WEBVTT - Mini Crush #50

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, welcome to Movie Crush. It's Chuck Brian here

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>next to Noel Brown. Sounds so pleasant today, Chuck, Mr

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Noel Brown, Mr Chuck Bryant, as I live and breathe,

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't just realized, Noel As we didn't sing it

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>all in that last episode. Is that a thing we

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>have to sing in every episode? And you have to

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>mock me for being a Harry Potter fan? Wait, well no,

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and poke at my hole. We don't. We don't always sing,

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we talked about this. It seems like

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we end up singing a lot sometimes for no reason.

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>You just have to sing. It comes from the heart.

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I love that that. I introduced you to the Dance

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Movie a few weeks ago. Yeah, the Dance Movie. Is

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it like is it like a drum line movie? Is

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.559
<v Speaker 1>it like one of those man see a dance movie,

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>knol see footloose? For God's sakes? Is it like like

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>one of those movies from the twenties with the big

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>cakes and stuff and everyone's yeah, it's a big cake.

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>That is you know what I'm talking about? Shock? Yeah, Well,

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the Coen Brothers got to um sort of duplicate that

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Inhale Caesar Scarlet dance. That must have been so much

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>fun to yeh. You know, have you seen Ballad of

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Buster Scrugs yet? By the way, well, my friend that

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is on stream this in this very episode, so save it. Okay,

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I love that. Have you seen it? Yes? Several times? Well,

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do a little mini crushed judgment then, alright,

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Social studies is what we're gonna start out with, though,

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone social movie. I asked you all a few weeks

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ago if you could ask your favorite actor any one question,

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>what would that be? And here would go with DC Hoover,

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>good one, he says, I would ask Matt Damon why

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>he never wrote another script after Good Will Hunting. You

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>know what, I have a theory about that because you

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 1>know who has written other scripts? Ben Ben? So you

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>think Ben was the main writer? Ben was was the

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>guy has been written other scripts? Did he write some

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of them? Wrote the Town Dude? Okay? I didn't know.

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I knew he directed, I didn't. Maybe maybe I'm right.

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And I thought he wrote Gone, Baby Gone as well.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought that that was adapted, wasn't it wasn't that

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 1>based on a book. I'm wrong. I'm pretty sure he

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>wrote The Town though. Okay, well, why don't you type

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>your little fingers over there into Mr ben Afflecks holes

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>find out how he has them plugged? What it's going on?

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>God's so base? Um, yeah, that's a good question. Why

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 1>would he never write another script he's in DC. Hoover

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>says this. I don't know if it's uncool to like

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>that script or film, but I think it's great. No,

0:02:57.960 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I think good Will Hunting is wonderful. Yeah, dude. He

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>wrote the screenplay for Gone Baby, Gone. Um. He wrote

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the screenplay for The Town. Wow, they were both good.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>They were both Another one called Live by Night or

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Live by Night, Well, that's the one. Like, he had

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a really stellar directing and writing thing going until Live

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>by Night. Yeah, it wasn't good. I didn't even see it,

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but it got paanned. He also wrote a screenplay for

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a Batman movie that didn't get made. I seem to

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>remember that floating around when he became Batman for right

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like him as Batman. No, but I'm serious, dude, I

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>think Matt Damon maybe not the writer. Well he may have.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's lots of different ways to collaborate. He

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>made not to put finger to keys. Well, there's there's

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it's funny too, because the joke used to be that

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>ben Affleck was the big dumb bro and then Damon

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>was probably like the brains behind the operation. But seeing

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>some of ben Affleck's direct directing works, he's got some chops. Yeah,

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe Damon's the dummy. Dummy remember how they up to

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>be the are They portrayed him in that Team American

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>movie where it's like that damn Yeah, yeah, it's like that,

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>like those guys, I'm staying behind them. Yeah, me too.

