WEBVTT - Selects: How Police Interrogation Works

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>M Hey, everybody, it's Josh and for this week's s

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Y s k Seles, I've chosen how police interrogation works

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>from back in two thousand and fourteen. It's a really

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>fascinating look into how the cops get people to admit

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:18.639
<v Speaker 1>that they did the worst thing they ever did in

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>their entire life, and some people who didn't do anything

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>at all to admit that they did something. If you

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>thought that was confusing, just wait till you hear this episode.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But it is pretty mind blowing, So buckle up. I

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>hope you enjoy and as much as anything, I hope

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it really opens your eyes. Welcome to Stuff you should know,

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>A production of I Heart Radio. Hey, and welcome to

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant,

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>uh and Noel. I guess producer nol is over there,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>which makes this stuff you should know. Jerry's on the beach.

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Good for her. Yeah, and I'm Jelly. Yeah. It'd be

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>nice to be on the beach right now. Sure would

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>podcasting on the beach. Yeah, there's a beach person for sure.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>In uh is she okay? She was flip pops like

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in the dead of winter. Yeah, that's true. The beach

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>person which got nice feet up. Can I say that

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I acquired for saying that. I don't think so. If

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you said it, like alone in a room or something

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>she didn't feel like she could leave, you'd probably get

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>fired for that. But yeah, saying it on the podcast

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to everybody's probably in the clear. Okay, we'll find out.

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she edits these so she'll say thanks Juckers.

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>You so Chuck. Have you ever been interrogated by the police. No,

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that's good. No, it's a good way to be. I

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>was shaking down on the street once, but they didn't

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:55.559
<v Speaker 1>ask us any questions. Stopping frisk Yeah, in New York.

0:01:55.800 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>In Athens, m just walk into the car after being out,

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>threw us all against the wall. Fristus been left. I'm

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>sure it was a real cop. Yeah, there were cops. Man.

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I was like, what's going on? Huh? I don't even know.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I still don't know what happened. Well, I guess they

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>were just stopping and frisking. A little known fact, Athens,

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>George is the real home of stopping frisk Well, five

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>minutes after it happened, we didn't care. You know, these

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>are college days. Yeah. Now though you must be burning

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>with a sense of injustice over the whole thing. Well,

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I ask you if you've ever been interrogated by the police,

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>because we're about to talk about police interrogation, so it

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>seems appropriate. And before we get started, I have some

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>side reading that I think my interest some people. Um

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>there is a New Yorker article called the Interview. Um,

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>there's one called Joe Arity was the Happiest Man on

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Death Row. It's in Westward. Uh, there's something called Brooklyn's

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Baddest which was in g Q. And then lastly, looking

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>left or right doesn't indicate your lying in Smithsonian. So

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>all those articles are awesome, and they all have something

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to do with this police interrogation, which is it turns

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>out becoming an increasingly controversial subject. Yeah, and I think

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this probably brings our police suite to a close or

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>close to it, don't you think? I think so every

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>time I know, and I didn't even know this existed,

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and then I saw it and it turned out to

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>be one of the more interesting ones, I think. Yeah,

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of falls into this um law enforcement category,

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>into the subcategory of are largely debunked armchair psychological or

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>armchair psychology techniques like polygraph Yeah, we did that, Fingerprints,

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we did that, truth serum we did that. Yeah. Like,

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>there's all these episodes that we've done out there about

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just law enforcement techniques. We're doing them. We were like,

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>oh wow, this is this should not be the way

0:03:56.240 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it is. And apparently police interrogations similar. Yeah, it's a

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of a shakedown. So let's talk about this. Like

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in in the United States, there is um a long

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and storied history of rather intense interrogation and I think

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you know this, this comes before the United States too.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>We did a medieval torture episode as well. There are

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>plenty of interrogations going on. We did the Spanish Inquisition

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that was pre United States. Yeah, I would I would

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>say that falls into the banner though, of our police

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and crime interrogation. Yeah right, So, um, the United States, though,

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>has carried on the torch of basically beating suspects up

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>to get confessions. This is where the term the third

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>degree comes from. Actually, like when somebody's like, hey, why

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>do you give me the third degree? They may or

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>may not know it, but they're they're speaking about interrogation

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>techniques that cats use to use yeah, those third degree techniques.

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of were involved deprivation, like or you know

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the one where they shine the bright light in your face.

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>That's old school. Yeah, that's an old movie trope. But

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, no access to food and water, Um, long

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>periods of isolation. We might beat up a little bit,

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we might threaten you. That's the third degree, right, And

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>then uh, starting in about the thirties, the public started

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>to say, I don't know if this is such a

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>good idea because I might end up in a police

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>interrogation one day, and I don't want to get beat up.

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And then the I guess the straw that started to

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>break the camel's back came in ninety seven in the

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>case Brown versus Mississippi, where Brown said, Hey, your thug

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>cops tied me up to a tree and with me

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>more than once, not just with me more than once.

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Strung me up in a tree to whip me more

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>than once has happened repeatedly, and I don't think that

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the confession they got should stand. The Supreme Court said,

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>we agree with you. Yeah, it was He and his

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>two buddies were accused of murdering Uh. They were tenant farmers,

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 1>murdering their ball. Basically. Of course, they were black guys

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and the boss was a white guy, so they were

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty determined. Then well we'll see over and over. A

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of these cases of coerced false confessions are mainly

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>because someone really wants to tab somebody as the criminal. Well, yeah,

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of different reasons. There can be a

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of injustice. There can be a genuine conviction that

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this person is guilty um, and then there can be

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the case clearance um percentage that a

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>cop needs to keep up. But there's a lot of

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>reasons why a cop might say you need to confess. Yeah.

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of them too that I've seen

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>documentaries on at least or because of the public, Like,

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>hey man, we really need to finger somebody for this,

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>because people are scared, and who better than this person

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>who might not be too smart or might but might

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>be kind of poor and can't afford and doesn't you know,

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>representation doesn't know what's going on. So let's run them up,

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>run them up, ring them up, sure, run them up

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a flagpole, right and see if it sticks to the wall. Yeah.

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But despite the fact that it is not easy to

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>get someone to confess. Uh, they estimate between fort of

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>suspects do confess and that's the one thing you don't

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>want to do, and up still do it. Yeah, so

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we should say supposedly up to um eight percent of

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>suspects in in the United States waive their right to

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>silence and counsel. Yeah that's just wait, that's just agreeing

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to be interrogated, right, not necessarily confessing. Yeah. So, but

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you can get around the whole idea of a false

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>confession or of being coerced into confessing or whatever, just

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>by remaining silent, not being like part of that demand

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>your lawyer. I mean, we're gonna give you some tips, um,

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>not how to get away with a crime, but some

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>tips on if you if you are rounded up and

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>put in a room, there are some things you can do. Right.

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a public service announcement with guitars. By the

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties, they confessions that were involuntary. Um, they consider

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it involuntary, not just if you were beaten and threatened,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>but if you were all the deprivation third degree techniques

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>were no longer allowed, like even if you couldn't use

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom, or if you've been promised something in return

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>for confessing, or we'll go easy on you, buddy, or

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>if you'd even just been threatened, that counts as coercion too,

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And so in about the fifties, UM the United States said, Hey,

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 1>this kindler, kinder, gentler interrogation technique thing is is starting

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to work out. Let's put a bow on the whole

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>thing and say that for a confession to be admissible,

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>the the confess or has to sign it yeah and

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 1>say yeah, I didn't I didn't do anything under coercion.

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 1>This is my own, full, free confession and here's my signature,

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and UM, which helped but certainly didn't stop false confessions. Right.

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So the thing is is, UM law enforcement replaced the

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>physical coercion with what amounts to plainly is psychological manipulation.

