WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - January 17th, 2020

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Hi, I'm

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelley and I'm Carol Masser. Welcome to the weekend

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week. Another very busy week on

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the corporate front, and certainly when it came to news

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>out of Washington. Jason, absolutely, we had trade, we had impeachment.

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>We had more details about how you might need to

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>hire mercenaries to smuggle yourself out in a box if you,

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't think you're gonna have a fair trial

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in Japan. I gotta say that's one of my favorite stories.

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>We really get into the details of how Carlos going

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>his great escape from Tokyo, and we also get into

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like this story has gotten hidden, about

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the legal implications and the legal issues still facing Mr. Gone.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Plus you mentioned trade and impeachment and politics. We caught

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>up with both black Stones, Steve Schwartzman, he was in

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the room when the trade deal was signed, and you

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>caught up with New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy about the

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>state of the state and the state of politics. We did, indeed,

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Plus Apollos greed it is this week's cover's story. It's

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a story that really hasn't been told, but our team

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they got the interview with Leon Black first to the

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>big story of the week. So, China has made substantial

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and enforceable commitments regarding the protection of American ideas, trade secrets, patents,

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>and trademarks. China has also pledged firm action to confront

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>pirated and counterfeit goods, which is a big problem for

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>many of the people in the room. And that was

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>President Trump after the US and China signed that phase

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the trade deal, a lot of pump and

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>circumstance down in Washington, a full room, the President name

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>checking a lot of his friends there in the audience.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's get more on the economics of the trade deal.

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Shawn Donna in DC with his story.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>And how now comes the hard part? After the handshake.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the photo ops. This is the tough part.

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Why is it so hard? Sean? President Trump is not

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the first president to make a deal with China. In fact,

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he referenced that when he was signing this, saying that

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he was righting the wrongs of the past, writing the

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>issues that his predecessors had not addressed in terms of

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>dealing with China. President Clinton, of course, brought China into

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.839
<v Speaker 1>the w t O. George W. Bush had his own

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>dealings with China. So did Barack Obama, who not only

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>had a constant economic dialogue with China but also was

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>looking for his own trade deals to try and deal

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>with the threat of China. That was the Transpacific Partnership.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 1>The common thread through all of this has been that

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the consensus here in Washington certainly is that China just

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>hasn't lived up to its promises in these past deals.

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the China moment is for Donald Trump.

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Right now, He's got his deal. Now will China live

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>up to it? And so what does enforcement look like, Sean,

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>What does it look like on the ground and where

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>does the rubber meet the road here? Right So, the

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that the administration says is very different about this deal,

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and the reason they think they can get China to

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>live up to its commitments is this enforcement mechanism that's

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in there. Essentially, it sets the stage for if the

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>U S has any complaints or any inkling that China

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't living up to the deal. There's this kind of

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety day process of consultations at the end of which

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you can whack the Chinese with tariffs if you choose to.

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:12.279
<v Speaker 1>That's uh, that's good. That seems to be a mechanism

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that could work. But it's also an unwinding of the

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of global system that was set up in the

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties, and that's essentially the World Trade Organization, which

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>was set up to be a neutral arbiter in disputes

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>like this, and the Trump administration is just going around that.

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>And that has big consequences for everyone else in the

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>world because it means that that's going to reduce the

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>credibility of the w t O and its ability to

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>keep the peace and global trade at a time when

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration is already undermining it by by failing

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to a point or blocking the appointment of of new judges.

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So there's big consequences for not just the US and

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>China in terms of trying to get China to live

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>up to this deal, but also for the rest of

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the world and global trade. You know, I mean the

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>whole idea of the w t OS to avoid trade wars.

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has gone down the path of trade wars. Uh,

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and now he's promising more trade wars to try and

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>enforce deals essentially, if that's if that becomes the issue.

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's Sean Donn and senior trade reporter for Bloomberg Carroll.

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn now from trade to the twenty twenty presidential campaign.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Here's Josh Green with the story on the Terminal and

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>online how Bernie Sanders is poised for an upset. You know, Josh,

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it does seem Bernie is out there to win this one.

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>What's different about the team presidential race and his run

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to get the nomination versus today and Kenny Win. Bernie Sanders,

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>who was all but forgotten about three months after he

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>suffered a heart attack, is in first place in the

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>race in Iowa. And yet I still think there's a

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>sense in Washington and on Wall Street that there's no

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>way Bernie can possibly win. So what I do in

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.799
<v Speaker 1>the magazine this week is do a deep dive into

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Sanders and look at what is different about his race

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.679
<v Speaker 1>this time around. Uh, the main thing is he's running

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>to win. Last time around, when he was running against

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton, he was in the race. I think more

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>to make a point, but the key takeaway here is

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that Bernie is playing to win, and he is actually

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>in position to be able to do so, and Josh

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>tell us about that Warren v. Sanders battle that is

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>shaping up. While I was out there in Iowa, Politico

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>reported that Bernie's campaign had been giving it surrogate's talking points,

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>telling them to tell voters to attack Elizabeth Warren as

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>an elitist and somebody who couldn't unify the party and

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>beat Donald Trump. Uh. That is a harsh attack from

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>someone supposed to be an ally. The story went public,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like in retaliation, Warren's camp leaked that

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in a in a private meeting between the two of them,

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of this cycle, Sanders had said to Warren,

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think a woman can win this race. Now,

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>none of this was ever spoken of. It only came

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 1>to light a few days before this past weekend's debate,

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>and it's set off a firestorm, as you might expect,

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>with the political press out there putting pressure on Warren

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, is this true. Well, after about

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a day of being quiet, Warren put out a public statement.

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>It was like pouring gasoline on a fire. Josh, thanks

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>so much. That's Bloomberg's Josh Green. He's been following the

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>comings and goings of the presidential hopeful, certainly the Democrats.

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think this one's an interesting he focused Remember

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>last year, Josh focused on Elizabeth Warren, that great story.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting to see how there's a lot of

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>attention and for good reason, being paid to Bernie Sanders

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>well in the clash between Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>seems to be one of the most compelling storylines out

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>there right now. You know, I feel like this Carlos

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Gohnes story, Carol, every time we think, wow, that's the

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>most interesting thing I've heard, or what a twist or

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>what a great details, it is not uh, And thanks

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to some stellar reporting from Matt Campbell, there's just a

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>constant stream of new information. He led a team that

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>put together a really nice pieces then this week's magazine,

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Blueberg Terminal and on Blueberg dot Com. Today,

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt joins us on the phone from Bay Route. He's

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>still on the ground on the Gun story until Webber,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the editor Bloomberg Business Week, is here with us in

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactor Broker Studios. So Matt, I gotta ask you,

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>especially since you have the perspective of really being in

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this story. What's the thing in this story about the

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>escape itself that you really just zero in on as

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the as Carol Master would say, whoa moment. Well, I

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think there's there's quite a lot to say wow about

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in the story. I'm interested in in all the scenarios

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that were examined to get Carlos gone out of out

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of Japan. There's some discussion about and was published notably

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>term of sun discussion of actually buying a cargo ship

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and sneaking him onto it, so that was rejected as

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>too complicated, and in the end they did get to

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this very dramatic private jet escape that we now know

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about, which you know. This to me,

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Um and the wonder of this story, it's like we

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>all these little dribs and drabs that have come out

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>over the last week and change. Actually ever since the

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>story really broke at the beginning of the year, you know,

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we've all been captivated by part of what made this

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>be Um. I think this epic part three of this

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>story that Matt's been kind of shepherding, is this inside

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the plan of of how to get how to get

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody out of the country, how to extract someone and

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a very movie esque, but you know

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the reason it can be movie esque is because of

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>like real reporting and and Matt, can you kind of

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>walk us through how the story opens. Well, so the

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>story opens with a security contract or an Asia, uh,

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 1>someone who does this kind of saying s quoting v

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I P s as protecting cargoes. He gets a call

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago from someone he knows who's looking

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to hire for a job in Japan, looking particularly to

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>escort someone out of the country and looking for operatives

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with Asian East Asian faces particularly, and and the security

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>contractor was sort of noncommittal, and no one really came

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to mind, and he never really thought of it again.

