WEBVTT - Anarchism Past and Future

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>It could happen here. Uh, it being a number of things. Uh,

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the podcast about things falling apart and also

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe putting them back together. And assuming there's not a

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>nuclear war in the immediate future, you will probably be

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>hearing this episode sometime in early March. I am Robert Evans,

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>my co hosts as always well as often Chris and Garrison,

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's my job for the day. Done. I'm

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna sit back and chill. You guys want

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to take it from here, Yeah, I'll take it from here.

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>We are doing one of our perennial things fall apart

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 1>but also we sort of put it back together again episodes.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And joining us today is j m C from Strange

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Matter as a new libertarian, socialist cooperative magazine. J MC

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>great to have you here. Yeah, this is really great.

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So I guess we should probably explain with the magazine

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is not just in of itself, but also because it's

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a good lead in into um um into what we're

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about. So we basically, uh, there's five

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 1>of us as co editors and we're all equal worker

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>owners in it. It's a magazine called Strange Matters. And

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the point of it is to explore radical new ideas,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>not just in terms of politics and economics, which is

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be kind of half the focus is trying

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to figure out like you know, libertarian socialists talk a

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>lot about dual power, which I know y'all talk about

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>on the show a lot talk about building independent institutions

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>under the direct democratic control of the working class to

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>control real resources and are not the state or capitalist firms.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>But like, we talk a big game, but do we

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>actually know how to do that stuff, and do we

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>know how to do stuff like run like you know,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a big company as a as a self managed democracy,

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>or do we know how to like run a city

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>as a as a radical democracy like rooted in neighborhood

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>councils or anything like that. The answer kind of is

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not really. And there's a lot of like um open

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>questions that we don't know yet the answers to, and

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that very few people are working on those answers. So

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Strange Matters is um partly about discovering, uh, those answers,

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>not because we the editors have the answers, but because

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we need like some kind of space within which we

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>can bring lots of different people different life experiences together uh,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in order to talk about the stuff and figure it out.

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And then the other mission of it is to be

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a kind of general interest literary intellectual magazine doing the

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of journalism and philosophy and poetry and memoir and

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that that uh that UH perhaps gets shut

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>out of capitalist society because it's not commercial or because

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it's too weird, because it's like, I don't know, historiographical

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>essay about it's been called doon or something like that,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you know. And and we think that there should be

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a place for that, um, just because it brings delight

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and meaning into people's lives, and it's what we're fighting

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>for more democratic society in order to do so. That's

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>basically our vibe UM. And the answering question is a

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>collective editorial that we that we collectively drafted and edited uh,

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about our political views in particular and the recent

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>history of libertarian socialism UM. And then asked for me,

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm a writer who's written for a couple of

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>other places like The Point in the Brooklyn Rail UH,

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and I also was involved in the d S as

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Libertarian Socialist Caucus and also the the Yeah yeah, right, yeah,

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of history there, trauma, you know, some

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>some uh yeah, but any who, uh and also the

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Symbiosis Federation UM, which is a federation across Mexico, the US,

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and Canada that is trying to put together. It's a

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a confederation of local organizations that are trying to

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>do this kind of direct democracy stuff. Yeah. So I guess, well, okay,

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>so the pandemic isn't I guess the perfect jumping in

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>point for this. But I wanna go back and I

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>guess getting into the meat of this piece because I

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's very interesting. I wanted to sort of talk

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>about the origins of like what's called sort of new

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>anarchism and how it's sort of begin to decay after

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>after the collapse of occupying After well, I guess that

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the sort of kind of revolutionary arc ofens so basically

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>before you do the decline, at least is the way

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that we wrote it, and I kind of think that

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the way that I would tell it. Um, you

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>have to kind of do the rise first, right, because

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like there was this moment from roughly the fall of

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the Soviets in two roughly like two thousand and even

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of lingering in an afterlife afterwards where it kind

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.559
<v Speaker 1>of looked like anarchism was going to take over the world.

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's a bit of a joke. But it's also

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>not a joke because in the context of like the

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>radical left, which is of course obviously a kind of

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like you know, dissidents seen in any country where it

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>happens to exist. Um, you know, everything ing receded in

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of the traditional parties because the fall of the

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Soviet style uh Leninist states uh, either through their collapse

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>as in the case of the USSR, or in the

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>case of their transition to much more like clearly and

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously like state capitalist uh semi liberalized model like in China,

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>like the you you basically had like this total recession,

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>not just in Leninism interestingly, which obviously enough right, like

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's basically a global collapse of Leinist style

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of governments, but also in like social democracy, um, because

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of the I mean, it's actually kind

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of interesting why it's it's unclear why it is. Uh.

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.239
<v Speaker 1>People have different theories, but they're you know, people often

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>describe it in in um you know, Fisher's term the

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the writer Mark Fisher capitalist realism. The attitude in the

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>nineties was that, uh, you know, there's there's only one

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>world that's possible, and it's the best of all possible worlds,

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's the capitalist world, where everybody's gonna have McDonald's

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in every country, and two countries that have the same

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>McDonald's are never going to go to war, which we

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of found out the hard way this week that

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not really the case. Well, and if people had

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>paid attention more to other parts of the world, they

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>would know that, like, well, there were civil wars in

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of countries that had McDonald's. It didn't stop

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>people from shooting each other, as as the United States

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>should tell you, people will kill each other whether or

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>not they have access to chicken McNuggets. Yeah, you know,

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think like that, that's that's a period

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that has it's full of the most wrong anyone has

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>ever been, Like you got Franchis Fukiyama, like the most

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong person ever You've got. Yeah, You've you've got a

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of sertif idealogues you like, have sort of deluded

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>themselves into thinking this stuff is over. And yeah, I

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>think you're right. That that that sort of plays into this,

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, into sort of the collapse of of of

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess, the party state left, and then the way

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in which that at, you know, the alternative to that,

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess becomes new anarchism, and anarchists practice, even if

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily ideology with all the groups, kind of

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>seeps its way into the rest of the activist scene. Yeah.