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's predicated on the idea that you when you

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 1>are saying you didn't do something and you're guilty, you

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to become stressed out. And then the that

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>stress is derived from anxiety over knowing you're guilty and

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>having to lie. Because when you're being interrogated and you're

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>denying that you're guilty, the cops don't just say oh, okay,

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>well thanks, for coming by. If they think you're guilty,

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they or they want to think you're guilty, they're going

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>to keep pressing you. Like interrogations aren't necessarily brief things, right,

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So the more they press you, the more stressed you

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>should get. And the more stressed you get under this

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of um interrogation technique, the obvious, the more obvious

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it is that you're guilty, which means the more they press,

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So this feedback loop starts, right Yeah. I mean they're

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>basically relying on a few basic human things inherent to humans,

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>tendencies inherent to humans. Um. One is you're gonna probably

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>open up more to someone who is like you, uh,

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>to their If you start talking, it's gonna be hard

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to stop. And three, if you're if you're telling the truth,

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be harder to lie. Right, So they kind

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of prey on that with some age old techniques like

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 1>the good cop, bad cop. Right you you uh, if

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you're being persecuted, but then you're also

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>being rescued by somebody else, you're going to identify with

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the rescuer, trust them. That's a classic move. And here's

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the thing like that, a lot of this stuff, like

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the Good Cop part um is predicated on this complete

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and utter deception that that cop understands where you're coming

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 1>from and sympathizes with you. That cop does not sympathize

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>with few. That cop may understand where you come from,

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but he or she probably despises that, and they are

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>not your friend. But the whole one of the whole

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>points of um of interrogation is for the cop to

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>pretend like they're they're right there with you, they understand

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>where you're coming from, they feel for you. This is

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>just you're jammed up and I want to help you

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>get out of it. Oh yeah, you see. I mean

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>if if all this sounds super familiar from every TV

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>show or movie you've ever seen, is because they it's

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>been written so much that it's almost like they don't

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>need to do their own Like writers don't even need

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to do their own research into how this is differ

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>because it's just how it is in the movies. When

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it is in the movies is how it is in

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>real life. When I was reading this, I was like, oh, yeah,

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that before. I've seen that technique before, Like

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.599
<v Speaker 1>it made me Actually researching this article made me appreciate

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that there are some TV cop show writers out there

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>who like really do their homework, Like The Wire, like

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>every it was a little more nuance. It's like law

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and Order. Um, what is it? Uh? I don't watch

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>those the one Vincent didn't offer you. I don't know. Oh,

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember what it's called criminal minds something like that.

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>It's not it, um, like it's a little more overt, right,

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's all the all the factors are there. Yeah.

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Another one of the tried and true techniques is maximization.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>That's when they try to scare you. Um, if you've

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>ever heard like, oh you're you're pretty Josh, they're gonna

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>love you in prisoner. I hear that almost every day.

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>That is a classic maximization, or just you know, they're

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>going to throw the book at you for what you've done.

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>You're unless you you know, start playing along, you're gonna

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>get the max exactly. Um. They may also go the

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>exact opposite route, which is minimization, which is to create

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea that society will will commiserate with you because

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>anybody in your position would have done the same thing.

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, like that that little lady was ask him

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>for her person to be taken. You know, in this

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>day and age, in this economy, that kind of thing. Um,

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>polygraph was used for a while, and they still use that,

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>but most times, um, if you listen to our show

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on polygraphs, they're not admissible in court. So a man

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>named John Reid, he was a polygraph analyst, said, you

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>know what, there's a lot of things that happen during

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a polygraph exam that we can use without the machine,

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>just to root out the truth or lies. Yeah. Basically,

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>John Reid said, Hey, I've noticed through all of my

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>experience all of these things that a person who is

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>guilty or who confesses at least goes through. And here

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>are some ways to like really make this more efficient,

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to make them react more strongly, to get them to

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>confess faster, more forcefully. And he came up with the

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>order called the Read Technique nine steps of the Read Technique,

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>trademark of Johnny Reidon Associates. Yeah, really, because Johnny Reidon

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Associates is like this business that's still very much around. Yeah.

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I need to say that, but

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it is their technique. Yeah, And they train the CIA,

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the FBI, the local law enforcement there, like the in

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the United States, the red technique is the gold standard

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>for police interrogation. The problem is it is also being

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>increasingly proven to be based on basically armchair psychology and

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>not science. It's say, it's going through the same thing

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>right now that like a lot of the forensic sciences

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>are going through. There's like based on intuition that doesn't

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>really hold up to scrutiny. And I should say the

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>red technique has not been across the board debunked, and

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense in a lot of ways, but there

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>are studies out there that have said, like this doesn't

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>really this doesn't really hold up. Yeah, he defends it. Uh,

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>he says, it's very sound technique, but false confession comes

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>from improper use in bad police work. Yeah, and it's

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not it's not necessarily like the read people are treated

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.119
<v Speaker 1>like they're you know, they're out to get anybody and everybody.

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>The Red technique is criticized because the whole foundation that

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's built on is the presumption of guilt, and it

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>has been shown to prove or produce false um confessions.

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right, all right, If you sit down in a

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in a room to get interrogated by the cops. One

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that they're probably going to start doing is lying

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to you and saying we have evidence that they may

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>not have. We have witnesses that put you at the

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>scene that don't exist. Basically, with a few exceptions, cops

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>can lie and say whatever they want in there. And

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that is going to make someone nervous. Even though you

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>were you know, surgical gloves when you broke into that house,

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>if they say your fingers are all over the place,

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna start second guessing yourself and get nervous. Yeah.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And even if like you weren't in that house ever,

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know that you weren't in that house, you're

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna start to wonder if maybe you suffer from blackouts

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and do horrible things like this cop is saying, Wow,

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you're blacked out. Um, And yeah, the courts of upheld

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the cops right to deceive. Uh. And I've read about

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a study that found that of six and thirty detectives

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in the U. S. And Canada that were pulled say

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they use false evidence ploys where they're saying you have

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>surprised it is not a hundred yeah, you would guess,

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe the other eight percent We're just like

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>they didn't even look at what they were saying, you know,

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, they you can and they do say we

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>have your fingerprints, we have a witness, we have d

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>n A. They can completely lie about what they have

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and that they have it on you to get you

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to confess. It doesn't matter. You can't say, well that

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>cops said he had evidence doesn't matter. And the whole

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>legal basis for this idea for the cops to be

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>letting the cops deceive is this uh longstanding notion that

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>no innocent person would ever sign a confession even if

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>they were lied to about physical evidence of their guilt

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>being at the scene of the crime, because there they

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>know they're not guilty. The problem is that long standing

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>idea is coming under more and more scrutiny is being

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>found to be not the case. Like people, it's been

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>shown people will when lied to in situations like that,

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>they will infest the things that they did not do.

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I know it seems crazy for people like you and me, um,

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>because I know I would never do that, but you know,

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mentally challenged or I'm not poor, and I

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't you know, there's a lot of reasons why someone

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>might falsely confess. Yeah, and I think though also it's

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>not just necessarily like going how you are going into it. Like, Yes,

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the a lot of the like mentally ill people UM

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>make up a decent amount of UM false confessions. Same

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>with UM, mentally handicapped, cognitively impaired people, UM, people of

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>low socioeconomic status. There are a lot of a lot

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of factors that set you up to be more likely

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to have a false or give a false confession. Knowing

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>your rights. But if you took if we took you

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and ran you through a long enough UM interrogation with

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>people who knew what they were doing, they who knows

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>what you would sign, I'd be all right, we'll see

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>because I am stand this all. I know my rights.