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Good to Hunting is great and it turned me on

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.839
<v Speaker 1>to Elliott Smith the first time. Really, that was where

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you got it? Huh miss misery? Yeah, so good alright,

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>p Jacob stubble Field, says Hugh Jackman. I would not

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>ask him a question, per se. I would thank him

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>for being the perfect Wolverine for so many years and

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>always keeping the integrity of the character. That's wonderful, especially

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in that really really gritty one the last Logan. That

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>was great. What a movie. I really enjoyed that. That

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>girls fucking fantastic, all of it. Everything about that, just

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the way the arc choice for like such an iconic character,

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:50.119
<v Speaker 1>because it was so man just dusty and sad and

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and just like violent in the most nihilistic way kind of.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I thought it was great well, and especially

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time where super heroes are eventually just replaced

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and like, well we got any Spider Man or now

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we got a new uh Fantastic Four or whatever. There's

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>no like to sinnamentality like or arc of a character.

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Like with Logan. They're not just gonna replace I much,

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and they will at some point at some point, but

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they have given this character sort of an end. We

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>still need to grieve, Chuck Public needs to grieve, and

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>then they'll drop in some new hotshot to be woltering.

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But maybe we'll do a good job and that'll all

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be in service of the work that Hugh Jackman did

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>for the character. Whoever they get has to be damn

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>good boy man. I would not want to take over

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>like Heath Ledger doing the Joker. You know, he had

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>some serious hues to fill and he and he did

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>a good job. He did. Uh. Andy Kepler, says John

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Goodman was the oh you're just this is right up

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>my alley. Buddy was the fire at the end of

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Barton Fink real or part of the main character's imagination.

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you see Barton Fink? Yeah, I'm that that's sort

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of a spoiler, right there, isn't it? Uh not really?

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's there's a fire towards the end of

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the movie. Kind that's true. We don't have to get

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>too into it, um, but there's a lot of like

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>ambiguity about what we're gonna going to discuss it. You know,

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to spoiler alert this a little bit. This

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't John Goodman's character spoiler alert for Barton Fink movie

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>that's twenty years old at this point. Isn't John Goodman's

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>character kind of the devil? Is that the point is

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that maybe it's it is all in his imagination, that

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>this kind of like neurotic don't know writer that's like

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>freaking out about this deadline, right, And there's this neighbor

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 1>in the hotel is who he turns out to be

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a serial killer, right, But it's not the devil. But

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>they're definitely like super fire is meant to be supernatural? Yeah,

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's not like it it showed like a fire

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>started somehow. It's just it's spontaneous emanating from this to

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>which one is what I'm saying, and as he ran

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>down the hall of the fire spread with him. I

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I think it's just sort of that stylized

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Coen Brothers thing for sure. But I also think there's

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>something to be said about the fact that the Barton

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>fink or Um, this is what the actre's name. John

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Dearro's character is just kind of slowly losing his mind

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and losing touch with reality and like, well, and that's

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>what John Goodman is yelling at him as he runs

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>down the hall is I'll show you the life of

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the mind. There you go. Yeah, And that's the thing too.

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the Life of the Mind it's almost like

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>adaptation right where you're experiencing this guy's creativity in him

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>going mad like in him and losing losing his mind

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of. Yeah, that's how he's using his imagination. Is

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>like instead of writing, he's kind of just like experiencing

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it all in this really visual way and working like

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>right there with him. I don't know. I like it.

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I love that movie. It's a very good movie. That's

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>one of my old faves back in college. Very good stuff.

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Jane Savage. In fact, They're gonna have my good friend

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Eddie on to talk about Barton Fink. We've already talked

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>about this. Jane Savage says, my favorite actress is Kathy Bates.

