WEBVTT - Goldman Commodities Scores $2.2 Billion Comeback

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovic. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Search Bloomberg Global News. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masster, Katie Greifeld in for Tim Stanovic. Hey, Katie.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Some of the headlines that we saw when it comes

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to COVID today the President President Biden coming out saying

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>his administration will double it's order of rapid test to

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>send to Americans while also distributing high quality mass to

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>help fight a surge of cases of the macron varying. Right.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>That's something I know. Mike and I were just talking

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>about the quality of maths. It's a difference. It it matters. Yeah,

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in my life. I mean, I would love to get

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>my hands one of those masks, but I'm trying to

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>order them off of Amazon, and it's it's you know,

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a chunk of change. Yeah, it's a chunk of

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>change if you can get them. Hey, let's see what

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 1>he is seeing when it comes to the latest headlines.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.199
<v Speaker 1>By the way, China detecting O Macron in a second

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>major ports city. So we continue to see outbreaks certainly

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and for them it's tougher ahead of

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>those Olympics. Dr Andy Pekosh, she's back with us, Professor

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology at Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>School of Public Health, of course, supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, Founder,

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ALP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. He joins us once again

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Baltimore. Dr Pekosh, good to have

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you back here on Bloomberg with Katie and myself. How

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>are you and what's the latest um from your perspective

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>and the headlines that we really need to be paying

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>attention to. Well, you can see that the case surges

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Macron are still at you know, unfathomably high levels. Um.

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I know there's some parts of the country that are

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>hoping to see a plateau, but at the end of

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the day, we are we are at a such a

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>high level of Kate says that even if things started

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to go down, we would be at high levels of

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>cases for a week or maybe even more. Um. So

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it's really a matter of dealing with the surge that's

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>ongoing right now and dealing with it with the lack

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of certain essential things that we need, like you were

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>mentioning before testing, and various other things and dr I mean,

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the narrative around the omicron variant is

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's less severe. You know, you're gonna get sick,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>but maybe it's you know, equivalent to the common cold.

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I know that hasn't been the case for everyone, but uh,

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my dad has been joking for weeks that

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't want to get a macron. He wants to

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>get the variant that comes after a macron because it

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's been getting less and less severe. But

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 1>does the science actually work that way? I mean, should

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we believe that the next variant that comes along will

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 1>be even milder? Yeah? No, Unfortunately, the science doesn't suggest

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.839
<v Speaker 1>how the how COVID nineteen disease is going to change

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in the future. You know, I think even with all

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>macron if you're unvaccinated, I would be very concerned about

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>getting infected with a macron if you were unvaccinated, because

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>those are the people that are in the hospital right

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>now that still represent the majority of people with the

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 1>severe disease um you know, for the rest of the population,

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly because of our immunity that we have from vaccines

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>um those vaccine induced immunity doesn't protect us from infection,

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but it is preventing lessening disease, severity, lessening symptoms. It's

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>very similar to what we talked about on an annual

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>basis with influenza vaccines. The vaccines are not not preventing

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>infection as efficiently as we maybe would like them, but

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>they really are protecting against us against severe disease and

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and and quickening the course of the infection in individuals.

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So when you look into your crystal ball, I'm curious.

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we keep thinking, all right, it does feel

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like certainly better than where we were a year ago,

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but it still is staggering to think we are in

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>year three of this, um Dr peckash. I guess I'm

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to get my head around that. Well, I always

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>probably be living in a world with COVID, but we'll

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>get to a point where I look at COVID just

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>like a case of the flu. And I shouldn't say

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>jas because the common flu every year kills thousands of

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>people too. Right, absolutely, But but I think if there

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is a sort of silver lining here, it's clear that

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>people who are vaccinated and who have subsequently gotten infected

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>have an amazingly strong immune response that's not only very high,

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's also broad, meaning that it recognizes lots of

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>different variants that have been through the population already. So

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>this combination of vaccination and infection is going to put

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>us at a place where severe disease for at least

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>most of the population is going to be somewhat unlikely.

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we'll need boosters periodically to maintain that. Um

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>My real worry though, is, you know, we really don't

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>know a about the high risk population. So we know

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the elderly are more predisposed as severe disease. We know

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>there's certain medical conditions that make you predisposed as severe disease.

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Those are the populations were really going to have to

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on as we go forward, because we

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that we're protecting them as well

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>as as much as we're protecting the healthy part of

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the population. And after we don't have much time left.

