WEBVTT - Disney’s New Streaming Star vs. Netflix

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the world's of

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. If you

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>can download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com. If you can also listen to our radio

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and be

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>sure to watch us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Global News, Top Business, and definitely top stock story today

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>is the Walt Disney Company, because man, it is a

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent in today sessions. It's amazing given that the

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>business model has been completely upended by the pandemic. To right,

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Its parks are closed, movie theaters are closed, right exactly,

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>so many parts of their business and they're like, you

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>know what, We're going to wrap it up when it

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to streaming, and investors like it. So let's get

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>into it. Um. We do get a bunch of headlines

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>late yesterday and that's why we're seeing such strong stock reaction.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's do a deep dive into the company. Chris mary

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is l a bureau chief for Bloomberg News. He's on

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the phone in Los Angeles. Also Bloomberg opinion columnist Tarala Chapelle.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>She covers the business of entertainment, telecommunications, and the deal's world.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>She's on the phone in New Jersey. Chris, I want

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to kick it off with you. WHOA why is I

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>mean the stock is that it's all about streaming. Yeah,

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know it's like to your point, Uh,

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>if you know you said at the beginning of the

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>year there was going to be a global pandemic that

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>would shut you know, theme parks and cruise lines at

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>movie theaters and live sports, and you know, should you

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>sell Disney? Of course you would say yes. And yet

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>here it is continuing to hit new highs for a

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. Now, um, it's yeah, it's all about streaming.

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>You know that they happen to launch this product Disney Plus, uh,

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a year ago in November, right before the pandemic, and

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody's now focused on home entertainment and what can I

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>do with a family at home? And uh, schools out

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and so subscription surge all around the world. Uh. And

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>why Wall Street loves This is because it's a recurring

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>subscription business. Everybody is paying their monthly Disney Plus bill

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and so they can project those subscribers out at infinitem.

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's a you know, it's it's a lot more

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>reassuring than trying to get a movie sold this weekend.

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Great visibility, right, Yeah, yeah, it really is. And I

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>want to bring Tarry in here because she got She

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>has a new column out today called Disney's new streaming

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Star is a Netflix? Is Netflix? You guys talked earlier

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>on We talked earlier on Quick Take, and it's all

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>about Star and what Star is doing and how Disney

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is positioning Star internationally. Tara, take us through this because

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it didn't get a lot of attention when Disney first

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>acquired Star, but now it's kind of becomes center stage, right,

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>especially when Bob Tapek is sitting up in front of

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a big screen and you see the Disney Plus and

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>then you see Star behind at the logos. Tara, Right,

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what was so telling. You know, Hulu was moved

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to the side and right behind shapec or whoever was

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking last night, you saw Disney Plus and Star and

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that was definitely new and What I love about it is,

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, covering mergers and acquisitions, when you see deals

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the size of the when Disney did for Fox eight

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars, what often happens is there are businesses

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that are bought part of those deals that the acquirer

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really want, some smaller units or brands that they

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>get because they kind of have to because they're buying

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the company. But with Star, I think it was a

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>little overlooked at the time when the deal closed, people said, well,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an Indian TV brand. Yeah, there's growth there, but

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's going to stay kind of a smaller piece of Disney.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And instead, Disney is putting it front and center and

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>building this brand into an international streaming powerhouse. It's going

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to be there global version of Netflix, the brand with

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>all the sort of adult programming beyond the stuff that's

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>on Disney Plus. And it just makes a whole lot

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of sense. It's kind of filling a hole that Disney

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Plus had, and I think people are gonna like it.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna make it a really compelling offering. Vias of

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the Netflix, Sarah, we won't see it are in the

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>US though, right, We'll see Hulu instead. Right, So they're

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>only doing it outside the US with Star in the US.

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>It seems like, at least for now, they're sticking with

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>this bundle for thirteen dollars a month where you can

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>get Disney plus Hulu if you want some more, um

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, adult programming and ESPN Class if you're sports fan.

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the the US offering is a little bit messy.

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>They need to figure it out a little bit more.

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>But the global offerings are really compelling. Well, and you know, Chris,

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>come on back in on this conversation. Global, right, there's

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>US growth and growing in the US market, but global

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and the opportunities there for Disney, Um, they've always thought

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>about beyond the US. Well, if you look at the

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>projections they made yesterday, three fifty million worldwide subscribers by

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>four that's bigger than you know, Netflix right now is

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a million. But even our our consensus forecast on Bloomberg

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is for Netflix around three d and twelve million. So

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>they're basically saying we're going to be big than Netflix.

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>They have an advantage, which is they have these four

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>uh streaming services, so you can you know, if you're

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a Netflix customer, you're only getting one they have different

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>plans even with ads without but you're but you're not

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>subscribing to both. With Disney, you can easily have three

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>different services so than one customer three uh you know plans.