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So basically the story that we tell is that there's

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>some you know, the sepathist of rebellion in triggers these Uh.

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not just that the stufferthiasts are able to create

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>their autonomous territory and chap us, but they it triggers

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this wave uh that UM. We use a term that

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's used in academia called neo anarchism for this. UM.

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's an anarchist revival in the nineties UM

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and it's not just people calling themselves anarchists.

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>It's all these movements that were inspired by the libertarian

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>socialist broadly speaking UM sabathistas UM adopting kind of similar

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>methods in their local contexts in different countries, fighting against

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of things. Initially it's against like

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, neoliberal trade deals, but it also ends up

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>being against like sweatshops, because that's basically what a lot

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of outsourcing is is. You know, if if they have

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>unions in this country from the social democratic period, they

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>shut down the factory fire, everybody moved it to someplace

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>where some dictatorship is going to shoot anybody who tries

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to do a union. Uh. And then that you know

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that lowers Uh. Logistics has gotten sophisticated enough by this

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>point that you know, it ends up being cheaper for

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the company even though they have to transport goods all

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>across the world and do just in time delivering that

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:34.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. So um. The a lot of the

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the the anti globalization movement that sprouted up around the

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousands was like, um, against all these things and

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>usually using the kinds of direct actions, which is when

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you act kind of independent of the state and not

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to like, you know, convince politician to do something,

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>but taking direct action to get your results, your desired result. Um.

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, and all this kind of stuff uh that

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>we're at using direct democratic consensus methods uh in the

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>way that they organized stuff. Uh. That that was that

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>was all basically an artistic and so there was this

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>way in which anarchist methods, anarchist tactics, anarchists like attitudes

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>towards what activism even is, started filtering into all these

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>other movements. And this has been happening a little bit

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties too. So there was like the anti

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>nuclear movement had a lot of this, the feminist movement

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of this. Um there was a whole

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>um stream of single other ecological movements were actually like

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>pioneered in a lot of ways by anarchists in the nineties,

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>um so, as well as indigenous movements in places like Mexico, Bolivia, etcetera.

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So the this is the kind of like rise of

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this neo anarchist movie that we're talking about, which is

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>not just about anarchists, it's about people who act and

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think like anarchists without necessarily identifying as it. Yeah, I

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 1>mean that's the kind of thing that I hope we

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>can kind of more encourage as well in the next

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>few decades as those types of ideas can be I

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>want I want to make sure that we can take

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>these ideas and make them very approachable for people, even

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>if they don't use the terms that we might use.

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>You can still kind of suggest these types of thoughts,

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and this suggests these types of kind of lenses and viewpoints. HM.

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>As much as we're about to get to how this

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>sort of goes wrong fails in substence, Like, I think

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the strength of this movement was that it

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>was its tactics were really easy to spread, and that

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>led to a lot of people adopting me. It led

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>to it sort of becoming this I guess activist consensus

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know, like you use in consensus process. You

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have hozontal organizations, you have you do

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>direct actions, you mobilize people. You don't have these sort

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.839
<v Speaker 1>of like article parties. But that yeah, And I think

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 1>I think the next part of the story that you

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>want to tell us about, I guess how that fell

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>apart and the consequences of that. Basically what ends up

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>happening is that like there was this moment of our ascent,

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>because I would identify myself as being definitely like part

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of these uh, the this general of you. I mean,

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I came I hopped aboard a lot later with like

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Occupy Wall Street, but a lot of the kind of

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>explosion of movements that happened around the world in again

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>not always right. It started with the Arab Spring, which

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>started with somebody seeing themselves on fire in Tunisia and

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>like you know, and then that spreads to um other

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>countries in the Middle East and um, you know, protest

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>against dictatorships and so on. But it starts getting kind

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of like transported beyond its initial Middle Eastern context. And

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of people don't know is that the uh,

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the Occupy Wall Street movement in North America and like

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>other movements that you know, some of them were called

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>occupy some of them, I'm one of them was my

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Don in Ukraine as a matter of fact, um, and

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>other like you know, the the Hong Kong, the the

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the umbrella movements, yeah, the and all these kind of

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>movements that that proceeded from after twenty eleven. A lot

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of them were basically in a single kind of wave,

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a protracted wave of copycat movements. Uh that we're trying

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to adopt the same kind of tactics of like occupying

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>public squares, uh, declaring them basically autonomous and doing like

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>direct democracy in those squares, modeling the kind of society

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that they that people wanted to create, um, you know,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in this moment where it seemed like you could have

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>these direct democratic, uh sorts of movements the the end.