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a very strong mind. Probably say I want

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer. Well yeah, I just ended all. And then

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd be like, m, I don't know any lawyers. Do

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you know a lawyer? I have an entertainment attorney. Does

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that count? Um, they know lawyers? Yeah, exactly. This is

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole network. So UM, once they bring you in

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the room, the room itself uh. And this is all

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>from Read's manual. He wrote a manual nineteen sixty two

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>with a Northwestern law professor named fred Inboo called Criminal

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Interrogation and Confessions. I imagine every writer in Hollywood has

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>a copy of that on their shelf. Um. But the

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>room that you see on TV, that's what there they suggest,

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, nothing on the walls, a very plain desk,

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a very uncomfortable chair on one side, two chairs on

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the other for the detectives. UM, that one way mirror

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna serve a purpose of letting people spy on

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you and just to make you nervous even if there's

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>no one on the other side, and put you out

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of reach from this one. I didn't really uh, I

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>had never really noticed. But out of reachs from just

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>light switches and maybe the the a c uh, what

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>do you call those thermostatic thermostatic just to make you

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>feel powerless. It's all a mind game to make you

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>feel helpless. So far seems pretty intuitive, pretty logical, Like

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>if you can't flip the lights on and off, it's

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>not something I would think that I would want to

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>do right then, but maybe knowing seeing that it was

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that far away, yeah, woid just give me this reinforced

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that, Like, I couldn't even if I wanted to,

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's all the way over there. That's probably small

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>detective in between me and that, like exactly, but it

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. But I point that out because that's that's

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the read technique. Stuff like that, keep the light switches

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>away from the criminal because it'll make him feel helpless,

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>right does It sounds a little hinky, but it it

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>makes sense in a way. That is the read technique encapsulating.

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's continue, Chuck, So that was that's just the room. Yeah, yeah,

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>that they suggest there there if you follow the re

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>technique to a t, and this is one of the

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>saving graces of it. Um, you're supposed to do what's

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>an initial interview, And if you're the detective and you

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>go into in an initial interview of an interrogation, you

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>are the re technique tasks you with going in without

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a presumption of guilt. Yet that's the point of the

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>initial interview, is you're supposed to be sizing your guy

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 1>up and determining for yourself as a seasoned investigator, whether

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you think initially they're guilty or innocent. I'm sure that

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>happens some Yeah, there's another study that found that it's

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>often skipped as well. Um, and that's they just start

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>like hammering right away. Well, yeah, you're throwing out the

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>the the potential for this, um, this person to be

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>treated as possibly innocent. You're not sizing up. You're going

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 1>in assuming they're guilty. So but if you if you

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 1>do go through that initial interview, the other point of

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it is that you're supposed to be creating a bay line. Yeah,

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>which I think is that showed up in the polygraph

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>one too, Yeah, which isn't surprising because John Reid was

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a polygraph expert for a while too. Yeah, and you've

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>been gratiated yourself, you know, in the first few minutes

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>by this point, like, uh, if if you're if you're

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in Philadelphia and your suspect has on like a Phillies cap,

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you might talk about the game last night, right exactly.

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And that that throws back to um, the suspect being

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>more likely. Can you trust someone that shares their same

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>views that they feel they can identify with, So the

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>detective will do whatever they can to make it seem like, oh,

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you're a Catholic, I'm a Catholic too, that kind of thing,

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, And so once you've got a little

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of rapport going on, is when you're gonna set

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>your baseline. And I thought this is pretty interesting. You don't,

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna start looking for this on cop shows

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to see if they don't overtly talk about it, if

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.479
<v Speaker 1>they're just how good they are with their you know, uh,

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>with their acting, because if they're looking at the eyes, um,

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>then they're going to be accurate, because that's one of

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the way is supposedly you can create a baseline. Um,

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna ask some some questions that require memory recall,

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.239
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna ask other questions that require more creativity,

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna look at where their eyes go. Supposedly,

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>if your eyes moved to the right, that is just recall,

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>because you're I guess looking in the direction of your

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>memory center of your brain. If it's more creative, you

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>might look to the left. And then then you're gonna

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>use these later on to see if your suspect is

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>creatively making up a lie, they might look to the left,

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>or if they're just truthfully recalling something, they might look

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to the right. Is that bunk? Yes, all right, it's

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>very dangerous too, because they that is incredibly widespread. It's

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a popular misconception. If you ask anybody if you move

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>your eyes a certain way, does it indicate your lying?

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Most people are gonna say yes, Yeah, it totally does.

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember if it's right or left, but if

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you look a certain way, it means you're lying. So

0:23:55.200 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a longstanding thing that's based actually on a self

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 1>help philosophy from the seventies, has nothing to do with science.

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And actually Richard Wiseman, who we Um incorrectly said, did

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>some research that proved that ghosts exist in our ghost episode. Yeah,

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that guy, he's done someones to debunk this. He did

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of studies and in one of the studies

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>he found um. He he used footage of people who

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>were holding press conferences searching for lost relatives. But the

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>person pleaing for their relatives return was later convicted of

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like killing or kidnapping their their relatives, so they were

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously lying. They were committing a huge lie in front

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of the public. And he found that they were just

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>as likely to look to the left or the right.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>There was no correlation whatsoever. Yeah, I'm sure there are

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>facial cues of pantomimes if you're Christopher Walkin. But um,

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>it all depends on the person to write, like, you

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>could be really good at lying or really good at

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>throwing people off with facial cues. Yeah, or the idea

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that you your eyes move in a certain direction at

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>all because you're coming up with a lie or because

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you're remembering something might not It doesn't mean anything necessarily. Yeah.

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>We also did one of micro expressions. This is a

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 1>culmination of a lot of shows. I'm realized. Yeah, it

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>really is so um that was another one. You you've

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>got the baseline set. You're watching the eyes even though

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you really shouldn't be. Um, But for the most part,

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you're you're seeing what your suspect appears like when they're

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>stressed or I'm sorry, when they're relaxed. And and the

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>reason you're creating this baseline of what they act like

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>when they relaxed is because if you ask them questions

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and they answer them and appear relaxed, then supposedly they're

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>telling the truth. Again, this is predicated on some faulty

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>ideas because here's the problem. Anxiety is not necessarily linked

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to lying. Like, yes, you may appear anxious if you're lying,

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that if you're anxious, you're lying, right,

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I'm saying? Yeah, I would do that.

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I would do the chuck chuck technique would be the

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>fast thing, like I would set him up. I'll calm

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and be like, Hey, did you watch a game last night? Yeah?

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>How cool? Why did you kill it? Old lady? Yeah?

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 1>You like the Phillies. Yeah, it was a pretty good game.

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:19.479
<v Speaker 1>How do you think they're gonna go far? Yeah? Did

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you kill your wife? And boom? That was pretty good?

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You almost said yes, yeah, really and you didn't kill

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>your wife? No? I mean, geez, that was thrilling. The

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>chuck technique. I I like the Colombo. What's that? Oh? Well,

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you're just like that's that's great. I'm glad you like

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the Phillies. I just want to thank you for coming by.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>That's it was good to meet you. Write if we

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>if we need anything, can we call you? And they're like, yeah,

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they're so relieved that they get to lead, and then you, oh,

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but one more thing. Why did you kill

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>your wife? That Colombo did? Yeah, he was a little

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>better at it than I was. He would say, there's

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>there's just there's one of the things just not making

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. If you think of your wife, why

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>were you found standing over with the knife? Yeah, so

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that's how Colombo would catch him off guard, like really

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:08.959
<v Speaker 1>get them to let their guard down. Yeah. I like that.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So you said, he I know what Colombo was. I

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>was about to say he went on and killed his wife.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But that was Robert Blake. Yeah, that was Barretta. What

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>was his technique? I don't know. I never watched Barretta

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>check your gun with the matre d and then isn't

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>that what he did? Know? What did you do? I

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>think he left his gun with the matre d soup,

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what he said he did, Like, you know, I'm

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>here table for two, here's my coat and here's my gun. Yeah,

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>well you hang onto that for me, will you be

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>my alibi? Um? I think we're at the read technique now, right,

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we are. So the the other stuff was from the

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>book that's based on the read technique criminal interrogation and confessions.