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.239
<v Speaker 1>So so they have that advantage. You know, they're tailoring

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>these for different markets, as Tara said, you know, sports

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for Latin American customers and streaming uh in Europe, you know,

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the sort of f X content, and they have more

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>adult Fox films are going to be bundled in with

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Disney plugs for a higher fee. So they're trying all

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>these different strategies. So Terry, if if if your Netflix

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>right now, what are you what are you thinking? Because

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Netflix was the company that invented direct consumer streaming.

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it threatened by Disney's power now? Yeah? But Netflix

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>will say that they welcome the competition. That kind of there.

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>They always they always say that, but I think it's

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it's what it means is that, you know, Netflix isn't

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>standing still like they are growing. They're constantly creating new content,

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so they're going to have more competition. But I think

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>what it means is they kind of try to step

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that up a little bit, maybe the quality of the

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff they're putting on their service, maybe more kids stuff

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>so that they can try to compete head on with

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Disney the way Disney is trying to do with Netflix.

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, as a consumer, this is a good time.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's always trying to figure out who's going to be

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the Netflix killer, who's going to be left standing at

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of the streaming wars. But for consumers, it's

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>important to remember competition is a good thing. It keeps

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>prices low, it keeps the value proposition up, so more

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>companies that are fighting for our dollars the better. How

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>much of this in terms of the emphasis on streaming was,

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the brainchild of Bob Iger, longtime CEO UM

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>now I think he's executive chairman. Uh. And also how

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>much of it is Bob J Peck Well, uh, you know,

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>there was this narrative earlier this year that you know,

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Bob Iger was still running the show. He's a powerful force,

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>no doubt, Um certainly listens to him. But you know,

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>there were certainly hallmarks in yesterday of of J Pick

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>running the things. In fact, there was almost this disconnect

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>where Bob Iger gets up to speak and he said,

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're going to emphasize, uh, quality over quantity,

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and they announced a hundred movies and TV shows. Uh,

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>every retread you could possibly imagine Sister Act three, the

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Dog from Up gets his own series. I mean we

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>need Chris the Board, Bob J. Peck, you know, sitting

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>like at a you know, portable table in the lot

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>parking lot of Disney, just saying yes to a long

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>line of people pitching him ideas. Uh, it was. It

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>was very much, uh, let's throw everything at the wall,

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and and really just pretty different from Disney Films strategy

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>under Eiger when he took over. You know, they deliberately

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>paired back all of those movies that were you know,

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the sports films, the you know adult ori need comedies,

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and they really focus deliberately on these big blockbuster Superhero

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and Star Wars and Pixar movies that they can get

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>more bang for the buck out of. And so totally

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>different strategy. Now, this stuff is expensive to do though,

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it's expensive to shoot, it's expensive to get the talent.

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Why do investors seem to be ignoring how much cash

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>this is actually going to cost Disney. It gets back

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to our earlier point about it's all about the subscriber numbers.

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And so if you can get to three million subscribers

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>paying you ten bucks a month, you know, it's it's

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>just a huge surge and dependable revenue. So what Wall Street,

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not about the earnings right now, and the Disney's

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is losing money. Uh, you know, given the pandemic and everything,

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it is all about the future subscriber. I mean, this

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is Netflix's playbook. Netflix just burns cash, and they've been

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>burning cash for years buying content. It's it's almost any

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>tech company, right, h And is the Amazon story right

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>with that? When exactly how how many you know, long

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 1>term subscribers can you get? Because subscribers stick around and

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, it's it's predictable revenue. So so yeah,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so the fact that they're spending more money losing more

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>money Wall Street applause. So so, Chris, listen, you've been

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>following this company for a long time. I mean, where

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>does I don't know, things like Hulu fit into this.

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Where do those you know, big releases to the big screen.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, certainly after Warner Brothers kind of shocked the

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>industry by saying, you know, we're gonna go straight to

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, streaming or offer them in streaming and theater

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Where does all of that fit

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>into Disney's world, Because the big screen it's important to Disney.

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>It is and and I think one of the takeaways

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>from YESTERD is they they indicated that they were not

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>going the Warner Brothers route, and in fact, some of

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the theater chain stocks are up quite a bit today

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>as a result. Um, you know, so they're gonna save

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the new Indiana Jones with Harriton for the next Star

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Wars directed by Wonder Woman director Patty Jenkins. Those are

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>going in theaters. Um, you know. They announced one movie,

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, a new animated film which was entirely new,

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>uh contacts there and The Last Dragon is going to

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 1>go up in theaters and on Disney Plus for a

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>premium thirty dollar purchase on the same day. So they're

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>testing that model. You know. They they're putting a Tom

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Hanks Pinocchio movie direct to Disney Plus. So you know,

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>they're trying a lot of different things. But they're very

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>clearly not saying everything is going to the streaming service

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>day and day with the movie release theater release. So

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a different approach, and it's more nuanced

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>than it gives the theater some hope. Yeah, exactly, good stuff.