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I would ask her except maybe

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>about her roll in Six Ft Under, which is one

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite performances of hers. So wonder well that

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>show meant so much to me. Emily's favorite show ever

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>or number one mine too, Yeah, not equivocally. I was

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>watching it right when my father died, And you would

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>think that that would be like a real bummer, like

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>really heavy or like not something you would want to do,

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>but it actually gave me a lot of comfort kind

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was really interesting that I just like I

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>kept rolling with that show the whole way, like when

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it was on. You know, yeah, that's awesome. Yeah, what

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a powerful, amazing show. Kathy Bates is great. She was

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite characters. You know, she popped up

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>uh every now and then as a is. Uh. She

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a relative. Wouldn't she just a good friend of

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Patricia Clarkson? Or was she? Yeah? No, a really good friend. Okay,

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>but she was not a relative though, right, I do

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>not believe so Okay, they were just great and I

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>love seeing those two together. Patricia Clarkson is a is

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a treasure A treasure dream guest. Yeah, she's amazing, boy,

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to meet her. Cam Hoptman, says Tom Hanks.

0:08:56.400 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say after Big, how did Josh's life play out? Goodwin?

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear Tom Hanks surmised something like that. Yeah,

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it'd be fun. He does he get? Does he get

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>shrunk back? Gets shrunk back to kid's size at the end? Right?

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>He does? Uh? I would love to see a sequel

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to that? How about a big sequel. Here's a weird

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>question for you. Did they have Did they really have

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>sex or was it just like heavy petting? Well? I

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>think they really had sex as his adults, but yeah,

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was technically whatever. And how did she

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>not catch on? Like this person doesn't. That's going to

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>could happen a lot, though, you know, I don't know

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it happens to all guys. No, that's what I'm saying.

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>It's very true. But he was with like I think

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>was he ten? How old is he meant to be

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in that movie? I feel like he was like, okay,

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>well then he had some ideas. I never really I

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>mean that's so it's a weird question. I'm sorry, No,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>it's not tainted. It's a very nice movie. It's a

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>nice movie. That scene always just weirded me out a little.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And I was also I was a kid, so like

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>my kid when some people kiss on movie, she she

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>covers her eyes. When I was that age, I think

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I was really uncomfortable with that as well. For the

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>time until then, I was like sort of like, oh,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I gotta find more movies like this, you know. Uh,

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Seth Nixon says he would sit down with gen Wilder

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and say, what did you on, Cleeve? You and Cleeve

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on little talk about when you uh rode off into

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the sunset and the Cadillac at the end of Blazing Saddles. Oh,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question, Seth. You know the end of

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Blazing Saddles, they get in the Cadillac and ride off

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 1>through the desert and there it's this great long shot

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're laughing and talking to one another the tops down.

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>You can see him talking and laughing and talking laughing

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>as they drive away. He's like, what were you guys

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about? I would love to know that. You know,

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember that scene that that's That's a movie

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that I've always seen in little bits and pieces. I

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think I've seen it in one sitting, but maybe

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the funniest movie joke joke for joke, got um William

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Angus says Vincent Donofrio, I would say, I would say,

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you've played a lot of bad guys, most recently on Daredevil,

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and now you're trying to be the new Lex Luthor

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in the DC universe. I didn't know that what attracts

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you to play the bad guy? It's a good question

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>for Vincent donafrio, although he is not exclusively a bad guy,

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but he can play a good bad guy. When I'm

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking of like the one the roles that come to mind,

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the iconic kind of ones I do think tend to

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>think of the bad guys well full metal jacket. But

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:32.719
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing that that's a very ambivalent is he

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the bad guy? He becomes the bad guy, but he's

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 1>also totally like he's just a troubled kind of sad guy. Yeah,

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he's not like a villain, no, not at all. Yeah,

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>but he has played some very larger than life villains

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>like the Character and the the Cell, which whatever you

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>think about the cell we're talking about earlier. He's like

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this weird, like psychotic demon overlooking and the guy that

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:56.239
<v Speaker 1>directed that did like the Losing My Religion video Tarsis.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>It's very visually come helling movie. Yeah, yeah, I agreed

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he did. Uh. I kind of thought that was the

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>beginning of really big things for him. And I think

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>he did another movie, um that didn't do as well

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and then has not done a lot since. Alright, our

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>statman's checking it. Yeah, I'm trying to look up as

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I am to be. I mean, he's definitely he's got

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a recurring role on one of those SVU type shows. Yeah,

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>he's he's on a law and order show. Didn't like

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that all the time, So I wonder if his movie

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>career kind of took a a little bit of a

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>back seat. Interesting to be an actor on a hit show.