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>But now we are at the actual read technique, the

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>nine point technique that is designed to maximize um, just come,

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>which leads to more frequent confessions. Yeah, and it's actually

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it's illegal and a lot of European countries for children, um,

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>which which it should be, because that's another risk factor

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>going in. They can produce false confessions as age of course,

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get to some of those later. Those are

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of uh maddening when you read about like a

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>fourteen year old it's interrogated without their parents for like

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a full day, but it happens. So step number one

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and the re technique is the confrontation. Uh. And this

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is after the initial interview you have. You're going to

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>present the facts of the case. You're gonna tell them

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>about the evidence, um, what they're faced with, the all

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the evidence against them, even if you're making some of

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it up. You might want to invade their personal space

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>at this time if you're Matthew McConaughey, uh. And then

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you start looking for things like fidgety, uh, suspect they

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>look in their lips, are they like mustle with their hair? Um.

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And then if you're a skater, you might say, all right,

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got this guy just where I want him. That

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>guy ran his fingers through his hair. He's guilty, exactly.

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:08.959
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of part of the part of The

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>issue that a lot of critics of the re technique

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>bring up um is that basically, if you stripped non

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>verbal stuff out, then you've got some sound stuff there. Right.

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>The biggest problem is when you're trying to read nonverbal

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>cues because there it's not rooted in science, rooted in

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>armchair psychology and pop science totally. So the idea that

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody's fidgeting meanings they're guilty and they're lying. Not necessarily

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>they could be fidgeting because any human being would be

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>really uncomfortable when placed in that situation and interrogated by

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>cops who are experts at it. Right. Uh So, step

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>number two is theme development, and you're gonna be a

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>little more soothing here with a softer voice. And this

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is when you come up with some some theories and

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a story maybe of why they committed this crime. Like

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, you just couldn't go on any longer now

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>when your best friend at sex with your wife. You

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>just couldn't live with that, could you. And if the

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>suspect latches onto that in some verbal or nonverbal ways

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and they'll continue they don't, then they'll just create another theme. Yeah,

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and the the detective will basically just kind of while

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they're creating the story for the for the suspect to

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>latch onto there also actively listening to the suspect to

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>see if the suspect will latch onto it in any way,

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>shape or form, and if they don't, they try another one.

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>If they do, then they start to kind of beef

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that one up and at least alternatives, which actually comes later,

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>but in the meantime. One of the main techniques of

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the read technique is stopping denials. But I didn't do it, Josh, listen,

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you I was. But imagine my finger on

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Chuck's lips right now. That's why you would never do that.

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Now you stop denials, does it creates a sense of hopelessness,

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>like the like, don't you feel hopeless with my fingers

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on your lips? So hopeless you have no idea? Uh?

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>It makes you feel hopeless that you don't even have

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to to reason with this cop. You can't

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>defend yourself, not at all, so you have a sense

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of hopelessness. Plus, the other upside if you're an interrogator

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is that you're keeping the person from talking, meaning they

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>also can't ask for counsel. Then I don't see why

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>people don't just do that the first thing, over and

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>over say I need a lawyer, I need a lawyer,

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I need a lawyer. I read this article in I

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>think this stranger aren't the oddest Seattle. I don't know.

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a great article. It was kind of um,

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it was just kind of misleading, like the the author

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>really wanted you to to sympathize with the guy who

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>was guilty and didn't really revealed that he really was

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty guilty towards the end. But it had this this

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>really great exploit nation for why people don't ask for

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer in this article. Yes, and I've seen it before,

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but this article really got the point across that this

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>guy was, like I mean, he'd done some stuff before,

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>like I think like he um he was he dabbled

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in drugs and like ran an illegal like poker game

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that like mouthfeasance. Yeah, and he so

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>enough so that he was like he knew he was

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>technically guilty in the eyes of the law, but not

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>for this thing that they wanted him on. Um, so

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he was he had that guilt to begin with, and

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>then these cops saying like, you're gonna really look guilty

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>if you if you ask for a lawyer. That's one.

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And then the other aspect was if you lawyer up,

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we can't help you. One. If you talk to us,

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the only way we can help you get out

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of this jam. We want to help get jam like

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we we know we might we would have done the

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>same thing you did. Yeah, but the cops never want

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to get you out of a jam. No, that's not

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>what they're trying to do. And so what they were

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>saying was like if you clam up this, like, who

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>knows what's going to happen to you. They were doing

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of really effective psychological manipulation. And the guy

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they were talking to was a lawyer's son. Yeah, and

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy who like forty years old, a lawyer's son,

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and so he'd known his whole life to ask for

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer. And even this guy didn't immediately ask for

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer because these cops got him. You know, I

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't either. Actually, if I was if I was

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>arrested today after work and obviously completely innocent of anything,

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.239
<v Speaker 1>would that be mind blowing if that happened and I

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>was completely innocent. I would I would at first, my

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>first instinct would probably be like, I don't need a

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>lawyer and I didn't do anything, Yeah, like why why

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.479
<v Speaker 1>occurred that expense? Well, I think that's another aspect of

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the initial um, initial consultation. That an initial discussion where

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, it's all friendly, we're talking about the Phillies.

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Why would you need a lawyer for that? All right,

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I retract my statement. I get it now, but you

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>should stick to your original statement no matter what. Like,

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a right to counsel and there's no reason

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you should not invoke it. Your your punishment is not

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be worse for asking for a lawyer. Yeah,

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you should open up. You sound like one of those

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:19.760
<v Speaker 1>legal commercials called Josh Clark. That reminds me we should

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>do and we should mention the A C l U

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>episode that was a pretty good in too. Yeah, man,

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>this thing is just so many tangential podcasts. So the

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.240
<v Speaker 1>stopping denials, that's a big part of the read technique.

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And then um, there's something that's similar that John Reid noticed,

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>but it is a little nuance. There's a difference, uh,

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's objections to to to read denials were different

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>than objections, and objections were something to be treated differently

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>as a result. Yeah, an objection. The example they gave

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>here was like, I would never rape somebody because my

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 1>sister was raped and that it destroyed our family, So

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of course I wouldn't do something like that, right. So

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to a cop, that's not a denial. A denial is

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>like I didn't do that. I didn't do that that,

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not me. You got the wrong guy. Those are denials,

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and the cops would try to stop you from completing

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:15.280
<v Speaker 1>those sentences. That objection you just said is a denial,

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's encapsulated with um, yeah, a justification something to it.

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember when you used to take multiple choice

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>tests in high school? They always said that if you

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answer, usually the one with the most verbiage,

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the one with the most words is the right one.

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I never heard that it's true that works out. It's

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>not good at taking tests either. Well, no, wonder, we

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>need to get in the way back machine. You can

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>go take some more multiple test tests. Knowing that now,

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But the the I think that's kind of the same

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>premise for an objection. It's like, it's not just a denial.

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>It's there's more to it, and the fact that somebody

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>put that much more thought into it means that there's

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>something to that. So a cop will take that and

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>cultivate it and try to turn the at around and

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 1>they would say, we, I know you love your sister,

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know you you stood by her while she

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>was raped, So of course this wouldn't be like a

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>recurring thing. This is just a one time thing that

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you did and you were out of your head or whatever,

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>because you care about your sisters, so you would never

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>do this all the time or something. And so all

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, you're you're kind of like you're giving

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the suspect like a something to latch onto, something for

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>them to to basically re enter society to an extent,

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>because at this moment, especially if they're guilty, they are

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 1>totally on the ounce with society, and the sole representative

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of society, and who's speaking with them right now is

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the cop that's interrogating them, and everybody wants to be included. Yeah,

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't, then your a sociopath and they're

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna get you anyway. They're well, yeah, but they're gonna

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time through interrogation. So number five is

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>getting the spects attention. Is I don't know these the

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 1>real titles or is this just the liberties of the

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>author of this article. I don't know what We'll call it.

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Getting the suspects attention. And uh, this is when you

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:15.799
<v Speaker 1>pretend to be the ally of the suspect um, because

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point they're probably looking for a way out.

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's when you might go, hey, man, I get it.