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff. Ten Star Wars series spinoffs and ten Marvel

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>series that will debut you on Disney Plus. I know,

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.719
<v Speaker 1>family members, that's what we want. I have a baby brother, man,

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>he's just gonna be like all into that. Look, as

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>long as they continue to have the Mandalorian, I'm going

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep paying for Disney Plus. You're gonna be paying

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>for it for a long time. With your son two

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>years old, You'll be paying for it for a long time.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paul Mary, thank you so much. L a bureau

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>chief at Bloomberg News on the phone from l A.

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Check him out at Chris Paul Mary on Twitter. I mean,

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>listen the Disney story. I'm just fascinated by the company

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and the strategy those acquisitions of Lucasfilm and Pixar and Marvel.

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're brilliant then and even looking more brilliant now. Yep.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And they just kind of, you know, the strategy, they

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>just move it around the platforms. This is Bloomberg Business

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer from Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business Week Carl Masser along with Tim Stenovik a

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quicktake and Tim this story. I noticed it's been

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>among the most read on the Bloomberg. It's about a

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>group of guys trade ors who rode the crash in

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>oil prices and as a result, they made hundreds of

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars not too shabby. It's all about what

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>happened in April. I remember that day where I was

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>because this was just mind bending what happened, right because

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the oil prices, neil prices crashing going to negative, essentially

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>requiring that people pay you to take oil off your hands.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You paid people rather to take off your hands, right, Like,

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it just didn't make sense for anybody who's been following

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the financial markets. This story is reported for Bloomberg Business Week,

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and here to tell us about the guys and the

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>ride is Bloomberg business Week. Get it to Joe Webber

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>on the access line in Brooklyn. It's written by Liam Vaughan,

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>senior reporter at Bloomberg News and Joe, let's kick it

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>off with you. Uh. This is like one of those

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>stories that I feel like again, you can make a

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>movie out of it. Yeah, well, it's what we try

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to do and this was one that you know, Liam

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>has been close to for a while. Um. And you

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>know we reported in Business Week back over the summer

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>actually when we found out the details of of the

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>trade and that it was more than five million and

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>now it turns out it's even more than that. It's

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it's six and sixty million dollar profit. And what we've

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>also learned in that time is is what makes this

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>story so special, um, And it becomes almost a character

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>portrait of the group of of guys who were behind

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the trade, and um, we know very little about them,

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>but what we do know is all in the story

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's this little group of guys in Essex, England.

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul Cummins, I mean, I feel like it's just like,

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as I said, you could just kind of you know,

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you just want to pull out his story, um, because

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it's his name. Which is part of the joy of

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the story is that the case of characters, it's so

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like a guy Ritchie film and they have

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a really tight knit crew. And and the character

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned it goes by Cuddles or that's how

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>he's affectionately known within the group. I feel well. And

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>then there's another guy named Dog, right, ye Dog. And

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you know that was part of the charm of the

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>story was that you know, we we uh, as we

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>found out a little bit about their details, we tried

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to kind of bring them all uh to light. And

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, um, you know, the other element of

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the story that I just find totally fascinating is his

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Cuddles actually really does know oil. He's been in the

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>trenches for for decades now, but some of these other people,

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>um don't in their in their twenties. Uh. And basically

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it's this ring of of of characters, characters who sort

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of know each other and that's all they all they know,

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and they they've kind of grown up with each other

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and have learned the oil trade. And that's kind of

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're almost like novices in that they're they

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>probably don't have that much experience, and yet they at

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a day on April. Well, and this

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is one of those stories like as Tim was talking

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>about joll like when it happened, we're all thinking, Okay,

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all, this makes no sense negative you know,

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we're all getting used to negative rates. But this whole

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of negative oil prices and what it what it

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>meant and the thing is it happened and then it

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it went away. Um. But as as people wanted to

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of understand the trade that day and how it happened,

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that's where investigators on in the US and I guess

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere really started looking into to try and understand how

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>did this happen, and that's what really led them to

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this gang of nine. Yeah, we we don't really have

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>visibility into into where any sort of investigation or where

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that stuff could go. But what we do know is

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that the trade is um. You know, some of these

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>details were ones that we are able to report on

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>earlier but then even learn a little bit more of.

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>For this story, UM, it comes down to Tad's T A. S.