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So of course he saw the news along with the

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world on New Year's Eve, and that's

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>when you connect the dots and and uh what you know,

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I've been kind of captivated

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>by and this is like, obviously Carlos going had the

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>means to actually, you know, fund something like this, but

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>what what kind of what would it go down for?

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Like what what is the service actually cost someone? Well,

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a very good question. One estimate that I've heard, uh,

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>was fifteen million dollars, which when I first heard it

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>sounded insanely high. But the person who was proplaying an

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>estimate to be that then took me through the mass.

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>And and one thing that you have to add at

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>every point in that calculation is, for lack of a

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>better term, a risk premium. This is flagrantly illegal. Everyone

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>involved could be exposed to arrest obviously, uh. And people

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>need to be compensated for that kind of risk taking. Yeah.

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>And when you say everyone, we've actually got some names.

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>You've got a Michael Taylor and then you've got a

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>buddy of Michael Taylor. I mean, we've got names on

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the individuals who are believed to have helped Carlos Gone

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>get out of Japan. That's right, so far, just two names,

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Taylor being the leader of the group. Very interesting

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>guy with a somewhat checkered history. Uh. Former Green Beret,

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>very experienced Special Forces operator, ended up in the private

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>security business, but actually ended up going to jail in

0:10:55.600 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the Mids over federal charges to do with allegedly bribing

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>his way as to a contract in Afghanistan. So really,

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>someone has operated in some gray areas and they pulled

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>off this amazing coup on behalf of Carlos Bone. So

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier that this is sort of the part

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>three in the Magazine of Carlos Gone trilogy that you've

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>basically been steering from the moment. Uh. You know that

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Japanese officials basically arrested him on a tarmac year and

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>change ago. Um, so, what what have you learned? And

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>what is what is this escape? What you know? Put

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>put it all in context? What what does it mean

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>for uh, for people to know? Well, I think the

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>big scene here is that he has now turned the tables.

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Over the last year. He seemed pretty helpless, this real

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Titan business is very respected corporate figure, was suddenly just

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>completely at the mercy of the Japanese justice system. And

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and none of all these none of the advantages he had, money, connections,

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>access to media or whatever. It didn't see the count

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>for anything. And it was, you know, really a tale

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of a guy kind of alone, kind of abandoned and

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>facing a pretty grim fate that's now completely changed. He

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>has gotten out of the threat of being sent to

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese prison, though he's certainly not out of the

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>woods yet. As as we discussed in the story what right,

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>and and I want to end on that note that

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>if we can, I mean, not out of the woods,

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>because he's essentially, without overstating it, sort of a different

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>type of prisoner at this point. By by some accounts,

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>he's not free to go in any sense. Right, Well,

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>he is, Jason certainly free to live here in Lebanon,

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>at least as far as we know there. There is

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a judicial proceeding that is going to run its course here,

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's very unlikely to be extracited. So he is,

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>he's fine to be here for now. Uh. He certainly

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>can travel anywhere, except perhaps to France, where he's also

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a citizen. Uh. And the other thing is, you know,

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>his reputation has not yet been rehabilitated, and I think

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>if he entertained thoughts of a comeback, which which he

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>very well might, there's a long way to go to that.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just gonna say, as you so rightfully, including

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>your story, it's another case of the winner take all

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in the game of twenty one century capitalism. If you've

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>got money and means, you can get yourself out, Matt

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>just quickly. Indeed, Yeah, well it's it turns out that,

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were very surprised and you have that

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't beat the system, but he was able to

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>exit the system, which is not something that's the most criminal.

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>The other option, if you can't beat the system, just

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>change the system altogether, exactly. You got to get in

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the box. That's Bloomberg reporter Matthew Campbell and Business Week

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>editor in chief Joe Webber. Jason, this story just gets

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>more and more interesting, and I've got to take my

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>hat off to our team here at Bloomberg who has

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>done great investor gate of journalism and is really getting

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to the details the names of the individuals behind that

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>great escape of Carlos Gone and how it all came down.

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>It is now approximately three weeks since Carlos go in

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the ousted head of Nissan and Renault escape from Japan.

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And while we're all obsessed Jason easily with the Hollywood

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>like feel of this story, real story, there are still

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>something we can't forget and that's the legal side of

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this story. A lot of questions still, absolutely and we've

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about, as you say, the escape, the

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>dramatic you know, sort of in the box literally like

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>getting to Lebanon. But what happens from here from a

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>legal perspective, that's what we really want to dig into. Now.

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Greg Farrell is here with this. He has unpacked this

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in a way that few have and is here to

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>provide some historical perspective as you look at this, what

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>are the key legal issues here? The case against gone

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is not like a lot of cases brought against CEOs

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, where it's a clear case of

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>either inside or trading or accounting fraud in order to

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>goose up or an so that you can get your bonus,

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the end ron stuff that we all remember from fifteen

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago. The case against Gone h is unusual

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in so far as it's a he's been accused of

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>helping himself to more money than he deserved or somehow

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>finagling away to get the board to approve or unbeknownst

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to the board and even bigger pay packages than he

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>was entitled to, which is uncommon. It's seen rarely here. Basically,

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to my mind, it brought back the case against former

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Tycho CEO Dennis Kozlowski and his CFO, brought not by

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the federal government but by the Manhattan District attorney Bob

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>morgan Thou back in the oh four oh five era,

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and that was kind of a messy case. It was

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:47.479
<v Speaker 1>not clear they went after him on books and records issues, etcetera.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>But we did not have that clear resonance that an

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>accounting fraud securities fraud case has. Tycho shareholders were not

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>really burned by this, Yes, Becauselowski helped himself to more

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>money than you know, the board had a proved But

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>unlike Endron, unlike Health South, unlike some of these other

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>world calm, Tycho was a real profitable company and his

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>shareholders were doing well. So this falls into that category.

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Going was accused of helping himself to more than he

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>deserved and basically parleying his position to enrich himself. Another

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that was missing from you know, morgan Thou's case

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>against Tycho, but clearly present here is the plan and

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Going referred to this in his press conference last week,

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to basically fold Nissan into a wider global automotive group

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that would basically, you know, uh, remove the essential Japanese

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>element from it or make it less of a Japanese

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>champion brand that had been and you know, I think

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>He's actually got a point there that this is something

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that didn't go over well. But it was in the works.

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It was in the works. It was in the works.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>It's more than a coincidence. I think that this very

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>aggressive regulatory legal action and prosecution of Going took place

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>at a time when Nissan was, in fact, you know,

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>drifting towards becoming an international brand, unless of a Japanese brand.