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, I mean that's something that's wrong with that.

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it seemed like that's a little sure prestigious,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>slightly lower because it's like, no, I agree, director of

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a movie as opposed to h on screen detective. Yeah,

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, Kenneth Bella gutt Or Balago. I don't know

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>how you say your name Daniel Craig, who was your

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite Bond? That is a great question to ask Daniel

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Craig that maybe that information may be out there. Actually,

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Daniel Craig is lauded like Sean Connery.

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps I thought he was great. Who Daniel Craig, he

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is great. But who do you think his favorite Bond

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 1>would be? Probably Connery? I think I've heard him talk

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>about Connery has got had had a little bit of

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the edge, you know, he had a little bit of that, yeah,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit of the kind of like an

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>intense face and eyes. And he wasn't just a little

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>more dangerous little pretty boy, you know. Yeah. I agreed.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I like Daniel Craig because he was just kind of

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like sad Bond, you know. He was like Bond as

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Batman kind of you know. Yeah, yeah, I mean it

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely rounded out that character and with a dimension that

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>we had never seen. We've never seen James Bond have

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>emotions really, you know, not like that, Yeah, for sure,

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>when he loses his lady, right, yeah, I mean the

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>only emotions that Roger Moore had were karate chopping and

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and boy yeah and and martini time. Hey, I love

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Roger Moore was my guy. I grew up with him,

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>so I loved it. So apologies, I'm not trying to

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>disrespect the men's work. No, it's but but I think

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the Daniel Craig stuff sort of elevated the bond material

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of like a real type of

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>human with complexities or whatever. Even was very old weather

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know. Yeah, I'm with you. Mark phone

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>M says, not my favorite actor, but I always want

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to have dinner with Eugene Levy and picked his brain

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>about SCTV. That would be fun. He seems really fun. Yeah.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a good guy too. Supposedly he'll also

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>he'll do just about any project you throw at him too,

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>because he's been really he's been in some amazing stuff

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's been in some Yeah, I bet he wouldn't

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>be on movie Crush he would? Why because I was?

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm talking to you. No, Um, I think he's

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a hugely talented guy. But there are just some things

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>where I'm like, why did you do this? Eugene? Like

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>American Pie three, you know, like he I'm sure he

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>has uh several hundred thousand reasons why that's fair? That's fair,

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>chuck um. And then finally, Michelle Johnson says, Steve McQueen,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the legendary Steve McQueen. She said, I would say, what

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>was it like making The Towering Inferno? And who did

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you like meeting out of all the stars in that movie?

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I love it, kind of fan bowing out with Steve McQueen. Also,

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>given the opportunity, what role would you have liked to

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>have played in your career? Hey, Michelle, I love a

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>throwback Steve McQueen reference. He was the man. Have you

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>ever seen his movies? No, I haven't. Bullet right, people

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>love Bullet, Yeah you should. I mean, if you're gonna

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>see anything, see Bullet and like to me The Great Escape.

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a great movie, but I think his

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>part of that's fantastic. Um. Yeah, Steve McQueen. No, no

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>cooler guy has ever graced a movie screen. Perhaps All right, now,

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna stream this Ballad of Buster Scrugs, the Coen

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Brothers anthology film that was released on Netflix and in

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>select theaters. Um, I'm kind of mad at and see

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it in the theater. It was at the Plaza for

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>another Plaza, the Midtown I just man that on the

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>big screen it would have been really something else. It's beautiful,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>beautifully shot movie, beautifully shot movie. Did you love it?

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I did love it. There were some that I loved

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>more than others. Of the of the six little vignettes

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>or whatever you wanna call him. Um, but the one

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>with the first one, the really funny one, the ballot

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of Buster scrub One's incredible. It's so funny and also

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>really moving at the end. It's like, really really really good.