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And the it's also known as quote unquote banging the

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>clothes and settlement exactly. And there is um a little

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of um understanding within the community that this is not,

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, anything nefarious or illegal. It's been practiced for years,

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>especially back in the commodities glory days, and that's kind

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of where UM cuddles as he goes. But UH perfected

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this and so we think that they basically were able

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to do that during the close really take advantages of

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the price going negative. There is some some speculation or

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>interest in it whether or not they actually pushed it

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>negative just through their own trading activity, but that's not

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>for us to say. But yeah, you know, when you

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>look back on the course of this year, we've seen

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>so many incredible things, so many weird circumstances that you know,

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>even even that that day and negative oil remains one

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of the weird are just things, and and yet you know, uh,

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 1>this this crew is responsible for for perhaps maybe the

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>trade of the year. I think, yeah, And I guess

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>my question would be, you know, even though it was

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>such an anomaly to see oil do this and crash

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>like this in a day, is this trade still possible

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in the future, or by shining a light on it

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>like this as a sort of decrease the opportunity that

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>people can can do this, you know, it's it's hard

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to know. Um. I think in many ways this was

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a perfect alignment where we had a coronavirus and supply

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and demand things, so we had oil already come down

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, all of this coincided basically with

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>this one day that happens every month with oil where

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the contracts roll over. So you know, we we even

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>thought maybe the following month there could be a repeat

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>because we were still on lockdown right then and demand

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:59.239
<v Speaker 1>had evaporated. So who knows. I do think, you know,

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing we know about about finances that weird things happened.

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>There are glitches. Um, no one thought the prices could

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>ever go negative until they were starting to be warnings

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like days before that it was it was possible. So

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it took a special alignment. And when you

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of actually, um, you know, read the story closely,

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it it seems like they knew what they were doing,

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and everything happened to align just right well and to

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>be fair and to be fully transparent. No authorities have

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>accused Vega Capital or any of the traders referenced in

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this story on doing anything illegal. And I love the

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>law firm. I guess that represents eight of the nine

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>traders in this group toll each the quote is, each

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of our clients regularly puts his own money at risk

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to try to make a profit. Sometimes it works, sometimes

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. And and and Liam even includes in his

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>story that you know, if they've made maybe seven million

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>dollars that day, nobody would have maybe really you know,

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, okay, whatever, But it was just they made

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>almost seven hundred millions, and so authorities, yeah they had

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to take a law and maybe they don't. Yeah, yeah, exactly. Yeah,

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I think you know that. That last note of the

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>story is another trader who says, look, if it was

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>BP or Goldman Sacks, nobody would be saying anything but

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that these are, you know, working class lads

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in the neighborhood like Essex, which is is basically the

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of New Jersey for thank hey, so there you go.

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it was just a correct trade. Maybe it

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was just a great trade. So that that's what got

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>people talking about it, the fact that these aren't it's

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>not a firm that everybody knows. It's just some guys

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>who had a great day kind of like jefter then

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Joel Webber, have a good weekend. You told it, well,

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody should check it out. Joe Webber, editor of Bloomberg

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, on the remote Access from Brooklyn, given some shade. Yeah,

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to forget about that comment come monday.

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Are you liked him really up to that point? All right?

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>For those of you listening to New York DC in

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.959
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco watching a YouTube Bloomberg Business Week. We're going

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to continue if listening on Bloomberg one or six one

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in Boston based day Business is coming up next. Check

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>out the magazine Incredible Stories. You can find it on newsstands,

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg and online at Bloomberg dot com. You're

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer on Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, so yeah, tough story once again of our day,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of our week, of our year, no doubt about it.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Is everything and anything to do with the coronavirus and vaccine.

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Pellett just talking about the story that we've seen

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:29.959
<v Speaker 1>came out of the Washington Post that the White House

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Chief of Staff Mark Meadows telling Stephen han In, the

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Commissioner of the FDA, to submit his recognition but Hans

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>saying no, that's not likely, right or not happy? That's

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>what That's what han is responding. And and look, I

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>think it raised if this story indeed turns out to

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>be true. I mean it's a Washington Post story. Um,

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't help confidence in the vaccine at a time

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>when Americans are concerned that it's been rushed through exactly.

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And let's get into that with our next guest, Dr

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Ian lous Bader with us as he is always every Friday,

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>his clinical associate Professor of Medicine at n y U

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Landgown Medical Center, on the phone in New York, on

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a day when global cases exceed sixty nine point seven

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>million deaths, surpassing one point fifty nine million UM. Dr Lesbad,

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 1>are nice to have you back with Tim and myself. Um,

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>how are you okay? Doing doing well? Thank you, Carol

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and Tim. Happy Friday. Yeah, you sound a little tired. Well,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's been a long week. It's been a busy week.

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>And uh, but I think we have good news coming.