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting, I want to go back to what you

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>said of you know, perhaps Carlos Gone helping himself to

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>more than he was allowed. Is that a simple legal

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>case to figure out? In other words, do you just

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>go back to the employment contracts and here's what they say,

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you weren't allowed to have this house or so and

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>so forth, or when it comes to this kind of thing,

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>because I could certainly see with a board that's really

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>happy with its CEO, and Carlos Gone was lauded as

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this incredible auto executive in the industry and really globally

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>as an executive. And I do wonder whether it's like, oh, yeah,

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we like him, Yeah you can have that, or you

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>can do this, Like how do you go about legally

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>proving it what's required? There are a lot of wiggle room.

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>How You've made a very good point here, and that

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is he was a superstar CEO by the time this

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>all unfolded a little more than a year ago. And

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out in his press conference last week, UH,

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>somewhere near twenty books have been written for case studies

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in business schools about his phenomenon. We would ter you

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>him saying, what a right, But this is at the

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>far end of a twenty year reign. Certainly, when you

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>have that much success over a period of time, Uh,

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>there are certain realities that happen. We've seen it here

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US with very powerful uh you know UH

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>CEOs who developed sort of a there's a hero worship.

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And after a while, technically all you know, boards of

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>directors are independent, but over particularly twenty year period where

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, new board members come on, etcetera, after a while,

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the board becomes, if not a wholly owned subsidiary, far

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>less of an independent watchdog. But then what you know,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>shareholder activists would would like us to have, they do

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>become that becomes a very comfortable relationship between the board

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and the CEO because everybody's doing well, why rock the boat?

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>And in that gray area is um whether or not

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, Going is entitled to this h the board,

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, So there'll be different claims if this ever

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>went to trial, that the board was not aware that

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>he paying himself, that Going could say no, why I

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>told them this, or they knew that, or we had

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a discussion at the end of the last board meeting

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>where I said I'd be interested in this, but the

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>money went through and somebody yes, exactly. And there were

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>lawyers for every board meeting, in board minutes, etcetera. So

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>these are not like secret meetings that happen and people

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>forget um. So you know, that is a very great area.

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's Greg Ferrell, one of the legal legals here

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg. And what I loved about his conversation was

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>he put it in context, historical context. He's followed everything

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>from Enron to Tycho, and those connections that he made

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Dennist Kauselowski story I thought were fascinating. I

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>also think it was funny that in starting to talk

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>with him, he's like, wait, I had to remember that

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>there were charges. What were the charges specifically against Carlos

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Go And so he gets into the particulars. So obviously

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a store that continues to evolve, it isn't over. As

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you said, Even if you don't know Apoulo management, you

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>probably know some of the company's targets, right Jason, We're

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about Horris Casinos, Claire's jewelry stores, Linen and things.

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>This brings us to the cover story this week, it does,

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's really an unbe leavable story that's never been told.

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Leon Black, one of the key figures in the world

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of finance, in the world of philanthropy, and certainly in

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the world of private equity. Caleb Melby and Heather Pearlberg

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>wrote the story. Caleb here with us in New York City,

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Leon Black, Where to begin? Where did you begin? Indeed? Yeah,

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Heather and I it took us months to to put

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>this together. Um, and we approached it in the summer

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>being like, here's this guy. He was in the news

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time because of his affiliations with Jeffrey Epstein,

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and like his name was in headlines everywhere, and it

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>was suddenly of much broader interest to a much broader

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>group of people, and we were like, do people know

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>who he is? Like what his story is? The fact

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that he's been at like all the key junctures in

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like American financial history for like half a century. Um,

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So we went and you know, we started talking to

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>people all the way back to the nineteen seventies about

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Leon his story, how he came to be one of

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the most powerful and ruthless people in American finance. And

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we do want to take that step back. I mean,

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>who is he today? I mean he is when it

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>comes to private equity and investors, I mean big deal,

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>but someone who's been very quiet. Yes, yeah, he is.

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>In private equity. There's there's some people who you can

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>think of as kind of ambassadors for for that line

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of work, right probably Steve Schwartzman, chief chief among them.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Leon Black has not shouldered that responsibility to tell the

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>industry's story or anything like that. He's very adverse, uh

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to the press, and we learned about why when we

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>talk to him. But yeah, Apollo Global Management now has

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars under management. That's a figure that's grown

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sixfold in the last decade. He wants to get up

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to six hundred in the decade after this one. And

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>he's worth almost ten billion dollars now. He's chairman of

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the Museum of Modern Art, which in in I feel

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>like New York society culture. If you want to be

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the head of a cultural institution in the world, that's

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a big one. That's a cover position. Yeah, I've kind

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of been thinking about it. Is like the iron throne

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for Game of Thrones, for for like the royal houses

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of Manhattan for sure, um and and yeah, mostly he's

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>done that. Yeah, much less in the public eye than

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>his contemporaries, um and uh. Apollo also has a reputation

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>across the street, across the realm of finance for for

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>playing harder ball than some of his contemporaries as well.

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And so let's talk about some of those junctures going

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>back through history. For for Leon black And one of

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the most notable is his time at Drexel Burnham Lambert

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at the foot, at the side. However you want to

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>characterize it of Michael Milkin, you know, a definitive time

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in American finance. As you say, remind us why Drexel

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>is so important? Well, yeah, he he learned under Michael

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Milken and h He also served as banker to some

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of the most important corporate waters of the nineteen eighties.

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>He was banking for Henry Cravis. He was banking for

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Carl Icon, who would become something of a men tour.

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>They'd go on vacations together, play poker together. Um. And Uh.

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course Drexel is one of the most famous like

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>low points you can probably say in Wall Street financial

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>history with the trial of Michael Milken, it's bankruptcy and

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>everything else. Um. But also with the time heals all

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>wounds Michael Milken, Leon Black, a lot of these guys

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>there now you know, they're that's all in the past,

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and and they've risen to become kind of like lord

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and master of of Wall Street. And the Drexel part

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of the story I think is really important because it's

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>success and essentially creating the junk bond obviously, and the

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>junk bond market is critical for what comes next and

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>what comes comes next for Leon Black. But also, and

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you alluded to this, the dissolution of Drexel. The bankruptcy

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>makes Apollo possible absolutely so when Leon uh first strikes

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>out on his own right around, it's all with like

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Drexel survivors essentially and uh. And at the same time,

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>there's this credit crunch Uh in the economy and all

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of the companies that had been bought or we're sitting

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>on piles of high yield debt, we're now in trouble.

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of them, a lot of that debt

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>was issued by Drexel, sometimes by Leon himself. He knows

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>which are the good companies, which are the bad companies,

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And now all of a sudden, they're all struggling and

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the game is no longer mergers acquisitions l b O

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>S is about buying that distressed debt and using it

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to maneuver to take over these companies. And he's had

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a front row seat as that that was being issued.

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And now he forms what's actually called line advisors at first,

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>but then later becomes Apollo uh To to go in,

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>working with backing from Credit Leon, a French bank, to

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>really start to rifle through these distressed companies. And he

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Apollo's really big value at is that they're going for

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the ones that are so distressed that his competitors, your

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Cravis is your icons are not touched them. And he's

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>going in there and he and his team are willing to,

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, go through the restructuring battles, go through the

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy battles to try to make a profit off these companies.