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>The one with Tom Waits, I think is perfect. I

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's so beautiful. He's like this mountain man panting

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for gold and the streams somewhere and like looks like

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a painting. It's insane. Yeah, that's uh. Well. The first

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>one is the Ballotbuster Scrugs with Tim Blake Nelson. The

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>second one is near algadonis Um, which I've actually spent

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>some time in Algadonas, Mexico. It's right over the border

0:16:55.240 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>from Mima, where I lived. Um. That one had what's

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>his face? Franco, James Franco, and uh, it was the

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 1>shortest one and really like I don't want to give

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>anything away, but I thought was just very Cohen's the

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>most Cohen Brothers of them all. Perhaps it's a comedy

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of errors in tone, it's a total comedy of errors,

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, where everything goes wrong and then goes wrong

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>again and then gets better and then goes back to Yeah,

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it was really kind of funny, and they so much

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 1>happens in such a tight, little compressed story. And I

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>thought it was a band shot. Yeah, that was my

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite party band shot. This is great. The third one

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>was a meal ticket. This one was it was a bummer.

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>This was the one with Liam Neeson and I can't

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>remember the actor's name, but the other guy that he

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>worked with as sort of traveling Carney side nut carny

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>but sideshow act um cool seeing Liam Neeson and something

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>like that, though, you know, yeah, very understated role, Yeah,

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>very little dialogue. Didn't kick anyone, didn't kick anyone to

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>tell anybody with his it's weird how he became that thing.

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Well you did you hear what I just said? Yeah,

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>what spoiler everyone, So if you haven't seen it, turn

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it off for twenty seconds. I said. Didn't kill anyone

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>with his bare hands, but he did, Yeah he did,

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I know, But that was it was that was implied. Yes,

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I was implied, all right, everyone, we're backs. Uh, But yeah,

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was good and really sort of for

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cohen's very kind of emotional, very somber, somber. And

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I actually watched it with my mom over Thanksgiving. Um,

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't really like movies. She's kind of a curmudgeon

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to this kind of stuff and that

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>she always is suspicious when I'm like, you should watch this,

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>She's like, right now, I don't know. I remember the

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Bachelor Party right right. And so she loved the ballot

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of Buster Scrogs one. She just thought that was so

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>funny and yeah, right, and you know I told her,

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>I was like, it's a little violent, you know, but

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>she really liked it. And I skipped the second one

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:53.959
<v Speaker 1>because I know the third She loved the second one

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>with Franco. I skipped the really sad one because I

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>knew it would like you had already seen it. I

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>skipped it because I was like, this one's too down.

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't like stuff like that. And then we moved

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>right on to the set all Gold Canyon so beautiful. Yeah,

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that one was so cool because not only is it

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know Tom waits and it is so great to

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>see him on the screen anytime, But uh, I didn't

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>know how prospecting worked. I didn't, and to see that,

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it's so fucking It's all about like you digging holes. Dude,

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>you're digging holes, but you're you're what's the word I'm

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 1>looking for, You're zeroing in on something. Yeah, you're kind

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of using process of elimination to like figure out where

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the gold isn't to find out where it maybe is. Yeah,

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>digging up dirt, putting it in a pan, swishing the

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>water around and seeing how many little flecks are in

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>there a hole, and then putting the flag in and Okay,

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>this area is depleted, and then by process of elimination

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>you find your way to the Mr Pocket. Yeah did

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the Motherload calls it Mr Pockets. So you're working your

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>way out and if there's like less gold, you're like,

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>all right, let me go back in this direction. But

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you're just digging holes. And that was so cool because

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of course I didn't either. It's really the procedure of

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, and it was so like they didn't

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>explain it. You just see it. Yeah, Yeah, it's that

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>show not tell thing, you know, That's what the Cohens

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>are great at Yeah, here's another thirty second spoiler, everyone,

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>so tune out for thirty seconds after all that. You

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>love this character so much and I was so mad

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>when that guy shot him and had not worked for

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that goal. But it all worked out great, does work

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>out great? All right, we're back from spoilers. Every spoilers.

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And that was less than thirty seconds. I love that

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>owl scene too. That was really sweet. Everything about it.