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I think where we within the next few days, I

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>think we are going to get FDA approval. The Vaccine

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Advisory Committee uh seventeen to four voted uh, you know,

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to to approve this authorization, and I think, uh, literally

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>within the next few days we'll get the full f

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>d A committee to approve it. I think by the

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 1>hanging I want to I want to get to that,

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but I do want to get to that headline that

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the Washington Post was was or they

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>were reporting that the White House was threatening the FDA

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>chief um to basically prove it or else. Yeah, So yeah,

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>what does that do? And Tim brought up a really

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>good point, what does that do to confidence in the process,

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>especially for the American public when there are still many

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>out there it's safe to say that are a little

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>nervous about taking the vaccine there are and even some

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>physicians I know, or or a little hesitant. You know.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think politically or scientifically that was good. I mean,

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to let the the FDA evaluate it, which

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they did. The vaccine data is very good in terms

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of efficacy and hopefully lives to be saved, and and

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>side effects are are low, not zero. So to me,

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly unnecessary to um, you know, to threaten or

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>cajole the f d A and you know, we really

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 1>should sort of stay out of that scientific realm. So

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that was an error in judgment and I

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>think unnecessary because the FDA is going to do no

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>matter what, the right thing. I don't think you're really

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>subject to a political pressure anyway. Because these are committees

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and they're composed of infectious disease specialists and heads of

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>departments and people who know what they're doing. Well, what

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>would dr what would you say to someone who is

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing the news from the UK this week and understanding

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that people in the UK are already getting shots of

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Visor bion Tech Vaccine American company Visor at least, and

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>not getting shots here in the US. I mean, what,

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>what like can you shed on the FDA approval process

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>as to why it is taking a few more days

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to get it approved here? Well, Uh, it is really

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>just the difference of a few days. And I think

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 1>this is not like the space race where you have

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to be the first one on the moon. Uh. You know,

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we've had an amazing under a year to

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>get a vaccine is really unheard of. I think Worpspeed

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>did did an amazing job, you know. And I think

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the FDA, or at least the way we work here

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is that it's goes through several committees. And it was

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>eight hours plus of discussion on the back seen Um

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Advisory Committee. They had lots of different opinions. You can

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to it if you want on YouTube. I think

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a long, a long series and they really waited

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>out the pros and concepts just how we do it here.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>And I think people should feel confident about that because

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>really experts, leading experts reviewed the data, they went over it.

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>This was not a rush judgment in anyway. I'm not

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>saying the UK was a rush judgment. Maybe their committees

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>work faster, or maybe they started a few days earlier.

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think we're going to start giving out the

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>first vaccines. My bet it's later next week. Wow, And

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that's when are you anticipate coming to n y U

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>landgoing that you guys start to get it? I do.

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I think the FDA sometime in the next two three days,

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>four days will formally approve it. I think based on

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>all the data, and I think it will be ready

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to shift by midweek. Uh if all goes well, And

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the first vaccines probably will be later next

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.479
<v Speaker 1>week or early the week after. Is my my guests,

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I have no insight information and but that's my guess

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is to the timeline. Do you think the rollout from

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the recommendations from the CDC about making sure frontline workers,

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>healthcare workers and those who are most at risk, this

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is the right way to distribute the vaccine? I do

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you know? Unfortunately, we literally see multiple COVID patients every day. Fortunately,

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>the volume in the hospital at leash in our area

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is taking up, but not massively. Um. And I think

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the frontline healthcare workers are the most at risk. Elderly

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>at the most at risk and uh, and then the

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>rest of the population. And I think once some people

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>see that we chuck it and that we're doing fine,

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there'll be more encouraged to take it as well. That's

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>a really good point. Yeah, when when they see the

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>doctors taking it totally right. And what I do wonder

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>too is Santa Fie and Glaxo Smith Klein Um they

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>delayed some advanced trials of their experimental COVID nineteen shot.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess it didn't produce the strong enough response in

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 1>some older people, so that they're drugs are being pushed

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>out maybe in terms of availability to the end of

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>next year. I mean, ian, this is what we're going

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to see. But that does complicate potentially getting vaccines to

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the entire world. Correct. We need all of these companies

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to have success we do. Manufacturing vaccines is not easy. Uh,

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of limiting steps and I think

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we need multiple vaccines. Again, the data that I've seen

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>parliamentarily at least with Feisser and Maderna Astra Zeneca. Is that,

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, again playing with a dose a little bit.

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>You know that we're getting into the um efficacy, which

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is great. You know again, flu shots not even that

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>strong in their mandatory in many medical institutions. You know,

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they may be effective. So, uh, we do need a

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies. And then when you start getting out

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>into Africa or other countries where they don't have infrastructure,

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>you really need vaccines that that need to be transported

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>without such critical conditions of you know, minus subzero temperatures.

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So in a way, it's good that that perhaps more

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Western countries who have the technology are getting at first.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>It's great that Fiser is coming out. I want to

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>get to this news that we learned earlier today from

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Governor Cuomo saying that indoor dining here in New York

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 1>City is set to close on Monday. Is this, in

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>your opinion, the right move? Well, uh, that's a good question.