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>If I call it my best friend having sex with

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>my wife, I'd kill him too. Yeah, I understand where

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you're coming from. And uh, maybe a little pad on

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the shoulder, a little rub on, a little rub on

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the back, or maybe a pad on the back and

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>just some reassurance, like I get to where you're coming from. Man,

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>it could have could happen to any of us, and

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you're in big trouble at that point. Yeah, and that's

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>probably going on like throughout. Yeah, and the themes run

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>these all overlap quite a bit. But if if there's

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 1>an objection that you've noticed that you're working, you've turned

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>around and you're working, Yeah that objection with an extra

0:37:56.280 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>layer of compassion and commiseration. Yeah. Uh, and I guess

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>really kind of start to ensnare the suspect a lot more.

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>It's weird because I'm I'm repulsed by a lot of this,

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>but I'm also very impressed by like what I've seen

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>on TV. What you can tell is someone who's really

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.399
<v Speaker 1>good at it. Oh yeah, it's an effective like an

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 1>art form. There's UM I believe something like eight percent

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 1>or seventies six percent of UM suspects who are interrogated

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in this manner when you take out people who UM

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>invoke their miranda rights, uh confess like it has an

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:38.919
<v Speaker 1>enormous confession, right, And there's a lot of people who

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority the study I saw or the number

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw, six of those confessions are from guilty people,

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>but something like point zero four percent are false confessions.

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>The problem is there's still such thing as false confessions.

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>There's no safeguards. It's just it just so happens that,

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like the false confessions are in that small of an amount. Yeah,

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and that percentage isn't high. But if you think about

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>how many people are interrogated, that's like several hundred per

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>year in the US, up to several hundred per year.

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of people. Yeah, and it's not like

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that that those people just it gets found out at

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 1>trial or somewhere down the road that they're innocent. Like,

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>those people may spend the rest of their lives in jail.

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>At the worst case, they may be executed, which has

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>probably happened in the history of the US, although it

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been um irrefutably proven yet. Yeah, and you can

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 1>listen to how the Innocence Project works. From June, we

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:45.399
<v Speaker 1>interviewed paula Is on, Oh, yeah, that's right. I wish

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I'd known a lot more about the Innocence Project back

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>when we did that episode, Like I kind of got

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it and understood it. But just over the last few years, Um,

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of I understand it even more. Yeah, I

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>wish I would have known better than It's still a

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>good episode. We talked to Paul paul Is on Yeah,

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:08.720
<v Speaker 1>she's a real pro. Yeah, no, it's not, is it? Okay,

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that's how rumors get made. Well, I just liked her

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>like more after you said that. Oh yeah, yeah, I

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 1>love Steve's on. Um, all right, and back to the

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>red technique. At this point, number six, the suspect might

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>lose resolve and uh, This seemed really obvious to me.

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>If the suspect is has his shoulders hunched, or has

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 1>got his head in his hands, or is crying, then

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>you've got them just where you want them as an interrogator, right,

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>you were going to get your confession, whether it's a

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>false confession or not. That's not guaranteed by these outward signs. Again,

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>if you strip away the non verbal stuff from the

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 1>red technique, it's it's pretty pretty good stuff. And apparently

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this is where you really want to regain their attention.

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Like if they start crying, like forced them to look

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 1>you in the eye. Uh, because I guess that works.

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>That increases the stress level. Um. So remember we talked

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>about that theme development. It's like here, here's what happened,

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they object to that, and then you

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:11.879
<v Speaker 1>take that objection, you turn it around, and they start

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to latch onto that theme couched in that objection. You

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>take that next, and as you're developing it, it becomes

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>one of two or more alternatives. But basically you're taking

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the theme that the person latched onto and you're making

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that the minimal um example. It's almost like a good cop,

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>bad cop version of reasons why you did it exactly.

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's um you you you shot that lady

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>in the back because she was a horrible person. Nobody

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to think that you did it because you

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 1>just wanted the entrance money, exactly, that anybody in your

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:59.399
<v Speaker 1>position would have done this. And everyone's gonna understand this

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>is why you not. This horrible reason, this reason, this

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>reason society can live with. Maybe you'll go to jail

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>for a year two, who knows, But when you come out,

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gonna say, Hey, that Bernie guy is okay. I

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 1>would have shot that old lady in the back too.

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Did you see that movie? Yeah, that's good. Uh, it's not. Hey,

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 1>that Bernie guy needs to burn in hell for the

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>rest of his life because it killed some poor old

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>lady for insurance money. You know. So with the cops

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>sitting there saying, here's what we're saying, you're agreeing to.

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Here's this horrible interpretation that I can't control. But this

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I've created and sculpted with your help. So let's throw

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>this horrible, big thing away and this thing that doesn't

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>seem nearly as bad is what the press will hear.

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>They will start to put it on paper. Yeah. But

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>here's what you're not thinking about what you're doing is

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>it's the same in both cases. If you're confessing to

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a murderer and you are just at a point to

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>where you're you think, man, that sounds way better in

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 1>a NewSpace paper and this other thing. And also it's

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the mouth of this detective that is

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:07.839
<v Speaker 1>um that is appearing to commiserate with you, that has

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>empathized with you, that maybe told you on the side

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like hey, I hated that old lady too, and I'm

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>glad you did it. The cop can totally say that,

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and and to win the trust of the suspect. So

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>all of these factors combine all of a sudden, you

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>have a story, you have a narrative, you're working out

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 1>with the cops. You may not even realize that that's

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. And then the cops going to say,

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a piece of paper and a pen here,

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>and I want you to write down what we just

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>talked about. I want you to write down your confession. Yeah, well,

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:42.919
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna bring someone else in there first. Well, there's

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>probably already someone else in there. They may bring a

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>third a new person in there. Uh, to try and

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 1>force them to retell their story, which they probably won't

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 1>want to do. Uh. And that's when you can introduce like, hey,

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to tell the story again to this

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>new detective. I know you're tired here to take the

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.760
<v Speaker 1>spend exactly, don't stab me with it. By this time,

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the person will likely want to do just about anything

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to get out of that room and from writing and

0:44:11.600 --> 0:44:15.359
<v Speaker 1>signing this this confession. There's salvation on the other end.

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a light at the end of the tunnel, even

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>if it's possibly jail. Yeah, they can get out of

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:24.839
<v Speaker 1>this room. They can get out of this horrible interrogation. Yeah.

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>They may promise like a hot meal, like something as

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:31.239
<v Speaker 1>simple as that can can get someone to sign a

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>confession at the end of a long, long day. So

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got the written confession, you haven't signed, Uh. They

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 1>probably have to sign an additional waiver that says I

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't write this under coercion or else. They'll include that

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in the confession and then you have basically what amounts

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>to a slam dunk conviction in court. Yep. And that

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is the read technique. Uh. And we're gonna talk about

0:44:54.000 --> 0:45:19.879
<v Speaker 1>some real cases of interrogation right after this break. Alright, Chuck.

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>So that's the red technique. You got your purpose, super effective, um,

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and it has been used in plenty of cases. Like

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we said, the number that I saw was like point

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>zero per point zero four of confessions or false confessions, UM,

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>which is extraordinarily small, which means that a lot of

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:45.439
<v Speaker 1>truly bad guys get caught through the red the red technique, right. Um.

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 1>And there's this one in this article on how stuff works, um,

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>how police interrogation works. And it's with a woman named

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Michelle Frederick. It's between her and a detective named

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Victor Lauria, and it takes place in Detroit in September

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand three. And Um, Nicole Michelle Frederick was

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the step mom to a two year old daughter, and

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the two year old daughter had shown up in the hospital,

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe, unresponsive with bruises all over her body had

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly been physically abused. And the step mom was saying,

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>she falls down a lot, like I don't think anybody

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 1>heard her, Like she just gets bruised like that, And uh,

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it certainly wasn't me, but not only was it not me,

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was anybody. The little girl just

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 1>falls down, she does it to herself. And with that,

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Detective Lauria took her to be blaming the victim that

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>she was trying to go free. By blaming this little

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>girl for being clumsy, lumsy and difficult, yes, which a

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:52.840
<v Speaker 1>detective can then latch onto is reprehensible as that sounds, uh,

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 1>by trying to get some empathy, going like, hey, I

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>get it, you know, like this is a tough baby, yes,

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's I'm sure it's trying, and it's very difficult.