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>And I do wonder too, write he's been at the

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>right place at the right time and kind of understanding

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. Um, but I also do wonder Caleb that

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he has kind of done a service in

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of going after some of those companies that maybe

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the other private equity firms weren't interested in. Sure, yeah, yeah,

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>he would. He would argue that, um, they are the

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>truest value investors in private equity, right that that the

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>way they think about value is you find a distress

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>situation that you are uniquely capable of heading into and

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>turning around, and that's going to lower your downside risk

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>because you're buying it for so cheap and hopefully also

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>boosting your chances of return later on. And one of

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the things that Apollo has notably done and with you know,

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>full permission from their investors, is they have had the

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>ability to invest all around a company in many ways,

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 1>not just buying at what he not just doing sort

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of a plane vanilla leverage file, but they're buying credit.

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Often they find themselves at different times on different sides

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of a deal, right, absolutely, And that's true for Apollo itself,

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's true for Leon as a person too, so

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>so so, yeah, he was He worked with companies and

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>executives while he was issuing the debt at Drexxel, then

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>then at Apollo, buying into those companies, as you say,

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>multiple different ways through equity, through debt um and then

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>he continues to run into the same people all throughout

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the next few decades. Um he's sometimes competing, as he

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>would later do with Icon for control of a company

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>or partnering with them. So, okay, I think what's interesting

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>about this story. There's so much because you do go

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>into family history and and so on. What I also

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>think is just novel is that you actually sat down,

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>You guys sat down and talked with Lion Block Black.

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>This is someone who doesn't give interviews. Tell us little

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>bit about the experience and what you got from him. Yeah. So, uh,

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Heather and I got to go sit down with Leon

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>at his office at nine West fifty seventh Street. Uh.

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Something that struck me. It's kind of kind of a

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>joke in financial journalism, knockout views of Central Park is

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a phrase that gets dropped into a lot of stories.

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>This was the most stunning view of Central Park I

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>have ever seen, like the whole park splayed out like

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.719
<v Speaker 1>a bocce ball court right in front of you. Truly,

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the most amazing um views I've seen in a Wall

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Street office reporting here. But he um uh. He was

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>incredibly clever, uh, funny, very obviously intelligent um, and was

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>very interested in trying to communicate to us that he

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>he felt his company was misunderstood. That's the first line

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of your story, yes, which is exactly what you said.

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 1>That the most feared man in the most aggressive realm

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of finance, he wants to know why he's been misunderstood, right, Um.

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And there's a few things that play there. One we

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we we deal with this idea of risk and who

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>bears risk in any private equity deal, and who bears

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>risk in in Leon Black deal specifically. And he makes

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a very good point that well, Claire's or Linen's and

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>things or whatever may be a distressed asset that appears risky.

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the way Apollo goes about it does not

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>mean Apollo itself or Apollo's investors are bearing a lot

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of risk. Right. You put a little equity in, you

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of debts shift shift shift that that

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>risk to to your creditors and then of course to

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the target company uh itself. Um, and and we we

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>came with a lot of questions. Uh. But that was

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the thing that really really animated him, and and I

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>really seemed to both excite and aggravate him in a

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>way that I found surprised. The notion of risk and

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the misunderstanding. Yeah, yeah, the misunderstanding of of him and

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>his company and and and and yeah, as we said,

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a part of those because he is not proactively told

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>his story in a way that a lot of his

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>contemporaries do. And and when I was talking to other

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>people around the company, they'll say, okay, Caesar's because casinos

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>something like at there's only one Apollo and there's like,

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, two dozen creditors who all hate how all

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Apollo is going about their line of work there, right,

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So so they feel like there's there's a definitional like

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>numeric sort of imbalance and how how their story gets told.

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>That's Caleb Melby. He and Heather pearl Berg did this

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>cover story, Jason, and what's wonderful about it is, uh

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they spent a long time on it. There's so many

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>details about the man, his background, his family, uh, and

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>really how he got to where he is today. And

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>what's fascinating too is and we talked about it with Caleb,

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is that they actually sat down with Leon Black and

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this is not something that Mr Black does often. The

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>insights that they got into him, into the firm, into

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the implications of the business, both there to follow and

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>into the broader private equity world totally fascinating. We should

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>mention you can get all of our conversation with Caleb

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Melby takes you even deeper into the story. It's our

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Extra podcast this week, so download that wherever

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcast. I got a chance to catch

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>up with Steve Schwartzman. He is, of course the co

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>founder of the chairman and the CEO of the Blackstone Group,

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a confidante of President Trump and of President she He

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>played a little bit of a shuttled diplomacy role throughout

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>these long trade negotiations. He was in the White House

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for the signing. Here's what he had to say, This

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>got to be a deal basically, uh, because it's been

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>going on for three years, uh since we really started this. Uh,

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it was two days before Davos three years ago. UH.

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And uh. So so we've had a lot of near

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>missus UH, a little bit of success, and now a

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of success. UH. And I think it takes a

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>while for each country UH to figure out what it

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>really wants to get out of a trade agreement, what

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it wants to get out of the compliance um uh

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the opening of its markets. UH. And for China, you

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>have to remember that the US in China, other than

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the World Trade Organization deal in two thousand and one,

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally hasn't had a trade agreement since the nineteen forties.

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>So what's been achieved is very very significant. The two

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>countries want to work together. That's that's a huge change. UH.

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That tariffs are starting to be reversed their U. There

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>are major purchases of things of not just agriculture, but

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>other things. Intellectual property has been reversed. Separately, the conversations

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>in December regarding fentanyl, which is killing over fifty thousand

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Americans a year in China is really made huge strides

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to cut off the supply of fentanyl. And and so

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is our countries that are competitive but

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>also have this huge relations and ship trade wise together

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>these two countries. Hard to believe, uh, the way you

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>depending upon how you calculated between thirty five of the

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>world's economy just in two countries. So the idea of

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>decoupling uh and everybody going their own way on virtually

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>everything is impractical and it's also not good for the

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>world economy. So so what the two countries have done

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>now is figure out where they can start the dialogue,

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>how they can implement it, uh. And it's a very

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>positive feeling. This wasn't a grudging type of deal that's

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>been entered into. Alright. So Steve, obviously you've been playing

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a role of a statesman going back

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.479
<v Speaker 1>and forth between these two leaders that you know very well.

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, you're a businessman, you're

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>an investor. What does this do for you as a businessman?

0:32:56.400 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>As an investor sitting at Blackstone? Does it amp will find?