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think everyone is trying to make their

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>best judgments all the way around. We do expect a

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of a bump a surge in cases after Thanksgiving

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and probably um, you know, around the holidays in December

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>as well. UM, certainly we know outdoor dining is fine.

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a tough call to really restrict indoor dining.

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I think what happened is that it was hard to

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of that is a reasonable number. But I think

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>there's been a number of infections people have had from

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>dining out. So I can understand it. The poor restaurants

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>have been understrain. The whole industries or understrained. But I

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think I have to agree, at least temporarily for for

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a short window to perhaps let case volume drop a

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>bit um. I think it should be reevaluated, probably on

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a weekly basis, because if if positivity rates come down,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they should be reopened. I can tell you it's a

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>tough time. By next summer, we are not going to

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>be wearing masks. Most Americans will have a vaccine and

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we will look back on this, but it is going

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a rough few weeks. I wish we could

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>take a time machine and get there, yeah and move ahead. Yeah.

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a headline out from ABC that Dr Anthony Fauci

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>says he will get vaccinated publicly. Um, so Charlie Pellett

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is sharing that with me. So yeah. I mean, listen,

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he understands. So many people understand and we

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>were talking, you know, Ian that you know, by you

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and other members of the medical community getting the vaccine,

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that is going to really provide incredible reassurances

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to the mass public. I'm hoping by next Friday, when

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we do another medical segment, that I will have had

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it by then, so I will let you know if

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I did, and how I feel well, and look forward

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to go ahead. Yeah, I mean, one thing I want

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to know is what it feels like to get a

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>shot of something that's stored at negative seventy degrees into

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>your arm, right, I mean, that's got it. You can

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>feel that, right for sure. It's a deep I am injection. Uh,

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it's got these lipid particles that protect the messenger R

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and A. Yeah, it's a it's a unique vaccine, it's

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a new vaccine. I'll let you know how it feels

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>if I If I get it before Friday, well, we

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>look forward to that. Hey, Ian, I do want to

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>ask you to, um, what are you seeing when it

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to COVID cases in New York City. We're definitely

0:29:53.240 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing a slight increase the hospitals are also seeing uh

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>an increase nowhere near March. I suspect part of what

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is the positivity. In other words, we're estimating

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>at twenty or over at least of the New York

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>City population has antibodies, so I think that may be

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>moderating it a bit. And when the vaccine starts rolling out,

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>there is some protection after the first shot. We don't

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>really know how much, and we certainly know many vaccines,

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>like the shingles vaccine, the moni vaccine, you really need

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>two shots for optimal antibodies. But I think there's some

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>data that there will be protection after one shot. So

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I really think in the next few weeks we will

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>at least have some good news coming along. But cases

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>are up a little bit, and I think that probably

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>factored into Governor Cuomo's decision about restaurants. But we've got

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to hang in there a few more weeks, and I

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think we'll begin to see a little more daylight. Yeah,

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>figures crossed here. The other thing, though, that is still tricky,

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>right that you can get the vaccine and so you

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>are essentially protected, but you still don't know you can

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>You can still though potentially spread the virus. Is that correct?

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Help me understand that? Well, yeah, you're a good, very

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>good point. You're you're you're on the cutting edge with

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>with nuances. So there's some rational abt people who've had

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it wearing a mask. In other words, you've had antibodies,

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you had COVID, you survived, should you wear a mask?

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we feel that it does make sense

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>for a while, and that's probably true to the vaccine.

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>There may be some carriage of the virus in nasal passages.

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a relatively low risk um and I

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>don't I think it's not going to be meaningful. I

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>think most physicians planned to wear masks even after they

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>get the vaccine as they're seeing patients really for a

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>few months until we really see a drop in cases.

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think part of that is cosmetic. I think

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it looks good and probably there's some protection. But once

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you have antibodies, generally they will go everywhere, and alluding

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to the nose where there's the virus, there's some thought

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that there will be fewer antibodies in the nose and

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.239
<v Speaker 1>you could harbor it or potentially infect other people. I

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's a theoretical risk, but a relatively low risk.

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>A doctor. We don't have much time left. But what

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>message do you have for people who may be putting

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>off going to the doctor because they're worried about being

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>exposed to the virus of our medical office is doing

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a safe are protecting people? At great point, Kim, thank you,

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>A great point. People need to come in for their screening, testing, colonoscopy, mammograms, vaccines,

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>flu shots. The offices are safe, there's social distancing. Everyone

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>wears masks. Many offices have air purifiers. I went to

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>my dentist and they have ultra violet air purifiers. So

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>we need to be less afraid. Get out there and

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>get your baseline healthcare done and uh and avoid crowds inside.

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>You may need to take a little break from restaurants,

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but I think the doctor's offices are relatively safe and

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:01.719
<v Speaker 1>it's important to get your you're screening healthcare than I got.