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So all of a sudden, uh, Detective Lauria has has

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:09.839
<v Speaker 1>this I guess this theme, this justification that was set

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>up by the suspect, and he starts to play it out.

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>He's saying, like this this girl, she was a difficult baby.

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 1>She's crying. You lose your head for a minute and

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you get a little rough and you know it could

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>happen to anybody, and um uh ms. Frederick says, no,

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not right at all. Nobody hurt this kid. I

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 1>don't understand why you don't believe me. You seem to

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>be not listening to me, which is from what I understand,

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that's you're in the danger zone right there, and your derogation.

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>If somebody's saying, if they're pressing back their own reality

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:48.839
<v Speaker 1>on the you the detective, you're not in control, right

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>then they are. So uh, Laurias started to look for

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 1>another theme, and it was along the same lines, but

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>rather than losing your head for a minute, it was

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a split second. Something happen been in a flash of

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a minute or flash of a second, and she perked

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>up a little. Yeah, she started to latch onto that one. Yeah.

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So then he knew he had her, you know, in

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:12.439
<v Speaker 1>a pretty tough spot, and um, she started nodding her head.

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>He sets up the alternative and said, you know what,

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:21.760
<v Speaker 1>if you don't explain this thing, every he's gonna everyone's

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna just assume that you're this awful, abusive person. Um.

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:29.919
<v Speaker 1>I think people might understand more though, because everyone's been there.

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:32.960
<v Speaker 1>If we paint you know, if if it was just

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a split second thing and he lost control, people are

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get that. So those are the alternatives. All

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, and then it came, uh, it came

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>out that the her daughter had had had brain damage,

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it was likely not gonna die. And then all of

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, the suspects started saying, oh I I they're

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna get me for murder. Yeah. Well, he pointed out

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to her, He's like, by the way, you haven't even

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>asked about the condition of your daughter. And she was like, no,

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I haven't totally have. He's like, no, you really haven't.

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:03.839
<v Speaker 1>And she's like, well, how is she. He's like, she's

0:49:03.840 --> 0:49:06.279
<v Speaker 1>not gonna make it, and that's when she goes, oh no, yeah,

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:09.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be tried for murder. And she was and

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:15.320
<v Speaker 1>found guilty. Um, she she confessed, I believe right. Yeah,

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>she admitted to shaking shaking a baby and then said

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 1>out loud, I killed the little girl. I killed her right. So, Um,

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>she was convicted of killing her two year old stepdaughter.

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And last I saw, I found an appeal in two

0:49:29.560 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand five that was denied. That was the last I

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>saw of her after her conviction. So it does work,

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and Detective Lauria followed all of these steps, um, and

0:49:41.400 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>got a bad guy in this case. Yeah, and so

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times it goes down just like it should.

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But it is super controversial, which we've talked about some

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and you mentioned at the beginning. One of the biggest

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 1>problems is it's guilt presumptive. Is they go in there thinking,

0:49:57.360 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, this person's the goal of the of the

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:03.359
<v Speaker 1>interrogation is to get a confession, not to find out

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:07.720
<v Speaker 1>whether or not someone did something. In most in many cases,

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:11.240
<v Speaker 1>they go in there thinking this person is guilty. And

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:14.359
<v Speaker 1>if you're going in there thinking you're guilty, even if

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't mean to, you're gonna start to filter out

0:50:18.000 --> 0:50:21.480
<v Speaker 1>any reasons why they might be innocent, even if they're

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 1>good reasons and valid reasons. And that ain't no good, No,

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not. That's um. That's well, it's pretty huge flaw really,

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:32.359
<v Speaker 1>even if it does result in only point zero four

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 1>percent of false confessions. Yeah, and you also mentioned that, Um,

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole purpose of the interrogation is to make someone

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>stressed and uncomfortable. And then when you notice people behaving

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>stressed and uncomfortable, that's the presumption an indicator of guilt. Supposedly,

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:50.400
<v Speaker 1>when it's like you said, would you call a feedback loop,

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I want to make you stressed and uncomfortable,

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you're being stressed and uncomfortable, that means you're guilty. Yeah,

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:03.799
<v Speaker 1>it's an odd way to approach things. It's coercion UM.

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also been a lot of people to

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:08.799
<v Speaker 1>point out that a lot of these techniques are the

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:12.600
<v Speaker 1>same thing that are used in brainwashing, which we did

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a show on July two thousand nine, did a brainwashing

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:20.439
<v Speaker 1>show invading a personal space, not allowing the person to speak, UM,

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 1>using contrasting alternatives to have them come to uh, make

0:51:25.320 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 1>them feel like they're making a decision or that they

0:51:28.440 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have a choice or some sort of power. I think

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you brainwashed me in that episode two right, Yeah, we

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>did a little role play. Yeah, it was awesome. Man,

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:37.680
<v Speaker 1>um I turned you into a prep that was five

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Yeah, and then UM position and confession as

0:51:42.040 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>a means of escape. Oh yeah, that was like the

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:49.440
<v Speaker 1>last step I think before resolution was to say like

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:52.799
<v Speaker 1>just like denounce your family or whatever and you will

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>be saved or something. Right in this case, it signed

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:57.919
<v Speaker 1>this thing and man, you're gonna get that hot meal

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and that cigarette I promised you. The thing is is

0:52:01.520 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>like we said, it's uh, it does produce false confessions.

0:52:05.120 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And I saw somewhere that of people who have been

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>exonerated with DNA evidence, UM gave a false confession. So

0:52:15.719 --> 0:52:18.919
<v Speaker 1>people go to jail for years for this kind of thing. Well,

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>here's a few of the more famous cases. Peter Riley

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy three, it's an eighteen year old who

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is whose mother was murdered. Um, I think no siblings

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:31.839
<v Speaker 1>and no father, so like the only parent he'd ever known.

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And after eight hours of interrogation by Connecticut police, he

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:39.239
<v Speaker 1>confessed to brutally murdering her. Murdering her and uh, I

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was convicted on manslaughter based on the confessional loan. There

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:46.080
<v Speaker 1>was no evidence, no motive. Medical findings suggested that there

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>were at least two attackers, and uh, the town really

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:53.160
<v Speaker 1>got behind him apparently, and like, so this kid didn't

0:52:53.200 --> 0:52:54.919
<v Speaker 1>do this, He's not that kind of guy. And let's

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>have bake sales and raise money. And Arthur Miller, the

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 1>famous playwright, lived in the town, and he championed it

0:53:01.960 --> 0:53:03.239
<v Speaker 1>because he did a lot of work with a c

0:53:03.400 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 1>l U and Um. Eventually new evidence came out that

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:11.319
<v Speaker 1>exonerated him, and he was set free after three years

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in prison. Three years not too bad. That's better than

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Earl Washington Jr. Who in nineteen eighty two he was

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>described as in please everybody, I'm using scare quotes here

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>He was described by psychologists as mildly retarded. He had

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:27.200
<v Speaker 1>an i Q of sixty nine, which is a whole

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:31.239
<v Speaker 1>other kettle of fish that mean anything anyway, But um,

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:34.480
<v Speaker 1>he confessed to raping and murdering a nineteen year old

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 1>woman under interrogation. He was convicted on the confession alone, right, Yeah,

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:42.440
<v Speaker 1>just on the confession. Well, a lot of these are

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and spent eighteen years in prison, some of them on

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:50.719
<v Speaker 1>death row and was apparently rescued from the executioner with

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:53.600
<v Speaker 1>like nine days to go. Yeah. But at the same time, like,

0:53:53.680 --> 0:53:55.439
<v Speaker 1>as a jury, what are you to do when someone

0:53:55.480 --> 0:54:00.279
<v Speaker 1>says I did this, you know, I mean hopefully don't know,

0:54:00.320 --> 0:54:03.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe add some other evidence to no, I agree.