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Does it accelerate investments that you may be making around

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the world and specifically in China. Well, what it does

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>is it provides a baseline of of a better world economy,

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think you're seeing in the markets over the

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:21.479
<v Speaker 1>last sort of whatever you want to measure, UH, you know,

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the last year, certainly the last few months as this

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>agreement has come together. It's not the only reason for

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>strong markets, but it's it's the business community globally UH

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>telling you that things are better now in terms of

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>prospects than they were before this agreement was entered into.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And so when you think about Phase two, and we'll

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>see when that gets started, what's the most important thing

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>for you to see as an investor in a business person? Well,

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I think UH, phase two will cover a number of

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:02.719
<v Speaker 1>other things, which which which are important. UH. You know,

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>things that that you know have not been resolved. There

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>are some issues you know regarding UH cyber and non

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>tariff trade UH restrictions and and and also tariffs themselves

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>have not been fully negotiated out UH in terms of

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>where you go when these things UM all unlined, assuming

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 1>you have a successful Phase two, and there are other

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>issues as well, UH. And so what's important as a

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>business person UH is to know that there's positive momentum.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>There are countries who realize that even though they may

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>be rivals in certain areas, that in the commercial area,

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>as much cooperation on as fair a basis as you

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>can do is better than than countries just sort of

0:34:55.400 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>breaking apart, which is which is deleterious? Uh, world trade

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and for business. And that's my conversation with Steve Schwartzman

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>there on the White House lawn. Interesting of course, he

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is a friend and confidante of the President. He's obviously

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>very pro this deal. He worked on it. But interesting

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 1>to see what the implications are for his day job,

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, running the world's biggest alternative investment manager. I

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta say it was just interesting to see who was

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>all in that room in the White House as that

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>trade deal with signed A very telling story. It is

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the second most popular dating app in the US. It's

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>supposed to offer women a better option, but does it.

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Bumble. It's the subject of a feature

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in the magazine this week. Clear set Of wrote it

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and it is quite a tale. She's here with us

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. Alright, where to begin? I guess

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>let's begin with what is Bumble. Bumble is a dating app,

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is also a networking app. They have like a platonic

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>version and a professional networking version. But essentially, you know,

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you swipe right or left if you like people, and

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>if you do, you go on a date, you can

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>message them. Um. But it's defining feature that it was

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 1>founded with is that only women can message men first.

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>So if you swipe right on a man and he

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>swipes on you, the woman, it's on her to message him. Supposedly,

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this is empowering, This allows women to guide the conversation. Um.

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>But the issue is there's not really any evidence that

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it actually is empowering or that it's doing what it claims,

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>which is supposed to be flipping the script, you know,

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>giving women more power and relationships. Right, And I feel

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:30.879
<v Speaker 1>like she's really on a mission to kind of get

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>rid of harassment of women on a dating website and

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe a big more broadly like on social media. Right,

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a mission. And the she we are talking about,

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Whitney wolf Heard, she came from Tinder, I mean, which

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 1>is an important sort of historical note, right. Yeah, So

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Bumble has like an amazing origin story, which is um,

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>it's founded by this woman named Whitney wolf Heard, who

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>when she was twenty three, she along with some other people,

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>co founded Tinder. She was first vice president of marketing.

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 1>She's sort of engineered tenders like initial explosive app especially

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in college campuses. UM. She's sued Tender for sexual harassment

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in UM. There was an undisclosed settlement, no admission of wrongdoing. UM.

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, she received a lot of harassment online

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>during all of this, you know, people calling her names,

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>death threats, etcetera. So when she found a bumble, she

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to combat harassment online and just make a

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 1>place on the Internet that's safer for women. And is

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:33.800
<v Speaker 1>she I mean, that's the really the big question. I

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're trying to get to and you look

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>at the culture of the company because there's been concerns

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>about that and whether or not she's making a difference

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>on social media. Yeah, and this story, I will say

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it took me a long time to report because initially,

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>when when someone tells you, you know, we're making the

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>internet safer for women, we have all of these policies

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in place, you think, Okay, there's the data that sounds great.

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, they've banned hate speech. UM. Women have to

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>message men first, so it's harder for men to in

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>theory anyway harass women. UM, at least out of the blue.

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Then the more that I looked into it and I

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>would ask for proof, I couldn't actually get them to

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>provide me with any explanation for how this worked. Eventually,

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>at one point UM they did tell me their abuse rate,

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 1>which is the number of people who are kicked off

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the app for violating these hate speech and harassment rules,

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is seven to eight percent. But it's been the same

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>throughout the entire time. So they've instituted these policies and

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>not much is really changing, And there's no real benchmark

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 1>for that, right because we don't know what that rate

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is that other dating sites right exactly. And you know,

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>I talked to UM a couple of dating sites off

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the record, and they said, well, we don't know how

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:42.919
<v Speaker 1>you can compare us because we all have different terms

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of service agreements and different user bases and that sort

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of thing, which it was there. But the reason why

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I started asking these questions is because former employees were

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>telling me Bill Bumble doesn't actually check to see if

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>anything that it does makes much of a difference. And

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 1>once I heard that from many people, I started to

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of rethink, Okay, so what does it mean. You know,

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that Bumble does is it bans

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>shirtless selfies. So their explanation for why they baned shirtless selfies.

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Is that of the accounts that are reported for bad

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 1>behavior have these shirtless selfies in them? So they banned them,

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>but you could just upload a different picture. There's no

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>real I mean, how does that mean women are safer

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>just because you can't take your shirt off into photo anymore.

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So they don't have any explanation for how this actually

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>benefits anyone. I want to go back to the culture

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of the company because it in part rests and part

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of the narrative rests on where the company sits sort

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of Organizationally, it's part of a larger company now and

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in fact, Whitney Wolf heard has essentially ascended to to

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>an even higher position. Tell us about the company and

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the parent company. Yeah, so if you've heard anything about Bumble,

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you you might know its origins story. But actually from

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning has been Um, part of a larger

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:09.439
<v Speaker 1>company originally called Bad. In June there's a structure change

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and now it's called Magic lab Um. But but Do

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is a London based dating app that runs primarily I

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:20.439
<v Speaker 1>think in Europe and Latin America. Bumble was started sort

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>of after the fact and has always been built by

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Bad engineers in London and then marketed and designed by

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Herd and wolf Heard and her team of women in Austin.

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's this weird mix of you know, it's a

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>scrappy startup, but it's also not And but DO was

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>run by a Russian billionaire, right, so many fun facets. Yeah,

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and BED has its own culture problems. There was a

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>great Forbes article a few months ago about um allegations

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>of sexual harassment over there and just the lack of

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>women's ability to advance the workplace at the DO. And

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 1>yet here's Bumble this like, you know, beacon of equality, Claire,

0:40:57.960 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>when you set out to do this story, I mean

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 1>part of it sounds like you wanted to know a

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about this person and the and the

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:06.720
<v Speaker 1>identity behind Bumble. I mean, tell us about your mission

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of what you what you hope to get out

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of it? What do you think you ultimately got out

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of it it? Yeah, I mean so I came to this

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>story because I had read all of the great press

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 1>about Bumble, and I thought, while they are doing so

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>many great things, and let's take a look at this company,

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>because if we can figure out what Bumble is doing,

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we can figure out, you know, what other companies should

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>be doing or how they should be changing their mission.

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But the more that I looked into it, the more

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I realized these problems are really complex. I talked to

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>this woman who is um an expert on trying to

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>eradicate hate speech, and she talked about working with Facebook,

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and there were specific terms that Facebook wanted to make

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>sure that people couldn't say derogatory, but also some of

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>those same terms people throw around at each other in

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a sort of endearing kind of way. And so if

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you decide to scrub that entirely from Facebook, you are

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>capturing of the posts that use it in sort of

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a nice way, right, nice but whatever, um so, non

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 1>non threatening, jokey kind of way, friend to friend. And

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>so what she was saying is that, you know, to

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 1>do this is much harder than just banning something. And

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>when I heard that, I thought, Okay, well, mostly what

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Bumble does is banned things. They don't have any explanation

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for how that actually works her high how that's beneficial.