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>It's like it starts Tom Waits. It starts Tom Waits

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and an owl and a deer. Yeah, it was just

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>so beautiful too, and just so like like you get it, Like, man,

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I could have been a prospector out there by myself.

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm beautiful land. Yeah, I think that. I don't. I

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it had a dog though, Oh yeah,

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I don't know if he did the cinematography

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for all of them. I kind of feel like maybe

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>they worked with some different people, but the cinematographer on

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that one was the guy that did Amalie. My friend

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was telling me that, so such a beautiful Film's very beautiful,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's like very bloomy, kind of like the soft

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>focused sunset kind of you just yeah, everything and it

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was the lush West that you don't see you see

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>dusty West so much, and this was like so green

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 1>and wyoming or something like that. Yeah, it's very very cool. Uh.

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>The next one up was The Gal Who Got Rattled.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>This was probably my favorite one. Um, just so great storytelling,

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>great story story tell And I think that the Cohen's

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>had been writing these for like a long time, just

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of like on and off for fund zis or whatever.

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think they probably picked the best, their favorite.

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>But I bet you there's more, because there's a lot

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>more with these games. I'd love to see a part two. Yeah,

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>so great. Yeah, that one is just what was the

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>actress's name who was in The Big Sick, Zoe Kazan.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>She's great. Yeah, she is so that face understated and

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and exsive. She can play so much with that really

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>really great. Yeah, it was a wonderful movie. And the

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>and the writing and that one and the acting. It

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>was just so good. It was that sort of period

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of the West where people spoke really formally and uh,

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it was so good. I'm not going to spoil the

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>It's got that Oregon trail back and train adventurous kind

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of spirit. Or whatever. I don't know, it's just it

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>was a very touching and exciting little episode. I guess

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you call it. That one was a decent length. Actually,

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that one felt like it was. It was half hour almost.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the longest one for sure. Uh.

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>And then they finished up with The Mortal Remains, which

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>was which was great and very talky and weird and

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of creepy, you know, that's the one. I was

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>watching it with a friend and I kind of got

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>distracted during that one. I was sort of up and down,

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like doing some kitchen and stuff, and I got confused

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>when it came back, and I was like, I don't

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>think I understand what this one's about. So I need

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>to watch that one again. Watch it again and really

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>really zero in on on these conversations because they're long.

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>But uh, it's pretty great. It's, isn't it kind of

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a nod to the John Ford movie Stage Coach because

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it's all sort of like in this moving stage coach

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's kind of like a rag tag band of

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>different types or whatever. Well, these are like, yeah, five strangers,

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, exactly so wonderful and a great way to

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>end it too, and sort of that creepy sort of

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>like what's going to happen? Way? All right, we're gonna finish.

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Check out the ballot of Buster Scrugs on Netflix everyone.

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>We had a good Facebook discussion going about it too,

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>so comic Cardinal five questions, Kevin Herban says, what would

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>be a more telling trip through history watching all the

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>best picture winners or each year's biggest box office earner?

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Good question, I guess, uh, it depends on what you

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>mean by more telling. They would tell you two different things,

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right, Yeah, two different things that you could

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>probably combine to give you a relatively pure perspective on

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>like where people's heads were at the time. Totally That's

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a nice little experiment. Yeah, I would be an interesting experiment.

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>But then again, sometimes the best picture gets it totally

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>wrong too, And a lot of times, like isn't there's

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>some elitism that goes into like that kind of Oscar

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's not even really like the way the public

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>actually felt through the way. I wonder if they've ever

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>aligned it's the top grossing film of the year ever,

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>one best picture maybe like Schindler's Last Titanic that or Titanic. Yeah, Titanic,

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I wonder what else handful of times maybe,

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>but it seems rare, especially these days, for sure, because

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about that. Or does that mean in case

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you're me and you're talking about just sort of it

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>was me and Casey like, let's give you, you know,

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>relative garbage all year long and then but just wait

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>till November and December. Everyone, here's the good night. Here

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>are good movies, whereas it used to be just all

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>year long. Right, that's right, And there was shipped back

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>then too, but just throughout the year. You would think

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we would have a great movie. Get it elsewhere now

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>though we get it on Netflix. Yeah, we get in

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>all these other avenues. It seems like we don't need

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you movies. Wait a minute, wrong show Now it's true.