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, I got a root canal. I've been

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in and out of doctor's offices done. I gotta go

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to the down screening. They have been incredible. So yes,

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you do need to go to then. I mean not

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>not for anything, but you just got to take care

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of your deep What are you telling me? All right?

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Dr Ian les Bader, stay safe, be well, Clink Associate

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Professor of Medicine, and y you land goom bro my

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>turn on. Yeah, but you let me drive? No no, no,

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>he's home. Please, I'll do the right vel. Lets me.

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive all Just drive baby, it's the

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>question trying. This is the drive to the Globe community. Thanks,

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll dry us to Dawn on Bloomberg Radio. All right, folks,

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we've just got about eleven minutes left in today's trading session.

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>It is time for of the drive to the clothes.

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Getting ready to wrap up this trading week. We're off

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>our lows big time. We need to take a look

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>at the trading day. Tim It's been kind of a

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>funny day, like we kind of sold off a little bit,

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>but not dramatically. But we've definitely bounced back here. But

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of overall a little changed. Yeah, and I

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>think investors taking a step back and thinking about stimulus

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 1>or lack thereof, and when is that going to happen?

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>If ever, like a little bit of a breather and

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens. Except for those Disney investors, except

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>for those Disney investors, or if you happen to hit

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the I P O s this week. So

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>let's get right. So let's get into it with Ryan Dietrich.

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>He's chief markets strategist over at LPL Financial. They've got

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred ten billion dollars in assets under management. He

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>joins us once again on the phone from Charlotte, North Carolina. Here, Ryan,

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you back with us here on Bloomberg. Um, So,

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Tim and I are watching the markets. It's kind of

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a mellow day, but it's been

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>an interesting week. But I think we are on track

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>for some losses for the week overall. When it comes

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to the broader market in the SNP five hundred, how

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>do you see the market environment right now? Are there

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>any technicals kind of you know, jumping out at you

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>at this point? Yeah, Carol, thanks for having me back.

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 1>What's You're right? And I guess markets they don't go

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>up forever, right, We're having a little poll back now.

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 1>It looks not forgot we had over a ten percent

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.919
<v Speaker 1>rally and equities just in November, and if you look

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 1>into the market technical seasonality, the first half of December

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 1>historically is actually kind of flat for stocks. Most people think,

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Santa Claus comes to town. December is always strong.

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>The majority of the strength in the month of December

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.919
<v Speaker 1>tends to take place the second half of the month.

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's, you know, kind of where obviously we're heading here,

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 1>uh fairly soon. But technicals are strong. I mean, coming

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>off the guys for a while saying there's a lot

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of participations, technicals are strong. The one thing that gets me,

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I consider a kind of market sentiments part of market technicals.

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Cinema is awfully frosty. I know you guys have talked

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 1>about all the big I p o s, the excitement

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.919
<v Speaker 1>that comes with those. Put the call ratios, and here's

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the lowest level they've been in decades. If you look

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>like the five days CBO, we put the call ratio,

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>UM investor Cinema polls. We can go on and on

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>margat to keep going up when Cinnamon is optimistic, but

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that does that a much higher bar, but maybe a

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit of disappointment UM and markets finally can pull

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>backcause people are a little too optimistic. We think that

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.439
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. We head into early sometime early next year,

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 1>what is the political risk here? I mean, what are

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you watching for in terms of from Washington? It it

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>does seem like that there will be some sort of

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 1>bill pass, but it's going to be smaller than I

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think the Democrats want. I mean that's pretty much guaranteed.

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>But what does it mean for what you're watching right? Well,

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>first OFFTI not nice to talk with you, but but

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I mean, that's that's pretty priced in at

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 1>this point, right, some type of fis stimulus bill is

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>extremely priced in. I mean, we think it's going to happen, right,

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, honestly, guys, we were talking about on August six,

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the summer resets, right, that's what we thought we were

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna have this stimulus bill. Now Here we are in

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the middle of December, still talking about it. So it's

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen. I mean, I at the same

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>time and his politics are waiting on the runoff in Georgia.

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>The makeup of Congress. Um. You know, at the end

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>of the day, the truth doesn't matter is the Fed

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is still a major backs of fiscal stimulus is coming.

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.720
<v Speaker 1>The economy obviously, the vaccine news is great, right, economy

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.879
<v Speaker 1>is opening up, so all these things are playing in there. UM,

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and just the fact that earnings are likely going to

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>increase more than the US and emerging markets next year. UM.