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>But I would love to hear your perspective on tests

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, just in my own personal life, I've

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>heard some mistrust about rapid tests, that you know, they're

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of faulty, that the PCRs the gold standard, that's

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>what you've got to get. What do you think rapid

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>tests work, particularly when you're showing symptoms, and so they'll

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>help you know if you're infected with COVID nineteen or

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>if with something else. UM. Given the test shortage, though,

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think a simple thing to remind people of is

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>if you've got some sort of respiratory symptoms, stay home period.

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>If you're infected. You may be infected with COVID, you

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>may be infected with flu, you may be infected with something.

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't have access to a test, just

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>keep the simple basic principles of it. If you're feeling ill,

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>stay away. UM use the rapid anagen tests if you

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>have them. When you're symptomatic and then always with a

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>positive rapid anagin tests confirmed that with a PCR test,

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>because that means you have uh covid and you need

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to get your numbers into the public health monitoring system.

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, We always appreciate time with you, Dr Andy Pekash.

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>She's professor of molecular microbiology and EMIL immunology at Johns

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health. And of course,

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned, it is supported by Michael or Bloomberg,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>founder of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg philanthropist Katie. But quickly,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you can call your dad Hopie was listening, because that

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>was some good information there. We're gonna send him the podcast.

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week and this is Bloomberg Radio.

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. H Katie, we

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about it. There's a bunch of Goldman stories on

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg that are catching people's attention. I love the

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>headline about the Goldman trading death. We haven't got their

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>earnings yet, but they're giving us a little bit of

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a preview. I think, yeah, absolutely, And this is interesting

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's about commodities, which I know we're about to

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>get into. But it feels like the bright spot for

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>so long has been fixed income. But I don't know,

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll see maybe the leadership is changing. Yeah, that's a really,

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>really good point. We're gonna get into that with our

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>own tree. Not AAJ and his financial porter at Bloomberg News.

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>He's on the phone in New York City. UM, shree,

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>great to have you here with us. We mentioned a

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>most read it's a Bloomberg exclusive about their trading death,

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>their commodities trading death. What's going on again? It's truly

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a window into the kind of success that Waltz trading

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>operations have seen in the last two years. The Goldman

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>commodities business is expected to post the best performance in

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>over the decade, and that mirror is the kind of

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>excessive successive seen a Goldman Sex and other banks. But

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it is a little more special than that. At Goldman

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Sex commodities business does have pride of place. It was

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the business from which you had senior leaders went on

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to run Trading Investment Management HR, and even all of

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the film including president and CEO, Lloyd Blankfine and Gary

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Cone all came through the commodities business, and in twenty

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>seventeen through seventeen eighteen, there was a room worried that

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the business wasn't serious decline mirroring the what people felt

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>was a secular decline in trading across Wall Street. But

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>much like everything else that these businesses have touched since

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>the onset of the pandemic, you have seen a remarkable

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>done around the fortune, and the commodities is just a

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>microcosm of that. And so I love, I love the

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>headline that this trading death the Commodities says it dodged

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the Acts, minting billions again. But I mean it feels

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>very fickle that. Obviously we've seen a ton of just

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>chaos almost in the energy markets. But I mean, could

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the Acts come again when things inevitably slow down or

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>does this the fact that they are so profitable right

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>now does not buy them time. Kittie, You're absolutely right

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>about the whole idea of it being fickled, because remember

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>when it was at its lowest point in twenty seventeen,

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the business was pulling in revenue that was less than

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of what it would normally do in its

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>best years, they would say this worries and at that

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>time the film like Goldman, Fax was also having a

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>leadership transition where when s the traiders rule the firm,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you had a bunch of advisory bank or suddenly rising

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to the tops. And when those people look at a

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>business like a commodities trading desk, basically something that's scary,

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>complicated and volatiles that sucks up way too much capital,

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>paltry revenues and return when equities that would antagonize and

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>scare away a lot of shareholder, but those who wanted

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to stick it out and those who wanted to keep

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the business make the point that it is counterslick, circlical

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:58.119
<v Speaker 1>in nature. It has its best years and moments of turbulence.

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>The best performances for that desk was it's sort of

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in the two thousand, seven, eight nine ten period when

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of other things were going great in finance,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and now since on set of the pandemic, when you

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>have negative oil prices and then shooting back up to

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>eighty dollars, you have a power grid failures in the US,

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>frenzy price action in the European gas and power market.