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>In the US, there's like a direct line of succession

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>from like Occupy Wall Street through to like Black Lives

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Matter through to like the anti pipeline Indigenous protests. There's

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like shared movement experience, a lot of

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the same people showing up to it or teaching the

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>next generation UM in those movements. And I think this

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is something I mean, uh, it's difficult to find like

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>sources on this, but I mean, y'all are involved in

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>social movements. I think that that's like a rough that's

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>roughly a description of of what's happened, right unless unless

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we're crazy. Yeah, I think, you know, I think I

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>guess what you call the last wave that is occupied

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>ice In Yeah, yeah, you know, like I remember, like

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that was the sort of mix of I guess two crowds.

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>One is you know, I mean, like I remember it

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>was a bunch of you know, people who'd been an

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>occupy and then also it was a lot of people

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>who radicalized essentially about Trump. Yeah, there was there was

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big new wave of people, yeah, around around

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>just sixteen and that, you know, and I guess I

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>guess the other thing that that that's going on through

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>this period is the the the ascension of consession of

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the right and the return also not just of you know,

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>not just a sort of the fascist right, but of

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Leninism and social democracy as well. Yeah. Um lapped around

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>like when Bernie Sanders was getting more popular. Yeah, yeah,

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think I think there's there's you know,

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of there's like two threats there. There

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>there's the sort of Bernie Sanders thread, and then there's

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the rise of the rise of the tankies,

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>which has to do with Syria and has to do

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>with sort of this backlash against the justin eleven revolutions

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know, like some some of that backlash turns

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>into like just you know, like aired ones like hard

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>right bobbing. It's never like not a right wing but

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like air to wance turn into just like fire bombing

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>cities and um and literally barrel bombing, you know, the

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>peaceful protests stuff. Um can overthrow governments if the government

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is not willing to bomb and shoot people who gather

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>on mass in the central Square because they're afraid of

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>what the world response would be if they did start

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>doing that. But you know when Bashar Alasad did that

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in Syria against the Democratic opposition movements, Um, you know,

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that basically sent the signal nothing, I mean nothing happened

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to us side, right, So that basically sent the signal

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that like oh he had a stress of years. But yeah, yeah,

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>right right, yeah, like like you can you can just

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>shoot people and bomb them and like it. And that

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>basically defanged the kind of central tactic that a lot

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of these movements were trying to do, which is to

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>have like large numbers of people do nonviolent civil disobedience

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and then through those like direct actions, cultivate this culture

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of like direct democracy in the hopes that, um, you know,

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the assemblies that are created in that space could in

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>some way become the germ of the organs that could

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>run society, or at least that's like when it's taken

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to its logical conclusion. Because usually people who are involved

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in this, they get involved in it, they think the

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>assembly stuff is really cool, they start learning more about it,

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>they get radicalized by being in the assembly because like

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're in a direct democratic something you're actually making

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the decisions like together, and then you come to an

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>agreement and you execute the decision. You start asking yourself

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>like why can't we do everything like this? Um? And

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>then um, you know all that that's what directs a

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in this kind of anarchistic direction. But yeah,

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why these movements starts to decline

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is because they get smashed um the But I think

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that there's always this other thing going on, which and

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how y'all felt about this, like reading it,

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>like you know, there's there was this kind of both

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>like an external critique at first from people like you know,

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Boskar Sencrove, Jacobin and things like that, but then also

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like this increasingly over the years in the last half

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of the internal critiques of anarchism coming from anarchists themselves.

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Are people in this general kind of you libertarian socialism

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about how like anarchists didn't have solutions to the

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>most pressing crises in the twenty century. Like if you like,

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if you guys had to say, I know it's like

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of pretentious, but like, what is the most pressing

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>crisis of the century, What are like the top three

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>just off the top of your heads without thinking, what

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>would you list if you have to list three, two

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or three separate things? Climate change, creeping authoritarianism, and rampant

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>disinformation about basic facts of reality. Sweet? Okay, so let's

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>tackle each one of those, right, Like, what's what's an

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>anarchist got to say about climate change? Well? Okay, disrupt

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the pipelines, like you know, do uh, Like, you can't

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>have infinite growth on a finite planet, so you have

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to have like, you know, we we have all the slogans, right,

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've all heard them like a million times. Yeah,

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you have the diagnoses of the problem. But yeah, yeah,

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>But then like, okay, so how are we going to

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 1>like you know, I guess we're gonna build some co

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>ops and then the co ops are gonna democratized per

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>auction and then we can do d growth somehow, but

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>like also disrupting existing production. But there's like a missing

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>step here, right, because like, you know, the reason why

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we have all this production in certain ways, because the

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>entire economy depends on it's been set up that way. Uh.

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So you implied in the idea that we're going to

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>do de growth somehows that we need some way of

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>constructing a different economy, and how do you construct a

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>different economy right through some kind of planning? So really

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the question is like how do you do economic planning? Uh?

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Second one, um, I got a skip creeping authoritarianism for now,

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>because that's actually like feeding into the more the ending

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of the essay. But the but the other one, right, disinformation?

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Another great question, right, like what do you do with

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 1>social media? Like? Okay, again, anarchists talked in general a

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>lot about like, okay, we're gonna democratize all the companies

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>because we're democratizing everything. We're democratizing neighborhoods or democratizing cities.

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of the same thing, turning everything into

0:18:55.040 --> 0:19:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like a radical direct democracy. Okay, but if we're going

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to have social media, first of all, should we like

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>was it a mistake to invent a centralized system instead

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of the more decentralized internet that created that existed before

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>social media? Right? That's kind of an interesting question. But

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>then assuming that we do, how do we restructure it?