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, fiscal stimulus matters in your term, but bigger picture,

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there's just a lot of stee wins that do say, hey,

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>things are still looking pretty good next year. Hey, Ron,

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to Tave Wilson a chart

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of the day, because he talked about UM earnings estimates

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>for the next couple of years making us do more

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>costly in historical terms than just one year's worth of

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 1>projections or even past results. And he said, SMP five

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred closing yesterday at twenty six times earnings. Uh, and

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>it goes it's close to the September second ratio of

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven point two that was the highest since we

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 1>saw some data being compiled by US. UH here at Bloomberg,

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>which goes back in when you look at the valuation

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>of the market, are you concerned, Uh, when you look

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>at next year's earning estimates, We're not super concerned. Is

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is it a one something that we think, oh, this

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is like n markets extremely overvalued? I think so here, Carol,

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'll tell you what look at emerging markets. I

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>mentioned them a second ago. They're extremely cheap ralt to

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the US, and you know, a lot the emerging markets

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 1>are not above where they were in two thousand eighteen.

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Emergy markets aren't even above where they were in two

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven. You're gonna talk about a long base and

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a long time to kind of consolidate that we like

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the US still don't get me wrong, But in the

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>models that we run for our more than seventeen thousand advisors,

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets are an area that we really think next

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>year from a globally diversifying portfolio point of view, that

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:39.479
<v Speaker 1>could be an area that you really start to see

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>some strength and out performance, honestly led by China. Nobody

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 1>trust Chinese data. I get that, but I'll tell you

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of positives South three of Taiwan, China.

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>There are some really good things happening in next places

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for investments next year are chief to be honest,

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>what does the recovery here look like? Does it? Does it?

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like this v shape. We're we're not

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>going to have that. We know that, Um, what do

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you look at? Yeah? I mean everyone wants to the shape. Right,

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we've been saying a swoosh shaped recovery where it's easy

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:07.879
<v Speaker 1>off the initial surge. We saw that the last couple

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of months. Now it's getting tough. We're looking at initial

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>planes just yesterday. Um, you know, there's there's gonna be

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>some sticky points here. But but the truth of the

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.399
<v Speaker 1>matter is, we just released our one outlook. We called

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it powering Through Here at LKI Research, we think the

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>US can grow about four percent next year globally probably

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>five percent or again. Earnings in the SMP can game

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe about twenty percent, which you get it to a

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.280
<v Speaker 1>one sixty five multiple. And we've got a fair value

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 1>target on the SMP of thirty. And I know that's

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a little lower than what a lot of people have

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>been laying out there, But honestly, I've become all with

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys where we've been bullish pretty much this whole time,

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and and we think maybe now that everyone's starting to

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 1>get optimistic, here that inner contrarian and it says, well,

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe let's pull it back a little bit. Seing globally,

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, grations. The emerging markets are an area that,

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>like I said earlier, is a lot of opportunity for investors.

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna leave it on that note. Ryan,

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Have a good weekend. Ryan Detrich,

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>chief market Strategies at p L Financial on the phone

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>from Charlotte, North Carolina, so kind of laying out his

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>metrics and what he's watching. But I think it is

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a week and I think you said it well that

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it just feels like a day where we're going to

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 1>just take a break a little bit, and maybe the

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>week because it does look like we're gonna end lower

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 1>for the week. Overall, I think investors are just kind

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of waiting to see if we pull something out of

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>DC potentially that gives us some optimism that kind of

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:24.839
<v Speaker 1>helps shore up the economy. Is Yeah, and I think,

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>like Ryan was saying that it's kind of priced in

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>right now. I think the big surprise would be if

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 1>we continue not to get something as the end of

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the year gets closer and closer. Yeah, exactly. I think

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.879
<v Speaker 1>that would certainly create some disappointment. I'm just going over

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:39.919
<v Speaker 1>to Airbnb and door dash because I wanted to see

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>how these docks are trading. So Airbnb, which was up

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>finishing up about a hundred and thirteen percent yesterday, it's

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 1>down about two and a half percent, So not a

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>big deal. Uh. Door Dash, which was up almost eighty

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>six percent and it's first day of trading on Wednesday,

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 1>lost about two percent yesterday and it's down about six

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>percent today, which is to be expected considering the But

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it'll be fun too and interesting to watch what the

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>trend line will be. Yeah, the hard work is ahead

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for these companies. They have to live up to the expectations.

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>And these expectations got lofty this week. Yeah, and listen,

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>both of them are pandemic plays, and I think some

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>think that maybe we'll see who has the longer term

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>play post pandemic. Ultimately, I don't think it's gonna be Yeah,

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. People could say I think door Dash

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.320
<v Speaker 1>because they're so in terms of market share and cemented

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in food delivery, but who knows. Yeah, I mean maybe

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna be traveling in living in different places.

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb could benefit exactly, exactly. Thanks so much for listening

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:39.359
<v Speaker 1>or at Bloomberg dot com, and be sure to check

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 1>out our daily radio show at two pm Eastern on

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio and be sure to watch us too on

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News