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>When you have a business that is able to participate

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in all those price moves, they will come out and

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>looking good. And that's where Goldman's acts will come UM.

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>One of the longer term implications of this tree in

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of I'm thinking of other firms who are looking

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>at this UM, I mean, I don't know what changes

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of anything. Much like we talked about how the commodities

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>business is a microcosm what was happening across all of training,

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it's also a window into what the commodities business itself

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>is looking like. Goldman's in house animalst Jeff Curry widely

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>followed Voice and Energy Markets came out and said that

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're entering another supercycle that could last another decade.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Curry for rose to prominence in the mid two

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>thousand when he called a bullmarket that was going to

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>be in place and lost for a while because of

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the China driven boom, and he forecast all prices going

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>above hundred dollars. Peoples Right ultimately went up to about

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty dollars. And when he says that this

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>period of a lot of interesting price action will continue

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to take place for over a decade. You will be

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>surprised if suddenly a lot of other banks are thinking

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>about beefing up their trading operations, trying to become more visible.

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>You have to be committed, and you have to be

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>certain you want to take the plans because there will

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of courts associated with the business and

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of capital charges, so you better be prepared

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to guts it out. But the rewards can be plenty

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and pretty if you end up on top of the plan.

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And sure, we have just about forty seconds. But I

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>am curious now. I mentioned fixed income trading that had

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>been the bright spot, it felt like, through the pandemic.

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>But we got those Jefferies results yesterday. You saw a

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>big drop off there, at least for this quarter. I mean,

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>are are the energy traders expected to be the all stars?

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Look the energy trading this sits within six income. And

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>when the Jeffreyes six income numbers came through, you saw

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>what happened. They posted a slowdown in the sick business

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and the shares at one point put down ten prevents

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>for the day. So when the bank's report on and

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>over the next week, it will be a tale of

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>two hubs. Everyone will look at a rear ru mirror

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and will be very pleased with how they performed. They

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>will be extremely keen to hear their forecasts and predictions

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>for what lies ahead, because that's what is really going

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to say the stop price movement. They want to see

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>if that brilliant action that we've seen over the last

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>two months canned, They in place or we're a waiting

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a soda. Alright, good stuff. Um. As I mentioned, there's

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>like three stories among the top ten on the bloom

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Park among the most right, UH, and that includes Shere's

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>exclusive and financial port Bloomberg News with the latest and

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>comment sack Stock up about half a percent today. You're

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>senaing to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio Katie. The Bloomberg

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Your Head issue. It's out. They are looking

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.719
<v Speaker 1>at the trends, the companies, the movements, so things are

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>really going to watch out for UH this year, and

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that includes a story on Hollywood heading back to theaters

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and really hoping that movie goers end up following That.

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>New issue is out on newsstands online at Bloomberg dot com.

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Backslash business Week and also on the Bloomberg terminal. Let's

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>bring in Bloomberg business Week at or Joel Webber. He's

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>on the Access line in Brooklyn along with Bloomberg News

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>reporter Brian Eckhouse on the phone in l A. Joel,

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>have you been back to a movie theater? I have,

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and it was like, uh, one of my favorite moments

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in that pandemic. It was like, you know, you know,

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to make sure that I saw done on

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>a big screen and it was totally worth it. I

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>love doing it, um and you know, if it weren't

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for Oh Macron, I would be there like every week,

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, um so, so I'm bullish on on movie

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>theaters in general. I think it's a it's a thing

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that people love doing and I want to be doing

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it again. And I think Hollywood feels the same, right Brian, Yeah,

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>they do. Uh. It's definitely a big push to get

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>big films established film names that Batman coming in March

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and others to write trying to make a event and

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>experience again. June was available on HBO Max. That's right,

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>saw it. It was beautiful that didn't have the sweep

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that you would have seen on a big screen that

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Joel had. Okay, I'm curious to hear you haven't been,

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have you? I have not been. The last movie I

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>saw in theaters January, cats have not been back since

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I heard that. Fitting I could have guessed that's what

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you saw. Unfortunately I have a very defined brand. But

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in any case, Brian talked to me about, you know,

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the theater exclusivity, because you have sort of seen this

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>trend emerge where Okay, a movie will get released in theaters,

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it's exclusive to theaters for forty five days. I think

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's stat I saw, and then it's available online on

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>streaming services. I mean, is that the way of the future.