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure that they're really solving anything. That's clear.

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Setteth who did the story on Bumble, and you can

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 1>find that story online and also on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Interesting this woman young, she was a co founder of

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Tinder and here she is behind bumble. But it's interesting

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>about a company that sets out with a specific mission

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.359
<v Speaker 1>UH and cleverly digs into does it, you know, live

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>up to that mission and does it create what it

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>promised well? And this is a story that's ultimately about

0:42:56.480 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the culture of the company, sort of the culture of

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the world we're living in right now as well even

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:05.240
<v Speaker 1>lawmaking to some extent, and how corporate influence can play

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a role there. So New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy, he's

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>heading into his third year. UH. He did give his

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>State of the State. I caught up with him. Talked

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>about a variety of things that are going out of

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the state, but we kicked things off with talking about

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that US China trade deal. Here's what the governor had

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to say. Trade impacts US, UM significantly. We have one

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest ports in the United States. UH. And

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:30.720
<v Speaker 1>so for that reason alone, never mind our other goods

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and services that are made in New Jersey. UM. I believe, UH,

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 1>at its core, there are legitimate issues with China period UM.

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And and that's that's not to me in question. What

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>has been in question is how we've gone about that

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:54.359
<v Speaker 1>UM and I have not supported the approach to this.

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I would have signed on the dotted line UH A

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of what was to go shade of assuming labor

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and consumers were protected. I would assigned what the Obama

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>had administration had worked on. But having said all that,

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 1>lowering the trade temperature, as you suggest, taking another distraction

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 1>off the table, I think is a good thing. I'm

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>not qualified to tell you that this is a good

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>trade deal. Again, I look at any deal through the

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 1>eyes of consumers and labor, but putting aside the specifics,

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>anything that can lower the temperature I think is good. Governor,

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about your kind of what I see

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is like two objectives with his Jobs Jobs New Jersey

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Plan UH an initiative. It is about helping employers access talent.

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:41.360
<v Speaker 1>It's also about helping residents that are in New Jersey

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>develop the skills. I hear this across the country that

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone is working on these initiatives. What specifically are you

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>going to do to help New Jersey residents have the

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>skills that they need for the jobs that are in demand. Yeah,

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>you've got it exactly right. First, of all. So the

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>notion here is this is what employers need for the

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the econom to me of tomorrow. These are the employees

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're producing with the skills they've got. How can

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:09.839
<v Speaker 1>we as seamlessly as possible shrink the gap and make

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:12.919
<v Speaker 1>it line up as as best we can? You're write,

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>lots of places are doing this, but no place starts

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 1>where we start. Number one public education system in America,

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>highest concentration of scientists and engineers per square mile in

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the entire world, a diversity unlike any other American state.

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>We just got ranked to be the smartest state in

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the nation. Uh. We start in a very good place,

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:36.799
<v Speaker 1>but again, getting that match to work. I can't tell

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you how many ceo s board chairs I've sat with

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you say listen, we love it. My first question is

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>where am I going to get the workforce for tomorrow?

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And just at this on the other side of the

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:50.399
<v Speaker 1>coin with recent graduates saying, listen, I feel really good

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 1>about my education, but I want to make sure the

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 1>skills have got will get me the job that I want,

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and so our job is to make that match as

0:45:57.400 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>best we can. I'm understanding. Of course, you guys are

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:03.359
<v Speaker 1>gradually raising the minimum wage. Small businesses are selling us

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that that is killing them. How do you respond to that?

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 1>And we know small business is always the backbone of

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:12.359
<v Speaker 1>really our nation's economy. Yeah. By the way, our administration,

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 1>for the first time, Carol has a small business unit

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 1>in our Economic Development Authority. That's never happened before. I

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 1>think six of the employment in our state is technically

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>by small businesses as it relates to minimum wage. One.

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>One way we're doing this is we're doing it gradually. Uh.

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:33.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a five year glide path to fifteen dollars an hour. Uh.

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's explicitly because of the small business community. Secondly,

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:40.280
<v Speaker 1>depending on how small you are, there are carve outs

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in the glide path is even longer. UM. I can't

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 1>justify having a two income household earning below the poverty

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>line in New Jersey. Uh, it's just it's unacceptable. So

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:55.760
<v Speaker 1>we had no choice but to go from eight dollars

0:46:55.760 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and something that we're now at eleven dollars. Uh. In

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in several years from now, we'll get to fifteen dollars.

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>It's the right thing to do. I think we're doing

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it in a responsible way, particularly with our small businesses.

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>And I hope we can have one of those one

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:12.279
<v Speaker 1>plus one equal three outcomes. At the other end of

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum, the millionaires tax. Gotta ask you about it.

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:16.839
<v Speaker 1>You keep pushing for this millionaires tax. It was in

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:19.720
<v Speaker 1>your state of the state. Um, you know, your fellow

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in New Jersey seemed to say it's a dead issue.

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Why do you keep pushing? What chance is there for

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>success here? Yeah, I'd say I just challenge a little

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>bit the basis of the question, my fellow Democrats. A

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>millionaires tax actually in New Jersey polls in the seventies,

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:39.759
<v Speaker 1>including a wild majority of Democrats and a majority of

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Republicans believe it or not. Why do we want to

0:47:42.360 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>do it? Because it's the right thing to do, and

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not begrudging folks who have done well. There are

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty two thousand and something folks in this state out

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:52.839
<v Speaker 1>of nine million who are in this category. Bless them

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 1>for their success. We take our hat off to them.

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 1>We want more of them. That's not the point. It's

0:47:57.360 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 1>not us versus them. We want them to pay a

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:01.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit it more. And the reason we want this

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is two reasons. Number One, will take the proceeds and

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 1>will put it directly into the middle class, UH direct

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:13.720
<v Speaker 1>middle class property tax relief and K through twelve education funding.

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I inherited a state where the middle class had been ravaged.

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:19.759
<v Speaker 1>We're on a two year run now where we are

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>making historic investments. This will allow us to accelerate that.

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And in particular, property tax is the big tax burden

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in the state above all else. And that's Phil Murphy,

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 1>governor of the state of New Jersey, coming off of

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:36.279
<v Speaker 1>his State of the State address, talking about your home state,

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Carol Master right, my great home state of New Jersey.

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:39.879
<v Speaker 1>So we did talk about a lot of stuff trade

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:41.320
<v Speaker 1>because it was in the news. Wanted to see what

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the impact was on the state, but also about his

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 1>mission for the millionaires tax and so much more. So

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 1>fund is to check in with he. He's an interesting

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:51.839
<v Speaker 1>politician to be se the Opener pursuits. This week, it's

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:54.400
<v Speaker 1>about building around greenhouse. I know, Jason Kelly, you've been

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:56.319
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that. I've been thinking so much about it.