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Not just in terms of how it's managed, but like, okay,

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we have the democracy of Facebook or whatever, and let's

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>say that we're the workers at Facebook, what do we do, Like,

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>how do we structure it so that it's not a

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>giant misinformation engine? Right? Like once once you actually have

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>like the responsibility and the power of being in the saddle,

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>which is what we spend so much of our time

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of just trying to do. You have to actually

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>make decisions about what to do. And honestly, there aren't

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>that many. I mean, what do you what do you

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>do with with the within with the utility like that? Like,

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, who ought to be in control of the

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>utility like that? Is it really just the workers of Facebook?

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Aren't all the people who are users of it? Don't

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>they have a right to be making decisions about it too?

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And is it just an American institution just because it's

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>an American LLC? Or is it like a global institution

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>because everybody on the planets on it? Um is there?

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, are are there ways that it could be reconfigured,

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>like fundamentally in terms of how users use it that

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>would change the experience in some way to actually make it, uh,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>make you less liable to misinformation. But on the other hand,

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>if you try to manipulate people in order to UM

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, not see something that's going to be misinformation,

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>isn't that well, you know, like censorship or or or

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>some other thing that we generally would oppose, right, like

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the tool of centralized social control. So they like, these

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>are really deep questions, and again this is generally a

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of silence, and of course, you know in that case,

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>there's silence from the social democrats too, and there's silence

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>from the Leninist I mean, well, the Lennis just kind

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of fantasize about turning Facebook into the tool of the

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>central party state uses in order to crush dissent forever

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But you know, social democrats are like less

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>nationalized Facebook, and it's like, you know, yeah, sure we could,

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we could do that. And then you know the n

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>S s A owns on Facebook. I'm sure that that's

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a that's a better scenario. Yeah. I mean, I tend

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>to think somewhat differently about what it means to have

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>an anarchist solution to those problems. Like, for example, I

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't see anarchists or social democrats or Leninists

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>having any kind of stopping climate change solution um, because

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't realistically see the organizing potential um

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>capable of actually stopping what's going on in any kind

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of reasonable time frame. And I certainly don't think that

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the existing you know, neoliberal structures or the authoritarian structures

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that exist in you know, other countries or in this

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>country are going to stop it either. So when I

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>think about solutions to climate change from an anarchist perspective,

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think about how can anarchist organizing help people deal

0:21:55.760 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>with the consequences of climate change, And I see to

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>see the potential for actually like mitigating climate change coming

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>more from there's as the consequences of this become more

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>dire to people, if anarchists are better, are good at

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>providing relief and helping people and organizing through that, and

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>eventually there's some potential to actually get people organized to

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>stop the causes of the problem. But um, I just don't.

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an optimist of about our ability to stop

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the worst of it at this point, um especially not

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>after the most recent I p c C report. And

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm kind of in the same boat when

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to disinformation, um I. And this is not

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>just like anarchists, I feel like lack as you've stated,

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>at a like a good idea about like what do

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>we do with Facebook, what we do with you do,

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what do we do with the way all of these

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>things are set up in the harms that they do

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>at scale. Um, Nobody and I include the people currently

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in charge, has any real good ideas for that, because

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>they they haven't. Like I've been working in this space

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time, I've I've spent a lot

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>of time talking with and debating with a lot of

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the folks who are leading minds kind of in the

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>fight against disinformation, and I just don't feel like there's

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>any sort of solution that is an immediate term solution

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>because so many the problem is so advanced as it is,

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>so as I guess that's kind of like where I

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>land on a lot of this stuff is we certainly

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>need to be thinking about solutions, but I kind of like,

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's less likely that there's going to be

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like you were you were saying, the kind of debate

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is between is there some way of like reforming or

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>fixing making Facebook more democratic, or is it just we

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>need to decide that maybe we don't have some of

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. And I tend to land towards that that like, well,

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the solution is going to be maybe maybe

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's a bad idea, maybe we should maybe we shouldn't

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.479
<v Speaker 1>have There's aspects of it that are necessary, obviously, and

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I think aspects of things like Telegram and Twitter that

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>are useful, But um, I I think the they're also

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally tied to the algorithms that drive them, which is

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>also what drives so much of the toxic aspects that

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're divorcing the medium from the algorithm,

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about something that is very different and longer

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>than media. It's longer than media. It's it's so radically

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>different that it's just it's it's not even useful to

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>compare them. It's like it's like it's like comparing Discord

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook. It's like they're not they don't operate the

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>same way. That's the Yeah, that's exactly kind of where

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I where I tend to be on on that. And

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I know that's not like I I to the extent

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that like, uh, that's pessimistic. I guess I am kind

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:51.199
<v Speaker 1>of pessimistic about anarchisms ability to stop the worst of

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>things that's happening. Where I kind of look at myself

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>as an optimistic anarchist is in the I believe anarchism

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>offers solutions when these things go as badly as they're

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>going to do in a way that you know, the

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>present systems or you know, more authoritarian systems that people

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>propose can't solve the worst consequences of these problems as

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. That's that's kind of where I feel like

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>it is can feel a lot simpler to default to

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>like the dual power framework of a lot of these things,

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise the problems are so complex that you cannot

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>approach them from from from every angle, because you really

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>do need to simplify and condense them and collapse them

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>into something that is more simplified, which often results in

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>like a dual power kind of framework for what you

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>actually start doing. Yeah, and I think you have to.