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Our theater is trying to change that? Well, it's the

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>way of right now for the pandemic. You know, we

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>would see films come out on streaming services three months

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>after it hits theaters. Before then, it was a lot

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>longer of a time period. Last year, some of the studios,

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>including Warner Brothers, they put films simultaneously in theaters and

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>on services like HBO Max. Uh. Theaters didn't like that.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>It really crimp their there were seats, so sort of

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a compromise and experiment going forward to doing that forty

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>five days thing you're talking about really have films and

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>theaters if it hits theaters for you know, a month

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half, and then it'll hit HBO Max, it'll

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>hit Peacock, Paramount Plus and others. So Brian talk to

0:15:58.040 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>us about what it's going to take for you to

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>get into a theater. Is it gonna be Tom Cruise

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and is it gonna be Tom top Gun or is

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it gonna be Tom Cruise Mission impossible? That's the question

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>before a macron. I was looking forward to seeing Lucorice Pizza,

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>which is the theaters right now, the latest all tom

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Aul Thomas Anderson movie. I haven't seen it yet, looking

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>forward to seeing it. I think The Batman in March

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>might be what gets me out next. And what about Hollywood?

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Like the first movie that we're really going to see

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>this strategy come to bear on is going to be Ambulance, Right,

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the first coming out Peacock's film and

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>sorry it's the universal film that will hit theaters in

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>April and then four ane days later it will be

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on Peacock. Um. I think we're to see a film

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>mcannel last week from Universal. Very similar will be on

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Peacock probably in late February. You know, I do wonder

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>too about the increased competition just for talent and content, right,

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the streaming services are still going to be competing for

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of stuff. Um, you know, what does this do

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to the price of things, especially as we kind of

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>increasingly move towards normal any indications, I mean, it sounds

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>like box office receipts are still going to be a

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit down once we get back to a little

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more normal. Yeah, I mean, we'll see receipts be

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>below where they were before the pandemic, although it'll almost

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>certainly do nearly double what it was last year, So

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>theaters are gonna see a bit of a return, not

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>what it was, you know, pre covid. Uh. In terms

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of streaming sites, you know, they're focusing really heavily, and

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you said on driving new subscriptions, on growth, and for

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the studios, they're focused increasingly on these services,

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>even more so in some cases than when they put

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>in theaters. And Brian, you mentioned simultaneous releases, you know,

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>putting big films out online and in theaters at the

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>same time. There's I get it. They didn't like that model.

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Did anyone like it? Though? How did those films actually perform?

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the films had old box office receipts

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>um King Richard was on HBO Acts in November around

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving simultaneous release. It was pretty well viewed online. It

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>didn't get a great box office. Um, we've seen that

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in other cases as well. Matrix did okay last month,

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>but again it had that release at home. In the

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>case of June, again, I saw that at home. I

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't see that in theaters. Um, it may adult. You know.

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>The box office for seats or grows for these films

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>was a particularly interesting case study, Brian, because it was like,

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the things that I jumped out

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to me as we're looking at this lineup where you've got,

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, a Batman movie and Tom Cruise movies like

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>these are like Avatar to which we haven't even mentioned,

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Like we've got we've got known entities and Hollywood always

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>loves the sure thing. At the same time, it's like

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to go to a theater and

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>just see a big, awesome movie that isn't a thing

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I've seen before, you know, Jurassic World being uh, yet

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>another thing that's coming out. So it's so Carol. Katie,

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>here's my question for you. Are you more inclined to

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>go see something that's all, you know, a known entity,

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>or do you want to see something that's totally new

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>from Hollywood in the theater. And what's the thing that

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>brings you back? About you, Katy, I want to see

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>my dinosaurs up on the big screen, just totally, but

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I think a known entity, I'm willing to be like, Okay,

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I know that's something I want to see on the

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>big screen. What about you, Katie? Yeah, you know I

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>would go in for cats too, but in terms like

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>to get me into the theater again, I mean I

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>was I'm I'm terrible at watching movies. I just fall

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>asleep anyway, so I'm probably not the target audience that

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>these theaters are worried about. Anyway. What about you, Joel, Well,

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll go back, you know the moment that um, I

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>can go into Date to Night and not you know,