0:48:56.360 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>But what we debated our houses, greenhouse conservatory, green house conservatory,

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 1>What to do? What to do? James Tarmy is here

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>with us in New York City. Didn't see this one

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>coming and yet it's a fascinating tale. So this is

0:49:10.000 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>how people are spending their money. It turns out that

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>very wealthy people in the last ten years or so

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 1>have started spending hundreds of thousand dollars of dollars, if

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>not millions of dollars, on their own private greenhouses in

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>an effort to control where their produce comes from. Is

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:29.120
<v Speaker 1>this to grow their own kale? What is it? Well? Possibly, yes, kale, tomatoes, lettuce, peppers,

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff that you would just buy at a

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>normal supermarket. People are very aggressively trying to grow on

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>their own. So you end up getting tomatoes that if

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you actually advertise the cost of what the actual greenhouse

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 1>costs and so forth costs like forty dollars of tomato

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:49.520
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. So yes, it's and and let's be honest,

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:53.680
<v Speaker 1>by grow their own, it's usually hire someone to grow

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 1>their own, or try to hire something. We're getting a

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:59.759
<v Speaker 1>little bit ahead of ourselves, of course, But the entire

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 1>shoot that many people have run up against is that

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the person who they call their gardener is who's the

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 1>person who trims hedges and you know, transplants things. There's

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 1>not in fact trained in horticulture, and train maybe in landscaping,

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but not horticulture exactly exactly. And so people are discovering

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that they build this massive infrastructure and think that they

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 1>can hire people to actually do what the infrastructure is for, namely,

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 1>grow plans, and end up being in a situation where

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>they literally cannot find anyone to actually enact their their plans.

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:33.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, so let's take a few steps back and

0:50:33.920 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about, um, what you found out. I mean,

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:39.319
<v Speaker 1>it really is kind of going back to what the UK. Right,

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:43.240
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of greenhouses. Yes, one person, it's one person

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 1>says that greenhouses in the New York UK are what

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>garages are to the US, and essentially everyone has them.

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But a bit of a bit of a blow. But um,

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:57.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, anyone can have a greenhouse technically if it's

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a kind of little glass shack, but really those are

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:04.479
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes called cold frame houses, um, where it's just sort

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:07.719
<v Speaker 1>of try to protect the plants from the frost. And

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:10.279
<v Speaker 1>these can be quite cheap. Once you start getting into

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:13.560
<v Speaker 1>an actual greenhouse that's meant to nurture and grow in

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 1>winter plants all year round, you end up having to

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 1>control temperature fluctuations during the day and night. You have

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 1>mechanical systems. You have a very very complex series of

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:30.839
<v Speaker 1>different machines and various calculations that you have to take

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 1>into account when you're constructing this ostensibly kind of you

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>calic little idyllic structure. All right, So going back to

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:42.719
<v Speaker 1>where we started a little bit, there's a greenhouse and

0:51:42.719 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>then there's a conservatory. Conservatory seems much more relaxing. It

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is relaxing, but it's also not great for actually growing plants.

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:52.359
<v Speaker 1>It's great for keeping plants, right, you know, as as

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>many people know, keeping plants in a glassy place during

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the summer and winter means that the plants, if you

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 1>water them, rive. However, it actually is not the best

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 1>place to grow plants, first of all, because you need

0:52:06.480 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of soil um and you need to water

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 1>them aggressively. But also plants need very different temperatures oftentimes

0:52:12.160 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>than um what you know your fern in your living

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:17.400
<v Speaker 1>room needs. And so if you're actually taking this seriously

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and trying to grow lettuce or whatever, um, you can't

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:22.880
<v Speaker 1>really have it attached to your house. You need to

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 1>standalone space, and you need a lot more serious of

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>an investment, I think, and maybe plants need a climate

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:37.919
<v Speaker 1>control that's not exactly comfortable for human beings. Right, So

0:52:38.480 --> 0:52:41.279
<v Speaker 1>now when it comes to cost, then it starts to

0:52:41.320 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>get incredibly expensive, especially if you wanted to look nice.

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, a lot of these companies have a

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of base model that are around three graft feet

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that starts starts at approximately fifty dollars um and that

0:52:55.960 --> 0:53:00.160
<v Speaker 1>cost will double when it comes to the mechanicals done

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is being implemented everything. So at the base amount for

0:53:03.120 --> 0:53:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these people, they're spending at least a

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:08.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars, if not a lot more. And going

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:11.799
<v Speaker 1>back to what we were initially discussing, they spend all

0:53:11.880 --> 0:53:14.880
<v Speaker 1>this money. And then one person told me that these

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>greenhouses end up being very very expensive storage sheds after

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a little while because they really can find anyone to

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:25.480
<v Speaker 1>staff it, right, that's really said. The point is though,

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:27.440
<v Speaker 1>also that there are these companies that are doing it,

0:53:27.480 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds like they are more in demand, right,

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that people do want them. These companies have seen their

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>sales at the high end treble and in some cases,

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, one company went from around fifteen greenhouses annually

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:47.760
<v Speaker 1>priced above two to more than fifty on an annual

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 1>basis in ten years. That is, I think objectively, an

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:55.520
<v Speaker 1>explosion in demand. Sounds like the real business opportunity is

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:59.439
<v Speaker 1>in staff and greenhouses at this point. So good luck,

0:54:00.200 --> 0:54:04.720
<v Speaker 1>good luck following that dream exactly, house tomatoes exactly dreaming

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:07.239
<v Speaker 1>about Yeah, you know, I mean this has been fun,

0:54:07.520 --> 0:54:09.239
<v Speaker 1>but you know, maybe I need to go staff some

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:14.239
<v Speaker 1>greenhouse at Tiget need exactly, James Tarry always great, Thank you,

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:16.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for having me so in pursuits

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 1>this week. It's not a supercar, it's not a race car,

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:22.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not an exotic concept car. It is a station wagon, or,

0:54:22.360 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 1>as I have learned to call it, a Carol Carve

0:54:24.680 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 1>station wagon. Yeah, Hannah Elliott is here. She's telling us

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:32.720
<v Speaker 1>about this sleek new Audie that's making station wagons sexy,

0:54:32.800 --> 0:54:35.319
<v Speaker 1>although apparently to some people they always were, always were,

0:54:35.360 --> 0:54:36.759
<v Speaker 1>So tell us about the car that you wrote. So

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:39.800
<v Speaker 1>this is very exciting in the world of station wagons.

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:42.799
<v Speaker 1>This is the Audi R S six a Vaunt and

0:54:42.840 --> 0:54:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it has not been sold in the United States until

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this year, and it's basically a supercar in station wagon form.

0:54:51.560 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you love station wagons, this is a very

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 1>exciting thing. We're finally getting something fast, powerful, cool, even

0:54:58.000 --> 0:54:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear about the car. But what is

0:54:59.520 --> 0:55:01.319
<v Speaker 1>it about? Is it that there are a ton more

0:55:01.360 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 1>wagons over in Europe? Yeah, you know ursus here. Europeans

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 1>have this thing where they respect and honor the tradition

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of the station wagon. Let's not forget this is the

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>shooting They call it a shooting break in Europe, and

0:55:12.760 --> 0:55:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that that comes from the tradition of going out on

0:55:15.000 --> 0:55:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the hunt and you take a shooting break and you

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 1>open the back of your car and it's a nice picnic.

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've got that long roof line. So of

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>course that the Europeans get it. We're slowly catching on

0:55:26.360 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and the automakers have finally decided to give us what

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we want. And so how much of this is about

0:55:31.880 --> 0:55:34.520
<v Speaker 1>just space in the sense that like Europeans, they have

0:55:34.840 --> 0:55:37.720
<v Speaker 1>traditionally like a little less space both in their homes.