0:54:05.160 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 1>The thing is is Earl Washington's um thing. He he

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:13.040
<v Speaker 1>was somebody else was caught doing it using DNA. That's

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:15.759
<v Speaker 1>that's been a huge change to this kind of thing.

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It's at least exonerated people like free and clear. But

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that brings up another problem with false confessions. Not

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:26.240
<v Speaker 1>only do innocent people go to jail, guilty people stay free,

0:54:26.640 --> 0:54:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and they accumulate more victims over time, you know, like, um,

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:34.960
<v Speaker 1>how how how many more children would that that lady

0:54:34.960 --> 0:54:37.959
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit have abused if like she'd gotten off or something,

0:54:38.000 --> 0:54:40.919
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean, like the and the guy who

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>created UM the read technique actually had a false confession

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and wrongful conviction under his belt, a guy. If you

0:54:50.560 --> 0:54:54.319
<v Speaker 1>read the article UM the uh the interview in The

0:54:54.360 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 1>New Yorker, the first thing he talks about is this

0:54:56.840 --> 0:54:59.280
<v Speaker 1>guy in the fifties who was in jail for twenty

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>years from ordering his wife even though he didn't do it,

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:05.600
<v Speaker 1>who was um interrogated by John Reid himself. Wow. Yeah,

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:09.239
<v Speaker 1>So the guy who actually did do it went on

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:12.839
<v Speaker 1>to rape pregnant women and um commit all these other

0:55:13.200 --> 0:55:16.960
<v Speaker 1>horrible crimes that he wouldn't have He wouldn't have done

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:20.120
<v Speaker 1>had he been caught the first time, or had the

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:23.799
<v Speaker 1>cups still been looking for him. Wow. So yeah, it's

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a huge point. I mean, like, it's not just innocent

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:31.120
<v Speaker 1>people in prison, it's guilty people out still. Yeah, if

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you really want to see uh this all firsthand, I

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend the documentary from Ken burn Sarah Burns, and

0:55:37.600 --> 0:55:41.440
<v Speaker 1>David McMahon, The Central Park Five. And this is the

0:55:41.440 --> 0:55:45.920
<v Speaker 1>famous story in of five young African American men who

0:55:45.920 --> 0:55:49.400
<v Speaker 1>were set up the River for a rape in Central

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Park and they did not do it. And uh. It's

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a great documentary and it's just summarizes how you can

0:55:56.080 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>get a false confession very nicely and it all plays

0:55:59.120 --> 0:56:01.279
<v Speaker 1>out and you see these inner abuse and get really

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:05.200
<v Speaker 1>angry and uh, but that was definitely a case of

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:08.400
<v Speaker 1>UM sort of like with the Atlanta child murders, Like

0:56:08.480 --> 0:56:11.400
<v Speaker 1>people are scared to go into Central Park now and

0:56:11.440 --> 0:56:14.719
<v Speaker 1>we've got these five use who aren't so smart and

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:19.000
<v Speaker 1>they're poor, and we can we think they did it

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and I don't care what the evidence says. We need

0:56:20.800 --> 0:56:22.759
<v Speaker 1>to finger them for the crime and put them all

0:56:22.760 --> 0:56:25.880
<v Speaker 1>over the news so people will feel safe again. But

0:56:25.920 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they were eventually exonerated thanks to DNA again um, and

0:56:31.040 --> 0:56:35.160
<v Speaker 1>they spent depending on which guy, between six years and

0:56:35.239 --> 0:56:38.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve years in prison. And really great documentary and I

0:56:38.560 --> 0:56:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's on Netflix. It is it is. Have you

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:45.200
<v Speaker 1>seen it? Yeah? Yeah, that's a good one. UM, so

0:56:45.400 --> 0:56:48.920
<v Speaker 1>chuck this. We've basically been talking mostly about the red technique,

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that there are alternatives. There's some law enforcement agencies have

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:57.400
<v Speaker 1>lost faith in um, the red technique. Uh and in Britain,

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:01.919
<v Speaker 1>apparently in there's a bunch of false confessions that came

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to light and the British government said, we need to

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:07.920
<v Speaker 1>figure something else out. So they created a Blue Ribbon

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:11.759
<v Speaker 1>task force and said, come up with an alternative to

0:57:12.000 --> 0:57:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the red technique, which ironically is a technique in the

0:57:15.840 --> 0:57:20.000
<v Speaker 1>re technique. But what they came up with was called peace,

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:23.800
<v Speaker 1>which this is the worst acronym of all time, but

0:57:23.960 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>preparation and planning, engage and explain, account closure, evaluate clearly

0:57:29.200 --> 0:57:35.240
<v Speaker 1>spells peace. Yes, um. So they came up with it

0:57:35.640 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 1>after a couple of years and by two thousand and

0:57:37.320 --> 0:57:41.320
<v Speaker 1>one it was pretty widespread. But the Peace technique is

0:57:41.320 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 1>predicated on the idea that you're not going after a confession.

0:57:45.120 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 1>This technique, like you as a an investigator an interrogator,

0:57:50.640 --> 0:57:53.919
<v Speaker 1>you're going in to just get the whole story out

0:57:54.000 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and as much detail as possible, and you're not going

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:00.520
<v Speaker 1>after a confession. You're not accusing the person of the crime,

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you're being polite and you're here's another thing, and a

0:58:03.960 --> 0:58:07.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of people think that this will cure false confessions

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 1>almost in and of itself, videotaping the confession from beginning

0:58:12.160 --> 0:58:14.919
<v Speaker 1>to end. And so what the cops do is they

0:58:14.960 --> 0:58:18.240
<v Speaker 1>interview the the suspect. They say, well, what about this,

0:58:18.520 --> 0:58:21.440
<v Speaker 1>here's a discrepancy, what about this? And they're not being accusatory,

0:58:21.480 --> 0:58:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they're just putting everything out there and letting this person

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:26.520
<v Speaker 1>explain it in front of the video tape or in

0:58:26.520 --> 0:58:28.640
<v Speaker 1>front of the video camera, and then the tape is

0:58:28.640 --> 0:58:32.200
<v Speaker 1>shown to a jury and the jury apparently decides whether

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the person is lying or not. Yeah, And this is

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:38.680
<v Speaker 1>all built on the what I think is a pretty

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:42.360
<v Speaker 1>rock solid theory that it is really hard to lie

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and lie and lie and keep it all straight and

0:58:46.280 --> 0:58:50.600
<v Speaker 1>keep it all and that that congruous line that's believable

0:58:50.640 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point, if you keep talking and you're lying

0:58:54.040 --> 0:58:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a bunch, you're gonna mess up. And that's what they

0:58:56.680 --> 0:59:00.000
<v Speaker 1>prey on, especially if you've just spent the last day,

0:59:00.120 --> 0:59:04.040
<v Speaker 1>hours like drinking cruddy coffee and eating a few ho

0:59:04.040 --> 0:59:07.919
<v Speaker 1>hoes and being asked questions by interrogators, even if they're

0:59:07.960 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 1>being polite like yeah, you're you're gonna have a really

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:14.160
<v Speaker 1>hard time keeping up with what you've already said. Yeah,

0:59:14.440 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Like you've got to be a real skilled sociopath to

0:59:17.600 --> 0:59:20.400
<v Speaker 1>lie for hours and hours and hours. Uh. And then

0:59:20.400 --> 0:59:23.160
<v Speaker 1>they'll bring him again and again a week later, let's say,

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's have some more tea and let's sit

0:59:24.840 --> 0:59:27.400
<v Speaker 1>down and talk. And uh, a week later, you might

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 1>forget some of the things you said. And um, and

0:59:30.200 --> 0:59:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the cops have the video and they're writing down all

0:59:32.280 --> 0:59:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the details. Seems pretty solid to me. Yeah, so good

0:59:34.760 --> 0:59:36.640
<v Speaker 1>on you Britain. And um, there are some people here

0:59:36.640 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in the US trying to teach it to cops here,

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 1>but apparently it's just like word of mouth and the

0:59:41.800 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 1>particular jurisdiction has to be down with it and support it,

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's just not super widespread here. Yeah. Well, I mean,

0:59:48.720 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the read technique isn't the force of law. It's just

0:59:51.560 --> 0:59:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the gold standard. It's the one that everybody uses and there, like,

0:59:54.440 --> 0:59:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to be like the cops on the shows. Well, yeah, exactly,

0:59:57.480 --> 1:00:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to do the piece technique. Um, the in Canada,

1:00:01.280 --> 1:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I found a completely different technique too. It's called the Mr.