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>be worried about Omicron Like, I will take that option, please, Brian. Yeah,

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think what's really good for Hollywood this

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 1>year is because of the postponment from COVID. You had

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this really a strong slate of big movies. Uh, this

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is really gonna test whether people want to come out

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>those theaters are not because you have such a robust

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>lineup of well known content. Yeah, I'm missing those big,

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>cushy seats. You now, you kick back if you go up,

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.719
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just gonna say, um, alright, guys, fingers crossed,

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>we can get back to those uh movie theaters more

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>so in Joe Weber, Editor Bloomberg business Week and Brian

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Nett Cass, reporter at Bloomberg News. Catch the year ahead

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>issue of Bloomberg Business Week on newsstands, online at Bloomberg

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com and also on the Bloomberg terminal. This is

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. This

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely shut up on our radar today. It's about the

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>many scandals over at metaformally known of course, is Facebook

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and Katie how some of this may be a bit

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>demoralizing for employees. Um when you think it's the case,

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>especially as they're trying to recruit folks in it like what,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I would think that's a pretty difficult on their recruiting

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>team to catch my eye that it didn't seem like

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the disfaction had to do with COVID,

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>which I feel like when we hear about employee morale

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>has to do more with COVID than anything else. But

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>now with Meta, Yeah, it's a really good point. Hey,

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>let's get all the details that Bloomberg News tech reporter

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Wagner, he put it out there on the Bloomberg

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>He is on the phone from our San Francisco bureau. So, Kurt,

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>what's exactly going on here? And what what's what's everything

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that's got so many of those Meta employees down? Yeah? Well,

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean this has been a couple of years in

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the making, as I'm sure you both know. I mean

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>you've seen stories, right. First of all, I think the

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>most obvious is there's just a lot more leaks coming

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>from Meta formerly Facebook these days. You know, that's usually

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>find employees aren't super happy. I think a year and

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a half ago or so, we saw an actual walk

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>out from employees who were not happy with how the

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>company handled President Trump's post. And then this week, you

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>know what, what kind of prompted this. I wrote this

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in our newsletters and when we prompted this was blast

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>door does this ranking of the best places to work,

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook is usually in the top ten. In fact,

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>three times it's been the number one place in the

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>world to work, and this year it was forty seven.

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was just kind of a reminder that this

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.640
<v Speaker 1>company that has historically been, you know, the dream job

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people, is not really the case anymore.

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, it's just proof that a

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the drama and scandals they dealt with over

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years is actually having an impact.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And Kurt, that's exactly what leaped out to me that.

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Meta formerly known as Facebook, it was the

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>number one company three times, to slip to forty seven.

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what happened? Is it just that, you know,

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Facebook now Meta is just a bigger, more publicly out

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>there company. But I mean it's just an incredible drop.

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>How do you explain it? Well, I think imagine, you

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>know what it's like to work there, and kind of

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>every two months or so, it feels like you are

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>dealing with some kind of scandal that you know, questions

0:22:57.720 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like am I doing good in the world, right, Like

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>that is the question that a lot of employees have

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>to ask themselves regularly, and I think that came to

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>ahead this year with some of the Facebook papers. You know,

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>we had the whistle Facebook whistleblower who came out and

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>released all kinds of internal documents, and you know, the

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:18.719
<v Speaker 1>CEO is often testifying before Congress, and it's just like

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of heavy, heavy stuff to think about on

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>a day to day basis when you're trying to do

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 1>your job, and not a lot of jobs have that.

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.719
<v Speaker 1>And you know, to Facebook's credit, it's because it's very

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>influential and that's why a lot of people like to

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>work there. They can they can have huge impact. But

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, with that impact comes a lot

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of questions about what that impact is. And I think

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>people struggle with that well. And I also think about,

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, losing employees costs a company something, right, you

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you lose an employee who might have been pretty productive

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that led to top and bottom lines gains at the company.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It costs a company to recruit, train, and all that

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. They're also those some workers, like I think

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>about engineers. We've talked about the tightness in the market.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Everybody needs, you know, programmers, engineers. I do think about

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>how that might ultimately impact if they can't get engineers.

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Do they care as much engineers about what's going on

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of morale um and if so, how that

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>might impact at his bottom line or the ability to

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>produce new products. Yeah, I mean certainly, if you can't

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>hire engineers, it's gonna be hard to grow, right, I

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>think that's pretty obvious. And I think stereotypically, you you

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>often think like, well, engineering department, probably more than any

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>other team at a at a tech company, is a

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit more heads down, right, like they're just building.