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're an insurrectionist, if you're a revolutionary,

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it you're an anarchist or or you know, a

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Leninist or whatever, you have to be looking at what's

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>actually happening in Ukraine right now and recognize that, all right, Well,

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to what extent do you think you're going to be

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>able to organize people in such a way that allows

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>them to deal with thermobaric weapons. You know, in what

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>way are you going to organize people that allows them

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to effectively resist cluster musician munitions? Um And I think

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that when you kind of look at it that way,

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>which is what it would take to overthrow any of

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the large hegemonic powers in the world right now, a

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>much more realistic set of solutions is, all right, well,

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>let's work on building power by building organizations and communities

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>that are capable of taking care of themselves in the

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>holes that these powers are increasingly going to be experiencing

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>because because they too are crumbling. And that's much smarter

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>than being like, all right, well, I'm gonna try to

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 1>get a bunch of my friends with rifles and and

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>arm up a couple of drones and and go up

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>against you know, people who have access to m l

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>r s, you know, weapons systems and whatnot. Yeah. No,

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a really great point. Um I.

0:26:55.840 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>The way that I would think about it is the

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>starting with the big picture problems is a bit misleading, because,

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as you said, like nobody, it's quite like that nobody

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>has solutions to these problems. Certainly the social Democrats. Yeah,

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I say this is somebody who's like

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>half a social Democrat by temperament. Um. It would be

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>really nice if we like did it a little social

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>democratic government and they swooped in and you know, did

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>like new deal stuff. I like new deal stuff. I

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like w p A stuff as much as the next. Uh.

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, um person who likes arts programs and infrastructure development. Well,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, some infrastructure development, not others. Right, the war,

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the war complex we can do a little without. But

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the thing about it is those big problems.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 1>You're right, it looks like there's not going to be

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>like a big solution, uh, and that we're going to

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to cope with the consequences of of it,

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>at least at first. Even coping this is this is

0:27:57.520 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of where I think the real kind of substance

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of of of the problem that libertarian socialist are facing

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>right now. Even coping would require a greater level of

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>organization than we have proven able to muster up to now.

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Not because the methods that we choose don't work. Because

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in fact, as you point out, and as I actually

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>really want to forcefully argue, and because because we do

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in the end of the essay, like authoritarian methods don't

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>work and can't work for a lot of the specific

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>problems that we face, uh, and history shows that very definitively.

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>But um, there is also a serious way in which

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>even kind of developing these like you know, local highly

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>like you know, rooted in a community, uh like direct

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:48.479
<v Speaker 1>democratic institutions that control real resources, scaling that up to

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the point where it actually could start replacing some of

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the gaps left behind by uh you know, U states

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and capitalist firms that are too dysfunctional or too focused

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>on their own goals to to to to meet those

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>needs that would actually require us to be able, for example,

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to know how to build up a cooperative sector in

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a city, or how to kind of like network the

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>tennis unions that already exist, you know, across different uh

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, regions, maybe even across like a continent, and

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>then construct like the way in which they self manage

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>each other or or not each other self managed together

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the the larger group or it would

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>require and you know, there's a lot of people working

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on these problems, but sometimes there is a kind of

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>like you know, you'll you'll see this like obstacle in

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the road, because, for example, like what do you do

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>when the it might not even be the state properly speaking, right,

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it might be like a posse that's funded by some

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>rich billionaire asshole who's got like his uh, you know,

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>his notion that some people are just better than others

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and that you should institute the dictatorship of the tech

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>bros um, you know, and then that billionaire funding a

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>bunch of people who have got now like you know,

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>some industrial access to industrial infrastructure, and they don't like

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you're doing your d I Y like

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, commune or whatever stuff in there on their turf.

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>So how do you fight back against that? I mean,

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>some of it you can fight back against that kind

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of our current level of capacity, but some of it

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>does kind of require us to start thinking like, well,

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you build up financial independence?

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>What like, how do you build up the kind of

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>independence where it's like, if we get kicked off of

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the capitalist uh social media, for example, which is a

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>great deal of what we use for fundraising, what kind

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of institutions could we create that would be like alternatives, um,

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that are not like the ones that the Nazis created

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>when there was a purge of some of them that

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>gab like highly dysfunctional, Like you know, it didn't even

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>work for them. Uh not that I mean I'm happy

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>about that, but like you know, my point is, like

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the same thing could happen to us, So what would

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we do? Um the like they're there are all these

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things that are more little picture questions in

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a way, but they scale up relatively quickly to at

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>least like medium sized questions where we need this kind

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of like um these these because because part of what

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it is is also that like it's not that these

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>questions are impossible, it's that they're kind of neglected. And

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>there's um there, there's these uh the thinkers like Christian Williams,

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>who is an anarchist from the Pacific Northwest, who wrote

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a pamphlet about this called Wither Anarchism. And there was

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>another pamphlet, uh an essay and CounterPunch by a person

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>named Gabrielle Coon who's an autonomous Marxist basically like a

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>libertarian Marxist Marxist anarchist type um called what Happened to

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the Anarchist Century? And both of those essays which I

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend that people read. They may they make points

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>basically like this, you know, like where where the focus

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>on how to construct those institutions and the nitty gritty

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of how to do that has kind of receded from

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>anarchism um as it's actually proud actist uh init Like

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>so there's like a rhetoric of revolutionary transformation, but not

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>always the attention to the nitty gritty of how you

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>actually can like build resilient institutions that actually like carry

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that through which you know, a hundred years ago people

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about like the one big union and the general strike,

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's kind of like, um, well a it didn't

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>work in exactly the way that they were thinking it.