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Will Burke says, if you could replace a single actor

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>with another actor in a good movie to turn it

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>into a great movie, would you trade out? That's a

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>good question, will Uh, And I actually picked one out

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>last night. You've heard me talk a lot about Gangs

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of New York and the my single problem with it,

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>which was Cameron Diaz, whom I like, I just didn't

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>think she was good for that role, and it took

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>me out of it. So I imagine if you would

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>have replaced if Gangs of New York had started Leonette,

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Leonardo DiCaprio and like Sarah Polly or Natalie Portman, like

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that would have been a totally great movie. Or maybe

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the one we were just talking about from Bustra Scrug Zoe, Well,

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>this would have been like a child there, but this

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is like football because she would have been would have

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>been yeah, or anybody, literally anybody Cameron did I just

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>say anybody? I didn't mean that, like, I didn't mean

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it like that. What a dick? Anyone? Nol Laura Giles says,

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>how does the movie business, which is in quotes, justify

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the salaries of a list actors? So many ways other

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>than theaters to view movies? Would be hard press and

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>name an actor who could guarantee a hit? That's true,

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, are you gonna give it to? But

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 1>do you not think there's a formula or like a

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheet or something somewhere in some exects they can justify

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the salary their clients demands or whatever. You know, you

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a predicted box office take for a given set of

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>people and directors and month it's in, time it's released.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Genre like, well, this is probably a whatever undred and

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty million dollars and that can change too. It's like

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a stock, right, Like you do one bad movie and

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you start your process, start going down, your asking prices

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>go down to yea yeah, or you can go away

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>altogether entirely. But to answer your question, why the A

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>list actors, Like, you know, people go see a Jim

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Carrey movie. I mean this is back when he was

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the top dog, but you go see him for Jim Carey,

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.959
<v Speaker 1>not for Courtney Cox as you know, the side character,

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know Zoe Deschanel, she's great, But people see

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Jim Carrey movies for Jim Carey, so he should get

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the most money. Does it feel like there are fewer

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>names like that these days than there may be used

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to be. Yeah, someone who can quote like carry a

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>picture it and it's just like you know, you know

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>who it is. It's like it's like the rock. We've

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>got the Rock. I guess. So sure, these action guys,

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's always in the kind of action he type movies. Yeah,

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know who like the biggest box office

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for a while it was like Will Smith,

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but he's sort of I don't think Stock is dropped.

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I think so. Yeah, i'd be curious. See you like

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the top people are I think it's the rock dude. Yeah,

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I agree. And you know, like Julia Roberts at one

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>point was, you know, a near guarantee for like a

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>number one film, and now she's doing a mid sized

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>m Hulu show for podcast. Yeah, I heard it's great.

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen heard Homecoming. I heard it's really really good.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Julia Roberts got to a point where she

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:04.479
<v Speaker 1>had had kind of done it all. I was like,

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I got kids now and I'm married, and I can

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of slow down and be super selected. Isn't she

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like New Mexico or something? I think Hollywood a long

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 1>time great. Yeah, I'm sure she's just really picky about

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>what she does now and that's why everything she does

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>is pretty great. I bet she's really happy person. I

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>bet she you know, she's just like that character and eat,

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>pray love. I think she's a good person too, Oh,

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 1>of course not. She's good good people. Gail Kunds, my

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>old pal from Ohio. Gail says, what mistakes have you

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>seen or noticed? In movies that you cannot not see anymore, um,

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>she says. Example, there's a scene in Scream where Sydney

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is yelling a dewey but her mouth says no, So

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just a really bad audio dub dialogue dub. I've never

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>noticed that. I've seen Scream so many times, Gail, and

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to. I imagine I will see and

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>not be able to unsee it. But for me, it's

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the Star Wars. Obviously, the stormtrooper head bump going into

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the room. I cannot unsee that now, like in through

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the little the corridor on the ship or whatever. Yeah,

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>have you seen that? Right there on the Star Wars

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>top a bunch of stormtroopers are filing through any boxes

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>out on the the doorway is way funny. I don't know, man,

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that might have been all they had, or maybe it

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>went unnoticed because I didn't notice it the first twenty

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>times I saw, of course, until the Internet came along.

