spoiling anything about

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 3>the list. I haven't mentioned those guys. They're obviously going

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 3>to be mentioned. I think you're going to see those

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 3>guys have similar regular season resumes and greater postseason accomplishments.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 3>What they What they didn't have was the ability to

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 3>play with Tim Duncan. Color me crazy. I think of Berkley,

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, at the tail end of his prime, would

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 3>have gotten Tim Duncan. He probably would have won some

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 3>titles too. So I'm confident with where I have with

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 3>respect to Michelle Beatle, where I have David Robinson twenty

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.479
<v Speaker 3>third best player of the last fifty years. Now we

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 3>get to number twenty two. I was excited to get

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 3>to one of my favorite players.

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Ever, number twenty two. Kevin Garnett.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Four time first Team All NBA, three times second Team

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 3>All NBA, two time third Team All NBA. He won

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 3>an MVP and O four. He finished second two other times,

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 3>five times he was top five. He won a Defensive

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Player of the Year and twelve times All Defense. One

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 3>of the greatest defensive players of his era. I think

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 3>you could argue the best defensive players who also impacted

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 3>you on offense. So I'm not talking about Ben Wallace

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 3>or Dennis Rodman. I'm talking about guys who could drop

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 3>thirty on you and were great defenders. One would argue,

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 3>of the last thirty some years, it's a team Duncan

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 3>and then Kevin Garnett. He won the rebounding title four

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 3>times from his age twenty one season through the year

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 3>he won.

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>The championship in Boston.

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 3>So that's eleven years because his career numbers are hurt

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 3>by the fact that he came into the league at

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 3>eighteen and he played super long. But if we take

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 3>his eleven year prime age twenty one season until the

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 3>title year in Boston, he averaged twenty two points, twelve rebounds,

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 3>five assists, and three.

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Steals and blocks combined.

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 3>He is one of only two guys his height or

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 3>taller with five thousand assists or more. It's him and

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Kareem six eleven guys with at least five thousand assists,

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 3>and so his passing is underrated. Now the postseason stuff

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 3>with kg's difficult because he does have two finals appearances,

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 3>and I would argue he was the best player on

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 3>the eight Celtics. I think it's inarguable he's It's certainly

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 3>inarguable he was the best player that regular season. Paul

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Piers won finals MVP, I think it should have gone

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 3>to KG. The next year he got hurt and then

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 3>he's on the team obviously in twenty ten at that point,

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 3>is he's still the best player. I'm not sure. They

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 3>lose that brutal seventh game to the Lakers in Kobe. However,

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 3>prior going to Boston to Boston, he went to the

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 3>playoffs seemingly every year in Minnesota and got out of

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the first round once.

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about this.

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 3>In three, when he had had five straight first round defeats,

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 3>he has thirty five, twenty and seven and thirty three fourteen,

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 3>four and four to go up two to one on

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 3>the defending champion Lakers in three in round one. Averages

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 3>for the series twenty seven points, sixteen rebounds, five assists.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 3>But they lose the next three and they go home

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 3>in round one again. How much is that on him?

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Not much.

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Second best player on that team was Troy Hudson, but

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 3>it was once again a first round exit. The next year,

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 3>he finally got some help Latrell Spree well Sam cassell

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 3>So and they got to the Western Govermends Finals. The

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 3>run there, first game of the playoffs, he throws up

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 3>a thirty and twenty. He averaged twenty six, fifteen and

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 3>seven that series against Denver for his first career series

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 3>victory in the Western Conference semifinals, faces a Game seven

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 3>against Chris Webern Sacramento. Keep in mind when I tell

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 3>you these numbers for this game seven. The final score

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 3>was eighty three to eighty, so eighty three points his

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 3>team scored.

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 2>In that game. He had thirty two points, twenty one

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 2>rebounds to assists for steels, five blocks in a game

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 2>that was eighty three to eighty.