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>What even in the most successful revolutions like in Spain

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and b it was also like the there's there's there's

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a certain way in which our tensions are focused on

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>other things. And it's not that those things are bad,

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just that like there's been this kind of neglect

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of the question of large scale organization and how you

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>do coordination, like you know, in order to tackle problems

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that are kind of like at the scale that that

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about before. UM and so Basically the

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>argument of the essay is that in the absence of that,

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like for the socialist movement that emerged after turned away

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>from NEO because I'm thinking basically that it had no solutions,

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think it's true either, but it's like,

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, like rather it was true in the moment,

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't have to be true, but it was true,

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>but enough people thought that it was that they turned

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to like the social democratic route. But with the failure

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of Corbin and Bernie that kind of burned a lot

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of people out too, and a lot of what is

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's coming up now, and I'm wondering, I

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>wonder what you guys think of this, Like a lot

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the people that we see showing up in movement spaces,

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>who we see kind of like getting politically activated for

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the first time or whatever, a lot of those people

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>are really interested in Leninism and on specifically, because I

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I don't know how true that is. That's

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>at least that's that's that that that part is not

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>true at least at least at least here in Portland. Portland.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Yet no other, no other part of the country is

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>like Portland other than maybe Eugene, Like, Okay, that's that's fairy.

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Like Portland. Portland is a big enough anarchist city that

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>there are entire decade long like like into anarchist wars

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that no one else in the US has ever heard

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of that are like the most important thing that's ever

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 1>happened in Portland's Oh boy, welcome to the Green Red.

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Let me tell you, Chris, you have just piste off

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty people who could not explain to you if you

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>gave them a year, could not explain to you why

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>they're angry. And I mean, I mean to to be

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, like I I am an anarchist in Chicago.

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:29.919
<v Speaker 1>When the first time I introduced too of my Twitter

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>mutual together, they almost got a fist fight. So like

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that make yeah, that's that completely scans Even with like

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>d s A stuff, I feel like there's there was

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>at least was a trend a little bit to stay

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>away from some of the more Russia Communist kind of

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like types of aesthetics and ideas because it is a

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>turn off for so many people and it does encourage

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>us and it has like encouraging forefront a form of

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>authoritarianism that maybe is not great. Yeah, I don't know,

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I've seen sort of both friends of walking. So

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I think the last like a year has been very

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>different than I think the previous five. I've seen it

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, but I don't know how much it expands

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>into as I think. I think it's like I saw

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>lot ex happens in the d s A is that

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the Leninists essentially took over the International Committee and they

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>had this kind of delicious division label inside the d

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>s A where like you have like you have a

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>part of the d s A that's essentially a social

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>democratic machine, and then you have the International Committee, which

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>is which is the foreign policy wing essentially run by

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>by essentially run by by the Leninists. And I think

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I think I saw it there. And

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I think I saw a lot of

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen even from people who are ordinarily not Stalinist,

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 1>is what you know, part of what was talking about

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this is the sort of like climate Stalinism or like

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>climate house Off like that that is a huge problem

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that you know. I mean, I think I think part

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of it also just has to do with the fact

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that people don't like Okay, so like we we have

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>actually existing, uh, climate leninism, like we have it. It's

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's China, like the CCP changed, it's

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>literally changed. State ideology in in in the mid two

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand tends, as you know, as an attempt to deal

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to deal with with within with pollution climate change. It

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>did nothing. Like they pressed every pricey it doesn't it

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't like it didn't work. Yeah, yeah, I mean they

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 1>did carbon markets, they did. They literally just banned coal

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and entire provinces and it didn't work. They they change

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>your contravaluations. I I problem people. Yeah, Like La Late

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>lays this out specifically with China to an excruciating degree,

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like like in detail. If you're really interested in this

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.760
<v Speaker 1>type of like climate left authoritarianism. They call it climate

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Mound the book, but you can call it climate climate Leninism,

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:00.879
<v Speaker 1>you can call it whatever. But they they lay out

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>how it could work and how use cases of it

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>have not worked, um to a pretty pretty intense degree.

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're interested in that, I would recommend reading the book.

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Climate Leviathan definitely influenced a large portion of the writing

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 1>for this show. Yeah, And I mean to your point,

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that this is the only trend I do.

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you that out of like the conjuncture,

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>there was this um I I think that a lot

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of the more like establishment reformist aspects of the movement

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>were discredited and that pushed people in different radical directions,

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>like one of which very much is anarchism and libertarian socialism.

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I am seeing a lot more faces that are interested

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>in in in those questions for sure. Uh. And that's

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of counter to the trend that I was describing

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>from the last like five years of like you know,

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>people becoming more disinterested because of the real or perceived

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>lack of solutions. However, I do think that it's important,

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is kind of following on Chris's climate Leninism

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.280
<v Speaker 1>point to understand that there's at least a counter trend

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of people are have not only moved

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:05.439
<v Speaker 1>away from libertarian socialism, have not only moved, but they've

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.760
<v Speaker 1>also moved away from democratic socialism. And if you follow

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that pattern, which is a pattern that I at least

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.320
<v Speaker 1>have seen within the d s A, within various trade unions,

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of among a lot of like intelligencia

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>type people like journalists, professors, blah blah. You see a

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:24.839
<v Speaker 1>very common set of arguments. And I think it's very

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>clear that as the century proceeds and the crises get

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.359
<v Speaker 1>worse and start killing like even larger numbers of people

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>than they already are, we're going to see this argument

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot more. Um and and the argument is something

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like this. I mean, there's a quote from a tweet.