0:55:38.080 --> 0:55:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a smaller part of the country. Right here in

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States, were like bigger is better, whether it's

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a minivan, whether it's an escalator or a suburban or whatever.

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:50.080
<v Speaker 1>We've gone big and not been as economical. I guess

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 1>with the way we design cars. Is that Does that

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>make sense totally? Um? I think the key word here's functionality.

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:59.719
<v Speaker 1>You get something that is the height of a car

0:55:59.840 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and the width of a car, so it's smaller than

0:56:01.520 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a sub, but it has the functionality of an suv.

0:56:04.600 --> 0:56:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's maybe the thinking person's sub. It's practical, you

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:11.239
<v Speaker 1>can put you know, the back door. It probably has

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:15.600
<v Speaker 1>slightly less space than an suv, but it's as functional,

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say. So we're talking functionality, all right, functional,

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But you sounded like this car from driving it, that

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you liked it. Tell us where you drove it and

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:25.879
<v Speaker 1>what the experience was. Okay, So I took this out

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in the hills in Malibu, and you you may not

0:56:28.200 --> 0:56:31.760
<v Speaker 1>think this because there's there's, of course the highway in Malibu,

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but if you take a hard right and you go

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 1>up in the hills, there are some really aggressive turns

0:56:35.960 --> 0:56:38.680
<v Speaker 1>up there. So I took this a vaunt up there

0:56:38.840 --> 0:56:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and it performed. I had just gotten out of the

0:56:42.680 --> 0:56:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Audi R eight and got into this. Now that rates

0:56:45.560 --> 0:56:48.680
<v Speaker 1>their sports car. It kept right up. It has almost

0:56:48.719 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>six hundred horse power, which is kind of insane, all

0:56:51.480 --> 0:56:54.560
<v Speaker 1>wheel drive, all these crazy drive modes. It was a

0:56:54.600 --> 0:56:58.360
<v Speaker 1>blast and it sounds incredible. Well, talk to us a

0:56:58.360 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the growl of the car. You actually

0:57:00.040 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have a line in the story. Yeah, this is made well,

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:06.840
<v Speaker 1>oh the R rated line. Yes, it does. It sounds

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like a sports car. And this engine note was made

0:57:09.400 --> 0:57:13.360
<v Speaker 1>specially for the American market because Audie knows Americans again

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 1>might be a little hesitant about the station wagon thing,

0:57:16.200 --> 0:57:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so they made a unique engine note specifically for the

0:57:18.960 --> 0:57:22.479
<v Speaker 1>American market. It does sound really aggressive. And so where

0:57:22.480 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 1>does this fit? Sort of in the price range? Mean,

0:57:25.080 --> 0:57:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Audi obviously is is higher end, but Mercedes, i think,

0:57:28.080 --> 0:57:32.480
<v Speaker 1>also has a pretty popular Audie I'm sorry. Mercedes does

0:57:32.560 --> 0:57:35.560
<v Speaker 1>make great station wagons. Um that it makes even a

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:39.400
<v Speaker 1>MG station wagons which are cereals mid six or you know,

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in the six figures. Um. Audie tells me that this

0:57:42.760 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to be roughly a hundred and twenty thousand.

0:57:44.840 --> 0:57:47.160
<v Speaker 1>They haven't come out with official pricing yet, so it's

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:51.200
<v Speaker 1>very expensive. Audi does make other less expensive wagons that

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:54.400
<v Speaker 1>are around fifty thousand, so it's a big jump. Um.

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you think, okay, portion makes a Panamera sports

0:57:57.080 --> 0:57:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to reasona, which is kind of like a wagon to Again,

0:57:59.440 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 1>these are all the six figures. Now these are primo cars.

0:58:02.840 --> 0:58:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So alright, so you liked how it drove, tell us

0:58:06.000 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 1>about the interiors, the exteriors in terms of it. So,

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:11.920
<v Speaker 1>my favorite thing about the technology on this car is

0:58:12.360 --> 0:58:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in the back. It has a motion sensor that if

0:58:14.520 --> 0:58:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you swipe your foot underneath the back, it opens the

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 1>back hatch, which I think is so cool that my

0:58:22.040 --> 0:58:26.280
<v Speaker 1>whole family made fun of me. When your hands are

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 1>full of its completely it's a great thing. Um to

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 1>your point about the interiors, it comes with two special

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:35.200
<v Speaker 1>interiors of the R S Spec interiors. You've got this

0:58:35.240 --> 0:58:38.360
<v Speaker 1>honeycomb pattern on the seats. It's basically trim like a

0:58:38.440 --> 0:58:43.000
<v Speaker 1>sports car with perforated leather um. The whole interior is

0:58:43.320 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>gorgeous tradition. And so what does this tell us about

0:58:47.440 --> 0:58:50.400
<v Speaker 1>where the market may go from here? It's very interesting.

0:58:50.520 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. The answer is, I don't know. I

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:54.919
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's a bit of a trial thing. We've

0:58:54.920 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>seen SUVs continue to dominate. There's no sign of that

0:58:57.840 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 1>changing or slowing down. But this isn't interesting option, and

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it is telling that they are bringing it to market now.

0:59:04.960 --> 0:59:07.320
<v Speaker 1>It's telling that it's not a hybrid it's it's a

0:59:07.400 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 1>full on V eight car, so we'll see. And fuel efficiency,

0:59:12.360 --> 0:59:15.480
<v Speaker 1>do you get any more efficiency here than you would

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:18.800
<v Speaker 1>for a big gas guzzling SUV. Yes, you know, I

0:59:18.840 --> 0:59:21.440
<v Speaker 1>will say this is not the most efficient station wagon

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in the world, but yeah, I mean if you drive

0:59:23.480 --> 0:59:26.400
<v Speaker 1>this on long um stretches, you can maybe get twenty

0:59:26.440 --> 0:59:29.800
<v Speaker 1>miles per gallon, so so yes, a little better. Yeah.

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you anticipating other folks? Is there anybody else to

0:59:32.720 --> 0:59:34.360
<v Speaker 1>like bring in a wagon? I don't know, I don't

0:59:34.480 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't think. So, you know, again,

0:59:36.640 --> 0:59:42.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a really niche audience. We'll see. We'll see.

0:59:42.920 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of new and exciting and hasn't really been

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:49.240
<v Speaker 1>done like this before, so we'll see. I'm excited to

0:59:49.520 --> 0:59:52.919
<v Speaker 1>find out Christmas there could be a bow on this car.

0:59:55.040 --> 0:59:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I love my wagon. I gotta tell you, right, Hannah Elliott,

0:59:58.040 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot, Thank you guys, and that wraps up

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Bomberg Business Week's weekend podcast. Thank you so much for

1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>joining us. I'm Jason Kelly and I'm Carol Masser. Proud

1:00:05.240 --> 1:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of my station wagon. Be sure to tune into Bloomberg

1:00:07.120 --> 1:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Radio Live Monday through Friday. All starts at

1:00:09.560 --> 1:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>two pm Wall Street Time, And if you can't catch

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>us live, get our daily podcast wherever you download your podcast.

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch the show live on YouTube. Just

1:00:17.440 --> 1:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>search for Bloomberg Global News and get this week's edition

1:00:20.120 --> 1:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine. It's on newsstands now. We'll be back

1:00:22.600 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>next week at the same time. This is Bloomberg