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>They're they're focused on the code, and there may be

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>less impacted by some of the cultural things that happen.

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I mean that's that's the

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>stereotype and and and it's not going to be relevant

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>to every every person who's there. And if you have

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>a chance to go build something cool at a company

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>that also aligns your vision, of course you're going to

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>go do that. And um, I think that's part of

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the reason we're seeing Facebook lean so heavily into this

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of a metaverse, right. It's something exciting. That's something

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>future is stick and if you're an engineer and you

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>want to be building, um, you know, products that are

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>on the cutting edge. While Facebook made a pretty public

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>stand here's what we're building, you know, come join us.

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And I have to imagine recruiting with a huge part

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of that. And so Kurt employees a lot of discontent.

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>They're a lot of existential questions there. But what about advertisers?

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Are they asking the same questions? And uh, have we

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>seen any pullback in spending? We have not. And that's

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why I thought this UM kind

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of angle or this anecdote about the glass door ranking

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>was notable. Was you know, for years, we have not

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>really seen a whole lot of anything changed with Facebook

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.679
<v Speaker 1>because of all the stuff going on. Right you keep thinking, well,

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>certainly advertisers are going to pull back, right um, or

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>business is going to slow down as users lead the service.

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But that hasn't really happened, right Um, despite all the

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>bad things that have gone on around Facebook, And so

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you know, employees might be the one

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>area where it's actually having an impact, I think was

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty notable, and that I should point out. I mean, Facebook,

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>our Meta is huge. It has sixty eight thousand employees.

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>It's not as if nobody wants to work there, right,

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just that at a certain point it becomes harder

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and harder to recruit. Hey, Kurt, just real quickly, twonds here,

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>does the internal management, the senior managers that they care,

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they looking to make it better? Just quickly? Yeah? Absolutely.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean a bunch of people actually left last year,

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of high ranking folks. But this has been

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you can't hire engineers has been a

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>big issue for Mark Zuckerberger for the last couple of years.

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So this matters to them immentally. I'm sure all right,

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna leave it there. Hey, um, Kurt, thank you

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>so much, really appreciate a Bloomberg News tech reporter Kurt

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Wagner on the phone from our San Francisco bureau. Shares

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 1>of Meta uh down about one point six percent in

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>today's session, but we've seen a lot of big tech

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>under pressure stocks down about two and a half percent

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so far in this new year. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Business Week on Bloomberg Radio. Row. Yeah, but you let

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>me drive Oh no, no, no no, no, all right, please

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>album of Bridey Gravels. I want to drive. It's a

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>good question. This is good ride to be closed on radio.

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, just got a app not in a half

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>minutes left in today's trading session, and we are seeing

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 1>those major equity averages dive, just talking about them a

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>few moments ago. They are at their loads of the session,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>so down about two and a half percent on the NAZAC.

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Really feeling the under performance among those three major equity averages,

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but the SMP also down about one and a half percent.

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>This is ahead of course of tomorrow's big bank starting

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to report earnings, will hear from JP Morgan City, so

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>that will certainly help impact the tone of the trade.

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the drive to the close. Kate Fettus

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>is with us. She is president, chief investment officer at

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Grace Capital. They're a Boston based registered investment advisor. She

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from Boston. Kate, nice to

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>have you here with Katie Greifeld and myself. So the

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>market trade, I don't know it's a all to one

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>safety say. We've seen some losses, we've seen some rallies.

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.239
<v Speaker 1>What do you think fundamentally might be the tone of

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the markets as we just get ready to kick off

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that earning season. I think, fundamentally, thank you for having me,

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Carol and twenty, But fundamentally the market is looking to

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>take a pause. It's looking to take a pause because

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>we've had three very strong years. Last year, the market

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>was up twenty nine percent. And what's fascinating about it

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is if you look at how it happened, the market

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>was up. It did better than the Russell one thousand

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>growth and better than the one Russell one thousand value,

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So that tells you that it was a very narrow market.