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh and And you know, one could argue that the

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>tweet doesn't matter, but you are naive if you think

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>this is the tweet climate You are naive if you

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>think climate change can ever be solved without an authoritarian

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>government at this point. That's and that's that's the whole thing.

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's a nasty little tweet because it's ambiguous, right,

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it has this like shocking and scandalous effects. You know,

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we need authoritarianism to to to solve climate change, the

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>scandalous you know, bougeois or whatever. But then it's like, okay, wait,

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but what do you mean by authoritarian? Am I just

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 1>being hysterical reacity. It's the same as saying you're naive

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:22.800
<v Speaker 1>if you think that, um, climate change can be solved

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>without nuclear power, or climate change can be solved without

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>really big hammers, Like, we have authoritarian governments, we have

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 1>nuclear power, we have really big hammers, and climate change

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>does not be solved been solved. Is it possible that

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>any of those things might be a part of a

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 1>theoretical solution that may happen someday. Yes, but it hasn't.

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>And there's like, if you're trying to say that authoritarian

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>governments are better at dealing with climate change than the

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.839
<v Speaker 1>governments that currently dominate number one, hell of a lot

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>of authoritarian governments are responsible for our current situation, are

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>climate change. Number two, the Soviet Union, which I suspect

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>most of these people's see as a guiding light. Horrible

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for the environment, turned the largest body of water in

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Eurasia into a poison lake. Yes, not not good at

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the environment, you know. And here's here's what's interesting about

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing to me. The other thing that it's doing

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is kind of signaling that it's like patently ridiculous to

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>oppose this idea without specifying what the idea is like

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 1>and like, in other words, authoritarianism, like but like, I mean,

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>let's let's be blunt, right. What they're implying as a

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Leninist is the one party state, the secret police, press

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:39.400
<v Speaker 1>censorship in the command economy. So does that help you

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>fight climate cheese? That's actually an interesting and a kind

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of like you know, distant five thousand foot view, you know,

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>from the god's eye view or whatever, like, uh, the

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting technical question. Do these institutions actually help

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>or hinder a response? But we're not even having that

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>conversation because instead it's this kind of underhanded attempt to

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>get you to think that. So again, does a tweet matter? Well,

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I think a tweet matters if it comes from a

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>member of the National Political Committee of the d s A,

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>because at least ostensibly if d s A is, which

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 1>is who the person who did that tweet? Because at

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>least ostensibly if d s A is a mass movement

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>as it purports to be the mass movement of socialists

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and you know, and and the National

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Political Committee is ostensibly the leadership of the d s

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 1>which I personally don't believe, but that's certainly how they

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 1>think of themselves. Um, then this indicates that the largest

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.359
<v Speaker 1>most important socialist mass movement in the US, at least

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>self branded UH has people in its leadership who believe

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that the secret police might help in addressing climate change.

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting thing and it's also very disturbing. And

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the thing is this, this person is not actually like important,

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a symptom because this is something that's happening across

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the board. And a more intellectually serious version of this

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>argument was put forward by the Arxist intellectual and historian

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 1>um a professor of human ecology called Andreas mom And

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>people who are really into like Marx Nerds stuff will

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>probably have heard, Yeah, what a very good book called

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Fossil Capital. Everything he's written after Fossil Capital is a disaster.

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I like some of the sabotage. It's it's I mean,

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a little romantic and impractical. He wrote an ethical

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 1>discourse instead of a thing about like the risk of

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>eco sabotage, which is the actual important part of the

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>degree to which it can matter because eco sabotage. There's

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this idea on the left that like, what we need

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to do is be targeting fossil fuel infrastructure. And again

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like what it's it's like what that ds A

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>dude said, like, yeah, that could theoretically be a part

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of but as if it's like nine dudes who do

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it and then they go to prison or get shot. Well,

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't really fix climate change. I think the book,

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the book A Ministry for the Future really lays out

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>all of the all kind of like the best case

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>scenario for all these types of things and how they

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>can work together to overall trend in this direction. Because yeah,

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that type of like eco sabotage in conjunction with other

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like political effects can be impactful on what things happen.

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's can won't necessarily be you know, it's not

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not as simple as we would like it to be,

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, it's it turns out a complex world has

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 1>complex consequences and complex and and I think I think

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>this is you know the trend that Mom was on,

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the trend on that you know, there's there's a big

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>environmental authoritarian like thing among among liberals. This is a

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>huge thing. In political science was a big thing, and

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in ecological studies that was essentially making a similar argument

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to to I'm almost making this like, well, okay, you

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 1>need some kind of air quotes vague authoritarianism to deal

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to climate change, and you know, it's it's it's it's

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 1>basically this this attempt. There's like these people have seen

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>climate change, but they have no actual solution to it,

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>so they wave their hands and pretend that like this,

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the state is going to descend from

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this guy and save them, and it's not. And I

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's you know, I think I think we're we're

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of I don't know, I think as we just

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess kind of wrap this up because we unfortunately

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:24.239
<v Speaker 1>they're running out of time. But you know, this like

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>this exact moment like like these like few weeks are

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this moment of incredible like rupture on the left right,

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:30.840
<v Speaker 1>because we we have we've had we've had in some

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>way social democrats be discredited by the fact that like

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Corbin and Sanders both lost right their political project has

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>been discredited. Um, we've had a serious sort of anexist failures.