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>They're like, look at the stormtrooper. I'll tell you what

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it is. For me, it's, um, the hidden sexy messages

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in Aladdin, there's like, it's it's you know, I would

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>consider that more, I guess in Easter. I guess it's

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing where you was it in the

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>movie or on the cover. It was the no on

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the cover, head of no that that was. That was

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the Little Mermaid. Oh right, right right, Ye Little Mermaid

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>had like a coral tower that looks like a like

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a dildo or something in um tower that looked like

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a coral tower. U t m um, that's a particular

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>brand of dildo the Cool Time of Power. Did you

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>just trademark that jet? So? So in Aladdin, there's a

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>scene where Aladdin um kind of creepily goes onto Jasmine's

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>balcony using the flying carpet and uh, the tiger kind

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of comes at him, right Rajah the tiger and you

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you hear him say good It's like you say good

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>kitty like that. But what he's really saying is good

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>teenagers take off their clothes. And it's in there and

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they probably have edited it out in subsequent releases. He

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>says good teenagers take off their clothes, but it's like

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>good like It's like it's like a hidden dubby message.

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not do I sho you not, dude, look it

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>up on snopes. It's a thing, Okay, once I discovered that,

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I could never not hear it. But it's the kind

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of thing that you could easily miss it entirely, but

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>once you've heard it, you're gonna hear it every time.

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's really strange. Well, I think we should

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>see if there's a clip. Surely it must exist. Someone's

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>uploaded like a you know, VHS copy of this, because

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I know they got rid of it on the DVD

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>reissues or the blue rays. It's a thing, my friend.

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, if if we do have a clip,

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>then uh, why don't we just play it right now?

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>So how's our little bow doing? On goods? Take off?

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>On goods? Take off? All right? Everyone? There it is.

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe that. No, I did not know that

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>was the thing? Was there another one? You said? All

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the things in a Laddin where they're more creepy messages

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>or a lurid message. That was the one that that

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>always stands out to me. But what a dumb thing

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to say to Yeah, but I mean there there's a

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of hidden things and creepy different Disney movies.

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And it was like, I think you were like blamed

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>on some kind of rogue exactly that is now within

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration exactly. All right. Finally, number five, Sue

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Robins says, what is your opinion of them making Break

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Bad into a movie? Um? I think it's great. I

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.479
<v Speaker 1>heard that news and I was super excited. How can that?

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>How could that not be a good thing? Vince Gilligan

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and get the whole cast together again. I would I

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>totally can't wait for a Breaking Bad movie. Why would

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it not be good? There's no reason would if it's

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a different story, if it's like, is it a prequel

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>or a sequel or I don't know. I bet it's

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>just that I don't I don't think anyone knows yet.

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And if Vince Gilligan's involved, he's writing it based on

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>his world that he created, it's gonna be good. Yeah,

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like the Deadwood movie. It wouldn't have made it

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:36.959
<v Speaker 1>if there wasn't a reason to make it. Yes, I

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>think these these types of artists, you know what I mean?

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>The Deadwood movie is going to be amazing, and I

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>think so with the Breaking Bad movie. Alright, so, good question.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>We're We're down with it. We are down with those films. Uh, So,

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you for tuning in this week everyone, and uh,

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope you have a nice rest of your week. Yeah,

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm really not sure even what when. This has kind

0:32:57.840 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of come out so I can I'm trying to think

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of something seasonal to say. Are we past Christmas at

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this point? Chuck? Do you think? I don't know, but

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes out on a Monday. Good. Well, I hope

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys had or we'll have a good Christmas. Yes,