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Big technique. Have you heard of it. It's it's extremely involved. Basically,

1:00:10.720 --> 1:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you the suspect, will meet an undercover cop who's posing

1:00:16.000 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>as a criminal while you're out and about and free

1:00:18.320 --> 1:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and easy or whatever, or maybe while you're being booked whatever,

1:00:21.240 --> 1:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and you guys are gonna become friends and over the

1:00:23.320 --> 1:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>course of the next several months, this undercover cop is

1:00:27.040 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>going to gain your trust and get you to ultimately confess.

1:00:31.640 --> 1:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>That shows how little crime there is. They're like, so,

1:00:33.520 --> 1:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>would you cut down your neighbor's street right exactly where

1:00:35.960 --> 1:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like they can spend like three months on a single confession.

1:00:39.920 --> 1:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>You know. Yeah, But it's called the Mr. Big technique

1:00:42.240 --> 1:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and it actually the reason it's called Mr biggess Uh

1:00:45.200 --> 1:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in its ideal form, you, um, the suspect are become

1:00:50.960 --> 1:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>like kind of criminal compatriots with this this undercover cop

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>who then introduces you to Mr Big, this crime boss

1:00:57.680 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>who wants you to step up to the next crime

1:00:59.760 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>lab bowl. But it's gonna get you to talk about

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>this murder that you did or whatever, and then you

1:01:04.480 --> 1:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>confess it and you're being secretly taped and you don't

1:01:06.720 --> 1:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>know it and you've just entrapped yourself. Man. I love Canada,

1:01:11.280 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Mr I might have to move there, man, Yeah, you're

1:01:14.520 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna stick around after a Toronto or Vancouver might just

1:01:18.600 --> 1:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>one country. So we said earlier we were gonna give

1:01:21.800 --> 1:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>some tips. I think we'd be remiss if we didn't. Um.

1:01:24.520 --> 1:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>They seem a little silly, but they recommend you just

1:01:27.600 --> 1:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>don't talk. You don't talk, they said, imagine the words

1:01:31.160 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I invoke my rights to remain silent painted on the

1:01:33.360 --> 1:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>wall and stare at them. Uh, ask for counsel, ask

1:01:38.400 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for a lawyer. And then the number five thing they

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>say to do is cultivate hatred for your interrogator. Who

1:01:44.520 --> 1:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>who's that from Peace Help Beagle or something weird like that.

1:01:47.720 --> 1:01:51.439
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, it's for recommendations for animal rights activists who

1:01:51.480 --> 1:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>get arrested. So yeah, he seems kind of basic to me.

1:01:57.600 --> 1:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>It is, but I think it's one of those things

1:01:59.280 --> 1:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>where they can easily go out the window when you're

1:02:02.280 --> 1:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in that situation, you know. Yeah, and again, if you're

1:02:06.040 --> 1:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and you invoke your right to council,

1:02:08.640 --> 1:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that like the cops are they have to stop,

1:02:11.080 --> 1:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and if they don't, that's a that's a big problem.

1:02:13.600 --> 1:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I kind of perversely want to know how I would

1:02:15.840 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>hold up. I know it's no laughing matter and I

1:02:18.320 --> 1:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't joke around about it, but I would like to

1:02:20.200 --> 1:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be interrogated just to see. Uh so, Uh, I guess

1:02:28.120 --> 1:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that's if you want to learn some more about UM

1:02:30.800 --> 1:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>police interrogation, check out this article police interrogation on how

1:02:34.320 --> 1:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. It's a good one, um, and

1:02:37.200 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you can find that by using the search bar, of course.

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And since I said that it's time for listener mail,

1:02:43.440 --> 1:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this Jittery Joe's. Oh Yeah Coffee. Hey guys, Hope,

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Paul as well my wife Cassie now are big fancy

1:02:50.880 --> 1:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>yalls and uh we've been listening for years. This summer

1:02:53.600 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we took a two month honeymoon to Southeast Asia. It

1:02:56.080 --> 1:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>was a blast. Your podcasts kept the sane. Thanks for that.

1:02:59.480 --> 1:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>You sent you a postcard from uh angkor Wat in Cambodia. Uh.

1:03:04.520 --> 1:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>It was bought there, written in Borneo, and mailed from Malaysia.

1:03:08.360 --> 1:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember so it was well traveled. Um. Anyway, we live

1:03:10.600 --> 1:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in Athens and love to hear your stories about Athens.

1:03:12.920 --> 1:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>We actually live in five Points on the Shortcut Road

1:03:16.400 --> 1:03:19.439
<v Speaker 1>where Chuck told about his mystery creepy old Lady ghost story.

1:03:19.480 --> 1:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I drive by there every day and I always keep

1:03:21.680 --> 1:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>an eye out for her. But my day jobs with

1:03:24.960 --> 1:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Jittery Joe's Coffee Roasters, a local Athens institution, and um,

1:03:29.280 --> 1:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>he brought a huge box of coffee and shirts and

1:03:35.200 --> 1:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>hats and hand delivered it to the office. And Uh,

1:03:38.960 --> 1:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he was surprised to know that. I remember

1:03:41.040 --> 1:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>when Jittery Joe's first opened, because he was like, oh, well,

1:03:44.080 --> 1:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that was before my time. I think he I didn't

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>think I was as old as I was, But I

1:03:50.440 --> 1:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>remember Jittery Joe's opening up. It was a big deals,

1:03:52.680 --> 1:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>like the first kind of good indie coffee house in Athens.

1:03:55.640 --> 1:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know they were the first, but I'm not

1:03:57.440 --> 1:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>surprised the first one I remember at least. But he

1:04:00.560 --> 1:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>suggests the Sumatra Wahana. He said, it's unlike any coffee

1:04:03.760 --> 1:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I've ever had. People either love it or hate it.

1:04:07.240 --> 1:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So um, that is from Mike Lord and you can

1:04:10.680 --> 1:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just look up Jittery Joe's online. I'm sure you can

1:04:12.880 --> 1:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>order this stuff. Yeah, you definitely can. Thanks for the coffee, Mike,

1:04:15.480 --> 1:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it's good. Yes, and thank you to your wife Cassidy

1:04:18.360 --> 1:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for all the support. Uh. If you want to give

1:04:21.680 --> 1:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Chuck and Eye free stuff, we are happy to accept it.

1:04:24.680 --> 1:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>You can get in touch with us to ask for

1:04:26.400 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>our physical mailing address and we'll give it to you. Okay, Yeah,

1:04:30.520 --> 1:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I have to say showing up at the office and

1:04:31.960 --> 1:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>announced was a little weird, but since he had a

1:04:35.640 --> 1:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>huge box of coffee, it was all forgetting. Oh yeah,

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>so your combaring gifts, It's like, yeah, yeah, it's social lubricant.

1:04:43.080 --> 1:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah gifts, sorry, especially good on It's like jittery Joe's coffee.

1:04:47.360 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>You can get in touch with us via Twitter at

1:04:49.480 --> 1:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>s Y s K podcast. You can join us on

1:04:51.440 --> 1:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Facebook dot com, so I Stuff you Should Know. You

1:04:53.720 --> 1:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>can send us an email at stuff podcast at how

1:04:56.600 --> 1:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot com, and as always, joined us at

1:04:59.200 --> 1:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>at Home on the web. Stuff you Should Know dot com.

1:05:04.800 --> 1:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of I Heart Radio.

1:05:07.600 --> 1:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the I heart

1:05:10.200 --> 1:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

1:05:13.120 --> 1:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. H