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, and in the last couple of weeks, right,

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it was all of the sort of big state like

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>authoritarian people like tied themselves to a bunch of imperialists

0:44:47.920 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and you know, May staked their whole entire politics off

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of them being the anti imperialist class. And then you know,

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:56.479
<v Speaker 1>the state, who's like a bunch of their press, people

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>like literally work for right and who who they've been

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>arguing like is is the contramperist powers does imperialism? And

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>so like, Yeah, I think we have this moment where

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 1>everything is in chaos in which we have to be

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the ones that that that have solutions or have or

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have the tools to build them. And I think that's

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 1>why that's why this project is important, because that's that's

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>something that we need in this exact moment. Yeah, I

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's a tremendous value in being humble about seeking

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:33.279
<v Speaker 1>out solutions to these questions and not doing what so

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>many do on the left and pretend that their tendency

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:38.240
<v Speaker 1>has an absolute answer, because all we have is theories.

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I know that to a point of

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 1>certainty is that no one has solved any of these

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 1>problems yet absolutely, And and so there is a tremendous

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>degree of humility that people need to have in terms

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of like, all right, well, we are attempting to arrive

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>at the conclusions that can lead us to a better world,

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to we are trying to force through this

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 1>thing we know will work. Um, because you don't, you know,

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:05.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Marxist leninist, and you think that we

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>need climate MAU, you don't know that that will work

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 1>because it hasn't yet. And if you're an anarchist who

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 1>thinks the solution is bombing as many oil refineries as

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you possibly can, well, you don't know that you're ever

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>going to get enough people on board for that to

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>mean anything. Um. And I think that there's the conversations

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>that we need to be having. I think it's it's

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 1>important to see them as conversations as opposed to polemics

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:33.320
<v Speaker 1>aimed at just getting people in line behind this shining

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 1>vision of a of a clear set of steps. Um.

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 1>It's important to envision the end goal. I say that

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot. You know, we need to be looking and

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and accepting the possibility of a better future, but it's

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:46.759
<v Speaker 1>important not to be dogmatic about the road to get

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 1>there because nobody, nobody really has a clear idea of

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 1>what that looks like. Yeah, So the piece ends up,

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and if you want to see the ending of it,

0:46:56.680 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 1>it'll it'll be up in um in sometime in the

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>next couple of weeks. But the basic gist of where

0:47:02.000 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it goes is precisely to the practical question, right, Instead

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of like making these like polemical arguments that are rooted

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>more in like kind of like what tribe you've decided

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to identify with within the broad family of socialism than

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in like actually trying to like solve problems for the

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>people around you, right, or help contribute to the solutions.

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Like it's actually what we want to ask is like,

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:31.399
<v Speaker 1>if we have like the giant ecological crisis, Uh, how

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 1>do you how do you actually do it? Is it

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>by trying to force people from the top down to

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:38.160
<v Speaker 1>do it as Um under his momb kind of draws

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>on the failed uh policies of war communism as and

0:47:41.280 --> 0:47:45.160
<v Speaker 1>inspiration for that. Or is it potentially by having like

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:49.120
<v Speaker 1>democrats democratized institutions that incentivize people with carrots instead of sticks,

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Like Naomi Klein basically uncovered a want of her journalism

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 1>and this changes everything. So this is kind of like

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the debate that we have to start having in order

0:47:58.040 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to be able to together formulate the kinds of solutions. Yeah, alright,

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 1>well I think that's gonna do it for for us today. Um,

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>what do we what do we we do? You got

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys gotta gotta gotta plug You want to throw up,

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>throw up before we roll out. Yeah, if if you

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 1>want to follow us at at Strange Underscore Matters UM

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. UM. We also have a Facebook and you

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 1>can read our articles at Strange Matters dot co op,

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 1>which is our website. Uh and if anything that you

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:38.359
<v Speaker 1>read there that you've heard here inspires you at all,

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:40.399
<v Speaker 1>please consider donating. We're going to be in the next

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:43.759
<v Speaker 1>month raising money uh for for the magazine and we

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:46.400
<v Speaker 1>want to pare writers above market rate because we think

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 1>market rates too low. So but in order to actually

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 1>do that, and none of the money is going to

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the editors from the fundraisers, so if if, if we're

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to do that, we've got to

0:48:54.520 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>meet our fundraising target. All right, Well support them and um,

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, figure out how to save the world. It's

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it's up to you. And I'm speaking to exactly one

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 1>person right now and no one else, but I'm not

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:15.799
<v Speaker 1>going to be more specific. It could happen here as

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a production of cool Zone Media. Well more podcasts from

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>cool Zone Media. Visit our website cool zone Media dot

0:49:21.280 --> 0:49:23.359
<v Speaker 1>com or check us out on the I Heart Radio app,

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:29.440
<v Speaker 1>find sources for it could happen here. Updated monthly at

0:49:29.480 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>cool Zone Media dot com slash Sources. Thanks for listening.