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:51.239
<v Speaker 1>The top ten companies uh playing an outside performance in

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the market. At the same time, even though the market

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>is little worried, they're like, oh, we had a big year.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>We gotta calm down. If you think about it, strifically,

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at the facts, the smp UM multiple declined from

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>forty one times a year ago to eight times currently,

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So the earnings in the spire actually grew last year,

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>so things are not quite as dire as if you

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>look at what's going on today, it would appear so okay.

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>To your point, you know, we've had three big years.

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>For stop the stock market looking to take a pause.

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Now we're also cruising into the federal reserves lift off

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>from zero, potentially the first interest rate hikes. Since how

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>do you position in that environment? What are you expecting?

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>How how is that going to play out? You know,

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's hard to guess what the Fed is

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>going to do in a in a general sense. Um,

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So I am not someone who likes to make a

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of macobetts. Having said this clearly, I think the

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Fed directionally has been very clear with what they want

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to do in a general sense. You know, the the

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the logic is, well, the head's gonna raise rates, therefore

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you should, you know, buy the banks and sell the

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>text stocks. Bed's gonna raise rates, therefore the market is

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>going to go down. Not necessarily in a general sense,

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the FAED has proven itself to be quite dubbish. I think, um,

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>if you really look at the way it behaves, it's

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>clear that it's not so much about its mandate of

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>full employment and to percent inflation as much as keeping

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the markets buoyant. So any time they do anything and

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the market looks like it's going to react negatively, they

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>back down. At the same time, it's not clear that

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>raising rates will be bad for the market general yelling

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:51.959
<v Speaker 1>raise rates from actually zero to about one five beginning

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in and the Dow Jones went up did extremely well.

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Only person with a better record was Greenspan, because what

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>happens when you raise rates in the US. It's a

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>global market. You're gonna track inflows from Europe and Japan. Okay,

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to something you said at

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the top to Katie and me, and you said performance.

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm looking at some of the notes to you

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>shared with our team and our producer um performance. You

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>said so concentrated that the sp performance bested both the

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>rust of one thousand growth and one thousand value industries

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about last year in particular. I just want

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:25.959
<v Speaker 1>to confirm that. And then are you saying that that

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>shows that there's a lot more room for gains by

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>other equity plays, maybe not those big cap names, to

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>continue the momentum there. There is a lot more room

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to continue the momentum at the same time, because remember

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>at this point, more than half of the market is

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>being invested passively, people just putting their money blindly into

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the index funds. So that creates some vulnerability because you say, oh,

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be diverse FI and I'm just gonna

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>buy the SMP five hundred, not going to use the

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>stock picker. And you don't understand really how vulnerable you

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>are that thirty. You know, percent of your performance is

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>being controlled by handful of stocks. So if that handful

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of stocks stumble, an in a passive index investor in

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the SMP could will stumble along with it. An active

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>manager like what we do, where you're actually picking stocks,

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you could actually have a very good year despite the

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>market in an aggregate sense doing poorly. And so kate,

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>as an active manager, where do you see the most

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>opportunity right now? You know, on the single stock level,

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>but also on a sector level. What looks most attractive

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in a I'm going to answer that in sort of

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a long term and near term and you know, I'm

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>going to contradict myself a little bit from what I

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>said not that long ago, but hey, that's that's life.

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>On a long term basis, technology is clearly the place

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to be. If you look at the market, it's very

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>dominated by the big tech players. And actually we ran

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this for our annual report of the s and P

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>five hundred has its headquarters in California, another eleven percent

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Washington State. So technology is an outsize um

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>part of the economy global economy, and that will continue

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the near term. However, I think SECT energy is

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>actually interesting. We are also E s G investors, so

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in the general sense we shy away from most energy,

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>not all energy, and the overall market is very E

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>s G centric right now, and as a result, you're

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>having an under investment in traditional energy. So when you

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>have an under investment with the same level of demand

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you've always had in the end, globally we have a

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>growing population India, Africa, right, you know, we got growing

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>so energy. I think it's very interesting. We've got a

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of names that we really like. Um just quickly,

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 1>just got about twenty seconds, Kate, Oh okay, I'll go out, sir.

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Sneer Energy. A yields five and a half percent.

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>What we like about it's take or pay contracts. They

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>felt that you gotta go, Yeah, we gotta go. That

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>means we're just gonna have to come and have you

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>back because we do like talking names. Um, Kate, do

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>have a good rest of the week. In a good

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>week in ka Fatas She's president, chief investment officer of

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>A Grace Capital on the phone from Boston. Thanks for

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News.