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 3>He carries them to the Western Govermends Finals. Average for

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 3>that series twenty four, fifteen and four overall to get

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 3>to the conference finals. In the Western Armends Finals, they're

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 3>in rough shape. They're playing the Lakers. That's gonna be

0:25:57.760 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 3>a tough matchup for them.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Shack only average like twenty points in that series. KG

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 3>defended him well. KG however, he had thirty and nineteen

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 3>down three to one to force the game six. But

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 3>they were never winning that series, and then he misses

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs for three straight years until he goes to Boston.

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 2>On that run to the title.

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 3>In Boston, however, he had twenty six and sixteen in

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Game five against Lebron and Cleveland in round two, he

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 3>had twenty and eleven average for that series against Lebron

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 3>and Cleveland in the conference finals. In Game five, he

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 3>had a thirty three and seven to go up three

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 3>to two on Detroit, and in the title clinching game,

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the Anything as Possible Game, had twenty six and fourteen.

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 3>For the finals, averaged eighteen points, thirteen rebounds, three assists,

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think should have been finals MVP had the

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 3>all time Greade anything as Possible moment. One of the

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 3>greatest defenders ever, one of the greatest prep to pro

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 3>players ever. We're talking about high schoolers to go pro,

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 3>it's got to be Lebron, Kobe, Moses, KG. Those are

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 3>your top four by a minle. He also, his relentlessness

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 3>probably worked against him.

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 2>He was so intense. I think it probably hurt him

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 2>a bit.

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 3>I give him a slight bonus point for an underrated

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 3>acting performance. In Uncut, Jim's twenty second greatest player of

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 3>last fifty years one Kevin Garnett.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 2>We have a caller on Garnett before we move on.

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 10>Hey, Nick at your old friend, mister Kilbourne. I'm a

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 10>big fan of yours. However, your East Coast snobbery is showing.

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 10>You're treating Minnesota like a flyover state. KG is a Timberwolf,

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 10>not a Celtic. Obviously, he had the team championship in Boston,

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 10>but individually he was the league MVP in Minnesota and

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 10>he had his best years as a Timberwolf. Just a

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 10>quick heads up. Also, if Larry Legend is not in

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 10>your top five, this list is not legit. It's what

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 10>we call it debacle. Thanks for listening, Nick, proud of you.

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, look at Craig Kilbourne there. First of all, I

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 3>didn't know he's my friend. We've never spoken, but I

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 3>now say we are friends. That was exhilarating. That was exciting. Second, old,

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 3>there's no East Coast snobbery. I'm from Kansa, Missouri. I

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 3>am Midwestern born and KG I wanted to have him higher.

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not going to reveal the other people on

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 3>the order of the people on the list. What was

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 3>KG better than Barkley? Was he better than Dirk Dirk?

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 3>Some will argue Dirk is the sixth most points ever

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Dirk's championship. He didn't have Paul Pierson Ray Allen with him.

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I love KG twenty two. I'm very comfortable with his

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 3>spot there. Quick break come back with some of our

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 3>toughest decisions yet as we get into the top twenty one.

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, So there it is.

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 3>We have now gone through players fifty through twenty two

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 3>of the fifty best players of the last fifty years

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 3>in NBA history. Top twenty one is incredibly difficult, and

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 3>I will admit it is still fluid because uz you

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 3>have six guys in the top twenty one that are

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 3>active players now right now in your head you're probably thinking,

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 3>you're like, I know he's gonna have Lebron in there.

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 3>We haven't heard Katie, we haven't heard Stah.

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 2>We haven't heard Wait.

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I know you can think of five of the six,

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 3>but have you been paying close enough attention to the

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 3>list to figure out who the sixth of those six

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 3>active players are? No spoilers, but did two of them

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 3>play each other in a playoff series this year? Maybe

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 3>we'll discuss that and we will get into what is

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the impossibility of ranking the top twenty players in order

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 3>of the last fifty years. That's next week on What's

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Right with Nick Ray